TBPN Live - The World’s Fastest Growing Defense Company, OpenAI’s Code Red, Google Strikes Back | Diet TBPN
Episode Date: December 3, 2025Our favorite moments from today's show, in under 30 minutes. TBPN.com is made possible by: Ramp - https://ramp.comFigma - https://figma.comVanta - https://vanta.comLinear - https://linear.a...ppEight Sleep - https://eightsleep.com/tbpnWander - https://wander.com/tbpnPublic - https://public.comAdQuick - https://adquick.comBezel - https://getbezel.com Numeral - https://www.numeralhq.comPolymarket - https://polymarket.comAttio - https://attio.com/tbpnFin - https://fin.ai/tbpnGraphite - https://graphite.devRestream - https://restream.ioProfound - https://tryprofound.comJulius AI - https://julius.aiturbopuffer - https://turbopuffer.comfal - https://fal.aiPrivy - https://privy.ioCognition - https://cognition.aiGemini - https://gemini.google.comFollow TBPN: https://TBPN.comhttps://x.com/tbpnhttps://open.spotify.com/show/2L6WMqY3GUPCGBD0dX6p00?si=674252d53acf4231https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/technology-brothers/id1772360235https://www.youtube.com/@TBPNLive
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Why is no one talking about Armin Popper.
He's the CEO of Reinmetall, and they've been on an absolute tear.
We're, of course, going to get to Code Red.
We're going to talk about Open AI.
But we talk about Open AI every day, basically.
And I thought it'd be interesting to meet the CEO behind the world's fastest growing defense company.
It's on the cover of the business section of the Wall Street Journal.
When I think high-growth defense companies, I usually think Anderl, or, you know, Soronic, or the world.
There are so many other companies that are growing very fast in defense tech.
Ryan Mottal's been on an absolute tear.
They're now basically the same size as Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics.
You can see the gun that they make in that picture.
They make massive cannons.
They make artillery shells.
They've been very important to the Ukraine war.
So in the last three years, they've been on an absolute tear.
They've gone from roughly $5 billion in market cap three years ago to $80 billion in market
cap.
We've got to ring the gong.
We've got to warm up the gong.
Bring the gong.
80 billion market cap.
They've been on a tear, but they've been basically three key drivers to the growth, to the story.
First, they had a head start.
This company, they actually started it over a century ago.
1889, can you believe that?
They spend their first 25 years basically just stacking up ammo for the German Empire.
This obviously comes to a head in 1914 when World War.
One breaks out. At the time, the company was one of the largest arms manufacturers. Like,
they were, they were pretty big after 25 years of just stockpiling ammo, growing, growing,
growing, growing as a defense company. World War II, World War I breaks out. But then after the war,
they got a pivot. They got to pivot because the Treaty of Versailles forces them to switch to
non-military products. They say, hey, you got to build. Make some trains. They get fixated on
trains. And also typewriters. Not the first group to get fixated on trains.
Happens to the best of them.
But they have a good run.
They stay in business.
They keep making trains, locomotives, particularly.
You know, they're making big stuff.
And then 20 years later, it's the mid-30s, 20, it's 1935 around there.
They are starting to get back into weapons and ammo production.
They can't stay away.
Uh-oh.
Who are they rearming?
The Wehrmocked.
And World War II, obviously, it's massive for production.
They're printing.
they're making lots of weapons, but by the end of the war, their facilities have basically been
destroyed by areas they need to rebuild the company from scratch. So after the second war,
they get banned from making weapons again until 1950s. Keeps happening. And so they have to go back
to making typewriters. They keep getting relegated to typewriters. Like, you guys, no more guns.
That's enough. You have to make some typewriters. And so they get back into defense tech in the 50s,
the German Armed Forces gets re-established in 1956, and by 1979, Ryan Mottal is making
120-millimeter guns that go on leopard tanks that you've probably seen in that image, roughly.
And so there's lots of M&A, lots of diversification over the next few decades.
They expand into automotive and electronics, and that kind of brings us to the second act of
the story, which is the Ukraine War. Russia invaded Ukraine on February 24th, 2022.
who, Ryan Mottal was around 5.5 billion, market cap then.
And three days later, Olaf Scholes, the chancellor of Germany, gives what's known as the
Zaytonwold, white, Zayton Wend speech, which is literally translates to turning point.
