Tangle - SPECIAL EDITION: The third Republican debate.
Episode Date: November 9, 2023The third Republican debate. On Wednesday night, five Republican candidates took the stage in Miami, Florida, to debate foreign policy, abortion, former President Donald Trump's record, and the ec...onomy. To qualify for the third debate, candidates needed to poll above 4% in either two national surveys or in one national survey and two surveys from early-nominating states. Each candidate also needed to receive more than 70,000 individual donations. The Iowa caucuses for Republicans begin in just over two months. On stage were Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy, South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott, and former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie. Former President Trump, who is leading in the polls, skipped the debate for the third time.You can read today's podcast here and today’s “Have a nice day” story here. You can also check out our latest YouTube video, an interview with Rep. Dean Phillips and his bid for the Democratic Presidential nomination here, and a sizzle reel of our first ever Tangle Live event from August 2023, here.Today’s clickables: Announcements (0:36), Quick hits (1:40), Today’s story (3:41), Tim Scott (5:37), Chris Christie (8:05), Vivek Ramaswamy (10:19), Nikki Haley (13:20), Ron DeSantis (16:06), Left’s take (19:38), Right’s take (22:50), Isaac’s take (26:06), Numbers (31:46), Have a nice day (32:58)You can subscribe to Tangle by clicking here or drop something in our tip jar by clicking here. Take the poll. Who do you think was the winner of last night's debate? Let us know!Our podcast is written by Isaac Saul and edited and engineered by Jon Lall. Music for the podcast was produced by Diet 75. Our newsletter is edited by Managing Editor Ari Weitzman, Will Kaback, Bailey Saul, Sean Brady, and produced in conjunction with Tangle’s social media manager Magdalena Bokowa, who also created our logo.--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/tanglenews/message Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Based on Charles Yu's award-winning book, Interior Chinatown follows the story of Willis
Wu, a background character trapped in a police procedural who dreams about a world beyond
Chinatown.
When he inadvertently becomes a witness to a crime, Willis begins to unravel a criminal
web, his family's buried history, and what it feels like to be in the spotlight.
Interior Chinatown is streaming November 19th, only on Disney+.
The flu remains a serious disease.
Last season, over 102,000 influenza cases have been reported across Canada, which is Chinatown is streaming November 19th, only on Disney+. yourself from the flu. It's the first cell-based flu vaccine authorized in Canada for ages six months and older, and it may be available for free in your province. Side effects and allergic reactions can occur, and 100% protection is not guaranteed. Learn more at flucellvax.ca.
From executive producer Isaac Saul, this is Tangle.
Good morning, good afternoon, and good evening, and welcome to the Tangle podcast, a place where you get news from across the political spectrum, some independent thinking, and a little bit of Isaac's take. I am your host for today, John Law, and today we're going to be
talking about last night's Republican presidential debates. A quick reminder before we get started,
typically we'd be off tomorrow, Friday, in observance of Veterans Day, which is November 11th,
but we are going to be releasing a contentious Israel-Palestine
debate on our YouTube channel and the podcast. I am currently in the midst of editing both of
those right now, and it is worth taking a look at. It got pretty intense. Both of our guests
definitely had some very strong opinions on the subject. For our paid subscribers, keep an eye out for an email with links to watch and listen.
And if you're not a paid subscriber, it's a good opportunity to jump in.
We are going to be having a lot of great content coming up.
And it's also a really great way to show us that you support what we do here at Tangle.
So, you know, take a minute, head over to our website, readtangle.com and
sign up for a membership. All right, with all that out of the way, we're going to jump in today
with our quick hits. First up, Israel continued its offensive in Gaza City yesterday with numerous
clashes reported between Israel's army and Hamas militants in residential areas. Meanwhile, U.S. Secretary of State Antony
Blinken called for a united Palestinian-led government for the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.
Number two, House Republicans subpoenaed Hunter Biden and James Biden, the president's brother,
as part of their impeachment inquiry. Number three, Ivanka Trump testified in the New York civil fraud trial that is investigating the Trump organization.
Number four, in the wake of Tuesday's elections, Democrats are moving swiftly to add abortion-related
ballot measures to the 2024 elections. And number five, the union representing Hollywood actors
struck a tentative deal with major studios last night, effectively ending the writers and actors strike that has brought the industry to a standstill.
