Tangle - The Tennessee special election.
Episode Date: December 4, 2025On Tuesday, Matt Van Epps (R) defeated State Rep. Aftyn Behn (D) in a special election to represent Tennessee’s Seventh Congressional District (TN-07). Van Epps, a former Army officer endo...rsed by President Donald Trump, received roughly 54% of the vote for a nine-point victory over Behn, a former social worker and community healthcare organizer. Former Rep. Mark Green’s (R) resignation in July triggered the special election, and the race drew national attention and significant outside spending. Van Epps’s win preserves the 220–213 majority Republicans held prior to Green’s resignation. Ad-free podcasts are here!To listen to this podcast ad-free, and to enjoy our subscriber only premium content, go to ReadTangle.com to sign up!Watch our most recent live event.In October, we hosted a live event at the Irvine Barclay Theatre in Irvine, California. The evening provided us with another opportunity to meet and mingle with Tangle readers and featured a round table discussion on issues relevant to California. Executive Editor Isaac Saul hosted a discussion with Alex Thompson, Ana Kasparian, and our own Editor-at-Large Kmele Foster on immigration, gerrymandering, the 2028 presidential election, and more. Today, we’re releasing the video of that full discussion. You can watch it on our YouTube channel here!You can read today's podcast here, our “Under the Radar” story here and today’s “Have a nice day” story here.You can subscribe to Tangle by clicking here or drop something in our tip jar by clicking here. Take the survey: What do you think the special election signals about next year’s midterms? Let us know.Our Executive Editor and Founder is Isaac Saul. Our Executive Producer is Jon Lall.This podcast was written by: Isaac Saul and edited and engineered by Dewey Thomas. Music for the podcast was produced by Diet 75.Our newsletter is edited by Managing Editor Ari Weitzman, Senior Editor Will Kaback, Lindsey Knuth, Kendall White, Bailey Saul, and Audrey Moorehead. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
From executive producer Isaac Saul, this is Tangle.
Good morning, good afternoon and good evening, and welcome to the Tangle podcast, a place we get views from across the political spectrum, some independent thinking, and a little bit of my take.
I'm your host, Isaac Saul.
On today's episode, we're going to be talking about the Tennessee Special Election.
I'm bringing in Audrey Moorhead today, one of our associate editors.
Audrey is from Tennessee, and she grew up in the town that is just next door to the district where this race happened.
So, you know, yesterday you guys heard from Will Kayback, who has a bunch of Minnesota roots, who I thought had a really interesting take, a really good take.
I mean, I'm not sure I could have written it better myself.
if I had some, if I had any objections, maybe I would have gone a little bit further than he did in sort of pinning some blame on the Somali community, which I'm going to talk today about, actually, which I know is a little bit of a controversial opinion. But I think it's, well, I'm not going to spoil it. I'm going to talk about that on suspension of the rules, which is going to come out after this show. And I encourage you guys to listen to. But today, again, some news that was just tied to.
the local background of one of our writers and editors.
So I tapped Audrey, and we brought her in for today's take,
which I thought was really good.
So I'm excited to share that with you guys.
The next thing that I want to give you a heads up on is that we have a guest writer
coming in to publish our Friday edition this week.
So if you get our newsletter, I encourage you to keep an eye out for that.
It's from A.M. Hickman, who writes the newsletter Hickman's Hinterlands,
which is one of my favorite new newsletters.
We're going to try and get him to hop on the pod
and record the piece as well.
So I'm hoping that you guys will get to listen to him,
share that piece with you here for the Tangle community.
But definitely keep an eye out on the newsletter.
And of course, as always, don't forget that this is members-only content on Friday.
So if you're not yet a member,
you can go to readtangle.com forward slash membership
and become one.
Your memberships make up 90% of our revenue.
That's how we support our work.
So we appreciate that.
And it also gets you ad-free podcast,
which, you know, I know the ads can be annoying,
but it's another way we keep the lights on.
