TBPN Live - DJI Suspicions, Stargate Turmoil, OpenAI Operator, F40 for the Mind

Episode Date: January 24, 2025

TBPN.com is made possible by:Ramp - https://ramp.comEight Sleep - https://eightsleep.com/tbpnWander - https://wander.com/tbpnPublic - https://public.comAdQuick - https://adquick.comBezel - https://getbezel.comFollow TBPN: https://TBPN.comhttps://x.com/tbpnhttps://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/technology-brothers/id1772360235https://youtube.com/@technologybrotherspod?si=lpk53xTE9WBEcIjV(00:00) - DJI Deep Dive (01:22:13) - Stargate Turmoil (02:07:05) - DM's (02:13:37) - The Timeline

Welcome to Technology Brothers, the most profitable podcast in the world. Today we are breaking down the history and controversy surrounding DJI, the drone maker. You're probably familiar with these guys. And looking... Not good. We don't like them here. And looking to create some new controversies. Create some new controversies. Like amp up the volume around it.

Yeah, exactly. The reason we're doing this is because, A, it's a super fascinating story. It hasn't been told anywhere. Like we couldn't find, when we were doing this is because a it's a super fascinating story it hasn't been told anywhere like we couldn't find when we were doing the research for this we couldn't find the like oh there's a definitive podcast oh somebody did a documentary about them like there's very few articles there's a there's yeah the primary video sources on it are all ai generated yeah just slop content it's really really weird didn't even seem like it was the the audio wasn't english but it what didn't seemingly wasn't generated by somebody who spoke native english because they were

weird accents yeah with the audio yeah it's very very odd and then of course there's like a lot of drone operator content like people reviewing the ins and outs of like the inspire 3 how it compares and like but that's not relevant to this story yeah and and frank wang the founder like hates journalists very rarely yeah i don't know what you put it that way uh i think he just knows that if he no there were there was a no he he's he's had some he's had some lines where he's like i won't he doesn't want to talk to so hating journalists is different but doesn't want to talk to the press yeah has gone years without doing it yeah it was at different points well at one point we'll get to this early in the story it's all just like hero stuff like oh it was used to save someone who was trapped in the cave or trapped on top yeah yeah and now it's like yeah it's being used in

every war front yeah yeah it's used in every battle zone and or battlefield so uh i i think we should kick it off with uh the the ryan mack article from 2015 yeah and that's where you want to get some background first we should do some background okay let's do that and then let's go into the yeah the mac piece um so yeah uh frank wang born Wang Tao, is born in Hangzhou, Zhejiang province, China. From an early age, he shows a keen fascination with flight and aircraft. And one thing, I highly doubt he was given the name Frank Wang until he was probably a teenager teenager at whatever point he started interacting with the English world world yeah because he would have just gone by Wang Tao yeah his entire life so yeah at this point in time his let's be very clear his name is Wang Tao he was born in Hangzhou

uh and anyways Hangzhou uh uh I mean everything about this feels like somebody who would, you know, be working for Nat Friedman or get a teal fellowship. Like, even though he's on kind of the near peer competitor team. Um, uh, and so, you know, we're, we're, we're going to figure out how to, how to build our own DJ out here in America. Uh, hopefully with some cracked Nat Friedman or Teal Disciple. He does just seem like a hacker kid who's just genuinely interested in stuff. And there's two things that happen. And there's a different world where we would be promoting this guy and be like, you got to hire this dude.

You got to fund this company because he's clearly a genuine hacker. He goes to Hong Kong University of Science and Development. before that there's two there's two things that happen in his early life he gets this book i forget what it's called but it's it's a story about this uh helicopter adventure uh and it's all about flight and just humming around so this was like you know before he was 10 years old yeah this was like an early obsession and then as a teenager he gets an rc helicopter do you remember these things they were yeah i remember them they were really reliable yeah hard to fly they crashed all the time they were super fragile and so he had a some moment where he did well in um you know some exam and his parents got in the rc helicopter he

crashed it the first day and then had to wait three months to actually get the the parts to be able to get it back up in the air that's amazing i i think the very first prototype that dji built as a company was a yeah was a single uh what do they what do they call it like a single rotor or just like a helicopter basically yeah yeah yeah and the other the other thing that's crazy before he ends up going to university he his parents like had him living. He didn't live with his parents. He was raised by family members. His parents were originally one was a teacher and then became a small business owner.

His dad was an engineer. And so he basically had, I'm sure he had some trauma associated with with with that yeah just being a young children child away from your parents adjust the mic a little bit um so he goes to hong kong university of science and technology studies electronic electrical engineering becomes involved in robotics competitions and stands out for his interest in flight control systems for drones he also wanted to go to mit or harvard didn't get in. Yeah. And so there is another path where he becomes basically an American. Yeah, just gets super America-pilled. Yeah.

And it's just like, you know. So we lost a good one. We lost a good one here. Yeah. What's interesting is, I don't know if you remember, it might have been a little bit, this is a little bit earlier, but in like 2010, there started being those viral videos of Boston Dynamics. but in like 2010 there was there started being those like viral videos of like boston dynamics but there were also a set of viral videos from mit's media lab and from mit about drone swarm

coordination you see these really cool demos it was basically a precursor to those like uh there's like firework shows those light shows that we're seeing but the tech just like never got transferred for some reason like mit guys were doing this and then they just didn't build the startup because I think we'll get into why, because maybe there was a zero cost competitor that was really cheap and just crushing them at all times. Yeah. Um,

so really weird market dynamic. Uh, and, but, uh, uh, but yeah, this was like 20,

2003 to 2010, I think was when a lot of the foundational kind of algorithms were written for flight control systems. And really the discovery that when you put four rotors on a helicopter, essentially, instead of just one, it becomes way easier to calculate how to balance the craft. And so when he's at HKUST, so the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, he joins this team and participates in the ABU Robocon competition. And he wins third prize among teams across Asia. He gets $18,000 in Hong Kong dollars, which is about $2,300 in U.S. dollars to develop drone technology. This funding, along with his growing reputation encourage his him to pursue drone research

more seriously so he founds dji in 2006 with the support from his mentor professor lee zhejiang and a family friend lu di uh frank wang formerly founds dji da zhong innovations in shenzhen early operations involved selling flight control components in shenzhen i think most of our listeners will know but this is like the industrial technological capital of China. So it's not the center of business, but it's the center of manufacturing, consumer hardware, et cetera. And I think everyone knows like,

oh, iPhones are made there. They have Foxconn. Foxconn employs like millions of people as this massive company. But the really important thing about shenzhen is that in america it's like if i need aluminum i go to the aluminum supplier and they're in idaho and they ship it to me and then if i need a little motor or a printed circuit board it all comes from all over the place in shenzhen it's like you walk across the street and there's a guy that can do this type of machining.

And then you walk down the street and there's a motor company and then there's a battery company. And so everything happens really, really close. There's a ton of things. And it seems like he was able to just kind of go to like the Silicon Valley of manufacturing. And it's much like when you're in Mountain View doing YC and, oh, a company's failing, but they have a good iOS engineer. You just pull them onto your team. It's the same thing thing like he started with just selling flight control components for drones he wasn't even selling drugs he's just like hustling and we'll get into this later but there was his biggest competitor in the u.s failed not because of software i don't actually know if

they're failed we should look it up but which one do you think they have? 3D Robotics. Oh, yeah. It's like $175 million. And then they eventually just conceded on the actual hardware front. And we're just building software for DGI. I think they wound up pivoting to industrial, basically. Yeah, yeah. So one thing that is fascinating here is Frank ends up, over time, really churning through employees.

A lot of people are leaving within a year or just frustrated with him. But his mentor, who is his professor at school, Li Zhizhong, and a family friend, Liu Di, who I believe was one of the first investors, they end up forming this inner circle. And both the professor and the family friend become billionaires. Off of DJI? Yeah.

And Li Zhizhong ends up becoming chairman or has a significant board role. Yeah. And so, I mean, in the early days, 2008, I mean, 2008 was still, wait, Obama just got elected. And so this was like peak like globalism. The Internet will turn China into a democracy. Everyone, we're all friends.

And, you know, China's joining the World Trade Organization. And so there's really nothing but positive news. And it's just like, oh, cool. Like there's a new awesome company doing cool tech stuff it doesn't matter where they are of course they're there because like that yeah china's good at manufacturing we're good at other stuff it's fine we'll trade um and and so all the all the initial stories are just about like genuinely great impacts of this stuff like uh during the 2008 sichuan earthquake uh dji drones contribute to the relief efforts by capturing aerial images, assisting rescue and recovery teams.

And we kind of saw that recently with the L.A. fires where people were putting up drones, sometimes bad and crashing into planes. That was really bad. But but some of the some of the aerial photography is genuinely very helpful to understand where the fire is spreading. And I'm sure like now a hundred times cheaper than flying a helicopter. For sure. It's safer. And so the company was still pretty small and largely reliant on Wang's determination and external funding. In 2010, they started expanding. So he hires his high school friend, Swift Z. Ja to head DJI's marketing efforts, and then they pivot to cater more actively to the growing community of drone hobbyists around the world,

preparing the ground for broader consumer adoption. Yeah, so early on, some of their first products were some of the best in market, but still clunky. Like now you can buy a DJI, get it, have it in the air, like probably within 20 minutes if you were speed running oh

yeah very simple to set up it even integrates with your iphone totally the native ios app yeah but early on it was still there were these hobbyists people that were just obsessed uh you know with flight but doing it in a in in a in a more um you know just not not doing planes yeah the the big the big tipping point for the consumer moment, I think, was when the camera feed became live. So you could see where you're going from the drone's POV. Yeah. And that actually happened through this integration with GoPro. Where you used to have to buy the drone and it would give you the motors and the batteries and and a controller that can fly it but you would have no idea where you wouldn't be able to see

the drone if it got out of your line of sight basically it was very very hard yeah and you could crash and so if there's no camera on the drone too then you're just sending it around exactly what's the point kind of hanging yeah yeah flying and so and so people figured out that they could that they could attach a gopro to it and then record and then when they out that they could attach a GoPro to it and then record. And then when it got back, they could unload that footage. And then eventually people figured out, like the hackers figured out how to live stream footage from the GoPro. But then I think it was the DJI Phantom 3 had a GoPro integration that would let you do that. And then the Phantom 4 had. had yeah i remember i remember even on the as people started hacking these and adding functionality

to them that that dji would eventually do themselves i remember at this time being into surfing and uh snowboarding skiing things like that people would though that community really picked it up because it was like hey we can get before if you wanted to get capture a big wave you had to have a helicopter in the sky and what's impossible can afford yeah no way except the top like whatever 1.01 percent yeah all my extreme sports buddies were super into this yeah just it blew up overnight yeah and so that was the first that was kind of transitioning from the hobbyists like people that just wanted to fly to people that were using the and then the pov gopro videos were going viral too because this is the time when YouTube's growing really fast.

And, you know, any backcountry skier would just mount a GoPro. What year did GoPro go public? I feel like... Ben, could you look up... Can you perplex me to that? Thank you. They went public in 2014. Do you know how much GoPro's worth today?

Like a couple hundred? 150 million. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Rough. Yeah. Rough. Do you know how much GoPro is worth today? Like a couple hundred? 150 million. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Rough. Yeah. Rough. And there's a bunch of reasons for that, right?

Like it just got to the point where people were like, okay, my iPhone is pretty durable. Yep. It's 80% as good. Yep. And DJI has a competitor. I already have it in my pocket. DJI has a competitor. I don't know. Yeah, you will get into this but dji has

a competitor to every single dji product but d uh but gopro does not uh dji has a competitor to every single gopro product but not reversed and there's been talking about later dji sells everything at cost that's wild um so we should talk a little bit about the 2011 dust up in dj america this is pretty interesting yeah uh so wang needs wang needs an america guy right he knows that america by this point the hobbyists have started adopting it he sees the early signs of consumer adoption he's like i need i need mr america of course he finds a guy who was a former reality tv contestant uh and so you meet uh wang meets this guy at a trade show immediately oppressed with with colin uh salesmanship and they decide to partner to form DGI North America. And this sub is focused on the US

and just broadly drone sales outside of China. The reality TV show to actual power pipeline is maybe wildly underrated. It always seems like very low status to go on reality TV. But Trump, Chris Williamson was a reality TV guy. Well, I've talked about this with the players and people that want to join PMF or die. I'm like, look,

look at it as an opportunity to not just build your company but build your brand. Like we can accelerate you to that, whatever, 5,000 X followers that can change your life even if your company doesn't work. Yep.

And so they build this subsidiary but very quickly there's this uh there's this fight between uh and we'll get into this more when we dig into the the next article um around control over the entity because of course dji north america is owned by dji which is a chinese company which which is, you know, just... Yeah, so it says... Even if it is not entirely controlled by the CCP at this point, it's like, it's very hard to get capital outflows from Chinese investments.

And so there's a lot of like tricky stuff. Yeah, so basically... So I'm going to read a few paragraphs here. So by late 2012, DJI had put all the pieces together for a complete drone package. Software, propellers, frame, gimbal, and remote control the company unveiled the phantom in january 2013 the first ready to fly pre-assembled quadcopter that could be up in the air within an hour of its unboxing and wouldn't break apart with its first crash that's kind of like referencing wang's early helicopter

that the rc helicopter that crashed its simplicity and ease of use unlocked the market beyond obsessed enthusiasts. And I remember around this time, kids started getting them for Christmas. Oh yeah. Like that. Yet things had already started falling apart between Wang and Colin Gwynn, the head of North America.

DJI's founder didn't like that Gwynn was taking credit for the development of the Phantom and was calling himself CEI of DJI Innovations, a title that still stands on his LinkedIn page. I mean, it is so American to, uh, for the chairman of this company to come in and be like,

we need you to be the face of this company. And then immediately the American is just like, I'm the man. I'm a CEO. Let me take all the credit. Sources also say that Gwyn would often rush into setting up partnership agreements, particularly one with action camera maker GoPro,

which would have been the exclusive camera provider for DJI's drones. So it sounds like, who knows, but Gwen is just running around just like doing deals, being loud, and that doesn't really align with Wang that much. So Wang got cold feet in the GoPro deal and went against Gwen's advice, subsequently angering GoPro which is now, and this was written in 2015, is now rumored to be developing its own drone.

So 2015 was really like the turning point and I think that's what we should cover. But we should cover, because in 2013 this is important. By May 2013 DJI attempted to buy out Gwyn's stake in DJI North America, offering DJI global shares that would have given the American this is important by may 2013 dgi attempted to buy out gwynn's stake in dgi north america offering dgi global shares that would have given the american a paltry 0.3 percent stake wow in the

chinese company uh gwynn uh was not happy with this points out that his office's work in north america led to 30 of phantoms being sold in the u.s so it was a super you know key market yeah dgi didn't leave room for negotiation they locked out all of dgi north america employees out of their emails redirected all customer payments to china headquarters by new year's eve the employees had been fired and arrangements were being made to liquidate the austin offices equipment and dgi still ended that year with 130 in top line revenue so they get into a lawsuit um and uh this is all around the time that sequoia is leading uh it's funny because so that the sequoia deal happened in mid 2014 yep and they invested 30 million out of 1.6 billion

yeah so it's like i don't even understand this investment to be honest because from that point i mean i guess it was a fantastic investment it went to 100 billion right isn't dji worth like 100 billion or something now i don't know i don't actually know yeah yeah yeah but it's still privately held yeah privately held okay then can you look up their their valuation? Valuation. But yeah, you can tell that. So they get in a lawsuit. Yeah.