Donald Trump's a lot different guy than he was in 2016. He owes it to you to be on this stage and explain why he should get another chance.
And he said Republicans were going to get tired of winning.
Well, we saw last night, I'm sick of Republicans losing.
Well, I can talk about President Trump.
I can tell you that I think he was the right president at the right time.
I don't think he's the right president now.
And I am upset about what happened last night. We've become a party of losers at the end
of the day. We're the cancer of the Republican establishment.
We need a president and a candidate who will actually help our base solidify and
attract independent voters into our party. I'll say this about Donald Trump. Anybody who's going to be
spending the next year and a half of their life focusing on keeping themselves out of jail and
courtrooms cannot lead this party or this country. It needs to be said plainly. What would you do?
What would you be urging? On Wednesday night, five Republican candidates took to the stage
in Miami, Florida to debate foreign policy, abortion, former President Donald Trump's record, and the economy. To qualify for the third debate,
candidates needed to poll above 4% in either two national surveys or in one national survey and
two surveys from early nominating states. Each candidate also needed to receive more than 70,000
individual donations. The Iowa caucuses for Republicans begin in just over two months.
On stage were Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley,
entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy, South Carolina Senator Tim Scott, and former New Jersey Governor
Chris Christie. Former President Trump, who is leading in the polls, skipped the debate for the
third time. Throughout the debate, the candidates were asked questions about the war in Ukraine, the unfolding conflict in Israel, Tuesday's election
results, anti-Semitism on college campuses, abortion, economic growth, and former President
Donald Trump's record. The mood of the night was testy, with several candidates calling out
Republicans' underperformance in the last two elections and demanding new leadership.
For the first time, three of the five candidates criticized Trump directly, framing him as a political loser and a different person
than he was in 2016. Haley and Ramaswamy in particular sparred throughout the night,
with Ramaswamy at one point invoking Haley's daughter and her use of TikTok, and Haley
calling Ramaswamy scum in response. As we did with the first and second debates,
today we're going to get out of our normal format and highlight each candidate,
from least to most popular in the national polling average,
and briefly recap their highs and lows from the night.
Then we'll share views from the left and the right, and then Isaac's take.
We'll be right back. First up, we have Tim Scott, who's currently polling at 2.2% in the polls.
Scott, the 58-year-old South Carolina senator, often seemed listless on the stage,
especially on a night when his counterparts were highly engaged and animated from their opening remarks.
Faith was a central theme in his answers, and he stressed the need for a cultural and spiritual rebirth in American society.
He largely stood by the positions on Ukraine, immigration, abortion, and the economy that he shared in previous debates,
but was often evasive when pressed by moderators for explicit stances on issues like new funding
for Ukraine. Though he grew more energetic as the debate progressed, Scott seemed relegated
to the fringes of many discussions. Still, he managed to articulate clear conservative positions
on many of the issues most important to GOP voters. Some notable moments for Scott, he opened
by drawing attention to the
need for the GOP to attract more independent voters to the party, saying that as president,
he would work to restore faith and Christian values to U.S. society. He came out forcefully
in support of Israel's military campaign in Gaza, arguing the country has a responsibility and a
right to wipe Hamas off the map by whatever means necessary. He said Biden's Middle East policy amounted to an appeasement through diplomacy
and called for strikes against Iran in response to attacks on U.S. military personnel in Syria.
On Ukraine, he said the president needed to better explain to Americans
how U.S. aid is being spent in the country, but stated his support for the fight against Russia.
When pressed on whether he would support additional funding to Ukraine, though,
Scott sidestepped the question.
Speaking to college administrators on campuses that have seen anti-Israel protests in recent weeks,
Scott said federal funding is a privilege, not a right,
adding that he would deport any foreign students on visas who express support for Hamas.
In a prolonged exchange with moderator Lester Holt on the economy
and cost of living issues, Scott made a spirited case that removing barriers to harnessing America's
energy resources is key to driving down prices in all other areas of life, arguing that consumer
confidence in future abundance would naturally lower prices for most goods. Finally, Scott said
he would not support raising the retirement age
for Social Security benefits and proposed a return to pre-COVID levels of spending to free
up money to sustain entitlement programs. He also reiterated his call for a 15-week
national abortion ban and pressed other candidates on stage to get behind the proposal.
