Stuff You Should Know - Selects: Robber Barons!

Episode Date: February 8, 2025

The robber barons were not a group of evil super villains. OR WERE THEY? Learn all about these titans of industry from the Gilded Age in this classic episode.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Do you want to see into the future? Do you want to understand an invisible force that's shaping your life? Do you want to experience the frontiers of what makes us human? On Tech Stuff, we travel from the minds of Congo to the surface of Mars, from conversations with Nobel Prize winners

to the depths of TikTok, to ask burning questions about technology, from high tech to low culture and everywhere in between. Join us. Listen to tech stuff on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Did you know that 70% of people get hired at companies where they already have a connection? I'm Andrew Siemen, LinkedIn's editor at large for jobs and career development. And on my podcast, Get Hired, I bring you all the information you need to, well, get

hired. Landing a job may be tough, but Get Hired is here for you every step of the way with advice on resumes, networking, negotiation, and so much more. Listen to Get Hired with Andrew Seaman on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you like to listen. Hey everybody, it's me, Josh, and for this week week's Select I've chosen our July 2020 episode on robber barons. It turns out that today's billionaires and leaders of industry bear some resemblance to the robber barons of the gilded age, but there are some big differences.

Namely, today's billionaires are kind of terrible at philanthropy and the robber barons of the last century were far less preoccupied with outer space. Hope you enjoy this episode. It's a pretty good one. Welcome to Stuff You Should Know, a production of iHeartRadio. Hey and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark. There's Charles W. Chuckers Bryant over there. Jerry was just here doing the COVID setup and then got out of the room really quick. Hold her breath for five straight minutes. It's a new record. It really is.

New studio record. Sure. And this is stuff you should know. That's no David Blaine record, by the way. No, I mean, that's her studio record. Sure. And this is stuff you should know. That's no David Blaine record, by the way. No, I mean that's her studio record. You should see her when she's pearl diving, though. Wouldn't that be something if Jerry did have a secret life pearl diving? That would be amazing. It would. But we're not talking about Jerry, Chuck. Enough about her. Instead, I propose that we have a nice pleasant conversation

about robber barons. Yeah, this is an interesting topic because depending on who you ask, the robber barons were either the greatest thing to ever happen to this country or one of the worst things to ever happen to this country or one of the worst things to ever happen to this country. Yeah. Yeah. At first, from what I could tell, historians immediately after and a few decades after, the Gilded Age, which we'll talk about where the age of the robber barons worked and operated and lived in, really took it to be like their presence,

their existence was one of the worst things ever. But over time there's kind of been a reformation of them, you know, kind of like a revisiting of them that has tried to revive their image or actually make their image possibly better than it ever has been. Yeah, I mean, it kind of, I think a lot of this has to, probably depends on what you feel about, you know, capitalism to this extent where it kind of doesn't matter how you make your money, if it's sort of underhanded and you sort of undercut competitors and monopolize things. That's all just free trade, man, free capitalism and that's how it works out. And then those guys gave a ton of money to society before they died. And so that's all, the injustice is the means.

Yeah, I actually ran across. Yeah, that's the conservative way to look at it. And I ran across something, I can't remember what it's called, but it's basically, oh, human imperfection. Did you know that the idea that humans are imperfect and there's really no reason to try to make a perfect society because it will always be imperfect and end in ruin? That that is a cornerstone, a hallmark of conservativism?

Did you know that? I didn't, but I mean, of course you can't make a perfect society. It makes sense. Well, so conservatives are saying that in opposition to all of the liberal efforts to make a perfect society, to have government regulation that says, no, no, no, we should all have clean water

and we should do it at the expense of making corporations clean up the wastewater before they release their waste into the shared common water resources, things like that, right? And that there's this idea that you can mold society into some perfect form, that that's the opposite of human imperfection, that that's like what liberals think. And that that is, that right there is one of the main dividing lines between conservative and liberal.

I've been on the planet for almost 44 years now, and I had no idea that it was just that simple. And it really kind of is. I think the word perfect is what's a stumbling block for me because I don't know, a single liberal thinks that they can make things perfect. I think the goal is to make things better. Yeah, yeah, agreed. I don't know that it's a great word either, but I think that that's, you know, I mean, hey, you're going to argue with the Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy?

I'm not. Bring it on, man. I'll punch that thing right in the face. Speaking of Stanford, did you know that Stanford University was named out and funded? Named for a robber baron? Yeah, a robber baron named Leland Stanford actually. Yeah, a lot of universities are named after robber barons. Yeah, there's a lot of problems with some of the early histories of universities,

as we'll find out in the coming weeks. So, we should get into the Gilded Age. We should hop in the old way back machine because that's the age that we're talking about and when you hear Gilded Age, it might sound really great because, I mean, what's better than a Gilded, I don't know, toilet? Aaron Powell Gilded Lily, isn't that another one, another thing people gild? Matthew Feeney I don't know. That's a pretty good band name though. Aaron Powell Gilded Lily? Matthew Feeney one, another thing people gild? I don't know. That's a pretty good band name though.

Gilded Lily? Yeah, like a 90s power pop. Oh, totally. You nailed it. And I said, what about breakfast at Tiffany's? But the gilded age is, and Dave Roos helped us put this together, and he points out it's not a term of endearment. When something is gilded, that means it's got a thin coating of gold, but underneath it could be a gilded turd. Sure. I hate that word so much.

I love it. It's so great. Do you? Oh man, I hate it. I mean, I love it in how awful it is. Oh, gotcha. But I think it's so awful, it like comes out on the other side as just plain old awful to me. Okay. So, yeah, that's the idea of the Gilded Age, that it looked great on the outside, but on the inside it wasn't so great. But when was this? So this was the second half of the 19th century basically, from pretty much the end of the Civil War up until the first decade of the 20th century. And it was characterized by a huge massive shift in

the American economy where I saw somewhere that at some point in the 1860s to some point in the early 1880s, in about 15 years, the American economy doubled, doubled in size in 15 years. That's how massive it was and that's how fast it happened. And what it was was a transition from an agrarian society to an industrial society and it happened virtually overnight as far as history goes. Yeah. And it was because it happened so quickly and because it was such growth, I think the

government was like, we're going to stay out of this and kind of just let you dudes do what you're going to do. No regulation. You can be as competitive as you want to be and you can scratch every capitalist itch you want and we're just going to let that happen because we're also kind of getting rich on the side. Right. So that kind of raises something that I saw, is that the idea that it's kind of like a myth of the laissez-faire government during this era, they were definitely laissez-faire when it comes to regulation

and letting corporatists run roughshod over labor. But they were anything but hands-off when it came to corporate welfare and political entrepreneurship and helping out the wealthy class at the expense of the people in general. So on one hand they were laissez-faire, on the other they were not. Yeah, and what we're talking about is stuff like snatching up resources where you could, hoarding them for yourself, like building such a massive business that you could drive out every other smaller business, drive them right out of business by undercutting their prices.

