Tangle - New York's traffic congestion pricing plan.
Episode Date: June 11, 2024New York’s congestion pricing pause. On Wednesday, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) paused a plan to implement a “congestion” toll on motorists entering Manhattan below 60th Street. The ...toll, scheduled to go into effect on June 30, was intended to relieve gridlock, improve air quality, and provide roughly $1 billion a year to the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) to modernize the city’s century-old transit infrastructure. You can read today's podcast here, our “Under the Radar” story here and today’s “Have a nice day” story here.You can catch our latest YouTube video, an interview with Alyssa Cass and Pat Rosenstiel, and their efforts to make the popular vote the official decision in electing the US President, here.We were previously publishing these episodes on our Tangle podcast page, but we just re-launched the series — and released a brand new episode — on a unique podcast channel for The Undecideds. Please give us a 5-star rating and leave a comment!Check out Episode 4 of our podcast series, The Undecideds. May 30th, 2024, just after 5pm Eastern Standard Time, a landmark moment was branded into the 247 year history of the US. For the first time ever, a former American president was found guilty of felony crimes. A jury of 12 New Yorkers deliberated for roughly 10 hours to reach a decision in a case that has people on all sides of the political spectrum debating the integrity of our justice system. In the end, Donald Trump was convicted on 34 counts of falsifying business records in an effort to influence the 2016 election. So how does this affect our undecided voters? The answers may surprise you. We gauge the impact of the verdict on Diana, Zahid, Claire, Brian, and Phil and discover that on the road to the White House, even a felony conviction doesn’t block all paths. Today’s clickables: A note about The Undecideds (0:56), Quick hits (2:57), Today’s story (4:59), Right’s take (10:05), Left’s take (14:12), Isaac’s take (17:59), Listener question (24:03), Under the Radar (25:58), Numbers (26:45), Have a nice day (28:01)You can subscribe to Tangle by clicking here or drop something in our tip jar by clicking here. Take the survey: What do you think of New York’s congestion pricing plan? Let us know! Our podcast is written by Isaac Saul and edited and engineered by Jon Lall. Music for the podcast was produced by Diet 75. Our newsletter is edited by Managing Editor Ari Weitzman, Will Kaback, Bailey Saul, Sean Brady, and produced in conjunction with Tangle’s social media manager Magdalena Bokowa, who also created our logo. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Can Indigenous ways of knowing help kids cope with online bullying?
At the University of British Columbia, we believe that they can.
Dr. Johanna Sam and her team are researching how both Indigenous and non-Indigenous youth cope with cyber-aggression,
working to bridge the diversity gap in child psychology research.
At UBC, our researchers are answering today's most pressing questions.
To learn how we're moving the world forward, visit ubc.ca forward happens here.
Based on Charles Yu's award-winning book, Interior Chinatown follows the story of Willis Wu,
a background character trapped in a police procedural who dreams about a world beyond Chinatown.
When he inadvertently becomes a witness to a crime,
Willis begins to unravel a criminal web, his family's buried history, and what it feels like to be in the spotlight.
Interior Chinatown is streaming November 19th, only on Disney+.
The flu remains a serious disease.
Last season, over 102,000 influenza cases have been reported across Canada, which is nearly double the historic average of 52,000 cases.
What can you do this flu season?
Talk to your pharmacist or doctor about getting a flu shot.
Consider FluCellVax Quad and help protect yourself from the flu.
It's the first cell-based flu vaccine authorized in Canada for ages 6 months and older,
and it may be available for free in your province.
Side effects and allergic reactions can occur, and 100% protection is not guaranteed.
Learn more at FluCcellvax.ca.
From executive producer Isaac Saul, this is Tangle.
Good morning, good afternoon, and good evening, and welcome to the Tangle Podcast,
the place we get views from across the political spectrum, some independent thinking,
and a little bit of my take. I'm your host, Isaac Saul, and on today's episode, we're going to be talking about New York City's now maybe dead congestion pricing plan. This is, to me, a really interesting policy
debate. It's something I think we could see in major cities all across the U.S. if it were to
be implemented and successful in one big major city. But it does not look like that city is
going to be New York. And we're going to talk about why and what happened. Before we jump in,
though, I do want to give you two quick heads up. The first one is really important. Those of you who are listening to
this podcast are probably fans of our Undecideds podcast, the limited podcast series where we are
following undecided voters. Up till now, we've been publishing episodes of that podcast on this
channel, but we just released episode four.
