Stuff You Should Know - Solipsism: This Is All In My Mind?

Episode Date: December 3, 2024

As the philosophical holds, there’s a chance you don’t exist, that not only you, but this episode, the podcast, and the entire universe are only projections of Josh or Chuck’s mind. If so, then recording this episode was a waste of time. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This is Tracy V. Wilson from Stuff You Missed in History Class. Do you like podcasts, music, and audiobooks? Because when you subscribe to Amazon Music Unlimited, you get all three in one app. Imagine listening to your favorite podcasts and music on the go to work, school, the gym, or better yet, vacation. Now, imagine being on vacation

with your favorite audiobook from Audible, then listening to a new one every month from a huge selection of popular titles. That sounds like a pretty good vacation, right? Audible is now included on Amazon Music Unlimited. Download the Amazon Music app now to start listening. Terms apply.

Hey guys, I'm Kate Max. You might know me from my popular online series, The Running Interview Show, where I run with celebrities, athletes, entrepreneurs, and more. After those runs, the conversations keep going. That's what my podcast, Post Run High, is all about. It's a chance to sit down with my guests and dive even deeper into their stories, their journeys, and the thoughts that arise once we've hit the pavement together.

Listen to Post Run High on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome to Stuff You Should Know, a production of iHeartRadio. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh and there's Chuck and Jerry's not here. We are. And we're pretty sure that both of us are here, but it's possible just me is here. And this is Stuff You Should Know. That's right.

Diving into philosophy again. This one solipsism perhaps the most navel gazey Sort of unintelligible aspect of all of them, which is that sort of old classic stoner college dorm room thing How do we know if anything is real? What if it's is all and this part of it? What if it's all just a simulation? Yeah, that's one. That's one example of what it could be. But there's a couple of things about this. One, as annoying as it is, because if you're arguing for solipsism, and I don't want to say you're a solopsist because there's basically nobody out there who's an actual solopsist. Like you can just keep saying, like, but yeah, how do you know? But yeah, how do you know? There doesn't seem to be any more reducted argument in all of philosophy.

All other philosophy can essentially be argued against by solipsism. And the reason why is because the basis of solipsism is that there is no reality. It's just you. You hearing this, I don't exist, Chuck doesn't exist, this podcast doesn't exist, nothing exists except for your mind. And that's the basis of everything that you think is real, and none of us are actually doing anything that you're not projecting out of your mind. That's solipsism. And it sounds mind-blowing, but like I said, it's also annoying, and it's also extremely simple,

so much so that it can deceive you into thinking that it means more than it does. It doesn't. It's as basic as that. But again, as annoying as it is, it is in some ways a useful argument because if you really wanna make a philosopher rigorous in their argument, have them take on solipsism or some form of it. Yeah, I think Livia found something online that said like no modern, like legitimate philosopher even takes part in these arguments

because it's just such like, hey, get off the couch with your bong and maybe talk about something, some real philosophy. Well, also the other part of it too, is if you were a genuine philosopher and you genuinely believe that nothing was real except in your mind, there is zero point for you to do anything like write a philosophy paper for solipsism.

Because nobody's out there to read it in actuality. So what's the point? You're by yourself in the entire universe, so much so that the universe doesn't even exist outside of your mind. You're by yourself in some incomprehensible form of existence. It's just weird and depressing in a lot of ways. Yeah, for sure. form of existence. It's just weird and depressing in a lot of ways. Yeah, for sure. We should mention the skeptics a little bit because that sort of lays the

groundwork for solipsism a little bit. The skeptics started around the third century BCE. The word itself came from the Greek term meaning inquiry or examination. And they were basically like, hey, it's not possible to have some knowledge to make definitive judgments arguing against the Stoics who said, no, you should be able to test claims using stuff that we can see and hear, using our senses. And the skeptics, and this sort of laid the ground of what was to come for solipsism,