Jobs were more scarce, so you could have people work harder for less and less wages, that kind of thing. Right, exactly. And what's crazy, like it was a dog eat dog economy. It was just nuts how it happened. And there was a lot of like learning on the fly. And the learning curve was extremely steep because because I mean, this was just basically a country of farmers who had been, you know, looked down upon by Europe

for a century or more. And they all of a sudden were captains of industry. And the most ruthless among them were the ones that rose to the top because like you're saying, there was no rules, there was no regulation. There weren't any standards of business. They were all figuring it out as they were going along, and they went immediately to the worst impulses

that capitalism can raise in a person when you're in pursuit of as much possible wealth as you can get, and there's plenty of it to be had. And then, like you're saying, not only did the federal government not get involved, they weren't equipped to get involved because at that point, most of the government was focused on local stuff.

And now all of a sudden, as the United States is truly becoming a continent wide nation, the federal government is kind of lagging behind to catch up and wouldn't really begin to catch up in the progressive era. And some would say that the pendulum swung the exact opposite way to the exact opposite extreme direction that it had during the Gilded Age. Yeah, I mean, let's talk about the Gilded Age and the, I guess, just,

you owe it all to trains, really, and trains you owe to steel. So you got to go back a little bit. Right. Steel was a very big deal in that when they found out, Mr. Henry Bessemer in the 1850s found out how to make steel like a lot cheaper. He got a new process going where it was just like making vast amounts of steel for a fraction of the cost and speed. And all of a sudden, you could open up those local rail lines to stretch across the country

and all these regional specialty businesses and industries, whether it was, you know, Cincinnati was known for furniture and obviously in places like Wyoming, you had coal and you had copper in Montana and you had a lot of timber in Oregon. You could get that stuff anywhere you wanted to go and that changed everything. Yeah, not only could you get it to where you wanted to go, you could do it exponentially cheaper than it used to be over land or say using canals and then also way faster too. So now if you were making like really great arm chairs in Cincinnati like you were saying, like not only did you have the town, they're just known for it.

That's their mascot I believe of the baseball team. Yeah, the sitters. Right. Not only did you have the town of Cincinnati and maybe some other regional parts of Ohio as your market, you now had the entire country to supply with chairs. And that happened at a really great time, the steel coming along and building the railroads, because the United States economic engine was kind of idling at a really high RPM for a little while before this. Apparently the War of 1812 caused the United States to kind of stop relying

on Europe and turn inward and become much more self-reliant than it had been before. So it started to exploit more industry and resources rather than rely on imports from Europe. That was a big one. And then the Civil War had brought a lot of factories online in the North that hadn't been there before. And so when the Civil War ended, these factories were all ready to go. And with the abundance of plentiful steel, that engine got put into gear and it just kind of took off like a rocket.

Yeah, when I was reading this, and I tried to find out, but I couldn't really get a firm hold, I wondered if back then, when this started to happen, you know how people rail against global trade and the globalization. I wonder if people railed against nationalization of commerce back then or if they all just thought it was all great. No, no. Well, one of the things I read about that's actually a mark in favor of the Gilded Age being actually a good thing for America is is that people, everyday people, were super involved

in politics and the political process and agitating for what they wanted. And so if there were people who were definitely in favor of this kind of just taking off like a rocket, knitting the country together, that kind of stuff, nationalization, then there was definitely opposition parties to that too who saw the problems with it. But the cool thing is that everybody was involved and everybody was like, they cared about the

direction the country was going rather than just sitting back and being like, well, nothing we can do about it. I wonder though if it was like, if there were business, like if there were furniture makers in Cincinnati going, I don't want to sell my chairs out there. That is not what they say in Cincinnati. Is that not a Cincinnati accent? No.

Okay. I might be thinking of Maine. Right. But I wonder who was opposing it. I don't know. I don't know. I haven't seen that one. Some of the things that I saw were one of the big fights was over currency

and whether it should remain on the gold standard or whether it should be easy money, which of course the farmers wanted, I think they wanted easy money. I can't remember who wanted to stay on the gold standard and others wanted, you know, basically to leave the gold standard and make money, you know, basically to leave the gold standard and make money a lot more easy to come by. Oh, I thought you were talking about the Rodney Dangerfield movie. That was an easy, easy money.

Man, that is a tawdry movie. It was, wasn't it? Yeah, it was good though. Yeah. Hey, even the worst Dangerfield movie is still pretty great. And on that point, real quick, I'm sorry. I know we don't like to go off on tangents very often.

But I have been watching Happy Days and Shirley lately. Man, that is some comfort food, isn't it? Dude, they are, but not only that, it's not like junk food though. They're like well written, well acted, but not only that, it's not like junk food though, they're like well-written, well-acted, well-directed TV shows. It's Gary Marshall. It's not at all like throw away or disposable, it doesn't rely on special effects or anything like that. It's just good stuff, man.

Yeah, I agree. And you know what, since we're on this tangent, we should tell everyone that we're writing a book and it's coming out this fall. It's called Stuff You Should Know, an incomplete compendium of mostly interesting things. And you can preorder it now if you want a special custom poster. Yeah. You preorder it and you can go and upload your receipt at stuffyoshouldreadbooks.com. And then there's like a little thing that says like get your preorder gift and you upload a picture of your receipt and they mail it to you and you will be very happy with it because it's pretty awesome.

Yeah, and we want to sell, we do want to sell these books out there. We want to sell these books all over the world. Yes. We're glad that the railroad exists so we can move these books around easily. Oh man, you ain't kidding. Ship these things to Cincinnati. Right. So, where were we?