All right, with that, I'm going to send it over to John,
and I'll be back, not for my take,
because that's going to be Audrey,
but for your questions answered today.
Thanks, Isaac, and welcome, everybody.
Before we get started, just one more quick reminder
that if you missed the Tangle Live event
in Irvine in October, the full uncut, unedited video version of that is now available on our
YouTube channel. So I'd really appreciate it if you could all go and check that out. And while you're
there, please click like on the video to help us in the algorithm and click subscribe so that you
get notifications on what videos are coming out in the future. All right, with that said,
here are your quick hits for today. First up, federal authorities have reportedly arrested a
Virginia man in connection with the investigation into the pipe bombs placed outside the headquarters
of the Republican and Democratic National Committees
the night before the January 6th, 2021 Capitol riots.
Number two, a Defense Department Inspector General report
found that Defense Secretary Pete Hegeseth
could have endangered troops
and violated some Pentagon rules
when he shared sensitive information
about imminent U.S. military action in Yemen
through signal on his personal cell phone.
The report also stated Hegsef has the authority
to declassify defense department information,
suggesting he did not break the law.
Number three, Navy Admiral Frank Mitch Bradley will brief lawmakers on the September 2nd strike on an alleged drug boat in the Caribbean that has come under scrutiny following reports that Bradley authorized a second strike to intentionally kill survivors.
Number four, the Trump administration began enhanced immigration enforcement operations in New Orleans and Minneapolis.
President Donald Trump also said he has plans to send National Guard troops to Louisiana.
And number five, President Trump pardoned Representative Henry Quayar, the Democrat from Texas,
who was charged alongside his wife in 2024 with bribery and money laundering related to alleged
payments from an Azerbaijani oil company and a Mexican bank.
The Quayar's trial had been scheduled to begin in 2026.
We do have breaking news this evening.
evening, as CNN can now project that the Republican Matt Van Epps has won the special election
in Tennessee's 7th Congressional District that is staving off an attempt at a stunning political
upset by Democrats from the candidate in this race, Afton Fain, you just heard from here.
It's a district that, of course, is used to be considered a conservative stronghold.
And when I say used to be, I mean last year, because President Trump won this district by more
than 22 points in the presidential election.
On Tuesday, Matt Van Epps defeated state report.
Representative Afton Bain in a special election to represent Tennessee's 7th Congressional District.
Van Epps, a former Army officer endorsed by President Donald Trump,
received roughly 54% of the vote for a nine-point victory over Bain,
a former social worker and community health care organizer.
Former Representative Mark Green's resignation in July triggered the special election,
and the race drew national attention and significant outside spending.
Van Epps Win preserves the 220 to 213 majority Republicans held
prior to Green's resignation.
For context, the Tennessee 7th comprises 14 counties in West and Middle Tennessee.
The district is a GOP stronghold, having been represented by a Republican for over 40 years.
Former Representative Green won his seat by over 20 points in 2024, and President Trump
carried the district by 22 percentage points.
However, analysts predicted a competitive race in the special election.
An independent polling headed into the election showed Van Nupt's leading bane by roughly two percentage points.
The possibility of a Democrat flip led to an influx of funding on the race, with the two parties
spending a combined $6 million on campaign ads in and around the district.
Both candidates ran primarily on affordability issues, with Republican ads warning Bain would
raise taxes and Democratic ads suggesting VanEpps would raise health care costs.
Van Epps won the election decisively, carrying every county except Nashville's Davidson County.
However, every voting district shifted left compared to last year's presidential election.
Republican leaders broadly celebrated Van Eyp's victory, with President Trump calling it another
great night for the Republican Party.
Some party strategists frame the night's results differently.
Veteran political strategist Matt Whitlock said the results showed one of the biggest flashing
red light warning signs we've seen yet for Republicans.
Democratic leaders expressed an optimistic outlook on the single-digit margin in a district
where they have struggled to be competitive for decades.