basically said like, hey, we can all be deceived though. What about the case of identical twins? You could be deceived there, or you could have a sensory experience if you're talking about trusting your senses that aren't connected to reality, like that's what a dream is. And dreams sort of play into the whole thing,

at least at the beginning. Yeah, the skeptics said, you ever had a dream is. And dreams sort of play into the whole thing, at least at the beginning. Yeah, the skeptic said, you ever had a dream, Dengus? How are you gonna trust your senses with that? And so skepticism, like you said, is kind of an extension of it, a basis of it. It's not quite there, but enough that solipsism is often thought of

as an extreme form of skepticism. Sometimes it's also called global skepticism, like you're skeptical of everything. And then it's also sometimes called Mondo Skepto. Speaking of the dreams though, there was a Taoist philosopher named Zhuangzi that, and this also sort of laid the groundwork was, hey, if I wake up from a dream and I was a wildebeest in that dream, how do I know that I'm not really a wildebeest and that this is the dream? Yeah.

And all of this, again, yes, it does seem kind of bong-ish or bong-adjacent for sure, but this is the kind of stuff that philosophers care about. Like, it's called epistemology. Epistemeology? I like to add a lot of syllables sometimes, so I'm not quite sure which one, but it's the basis of how we know what we know, how we gain knowledge. And the point of this, of all this stuff as people were kind of building on it, is to say like, we need to kind of figure out how we do know, because if you really stop

and think about it, we're not quite sure exactly how we know anything. And that whole thing was picked up in the 17th century by Descartes, and his very famous quote, I think therefore I am, came out of this, right? Yeah, and that's, am, came out of this, right? Yeah, and that's, you know, basically saying like, hey, I know that I am real.

I'm doing the thinking. I have a brain. But that's about all I know. Right. They, you know, Descartes was the first one that came in and said, hey, maybe we should get a system called method Doubt, great band name, to determine if like, hey, you're saying something is truth, like one of the truths, we should be able to test this,

but things are fallible, like math, you can make mistakes in, you can't look at tradition of a culture, because people might disagree with that kind of thing. And then the idea of an evil demon coming in and basically kind of taking hold of your consciousness and saying that you're having all these illusions and that's inhabited inside of you. Yeah, so that evil demon thing too,

it's like, as we'll see, it's been updated in much more modern form, but Descartes was the first one to really kind of say it's possible, especially we should say Descartes believed in God. The extension of that, I think therefore I am, is also that anything I can just intuitively know is real, like God is real. So he believed that there definitely was God. So he was arguing like, okay, if we believe in God, then we have to entertain the possibility

that it's not just our minds that are projecting this, but that we're being deluded, that we're like an entire universe is being created for us by this evil demon. This is his 17th century application of it. But it's like I said, it kind of formed these, or it's been updated in modern forms. And that really kind of, that's where it gets super tough because it's like, okay, yeah, it's ridiculous that you're the only person who exists and all the rest of us don't exist.

Or even more creepy, this is where it gets it to me. Okay? Like when you start to try to argue against solipsism, one of the ways that you're going to go is that other people have experiences and thoughts and emotions too. So that totally discounts the idea that you're the only entity, you're the only self in the entire universe, and that all of this is just in your mind. But then you have to ask, like, well, wait a minute, how do you know other people have experiences and thoughts and feelings like you do?

There's no way for you to know that. And there's actually no way for them to get that across to you in any provable way. And then you just kind of go like, oh, it's a little scary. At least I do. It's the kind of thing that keeps me up at night. Well, the word itself, if you want to break it down, first appeared in 1869 from Kant,

and I think it's Latin for solus from alone and ipsy, meaning self. And this isn't the kind of thing where like at the beginning people are like, wow, this is really, it holds a lot of water. From the beginning, it was pretty ridiculous and philosophers thought it was pretty ridiculous. Oh, here's a quote, no great philosopher has espoused solipsism, is the quote that Livia found. Because if you believe that there's nothing, then you can't have an argument about anything because like you said at the beginning, a solipsist would just come in and go like,

well, how do you know? Prove it. You can't prove that. Because even your proof isn't proof because it's not real. Yeah, one of the other things too, just to kind of get this into perspective is, like you can't even say that you have a brain because everything you know about a brain,

you've basically, you're not born with the concept of a brain, you learn that from the external world. And if the external world doesn't exist, then maybe brains don't exist. Like maybe you just don't even, can't even conceive of who you are. And that's the ultimate problem.