So, we were shipping things, regional businesses were becoming national businesses, people were leaving the farms, they were leaving small towns, they were going to the big city, immigrants were pouring in from Europe, African Americans were going north because reconstruction didn't work out so well. Yeah, because it got abandoned. Yeah, yeah. Have we done out so well. Yeah, because it got abandoned. Yeah. Have we done one on reconstruction?

No, no, we really need to though. Totally. I mean, the more I've been reading a lot about that period in history, and yes, we need to definitely do one on that. But the point is, there are a lot of people flocking to work this, what was called the second industrial revolution, where we saw over a period of about 40 years factory output went from 1.9 billion to 13 billion dollars. Right.

I mean, like, this happened almost overnight. It's astounding how fast this happened. I don't think it even happened this fast in the first industrial revolution, you know, the one that started over in Manchester. Like, I think that it's, this is, nothing like this has ever happened in the history of the world as far as I know. I believe it. So, should we take a break?

Oh, sure. I was just getting revved up. My own economic engine's idling high right now. Well, take your foot off the gas. Okay. And let's take a little break and we'll talk a little bit about Mark Twain and what these – a few economic stats of the day right after this. Do you want to understand an invisible force that's shaping your life? I'm Osvalosian,

one of the new hosts of the long running podcast Tech Stuff. I'm slightly skeptical, but obsessively intrigued. And I'm Kara Price, the other new host, and I'm ready to adopt early and often. On Tech Stuff, we travel all the way from the mines of Congo to the surface of Mars to the dark corners of TikTok to ask and attempt to answer burning questions about technology. One of the kind of tricks for surviving Mars is to live there long enough so that people evolve into Martians. Like data is a very rough proxy for a complex reality.

How is it possible that the world's new energy revolution can be based in this place where there's no electricity at night. Oz and I will cut through the noise to bring you the best conversations and deep dives that will help you understand how tech is changing our world and what you need to know to survive the singularity. So join us. Listen to tech stuff on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Catch Jon Stewart back in action on The Daily Show and in your ears with The Daily Show wherever you get your podcasts. special content just for podcast listeners, like in-depth interviews and a roundup of the week's top headlines.

Listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome. My name is Paola Pedroza, a medium and the host of the Ghost Therapy Podcast, where it's not just about connecting with deceased loved ones. It's about learning through them and their new perspective. Join me on the Ghost Therapy podcast. Whoa, my lights in my living room just flickered. I'm a little nervous.

I'm excited. I'm excited, nervous. You know, I'm a very spiritual person, so I'm like, I'm ready and open. That was amazing. I feel so grateful right now. I got to speak to my great-grandmother, Abuela, and she gave me a lot of really good advice that I'm going to have to really think about. Wow.

Okay. That's crazy. Yes, that is accurate. Listen to the Ghost Therapy Podcast as part of the MyCultura Podcast Network available on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. All right, we're back, Charles. I'm feeling much better now that my foot's off the gas.

That was just good advice. Well, I mentioned Mark Twain, and the only reason we're going to talk about Mark Twain for a moment is because in 1873, he co-wrote a novel, a satire called The Gilded Age Colon, a tale of today where it followed a poor country farmer who is sort of, I mean, does he move to the city trying to get in on the second industrial revolution? Yeah, totally. It's exactly that kind of migration that you were talking about just a few minutes ago. And it didn't work out so well, right?

I don't know. I've never read the book, but from what I can tell, no, it didn't work out very well because he is taken advantage of by all manner of bad people like crooked politicians and crooked businessmen and is basically run through the wringer from what I can tell. But I've also seen that that wasn't, it wasn't exactly the best piece of writing Mark Twain's ever come up with. But the thing is that he released this in 1873. And this is like at the very beginning of the Gilded Age. So he saw it pretty quickly what was going on. And what he saw was this emergence from a relatively egalitarian society

of a group of ultra mind bogglingly wealthy people that just rose up from the United States. And through cheating and business acumen and taking advantage of people and overworking people and underpaying people, but also like having a lot of vision and foresight, all these things coming together, grab control of almost all of the wealth that was being produced by the average American

and all of the average Americans put together who had moved to these cities for the promise of better wages, better living than the farm could offer. Some people were exploiting that more than other people and those people came to be known as the robber barons and they were the lynchpin of why people think of the Gilded Age as a rotten part of American history. Yeah, here's some stats for you. In 1890, the top one, and this,

these should all sound very familiar if you're alive and breathing oxygen today. But in 1890, the top 1% of the US owned 51% of all wealth. Yeah. Dude, more than half of all wealth. Isn't that nuts? It is nuts, but you're right, it does sound very familiar. The top 12% owned 86% of all wealth.

And the lower 44% of the US population, which was about half the population, owned 1.2%. That's even more nuts. Well, I mean, all of these just top one another, I think. Here's the last one. In 1897, the. Well, I mean, all these just top one another, I think. Here's the last one. In 1897, the richest 4,000 families, that sounds like a lot of people, but that's less than 1% of the population, the richest 4,000 had as much wealth as the other 11.6 million families combined.

Yeah. How about that? So that is what you would call economic inequality, right? And I think the thing is, especially over time, but I get the impression during that age too, like the people who resent that, liberals typically, tend to be painted with this brush that says, you're just jealous.

You've never made that much money in your life, you probably never will. And it's sickens you to see somebody else with that money because you don't have it. And it's that second part, that last part about because you don't have it, that I think misses the mark. And that even at the time during the Gilded Age, today when people look at inequality, that kind of stuff,

what a lot of them, I'm sure there are people out there who are just jealous and haters for that reason, but a lot of them say, no, no, like that level, that amount of disparity shouldn't exist. Where if there are people who are just genuinely suffering, who are just poor and aren't able to make it with whatever living they're making, if they exist, then you shouldn't have people

who have that much amount of money. And that was a sentiment in the Gilded Age as much too. It wasn't like they didn't realize this was going on at the time. The sentiment was very much like it is today, except in the Gilded Age, they did things like form labor unions and strike and just basically did something about it. They didn't take it laying down, which is actually criticism that's levied or has been

levied in the past against people today. Yeah. And I think there's also a notion that the more left-leaning people are anti-success. And that's not true either. It's – well, that's all I'm going to say about that. That's just not true. It's just not true. They're not anti-success.