The fact that Republicans spent millions to protect this Trump-plus-22 district and still lost so much
ground should have the GOP shaking in their boots, Democratic National Committee Chairman Ken
Martin said in a statement. Today, we'll share what writers from the right and the left are saying
about the results. Then, Associate Editor Audrey Moorhead will give her take.
All right, first of let's start with what the right is saying.
Many on the right say the result was too close for comfort
and should prompt reflection ahead of the midterms.
Some emphasized the massive resources Democrats poured into the race.
Others say Bain was a bad candidate,
showing Democrats still haven't learned from 2024.
In Fox News, David Marcus wrote,
GOP wins shows Tennessee hasn't been Californian, at least not yet.
A win is a win, but Van Nepp's relatively narrow margin of victory
will set off alarm bells for Republicans nationally, and emboldened the socialist wing of the Democratic Party,
which is already fast on its way to establishing its dominance, Marcus said.
Over the past few years, the population of Nashville has grown by roughly 100 citizens a day,
about 30,000 souls a year, and many are coming from blue, high-tax, high-crime states.
Sadly, many seem willing to bring their failed politics with them.
In her concession speech, Bain said her campaign was the beginning of something powerful in Tennessee and across the south.
She could very well be right, because Nashville is not alone in turning bright blue, Marcus wrote.
Republicans need to take those warnings seriously.
Say what you will about the tenets of socialism, but at least it's an ethos.
Right now, nobody seems to know quite what Trumpism is other than Trump himself.
That has to change.
In the Federalist, M.D. Kittle said Republicans won despite the left's aggressive campaign to turn it blue.
Bain, dubbed the AOC of Tennessee, still proved far too left for a traditional.
Additional Values District that reaches the borders of Kentucky and Alabama.
Bain tried to keep the focus on pocketbook issues, audaciously claiming that she would stand
up to both parties to make life more affordable.
But she couldn't escape her far-left record, much of which stands contrary to making
life more affordable for the average Tennessean Kittlerot.
Like the squad's Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Bain has supported taxpayer-funded Medicaid
for illegal aliens and government-run health care.
Democrats, buoyed by Big Winds last month in Blue States, New Jersey, Virginia, and
California, pumped a lot of money and personnel into winning Tennessee's seventh congressional
and, more so, the momentum narrative. The left's full court press helped turn what should
have been a blowout victory for the GOP into a race a little too close for comfort, Kittle said.
As one influential Tennessee conservative put it, Tuesday's special election should be a massive
wake-up call for congressional Republican leadership. In National Review, Noah Rothman shared
the other way of looking at Tennessee's special election results. The first concluded,
most political observers have drawn from a Republican candidate Matt Van Epp's nine-point victory,
is that it is a terrible omen for the GOP ahead of the 2026 midterms, Rothman wrote.
There's another way to evaluate this race, though.
For all of the environmental advantages that buoyed Bain, she was also a terrible candidate.
Indeed, Democratic primary voters in the district seemed to know she was a terrible candidate.
In October's Democratic primary election, Bain barely managed to eke out a victory in a four-way race.
Bain's policy positions on a range of subjects lean far to the left of the median voter in her district,
but her party nominated her anyway. And as such, she underperformed what looks like the emerging
Democratic Party baseline in 2025 special elections, Rothman said. Democrats are liable to nominate
similarly ill-suited candidates in competitive primaries next year, or even oust entrenched incumbents
in favor of progressive insurgents. It is almost a certainty that Democratic primary voters
will snatch defeat from the jaws of victory in at least a handful of races.
All right, that is it for what the right is saying, which brings us to what the left is saying.
The left views the results as a flashing warning sign for Republicans.
Some suggest a blue wave is coming in 26.
Others say Republicans struggle to turn out their base when Trump isn't on the ballot.
In the New York Times, Nate Cohen wrote, the GOP continues to slip.
The winning party in the last five presidential elections has gone on to lose each of the next
five midterms and four of the next five presidential elections.
If the last month, or really the last year, of election results is any indication,
today's Republicans are following the same path.
Almost every election night this year has gone poorly for them, Cohen said.