You can just keep reducing it. Like you can't prove how you know what you know. And I feel like that's really kind of set us up for a break. What do you think? Yeah, we'll be right back. This is Tracy V. Wilson from Stuff You Missed in History Class. Do you like podcasts, music, and audiobooks? Because when you subscribe to Amazon Music Unlimited, you get all three in one app. Imagine listening to your favorite podcasts and music on the go to work, school, the gym,

or better yet, vacation. Now imagine being on vacation with your favorite audiobook from Audible, then listening to a new one every month from a huge selection of popular titles. That sounds like a pretty good vacation, right? Audible is now included on Amazon Music Unlimited. Download the Amazon Music app now to start listening. Terms apply. Hey, guys, I'm Kate Max.

You might know me from my popular online series, The Running Interview Show, where I run with celebrities, athletes, entrepreneurs'm Kate Max. You might know me from my popular online series, The Running Interview Show, where I run with celebrities, athletes, entrepreneurs, and more. After those runs, the conversations keep going. That's what my podcast, Post Run High, is all about. It's a chance to sit down with my guests and dive even deeper into their stories, their journeys, and the thoughts that arise

once we've hit the pavement together. You know that rush of endorphins you feel after a great workout? Well, that's when the real magic happens. So if you love hearing real, inspiring stories from the people you know, follow, and admire, join me every week for Post Run High. It's where we take the conversation beyond the run

and get into the heart of it all. It's lighthearted, pretty crazy, and very fun. Listen to Post Run High on the iHeart Radio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Martha Stewart has been a household name for over four decades and still isn't done. Join iHeartMedia chairman and CEO Bob Pittman for a special episode of the hit podcast, Math and Magic, Stories from the Frontiers of Marketing, as he interviews this icon in

front of a live audience to celebrate her 100th book, Martha, the Cookbook, 100 Favorite Recipes with Lessons and Stories from My Kitchen. Did you ever think you were going to wind up writing 100 books? Yeah. You did? Yeah, it's just a minor goal. This intimate and wide-ranging conversation between friends covers the pivotal decisions in Martha's career,

the philosophy that has guided her, and the source of so much of her creative inspiration. They actually looked at the July issue that I had prototyped and they said, this is fabulous, what would you do next July? And I said, well, living is a limitless subject matter. Listen to Math and Magic on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. So one of the things I kind of talked about earlier before the break, Chuck, was that

as far as philosophy goes, like if you're trying to actually apply this to philosophical arguments or maybe like real world kind of stuff, is that it has to do with other minds and the fact that we can't ever fully understand what other people are thinking and then as relates to solipsism, we can't really prove that other people are thinking. And there's actually some, not just philosophers, but neuroscientists who've kind of investigated this, because it is an interesting question. It's that same kind of question, how do I know that we both

experience the same color green in the exact same way, and that what you call green, I actually think is blue. I experience it as what you would experience blue, but I call it green because I think that's what you're talking about too. Yeah, and in terms of neuroscience, you know, you're talking about maybe a technology where you could brain splice and you could literally maybe get someone inside someone else's head. But even then, it's not like some sort of foolproof, solipsistic argument because even if you were sending signals from one brain to another, it's still going to be a subjective experience. And you wouldn't have any idea, even though you're getting the signals from their brain, like the subjective nature of it.

Like you can't gauge subjectivity scientifically. Yeah, and there's this example of like, okay, one person that you're connected to the brain of is saying, like, I'm thinking of a red apple. And the other person with the other connected brain is like, yep, I can see the red apple that you're thinking of. But again, to that person, red is what the other person would think of as blue, and you can't possibly know

that that person is thinking of what would be actually a blue apple and calling it red. But the thing is, you can. You can just be like, okay, person number two, now you think of a red apple, and we'll see what person number one thinks of it if it matches their conception. It'd be really easy to find that out, if you ask me.

