Tangle - The Israel-Hamas ceasefire deal.
Episode Date: January 16, 2025On Wednesday, negotiators announced a ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas that will pause fighting in the Gaza Strip and could potentially end the 15-month war that heightened other conf...licts in the region and leveled much of Gaza. The deal is still pending approval by the Israeli government, which delayed a meeting to discuss the agreement on Thursday over alleged concerns that Hamas had not accepted all of the terms. Hamas senior officials said they remain committed to the deal. Ad-free podcasts are here!Many listeners have been asking for an ad-free version of this podcast that they could subscribe to — and we finally launched it. You can go to tanglemedia.supercast.com to sign up!You can read today's podcast here, our “Under the Radar” story here and today’s “Have a nice day” story here.Take the survey: Do you think the reported ceasefire deal will result in a lasting peace? Let us know!You can subscribe to Tangle by clicking here or drop something in our tip jar by clicking here. Our podcast is written by Isaac Saul and edited and engineered by Jon Lall. Music for the podcast was produced by Diet 75. Our newsletter is edited by Managing Editor Ari Weitzman, Will Kaback, Bailey Saul, Sean Brady, and produced in conjunction with Tangle’s social media manager Magdalena Bokowa, who also created our logo. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
From executive producer, Isaac Saul, this is Tangle.
Good morning, good afternoon and good evening and welcome to the Tangle podcast, the place
we get views from across the political spectrum, some independent thinking and a little bit of my take.
I'm your host, Isaac Saul. And on today's episode, we're going to be talking about
the Israel Hamas ceasefire deal that was announced late on Wednesday. And we have some updates on
that potential deal, I guess we should say now from Thursday morning. It seems to be a little bit of
waffling happening now, which is never encouraging, but we're going to break down exactly what's going on and give you some views from across the political spectrum, including some views from
Israeli and Palestinian writers. Before we jump into that though, quick heads up that tomorrow,
we're going to be taking stock of the moment as President-elect Trump starts his second
term.
We're going to highlight a series of Trump's promises and broader metrics for the country
that we're going to track over the next two to four years.
I also wanted to give you a quick reminder that we are off on Monday.
We take all bank and federal holidays off as a team.
Monday is Martin Luther King Day, so we'll be off for the long weekend.
We might send out a newsletter and maybe drop a podcast here with a fresh interview that
we're about to print. You can keep your eyes out for that, but we'll be taking a break
from the typical daily newsletter.
All right. With that, I'm going to send it over to John for today's main topic and he's going to break down what exactly is going on
And then I'll be back with my take
Thanks Isaac and welcome everybody here are your quick hits for today
First up a bit of breaking news Florida governor Ron DeSantis announced that he has selected State Attorney General Ashley Moody to replace Senator Marco Rubio if confirmed as Secretary of State.
Number two, President Joe Biden delivered his farewell address speaking about the role of
democracy in the United States and warning about the potential consequences of a rising tech
industrial complex. Number three, the consumer price index increased 2.9% over the year and 0.4% from the previous month,
according to the Labor Department's December inflation report.
Core CPI, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, rose 0.2%, the smallest month-over-month
increase since July.
4.
The Food and Drug Administration announced that it will ban the use of synthetic
dye red number three over concerns about its links to cancer. And number five, the Supreme Court
appeared divided during arguments over a challenge to a Texas law requiring pornography sites to
verify the age of their users before providing access. The court is expected to rule on this case this summer.
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
-
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪
[♪upbeat music playing -♪ [♪ in Gaza that widened across the region. A ceasefire and hostage deal was struck today
between Israel and Hamas.
The deal between the warring sides was mediated
by the United States, Egypt, and Qatar,
and will start this weekend.
The Biden administration had spent many months
trying to force the parties toward a deal,
but a final push in coordination
with the incoming Trump team helped get this,
helped get to this agreement today. A senior administration official says that the U.S. didn't know
there would be a deal until just minutes before announcing it,
after Hamas tried this morning to insert new objections.
But tonight, after 15 months of one of the most intense
aerial campaigns in history, the deadliest ever war
on Israeli soil and the deaths of tens of thousands of Palestinians,
there is cautious hope the ceasefire will hold.
On Wednesday, negotiators announced a ceasefire deal
between Israel and Hamas that will pause fighting
in the Gaza Strip and could potentially end
the 15-month war that heightened other conflicts
in the region and leveled much of Gaza.