All right, next up we have Chris Christie, who is polling at 3.1% in the polls.
Christie, the 61-year-old former governor of New Jersey, gave direct answers to the questions posed
by the moderators, outlining a vision for strong American leadership in global conflicts and
advocating for a number of reforms to domestic policies on key issues like border security,
entitlements, and energy. Though he remained a
vocal critic of Trump, Christie's responses were more issue-oriented than they had been in past
debates, and he pointed to his record as a governor to illustrate many of his policy positions.
The relatively smaller candidate pool on stage also enabled Christie to weigh in on virtually
every topic covered in the debate, but he eschewed personal attacks and was relegated to the
background during the most animated moments of the night. In a departure from the first two debates,
he was not asked about either aliens or AI. Some notable moments for Chris Christie. He stated his
unequivocal support for Israel in its military response to Hamas's attack. Speaking to Israeli
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, he said, America is here, no matter what it is you need at any time to preserve the state of Israel.
Similarly, he gave his full support to continued Ukraine funding, suggesting the U.S. has a
responsibility as the leader of the free world to defend all our democratic allies abroad.
Asked about how he would respond to Muslim Americans who say they fear for their safety
in the U.S. right now,
Christie invoked his experience as the U.S. attorney for New Jersey after 9-11,
saying he worked to develop strong relationships with Muslim communities to ensure their well-being in the aftermath of the attacks.
When discussing how he would respond to the threat posed by social media apps like TikTok and spreading disinformation,
Christie said TikTok is not only spyware,
it is polluting the minds of American young people. He added that he would ban TikTok in his first week in office. On border security, Christie called for more resources and technology
to be sent to the southern border and said he would sign an executive order to direct the
National Guard to partner with Border Patrol to better enforce immigration laws. On abortion,
Christie reiterated his stance that the issue should be decided at the state level and argued Republicans need to show that they are pro-life for the whole life and not just during pregnancy.
Alright, next up is Vivek Ramaswamy, who is currently polling at 5.3% in the polls.
Ramaswamy, the 38-year-old entrepreneur, had another night of
personal attacks and positioning himself as outside the mainstream of the Republican Party.
He again brawled with Nikki Haley, drawing real indignation from the former UN ambassador and
boos from the crowd, and also picked fights with Governor Ron DeSantis. Throughout the night,
Ramaswamy dropped a handful of references to some more niche online ideas like Elon Musk or Joe Rogan moderating a debate, DeSantis wearing
lifts in his boots, and that the DNC is secretly planning to replace Biden as their nominee.
A theme throughout his answers was that the current political moment calls for a
CEO of the next generation, telling a narrative of a Republican party that is losing
on the issues and needs a change at the top. Some notable moments for Ramaswamy. In response
to his opening question, Ramaswamy attacked the debate moderators, asking NBC News' Kristen
Welker to defend her reporting on the Trump-Russia collusion story. Ramaswamy was on the attack all
night. At one point, he said there is a cancer in the Republican Party that's been losing them elections since 2018, seemingly queuing up a real refutation of Donald
Trump. Instead, he said the person Republicans should blame was RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel.
Several attendees said that they then saw him arguing with McDaniel from the stage
after the debate. He drew boos from the crowd for telling Nikki Haley to
take care of your family first because her daughter used TikTok,
provoking a contemptuous response of, you're just scum, from Haley.
Like most candidates, Ramaswamy was highly critical of southern border security and the
Mexican government for the fentanyl crisis, but went further in calling fentanyl deaths
poisonings and calling Mexican President Andres
Obrador a failed leader. He then went another step further, saying that we should be proactive
and build a wall on our northern border with Canada too. On Israel, he said that the state
is an ally with the right to self-determination, but differentiated himself on the position of
anti-Israel protests on college campuses. He said that pro-Hamas protesters are fools that need to be won over with leadership,
but shouldn't be responded to with censorship.
On Ukraine, Ramaswamy cautioned against drawing ourselves into World War III and said that
we have to stop sending aid to a corrupt country.