So he says, this is a turning point.
Europe has been invaded.
We now have a foreign army on European soil.
Even though Ukraine's not part of NATO, it feels like, you know, Russia is expanding.
If they keep, if they just keep going in the same direction, they're eventually going to be
our hometown. So we got to do something about it. And what does he propose? He doesn't just say,
hey, this is a big deal. He says, no, we're actually going to invest $100 billion, like, off-balance
sheet from some fund into defense tech. We're going to spend more money. And then, of course,
there's a whole bunch of other initiatives that happen. There's the Trump negotiations around
how much Europe should pay as a portion of GDP on defense. But basically, it's this major
turning point where Europe goes from spending, you know, sustainment levels. Okay, we're going to
spend this much every year to we are going to double or triple or you know exponentially grow
our spending and it's all going to be net new so you can go and fight for it and that's what ryan
matal does so uh revenue's grown 50% uh since 22 they're guiding for sales of 58 billion
dollars in an operating margin of more than 20% by 2030 so they have like almost AI growth level
numbers of everything it feels very similar where there's a there's a structural change in
the way their business is going to work. Same thing as Eli Lilly, same story. There's a couple of
these stocks where there's now sort of a megatrend and they are in position to capture a ton of
value as long as they can execute. The big question is, you know, what winds up happening? But the
third leg of the stool, the third important piece in this story is the current CEO, the man no one
is talking about, until today, Armin Popperger. He's been called a white-haired Goliath. I love that.
CNN. Can we pull up a picture?
Just randomly threw that in.
There he is.
There's some other photos.
And last year, he was targeted in an assassination plot by the Russians.
What?
So the CNN reported that Russia had made a series of plans to assassinate several defense industry executives all across Europe who were supporting Ukraine's war efforts.
Earlier this year, Armin Pappberger opened a new factory that will allow his company to produce more of an essential caliber.
of artillery shell, then the entire U.S. defense industry combined.
Ryan Mottal is now the world's fastest growing large defense company and a key player
in Europe's quest to rearm.
Ryan Mottal's stock is up 15x since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022,
giving a market cap of 80 billion, roughly on par with U.S. rivals.
So let's head over to Red Alert Territory.
Gavin Baker, responding to the reporting, says October.
$1.4 trillion in spending commitments, November, rough vibes, and December, code red.
Life comes at you fast.
It certainly has felt fast ever since that fateful podcast.
Yes, that was a crazy turning point.
Although there was plenty of conversation, you know, prior to that around what the trajectory of Open AI would actually look like.
the the code red like leak from this the the information reported it was clearly like some sort of
all hands that sam altman was uh you know holding a town hall with the rest of the open a i team
and he's kind of just saying like lock in that's what he should have said you never say code
red you got to say lock in brothers lock in say we're we're taking that hill we're storming their
fortress we will grind google jemini team into paste with and we will crush our enemies we will see them
Yeah, hospitals learned this lesson.
They used to say code read.
That meant there was a fire in the hospital and that you would probably want to figure out a way to get out.
Yes.
I think if you're a CEO who's under incredible scrutiny, like you're Sam Altman, and you have beat reporters at this point who are texting your employees every single day, hey, what's going on, what's on the ground?
Give me a quote.
What happened?
Yeah, so to give people context, a beat reporter might reach out to, they will actually.
adopt the strategy of just trying to wear someone down where they will send hundreds of messages
to individual people on on the team just over and over and over relentless like email cell phone
instagram dm, LinkedIn just like constantly constantly constantly flooding hoping that at some
point this person just says like fine like I'll talk with you. The name beat reporter comes from
them trying to beat you down that's the whole point is that true that's where it comes from
No way.
Yeah.
Are you messing with me?
Yeah.
Okay.
I'm messing with you.
Okay, okay, okay.
I have no idea.
But I like the idea of it.
It's like, they just try and beat down your employees.
They're trying to beat you down.
There is some praise for Open AI on the timeline, which we should get to you from none other than Blake Robbins.
Blake says, Open AI is operating on a different level.
Play that sound cue, Jordi.
The amount they have shipped in the past few weeks and months is incredible.
feels like we are witnessing a generational run.
This was on October 6th.
Okay, this was on October 6th.
SORA was, I think, number one in the charts at that point.
Yes.
It's now 21.
Yes.
