TBPN Live - Crypto Day | Brian Armstrong, Balaji, Chris Dixon, Katie Haun & More
Episode Date: May 28, 2025TBPN.com is made possible by: Ramp - https://ramp.comFigma - https://figma.comVanta - https://vanta.comLinear - https://linear.appEight Sleep - https://eightsleep.com/tbpnWander - https://wa...nder.com/tbpnPublic - https://public.comAdQuick - https://adquick.comBezel - https://getbezel.com Numeral - https://www.numeralhq.comPolymarket - https://polymarket.comFollow TBPN: https://TBPN.comhttps://x.com/tbpnhttps://open.spotify.com/show/2L6WMqY3GUPCGBD0dX6p00?si=674252d53acf4231https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/technology-brothers/id1772360235https://youtube.com/@technologybrotherspod?si=lpk53xTE9WBEcIjV(01:07) - Balaji Srinivasan is an American entrepreneur and investor known for his roles as former CTO of Coinbase and general partner at Andreessen Horowitz. He co-founded several companies, including Counsyl, Earn.com, and Teleport, and authored The Network State, a book on building decentralized digital communities. Srinivasan holds multiple degrees from Stanford University and is an active angel investor in technology and crypto startups. (27:00) - Alon. @a1lon9 is the co-founder of Pump.fun, a Solana-based platform that enables users to create and trade meme coins instantly. Launched in January 2024, Pump.fun has facilitated the creation of over 6 million tokens and generated significant revenue through transaction fees. They have been a vocal figure in the crypto community, advocating for the democratization of token creation while addressing criticisms regarding the platform's role in speculative trading. (42:07) - Katie Haun is the founder and CEO of Haun Ventures, a $1.5 billion crypto-focused venture capital firm. A former federal prosecutor, she led high-profile investigations into the Mt. Gox hack and Silk Road case, and created the DOJ’s first cryptocurrency task force. Haun previously served as a general partner at Andreessen Horowitz and was the first independent board member at Coinbase. (59:11) - Chris Dixon. Chris is a general partner at Andreessen Horowitz and founder of a16z crypto, overseeing over $7 billion in Web3 investments. He previously co-founded SiteAdvisor (acquired by McAfee) and Hunch (acquired by eBay), and was an early investor in companies like Coinbase and Oculus. Dixon authored Read Write Own (2024), a book advocating for a decentralized internet. (01:29:16) - Kyle Samani. Kyle is the co-founder and managing partner of Multicoin Capital, a thesis-driven investment firm specializing in cryptocurrencies, tokens, and blockchain projects. Before Multicoin, he founded Pristine, a health IT startup acquired by Upskill. Samani holds degrees in Finance and Management from NYU Stern and is recognized for his technical analysis and thought leadership in the crypto space. (01:42:52) - Ben Pasternak. Ben is an Australian tech entrepreneur who gained early recognition for creating the viral game Impossible Rush and later co-founding the social apps Flogg and Monkey. At 15, he became one of the youngest tech founders to secure venture capital funding. He used to be the CEO of SIMULATE, a food technology company known for its plant-based chicken nugget alternative, NUGGS, which has raised over $57 million from investors including Alexis Ohanian and Jay-Z. (01:58:03) - Tom Schmidt. Tom is a General Partner at Dragonfly Capital, focusing on early-stage Web3 and crypto investments. He previously led product at 0x and held product management roles at Facebook and Instagram. Schmidt holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in Computer Science from Stanford University and has advised companies like Audius and Betty Labs. (02:15:01) - Konstantin Richter. Konstantin is the founder and CEO of Blockdaemon, a leading blockchain infrastructure provider for node management, staking, and wallet services. Before founding Blockdaemon in 2017, he held roles at Deutsche Telekom and Nokia, and built several SaaS platforms with successful exits. Under his leadership, Blockdaemon has raised over $400 million, reaching a $3.25 billion valuation, and serves major financial institutions including JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Citi Ventures. (02:29:06) - Luca Netz. Luca (born Luca Schnetzler) is the CEO of Pudgy Penguins, an NFT brand he acquired for $2.5 million in April 2022. A former e-commerce entrepreneur, he revitalized the project by expanding into physical toys, selling over 1.5 million units through major retailers like Walmart and Target. Netz also launched the PENGU token on Solana and developed Pudgy World, aiming to establish Pudgy Penguins as a leading Web3-native IP brand. (02:44:27) - Dylan Abruscato. Dylan is the Emmy-nominated founder of Crypto: The Game (CTG), a viral crypto survival game blending elements of Survivor and Squid Game. Launched in 2023, CTG gained traction for its social gameplay and was acquired by Uniswap Labs in 2024. Prior to CTG, Abruscato held marketing roles at HQ Trivia, Uber, and Postmates, and began his career at Saturday Night Live. (02:59:10) - Brian Armstrong. Brian is the co-founder and CEO of Coinbase, the largest U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange, which he launched in 2012 after working at Airbnb and Deloitte. A Rice University graduate with degrees in computer science and economics, he has also founded GiveCrypto.org and NewLimit, a biotech startup focused on extending human healthspan through epigenetic reprogramming. Under his leadership, Coinbase went public in 2021 and now serves over 100 million users globally. (03:30:22) - Soona Amhaz. Soona is the founder and managing partner of Volt Capital, a venture firm investing in early-stage crypto startups like Nansen, Magic Eden, and LayerZero. Prior to Volt, she co-founded Token Daily and worked at Alation, with a background in engineering from the University of Michigan. Recognized in Forbes 30 Under 30, Amhaz is known for her contrarian investment approach and active participation in the crypto community. (03:45:24) - Mert Mumtaz. Mert is the co-founder and CEO of Helius, a Solana infrastructure company providing developer tools like RPCs and APIs to streamline blockchain app development. Previously a software engineer at Coinbase, he identified inefficiencies in blockchain tooling and launched Helius in 2022 to address them. Known for his outspoken presence on Crypto X, Mumtaz is a prominent advocate for Solana, often engaging in technical debates and challenging misconceptions about the network. (03:59:29) - Dan Romero. Dan is the co-founder and CEO of Farcaster, a decentralized social protocol designed to give users control over their identity and data. Before founding Farcaster in 2020, he was Vice President of Operations at Coinbase, where he joined as employee #20 and helped scale the company through its early growth. Romero is also an active angel investor in startups like Linear, Eight Sleep, and TipTop. (04:16:36) - Shehzan Maredia. Shehzan is the founder, CEO, and CTO of Lava, a Bitcoin-native lending platform that enables users to borrow dollars while retaining full self-custody of their BTC. Previously, he worked as an engineer at Google and earned degrees in Electrical Engineering, Computer Science, and Math from Duke University. Under his leadership, Lava raised a Series A co-led by Khosla Ventures and Founders Fund, and introduced innovations like seedless self-custody, Discreet Log Contracts (DLCs), and Lava Free Pay for gasless blockchain transactions. (04:27:00) - Brandon Millman. Brandon is the co-founder and CEO of Phantom, a leading self-custodial crypto wallet initially built for Solana and now supporting Ethereum and Polygon. Before founding Phantom in 2021, ...
Transcript
Discussion (0)
You're watching TVPN!
Today is Wednesday, May 28th, 2025.
We are live from the TVPN Ultra Dome.
But today is the trenches of technology.
The domicile of DeFi, the mansion of meme coins, the capital of crypto.
It's crypto day on TVPN.
We started early.
We're talking to people from all over the globe.
We just talked to Balaji.
We've actually already been podcasting for hours. We cut it down for you. We have our first three interviews. They're going to play over the next hour. Then we're going to hop back on and do a whole bunch more live interviews. So stay tuned. But we're kicking it off with Balaji. Let's go. Let's go.
Big news, we have Balaji in the studio.
We're gonna bring him in, talk to him for about 45 minutes, take his temperature on what's going on in crypto.
I want the update on what he's up to
and really just take us on the whirlwind tour.
We're gonna get to the bottom of what happened in 1971.
We're gonna get the final answer.
It's been hotly debated.
We're gonna figure it out right now.
Let's bring in Balaji. How you doing? Good to see you.
Good to see you guys.
It's amazing having you on the show. Can you give us just the update on
what is your day to day like? I'm familiar with some of the prehistory, but what are you working on?
What are you most excited about right now?
Sure, so I actually, can I project here?
Yeah, please. Is it possible?
Yeah, you can show your screen.
All right, so,
in Q4, we just opened something I'm calling Network School.
Can you guys see the wedding day shot there?
Yep, so that was the kind of ribbon cutting.
And this is something that combines
a bunch of things
that I care about.
Here's like the site is at ns.com.
And actually-
Great domain, by the way.
No way, no way.
Fantastic domain.
Thank you, thank you.
I appreciate that you guys are connoisseurs also.
Yeah, we have a four letter domain.
You're kind of destroying us at the two letter domain.
You mocked us.
Well, well, we will, you know, I still, you know,
you're in the four commas club or something, I guess. Yeah,, I still to you know, you're in the the four commands club or so
I guess I know
Characters club, right? Yeah
Break it down. I saw a hundred k fellowship. I also see a school
Typically I have to pay for school. Are you paying me? How does this all work? Right?
So this is essentially there's several things that are happening at the same time
Sure, like obviously traditional academia is basically over as we know it. Yeah, it's about ten different things hitting it at the same time
and it's you know, lost trust and credibility and so on and
You know what we've got here is we're doing global meritocracy anybody from anywhere. Obviously Americans are welcome
But anybody who's what I call internet first is welcome, right?
So if you're, you know, pro Bitcoin, if you're pro cryptocurrency, smart contracts, and so
on, you're pro AI, you're pro biotech, pro nuclear and whatnot. And those kinds of people
exist all over the world. And, and so we're bringing them here. And so global meritocracy,
basically. And there's there's Vitalik, there's Brian Johnson, can you see the video? Yeah,
incredible. Yeah. So this is basically It's on screen. Yeah, incredible.
So this is it.
Basically, we're actually doing the Startup Society.
So that's what Network School is.
There's much more I can say about it,
but that's the idea.
Okay, so walk me through the actual experience of joining.
Is this cohort-based?
A lot of these new education initiatives,
very few of them have just jumped straight to,
we're gonna replace a four-year experience.
And I don't know if that's because the four-year experience is fundamentally broken
There's a lot of things that are potentially broken about higher ed
but what is your view on just the length of time that it takes to
Get whatever you need to out of academic academia or schooling generally. That's right. So well, very good question
It's a long long topic, but just to level set,
I actually spent 10 years at Stanford.
I was an undergraduate graduate.
Got my MS in chemical engineering,
BS, MS, PhD, electrical engineering.
I taught computer science and stats there.
I'm a research scientist.
I have 5,000 plus citations, blah, blah.
Did genomics, taught computer science
and so on at Stanford.
So I know academia fairly well, and in fact I thought
for the first 10 years or so of my adult life
that I was actually gonna be a professor,
and then I started a genomics company
and basically became, you know, gone to tech.
And my view is, there's many things I can say
about the four-year college education,
but one issue is it's like front-loading
all the cost to the beginning,
and then there's zero budgeted for maintenance
over somebody's life.
So it's as if you paid $200,000 for a car,
and then zero for oil or gas or wheel changes
or so on for the rest of your life.
And so people get this expensive education,
and they forget all of it just a few years later.
I'm sure if you gave test, retest, you know, stats
and looked at what percentage they actually retained,
we know all this stuff about space repetition.
We know forgetting curves and so on.
So basically, the education is gone.
And what you really want is something that's like
continuous education over the course of your life, where, you know, then like, for example,
VO comes out or some new API comes out,
but you want us to be able to quickly load that into your brain,
be productive and to have some budget every year in a continuous sense,
as opposed to, you know, like a, like a upfront upfront forget everything sense.
That doesn't even get into the fact that
unless you've been in the world of work,
you don't actually appreciate how amazing it is
to have just time to purely study,
you have to learn everything on the job.
It also is something like front loading the vacation
and getting all these kids at age 18
into like a lifetime of student loan debt.
There's many, many things wrong with it,
but that era is ending.
And then what's next?
Like my view, why am I doing this in part because, know how well actually get right into it. You know how America started
loosely
Actually America was started by the tech and the bro forming a texture. Let me explain okay, so
Okay, here's why so
Massachusetts Massachusetts was attack. Yeah, Massachusetts was the tech,
and Virginia was the bro.
Okay.
There we go.
There we go.
Okay.
So, for those who don't know, like Massachusetts, the Massachusetts Bay Colony, that was the
Puritans, they founded Harvard in the 1600s when, you know, it was actually just a one-room
schoolhouse based on a one-room place, right?
It was a very, very small thing, very modest at the beginning.
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology
was founded about 200 something years later,
but basically Massachusetts has always been the center
of like higher learning, education, and so on in the US.
In Virginia, the Cavaliers, they were the bro.
They were muscular, they were on horseback,
and they liked to shoot things and so on.
And actually Virginia was the most important state
during the American Revolution.
And a lot of the early American leaders came from Virginia. That was like the founder, CEO, archetype.
Right. And both of these were actually different factions at different times, won and lost in the
English Civil War of like, you know, 100 something years earlier, the Roundheads went to Massachusetts.
That was like the left of England and the Cavaliers were like the right and they went to Virginia.
Anyway, so they basically when the right and left were working together, that was the tech
and the bro, right?
And that's what made America really great when they were working together.
Now of course, not as much.
Let's say you have a husband and wife and they have kids and they have and one of one
of the adults, you know, wants to participate in the network state and the other parent is like well sorry the kids are in
preschool and you know that feels like a large part of the people that you would
want to recruit over time and I and I can imagine exactly what your kind of
answers to that would be but I'd love to hear it from you. Sure so so first of all
um you know like my vision in that,
which is definitely family friendly.
With that said, who moves and who moves at what times?
So typically, people move for education or employment,
and they usually move in their 20s and so on and so forth.
And once they're anchored in territory,
they tend to only move if there's
like a job for both husband and wife,
for example, or if they're like refugees, like things get blown up like in Ukraine or, or in,
you know, Middle East or what have you. Or if they're like refugees from, for example, blue
states where the policy gets so bad that people just uproot and move and there's like muggings or,
you know, something like that syringes, etc etc like a lot of people left blue states or last you know five years as you're aware because of that in part
and i know some people say things are getting better but like you know at least in some places
but i think in general that that exodus is still there um that's also actually how the us itself
was populated at the beginning there's two different forms ways of founding star societies
and they're complementary the first is the wild West frontier kind of thing, where you have single men
coming out. But the second actually, the Puritans had quite a few married
couples coming out, but because because they had an ideological or religious
motivation. And then you also had waves of refugees from Europe, there's all
kinds of crazy wars in Europe, like the revolutions of 1848, or, you know, famine
in Europe, like the Irish potato famine. And that also brings, you know, like,
like people out right but
So so the answer is like um there's only so much you can do at the beginning in a sense
You know how dropbox started as an individual product and then it became a product for small teams and then for enterprise
Yeah, right so in the same way like you first kind of have to build a product that works for like the individual remote worker
Then maybe the couple where it's a two-body problem
Then like you know the early family then the scaled-up family then like the whole community of people who are moving together
Or the whole startup there's no together
And so it's just like think of it as kind of going from individual to SMB up the ladder like that
So you definitely want families and we actually have a lot of people who brought families um
But the product for families is itself a product,
just like Apple has a family plan, for example.
There's new permission structures and so on,
account structures and stuff you need for families.
It's all in the program.
That's something.
I like how you explain this in product-led SaaS terms.
That's great.
That's great.
I'm on the Tech Bros podcast, so I'm speaking.
Yeah, no, no, no, it's perfect.
No, and I totally buy that it's OK for these
to initially be frontiers and sort of establish Yeah, yeah, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, in. The interesting story that I've been toying with with Bitcoin is that the narratives have
shifted. Bitcoin promised a few things. It didn't deliver entirely on all of those. It wasn't
entirely anonymous. It wasn't entirely used for transactions, but it's become a fantastic store
of value. And that's kind of where it landed. Do you think that that's the correct story of Bitcoin? And do you think that crypto projects,
is there a pattern of this like,
shoot for the moon, you'll land amongst the stars.
It's okay to kind of build towards like
a three pronged amorphous future
because if one of them hits,
you could still wind up with a fantastic power law outcome.
Oh yeah, I mean, like I think,
I think it's the only way of doing things.
In the sense of, it's kind of like people
Who there's some people there's one guy who remain unnamed who like critiques like Elon's self-driving schedule
It's like he promised it an X date and it only arrived like like a year later. He sucks so much
and I'm like
You know like I think you want to sing like Tesla or you know, space because they turn impossible into late
Yeah
Right. Yeah, you'll take that every single day obvious in my view obviously, right?
The I want to answer to your point
So the way I think about Bitcoin is maybe the obvious way, but it's digital gold, right?
That's to say it is
infrequently moved on chain, it stores large amounts of value. And it actually serves some of the purpose of gold reserves where, like you sort of want to show on chain that you have it, it's almost like, meant to be public in some ways, right? And then the various kinds of features that people have wanted to add over time to Bitcoin, The problem is that gold should be as immutable as possible
and mutability is in conflict with,
I mean, programmability is a good value
and immutable is a good value,
but those are like fire and water, they don't mix, right?
There's, you know, you want a drink of water
and sometimes you want a hot fire to keep you warm,
but you don't want them in the same thing
and then you get nothing, right?
So immutability, Bitcoin's immutability, its stability, and its predictability,
think of it as locked, right? And then what happened was privacy went to like Zcash and
zero knowledge, you know, tornado cash was now legal again, and so on. And zero knowledge
is booming. Zero knowledge is one of the big things that people are under pricing, I think. Cool. Bytec, arguably another and so on.
Then number two is programmability with smart contracts.
That went to Ethereum and Solana and whatnot.
Number three, transactions, you know, as digital cash, that went to stable coins, USTC, USDT.
And then other kinds of things like storing data on chain and you know
like like using it as an Oracle that went to other stuff like chain link and other kinds of things and then
You know basically other other functions like on chain data is
NFT is just like on chain code of smart contracts that went to NFTs
So all of these things that were initially contemplated did happen just happened on other chains that tolerate the risk
Because you know you have success and failures then and Bitcoin
Couldn't tolerate that risk Bitcoin is locked. Yeah. Yeah well
With the zero knowledge stuff. I I haven't been tracking it as closely most recently
Are you waiting for?
Engineering challenges to be hurtled. Are you waiting for
Just more code to be written. I understand that it's incredibly complex code,
some of the hardest programming software, right? Or is it more
on the customer adoption side, we're ready for on ramps of kind
of the masses, but it's just going to take time for people to
build the the bridges to actually make these new ZK
products just lovable and like, you know,
well, first, just to explain what zero knowledge is, your knowledge arguably is,
and the tax ultimate analogy, ZK arguably is to crypto with the transformer is AI,
in the sense of it takes a bunch of things that were previously special case stuff.
And it puts it into kind of a common framework where you
can, like, lots of special case subroutines can now be general
case to very to oversimplify. And what that means is you can
develop ZK protocols that, for example, you know, ZKYC, where
they just prove what is necessary for a government to be satisfied
that this is a real human being and nothing else, right?
And that's necessary because look at these, you know,
these KYC attacks on like, you know,
Raj of salon and other kinds of people, right?
Like the modern form of KYC is where governments
force companies to store giant honeypots
full of sensitive information.
And then the governments themselves are often hacked,
like the OPM hack and so on and so forth. So that's one aspect of where ZK can come in and
be the solution. Another thing is that ZK is actually used as a compression technology. So,
for example, ZK rollups, not just a privacy technology. And so this stuff is actually
already there and it's being deployed and it's working those EK chains and so on
It's it's one of those things where is it consumer visible? Maybe not
But I think I think it's just a really important technology might never not to be consumer visible is what you're saying
That's right. But but what it does basically mean is there can be sort of magical things where?
You can prove what you need to prove without giving up anything
else.
Yeah.
Right?
You can prove you are a...
I mean, that's the way a lot of KYC stuff works right now.
I scan my ID.
Most people don't know that there is a machine learning algorithm with computerization in
there that's reading the ID and checking it with a database.
People just know, hey, I scanned my ID and I got KYC'd.
It could be a lot easier and it could be more resistant
to hacks and leaks, right?
Well, you want, we want to something like SingPass
or Estonia's digital ID, where it's like an app
on your phone and that's your ID card.
And then that can do is your knowledge handshake
with something else, right?
As opposed to like a piece of paper, like physical card.
You know, how are you feeling about stable coins these days?
How are you feeling about stable coins these days? How are you feeling about stable coins these days?
I feel like there's an immense amount of energy
and excitement, but they always feel a little bit
misaligned with the folks who are like,
let's get off the dollar, let's, you know,
you know, we don't, we wanted to move away
from that system and we're kind of maybe rebuilding it.
How are you feeling about stable coins?
Are you optimistic?
Is there, do they play an important role
in your vision of the future?
Yes, though I think, well, so let me actually show you guys
something, ready?
Here is a fun video.
Okay.
Can you see the screen there?
The stable coin video is dropping right now, let's see. Oh, coinbase and circle announced launch of USDC digital dollar. Yes, October 23rd 2018
And so guess who's there were you behind this?
That's amazing
Lore this is good. Yes. I remember this video. Yeah
I remember thinking like oh, I don't really understand this but now I do so you were
Yeah, this is a long way of saying you were early and right you were super long stable coins But I heard it's hard to make money
Just underline here is the market cap of USDC, which is now 60 billion dollars. Yeah, wow
October 3rd this if I can get the cursor bang. What's up? Let's say October 2 2018. Can you see that? Yeah, I can't see that but
I can see the broad chart, but
Congratulations for being early. You're always early where we're going in the future with stable coins
How important are they going to be because it still feels like there's a little bit of tug of war with like we're staying on the dollar
We're not really and new these few, future global currency.
And new and legacy financial institutions,
seeing that we're in a friendlier regulatory environment,
seeing the product market fit of stablecoins
now wanting a piece of the action.
Like when the Wall Street Journal reports
like the dollar fell in value,
like the stablecoins also fell in value, right?
And so it solves some problems, but not all of them.
So what's your take?
Right, so, well, the term stable coin obviously is historical
because it was stable relative to Bitcoin.
Sure.
I think you could sort of separate that out
into two things like a fiat coin and a flat coin.
Totally.
Like a fiat coin is something that's an on-chain mirror
of fiat off-chain.
And a flat coin would be something
that actually retained its purchasing power over time.
And that's much harder to do
because you'd have to maintain its stability
against bread and PlayStations and whatever. And if there much harder to do because you'd have to maintain its stability against
bread and playstations and whatever. And if there's an actual shortage of those things, then price might increase for no reason other than actual physical shortage.
But keeping the historical name, stable coins are... So first, why are they useful? Well,
at a minimum, they're better international wire transfers.
That alone justifies their market cap.
That's like tens of billions of dollars in market cap
because they just save you from $25.
And more importantly, banks are only open
like nine to five weekdays, right?
So like from 40 hours a week uptime
to 168 hours a week, which is 24 seven uptime,
that's worth a lot. Imagine if websites were only up 40 hours a week uptime to 168 hours a week, which is 24 seven uptime, that's worth a lot.
Imagine if websites were only up 40 hours a week, right? So just that alone, the ubiquity
internationalization, then you add programmability and so on. When people say, oh, why just put a
dollar on chain? That's why, right? That's why they're valuable, right? And the space is partitioned
in an interesting way. And I think many other things will partition this way into like a US and a global
Right like the usdc coin or the usdc asset is like us regulated and then usdt is like intentionally non-us regulated
Right sort of like there's like coinbase and there's like global exchanges and so on. So I think that'll be a common
partitioning of many kinds of markets
um
And so, uh, so that's that's justification for why I'm bullish. But now
onto your specific questions. I think that one of the things once you've got something
on chain, it can just be easily swapped. Right. And so now that USDC is there, you're going
to have probably every other fiat currency up there and what have you because it's become
so mainstream and whatnot. But when that
happens, you get an interesting thing, which is similar to launch of Google News in the mid 2000s.
As you may recall, all these newspapers put their newspapers online in the late 90s and early 2000s.
Then when Google News launched, it suddenly showed that the Des Moines Herald and the San Francisco
Chronicle and NYT, WAPO Miami Miami Tribune, whatever we're all
Basically printing the same stuff. There was some custom stuff that they had in their own markets
But most of it was just reprinting the AP the news right?
News right and you can see this on Google is it's like a hundred and seventy three other outlets printed this story
It's all the same story every time. Yeah. Yeah, and that's because those newspapers
They had trucks and they had you know
You used to say never argue with a man who buys ink by the barrel now never listen to a man who still buys ink by
the barrel long right because
You know, are you buying any ink? You know, I mean I actually like pencil and paper to write but not print right?
That's really not early days. We went through a lot of days never fight with a podcaster who live streams for 20 hours a week
Something like that exactly is beat you on exact
That's right
So point point being though that they had these geographical monopolies at something they put their stuff online and there's a delayed reaction
And suddenly they realized wait a second every newspapers in competition every the newspaper
And so of course all the local ones not any just all died. And only the national ones survived.
And they became much more ideological.
And the new partitioning of information space
was on the basis of ideology, not geography.
So you've got the Jimbrows,
and you've got people who are interested in,
I don't know, various political causes,
you've got crypto causes,
you've got things sectioned by vertical
rather than geographic horizontal,
ideology rather than geography.
Okay, so the same thing is gonna happen with assets.
And the reason is, first, you've got these fiat currencies
that are put on chain.
And then we're nearing something
which I call the DeFi matrix.
The DeFi matrix starts with the observation
that fiat fiat can be swapped like Forex,
but fiat crypto can also be swapped like USD BTC
and crypto crypto can be swapped like BTC ETH.
And of course crypto can be swapped for NFTs
and all kinds of this crazy man entry of digital assets
is now out there.
So you visualize this giant square of every asset
that can be traded for every other asset.
And there's amazing numbers of crazy financial machinery
out there now that will basically do the complexity of finding buy and seller pairs, you know,
like Uniswap and MarketMakers and so on behind the scenes for this swap. What that means
is that whatever asset you have, you have less need to get into a fiat currency, you
can just hold that asset. Then when you want to, you just liquidate it for whatever other
asset you want at some fee. Okay, what I mean by that is, what do you want to, you just liquidate it for whatever other asset you want at some fee.
Okay, what I mean by that is, what do people call it?
What's the hybrid way of saying when you sell your company, you get a liquidity event.
That's right.
That's another term of talking about cash.
Cash is liquidity.
Cash is universal barter.
Cash can be traded for anything.
But now anything can be traded for anything, which means there's less need for cash, right?
And so all these countries will wake up one day and they'll find, wait a second, just
like the newspapers, we had a geographical monopoly on our fiat currencies, but now we
don't and we're competing in this global marketplace of all these other cryptocurrencies as well
as really big fiat currencies, right?
And then they're going to have to compete just like, you know, the information environment,
you compete on ideology rather than geography, then in the transaction environment, you have
to compete on features, not on places, right?
So for example, privacy coins or smart contract coins and so on and so forth.
You compete on the vertical as opposed to the horizontal of France coin, is a fronk and Japan coin which is JPY right? Yeah, and it's a funny way of putting it
But that's what that's like what they are, right? Yeah, so I'm not saying there isn't any utility to geography
So especially given that so many of these things, but are people done all these countries have gone cashless, right?
Yeah
cash physical cash was actually something that
Tethered people to geographical area because you needed to actually hold it and it was issued there and redeemed there and so on and so forth.
Once you go digital, you don't have to use cash anymore.
And many people have, for example, crypto cards where they can hold in one currency and spend in another.
And it just Apple Pay or whatever just works, you know, that people don't know.
So stable coins are an intermediate form that facilitates this transition from the fiat
world to the pure crypto world, kind of like putting newspapers online was an intermediate
form.
And just like there was a whole battle in the 2010s where newspapers at one point felt
threatened, oh my God, I mean, they still feel threatened, but they fought this whole
battle of the bulge counterattack on social media, tried to take away your voice, my voice,
everybody's voice, but they lost.
You know what I call when Elon took over X, you know what I call it?
What do you call it?
X day.
It's like D day, right?
All the good guys amassed $44 billion for like the Normandy landing.
Boom, right?
Like this, you know, because all it was still technically illegal.
They were like, if you want your own company, Why not build one or whatever to get free speech back?
Remember those kinds of lines of argument prior to it,
right, Transway 2?
And then Elon basically gathered the forces
and every tech guy, like some Marvel movie,
put in a mill, a bill, five mill,
whatever they could afford, pass the head around.
I mean, $44 billion in cash is like a non, go ahead.
Yeah, no, no, it's just funny passing the hat around
and Morgan Stanley puts in 13 billion in debt.
It's kind of classic.
Yes, so every center right, center left in some cases,
person who just piled it,
because Elon obviously was the man,
but so many people backed him, right?
And this was something where like,
Thor landing with a hammer, or boom like this, right? All of these communists just fly back against, you know,
the walls, all these books just defeated like this and X day, right? Now, what that actually
also meant was a tower of Babel kind of moment because Twitter no longer exists. There's
X, there's truth social and Gab and whatever all on the right.
And there's Blue Sky and Macedon and Threads
and TikTok on the left.
And there's the crypto networks like Nostr and Lens
and Farcaster and so on, right?
So you have a tarot-bale moment
where Twitter has been shattered.
Anyway, this has been fantastic, Balaji.
Thank you so much for stopping by.
You're welcome to come on
and screen share with us anytime.
Yeah, this is great.
Awesome, great. Maybe I can be your Kramer special guest. And thank you for kicking off. You're welcome to come on and screen share with us anytime. Yeah, this is great. Awesome, great.
Maybe I can be your Kramer special guest.
And thank you for kicking off.
Yeah, I would love that.
We have, I think, 10 plus other exciting crypto entrepreneurs.
Yeah, it should be a big day once again.
Welcome, how are you?
There he is.
What's going on?
Hey, how's it going, guys?
A pleasure to be here. Welcome to the Temple of Technology.
Can you kick us off with a quick introduction on yourself and the company?
And your PFP too. Got to get the backstory there.