The war between Russia and Ukraine was not good versus evil, he said, calling Ukraine no paragon of democracy
and implying that the territories Russia has occupied since 2014
are not legitimately Ukrainian.
Ramaswamy's position on abortion was similar to every other candidate aside from Scott,
saying the unborn have a right to life, that we shouldn't pursue a federal ban,
and we should support more programs for contraception and adoption. He criticized Republicans for having a losing message on abortion and added
that men need to be more responsible for births, resulting from supporting unwanted pregnancies.
Okay, next up is Nikki Haley, who is polling at 8.7% in the polls. Haley, the 51-year-old former ambassador to the United Nations,
was a key player in the debate amid a recent surge in her poll numbers. She called for sustained U.S.
support of allies Israel and Ukraine while condemning Russia, China, and Iran for their
roles in ongoing global conflicts. On domestic issues, she sharply criticized President Biden
while seeking to distinguish her positions from others on the stage, particularly Ron DeSantis. Once again,
her most memorable moments came during back-and-forths with Vivek Ramaswamy,
though this time Ramaswamy was the one initiating the clashes. On the whole,
Haley sought to bolster her image as a leader with deep executive and foreign policy experience
while also speaking to cultural issues that ignite the GOP's conservative base. Some notable moments for
Haley. She covered a range of key issues in her opening remarks, touching on cost of living
expenses, anti-Semitism on college campuses, border security, and crime. She also led with
an attack on Trump, saying, Trump was the right president at the time in 2016, but I don't think he's the right president right now.
On Israel, she said the U.S. should have three goals in the conflict.
The elimination of Hamas, consistent support of Israel in its fight,
and the safe return of U.S. citizens held hostage by Hamas.
She added that America is relying on Israel as the tip of the spear, leading the fight
against emerging threats in the Middle East like Iran, which she painted as part of an unholy
alliance with China and Russia. Discussing the possibility of a war with China over Taiwan,
Haley said the U.S. needs to modernize its military and sever relations with China in
areas like trade and land purchases. She also claimed that the best deterrence the U.S.
can offer against a Chinese attack on Taiwan is ongoing support to Ukraine, which demonstrates
America's willingness to support democratic allies in global conflicts. Haley repeatedly
framed herself as a pragmatist on issues like social security and inflation, arguing that
Republicans need to be honest with voters about what options are feasible to address the issues that affect their lives. Her answer on how
Republicans can navigate the issue of abortion was a standout moment. I don't judge anyone for
being pro-choice, and I don't want them to judge me for being pro-life, she said, adding that the
issue has divided Americans for too long and consensus should be sought in areas
like ensuring contraception access, encouraging adoptions, and banning late-term abortions,
which drew a long applause from the audience. Haley and Ramaswamy attacked each other repeatedly,
with the exchanges often turning acrimonious in a debate that was otherwise more civil than the
previous two. All right, and last but not least, we have Ron DeSantis, who is
currently polling at 14.1% in the polls. DeSantis, the 45-year-old governor from Florida, had a very
in-character night of mostly recycled talking points with a few gems scattered throughout,
like his opening message that directly challenged Donald Trump. DeSantis continued to use aggressive
language on all issues involving the military and security, but general language to describe message that directly challenged Donald Trump. DeSantis continued to use aggressive language
on all issues involving the military and security, but general language to describe his mainstream
Republican positions on issues like social security, economic growth, TikTok, and abortion.
In both his opening and closing statements, DeSantis delivered nearly identical messages
that he would fight for Americans and deliver on promises, touting his record as Florida's governor and his service in Iraq. He deflected personal attacks from Haley
and Ramaswamy during the debate and often spoke vaguely, but was very comfortable fielding
questions on the southern border and his plan to grow the U.S. Navy. Some notable moments for
DeSantis. In his opening statement, DeSantis said Donald Trump owes it to the American people to be
on the debate stage
and explain why he didn't build the wall, why he increased the debt, and why Republicans are losing so much.
He touted his service in the Navy in Iraq in response to a question about attacks on U.S. military bases in Syria and Iraq,
chiding Biden for being too weak to challenge Iran directly.