The deal is still pending approval by the Israeli government, which delayed a meeting
to discuss the agreement on Thursday over alleged concerns that Hamas had not accepted
all of the terms.
Hamas senior officials said that they remain committed to the deal.
The deal is structured in three phases and includes the return of all living and dead
Israeli hostages, the total withdrawal of Israel from Gaza, the exchange of hundreds of Palestinian prisoners, and eventually a
Gaza reconstruction plan.
Egypt, Qatar, and the United States are guarantors of the peace deal, which was mediated in Doha,
Qatar, and included negotiators from Arab countries and the United States, as well as
an envoy from President-elect Donald Trump's incoming administration. According to Qatar's Prime Minister, Mohamed bin Abdulrahman al-Thani,
phase one of the deal will begin on Sunday and last roughly six weeks. The first phase consists
of a ceasefire, a gradual withdrawal of Israeli troops from central Gaza, the return of displaced
Palestinians in northern Gaza, admittance of humanitarian
aid into Gaza, Hamas's release of 33 hostages including two Americans, and Israel's release
of hundreds of Palestinian prisoners.
Specifically, Israel agreed to release all Palestinian women and children under 19 detained
since October 7, 2023, returning 30 Palestinian detainees to Gaza for every
civilian hostage and 50 Palestinian detainees for every female soldier Hamas releases.
Israel will also retain control of the Philadelphia corridor between the Gaza Strip and Egypt,
though this provision is reportedly now a point of contention.
Negotiations over the second phase will begin on the sixteenth day of phase one.
While discussions are still ongoing, that phase is expected to include the release of
all remaining living hostages to Israel, a permanent ceasefire, and Israel's total
withdrawal from Gaza.
The third phase of the deal includes the return of the remains of deceased hostages to Israel
and a reconstruction plan for Gaza.
There was no other way for this war to end than with a hostage deal, and I am deeply
satisfied this day has finally come, for the sake of the people of Israel and for the families
waiting in agony, and for the sake of the innocent people in Gaza who suffered unimaginable
devastation because of the war," President Joe Biden said in a statement.
This epic ceasefire agreement could have only happened as a result of our historic
victory in November, as it signaled to the entire world that my administration would
seek peace and negotiate deals to ensure the safety of all Americans and our allies,'
President-elect Trump said, posted on Truth Social.
The Israel-Hamas War began on October 7, 2023, when Hamas launched a surprise attack, killing
over 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and taking about 250 hostages, according to Israel.
Since then, Israel's ground and air campaign in Gaza has killed over 46,600 people,
over half of whom are women, children, and older people, according to the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry.
Today, we'll get into what the left, right,
and righters from Israel and Palestine
are saying about the deal, and then Isaac's take.
["The Last Supper"]
We'll be right back after this quick break.
All right, first up, let's start with what the left is saying.
The left is glad the two sides reached a deal and primarily credits Biden, but many say
the president's handling of the conflict deserves scrutiny too.
Some suggest Trump made the deal happen given his unique political leverage.
In the foreword, Emily Tamkin said, this hostage deal is Biden's victory,
but it's also Biden's shame. President Joe Biden's administration has secured a ceasefire deal
between Israel and Hamas, and President-elect Donald Trump is taking much of the credit.
The parallel that immediately jumps to mind is that of President Jimmy Carter,
whose work to resolve the Iran hostage crisis only paid dividends after his successor had been
sworn into office, Tamkin wrote. Like Biden, Carter spent his last year in office as a one-term
president consumed with negotiations over trying to get hostages released, but as tempting as it is
to see history rhyming, a crisis in the Middle East, inflation, a president finally achieving a deal only on his way out the door, there's an important
difference.
Namely, Israel is not Iran.
Where Carter was exclusively negotiating with an enemy country, one of the two countries
with whom Biden was negotiating was Israel, an American ally.
And although the Biden administration repeatedly placed primary blame on Hamas for
scuttling ceasefire efforts, we know that, for example, ceasefire negotiations this summer
were reportedly complicated by conditions that Netanyahu added in, Tamkin said.
It is perhaps too early to make sweeping assessments about what this deal shows us, but one question
we can ask now is whether Biden privileged preserving U.S.-Israel friendship, even as his own relationship with Netanyahu reportedly deteriorated, overreaching a deal.