Absolutely. I think not too many people are familiar with the PFP, but to start with myself,
I'm Alan. I'm one of the co-founders of PumpFun. PumpFun is a launch pad where anyone can create their own coin
and it's based on the Solana blockchain.
And my PFP is Remilio.
It is an NFT based on Ethereum.
Very cool.
A little crossover.
Yeah, crossover.
Pulling over some Ethereum.
Not pure Solana.
Why don't we start with,
we have a primarily sort of traditional tech audience. pulling over some Ethereum. Not pure Solana Max. Why don't we start with,
we have a primarily sort of traditional tech audience.
Why don't we start with the origin story of Pump?
I know you have had a crazy time,
even fundraising went through a couple
pivots to get to the launch pad that is today.
So I think it'd be great to hear the backstory.
Yeah, absolutely.
So my background, I mean, I've been in crypto for a while.
Before we built PumpFund, and myself and my two co-founders
were building a bunch of different ideas
in crypto, consumer crypto, in NFTs, and social
fi, and a bunch of different random corners of the space.
Nothing really stuck.
I mean, I think we built for around a year or so
before we got any
semblance of traction. Ultimately, we weren't really building for ourselves. And I think once
people started trading meme coins on Solana is when we first saw that there's a problem or a few
problems that we can solve that would actually be addressing some of our issues because we were
trading on the side. We've always been trading meme coins and NFTs and all that different stuff on chain. And we noticed that there's a whole bunch of different problems
that we could solve by building a launch pad where anyone can create their own coin, standardizing
the way people launch these things in a more secure and safe manner, as well as in a way that
is more user-friendly for people so anyone can get involved
and you don't need to be highly technical
to launch your own asset.
So PumpFun, I would say was the first product
that really allowed for mass tokenization
and it's something that we're gonna continue doing.
So I wanna give a little bit of backstory.
I'm sure you can't talk about numbers,
but Pump is one
of the fastest growing companies in history. It's why we're, you
know, one of the reasons we were interested in having you on the
show. I believe we'll have to make some type of chart at some
point, but I believe we'll probably be one of the fastest
companies ever to a billion dollars in revenue. How quickly
when you guys started the launchpad, did you feel like you
were? Did you kind you feel like you were,
did you kind of realize that you were onto something?
Was it kind of immediate PMF,
or did you even have to iterate
from that initial launch of the launch pad?
Yeah, when we first came up with the idea,
we were pretty confident that it was going to work,
especially compared to some of the other stuff
that we were building.
On our launch day, we got quite a bit of buzz around it. I mean, the MVP that we shipped was
so incredibly shitty that everyone came and then they had to leave because it just wasn't working.
But that initial buzz and the feedback that we got made us realize that we were onto something
for sure. It was only a matter of iteration. It was a matter of finding distribution because
ultimately what we offer is a marketplace.
It's a launch pad where you're connecting people that are creating these assets
and people that are potentially interested in buying and selling them and trading them.
So it was a matter of distribution.
It was a matter of iteration and make and polishing the products.
It took us around two months after launch to actually get it off the ground.
There's a lot of, you know,
make it work, but eventually it, uh, it played out and obviously, you know, we
were confident that it was going to work, but we had no idea that it could blow up
and then actually generate so much revenue and become this great business.
Um, how do you actually make money?
Yeah.
So, um, two different, two main, it's, two main, it's all really the same model.
It's a small fee on each trade.
So whenever a coin launches, the platform takes a 1% trading fee and each time the coin
is traded, once it graduates, I mean, a graduation is basically when a coin gets to a certain
market cap, it grows in size and so on. Once it graduates, there is a, it's the same fee basically, but
just a smaller one that the platform charges.
And is that supply designed so that you don't get dissimilar mediated or you don't get outcompeted
by other platforms? Like, are you thinking about that? And, and because I feel like there's
this narrative in crypto where like somebody builds something amazing, has a great business and then there's like an open source fork
of it or something like that.
Is that, is that a risk that you're thinking of and like planning against?
I mean, of course, you know, when you build something successful, I think in any industry,
you're going to expect some copycats.
Um, I mean, something that we've been expecting is something that we saw historically.
We saw that a year ago.
We saw it six months ago and we're continuing to see it.
Um, I mean, obviously we're continuing to see it.
I mean, obviously, we continue to monitor the markets
and kind of see what user feedback is
on different approaches and models.
But ultimately, we have our own solutions.
We speak to our own users.
And we kind of stand our own way in that regard.
Talk about the branding.
It's extremely chaotic.
It feels extremely internet native.
And but I'm curious what your kind of like framework
to making decisions around everything kind of design brand.
Yeah, absolutely.
I mean, I think when we first started,
Pump actually wasn't the name that we came up
for this product specifically.
It existed for like a few different products
that we launched because we honestly
thought it was like
all the products we were building were for people in the trenches, so to speak. So people that were
trading on chain and so on. And we felt like that whole ethos, that whole branding just kind of
aligned with, I guess, with the culture of people trading on chain and really this
culture of people trading on chain and really this deeply internet native crowd that we were addressing. I think definitely contributes to how we think about it today. The way we think about
it is we don't necessarily want to, I guess, we want to pay respects to kind of where we came from and we want to grow our community rather than removing and making our brand
like, I mean, there's a big difference between making your brand more accessible or your
product more accessible and kind of moving away from the brand that you've built.
Right.
So I think a big part of why Pompous succeeded is that it has really built a community of people
that are trading and hopping on every single day and so on.
And a part of that is being in touch with them
and continuing to interact.
And that also reflects in the design.
Like if we changed everything all of a sudden
and it was extremely, I guess,
looked like your average product
and AI or something like that,
then I think there'd be a lot of eyebrows
that would be raised by our user base.
Yeah.
Can you talk to us about VC?
I mean, have you raised any, I'm sure people
who grow fast, they're beaten down your door.
I think the story is you raised from a six man, right?
Is that correct? Dudutis is fun.
That's correct. I can't give him too many details on the whole, I guess, life cycle.
Yeah. But I have a question that, that I, that would be fun to answer. What's the craziest
thing a VC has ever done to try to win allocation? Cause I know you guys, not a mess. Revenue
is just rocketed to such an extreme degree. You guys, for every dollar of venture capital,
I'm sure you've generated, at this point,
an obscene amount of profit.
But do you have any funny stories there?
I'm not sure if there's anything in particular there,
but definitely there are so many stories where,
not just for VCs, but I guess influencers in the space
and stuff as well, where we DM them multiple times
and got received introductions
and didn't get any responses,
only for the exact opposite to take place
once the platform has gained traction.
And yeah, this has happened many times.
Can you talk to us about the livestream product
that you guys have?
I mean, we're live streamers ourselves
and so super interested in what's going on there.
Yeah, and you recently brought it back
and made a number of changes to it.
So I'm curious how it's evolving.
Yeah, absolutely.
So the live stream feature is pretty simple.
When you launch your own coin,
you can also launch a live stream alongside it
to engage with your community,
talk to them, do a whole bunch of different things. Obviously, I think a lot of your viewers are going to be familiar
with the previous live stream product that we had, which kind of, I mean, it gained a lot of
mindshare late last year and ultimately needed to shut that down for a variety of reasons.
But we decided to bring it back with much, much better moderation, as well as just an improved product overall.
And the reason why we think that our live streaming product
can genuinely change the whole creator landscape
and actually compete with some of the biggest
live streaming platforms out there,
is that it completely flips the incentives
that creators are currently facing.
As a creator, I mean, I'm already seeing this
with relatively few users compared to the biggest platforms.
As a creator, when you're starting out, it's pump fun. Live streaming is the easiest place in the
world to get your first 50 to 100 viewers. Why is that? The reason is because users are directly
incentivized to find people early. Because if they find your live stream early, they see that
you're interesting, you're entertaining, you're funny, et cetera, and they buy into your coin. If your coin gets more attention, then that presumably can
yield profits, obviously, not financial advice, et cetera, et cetera. But that's oftentimes what
ends up happening. And because of that incentive structure, it makes it so much easier for creators
to get traction. And that's the biggest problem that creators usually face when they start out.
That's the first thing.
The second thing is that,
with a few recent changes that we've made,
creators don't necessarily even have to sell their tokens
to make money.
They can monetize instantly with no middleman
through creator revenue sharing.
So whenever someone makes a trade,
a small percentage of that goes directly to the creator.
So they monetize immediately. There's no percentage of that goes directly to the creator. So they monetize immediately.
There's no approvals that they have to go through.
They don't need to reach any milestones.
They interact directly with their audience
and they don't necessarily need to appeal
to any advertisers and so on.
As long as their content is within,
respects the terms of service of the site,
they're going to be able to monetize.
Talk about why you chose Solana early on
and why you're continuing to double down there.
And if you're looking at opportunities
on other chains at all.
Yeah, so we love Solana.
I mean, we, I mentioned Ethereum early on with my PFP.
So that's, I guess, kind of where our background is.
We built on Ethereum for many years in that ecosystem.
Eventually, because we were building products
and we're getting, I guess, increasingly
desperate to get users, we saw that, especially for this,
for meme coins, people were starting to trade them
on other blockchains, specifically Solana.
And that was gaining a lot of traction back then.
So we wanted to go to where all the users were, right?
Because that would maximize our chances of succeeding.
So we went to Solana, obviously after we gained success,
we got a ton of inbound from other blockchains and so on.
And people were asking to get their favorite blockchain added.
But ultimately our goal is to bring tokenization
to the masses.
Our goal is to kind of expand this universe
and really break into the mainstream.
And I don't necessarily believe that going
into any other chain would contribute to that.
Solana as infrastructure has improved so significantly
over the past year, year and a half
since PumpFund has been live,
that we're very confident that once
I guess that critical mass has reached,
the infrastructure will be able to support
to support the activity on the platform.
And more than just that,
there's so many ecosystem applications
that utilizes, pumps marketplace infrastructure
and so on that actually contributes,
not just to the bottom line,
but contributes to the overall user experience.
People can use whatever interfaces they like
to get the best experience possible.
So all in all, couldn't be happier being on Solana,
and we're not considering leaving anytime soon.
Very cool.
Fantastic.
Thank you for jumping on.
I know you don't do a lot of interviews,
do a lot of media in general.
So I appreciate you coming and telling the story.
I legitimately think there will eventually
be a Harvard Business School case study on what you're building
because it's completely unprecedented, the growth.
I think we'll probably just start to see this year
people realizing how big a business Pump has become
in such an incredibly short period of time.
So thank you for jumping on and sharing
and we'll talk to you soon.
Absolutely, appreciate it soon. Absolutely.
Appreciate it, guys.
Cheers.
And that Harvard Business case study
will be tokenized on-chain.
I'm sure it will have a meme token rounded.
I'm sure it will get 20 meme coins per case study.
Maybe a meme coin for every paragraph.
HBS class should just be live-streamed on PumpFund.
They could fractionalize the case study every every word
You can just get a word
Yeah
well
It's interesting that the the I think meme coins were working on a theory
Yeah, but the the gas fees on a two-hour so high or something
You know you couldn't make a trade for $100 because somebody would be like,
are they gonna pay $50 in gas to make a trade like that?
Speed and price, you increase the speed,
you drop the price, you always just see more activity.
And so, yeah, fascinating.
That $1 billion revenue number,
is that something that you can just inspect on the blockchain
if you just add up a lot of transactions?
Is that possible?
Yeah, it's visible.
I had seen a post as of maybe last week
that they had passed $750 million in revenue.
And when did they actually launch?
It seems like it was like a year ago.
Is it like roughly a year ago?
Wow, impressive.
So one year to $750 million in real,
and it's not marketplace.
That's like their-
That's not GMV, that's actually their take on-
Net revenue.
Net revenue.
Anyway, next up we have Katie Hahn
from Hahn Ventures in the studio.
Welcome to the show.
Katie, thanks so much for hopping on.
We're excited to talk to her.
Welcome.
Welcome.
Hey.
Hey, guys.
Good morning.
Good morning.
How are you?
Wherever you may be.
I think you're at the conference.
No, we are not.
We are in Los Angeles.
We're in Hollywood, the future of media.
Yeah, we're bringing media back to Hollywood.
But thanks so much for joining.
Would you mind kicking us off with just a little bit
of an introduction? and how are you spending
your day to day these days?
Oh my gosh, a little bit of an introduction.
Well, my name's Katie Hahn.
I founded Hahn Ventures, which is,
we're investing in blockchain technology
through an early stage fund and a later stage fund.
And we're about three and a half years old
as a company and as a fund.
Do you do liquids or all of those?
How many decades has the last three and a half years felt like?
Oh my gosh. Well, you know what, guys, I've actually been in the space over a
decade. Yeah, over a decade.
So how how many years has that felt like?
The last three years have been wild, but I'm really excited.
You asked about how I'm spending my days.
I'm really excited about this particular moment in crypto because we have a lot of the fundamentals coming together.
And as I said, I've been in this space a long time
and we've had different fundamentals working
at different points, but it finally feels like
all these fundamentals are working all at once.
Break down those fundamentals.
I imagine it's regulatory, it's community,
it's collective belief.
It's like scale of the actual chains,
maturity of the code.
But how do you think about it?
What are you thinking about?
Well, here, you guys do it.
I can question you.
It's a great job.
No, so the first thing is institutions, like you said.
Institutions, the institutional story has been around before
in crypto, in different cycles.
And we had some early adopters for institutions, right?
We had Fidelity.
If you think about folks like Abby Johnson,
she's been in the space for as long as I have,
maybe even longer.
We had folks like Metta.
I mean, I was on Zuck's original VM project board.
He saw stable coins coming years ago.
So we had Metta leaned in as an institution kind of early.
And then we had other institutions, folks like BlackRock.
I think Larry Fink is actually a great exhibit A
for someone who really changed
their mind on crypto.
Totally.
Larry was against crypto, not against, but he was certainly not a fan of blockchain technology.
And a few years ago, he said he had really changed his mind.
And now you have BlackRock running a tokenized money market fund, Biddle.
So that's some of the earlier institutional adopters.
But now we have some of the later institutional adopters,
folks like JP Morgan, Charles Schwab and others,
and you'll see other announcements coming out soon
from other institutions.
So the institutional story is one fundamental,
but I wanna talk about three others.
You mentioned one regulatory,
but before I get to regulatory,
cause it's not the most exciting,
is the technological progress.
We've had different kinds of levels of technological progress
over the cycles that make up the crypto industry.
Cycles, we always talk about the bear and the bull cycles.
And really kind of the last bear market
when folks were really declaring the space dead,
as they do by the way, every single cycle.
It really felt, I remember when aetherium was touching $800 after the FTX crisis and I
was like I don't know where the bottom is here this feels like the most toxic
asset that was like I basically start a fun right well yeah I had just started
our fun no and in hindsight and hindsight, I was like, the moment
that I thought this was over, it was completely over,
was like a perfect bottom tick.
Perfect bottom.
Guys, another time, another story for another day,
remind me to tell you my Solana buying story in New Year's.
And when I thought it couldn't go any lower, it even went lower.
We got in when it was pretty darn low.
And to a lot of assets, you asked if we do liquids.
Absolutely, we do.
We believe hugely in tokens.
We believe hugely in equity.
But let me get back to the fundamentals first,
because this is where we're spending our day,
thinking about stuff like the technological progress.
If you think about post-FTX,
that era you're talking about,
ETH is at $8,000,
or thereabouts, Solana got down to it, like what, $9?
Bitcoin's hitting like 17, what, $9, Bitcoin's hitting, like, 17, 16,
$18,000 levels.
People were declaring the space dead pundits.
Sorry, I know you're not pundits, but everyone was saying, God, terrible idea.
You started a crypto fund.
And here we were, 10 of us, like, no, this is a great time in the space.
And I think one of the things we saw is there's a market story to crypto and there's a technology
story to crypto.
And what we saw on the technical progress, and by the way, Fred Wilson and I authored
a blog post probably about a week after FTX saying, hey, the technical story here has
not changed, folks.
And instead, it's only changing for the better.
We had things like the Ethereum merge, the largest software upgrade in history.
You know, totally the founder of Solana recently said that we're no longer talking about block space
for one of the first times in this industry. Stuff is scalable, stuff is cheaper, instead of paying, you know, multiple dollars for a stablecoin transfer or an NFT transaction,
it's sub one cent. And that's due in large part to the builders that were building through these bear cycles,
including the last painful bear cycle.
So that's the second fundamental.
And I think the third fundamental, as I think about it, is product market fit.
You talk about things like product market fit, Bitcoin, hello, product market fit exhibit
A. I debated Paul Krugman in, was it 2018 or 2017, and he told me Bitcoin
has zero use. I debated him and I said it will find product market fit. At that time, I think
Bitcoin was trading around three, four or $5,000. And lo and behold, fast forward these years later,
I think it's clear it has found product market fit as a digital store of value.
But also we have things like stablecoins have found clear product market fit.
And I hope we can talk about stables.
We'll dive deeper later in today's session because stablecoins are the story of the day
that folks in the mainstream are now talking about.
So we have product market fit and other product market fit, kind of I would say we're on the
precipice of, we can talk about that.
But then you mentioned the fourth fundamental, which is regulatory.
And I think the thing I heard for the last decade from builders, by the way, from enterprises,
from institutions, from LPs when I was at my prior fund, is regulators aren't going
to allow this though, right?
This is all going to get shut down.
What was your answer then? Was it like, the obvious rebuttal
is regulators are going to make code illegal.
Like, it's pretty hard to ban code, right?
Anybody can kind of create it and put it out on the internet.
I'm sure you were always confident that it wouldn't
be made illegal.
But at the same time, the sort of US regulatory regime was making it
pretty difficult to exist as a crypto founder in the US, which had the same sort of effect
in some ways. Yeah, you know, fun fact, since there's the conference going on today, I don't
know if you guys are aware of this, I was asked probably around 2012, 2013 to help shut down
Bitcoin for the US government
when I was a federal prosecutor.
So it's just crazy to think about.
I mean, yeah.
Hey, Katie, little project.
I don't know if you have time this weekend
to look into it.
Can you shut down?
Open the case, Fennu Lanu, first name unknown,
last name unknown.
Wow.
You know, somewhere in the Tenderloin,
San Francisco 450 Golden Gate said file of Fionula
New. But look, I realized early on that this was a really powerful technology. And regulators,
by the way, and we've been saying this for the last decade, regulators should love this
technology for its kind of permanence, right? All of the things that make a block team great
for a lot of things. Also, by the way, make it, look, as I always said, when I was a criminal, I hoped that
criminals would use this instead of cash or wires, which I don't know how many banks anyone
has ever subpoenaed.
I've subpoenaed a lot of them.
Good luck getting compliance with a subpoena.
But at the same time, I really do worry about the erosion of financial privacy.
And not just now that I'm in the crypto industry 10 years later
I talked about this when I was a prosecutor and the kind of reach of the Bank Secrecy Act and we can go really deep
On that I think there are parts now under the third party doctrine that if it went back to Supreme Court today
I think you might have a very different result than the last bit time
The Bank Secrecy Act was challenged was in the 1970s
And of course the velocity of payments has just skyrocketed since then.
And now, unlike in 1970, where I couldn't glean too much information about you from
your maybe couple payments or people writing out checks back in those days, now if you
think about if I have all access to all of your payment information, I could probably
like predict where you're going to go every day, just about, right? I mean, it's a really great almost in that
way. And this is not crypto. This is just all financial data, right? Every time you
use your Apple Pay, you're doing a credit card, you're using stable coins. I mean, this
is something that we should talk about at another time.
Talk about, talk about your kind of early stage investment framework
philosophy.
What are you, I imagine there's investments
that you get the opportunity to make
that you believe will be successful,
but maybe aren't the best use of your capital
if you have this sort of broader vision
of where the asset class and the technology can go.
But I'm curious how you think about opportunities
and even kind of your moral framework for investments.
I've never heard it described as a moral framework,
but that's an interesting framing.
I mean, I think, first of all, we start with the founders.
Like any other venture investor, it's
all about the founders and the market opportunity, right?
If you think about founders that I've previously kind of known in my gut, this is an amazing
founder and exceptional person who's going to build an amazing business.
I mean, the first instance of that, as far as I was concerned, coming into crypto was
Brian Armstrong and Coinbase.
And I think one of the things that makes Brian so remarkable is he had a huge business going just spot trading
Bitcoin and then aetherium and adding all of these other assets
But he was never content to just rest on those laurels as an exchange
It was always about diversifying the business and the web 3 economy and he was thinking about things like stable coins
many many years ago, obviously
USDC was a partnership between Coinbase.
Yeah, we had Bology on earlier, and he showed a video
of the launch, the web page for the launch video.
And he's like in the first five seconds.
He's seven years younger in that video.
I remember that.
I remember that.
Did he have a bowl of cereal with cream or something
in that?
I think so, yeah.
I remember those days with Bology well,
with the USDC launch happening. And I think, again, I remember being days with Balaji well, you know with with the USDC launch happening and I think again
He I remember being in the coin based office by the way the day
The day that Bitcoin first hit ten thousand dollars for the first time imagine by the way if we were having this conversation
You know now we would be like, oh my god ten thousand dollars market correction
Well, you sure it years ago that was like cause for celebration.
People couldn't believe it was $10,000.
I was in the office.
The euphoria was kind of everywhere, except Brian had his eyes on what's happening next.
We're not going to get comfortable with this.
We're building an open global financial system for the world.
Where are we taking our revenue lines next?
And he's been thinking about that day, the S1,
day the direct listing happened in April of 2021 at Coinbase.
So I was so excited to be a director of that company
for almost eight years and see that company
through a remarkable series of events.
And I still am so excited watching from the sidelines
about what they're doing.
So I think the first thing we look for
is we look for an amazing exceptional founder.
And that, you know, Brian's a great example, right?
So we're just trying to find the next Brian's.
But also the market opportunities and the space,
as I said, the asset class is so broad.
So it really, we're talking about, what are we talking about?
We're talking about prediction markets.
One thing, that's an area we're very excited about, but we kind of think
about it as where will this evolve?
Not the current state of innovation, but more of the end state of innovation
or the midpoint state of innovation.
And in the case of prediction markets, I'll tell you, one of the things we
think about is, um, think about like Netflix.
Netflix did, um Netflix was very centralized.
It curated content.
And then all of a sudden YouTube came along
and then unleashed even more content globally at scale.
I mean, exceptionally so.
So for prediction markets,
when are we gonna get that user generated equivalent
or the YouTube moment?
I think that's really interesting.
And I think what makes crypto special in that story is the programmability
That people around the world
24-7, you know the internet internet operates 24-7 and anyone with a smartphone can access that so we think that's exciting
Yeah, so we're looking for you know, we're looking for exceptional founders
Job just find ten more Bryan Armstrong's and you're great
I believe it I believe in you
Thank you for doing the work to surface the Brian's yeah the world yeah, we're talking later today
We're very great. Well, I'll tune in for that also. I think though you mentioned moral
I think one of the things we've done.
No, I think I know what you mean.
The context there is certain traditional VCs
will have a vice clause, where they say, we don't do defense.
We don't do recreational cannabis.
We don't do this.
And I could imagine crypto funds bifurcating to some degree,
where some of them say, we're going
to do these types of deals, and we're not going to do those types of deals.
But maybe that's wrong. That happens already.
You saw this during the last run up, the last full run in 2021.
We had many folks, traditional VCs, many of whom are friends of mine,
decided they were going to get into crypto, but they weren't going to touch tokens.
They were only going to do equity businesses.
And although we love crypto equity businesses, they missed out on a lot of tremendous opportunities.
Like imagine if you had said, we're not touching Solana. I mean, Solana is a huge market opportunity.
Ethereum, huge market opportunity. I mean, Bitcoin, huge market opportunity, right? These are just some
blue chips I'm naming. Of course, there are plenty of others. We said we are crypto maxis. We're not going to be religious zealots about any particular token,
but nor are we going to write off entire segments. Rather, we're going to focus on the founder,
the bona fides of the project, the metrics of the project. And we really want to know here,
by the way, do they have a plan for regulatory compliance,
realizing the times were uncertain in those moments?
But do they have a plan for it?
Or is there a plan to launch a token and then,
we say leave the US.
That's got to be the most nervous meeting
a founder has in their round,
is pitching you on their regulatory plan.
Because a lot of other VCs are like, great,
he's got a regulatory plan.
You're like, well, here's the 10 reasons
why that is not going to work.
Yeah, but you know what?
I think that actually we like to think
that we can be helpful in that way, even with clarity.
I was talking to probably one of the most legendary biotech
investors in the world a couple of months ago.
And he told a group of our founders, he said, you know, I'm in a regulated space, we've
got plenty of regulatory clarity, and believe me, we still need to kind of navigate.
It doesn't just go away just because we have legislation passed, which we think is really
important in clarity.
You still got to comply with it.
And we always said, I always said, look, you got to have a plan for it.
You don't have to have it all figured out when you're raising a seed round, when you're
raising your Series A. Coinbase was great in this regard, but look, they did not.
They've obviously made a lot of progress as a company on that front across the different
iterations of their company, like one would expect, like is reasonable.
So my touchstone is what's reasonable.
And you got to build a business too, right?
And I think we realized that and we're pragmatic partners and we like to work with founders.
Tell me a founder who says, I have no idea what to do here. I don't want to break the
law. I don't know what the law is. But we'd love your help. We'd love your thought partnership.
And we love those kind of founders.
It's amazing. Well, thank you so much for stopping by. This was fantastic conversation.
Thank you guys. Thank you for having me. We'd love to go way deeper. I'm sure we're going a lot today.
This is good. Okay. Talk to you soon. Bye. Up next, we have Chris Dixon from Andreessen Horowitz.
But first, let me tell you about Ramp. Time is money. Save both. Easy to use corporate cards,
bill payments, accounting, and a whole lot more all in one place. Go to ramp.com to get started. Ramp. And very excited to talk to Chris.
Obviously, extremely storied investor,
top of the Midas list, early Coinbase investor,
continual Coinbase investor.
We got Brian Armstrong coming on later
to tell his, the founder journey of Coinbase,
but Chris has been all over the place in crypto
for a decade, 15 years, 20 years.
I think he invested in Bitcoin back in 1994.
Right.
Yeah.
A lot of the people that we're having on today were early and right.
Yep.
Yep.
Yep.
Good thing.
So Chris, welcome to the show.
How are you doing?
I'm great, John.
Good to see you.
Good to see you.
I'm an early, uh, silent investor.
Yes.
Yes.
Um, already good to see you guys.
Congratulations on all the success with the show.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Yeah.
It's been a lot of fun. Um, where good to see you guys. Congratulations on all the success with the show. Thank you. Thank you. Yeah. It's been a lot of fun.
Um, where should we start?
Can you give us a temperature on the crypto markets?
It's been, um, up and down.
Let them take a victory victory.
Lab.
I feel like, I feel like you get, I know the job's not finished, but
they always twist you and twist your arm into doing podcasts when the
market's down and saying, Oh, you got to hold you accountable. And then, and then, and then where is Kara Swisher doing podcasts when the market's down and you gotta hold you accountable and
And then and then where is Kara Swisher calling you when the markets up, you know, that's the point. That's a good point
Oh, wait, can you guys hear me? Okay? Yeah. Yeah, you said great. Okay, great
Yeah, good. I mean, it's it's yeah, it's been a it's been a long journey as you guys pointed out
I think that you know, we had a lot of challenges the last four years
I think that we had a lot of challenges the last four years, regulatory challenges with the last administration and that looks like it's trending much better now with the new
administration is sort of more pro-tech and I think we have a lot of momentum in Congress
and that's a big deal because that created a lot of headwinds.
So that's great.
And then also like the kind of core infrastructure and I don't know if you guys want to talk
more about it but like so for example, one of the things happening right now are stable coins are really taking off
So like last month it was something like two trillion in stable coin volume
Which is more than trill with trillion with a T, which is more than Visa
And so, you know quite a lot of volume and that a lot of that's due to the fact that the infrastructure
So Solana Ethereum and so forth has gotten really good
So you can now send an arbitrary amount of money anywhere in the world for under one penny and one second. But that took years and years of work, investment, founders,
technical folks doing a lot of work. So that's great. And so there's a lot of good things.
I think that there's a lot of challenges too, but overall it's been fun.
Do you think that the narrative around stablecoins is still going to morph into micro payments
for the internet?
Ben Thompson was talking about this with MCP.
It's not in the standard, but you can easily imagine that getting worked into the second
version of the standard.
At the same time, obviously just global remittances has always been a huge category.
It is the one category that I used stable coins four years ago.
And it felt very real in that moment, even while people were saying, oh, this is useless.
It felt like, okay, this is the value.
But I'm interested in like kind of the next application of stable coins and then the one
after that.
Yeah, great.
So I think just maybe briefly, the way to think about stable coins is today, we don't
really have a global payment system or global financial system.
We have 195 countries, each one has many different banking systems.
When you send money to another country, like I say, you wire money, like actually we've
had this experience at the firm where we wire investment, and it ends up going through a
bunch of humans and paperwork.
It's really just a mishmash of systems.
And so the way to think about stablecoins is similar to how, for those who are old enough to remember, text messaging was like this, like
in the 2000s. You would send a text message and you would say, you don't have a plan to send to
Canada, you got to sign up. And it was all these different systems. And then WhatsApp and FaceTime
came along and they built this sort of what they call over the top global network, right? So think
of sort of stablecoins and blockchains as an over the top network. It's from day one global, low fee, credibly neutral, programmable payment system that
just sort of works everywhere.
That's kind of the simple way to think of it.
And so as you mentioned, one of the obvious benefits is just cross border.
And that's where a lot of the uses are right now.
And so for example, like SpaceX has a program where they move, they'll sell a Starlink and
I think it's like some
South of Brazil or something and then they'll immediately use stablecoins for so-called
treasury management.
This is one of the kind of growing use cases that folks like Stripe will talk about.
Remittances, you're sending money back home from the US to whatever some developing countries
where the currency is volatile and they want access to dollars or
euros.
And then as you mentioned, John, the idea that because, and actually I encourage those
who are interested to go listen to the Collisons, they were an all in podcast a few weeks ago
talking about this.