It's a brand new episode
and it is not gonna be in this channel.
It is gonna be on a unique,
independent Undecideds podcast channel.
So right now, if you want,
you need to go find the Undecideds,
look up the Undecideds in your podcast platform.
And when you look up the Undecideds, you'll see
an image with the blue on the left and red on the right and the words The Undecideds in big white
bold letters. That is our new podcast channel for that podcast. What would be really great for us
is if you went, click that podcast channel, subscribe, and even took a couple seconds just
to rate the podcast, obviously,
give us five stars. That would help get us and get this podcast into other people's feed. So again,
the Undecideds will not be showing up here on the Tangle podcast channel anymore. We want to make sure it's a separate thing. And you can just go find it by looking up the Undecideds really quick
and subscribing to the channel. We would very much appreciate it. So that's big, number one. Number two is just that we have a new
YouTube video up of my interview with a Democrat and Republican who are fighting to make the next
election a national popular vote election for the President of the United States. We released a
transcript of that to
subscribers only a few weeks back, but now the entire interview is up on our YouTube channel.
I encourage you to go check it out. All right, with that out of the way,
I'm going to pass it over to John for today's main story, and I'll be back for my take.
Thank you, Isaac, and welcome, everybody. Here are your quick hits for today.
First up, a Delaware jury found Hunter Batting guilty on three felony counts of lying on a federal firearms application in 2018. Number two, the United Nations Security Council adopted a
U.S.-led resolution calling on Hamas to accept a ceasefire and hostage
release plan offered by Israel. Number three, Teamsters President Sean O'Brien has asked to
speak at both the Republican and Democratic national conventions this year as Joe Biden
and Donald Trump seek the union's endorsement. Number four, the port of Baltimore's main shipping
channel fully reopened on Monday after a massive cleanup effort following the
collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge. At number five, Malawi's Vice President Salos
Chalima and nine others were killed in a plane crash in northern Malawi.
Well, this is a major development.
Congestion pricing will not go into effect here in New York City at the end of this month after all. New York's Governor Kathy Hochul announced today that this first of its kind initiative is postponed indefinitely.
The MTA head, Jano Lieber, making his first public comment since Governor Hochul's bombshell
abrupt decision to pause congestion pricing.
He said that the news was incredibly difficult and that the MTA will try to figure out funding
without the tolling plan.
Bottom line, this phase of the MTA's work is a huge challenge and I have a great team
that is going to be laser focused
on working on this. It may feel right now like things are a little crazy and even that there's
a crisis, but we need to stay focused so that we can maximize the situation for our riders.
They are our focus right now. That is where our heads are at.
riders. They are our focus right now. That is where our heads are at.
On Wednesday, New York Governor Kathy Hochul paused a plan to implement a congestion toll on motorists entering Manhattan below 60th Street. The toll, scheduled to go into effect on June 30th,
was intended to relieve gridlock, improve air quality, and provide roughly $1 billion a year
to the Metropolitan Transit
Authority, more commonly known as the MTA, to modernize the city's century-old transit
infrastructure. The pricing plan would have charged different rates for different vehicles,
including a $15 charge for passenger vehicles entering the city. Some exemptions or credits
would have been included for low-income drivers who live in the congestion zone or who had paid
tolls to enter the city through the Lincoln or Holland tunnels. Prices also would have been included for low-income drivers who live in the congestion zone or who had paid tolls to enter the city through the Lincoln or Holland tunnels.
Prices also would have varied based on the time of day peaking at rush hour.
Other major cities around the world, including Stockholm, London, and Singapore, have established congestion pricing programs, but New York's plan would have been the first of its kind in the U.S.
The pause does not require a legislative sign-off. Hochul only needs approval
from the MTA's 23-member board, which she controls. But the state Senate and Assembly
must approve legislation to make up for the revenue loss of the MTA. The governor's office
suggested that Hochul could temporarily tap the state's reserves to cover the funds and is
exploring increasing taxes on New York City businesses as a long-term solution.
Congestion pricing in New York City was first conceived in 1952,
but has remained mired in debate and competing proposals for decades.