They've lost or badly underperformed over and over, including on Tuesday, in a special
congressional election in Tennessee, wherewith nearly all of the vote counted, the Republicans
led by nine percentage points in a district that voted for President Trump last year by 22 points.
Like other recent presidents, Mr. Trump has pushed too far in pursuit of an ideological agenda.
In doing so, he either alienated many of the voters who put him over the top or neglected the
issues, like affordability, that brought them to his side in the first place, Cohen said.
After the last year of agonizing debates over the Democrats' future, there's something painfully simple,
even mundane, about the political opportunity that's opening up for them.
They didn't have to do anything. But historically, electoral comebacks haven't been built on fixing
what went wrong in the last election, like moderating on the issues or avoiding an unpopular stance.
In CNN, Aaron Blake suggested Republicans avoided a nightmare in Tennessee.
The Tennessee 7th is a district that Trump carried by 22 points and former GOP representative
Mark Green won by more than 21 points last year. That means, as things stand,
Bain overperformed Democrats' 24 presidential margin by about 13 points,
and their 2024 House margin by about 12 points, Blake said.
The swing is actually smaller than other U.S. House special elections this year.
Before Tuesday's race, Democrats had overperformed Kamala Harris's margins by an average of 18 points
and their House margins by an average of 16 points in four special congressional elections
held in three states, Arizona, Florida, and Virginia.
One fair question for Democrats, given the smaller overperformance,
is whether they fail to fully take advantage of the environment
by running a quite liberal candidate in Bain.
She gave Republicans plenty of material with her past comments,
which included saying she hates Nashville,
expressing support for defunding the police
and calling herself a very radical person, Blake wrote.
But with 2025 soon coming to a close,
all told, Democrats appeared to be performing better electorally
than they did in 2017,
and Democrats went on in 2018 to win
back the U.S. House in a wave election.
In The Washington Post, Paul Kane said, the surprisingly tough Tennessee election reveals
House GOP has a base problem.
Republican strategists have worried for several months about Trump's plummeting support
among independent voters, which helped lead to blow out wins for Democrats in gubernatorial
races in New Jersey and Virginia last month.
But the underperformance of Tennessee's 7th Congressional District backs up some research
showing a lack of energy among conservative-based voters, Kane wrote.
Democrats estimate that about 70 House seats held by Republicans are more friendly than this Tennessee seat.
In its monthly poll released last week, Gallup found a seismic drop in approval from Republican voters
for the job performance of Congress, down to 23%. Back in July, more than 60% of Republican voters
approved of the GOP-run House and Senate, Kane said. That's the type of drop that is usually
accompanied by a calamitous event that is considered an act of betrayal by one's own political party.
That poll has been shared among House Republicans, according to lawmakers, who are warning each other about how difficult the next 11 months could be for several dozen incumbents.
All right, let's head over to Audrey for her take.
Hi, I'm Associate Editor Audrey Moorhead with today's take.
The National Political Party's laser-focused.
on my home state over the past few weeks has been a surreal experience. Of course, the reasons for
the attention are obvious enough. Tennessee's 7th district was a 22-point Trump district in last
year's presidential election, but early signs showed that Democrats had a real chance of challenging
the historically solid Republican seat. Even so, I never imagined that an off-cycle race
in a district neighboring my hometown would garner so much national attention, that the race became
so close is noteworthy in itself and has huge implications for the midterm elections.
Matt Van Epps only managed to hold the district by single digits,
and that was after the party poured millions into defending the seat
against a very progressive challenger in Afton Bain.
This should have the national GOP battening down the hatches on its own,
add in that the 7th District was redrawn ahead of the 2022 midterms
to split up the Democratic stronghold of Nashville,
and the GOP's narrow victory in the district could portend bad outcomes in other favorable districts,
not just in Tennessee, but across the country.
Voter turnout can be wonky for off-cycle special elections, as participating voters tend to be either very politically involved or the highly motivated base voters of the challenging party.