What they're actually say they're really excited about is less the low fees and more the programmability
as you just described.
And so you can do, so this is like one obvious thing is invoice fraud.
So people will send these faxes type things.
That's a really old fashioned where they'll say like, here's my wiring instruction.
And you know, if you guys, if you've done this, you'll say like, please make sure you
call first.
But of course calling doesn't work in an age of AI because it could be a fake voice.
And so, you know, what, what Stripe was excited about is because blockchains are
programmable, they can have a full kind of reputation system on top.
So they know like, this is a valid place to send money to
for your invoicing system, right?
So you can program it as you mentioned, micro payments,
right?
Now that you can send money for one penny that unlocks a
whole bunch of use cases.
So machine to machine payments,
every time you're doing an AI API requests,
as you mentioned, MCP, right?
So like watch MCP,
I would expect would have down the road a payment standard,
right? And AI agents. So you imagine a world, which I think we're headed to pretty soon in a couple
of years, we have all these different AI agents running around.
I'm hey, I'm advertising, I can program, I can write your essay for you, I can do your
homework, whatever, and they're all sort of advertising their services.
And then you sort of imagine other agents coming along and negotiating and and you know Penny's getting transferred back and forth and this big kind of you know economic
You know kind of mishmash like kind of collection, you know on top
So the web moves from like these kind of signup forms to agents sending money automatically
And we think that would be powered by most naturally powered by a global, you know low fee
programmable system like blockchains.
Yeah, yeah.
How has, I'm super curious to understand how your guys' lobbying efforts have evolved over
the past six to 12 months.
We went from, you know, a sort of a large coalition of people trying to basically block crypto from getting real
adoption and traction in the US to suddenly ETFs being approved and things like that.
And I imagine that's kind of changed your guys' strategy on the Hill.
So I'm interested to hear how that's evolved.
Yeah.
So that's a so I've been doing, you know, we sort of I saw Mark Andreessen on you guys.
It was a week or two ago. I watched that and he was talking about a little bit. I've been doing, you know, we sort of, I saw Mark Andreessen on you guys, I think it was
a week or two ago I watched that and he was talking about it a little bit.
Mark and I have been very involved in this and by necessity originally like four or five
years ago.
And then over time realized just how important it is to engage.
They say in Washington, they like to say if you are not at the table, you're on the menu.
So you don't want to be on the menu.
So, you know, I've been going
sort of like once a month and Mark has to and just really just kind of trying to explain
our perspective because we feel like the interest of startup like so start most startups don't
have the resources to go to DC, right? And of course, big tech companies do and big banks
do and all sorts of other big entities do. And so our kind of logic was that we're one of the few entity, you know, kind of organizations
that has enough scale to have a government affairs team who represents the interests
of startups.
And so we go and we say, look, we represent small companies and here's what they're interested
in.
So for example, they want to have clear guardrails and rules around blockchains.
They want to have open source AI. That's another
really important issue to us. Clear rules on AI and copyright. There's a series of things,
having a single federal framework and not a 50 state laws on a lot of these things and
so forth. And so we go and we advocate for that. We've taken a bipartisan approach from
the beginning. We think that's very important. I mean, look, just one is to get, we think
the way you really build industries is legislation.
If you think back to the internet,
that was built on really on the 96th Telecom Act.
If, you know, and had things like section 230,
which you know, you may know is now a contentious issue,
had section two, I like to say section 230 had been,
you know, administrative guidance instead of legislation,
it would have been a political football every four years.
It was built into legislation.
And so you could, section 230 is what enabled marketplaces, social networks, and so forth
to build reliably on the internet.
So we've always felt that both for AI and for crypto, we want legislation that provides
clear rules, pass for innovation, and really eliminates or mitigates or eliminates all
the kind of bad use cases and bad actors.
And so that's always been our approach.
It's been bipartisan. That's the legislation you need bipartisan, first of all.
And secondly, the Democratic Party has,
like most people will sort of think
Republicans are pro crypto, Democrats are anti.
That's not really true.
We just had a last week, a Senate,
sort of it was a procedural vote on the stablecoin bill.
And I believe there were 17 Democrats who voted for it,
which is significant.
And I think our view has been we want
to kind of shift the Democratic
Party back to the values of Obama and Bill Clinton when
they were pro-tech and not the blue sky Democrat
thing that happened the last year.
The interesting thing about the lobbying
is that I looked at the donation dollars that
were coming from crypto-aligned people and crypto funds,
and it was split almost exactly 50 50 like the entire crypto community
really did go super bipartisan with the spend and obviously the Republicans
won.
So it feels like a Republican issue like right now, but I it doesn't feel
like it's going to remain that way on the issue of government.
I'm interested to know maybe stable coins are a good example, but just
general crypto adoption.
How do you bucket? How do you think about the adoption across government, B2B, or just direct to consumer?
Because when I think about stable coins, for example, there's people that want to pay people
individually, but there's so many ways that you can just tuck stable coins under some
business, like with the AI thing.
If you get Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Microsoft
using stable coins in an agentic application,
the user might never know that I'm paying a fraction
of a cent to access a Wall Street Journal article,
it just happens and I'm not even aware.
So what are the key drivers for the different constituencies
and then the different applications
and how do they fit together?
No, that's a great question.
And like I have a broader kind of framework I like to talk about, which is sort of, I
sort of like to distinguish technologies between what I call inside out and outside in.
And so inside out of things that sort of start with established institutions like AI to some
extent is like that, you know, the iPhone was like this, it came out of Apple, a very
established institution, AI came out of, you know, Stanford and so forth.
Whereas crypto very much, you know, Bitcoin started at the fringes, right?
And sort of like open source software
and there's other kind of tech movements
have started at the fringes
and it sort of worked its way in.
So stable coin started for the main use case
was settling crypto trades seven years ago or something.
And then over time, you started to see more and more
like payment providers in Argentina, for example,
and that sort of more kind of moving to the center.
Now Stripe, I think of Stripe is very much probably I think the smartest, a lot of people
think the smartest, one of the, if not the smartest, fintech company is all in on it.
They did a billion dollar acquisition bridge to ramp up their efforts.
I think the main good legating factor, like I speak to a lot of like, like what I would
love to see is a world where you have banks and asset management, asset management firms and every payment provider as you described John, like
behind the scenes it's just sort of it's the substrate, it's the infrastructure,
right? It's like HTTP or SMTP, it's just this thing that exists. A lot of
them say we just want like that final you know regulatory clarity piece, right?
Because they want that assurance because they're like they're risk-averse, we just
had four years of kind of lawfare against the industry.
So that's why I think that's really like honestly like I probably spend more than half my time
on that now.
Like that's just kind of the key.
There's two.
And just to say there's two big kind of bills that we're advocating for.
There's stablecoins.
There's one called market structure that's just coming forward in the house now, which
is also to kind of clarify more broadly on tokens.
But I think that's the main thing right now.
I think and I put to your point exactly.
I don't think most people ultimately will think of even more broadly on tokens. But I think that's the main thing right now. I think tonight, but to your point, exactly. I don't think most people ultimately will
think of even the word stable coin. I think there'll be like digital dollars, you know,
that like for the for the average person, right?
industry term like ERP people, they don't know.
And like, actually, but we'll see like, like, we have a fintech group with the firm that's
not crypto. And you know, folks like I think you interviewed a niche and yeah, all those
folks. And then, you know, they like I think you interviewed Anish and all those folks.
And they like crypto, but they're not like crypto.
And they'll tell me now, it's become pretty standard
in the FinTech stack that people will use stable points.
Yeah, you're like a three person startup
and boom, you push a button and you got 190 countries.
That's very different than the old days.
I wanna get your point of view on the competitive forces
and dynamics right now because we have
Startups which there's entire subcategories you have hyper decentralized, you know crypto companies
You have sort of hybrid companies like maybe bridge that are kind of sitting in between
fintech and
And crypto rails and then you now have big institutional players that are coming in
Maybe they brought ETFs to market to start.
And then now they're thinking about, you know, stable coin applications as well.
How do you look at the market and what kind of advice do you give to portfolio
companies that are trying to figure out who they are,
whether that's fully decentralized or some type of hybrid or, or, or so on.
Yeah. Yeah. I think think that's a great question.
I mean, the point is not for decentralization
and this new architecture of blockchains for its own sake.
The point is they have specific benefits.
So why would one build on a blockchain like Ethereum
or Solana as opposed to a traditional AWS,
like a traditional architecture?
And the answer is, when you build,
the way I like to describe it most simply
is blockchains allow you to build digital services
that remove the intermediaries.
So you remove, so for example, stable coins,
you have no intermediaries that are taking fees.
You don't have the banks and the payment providers
and the payment networks, right,
that take all the different layers of fees.
So that's an important benefit is you're building these,
you could build social networks without fees.
You can build games without fees. You can build AI systems without fees,
right? Without fees, it's like very low, like sub like couple basis points. I actually have it for
those interested. I wrote a book, read right on, and I have a chapter on take rates where I go
through this in detail. But it's essentially going from like 30% in the app store, you know, 100%
in Facebook and 50% on YouTube to like five basis points or something, or 2.5% for
payments and so forth.
So the first question is why would you want to build on them?
The other one we mentioned before is programmability.
You can do all sorts of cool stuff on top.
And so I think it's your question.
I think it depends.
Ultimately, I think of startups as you want to work backwards.
You want to say, what do you want to do for the world?
What kind of service do you want to provide?
And then you work backwards and you say, how do you want to build that?
Right?
In some cases, that means you want to build something on a blockchain, like a peer service,
like a protocol, we call it, with a token and so forth.
In other cases, you want to build more traditional software that may be like, for example, like
you mentioned, that bridges between a bank and an asset manager and a blockchain system.
Right?
So I think ultimately we think of it through that lens is kind of now as an investor, I skew towards things I like things with, for example, network effects, because they can be very
I've my career, I found that network effects can be very powerful, right? You invest in something,
it grows, it kind of has a natural kind of defensibility and kind of gets better as more people use it.
So there's just kind of different lenses you can look at it.
The last thing I would say is to your listeners, I know you have a broad audience,
I think that the crypto space right now, the real shortage we have is startup talent,
in that there's a lot of obvious good ideas where there just aren't many people pursuing.
Yeah. So I think it's actually the opposite problem than most, like then you might have an AI right
now, where I imagine AI, it's an amazing technology and deservingly people are excited, as they should
be excited about it. But you probably for every idea have, I don't know, 50 good startups pursuing it.
In crypto, I think we're under competed, like we have under too little competition, honestly.
Like, so I would say to your listeners, if you're a smart person thinking about doing
a startup, I think there's a lot of white space right now.
If you're in AI, pivot to crypto.
We heard it here first.
Or we do both.
We love AI. It is exciting. Yeah, how are you?
I'm sure you're perpetually going
to be unsatisfied with the technological progress,
because you understand the full potential, right?
Where are you at right now?
You know, we had Balaji on earlier.
He was very bullish on ZK proofs and what's coming down
the pipeline there.
Prediction markets a little bit.
Yeah, prediction markets feel like.
During the election, it was like, wow, this is a completely,
no one was talking about this during the Bitcoin white paper.
And yet crypto has created something
that everyone gets value out of in one way or another.
Yeah.
Yeah, I think we are still, I think of these technology things
always go in S-curves.
We're clearly still at the, somewhere in the bottom of the S-curve.
I think there's just a lot more growth.
Just like user base, there's something on the order.
Most of these applications I'm describing have up to at the highest end probably 50 million
users, which is 1% of the internet.
It's still very early.
Polymarket is doing incredibly well, but I assume it's still in that kind of sub 1% of the internet.
It's not.
The internet has, you know, 5 billion people now, right?
So we have a long way to go.
I think a lot of the kind of core infrastructure is now as of a year and a half ago, kind of
good enough.
You know, I think a lot of these technologies have that characteristic where you have kind
of, you know, whether like neural networks only got good enough, I don't know, whatever
circa let's call it, you know something in the 2010s because of the
Moore's law and GPUs, right?
And so iPhones, once you had capacitive screens and whatever, processors and so forth, I think
blockchains, I think we no longer have infrastructure as an excuse anymore.
Like now it's about building applications, about getting regulatory clarity.
And I think we're pretty far along there.
I think we have a long way to go fully exploring kind of the idea maze and all the different cool things you can do and and you know and
then bringing it to billions of people is the goal. How have you been advising
crypto emerging managers? My one of my favorite I'm gonna kind of butcher the
stat but apparently like the sort of median crypto fund massively out
performed like the median venture fund
for most of the last decade.
And so I thought that that was this beautiful
narrative violation because people,
traditional venture would love to poke fun at crypto VCs,
yet they were sort of systemically outperforming
the other party.
But what kind of general guidance are you giving to
somebody that maybe was an active trader and wants to get more into the actual, you know, kind of venture side of the game?
I've been so, you know, I've been that so I've been investing in venture funds and crypto funds for a long time, just sort of after I sold my first company. In fact, Mark, Mark and recent I have done it together for a long time long time and have been doing crypto funds since probably 10 years and just consistently. And I'm still
very bullish. And to your point, I think that's probably correct, like on the data, like they've
just they've done. And I think it's just traditional finance in the sense of you have to, you know,
non-consensus, right? Right. Like, as much as we hear about crypto, it's still very non-consensus.
A lot of a lot of a lot a lot of venture funds
Just simply maybe they'll have a little bit of Bitcoin, but they'll otherwise they'll rule it out if there's tokens and things
You talked to fund to funds
They a lot of them will say we have a no crypto rule, you know sovereign wealth funds
So all the kind of giant pools of capital that fund the venture world
And so it's still kind of this considered this kind of weird sideshow
Like obviously the past doesn't predict the future and so forth.
And we don't know how things will play out, but it's still very non-consensus.
I think from a, from a financial investing point of view, the broader crypto world.
So I, I will look, I believe that's where the opportunities
are in, in, in venture investing.
Um, obviously you have to also be right.
And so time will tell, but it's, I think it's still much more not,
it's surprisingly non-consensus in the investing world,
I think to this day, despite the performance.
Can you explain a little bit of the dynamic of how venture fits into the
life cycle of a new crypto company these days,
because there's liquidity available from retail in some cases. Um,
there's some companies that are going to be profitable very early because of their you know
Insane product. Yeah, we had a lawn from from pump on earlier and that's classic example
It's like a very profitable able to be very efficient
And I think we've seen on the other side you have companies like hyper liquid that got out and and have a token very early
So I'm curious
Yeah, how you think of the capital lifecycle? Yeah
Yeah, so we see if I can answer that so like one reason we started separate crypto fund originally like I guess 2018
Was so that we could
Before that I was doing like crypto investing
Yeah, but it would always get these questions from the LPs and like what is this?
It's an equity as a tokens and so create a separate crypto fund with the basic idea was we have maximum flexibility But it would always get these questions from the LPs and like, what is this? Is it equity? Is it tokens?
And so create a separate crypto fund with the basic idea that we have maximum flexibility.
And we went to the LPs and we said, look, this is going to be different.
And here's the idea.
And here's the, and a lot of them opted out.
Some of them opted in, but we were very clear upfront what it was.
And so what we, what we think of it is we can do everything from, we can buy, we buy
Bitcoin or something just directly, which we do.
People see our funds and they assume it's all ventures not.
We do a lot of just buying tokens that we think have upside.
We also do a lot of, we can do equity investments like a Coinbase.
It's just a classic equity investment.
We have a bunch of those that the goal would be to someday IPO.
They could be cashflow heavy ones that do dividends like the ones you're describing,
Jordy, like maybe some of those, or maybe I don't know what their plans are pumped up
for.
Maybe they IPO, maybe they dividend, maybe they buybacks.
If you have cash flows, you have a lot of options.
Then the third one, which is actually one of our core ones, is you'll do an equity,
a project will start as an equity investment, but then over time, we'll launch a token.
The equity investors get sort of pro rata rights to those tokens.
And that actually, that was sort of the new thing that we really wanted to lean into back
when we started the crypto fund.
That was a new idea.
We helped kind of pioneer that, I think.
And that was like the warrant structure?
Yeah, it's very simple.
It's a term sheet with two extra things.
It has essentially token rights. Yeah, it can be a warrant and's a term sheet with two extra things that has essentially token rights.
Yeah, and it can be a warrant and there's different ways to structure it.
And what's nice about that is it, you know, one of the reasons startups works
so well is that they're maxed, like when they work is that the investors and the founders are fully aligned.
So before that structure existed, I don't know how deep you guys want to go on this,
there were these things called SAFs and like these kinds of things where you do token purchases and the problem is it created all these weird incentives where the founder would try to create a token just to do something
Well, we believe very strongly is alignment between the investors and the founders and so there's sort of this this equity structure with token rights
Or token warrants is one where if they decide to they can stay an equity company and they can do you know
Just do traditional kind of go for profits and things or they can create a token or they can create two tokens or whatever
Is best for that service
they're trying to create.
And in whatever way that they eventually decide to,
whatever business model they pursue,
the investor will participate kind of per rata
alongside the founders.
What happens to the C Corp in that scenario
where they launch a token, the token grows
and the community is in like the,
the asset is now controlled by the token and the C Corp still exists.
Are there roles for foundations and nonprofits and different transitions that
can happen?
Yeah, it's a great question. A lot of times they'll become, um,
they'll just become like kind of one software provider in the network.
Oh, sure. Like, um, you know, they're so, so for example, um, you know,
think of the Ethereum Foundation.
I don't know if you guys know the relationship
between Ethereum Foundation and Ethereum.
Ethereum is a network.
Ethereum Foundation, they help make a little bit of software.
They give some research guidance,
but they don't control the network.
They don't, it's like kind of in the same way
there's just sort of a foundation
that has some kind of a bully pulpit.
Sometimes they can have a separate business model.
So like Uniswap is a decentralized protocol that we're investors in.
Think of it as a decentralized New York Stock Exchange or something that's doing very well,
multiple trillions and trillions in volume traded.
And they separately, so they spun out this protocol and then they separately have a website
that they operate, which is what the company does.
And the website is now, I believe it's sub 5%
of the volume on the protocol, but it's still 5%, right?
And so they're just one front end to it.
And so I think that's probably gonna be
one of the best examples of what you're asking, John.
That makes a ton of sense, Jordy.
Where, what are you expecting to see out of the
kind of real world asset category
over the next couple of years, it feels like,
this year, at least to me, it's felt like we're
days or weeks away from some pretty high profile assets
coming on chain.
I'm curious how you think about the category broadly.
Yeah, I mean, I think of stable coins
as sort of the initial real world asset, right?
It's so you have dollars bank account
and then the next and then and then the great thing about that the kind of adoption there and hopefully all the regulatory clarity
we're getting is that will be a natural stepping stone to
You know, you have Robin Hood talking about stocks. You have BlackRock talking about, you know, Treasury bills
Wouldn't I think it would be nice if anyone in the world
I think it'd be good for the US and I think it'd be good for the world, if anyone in the world could buy 4.5% interest Treasury
bill and have it secure and easy and permissionless and low fee.
I think it's good for the US, the popularity of the dollar, and I think it would be nice
for somebody who has a volatile currency to have access to those.
So stocks, stocks bonds, and then you can imagine
all of these sorts of so-called dark pools. So still a large part of finance is people
using Bloomberg and calling each other. And a lot of that, like trading bonds and
uni bonds and corporate bonds and things like that, there's a lot of interest from the banks
to think about ways to use blockchains to create essentially marketplaces there,
maybe permissioned marketplaces where only kind of certain participants can participate.
For them, the benefit is why haven't they created a network like a marketplace before?
Because they don't trust each other.
They don't want like, who's going to create it?
Is Goldman going to create it and JP Morgan is going to use it?
They don't trust each other.
They don't trust startups to do it because then the startup will start taking big fees.
They just sort of kept it informal and by phone.
And so in a way, a blockchain kind of solves
a political problem of getting these 20 entities
or a hundred entities who previously
wouldn't kind of coordinate together.
I think that's one broader way to think of blockchains
is like, if AI is solving all the problems in the world
that they need more intelligence, right?
Blockchains try to solve the problems in the world that need more intelligence. Blockchains try to solve the problems in the world that need more coordination or more
kind of collective action.
Blockchains are fundamentally social technologies and it's about getting a bunch of...
That's what money is ultimately social.
It's getting a lot of people to agree on a standard and to use the same systems and tools.
And so similarly with real world assets like that.
And there's other interesting ones to your question.
We have one called Story Protocol, a project where investors in that's putting intellectual
property on blockchains and letting people do capital formation and licensing and so
forth around.
So you create a new superhero theme thing and someone wants to make an AI remix of it.
And how do they
So we thought about like in an AI world like how well, you know creators get paid how will IP work?
How will how will how will money flow on the internet in a world with abundant content, right?
And I think we think blockchains have an important role to play in that
How would you like to see the industry and kind of the world
collectively try to solve social engineering hacks?
Feels like Worldcoin is one potential solution there.
But I imagine there's a bunch of other sort of businesses
that you could fund and then a whole regulatory piece
as well, which is we sort of force these large companies now.
Bology described it as like, you know,
to basically hold these, you know, honey pots of data
and there's probably gotta be a better way.
Yeah, a great question.
So you mentioned Worldcoin, I'll just say briefly.
So what Worldcoin does is what we call proof of humanity.
So it's a way for you to get a cryptographic key
that proves you're human and the ideas in a world,
you know, as we're moving too quickly with AI bots and deep fakes
and so forth, there's useful to be able to say, Hey, I'm truly human.
And then, you know, I can get a, imagine a blue check on Twitter that actually literally,
you know, cryptographically means you're human and not just that you paid $10.
We think that would be useful.
It's sort of a missing, you know, kind of building blocks, so to speak, for the, you
know, for the internet that I think we all want.
And so one thing we think about is like, what are those missing building blocks?
You mentioned zero-knowledge proofs.
Zero-knowledge proofs are, I think, a really interesting cryptographic breakthrough that
I think people underestimate in the broader world how important they are.
What they let you do is essentially prove things.
So I can prove, like a bank needs to know I'm a US citizen,'s say or I'm you know have a certain income or certain profile, you know
Health data or so forth was your knowledge proofs
Let you do is I can prove that to the system without revealing any of that like my actual you know
where I can it can basically send me a
Cryptographic kind of a game that says prove that you're a US citizen and I can prove it back without revealing
All you know my name and all the other kind of stuff that might that might dox me, right?
I mean, I just you know, we just saw like, you know
Day after day we see these giant hacks KYC hacks
So for like at this point you should just assume all of your information that sadly has been hacked many times
I'm not you know having Social Social Security as your unique ID and password
is just like a ridiculous system in this era.
And meanwhile, we have these,
we care around these supercomputers with biometrics
and advanced cryptography, like why aren't we using it?
The problem is not the tech, the core tech,
the problem is coordination again,
like it's how do you get everyone to agree
on what the standards are right?
And that's why I think blockchains can be important because it's really the the all the pieces are there
But how do you kind of put them all together in a broad kind of you know standard or coordinated system?
Amazed that's great. Thank you so much for coming. I love to continue for yeah, we can go way longer
We need to have you awesome guys. I appreciate it. It's great to see somebody a
Contrarian idea that a tech show that actually likes tech
Very bullish on it. So thank you so much
Next up we have Kyle coming on yeah
You know we're talking to people just because he's the number one guy on the Midas list doesn't mean you can't hit him with
The Ashen Hall. Yeah, you can't hit him with some sound effects. I should have.
But we have Kyle Simani coming on.
Let's bring him in the studio.
How are you doing, Kyle?
Welcome to the stream.
Welcome.
What's up, Jordan?
What's up, Jordan?
Pleasure to be here.
Great to see you.
What's happening?
Dude, I'm doing great, guys.
I'm actually in Vegas right now.
I'm actually looking at the sphere out my window in my hotel.
Amazing.
Bitcoin Vegas is going on.
It's a fun time in crypto. Is Crypto a company sponsoring the sphere right now or maybe we, TBPN should buy the inventory
at this very moment.
I think y'all's faces would look really good at 400 feet wide and tall.
We should just be live broadcasting this there.
That's the real alpha.
Anyway.
It's great to have you on.
I have a bunch of places to start with.
So I don't even have context.
What event is happening in Vegas?
I think Katie Hahn is there as well.
Is that correct?
It's a Bitcoin conference.
Can you break it down?
What are you expecting?
What's happening on the ground?
Yeah, it's Bitcoin Vegas is going on, largest crypto conference ever, more than 30,000 people
at Venetian Palazzo.
Vance, I just spoke or speaking shortly. David Taxx is here. Bo
Heinz is here. Ross Ulbricht is here. David Bailey, Michael Saylor, tons and tons of folks
are all here. Senators here, Lummis, Haggerty, a whole bunch of other folks. So politics
is here. Wall Street is here. Industry is here. Very, very exciting time.
And what are the key indications or news items that people are looking
for? Are there people still hunting for different companies to establish bitcoin reserves or news
from the government? Like what are the unanswered questions that people are looking for hints as to
which way they'll break? I think probably the biggest questions are how is the bitcoin's
refutic reserve going to be funded? Senator Lummis
has proposed the Bitcoin bill, which proposes open market purchases authorized by Congress.
That hasn't made it very far in Congress, but it's at least in the public domain. When
the executive order was signed by President Trump a few weeks ago, it said that they can
kind of fund the Refugio reserve using revenue neutral mechanisms. And so
there's a lot of discussion today about what exactly does
that mean. Folks like Bo Heinz and David Sachs and the
administration are certainly working on figuring all that
out. They haven't shared anything publicly yet. But
there's a lot of discussion about that. There's a lot of
discussion around Bitcoin L2s. These are kind of ways to bring
DeFi to Bitcoin with
like two or three or four asterisks after that end of that statement. But like a lot
of people are trying to figure that out. And then obviously the kind of hot subject of
the moment is these Bitcoin treasury companies. The most recent of which I believe is DJT,
which I think just announced a two and a half billion dollar offering.
Yeah, is that truth social?
Yeah, true social. And GameStop announced today as well announced a $2.5 billion offering. Is that Truth Social? Yeah, yeah, Truth Social.
And GameStop announced today as well, a large purchase.
Yeah, in some ways, all the regulatory stuff happening
right now feels like the kid who didn't do his homework
until two minutes before the exam or something
and is just cramming.
Because crypto has been an important industry for a decade.
People have been investing in this category for a long time.
But now it's like the government's like, okay, let's figure all this out.
Is that just because we've really finally gotten to adoption and breach the
technical milestones or, or do we, and I guess the question is like,
do you expect us to get through this regulatory kind of crunch period and then
go back into build mode. And if so,
like what are the technical milestones that we're that we're trying to build?
What what's coming on the horizon after we get through the political arc that
we're in right now?
Yeah. So, I mean, the reason we're here,
where the reason we're kind of in this moment is like a lot of stuff building
over the last 10 or 15 years and there's really extenuated by the Biden
administration.
I don't think our industry would be as politically relevant
and as politically active
if it were not for the Biden administration
so strongly trying to press on the scales
against industry,
and industry really mobilized against the Democratic party
in a meaningful way.
And my sense is that most political strategists
probably will tell you that like on the margin,
the thing that moved the election in both Congress
and then the presidential in 2024 was the crypto industry
in terms of dollars, reach, anger, PR, kind of et cetera.
That now is kind of swung from very frustrating administration to extremely accommodating
and welcoming administration that we have today.
The work that Bill Hines and David Sacks are doing in the executive branch is phenomenal.
We're seeing awesome stuff out of DOJ, SEC, and CFTC on an almost daily basis now.
And then the other big item is Congress.
There's the Stable, the genius act in the Senate today,
and then there's market structure
that's coming pretty shortly.
All that stuff is happening.
So I think the reason we are where we are is like,
like the pendulum is like kind of swung
from one extreme to the other.
I feel pretty good that we're gonna kind of basically get,
industry is gonna get I think most of what it wants
in the next few months.
And that just then provides the foundation for crypto to really permeate all of software.
Crypto systems are the most basic level just systems for moving money around.
And they're much more better and efficient and global systems for doing that.
And so my hope is that once we get these final things done from Congress and then the executive branch, then you see Facebook, Google, Apple, Microsoft, et cetera, embed crypto into all of their respective
operating systems. You have AI agents do trading with crypto, whatever. And now crypto financial
rails truly permeate global software. Do you think there'll be a realignment from the left
around crypto? Or do you think think like because it did feel like it
was bipartisan for a little bit or at least it was just ambiguous on both
sides then it kind of broke right but it's such a big industry that it feels
like maybe the Democrats might want to say hey like we're it's a it's a big
tent we're also pro crypto yeah I mean there's really a handful of
prominent Democrats who have been pro crypto,
folks like Richie Torres, Senator Gillibrand.
There's some others I'm sure I can't remember
their names off the top of my head.
And we've been donor,
although we're primarily donors to Republicans,
we are selectively donors to some of those folks
that I just mentioned.
The party as a whole, I would say,
has not really realigned and embraced crypto.
And I'd say I'm fairly surprised by that.
It just seems kind of like an own goal here.
There's a handful of Democrats who like ideologically hate crypto,
most notably Senator Warren.
But like the vast majority of Democrats in Congress kind of like don't care or like pro crypto.
Sure.
And so I've been surprised by the lack of warm embrace.
Makes sense.
Jordy.
Mutual friend, Jared Madfes asked me to ask you,
what are you excited about in crypto
that no one else is talking about yet
or very few people are talking about?
about yet or very few people are talking about?
I am really excited for Deepin. And this is a category that's been around in crypto
for a few years now.
And we were very fortunate to help pioneer
some of our early investments like Helium.
But the Deepin things are starting to really work.
Helium, I believe yesterday or the day before
was their first day ever.
They had a million customers on the Helium network in one day.
Helium, for those who don't know, is a decentralized wireless network. Anyone can stand up a hotspot in their house and provide wireless coverage and other people can use your network and pay you for doing so.
We just invested recently in a very high profile deep end project called double zero, which basically is bringing private fiber
to anyone who wants to pay for private fiber
per byte of data.
And this is gonna go live over the summer.
And it's gonna really change low latency trading
on public blockchains.
There's a handful of other kind of major deep end teams
like HiveMap or Pipe Network and a number of others
that we're involved in.