In 2019, then-Governor Andrew Cuomo and the state legislature reached a deal to enact congestion pricing in Manhattan, but the rollout was delayed for years.
Just weeks ago, Hochul reaffirmed her support for the plan,
calling it critical to making cities more livable. In anticipation of the plan going into effect,
the MTA installed cameras, sensors, and license plate readers and signed a $500 million contract
with a private vendor to operate the tolling infrastructure. Hochul said concerns over
inflation and New York's post-COVID economy led to the last-minute change of plans. Let's be real. A $15 charge may not mean a lot to someone who has the means, but it can
break the budget of a working or middle-class household, she said in a video announcing the
decision. I cannot add another burden to the working middle-class New Yorkers or create another
obstacle to our continued economic recovery from the COVID pandemic.
The plan has long been derided by Republicans, including former President Trump,
but has also attracted the ire of Democrats.
Before the pause was announced, Politico reported that House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries raised concerns with Hochul about the plan's political blowback to Democrats
in vulnerable House districts in an effort to delay its implementation.
Recent polling also found congestion pricing is broadly unpopular, with New Yorkers living
both inside and just outside of the city.
Proponents of congestion pricing expressed shock at Hochul's decision, calling it a
betrayal after decades of work to implement the plan.
We've been blindsided, said Kate Slevin, executive vice president of the Regional Plan
Association, an urban planning nonprofit in New York. It's a betrayal of millions of transit riders and the future of New York's
climate and economy. The plan also faced numerous legal challenges, including a lawsuit brought by
New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy, who alleged the U.S. Department of Transportation and the Federal
Highway Administration did not conduct a proper environmental review of the plan. These cases,
however, did not appear to impact Hochul's decision to order the pause. Congestion pricing would have provided the
largest source of funding for the MTA's $51.5 billion capital program. The agency planned to
borrow against the $1 billion of expected congestion pricing revenue to sell $15 billion
of debt to pay for service improvements. Now, critical upgrades and
repairs to transit lines will take priority over planned initiatives for electric buses,
accessible stations, and new track signals. Today, we'll look at reactions to Hochul's
decision from the right and the left, and then Isaac's take.
We'll be right back after this quick commercial break.
Looking for more than just politics but want balance coverage just like Tangle?
Interested in what's happening in the world of finance, economics, and world and business news?
Well, we've got the answer.
TheDailyUpside.com. Founded and authored by a team of career journalists, experienced investment bankers, and finance professionals,
the team over at Tangle reads TheDailyUpside.com every day. It's your direct line to exclusive
news, analysis, and commentary on global business news. Recent headlines include Canada slashes
interest rates, Europe likely to follow
suit, what's that smell, the FDA reverses its ban on e-cigarette Juul, and Sam Altman-backed
startup is forging a nuclear energy deal with OpenAI. You can join over 1 million daily readers
who choose smart, actionable market news, and you can subscribe to The Daily Upside for free.
Just go to thedailyupside.com.
Based on Charles Yu's award-winning book, Interior Chinatown follows the story of Willis Wu,
a background character trapped in a police procedural who dreams about a world beyond
Chinatown. When he inadvertently becomes a witness to a crime,
Willis begins to unravel a criminal web,
his family's buried history,
and what it feels like to be in the spotlight.
Interior Chinatown is streaming November 19th,
only on Disney+. The flu remains a serious disease.
Last season, over 102,000 influenza cases
have been reported across Canada,
which is nearly double the historic average
of 52,000 cases.
What can you do this flu season?
Talk to your pharmacist or doctor about getting a flu shot.
Consider FluCellVax Quad and help protect yourself from the flu.
It's the first cell-based flu vaccine authorized in Canada
for ages six months and older,
and it may be available for free in your province.
Side effects and allergic reactions can occur,
and 100% protection is not guaranteed.
Learn more at FluCcellvax.ca.
First up, let's start with what the right is saying.
The right welcomes the decision, but says Hochul needs to completely scrap the idea.
Some suggest the saga reflects poorly on Hochul regardless of the outcome.