He described our Middle East military personnel as
sitting ducks and said retaliation to these attacks had been glancing blows when a forceful
and direct response to Iran is needed. DeSantis was highly supportive of Israel and extremely
critical of those who are not, saying that he would pull the visas of students who protest
with Hamas. He boasted that he's done more than Biden has on this issue by helping to bring
Floridians back home from Israel, chastising the president for warning against rising Islamophobia
when the real problem in the U.S. is growing anti-Semitism. In response to how to stop the
war in Ukraine from becoming a regional conflict, DeSantis said we shouldn't send any troops to
Ukraine, but to the southern border instead. Furthermore, he said Europe needs
to do their part in Ukraine and that the U.S. needs to invest in confronting its real enemy,
China. The Florida governor offered the most specific and direct answer to the question of
how to grow the Navy, saying that he has a plan on his campaign website to increase the U.S. naval
fleet to 355 ships after his first term, 380 after his second, and to be on the path to 600 within two
decades. His answers on the economy were noticeably vague. To spur growth on day one, DeSantis said
that he would throw Bidenomics in the trash and rein in the Federal Reserve. To fix Social Security,
he said he would focus on GDP growth. Each candidate had a noticeable change in their position on abortion,
and DeSantis' response echoed what his fellow candidates were saying.
That everyone has a right to life, and that we need different responses on the issue in different states,
shying away from supporting a federal ban.
He also criticized a state-specific abortion referenda and Republicans losing positions,
but seemed to be searching for specifics while talking in circles.
All right, that is it for the review of the individual performances of all the candidates
from last night. Before we get into what the left and the right are saying and Isaac's take,
we're going to pause here for a quick break. Welcome back. First up, we're going to start with what the left is saying.
The left says the debate was another dud and questions why the candidates remain so reluctant
to criticize Trump. Some called Trump the clear winner of the debate and said his decision not
to participate continues to be validated. Others say most of the candidates still floundered when
it comes to key issues like abortion. Based on Charles Yu's award-winning book,
Interior Chinatown follows the story of Willis Wu, a background character
trapped in a police procedural who dreams about a world beyond Chinatown. When he inadvertently
becomes a witness to a crime, Willis begins to unravel a criminal web, his family's buried
history, and what it feels like to be in the spotlight. Interior Chinatown is streaming
November 19th, only on Disney+. It's the first cell-based flu vaccine authorized in Canada for ages six months and older, and it may be available for free in your province.
Side effects and allergic reactions can occur, and 100% protection is not guaranteed.
Learn more at flucellvax.ca.
In the Washington Post, Aaron Blake assessed the winners and losers of the debate.
and losers of the debate. Trump was the winner, as his lead has only continued to expand and the candidates continue to be averse to even really attempting to lay a glove on him, Blake wrote.
The candidates are obviously worried about alienating Trump's supporters, but it hasn't
worked, and they still haven't found the recipe for even subtly criticizing him in a way that lands.
DeSantis and Haley were losers, as they didn't do much to really change the race.
Neither looked like someone who could seriously challenge Trump,
or even appeared all that likely to become the clear alternative,
which seems to be the real prize right now.
Ramaswamy, meanwhile, appears to have lost his moment in this race to the extent he had one,
and his comments were more befitting a guy looking for a Fox News hosting gig than anything else.
were more befitting a guy looking for a Fox News hosting gig than anything else.
In Slate, Molly Olmsted said Nikki Haley was the only GOP candidate who seemed to learn something from the party's election performance. After years of hearing Republican candidates recite
virtually the same talking points about abortion on the campaign trail and at debates, something
strange happened on Wednesday night. Nikki Haley said something different,
Olmsted wrote. The message was clear. The party needs to give this up for good. And that message seemed sensible after the GOP's dismally poor performance in Tuesday's general election,
blamed largely on abortion-related campaigns. The tactic echoed the pragmatic case that Haley
made against nominating Donald Trump in the first debate, that he cannot win another general election,
one that saw her poll numbers rise even after she criticized her party's most popular figure.
It's possible this kind of leveling with the voters about what's realistic,
whatever her motivation, is part of why she's outperformed Trump and DeSantis
in a couple of recent head-to-head polls against Joe Biden.