And I don't think that every conservative thinks like, yeah, man, like it's all fair and you should be able to do whatever you want to get ahead and stomp on any one's head that you want to get there. I think these are just broad brush things that keep the country divided. Yeah, absolutely. I think that, yeah, I think both sides misunderstand each other. Conservatives and liberals misunderstand each other to a debilitating degree these days. Agreed.

So, let's get off that and let's go back to the original, the OG robber barons, who were not these guys. I'm talking about the term robber baron, which didn't happen in the 19th century US for the first time. It happened thousands of years ago in Europe. I don't know about thousands of years, but- A thousand. Pretty close to eight, I'll give you that one.

So apparently along the Rhine River, if you wanted to move goods up and down Northern Europe, like that was your way to go. But unfortunately for you, there were places where the Rhine River like really narrowed with high cliffs. And you were easy prey for local nobility who wanted to like set up toll booths basically and said, you need to give me some money if you want to keep going

and plying your goods along the Rhine. Yeah, and you had, you couldn't just portage your steamship up a mountain and over a mountain. You had to pay the piper. Plus, they didn't exist at the time. What, steam ships? When did those come around? The early 19th century. You have a much better just general world timeline that lives in your brain than I do? Well, I understand history perfectly and without any delusions or any of my opinions informing

my vision of history as well. I think that's what you're known for. Wait, were you joking? Oh, no. Okay, good. I just always get the time periods confused, so I rely on books and research, like a big dum-dum. So do I.

Yeah, no, but then you keep it in your brain. Mine just floats out like, you ever see those cartoons with birds flying around people's head when they get knocked out? Chuck, I've seen every cartoon that ever existed, and I remember each of them perfectly, and without any of my opinions coloring my view of them. Those birds are always above my head.

I don't have to get hit with an anvil or a piano. So the Rhine Gorge was one of those really narrow straits. And in 1250, Emperor Frederick III died. There was no successor and basically that meant no regulation. And believe it or not, even way back then, a lack of regulation meant that people would take advantage of that. It's crazy. Same as it is today.

It's almost like people are imperfect. Almost. And so these thieves would move into that gorge, jam up those tolls, maybe just steal stuff if they wanted to as well. And they were named the Robber Barons. That's where that term came from, those people. Yeah, because they actually were like low-level nobility, and they already were well off, but that didn't prevent them from, you know, trying to take advantage of the merchant class

who were just trying to make their way and make a living. And that became like a really great description for some of the most successful business tycoons of the 19th century. I think it first popped up in an Atlantic article in 1870 where it didn't directly say that, it didn't say that these guys are the new robber barons, but it said that the old robber barons of the Rhine Valley were actually probably more honest

than the new aristocracy of swindling millionaires. So, it's a big time burn. So even in 1870, people were saying like, this is wrong, there's something like really wrong here. I mean, this is within just a few years of the Gilded Age really starting to take off and people had already identified that there were some major issues developing.

Yeah, it's so weird to look at this stuff and just how apt it applies to what's going on today. And we think, I think some people think that these are all new problems and new issues, but it's as old as time, you know? Yeah. So weird. It is a little weird to... It is weird. What's even weirder though is like,

I believe if we look back, if we zoom out far enough, we see humanity kind of ever going upward, even though there's like peaks and valleys in the line, and the line overall is kind of up, moves upward toward something great, I think, but. Toward perfection? I wasn't, maybe. I wasn't alive 10,000 years ago,

so who knows, maybe that was the pinnacle of human existence, I don't know. Maybe. Who can say? Should we talk about a few of these dudes? Yeah, so I feel like we have kind of set this up, that the robber barons were ruthless business tycoons.

And we're going to start with one of the first ones, Commodore Cornelius Vanderbilt, who for my money was the OG robber baron. Yeah, and Commodore is a nickname that, and as you will see, he later, Vanderbilt University is named for him and their mascot is the Commodores because of him. And a Commodore is a naval officer sort of above, not quite an admiral, but above a captain. I think they command like a fleet. Oh, well, that's actually pretty appropriate because he did command a fleet of ships, originally sailboats, originally a sailboat,

I think when he was 14, and then steam ships to ferry people around New York. I thought there were no steam ships. There were by this time. And you know, you know, what's ironic, we were talking about steam ships and when they were invented, the guy who invented steam, Robert Fulton, remember we did a whole episode on steam technology? Yeah, yeah. He had a 30 year monopoly in New York to ferry people using steam ships.

That's right. And ironically, Cornelius Vanderbilt had to overcome that monopoly using ingenuity and his own resourcefulness, and eventually was successful in breaking that monopoly just through good business tactics that actually resulted in far lower fares for everyday people and companies. I think just at his first try by improving the size of the steam engine and using cheaper anthracite coal, he managed to drop the average ferry price from like $7 to $3 in his first try.

That's amazing. Yeah, so I think that's really kind of like instructive though, man. Like think about it. We think of this guy as like a ruthless robber baron, and in many, many ways he was, as we'll see. But he was able to get to that position by outwitting and outsmarting other robber barons. And that was the climate at the time. Like it's so easy to sit back from this time and just be like, just judge, judge, judge. And it's actually

kind of fun too. It's a great pastime. But you also have to remember at the time, that was, that was the business climate. That's just what it was. And if you weren't willing to do that, well, then you were not going to make it in business, which is fine. Like maybe you'd say, this is too cutthroat for me. I'm just going to sell out to these guys. And there's nothing wrong with that.

But the ones who were left standing are the ones that, you know, history still remembers for better or for worse. Yeah. And it's worth pointing out, and as we'll do with, I think we're going over four of these guys, but some had money born into it, some started out very poor. And Cornelius Vanderbilt, even though that sounds like such a rich hoity-toity name now, he was born very poor. He was born in 1794 in a farming family on Staten Island and quit school when he was 11 and that's when he started working on the boat docks and he was literally a self-made man starting with that first little ferry boat that you mentioned

at age 14. He was a big dude and he was very savvy but also very ruthless. And this is something that you'll see with a lot of these men was a competition and a competitive edge and nature that was sort of the underlying thing with all of them I think. That I watched There Will Be Blood recently for Movie Crush, and Daniel Plainview was very much based on some of these robber barons. And he has that great, great classic line from that movie when he goes, I have a competition in me.