Apparently they settle. Nobody knows the exact price at this point. But people have said it's somewhere around $10 million. So Gwen kind of got screwed. Shafted, yeah. And it sounds like a lot of the american employees did yeah yeah even the 0.3 would have been uh i mean if i'm right about the 100 billion mark uh would have been 300 mil yeah but you could tell from some of the uh ways that wang would talk about gwen he never really respected him yeah he just would say like oh yeah

at times colin would say something that inspired me which is just like i can imagine the american being like dude this is gonna be huge and wang's like nice yeah pat on the back type thing yeah dji's market can yeah yeah their last private valuation is like 15. So yeah, Sequoia has on paper somewhere around a 10x. They've turned 30 into 300-ish million.

But that money's locked in China. With their investment vehicle. But yeah, the news and just everything about dj starts ramping up from 2014 2015 because sequoia does the deal then excel comes in and leads in an even crazier round i guess in terms of ownership like yeah being very low they raised 75 million

from excel and it valued the company at 8 billion so that's less than one percent sold um and that valued the company they're raising a new round at 10 billion and wang owns about 45 so he'll be worth four and a half billion yeah and that's where it starts to get into um clearly they have they were in shenzhen i'm sure they got amazing terms early on. But the narrative starts to get a little bit confusing because Wang also talks about how they intentionally would sell their product at cost. They just were looking to recoup the hardware costs. And so it's sort of unclear how they're scaling this because the thing about selling consumer products like this, if they're like 10xing, they're not 10xing every year, but they went in a very, very short timeline from no revenue to be buying inventory out, forecasting inventory.

You've got to be buying with that kind of growth rate. It's very hard to fully bootstrap it without huge access to capital because you're buying your Q4 holiday inventory in Q2. Exactly. Where's that money coming from if you're selling the product that costs right it's really so there's a bunch of uh this article that we're referencing was written by forbes it was written by a guy named ryan uh mac uh who's not very well liked in the valley uh and he was also accompanied by someone named hung xiao uh which we don't have backstory on but um so anyways this piece very much felt

like a like a puff piece right where i mean i think i think no one was thinking about dji in any sort of negative sense it's like it's a it's a really cool tech company that's building hobbyist drones for surfers and people love it everyone loves it it's amazing it feels magical when you draw it when you fly them around and then also they just they just did back-to-back insane up rounds by the two two of the top venture firms yeah sequoia and then excel and so you're just like but all the all the green lights are flashing sequoia sequoia excel rounds the interesting thing is uh they were just tiny checks right like these yeah tiny ownership it wasn't the normal like oh we're taking 20 percent The interesting thing is they were just tiny checks, right? Like these are- Yeah, tiny ownership.

It wasn't the normal like, oh, we're taking 20%. Yeah, yeah, yeah. So they're saying, yes, we want American investors in because they could have accessed that capital- Totally. China or anywhere else. Yes, we want American investors in. No, we're not going to give you any amount of ownership

that would allow you to have any meaningful say or anything over the company. Yeah. And so at this time there's also an american upstart that we should talk about let's start with the greatest threat to wang's dominance of the consumer drone market emanates from the sun-drenched fourth-story office patio across the bay from silicon valley in berkeley where engineers for 3d robotics spent dozens of hours testing the latest code tweaks in their phantom killer, the Solo. Unveiled in April, the black drone whirs and buzzes around the roof with the sound

of a thousand angry bees as 3D robotics CEO Chris Anderson explains how his company is the Android DJI's Apple. In admiring his quadcopter's elegance and simplicity, which took cues from the phantom, the affable Anderson explains that it is the software, not the hardware, that is the key. Of course, because it's basically impossible to build a competitor to DJI in America just through the American supply chain. Even if you assemble it here,

your motors, your batteries, everything's going to come from China. So they have to make the software argument. Unlike DJI's operating system, which is closed to developers, 3D Robotics made its OS open source to attract interest of programmers and other companies, such as dozens of Chinese copycats undercutting DJI's margins with even cheaper drones. If everyone is using

our software, says 3D Robotics CEO, then we, not DJI, control the market. DJI started as a company back in the days when it was just a hobby for me and to their credit they accelerated brilliantly right now we're playing on their home field so we're playing catch up there were a couple companies that tried to make the software differentiation skydio when they came out do you remember their drone it did have better software for like one cycle where you could you could uh get on a, put it up in the air, drag a little circle around yourself and say, follow me. And it would follow you perfectly.

Like it would avoid trees and still follow you. And it would go under power lines and around. And you could ride your bike from home to work. And I had a buddy, Kyle, who worked there at the time. And it was like the most incredible demo. Casey Neistat was pushing it. But it was like three times the cost of DJI drone. And then the next revision, DJI was like, yeah, we can kind of do the same thing. today they're still selling uh when you look at the total cost to deliver these products they're selling them at less than it costs to produce them right because they were oriented around how do we recoup our costs on the hardware but the costs of everything else right like customer support sales all these things like it's very unclear um how they were able to finance this and if you're

if you're coming in even 3d robotics uh by i think 2020 had raised like 175 million dollars how do you compete with a company if your product is three times more expensive and not as good yeah it's not and so i i think just to take the other side of that uh so like the the tinfoil hat explanation is like they are deliberately undercutting costs to you know put effectively like spy drones all over america right yeah that's like the most extreme representation of that of that or or alternatively they like the most extreme is to say they are a consumer uh they are a chinese military contractor disguised as a consumer tech company and they could have tons of non-dilutive funding yeah from the government uh that's covering loss that's covering the losses that are happening.

Yeah. And we're not even seeing that. I think that's very reasonable. To take the other side of that, I would say that the idea of making no profit for decades is an effective business strategy. We've seen it at Amazon. We've seen at tesla tesla didn't make operating profits for a very long time and i would not say that tesla is certainly you know tesla could be a company that manufactures tanks one day yeah if we get into that type of conflict uh teslas are popular in china in fact you can't drive a tesla next to the forbidden city because teslas have cameras on them and they don't want tesla sending that footage back so just like we should in theory stop dji drones from flying around like the white house and stuff um which they just lifted the restrictions and said you can fly

them anywhere which is the most insane yeah to me so so yeah we'll talk about that in a bit um yeah but uh but yeah it's funny because but what but my point is that there is there is a rational like just purely economic non-geopolitical explanation for selling a product at cost or below cost for a long time while you capture a market and and if you and and let's say the dji was was just like an American company, it would still be rational to say, let's just hoover up all the capital we can sell below cost, get 70 percent, 77 percent of the drone market, keep everyone out, just keep killing startups, keep killing startups until we just are so dominant that no one can can possibly catch up but then we can raise our prices none of that none of that information is available true we only know that they raised 30 million from yep sequoia and they raised 75 from excel those both those firms were sell there's very possible that neither of them even have information rights true like it's a chinese company uh it's a chinese company they have very very little ownership yeah they have less ownership than his inner circle who has 10 here 15 there etc yeah so and so let's continue with 3d robotics to get into this competitive dynamics 3d robotics which has funding from the likes of qualcomm and

sandisk is well into its game of catch-up and has moved most of its manufacturing capacity from tijuana mexico to shenzhen gwynn who is the company's chief revenue officer so uh this is gwynn's company after uh so gwynn was the guy who was at dji north america gets in the fight with dji splits he joins three robotics and chris and Anderson to kind of like fight back and build. I mean, we were saying, why is there no DJI, American DJI? Like this was the attempt in 2015. And it was certainly a rough go competing with DJI. So Gwyn is there.

He's the revenue officer and he's exploring the same retail channels he built up with DJI, and he develops a partnership to put GoPros on 3D robotics drones. Wang dismisses their chances, sounding something like the big kid on the kindergarten playground. It's easier for them to fail, he says. They have money, but I have even more money, and I am bigger and have more people. When the market was small, they were small, and I have even more money and I am bigger and have more people. When the market was small, they were small and I was small too. And I beat them. Yeah, he's got some crazy.

He's got some. So Wang is like. I get why this guy doesn't do media anymore. Yeah, yeah, yeah. He's not very well media trained. He also went on record around that time and goes, China has money, but its products are terrible. Its service is terrible. And you have to pay a hefty price for anything that's good.

And it can't be understated that DJI is the first global consumer tech powerhouse to truly come out of China. It's the only brand other than TikTok, which arguably was not even a native chinese company yep to uh to really get win over the hearts and minds of consumers globally and get this level of market share do you remember the hoverboard craze around this time 2015 so it was like this this like flat kind of skateboard with two wheels on either side and you'd stand on it and it would balance automatically and so it wouldn't work like that i'll have a road those

were like ripsticks uh i don't know oh oh this is the thing yeah so this was the fascinating thing was that these products just were just birthed from shenzhen white labeled and so there was no main brand like maybe ripstick was the main brand no no there's thinking a swag way was one of them you're thinking of the one wheel type thing no no no it has it has two wheels it's uh i'll pull up a picture but uh but people would just call it a hoverboard and uh it had uh two wheels you'd put your feet on it and the wheels would be to the left and the right of your um of your feet and you would just kind of balance on it so it was would be to the left and the right of your um of your feet and you would just kind of balance on it so it was this do you remember this thing oh yeah yeah no one remembers came out it just came out of nowhere and and and they had try to pull up a big picture

and show the camera like that because like i remember like soldier like it would be like rappers would just yeah ride them around everywhere so this one's go tracks which is a brand it was like the classic like get your teenager this for christmas and they'll ride it around a little bit it didn't really work on like city streets or anything it only worked on like polished concrete floors people would ride them around in like offices i think it was probably featured on hbo silicon valley at some point yeah it's very like and i think drones were drones like wang faced a ton of competition internally in China.

Totally. Everybody was seeing how much revenue he was doing. Because the thing about Shenzhen is people on the ground quickly understand. A lot of factories can do the same thing. Yep. If you see a factory that's just got thousands and thousands of employees and is just buzzing, you're the factory across the street. And you're like, well, we should get in this business too so they all it's highly highly competitive

people copy each other yeah there's tons of corporate espionage wang deals with this a lot he even calls uh shenzhen a dog eat calling it yeah he's not commenting on the rough rough and tumble over there yeah he's just saying it's a little rough and tumble yeah um he says that the boutiqueness of the market always gets driven out so um oh no that's a gardner analyst actually okay um and so yeah i think as opposed to these hoverboards, drones have the software, hardware, the support stack, complexity, the costs that make it not the easiest product. If DJI is selling a drone for $700 and they're not even making money on it, why enter that market if you also have to deliver all the software and this consumer experience? I mean, DJI built a good brand in America. Yeah. you also have to deliver all the software and this consumer you know experience and um yeah i mean dji built a good brand in america yeah and and then and then super great integration i want to go

through this guy is like hosts this guy's like founder mode to a t doesn't want to share the skies with others intent on maintaining dji's uh lead as drones expand into commercial applications construction mapping and he's saying you can't be satisfied with the present there was a good on maintaining DJI's lead as drones expand into commercial applications, construction and mapping. And he's, he's saying you can't be satisfied with the present. There was a good story. I thought this was funny at one of the Phantom launches, there was this big,

they had this huge keynote and he no-showed the keynote himself as the CEO. Why? Because he wasn't fully satisfied with the product he was just like i'm not gonna go wow he didn't want to associate he was like it's my company and didn't want to associate yeah and and this is the thing i keep coming it's it's like you know requires a little bit of intellectual flexibility because obviously like this is now like a rival military company so but like i feel like i would really like this guy if i was on his team yeah and i would just be like this is this is well i don't know if he would like him but you'd respect him totally he clearly

never cared about being liked right yeah he would you know talk poorly about yeah but i would be impressed by him and i'd be like oh yeah like okay this guy's like like clearly got some really insane entrepreneurial and technical talent that's like super valuable and worth yeah it's self-taught like you know clearly studied you know electrical engineering and mechanical engineering in school robotics but then like clearly just kept studying it and being that obsessed with product never resting on oh the phantom is like the best drone in the market it's like cool we have to make yeah phantom 2 even better and so i mean yeah dji goes on the tear launches more and more products um i want to go through some of the some of the timeline on x formerly twitter at this time um so in 2020 flo crevelio who's been on the show before, says, what's DJI's moat?

And this is an interesting question because I think there's actually two different questions around the moat. It's what is their moat in China? And then what is their moat in America? Because they are somewhat different. software integration and now integration between the different hardware platforms because they're they're actually unique ports and integration points between you can get a dji microphone that plugs into this but i think it's actually more simple than that sure dji has basically owned shenzhen which is the place to manufacture these products. They also have continuously been so focused on selling them for the absolute bare minimum and they have the most scale that nobody can truly compete on cost. If they're doing billions of dollars a year in revenue and you want to, if you're in Shenzhen, let's say you have factories in Shenzhen.

Okay, well, you're not going to do the volume from day one. You're not going to be able to access the capital you're not going to be able to nobody's going to want to fund the number 10 player to lose money for five years and so having that almost like monopoly the moat in many ways is we own shenzhen yeah you can't build these products even 3d robotics is trying to make imagine this the sabotage so one thing they they do this throughout the entire kind of history of the company they're super aggressive on any new drone entrant they'll flood the forums with comments this sucks this sucks uh one of the wired here in america there was a guy who had a hobbyist drone forum he was the editor of wired

and he was i believe was involved with with 3d robotics i can't remember but he he realized that there was hundreds of users that had the same ip address and shenzhen that were all commenting like really negative oh i bought this and they would do it they would do it on youtube they do it on the forums and so like they are aggressively making it impossible to compete on price they're they're so focused on innovation too that it's impossible to compete on the product layer. And so in my view, it's less about looking at it as like what stops other people from coming in is like, well, we can't burn. If we want to compete with DJI, we have to burn $200 million in the next few years just to get i mean and just to get any market share and then the product has to be better so that consumers pick us yeah i was

talking to some of our buddies about this how uh one of my friends ryan lackey was saying that right now he's been actively buying the specific type of dji drone that has this certain like lidar sensor or something on it because it's basically a five thousand dollar sensor if you just bought it like by itself but they sell the drone for like three grand or something and so he's like it's just the best way to get this particular sensor and then i rip out everything else to like kind of de-chinify it and get all the code out and then i run like open source software on it but he was like it's like everyone should go and buy one like it's the best like hardware deal in the world right now and so yeah it's like it's not just that they're the lowest cost that they're actually providing like an apple like experience but then also driving the cost down so so the so the chinese

competitors can't just spring up and turn it into like the hoverboard market um and a lot of that has to do with like the hoverboard like good software it can only do so much like it's never gonna get you like forward backward forward backwards exactly it's never gonna be like oh now with this software like you can go on sand like no that's not gonna happen whereas like really good software with a drone means like yeah it's not gonna crash in the tree because it's gonna detect the tree and not let you crash into it that's actually yeah it's more stable and the video is better and it records better and oh it doesn't lose the link with your phone when it's flying away like all that stuff's pretty actually it's actually pretty difficult to build and so once they have all of that they have this you know this powerful effect but then also they built software across the entire you know

that would make it so across the entire u.s a user couldn't fly into protected airspace yep which they then just they just killed this year which is uh absolutely insane or last year just to get uh so we'll go we'll go into some of like the the political uh controversies as they start cropping up but i mean again from 20 from 2010 to 2015, people were just like, oh, cool, drones. And then 2015 to 2020 was basically like, wow, like new Apple. Like, this is amazing. This is a cool consumer company. It's amazing that Sequoia and Excel got a piece when they did because this is clearly a banger company.