Yeah, and if that was a test subject subject they'd say, why is Chuck walking into traffic? What's going on? Yeah, I mean we should say here like all of this does require brain implants and I just don't feel like there's anybody trustworthy to put an implant in your brain right now. Yeah, that's true. There's also this concept of a philosophical zombie, right? They're called P-zombies. And it kind of ties in with what I was saying. Like, we can't ever say that somebody else is thinking

or emoting because we can conceive of something that looks like a human, acts like a human, has all the same thought processes of a human, maybe even has emotions and all that stuff, but they're missing what it means to be a human, which is the experience of experiencing something, right? So, like that person can eat an apple and taste what an apple tastes like,

but they will never feel what it feels like to taste an apple that's like really delicious. You know what I'm saying? And so people came up with the idea of a pea zombie, a philosophical zombie, to try to investigate like what it is that makes humans humans, and that's kind of what they came up with. Yeah, and if you, you know, as AI comes on more and more,

and I know you tackled some of this in the end of the world, your special podcast series. Thanks for the talk. But the idea of like AI becoming sentient or conscious or whatever, like how are we going to know if that's even happening? Because it's not just if it knows so much stuff. It can, you know, AI can learn facts and things, but like it's that subjectivity of a human or I guess just an experience because it wouldn't be human.

And how do we know if that's happening to an AI? Yeah. Or a person too, you know? It's just, and again, I think you kind of nailed it on the head. All this seems like navel gazing, but there is like some utility to it. Well, let's talk about some of the, I guess, varieties of solipsism that they've come up with over the years.

There's one called metaphysical solipsism that's basically that an individual is like yourself is all that there is, nothing else has any independent reality at all. Then there is epistemological solipsism, and that is it is not even possible to know where anything outside our individual consciousness exists or is real.

And that one is actually like kind of a step down from metaphysical, they're like, we're not saying that nothing else in the universe exists but your mind, but we they're like, we're not saying that nothing else in the universe exists but your mind, but we're saying like, like you and I were just talking about with P-zombies and AI, like, we can't prove that anybody else has those thoughts and feelings besides the thinker. – Right. Not the famous statue, but you know, a real thinker. There's methodological solipsism, got that extra O in there, and that means it's not possible to even start to analyze the world except through your own individual consciousness

and lens, which that makes sense. Yeah, it does. But I saw that it really gets tricky with research because that base methodological solipsism says You don't need to mess with data or other people's research. Just what do you think about the subject? And that doesn't really hold water for like a research paper because yeah, I mean that's a good place to start You can't just dive in or you I guess you can but it's also like what are your conceptions about this and Let's start from there and then go figure out if that's correct. This is just sticking with the, what do you think about this and write the research paper.

So it's not a really good idea, frankly. And then also, Chuck, there's just a straight up bad idea. Ethical solipsism, also called POS solipsism. ethical solipsism, also called POS solipsism. Yeah, I think there's a professor from MIT named, a philosopher rather, maybe teaches philosophy, named Casper Hare, and he had a book in 2009 called On Myself and Other Less Important Subjects, where he was arguing a lesser version of ethical solipsism, which is the idea that other things and people might exist, but we have no obligation to any of those people or ideas except for our own. No.

And I think ultimately at the end he's like, but for us to, for the person, the individual to lead a fuller life, you kind of do need people here or there, so you don't want to just completely screw over everybody for yourself, but that's the basis of what's called ethical solipsism, that you have no moral obligation to anyone except yourself. And then the other thing that really stuck out to me, Chuck, was that you have no moral obligation to anybody but yourself right now.

So you don't even have to look out for your future self. All you need to care about is your present self. And that's why I call that POS solipsism. Yeah, piece of what? Piece of S. There are also lots of little sort of side ideas that come along if you're gonna gaze at your navel about solipsism.

