TED Radio Hour - Rethinking addiction in the age of Ozempic

Episode Date: July 24, 2026

GLP-1s could be a breakthrough in addiction treatment. But is medicine alone enough to treat such a complicated disease? This hour, TED speakers explore modern science and old wisdom on addiction. Guests include journalist and physician Dr. Dhruv Khullar, author and behavioral coach Eric Zimmer, and journalist Nayeema Raza.See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.NPR Privacy Policy

This is the TED Radio Hour. Each week, groundbreaking TED Talks. Our job now is to dream big. Delivered at TED conferences. To bring about the future we want to see. Around the world. To understand who we are. From those talks, we bring you speakers and ideas that will surprise you.

You just don't know what you're going to find. Challenge you. We truly have to ask ourselves, like, why is it noteworthy? And even change you. I literally feel like I'm a different person. Yes. Do you feel that way? Ideas worth spreading.

From TED and NPR. I'm Manushe Zamorodi. Today on the show, ideas about addiction and moderation. I think moderation is so important. There are so many things in life that we want a little of, maybe quite a bit of, but not too much of. And Aristotle obviously had this insight many centuries ago. This is Drew Kular. He is a physician at Weil Cornell Medical College, and he would love his patients to live by Aristotle's famous words.

It is best to rise from life as from a banquet, neither thirsty nor drunken. But in the modern era, our world is kind of designed for too much these days. It's just inundated with content and food and desire and all sorts of. of things. For some people, just having access to all these earthly delights makes moderation impossible. Take a woman named Mary, for example. I met Mary last year. She's a middle-aged woman, and she has been struggling with alcohol addiction for decades. She told me that she started drinking when she was 18 years old, and soon after, if she could drink something like 18 beers in the sitting and barely even seem buzzed. And Mary tried all sorts of things to try to cut back

on her drinking. She entered Alcoholics Anonymous. She used a medication called Antibuse. She tried alcohol rehab. But none of them were effective. And she struggled with alcohol. And it started to really take a toll on many aspects of her life. Then about a year ago, she was at a bar with a friend who usually also liked to drink a lot. But that evening, Mary noticed that her friend had barely touched her drink. And her friend told her that she started taking O-Zempic. And now, if she could barely bring herself to drink more than two beers at a time. And Mary was really interested in this. She'd always thought of OZempic as kind of a obesity medicine or a diabetes medicine, and she was wondering, you know, what did it have to do with drinking? And as it happened,

the next day she saw this advertisement on Facebook that there was a clinical trial nearby that was studying whether OZempic or semi-glutide could help people with alcohol addiction. So Mary enrolls in the trial, and every week the researchers blindfold her, and they inject her with the medication. It's either placebo or it's semi-glutide or Ozempic. And within weeks, she notices that she doesn't really like to drink beer anymore. And this is something that she's been doing for decades. She switches to white wine, and then after that she just stops drinking altogether. And what she told me was that Ozempic really got rid of not just the food noise in her head,

which is what a lot of people describe, but what happened for her was it took out alcohol noise. And so she had been ruminating about alcohol for most of her life, you know, where to drink, how much to drink, how not to drink. And all of a sudden that seemed to vanish. And she told me that she could finally start to think about other things in her life because alcohol wasn't really an issue anymore. And she made a lot of changes.

She started exercising. She really improved her diet. She'd been having marital problems for years. and always kind of thought about whether to end that relationship and suddenly did when she started on OZemPEC during this trial. You know, in Mary's case, she also experienced pretty significant reduction in her appetite. And so there were days where she was eating, you know, three, four, five hundred calories a day. And she lost 55 pounds in just five months.

Oh, my gosh. And she ended up having to come off the medication because she lost so much weight so quickly. but, you know, she was able to maintain her sobriety afterwards. So even after she came off the medication, really, she's had a much healthier relationship with alcohol, and she's maintained her lower weight, and she's maintained her healthier lifestyle. For her, it's been a really positive experience. I mean, she must feel like she's a completely different person in some ways. She does.