In The Atlantic, Yaya Rosenberg wrote, Trump made the Gaza deal happen.
The terms largely echo a proposal laid out by Biden himself in May 2024,
but the incoming president dragged the parties over the finish line.
What changed was not Washington's general orientation toward the conflict.
Far from turning up the heat on Israel, Trump telegraphed a further embrace of its positions
during his 2024 campaign, Rosenberg wrote.
Hamas could reasonably surmise that it would not get a better deal during a Trump presidency,
while Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's hard-right government likely acceded to the arrangement in order to stay in the new leader's good
graces as he assumes office.
Put another way, it's not that Trump had a stick with which to beat Israel that Biden
didn't have.
It's that his presidency holds out the prospect of carrots that Biden would never offer, Rosenberg
said.
It was less the president-elect's pressure than his potential promise that brought the
Israeli far-right onside.
With Trump, everything is a transaction, and for his would-be suitors, not just Israel
but also Hamas' sponsors in Qatar, the Gaza ceasefire is a down payment. Alright, that is it for what the left is saying, which brings us to what the right is saying.
Many on the right argue that there are few winners in this conflict, but Trump clearly
made the deal happen.
Some say Israel faces an uncertain future and an unpredictable American ally under Trump.
In Reason, Matthew Petty said nobody won the war in Gaza. certain future and an unpredictable American ally under Trump.
In Reason, Matthew Petty said, nobody won the war in Gaza.
President Joe Biden tacitly endorsed a de-escalation-through-escalation strategy, flooded Israel with weapons
at U.S. taxpayer expense, and even deployed U.S. troops onto Israeli soil.
In November 2024, the Hamas negotiating team was kicked out of Qatar, reportedly because
of the Biden administration's pressure.
Thousands of Lebanese and Palestinians were killed, Petty wrote.
Hamas will rule over a traumatized population living in bombed-out wreckage.
The dead have not been properly counted.
The official death toll of 46,600 may have missed 40% of violent deaths, and that doesn't include deaths from starvation
and disease.
Iran, which had given Hamas vague assurances of support in a war with Israel, was caught
by surprise in October 2023 and turned out to be unprepared for the confrontation that
followed, Petty added.
Iranian losses, however, are not necessarily America's gains.
The United States now has more responsibilities in a Middle East that is more chaotic and
violent than before.
The only winner so far is Trump.
Discontent over Biden's war helped swing the election to Trump, and a ceasefire on
the eve of inauguration is the best of both worlds for the Trump administration.
In the New York Times, Brett Stevens suggested the Israeli right may soon be disenchanted
with Trump.
Thanks largely to Trump, a deal demanded by the Israeli left and reviled by the right
is about to come into effect.
A year's worth of diplomacy by the Biden administration is finally about to bear fruit
on account of its political nemesis.
The far-right parties that were part of Netanyahu's
coalition may bolt the government, Stephen said. In the hostage deal, the price for Israel will be,
in many ways, heavy. For every Israeli hostage released by Hamas, Israel will release several-fold
Palestinian prisoners, many of them with Israeli blood on their hands. This doesn't mean the deal
is a bad one for Israel's national interest. A more difficult quandary for the Israeli right is what else Trump may want them to accept.
The President-elect clearly wants an Israeli-Saudi normalization agreement as a capstone to the
Abraham Accords he oversaw in 2020.
For that to happen, the Saudis will demand a roadmap for a Palestinian state.
Trump may also prefer to use Iran's current weakness to negotiate a second nuclear deal,
Stevens wrote.
Donald Trump may have the soul of a bully, but he also has the instincts of a deal-maker,
and a yearning for a claim, including the Nobel Peace Prize he thinks he was denied
for the Abraham Accords.
Whatever else his next four years in power will bring, it won't conform to ideological type.
Alright, that is it for what the left and the right are saying, which brings us to what
some Israeli and Palestinian writers are saying.
Israeli writers celebrate the hostages' potential return, but worry that some terms
of the deal
will embolden Hamas.
Palestinian writers express relief at the prospect of an end to the fighting in Gaza
but say it is little consolation after the last 15 months.
In the New York Post, Leo Leibowitz wrote,
Praise that the Israeli hostages are coming home, but a deal that keeps Hamas in power
is a bad one.
The ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas is meant to be a first step, and we don't
know what happens next or the promises that were made behind the scenes.