And one is the famous brain in a vat or the Futurama or the matrix idea, which is all you are maybe is a brain floating in a jar with some life-sustaining liquid and it's hooked up to a computer and everything you see is a simulation. Yeah. And this is where we kind of get into the modern updated versions of Descartes' evil demon, right? Like what's keeping you in the brain in a vat? What's running that simulation for you?

There's also the simulation hypothesis, which came from Nick Bostrom, which I did do a whole episode on End of the World on, because it just fascinates me. But it's a lot of people confuse it with the brain in a vat but it's different because in the simulation hypothesis which is that if a civilization becomes advanced like say we're their ancestors, they're our descendants, they just keep getting more and more technologically advanced that they can invent simulations that are indistinguishable from reality.

And they run a bunch of simulations over and over again, like say they sell copies of the simulation game. So a hundred million simulations are ever created over the course of history, then mathematically speaking, since we can't distinguish between reality and a simulation, it makes, it's much likelier that you and I exist in a simulation rather than the actual one version of reality that the simulations are based on. And the thing that people get mixed up with the brain in a vat is that the brain in the vat, in reality, your brain in a vat. In the simulation, in reality, your reality is simulated.

But to you, it's reality. There's nothing different. There's no other reality that you could wake up to. That's just reality. It's essentially like a techno version of creationism, essentially. Like if you replace whoever came up with the code for the simulation with God, it's essentially saying the same thing. Yeah. There's also, and this is sort of along those lines,

the experience machine idea. There's a philosopher named Robert Nozick in a 1974 book that said, how about this for a thought experiment? I don't think that people are just basically hedonistic in life. And what would people choose if they could be attached to a machine that can simulate any experience, like as if it were identical and real, and you thought it was real?

Like, would it be hedonistic? Would you choose falling in love? Would you choose to write, you know, create a great piece of art or something like that? And then that, you know, there are different versions of that, like, what if it's for two years at a time? What if it's your whole lives? And the counter to that usually is somebody saying, yeah, but people, it's not reality and people aren't engaged in reality and humans inherently want to engage with reality.

Yeah, and like to sweeten the pot, Nozick was like, like, you will have nothing but pleasure for the rest of your life. All the pleasure you want, you will never be able to distinguish it from what life was like before. You won't remember that there was a life before. Like, it will be amazing.

And something like 74 to 80% of people who are opposed this thought experiment say like, nah, I don't wanna do that. Even though life is suffering in a lot of ways and sucks and can be boring and is definitely not 100% pleasure all the time, most people still want to be engaged in reality. And that's, again, like it's not just a cool thought experiment.

They use that to argue against the idea that humans are at bottom, just nothing but hedonistic creatures who seek out nothing but to increase their pleasure. Nozick really kind of demolished that with that thought experiment. Yeah, I think what in The Matrix, wasn't Joey Pantz fully on board with the simulation? I don't remember. I don't remember that. I think he was, because I think he was like eating the steak and they were like, yeah, but the steak's not real.

And he's like, yeah, but you know, it tastes real. Tastes good to me. Something along those lines. But yeah, it's pretty interesting. Do you want to take our second break and come back and talk about our favorite part of this, criticisms? Yeah, let's journey into Act 3. This is Tracy V. Wilson from Stuff You Missed in History Class. Do you like podcasts, music, and audiobooks? This is Tracy V. Wilson from Stuff You Missed in History Class.

Do you like podcasts, music, and audiobooks? Because when you subscribe to Amazon Music Unlimited, you get all three in one app. Imagine listening to your favorite podcasts and music on the go to work, school, the gym, or better yet, vacation. Now imagine being on vacation with your favorite audiobook from Audible, then listening to a new one every month from a huge selection of popular titles. That sounds like a pretty good vacation, right?