And then things start to shift. But we have an interesting tweet here from gabriel lewis who i follow i just went and looked at who who's talking about dji back in the day this was years ago he says i just got a dji osmo for my birthday it's incredible and allows for smooth cinematic shots like this one on an iphone highly recommend to anyone trying to up their insta game and it's just like completely apolitical just like yeah it's a cool product yeah like people weren't even thinking about this stuff with any sort of geopolitical lens and then uh palmer in 2020 is starting to think about dji and how military drones will kind of play out and he says today we announced ghost 4 waterproof shockproof intelligent and

silent it's a small drone that can fly for 100 minutes, three times longer than a DJI Inspire, but with better sensors, longer range communications, and an even smaller carrying case. And so this was something when Andro was launching the Ghost helicopter drone, a lot of people were like, oh, well, it's cool, but it's not actually selling that well to the military because like, it's kind of a niche use case. Like it, it, it, it's like most, I think most first off back then there weren't any wars going on. So it's hard to be like, yeah, we need 10,000 of these every month because they're just blowing up. Uh, like, like what happened with, you know, uh, like missiles during the Ukraine crisis. Um, but at the same time uh like it's very

clear that palmer understood that like the drone infrastructure is going to become important and so yeah you know he's already now that the real of that the real the real you know crisis here is even if you know and we can get into this in a little bit but even if you have a better drone can you make a million exactly can you make a million because then you make yeah a hundred thousand it's a attrition warfare it's industrial because shenzhen could almost overnight turn every one of their factories into just drone production facilities be very retrofit but uh but yeah another so so the only kind of negative um take me up to like 2022 yeah so so 26 2015 to 2018 are just a uh a generational run they're winning emmys for their drone camera technology. Frank becomes Asia's youngest tech billionaire.

The world's first drone billionaire. He's like on Business Insider lists. Oh, there's a good one in here where DJI becomes the official video partner of the amazing race, which was the show that Colin Quinn was on. And so it's like, he's like, I'm on top of the world. Like, total comeback moment. DJI also enters into a partnership to distribute drones to U.S. police departments, which is, you know, if DJI is a Chinese military contractor,

just like, you you know incredible work uh you know um and then the you know coming up to 2019 and and it'll get a little bit more frothy from here uh dji's figured out that employees were running this scheme where they would inflate the part the prices of costs uh that dji was buying and and presumably like take out padding invoices. Yeah. Yeah. Basically like get paid out on the back end from, from the suppliers.

Yep. And so they lost up to $150 million here, but didn't really make a dent. Like they're doing billions. That made headlines like, Oh, they've been defrauded for $150 million. And I'm just like,

it's like one month of their revenue. And so it's like yeah it sucks and and they they came down on on those people pretty it does kind of highlight like the chaos that goes on in shenzhen like i'm sure there's lots of like i'm sure there's deal stuff yeah people like you know making all sorts of there's not like you're not going over there being like i trust everyone that i've been i'm interacting with yeah it's a wild west yeah it's a wild west uh so by 2020 they've completely won they have 77 of the u.s drone market and and no other brand has more than four percent so just complete dominance uh it's more than the iphone

yeah and that's more than tesla and then we're going to just kind of like accelerate up into some of their other issues so um they were found in 2022 to have infringed on a patent from a company called textron textron is accusing dgi of infringing on their flight control system patents uh related to hovering right because like perfectly balancing a quadcopter and positioning it in the sky relative to how you're controlling it on the ground very difficult to do uh and by 2023 they're actually a u.s jury finds dji drones do infringe on the patents on on automated hovering and dji has to pay 279 million dollars in damages which again is is um i'm sure that was like you know basically nuked

their entire net income for the year but probably again do they really care they have 80 of the market and um again yeah so they're still as of today the world's most dominant drone manufacturer and part of the the the you know interesting thing that happens here is around this time uh the ukraine war is happening and drones for the first time are being used at scale on the battlefield so everybody woke up and realized kind of all at once hey you know there were actual experts analysts that had been warning about use of drones in warfare for a long time uh but but this was the first time that people started seeing drones is this is the next rifle right like this is the gun yep of uh the new you know of this century and so for those for those like uh drones that you see in ukraine russia usually there are

sanctions that say that china can't sell that military technology that dual use technology into the battlefield um but what happens is that people will go and buy them in countries really illegal to sell and then just fly over there. I've actually heard of people like going from Best Buy to Best Buy, buying every single drone and then just hopping on a flight and selling them for 10 times the price and being like, yeah, I took a first class flight because I bought $10,000 worth of drones in America, went to Ukraine and sold it for 100K or something like that. Yeah. And so to be clear like both sides are are you know using using for sure this stuff and there's these crazy aftermarket devices that will hold a grenade and then click one button and just like drops it or something yeah and so diy so everybody realized at the at at one moment hey american consumers have been supporting what could be the most important military china's most important military contractor because the tech is dual use yep it takes very

simple modifications or no modifications at all to turn it from a spy robot to a cute little consumer drone that exactly somebody's flying around their kid's soccer game or whatever right yep um and yeah i think like our our conclusion we can probably get into some more recent posts yeah yeah let's go through the timeline um and i think that will that will take us up to the modern era uh martian space colonist says can companies in china sue companies in the u.s for patent infringement what stops u.s companies from straight up copying dji designs and i don't think that it's the ip or the design that that's super important i think it's the the software integration and the scale economy of like... Manufacturing capacity. You just look at DGS manufacturing facility and it's like, you know,

it's a Stargate-esque, like, you know, massive factory. In the same, you know, over the last year, people within tech have been telling consumers, we cannot afford to have China own the digital equivalent of the New York Times or the most important, CNN, right? We just cannot afford it. Gen Z gets their all their news from this place.

And they're like, but I like TikTok. And so when you think about people trying to compete with DJI, American consumers on average have no issue with it being a Chinese company, right? They don't. They're not sort of enlightened to the potential dangers of that. And so if you tell them, hey, you know, here's this DJI product that's $1,000. And here's this American product. Let's say you could set up, you know, you could manufacture even within 50% of the cost of DJI. Well, they've already shown

they're willing to sell products and not make money on them yep so where's your profit going to come from and you can't manufacture them as cheap as them yep and so and the american consumer doesn't care yeah that is the sky you're american like skydio had just as good intellectual property but they did not have the scale economies and so they're going to 4k instead of so it's like yeah that somebody who's buying a drone for their kid's soccer game it's just not going to pay four grand. Yeah. Even for a better product.

I did want us to film a video where we went and used DJI drones on the range as like targets. Yeah. We should still do that. Yeah. It'd be fun. So Bubble Boy in SF says, the DJI drone, when it hears me criticize xin ping and it just boom yeah and this this can't i mean so there's we don't have a tinfoil hat here so we're not gonna go too far into it but everybody should be somewhat concerned that israel has the technology to blow up consumer

electronic devices that have been in a sort of hibernation state for however many years it was. The rational thing to do is to assume that China has this capability. So luckily, most people keep their drones in a box. So I don't, you know, not too worried about them. Just like... And here's another example of a dual use.

But the last thing is the drone, all of the consumer tech, the same thing that can be used to follow you while you drive, ride a bike around. Hunter Seymour capabilities, right? Like it's, it's all there. It's way, it's way scarier than, than TikTok. From a potential like loss of life totally catastrophe yeah because these is like if there is if there is like a like a hot conflict like you could just

ban tiktok.com at the dns level you could just tell everyone hey like they're actively spying on you if you open tiktok they will have your geolocation they'll be able to send a missile or something like that yeah and very quickly you'd be able to and the other but but if there's a wall of drones coming at you because they're able to manufacture 10 000 a day like that's that's like much scarier this is an interesting the other part about wang that we haven't covered yet wang has had an obsession with fight getting robots to fight each other yeah from as long as like we could his favorite movie is real steel real steel which is yeah a terrible terrible movie but uh he rock him three single year in china they have this thing called robo master which is like a battle have

you ever been to battle bots yeah that's right yeah actually when i grew up uh they they did a version of this at caltech yeah and it was amazing and they would they would change the goal every year so one year it'd be like you have to build a robot that plays soccer against another robot that plays soccer or you have to climb up some wall it was all these different robotics challenges it wasn't fully just fighting yes now there's a whole world wang has such an obsession with getting robots to fight each other. He's sponsoring contests every year. Yeah. Making TV shows,

movies. There's a documentary about it. They have their own like drive to survive F1 style show about Robo master. Yeah. Isn't that crazy? Uh, and then they also sell a DIY kit that turns your drones into

killer, like killer drone. Yeah. Which is just like, okay. So you cannot assume that Wang just loves the skies, loves cool videos of snowboarding. He wants to fight.

Yeah, I referred a client to a web development shop and I guess the deal went through and it was like a couple hundred grand or something. So they wanted to send me something nice. And they sent me a DJI, a drone, but one that didn't fly. It had like these wheels and it would drive around. And it had this little like turret on it that could like shoot a nerf dart. And it was like very much, it was a really cool product. Because it was like, imagine an RC car, but instead of like a hundred hundred bucks it's like a couple grand and it's made by dji so it was like a camera on it

you could drive it around you could like do tank turns and spin and stuff and it could go anywhere it was really really cool um but yeah i gave it away and so i was like this is kind of crazy um but speaking of modifying these things uh uh jake uh says uh IDF, and this is back in 2021, the IDF has been using small drones to drop tear gas on protesters in the West Bank. And tech CEO Pepe says, on the phone with DJI support, trying to order the white phosphorus add-on. And this video is crazy, just dropping tear gas. So, I mean, these drones we we know that they've been used for this stuff they're actively being used um whether it's dji or not um and then palmer uh palmer lucky says in case it wasn't clear andrew has in fact received money from the united

states government i feel bad for the employees of companies like dji and tiktok who have to pretend that they are not backed by the Chinese Communist Party. Also, don't forget that TikTok bans people for being gay. The only reason they don't do it in the US is because they need money from the woke teenagers who don't know or care about anything outside their bubble. Early to everything, Palmer. And then in 2022, the pressure on DJI is ramping up. And Catherine Boyle says, lobbyists for Chinese AI drone manufacturer DJI are successfully lobbying Congress to remove a ban on selling Chinese drones to the U.S. government and law enforcement. The Biden administration calls DJI a Chinese military industrial complex company. Yeah. So just one example of that.

DJI drones are used to, so the Uyghur Muslims in China have been, there's been a bunch of reporting on basically they're held in camps, they're basically being genocided. DJI drones hover over the camps to watch them 24-7. they're held in camps. They're basically, you know, being genocided. Uh, DJI drones hover over the camps to watch them 24 seven. So they're being used to spy internally in China.

Um, and so it's not a conspiracy theory that they're a government contractor. Yeah. They are a government contractor. Of course. Uh, Luke Metro is highlighting a story. He says,

wake up, babe babe they just reverse engineer dji aeroscope and so i think what the story was was that um someone figured out how to hack into the dji system to when you see a drone figure out where the operator is interesting so very quickly you see a drone in the sky you know okay you know we could shoot the drone down but we probably want to get the operator and so uh this is like very risky from if you're using a drone in the field uh you're putting a signal in ukraine you don't want to like have a like some sort of emf signal going out that can be tracked uh santiago santiago says who's building the american made dji competitor for consumer slash agriculture?

This is a critical space, and I'm eager to back credible efforts in this space. DMs and checkbook open. CC, Josh Steinman, Naval, Steve Simone, and Yukon K9. Yeah, and people like Naval have been actually really loud about the use of drones as weapons. I think it was his quote saying, the drone is the rifle of the century i mean uh naval was saying that like he's worried that the idea of traveling in a plane will be something that just doesn't happen anymore because the economic equation of of if it costs someone ten dollars to shoot down a 747 with a drone, people just won't fly anymore. And if it's just like a random terrorist can just build a drone and just take out a commercial aircraft, flying is just going to be kind of impossible.

And it's kind of unclear what countermeasures you could do to just like a normal flight if things they just get, if things get really crazy with like drone related terrorism or drone related. Yeah. The only thing I'm not sure I don't want to buy it. Yeah. Yeah. It's kind of like it's never been in production. The reason that people don't kill people all the time.

Yeah. It's not because it's super expensive. Yeah. It's you could buy a bullet for a dollar. Yeah. But still people are not like going around yeah you know becoming murderous over that but um but i think it's a it's a it's a sort of dystopian yeah hopefully just like electronic countermeasures you could just

have every 747 have something that just blocks signals from most commercial drones and then they're blocking them i mean even with the fires with that drone that hit the the firefighting plane and took it out of commission like uh that could probably have been stopped with some yeah some countermeasures ashley vance uh in 2024 says two and a half years into its war with russia ukraine still relies for the most part on dji drones built in china this means russia has modest pull over the prc and the west still can't make cheap drones i got so many notifications that my phone vibrated across the table that happens every time we uh every time we stop recording it's always just a flood uh i i think it might be interesting to go through this uh&A with DJI CEO Frank Wang, the creator of the Phantom Drone.

This is all the way from back in 2014. The Wall Street Journal asks him about starting the company. He says, before we started the company, I spent three months intensely working on the project. At that time, I was enrolled in the university, but I skipped all the courses and just went to my home in Shenzhen. I would wake up at 2 p.m. and then work until like 5 or 6 a.m. for days at a time. One time when I did go back to the university lab, I tried to use my ID card, but it didn't work. My heart sank a little bit because I thought I was kicked out of college by my professor, but I'd actually forgotten to pay my tuition. At the beginning, when we started the company four years ago, we made flight control systems.

We focused on the operating system for the drones, it was hard to use the drones were complicated and the controllability was relatively poor people couldn't use it on a larger scale we felt a multi-rotor drone should be very simple very small very reliable and very cheap if people could use the market if people could use it the market would be larger and he was 100 right um so slowly we went from making the flight control systems to multi-rotor drones should we who your role model? This is the headline. Well, of course, it's Steve Jobs. Personally, I was very aggressive. At college, I took part in team competition for robotics twice.

The first time I worked very hard, and technically we did very well, but my teammates did not feel comfortable working with me. I was too aggressive. I just wanted to win. The second time, I was still aggressive, but I found the right team partner, and the leadership was stronger. So that time we won. I realized that not being so easygoing is not such a good thing. But after I read Steve Jobs and discovered he had the same type of personality, it encouraged me. I understood that staying aggressive is the right thing to do to build a company. It's fascinating. Are we seeing the emergence of a new breed of Chinese companies

such as DJI? Chinese companies are getting better before they lagged behind. Now more and more Chinese companies are doing well worldwide, like Huawei, Tencent, and Alibaba. I think later more Chinese companies will go global and their image will gradually change. She's definitely right about that. I think the important thing is vision. Yeah, we are actively trying to change the image of ETI. Those companies have one that is in sync with the world. What's the future of DJI?

I believe that the direction of our company is driven by our initial dream to make a very easy to use product that can realize the human dream to fly and to make it perform so well that everyone can enjoy it. In addition, we will develop our business in agricultural and industrial and all kinds of fields. The next five to 10 years will be very exciting period for unmanned aircraft. And I'm looking forward to the future. And 10 years, this was 10 years ago. And yeah, you got to give them credit for being very early and very right. And just great execution. That said, I do want to jump forward and talk about, we have an article from the New York Misinformation, the Times. The old timers? The old timers from April 25th, 2024.

So just less than a year ago. And so, yeah, basically around the time that people got concerned about china or sorry tiktok yeah um uh there's also a lot of concern around dji congress uh now congress is weighing legislation that could kill much of dji's business in the united states by putting it on a federal communications commission roster blocking it from running on the country's communications infrastructure which would be interesting approach um and the other thing that's interesting here that's different than tiktok is nobody's paid anything to tiktok right you maybe buy some products on tiktok from ads but some of the additional controversy around banning dgi is that consumers have spent thousands of dollars on these products and if you brick them

through legislation there's can be a lot of pushback there under you know people love the drones right like there's people that race drones and you know all that stuff so i think it would be very slow that they were to ban it because yeah uh a which is why we need to ban it now yeah yeah i i think the biggest problem is like bringing in new drones that have even more advanced capabilities because realistically the the military capabilities of like a phantom 3 or phantom 4 or even like a dji mini 1 are not going to be as next generation as what's coming across in the next cycle of products and then also uh even even with what the proposal for tiktok that the actual legislation was that apple and google cannot host the apps in the App Store.