I want no one else to succeed. And that just crystallizes that character. And I think a lot of these guys, it wasn't enough to just get rich. They wanted to devastate the competition. Right. So, it makes you wonder, like, is that just a normal, there's just at any given time, there's a, you know, a handful or a multiplicity of people who are like that. It's just that these guys happen to be living in a time where they had the freedom and ability to exercise

that to their greatest ability. Or was it that these guys shaped the business world because they all happened to be alive at the same time? I don't know, man. I wonder. It's interesting, though. It's interesting though. It's that competition. And again, with the Plainview, not just a competition to succeed,

but a competition to see that others don't. Right. So did you talk about the railroad yet? I didn't catch it. No, so, you know, it started off in the steam boats, but if you know Vanderbilt, you know he was a railroad guy. And if you look at the list of robber barons, I'd say easily like a third of them were railroad men.

Yeah, because there was so much money to be made from the railroads. It was just like printing your own money. And one of the reasons why was because there's so much stuff being shipped over the railroads that if you own the railroad, you got a cut of every single industry because every single industry basically had to use your form of transportation. That's why they all got into it. Plus it was wide open. Like there was so much open space and so much room for expansion that it was a good time to get rich off of

the railroad for sure. So his first railroad ride was at 39 years old. He wasn't like in his 20s and early 30s getting into the railroad business. He wasn't even on a train until he was almost 40. And that train crashed. An axle broke and went down an embankment and he punctured along, broke some bones and I guess was lying there wheezing out of a hole in his lung saying, this is the future. That was so great.

And he got into railroads. It's crazy, like a year later. Yeah, he did. And one of the things that he had a really great talent for was identifying like loser railroads, seemingly loser railroads, and figuring out ways that they actually had been overlooked. And a really good example of that is the Harlem Railroad, which is just a short little line that other railroads, larger railroads use to connect to New York City. But Vanderbilt recognized that it was the only line that went all the way into the heart of Manhattan.

And so he bought that up and he also at the same time not only got control of that little railroad, this is a really early chance for him to show how good he was at driving up stock prices. So when he came along and bought the Harlem railroad or started buying shares of the Harlem railroad, it was worth in today's money $168 a share. Not too shabby, but from what I could tell at the time,

not very great at all. By the time he was done cornering this stock, he had driven the shares up to $5,998. How? In just a few years. And so in doing so, not only did he make a ton of money for himself, he also developed this reputation that made owners of other railroads say, I own a bunch of shares in my railroad.

You want to come buy mine and drive my stock price up and then buy me out? And so eventually he didn't even have to plunder other companies. They came to him and just said here buddy bias, please They were blue star airlines What is that remember that from wall street? From there will be blood. No, there were no airlines in there will be blood Now remember Wall Street that was the one that Martin Sheen worked for Yeah, that Gecko came in and bought out and I think he shuttered them though.

That was the difference. Yeah. Yeah. He was a corporator. And actually that era, that 80s junk bond era is frequently cited or it was at the time as the Second Gilded Age. This is not the first time we're living in what's known as the Second Gilded Age. So to put a bow on Vanderbilt, he consolidated, like you said, all these railways between

New York and Chicago. He manipulated stock. He fixed prices. Like you said earlier, the government wasn't looking, so you could kind of do what you wanted. And he became a very, very, very wealthy man. And like a lot of these guys, late in his life, turned into a philanthropist, built Grand Central Station. It was called the Grand Central Depot at the time, which during the recession provided tons and tons of jobs for people.

And then the Central University of Nashville was eventually renamed Vanderbilt University because all he did was give them a million bucks. Isn't that crazy? Is that right? I guess back then that's a lot of money. By the time I mean that's significant. Sure. Sure. Like I feel like we could get stuff you should know listeners to pitch in and get a university named after us. Let's try that actually.

Like stuff you should know you. We could do a, we could Morganize a struggling university. How about that? Hey, one more thing about Vanderbilt. So he left about $100 million mostly to his eldest son, William. In six years, William doubled that, mostly by investing in railroads. That's how much money you can make in railroads. And William was also well known for throwing probably the most lavish party in the history of New York City.

They spent $1.8 million in today's dollars on champagne alone. Yeah, that was when he finished his mansion on Fifth Ave. And I looked it up to see if any of these Robber Baron mansions were still around today. Oh, yeah. Yeah. I don't think it, I mean, I know this one was demolished in 1926. So if you want to get a really good idea of just how rich these people were, go to Newport, Rhode Island and visit Millionaire's Row.

Because there was a huge, there's a huge, overlooking this cliff, there's a long row of the most astounding mansions you've ever seen built during the Gilded Age. It's one of the better walks you can take in life. It really is. Because you've got the ocean on one side and then these mansions on the other. It's really cool. And each mansion is so different from the others. Just touring them is amazing.

You could just be utterly disgusted by the concept of billionaires or robber barons or whatever, and you can still enjoy taking this tour of these mansions. They're just works of art, you know? It's really worth a visit. Plus Newport's just one of the more charming towns in the country. I love Newport. Or you could take a hate walk and just look at those mansions and think about what a wrecking ball would look like.

Shake your fists at the dumbwaiters and all that. But then you turn around and look at the ocean and think, oh, okay. All right. It's really cool. It's definitely cool to visit them for sure. And by the way, a little piece of trivia, if you go, if you enter Central Park at the 105th Street entrance, that big beautiful iron gate was from that mansion, the Vanderbilt Mansion.

They donated a lot of the stuff before they demolished it. Is that right? Yeah. So I mentioned Morganization, and that's actually named after the next Robber Baron we're going to talk about, okay? Do we break beforehand and tease that? No, I think we break after JP. How about that? Are you okay with that? Sure.

Okay. So then we're going to hang in there everybody. Don't fast forward yet. We're going to stick around and talk about JP Morgan right now. Yeah he was born with money he did not come from meager means and work himself up by his bootstraps. He was the son of a very successful banker and merchant and used those connections to get a plum job at Wall Street when he was 20 years old and then when he was in his 30s he partnered with a guy named Anthony Drexel, who was a banker from Philly and created Drexel Morgan & Company. And it became one of the biggest investment banks at the time in the world.