The scattershot nature raises questions about the company's discipline
and ability to support these disparate initiatives.
Is Open AI a frontier research lab,
a social network operator, a commerce engine, a hardware company
because it's hard to do all of that well?
If you go back to the BG2 interview or just the BG interview, Sam's answer to the question
of how are you going to support the $1.4 trillion of commitments was we're automating science
and we're making and we're making like consumer electronics.
And the reason that that, to me, that was kind of like a concerning answer because
Google has been doing those things for years.
Yeah, but they've earned the right because they have 25 years.
Yeah, they're funding it with massive cash flow.
Yeah, hundreds of billions of dollars of revenue and so much cash.
I have a plan.
If Sam Altman really wants to set the record straight, everyone's saying Code Red, oh,
Code Red, it's so bad.
He needs to come out with a statement, we're going to Baja blast Gemini out of the app store.
If he says our plan is to Baja Blast Gemini and Anthropic into the minor
leagues of AI research, I think he just wins completely.
Let's actually play this clip from Ashley Vance here.
Yeah, yeah.
So to speak to Gemini theory specifically, you know, it's a pretty good model.
And I think one thing we do is try to build consensus.
You know, the benchmarks only tell you so much.
And just looking purely at the benchmarks, you know, we actually felt quite confident.
You know, we have models internally that perform at the level of Gemini 3,
and we're pretty confident that we will release them soon,
and we can release successor models that are even better.
But, yeah, again, kind of the benchmarks only tell you so much.
And, you know, I think everyone probes the models in their own way.
There is this math problem I like to give the models.
This is funny.
I think so far none of them has quite cracked it, even thinking models.
Can you just tell us?
So, yeah, I'll wait for that.
Is this like a secret math problem?
Oh, no, no, no.
Well, if I announce it here, maybe it gets trained on it.
It's going to get so saturated.
To speak to Gemini theory specifically, you know, it's a pretty good model.
And I think...
Let's read what Prins is saying here.
So new interview with Mark Chen from OpenAI.
Ashley Vance, the interviewer, has apparently been spending a lot of time at OpenAI,
including sitting in on meetings.
He seems to be writing a book.
And he seems to think that Open AI has made some huge advance in pre-training.
Pre-training seems like this area where it seems like you've figured something out.
You're excited about it.
You think this is going to be a major advance.
Mark doesn't spill the beans, though.
He says, we think there's a lot of room in pre-training.
A lot of people say scaling dead is dead.
We don't think so at all.
Big question about what that means.
Is that scaling RL?
Is that scaling dollars in?
Is it, oh, yeah.
If you invest $100 trillion, you can give it one more IQ point.
It's like, yeah, that would be an example of like scaling holding, but like no one's going to make that trade off.
Okay, so what Sam said in the internal Slack memo is he was directing more employees to focus on improving features of chatchbt, such as personalizing the chat bot for more than 800 million people.
And again, we've seen them launch more functionality around this. I think the theory is that this could be a very, like, make the product really, really sticky. Whether or not that's true generally is still unclear.
It's certainly people have been very loyal to 4-0.
Other key priorities covered by the code red
include ImageGen, the image-generating AI
that allows users to create a variety of photos.
Fundamentally, what LLMs are doing,
what these chatbots are doing is they're basically
instantiating full web pages.
They should be able to instantiate anything
that you could possibly land on,
whether it's a video, an image, a blog post,
images embedded.
Like, it should be able to, like, not just understand everything and give you the answer,
but it should be able to contextualize that answer in any format.
Should they say, hey, we're just going to use Nana Banana?
Which is like a crazy thing, but, you know, there is a world where they say, like,
hey, yeah, like, we're not going to focus on that.
Open AI has a strong hold on the consumer market to the point where if they swapped out
the underlying model, they would still accrue tons of the value because people don't really
know what model is which? Like, I think the average user doesn't do it. But first, Tyler has a
Yeah, I mean, I think that especially makes sense in the context of images and video because they're
just so expensive. Yeah. Like, um, I think a nano banana pro image is like, I think it's like 10 cents.
No way. Or, okay, that might be per like a thousand or something. But it's still, it's still,
they're really expensive. Yeah, yeah. Videos are even more expensive. Videos are like really, really
expensive. Oh, architects are cooked. AI is coming for you. Prepare accordingly. And you see this and it's like
this AI-generated image, and it looks like remarkable.