Most importantly, the idea of dozens of Israelis, including toddlers, returning home after more
than a year in purgatory is enough to dull even the most hawkish observer's concerns,
Leibowitz said.
Yet, it is very hard to observe this deal and see it as anything other than an utter and
complete disgrace and an embarrassment for America.
First and most devastating, Hamas remains in power, greatly weakened, true, and hampered
by increased Israeli military presence in Gaza, but able to claim ultimate victory.
Why would Trump, who repeatedly said there would be hell to pay if the hostages weren't
released before he takes office, put his weight behind a deal that, with very few and very
minor details, is the exact same one peddled unsuccessfully for many months now by the
Biden administration, Leibowitz wrote.
The unspeakable horrors of October 7, 2023 ought to have inspired a new and bold rethinking of American policy
in the region, one that no longer tolerates terrorists or their handlers.
Instead, we're getting another deal that telegraphs a lack of resolve and rewards the
terrorists for their heinous crimes.
In Al Jazeera, Afaf Al-Najjar described a fragile claim amid unending struggle.
As a Palestinian, receiving this news feels like standing in the eye of the storm in a
moment of ghostly calm surrounded by chaos and destruction.
For me, at least it marks the end to the bloodshed.
But the fact is, the ones we lost will never return, and these scars will never heal.
How would a ceasefire ever change that fact? Al-Najjar wrote. Ceasefires are often hailed as victories for diplomacy, but to me, they are more like pauses
in a constant nightmare.
This latest agreement is a reminder that for the people of Gaza, survival often hinges
on the fragility of politics.
Children, mothers, and fathers carry the unbearable weight of uncertainty.
I find myself asking, is this truly a step toward peace or just another chapter in a
story of delayed justice and extended suffering?
The cease-fire's terms, reached under immense international pressure, include a halt to
airstrikes and rocket fire, along with provisions to allow humanitarian aid into Gaza.
These measures are desperately needed,
but their necessity is also an accusation of the international community's failure to act sooner
to prevent the crises that make such measures critical," Al-Najjar wrote.
Temporary peace cannot replace the right to live freely and to dream beyond survival.
This prompts another critical question. Will Palestinians ever get their rights to have full control over their political and
diplomatic path to justice, or will they always be eliminated from the political stage and
portrayed to fit in the victim's role?
All right, let's head for what the left and the right are saying as well as some takes
from Israeli and Palestinian writers, which brings us to my take.
So first and foremost, I'm glad Israel and Hamas seem to have reached a deal.
Even if I have to explain a million
different caveats which I'm going to in a moment, this is an important term that everyone can
celebrate at least to some degree. In December of 2023, I wrote a piece titled Ten Thoughts on
What is Happening in Israel, and in thought number three, I insisted that the most important story
in the war was the death and destruction in Gaza.
A couple months later, I wrote The Zionist Case for a Ceasefire.
One thrust of that piece was that Israel was going to create a generation of new adversaries
by continuing this war.
Today, the United States believes Hamas has recruited almost as many new fighters as Israel
has killed since the war began.
To sit here, now now in January of 2025,
having just begun this ceasefire process,
is in some ways a relief,
an outcome I've been praying for every day for over a year.
But it's also disheartening that the deal took so long
and that it seems so incomplete.
I wish that I could sit here and tell you
that this war is over, but I can't.
The hard part doesn't start until the first stage is completed.
Negotiations for phase two will begin on the 16th day of phase one, and they will require
Hamas to coordinate the release of all its remaining living hostages and Israel to commit
to a lasting peace and total withdrawal from Gaza.
We are a long way out from a more secure future,
and this agreement is in many ways just a baby step. Sadly, even that small step is often an
auspicious start. This morning, we got this update from Israel via the New York Times,
quote, Israel's cabinet was expected to vote Thursday, but at midday, Israel had yet to convene
ministers to discuss the proposal, citing last minute disputes with Hamas. On Thursday morning, the office of Benjamin Netanyahu,
the Israeli prime minister, accused Hamas of reneging on parts of the agreement without
specifying which ones. A senior Hamas official said the group was committed to the deal."
I could say a lot about the timing of this deal. For starters, I have long believed that the biggest
obstacle to ending this war, aside from Hamas holding hostages, was Netanyahu's understanding
that ending the war would cause a collapse in his governing coalition. That coalition has depended
on far-right extremists in the Israeli government, and Netanyahu knew that if he agreed to a deal to
end the war that allowed Hamas to retain control, they would likely abandon him,
and he would lose power. Here's how the Wall Street Journal reported on the changing dynamics.