In The Atlantic, Russell Berman wrote,
the candidates once again declined
their opportunity to take on the absent frontrunner. When Ramaswamy bemoaned the GOP's
lackluster performance in this week's elections, he chose to blame not the party's undisputed leader
for the past seven years, but Ronna McDaniel, the party functionary, unknown to most Americans,
Berman said. The moment was a fitting encapsulation of a debate that, like the first two Republican
primary matchups, all but ignored the candidate who wasn't there. If nothing else, each of these
Trump-less debates offers his opponents a free shot to make the case against him, a platform
to criticize the frontrunner without facing an immediate rebuttal. For the third time in a row,
Haley and her competitors mostly passed up their chance. If they're angling to be Trump's running mate or emergency replacement,
perhaps they've advanced their cause. But if their goal is to dislodge Trump as the nominee,
opportunities like tonight's are slipping away.
All right, that is it for what the left is saying, which brings us to what the right is saying.
The right thinks the debate was a notable improvement on the first two and featured interesting, substantive discussions. Some say Christie, Ramaswamy, and Scott need to drop out
and let DeSantis and Haley take on Trump for the nomination. Others say Trump continues to outshine the entire field combined.
In the New York Post, Isaac Skor said,
It's time to let DeSantis and Haley spar to take on Trump.
There is no case for any other participants to press on.
For the third consecutive time, DeSantis and Haley did the most to help themselves,
proving that they're the two best candidates on paper and in practice, Skor wrote.
Haley gave focused, policy-driven answers informed by her Reaganite worldview.
DeSantis stressed the difference between rhetoric and real-world results, bringing up his record of accomplishment in the Sunshine State at every opportunity.
The frontrunner has wisely stayed above the fray to date.
To draw him into it, the anti-Trump forces will
need to coalesce around a single candidate, and before there can be one, Haley and DeSantis must
have it out without the three also-rans distracting from the two contenders, Skor said. Basic math and
patriotic duty demand that those without a chance of saving the country from a Trump-Biden rematch
at least refrain from condemning it to such a calamity.
In National Review, Noah Rothman said,
There's the Republican Party I recognize.
It was a combative debate, but there was more consensus on that stage than contention.
Among the points of broad agreement, America is a force for good on the world stage, the American-led geopolitical order is worth preserving, and America's geostrategic position
vis-a-vis its foreign adversaries can have dire consequences for the quality of life
U.S. citizens presently enjoy, Rothman wrote.
Of the three GOP debates so far, this was the strongest.
These two hours were devoted to issues Republicans care about, and the questions were premised
on Republican assumptions.
The relative seriousness of the moment was reflected in the candidates' demeanor, Rothman said.
They treated the job they were interviewing for like it was the most important position in the world,
and they didn't talk down to their audiences.
In the Spectator U.S., Roger Kimball argued Trump's rally mattered more than the GOP debate.
It was pleasantly, mostly surreal, flicking back and forth between the tidy, well-laundered,
and well-pressed debate and the raucous free-for-all that was the Trump rally, Kimball said.
Anyone wanting to know which event mattered more, the official debate or Trump's free-for-all down
the road, need only avail himself of an applause meter of the sort that they used to use on Queen
for a day. By that measure, Trump won in a landslide. His thousands of fans generated
enough energy to illuminate a small city. Vivek won the night at Conservative Inc. HQ, but none
of the five there is going to nab the Republican nomination. That poem will go to Donald Trump.
He confirmed it tonight, not by any policy announcements, but by the mood and energy
he generated, Kimball wrote. Trump's opponents are lost talking about what program or incentive they would support his president.
They were in a room on a stage.
Donald Trump was outdoors performing like a rock star.
All right, that is it for what the left and the right are saying, which brings us to
Isaac's take. Just a reminder that this is Isaac's opinion, and I'm just reading it in the first
person. We highlighted some highs and lows for each candidate above, and I had some highs and
lows from my personal perspective, too. On the whole, I think this was actually a very substantive
night, and the first time we've seen anyone, aside from Christie, really step up and challenge Trump, which made it
a whole lot more interesting and relevant than the first two debates.
I thought Ramaswamy gave the best answer about the protests happening on college campuses
that have veered into bizarre defenses of Hamas and justification for their attack on
Israel.
While candidates like DeSantis were championing censorship, pulling visas, and cutting funding for student groups,
Ramaswamy took a different tack.