Looks like a floor plan.
It looks like a floor plan.
It looks amazing.
Like, it looks like, okay, yeah, that's like, all the lines are straight.
But you zoom in, and it's like one of the funniest layouts ever because you realize
that it's just, it's just one massive room with like three or four.
Okay, so first off, okay, so you come in through the two-car garage, then there's a powder room.
So, so first of up, there's this mud room, lawn.
room and laundry with two bath tubs in it scroll up to the right okay just go yeah right there so
why do you have two bath tubs next to your coat closet in the mudroom in the mud room in the mud room
and then and also like you can't go normally you come out of garage you go straight to the mud room
but here you have to go into the main area which is the gallery hall and then you go from there
into there and so scroll to the left a little bit so we can see the what is the coat what is the coat
There's a powder room, and then there's the...
With the coat bath with two toilets.
And why are there two toilets next to each other?
Remember we were touring that facility and it had two...
It had two bathrooms right next to each other with no line next to it?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
We were in the...
In the office, in the crazy office that had the machine, one of the bathrooms just had...
It was like it was meant to be a private bathroom, and it just had two toilets there.
We were like, why the two toilets?
Yeah, so it's like...
So you...
come in through your main foyer, then there's a master bathroom, then there's a coat bathroom
with two more toilets, and then there's a huge walk-in closet, which isn't even directly attached
to anything else. So you have to, like, go through this corridor to get to the rest. And so
this master suite has three toilets. But then it gets better, dude. So go over to the top right
hand side, because this is, so look at bedroom number two. It's just like off the center. Then
bedroom number three is there, then there's a Jack and Jill bath, then scroll down.
Wait, three, three sinks? Three sinks, no toilets. And then there's another bedroom.
And then there's a third bathroom with a third bathroom with a two. This is, with Zia5 sinks.
This is, you might not like it, John, but this is this is, this is architecture at its best.
Is AI going to help with, you know, architectural design? Of course. Is nanobanana going to randomly one shot like the perfect floor plant? No. Also no.
This is why OpenAI is in code red in the two weeks since the Gemini launched ChatGPT unique daily active users, a 7A average are down 6%. He is sharing, to be clear, web traffic data.
these these traffic sources are so rough i just feel like people use apps anyway the part of the code red
of course is uh that uh opening i saura app has fallen out of the top 20 most downloaded apps
in the united states on both the app store and google play things are things are falling i actually
opened up sorra today i looked at it and there was some cool stuff happening this is a little bit
of a hot take like it was not there was still a lot of slop which i would define as like
Like, you know, it's a POV video of a bus driver with a bunch of cats on the bus, and it's
cute and funny.
You're like, you know, it's a chipmunk, water skiing, like that type of stuff.
Is that why you were late for the gym today?
No.
So you think they have to explain the funding gap at this point, or can we all just agree that
maybe everyone got a little too excited?
Yeah, I don't know.
I don't know.
Um, I, I feel like everyone's sort of repriced everything already with the Oracle round tripping and just this idea that, uh, you know, some of the equity investments, like they are circular, but it's basically just like a discount on their purchases. And, uh, you know, these things probably aren't as binding as, as we think. And so I feel like the, the open AI is going to blow up the economy narrative. I feel like that was really oversold. It should be fading in my opinion, but I don't know.
Apparently, chat GPT is also down right now.
I just tested it.
It's not down for me, but the chat says it's down.
Time to Baja blast those surfers back online, brother.
It's time to rock.
And we're going to have to Baja blast some funding into this company
because apparently there's a $270 billion funding hole.
Squaring the total, it leaves OpenAI in a $270 billion funding hole.
The math doesn't work.
Maybe Open AI should release to the world.
Here's how the math can work, because I haven't seen anyone state how this can actually work.
Even if you get there, Open AI does fall $207 billion short of the money.
It needs to continue funding its commitments right.
So it has, in 2030, Open AI free cash flow will be about $287 billion.
That's like insane.
If you're in a situation where you have $287 billion of free cash flow, like you can't raise more debt on that.
Like, I feel like math tends to work out when you go from a non-profit to a $300 billion cash flow a year in 10 years.
Like, it's just, everything just forms in front of you.
Like, yes, you are building the bridge as you're driving, but like that tends to happen when you're on that much of a tear.