The agreement isn't much different from the terms that were available months ago when more
Israeli hostages remained alive and before thousands more Palestinians lost their lives.
But several factors have pushed the parties closer recently. Netanyahu, meanwhile, has solidified his governing coalition, reducing the leverage of right-wing parties who
have opposed any deal. I really can't overstate how disgusting this entire spectacle is. It
should be one of the great political scandals of our time, that an obstacle to ending this
horrific spate of violence was a prime minister fearing he would lose his job if the war ended,
exactly what many Israelis have been accusing Netanyahu of for more was a prime minister fearing he would lose his job if the war ended,
exactly what many Israelis have been accusing Netanyahu of for more than a year. Instead,
it's a mere footnote in the coverage. This, of course, is not to absolve Hamas. From day
one, they could have laid their arms down and returned the hostages to end the war,
but they opted not to. You can read their actions in two ways. One, they mortgaged the
lives and infrastructure
of the entire Gaza Strip and their delusional belief
that they could win the war.
Or two, they were glad to martyr the Gazan people
uninterested in the pain and suffering they invited
onto those they supposedly care for.
And then of course, there's the question
of whom to credit in the US.
My view is that even if this ceasefire holds,
it will be one of the great embarrassments
of the Biden administration, the cherry on top of a foreign policy record that is teetering
on abysmal.
Consequently, it will be one of Trump's great accomplishments, beginning before he
even took office, a goal he stated during the campaign.
The Times of Israel reported that Trump's envoy swayed Netanyahu more in one meeting
than Biden did all year.
The Washington Post
reported that this was the first time there has been real pressure on the Israeli side to accept
a deal since the war began, crediting Trump's influence. If this deal holds, again, if,
it will also reflect poorly on me. I wrote repeatedly that the Arab-American voters in
Michigan and across the U.S. who opposed Harris or outright supported Trump in protest of
Biden's handling of the war would be sorely disappointed. Perhaps my view there proves accurate
in the long run. I still believe Trump is a staunchly pro-Israel president whose interests
are diametrically opposed to the Palestinian liberation cause. But if Trump begins this term
by helping negotiate an end to this war, I'll be eating some crow and those voters will have both increased their
political power and gotten the result they wanted.
What comes next is anyone's guess.
I've seen reports and heard from a few sources that Trump is going to pursue a
Saudi normalization deal, which would likely include recognizing the right of
a Palestinian state.
Gaza, which has been completely leveled, will have to be rebuilt.
Only 16 of the 36
hospitals in the entire strip remain operational, and even they are only partially functioning,
with just 1,800 beds available in total, according to the UN. Schools, places of worship, and homes
across the strip have been destroyed. There is no economy. Infrastructure like sewage, water,
and power lines have been wiped out. The scale of the rebuild is incomprehensible.
The road ahead is certain to be rocky, with little guarantee that Hamas and the Palestinian
Islamic Jihad will stop attacking Israel or that Israeli soldiers will leave Gaza and
stay out.
When the war does end, journalists will enter Gaza in earnest, and the truth of the destruction
will come into focus.
There will be trials, charges for war crimes, and ongoing allegations of genocide. A massive power struggle to lead
Gaza will unfold as well. Moments to celebrate in this conflict have been rare, so for now,
I'll take it. But nobody should mistake this first step as an end to the war or as a peace deal.
This is just the first step in a long brutal road ahead toward reconciliation
and stability.
We'll be right back after this quick break.
All right, that is it for my take, which brings us to your questions answered. This one is
from Joe in Naples, Florida. Joe said, is your answer about the smelt living in brackish
water not being an issue really your answer to the more important question, which is,
has fresh water been diverted to preserve the brackish water of the smelt? So this is
a good question from Joe and it relates to
our issue on the Los Angeles wildfires in which we dismiss President-elect
Trump's claim that protections for the Delta smelt were responsible for Los
Angeles's water security issues by saying the fish didn't live in zones
where the city sources its water. This question presents a good point. The issue
Trump is highlighting might not be with the estuaries themselves, but with
the upstream water that feeds them.
In fact, part of the preservation plan for the Delta smelt is outflow augmentation, meaning
that conservation efforts have indeed called for the state to commit to providing more
fresh water to those areas.