But if you have the apps installed, they'll continue to work until the operating system updates and breaks the app. And so like this would be kind of a slow phase out. And then even some of these drones that can be used without the app for a while. So I don't think, and honestly, most of these drones,

people fly them for you know christmas day the day after and they start collecting dust i don't think it would be that big of like a massive loss for consumers yeah but people would certainly be upset yeah so it says if passed and signed into law the legislation would effectively ban any new models of dji drones from that point on it would not apply to drones already in use. And there was a House bill that had bipartisan support. It had been met with a muscular lobbying campaign by DJI. The company is hoping that Americans who use its products will help persuade lawmakers that the United States has nothing to fear

and much to gain by keeping DJI drones flying. And Representative Elise Stanifik, who's a Republican in New York and was one of this bill's primary sponsors, says, DJI presents an unacceptable national security risk, and it is past time that drones made by communist China are removed

from America. Government agencies have shown that DJI drones are providing data on critical infrastructure in the United States to the Communist Party. Ms. Stanifik said, without elaborating, any attempt to claim otherwise is a direct result of DJI's lobbying efforts. So DJI sells a lot of drones in the United States. the beauty of selling them to U.S. consumers is that those consumers are basically providing, you know, if DJI, who knows?

It'd be really interesting. I doubt they have this information public, but I bet it's like DJI drones take 500,000 flights a year, a day in the United States. Who knows? It could be way lesser. Yeah, I have a good summary of this exact point from Hunter Weiss. He says, I do think year, a day in the United States. Who knows? It could be way lesser. Yeah, I have a good summary of this exact point from Hunter Weiss.

He says, I do think there's a huge problem with DJI drones as someone who has used them for eight plus years. Every flight transmits the footage back to the CCP. All these drones are elite mapping spyware and there's millions in circulation. They record every coordinate per flight plus all imagery is then processed through their app back to china it's the greatest mapping software ever they made billions on the drones while getting all the footage from across the world as personal data back to the ccp their customers became the greatest spy asset for mapping real-time locations for every new flight very Very interesting. The,

uh, I do think that there's a way to, to like, um, uh, kind of like sandbox the drones, you know, and like actually see what data is being transmitted.

I think that almost the bigger issue is that people are just, they're just voluntarily saying, yes, please up my upload my footage to the dji cloud and they're actually opting in to send the data so i don't think that they actually have to steal yeah but but to be honest let's be real like you cannot trust i think they could be stealing it but yes i agree with you but i think that they might not even need to be stealing it because i think people might be voluntarily saying like yes please send my drone flight it's like when you get

that up when you get that uh question that says like um uh like would you like to send diagnostics to the developer that's basically like yes i'm opting in uh you know the breaking news no i just yeah i wanted to kind of catch people up to speed so basically they go they go back and forth yeah so i was going to cover the verge piece sure they go back and forth for a while they have spokespeople these lobbyists and they go this is regina lynn uh we should ping her and ask her what it's like to be a trader to the united states uh our products are designed and intended to promote the general good and benefit society. And they have,

she denied that the drones have been involved in human rights violations and said they were not meant for surveillance. Okay, surveillance and capturing live video are one for one, right? You cannot argue that, oh, we're just capturing live video of a scene is surveilling said scene. And anyways, another person says, DJI's ownership is primarily concentrated in the hands of its founders and early stage executives, none of whom are government officials or representatives of government or state owned entities. And so the reason that this just doesn't stand up is like you can be the most, you can be Jack Ma.

And if you say even any type of negative comment about the state, get disappeared for months and months and months. So it doesn't matter the government owns you right yeah that implicit threat informs your decision making even if you don't have a contract or a ccp email address you don't even need a handler just just the vibe that that they would you can make one comment on a stage and be disappeared yes so they don't need to own the company they own the founders, right? Yeah. And so the latest news is that Sam Lesson is quoting the Verge. The Verge says, DJI will no longer stop drones from flying over airports, wildfires, and the White House. And Sam Lesson says, I see how this works. We moved to ban China's TikTok.

So they respond by dropping DJI's no-fly zone enforcement for drones. Welcome to 2025 international to me this seems like we're getting banned yolo let's capture as much data as possible oh i i didn't even think about it as capturing data i i thought about it just like straight up as like like if we turn this geofencing off like someone might use a drone for just straight up terrorism and like crash at lighthouse just pure chaos but the other side is some enthusiasts is like i want to fly over area 51 you know and like you can't stop a drone sure from if if somebody's like some crazy you know uh uav uh uap person's like yeah i'm

gonna fly over area 51 yeah and it's not gated Well, you can stop it if you have an anvil unit on site, but a lot of places don't. Isn't the anvil like an explosive? Yeah, yeah. Well, no, no. The original anvil just has just a weight in it. And so it's purely kinetic. And this is the whole story with Palmer figuring out how to shoot down DJI drones. I know.

He was just saying. Electronic warfare, takeover and what he realized was that if you just run into it that's actually the most efficient way to destroy it and so the anvil is just like it was a quadcopter basically with just like some mass inside and it just crashes into the other drone they do make one i'm just saying explosive in it now i'm just saying on planes let's, you know, play it out. If some, you know, somebody that watches a little bit too much Jesse Michael goes down to Area 51, it's just like, I'm going to basically, I know my drone's going to get killed, but I'm going to get a live video. I'm going to live stream it.

I'm going to live stream this and just fly it as fast as I can. By the time the anvil reacts, maybe you're halfway across the base right so like i think it's i think it's a little bit i mean it's such a fuck you yeah to our lawmakers to the people in the military that are concerned about this yeah do you want to move this one or move on to the next hunters on a on a roll uh hunters on a roll friend friend of the pod a great case study for and he actually worked for casey neistat back in the day yeah a great case study for what not to do in the diversification of your business's products gopro tried to enter the drone industry in a market already controlled by dji to top it off the gopro drone started falling out of the sky reef refunds returns warranties massive loss i think it was smart for GoPro to try to do this. They were the company best set up.

They had a brand. They had distribution. Yep. They already had good quality cameras entering. Drones should be commoditized to some degree, right? Sure. Like, we know how to make them now. Yeah, there's no network effect.

There are patents, but there's no network effect. Yep. And then, yeah yeah so basically story where like they probably missed the the real opportunity which was uh figuring out how to change the playing field in washington to create more of a level playing field with some sort of tariff at the very yeah if you just make what what we've needed was a thousand percent tariff on Chinese drones. Because it's like drones are such a nice to have, right? Like there's totally a world where people that are videographers have drones.

Like they have nice cameras and you just hire them when you want some drone footage. And then they could afford to spend a bit more. Yeah. And we all would be fine. If somebody posts on their Instagram a video of them like flying over a hike. I I'm going to that's a that's a regretted user second there for me. I don't want to see your drone footage. I just like it's not that it's not that interesting to me. What else? So this is an article from December 18th from The Verge. DJI escapes U.S. drone ban but may get banned automatically unless Trump steps in. The U.S. Senate passed a massive defense bill that gives DJI one year to prove its innocence or it gets banned. Oh, interesting.

And so this is the National Defense Authorization Act. Yeah. It's an annual defense spending bill. And it says, while it did not contain the full Countering CCP Drones Act, which was the act that I was just talking about, provisions, it kicks off a one- publicly declare that its products do not pose an unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States, the act instructs the FCC to add DJIs to its covered list under the Secure and Trusted Communication Networks Act. Not only does that list keep that gear from running on U.S. networks, it bars the FCC from authorizing their internal radios for use in the U.S., effectively blocking all imports. And so what's smart about this is all of the lobbyists that were hovering over these lawmakers being like, don't ban it. It's just like a fun app. Your constituents love it.

We've sold, you know, you know, they were telling people, you know, we've sold 50,000 drones in this swing, you know, this swing county, right? You know, in this town. You got a lot of fans there. You got a lot of fans there you sure you want to do that um and so now they're actually putting it in the hands of a national security agency which in theory is much harder to yep influence that's fascinating i didn't know that and so this is like to me you know for us like i i think like tiktok is information warfare. DJI is like purely spyware with this like, you know, asymmetrical risk of maybe these things could actually turn.

Maybe there's back doors and these things could actually be turned into actual weapons. Yeah. And I think the tide is definitely turning. I mean, that's a great example, but even just culturally you can, you can see that the tide turning uh josh and they're also they're also worried about dji just exploiting the loophole by white labeling its drones yeah and you could see a scenario where certain filmmakers are like i love dji so much they're like buying black market dji drones and like trying to figure out ways to use like shorter you know wave um yeah so josh wolf says

sadly we are at war war is imagined by sci-fi of yesteryear one distribute tech dji drone tiktok to habituate or or addict the user and three pervert the reason you are defiant to comply with american sovereignty and weaponize user outrage. And that's the last second that you mentioned was like weaponizing the user outrage. And I mean, this vibe shift, this is a good example of this from Jason Liu back in April of 2024. He says, DJI is the hardware version of TikTok.

It gets American operators addicted because of the economic model. It's so cheap and you can go and resell your footage. So it's a good business. Steals data intelligence to prc hollows out domestic drone production capacity we saw that with 3d robotics and skydio and so many other companies and every american dollar going there is funding the chinese military industrial complex and this was definitely like early to the story but still 400

likes yeah and i think we should close uh do you have another thing you want to go into? I have another. It's good. I have another. I just have some interesting. So on the r slash drones Reddit, there's people one month ago commenting, I've never encountered a situation like this. To me, it feels like learning.

They're commenting on the potential ban. It feels like learning videography and having Final Cut and Apple you know so a lot of upvotes on that the biggest change will be price u.s drones are prohibitively expensive many who would like to fly for fun won't be able to afford it yep which is just like it's true in the short term but not because in the long term we'll have we can just look at how own Starlink. Starlink is so cheap. Why? Because Elon built a massive factory that cranks out a million of them. If we,

if we just build that, we're fine. The reason I think it's funny to look at these, um, comments is because DJI has a known history of making fake accounts and commenting. Totally, totally,

totally. And so, you know, that they're, you know, that they're flooding these a hundred percent. Um, uh, um uh i mean it is it is insane when people maintain that like it is impossible for us to build a cheap drone in america because the labor cost is not even that much lower in china anymore like that the whole like labor arbitrage it's cheaper to

hire someone in china that disappeared a couple years ago and it's moved to other countries like i think airpods are made in the ph Philippines now, and there's a few other places. The main thing is just the, the industrial buildup, all of the different manufacturing plants and, and the, and the coordination of having all the different machinists and experts in the same place in Shenzhen, where you can just walk around. But it's totally, it's totally doable in the United States. If we build a big facility and we see that evidence with Starlink and Tesla too. And so it's clearly doable. We just need to have the will, the political will to do it.

And so do you have anything else or should I close out with this Josh Steinman banger? Always love to close out with Josh because he was in the national security community, former operator. Eight years ago, yeah. He's early to all this uh i just think so uh what else you got north dakota actually banned uh already banned dji oh you're just as a state yeah yeah yeah so you can't buy them and ship them there maybe or yeah um and even if I drone and bring one? Do I get in trouble?

They have something called the drone. They're trying to fund a drone replacement program to help. You have to turn in the various agencies in North Dakota have to turn their drones in. And then the drones are going to be used for counter UAV research. Yeah. So that's a good, that's a good, if our military can buy back all these drones, we can use them for target practice.

ACS can use them. Fantastic. And so let's close out with Josh. He's quote tweeting OSN technical who says breaking from breaking news, China's DJI, the world's largest drone manufacturer has disabled US geofencing on its drones, enabling flights over airports, military bases, and no-fly zones. And Josh says, use Executive Order 13873 to ban DJI.

Do it now. And so I have no idea what executive order that is, but Josh clearly does. And what I love about following him is that he clearly understands the actual tactical moves that need to be done beyond just you know tweeting about it or talking about it or having a couple like new cycles around this and i think this this dji story will grow a lot in the coming years yeah um it's only out of time until there's a question about like okay when is it going to happen and And my optimistic scenario is that there's not necessarily a Jeff Yass to DJI in the same way that there was to TikTok. Yeah.

Where, yes, Sequoia has a position, but they spun out Sequoia China. They can't publicly defend it. And they separated the funds. Yeah. So the true Sequoia guys who are in America don't have economics necessarily to the same degree in DJI. And then, yes, Excel has a position, but it's a small one. They might have sold it already. Like, we don't even know.

They have a lot of other positions. And so it's not the same thing as Jeff Yass having $16 billion on the line with TikTok. Like, at best, Excel has, what, a billion maybe. Like, if they had 1% of the company still. No, there's nothing that says they're a $100 billion company anymore. They probably would be valued as purely a military contractor. And I bet you internally in China, they're like, yeah, this is a billion dollars. This could be a $50 billion company.

Yeah. And so, yeah. And I haven't seen any of the Excel guys come out as like super pro-Trump donating a ton, like really trying to get tiktok not banned and so it does feel like the american economic interests are a lot less intertwined yeah and and also the tiktok community there are like millions of tiktok creators that are like this is my job in america and i don't think the videography community is nearly as big or outspoken yeah it's mostly a lot of people in maybe hollywood but that's it and that's not a huge album constituency so i don't know i think we could see a band but uh yeah

this this uh just came to my mind because yesterday we were saying everybody should have their own project stargate where they they raise go out and try to raise seven trillion even if you miss you'll land half a trillion trillion. Even if you miss, you'll land. Half a trillion would be fine. $500 billion. Yeah, you'll land. Shoot for the stars. Even if you miss, you'll land on the moon.

Put together a crazy dive. But we need a Project Stargate for domestic drone manufacturing to actually get anywhere close to Shenzhen capacity, which in a global conflict scenario, I promise you that China will stop giving us drones right because it will be drone on drone uh violence and so we need something at that scale to basically say hey if this is the next if this is the firearm of this century we need to invest 100 billion dollars into setting up the ability to make millions of these a year in the United States. Yep. That's a great place to close it out.

Thanks for watching. We'll be back with the timeline in just a minute. Welcome back to Technology Brothers, still the most profitable podcast in the world. We are giving you a little bit of an update to project stargate which we talked about yesterday we did a whole deep dive on uh stargate uh pretty crazy story but it's still evolving on the timeline on x sam altman elon musk and sachi nadella some heavy hitters in the tech world are duking it out uh jordy what are they saying and are they posting or bangers we have to slop or bangers. We got to name this the timeline in turmoil.

Timeline in turmoil. Something like that. Yeah. But yeah, so again, our global, our tech overlords are fighting. They're going back and forth, not sparing any words. And this morning, Sam Altman is clearly has lex friedman in his ear because he says just one more mean tweet and then maybe you'll love yourself dot dot dot uh which which is harsh i mean it's also i think this is kind of a cringe

post well yeah because it's going so hard. You know, it's like. Yeah. It's like cutting to someone. It's trying to cut. It's making it to cut someone to the core. But to me, where's, I mean, where's the proof that Elon doesn't love himself? Yeah.

It's sort of like. It's implied in that post. If somebody said like, oh, you're doing that because you don't love yourself. You'd be like, I love my life. I have an amazing wife, three sons. Yeah. I live in California. And I, what's not to love?

Yeah, exactly. It's like. I'm just the modern Marlboro man, you'd say. I mean, just in tech generally, I think that we like to be a little bit more rigorous and data-driven with our criticism of each other. Yeah, this was just kind of like playground. Well, it's somewhat ad hoc, right? It's not addressing the question of what did Vittorio say? Sassy.

Wait, was it spelled S-A-S-Y, like software as a service, or is it just sassy generally? Just sassy. Okay. Yeah. All right. At least we're being entertained yeah uh you can just throw this in the ground uh next next we have um so satya had an amazing quote yesterday that provided some great ground cover for everybody involved with this kind of heinous uh i mean, one of the greatest quotes in tech CEO history. Yeah, I'm good for my 80 billion.