Yeah. And this was when he was in his early 30s, like you said, right? So JP Morgan was known as the guy who financed all the other robber barons. And he had his fingers in basically every pot that was going on. He also knew that like you could make money off of the railroads because you were taking a cut

of all the other industries. So he definitely got involved in them. But his whole thing was what's called horizontal integration, where you basically come along, you say, this industry should be doing way better than it is. I think there's too many competitors and they're all holding one another down. I'm going to slowly start buying them up. And here's the thing. This is how you get control of a full industry during the Gilded Age. You go to a couple, you start buying them up, and then you put all those together

and you form a bigger company that's way leaner, has much better economies of scale, and you can compete better against all the other guys. So you start buying some of the other guys up because they're facing going out of business now. And then you've got left the real holdouts, the ones that are never gonna sell to you because they hate your stupid face

and they'll never give a penny to you. Make sure that you'll never set foot in their offices ever again. And what you do then is you start selling for less than cost. You're a big company, so you can totally stay in that for a much longer time than these holdout competitors and they face either financial ruin

or you eventually put them out of business and either way you no longer have that competition. You literally control an entire industry, consolidated into one beefy mega company and all of a sudden you have what's called Morganization which is, I don't know if it was pioneered by JP Morgan but he definitely perfected it enough that they named the process after him. Yeah and that's a good example of what I was talking about earlier, is it's not enough to succeed and be successful, but to make sure no one else can be. So like, it would be the kind of thing in that one company you were talking about that may be kind of pretty small even, but they might hold, have an iron grip on one very

tiny region of the United States. And you could just let them have their business or you could do what you're talking about and make sure that you squash them by any means necessary and force them to sell. And that's, I think that's where capitalism for a lot of people has gotten its bad name is like, yeah, work hard, succeed, do well, but not at the expense of every other person trying to do well. Right, because it interferes with something this country's based on, which is called the quality of opportunity, which is the idea that at least under the eyes of the law, every single person in America has an equal shot at making it, at making something of themselves, of having like a good life.

And when somebody is cheating or engaging in monopolies or using underhanded tactics to run out the competition so that there is no competition any longer, that is problematic. That flies in the face of the idea of equality of opportunity. That's right. And if you listen to our Monopoly game episode, you might remember that JP Morgan was the basis of Monopoly man, Uncle Penny. Did we say that? Yeah, we talked about that.

Good. Okay. That makes me feel good. Yeah. He was modeled after old JP Morgan himself And he was actually one of the first people to be targeted For antitrust in 1904 Teddy Roosevelt came after him under the Sherman Antitrust Act and said hey this northern securities corporation is really monopoly and

Supreme Court said yeah, it is busted up Yeah, and so today when we think of trusts, we think of like, you know, a legal entity that can hold assets. At the time, the word trust meant basically an industry that had been morganized where all of the competitors had been folded into one large company and the market was cornered by this one mega company, General Electric, US Steel. Both of those were Morganized companies. And apparently US Steel was the first $1 billion company that ever existed because of that level of consolidation. But then yeah, when the Sherman Antitrust Act was passed in 1890, that was a clear sign that this was not going to stand much longer.

And I think Roosevelt, it was Roosevelt you said, right? Yeah, Teddy. Who busted that up. And he ran on that and actually went against, he was a Republican, I believe, and he went against the advice of the elder statesman in the Republican Party, established himself as a genuine president of the people and help set himself up for reelection just from that one antitrust act.

So that's JP. Now do we take a break? Oh, one more thing, Chuck. I'm not toying with you, I swear. So one of the ways that Morgan, one of the reasons he's reviled still, and he did some philanthropy, probably more than he gets credit for for sure. But one of the reasons he's reviled is because one of the ways he made it

so that he could compete with other companies was in sell for lower than cost was by slashing wages, slashing the workforce and increasing productivity of the existing workers. And then just making sure that working conditions, he didn't spend a cent on improving working conditions to make them safe. And that is really not because he amassed a fortune.

Some people criticize him for that, but it's tactics like that, like becoming a billionaire, basically, on the backs of people who he wouldn't have spent a cent to make sure could stay alive working in his factories. That is the quintessential problem people have always had with robber barons is that kind of mentality.

That's right. Now I'm done. All right, we'll come back right after this and finish up with two more Robber Barons. Do you want to understand an invisible force that's shaping your life? I'm Osvaldo Lashin, one of the new hosts of the long running podcast, Tech Stuff. I'm slightly skeptical, but obsessively intrigued. And I'm Kara Price, the other new host. And I'm ready to adopt early and often. On Tech Stuff, we travel all the way from the mines of Congo to the surface of

Mars, to the dark corners of TikTok, to ask and attempt to answer burning questions about technology. One of the kind of tricks for surviving Mars is to live there long enough so that people evolve into Martians. Like data is a very rough proxy for a complex reality. How is it possible that the world's new energy revolution can be based in this place where there's no electricity at night? Oz and I will cut through the noise to bring you the best conversations

and deep dives that will help you understand how tech is changing our world and and in your ears with the daily show Ears Edition Podcast. From his hilarious satirical takes on today's politics and entertainment, to the unique voices of correspondents and contributors, it's your perfect companion to stay on top of what's happening now. Plus, you'll get special content just for podcast listeners, like in-depth interviews and a roundup of the week's top headlines.

Listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome. My name is Paola Pedroza, a medium and the host of the Ghost Therapy Podcast, where it's not just about connecting with deceased loved ones. It's about learning through them and their new perspective. Join me on the Ghost Therapy Podcast.

Whoa, my lights in my living room just flickered. I'm a little nervous. I'm excited. I'm excited nervous. You know, I'm a very spiritual person, so I'm like, I'm ready and open. That was amazing. I feel so grateful right now. I got to speak to my great grandmother Abuela and she gave me a lot of really good advice that I'm going to have to really think about. Wow. Okay. That's crazy. Yes, that is accurate.

Listen to the Ghost Therapy Podcast as part of the MyCultura Podcast Network available on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hello everybody. We're back to talk about Andrew Carnegie. You've ever been to Carnegie Hall or Carnegie Mellon University? I've been to both. You've been to one. I went to the university with you. That's right.

We did a little job there one time. That was fun. I've been to Carnegie Hall. I ushered a show there. No, I didn't usher. I passed out the playbills, which meant I got to see the show for free. And I saw... Which show? Oh, man. It was one of those special nights. I got to see Beethoven's night with the full orchestra

and German choir at Carnegie Hall. It was amazing. Wow. Something else. That's pretty neat. And all, it was amazing. Wow. Something else. That's pretty neat. And all I needed was a bow tie. Is that the Die Hard song. I got you. I went and saw Die Hard on concert. It was great. It was hilarious.