And I think these are, crypto is fundamentally financial in nature, but like
finance is hard for people to grasp.
And what's cool about these deep end use cases is that they are like fairly easy for people
to understand.
And the first handful of those things are really starting to achieve escape velocity.
That's great.
How'd you meet the Solana founders?
I met Anatoly first. I don't actually don't know who introduced me to Anatoly, but I was in
San Francisco in April of 2018. I was at a co-working space and I met Anatoly on a Saturday night
and
I was sent he had sent me the white paper for the proof of history and slana consensus white paper
I remember I read it was absolute trash
And I was like,
I have no idea what this does. But someone told me Anatoly was really smart. So I met with him.
And after meeting with him, the thing that really stood out to me was of all of the L1, all of the
L1 founders were like very academic in background and their pursuit and approach. And Anatoly was
the opposite. He was like, I hate academia. I don't ever want to write a fucking paper.
I don't ever want to solve an unsolved problem in computer
science. He's like, my only job is to like let other people
solve problems. And then I'm just gonna like apply their
solutions to making my software go fast. And his whole career at
Qualcomm and Dropbox and other places was just doing that. And
I was like, I like this guy, this guy does not sound like all
of the other L one founders. And so we started the kind of back salon from very early on. I was got, I like this guy. This guy does not sound like all of the other L1 founders.
And so we started the kind of back salon from very early on. I was got the meat raw shortly thereafter and the rest is history.
Yeah. So, I mean, was, what was that investment? Did you feel like it was out of your sweet spot?
Like, were you stretching in terms of what you're pattern matching against? Or was it like
delightfully contrarian in your mind?
Um, I mean, like multi-coin was very young. We were six months old at the time. We kind of made
that first investment and I don't think we had even a sense of like, what is our strike zone or
not? We just kind of were like young and running as fast as we could and same what happened.
Um, in hindsight, I would say like, multi-coins generally likes to invest in more blue oceans than red oceans.
And investing in an L1
was certainly a red ocean investment.
And so when we invest in red oceans,
we just wanna be like,
have a pretty pointed view on why
the player we're betting on is like the standout player.
And as I was just saying, like, just at the founder level,
totally his background was completely different
than the other L1 founders.
There's a number of other things that kind of stood out,
but that being the primary one.
I would say now with seven or eight years of history
looking back, I don't think the salon investment
like stood out as being fundamentally
like out of strike zone.
We knew we hated Ethereum.
We knew that like there was problems and we were looking for alternatives.
And lots of people were showing up saying like, look, I have an alternative.
And so in that sense, it was like very kind of shot on goal.
What's been your success rate of identifying new metas like, you know, before other people.
It feels like in crypto, if you're if people that are trading are trying to trade, you know, specific metas and then identify new ones.
But as on as a VC, you really need to identify things two, three years, sometimes sometimes even more than that.
Otherwise, you're just going to be too late.
Right. Once the thing is already big, you don't necessarily
want to invest in the fourth or fifth player in a category.
Yeah, I feel very fortunate.
We've been involved early in a number of eyes
metas, for lack of a better word.
First, probably being like high performance blockchains,
being Solana.
Second, probably being D-PEN, starting with Helium
and HiveMapper.
More recently, we've been very focused on on-chain privacy.
Most people in crypto have been talking
about zero-knowledge proofs for, God, five, seven, eight years
now.
We've scrapped all that, and we've made big bets
in fully homomorphic encryption, which
is a totally different cryptographic approach.
So those are probably the three, I think, really big ideas where we were pretty
early. And there's a number of other areas that are like smaller where I think we've been early.
In terms of where, you know, the Meadows were like focused on today, I'd say it's like,
it's pretty obvious stuff, but like getting stablecoins in the hands of people who want
stablecoins. We've invested in a number of P2P exchanges that make it possible for people in emerging
markets in which have capital controls to get stable coins despite their local governments.
And so that's a lot of focus area.
And then we've been thinking about what are, as more stable coins come on chain, what are
the secondary and tertiary impacts of that?
And then we've been going along a lot of those things in both public and private markets
The help helping, you know people with capital controls get on chain is interesting
It's kind of like cryptos outlaw roots and a little bit but but very mission-oriented is saying we believe in economic freedom
They're you know willing to go in and to certain markets and deliver that so very cool. Very cool. Well, thank you so much for stopping by
Yeah, this is great. Hope the conference is great. Come back on the show anytime
Enjoyed Jordy John. Thanks for having me awesome be here. You're the man. Cheers
Next up we have been pastor neck
Founder I met years ago because we were both building in consumer packaged goods. He's gone on to crypto
I've gone on to media but excited to get the update from him probably has to be the most viral new
Crypto app. Yeah in yeah at least a year at least six months
I'm excited to chat with him. So Ben welcome to the stream. How are you doing?
with him so Ben welcome to the stream how are you doing what I don't even something's done believe in bad welcome to show thank you good to see you guys
how you guys doing it's good we haven't talked in a few years I'd love to just
get the update I should know idea what a tear you've been hungry friend friend of
friend of ours Dylan is here at the studio he's gonna do a live interview
later and he brought up he brought you up.
And John was like, Ben, pastoral.
Yeah, like the we talked a bunch.
And then had no idea.
He's so he's so locked in on traditional tech
that he had no idea what you're up to.
And then and then we explained, of course.
So yeah, why don't you actually just give me a catch me up
to speed on what you're building?
Yeah, we'll believe is a platform for belief and people empowerment.
So if you want to contribute something to the world, if you want to build
something, if you're gonna create odd, if you're gonna create a song, whatever
it is, you can come to believe and raise the capital you need.
Okay, break the the how is this different than NFTs? What technologies are
we leveraging? It's obviously somewhat crypto related,
but then a comp it to a patron for me. Well, so I'll give you some context.
Luke Metro, the show, I believe he used, believe this is okay.
Got it. Cool. John's familiar. I have to do this. Cool. Yeah. Yeah.
It's basically, um, we enable people to launch a coin on slana super easily.
Uh, you know, the, The tokenomics itself are pretty straightforward.
What we kind of introduced to the space is like a fee that's collected.
Yeah, basically a trading fee and creators are able to raise money through that trading fee.
And yeah, the product went like super viral this past month.
It's only four weeks old because you can launch a coin directly from Twitter.
So we're kind of tapping into the existing trend of builders like building something,
screen recording it, posting it on X, and they can just tag launch coin to launch a
coin.
Yeah, yeah. So you're even removing even more barriers. You don't even have to go to the
different website, no wallet or anything. But I assume at some point you can interact
with the blockchain at like a lower level through the actual app. But I assume at some point you can interact with the blockchain
at like a lower level through the actual app. But the initial kickoff and instantiation
happens all on X. Is that correct?
Exactly. Yeah. So you launch an X and assuming your coin does well, you can download our
app, link your X and claim your fees, edit your project details. And we're also building
kind of like an ecosystem for people to integrate integrate their coin into that product you know engage with
different mechanisms and that's all through the app. So what sorry what what
is kind of like the optimistic use case here for someone actually using this to
fund kind of a new idea or new concept because there are places where you can
go and get a grant for something,
but increasingly it's harder and harder to get a grant for, for great art,
or even raise money for the next movie because of Hollywood and all these other
dynamics. So, uh, what, what is a win condition look like for you?
Yeah. I mean, I think it's a different, depending on the industry you're in.
You know, tech obviously has venture capital, which is a pretty good system.
I think it is evolving just because,
I guess the big trend is you're seeing a lot of ARR,
MRR and people's bios.
And I think thanks to AI,
engineers are way more efficient.
There's like less of a need to raise
a huge amount of money upfront.
So if you can like,
I guess bootstrapping is kind of in
and this is just a great way to get started.
So for tech, I think that's the use case for other industries. There isn't really a great way to fundraise for anything.
You could start a GoFundMe, but those generally haven't gone too far, I guess in some cases,
but pretty mid-outcome. So this can lead to massive funding for those types of projects.
Yeah. Do you think that there should be a link
between the token and the equity in a company
that's eventually created?
I imagine at four weeks old,
you probably haven't figured out that interaction
because that's probably the most complex legal menagerie
you can imagine, but talk to me about the long-term vision.
Yeah, well, so when we shipped them,
we thought there'd be purely attention coins and and speculative but that quickly changed because, you know, the first launches that did really
well started integrating their coins into that product, you know, introducing different
like burning mechanisms.
So I think that the kind of way I view it right now is, you know, they're essentially
like utility coins and, you know, depending on how I consider ourselves to be like the
stripe for coins.
So we give developers the tools to like integrate their coin however they want
But at the end of the day, they're really versatile tools and they're gonna come up with all different ways that kind of inspire us
Long term, you know, yeah, the regulatory environment is rapidly shifting
So I think that out, you know, we're planting a lot of seeds today and depending on you know, what happens here and it's looking pretty
Good so far, you know, you can do a lot more in terms of equity, et cetera.
It's very interesting.
What's it been like building in crypto,
transitioning from, it feels like to me,
watching what you built with Simulite from afar,
it was always very high profile, always in the news,
and more so than I think like a traditional CPG company. So in that sense,
just being good at thinking different and capturing attention and leveraging that probably
set you up pretty well for building in crypto. What have been some of the challenges? I imagine
you're not sleeping a lot because every time you go to sleep there's something's breaking or
someone's yelling at you or something like that, but what's it been like?
Yeah, well, it's not my first rodeo to your point.
And prior to Simulate, I built a social networking app
called Monkey that has tens of millions of users to this day.
So I'm familiar building consumer software.
I think to your point, yeah, the crypto stuff is 24-7.
So in most spaces, you have kind of room to iterate
and make mistakes.
In crypto, the market is less forgiving.
So it's a tricky balance because you obviously can't be stagnant, but you have to keep evolving
and changing things.
So yeah, definitely a pressure cooker environment.
But the outcomes are really crazy.
And the cool thing I believe is we have dozens, if not hundreds of creators that have raised
funding.
People have quit their jobs and gone all in on whatever they're building. And it's rare you get to
ship something and for it to immediately have a positive outcome for these people in a life-changing
way. So for me, that's super energizing. And I hope we can continue to do that at scale.
How do you think this evolves? Right now, it feels like Believe is a product for individual
creators, entrepreneurs, artists
like you're talking about.
Is there a world, but if you guys become, you know, striped for coins or however you
phrased it, is there a world where traditional companies in the future would use Believe
to get on chain in some capacity?
How do you think about that?
For sure, yeah.
We're already seeing that.
So I kind of the
biggest case studies, do you which is like a venture backed
company, I can't speak to their exact revenue numbers, but very
serious company that has, you know, strong PMF. And they
launched a coin, and their coin has like crushed it, it's brought
them like a new revenue stream. It's like really activated like
this new community for them. And yet, Bobby, the founder of
Jeep is just like really leaned into
that. So I think that is going to definitely keep happening.
And, you know, I guess like some of these individual builders
might like want a project that later evolves into like an
actual company. And the coin is like, it could definitely be
tied to that. You know, watching things, watching how things
unfold.
I want to talk about the line between good and bad projects,
essentially.
There's two narratives.
One is, look, it's all a casino, no crying in the casino.
The DGENs love to just do whatever and just like,
you know what you're getting into.
The flip side of that is like, you know, they're there. I guess the question is like there are a lot of people that have launched stuff and
It's gone super well and they built really cool things
There's other stuff where it's clearly just been like a rug and a mess and a disaster and it chases them around the internet
For a couple months or even years
Where where is the line? What would you counsel people to?
Where is the line? What would you counsel people to kind of rules of the road
today for getting involved in this
and not just frustrating a bunch of people
and actually having like a good experience
and kind of not just obeying the letter of the law,
but like the spirit of the law.
Yeah, and on that like decision making around going,
you know, doing curation versus just creating a platform and letting people do kind of
whatever they want. Totally. Yeah. So, you know, I consider
by the head alone on earlier level on he's great, you know,
friendly with him. And you know, so pump is a huge innovator in
the space. I consider pump to be kind of like the World Wide Web
and what we're doing to be closer to the App Store. Okay,
you know, you can't completely curate for reasons that I won't go into.
We can't say, hey, this is good, because if we do that, we're going to be wrong some
of the time.
But it is quite easy to say, hey, this is bad.
And when we identify bad actors as mechanisms, we can integrate to basically disincentivize
them from launching with us versus one of these other platforms.
I think the biggest thing for us is, you know, founder education.
So, you know, I think most Silicon Valley founders, like 99% have like really positive
intent with, you know, things they do.
And it's our job to kind of like create harmony between the traders and the founders.
And we can just do like a way better job at that.
Similar to like, you know, if you fundraise with like a safe or even if you do like a prize round,
your first time doing it,
there's usually a pretty big education curve.
Like a lawyer is explaining to you
what these different mechanisms mean.
Most people completely make a mess of it,
but by their series A,
they identified the problems they made.
So there is education
with like existing fundraising mechanisms.
And I think that for this too,
there's an education that we need to make like really easy.
Yeah, I'm interested in we've talked to some founders who have been kind of like curious about dipping their toes in the water. And
well, I remember it was we had some buddies to talk to people off the ledge. Yeah, after the Trump, you know, coin happened. Why not me?
after the Trump, you know, coin happened and why not me?
We had some buddies that that were thinking about it. And ultimately at the time, I think they made the right decision
not to do something.
But things are changing week by week.
And the trick is like, it feels like the the most basic thing
would be like, don't rug, don't don't sell what you own or whatever.
But there's this other dynamic that I learned about.
And this is probably obvious to everyone who's who's
native to crypto. But I could I could launch a coin, not sell
any, some traders could come in, pump up the coin, right? And
then people buy when it's at the high and then it and then those
traders sell and I didn't rug but like it feels like it rugged
and people are like, I lost money on your thing and then
they're mad at me. And so I guess in terms of the messaging and the risk reward,
how do you think the rules of the road?
What you're describing is there's a PVP dynamic.
Totally.
So I'm curious for you at a platform level,
do you think that, for example, are there
things you can do at a product level
so that if an artist comes on to believe
is using the mechanism to raise money,
you prevent it from turning into this PVP warfare
where people are duking it out on chain at the expense?
I feel like we're going to reinvent accredited investor
laws because the whole idea is a venture capital firm can lose
$100 million on some crazy biotech startup
or some hard tech startup,
and it really is no crying in the casino.
It's like you guys did your due diligence,
you signed the documents,
and you gave it a shot
and that particular technology didn't work out.
And so as long as there's no fraud,
you move on and you make money on the next thing.
But for random retail people,
sometimes they get caught up and they, and bad outcomes happen.
I feel like there's some, there's some vibes in, in,
in the ecosystem that can just be enforced loosely. There's also some rules,
there's some platform stuff. So I'm interested in kind of how you're,
how you're dealing with that.
Cause it's obviously going to evolve a ton over the next few years. I mean,
you're going to be running this for a long time.
Totally. Yeah. Yeah. To me, it's a, so, so, you know,
pumping being the worldwide web, there's like very small
mechanisms that you can integrate that I think just make
the whole space a lot safer. Sure. And yet, to your point,
read the snipers where they like by large, by the dump at the
top. There's like a lot of mechanisms like I'm seeing that
I think are really interesting, which is basically, you know,
having like, you know, extremely high fees for the first, you know, X amount of seconds at trading so that,
you know, the snipers will still get some ownership, but they're the ownership is like
greatly reduced on this rate limiting. So there's like a max purchase amount, uh, you
know, for the first couple of seconds. So yeah, a lot of these, um, anti sniper mechanisms
are just like kind of evolving right now. Um, and I think they're going to lead to a
much healthier ecosystem. Um, and in addition, like, like, yeah, I think it's like the kind of few, it's hard to say what
is good, but it's much easier to say what is bad.
So if we do detect bad actors, it's pretty easy for us to kind of disincentivize future
bad actors.
Yeah.
How much of the viral growth or the growth of the company right now has been, would you
attribute just to the specific kind of like viral growth hack of like
being able to launch a coin directly on Twitter or X?
Yeah, I'd say maybe like 50%. I think the, you know,
the other thing is that, you know, within the so-and-so trenches is, uh, you know,
they've been trading these kind of like traditional meme coins, uh, forever.
And this, uh, it's a really fun game that everyone enjoys,
but there is hunger for a new game and I think that the vision here has really like energized the whole space so that narrative alone I think
has done a lot of damage in a good way the opportunity right yeah yeah yeah
anyway anything else very cool we're good this is great I'm sure you have a
bunch of new things to work on in the in the 15 minutes that you've been on.
So good luck building.
Yeah, excited to follow.
Yeah, thanks for breaking it down.
I actually look at the time.
Yeah, thanks for having me, guys.
It's been cool to see everything go up
for you guys in a good way.
Yeah, yeah, we appreciate it.
Thanks a lot.
We'll talk to you soon.
Great to chat.
Cheers.
Fantastic.
A round of applause.
It's great to see him winning. If you're in CPG, privates of crypto. Yeah.
It works.
It works.
I guess that's the play.
Every once in a while.
Next up, we have Tom from Dragonfly Capital coming in the studio.
We'll break down some more trends, investments.
Yeah, it is interesting to look at companies like Pump, which was only launched something
like a year ago, and now is done
close to a billion dollars of revenue,
then you have Believe, and both these businesses
look pretty obvious in hindsight, right?
But just required a specific type of founder to unlock it.
Really quickly, if you're designing a crypto app,
you gotta be on Vanta, go to vanta.com,
think bigger, build faster, Figma helps design a crypto app, you got to be on Vanta. Go to Vanta.com. Think bigger, build faster.
Figma helps design and development teams build.
You said Vanta instead of Figma.
Oh, sorry, Figma.
Go to Figma.com.
It's a big day.
Whoa, whoa.
Yeah, go to Figma.com.
It is the background of the show.
And if you work at Vanta, use Figma to design Vanta.
That's right.
We're creating a Koretsu.
And if you're at Figma, use Vanta for compliance,
for SOC 2 compliance.
Vanta, automate compliance, manage risk, improve trust.
Continuously, Vanta's trust management platform
takes the manual work out of your security
and compliance process and replaces it
with continuous automation, whether you're pursuing
your first framework or managing a complex program.
That's right.
And two ads and one go, let's do it. Nice work, program. That's right. And kill two ads in one go.
Let's do it.
Nice work, John.
Let's bring in Tom.
Let's bring in Tom.
How you doing, Tom?
There he is.
Good.
Nice to meet you.
Technology brothers.
What's up?
Good to see you guys.
What's happening?
How are you?
Not a lot.
Doing well.
I'm loving the suits.
I mean, you guys always bring it, but you look great.
Have you watched the stream at all?
Are we asking too normie of questions?
Or are we hitting the right topics?
No, it's the right blend of norminess. There's a lot of stable coin
Conversation that's to be expected, you know people people have the stables. So no, it's been good. It's been great
I mean my bear case on stables is I went super long stable coins and my portfolio is completely flat
And so I'm looking for alpha, give me some crazy ideas.
What are you excited about right now
that's not one year out, but 10 years out, 100 years out?
What's the future look like?
Break it down.
A hundred years out, I think we're all gonna be dead
and replaced by a agent.
So it's all good.
I'm not too concerned about that.
You know, on the stable coin thing, I wouldn't sweat it.
I think you're gonna get a little, you know,
circle equity airdrop during the Ikea.
They're gonna just airdrop some shares
to all the USDC holders.
We're shelling for the US dollar.
We're shelling, we're US dollar shells.
Yeah, anytime a company sells
like a traditional crypto asset and buys USDC,
they're defending the dollar.
They're defending the dollar.
Yeah.
I agree.
I actually, you know, I think you're talking about stablecoin.
And when people talk about stablecoins,
they talk a lot about flow.
They talk about using stablecoins for payments,
B2B payments, P2P payments, whatever.
I think the stock thing is actually underrated.
And there's a few people in DC who talk about this.
I think Paul Ryan was actually talking about basically
stablecoins being a way to
You know mitigate a lot of the US debt because now you have all these new Treasury holders
Tether is like the seventh largest Treasury holder at this point and I'm like this feels like a very pro US
Bipartisan topic of yes, we want people to be buying we want more marginal Treasury buyers
stablecoins provide that route. And it's like a
little bit of like a, you know, saying the quiet part out loud, but I don't really care. I'm, you
know, very pro US and I think like using promoting the digital assets, which people saw as
alternatives to the dollar are now some of the greatest defenders. Yeah, kind of dig into it,
though, is is like Tethers the seventh largest holder,
is that because they displaced like fidelity
by taking like all of the treasuries
and they just moved them over?
Or are these, can we really think of these
as like net new treasuries that are being bought?
These are incremental, right?
Cause these are people who are offshore,
people who are in Argentina or Turkey.
Certainly maybe some of it is cannibalistic,
but for the most part, from what we've seen from,
and actually Rob Haddock, who's one of the GPs with me
at Dragonfly just had a great stable coin research piece
come out yesterday talking about
who's actually using stable coins.
And it's yes, some people in the US,
and yes, maybe some people who previously
would have purchased treasuries through the broker,
but actually it's people who are offshore.
And that is actually, I think, kind of the killer app.
What is happening in the Asian crypto markets right now?
I know you've spent a ton of time over the years
kind of focused in that area.
How is the regulatory environment kind of evolving?
What does crypto activity look like?
How do we get them to rotate entirely into USDC?
Yeah.
Yeah, that's part two.
Well, they're waiting for the airdrop.
No, I mean, Asia and the US have always,
I think, would say specialized when it comes to crypto.
Like, if you look back the past three, four years,
Asia has really been running laps around the US when it comes to anything
C-Fi.
We're early investors in Bybit and Bitget, which are now two of the largest exchanges,
incredible businesses.
I mean, we're talking billions of dollars in revenue.
Some of the features and some of the products that they offered, US exchanges are just now
sort of catching up to.
So I would say as one example,
a lot of Asian exchanges offered what we now call C-Defi
of offering a totally normal,
centralized exchange experience in the front end,
but wrapping some sort of defi protocol on the backend
to be able to offer people trading for new assets
or to be offer lending and financing opportunities
or yield opportunities
or whatever is actually available on chain, but without all the complexity and yuckiness
of having to manage your own keys, which is kind of what normies want.
Coinbase just launched Bitcoin-backed loans using Morpho, which is an on-chain lending
protocol, maybe a few months ago.
So this is something where the US is now just playing catch up to what's been happening in Asia for many, many years.
I think there's also been this trend of more,
I would say, Chinese, previously O2O founders,
moving into crypto and, frankly, also moving offshore.
Because they see, hey, venture in China is kind of dead.
The domestic market is kind of dead.
But I'm a really great technologist.
I'm a really great builder.
Building in crypto is a way to access a global user base
and global capital base,
but you know, with sort of the skills that I already have.
And so, you know, we're early investors in Kaido,
which is sort of this now has been coined InfoFi,
which I don't quite love,
but I think it's a cool concept of-
Sounds cool. Yeah, yeah, basically I don't quite love, but I think it's a cool concept of. Sounds cool.
Yeah, yeah, basically scraping Twitter data right now,
ingesting that and then sort of spitting that back out
into this sort of gamified cloud system.
They also do some really cool stuff
with like transcribing all these podcasts
and just like giving you sort of like an alpha sense
for crypto, but again, that's like a lot of Asian talent
now sort of moving into crypto.
Interesting.
How are you thinking about the intersection of AI and crypto personally?
We've talked with a number of people about the potential of stable coins within agents,
but there's a bunch of other potential.
How often should you pivot from AI to crypto and back?
Is that every three months, every six months, every two years?
What are you thinking?
No, but in all seriousness, how are you, I mean, I imagine you're a consumer crypto investor.
You need to get this bet right.
Totally.
Otherwise, you're going to look like a fool in 10 years.
Jordy, this is what I have nightmares about.
I am.
I'm sure you do.
No, I think we've been maybe a little bit contrarian when
it comes to AI crypto in being
more bearish on this category.
I think a lot of what AI crypto has broken down into is people trying to do decentralized
inference, this GPU marketplace.
This is, again, an old idea in crypto.
This was something that Gollum way back in the day was trying to offer for video rendering.
Now coming back, there's decentralized training,
decentralized data marketplaces.
I think for the most part, this is just really tricky to build, right?
Like if you think about how you actually train a state of the art model,
you don't use a million consumer grade GPUs all around the world.
It's like you want one big co-located A100 cluster.
Like that is actually kind of the thing that you want.
A decentralized network actually,
it doesn't really have the right characteristics of something.
The type of compute that you want,
compute is not a monolith.
The areas where we've been investing in AI meets crypto in there,
that we get really excited about.
You mentioned MPC and agent payments. I agree,
this just seems like kind of the no brainer where you want
deterministic final finality, you want your micro payments,
something that just like existing SaaS company existing
SaaS payment companies just aren't really set up to provide.
Do you want to be able to say, hey, I want like one simple API
call for a fraction of a penny,
and then never going to use the service again.
That's something where stablecoin payments are uniquely positioned to be able to do this,
but it's just not something that you're normally going to see out of traditional payment companies.
So we're investors in a company called Gold Sky, which is building in this category.
We're also, I mean, kind of on the compute topic,
we're investors in EXO, which is sort of borderline crypto.
It's, I don't know if you've seen them around Twitter,
but basically they allow you to run sort of sharded
inference locally on your own network.
So let's say you have, you know, a couple of Mac studios,
they're really sort of specializing Apple Silicon right now.
It will automatically discover
and execute, let's say something like DeepSeq R1
across those different computers on your local network.
So you can run really great models
on consumer grade hardware,
given sort of the existing shortage of GPUs.
And so you can imagine that, hey,
if you can sort of distribute and start to compute
across your local network, maybe at some point in the future, you can actually do that across a global network.
They're building towards that. I don't know if that's exactly the direction that they want to go. But in the interim, you have this really, really useful tool that allows you to actually get access to local edge compute models, which I think ultimately is where that whole industry is going to go, versus, hey, we're all going to be running our own models on someone else's cloud.
Back to the venture side, how do you see crypto funds evolving?
It seems like there's a number of funds with massive AUM and maybe not enough places to
bet on the equity side? Do these funds end up having, you know,
you know, be end up 80% sort of liquid, 20% equity, you know, sort of early stage
focused or how do you see that evolving? Especially I was talking with with Ani
on your team offline and he was talking about how with AI being so deflationary,
we just have companies now that have massive potential
but just don't really need capital.
So you're sitting in the investor's seat
being like, please take my money versus maybe 10 years ago
would have been reversed.
Totally.
I think that is definitely a trend that we see.
I don't think it's even necessarily a crypto venture thing specifically,
but I mean, you were talking earlier about people throwing ARR in the bio.
And it's like, yeah, that is downstream from just operators having so much leverage now that they didn't have before.
Crypto amplifies that where now you can sort of go public.
You can access a massive user base.
You can be way more sort of revenue positive than you were before.
And so maybe the history of crypto funds just to sort of take a step back.
If you think of sort of like 2017 2018, for reference, Dragonfly was started in 2018.
Crypto was a monolith.
You give some capital to a fund manager and they're going to decide, okay, I'm going to buy some Bitcoin.
I'm going to buy some ETH.
Am I going to invest in a early stage equity round?
Am I going to buy a SAFT? Whatever that sort of blend was, they're going to be managing that for you.
And oftentimes that was in a true closed-ended venture structure.
But sometimes it would be in a liquid hedge fund structure with some side pocket.
And it was like the whole thing was kind of no one really knew what this asset class was going to look like.
And so you give capital to someone else and they figure it out. There was also obviously a byproduct of
the fact that even getting access to something like Bitcoin previously was so difficult, right?
Like you couldn't buy it through your brokerage, your bank, no ETFs, most just like you need some
wacky custodian. But the whole process was very convoluted and so great. You've managed to do a
fund. That's something you can underwrite. And they can actually
go and determine how much of the Bitcoin exposure that you want. You fast forward several years.
And now, hey, if you're a reasonably sophisticated LP, you can go and choose how much Bitcoin you
want to buy yourself. We actually don't buy major liquids in our fund at all. And it's like,
I don't need to charge you two and 20 to go buy Bitcoin or E through
Sol or whatever it actually is.
You can go do that for yourself.
And so there's been more specialization in the crypto fund area where now you have
true dedicated venture funds like Dragonfly that are kind of doing, let's say, seed
through B in addition to, hey, maybe doing some treasury purchases for
some liquid assets that we think have sort of venture upside. And then you have sort of true
dedicated liquid funds. Maybe those are delta-neutral funds or credit funds or actually just sort of
long-only discretionary funds. But there's sort of this true split. And I would say it's a bit like
the sharks and the jets. I think the liquid funds always talk shit about the venture funds and the venture funds.
I don't really talk shit about the liquid funds.
I think they're great.
But it's, you know, there's sort of the specialization in the strategy, maybe to what, you know,
Ani was mentioning and what you were mentioning earlier.
Now the trajectory of fundraising goes, hey, we're going to raise a pre-seed, though maybe
we'll raise a seed. Maybe we'll do an ATBD. But generally, hey, we're going to raise a pre-seed, though maybe we'll raise a seed.
Maybe we'll do an ATBD, but generally, hey, you'll launch a token, token will go public,
and then maybe you'll do a treasury sale after the fact if you need more capital.
And so if you've raised north of a billion dollars, to your point, where do you actually
go and deploy that?
Maybe there are some equity-only companies, and certainly we do a number of those where we think hey, there's this company's gonna IPO
You know, we don't think there's gonna be a token
It can be just just a pure sort of revenue generating company
And I think that's like actually kind of an underrated area of the space
But it's sort of unclear where the rest of that capital goes
Which is why you certainly see these very wacky rounds where some company raises some
insane amount of money and you're like, what is going on here?
And I think there's just this lag effect between capital raised by VCs and then capital actually
deployed into startups.
What keeps you up at night about the industry right now, potential risks?
It feels like the industry broadly, you know, this year has been up up and down but so has every year in crypto to some degree but generally the industry is
sort of like riding on a high getting more regulatory clarity there hasn't
been you know 20 billion dollar hack in a while but like what what kind of what
what kind of risk do you see at a high level that actually were you?