We don't quash this with censorship because that creates a worse underbelly, he said.
We quell it through leadership by calling it out and adding that
it's not productive for companies to blacklist kids for being members of student groups that make dumb political statements on campus.
He rightly warned conservatives that anyone wielding cancel culture
against anti-Israel groups will inevitably feel the brunt of that culture themselves.
And he made comparisons to similar actions being taken against people
who support Donald Trump or were critical of taking vaccines.
I also think he has a cogent philosophy that a lack of national pride
is ripping at the fabric of American life.
Haley again shined, giving the
best answer on abortion that I've heard from a pro-life candidate in a long time. You have to be
honest with the American people about what is realistic. You have to recognize the personal
liberty element of this conversation. You have to accept the fact that, without Roe v. Wade,
states are going to decide this issue. You have to win the argument on the merits, not with empty
promises that any president is going to be able to step in and ban abortion at the national level, which is not going
to happen. There actually is a great deal of consensus on the issue that the pro-life side
could act on if they let go of the pipe dream of a federal ban. Haley is the only one honest enough
to say that out loud, which is astounding, especially given how badly Republicans are
losing on this issue.
Not only that, but she calls for things like increased contraceptive access, more adoptions,
and better support for mothers, all things that desperately need to be heard by so many people.
Finally, I thought DeSantis did the best job of actually challenging the person they are
supposed to all challenge, Donald Trump. He hit Trump where I think it's genuinely important.
Donald Trump's a lot different guy than he was in 2016. He owes it to you to be on this stage and explain why he
should get another chance, DeSantis said. He should explain why he didn't have Mexico pay for the
border wall. He should explain why he racked up so much debt. He should explain why he didn't drain
the swamp. He said Republicans were going to get tired of winning. Well, we saw last
night, I'm sick of Republicans losing. To me, that's the argument for anyone who wants to beat
Trump. He is not the same person he was in 2016. He's dodging the debates. He failed on his signature
promise. He racked up huge amounts of debt. He didn't drain the swamp. Even in his telling,
he got outmaneuvered by the swamp, and Republicans have done nothing but lose since he got in office.
Again, I'm shocked it took DeSantis this long to actually attack Trump, but here we are.
There were also lows.
Ramaswamy started the night with a bizarre attempt to blame everything on the media and attack the moderators before any real questions were even asked.
were even asked. It stunk of rehearsed, out-of-place swing for the fences to me,
and it was especially bizarre because this ended up being the best and most fairly moderated debate so far. I have no idea what he was going for, but if his position is that it's the media's fault
Republicans have been losing elections, he's not going to make it very far as a candidate.
Perhaps most disturbing was that nearly every candidate on stage seemed to be salivating over
the prospect of a war with Iran. If you want to understand why Trump is still one of the most
popular politicians in America, just go listen to the answers on Iran from the candidates on
stage last night. Aside from Ramaswamy, the entire Republican field answered questions about Iran
with rhetoric that essentially amounted to, Joe Biden should have been bombing them yesterday.
It's a stunning post-9-11 posture
that is so divorced from the desires of the American people that I was actually shocked to
see almost all of them take it so confidently. Kudos to Ramaswamy, at least, for not joining
the fray, but woof. I'm more certain than ever that the establishment is ready to drag us into
another major war tomorrow if they get a chance. I did enjoy the initial
barbs between Ramaswami and Haley. Dick Cheney in three-inch heels was a well-placed line at Haley
and DeSantis, and Haley was well-prepped with a quippy response of her own. But it went from
funny barbs to way too personal when Ramaswami invoked her daughter and Haley took the bait,
calling him scum. At a time when our country desperately needs some adults in
the room to show us all how to have responsible disagreements, that exchange was a massive failure.
Ultimately, redundantly, and for the third time, I think the real winner was Donald Trump. He took
a few more blows than he did in the first two debates, but for the most part, the five candidates
ate each other alive, ringing the bells for more war and doing little to meaningfully separate themselves from the one man they all have to beat if they want the nomination.
It seems clearer and clearer to me that Ramaswami is interested in being vice president or pursuing
a future in Congress, or perhaps on cable television as Aaron Blake suggested and under
what the left is saying, and not the actual job he says he's running for. Scott and Christie are
simply biding their time and everyone knows that they don't have a shot at this point. I think the real
race is now between Trump, DeSantis, and Haley, and it'd be really great if voters got one look
at the three of them on stage together before primary voting actually begins.