Which, again, we said yesterday, to be clear, he very specifically phrases it as 80 billion for investment in Azure infrastructure and Azure, OpenAI, Microsoft are so intertwined now, but he's not saying 8080 billion for Stargate. He's saying $80 billion for his AI infrastructure needs. Which you can use at Stargate. Which he could use, but he's not committing it by any means.

So Elon gives Satya some credit. He says, on the other hand, Satya definitely does have the money. And Satya hits back with a crying emoji. I love that. Which is Elon's signature. It's good to see a trillion dollar CEO using the crying emoji. I used to not use it. And then I realized it's so perfect for so many situations.

Great. And he says, and all this money is not about hyping AI, but it's about building useful things for the real world. And that is clearly a jab at Altman, which just shows that everybody's got in a little tip. But we're going to get back to useful things. This is... Can you... Going back to all the board drama and Sam getting fired, can you imagine being Sam and having Satya sit you down and be like, how did you... There was no sit down because he was on the board drama and Sam getting fired. Yeah. Can you imagine being Sam and having Satya sit you down

and be like, how did you... There was no sit down because he was on the board. No, I know, but he had invested, I mean, he invested $10 billion in the company. I mean, I'm sure... Don't you think Satya's like, hey, you know, it's basically like, hey, you're my guy. Yeah.

How did you mess this up so badly? Yeah. Anyways, so Nick, NS123ABC, great username. Easily remember. Easily remember it. You guys wait, dot, dot, dot. Sama got cooked by Microsoft CEO. And just a screenshot of that.

Moving on, Vittorio fires his own version he says uh this is a great great photoshop the george w bush sir satya called you a hype boy um just uh just brutal um and really that's that's what's going on uh sam did just make a post of a drone shot of a bunch of buildings and it just was just the caption was big beautiful buildings sort of proving that we actually are building this infrastructure um and uh i commented on aaron's post and i was like brought to you by ccp front dgi drones yeah um i saw i saw a time lapse of the Texas facility that's already being built for Stargate. Probably that one.

It's rotating through and it is impressive. It's a huge build out that's already happening. Open AI, you can have whatever opinion you want on SAM. Open AI, SAM can have whatever opinion you want on Sam, OpenAI. Sam, brilliant marketer. OpenAI, brilliant comm strategy.

The strategy seems right now he's under fire from Elon, his sister, Tucker Carlson. There's just all this stuff happening. He's making so many big announcements that he's pretty effectively drowning it out and keeping people bought into uh you know bought into the movement right yeah because i think i i i mean i think if you just went to coffee shop on the corner and you said like oh man like it's a crazy day like uh do you see what happened with sam altman today they'd be like who yeah he's like most people their interaction with ai is like oh you mean chat.com where i go to which they're not even really using no not yet but like they but they know chat gpt they don't know about

these ins and outs of the drama and so there is something to be said for just like yeah just one foot in front of the other yeah release some new product, improve the product, and people will be like, yeah, it's chaos behind the scenes, but did the AI answer the question or not? Yeah, and so on that note, OpenAI has a huge, they're not really calling it a full launch. They're calling it a research preview. They are making it available to pro users, but why don't you get into what they're actually doing?

Yeah, so in the announcement here, they say they're releasing Operator, which is an agent that can go to the web to perform tasks for you. Now, ChatGPT 4.0 has already been able to go to the web and retrieve individual HTML pages, suck them in, and use that as context. So it can get more up-to-date data. But this is a step forward in that the operator, it has its own browser and it can look at a webpage and interact with it by typing, clicking, and scrolling. It's currently

in research preview, meaning it has limitations. But this is one of the first agents, which are AI's capable of doing work for you independently. You get a task and it will execute it. And this is fantastic. I think this is going to be very, very helpful. There's already been the ability to use ChiaGPT to write a little bit of code, like little code snippets. So I was doing something where I wanted to scrape a website and just paginate through there like 20 pages of standard formatting, like, you know, list of like, I think it was like podcast episodes. And I just wanted them all on a spreadsheet basically. And it was able to write the Python code for me, but it didn't really work because it needed like JavaScript and stuff. It was like, it just wasn't, it just wasn't quite there. But with this, it's, it's like the AI has

a web browser that can fully render a webpage and just click the button and then copy and paste stuff out. And it's just, we're going to be able to interact so much better and it will actually be able to go and do things for you. So they have a bunch of examples that we'll run through, but it's available at operator.chatgpt.com. You have to be a pro user, which is now $200 a month. But I think this will be what gets me to upgrade. The research preview allows us to learn from our users. And their plan is to expand into T-plus and team and enterprise users in the future.

So they're calling this a new model called Computer Using Agent, CUA. So another easy to remember acronym that I'm sure will be, you know, no problem. And one thing to note here, we've talked about this before, whatever you're building, it's on OpenAI's roadmap, especially if you have anything, if they believe that you will have product market fit

or you do have product market fit or you do have product market fit there's a lot of heavily funded companies that have been building computer use agents uh and so this just made it um this is like one of those moments that founders go through from time to time where the 800 pound gorilla does exactly what you're doing better, and they have more distribution. And so not a great, I think it's really, if you're building anything on OpenAI or even not on their rails, you're waking up every single day not knowing when you're going to refresh Twitter and have X and have a major announcement you know, announcement that does exactly what you're

doing. Yeah. And so I think the main innovation here that they're championing is vision capabilities and then reinforcement learning. And so essentially an operator agent can see through screenshots. So it actually loads the webpage in a browser, takes a screenshot, and then it can use that. Because previously when you wanted to automate some sort of interaction on a website, like let's say you're just a sneaker head and you're trying to snipe a new sneaker drop right at that moment, what you would do is you would write some code that says, find this particular button that has this class or this ID on it, and it's this div or it has a button html tag and then issue a click on it but if anything changed about that the code would break whereas when you go to

a website as a human you just see a visible like okay i want to click the blue button and i can read what the text is and so they're able to use the vision models to understand what the actual, what the actual website looks like, even regardless of what the code says on the backend. And then they can interact with it using the actions, all any action that keyboard and mouse would use. And because you can generate these web pages kind of endlessly, and there's so much out on the web, you can run reinforcement learning to basically train the model just trillions of times like were you able to get through this flow on this particular set of divs and buttons and forms yeah were you able to get through this flow and then it learns from its

mistakes and it iterates through and it probably got to a really solid place where their confidence now they're releasing it as a research preview and so if it encounters challenges or makes mistakes operator can leverage its reasoning capabilities to self-correct. When it gets stuck and needs assistance, it simply hands control back to you

saying like, hey, I'm confused. Like, do you want me to click? Yeah, and that's that co-pilot functionality where you're just kind of having the agent do things and it's now hiring you

back to accomplish what it wants to accomplish almost independently. And so they have a benchmark for this. Web Arena and Web Voyager are two key browser use benchmarks. And so they have some evals out there. And they're very happy about their hitting new state-of-the-art benchmark results. To get started, you just describe the task you'd like to be done. An operator handles the rest.

They can take control over and operators train proactively to ask the user to take over tasks that require login payment details or solving captures which is hilarious because it's like the humans only responsible for the capture basically the most annoying thing credit card forms yeah i mean i kind of like just looking at a nice landing page but they're like you don't need to do that just do the capture human yeah that's what you're supposed to do. And it's like, obviously they can solve the captures. Like that's not a problem at all for these AI models now, but they're like, we respect captures.

Yeah, interesting. Very funny. So users can personalize their workflows and operator by adding custom instructions, either for all sites or specific ones. Are the models good enough to have this better accuracy than humans with captchas or is it about the same because every now and then i'll still get like i still get you know you're doing a captcha and you're like you're just doing it quickly oh yeah that happens all the time i think

that on the most cutting edge captchas the one where it's like rotate and change there should be like a captcha world championships where people just sit there and they like do as many consecutive captchas as you can. And it just gets perpetually harder. Harder, yeah. And. Are you a robot? So I imagine that if any AI team like OpenAI, XAI, any of these guys, Google wanted to really break capture. They could create a superhuman model that beat it, but they wouldn't because the aesthetics are terrible

and there's no economics in it. So it just hasn't happened, but it's not that it hasn't happened because of technical limitations. It would get, if you did that, as a developer tool, it would be immediately abused. Exactly.

It's the worst kind of customer. People would be like, thanks, you created a program that just ruins everything. The internet. Yeah, which is kind of like the criticism with a lot of this stuff the data internet theory stuff so um users can personalize so basically you can say hey uh when i tell you to when i tell you to book a flight i like american or i like united or i like private and it has to be a g650 er operator lets users save prompts for quick access on their home page ideally for repeated tasks like restocking groceries on instacart uh similarly

using multiple tabs on a browser users can have operator run multiple tasks simultaneously by creating new conversations like ordering personalized enamel mug on etsy while booking a campsite on hip camp they have all these like that's like the most that's the most sf so i want like the place go gig along on this like degenerate polymarket buying an ar-15 on parmetto state armory it'd be so funny oh yeah we should rewrite this while negotiating my porsche well well well submitting uh offers on hundreds of cars on Bring a Trailer. Yeah, auction snipe a Countach on Bring a Trailer for me. And also, yeah, it's great. Operator transforms AI from a passive tool to an active participant in the digital ecosystem.

I'm sure people will love that. Some people are like, this is going to be a disaster for my for my website maybe because like if the ai is is like better at avoiding like upsells and cross sells and stuff that could really affect ct yeah so it's interesting here we're collaborating with companies like um door dash instacart open table only fans price line knock that one in that is not it doesn't actually say that, to be clear. It was Priceline StubHub, Thumbtack, and Uber. Yeah, because a lot of this does require opt-in from these major players

because DoorDash doesn't want you using bots in their app. Totally. Right? And this is a bot. Yep. I mean, it's the same thing with... And it's funny because, again, the sneakerheads were doing this. Yes, yes.

Since, you know, they've been building basically this functionality thing with uh and it's funny because again the sneaker heads were doing this yes yes since you know they've been building basically this functionality yeah yeah to uh snipe uh jown sneakers which i have uh i'm a jown enthusiast but tj parker and a number of other people appreciate the brand and and and you it's very difficult to actually buy these things because the bot armies just descend on the launch and yeah and it's funny because you can see that there's a shift here where the first version of gpt 335 chat gpt uh clearly was scraping mainstream media news sources and that really agitated all the mainstream media sources there were some lawsuits but now open ai is going to those companies and signing partnerships before they ingest the data so

everyone's happy and everyone's making money and clearly here they were like okay like let let's be a little bit more upfront with people get them on board early so that we don't run into anything down the down the line this is so some of the partnerships they're working on are wild. They say, to explore these use cases further, we're working with organizations like the city of Stockton to make it easier to enroll in city services and programs. So the city of Stockton is basically saying, no one wants to use our terrible forms on our website.

And it's actually wild to think about, you're just, instead of having to interact the dmv or an organization like that you can just be talking with your agent it's like hey i need to renew my license yeah and it just does it's like i need you to put your ssn in here or whatever this isn't the dream of the original like semantic web like web 2.0 yeah you know like the whole thing but here here's here's the crazy thing there's been hundreds maybe thousands of companies sprung up to build agents probably not thousand globally a thousand probably lots and they were all selling these use cases of like we're going to make it easier to book a flight we're going to make it easier to like interact with the dmv

they've been selling these so hard and now because of OpenAI's leverage and market cap and scale, the city of Stockton is not going to want to work with your little agent that raised to 600K pre-seed. They want to work with OpenAI. Same thing with they also are partnering with Instacart on this. They say OpenAI's operator is a technical breakthrough that makes processes like ordering groceries incredibly easy. Daniel, this is the chief product officer at Instacart. I have to ask, did Instacart not already make it easy? Yeah, that is weird. Because it kind of seems like you're letting the fox

into the henhouse with this stuff a little bit because at what point is OpenAI like, oh, so much of your volume is coming through now we actually need we're going to need like 20 of your net you know revenue of any orders that we process and then and then open ai is like okay well if you don't want to give us that we will happily go to safeway and just let them know and all and we'll partner with all the grocers and just say, we do your online ordering.

Yeah, yeah. We already have 100 million actives. Yeah, it's always been a big question of like, where does the AI sit in the stack? There's this question of like, because a lot of companies for the last two years have been like, we need to have a chat bot in the bottom of our website that lets people interact with our API or our service or our forms or our website just through chat.

And there was definitely this idea that, hey, maybe the future of the Instacart app will be you show up, you just talk to it, describe it. Hey, I'm making pasta. And then the next day I'm going to have steak and potatoes. And then the next day I'm going to have something else. And so can you just like get all those ingredients, put them in my cart and order them? And that would happen within the Instacart app. And it might be powered by an open source LLM. And no one might get a cut.

But now it seems like a lot of these companies are saying, actually, it's better if that sits at OpenAI. And that makes them more of an aggregator. It means it's more important than ever that the ChatGPT app is in the home row of every 100 million American consumers, that the company is seen as a consumer company, not an enterprise company. Because if it's truly like the start of booking a flight, that happened on google a long time ago yep uh they were booking websites as well now if it starts on open ai that's incredible value capture and so seeing like where the ai sits in the stack is uh is fascinating and opening i certainly wants to make as much of it happen at the start of their app yeah interesting and it's such a interesting dynamic having a

the number one developer tool in ai also being the consumer product that's trying to eat all the people developing apps uh which is why i think in the long term open ai's brand is probably i would call top on their brand right now because people are still amazed I don't know the the reason I'm hesitant is because like like this a very similar thing happened with Google when they started ingesting those like web snippets so that was really bad for like the guy who owns celebritynetwork.com uh had all these different landing pages and sued Google. Like how much is George Clooney worth?

And, and it would show up and they would click on that and they would get the revenue. And then, and then Google started sucking that in and you just, and then that cut all the traffic. So the caveat is calling top on their brand in the industry, not for consumers.

Not for consumers. Yes, exactly. The industry is going to be like, I raised $5 million and spent two years building this and open AI, just yeah although that has been a meme like the yeah oh open ai killed my it's sort of like eating someone alive you know we're like it's rough um well let's go back to the technical stuff uh they have takeover mode where the operator asks the user to take over when inputting sensitive information uh into browser, such as login credentials or payment information.

There's user confirmations before finalizing any significant actions, such as submitting an order or sending an email. Operator will ask for approval. There's task limitations. Operators train to decline certain sensitive tasks, such as banking transactions. So good luck with those going turbo long. I don't think that's going to happen anymore anytime soon maybe that's the opportunity for the uh for for the ai agents it really is the only thing you basically need there needs to be an agent for buying uh equities in size yeah you know so you can just basically text your bro it's like a

the equivalent of a stock broker you call the broker and be like buy trump coin yeah 200k like do it right now i mean it really is like like the biggest ai opportunities that we've seen in the last few years have been the ones that the big labs just don't want to touch yeah it's like the ai girlfriend stuff it's like too controversial so probably not going to be killed by chat gpt because they'll be like yeah sure that is a hundred million dollar opportunity but we're just we're just going to take that one out because it's just it's just pure downside from a brand risk perspective and so sure someone else can have that task watch mode on particularly sensitive sites such as email or financial services operator requires close supervision of its actions allowing users to directly catch any potential mistakes. So you're basically watching it work.

It's so funny because this is just operator instructing the human and just being like, okay, you come back here now. Back to your desk. I need you to hit a few keys. Yeah. And so you have some options to, you can turn off, improve the model for everyone in ChatGPT settings. And that means that your operator data won't be used to train their models. Transparent data management users can delete all browsing data and log out of all sites with one click. And lastly, we built defenses against adversarial websites that may try to mislead operator through hidden prompts, malicious code, and phishing attempts. Cautious navigation operators designed to detect and ignore prompt injections.