Audible is now included on Amazon Music Unlimited. Download the Amazon Music app now to start listening. Terms apply. Hey guys, I'm Kate Max. You might know me from my popular online series, The Running Interview Show, where I run with celebrities, athletes, entrepreneurs, and more.

After those runs, the conversations keep going. That's what my podcast, Post Run High, is all about. It's a chance to sit down with my guests and dive even deeper into their stories, their journeys, and the thoughts that arise once we've hit the pavement together. You know that rush of endorphins you feel after a great workout? Well, that's when the real magic happens.

So if you love hearing real, inspiring stories from the people you know, follow, and admire, join me every week for Post Run High. It's where we take the conversation beyond the run and get into the heart of it all. It's lighthearted, pretty crazy, and very fun. Listen to Post Run High on the iHeart Radio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Martha Stewart has been a household name for over four decades and still isn't done. Join iHeart Media Chairman and CEO Bob Pitman for a special episode of the hit podcast,

Math and Magic, Stories from the Frontiers of Marketing, as he interviews this icon in front of a live audience to celebrate her 100th book, Martha, the Cookbook, 100 Favorite Recipes with lessons and stories from my kitchen. Did you ever think you were going to wind up writing a hundred books? Yeah. You did? Yeah, it's just a minor goal. This intimate and wide ranging conversation between friends

covers the pivotal decisions in Martha's career, the philosophy that has guided her, and the source of so much of her creative inspiration. They actually looked at the July issue that I had prototyped and they said, this is fabulous. What would you do next July? And I said, well, living is a limitless subject matter. Listen to math and magic on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. All right.

So when it comes to criticisms of solipsism, not from us, there are some famous stories, one of which, very famous story in philosophy circles that is at least. If you're not a philosopher, you probably would be like, what's that guy kicking the rock for? But it was an 18th century story about writer Samuel Johnson, who was in a, I guess, debate with a philosopher named George Berkeley. And Berkeley said, hey, Descartes' mind-body dualism is faulty, and everything that appears to have existence is just made up in your mind.

Well, first Berkeley said it's impossible to refute this, and that's when cheeky old Samuel Johnson came in and kicked a very large rock and said, I refute this. In other words, hey, this rock is here, and this is just an absurd idea because I can kick that rock and it hurt my toe. Right, exactly. Yeah. And so if you're a philosopher, you're like Samuel Johnson doesn't get it. And if you're not a philosopher, you're like Samuel Johnson gets it. Like philosophers are very famously maybe overly engaged in perfectly crafted, totally airtight arguments.

And the idea of just kicking a rock and being like, see, it's real, doesn't really hold water with them, but for everybody else, it's like, yeah, it kind of gets to what Wittgenstein, is that how you would say it in German? Yeah. Ludwig Wittgenstein. I'm gonna say his name again at least one more time

because it's fun. He was a philosopher of the 20th century. He basically was like, man, philosophy, this is not a quote, I'm parap to say his name again at least one more time because it's fun. He was a philosopher of the 20th century. He basically was like, man, philosophy, this is not a quote, I'm paraphrasing, has some real hangups with having to just, like the fact that solipsism is actually, it exists and people feel the need to argue against it sometimes, says all you need to know about how uptight philosophers are about philosophy, and essentially we just need to take some things as fact, as granted, or else all we're doing is spinning our wheels.

But if you say like, okay, I believe that the world is material, that it exists apart from human consciousness, that if there were no humans around and no life to experience it, everything would still be the same. Like, let's just take that as fact, if that's what you believe, and just move on from there. You need to have some sort of foundation that you can say, this is real, this exists, and then you build off of that.

And if you don't, then you're just shooting yourself in the foot, essentially, was what Ludwig Wittgenstein was saying. Yeah, I think, unfortunately, Wittgenstein. Well, I didn't see it, but I think the second letter in the EI in German is the one that's favored. Oh, so how would you pronounce it then? I think it would be Wittgenstein. Well, I still like Wittgenstein,

so I'm gonna stay with it. Like Frankenstein. Oh, I had it backwards, so I thought that Stein was like the anglicized version of it and Steen was the German version. I'm pretty sure the second letter in German is the one that's pronounced. No, I believe you.