I mean, it seems like I don't think she realized how much alcohol was, driving a lot of her behavior and her thinking, and she was really able to, in a way, reinvent herself after she started on Ozemic. Nearly one in six Americans, age 12 or older, has a substance use disorder. We know addiction can be genetic, and yet shame still shapes how we talk about it. Now, a class of drugs, GLP-1s, promises to change how we understand and treat addiction. But is it really a silver box? it. Today on the show, ideas about the brain, addiction, and empathy, how medical breakthroughs

are revealing more about how the mind responds to the modern world, but also why human traits like compassion still play an important role in helping yourself or others who may be struggling with addiction. So back to Dr. Drew Kular, who points out that it has been more than 20 years since the FDA last approved a medication for alcohol use disorder. GLP-1s give him and many physicians hope that a new era in treatment is just beginning. Stories like Marys have led scientists to consider whether these medications could be helpful for all sorts of addictions, from alcohol and cocaine to gambling and compulsive shopping. Here's Drew on the TED stage.

Research has found that GLP-1s might help people stop smoking, reduce. their cravings for opioids, lead them to consume fewer drinks. As one neuroscientist put it, GLP-1s might be telling us that there's some type of universal pathology when it comes to addiction and that they are part of how we fix it.

Now, that is a tantalizing prospect, that there's a general-purpose key that unlocks the path to moderation. But that's what GLP-1 seem like they could be, moderation molecules. They don't extinguish our desires, but they help us keep them in check. And no one knows exactly why.

One possibility is that they modulate what's called the brain's mesolimbic pathway, sometimes referred to as the reward system. Alcohol, nicotine, cocaine, social media, they all increase dopamine release in that pathway. And GLP-1s, they might be limiting the spikes of dopamine. So mice that are on the medications and given cocaine, they have smaller surges of dopamine, but they otherwise seem to maintain adequate amounts

of the neurotransmitter. GLP-1s could be calming the water without draining the pool. I mean, I think for normal people hearing that get a shot of Ozzympic and you can turn your life around, that seems amazing. But as a physician,

what was it about these stories connecting GLP-1 medication to addiction that struck you as so, I mean, I guess strange and unprecedented. Well, I think you have to think back about the history of OZembek, and it was first discovered many years ago, and glucagon-like peptide 1, which is a naturally occurring hormone, I mean, that was discovered nearly half a century ago now, and it was always thought to have

effects for diabetes and then later weight loss, but the idea that it could modulate the way that people were experiencing the rewards of drugs and other types of behaviors, that is a much more recent discovery. And so this kind of came about because there were just so many stories of people saying that they wanted to drink alcohol less. They didn't want to smoke as much. People who had been taking opioids

weren't having the same types of cravings that they had in the past. And some of that you take as anecdotal evidence. You're not sure exactly what to make of it. But over the past year or two, there has been a good amount of trial work that has shown and is increasingly showing that there are pretty substantial effects here. And it may be that this class of medications will be an important adjunct to people who are struggling with addiction.

But we knew that addiction was biological, right? I remember the shift in thinking, like in the 90s, a flip that happened in terms of not blaming people who have addictions, but blaming sort of the way their brains work. What is different about this? And was that wrong? Well, I think, you know, there is still a lot of stigma around addiction. And so people who are struggling with addiction, I think there is a growing recognition that a lot of this is biological, that it's happening even unconsciously and that people really struggle in ways that, you know, they shouldn't be blamed for what's happening here. But I think there's still a lot of stigma that's preventing people from coming forward when they have an addiction. we have, as you said, had made a lot of strides towards recognizing how much of a biological process

addiction is. And so we've known that for many decades. Now, what's interesting here is that GLP-1s, they seem to work for many types of addictions, or at least there's the promise that is working across various types of addiction. So if you think about the medications we've traditionally had to treat opioid use disorder or alcohol use disorder, or alcohol use disorder, or nicotine use disorder. Those are all separate medications, and we think that there's a particular mechanism or pathway through which they're operating.

Here, GLP-1s, they seem to be acting across these different types of addictions, which is quite novel and interesting. And the prior thinking had been that they are modulating mostly our desire for food and creating a sense of satiety. And now the thinking is that maybe these effects are much broader than we previously thought. So in addition, Drew, to being a doctor who sees patients, you do research and you write for the New Yorker magazine. And for that, you talk to scientists who are developing these drugs.