Yeah, a million things, honestly. It's an industry that is always changing,
and therefore there's always more things to be worried about, but also things to be excited
about at the same time. Maybe to your point around regulatory clarity, I'm more worried that we don't
get regulatory clarity, and we fail worried that we don't get regulatory clarity
and we fail to get a stablecoin bill passed,
we fail to get a market structure bill passed.
Both of those are in the short term, not terribly bad.
I mean, I would say it's impressive
how well stablecoins have grown
in spite of being in this sort of regulatory area.
In the long term, the question is,
can we get a digital version of cash that is,
if they can have privacy for peer-to-peer transactions,
or do we get true Panopticon status centralized control?
That's something that is gonna be bad on,
you know, a 10 to 100 year time horizon,
maybe not so short term bad, but
we need to lay the foundation for that now so we don't end up in that bad situation.
I'm also frankly maybe a little bit worried about a lot of these Bitcoin treasury structured
companies. I think there's only so much market demand for these assets and I'm like,
it is great when number go up I'm a little
bit worried about what's happening when number goes down. Let's just give it up for when the
number goes up. Yeah yeah just stop right there you don't need to talk about when the number go down.
Yeah we want to cut you off. That type of thing never happens so let's not worry about that but
overall I mean it is a great time in the industry.
It feels like, like you were saying, it just never dies.
Every time someone thinks it's over,
that's actually the time that we're so back.
That is the exact time to be back.
And it feels like we're back now in a big way.
So yeah, we're really excited about where the future
of the industry is going.
Well, thank you for hopping on.
This is fantastic.
Thank you for coming on.
Come back on again soon.
I think you might be a generational yapper.
You're one of us.
You know, we lived a post.
We died a post.
It's all part of the same lifecycle.
So thanks for having me on.
All right, thanks for coming on.
Good to see you, Tom.
Cheers.
In the meantime, let me tell you about Linear.
Linear is a purpose-built tool for planning and building products.
I'm just going to clap through this drum.
For modern software development,
streamline issues, projects, and product roadmaps.
I would bet that every founder that is coming on the show
today already uses Linear.
Don't say that.
They're all about to convert with our coupon code.
We don't have a code.
We don't have a code.
Linear is going to eventually get to 105% market penetration
because certain companies will have two instances running.
That's ideal.
Yeah, that's our goal.
We're trying to capture 110% of the TAM.
We'll go into that more later.
Next up, we have Constantine from Blocked Even here.
How you doing?
Welcome to the stream.
Hey, guys.
How's it going?
Great to have you. Thanks so much for joining.
Would you mind kicking off with a little bit of introduction on yourself and the company,
just to get us started?
Yeah, yeah, no, listen, it's a great question.
Blockdemon, you know the word daemon means in computer science and operating system that runs
silently in the background, and that's really what Blockdemon is.
We connect institutions to blockchain networks and we allow for compliant and secure monetization
of the underlying fee and earn structure.
Translated, it means we run nodes for institutions.
We're pure B2B play.
We run core infrastructure.
We run around 250,000 nodes across 40 different data centers around the world,
We run around 250,000 nodes across 40 different data centers around the world, enabling basically institutions to purchase and hold assets and their respective consumers.
That has been the large activity over the last five years.
Right now, we're pivoting more into the DeFi area of things, where the next few years are
really all about allowing people to borrow and lend against the assets that they're now able to hold and buy a little
more easily. Blockdemon is an enabler. We're really purpose-built to meet enterprise-grade
demand for infrastructure. A couple of things that are special, I guess, is that we are domiciled in the US, for better or worse.
And we've been able to attract very institutional capital.
And so on our board governance, we have people like JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs, and Citibank
is another large institution with major shareholder status.
And so we've got a really unique investor and partner group,
I'd say out of the top 500 institutions offering crypto,
70% are customers of our infrastructure.
And so we're very foundational to the space.
We've been around for seven and a half years.
We raised a bunch of money from said institutions
in order to really bring institutions to crypto
networks and do it in a way that's as mentioned secure. I'm from Germany, I come from the
cell network world and I always describe nodes as cell networks.
Who's that Nokia?
Yeah, Nokia. Deutsche Telekom actually is my claim to fame. I worked for, uh,
back then a young man called Nika Sharoha who, uh, uh, you know,
for a moment was president at Softbank and now runs Palo Alto networks and also
was chief business officer at Google.
And so there's been a lot of people who started in cell networks and figuring
out how to make that data work.
One network, one type of network to another.
Yeah. Yeah. It's all the same.
Well, can you give us a temperature check on the enterprise? Um, One network, one type of network to another. Yeah, yeah. It's all the same. There you go.
Well, can you give us a temperature check
on the enterprise?
In the last cycle, a lot of the pitches for the enterprise,
there was a lot of exploratory budgets,
a lot of, oh, maybe we can put our inventory
on a blockchain and we'll store the data, you know,
and, but now our institutions coming around
and are they more up to speed on what crypto can do for them?
How are they thinking about plugging in?
And what is what is kind of top of mind for crypto amongst like the Fortune 500 from what you from what you've assessed?
Yeah, so I think there's different categories, right?
And so first off, obviously, the core financial institutions, the Robinhoods, the Paypal's that enable people
to purchase crypto and hold it are now all investigating, how do you earn using these
assets?
And so I think you have existing fintech players that have offered basic crypto services that
are now feel a lot more empowered in what we call staking or DeFi to offer sort of earn adjacent
products to their customer base. I think you'll see a big trend there. In the TradFi world,
I think you're going to see a lot more interest in wallets specifically. And so they're really
at that stage of figuring out, hey, what technology do we use in order to custody crypto assets
in our own infrastructure?
And so I think in the past, basically,
you didn't really want to touch crypto
or if you used a third party that you could point to
if anything went wrong.
And so now I think in the current iteration,
all these institutions are really figuring out
what their own proprietary basic solution setup is in order to custody assets and then also offer adjacent earned potential here.
And so we see a lot of that and with the sort of more Sony type of companies in the world,
you see a lot of interest in building their own version of a blockchain L2s.
You know, I don't know if you remember the good old days when everybody had a totally
permissioned
little hyperledger thing going.
I think we've made some progress there.
It is a funny thing.
It's like, we should pay attention to this crypto thing
and then, oh, we should just make our own blockchain.
That's the way to get involved.
It definitely was an era.
Yeah, we should start our own Visa network competitor.
Yeah, why not?
Why not?
It's like, a little trick. That's right. Go for it. Yeah, and then it our own Visa network competitor. Yeah. Yeah, why not? Why not? It's like, a little trick.
That's right.
Go for it.
And then it's changed with the optimism, the ZKZinc,
arbitrams, people being able to easily spin up
a sort of permission chain on a public network.
And so there's been some progress there.
And we see quite a bit there.
And then obviously all the ETF stuff and technology
that you need in order to basically custody these assets and offer yield over time.
What legacy, you know, we've had a bunch of interesting conversations today in different
perspectives and it feels like in many, you know, the irony of stable coins is that in many way they actually sort of expand
and support the dollar, right?
So this crypto being this sort of disruptive force
is at the same time propping up this sort of legacy system.
What areas of traditional finance do you feel like
are most prone to disruption over the next decade.
Yeah, I mean, well.
Because the context is like those legacy institutions
are coming to you now, or they already have,
and they're saying help us not get disrupted.
Like we don't want to be Nokia basically.
Yeah, yeah, well, I think interestingly enough,
everyone is, and thank you for pointing that out.
I feel like I joined Nokia in 2005
on top of the world. I left in 2010 after I ran it into the ground.
Hey, at least you can joke about it now.
Yeah, exactly. No, I mean, I was obviously a small little figure there, but it was an
interesting learning, right? Because ultimately you had an entity that was very, very good
in building really complex technology in thousand different versions, was very, very good in building really complex technology in thousand
different versions, but very, very bad in streamlining singular software tools across
its platform.
And so I think you'll find that financial institutions have a similar risk, right?
Like the IT stack of a large stratify is insane.
You know, I mean, it's probably akin to what Elon Musk, when he talks about Doge,
you'd be surprised about how archaic
a lot of these systems actually still are.
I mean, if you look at the structure of the Swift network
that obviously is one, sorry guys.
And then you also, just the ERP systems underneath it
are so complex and JP Morgan has a hundred thousand
engineers and they keep on building and doing stuff.
And so pivoting away from that archaic infrastructure is really, really difficult.
And they're starting to do it. I think, frankly, I think we're all way behind here, even as
institutions, because the beauty of AI and blockchain and the opening up of financial systems via Bitcoin is going to accelerate
the movability of money and so remittance specifically are sort of areas where I think
time's running out for institutions.
It's like either you can innovate really, really quickly or people are going to find
other ways to do it and let it be a Coinbase issued stable coin or something like that, that can actually take care of a lot of
these things. And so it's going to be really, really interesting
how financial institutions hold on to also the custody component,
right? And crypto has a self custodial cryptographic sort of
component. And if you think about what you pay your bank,
first and foremost, you pay them so they hold custody of your
assets, right? And so often,
custody can be fairly archaic. But with that custody, you also obviously lose a lot of control.
And, you know, you have technology and solutions today that can replicate basically what an
institution offers here for zero cost, right? It's really the consumer that is nervous in
touching them. And the infrastructure currently is way, way too complex for anyone to use.
But you're going to see a lot of improvements there on the user experience front.
Also with AI, I heard you guys mention AI and obviously, you know, you got to pivot into AI every three months.
But I think one use case that I kind of want to point out that we're working on that I think is really interesting on the wallet layer
is using AI to issue very simple commands to crypto networks, right? case that I kind of want to point out that we're working on that I think is really interesting on the wallet layer
is using AI to issue very simple commands to crypto networks, right to just say, hey, I just want to send Ethereum to this
address. Yeah, you know, like kind of that can be nice. If you
could tell a wallet, you know, an agentic wallet, just make me a
10% return daily, compounded daily, just forever, please
don't make mistakes.
You know, but basically make mistakes. Just get me a 10 bag, a 10 X this. Right.
You know, but basically make the interface that simple,
right?
Hey, wire securely $100 to France.
You know, I don't know if they need it,
but you know, we can, those types of things,
I think are gonna be real improvements
on how this works.
Yeah, Jordy.
How, what's happening with emerging markets,
we've talked about with other guests today around the risk that certain governments might
not want their citizens to be, you know, selling their native currency for something like stables
or other assets.
And so how much attention are you paying to the policy decisions in markets outside of the
US or is that not a focus for you right now?
No, for sure.
I mean, the outside of the US is still our largest market because we were in the US and
obviously got clobbered by regulators and by basically Operation Chokepoint 2.0.
And so we expanded massively into Asia.
Asia is a really exciting market for us. You'll see
Asia's lots of things, lots of different technologies and standards. And you have the
full spectrum of really, really dogmatic and suppressive systems and very, very open ones,
technically. And so yes, we follow this very closely. I think if I may age myself again,
it reminds me a little bit back in the day, we were trying to figure out how to distribute music
via digital channels and cell networks. And so once you pixelate stuff in ones and zeros,
it's just really difficult to contain it. And you're going to see that with currencies
on a very basic level as well. It's just like, you can try and do the China
and ban Bitcoin and things like that,
but the reality is it's a temporary solution.
People are gonna find ways around it.
And so I think we've-
Yeah, like the piracy, media piracy has not been solved,
right?
Like at all, not even close, right?
It's probably easier than ever to get movies online that that that
Without you know paying for them
So the idea that you're gonna sort of regulate crypto out of his existence is is a bit silly last question for me
MCP people have been talking about potentially integrating stable coins into that standard where how do you see it evolving?
What are you excited about?
Or do you think it'll just live side by side with crypto rails?
I mean, it's a good question.
I mean, I have a preference, right?
I think, um, what is your preference?
Well, my preference is that it's all integrated in one, right?
Like I really want to, um, uh, ultimately I'm, I'm an old school crypto guy.
I want access and, and inclusion via crypto rails for everyone
that no single entity can control.
And so my job is to bring a substantial amount of volume
from hard-coded institutional rails
into open source on-chain networks.
And so that's my preference.
I think it's gonna take a minute with regulators,
even though we have a much better administration that's
a lot more open to thinking about how to regulate this
and the market structure bill coming that we're working with
and trying to ensure that this gets done correctly.
I think it's going to take a few iterations.
We're going to get something done, some regulation at first,
and some of it is going to be good,
some of it is not going to be so good.
And then we've got to see how much support the industry can
continue to garner across also the aisle, basically.
It has to be a bipartisan issue on the regulatory front
as well if we want to see real progress.
But obviously, we're very optimistic here
that we can come up with something
that is as open as possible and replace us
as many of the legacy rails as possible.
Fantastic, thank you so much for stopping by.
Hope you have a great rest of your day.
Yeah, really enjoyed the conversation.
We'd love to get the update from you as things progress
and we get more clarity on the regulatory side too. But thanks so much for stopping by we'll talk to you soon. Cheers
Next up I gotta tell you about numeral sales tax on autopilot spend less than five minutes per month on sales tax compliance
benchmark series benchmark series
Yeah, I wonder how sales tax
Well, you know who has to pay sales tax pudgy penguins because they sell real things in the real world
Oh, yeah, they do they do and we have Luca from pudgy penguins coming on the stream next talking
Just make the next 20 minutes
Exactly exactly how you paying sales tax. Let's get to the really important questions
Yeah, we don't know what the market people want know. We want to know about your sales tax stack
and how numerals fit in.
Luca, welcome to the stream.
We are, of course, joking.
How are you doing?
What's going on?
Welcome.
Hey, guys, happy to be here.
Thanks so much for hopping on.
I'd love to start with kind of the,
a little bit of the history of Pudgy Penguins
because I know that there's been like a series of eras for the
company. And you're obviously taking it in somewhat of a new
direction or expansion now. But what's the story that you tell
about the genesis of the project, your involvement over
time and like where things are going.
So the the 60 second version is I was a huge collector of of pudgy penguins when they launched about three and a half years ago
They were kind of one of the three golden projects of the NFT bull run. It was really board apes punks and penguins
Unfortunately penguins kind of got mismanaged
They were founded by a bunch of 18 year olds in their college dorm basement with no operational experience
So at no fault of them, you know board Board Apes ended up being a $4 billion business.
Punks became a legacy collection with a multi-billion dollar market cap.
And Penguins kind of withered to the wayside.
But at that time, while I was collecting the NFTs,
I was CMO and co-founder of a company called Gel Blaster,
which was North America's fastest growing toy business.
No way. I was really involved in just IP. You got to get those for the studio. founder of a company called Gel Blaster, which was North America's fastest growing toy business.
I was really involved in just IP and the studio. Yeah, I see those ads all the time. I didn't
really see her behind this. Ben, order some gel blasters right now. Yeah, I'll get you
guys sent. I'll send some to the office. But that that I was I was really immersed there.
And so when I just closed my eyes and I thought Pudgy Penguins, I just thought this is a multi
billion dollar business. And so rather than being like a disgruntled holder who was complaining all day, I decided
to step up to the plate. And I bought the project for about two and a half million bucks three years ago, April 4. So
we're about three years and three and a half months into this. I think what we want to be today is I think twofold. I
think on one side of the spectrum, we want to be the face of crypto. When you think crypto today, I think what we want to be today is I think twofold. I think on one side of the spectrum, we want to be the face of crypto.
When you think crypto today, I think crypto is intimidating.
It's taboo.
But I think there's no better way to invade the hearts and minds of everyday consumers
and with cute pudgy penguins.
And I think there's no better representative from a mascot perspective for the industry
than the pudgy penguin.
You know, the story all encompassing.
And on the other side of the spectrum, we want to be the face of penguins around the world when you think penguins
I want you to think pudgy penguins, and I just believe that the penguin animal
Do you do you guys give
Do you guys like do any charity things for the actual penguins?
You know kind of like a royalty a little give back for the we've done a couple activations
I think children's to children's health and pengations. I think Children's Health and Penguins,
I think are the two places that we donate
and we're charitable.
Awesome, very cool.
You mentioned that the early Pudgey Penguins community
was unhappy with the development of the project.
It sounds like that's in contrast to the other NFT projects
where people were satisfied.
But from my perspective, like a lot of these they the 10k
NFTs go out they meant and then I
Don't really engage with these projects deeply enough to know like what is the community clamoring for?
So what was the community in pudgy penguins clamoring for that?
They weren't receiving and then what are you building that actually will satisfy the community or what?
Like what are they asking for and what what are you trying to give them?
Yeah, I think I think what every community member and crypto wants is productivity and and pushing the boundaries and forward progress
Within you know both the the internal IP and maybe just for the category in and of itself
But just to be clear like we bought punchy penguins under the guise that the NFT race and the NFT build out was severely underdeveloped. And there was a bar still yet to be set. And we bought this business to win in this category, and ultimately to win in the broader crypto category. And so I think from our perspective, it's not just winning for our community members within our small niche and within our, you know, within within the Pudgy Penguin universe,
it was really winning for the entirety of NFTs because prior to us,
NFTs stayed in this digital universe and this, you know,
vision that Ready Player One was going to come 20 years earlier than it actually
was going to come. And I thought, you know,
if this was the next generation brand and all of these companies were raising
billions of dollars under this guys, then as a brand builder for the last eight years, I felt like they just weren't doing all of the obvious things that all these brands have to do to win.
Are we going digital? Is everything going to be digital 20 years from now? Sure. But today people need physical interactions.
And I think that's a huge reason why we've won and we've been so successful the last couple of years is we really blended
The two worlds right we have you know toys and 10,000 retailers every toys tied in with an NFT and crypto experience
And and the whole thing really segues you would build this thing the same way
You've you know Hasbro or or Mattel or Disney would build it, but it's crypto native. It's internet native, and I think that's the difference
How do you balance developing the IP in the way
that you believe will create the most value long-term
and kind of the desires or wishes from the community
of initial holders, right?
Because as a business, you constantly need to be evolving,
reinventing yourself.
And I imagine there's a bunch of good parts about having this super loyal, dedicated fan
base that's heavily invested in the projects, but then there's also some hard decisions
to make at different times.
Yeah, I think the community's bought in under this guise that we are creating the internet's
Mickey Mouse and that everything that we do is to support that thesis and they're aligned in that vision
I think the problem or not the problem
But I think the hard part about this business and it's and it's relevant for a lot of crypto founders
But I coined this like three years ago
Which is we're basically building a publicly traded startup where I have all of the cons of being publicly traded with none of the pros
And I'm a startup, right? If I shit the bed, right,
and price in crypto is the best marketing
because it's such a hyper-financialized asset class.
And I do something great, price goes up,
holders are in the money, the more in the money they are,
the more they champion,
the more they recycle those profits back into the product
and the different product lines
that we have within the business.
But then obviously if you shit the bed, the financialization to me is a hyper form of
alignment and it can be your greatest superpower, which I think we've been able to harness and
galvanize over the last couple of years, or it can be your greatest kryptonite.
You've seen situations like this with basically 98% of founders in crypto is that ends up biting them in the ass.
They make one wrong step. They don't have that relationship. They don't have their report, the community, and the whole thing just kind of backfires.
Yeah, do you think if you look back at the NFT category holistically, is our projects, is part of that kryptonite just being over
capitalized. How much of a strength have you, you know, I don't know how
resource constrained you guys have been exactly, but I imagine it's quite a bit
more constrained than many other projects in the space, especially as, you
know, certain projects got marked, you know marked really, really high, a bunch of
capital flooded in, and I don't really have a good lens on how that's worked out.
Yeah, I think that's just entrepreneurship 101.
I mean, crypto in general makes people more money than they're supposed to make.
It's kind of like there's an arbitrage that I talk about a lot where, you know, there's
a real opportunity for builders in Web2 to come here because the premium on users and
success here is probably 10 to 15 to 20X what it would be in the real world.
Meaning like the EBITDA of Pudgey Penguins, you know, might be, you know, we might be
a $300, $350 million business today.
We've created five plus billion dollars in value
over the last couple of years,
and our total ecosystem is north of $2 billion.
So I think from our perspective,
it's really just a matter of,
being resource constraint has been
one of the biggest things for us and probably
the lens that I'm most proud about.
I mean, our next 10 competitors that we've outperformed over the last couple of years
have, you know, nine figures in funding, whether it's from venture or community.
But that's naturally, every entrepreneur gets into that problem at some point, unless you
really fight tooth and nail
over the course of a long period of time
to earn that capital.
But in crypto, you can make a lot of capital
and raise a lot of capital really quickly.
And the NFT cohort of 2020, 2021 is exactly that.
I mean, guys made 50, 100, a billion dollars
within 12 months of being in business.
You're not gonna be a superstar organization
off of that type of growth,
unless you're just a one in a million entrepreneur in group.
But that wasn't the case here.
And so I think us being scrappy has been huge for us.
We raised nine million our seed round,
and we haven't raised anything else for Pudgey since then.
And this year we'll do $40, $50 million in revenue.
So, so far so good.
That's awesome.
Can you talk about the decision to surface crypto
functionality to the user, to the customer?
The Instagram has 1.8 million followers,
never really mentions crypto.
There's a world where you're communicating
to a non-cryptonative audience.
You have a different group of customers
that's very crypto-native.
How do you balance those things out?
Is it all just one on-ramp, one direction
or the other direction?
How do you think about that dichotomy?
Yeah, so I'm a consumer product guy.
And consumer products, conversion's an action.
In crypto, and I think with building IP and character and love and affinity,
I think conversion is a process, right? And so, I think the idea that, you know, you immediately sell people on something that is still taboo and still intimidating, I think is a mistake.
And so, my objective is, how do I create love and affinity around this character, you know, positive impact around this character, positive association around this character over the course of time.
And as they become super fans and participate in fandom, they then go and figure out that this is crypto and go down that rabbit hole.
And I think that's a really beautiful story. Now, on one side, that's epic.
But I think a lot of people always misinterpreted our strategy, which is like, oh, how do you get the non crypto user to then go buy our assets, whether it's our token or NFTs. And it's
actually a misappropriated way of how I think people look at the strategy. It's more impactful
if you're a crypto native, let's say you're a crypto whale and your mom or your cousin
or your niece or your nephew or your son or your daughter is then participating in a Pudgy Penguin, buys a Pudgy Penguin product at Walmart or shares you with an Instagram
piece of Instagram content or a game or something like that. That aha moment for that crypto whale
is then like, oh, I've been in crypto for how long? You know, nothing has has transcended into my
family the way that this has. This is clearly doing something for the industry that nobody else is doing.
And that's kind of like our edge.
It's like, we believe crypto is for everyone.
But right now it's not positioned for that, right?
It's positioned for the finance bro, for the cool guy.
But if we really want crypto to succeed,
it's gotta be for the woman.
It's gotta be for the child.
As silly as it sounds,
those kids are becoming crypto native.
And an anecdotal story that I think your audience will love
is I started to meet some of the top
Solana traders over the last couple of months. These kids are 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 guys who made
20, $30 million in cash, right? Are 16, 17 years old. Couldn't cook a steak medium rare if they wanted.
Those are the crypto native, right? And that next generation will actually be native,
unlike you or I, who maybe saw the world before crypto.
We're crypto adjacent and we're crypto familiar,
but we're not native.
This next cohort that's coming in the next five to 10 years
will be crypto native, and that's the audience
that I really wanna speak to.
That's pretty awesome.
Talk to me about the decision to trade-offs
between the Ethereum blockchain and Solana.
Obviously the project originally launched on Ethereum, but the pudgy token is on Solana now.
What are the trade offs?
How do you think about those?
Is there one power law winner that's running away with the game or is there a world for both?
Yeah, I think they they're functionally trying to achieve two different things in my opinion.
I think Ethereum's goal and objective and mission is to be a decentralized network state, which I think is really important for the sake of humanity.
Right. Like if you if you weigh a bunch of different variables, AI and just everything
that might come into the future, like having a decentralized network state is really,
really important. And I think it plays its role really well doing that.
I think Solana is the first blockchain
that I've really interfaced with from an outside org in
that I think is really trying to be an organization
that's built to win, right?
And they want to capture as much value in winning
and building the biggest and best blockchain in the world.
And then all the things that come with that, right?
Like low latency, really fast, amazing BD,
getting all the top advisors in to come and help,
bootstrap and help ecosystem apps.
It's really run like a Silicon Valley organization
and its function I think is to win, right?
But there's two different functions, I think.
I think building a centralized network state
and building a blockchain to win, right, and to
dominate, you know, tech and to, you know,
because blockchains fundamentally are,
what are they really, right? A lot of
people tell themselves a lot of
different stories. To me, they're
borderless payments, right, and they're
global, and they're global, so global
liquidity and global composability, right?
Like those are its two functions, and if
you actually understand that as like an
entrepreneur building in the web, those solve two really big problems, right? Like those are its two functions. And if you actually understand that as like an entrepreneur building in the web, those solve two really big problems, right?
Like, like immense problems, right? Like, like Stripe used to, you know, Stripe and PayPal would
take your money and shut you down and do the whole nine, you know, like blockchain will remove that
edge. And so I think they're functionally two different organizations. I think from our
perspective, we wanted to launch our token
because we wanted everyone to have a piece of our main character,
this Internet's Mickey Mouse.
We wanted our followers on Instagram and on YouTube and on TikTok
to be able to participate, you know, in purchasing that token.
And today, it's hard to argue that Solana doesn't have the best experience
for that person coming from Instagram to then go in and purchase
something quickly, right? Like Ethereum today, even with cheap gas fees, like no one wants
to spend a couple bucks, you know, on some gas fees, even when that's relatively low
for the ecosystem, you know, they'll want to spend a couple bucks buying the token and
that's about it. So it seemed like a good fit.
That's awesome. Well, thank you so much for stopping by. This is fantastic.
Yeah, I really appreciate your perspective. We'd love to have you back
on again for a longer interview. Yeah, this is great. And I'm excited for our
Gerald Gel Blaster Nerf battle. Yeah, we need to address. It's gonna be pretty
obnoxious. The so stay tuned. Okay, great. We'll talk to you soon. Amazing.
Good. Really quickly before our next guest, Public.
Investing for those who take it seriously.
Multi asset investing, industry leading yields.
They're trusted by millions.
Of course crypto.
And next up, we have an in-person guest in the studio.
First in-person guest ever.
Welcome to the stream.
Do you guys need to swap headphones?
I'm just gonna talk to you directly.
Okay, cool.
Cool, cool, cool. I should've worn my suit. I know, you should've worn your suit. I mean, it's, it's, it's, uh, he'll so underdressed. Yeah. Uh, well fitting that you're the first guest.
You've been a close friend and, uh, advisor to the show here informally.
Yeah. Uh, for a long time.
Crypto day. Crypto day. It's been, um, it's been very fun. It's, it's such a, uh,
it's amazing to get perspectives from so many different parts of the industry.
And, uh, I think it's, it's, it's, it's, it's, it's, it's, it's, it's, it's, Crypto day. Crypto day. It's been very fun.
It's amazing to get perspectives from so
many different parts of the industry, investors, et cetera.
And there's a lot to be optimistic right now.
A lot more so than when you started Crypto the Game.
Yeah, I feel like we've launched season one kind of
in the depths of the bear market.
It was early 2024. I was trying to think about what to do next.
And I know we had spoken-
Well, you had had this idea forever.
Years, yeah. I can kind of give you the whole back story, which I know you know, but could
probably be helpful context for listeners. But when I first started working on it, for
real, everyone was like, you're crazy to building crypto right now. But in hindsight, it was
kind of the best time to launch.
Totally. crazy to building crypto right now, but in hindsight, it was kind of the best time to launch. But yeah, I mean, I kind of grew up an obsessive Survivor fan, watch every single season, they
just announced the cast for season 50.
I was like off camera reading up on that and apply every year never got a call back.
But kind of played this like CD rom version of Survivor called Survivor Ultimate with
my friends growing up and it was like very very rudimentary you picked your
Tribemate you, you know played tic-tac-toe for immunity and you voted each other off
Against the computer. It was like very very early like early 2000s
And I don't know just kind of like always envisioned this world where I could play a version of Survivor online with my friends
fast forward to my professional life,
I worked at HQ Trivia for The Rise and Fall, which
if you're listening, you might remember a live interactive
game show and started my career in TV,
but joined HQ for kind of the grand vision
of a live interactive TV network
so in the same way that HQ took a game show and made it live and mobile and
Interactive the same could have and should have been said for a shark tank format or a talent competition or a dating show
And of course in my mind the Survivor show so actually first pitched the idea for what is now CTG internally at HQ
Probably six or seven years ago now, which is crazy.
And then, yeah, it's just one of those ideas
that kept coming up.
I think I pitched it as an idea for a party round drop
and just kind of like, you know,
was starting to think about what was next
a couple of years ago.
Well, it's interesting because it was this,
one of the most complex products that you can build,
right?
This social, interactive, multiplayer, constantly evolving
game that's happening on chain.
So watching you build it, I mean, you and Tyler and Brian
and the team just did it very quickly and then got to market.
And I remember it very quickly took off.
And you very quickly were just, you probably
didn't sleep the first week?
No, not at all.
I mean, it kind of ballooned into this 24-7 game show.
I mean, I kind of assumed the way that it's set up,
it's a 10-day season.
Every day kind of follows the same format
of a daily immunity challenge in the morning.
Think like classic arcade games or crypto puzzles or digital scavenger hunts.
If you win that challenge, you have immunity and you're safe from the vote that night.
Everyone else votes people out.
Basically last person standing wins the pot.
And I kind of assume people would log in in the morning, meet their tribe mates, make
an alliance, register a score of a game, go back to work and then kind of assume people would log in in the morning, meet their tribe mates, make an alliance,
register a score of a game, go back to work,
and then kind of come back on that night to vote.
But it just was so, so, so time consuming for the players.
And as a result, it was just 24-7 for us as well.
Yeah, I remember.
Weren't people basically calling in sick
or taking vacation days so that they can just fully walk in?
My most heavily requested question basically from players between seasons is like when's the next
season so I can request my PTO? What was that early controversy you guys had? I think you navigated
it well obviously because it turned into a second season and then an acquisition by Uniswap but
I feel like you quickly ran into the nature of crypto
is that you're talking,
I forget who we were talking about this,
but maybe it was Balaji,
but crypto because it's so financialized
is effectively incentivizing constant penetration testing
and incentivizing the world
to basically try to hack your system.