However, the critique that this hurt Los Angeles's water access falls flat for two reasons. One,
the plan the state enacted only pertains to pumping delta zones in the winter and did
not result in changes to managing upstream flows. Two, the delta zones implicated by
the plan are in the San Francisco Bay area and wouldn't affect Los Angeles. All that
said, we still think it was correct for us to say smelt conservation isn't relevant
to wildfire responsiveness in Los Angeles. We do appreciate the probing question for allowing us to more fully get
into why.
All right. That is it for my take in your reader questions today. Again, we'll be back
tomorrow with a members-only podcast. We're off on Monday for Barton Luther King Day,
but as always, we'll have a Sunday pod coming your way. Keep an eye on the feed and you'll hear from us soon. We'll see you guys then. Have a good one.
Peace.
Thanks, Isaac. Here's your Under the Radar story for today, folks.
Ohio Governor Mike DeWine is set to announce his appointment to fill vice president-elect JD
Vance's now vacant Senate seat this week, and one name is beginning to gain public traction – the vague Ramaswamy.
President-elect Donald Trump has reportedly been pushing the tech entrepreneur to fill
the seat if offered, and Ramaswamy is said to be open to the idea.
While Trump previously named Ramaswamy to lead the Department of Government Efficiency
alongside Elon Musk, a Senate appointment
would likely require him to vacate that role.
Whomever DeWine appoints will run to keep their seat in 2026, and the winner of that
election will serve the remainder of Vance's term ending in 2029.
The Washington Post has this story, and there's a link in today's episode description.
Alright next up is our numbers section.
The estimated cost of damage to critical infrastructure in Gaza during the Israel-Hamas War is $18.5
billion dollars according to an April 2024 report by the World Bank and the United Nations.
The percentage of structures in Gaza estimated to have sustained damage during the war is
66 percent, according to a September 2024 United Nations assessment.
The approximate percentage of Gaza's health facilities that have been damaged or destroyed
is 80 percent.
The percentage of Israelis who said that President-elect Donald Trump would be a better president than
Vice President Kamala Harris for
Israel's interests in a November 2024 Israel Democracy Institute poll is 64.5 percent.
The percentage of Israelis who said Harris would be a better president than Trump for Israel's
interests is 13 percent. The percentage of Palestinians in the Gaza Strip who said they
expected Hamas would control the Strip at the end of the current war in September 2024 is 57%, according to the Palestinian
Center for Policy and Survey Research.
The percentage of Palestinians in the Gaza Strip who said they prefer Hamas to control
the Strip at the end of the war is 36%.
And the percentage of Americans who said the U.S US should play a minor or major role, respectively,
in resolving the Israel-Hamas war is 37% and 24% according to a September 2024 Pew Research
survey.
And last but not least, our Have a Nice Day story.
At 16 years old, Renee Wang was already seeking solutions to important societal issues.
She noticed the extensive number of homeless individuals in her community, prompting her
to research constraints on the existing shelter system.
Inspired by the efficient design of Rubik's Cubes and Legos, Wang created a model for
sustainable housing that could be implemented on a massive scale.
Currently, she is communicating with nonprofits,
San Diego City Council members, and others who can help turn her model into a prototype,
then hopes to turn her focus towards implementation.
Good Good Good has this story and there's a link in today's episode description.
Alright, that is it for today's episode. As always, if you'd like to support our work,
please go to reetangle.com and sign up for
a membership.
You can also go to tanglemedia.supercast.com to sign up for a premium podcast membership,
which gets you access to ad-free daily podcasts, Friday editions, Sunday editions, interviews,
bonus content, and so much more.
And with that said, we have our Sunday podcast this week with Ari and Isaac.
And because we're off on Monday for Martin Luther King Day, we're also releasing
an interview with Sharon McMahon, otherwise known as America's government teacher.
I'll be back here on Monday for Isaac and the rest of the team.
This is John Loll signing off.
Have a fantastic weekend, y'all.
Peace.
Our podcast is written by me, Isaac Saul and edited and engineered by John Wall. The script is edited by our managing editor, Ari Weitzman, Will Kadak, Bailey Saul, and Sean Brady. The
logo for our podcast was designed by Magdalena Bacopa, who is also our social media manager.
Music for the podcast was produced by Diet 75.
If you're looking for more from Tangle,
please go to readtangle.com and check out our website.