So Carnegie, we're talking about Andrew Carnegie, who was born in Scotland and they came to Pittsburgh. He was very poor. He's about 13 years old and he worked in a cotton factory. And this will come into play later. He kind of self-taught himself from books that he borrowed from a wealthy benefactor from his private library, which will come into play later. His favorite one was Flowers in the Attic. Wow. I would have thought great expectations, but that's OK. No.

So he, like Vanderbilt, is definitely a self-made man, for sure. And I guess he kind of was, he had his fingers in a lot of different pots, kind of like JPMorgan at first. And then he turned his attention to steel. Because again, remember, steel is basically the foundation for this American economy just blowing up and he was in Pittsburgh.

Sure. So he he his name became synonymous with steel and I guess at first up until about 1892 he had a reputation as being a friend of the worker and that the workers at Carnegie Steel in Homestead just across the river from Pittsburgh, they felt like, you know, Carnegie would take care of them. And they found out the hard way that that was not the case when they went on strike in 1892 during what came to be known as the Homestead strike, which would result in the death of 10 people,

which is not how they plan things to go. And apparently the reason why that happened is because the Pinkertons were called in as strikebreakers. Yeah, I might want to eventually do an episode on this, but that's sort of the overview. You bring in the Pinkertons and then they battle with the, like literally with guns. Pinkertons died, I think like eight or nine of the 10 or 12 people that died rode the Pinkerton's.

No, no, I think it was just one. I think the nine were the strikers. Yeah. Oh, okay. Well, we should definitely do a full episode then because I want to get this right. But what I read was that the strikers, so the Pinkerton showed up in barges and they were basically hired on as a private army to protect scab workers and bust the strike up. But they arrived in barges and after the initial violence, the striking workers and some of their families surrounded these barges and demanded that the Pinkertons come off the

boats. Didn't they burn them? So the Pinkertons said, okay, we'll come off if you guarantee our safety. And they said, fine. And the Pinkertons came off and they got beaten by all of the strikers. They just completely went back on their word and then set their barges on fire. I guess the Pinkertons escaped to the factory with their life

and the National Guard was called in to quell the violence. Yeah. Well, National Guard was called in not only to quell the violence, but also called in to act in the interest of Carnegie. So he kind of commandeered his own little personal army to help take care of things. Right. Starting with the Pinkertons and then with the National Guard.

And it's like this kind of collusion that is also another huge criticism. Like we were saying, the government is known for being like laissez faire as far as regulation is concerned, but they'll totally send in the National Guard, not just to quell violence, but to make sure that the strikebreakers don't attack the scab labor to keep the factory going. And that kind of like government capital collusion

at the expense of the workers is, that kind of like government capital collusion at the expense of the workers is, that is, there's a long standing tradition of that being almost universally reviled in America. Over enough of an arc of time, if that keeps up, more and more just everyday Americans start to notice and start to resent it. And that apparently is a really good force for social change because Americans don't like that kind of thing after a long enough period of time.

Yeah. And I think Carnegie tried to distance himself from that strike by saying that he was sort of out of the loop. He was in Scotland the whole time. But they have since found correspondence that shows that he was very much involved in that. And there's some speculation that he may have had some genuine moments of regret and guilt over that because he was a big-time philanthropist later in life. I think he said in his book, The Gospel of Wealth, the man who dies thus rich dies disgraced.

And we mentioned the libraries coming back into play. He built more than 2,500 libraries. And that's really one of his big legacies, along with the arts, the Carnegie Corporation, and the Endowment for International Peace, Carnegie Mellon University, Carnegie Museum. But the libraries really have made a pretty big difference in this country. They really have, for sure. And he was one of just the all-time great philanthropists in American history, for sure. But he still pales in comparison to the all-time top record holder philanthropist, John D. Rockefeller, who is also a robber baron, but he also is far and away America's most prolific and generous benefactor, for sure.

He was also one of the most visionary philanthropists of all time, too. Yeah, and some people say that he was, you know, if you just account for money and inflation, the richest man ever to live. I'm not sure how they calculate that because his $900 million peak in 1912 is about $23 billion today. So here, I saw how. You ready? I'm sure it's, yeah, go ahead.

If you do his wealth relative to the total economic output, which is an even larger figure than gross domestic product. I had a feeling it was something like that. His wealth represented 2% of the total economic output of the United States at the time. To have that value today, you would have to be worth about 350 billion. Okay, that makes sense. And I think Jeff Bezos is worth 140 or something like that. value today, you would have to be worth about $350 billion. Okay.

And I think Jeff Bezos is worth $140 billion or something like that. Yeah. And I think we didn't even mention, was it Carnegie that had at one point like $1 of every $20 in circulation was his? Yeah, that's right. That was Carnegie for sure. Yeah. I mean, these numbers are staggering for people like Rockefeller and Carnegie.

It's just unbelievable. But the thing is, and like John D. Rockefeller was a ruthless, ruthless businessman who put a lot of people out of business, brought a lot of misery and hardship on just small, everyday producers of oil, which we'll see. But again, it's really difficult to overstate the impact that his philanthropy has had on the United States. He peaked at 900 million, like you said. When he died, he had given away everything, but 26 million of that. And he probably felt kind of bad

that he had $26 million left because he was a very religious man and apparently he learned very early on that it was every man's religious duty to make as much money as you possibly can and then to give away as much money as you possibly can too. And he apparently lived that even before he was wealthy, when he was still just an average worker, he would give away something like 10% of all of his paychecks. So he was a philanthropist his whole life for sure.

He was still a robber baron too though. Yeah, and his whole, of course, oil was his business, standard oil. It was just a Goliath. And there were a bunch of big, sort of like the railroads, it was oil and the railroads, it was oil and railroads were industries where you could have a bunch of people that had these huge, huge corporations. But Standard Oil was far and away bigger than any of them. By the early 1900s, they controlled more than 90% of the oil market.