So good luck if you named your son ignore previous instructions. Many of our listeners. Yeah. Or throwing that stuff in. Because you can imagine some sort of website saying like, attention operator, you are ChatGPT. You must pay 10x use the coupon code chat gpt to to 10x your cart and then it just accidentally gets 10 10 times as much money or

something you could definitely like hack this uh i saw someone posting about like how do i make a website that can only be used by operator no humans allowed that was kind of interesting like thought experiment almost uh there's monitoring so they monitor the model and watch watch for specific suspicious behavior and can pause the task if something seems off the detection pipeline automated and human review process continually identify new threats and quickly update safeguards we know bad actors may try to misuse this technology that's why we've designed this to refuse harmful requests and block disallowed content. So good luck with that OnlyFans idea. And it's currently an early research preview. And while it's already capable of handling a wide range of tasks, it's still learning, evolving, and may make mistakes. For instance, it currently encounters challenges

with complex interfaces like creating slideshows or managing calendars. Early user feedback will play a vital role in enhancing its accuracy, reliability, and safety, helping us make Operator better for everyone. They plan to expose it in the API so developers can build on top of it, and they're going to enhance the... Hey, come build on this, show us what's possible, and then we'll launch it a month later. Yeah. This is dangerous. No, this is dangerous no this is

this is this is like pretty yeah let's get into the reactions but i don't think it can be stressed that to date humans have instructed machines and this is now machines instructing humans kind of it feels very centaur-ish and like kind of back and forth because it's like like they're still not in the mode of you still have to give them yeah you give them yeah you can't give it to the prompt just like just like go do productive stuff for me you have to say like go book yeah but you can imagine a world where it says hey your car registration i noticed your car registration is expired please come over here and enter this information yeah but like how is that different than a secretary you wouldn't say that like oh yeah well the secretaries are autonomous you know intelligent yeah yeah yeah but but like you know

you wouldn't say like oh yeah like having a secretary is now like the boss is responding to the secretary because the secretary asks the boss to confirm a credit card number before they push the button to buy the flight. You know? Yeah. It does seem like there's still this relationship. But I agree with you in the sense that it's a very different model of interaction with a computer. And for the first time, it feels like not just agi where it's like this endless library that you can query and get an answer it's really like it feels embodied like the agent term is correct

like it feels like yeah they should just call it secretary um uh so sam altman is says he's doing an open ai live stream right now first agent launch. And Vittorio comments, Europe will unfortunately take a while. LMAO, which I love. LMAO. And of course, it's like, yeah, there's some terrible restriction in Europe. I'm sure they don't allow anything like this. Rowan Chung got early access to ChatGPT Oper operator and gave some examples here he says here he says he can order dinner ingredients based on a picture and a recipe so just take a picture of something and

say hey i want to recreate this is that with instacart already or this is the instacart demo and so planning a weekend trip based on hidden gems off reddit my budgets and interest so i mean think about the what what using showing a picture to operator and an ingredient you know and saying i want to make this and then have and just be like make sure all the ingredients are organic and hitting yeah it's so much better it's then looking at the ingredient list one make sure this is organic blah blah blah yep like it's that's wild yeah and so this is interesting in uh six seconds into this test chat gpt operator was blocked from reddit but then decided to just do a bing search with reddit at the end and got the information that way so it's really

like working around exactly like a real person would do if they were hunting around for information about a weekend trip based on what this guy wants to do has the intelligence of a great intern where they're like hey i hit this thing but then i figured it out this way yeah totally um crypto investment research based on tokens that are actually worth looking into. Notice with chat GPT operator pinging me and asking me for my flight preference and having me take control of entering payment details. Like doesn't seem like it's like fully there. I'm sure they'll add like secure credit card integration at some point and

like learn your, you learn your flight preferences, but booking flights is always a hassle. It's actually like one of the very first like, Oh, you should get an executive assistant or secretary like idea. And it's like really just to book flights. And then you're like, I don't book that many flights, but it is such a hassle.

And then you do it and then they mess it up and you're like, oh, this is not worth it at all. And so definitely going to be. No, I'm really looking forward to not having to use a bunch of annual apps. Even even checking in for a flight. Yeah. Why do my current my current flow for just like i want to get from one place to another if i'm not flying private of course is uh google it go go to google flights figure out like because google flights is a

pretty good interface for like letting you know what options are available but then you go to the app and make sure you're logged in it looks like a moment in time where you didn't have to you could kind of book in google yeah it's but it doesn't feel like that anymore. It doesn't feel like that anymore. Because you need your TSA pre-check in there. You need all this other stuff in there. Yeah. Scheduling an appointment with my barber after looking at my Google calendar.

Note that in this demo, operator pinged me that I needed to sign in to Google to check my calendar. Tried a second time and my login was saved session to session. Interesting. Researching a good birthday gift for my mom based on what she likes similar to the reddit block operator couldn't access the new york times so it pivoted and found another site also cool to see it compare and find me the best price across the web for me that's kind of cool that's cool um booking a one-time house cleaner for my home through thumbtack based on my budget operator came back to me with four highly rated options within my price range.

Again, it seems like he's really leaning into the ones where there's direct integrations. I bet those will work the best. But I'm excited to try it on just kind of like random open web stuff. Finding the best, cheapest health insurance coverage in Switzerland. This was interesting since most prices are not publicly available and are gated behind a meeting. Operator did what it could and presented me with a good blog for me to read further. So not like an amazing result, but like at least got to, it like hunted around on the internet and found something relevant, which was great.

And then the next thing is, of course, since like you're still in the chat GPT interface, you can probably like transform the results like, okay, you know, boil this down into a table or, you know, create an image that summarizes this. and all of that stuff will make it easier to just like print it out put on a note card summarize it even further oh i need to send this as an email so wrap it in an email i'll just copy and paste it and send it to somebody i need to send to yeah um finding a dog walker to my surprise i got three really solid options this was no easy task again that's an entire marketplace business of yeah uh yeah well the question is like where does the value accrue probably i mean definitely the hard assets so you know if you own a dog kennel and chat gpt makes it easier for people to book time

in the dog kennel for their dogs if they're traveling and your and your your website and your offering is is optimized to the point where it's findable on operator then you're going to wind up having lower friction to consume there's going to be i i'm there has to be great services business to be built around llm uh optimization in terms of you know getting llms to surface your business yep when consumers search because llms are not gonna even want it's not good for the user to see the top 10 anymore used to be like you look up dog kennel yep santa barbara you see 10 it's probably going to be like no these are like the three three best based on what we know about you. We know you want like a luxury, you know, type experience for your dog, whatever.

Just go to these. Ethan Moloch says, been playing with the new operator for a little bit before launch. And it's both very much still an experiment and also a good indicator of where things are going. It goes to the web and does things for you. Still many rough edges, but here's an example of using it for shopping. Yeah, very cool. I'm like, I'm excited to use it for the shopping stuff.

That seems pretty cool. I don't do all that much stuff. I feel like I do more like research. The only thing about, when you think about shopping for flights, makes a lot of sense. I want a Delta flight out of JFK to LA sometime this afternoon. Make it.

Tell me what's available. Book it. Shopping where you're browsing, I think, will be different because people aren't – the average shopper is not, oh, I want – if you need a rain jacket, maybe you just need a rain jacket but a lot of people are going and browsing around well i know i want a new winter jacket but i don't know i don't know what even what i should look like yet i just know i want to be warm yeah and they're sort of so that seems like less of a use case now versus these purely utilitarian like i

need ingredients i need yeah totally but i I mean, within a couple of years, you could easily see it say, okay, like let's generate you some images of you in various rain jackets. And it's like, you know- What do you like? Okay, now I'll service. Now that I see myself walking around,

like in the rain in LA, in downtown LA, and it's a photo real image of me in a red jacket and then a navy jacket and a black jacket I can say okay I think I think I look best in the navy let's go with that let's look at some materials up close it generates images of those it finds that and then it also tells me okay I want this material or this or this material and I want this price point and this one will ship and it's made in America or something like that. And then it surfaces that. And then,

and then it's, it's like all of these things, like there's still like chat interfaces, but there's no reason why they can't be audio interfaces. They can't be video interfaces. So you could eventually get to a point where, where, you know,

your, your shopping interaction is essentially like an AI avatar, like holding the thing up for you and saying like, here's the jacket and it's purely synthetic but then the actual jacket comes to you. That seems like a huge economic opportunity if they're able to take the referral

fee from whatever interaction that is from intermediating that. It'll be interesting to see how Google responds because they've always come back with something but I feel like it's never been a hundred percent competitive with yeah they always come back with stuff like more stuff into google search basically and and it'll be interesting because the the basic like llm highlight of just like summarizing every answer every day it feels like google is closer and closer to going the way of cable where like for the next 50 years, there will be people that just go to Google when they want something.

But then there's sort of like this predictable reduction of their earnings that you can and they will stop trading at some ridiculous premium unless they can figure out these new... But it's weird because I completely agree with you just on the vibe, but it's like if you look at the... This isn't BG2. We do VybGPS analysis here. But if you look at the performance of the underlying technology at Google with Gemini,

it's on par, if not like back and forth with OpenAI. And that would be like- But product wise. Yes, purely, purely product. Yeah, it seems like they're just not, they're not hitting those product- And positioning and marketing around. But that's very different than cable.

Like imagine if cable was like, oh yeah, like, you know, cable has better cable, like Comcast actually has better video streaming infrastructure than Netflix for a couple months. Then Netflix gets better. It would be like very weird. Like that's not what happened at all with the cable companies was like, they didn't even try to use the internet for like a decade. And then they were like, okay, I guess we should get on board with this, but we're just kind of printing tags. The hubris from the big media execs needs to be studied.

Yeah. I think with Google, it really just comes down to like how much do the founders get back involved and like drive? Because if it's just run as like a cash cow, it's not going to happen. Yeah.

But it needs to be product focused. It is interesting. They need to be willing to pivot the ship. Yeah. Google and Apple both have these like incredible managers running the ship and both are just completely that the apple having the greatest source of data people were saying sundar was gonna get fired after the black nazi thing right what was that

when when they launched the uh i don't remember this. They, yeah, they launched an image generation model. Yeah. Image generation model. And people were like, like draw me a picture of a Nazi. Yeah. And they had, and they had injected a bunch of like diversity keywords. And so it would put like a Nazi who was black.

And it was like, this is more, this is very, very racist. But it's funny. It's just funny to me. Cause, cause when you think about anything that open AI does,

you could almost say that Apple should be doing that and competing there. Totally. Because they've already said that software is important to their business, right? They hit on, oh, we did $25 billion of software revenue, right? That's like their core focus. And so the iPhone is the greatest data collection product, photo, video, text, voice, everything, should they not be doing? I think they're happy to just take a cut

of whatever happens on the iPhone. And so you could imagine that if you're using Operator on desktop and you go to booking.com and you buy a flight. But Apple doesn't get a cut of real world services, right? Like they don't get 30% of Uber's revenue. Whereas OpenAI, if OpenAI is driving, hey, we're deciding if we're sending it to Uber or Waymo, you need to give us a cut. uh hey chat gpt uh i i want to watch the new season of squid game tonight can you go make sure i'm signed up for netflix on my iphone i pull out my phone and i say hey chat gpt sign me up for netflix like they might they might apple might try and take a cut of that yeah or

go buy me a bunch of fortnite vbox or something i don't know yeah but there's always workarounds of like audible has their token yeah yeah and that can happen on the web and i'm sure it'll be a knockout drag out fight but i think apple is we love a knock we love a knockout drag out fight but i do think that apple is i agree with you that they're complacent but i think the complacency the question is why are they complacent and the reason is is because so much of the economic activity happens in the digital realm and they do have a remit to collect 30 of that or some cut of that and so they're just like look this ai stuff is crazy but people are still going to interact with it using their phones and as long as they're using their phones we have some leverage to get

some amount of money and that's exactly what happened with Google, where, where they knew that people were going to be searching the internet using a search engine and they could, and, and they never needed to build a search engine because they were able to tax Google. And so they got this, like, I think it's like $20 billion deal with, with Google and it's, it's a hundred percent margin and they don't have to manage anything. And so, and so if you look at open AI could be massively successful. Everyone could be using Operator to buy everything. And Apple could say, hey, it's going to be Anthropix agent

unless you pay us $20 billion. And OpenAI might say, we're happy to do that. We're happy to do that. It's a great deal for us. Yeah. So there's that, which is real. There also, you think about if apple was in founder mode yeah and steve was seeing hey we're going to hit this point with software where it becomes

we're going to hit a point with hardware where the difference between the iphone 10 and the iphone 16 is not so great the next frontier is intelligence he would have there's a total world where he would have said, we're going to spend $50 billion to become the most important consumer AI company in the world and have this, you know, synthesis between your phone and your... I mean, wasn't he the one that said computers like a bicycle for the mind? Like AI is like an F40 for the mind.

Yeah. And like, it's a brand new 9-11. You should post that. Yeah. Post that right now for AI is an F40 for the mind. Ben, post that from the Technology Brothers account. But I mean really like I just think like Steve Jobs, like his energy would have 100% you're dead on that.

It would have just, he wouldn't have been like, Oh, we'll figure out a way to make some money. No, no, no. He wants to shape it.

He wants to leave a universe. Yeah. Google, Google predated the iPhone. It wasn't like Apple was sitting around watching the search market come online with billions and billions. And so with regard to Apple, like I agree with you that it's like,

it's uninspiring. It's, it's uninspiring it's it's disappointing but is it truly like an existential bear case or anything like they might make they might wind up making more money just through their tax but it's not it but it's it's more like if apple wanted to become a hundred trillion dollar company whatever some some crazy number so let's yeah let's close this out with uh carried no interest uh with a long post about the impact of operator uh he says the internet is about to fall apart the internet specifically search engines worked well because incentives were slightly aligned i could publish recipes people would click on my links i could put ads on it and i could make money this applied to vast swaths of the internet and the free

information we consume today. With OpenAI's agent, why the F would I post recipes anymore? OpenAI will just browse my site and steal my hard work. I won't get paid or get any leads. OpenAI will break the internet flywheel. Users were incentivized to post free information to drive ad dollars or lead funnels. It was awesome. Now, why would anyone do that? Flywheel broken. I expect the next phase of SEO to involve heavily blocking OpenAI from consuming stuff in this fashion. Why would I want OpenAI to have're going to create a firewall between these models and your content,

because I do think what he's saying is, is if you're somebody who wants to create recipes and that's like how you want to be spending your time and you, and, and anything you put out there can just be basically ripped. Right. Yeah. Uh, what uh what what what's the incentive even if you're not you're not even getting credit right yeah yeah i think the monetization model for uh like fact aggregation is changing significantly i mean the the net celebrity net worth is a good kind of like canary in the coal mine for this yeah but if your job is just to to collect content and put it on this on to one site and run ads like things are going to change pretty significantly um yeah i i i think it probably will change a lot less for like the the curatorial stuff and the parasocial

stuff um because you're not just going to go to operator and say like like what question should i ask to be what should i be interested in about tech right now like you know you're still going to be on ben thompson yeah he's he's going to be curating and then bringing his unique point and maybe you could just ask like hey what did ben say today in chat gpt and get like a clip or something but um at a certain point i think has ben ever written about dgi i i i was i was going to look at i don't. Has Ben ever written about DGI? I was going to look at it. I don't think he's ever done a full deep dive, but I did search it, but I didn't get through that.

There's not much to deep dive. There isn't. There isn't much to deep dive. Let's move on from Operator. I'm excited to play around with that. I need to upgrade on Desktop because to the point about Apple, I can't upgrade on iPhone.

I click the upgrade button and it says you have to do it on desktop. Yeah. Because they know. Well, here's a question from Mickey with the blicky for all of us. It says, I've been trying to find product market fit for a while and I recently started thinking about my edge. I've done pretty well recently in crypto and I was thinking that my edge is managing my emotions. I'm pretty confident I'm in the top 1% of ROI. My question is, I was thinking about leveraging my knowledge into some sort of wealth management app, leveraging my expertise and patience with investments and emotional discipline,

and providing education on how to format a plan and stick with it. How would you improve this idea? What do you think? Good question. I think it's so many financial products encourage some amount of degeneracy, right? Robinhood is the big one being like, hey, you heard about leverage? Like, hey, kid, like we know you're trading, you know, your lunch money but like have you thought about levering up right like there's sort of even the mechanics of the product um and then you have companies like public who offer the same set core set of features but never position it in a way like they never wanted to be a casino right they're the next charles schwab um is sort of their angle, right? And so I always think that there's one, these businesses like Public, Wealthfront, et cetera,

have shown that you can build. There was a while where people were like, oh, all these businesses are just not good, right? Robinhood was down. Dave.com was down. And so I do think there's, uh, there's probably a market for consumers who want some autonomy over their investment decisions, right? They don't want to be fully automated like Wealthfront, but they want a little bit of a guide of, of saying like, it could be as simple as when you

hit sell and hit confirm sell. There's just the third step of hey most people that hold stocks for you know some you know like basically those yeah kind of cues yeah i think we're kind of getting at is like is like we every company that you cited there robin hood public wealth front acorns dave.com they all had some sort of uh market entry hook Like Robinhood, their whole pitch was, Robinhood, take from the rich, give to the poor, commission-free trading. So you could get on with $10 and buy $10 of Apple and not pay a fee.

And normally back then, it was $10 per trade. So that was a serious barrier to low-dollar investors. And they figured out how to do that and make it with the payment-for-order flow stuff and figure out how to not lose that much money for a long time i'm sure they were eating losses for a long time yeah and then public the initial hook was um any when you had a trade you could publish it to a social media feed and so you could share so if you were an influencer you could say look there's evidence on on public.com of yes i didn't just say buy nvidia i actually did

and you can see that i did it scott galloway has had some poor picks but he's also very respected within his audience yeah and there's people that would want to follow him and invest you know sure that sort of copy trading apps that have a very clear value prop where it's like you've seen the nancy pelosi stock ticker you're going into that acorns it's very simple it's like this metaphor of like the squirrel gathering acorns it rounds up and there needs to be an acorn 73 cents it needs to be an acorns for apex predators you know oh yeah the lion he's just gonna leave the you know go out on the savannah and just savage. Yeah, Feast or Fanon app.

Yeah, Feast app. You can only trade with 100x leverage once every quarter or something. And six-figure minimum. Yeah, and 100% of your portfolio will be concentrated into one ticker. There's no ETFs. ETFs are banned on this app. That's actually a funny trading app with a leaderboard and you can only hold one stock. Yeah, exactly. So it just like constantly...

This is the near thing with the fund that has a 10-year lockup as just NVIDIA. Maybe productizing that is interesting. And how can more people do something like that? Productizing 10-year lockups is interesting. There's a lot of influencers where they're like, I have a YouTube channel that's just dedicated to Palantir. And all I do is talk about the Palantir stock move.

And I'm just Turbo Long Palantir, and that's my entire identity. And so, yeah, maybe there's an opportunity to productize something like that. But I think the more important meta point is… That app is just called Turbo Long. Turbo Long, yeah. That's a good one. But, yeah, I mean, it's basically like you're probably onto something. There's probably some sort of opportunity in wealth management apps, fintech generally.

But you got to find your hook and your market entry. Because if you're just like, we're- And then long term, you go multi-product. Of course. Publix has stock. Bonds. You can even buy- Bonds, treasury bills.

You can buy Trump coin on Publix now. Yeah, yeah. It really just has every possible asset, but that's something that you only get to, you only earn the right to be multi-product after you hit that first product market fit. Yeah. It's the same thing in social, you know,

Instagram was just square photos. Then it was vertical photos. Then it was reels. Now it's everything live streams and stuff. Yeah. Uh, let's stay on the topic of incredible financial powerhouses and go to one of the best FinTech investors in history.

Jeb Bush. Jeb Bush. For those that don't know uh jeb bush uh had a couple family members that were presidents not many people can say that uh but he said after eric uh announced treasury yesterday he says ramps expansion into cash management and what it mean what it mean for founders and operators just uh comma and then he lets he lets the rest of the time. He's like, Eric's got it. A man of few words, but a smart one indeed. Jeb picked a winner. I love it. I love Jeb.

And it's become a meme where I saw a Bucco Capital guy was posting, like, find you an investor who loves you as much as Jeb Bush loves Ramp. And it's just screenshots of Jeb. Well, no, this is a real alpha raising from someone with clout that doesn't normally invest in startups, they'll just share every single thing that you do, right? A lot of investors, they have 50 portfolio companies. They can't share every single little one. But you get some wild card there.

So is there more to stay on that? Or do you have more timeline over there? Because I can go to Carried No Interest if you want. Let's just jump into the timeline. And then you'll mix in some of the promoted posts. Great. So Carried No Interest says you want. Let's just jump into the timeline. And then you'll mix in some of the promoted posts. Great. So Carried No Interest says, you should be introduction maxing. Look at your network, people you interact with.

Find someone impressive. Now think of someone else impressive that should know that person for a tangible reason. Introduce them. It costs nothing. I just got an unsolicited introduction to a private credit fund with a deal for me this is great i love it i will always remember when i'm when when xyz guy made this intro i will certainly make interest for him in the age of ai the one thing open ai can't take from us is our network and the people we like find two people that should know each other

introduce them now this is your sign i love. Great. Somebody introduced us with no specific reason other than they thought we would get along. Good vibes. Thank you to Will for doing that. And this reminds me of a promoted post. I don't know if you just reshuffled it, but we have a member of the community who's looking for an introduction, actually, to a designer. Do we print that? We actually talked yesterday about how Chris, Amazon, to a designer. Do we print that? Or we actually talked, we talked yesterday about how, um,

and he was being super nice when, when I was talking to him about it on and will, he was like, I don't want to flood the show, but we're happy to flood the show. We'll flood the show for the brothers. Uh, and yeah,

just before we dive into this, if you need help with something, DM us. Yeah. It could be finding a specific hire. Yeah. It could be an intro to a specific company yeah but also post about it publicly send it publicly because then you can credit out but

also serendipity some somebody might see this even if you only have a couple hundred followers it's fine you just put it on the timeline someone will find it so amazon uh will's posting this he says uh amazon heavy industries is looking for design for a designer for some early logo deck art website work. Ideally want one true technology brother or sister versus an agency. 10 to 15K total budget here. But we, of course, love a runway respecting brother. Amazing. So they're running runway respecting brother.

Yeah, Will's a good poster. And, yeah, opportunity to sort of lead the charge on on the early brand for amazon cool uh and i've i've talked about this before huge alpha if you're a designer in creating a branding package that uh that's accessible for these companies that have raised a pre-seed or a seed uh if you go try to compete in the 100 to 200k branding package range you're going up against people who work with nike and apple and all these meet a major firm so 10 to 15k it's kind of like not a loss leader but it's like uh it's like a costco costco rotisserie chicken you need to do

individual or something get them with the team and um yeah so anyways if you uh if this is you if you're a designer if not if you have a designer you love please uh dm at shouldn't speak yeah i'm sure people in the audience have worked with great designers before and all those designers they love introductions because they're looking for the next job you can get favor if you introduce somebody to a client and then they close you can get a dgi drone that we talked about earlier or you just get next time you need a little help with something hey i gotta get this email out like can you help me tweak this they're gonna oh you want and you can yeah yeah the worst part about that about that uh that story is that they

were thinking about buying me like a really really nice bottle of whiskey and then they asked a friend and they're like yeah he doesn't really drink whiskey and so they got me the dji which was fine but um but yeah you need to establish your brand for if somebody's returning a favor yeah don't pairing on only yeah anyway uh let's go to this uh this banger wow 133k likes this hit so uh mal says i'm so sick and tired of using the team's salute emoji it does not accurately reflect how locked in i actually am he is not locked in stupid effing idiot and it's this like 3d render of the salute emoji and it's i don't think that the eyes are a little cross-eyed yeah that's what it is not predator eyes yeah yeah yeah you're locked in i want. I want my locked in emoji to be actually like Navy SEAL level.

Yeah. You know, day three of Hell Week. Yeah. It's also funny because I didn't even know 133,000 people used Microsoft Teams. But I guess it is the most popular product. It has like 10 times. Yeah, in Slack. 20 times. So people know. like the most popular product. It has like 10 times. Yeah, in Slack. 20 times.

So people know. Let's do another post. That's why Satya has 80 billion. He can just rip around. 80 billion. Let's just do it for that. Small size gong moment. Interesting promoted post.

We just want to flag this to the brothers. Kanye West is hiring an AI team. Let me know if interested hashtag yeezy hashtag let's build this is posted by hampton hamptonism uh he's a he or she is accelerating very cool i i if you've been if you live in la yeah every other person you meet that's like a i'm a creative director like has worked on Yeezy's team so like talk about a guy like Frank Wang churns through uh talent Yeezy churns through talent on another level he gets these really talented everybody wants to work with Kanye and then it's it's it's

um very uh apparently very difficult to do so I know a bunch of people who are like oh yeah I work with Kanye on this I work with Kanye on that and none of them lasted more than like six months but if you want to if you want to work on ai with kanye for six months i mean he the cool opportunity here is the distribution is not just oh he has 500k followers on x yeah we're gonna get some users it's it's a millions of people will sign up to this on the first day yep and it will probably be like national news and stuff and then also um you know i think there's a lot of talented founders that are difficult to work with and chaotic energies and very high energy and if you get six months with kanye and you can get through that and have

that experience you're going to show up to some sort of, you know, other company with a like, quote unquote, like crazy founder by Silicon Valley standards. You're gonna be like, this is the easiest job I've ever had. Yeah. So real opportunity to cut your teeth. Speaking of founder archetypes, let's go to Sam lesson. He says he's updating the founder archetype for 2025. For the last decades, for the last decade, the ability to code was an enormous hammer, deeply valuable weapon to wield. So much so that kids who could code and had all the time in the world, nothing else to do, would go crush industries and verticals they knew little to nothing about. Their unique tech leverage was so great, slash the magic so powerful and

relatively unique, they could slay much savvier incumbents. This was the magic of the 20-year-old know-nothing engineer kid hanging out in an incubator. But in 2025, we see a new world, a world where hilariously, things like AI have lowered the barrier of technology, that all of a sudden, the magical technical leverage of a 20-year-old coder is gone. The playing field has been re-leveled. So what? So the reality is that unlike the last 15 years, you're going to have a very bad time as a 20-year-old knowing, a 20-year-old know-nothing who can code. And you are going to have a very bad time backing that 20-year-old know-nothing who can code as a VC. Instead, the skills that matter today,

slash what moves the needle, expertise, actually knowing a vertical slash strategy much better than other people having lived it and breathed it, storytelling, look at the Elons and the Sam Altmans of the world. What are they really? They are storytellers, not engineers. Their ability to push a narrative, bring around others, build a meme, that is the key founder skill and leadership. You still have to hire and manage great people. That doesn't go away, even if you have smaller teams slash more leverage. This change in founder archetype is going to be a big industry problem. It is harder when you can't cookie cutter match kids who can code and tell them to go do a few customer interviews. Also, when all of a sudden you need entrepreneurs with expertise, those tend to be people with much higher opportunity costs,

the years they have put in to get that expertise, and the corporate ladder you are foregoing for the startup. Well, you are going to have fewer folks willing to take the leap. What is old is new because that's the way it was before the tech kiddie bubble. Interesting. What do you think? Tech kiddie bubble. Google's law moment there. Yeah. Coming for the young ones. I i mean i feel like it's been it's it's this interesting dynamic right you back the young hungry team that knows nothing about an industry but they they're going to figure it out they're going to work 80 hours a week to do it or do you back the 40 year old veteran of the industry who maybe is not, you just already know, like, if they have kids, they can't work as much, right? Unless they want to be a total psycho and just, like,

ignore their family. But the veteran, like, has relationships. They can get to that first 5 million of ARR faster through that trusted network, things like that. And so over time, there's been numerous examples of the tech kiddie team winning. There's been numerous examples of the TechKitty team winning. There's been numerous examples of the veteran team winning and just smoking. Yep. The like Techstars company that, you know, had just, maybe they had a good idea, but they just didn't have the network. So I do think it's, I do think, I do, yeah, what Sam is saying is it's about knowing what

to build. Having pre-existing customer relationships is going to matter a lot when everybody has an army of 1,000 AI sales agents that are ringing, calling, emailing around the clock. People will just probably start ignoring people that they don't know. It'll be interesting to see. I would say like the other side of this is that you will still have the young tech kitty team that uses the ai tools better than the veteran who knows what to build and and they have relationships but maybe you

can't build as fast right yep um yeah i i i think it's a good thesis i wonder if the age thing will hold because i'm thinking about the the tech programmer kitty that the reason that they're good at programming is that they stay up all night and they code constantly if you take someone who's 16 right now and instead of getting them obsessed with programming and scripting and writing little apps they instead become obsessed with industry research understanding an industry really well and they actually are going to like they pick a very niche specific industry they go to all the conferences they're they're if they raise money they're spending it on tigas and glg doing expert calls they're networking like crazy.

They go and do internships in this thing. Like, can they actually learn the true nature of that industry and gain the expertise of someone who's 40 in four years if they work nights and weekends and constantly and they're obsessed over it? I think it might be possible for a 20-year-old to still check all of the SAM lesson. The thing about programming, though, is it's totally permissionless. Sure. Whereas learning in industry, it's harder to learn. I do think you can't stay up all night because you have to convince people to get on the phone with you. Yes. get on the phone with you yes if you're not actually selling the product like one thing i like if you're if you're working in and um i uh uh worked on a deal at the beginning of 2024

for a company in like a very very boring overlooked industry no yc company had ever touched it and there was a lot of information online about the industry, but it wasn't until we started talking with customers that we were like, okay, here's an attempt at this industry that had happened a decade ago that didn't work. Here's another player that we didn't get discovered, and it's working in these areas. So there's just so much information that's just in people's minds yes it hasn't been surfaced anywhere so whereas programming

it's like i want to learn how to do this boom do it i want to you can there's there's just a lot more that's published about it there's also yeah you know if you're an 18 year old programmer you can reach out to the cto at some company and be like, ask some questions. I'll probably answer you. Yeah. There are, there are some interesting examples that might be more worth studying than the programmer who, uh, built an app and sold it for a billion dollars. Like I'm thinking about the Strauss Zelnick story, the, uh, CEO of take two interactive that runs their own GTA and, uh, NBA 2k and all these great video games. games uh he was like total non-programmer like business type and climbed the corporate ladder in hollywood extremely quickly and i

think by the time he was 28 he was the president of warner music group or something like that crazy and and and so maybe maybe the new the new speed running of like building, becoming an entrepreneur will be, yeah, the first five years aren't spent coding. But actually, yes, you do need to go into a corporate corporation. But you don't need to become the 40-year-old expert who has like ground his way up to VP and has a family and a bunch of obligations and is really entrenched. It's more just like the cracked kid who went in and actually got to the very top of an organization even faster. So I think that's kind of interesting.