I'm not positive, but I do know that Frankenstein was the doctor. You mean Frankenstein? And not the monster. Yeah, that's true. So let's talk about Stephen P. Thornton. He's a philosopher at the University of Limerick, the most sing-songy university in all of Ireland.

He has an argument that, hey, guys, it's a big mistake to view these mental states as just something we experience subjectively and then relate to others like, hey, I know how it feels to get my toe stubbed because I've done it, so I see that's happened to you, so I know how that feels. He says, no, we learn what these mental states are in what he called an intersubjective world. Like, we learn, like a kid when it's born understands what being sad is by looking around at someone crying or something like that.

And that's how they know what sad is, because of a behavior they witness and a context they witness it in. So if you, you know, Livia used a great example, if you're grinding your teeth and if you're, you know, snapping at people in your life and you can't sleep, then you probably know you're experiencing stress.

Right, this guy's argument to me is the one that makes the most sense, just refuting solipsism, which is like, yes, you have internal feelings and thoughts. Like, the experience of feeling sad is not the whole of sadness, that there's other stuff, and all the rest of it essentially comes from interacting and learning from the external world. And so the whole idea of solipsism is based on a faulty premise that the entire world could possibly just be in your head, because

how are you going to learn from something that's not actually there in the first place? I like Stephen P. Thornton. He's my new favorite philosopher. There was one other guy too we have to bring into the conversation. Bertrand Russell, he's a very famous philosopher and mathematician, I believe. His whole thing was like, if we might be like, what was it, Zhuangzi, him saying like, how can I tell if I'm a man dreaming of a wildebeest or a wildebeest dreaming of being a man. And Bertrand Russell was like, if that were true, dreams are just weird and freaky and anything goes. Like, waking life is not like that. So if waking life were a dream, there would be measurable ways that it veers off of like physics or whatever. And we would notice that. And these days it's called a glitch in the matrix.

You would notice glitches in the matrix. And there's actually a really cool subreddit called a glitch in the matrix. You would notice glitches in the matrix. And there's actually a really cool sub-Reddit called glitch in the matrix, and it's people's stories about just how weird, inexplicable, strange, small things that they've noticed here or there in life, they'll post them, and every once in a while they'll be a picture or two.

It's just kind of fun to go through. What would it be, give me an example. Do you have any? One that I saw a couple of times is something like seeing somebody go out a door, and then 30 seconds later they come in a totally opposite door that they physically couldn't have possibly gotten through.

So how do you explain that? Just stuff like that. Like how in the actual movie, The Matrix, things would literally glitch, like you could kind of tell all of a sudden they were like ones and zeros. This is kind of like that, but it's like the program itself is lazy or something like that. I gotcha.

So, you know, the navel gazing and talking about solipsism and debating it or whatever is one thing, but if you have a mental illness, especially if you have something like schizophrenia, this idea is terrifying. It's called derealization and it's something that can happen if you suffer from paranoid schizophrenia. There are people that suffer from that that talk about sort of exactly this, like the people around them are extras or empty shells and that you and you alone are real and responsible

for the world moving on as it is and being alienated from your own body and not having a sense of self. That's all real stuff and terrifying stuff. Yeah, for sure. There's a psychologist named Clara S. Humston who kind of explains how somebody with schizophrenia might actually retreat to a solipsistic state as a way to kind of exercise control over a world that they feel like they have zero control over.