All right, that is it for Isaac's Take. Obviously, this is a long podcast. Today,
there was a lot to cover, so we are skipping our reader question and the under-the-radar story,
and we are heading straight to our numbers section. The number of Tim Scott's speaking
time during the debate was 18 minutes and 55 seconds, the most of any candidate. The number of Chris Christie speaking
time during the debate was 16 minutes and 15 seconds, the least of any candidate. The amount
of time spent discussing abortion during the debate was 8 minutes and 27 seconds, the most of
any topic. The percentage of support the candidates will need in at least two national polls, or both
one national poll and one statewide poll in either Iowa,
New Hampshire, South Carolina, or Nevada, to qualify for the fourth GOP debate on December 6th
is 6%. The percentage of Donald Trump's lead over the next closest candidate at the time,
Ben Carson, in GOP primary polls on November 8th, 2015, was 0.8%. The percentage of Donald
Trump's lead over the next closest candidates now,
Ron DeSantis, in GOP primary polls on November 8th, 2023, is 44.1%.
And last but not least, our have a nice day story. Canadian entrepreneur Marcel Lebrun struck it big
when he sold his social media monitoring company for eight figures and wasted little time dedicating those funds to a philanthropic cause.
Lebrun founded the non-profit 12 Neighbors,
which creates affordable housing through the manufacture of tiny homes.
In a new factory in his home city of Fredericton, New Brunswick,
12 Neighbors is churning out one tiny home every four business days
to create a gated community of 99 tiny homes to
give Frederictonians a real second chance. The tiny homes have a full-service kitchen,
living and bedroom areas, roof-mounted solar panels, and a full bathroom, while the community
will have an enterprise center to help community members find work. LeBrun invested $4 million of
his own money into the project, which is three-quarters of the way to completion. I see myself as a community builder, and really what we're doing here is not just
building a little community. We're building a community in a city, Liberian told the CBC.
Good News Network has the story, and there's a link in today's episode description.
All right, everybody, that is it for today's podcast. As always, if you want to support our
work, please go to readtangle.com and sign up for a membership. One last reminder that tomorrow
we're going to be publishing and releasing the Israel-Palestine debate between our two guests
that got pretty contentious, started a whole Twitter firestorm. So keep an eye out for that.
If you are a member, you will actually get an email with links to
watch and listen and if
you're not consider signing up we release
a lot of great content on Fridays we've got
more great content in the future
coming up that is also going to be behind that
paywall for members so yeah
sign up now and enjoy it now
enjoy it later and
Tangle is pretty incredible in my opinion
and we'll take all the support we can get.
Isaac will be back next week.
And in the meantime, I hope you get to watch the interview.
We'd love to hear your feedback and comments.
So please leave them.
Hope you have a great weekend.
Peace.
Our podcast is written by me, Isaac Saul, and edited and engineered by John Wall. The script is edited by our managing editor, Ari Weitzman, Will Kabak, Bailey Saul, and Sean Brady.
The logo for our podcast was designed by Magdalena Bokova, who is also our social media manager.
Music for the podcast was produced by Diet75.
If you're looking for more from Tangle, please go to readtangle.com and check out our website.
Based on Charles Yu's award-winning book, Interior Chinatown follows the story of Willis Wu, a background character trapped in a police procedural who dreams about a world beyond
Chinatown. When he inadvertently becomes a witness to a crime, Willis begins to unravel
a criminal web, his family's buried history, and what it feels like to be in the spotlight.
Interior Chinatown is streaming November 19th, only on Disney+.
The flu remains a serious disease. Last season, over 102,000 influenza cases
have been reported across Canada,
which is nearly double the historic average
of 52,000 cases.
What can you do this flu season?
Talk to your pharmacist or doctor
about getting a flu shot.
Consider FluCellVax Quad
and help protect yourself from the flu.
It's the first cell-based flu vaccine
authorized in Canada for ages six months and older, and it may be available for free in your province. Side effects and allergic reactions
can occur, and 100% protection is not guaranteed. Learn more at flucellvax.ca.