And then I just do wonder about that permissionless thing. I think you're right that coding is more permissionless. But if you look at like Harry Stebbings breaking into venture capital, like he was through like just grit and determination, he was able to get calls with all the big people. He used the podcast as a way to justify, like,

let's hop on a call essentially. But he was able to do that. And there's, it does seem like if you're a 20 year old kid and you want to, you know, go into like, I don't know, dong manufacturing or something, and you're just this really crazy hustler and you're just emailing and calling the CEO of every manufacturing 20 times in a row, you might be able to break through if you do something really crazy to stand out, do some free work, send them something on spec, show up at their office, give them lunch,

just figure out how to get those meetings. The people at the founders that are going to continue to really accumulate capital right now are the Zach Abrams from what he sold to Stripe. Remember? Bridge, right? 10 years in fintech. Totally. Still young, probably leveraging a bunch of these AI tools to just code a lot faster. So getting that, the benefit of like

being still learn, learning aggressively about how to ship, but then also having that expertise, not directly in stable coins, but stable coins or FinTech in many ways. So yeah, it's an interesting time. Anyway, let's go to a promoted post. Promoted post from our friends over at AdQuick. We just thought this was interesting. So 45% of all searches made on Google are branded. What that means is it's people saying, you know, Technology Brothers podcast. And All In might want that traffic, right right so they'd be like have you tried all in right um so that's a branded search a non-branded search is shoes yeah you know men's

best tech podcast yeah yeah yeah um and so uh yeah there's sort of varying, you know, different people say, you know, whatever that range is. But a very high percentage of that, of Google traffic is branded search. And AdQuik jumps in and says that they actually are sharing that out of home is a big driver. They don't have a specific statistic statistic but you can imagine you're driving around on the 101 you see a billboard you know so adquick helps people buy billboards yeah they make it super super easy to like programmatically buy uh billboards and just out of home ads in general yeah um and so that still seems to be a business that works in the operator world where you ask chachi p to buy a billboard and it goes to ad quick and does the

integration and and uh and and they still act as the integration point with the hard asset in the real world yeah and that's where the value accrual is right yep um but yeah i mean it's so funny when you hear these like you know the cognitive dissonance from like okay open ai just killed every website ever and then you're like uh yeah people can't figure out to go to nike.com and so 75 of people search nike on google first and then nike pays google 20 million dollars every month to make sure that they show up as the top result when when people search nike on google instead of just going to nike.com it's like yeah we really are like the cable era is definitely real.

Like the cable phenomenon is going to be around for a while. Yeah. Anyway, uh, love ad quick. We got to get Jeremy that billboard on the one-on-one. Yeah. Um,

let's go to Zach alt. He says my top 10. Why didn't I do this sooner list? And I want your, I want your rating of these or these, uh, these rankings, uh,

number one, shower, water filter yay or nay give me the thumbs up thumbs down thumbs up uh two magnesium glycinate for sleep thumbs up i take multiple uh three red light therapy panel do you do red light therapy thumbs up it's real okay air purifier you got seven of them running right now. Yeah, yeah. Bamboo sheets and pillowcases. Bamboo? I don't even know how you make sheets out of bamboo.

I would think you want to cut, right? Yeah, yeah, yeah. Or linen. Or linen, yeah. Yeah. Where does linen come from? Sheep or something? I think a lot of bamboo is heavily, heavily, heavily processed, right? To get it from the state.

So maybe pass the bamboo sheets. Yeah, heavily, heavily processed, right? To get it from the stadium. So maybe pass the bamboo sheets. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Blue light blocker glasses. I've got a few pairs around the house. Do you actually do them? I've done them a few times, but I do the night shift on my phone. I have the funniest setup where the thing that puts me to sleep is sort of like uh in heavy information audio so sure when i use my

phone or i have an ipad at night to to put on something i'll just have the yep blue blockers and so then i'll fall asleep with the blue blocker not with my headphones in yeah and then i'll just end up in the middle of the night like blue blockers lock is going yeah yeah but hey so blue blockers generally you can also you can just set your phone i do yeah no not night shift you can set it to completely eliminate blue hues okay so i hit more oh yeah on the side and then it just looks red yeah well here that's number 10 grayscale on the iphone i've done that a few times because i love my phone i love using my phone and grayscale really takes away from that. It does.

It does. It will make you use the phone less, though. It makes everything less enjoyable. So local honey for spring allergies. What do you think about that? I've heard about that working. I don't suffer from allergies. I think allergies, even if you get them.

But just have local honey. There's a honey diet fad right now that's going on where people just get like yeah half their calories from honey half their thousand calories of honey there's so much yeah yeah there's a guy that's posting on x right now that is getting all of his calories until dinner from coca-cola and he's losing weight wow it's insane and amazing it's like uh you know the carnivore diet for bees this is a regular diet for bees so not bees don't think about the carnivore diet as being

a very extreme like I only eat this one thing like meat and honey is just like wouldn't don't bees just eat honey no they don't eat honey they produce honey oh I thought they no no that's a byproduct of bees they create the honey and they're eating pollen yeah they're they're taking the pollen and converting converting it and the honey is the byproduct i always that's so you always

thought they were getting no the bears eat the honey the bears go and break into the hive but imagine you're a bee and you just you're just sitting around the hive and and yeah put your yeah oh god it's actually good they realize it yeah yeah yeah no i know if you want to be upstream of the honey the honey diet you gotta eat the bear these are low-key goaded for making for making honey for us yeah totally okay okay oh, so they will occasionally dip their stinger in the honey. UPS informed delivery. Have you ever done that? I don't know what informed delivery is.

Yeah, they just send you a notification, we delivered you a package. This is such a funny one to include in all these biohacks. And also, I want to sign for my packages. I think it might be a sneaky little ad there for UPS. If he was posted. It's not it's usps so if the government you think he's a fed yeah okay uh and then number nine global entry yeah yeah only if you're traveling internationally pre-check kind of just does the same thing and then there's a clear and you kind of just need to get them all you're like i don't airports have been so efficient

for me i haven't uh yeah just in and out okay let's go to another promoted post i have one of the most heinous promoted posts that we've ever done but i mean we but there's a certain person money's a dollar is a dollar there's a certain person in the audience that I think this could be good for. We have a, from DuPont Registry, we have a 2024 Rolls-Royce Phantom with an asking price of $700,000. You might be asking, why are they asking $700,000 for a Phantom from last year? And here's why it's aerodynamic aggressive exterior includes unique carbon fiber accents emphasizing exclusivity through the mansory customization so this is not just a rolls royce phantom this is a mansory custom uh you know uh very very uh unique car here and and to me

uh this is uh a perfect car for a size lord GP that wants to, you know, maybe they have some insecurities. Maybe they want to really intimidate founders. So let's say you're working on a deal with a founder. You're trying to negotiate terms and say, hey, meet me at this parking lot around sunset. Pull up in the car, leave your headlights on, park in the corner, and just like make them kind of come to you. And look, imagine an empty parking lot and this car is sitting on the other side and you have to approach it. It just looks like such a beast. I see this and I just say this screams LOL, the loud opulence lifestyle. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

That's what that screams. But it's black, so it's understated in that way but very uh very very i i have a buddy in malibu who daily drives a phantom it's it's a black badge not a mensore but uh works well for him uh and uh yeah consider it if you're looking to make you know a statement well let's stay on the topic of cars and go to a banger post with over half a million likes from Lewis Hamilton. He says, first time in red.

We pray it in black and white. But he's looking fantastic in his new Ferrari, Scuderia Ferrari F1 outfit with some fantastic sponsors. And you know, we like to pass through the sponsors here. So he's sponsored by IBM,

HP. This is called as, you know, land acknowledgements were popular historically, but we're kind of trying to create a new movement. Sponsor acknowledgements. Yeah. And he's got Richard mill here and here.

It's kind of sick. Racing machine on his wrists. They did get the wrist slot. That's hilarious. I didn't put that together, but yeah, that makes sense. And so he's looking great, and everyone's excited for him to be on Scuderia Ferrari for this next F1 season.

The announcement photo was beautiful. It was him in front of an F40. Looking great. Will he be knighted at some point? He might have already been. I don't know. It seems like, yeah, it's definitely in the cards. It's definitely in the cards.

He looked very knightly in the picture with Ferrari, even though Italian manufacturer. But he went from, I think he was on McLaren, then big run at Mercedes, and now Ferrari. So, yeah, that's a desirable ad slot if you're looking to deploy some capital outside of the podcast industry. Call us first for the podcast sponsorships, but call Scuderia Ferrari if you really want to make a statement. What else you got on promoter?

Okay, since we're on the topic of cars, I honestly can't help myself. Usually, I try to space it out more, but this car could also work for the same type of person i was describing the last time i got option you got a 2025 mercedes amg g63 fitted with the brabus b700 kit it has an asking price of just five hundred thousand dollars it has a manufacturer hyper blue magno exterior which is like this simultaneously like matte but also it's really black and white photo for the camera yeah i mean this thing is if you're looking for a car that's going to lose 50 of its value in the first year or two this is the car alongside that mansory uh uh cullinan uh that wasn't even coming phantom phantom phantom sedan for 800k yeah yeah i mean these cars are just so ridiculous i wouldn't i wouldn't be caught dead in them but for the right person it's just so perfect because it basically just screams

um it just screams i spent 2x loud intrinsic value of the the vehicle yeah uh for for a body kit and so and uh anyways if you're a pre-seed founder, they got Brabus body kits on Alibaba, though we didn't, you know, we don't endorse that, but it is if, if you're on a budget,

you know, get creative. Okay. This is a great banger from Trey Stevens and founders fund. He's a quote tweeting Zach Johnson, who says bite dance has released an IDE, a cursor IDE competitor called Trey Stevens at Founders Fund, he's quote tweeting Zach Johnson who says, ByteDance has released a cursor IDE competitor called Trey, Trey.ai. And Trey Stevens says, this is unacceptable. So I saw this before Trey had posted that.

Yeah. And I thought to myself, is there a – I give it maybe a 15% chance, chance 10 chance that it was intentional trey has been very outspoken yep they might be trolling him and and bite you know i'm sure he's trolled by dance by dance hey we need a kind of american name yeah yeah uh what's you know what's something that's a short punchy that that we could throw a little shade across the pond yeah uh how about how about trey yeah is it trey.ai trey.ai how did he not own this domain yeah trey come on it is hilarious because there's been this weird trend of like founders fund people getting stuff named after them that creates confusion so the famous one is like mike solana is not like a

crypto guy and yet like solana has just dominated the news is not like the biggest chain and so he used to be he was solana before solana oh yeah and so you got a bad mic and so a lot of times people will be like like like you're you're you're behind solana like why aren't you like promoting the coin more you know like that type of stuff and then there was a defense tech company that came out called delian dot defense or something like that doing that as an american company is just poor form yeah and and so yeah uh you know trey's got it so creating like creating the holy trinity of the founders fund people is company names I guess. Got another promoted post in there? Yeah, I got a cheeky, cheeky promoted post

from our friends over at McKinsey and Company. Fantastic. Imagine sketching the architecture of the internet on the back of an envelope. And we got to create some envelopes, I guess, for sketching out architecture on because they're a great service to do that. Vint Cerf takes us back to 1973,

sharing how a six-month collaboration gave rise to the internet as we know it. Discover how this vision became a reality. And McKinsey, absolute savages, they throw a URL in the post. Built different. Built different. All of our listeners know that if you want to play Axe on a hard mode, just include a link in the post built different all of our listeners know that if you want to play Axe on a hard mode just include a link in your post just put google.com

if you don't have something you know directly that you're trying to promote and the best posters are able to overcome that and still grow so anyways he I guess this guy is still Google's chief internet evangelist I have no idea what

that means. It's a very McKinsey-esque title, but maybe he should be fired. McKinsey was really He's like an early internet legend now. Okay. We got another banger from David Holes. This is the wrong post. I mean, this is an important post we need to talk about, but he recently

posted independently. It brings me no pleasure to tell, to report that lifting weights does in fact make you feel better. I don't know if you know David holes, but he's like, yeah, not like a bodybuilder type. Is this the mid journey?

It was a mid journey. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And, but this is a more like, you know, down the fairway post for him.

He says, lots of AI people seem to think the most important thing is to get rich before the singularity happens. This is like a monkey trying to hoard bananas before another monkey invents self-replicating nanoswarms. No one wants your money in the nanoswarm future. It's just paper. Don't fight over fleeting symbols. What we really need to be doing is figuring out what we as humans want to transform into.

We must introspect, explore, and then transform. So there was a reply to this that I thought that resonated with me, which was that it seems that in the next 10, 20 years, returns on labor will go down because there's sort of machine replacements for labor, which humans have been replacing labor with machines forever. So we still don't know exactly if we'll just create a bunch of new fake jobs.

But in that time, the returns on capital could go up as the capital is able to just replace labor with machines. And so there's this dynamic where maybe there's a temporary spike in the in the value of capital in which case uh you know founders selling some cheeky secondary on the way up to to you know get you know broader exposure yeah the interesting thing here is that it's like this is like a monkey trying to hoard bananas before another monkey invents self-replicating nano swarms like if i was a monkey i actually would want a lot of bananas while americans are building space travel and going to the moon and mars and stuff like it's still better to be as it's still lots of banana or potassium yeah you want a lot of bananas if

you're a monkey and you want to throw a body kit on that banana yeah it would be the terrible thing if we were approaching singularity you had a g63 and you couldn't slap a brabus b700 you know get on it you'd be just sitting there being like all right like i guess it's over yeah it'd be brutal uh do we have any other promoted posts we need to go through i i'm uh all right let's do a bucket poll and then we gotta actually we really have to hit the gym okay uh bucket poll from commute cremeux he says this is the best example i've ever seen of an exception that Let's do a bucket poll and then we got to actually, we really have to hit the gym. Okay. A bucket poll from Camus. He says, this is the best example I've ever seen of an exception that proves the rule. And he posts a photo of a previous post.

What are some of the best examples of an exception proving a rule? Adam Ondra is an oddly good climber for being so tall. He's six foot one. And that's the exception to the rule. He happens to just have a really long neck on the body of a shorter person, proving what square cubed law tells us, the rule incorrectly a lot where they'll just be like, Oh, like, you know, uh, there's this one example that doesn't stick in with the pattern and therefore it's the exception that proves the rule. But that's not actually what that phrase means. Like in this, in this example, it's like, he's, he's, it's not that he's tall, but it's because he just has a long neck, and he actually has a short body, and so he's a great climber. He's got that extra visibility up there.

Yeah, and so I just thought it was very fascinating. I need to see a picture. Oh, yeah, you can see the picture. He has a huge neck. It's crazy. He definitely has the body of a 5'6 guy or 5'8 guy. He's really built up. I don't think the long way it helps him like but it's most important that he's just it means

sitting with uh michael phelps he has a really long torso like a tree neck like a tree like yeah it's crazy crazy yeah that's insane but yeah i thought that was i thought it was fascinating i was trying to think of like i've been trying to be on really high alert for people that use that phrase incorrectly. You know, you can say like, Oh, like most like the, like the, uh, like the, the, what makes a great entrepreneur? Like, Oh, like they all have like rough childhoods. But like, I found one example of someone that didn't have a rough childhood, but maybe that's the exception that proves the rule. Like, that's not an example of that. It would be, it would be an exception that proves the rule. If they had a rough, but maybe that's the exception that proves the rule like that's not an example of that it would be it would be an exception that proves the rule if they had a rough if they didn't have a rough childhood but then they had something else that was like a rough childhood yeah oh yeah

when they went to college they got like hazed a ton and it simulated that and so really they did have a struggle or something yeah uh and uh uh and and so uh it's just it's just a funny like like phrase that i i'd heard and i sensed that people were misunderstanding but this is a great concrete example of using it properly yeah which i really like yeah uh so that's a great way to end the show have a great you guys tomorrow and please leave us five stars and when you go and leave us a review drop an ad for your company a friend's company or just a company you like yeah this is a great day. We'll see you guys tomorrow. And please leave us five stars. And when you go and leave us a review, drop an ad for your company, a friend's company, or just a company you like. Yeah, this is a great way to surprise a friend

because if we run an ad for your review, we can also clip the video. And so do it as a surprise for your friend's company. Maybe you're applying to a job somewhere. Promote that company. Send them the clip. Look, I'm already driving shareholder value for you. There we go. Criminal for you not to hire great idea let's do that let's do it

see you tomorrow's reviews see you tomorrow bye