Others note the about-face will still cost the city millions, but with nothing to show for it. The New York Post
editorial board offered kudos for Hochul's congestion toll U-turn. Now make sure it's dead
for good. Bravo, Governor, for recognizing that New Yorkers can't afford to be squeezed in yet
another way by the state. Although Hochul did support congestion
pricing, it wasn't her brainchild. Thank ex-governor Andrew Cuomo for that. So she could be forgiven
for a tactical and graceful retreat, if it sticks, the board wrote. The delay was the obvious choice
politically in an election year. A whopping 63% of New Yorkers are against it, and the plan faced
opposition from everyone from the teachers union to members of Hochul's own party. Yet she's treating it only as bad timing.
Times are hard, and the city is still bouncing back from COVID shutdowns,
but signaling that the tolls could return under the right circumstances.
The fees would slam all New Yorkers, not just drivers, slowing tourism and slamming businesses.
That's all still going to be true even if the
city's economic outlook improves, the board added. Address the MTA's funding woes without pilfering
the pockets of hardworking New Yorkers. The governor should insist the MTA get its financial
house in order and that local district attorneys crack down on the fare beaters who are costing
the system millions per year. The governor deserves big props for listening to her constituents
and reading the post. Now, send congestion pricing to the bad ideas graveyard once and for all. In City Journal,
John Ketchum argued Hochul's last-minute pause on congestion pricing demonstrates chaotic leadership.
Setting aside the merits of congestion pricing, which have been debated for decades,
Hochul's abrupt cancellation of a progressive-favored policy has led some on the
left to question her leadership. The governor's clumsy handling is yet another example of the
political ineptitude that has marked her tenure, Ketchum said. Hochul stressed that the resulting
revenues would be used to improve the MTA's aging infrastructure, but tying the plan to the MTA's
funding enabled opponents to characterize it as a cash grab for the
dismally inefficient authority, not a genuine attempt to boost Manhattanites' quality of
life by reducing vehicular congestion.
Staring down the barrel of repeat electoral embarrassment that could potentially spill
over into New Jersey and Connecticut districts, the governor decided that backlash from congestion
pricing advocates would amount to less of a political hit in November than motivating suburban auto commuters, public employees, Republicans, and other opponents to
come out to the polls, Ketchum wrote. Unlike her predecessor in the governor's office, Hochul lacks
the political capital and the will to see her priorities through. In the remote chance that
she eventually unpauses congestion pricing, she will look yet more indecisive.
In the Washington Examiner, Carter Shrope criticized Hochul's weak congestion pricing backtrack.
Given the large number of people and organizations present on either side of the matter,
the Metropolitan Transit Authority, climate activists, unions, politicians, and citizens,
it's fair to say Hochul was in a tough spot, Schroep said.
But to backtrack at the 11th hour like this, with the MTA having already purchased $500 million
of equipment for tolling, is clearly representative of her ineffectual governance. If there was ever
a possibility that the plan had problems or would need to be disposed of, why spend the money and
drag New Yorkers through this controversy in the first place? The sunk costs here are immense. The reversal comes as positive news to many and is indeed
the correct choice, but the evident mishandling of the situation proves Hochul isn't fit for office,
Schroep wrote. Inherent to Hochul's decision is the disconnect she has with her constituents.
A Siena College survey from April found that 64% of people living in New York oppose the plan.
To charge someone for the grand crime of driving into certain neighborhoods is to impose on their liberty.
Alright, that's it for what the right is saying, which brings us to what the left is saying.
All right, that's it for what the right is saying, which brings us to what the left is saying.
The left is critical of Hochul's decision, arguing it sends a troubling signal to other U.S. cities.
Some frame the decision as an own goal in pursuit of fleeting political gain.
Others say the episode highlights Democratic leaders' struggle to govern effectively.
In the New York Times, Tom Wright and Kate Slevin wrote,
Kathy Hochul just upended a lot more than congestion pricing.
Hochul's action raises questions about whether congestion pricing,
which was set to begin at the end of the month, will ever happen.
It will mean continued congestion on some of the world's most traffic-stymied streets and no relief from the air pollution and auto and truck exhaust, Wright and Slevin wrote.
The idea had essentially universal support from environmentalists, transit advocates, economists, and policy experts.
The fee was expected to reduce traffic in the city's core by as many as 120,000 vehicles a day,
significantly improve traffic congestion, and reduce the exhaust that is fouling Manhattan's air.
Hochul has said she wants to postpone the program.
For how long, she hasn't said, because of the lingering economic impacts of the pandemic.