And I forget the guy's name.
Anish. Anish.
I'm sure you guys are buddies now.
I mean, we made up in the DMs for sure.
Yeah.
Yeah, so the way that it works is basically
you buy your entry for 0.1 ETH.
That entry goes towards the prize,
and the entire prize pot goes towards the winner at the end.
And I was always kind of concerned
that there could be some sort of civil attack.
Someone would try to buy up 51% of the entries
and basically guarantee themselves a victory.
And there were a couple of things we did
to try to prevent that.
And for season one, we kind of kept entries uncapped
so that people couldn't necessarily figure out
what the 51% mark would be.
But yeah, right before the entries locked
and the season began, Anish and his army of bots
basically bought up most of the slots.
And wearing my Web 2 HQ trivia hat,
I was like, oh, bots are bad.
Basically kicked them all out. And was like, this was built are bad. Basically kicked them all out.
And was like, this was built for real people and real players.
And immediately got the wrath of crypto Twitter,
which somehow happens every season to the point
where a few friends joke and think
that I'll intentionally drum up some CT controversy
so more people talk about CTG.
But I immediately realized that bots
aren't bad in this world.
And so we ended up refunding Anish and making things right.
And he was so nice.
And we ended on good terms.
What was it like bringing Web2 or sort
of traditional companies into CTG?
Because I remember you had some pretty high profile partnerships
as well.
Yeah, Adidas actually sponsored a challenge
during season two, which was our season two controversy.
Wow.
No, it's all good.
But yeah, I mean, it was so incredibly
humbling and refreshing to see that basically
after the virality of season one,
a brand like Adidas kind of saw
this little internet experiment
and decided to reach out and ask to be a part of it.
So, yeah, we had six sponsors for season two,
each sponsoring a different challenge,
one of which was Adidas.
The rest were all kind of like crypto native brands,
one of which being Uniswap and that kind of like to-
Do you expect legacy brands to get more involved with crypto?
We every once in a while we'll see them dip their toes in whether it's Adidas and CTG or Nike with its artifact, right?
Yeah.
But but it feels like that's died off a little bit.
But at the same time, traditional institutions are getting more involved with crypto than ever.
Yeah, I think eventually we'll see it.
I still think it's kind of a dirty word
with the big Fortune 500 non-crypto brands.
The artifact example didn't go well for Nike.
I would say the CTG example probably
didn't go well for Adidas, which is
a whole other conversation.
But I think we as in crypto builders
and pretty much everyone that's been on the show today
and that you will speak with has seen some sort of like
the wrath of the trenches and the army.
And it's not a great feeling.
And if you are a large like Fortune 500 brand
with like a crisis comms team
and you're kind of like seeing all of those replies
and you know, folks feel like basically when the crypto Twitter army like goes after brands, I think it's really hard to deal with so
having said all of that as you know the experience in the UI and the UX gets better and
you know things like privy like improve the login flow and wallet creation and kind of abstract away all of
basically all of the crypto from these experiences.
I think like big brands won't necessarily know
that they're doing quote unquote crypto integrations.
It'll all just feel like the internet.
That makes sense.
How have you seen crypto,
I would put CTG in the category of crypto entertainment
or crypto gaming.
It's one of the few games that it feels like crypto,
Twitter, crypto acts like really played
and got hyper engaged with,
even though it was at a small scale.
Have you seen any other games
really capture people's attention?
I know there was a bunch of like open world games
that raised massive amounts of money
but then haven't seemingly haven't delivered?
Yeah, ironically for a crypto game founder,
I'm not much of a gamer myself.
I think of CTG as much more of a game show than a video game.
But in my mind, the closest example
is Yapster, which is also very heavily inspired by HQ Trivia.
I don't know if you've played around with Yapster,
but it's an interactive game show where you basically can submit memes. The players can
vote on the memes and the winning meme each show is launched as a token. So it has that
and it's 100% live and everyone votes in real time. There's a chat functionality. And because
of the speculation of the token that basically
wins at the end, it has that feeling of a live show.
So I would put Yapster in my mind
as the only other live interactive game show that's
really, really exciting me right now.
And how big can something like that get in your mind?
I think huge.
I mean, the secret sauce at HQ was
that you could win real money.
And that is the case for most of these crypto game shows.
I think the difference with CTG and Yabster
is that there's kind of only one winner each time.
Whereas with something like HQ, tons of people could win.
But at the same time, because of that,
you had folks basically winning like 25 cents
or less than that with HQ because it grew so big.
So yeah, I think like, I don't necessarily know
that like a live interactive meme coin show
is gonna onboard the masses, but there's like
tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands
of people on crypto Twitter right now.
What are you seeing right now on,
cause I know you'll end up advising or investing
in other early stage crypto projects,
what are you seeing as far kind of trends in the early stage?
You clearly made the decision with CTG not to raise money.
And you had every opportunity to.
I remember in the early days, you would ping me,
and you'd be like, oh, this fun.
I remember having conversations about why it would probably
not be good for CTG if you were to raise.
But many people, I think, wouldn't
have made that same decision.
Yeah, no.
I think with regards to raising, I
think not every single idea has to be a venture scale idea.
We've spoken a ton about this offline.
But I think CTG was dreamed up as initially a drop,
like a personal drop.
I think that it's not like HQ in the sense
that we really embrace seasonality
and try to be very close to a TV show.
And so we technically go off air for like months in between.
And I think the players need that because it's so intense
and we need that because it's so intense.
And yeah, I think if we had raised,
we probably would be on that like hamster wheel
of like having to build some sort of scalable platform.
So communities and people can kind of like spin up
their own versions of the game.
And it was just like a very manual process and
I felt like
it wasn't necessarily the right choice for
CTG but I don't know. I'm excited about
Pixie chess which I know, you know our friend Josh has started and for those listening that aren't familiar
The way that it's been described to me is is basically like a noun style auction for different
On-chain chess pieces that have magical powers
So you can imagine a queen that goes invisible or a bishop that can go backwards forward sideways, etc
And every single day there's a different auction
You essentially acquire these pieces add them to your deck and the funds from those auctions go towards different Grand Slam tournaments that you can basically take your deck with you
and play against others.
Really excited about that.
I've been playing around with Vertigo,
which is a new decentralized exchange on Solana
that's anti-sniper.
So I know you guys spoke to Ben and Alon,
and a lot of these token launchers and tokens
kind of have a sniper problem, basically,
where someone will buy up most of the supply
and instantly dump it, so I think building exchanges
with cleaner token protections and anti-sniping mechanisms
is something that's just gonna be net beneficial
to everyone, so yeah, those are a couple of things that come to mind.
And then the last is probably Tokenworks, which
is like the closest thing we have to crypto mischief.
They do different like token drops.
I think that's how you're pushing about that.
Yeah, really excited.
So is Brian Armstrong next?
I think so.
I think we'll see.
Am I getting the boot?
Check the calendar. Well, thank you for coming on. You're the first official team. Yeah. I think so. We'll see. We'll check the calendar.
Well thank you for coming on. Your first, the first official
tune. Oh my god.
Thank you so much for having me.
We're not on the set, John. But there you are.
Thanks for coming on, Dylan.
Thanks for all the help on the show.
We got Brian Armstrong next.
The gong is still ringing.
The real gong rings much longer than. The gong is still ringing. Coming in the studio this morning. The gong, the real gong rings much longer
than the fake gong.
Yeah.
Well, we're waiting for Brian.
Let's tell you about AdQuick.
AdQuick.com, out of home advertising made easy and measurable.
Say goodbye to the headaches of out of home advertising.
Only AdQuick combines technology, out of home expertise
and data to enable efficient, seamless ad buying
across the globe.
It's out of home, built different, John.
It is.
It is.
And we have Brian Armstrong here.
Welcome to the stream, Brian.
How are you doing today?
I'm doing great.
Thanks for having me, guys.
Great to have you.
Thanks so much.
Welcome.
I don't even know where to start.
I mean, we were kind of in the same YC batch.
My first company was in YC summer 12.
It's been-
It was Soylent?
Yeah, Soylent.
It's a weird story because I joined the company shortly after YC and I was in a different YC Summer 12. It's been- It was Soylent? Yeah, Soylent. It's a weird story because I joined the company
shortly after YC and I was in a different YC company.
So, but that's a story for another day.
I give John problems all the time for not,
you know, tapping you on the shoulder and, you know,
demanding that you take an angel check in that era.
But anyways-
Well, 2020 hindsight, I can assure you,
we were not like the hottest startup in that
YC batch at the time.
I mean, it was hard to actually raise our seed round, et cetera.
But you know, obviously it worked out.
It was not obvious, though.
Yeah.
What was the incentive for joining Coinbase back during the YC days?
Was it a full Bitcoin as a referral fee?
Yeah.
I mean, I was kind of stealing a page out of the PayPal book where, you know,
everybody would get about, I think you could,
yeah, if you invited your friends and they onboarded,
they got $10 of Bitcoin and you got $10 of Bitcoin.
And at the time that was like about one Bitcoin.
So crazy to think about.
Yeah, and there was a lot of people,
I went around to like probably a thousand or more people
in the Bay Area at that time and anybody I could find,
I'd be like, hey, do you want some Bitcoin?
Like, I'll send it to you on my phone and I try to get them onboard into the Coinbase
app.
And yeah, it was when we started out, it was like five or six dollars for a Bitcoin.
Yeah.
So how do you tell the story of Coinbase now?
I mean, it's such a huge story.
Do you think about it in particular eras?
Is the going public era a different distinct era or or do you do or do you even map it to like the?
The the bulls the bull cycles and the and the bear cycles is that does that have a tangible feel in the coinbase story?
Internal to the company. Yeah
Yeah, well, I think of it in different so Fred Wilson had this great thing
He told me one time he said like companies have multiple founding moments on the way to being a public company.
And that was definitely true in our case.
So the first era was Fred Ersam and myself in an apartment just grinding it out 14-hour
days, just doing everything ourselves, answering customer support tickets, trying to recruit
people, trying to get anybody to join, writing code ourselves.
That was the pre-product market fit, how do we try to get something moving?
Then you go through hypergrowth, and your problems totally change, which is how do we
get a real set of leaders into this company?
How do we not get hacked?
How do we go raise more money, build a real board?
You go through this period of hypergrowth where we were like, we'd never managed anybody,
but suddenly we were managing 25, 50, 100, 500 people.
And we were hyperscaling just trying to keep up with all the demand.
And then crypto went through ups and downs.
Eventually, Fred decided to go found his own company, which was super successful, like
Paradigm, and he's doing another company now.
So I had to bring in an executive team.
That was like its own experience
with a bunch of infighting and blowups and drama.
And I finally got a exec team that worked,
and then we went public, and you know,
Emily Choi is like our president and COO now,
so she's like, you know, multiple foundings along the way
to get to these eventual outcomes.
It takes like 10 years to be an overnight success,
quote unquote. Overnight success, we takes like 10 years to be an overnight success, quote unquote.
Overnight success.
We love overnight.
We love 10-year overnight success.
We lost the overnight success button somehow.
We have a soundboard, and it plays overnight success.
Every time somebody says it took them 10 years
to really be successful, we hit that.
But what other industries have you
looked to for learnings to kind of build through these boom
and bust cycles?
Because it feels like, you know,
you guys are acclimated to that now,
but I know this is, you know, the case,
oil and gas is probably a prominent one.
Were you able to pick up anything from outside of crypto
to help you steer the ship through cycles?
Yeah, a little bit.
I mean, every company has different challenges.
So I actually don't think ours are that bad, but one of the challenges we had when we were
getting ready to go public was our revenue was super unpredictable and volatile.
We'd have a trading quarter where we would just blow it out of the water and we'd be
printing money, and then it'd be down like 70% the next quarter or something.
In the public markets, investors really love you to have these predictable revenue streams.
I still don't, to this day, know why they're so fixated on that. And in the public markets, investors really love you to have these predictable revenue streams.
I still don't, to this day, know why they're so fixated on that.
It seems like they should be thinking about the growth potential, but they love the predictability
of it.
And so, yeah, we had to look at oil and gas.
There's some energy brokerage.
Actually the traditional brokerages like NASDAQ and NYSE, they have the same issue.
They can tell you, one of them told me one time, he was like, if you can tell me what
the S&P 500 is going to do next quarter, I'll tell you what our revenue is gonna be.
But of course, if you can do that,
you got it made in other ways.
Whenever I feel like we're having a bad time,
I always look at the hard tech companies.
The biotech companies in the public markets
get beat up way more than we do.
They have much less predictable revenue.
Their revenue is pushed out way farther.
All my friends who are working on hardware companies,
I'm like, wow, they're really doing entrepreneurship.
I'm like, they're always calling me up
and like, I've got four weeks of cash.
We're trying to raise money and I'm like.
They'll mail me out.
You've been trying to raise money like every month
for the last 18 months, just living like one month
to the next month.
Those guys have true grit.
In software, our margins are high, and it covers up mistakes that we make.
We actually had revenue relatively early in our journey, whereas in biotech, you have
to invest in it for 10 years to try to get your first dollar revenue sometimes.
Yeah.
There were a whole bunch of narratives around crypto back in 2012, even before, decentralization,
resistance to government control, anonymity, just faster payments, all these different
things. What's the state of the union from your perspective? How would you grade the
different executions across the original goals? Some of them have just kind of fallen by the wayside as we found different solutions to those problems
But what are you?
What do you think we've knocked it out of the park on and what do you think?
We still have a lot more work to do on
Mm-hmm. Well, the ultimate vision for crypto was always economic freedom in my mind
In fact, that's the mission of coinbase is to increase economic freedom in the world
So that's like how do we give people more self sovereignty, more control of their money.
It enables them to not only live a freer life and not have things taken away from them,
but it also it's better for society because if we have a society with good property rights
and sound money and rule of law and these things, you can actually try more things.
If people are rewarded with the upside of their labor, they're going to go try more
ambitious things in the world.
There's actually economists who measure across different countries, like how high is economic
freedom?
And you see that in high economic freedom countries, there's higher GDP per capita,
but there's also less corruption, there's less war, there's lower infant mortality,
all these downstream effects.
The ultimate potential of crypto is to get more economic freedom in the world.
We've been trying to push on that through a variety of ways.
One way we've done it is by getting legislation passed in the US or pushing on that.
We had a big influence in this last election.
The crypto voters showed up in a massive way.
We had 2 million advocates who raised their hand in the US saying they wanted to elect
a pro crypto congress and candidates. We had a couple hundred million dollars in the fair shake super pack.
And so we now have the most pro crypto Congress that we've ever seen. And we're on the cusp of
getting stablecoin and market structure legislation passed. The other thing is we've been pushing on
our products. They have to be easier to use for the average person. The early crypto products,
it felt like some computer scientists came from on high
down the mountain and they tried to make this successful
to mere mortals and that was never gonna work.
So the products are slowly getting easier and simpler
for average people to use.
And crypto is growing into these areas like payments
and tokenizing securities and it's not just trading
as a use case, right?
So we're getting closer and closer,
but ultimately I think crypto is going to update the entire
financial system globally and the majority of all payments will run on these crypto rails.
They're just faster, cheaper, more global, and that's how we're going to get more economic
freedom in the world.
That makes a lot of sense.
Do you think the conversation around economic freedom over the next few years will shift
away from the US and more towards emerging markets who are adopting digital assets, but
may face, you know, push back from from their governments and
you know potentially even more aggressive way than we have in the United States over the past four or five years
Yeah, it's a great point because I think the unmet need is higher in some of these other countries emerging markets, right?
Where people like in Turkey, they're getting like 70% inflation a year or something.
It's devastating to their entire economy.
People have very high demand for the dollar and then Bitcoin, same thing in Nigeria, et
cetera.
Now, some of those markets are going to be very resistant to it, especially if the government
is not fully aligned with the people's interests.
The government wants to run their fiat currency because then they can print money and abuse it.
It's one of these original sins of fiat currency.
Some of these markets have capital controls, like in India.
I think the governments will be somewhat reluctant to embrace crypto in some of these places,
but the average person will love it.
Like, the people are demanding it.
They're rushing toward it.
The governments are a little hesitant.
And so in democratic countries, it'll be allowed because more people will vote for it.
But in places like China, they're really cramping down on it.
I don't think North Korea is going to add it anytime soon.
So it's a little bit like the internet, right?
China has the great firewall of China.
North Korea has their own private internet.
And so some of these like really corrupt regimes,
I think will have, they'll try to crush crypto,
but in most places in the world, it'll happen.
North Korea even has their own Linux distribution,
Red Star Linux.
Did they? I didn't know that.
I gave it a cool name.
I mean, you got to admit it's a cool name.
It is a cool name.
I want to talk about base.
Obviously, it's powering a lot of consumer crypto use cases right now.
How did that come about?
What has it been like incubating something like that inside Coinbase?
Yeah, a lot of people have asked me about that because they're always surprised that
a relatively big company can still innovate or whatever. But I think the way that it,
I can't take too much credit for it by the way.
The biggest thing that I did was,
we have a very entrepreneurial culture,
different people we've brought in.
And Jesse Pollock came to me at one point,
he was like, hey, I wanna work on a new chain.
And I was like, cool, take a small team, go run at it,
two pizza team or whatever, five people.
And I had no idea if it was going to work.
But the biggest thing, he deserves all the credit to be honest.
The only thing I did was I kind of shielded it from the rest of the organization a little
bit and just gave them time to cook.
And he went through like five or six iterations and I saw a couple of these along the way
and I was like, honestly, I have no idea if this is going to work.
And it turned out to actually really hit.
And so if there is like a secret to this, which I don't know if it's a secret, but you have to allocate
some percentage of your budget to these venture bets and make them small bets because you
want to have two, three, four people working on it, kind of like a YC company.
Don't put 100 people on it or something.
It's going to be a big bureaucratic thing.
As long as they're small bets, you can tolerate 75% of them not working out, and once in a
while something hits and it pays for all the rest of the bets.
It's like having a venture capital internal at the company.
We actually set up this thing called, we call it Next Bets, and twice a year, anybody in
the company can come pitch.
It's a group of people, we call it like
internal venture capital. And they're basically the people who run different product groups,
but there's also some really kind of like smart young engineers, etc. Basically, if
any one of them raised their hands and said, I want to fund that out of their budget, then
you're greenlit to go do it. You don't have to get a unanimous yes, you just need one
person to say yes. And there's, there's actually pretty big, like USDC, I will tell you, I actually voted no on USDC,
which was a terrible hit.
Now it's like almost a billion dollars of revenue
or something for us.
And I voted no because I was like a little skeptical.
I didn't think it was like decentralized enough
or something, but luckily somebody else on our team
voted yes, so it got funded and it turned out
to be a massive thing.
So it shows you how much I know
That's incredible. I want to talk about putting stocks on chain
You go back to that original like Peter teal lecture in the 90s talking about maybe we could have a digital dollar
That's not backed by gold or the Treasury, but actually backed by stocks
Is there a world where that happens what needs to happen? Is there a world where coinbase shares are?
securitized on chain and I know you probably can't give like forward guidance around that but like
Walk me through the the the changes that would need to be made and is that even a good idea in your mind?
Yeah, well just starting first with that PayPal
Point that you made I mean
There's a great book. I think it's called PayPal Wars.
I believe it's about the founding of PayPal.
And you know, it really, there was a lot of like that libertarian ideology of like economic
freedom was in the origin, the founding team, as you can imagine, they went on to do many
other things.
And I think, like in many ways, crypto is fulfilling the vision that the early PayPal
team started with around economic freedom.
The main reason I can think of for that, there's a lot of reasons.
They got acquired by eBay, et cetera.
The team changed in some of the motivations.
At the end of the day, nobody wanted a US company to run the global financial system.
If you were the Indian government or random person in some country, you didn't, do I really
want to put all my money in some US company.
But if it was a decentralized protocol that nobody controlled, like the internet, it's
like, OK, we'll all kind of integrate with that.
And so Bitcoin was the key innovation, I think, that unlocked that opportunity.
You also asked about tokenizing securities.
And I do think that's an exciting area.
We're pretty interested in that as well.
The trading of stocks is just one more area of financial services that could be improved
by crypto.
I mean, as an example, there's a lot of people around the world who want access to US securities,
but they don't have a simple way to open a brokerage account and track that.
So it's like the international access would be better.
You could get perpetual futures markets spun up for these stocks, which would give traders more leverage.
You could do 24-7 trading, you could do fractional shares.
So I actually think most traditional securities
are gonna get tokenized on chain in the next five years.
We've been working a little bit with the SEC task force
on this and trying to find the right path to do it.
So it's something we're interested in,
but yeah, obviously nothing to announce today.
Where are you getting the most leverage from AI internally?
I can think of a bunch of different potential
applications, but I haven't seen you do online virtue signaling
about it yet, like other certain CEOs have.
But I'm curious what you're excited about.
Yeah, OK, well, so I think we're doing
a lot of the current best practices that most people are doing
with well-run companies.
Then there are a couple of areas on the horizon that are more crypto-specific that I'll tell
you too.
The basic ones you probably know.
We onboarded all of our engineers to copilot and cursor and everything like that.
We got 100% of them onboard and that was good.
Our customer support, I think maybe 60% of inquiries are being answered by AI now, which is really good
We also for a long time been building AI models around fraud prevention and like detecting risky transactions
So but you could yeah, obviously like any process within the company that has a clearly defined input and output you can train a model on
and like Generating compliance reports like there's so we're trying to integrate it everywhere company that has a clearly defined input and output, you can train a model on and generating
compliance reports.
So we're trying to integrate it everywhere.
The ones that are a little more on the frontier or crypto specific for us, so one is that
I guess people are calling it agentic commerce, which is like your agent is increasingly kind
of like your assistant and it might need to book you a ticket to go somewhere,
or it might need to get through a paywall or something.
If you're like, hey, go read all the research papers from Nature on this topic and give me a report, like, okay, those cost money to ingest it.
And so AI agents are going to need to have a wallet to go pay for stuff.
We think that crypto will be the backbone of that. USDC on base is starting to be adopted by some of the...
We actually released this open source thing called AgentKit, which makes it easy for any
LLM to have a wallet.
We're working on a couple of checkout type solutions with other players that we'll announce
soon where the AI agent can actually get through the checkout flow in many of these e-commerce
sites and pay with USDC on base.
I think agent at commerce will be a big one.
I think it's also we're going to get AI agents that can be like your RIA, your registered
investment advisor, or almost like your trading bot.
Imagine you're in the Coinbase app and you tell them, hey, I want to put $1,000
or $10,000 or something into this account.
You're talking to a trading bot and you're like, just go make me money.
I don't know.
You might ask you- Don't make mistakes.
I joked about this before, 10% compounded return daily.
Don't make mistakes.
Don't make mistakes.
Yeah.
It may have some questions for you or it may make and like there's a lot of details to figure out
But I think having a trading bot like do a lot of that for you
And it's like hey Mitch like if I if it goes up a lot lock in some gains
You know it so I don't regret it later
Well, you can give it kind of abstract concepts like that and it'll go it knows how to make the limit orders for you or whatever
Yeah, how do you think that?
How do you think that,
how do you imagine that type of capability
really being dispersed?
Because I imagine, I mean, obviously there's people
with trading bots today and they're actually,
I imagine some of them are so effective that they just say,
well, we don't actually wanna release this
because we should just use it ourselves.
But it sort of could potentially tie into this dynamic
between closed source AI and open source AI.
And is that, do you think part of Coinbase's opportunity
is to make sure these types of tools are available
to as many people as possible
versus just a handful of traders?
Yeah, it's kind of, I mean, so we're not doing prop trading
on our own balance sheet.
So we're not like trying to be a own balance sheet, so we're not trying to
be a hedge funder or something with a proprietary algorithm.
So our goal would be to make this available to as many consumers as possible.
And yeah, it's adjacent to financial literacy.
Many people might come in and be like, yeah, I want to make crazy returns, and this thing
can tell you, well, OK, that's pretty high risk.
Why don't you dollar cost average into this diversified portfolio over time?
And that might be more in line with your risk appetite.
But if you want to take 10% of it and try something more high risk,
so it can teach people about these concepts.
And while also doing what they ultimately want to do,
what they would have done anyway in the app, but it's just making it easier for them.
Totally. Can you talk about the ext, but it's just making it easier for them. Totally.
Can you talk about the extortion attack, how you handled it?
And I'm particularly interested in going forward, there's a lot of tools in your toolkit.
You can throw more money, more people, more technology at the problem.
What's the next few years look like in terms of beefing up security?
Yeah.
Yeah, well, I mean, we've had a really good track record on security at Coinbase over the
last 12 years. And even in this attack, you know, we didn't see any private keys or funds
accessed directly by the attacker. So what they, unfortunately they were able to do is they were
able to bribe some of our customer support agents and to share with them like personal
information on, on customers, like name, address, et cetera. And they want this information.
Attackers want this information because they want to text people, call people,
try to socially engineer them and to get them to send their money.
And so unfortunately, they were able to successfully do that with a handful of customers,
which we've reimbursed 100% at this point.
And then they sent us this demand.
Once they realized they'd been found out and customers were kind of getting educated about
this, they sent us this demand for $20 million, or we're going to release all this information.
And it was an interesting moment.
We came together and thought about it.
And on the one hand, we could have paid them the money, but we talked to a bunch of security
researchers and people, and they were like, what typically happens in these cases is if
you pay the extortion, they're just going to come back in three months and extort you
again.
It's like, do we really want to be in this situation where we're funding their next attack
and rewarding this kind of behavior or do we want to try to create a deterrent to this
kind of behavior?
We decided to flip it and as you probably saw, we put out a $20 million bounty for any
information leading to their it and as you probably saw we put out a 20 million dollar bounty for any information leading to their arrest and
Conviction and that's been kind of a crazy experience
I mean just as one data point for comparison after 9-eleven the US government put out a 25 million dollar bounty on Osama bin Laden
And we put out a 20 million dollar back
so
We had like maybe five thousand
like tips or inquiries like come into the
Email that we put out there most of it was junk and we kind of whittled it down
There's about like 70 or so credible leads. I would say
and we always have to be a little careful because some you know, some of these could be like the
Threat actor themselves sort of trying to throw us off the trail or run down some wild goose chase
Some of the other people sending in tips or leads
are like other threat actors who kind of have beef
with these guys or like they're kind of like
no honor amongst thieves, right?
Yeah.
And so, you know, which is fine with me, but it's-
No, I really enjoyed the, you know,
I saw the video that you put out and I enjoyed imagining
the dynamic of the thieves, you know, sitting around a table, realizing that, you know, I saw the video that you put out and I enjoyed imagining the dynamic of the
thieves really, you know, sitting around a table, realizing that, you know, that the
sort of game theory of who's going to turn in who, you know, it was a, it was a nice,
it was a nice visual. Yeah. Yeah. So that's exactly what we wanted to create was a real
deterrent here. It was like, if you're, if you're going to attack our customers, you
know, you need to look over your shoulder
and always wonder who's going to turn me in or who did I interact with in my entire life
who might have known about this, who's going to turn me in. So anyway, I can't say too
much more. We're working closely with law enforcement, but we're going to run down those
leads and hopefully I get a good result. I mean, you asked about beefing up security
too, I think.
Yeah. Just kind of going forward, you can imagine,
let's hire more people, better people.
Let's throw a technology at this.
Let's monitor comms and where data is flowing.
Is this more of a technology issue or a talent issue
or an oversight issue or policies?
Like, how do you see investing in the next round of security?
The thing that popped into my mind,
the way that you're already leveraging AI
is there's a world in the future where of security. The thing that popped into my mind, the way that you're already leveraging AI,
is there's a world in the future where a more secure CX
function would be entirely code.
Right?
And it'd be much, you know, you could create an environment
for it.
Or at least AI oversight of everything, of every interaction.
But yes, I'm interested to hear what your take is.
Yeah, well, it's a great point.
I mean, the 60% of inquiries being answered by AI now,
I mean, they're not going to get bribed.
I mean, there are other threat actors with AI too, right?
Because people are always trying to jailbreak
these agents and things.
So there's not a perfect solution,
and I don't think we're gonna have,
we're still gonna have like human in the loop
on a lot of things for a long time.
But yeah, never let a good crisis go to waste.
Like this was definitely a good moment for us to go implement a bunch of changes.
We mobilized a team of about 300 or 400 people right away that just went into overdrive trying
to lock down a lot of these systems.
A lot of it was not just our own systems.
There's vendors that we work with that we needed to push them to hit a higher bar as
well.
We did relocate some of our customer support operations.
The ones that got targeted the most
were these overseas contractors and things like that.
And you can imagine some of the money being offered
as bribes would have been pretty impactful
even in the United States if people were there.
We need to have 24-7 coverage, et cetera. So it's not perfect solution to like just move it all in the US and pay people more.
Like it doesn't 100% solve it, but we are relocating some of those support operations
and then essentially just hardening our systems.
Like luckily we had, we had some good controls already, which limited the scope of it,
but we obviously didn't do enough.
And so we've got to keep investing in that.
But we obviously didn't do enough. And so we've got to keep investing in that.
Do you have any advice for younger builders,
maybe the younger version of yourself?
We had Chris Dixon on the show earlier today.
And he said that one of crypto's biggest problems
now is just a lack of talent.
There is talent here.
But it probably could have 10 times more
to create a lot of great outcomes.
I'm curious if you feel the same way around talent in the industry today.
Yeah.
Well, I think we've never had it easier actually recruiting great people into Coinbase.
I think there is a great, and probably that's due to our scale, right?
Startups have to really fight for talent.
But I think if you look at like the top five most exciting tech trends in the world right now, like my five would probably be AI crypto for increasing
economic freedom and all that.
Brain machine interfaces, fusion energy and longevity, I think is also in no
particular order, by the way, like long, you know, there's a biotech company I
co-founded called New Limit, which is working on epigenetic reprogramming, which is really cool.
It's an, it's a longevity company.
We talked to the founder. We were blown away.
We came away extremely excited by that conversation. Nice. Nice. That's awesome.