Those two factors seemed likely to produce much higher turnout from Democratic voters than Republicans in this election.
That expectation was reinforced by the primary elections, in which participation was down 75%, hitting Republican voters harder and sparking Van Epps's aggressive campaign strategy and the reaction from National Republicans.
If that low turnout had held in the special election and produced this narrow victory for VanEpps,
Republicans' logical next step would have been working to motivate the base in order to regain their stronghold over the district ahead of 2026.
But on Election Day, voter turnout wasn't nearly as low as expected.
Roughly 180,000 voters cast ballots, about the same level of turnout as the 2022 midterm election,
when former Representative Mark Green won re-election by 22 points.
and Election Day turnout overwhelmingly favored Republicans
compared to the early vote, where Bain had more support.
While the high turnout shows that Republicans' resources were well spent
and motivating the base to defeat Bain,
the victory is a double-edged sword.
After Bain undeniably converted some swing voters,
or even moderate Republicans in the district,
Van Epps will have his work cut out for him during the 26 election season.
Democrats, meanwhile, can take solace in the narrower than usual loss.
If they made such a high turnout special election
in a traditionally solid red Tennessee district so competitive,
their chances in swing districts look fantastic.
And recent polls also show plummeting approval of Congress
among Republican voters,
creating a worst-of-both-world scenario for the GOP,
where Democrats are motivated to turnout
while the Republican base is increasingly disgruntled.
But the big question for me
is whether Democrats are really banking their future
on candidates like Afton Bain.
Bain is a decidedly far-left member of her party.
She has a long history as a progressive organizer known for her loud, aggressive tactics.
In 2019, for example, Bain penned an essay in the Tennessean in which she wrote that Tennessee is a racist state with a racist legislature
and proclaimed that, quote, we will continue to be loud, disrupt, cause chaos, and speak truth to the racist powers that grip our state until the legislature changes.
She also spoke out in favor of dissolving the Metro Nashville Police Department and a 2019 video that went viral in the lead-up
to the week's election showed her being removed, struggling and shouting from their state house chamber
after her outbursts towards then-Republican Speaker Glenn Cassata.
That resume was galvanizing for the Democratic base in Nashville, but it also provided ample fodder
for Republicans' line of attack. I can't help but think that the GOP's attack ads were the primary
reason for the high turnout of low-propensity voters who tipped this election to Van Epps.
Van Epps, on the other hand, came into the race a relative political unknown, and notably
never seemed to be a major focus of the race.
He ran on his strong military background,
having served nine tours during 10 years
as an active-duty army officer.
But his only political experience
was his year as commissioner
for the Department of General Services
under Republican Governor Bill Lee,
a position he stepped down from
in order to run for this House seat.
Trump endorsed Van Epps in the Republican primary,
and most of Van Epps's campaign
emphasized economic priorities,
military service, and other standard Republican positions.
He was certainly a MAGA candidate,
but he didn't have an extreme background.
And interestingly enough, in the lead-up to the race,
and even now in the aftermath,
very little attention seemed to be on Van Nupt himself,
which made him a little hard to sell,
but also difficult to attack.
Speaking of attacks, I've got to talk about those ads.
Normally, when I read about the millions of dollars
poured into races from national interests,
I don't have a strong grasp of how those numbers translate to the ground.
But while I was at home for Thanksgiving,
watching football with my family,
and the ads flooded my TV,
I found the experience totally exhausting.
Still, a few themes stood out.
Bain's ads played up the issue of affordability,
and she cast herself as someone willing to fight both parties
in order to ensure low costs for Tennessee voters.
Van Epps took a similar approach in his own ads,
but his most effective ads were his attacks against Bain.