That like if you're like, nope, all of this is just in my mind and it's not real, then in a weird sense, even though as lonely and horrifying as that thought actually is, like you can feel like you can control those things then too. And that actually kind of ties into yet another argument or criticism of solipsism. If all of this is just in your mind, all of reality, how

do you explain the fact that you have no idea what's coming in the future or that you can be surprised or startled? Like none of that makes sense either. So I don't remember 30 seconds on how those two things tied together, but if I rewind, I'm sure I would find out that they did. Well, there are other disorders too that touch on other parts of solipsism. Certainly you're talking about the POS kind, the ethical solipsism. That very closely could tie into something like narcissistic personality disorder or

anti-social personality disorder, that sort of lack of empathy, and only making choices based on their own needs, that definitely is like rings of ethical solipsism. Yes. So yeah, I mean, that's pretty much solipsism. I don't think we're going to do a part two eventually. I think we've kind of put it to bed, which feels good Chuck. And since Chuck doesn't have anything else, right? I got nothing else.

I got nothing else either, so then that means of course that it brings up listener mail. This is from Yun, spelled J-A-N, but Yun is German. Hey guys, listen to the episode on Ludwig II, which I enjoyed like all your episodes. I work in research and development for wastewater technology, so I know how much work it is to research a new topic and become familiar enough to talk about it like you guys do.

And I mostly research stuff in my own field, so well done. I want to say thank you for being a steady presence throughout my PhD on waterless toilets Fatherhood the pandemic and my new job which often takes me on long road trips Love learning and your podcast allows me to broaden my horizon way beyond my normal work today However guys I have to write to assure you that filling a hall of 500 people in Germany would be I'm kind of spiel Child's play. Oh wow, okay. This is most, most people below the age of 40 here

speak English to a decent degree, and I know plenty of people that listen to your show. So please, please come to Germany. If you do, I'll make it my mission to get the event sold out. Oh wow. And let me know if you want any recommendations for decent beers while you're here.

And that is from Yun. Man, that's awesome. That was a great email, Yun. Yeah, I think we should take Yun up on that finally, Chuck. I wanna go to Germany. We've had enough people seem come to Germany. I think we have to go to like Berlin and Munich just to see what the heck is going on.

Two, huh? Yeah, we could do the big city style and then Bavarian city style. Okay, let's do it then it's it is settled And that was from young JAN. Yeah, I'm glad you said that because for my whole life I've been saying well first I said Jan and I grew up and I thought yawn. I did not know it was young Well, this is what I mean Jan in this letter said it's pronounced

Y you in in yeah, that's young for sure. That's young but Anybody's name pronounced yawn reminds me of a quote. Have you ever seen Johnny Swade? The Brad Pitt movie I never saw that Yeah, but there was a classic line in it where he's at dinner at like his date's house and the date's dad says, you know, John, if we were in Sweden, your name would be Jan Sveid. And he says, no, sir, it'd be John, Johnny Sveid. Always has been, always will be.

That's pretty good Brad Pitt. Yeah, you have to imagine Brad Pitt blankly saying this, but with a huge pompadour. It's pretty great. Not bad. Well, I think that's it. Again, thanks, Yoon, and we'll see everybody, including Yoon in Germany, eventually.

We'll figure it out. And in the meantime, if anybody out there from Germany or otherwise wants to get in touch with us, you can send us an email to stuffpodcast at iHeartRadio.com. Stuff You Should Know is a production of iHeart Radio. For more podcasts, my heart radio, visit the iHeart Radio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. runs, the conversations keep going. That's what my podcast, Post Run High, is all about. It's a chance to sit down with my guests and dive even deeper into their stories, their journeys,

and the thoughts that arise once we've hit the pavement together. Listen to Post Run High on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts. Join iHeartMedia chairman and CEO Bob Pitman for a special episode of the hit podcast, Math & Magic Stories from the Frontiers of Marketing, as he interviews the iconic and prolific Martha Stewart in front of a live audience in celebration of her 100th book. Did you ever think you were going to wind up writing 100 books? Yeah. You did? Yeah, it's just a minor goal. Listen to Math and Magic on the iHeart Radio app,

Apple podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hey everyone, this is Courtney Thorn Smith, Laura Leighton, and Daphne Zuniga. On July 8th, 1992, apartment buildings with pools were never quite the same as Melrose Place was introduced to the world. We are going to be reliving every hookup, every scandal, and every single wig removal together. So listen to Still the Place on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts.