TBPN - Apple’s New CEO John Ternus, Ferrari’s First EV | Diet TBPN
Episode Date: April 22, 2026Diet TBPN delivers the best of today’s TBPN episode in 30 minutes. TBPN is a live tech talk show hosted by John Coogan and Jordi Hays, streaming weekdays 11–2 PT on X and YouTube, with ea...ch episode posted to podcast platforms right after.Described by The New York Times as “Silicon Valley’s newest obsession,” the show has recently featured Mark Zuckerberg, Sam Altman, Mark Cuban, and Satya Nadella.Follow TBPN: https://TBPN.comhttps://x.com/tbpnhttps://open.spotify.com/show/2L6WMqY3GUPCGBD0dX6p00?si=674252d53acf4231https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/technology-brothers/id1772360235https://www.youtube.com/@TBPNLive
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Massive, massive news. Tim Cook to step down at Apple. This broke yesterday.
Germinator had the scoop, of course. He's coming on the show later today, but it's on the cover of the Wall Street Journal today.
Heavily predicted, often debated. It's a time to reflect on Tim Cook's legacy and what's up next for John Ternis, the longtime insider.
We just say incredibly well executed, incredibly smooth. They sort of telegraphed it. It wasn't a surprise.
Yes. It was already fully priced in.
Yes.
I personally was hoping that the market would give Tim Cook a 21% salute.
Yes.
Where when the news went out, it just immediately nukes 21%.
Massive red candle.
Let everyone know this is, we don't like this.
We love him.
It's a sign of respect.
We will miss him dearly.
Of course, rebound immediately.
Yes.
But I think that's something that the market collectively should try to do for great see.
Yes.
For sure.
Chartology is really the key thing.
It's 21% salute.
Still, nearly a $4 trillion company.
They're doing buying and they're cooking.
So let's go through a little bit of the review of the news and some of the previous discussions
that we've had around Tim Cook and John Ternis because we're going to be learning a lot more
about John Ternus.
He's probably going to do a lot more content, a lot more media, a lot more interviews,
and we will be hearing from him at keynote events for probably over a decade, maybe two decades.
We will see.
So in January, Bloomberg reporter, Mark German, who's coming on the show later today,
predicted that John Turnus would succeed Tim Cook as Apple's next CEO.
Let's just pull up this clip.
Let's give some credit to the Germanator.
He didn't predict it on our show first.
I think he scooped it and posted it.
I know, I know, but this was back in January.
I dropped the clip.
Everyone else in the Apple executive team, late 50s through their mid-60s, turning 66 this year
in the case of Tim Cook.
Your Apple's board, you like continuity, you like an insider, you like people who know what
they're doing, have been there for a while, they know where the bodies are buried.
Okay?
These guys all have hundreds of millions of dollars, if not more.
Pause.
I love Mark German so much.
He's the best.
He's the best.
And he's coming on.
At 50, he's the only one who is, if let's say Tim Cook hangs out another three to five
years, you're not going to point another CEO who's 65, 70 years old.
He's the only guy.
Apple, they get vast majority of the revenue from Hart.
He's the hardware guy.
Yep.
Have they screwed up any hardware since he's been in charge?
No.
He's a steady hand.
He knows what he's doing.
He's really the only choice.
You know, there was this New York Times report a few weeks ago, basically saying that it could
be Greg Jawswiak, could be Eddie Q, could be Deirdre O'Brien, could be Craig Federee.
It's for sure not going to be Craig.
It's not going to be Dirdreau.
It's not going to be Eddie.
It's not going to be Jaws.
The only category that makes sense is an operations person because you look at the
current CEO, Tim, obviously, comes out of the ops world.
You look at the guy who would have been CEO if Tim Cook didn't stay so long.
I'm not saying he shouldn't have stayed so long he's done.
Obviously, a fantastic job for shareholders and employees and what have you.
Would have been Jeff Williams.
He was the COO.
So Saabee Khan, he was named CEO a few months ago, but he's really been in that job for the last half a decade, I would say.
So anyways, it'll be Ternis or Saabee or someone completely out of left field.
I don't think this is imminent.
So we'll see what ultimately happens, but all signs are turning towards Ternus.
Everyone has an opinion that Ternus is going to be the next CEO fine.
I've been shouting this from rooftops the last two years.
But no one has given evidence, like, what is this based on, right?
Has there ever been a baton handoff?
Is he getting more responsibility?
Do they have a big baton?
You know what? You have white smoke coming out of the...
Sure.
Well, actually, no smoke.
Very environment.
big scoop, maybe.
So.
Is that the end of the clip?
You know, maybe out of the far.
Do they have a comically large baton?
Like, like we have our scoop?
Yeah.
Oh, Mark German, the scoopinator.
He's a scoop doggy dog.
Scoop athlete, the scoop, the scoop is on fire.
Yesterday evening, Mark was the one with the scoop.
Tim Cook will assume the role of Apple's executive chairman.
and John Ternis will take the reins of the company.
Mark followed up with a scoop with internal memos from both Cook and Ternus announcing the transition.
I don't.
I mean, I understand, I don't know.
Maybe I don't understand what it's like to be 65, but I was always optimistic that the Warren Buffett, 65 to 95 would be the new trend.
And that people would just say, you know what?
Tim Cook's healthy.
He's going.
Everything to date was a warm up.
Yeah.
It's time to go on the actual run.
That's what I would.
I mean, I totally understand.
He's like, I got another 10x to me. I'm going to, I'm taking us to 40 trillion. Yeah, I don't know. I mean,
maybe Warren Buffett's in a different world because he's more of an investor, maybe doesn't need to travel as much, doesn't need to be in the arena, shaking hands, kissing babies, doing product launches, you know, being in D.C., getting wrangled into things.
Like, Buffett can be more like hands off and just sort of read the news, review the financials and delegate.
with some liquidity, if needed.
Yeah, yeah. It's more, it's a more hands-off role.
I mean, I imagine that the role of CEO of Apple is incredibly demanding,
but I like the idea of just locking in and being like, oh, yeah, I'm 65.
Everyone expects me to step down, but I got another 30 years in me.
But, you know, he chose a different path and he is retiring or stepping into the executive chairman role.
Ben Thompson published Tim Cook's impeccable timing, which,
eulogizes Cook's impressive accomplishments as the head of Apple. Ben Thompson kicks it off with an
interesting thing. He says, it's the nature of business that the eulogy for a chief executive
doesn't happen when they die, but when they retire, or in the case of Apple CEO, Tim Cook,
announced that they will step up to the role of executive chairman on September 1st.
One morbid exception is when the CEO does die on the job or quits because they're dying,
but the truth of the matter is that where any honest recounting of Cook's incredibly successful tenure is Apple's CEO,
particularly from a financial perspective, has to begin with the numbers. And he says that the numbers
are extraordinary. Cook became CEO of Apple on August 24th, 2011. And in the intervening 15 years,
revenue has increased 303%. Profits surged 354%. And the value of Apple has gone from a mere 297 billion
to over $4 trillion, a staggering 1,251% increase.
And there was some chatter back and forth on the timeline
over whether Tim Cook had simply put Apple on cruise control
and lucked out as many big names in tech
also saw 10 to 40x increases in their market caps.
This is from Brandon Gorell's newsletter at TVPN.com.
You can sign up today.
But this interpretation ignores the fact
that many of the biggest public tech companies in 1980
when Apple IPOed, are no longer even close to the top of the pack anymore.
And Brandon cites Xerox, Motorola, Texas Instruments, IBM, and HP,
which all fell by the wayside over the past 30 years.
Well, Apple built the biggest consumer hardware company on the planet
and thrived in the public market.
And I was doing some digging on this as well.
I pulled up, you know, it's easy to look at like, well,
zoom back to the Mag 7.
All of the Mag 7 have done fantastically well over the past,
15 years during Tim Cook's tenure, did he do anything special? Is he in a different category in some way?
And maybe not when you look at, when you look backwards from the current Mag 7, but if you go back to
2011 when Tim Cook took the reins and you look at what were the biggest tech companies there
then and how have they performed, it does look like outperformance because Apple was at 377 billion.
That was, you know, big, huge, the biggest company at the time.
Then Microsoft at 218.
Yeah, you have to go look at what their peers were at the time where he took the helm.
And to be clear, Apple, Microsoft, Google, and Amazon were clearly there.
Fang was the term at the time.
Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix, Google.
For some reason, Microsoft didn't make the cut in that acronym.
That has since changed, of course.
But there were a lot of companies that didn't go on.
significant of runs. You have IBM, Oracle, Intel, Cisco, Qualcomm, and HP, all that were in the top 10.
They were sort of the Mag 10 of 2011, and now they are not in the Mag 7, although many of them have
done very well. This was our take from a long time. We like to harp on the failure of Apple
intelligence and how Siri is ineffective sometimes, and the FaceTime interface is odd, and the new
iPhone's app is hard to use, but where it matters.
We give them credit on Gen Moji.
Stop.
No, where it matters is, did they navigate tariffs?
Did they navigate supply chain?
Did they navigate the transition to Apple Silicon, delivering a great product consistently
that doesn't break?
We have ordered so many Apple devices throughout building TBPN, and there was a time when you
would get a new consumer product.
And it would just be, oh, it's a bad one.
I got a bad one.
And I got to take it back.
And that's never happened.
The quality control is flawless.
And navigating a very, very difficult chip export act from Biden in 2022, all the way to the Trump tariffs,
to different political swings back and forth and back and forth.
And Tim Cook has just done a great job of, like, keeping the wheels on the train going down the track.
And I think that should be celebrated, even though the sexy news.
AI features are...
He's bound to be under-appreciated because he wasn't the visionary that Steve was,
but he also never, I don't think he ever wanted to be seen in that way.
But the consistent operational excellence over almost two decades is almost unprecedented at this scale.
Yeah, just the way you put it, right?
The same experience that I had getting a new...
Apple computer as like a teenager I have today. It is actually almost remarkable how similar
the experience is. You open this wonderful box. You get a great device. It works for a long time.
And you still get that today. So the consistency, yeah, I think he will just get more, when people
kind of process the run over time, he will just get more and more respect. Yeah. And a lot of the,
a lot of the other computer manufacturers have had to go into bloatware and pre-installed software
and Apple's been very good at holding the line there.
They've, of course, ramped up their services business,
integrated advertising in places that were somewhat unexpected,
since that was always how they were counter-positioned against Google.
But they've done it in a way that hasn't been that annoying.
I feel like I don't see that many people complaining about ads in the app store.
People see the ads and they're like, wow, this company is bidding on the keyword for their direct competitor.
That is, you know, extremely competitive behavior.
The same thing happens on Google.
Didn't expect to see it in the Apple ecosystem.
Of course, it's going to happen.
The-
Raghav in the chat says,
not a single product recall under Tim Cook.
Is that possible?
Wow.
I think that is incorrect.
What did the recall?
Says they recalled a 15-inch MacBook Pro in 2019.
The AC wall plug adapter in 2016 and 2019.
Battery Gate Service Pro.
They've had some back and forth.
But, you know,
very, very successful run. The other two things that the chat was mentioning was the Apple car and the
failure of that program, maybe a little bit off too much more than they could chew. I think,
you know, looking at what's happened in China with every phone manufacturer launching a car
that's extremely impressive, I would have loved to see Apple execute there. And I think that would
have been very good for the American technology industry, the electric vehicle industry, a variety
of different American industrial efforts, but it was not to be, unfortunately.
And then there's the Apple Vision Pro, which I think a lot of people, you know, look at the churn rates,
look at the retention rates, and they just see it as an underwhelming product.
I still like it, but I'm in the minority, and I acknowledge that fully.
I do think that they made the right decision to turn it into a home cinema, a home theater.
Like, they understood that there was not enough of a video game library,
a VR game library to plug into in any meaningful way.
And so they made the decision.
I think one of the lead staff members on the Apple Vision Pro project
was from the Dolby Cinema team,
which had done Dolby Vision and some of the actual theater buildouts.
And so they were able to bring that experience
and understand what actually makes for a great movie watching experience
in a premiere cinema, and how can we recreate as much of that
as possible in VR?
Still, you know, obviously didn't hit the mark fully because the product has not taken off by any stretch of the imagination.
But overall, it was a fun project.
And I'm hoping that they continue that.
It might wind up pivoting into just camera glasses and they'll go up against the meta raybans,
which might be the more prudent, you know, business strategy.
But I still like, you know, these incredible investments in VR.
What are you laughing at?
Josh over at Semaphore says,
Nobody tell the new Apple CEO that he has a streaming service.
We've got a good thing going here, lighting iPhone and AirPods money on fire to make great movies and shows.
And we don't need that getting any extra attention right now.
5,000 likes.
Yeah, it is interesting.
Turnus is about as far as you can be from the Apple TV services organization.
But I don't know.
I talked to a filmmaker in Hollywood, a very successful filmmaker, like years and years ago before Apple TV was really ramping up.
and he was saying that Apple's brand is so prestigious that it's sort of antithetical to the Hollywood mindset,
which is much more VC risk on.
You're going to have flops.
Like every movie studio understands that it is impossible to predict the perfect success
and have the level of polish that comes from these slight iterations to apples.
Yeah, Bill different, for sure.
And so it's a different culture because if you have Apple,
Apple's, Apple hasn't, I mean, they've had like flops, but even the flops, like, they still feel like very on brand.
They don't have like a silly movie that is just like bad.
And running that risk was always a problem.
But I feel like Apple navigated it really, really well, especially with the F1 project and has done,
has done really well with the content side.
And they have held a brand standard that feels like almost at the level of HBO pretty quickly.
Whereas some of the other streaming services have kind of gone more scattershot, more reality TV, more, you know, sort of silly projects that might entertain viewers, but don't fully, they don't create a cohesive brand idea of like what am I getting when I open that particular app on the Apple TV.
Mark German said on TVPN in January that Ternus really viewed, really is viewed as the ultimate hardware guy at Apple, Ralph Winkler at the Wall Street Journal, Public.
an article yesterday detailing Ternus's pedigree with physical products, quote,
if Jobs was a product visionary and cook, a supply chain guru, Ternus is a hardware savant
who exists somewhere in the middle. Ternus, who has a background in mechanical engineering,
has been working at Apple for 25 years, and most recently led hardware engineering of all of Apple's
products. He played a crucial role in the development of Apple AirPods, obviously a massive success,
And he redesigned Apple's computers to use company design chips instead of Intel's a massive move that extended battery life and improved performance.
And set them up very well for AI.
Yeah.
Turnus is taking over Apple at a time when the company has largely sat on the sidelines of the AI race going so far as to outsource the technology powering Siri to Google's Gemini.
Turnus will have to somehow manage this dynamic.
Ben Thompson wrote about it in November of 2025.
Apple's plans are a bit like the alcoholic who admits they have a drinking problem, but promises to limit their intake to social occasions, namely how exactly does Apple plan on replacing Gemini with its own models when, one, Google has more talent.
Two, Google spends far more on infrastructure.
And three, Gemini will be continually increasing from the current level.
A number of people have talked about, you know, what are the challenges that Ternus is inheriting on supply chain, right?
kind of like, you know, stuck in China in a big way.
That presents a pretty meaningful, you know, risk to the business.
And then sort of like overall dependency on Google, especially on some of these key products.
And we will close out on this.
I need your reaction.
John, Ferrari's first electric cars priced at the low price of $650,000.
An absolute steel.
They're giving them away at that price.
It's electric, right?
So you don't have to deal with gasoline.
You don't have to deal.
Yeah, you save a lot on gas.
You don't have to deal with all the noise that comes out of a V12.
Yeah, no noise and you save on gas.
Yeah.
Oh, well, yeah, I mean, if you're saving on gas and you're driving, I mean, if oil keeps spiking
and gasoline goes to $1,000 a gallon and you're filling up every week,
you could easily be spending millions of dollars a year on gasoline in a normal car.
So there's potential cost savings here.
So it's sort of a more you buy, the more you save situation.
I think that Ferrari Luce.
There's really going to be a like, what kind of Ferrari client are you moment?
No, I think it'll be a status.
The depreciation, because if you see someone with this, you will know.
They can eat 300 grand of depreciation.
And you know that they are that they are high on the list for the F90.
Like they are working their way up buying in now.
And when the F90 comes out in a decade, they're getting a call.
Yeah.
They're getting a call.
Yeah, very interested to see how this does in the market.
And the good thing is if you are excited about the Luce,
but you're not excited about paying $650,000,
you will have an opportunity to buy them for far less than that very, very quickly.
Probably, probably.
But thank you for hanging out with us today.
It's been an honor and a privilege to be here with you.
We hope you have a wonderful afternoon.
Leave us five stars on Apple Podcast and Spotify.
Throw that flashbang.
Sign up for our newsletter, TBPN.com.
Goodbye.
Thank you.