Much like the Trump campaign's use of Kamala Harris' past statements
during the 2024 election,
Republicans used real quotes and videos from Bain's online presence,
videos of her crying on the floor of the Tennessee Capitol,
footage of her complaining about Nashville, and, most memorably, as in I can literally still hear
the line in my head, Bain's unfortunate statement, I'm a very radical person, which played in nearly
every attack ad sometimes multiple times. None of Bain's ads had similarly memorable attacks
against Van Epps, or even particularly catchy lines about her own positions. And seeing the ads
back-to-back, the juxtaposition between her bland moderate ads and the aggressive, loud
footage of her from the Van Epps campaign created an unsavory picture, making her seem disingenuous
and dangerously radical. Ultimately, I worry that the lesson Democrats will take from this election
is not about the candidate, but about the message. While I think a more moderate candidate
would have been less vulnerable to attack, possibly narrowing the margin further, or even outright
flipping the seat, Democrats may instead decide that they should attack the Republican candidate more
progressively next time. Given the intractable state of polarization in national politics,
I'd almost be willing to bet on it. The Van App's campaign's success and motivating right-leaning
voters on Election Day is their one silver lining from Tuesday, obviously outside of actually
holding the seat. Approaching the 26 midterms, Democrats seem to have the upper hand when they're
able to boil the race down to issues of the economy and inflation. Look at Abigail Spanberger's
success in Virginia, or Zoran Mondani's overwhelming victory in New York. But if Democrats
continue to run candidates easily branded as radicals,
they offer ample opportunity for Republicans
to motivate their base in red or purple districts,
meaning Republican candidates could force Democrats to get off message,
and the GOP might be able to limit their losses in 2026.
We'll be right back after this quick break.
All right. Thank you, Audrey, for the take. Really good stuff. Always appreciate mixing up the voices here. That brings us to your questions answered. Today's question is from Peter in Seattle, Washington. Peter said, I'm curious about how many political Twitter X accounts are foreign accounts. Additionally, why did they change the rules to show where the accounts are from and what caused them to switch it back so quickly? On another point, I heard that the Department of Defense account was from Israel,
Is that the only government account that was foreign and has that been the same account for the last few administrations?
Or does each new administration create a new social media account?
Lastly, what are your thoughts on the foreign accounts?
Okay, great question.
This was a big drama.
For those of you who are very online like we are, they made this policy change on Twitter where they started displaying, excuse me, on X, where they started displaying the nation of origin of the accounts on X.
Now, we were not able to find any definitive numbers or databases detailing how many political accounts on X are run by foreign users.
But this new feature revealed that the number is definitely not insignificant.
I mean, there were some big, big, big accounts that I have followed or kept an eye on or engaged with before that ended up being foreign-based, apparently, that were posing as Americans.
That's why this is important.
It's not like it matters whether the accounts are foreign or American in a vacuum.
What matters is that many of them were accounts pretending to be Americans who actually were like from Bangladesh or something.
So some of these accounts were left-wing or they reported on liberal causes, but the majority of the big ones did seem to be right-wing conservative or MAGA accounts.
Now, the feature has not been removed, but it has changed slightly after it was rolled out.
Initially, a user's initial location was listed next to their date-joined information.
However, that location information was removed, which led to speculation that Elon Musk, the ex-CEO, was scrapping the location information entirely because it was making conservatives on the platform look bad because so many big MAGA accounts were turning out to be foreign.
That's not the case.
If you look at a user's account page, the location data is still there.
Only the initial sign-up location has been removed.
X's head of product said this information wasn't reliable enough to list publicly.
So we have a screenshot in today's newsletter of our account.
You can see it has the date joined.
It says account based in the United States.
And then it also says that we're connected via the United States App Store.
Also, no, the Department of Defense or Department of War X account is not located in Israel.
This claim was originally made about the Department of Homeland Security's account
and Snopes tracked down the source to find it was a false rumor started on the platform.
government account pages do not display a location.
However, after the feature was turned on,
those accounts did briefly display locations
that showed they were run out of the United States.
As for my thoughts on the foreign accounts,
this is something that me, Ari, and Camille discuss
on the most recent suspension of the rules episode,
so I encourage you to go listen to it.