Yeah. I mean, so I think to me it's like, how do we accelerate progress?
Sure. And I think the smartest people from a talent point of view,
like the smartest kids up and coming, you know, people, whatever,
they all want to work in things that are going to change the world.
So those are the top five.
And I think there's actually a pretty incredible amount of talent in crypto.
You've just got to go try.
You got to go try ambitious bets and be OK with some of them not working.
I think sometimes people think that, well, Coinbase started and now it's big, and so
they're just a success.
And it's like, no, that's not true.
We're trying these venture bets all the time.
I got told you about USDC and base.
There's others that didn't work.
We launched Coinbase NFT and it was pretty much a flop.
We launched Coinbase in Japan.
We invested all this money and time.
Didn't work for a bunch of reasons.
I can tell you if you want.
We shut that down.
And so we're constantly like, stay hungry, stay foolish.
We're trying new ideas a lot.
And you have to be OK with two out of three or three out of four just not working.
What about the Super Bowl ad?
Was that a similar one person green lights it?
And who green lit it?
And what was the story with the QR code?
Yeah.
Well, as usual, success has many fathers and mothers.
But it partially came out of a rushed,
like a short time, constrained speed creativity, right?
So we actually didn't, I think by the time we bought the ad,
we didn't have enough time to go film something
for months and months.
And so the team just got really creative.
And I don't even remember who it was in the meeting.
Like our CMO, and there was an agency
Involved and it was a collaborative effort where someone was like, you know, what if we did kind of like a direct
Direct marketing type campaign where we want people just install the app
But you can never measure the result of most of these brand ads, right? You're always like, I don't know
Did it drive revenue or not? Nobody really knows. So we're like, well, we could actually measure
how many people just like scan it and sign up
if we just put a QR code on the screen.
So I don't remember who said it actually in the room,
but obviously it worked.
It was cool.
Yeah, and you tracked the ROI and it was positive?
Okay, so that's actually a very complicated,
we looked at it for you with the exact details, but long story short, so our
site actually crashed because we got about 20 or 30 million visits in 20 seconds. We
knew there was going to be a big surge, and so we had I think the first page loaded and
it was heavily cached, but then 20 million people started going
through the signup flow and everything shut down.
So we had to email a bunch of them later
to actually come back and finish it.
Long story short, so we lost probably about a third
of the value in just overwhelming demand
that we unfortunately couldn't scale to,
but it would have been very profitable.
It was still profitable depending how you count it.
The fact that we're talking about the ad today means something.
Very memorable.
Yeah.
The brand value alone maybe paid for itself even with none of the direct revenue.
I have one last question that we'll let you get out of here.
Feel free to just take it as like meta commentary on the nature of the question, but who is Satoshi Nakamoto?
So the official answer is it doesn't really matter because like the idea stands on its own
And so if anybody ever comes out and we find out who it is like in their their will or you know
Whatever I but but the the unofficial answer I think is
it's probably some combination of like Hal Finney and Nick Szabo
and maybe one other person.
But that's my guess is that it was a collaboration between those people.
But ultimately it doesn't matter.
Hal Finney is frozen at Alcor but he's no longer living.
But maybe if Alcor actually works, which is a big if, in the future we could bring him back to life,
we'll find out.
Yeah, that'd be amazing.
We'll have him on the show then.
Yeah, we'll have him on the show.
We'll have him on the show.
That'd be fantastic.
Jordy, any other questions?
No, this was great.
This was fantastic.
Thank you so much.
You're our first public company Fortune 500 CEO.
Yeah, that's right.
So thanks for doing this.
This is a big milestone for us.
We really appreciate it.
Well, I love that you guys are championing tech.
And it's, yeah, the enthusiasm is palpable.
So I get to see your clips all over.
Enthusiasm?
What are you talking about?
Enthusiasm.
Enthusiasm.
We're going to need a bigger gong.
We're going to need a bigger gong.
We're going to need a bigger gong. Thank you going to need a bigger gong. We're going to need a bigger gong. Thank you for stopping by.
It's great having you on, Brian.
Yup.
And thank you for the work that you do.
We'll talk to you soon.
See you guys soon.
Bye.
Bye.
Cheers.
I love your gong.
Great hit, John.
Great, great hit.
The gong is, it's working wonders.
Next up, we have Suna from Volt Capital coming in.
Is it Volt Capital?
I'm going to take one minute.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
I'll be right back.
I'll talk to Suna.
Let me tell you really quickly about what we're going to be doing.
We're going to be doing a lot of stuff. We're going to be doing a lot of stuff. We're going to be doing a lot of I'm gonna take one minute. I'll be right back. I'll talk to Suna
Let me tell you really quickly about Wander I gotta sing the song alone find your happy place
Find your find your happy place find your happy place book of Wander with inspiring views
50 million dollar series beat today
today
Congratulations hit the gong one more time. I mean on your way out with inspiring views. Hotel Great Amenities. $50 million Series B today. Oh yeah, today. Congratulations.
Hit the gong one more time.
I mean.
Jordy, on your way out.
Go size Wanderer, $50 million Series B.
Congratulations to the team.
Congratulations to John Andrew, Kyle, the whole team.
Fantastic.
You guys are crushing it.
Book of Wanderer with inspiring views,
Hotel Great Amenities, Dreamy Beds,
Top Tier Cleaning, and 24-7 Concierge Service.
It's a vacation home, but better folks.
And John Andrew is coming on the show tomorrow
Very excited about that. Fantastic, but amazing milestone. Well stay locked in we got four more guests. Our next guest is Suna
hopefully we can bring her in and
and
Keep the conversation going. How you doing?
and keep the conversation going. How you doing?
Hey.
Sorry.
It's been a big stream, been a big day,
but glad to have you here.
Would you mind kicking us off with-
Oh, stop the list, I was so happy about it.
Oh yeah, yeah, yeah.
It was great puzzling everyone together, getting everyone.
It's also hard because I'm not,
as it's very clear from this stream,
I am not crypto native at all.
And so the first time we tried to schedule this, As it's very clear from this stream, I am not crypto native at all.
And so the first time we tried to schedule this, we tried to schedule you was during
that big crypto conference in Dubai.
And everyone was like, what are you thinking?
Everyone who matters in crypto is going to be busy and they're going to be 12 hours off
your time zone.
And then we wound up scheduling it today and there's this massive Bitcoin conference
Unfortunately, some people, you know, we're able to hop on the stream
But it's but it's a great community
And so everyone's been able to break it down and explain it like we're five because we effectively are but would you mind kicking us?
off with an introduction on yourself and
And yeah, what you what you're excited about?
Yeah, sure thing. So I am at Volt Capital.
What we focus on is pre-seed and seed crypto companies.
And I mean, the reason we even started Volt Capital
is if you look at the landscape of crypto funds,
there aren't really that many that have a senior partnership
that have all founded companies before
or built a team from the ground up.
And that really is the DNA of the fund. And so what we do is we focus on founder first philosophy in terms of how we
index on investments and then also we've all been founders ourselves as well. And we're focused in
terms of like on a barbell strategy in terms of the thesis. One, there's established markets,
and by the way, this isn't live, right?
It is.
Oh, okay.
So there's established markets like payments, DeFi,
and I think the camera is, okay.
There's established markets like DeFi, payments,
stable coins that are taking on
these tens of trillions of dollars markets.
But then also, I mean, right now the rest of the world
is waking up to stable coin potential.
Stable coin started about five, seven years ago.
So if you look at what the net new narrative is right now,
it's largely around real world case applications for crypto.
And what we focus on is largely crypto AI intersection.
And then that oftentimes look like crypto and robotics
or like crypto and strictly crypto and AI or also D-PEN.
And Jordy, I know like you and I had collaborated
on that essay a while back where we go through
the different verticals and potentials.
That's cool.
Yeah, what is the state of real world assets
on chain? I remember during the last cycle Sam Altman or Sam Lesson was on the Logan Bartlett
show talking about maybe your mortgage will be on chain, maybe physical real estate will be on chain
at some point and there was a whole bunch of legal and technical and financial issues to work
through to actually make that happen. Are people optimistic about that narrative in real world assets or has it moved to a
completely different trajectory?
Yeah, no, we're absolutely excited about that.
I think for a few reasons.
One is institutional demand is here.
Secondly, a lot of the tech has been figured out, but the tech wasn't really the tough
part.
The tech was probably an iota of it.
If you look at the distribution of teams, it's like, all right, you have an engineering
team of like 20 or 30, but then you have like hundreds of people focusing on recourse.
And the ratio was pretty disproportionate in terms of what they were focused on.
And with regulatory language being cleared up and getting more approval from the administration
and I guess more legitimacy for the space, it's really paved the way.
But what we're focused on
when we talk about real-world applications,
in addition to that,
we're seeing companies at the intersection
of crypto and robotics
that are finding innovative ways to collect
and check for quality assurance of data
in massive global ways that you aren't able to do
with existing rails, particularly for robotics,
because there isn't really a common crawl equivalent
for robotics, like there isn't a way we train web two,
or like internet LLMs.
And then also like space and crypto.
We're seeing companies build at the intersection there,
like out of study research, so like really domain experts
in space that are finding really interesting ways
to create data marketplaces at the intersection of crypto and space. One thing that we've
seen and great great to see you by the way one one thing that we've seen from I
think a number of the different conversations today is it feels like
consensus that agents will use tokens or that the agentic web will be leveraging
tokens. As an investor what are are the different layers of the stack
that you're looking at, whether it's the agent layer,
infrastructure, the actual tokens themselves,
how are you thinking about investing
into that trend broadly?
So I'm gonna say something contrarian around banking agents.
And I don't think from a venture standpoint, it's, it makes sense to, to,
to invest like via private equity, particularly cause a lot of that value
capture is going to be done through enterprises.
We already saw Coinbase rollout X four Oh two, which allows agent to agent
payments and they already have massive distribution channels.
So you are already starting off with a massive disadvantage as a startup.
And instead what we're looking at in terms of crypto AI,
there's a lot to be done on synthetic data generation.
There's a ton to be done on the federated learning side
in terms of like how do you train models
when you're dealing with sensitive data
around health or finance.
So there are way bigger markets to go after
that I think are more appropriate for startups
versus companies that can be rolled out,
as we've already seen from these larger incumbents.
Yeah, we're talking to the founder of Prime Intellect,
kind of similar idea of distributed computing,
wiring it all together with crypto,
makes a ton of sense to kind of use those latent resources.
But you're saying that the same thing
can exist for data markets.
Is the, is the gig, is the goal there? Is it, is it like,
with regard to like robotics data, uh, you would think that if this, if this,
uh, evolves the same way that like the LLM RLHF market evolved, you know,
it's like scale AI is just gonna go in centralized it all and then sell access to that. Um,
is there some sort of underpinning fundamental difference with robotics
training data that would make it more native to an on chain environment?
Yes. So a few things. So one is, um,
up until recently at large way that we would train these robots is through
physical sensors and actually having to run physical simulations
and
What DeepMind came up with was a paper last year where they show that you can train robots purely on ego centric vision data
And ego centric vision data is point of view data. It's like a GoPro video
so they train robots to play soccer using ego-centered vision data or this video.
And there isn't a common crawl equivalent or just like these massive data sets where you have footage at the right angle or right height to then feed to these robots to be able to train them.
And the problem is not everyone has like the balance sheet of like a Tesla or like the ability to go and then collect that.
And so the best way to do that is in a distributed way.
And so there are companies that are working on, on one hand,
compensating users for uploading video data
that specific companies need.
And then on the other hand, and this
is where more of the scaly eye piece comes in,
is you can disincentivize or slash users,
essentially like a built-in penalty
for uploading poor quality data that's pixelated
or at the wrong height or angle
and streamline that all in the protocol level.
And so that unlocks a massive amount of potential
in terms of the economics of these marketplaces,
in terms of the amount of data that you can collect
and the diversity of the set of data.
It's interesting to flip around
because we've been talking about VO3 and Google's massive
advantage there with the YouTube data set.
I've produced, I mean through the show we produced hundreds of hours of video content.
It goes on to a few platforms.
It doesn't go on to every platform.
Now we're on most of them so most of the hyperscalers could effectively train on our data.
But if you're a YouTuber and you're just releasing
on YouTube, vending that data to another training platform
is something that's not really accessible.
Because obviously YouTube's not just
going to go license all that data to another company
to train.
Very interesting.
The problem is for robotics, right?
Yes.
Because you have to have specific footage. Very interesting. That's right. The problem is for robotics, right? Yes.
Because you have to have specific footage.
What is the state of the crypto seed market today?
Is it collaborative, sharp elbows?
Also, I mean, the dynamic I'm interested in is like, it seems like it's easier than
ever to just like spin up a coin in two seconds with one of these new pump coins
and then that's your seed round,
but it feels like that's still not a perfect substitute
for traditional venture capital,
but is that competitive with what you do these days?
Like there's so many alternative sources
for funding in crypto.
In many ways, you could also make the argument
that companies are going, you know,
creating tokens so fast that it's potentially good for seed
because maybe you need a seed round,
but you don't need the series A or the series B.
And maybe limit dilution, but I'm curious what you're seeing.
Maybe don't get squeezed as much.
Yeah, so every cycle, we see this meme where it's like,
will crypto kill VC?
And every single cycle, it doesn't work.
And the reason is because the quality of capital matters.
And what founders, like what first time founders
or founders or people that aren't even founders,
what they don't realize is that when you have,
and you guys, it's like when you have a venture fund
on the cap table, it's not just getting the capital.
Capital is now commodity more than ever.
It's the support you're getting from that particular fund and the legacy or brand name that they're going
to give your company to help you risk it, which helps you recruit better, be on news
outlets otherwise, wouldn't really listen to you because you don't have a brand name
around you and it's just your startup. Those intangibles matter more than the capital you're
taking on and that's the lesson that you And so those intangibles matter more than the capital you're taking on,
and that's the lesson that you see these founders learn
over and over again, when they think they can just
launch a meme coin and then call that their financing
for the rest of their lives.
Yeah, what are the other value adds
that VCs are pushing right now?
In defense tech, we're seeing VCs effectively set up
like lobbying firms in DC to help with that go to market with
the Department of Defense.
I imagine that at least staying ahead of regulatory changes in crypto makes a lot of sense, but
what are the other vectors other than, hey, we might refer a couple engineers, we might
get you a couple press pieces.
What are the outside the box value adds that a VC can bring to the table?
Yeah, on the defense note, I've also heard of some funds purchasing the American flags
that they all have.
Really?
Because there's actually like a division of the government
that provides them for a typical American flag,
you're not getting it from any retail stores.
But in terms, and that's, I guess, out of the box in defense.
But in terms of out of the box value add and crypto,
there are the universals, like you said,
like recruiting and helping put together the roadmap
and helping like next rounds of financing.
But one thing that we're doing at Volt
that I think is pretty unique is we're actually building
a simulation engine for deep in protocols
where you can input different parameters
for the network that you're building out
and see based on average inflows and outflows, how you can expect that network to perform in
different environments over time.
And you can update number of nodes, number of like what you anticipate and number of
end users being.
And so getting really sophisticated around technical value ads that help the team move
the bottom line in terms of revenue generation
I think is the the real thing that
Crypto venture funds to be focusing on beyond introductions to people they can recruit or make others and things like that
What do you think the the first truly break out deep in?
Product will be is it is is world coin classified as as deep in or is that not
the right framework I know there's there's the cell company there's hot
spots but but what do you what kind of categories broadly are you most excited
about yeah there's this joke where if you squint
hard enough almost everything's deep and like even Bitcoin is technically deep
in because there's a little harder component, but WorldCoin
absolutely has broken through mainstream. I mean, they were just on the time magazine cover. The
things that we're more broadly interested in are in deep in are like I said, the crypto robotics
angle, but then also the crypto space angle. So there are teams that are building out, I don't know
if you've seen that chart from our world and data where you can see the number of objects we've launched into space
And it is just I mean, it's not even hockey stick growth. It's like a vertical line almost and these are like
CubeSats probes landers like whatever
our crew landers and others and
And that that's gonna be a problem real fast, right? Like we need better anti-collision software
when you're able to track like silent satellites,
which are almost like second strike defense capabilities,
but in the sky.
And one way to do that is by booking out
commercial grade telescopes and being able to have eyes
on the sky data that way,
but usually they're booked out days in advance
and you have stale data when you get access to that.
The other way is to just crowdsource it.
Like a lot of people have electronic telescopes
to use anyway around the world that are hobbyists
or taking imaging in the sky 24 seven,
and you can compensate them.
And then on the demand side,
charge companies to access that data.
And so we're seeing a lot of interesting plays
around orchestration and data marketplaces
that are tackling very unique,
dynamic, up to the minute data
that we don't have in traditional Rails.
Very cool.
Very cool.
I think the broader-
I don't want to make too much of a joke,
but I do think we should let the aliens access pump,
you know, pump fun.
For sure.
They should be able to-
100%.
Extraterrestrials should be able to launch-
That's the first thing they should do when they arrive.
It's kind of a gateway to crypto.
Kind of welcome to America. Yeah, welcome to humanity
No, but I I believe we should put crypto in space. I agree excited crypto everywhere. Thank you so much for stopping by
This is a lot of fun. Yeah, we'll talk to you for helping us understand all these different. Yeah, this is great. Very cool
We'll talk to you. Have a good one. Tune in. Cheers
Next up we have Mert Mumtaz from Helios coming in the studio
We
Will get a little intro from him
We got to talk to you about bezel first your bezel concierge is available now to source through any watch on the planet
Seriously any watch Bitcoin at a hundred and ten ish. You got a nautilus
in the nautilus is
Welcome to the stream Mert. How you doing?
Good, sir.
How you doing?
I'm great.
Would you mind taking us through a little introduction
of yourself and your company, just to kick us off?
Sure, of course.
Yeah.
My name is Mert.
I work on Helios, which is not Helium.
I know Kyle was on.
He was talking about his investment in Helium,
which we get confused a lot.
And Helios does infrastructure,, infrastructure, high performance infrastructure for
Solana. Um, and I also shitpost a lot on the twitter.com.
That's great. Let's give it up for all of that.
What does infrastructure mean in this context? Are you building, uh,
data centers? Are you just managing them? Are you just deploying nodes?
Are you writing software?
What's the shape of the team look like?
Yeah, I mean, the short answer is yes.
And what I mean by that is we do some combination
of all of those.
Probably the least worst way to think about it
is like some combination of CloudFlare, AWS,
and maybe Stripe.
And so in this context, we basically help developers combination of CloudFlare, AWS, and maybe Stripe.
And so in this context, we basically help developers or traders or whoever wants the data to get data from Solana super fast in a structured way and also
write data to it super fast.
Got it. What are the different trade-offs?
You mentioned CloudFlare.
Like is geolocation important as you build out infrastructure like this?
Yeah, so it depends on the blockchain, but Solana has a lot of pretty advanced trading
activity. Now, the assets that they're trading are a little funny because you might get like,
not Citadel, but like let's say similar types of players really co-locating their servers
to a like Far coin or something.
But like the co location and like these latency games do play a pretty big role. Yeah, how how are how advanced are the high frequency trading operations?
What are they using? I know Jane Street writes everything in OCaml. Are we seeing like low level
programming languages being used to trade these meme coins now?
low level programming languages being used to trade these meme coins now?
Oh yeah, definitely. Um, like you, you have people, I mean, I don't know if the audience here would
consider like C and Russ that low level, but like everything from C and Russ to
some people will get extremely degenerate and start going into assembly for certain
parts of the stack or like raw networking code.
That's so yeah, it's, it's quite a serious game
played with very interesting assets.
A lot of fun.
What kind of players exist that don't
like to talk about what they're doing
and aren't allowed that maybe aren't doing anything that's
morally wrong or anything like that, but are just sort of? Under the radar. the radar under the radar just don't want to talk about their alpha because they don't want to bring about your competition
Though the question is what kinds of people like that exist? Yeah, like are they?
Scale these are they are they coming from other
Is it is it a new desk and an existing hedge fund or are these completely new operations
that have just scaled up from like an individual trader?
Yeah, that's a good question. I think it's pretty unique in that you have the existing
types of like quants from Chicago or New York who will have some sort of operation, not
all of them, but like probably the ones that you know of already
from TradFi, a good amount of them are already
kind of playing this game.
And then they'll compete with like a set
of interesting actors.
Some of those actors might be like some
of the props reading shops from like Tokyo
or just other parts of Asia.
But then they'll be like competing with like this random
17 year old kid from like Estonia in his basement.
And like that kid actually tends to compete and it's not just like a specific kid here,
but like persona.
And so crypto is interesting because you now have all these guys kind of on the same, roughly
the same playing field.
And it's interesting because it's also kind of why Solana was started by Anatoly, which is he basically wanted, um, he had this vision that I think he
got a front run like once or something on, on one of these things.
And he got so mad.
He's like, okay, you know what?
I'm just going to build a, this decentralized NASAC where everybody can compete.
That's amazing.
Uh, what is, uh, in your mind, what's the most important elements of the Solana roadmap
going forward from here? It feels like a lot's been built out. There's a very healthy ecosystem,
but jobs not finished. What's, what, what, what in your mind is like the most exciting
upcoming improvements? Yeah. So we have a very detailed roadmap that I wrote about on
solanarodemap.com and when
you go to that site, basically you'll see four words and it just says increase bandwidth,
reduce latency, nothing else to it.
And basically everything is centered around making the thing go faster.
And like there's, I think Kyle was talking about double zero as well, which is like a
new fiber layer where you can do some more advanced
like network level filtering.
We have like Jump, for example, building a new client in C
which is meant to be much more performance.
But everything, roughly speaking on the tech side
is always centered around how do we just make the thing
go from point A to point B faster.
And from a, let's say a cultural or socioeconomic lens,
it's very much about what we call the FAT thesis,
which is Founder's Apps tokens.
So really just how do we attract,
how do we form this association in somebody's mind
if they're like a product builder?
How do they think about, or why would they think about Solana first right so
that when you have been passed her an actual Lucas of the world or Alon why
should they pick Solana and that's because like people like me but also
everybody from Solana Foundation and and like investors and whatnot how do we set
up like the best friendly friendliestliest founder infrastructure? So it's kind of like, you know, the Y Combinator of crypto in a sense.
What is the state of the UAE crypto scene?
And how much do you actually feel inclined to travel outside of the UAE versus just waiting
for people to come to you?
Oh, that's a good question.
Well, I am in the UAE like 360 days out of the year.
But then now I'm in Montana where it's like UAE has no nature and then Montana has all the nature.
So it's like this barbell strategy.
But like, so I moved to the UAE from Canada, Toronto specifically,
So I moved to the UAE from Canada, Toronto specifically, where it is illegal to hold over or trade over 30,000 CAD, which is really like $8 USD worth of any coins except for
Bitcoin, Ethereum, which fair enough, and then Litecoin and then Bitcoin cash.
Okay.
So like vintage and leverage trading is illegal. So just to give you an idea
of leverage, band leverage. That's so unamerican. I'm unsurprised. I shouldn't be surprised, but I am.
Okay, so I think I think it's because like one of the pension funds was like an investor in
FGX or something. Oh, yeah, that's right. Which, you know, interesting. But like in the UAE,
in terms of crypto, specifically, for example, I can
pay my phone bill in USDC. And I have, which is pretty crazy. And the government actually
is like quite interested in like getting you, you know, on the phone and really trying to
work out how do we actually like support the builders here as opposed to some other jurisdictions.
But like the UAE, I like referring to it as kind of like the hotel for crypto where like
it's kind of just in the middle.
So whenever you're flying anywhere, people just stop by.
I remember the last time you wanted to host this crypto day, there was like a massive
conference there.
It was a terrible one.
I know, I know.
It really shows you how native I am to crypto. I'm completely out of the loop.
In fact, it ties to my next question. During the last cycle, I was really captured by the story of
Solana. I thought the founders had a fascinating story, obviously still kind of coming from the
outsider perspective, but I appreciated the technology they were building. There was that
meme of like sequel Lana. It's not as decentralized as it should be
it's not it's not as pure of a technology as other as other chains talk
to me give me an update on that has that have the problems that people were
surfacing have those problems been solved or were they never problems to
begin with is it all just memes and it doesn't really matter because it's just about the perception? Obviously, the perception of Bitcoin has changed
a ton. It was originally like, oh, it's going to be completely privacy based and it's very
traceable. There's been an evolution of the Bitcoin narrative. Has the Solana narrative
evolved and kind of take me through the last couple of years?
Right. So with Twitter, most of the debates or discussions,
let's say, happen on crypto Twitter,
which is an amazing place for intellectual sparring,
let's say.
Linger.
Definitely nothing gets straw manned
or taken out of context.
Yeah, yeah.
And so like SQL on it, for example,
was a jab from somebody from Ethereum who obviously
is not a very big fan.
Yep.
But that's okay.
And it was basically trying to draw the parallel that Solana is actually like this centralized
database.
Yep.
And basically I made somewhat of a career out of saying that's wrong aggressively on
the internet.
And it's of course wrong because fundamentally Solana is a blockchain
where you have thousands of different nodes and really what a blockchain does is it's a bunch of
different nodes functioning as one node, right? So that you shouldn't be able to actually tell.
There was some certainly quite valid criticisms and there are still today.
One of those was that like Solana would go down at like very high activity, right? So in 2022,
there was this whole NFT craze where people would like really try to mint pictures of like these
stones, pixelated apes on the internet. And it started on Ethereum, but then Ethereum fees obviously
went up and so they came to Solana.
But Solana was not expecting people to be that passionate about certain pictures.
And so that exposed a lot of interesting engineering problems in the core architecture.
And we basically took those learnings and then we iterated a few better designs for the blockchain.
And so what that allowed for is now when the next cycle came, which was with meme coins
and the president of the United States launching Trump coin and then his wife following right
after that, when that actually happened, this time the chain was actually ready to handle
it.
And that's why Solana has been basically like the main venue for most of these.
Where were you when you opened X and saw the president posting a meme coin?
Do you remember where you were?
Were you sleeping?
Oh man, this is that.
OK, so I had just bought 8 Sleep.
OK, it was it had just came to the US UAE
It's literally the last ad we have to do
Five-year warranty 30 night risk-free trial free returns code TB TB free shipping
Continue so you're in a deep slumber. You're like not you got 90 minutes of deep sleep, you get somebody shake you awake, what happened?
Yeah, so I'm like, extremely pumped.
I'm like, Oh, God, this is like the first time I'm gonna get a great sleep tonight.
And at like, I don't remember quite the time, but I remember just getting all these calls.
And like, I slept through most of them because of how good the like was a new future on it. And then so one of them finally broke
through and I opened my phone and I was like, oh shit, Solana has gone down. I'm going to
kill myself. Everybody's going to troll me on the internet. And then I look at my company
Slack because we power like a lot or most of the infrastructure on Solana. And then
I'm like, dude, how come I'm getting paid so much? And then my co-founder was like, oh yeah, like Trump launched a shit coin.
And I was like, what?
And I was like, is this real?
I was like, Chad, is this real?
But then like, it was handled so well
by like the existing infrastructure and the team
that like nothing was actually happening
except for just a lot of like
shenanigans on the internet. So that was that was the story of Trump. And it was a very chaotic day.
And then so at the end of the day, I was like, Oh, finally, let me just crack open a beer and, you
know, watch like an episode of Mad Men or something. And so I sit down, and I shit you not. The second
I cracked it open, I get another call and it's like dude
Melania just launched a coin and it was like that George Bush meme yeah it's like just pick
her second shit coin is in the blockchain and I was like oh no
oh my god and then that's when things started going really haywire because you could not tell if it was a hack or like it was legit and and so those were a very fascinating it was
very hard to describe to my dad what was happening and what I do for a living
that's hilarious hey well hopefully he understands what fantastic war stories
yeah thanks thanks for taking us through those those were really fun it was great
talking to you we got to have you on again. This is fantastic. We'll talk to you later. Have a great time. Cheers, Mert. Have a good one. Enjoy
Montana. Get a nice round of sleep. Well, next up we have Dan from Farcaster coming in the studio.
And big news, you can watch TBPN on Farcaster. Someone built a Farcaster mini app and which is a very cool novel
you have sort of experience that you have on far caster
yep people can create kind of sub apps with the app and they
live in the feed yeah let's bring dan in i think it's uh
jamie how you doing who built this for us good to see you
guys dan what's going on are you talking about the pirate uh
feed of tbpn yeah Authorized reproduction on Farcaster?
No, no.
It's authorized.
As long as it has our ads on there, we're happy.
It's authorized.
You guys are like the Grateful Dead.
Anyone can record the episode as long as the ads are on there.
Exactly.
Yes.
Exactly.
It is fascinating, because I remember, I mean,
when Farcaster dropped, it was very much like it looked a lot
like Twitter back then.
But you look at the trajectory of the two platforms and now like you think about like oh you can build a mini app that like
Repurposes TBPN and like that is something that's completely on not on anyone else's roadmap and the products evolved in a very very interesting way
So I mean anyway, can you just give us kind of the update on like how things are going?
What? Just give us kind of the update on how things are going. What is the current pitch for Farcaster?
Where do you see it going?
And kind of take us through a little bit of the industry.
I have to say, Dan and I were neighbors.
Oh, really?
We lived on the same street.
No way.
Very cool.
And it's just been amazing to watch
you build Farcaster in such an intentional way
from the very beginning.
I think you kind of had, I don't know if you had a master plan,
but you guys seemed to have this pace of building,
but also like patience and just like long-term thinking
the entire time.
So it's been awesome to see.
Well, first of all, thanks for having me.
I wanted to point out that I am the almost last person
in the group chat that started the MOZ podcast
back in the day that's been on your show.
Antonio has not been on your show yet.
We got to get him on.
We missed Antonio today.
That was a miss by us.
I'm just going to say, I'm so happy I'm
on this show before Antonio.
Yeah, bragging rights forever.
Yeah, exactly.
Open invite to Antonio.