We should read through Ben Thompson's latest piece because he's provided a lot more context on Google, Nvidia, and Open AI with a post called Google, Nvidia, and Open AI.
look at that. You have Luke, bored on Tatooine, called to adventure by a mysterious message born
by R2D2, that he initially refuses, refusing refusal of the call. This is the classic
hero's journey. A mentor in Obi-Wan Kenobi leads him to the threshold of leaving Tatooine
and faces tests and carries the battle station plans to the rebels while preparing for the road
back to the Death Star. He trusts the force in his final test. And, uh,
And returns transformed.
And when you zoom out to the original trilogy, it's simply an expanded version of the story.
This time, however, the ordeal is in the entire second movie, The Empire Strikes Back.
The heroes of the AI story over the last three years have been two companies, Open AI and Invidia.
The first startup is called with the release of Chachypti to be the next great consumer tech company.
The other was best known as a gaming chip company characterized by boom and bus cycles, driven by their visionary and endlessly optimistic founder.
transformed into the most essential infrastructure provider for the AI revolution over the last
few weeks. However, both have entered the cave. They're in the cave. This is the cave of disillusionment
and are facing their greatest ordeal. The Google Empire is very much striking back. So Google strikes
back. The first Google blow was Gemini 3, which scored better than Open AI's state-of-the-art model
on a host of benchmarks, even if actual real-world usage was a bit more uneven. Gemini 3,
biggest advantage is its sheer size and the vast amount of compute that went into creating it.
This is notable because OpenAI has had difficulty creating the next generation of models
beyond the GPT4 level of size and complexity. What has carried the company is a genuine
breakthrough in reasoning that produces better results in many cases, but at the cost of time
and money. Ben Thompson creates aggregation theory, this idea of like it's so important to aggregate
demand in the modern internet world it's potentially the only thing you can do you can't
really monopolize supply it's very hard to monopolize supply but monopolizing demand is
something that happens and the the strength of habits is significant like we're watching
this stuff every single day so we can take the time to okay yeah we should test out
this other you know model we should daily drive this app but for a lot of people if
they've if they have a map that's installed and they've been using it for a year
They're never changing.
The thing that I've heard come up multiple times is people that when Gemini 3 launched,
they switched to Gemini 3 on desktop, but they stayed using chat GPUT on mobile.
And, I mean, to be completely transparent, like the Gemini mobile app is really, really struggling
to stay connected.
There's something in the, when you fire off a prompt, it doesn't like save it locally
and then cash that and then send it off, inference it, and then come back.
like unless you keep the app open like it will uh it will just give you like a server disconnected air
like i've gotten like dozens of these and and that's going to be a real like i think it should be
something they should be they should be they should be able to fix in like a weekend this is i think
a broader point the naive approach to moats focuses on the cost of switching in fact however
the more important correlation to the strength of a moat is the number of unique purchasers to
users. Okay. So you can see where this is going with like,
Nvidia has five buyers. Yeah. And chat GBT has a billion buyers. I argue that
you could map large tech companies across two spectrums. The degree of supplier
differentiation from Facebook where the suppliers completely commoditized, just your
friend on Facebook, to, uh, to Microsoft and Apple where the suppliers are somewhat more
controlled. Um, yeah, there's the, what a chart. The, the more, the more unique buyers of your
product you have, the stronger
your moat, because it's hard to
convince each one of them. He started this article
recounting the hero's journey in part
to make the easy leap to
the Empire Strikes Back. However, there is a personal
angle as well. The hero
of this site has been aggregation
theory and the belief
that controlling demand trumps everything else.
Google was my
ultimate protagonist. Moreover,
I do believe in the
innovation and velocity that comes from a founder
led company like Nvidia. And I do still
worry about Google's bureaucracy and disruption potential making the company less nimble and
aggressive than Open AI more than anything, though I believe in the market power and
defensibility of 800 million users, which is why I think ChatGBTGPT still has a meaningful
moat. At the same time, I understand why the market is freaking out about Google.
Their structural advantage, their structural advantages in everything from monetization to data
to infrastructure to R&D is so substantial that you understand why OpenAI is founding.
was motivated by the fear of Google winning AI.
It's very easy to imagine an outcome where Google's inputs simply matter more than anything
else.
One of my most important theories is being put to the ultimate test, which perhaps is why I'm
so frustrated at Open AI's avoidance of advertising.