In short, people are free to offer opinions
on any subject they like,
but misrepresenting their identity
when offering that opinion
is obviously misleading and misinferencing.
I mean, someone saying, vote for MAGA to protect women's rights in America because I'm not going to use a bathroom with a trans woman.
And it turns out that person is based out of Bangladesh.
There's clearly something wrong with that.
The counterpoint is, you know, you could take Venezuela as an example.
We've offered opinions on the Maduro government a lot as a U.S. media outlet.
That'd be a problem if we claim to be a Venezuelan news company when we offered that opinion.
then it would be unethical.
So we wouldn't do that.
People on action do that.
And I think it's a great feature.
So kudos to Elon Musk for rolling it out.
All right, that is it for your questions answered.
I'm going to send it back to John for the rest of the pod.
And I'll see you guys soon.
Have a good one.
Peace.
Thanks, Isaac.
Here's your under the radar story for today, folks.
On Wednesday, President Trump announced a transportation department proposal
to roll back fuel economy standards for vehicles established during the Biden administration.
The Biden-era rules set the industry average for fuel efficiency at 50 miles per gallon by
2031 for light-duty vehicles. The new proposal would lower it to 34.5 miles per gallon.
Additionally, the Transportation Department plans to scrap a 2024 rule to raise the minimum
gas mileage for passenger cars and light trucks by 2013. President Trump said the change
is intended to lower costs for automakers in designing their vehicles. Environmental groups
criticized the plan as a step backwards.
CBS News has this story, and there's a link in today's episode description.
All right, next up is our numbers section.
State Representative Afton Baines' improvement over Vice President Kamala Harris' vote share
between the 2024 presidential election and the 2025 Special Congressional Election
in Montgomery County is plus 10, which accounted for 24% of the votes cast in the 7th District.
Bain's improvement over Harris's performance in Davidson County is plus 18, which accounted for
24% of the votes cast in the district. The amount Republicans spent on the Tennessee 7th special
election was $3.3 million. According to federal election commission filings, contributions from
Republican-linked PACs as of November 24th totaled $2.3 million. The amount Democrats spent in
the Tennessee 7th special election was $2.4 million. According to Gallup, the decrease in Republican
voters' approval of Congress between March 2025 and November 2025 is 40%.
And the decrease in Democratic voters' approval of Congress between March 2025 and November
2025 is 4%.
And last but not least, R Have a Nice Day Story.
Earlier this year, researchers in Wales found that a vaccine for shingles might be having
an unexpected side effect, reducing dementia.
The study of 280,000 adults found that those who had taken the vaccine,
had a 20% reduced risk of developing dementia over a seven-year period.
A follow-up study published Tuesday in the journal, Cell, reinforced this finding,
concluding that cognitively healthy people who received the vaccine
were less likely to develop early symptoms of dementia.
This would be groundbreaking for dementia, if confirmed,
Maxime Tackett, an associate professor at the University of Oxford,
who has conducted research into Schingles vaccination and dementia risk, said,
The Washington Post has this story, and there's a link in today's episode description.
All right, everybody, that is it for today's episode.
As always, if you'd like to support our work,
please go to reetangle.com,
where you can sign up for a newsletter membership,
podcast membership, or a bundled membership
that gets you a discount on both.
Isaac and Ari will be on tomorrow
with special guest Lydia Moynihan,
financial correspondent for the New York Post,
for the suspension of the rules podcast,
and I will return on Monday.
For the rest of the crew, this is John Law, signing off.
Have an absolutely fantastic weekend, y'all.
Peace.
Our executive editor and founder is me, Isaac Saul, and our executive producer is John Wohl.
Today's episode was edited and engineered by Dewey Thomas.
Our editorial staff is led by managing editor Ari Weitzman with senior editor Will Kayback and associate editor's Hunter Casperson, Audrey Moorhead, Bailey Saw, Lindsay Canuth, and Kendall White.
Music for the podcast was produced by Diet 75.
To learn more about Tangle and to sign up for a membership, please visit our website at retangle.com.
You know,