But investing in transit and ending seamlessly endless traffic headaches
is exactly what our region needs to continue to recover.
New York has been leading the way on congestion pricing in the United States,
and this sends the wrong message to other cities trying to untangle their traffic and mass transit problems.
Incurbed, Justin Davidson said, Hochul blew it. New York City should lead the world in urban
transformation, as it did when it created a central water supply system in the 1840s,
mapped out an expanding grid of streets, built the subways, fast-tracked the technology of
high-rise construction, developed a legal framework to control it, and enshrined historic preservation in law, Davidson wrote.
Congestion pricing should have marked one of those moments when the city acted wisely
to shape its own looming future, to start finally liberating itself from a century of
obeisance to the internal combustion engine.
Instead, it's given craven politicians one more irresistible chance to blow it.
Like many imperfect but necessary
innovations, congestion pricing doesn't pull well, but it's a crucial tool that ultimately
benefits everyone by making city streets more navigable and safer, while making it easier for
both those who do drive and the non-driving masses to get around, Davidson wrote. If all the effort
and collaboration turns out to have been wasted, if Hochul's capricious delay devolves into permanent collapse, then why would anyone bother waging such a protracted battle
again? In Slow Boring, Matthew Iglesias explored the large crisis of deep blue governance underneath
Hochul's decision. I'm both very frustrated with Kathy Hochul's efforts to kill New York City
congestion pricing at the last minute, and also sort of weirdly
sympathetic to her. At some level, she's just trying to help House Democrats win races on Long
Island, a worthy and important goal. The congestion pricing plan isn't popular there, and she is
prioritizing policy modernization and winning over idealistic pursuit of a niche interest group goal,
Iglesias said. But as someone who really likes congestion pricing, I'm annoyed that transportation reformers' ox is the one getting gored here. Congestion pricing was always a
political risk. We know from London, Stockholm, and Oslo that voters resist the idea of paying
for something that they're accustomed to getting for free. But we also know from these cities that
once congestion pricing is in place, it's proved reasonably popular and politically durable,
Iglesias wrote. Now,
New York is not addressing its major housing problems or transportation problems, and it's
had a U-turn on criminal justice reform thanks to a state leadership that can't set priorities
or get things done. And now let's head over to Isaac for his take.
All right, that is it for what the right and the left are saying, which brings us to my take.
So whenever we go through a stretch of news dominated by court trials, wars, and scandal, I always feel relieved to just have a good old-fashioned policy debate.
First and foremost, my baseline position here is that Governor Kathy Hochul should have seen
this experiment through, even if it were for a much more limited time or at a cheaper price point.
I say that just to offer an alternative solution to Hochul's political problem
before passing any judgment on the efficacy of the policy.
Even the people arguing that congestion pricing was going to be a net negative public policy have not argued that it was going to be so bad or so dangerous that we absolutely could not let
it go through under any circumstances. Given the relative political risk and the sunk financial
cost and irrespective of whether it was going to work exactly as planned or not,
I think Hochul was past the point of no return when she decided to pull the plug on this idea.
Now, New York is unprepared to navigate the MTA's budget shortfall and has wasted an unbelievable
amount of time, money, and political capital getting a potential solution this far just to
have the rug pulled out from under it at the 11th hour. That being said,
the debate about the policy is robust and interesting. To me, the most compelling points
against the policy are the following. A healthy majority of New York City residents, about 64%
according to Siena College and 72% of New Yorkers from the suburbs, oppose the idea. Living in New
York is already unbelievably
expensive and congestion pricing would just have made it even harder for any commuters who rely on
cars, especially the working poor who drive into the city regularly. All of the $1 billion a year
this could generate would go directly to the MTA, which already has a $7.8 billion payroll
and seems to be bloated and dysfunctional. In a similar vein,
there are some details on what the MTA is going to do, but I'd certainly appreciate more. What
will get prioritized and how will the upfront costs benefit the city in the long term? Can the
MTA spend the money efficiently given labor and construction costs in New York right now? Can it
get to a point where this money is used so effectively we can put current funding sources to other things? These answers aren't totally clear.