Yeah, so Farcaster, five years in this year,
we started decentralized
social pretty contrarian. I think Elon changed the dynamic a
bit in the sense that all of a sudden people got interested in
building alternative versions of Twitter. I think we've tacked
more into crypto over time. And so I think where we are today is
we're decentralized social network, but it's targeted for
crypto native folks, right. So there's a built in wallet and many apps as you point out. And so it just, if
you want to do fun things in crypto, you use Farcaster. And we're increasingly making that
happen in the sense that we support a bunch of different chains. So you can use Ethereum,
you can use base, you can use Solana. I think we're going to add other ecosystems over
time. So if you can kind of think of like, if you've ever had to do something in crypto or your friends
tell you, you got to get into this, you got to mint this or do whatever thing that you're
trying to say, you could just get on Farcaster and it's like two taps away.
And then there's no complexity around switching chains and bridging and gas and all this other
kind of stuff that if you talk to the average web two founder, it's like the UX that's acceptable
in crypto is crazy.
And so 2025, we finally actually have the infrastructure to be able to build decent
consumer experiences.
And so that's what we're trying to do.
Do you think you ever loop back around and go back into crypto non-native folks and tuck
some of the crypto features under kind of like a stable coin wrapper
or something that like abstracts it away over time because you've gotten that
like core fire going and then you need to turn into like a raging fire and
people I guess the meta question is like in 10 or 20 years does the average
consumer just in America are they are they do they does everyone become
crypto native or does crypto native cease to be a
Cease to be a concept because everyone just I think it's probably more cease to be a concept in the sense that I think stable
Coins are working so we do all of our weekly rewards
So we pay out $25,000 a week and our version of X payouts. Yeah
It's a little bit broader base and you can be a much smaller account get it we do that stable coins
So we do that every week works perfectly fine
and you can be a much smaller account and get it. We do that with stablecoins.
So we do that every week, works perfectly fine.
We didn't have to integrate any other FinTech provider
or there's no, just every user has a wallet,
we're able to stream stablecoins to them
for a ridiculously cheap amount.
That's amazing.
In terms of like fees, you know, so there's no middleman.
So that's for sure working.
I think, so we originally tried to do this whole thing
where we were using crypto under the hood,
but the whole point is like we're using it as a technology, not the forefront.
And I think that the reality is 2022 left crypto with a pretty big black eye with like
FTX and a bunch of that other stuff.
So I think there are a bunch of people that I think otherwise are pretty intelligent and
I would say reasonably open-minded, but when you talk to them about
crypto, they froth at the mouth in terms of it's all scams and griffs.
And look, there are plenty of scams and griffs.
It's a reputation that it's earned over time, but I actually think there's plenty of good
stuff being built in increasingly.
And so I think stablecoins is probably the thing to highlight in the sense that that's
just been chugging along.
Where did stablecoins start?
Tether was a scam and a grift that for 10 years, everyone kept saying it's on the verge
of exploding.
It's now the most profitable business in the world.
I think they make like $80 million per employee.
Stablecoins have taken a while to bake.
The infrastructure is finally there where it's like now Stripes in it.
So it's like Ramp, one of your sponsors.
So I think like stable coins
are just gonna make crypto way easier.
And then I think there's this concept of embedded wallets,
which you may have heard of,
but like there are a bunch of providers,
we use a company called Privy.
And basically, I think over the next three or four years,
like every app, whether it's a fintech
app or consumer app, will have built-in wallets.
They probably will use stable coins.
Now whether you can buy like Fartcoin or whatever meme coin in your Bank of America account,
probably not.
But I do think everything will get crypto enabled to the degree that you're using a more crypto forward
product like a Coinbase or a Robinhood
or like a completely crypto native product like Farcaster,
I think it's just like more of a personal preference.
It's top of mind for me, yesterday you
launched Farcaster Pro, a subscription.
You brought the 10K NFT collection back.
Talk through the whole process there.
Why use kind of that mechanism?
And it's sold out.
So it sounds like a cause for celebration.
Yeah, Coby would say, job's not finished.
So I think good progress.
I mean, we sold $10,120 subscriptions with stablecoins in a little less than 6 hours.
The 100% of the revenue we're generating, so this is kind of like for the protocol,
is going back into creator reward.
So effectively, we've doubled the amount of, like, weekly payouts we're going to do for the next year.
And I think you had Chris on earlier,
but this idea of like a zero take rate network,
I think it's pretty powerful.
And going back to your question, John,
of like, how do you actually get out of the crypto native
and move towards a broader base?
It's just like most social networks who use today,
what percentage of the value are they capturing?
Like, you know, Metta's market cap is pretty high,
like they're capturing a lot of that value. I think that the way for protocol based social networks value are they capturing?
crypto social network, one, you're decentralized social network.
You actually own your audience. You can't get your like links nerfed.
Like you guys are building a, like an amazing media brand.
If you lost your ability to do streaming on a couple of the major platforms tomorrow, that would be your growth.
And so the idea of like actually having a social network that you can be
guaranteed to have direct access to your audience. I think that's built
different. We would, we, we would just mail everyone a DVD every day. Easy daily problem solved.
Daily DVDs with stable coin payments. Yeah.
I want to know about some of the economic incentives on a social network.
It's been like the micro payments thing has been floated around.
Is there a world where with AI slop,
we need to be charging people to post or can just?
Algorithmic feeds kind of sort out the wheat from the chaff
Does any of that make sense?
Are there any new trends and kind of like the design of a healthy social network that has high?
I guess not just high retention and our poo
But also maybe high NPS because the classic thing with a social network is like it's printing money, but everyone says they hate it
Yeah, so I think that's a stated reveal preference where exactly people are
Totally I completely agree. So yeah
You bring up a great point and we are for sure at the forefront of this because if you know anything about crypto and people
Think there's an economic incentive you you bring a lot of coin operated users, right? Yep.
I think that any version of pay money as a solely a mechanism
for like, oh, there's some version of quality or non bot
like behavior, not going to work. I think any version of I
prove that you're a human. Well, you're proving a human, but I
could go use chat GPT to write the responses. So like, I think this is an extremely hard problem.
If you actually go look at like Metas 10 case, like they specifically say that like, they're
the biggest and best in the world.
This is still an extremely hard problem for them to solve.
They estimate something like 10% of like all users are potentially like spam or wow, is
it still, you know, but I think it'll be kind of a
Variety of tools, right? So I think economic activity is really hard to fake
Like one thing we had yesterday's bunch of accounts paid 120 dollars to a protocol no refunds, right?
Like, you know stable coins nice thing is like you can't charge that back
Whether they're a bot or not that money is now going to an algorithm, and this is where
I'm actually a big fan of algorithms.
Now maybe algorithm is the choice we could talk about, but the algorithm, if you design
it right, is going to reward the interesting posters, the best posters, and you're extracting
revenue from the bots.
So I do think charging is actually a good idea.
And then I think algorithms are the way to actually,
as you point out, wheat from the shaft, so to speak.
How do you see crypto long term as a funding mechanism
for creators, artists?
I mean, we had Ben Pasternak on earlier today
to talk about his vision for believe.
And it's, yeah, people are using it to create meme coins,
are also using it as a funding mechanism
for different projects.
And I bring it up because we've talked about,
we had Chris Best from Substack on maybe a week or so ago.
And there's this idea that like people subscribe to
Substack to get value in the form of content, but it's also a mechanism to just
support somebody to just do interesting things in the world and be
able to spend all their time, you know, thinking about a specific area or
sector, and it feels like there could be some element, some,
I could imagine a world in the future where Farcaster is
powering that type of activity.
Is that correct, incorrect?
Is that a problem space that you think about?
Yeah, although to Substack's credit,
I think they're doing better than the vast majority of Web2
in the sense that I think what they take 10% and yeah
Like YouTube, I think what is the 730 70 30 cut in terms of I think they take 70% and you get 30
Yeah, right. So so so like we're improving in the web to specify
I think what crypto does and a world where the UX is good and it's pervasive
I think these are like embedded wallets with stable coins
You just start competing things down to zero.
The ability for the platform to take a cut of payments, I think, drops pretty significantly.
And what the platforms that do take a cut, they are going to say, hey, I'm getting you
distribution.
If you go to an app like Substack, a lot of when you talk to Substack newsletter writers,
they're getting a lot of their subscribers these days from the Substack app. So that's value that Substack is providing. I think where
crypto is interesting is that basic payments are like you're talking like 10% improvement,
like marginal improvement. And I think where you're looking for is like 10x
improvements. I say you're pretty aware of the space and believe is a great example. This is like,
I think capital formation, fundraising with big quotes around that because obviously that's a
pretty loaded word. But the ability to kind of like internet flash mob money into a certain thing,
whether that's a meme coin or like a GoFundMe equivalent or a Kickstarter. Actually, someone
built a mini app with stable coins called Crowdfund on Farcaster.
Basically, it's a kickstart.
You use a smart contract.
You put your USDC stablecoin in.
And if it hits the funding threshold, it's unlocked.
So that makes so much sense as a venture
back company 10 years ago.
Now it's someone VOD coded over three days.
Yeah, it makes so much sense as a mini app,
because in many ways, people would just go to GoFundMe,
create this thing,
and then take it to social to promote it.
And why doesn't it just exist natively in the product?
Yeah, and I think the other thing that you have
is the liquidity in the sense that I'm not fragmenting.
I don't fund my GoFundMe wallet over here,
or I have to connect this payment method
for the seventh time.
And again, any time you're using a card-based payment
method, Visa and MasterCard, and the banks
are getting their 3%, right?
So I think it will be slow in many cases.
But this stuff will just become increasingly pervasive.
And people will choose it if the platforms or creators
are giving an incentive, right?
If I can not have to pay 3% to a card network
by having used a stablecoin, I'm going
to make that the default payment often.
And maybe I give you a 2% cash back,
or you get some loyalty points or an NFT,
or whatever reason to get you to switch your payment method.
Yeah.
What are you seeing?
How do you think about international long term?
I know the Farcaster network is default international,
because crypto is default, sort of borderless and international but
I feel like the the conversation in in
the the beginning of the 2020s really around sort of social media censorship and then you know
we had biology on the show earlier and he's talked about this moment with X where created this kind of fragmentation and
You know censorship on on X potentially being solved.
But then there's plenty of countries globally
that have even bigger issues than we have today
around censorship.
And so how do you think about enabling free speech
through Farcast over the long run.
Yeah, so we're a US-based company,
so I'm a big believer in the Constitution and US laws.
Farcaster basically is exporting that
as like our social networks policy.
So if I get a local jurisdiction somewhere in the world
and says, please remove these activists from Farcaster
to quote Elon, they can shake their fists at the sky.
We're beamed in over the internet. If you want to block our app or the network, go for it.
But I think by not-
But then in theory, a dissident could build up,
spin up a new iteration of the app
on the far caster network theoretically,
and it would be out of your control, right?
In addition, that that person could be directly posting like via the command line or something, and having it go out of your control, right? In addition, that person could be directly posting
via the command line or something
and having it go out to a global audience.
And so I think that the network design of Farcaster
looks a lot more like a blockchain under the hood.
And one of the reasons is it actually provides
really strong censorship resistance,
whereas something that's a bit more federated,
so if you kind of look at like Macedon or Blue Sky,
there are instances where they're already complying
with local law of like, okay, well, we won't be able
to serve our other users in this country
because they will just shut down the whole site.
So I think, again, it's not like a primary consideration,
but should we be successful
in continuing to scale the network?
I'm confident that if you think that the US free speech laws
are like a good baseline global policy, that's basically what farcasters going to fall in terms of our app.
Yeah.
Amazing stuff. Thank you so much. We'd love to have you back.
Yeah, come back on again soon.
Thanks for having me.
I think you have some of the best, I'll put it on the record, some of the best taste in crypto.
Yeah.
I put it out there. It shows up in the app and everywhere.
And yeah, it's great to finally have you on.
Come back on again soon.
I love the new studio.
Thank you.
Yeah, come by.
Do your next appearance in person.
Yeah, yeah, that'd be great.
It's only three hours away from the West side.
Sure, I understand.
Have a good one.
Next up, we have the CEO of Lava, Shazan,
coming in the studio.
We've been talking about with Bitcoin, it's at 107.
You can lend against that, you can borrow against that
and buy a Patek Philippe.
Yes. No brainer.
Yes. No brainer.
Use leverage to buy a luxury watch.
Anyway, welcome to the studio, Shazan.
Hopefully he is here. How you doing?
Hey, can you hear me? There he is. Yes, we can welcome
Take us off with an introduction to lava and then I definitely want to know about the announcement that just went down
So lava is the most secure way to borrow against Bitcoin
So a lot of Bitcoin is they believe that Bitcoin is the greatest appreciating asset of all time,
which historically it has been. And if you can avoid selling your Bitcoin, why wouldn't you?
And historically, if you wanted to borrow against your Bitcoin, you had to use a custodial platform.
So give full ownership of your Bitcoin to someone else and kind of trust them with it.
And we all know kind of what happened with these custodial platforms like
FTX or BlockFi or Celsius or Voyager.
They took your Bitcoin, they'd start trading it or re-hypothecating it.
And ultimately over the last few years, these custodial platforms have lost
around a hundred billion dollars in customer funds.
That's so much money.
We don't like losing money. Not good.
Not good at all.
So what's the solution?
So Lava, what we've done is we've embedded the logic for a loan into a Bitcoin smart
contract, which basically means that when you borrow against your Bitcoin on Lava, you
can verify on chain.
Like you can go to a block explorer, for example, and see that your Bitcoin is safe and secure,
that it's not being rehypotocated. And you have cryptographic guarantees, not just legal
or reputational assurances from lava, that your collateral is safe. So that's why it's
the most secure way to borrow against your Bitcoin. And not only that, Lava has the lowest rates on the market,
even lower than custodial platforms by 20 to 30%. And we can fund loans of any size.
You said Bitcoin smart contract. I thought that was an Ethereum thing. How is this working?
This is new technology. Is this something that wasn't possible previously? Because
the basic pitch seems like we should have been doing this all along so what had what needed to happen to get us to today you know it's kind of
surprising to me because they couldn't always had like scripting like it would
be a bit coins always had like programmability it's not just like
moving money from one address to the other
lava's kind of leverage certain like core Bitcoin primitives to kind of take that and
use what primitives Bitcoin has available and create this like loan contract. Does that make
sense? Bitcoin is not like Turing complete. What you can't do is like, you can't do all sorts of
things that you would want to, that you could do in Ethereum on Bitcoin, but you can do certain
very important things. And one of those is non-c custodial borrowing. And honestly, if you
look at the rest of crypto, I think the majority of like the main use case of DeFi really is,
in my opinion, being able to borrow against an asset and see that it's safe and secure.
Now, I imagine that it's pretty expensive. That's the whole narrative. Maybe that's not
true, but it feels like if I want to borrow 50 cents against my Bitcoin probably not gonna have a good a good time
Is that roughly correct? Like what where does it start to make sense?
You know taking out a hundred thousand dollar loan the gas might be or whatever the equivalent is might be a little bit more reasonable
Is that is that roughly correct? Oh the gas fees on Bitcoin are extremely
Like the Bitcoin is like really inexpensive right now, like less than a dollar.
But what you could do is you could lock a bunch of collateral up and over time take
out more and more in loans.
So we have a product in beta right now where you basically can lock your Bitcoin up and
get a card.
And as you swipe the card, more and more gets borrowed.
It's kind of like a line of credit. Yeah. And then what was the announcement today? So today we actually like fully officially
announced lava loans like out of beta alpha. We announced that we can fund loans of any
size from a hundred dollars to a billion dollars just based on the capital.
And we've already done, we've already made loans, like millions of dollars and like single
loans that have been worth like $5 million already, which is pretty interesting.
And we announced that our rates are like 20 to 30% lower than the next best rate on the
market.
And then walk me through all the different counterparties, who's getting paid.
Obviously as a consumer, I have a Bitcoin, I want to take a loan against it. At some point I'm probably getting stable
coins out, but then who's on the other side of that contract or how much money are they
making? How much money are you making?
So there's a bunch of different lenders on the other side that lava works with to facilitate
these loans. So as a borrower,
the way it works is you go to you download lava, you put your Bitcoin on there. It's all self
custodial. Do you say, okay, I want to borrow $10,000 for one year. And then your Bitcoin gets
moved from one address to this like smart contract address. And when that happens,
you get stable coins directly to your lava app. That's all abstracted away from you for us
and lava, we leverage stable coins because they enable us to
do instant dispersal of loan capital. But it's just seen as
dollars, like you just see, like dollars coming into your lava
app. And you can even use lava to withdraw those dollars to
your bank account. Sure. Within lava, you also have global, free
instant dollar payments. So kind of like what cash
app when most style payments you have that within the app for free as well. You don't
have to worry about any of like the blockchain complexity. We abstract away all the blockchain
stuff, the gas fee stuff, the stable coin stuff. And you can even use a card that we
could issue to you to start spending those dollars that you've borrowed.
It's cool. And then what drives the interest rate?
Is that just driven by Bitcoin volatility
or is there some sort of like underwriting of the individual?
Cause I imagine it doesn't necessarily need
to know anything about me other than the fact
that like the Bitcoin is in the wallet and that's it.
Yep, exactly.
There's no like underwriting of the individual.
So everyone gets the same interest rate.
Yeah, yeah.
Wow. Exactly. And how are the interest rates calculated? Where are they sitting right now?
Where they've been historically and, and, and how,
how do the lenders like think about that risk?
But today if you borrow,
you can get a loan from 5% for a one month loan up to 9.99% for a 12 month loan.
And that's really like the sweet spot in duration that people want.
People can like refinance, like extend their loans later if they want to.
And Lava earns a little bit of a spread and the rest is sent to the lender, essentially,
the rest of the interest payments.
Historically, I think over time, the rates will just come down.
They're always going to be somewhat variable to whatever the treasury rates are, right?
Because you're going to want some
premium over that. But I think long-term, the rate for a Bitcoin-backed loan should trend towards
the rate for a bar against equities. And in fact, lending against Bitcoin is a lot less risky than
lending against equities because it trades 24-7. So it's way more liquid. It will over time, it is already more liquid than most
like stocks, like individual stocks, right? And as the market cap grows, it will become
the most liquid asset in the world. So I think you could not even argue today it is that
because it trades 24 seven.
And is there some sort of like reserve ratio where if you have 10 Bitcoin, you can borrow
X amount against that or yeah
how does volatility work here because I imagine if you
borrow if you bargains all of your at some point they're gonna take your
Bitcoin right like but but but what triggers that so when you borrow there's
like an LTV right so kind of like if you bargains your equities you can maybe get
50% against value that you collateralized which is similar to how lava works and there's flexible TV so maybe if you bargain against your equities, you can maybe get 50% against the value that you collateralize, which is similar to how Lava works.
And there's flexible LTV.
So maybe if you want to be very conservative, you might only want to borrow 20% against
the collateral that you put up.
And then every loan has a like a price, a liquidation price, where if Bitcoin gets there
and you haven't repaid your loan or added more collateral, there will be a liquidation.
But you can kind of verify
that Lava sends you notifications all the time to make sure you're aware if you're getting close to
that liquidation price. Yep. That makes sense. Jordy, any other questions? No, very cool. This
is fantastic. A lot of our listeners are going to go lever up and use it to buy, find Swiss watches.
I guess my last question is there's there's there's this weird dynamic
in crypto right now where there are some seriously scaled founder mode companies in the space
that have huge distribution advantages that can they can offer competitive products.
And then there's the kind of this history of when something's working, it gets forked
and open sourced and there's a lot of competition there.
How are you thinking about the competitive landscape as it evolves over the next couple
of years, if you're really successful?
Maxfields...It's interesting.
I actually think there's no company in crypto today.
I very much view Bitcoin as being very distinct from crypto.
I think a lot of the companies in crypto today are serving this trading speculation use case,
whereas Lava is really serving this Bitcoin savory
use case.
There's these Bitcoiners out there, they don't touch any asset in crypto other than Bitcoin.
They just want to save in it.
And what we're really building are like North Star is whatever Fidelity kind of offers equity
asset holders, we want to offer Bitcoin asset holders.
There's people out there that we're serving that have basically replaced their
savings portfolio that's, you know, with equities or real estate, which is Bitcoin. And they don't really have a trusted brand that they can go to that they feel is secure,
that they can rely on to borrow against your Bitcoin to start spending dollars to buy more
Bitcoin. And that's really where lava is headed to. Is that a common use case? People take a lava
loan and just buy more Bitcoin.
So it's not like the most common use case.
We've had people bargain to buy a coin to buy houses,
which is pretty interesting.
Buy cars, pay their taxes,
like fund like vacations.
But there are some people who will borrow
to buy more Bitcoin.
But what's like more interesting
is a lot of people come to lava,
they bargain to Bitcoin,
but then they like stay to do the other things that they were already doing like do like dollar payments or when
they do want to buy more Bitcoin later they can actually do use that use lava to do that
as well.
That makes sense. Well good luck. Thank you so much for hopping on. This is great. We'll
talk to you soon. Congrats on the launch. Cheers.
Bye. Next up we have a last minute ad. Brandon, is that right?
Last minute surprise guest.
Surprise guest.
Brandon, co-founder and CEO of Phantom.
Phantom.
One of-
What's the line on that?
Wallet.
Yeah.
I don't know how many billions they're worth now.
Brandon, welcome to the show.
How you doing?
Hey, what's up guys?
Thanks for having me.
The wallet king.
The wallet king.
The wallet king.
The second greatest wallet salesman in the world one of our
two
Sean Frank the CEO of Ridge wallet direct competitor to you direct competitor both whole phantom wallet Ridge wallet
You can only have one collaboration. We got him on the bulls-eye in the office. Yeah
Sean you're on notice. Yeah, what's happening? Where are you right now?
Are you are you in Vegas like a lot of our other guests or
In San Francisco in the trenches so to speak
I don't think fandom needs a ton of introduction, but because our audience is
not typically, you know, super crypto native, it'd be great to give a quick kind of backstory
on your history and then the company and then and then we can kind of talk about a number
of other things.
It'd be great.
Yeah, totally.
Well, yeah, thanks again for having me on guys.
And you know, you guys have been on quite the crypto marathon
How long you guys been going at it like
I think I finally understand it's like it's like electronic money is what I'm getting from people
It's money, but digital digital money. That's that's my take. It's the big takeaway from today
Well, yeah, I can I can give a brief overview
myself Phantom
You know got my start working in Silicon Valley back in 2013
at Twitter
Pre IPO sort of that's where I cut my teeth on building mobile apps
You know Working on tech that reaches millions of users.
Around 2017 was bitten by the crypto bug, that's the white paper ICO era. I did a tour of duty
there from 2017 to 2021 at this early stage DeFi startup called ZeroX, which is still very much around active.
It's where I met my two other co-founders.
That's basically where we decided,
hey, at that time,
most used while it was MetaMask.
We had this very unique perspective,
not only being power users of MetaMask,
but also developers in the ecosystem as
well. And basically recognize that the number one problem holding crypto back today still back then
today still is usability and the wallet is essentially the key to unlocking the ecosystem
and supercharging everything that everyone had been working
on. And so yeah, that's when we decided to start Phantom. And yeah, four years later,
Phantom is now Vegas wallet and ecosystem.
What went into the decision making to choose Solana when you guys came out with Phantom?
I know now you support a bunch of different chains, but I'm sure that was somewhat contrarian at the time, or at least, you know, very early to kind of make
a bet.
Totally. Yeah, I mean, I think I mean, I think the initial insight was focus on like
build a wallet that focuses on it because of some on it because that was not a theory
on, you know, we have spent, you know, four years in the Ethereum space and I think had a number of
pretty interesting insights. One, Metamask continued to be this monopoly monopolistic product.
Despite a number of different attempts, everyone understood and it's not great UX. Obviously,
we should try to attack them
by solving that problem.
But despite that,
it was very difficult for people to break through.
And then I think the second thing was
after spending a while in Ethereum,
we kind of actually just got a little bit,
I think jaded by the culture
being very dogmatic versus pragmatic
and not really emphasizing user experience, cost, efficiency.
And so I think those two kinds of insights combined
decided, hey, how about we essentially create
our own home turf on an up and coming ecosystem.
That ended up, that choice ended up being Solana.
And that was all being contemplated like late 2020. So that was pretty early on.
Yeah. A lot of people have flagged that dogma today. What is the shape of the Ethereum dogma
right now? Like what are they dogmatic about specifically?
Yeah. Well, it's definitely, it's definitely ebbed and flowed. I mean, I think from the very beginning
it was all about decentralization at all costs
which and decentralization as this meme
which was attracted a number of different folks
for a number of different reasons.
People who were more anti-disestablishment,
people who felt like the centralization
was a method of security and all of that.
And I think that it ended up it obviously the spirit of decision by committee nature
that that kind of bread ended up basically fast forward
into the state of Ethereum today,
or it's like there's no really cohesive strategy, I guess.
There's no, there's a lot of different competing L2s
and different technologies and that the end stage
it's very confusing and quite frankly
just dangerous for like an end user to use.
Yeah, that makes sense.
Have you, I'm sure you guys have been hit up by a bunch of your investors, you know,
sending you tweets about pumps, you know, revenue being like, Hey, have you guys thought
about, you know about doing this?
And from what I can see, you guys haven't built a launch pad to date.
Talk about kind of how you view Phantom's sort of interaction with some of these new,
you know, we've had both the founder of Pump and Believe on today, which, you know,
are getting quite a lot of attention.
But I'm curious to get your point of view
on how you think of that market or category evolving
and how you see Phantom interacting with it.
Yeah, totally.
I mean, really at the end of the day,
it's all about tokens, essentially.
Tokens being this common sort of protocol and
format that is emerging from the ecosystem.
And then all of these apps sort of in this open and
permissionless way coming out and creating different mechanisms for
creating tokens.
And so I think what we're trying to do is just ensure that users can navigate
this new trend and meta like in the safest way possible.
And that's something that we've done a number of times before, whether that's with the NFT wave,
or whether that's for emerging stablecoins and real world assets trends. And so, yeah, I think we're just kind of trying to promote
the folks to sort of easily discover and use these things.
And yeah, kind of see how all the trends shake out,
but yeah.
Can you talk to me about Apple's role in this ecosystem?
I remember I first onboarded to Phantom as a Chrome
plugin. I believe there is an app but Apple has not been historically the most
receptive to crypto native apps interfacing with all the different UI
elements all over the phone. Coinbase was kicked out of the App Store for a while.
They came back.
And so what has it been historically?
And then are there any-
I love thinking about the Apple execs being like,
wait, Coinbase does billions of dollars in volume
and we're not taking 30% on that?
What are we doing?
I know, yeah.
But it feels like from the other stories
that are going on in Apple world that there's a little bit more pressure right now
Then in years past to open up whether that's the Siri button for other AI
Apps or the app store with what's happening with fortnight and epic
Give me like the state of the union on how easy it is to implement
Crypto wallet features on Apple and where you see it going over the next few years
Yeah, so
Yeah, interestingly enough like when we started like you called out when we started fancy
We actually started Chrome extension first that was actually a pretty contrarian thing to do
I think it was kind of a mixture of a couple of different reasons. One,
the predominant use case of crypto at that time, or on-chain crypto being DeFi, and that being sort
of more of a power user thing that people like to do on desktop anyway. And I think also the
prevalence of sort of Ethereum as the main L1 that people are using.
Ethereum is just not really compatible with mobile
as a technology.
In terms of people who want to use things on mobile,
they want things to feel fast, cheap, instantaneous,
fleeting, all of that.
And so nowadays, because you're seeing the protocol layer
of crypto, infrastructure layer get a lot more mature.
Now we're seeing a lot more prevalence of crypto on mobile.
So I think in the next couple of years,
mobile is gonna be a huge story for crypto.
And yeah, I think generally, personally,
we've had a great relationship with Apple.
We've never had any big scuffles
or had the app taken down or anything like that.
Like you said, I believe that as an ecosystem,
as a general tech player, they become more open
and are facing down a lot of competitive pressures
in different areas like the Epic case and all that.
So yeah, I mean, I do expect them just very similarly
to all other, a lot of other tech players
like big fintechs, et cetera.
I do expect them to be embracing crypto more and more often,
or sorry, more deeper and yeah,
yeah, and making it easier for folks to deploy apps.
Last question on my side,
what is the state of SF's crypto scene today?
It's certainly not getting nearly the attention that AI is,
but is it alive and well,
or are you traveling a lot
and hiring outside of the city quite a bit?
No, yeah, so all three co-founders
are based out here in SF,
been living here for 12 years now or so.
And yeah, Cryptocine is definitely,
it's definitely not AI, but it's alive and well of us,
folks like Paradigm, Alchemy,
some of the A16Z folks, et cetera.
So yeah, definitely alive and well.
New York is definitely another huge scene,
but I think places like Miami,
they kind of turned over a bit during COVID.
I love Miami.
I love Miami.
We're in the Miami of California. We're in Los Angeles. We are. I love Miami. I love Miami.
We're in the Miami of California.
We're in Los Angeles.
We are.
What's not to like?
This has been fantastic.
Thank you for joining and capping off
the first crypto day.
Thank you so much.
The first inaugural crypto day.
First of many.
Yeah, thank you.
Maybe we should make it weekly.
Weekly crypto day.
That sounds like a lot.
A lot.
But maybe quarterly.
This has been fantastic.
Thank you so much for joining us.
Yeah, thanks for popping on.
And good luck.
We'll see you soon.
Cheers.
Bye.
This entire stream has not been financial advice.
I was thinking we should ask the guests, hey,
just why don't you close that with some financial advice
for us?
How much everyone would hate that.
We never give financial advice.
Massive success.
We're just a couple of golden retrievers.
Yeah, yeah, we're just having fun out here talking.
You ever?
Pushing five hours on the stream,
pushing 42,000 viewers.
Thank you everyone who tuned in.
I think this is officially our biggest stream ever.
Until tomorrow. Thank you.
Until tomorrow. Two.
When we got Ashley Vance on the show.
It's gonna be 100.
We got some heavy hitters. We do have some hitters tomorrow and there's some big news coming and our first first
Fortune 500 huge huge milestone for us too many first of many huge milestone
Anyways, thank you folks for tuning in. Thank you for sponsors. Hey, but it was a great day
There's a great our lovely sponsors. We will see you tomorrow
Goodbye