Google is now my antagonist.
Google has already done this once.
Search was the ultimate example of a company winning an open market with nothing more
than a better product.
Aggregators win new markets by being better.
The open question now is whether one that has already reached scale can be dethroned by the overwhelming
application of resources, especially when its inherent advantages are diminished by refusing
to adopt an aggregator's optimal business model. I really wonder, who's going to take the
leap first? Who is going to jump and put ads in the app first? It feels like Google should do it.
Yeah, nobody's going to be like, what? Google is pretty.
putting ads in a product?
Yeah.
It won't be that surprising.
Apple AI chief, John G. Andrea, is leaving the company.
Amar Subramanya from Microsoft, has joined a lead AI under Craig Federigi.
Amman brings a wealth of experience to Apple, he's quoting here, having most recently served
as CVP of AI at Microsoft and previously spent 16 years at Google, where he was head of
engineering for Google Gemini.
This is bearing the lead.
He joined Microsoft AI four months ago.
Wow, what a crazy turn of that.
LinkedIn says six months ago, but who's counting?
That's pretty fast.
This makes sense, considering Apple is partnering with Gemini,
and not a lot of people are going to be in a better position
to help integrate that into Syria than Amar.
Strange hire for a number of reasons,
but it's hard to argue that the Apple job is a bad one.
Anything is an improvement at this point,
so the bar is as low as it cut.
I'm personally just excited to actually test drive, what Gemini, how it works in Siri, how seamless that is.
Because if it really is just raise, press the button, get Gemini, and it's linked up properly and it doesn't have timeouts and it gets back to you pretty quickly, like, that's going to be a pretty powerful experience.
That's definitely going to cut down on chat GPT app usage for iPhone users, I would imagine.
Underrated threat.
I would think so.
I don't even know that Apple will benefit massively from this.
It's not like they're going to sell twice as many iPhones.
They're already so big.
I don't think it's necessarily bullish for Apple.
It's an underrated threat for Open AI.
There's a lot of queries that all hit chatGBT on mobile that are not even like super
economic, but it's just a lot of my usage around like, hey, just trying to learn about
something or research or product, et cetera.
And if that's just like, again, one tap and you're,
in there.
Yeah.
I think I'm going to be using that a lot, unless they really botch it.
And I don't know how they're going to botch it.
But yeah, I mean, I think the...
If anything's possible, yeah.
Apple's like, hold my beer.
They can be like, every, for privacy reasons, every time you press the button, you have to
e-sign.
And it's like, why are we doing that?
Alfred Lynn comes in, uh, on the board of DoorDash buys a hundred million
of DoorDash.
Oh, Lynn Sanity.
He's not done stewarding, Dordash.
He's continuing to steward the company with a $100 million buy.
Let's pull up this clip from Huberman Lab.
Dr. Jeffrey tells Huberman that LED lighting in buildings is a public health crisis
that could be on par with the use of asbestos.
Many building contractors slash designers are coming to him worried.
They're going to be sued in asking how to start fixing the issues.
We're lighting.
Because I am very concerned about the,
amount of short wavelength light that people are exposed to nowadays, especially kids.
The group of us that are shuffling around, some of them are saying this is an issue on the
same level as asbestos. This is a public health issue and it's big. LEDs came in and people
won the Nobel Prize for this very rightly at the time because they save a lot of energy.
The LED has got a big blue spike in it, although we tend not to see that. And that is even true
of warm LEDs and there is no red. The light found in LEDs when we use them, certainly
we use them on the retinney looking at mice, we can watch the mitochondria gently go downhill.
They're far less responsive. They, their membrane potentials are coming down. The mitochondria
are not breathing very well. Can watch that in real time. Under LED lighting. Under LED lighting at the
same energy levels that we would find in a domestic or a commercial environment.
This is why I want to rig the studio with incandescent light. Incandescent. We're going back to
candles. Candlelight. How about a hearth? How about a hearth? If we put a hearth so we have lights
above our heads, I'm sure, or LEDs, killing us slowly and softly. If we put like somewhat
a bonfire right above us. That'd be the way. And then we just, when the wood kind of burns out,
The show is over.
We just go until that.
That would be good.
I like that.
Leave us five stars on Apple Podcasts.
Thank you for hanging out.
Goodbye.
Have a great evening.