And finally, the New York's teacher union, the New York Republicans, the NAACP, voters from
Long Island and New Jersey, and major trucking companies all came together to fight this plan,
an illustration of the broad and diverse swath of people who opposed it, which always
gives me pause. On the other side, I think the most compelling arguments for congestion pricing
are the following. Congestion pricing was unpopular in other major cities until it went into effect
and voters saw its effectiveness. While everyday New Yorkers might be resistant to it just as they
would be of any toll, transit experts, economists, policy experts,
and environmentalists overwhelmingly support the idea. Virtually no poor New Yorkers are driving
into the city, and the burden would fall mostly on well-off outer borough New Yorkers and major
companies. As the Community Service Society put it, quote, our analysis found that just four percent
of the city's outer borough working residents commute to jobs
in Manhattan by vehicle and could be subject to a congestion fee. This compares with 56% of outer
borough residents who use mass transit to commute to work in Manhattan, the other boroughs, or
outside the city. And lastly, not doing anything has its own economic cost. Horrible traffic actually
hurts economic output, and air pollution has very
real health costs. Broken and dysfunctional subway and bus systems also hurt economic output.
Given all that, implementing a bold plan would have appealed to New York pride. As Justin Davidson
said, this city should lead the world in urban transformation and experimental ideas like this.
Oddly enough, I think that last
argument is the one that sticks with me the most. Jody Avergon, a New York City journalist,
podcaster, and my longtime friend put it like this. The political caving is not surprising,
but more than anything, this feels like part of a real, we can't try big things in this country
anymore story, which is kind of the story of my lifetime.
I'm not 100% sure this was good public policy. I just think that it could have been,
and I would have at least been curious to see how it played out. Maybe over the long term,
the city would have adjusted and perfected the policy. For instance, the working poor could
have applied to have their license plates exempted from the toll rather than just have
some discounts applied as the plan currently calls for. Maybe tourists get one free pass a year,
or the city can let trucks serving certain industries in at a discounted rate.
Perhaps the congestion zone of lower Manhattan could be expanded or contracted, or pricing plans
could have come with specific requirements from the MTA to trim its costs and better protect
against fare beaters. I'm not sure exactly how this process of calibration would come about, mostly because we never got a chance to see
the policy actually go into effect. To me, that unknown is my greatest disappointment. Congestion
pricing could have been a broadly unpopular $1 billion revenue driver that became more popular,
normal, and welcome over time. We could have gotten to a
place where the policy did minimum harm and maximum good, and the people paying the majority
of the fare were the abundance of wealthy New Yorkers and successful corporations who just
genuinely didn't care all that much about an extra $15. Or, conversely, it could have flopped,
and we could have learned a good lesson and at least been able to say we tried something innovative and daring and big.
But instead, there was no attempt and no courage, just a lot of wasted time and resources, and now a lot of useless cameras and idle toll collection equipment all over midtown Manhattan.
We'll be right back after this quick break. Burton Lee becomes a witness to a crime, Willis begins to unravel a criminal web, his family's buried history,
and what it feels like to be in the spotlight.
Interior Chinatown is streaming November 19th,
only on Disney+.
The flu remains a serious disease.
Last season, over 102,000 influenza cases
have been reported across Canada,
which is nearly double the historic average
of 52,000 cases.
What can you do this flu season?
Talk to your pharmacist or doctor
about getting a flu shot. Consider FluCellVax Quad and help protect yourself from the flu.
It's the first cell-based flu vaccine authorized in Canada for ages six months and older,
and it may be available for free in your province. Side effects and allergic reactions can occur,
and 100% protection is not guaranteed. Learn more at flucellvax.ca.
Alright, that is it for my take, which brings us to your questions answered.
This one's from Penelope in Battlement, Mesa, Colorado. Penelope said,
In Tangle recently, Trump was referred to as President Trump. I strongly object to that. Perhaps former president is better. Still, Mr. Trump is not our president,
and hopefully will not be again. Okay, so this is funny. I get this comment surprisingly often,
and I also get the sense, Penelope, that you're not a very big fan of former President Trump,
so let me just try and be as clear as possible. Every person who has ever
served the office of President retains the title. We refer to everyone from President Obama all the
way back to President Washington by the highest office they've ever served in their careers.