Can you imagine? 90%. And the way that he cornered the market was, you know, he did that standard organization kind of thing where he went around and bought it first and then started to turn up the heat on the competition on the holdouts. But one of the ways that he turned up that heat

was he colluded with the railroad, the different railroads in the area who were shipping all this oil to say, not only were they gonna give him a rebate, so he got money back, where they wouldn't give money back to other oil shippers, just because of volume, that makes sense. But they also had to get his business,

and he had so much business that they would do this. The railroads had to tax and added tax on all of his competitors. So they paid an extra 20 to 30 cents a had to tax, an added tax, on all of his competitors. So they paid an extra 20 to 30 cents a barrel to ship. Not just paid more than he did because of his rebates, they paid more in addition to that, just for not being John D. Rockefeller. And then on top of that,

to keep him from taking that rebate and going around to other railroads and getting a cheaper rebate and abandoning that railroad, they actually gave him a kickback of that added tax. So his competitors were getting taxed by the railroads and he was actually getting some of that tax himself too. You just can't possibly compete with that. And it put a lot of smaller oil producers and shippers

and refiners out of business. That's amazing. It is. Let me see. He gave $75 million away to the University of Chicago. Well, it kind of founded the University of Chicago with that money. Also Spelman too, which was established to educate freed slaves. Yeah.

He bankrolled Spelman for its founding as well. And in one of our best and most favorite episodes, you might remember the Rockefeller Sanitary Commission helped eradicate hookworm in the South. Yeah, totally. Remember that? That is one of our better episodes for sure. So those are just four of the sort of most famous and some might say notorious robber barons. Big long list, you know, you could throw Henry Ford in there, John Jacob Astor, Charles Schwab,

Andrew Mellon. Jay Gould? Yeah, I looked at, I was thinking about Jay Paul Getty, but he was later on. He wouldn't have qualified. So some of these guys had some terrible quotes too that also just made them despised through history. Carnegie said that it's not the man who does the work who gets rich, it's the man who gets other men to do the work. Which is not a very tasteful thing to say when you're ultra wealthy and breaking strikes with guns. That Jay Gould guy I mentioned, he said that he could hire one half of the workers in America to shoot the other half

to death if he wanted to, which is another nice thing to say. And apparently, John D. Rockefeller once said, competition is a sin. So these guys had some terrible PR. And because of that, a lot of people have said like, well, I wonder if some of the ultra wealthy industrialists or innovators or people who basically the billionaires who are leading the world today, are they just like robber barons with better PR and better marketing?

Maybe. And apparently, supposedly that's not necessarily the case and here's why. Remember I was saying that like robber barons were kind of being reformed by historians these days? Yes. Especially conservative historians. Well, they point to some like really indisputable things

like these guys were ruthless and they engaged in horrific anti-competitive kind of anti-capitalist tactics to get those wealth. And they did it on the backs of workers that they took advantage of and didn't pay very well and killed in their workplaces basically. But the reason that America is still powerful today

is because of the work that these guys did of the industries that they created. Public schooling came about and became widespread to prepare people for the jobs that these guys created. You really can't look away from the fact that some of them were the greatest philanthropists that the country has ever produced too. That flies in the face with the exception of Bill Gates. It flies in the face of kind of the exception of Bill Gates. It flies in the face of the people who are around today.

That not only are they not great philanthropists necessarily. I'm looking at Steve Jobs who isn't around anymore, but definitely was not a good philanthropist in his life. He is now, his family is, but he wasn't when he was alive. That's a big, big mark against people who have control philanthropist in his life. He is now, his family is, but he wasn't when he was alive. That's a big, big mark against people who have control of significant portions of the wealth in America today. But also even more than that, those guys today are presiding over a decline, a decline in wages,

decline in living conditions. Whereas these guys, these captains of industry and the robber barons from the 19th century, they were presiding over a rise, like an improvement in the way that America lived and the standard of living. It, the kind of the polar opposite, even though the inequality is roughly the same. Very interesting. I think so too. I also wonder though, too, if this inequality will usher in a second progressive era, which

it seems like it has all of the markings to do that. Maybe so. We need to do a progressive era episode too sometime, okay? Deal. All right, well since you said deal Chuck, I think it's time for listener mail, huh? Yeah, I think I alluded to this in another one about the word marijuana. Yeah. Didn't I talk about that?

Totally. But I didn't read the mail, right? Not that I remember, no. All right, this is from Jack Glick. Hey guys, love the show. Been listening for five years or so, and I make sure not to miss any new episodes. I'm listening to the one on matcha when you started to talk about marijuana. I decided to get in touch. I am the lead analyst on cannabis taxation for the Canadian federal government

And we long ago made a decision to refer to the plant by its proper name cannabis Marijuana has a number of historically racist associations, and I know you guys are always using wary of using Appropriate terms for things I had a good laugh at the question over whether womb was still okay to say in the ultrasound episode. I thought you might like to know that how outdated and implicitly offensive marijuana is and I'd like to encourage you to use the word cannabis when referring to in the future. All the best. Keep it up.

That is from Jack Glick. That is a great name, Jack. Great job. Great name. Great email from a great guy, I assume. Sounds like a great guy. If you want to show off what a great person you are, you can email us yourself like Jack Glick did. Man, what a great name. You can wrap it up, spank it on the bottom and send it off to

StuffPodcast at iHeartRadio.com. it up, spank it on the bottom, and send it off to stuffpodcastsatihartradio.com. Stuff You Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts, my heart radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. Do you want to see into the future? Do you want to understand an invisible force that's shaping your life? Do you want to experience the frontiers of what makes us human? On Tech Stuff, we travel from the minds of Congo to the surface of Mars. From conversations with Nobel Prize winners to the depths of TikTok. To ask burning questions about technology.

From high tech to low culture and everywhere in between. Join us. Listen to tech stuff on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. I'm Tomer Coyne, LinkedIn's Chief Product Officer. If you're just as curious as I am about the way things are built, then tune into my podcast, Building One. I speak with some of the best product builders out there.

I've always been inspired by frustration. It came back to my own personal pinpoint. So we had to go out to farmers and convince them. Following that curiosity is a superpower. You have to be obsessed with the human condition. Listen to Building One on the iHeart radio app, Apple, or wherever you get your podcasts. Did you know that 70% of people get hired at companies where they already have a connection?

I'm Andrew Seaman, LinkedIn's editor at large for jobs and career development. And on my podcast, Get Hired, I bring you all the information you need to, well, get hired. Landing a job may be tough, but Get Hired is here for you every step of the way, with advice on resumes, networking, negotiation, and so much more. Listen to Get Hired with Andrew Seaman on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you like to listen.