If neither had served as President, then they would be referred to as Senator Obama and General
Washington to reflect those next highest, highest titles. For that
reason, regardless of how you feel about him, President Donald Trump will always be referred
to as President Trump, and that includes by us. And when we speak about him in the newsletter as
a candidate running for office, we will refer to him as former President Trump, just so we can
disambiguate him with his main political rival, sitting President Joe Biden. I get that you
object to President Trump having been our president and that he is not the current chief executive,
but every person has objected to at least one of our presidents and they still have earned the
respect of being addressed with that title, including deeply unpopular presidents like
Herbert Hoover or those who were marred by controversy like President Richard Nixon.
So even if he does not
win re-election in 2024, former President Trump will still be, and will always be, President Trump.
All right, that is it for your questions answered. I'm going to send it back to John for the rest of
the pod. Don't forget to go check out and subscribe to The Undecideds, and I'll be back here tomorrow.
and I'll be back here tomorrow.
Thanks, Isaac.
Here's your Under the Radar story for today, folks.
Gun suicides have consistently outpaced gun homicides in the U.S. for every year over the past 25 years,
according to new CDC figures.
The U.S. saw 27,000 gun suicides in 2022
compared to 19,700 gun homicides. While suicide impulses are often
brief, widely accessible guns can make them easier to act on and harder to survive, which is why gun
suicides account for more than half of all suicides in the U.S. Axios has this story, and there's a
link in today's episode description. If you or someone you know needs support now, call or text 988 or chat with someone at 988lifeline.org.
All right, next up is our numbers section. The year Singapore implemented the world's
first urban congestion pricing program was 1975. The approximate number of daily riders on New York City's subway
and bus systems in 2023 is 5 million. The expected reduction in vehicles entering Manhattan's central
business district as a result of New York's congestion pricing plan is minus 17 percent,
equivalent to 153,000 vehicles, according to the MTA review board. The amount that large trucks would be charged to enter Midtown Manhattan under the plan is $35. The amount Uber, Lyft, and other
rideshares would be charged to enter Midtown Manhattan under the plan is $2.50. The percentage
of registered voters in New York City who said they opposed the congestion pricing plan is 64%,
according to an April 2024 Siena College poll. The percentage of registered
voters in New York City suburbs who said they oppose the plan is 72%. The percentage of New
York voters who said they would travel to Manhattan less often if congestion pricing
plans were implemented is 14%. And Governor Kathy Hochul's favorable-unfavorable rating
in April 2024 was 40-49%, her lowest ever.
And last but not least, our Have a Nice Day story.
Mesh fishing nets are a popular tool for deep-sea fishers, but they are nearly invisible in the water,
meaning that other animals often get caught and become unwanted bycatch.
An estimated 300,000 small whales, dolphins,
and porpoises die each year from getting entangled in fishing nets, according to the World Wildlife
Fund. But this problem has sparked a few creative solutions. A group of German marine biologists
have threaded nets with tiny acrylic glass beads that make a noise to alert animals of their
presence. Meanwhile, researchers in Baja, California in Mexico
found a 63% bycatch reduction
using nets illuminated by green lights.
Nice News has this story
and there's a link in today's episode description.
All right, everybody, that is it for today's episode.
As always, if you'd like to support our work,
you can go to readtangle.com and sign up for a membership.
As Isaac mentioned at the top,
episode four of The Undecideds is out.
This time we talked with our undecided voters
about the Trump verdict
and their feelings and observations around it.
This episode is now on its own dedicated page
and there are links in today's episode description
for you to go check it out.
Also on our YouTube channel,
a Friday edition that had appeared a few weeks ago with Alyssa Cass and Pat
Rosensteil is now available to watch in its entirety. So you can head over to our YouTube
channel to check that out. If you haven't subscribed to our YouTube channel, please go do
that. And for the Undecideds page, it would be so helpful and really incredible if you could give us
a five-star rating and leave some positive feedback for us in the comments section there.
We'll be right back here tomorrow.
For Isaac and the rest of the crew, this is John Law signing off.
Have a great day, y'all.
Peace.
Our podcast is written by me, Isaac Saul, and edited and engineered by John Law.
The script is edited by our managing editor, Ari Weitzman,
Will Kabak, Bailey Saul, and Sean Brady.
The logo for our podcast was designed by Magdalena Bacopa,
who is also our social media manager.
Music for the podcast was produced by Diet75.
If you're looking for more from Tangle,
please go to readtangle.com and check out our website.