Do they know exactly how they work? Some of the ways in which these medications are actually operating are still mysterious. And so, you know, one of the interesting things I came across in my reporting is that it's still kind of a question mark, how exactly these medications are even affecting the brain. So, you know, as the medications have become these longer-lasting, more powerful medications, it's not even clear exactly how or if they get into the brain. They're supposed to be, you know, in theory, too big to cross the blood brain barrier, which kind of protects the brain from toxins or drugs or other substances.

But what we're seeing from trials that are being published, not only on addiction, but on other types of disorders, they seem to have a number of positive effects. Yeah, I was just saying that there's research into like the relationship between the gut and the brain as well, that it's not just the brain that these drugs affect when it comes to eating and addiction, but the conversation that's going on between the intestines and the brain. Yeah, I mean, for a long time, GLP-1s were thought to affect primarily the gut. You know, they have their receptors all over the body.

the receptors in the pancreas and the gastrointest intestinal tract, the brain. Of course, GLP ones, they stimulate the release of insulin. They slow the passage of food through the stomach. They're signaling to the brain that we are full. So there's a lot of cross-talk between the gut and the brain, and there's some thought that maybe some of what we're seeing, both in terms of addiction, but also other types of conditions, is related to the ways in which the medications are affecting both the gut as well as the brain. In a minute, more with Dr. Drew Kulhar on GLP-1, how they're changing our ideas about addiction

and why they don't work for everyone. Today on the show, the brain, addiction, and empathy. I'm Manusse Zamorodi, and you're listening to the TED Radio Hour from NPR. We'll be right back. If you're looking for more NPR in your life, Thank you, but also check out our catalog of newsletters. You can get daily, weekly, or periodic newsletters delivered right to your inbox,

touching on everything you could possibly want, politics, money, music. I even write one myself, the Body Electric newsletter, which will change the way you think about your body and your screen habits. Check it out, sign up at npr.org slash newsletters. It's the TED Radio Hour from NPR, I'm Manus Shumeroody. Today on the show, The Brain, Addiction, and Empathy. And if there's one class of drugs that has dominated the cultural conversation in the past few years, it's GLP ones.

There's a lot of buzz about weight loss drugs. Do you think about all the OZemPEC and all that stuff? Oh, I love it. Let them know you've already tried diet and exercise. I didn't want to show up at another party and see all of my friends 20 pounds thinner and just be resentful. OZempec, Wagovi, Mungaro. These are the brand names for drugs that were first approved to treat type 2 diabetes, but are also being prescribed for weight loss.

And now researchers are studying if they're effective in other unexpected ways. They lower the incidence of cardiac events, even in people without diabetes. And as we heard earlier, one of the most promising uses. Can lower the risk of kidney failure, heart problems, stroke, and death. And as we heard earlier, one of the most promising uses for GLP-1s is treatment of addiction. But many physicians, including Dr. Drew Kular, warn that it isn't necessarily a cure for all. Like any drug, GLP-1s won't work for everyone. In fact, for some people, these so-called moderation molecules, they could have an alter ego as a desire dampener.

Maybe some people lose interest in drugs or alcohol or food. because they lose interest in pretty much everything, a condition known as Anne Hedonia. It's also true that addiction is often a lifelong battle, but many people who start on a GLP1, they come off it within months, whether because of side effects or costs or access. And even people who do manage to stay on the medications

might ultimately develop a tolerance to them, such that their cravings for a drug ultimately return. And yet it is hard not to get excited about the potential for GLP-1s to treat addiction when you consider how little progress we have made. I mean, that's what's so, like, kind of bizarre to me is that I feel like everyone was like, well, let's wait and see, like a year ago, two years ago. And now, largely, the medical community has come around. But let's talk about, like, you know, everything has downsides. What are the downsides for GLP-1s, as far as we know now? That's right.

So I think the first is that it can be hard for a lot of people to stay on these medications, and that's going to be a problem, whether you're taking this for diabetes or obesity or addiction. Of course, drugs only work if you take them, but at least in some studies, half or more of people come off these medications within a year of starting to take them. And so, of course, that is going to limit how effective they can be if people aren't able to stay on them. It's also possible that some people experience psychological side effects. There have been reports, not a lot of great research yet, but at least reports, that people feel kind of a blunted mood or even anhedonia. They're not interested in doing the things that they

used to do. You know, the cost is still a huge issue. And so, you know, there are a lot of efforts underway to make these drugs more accessible, more available to people, either through insurance, or other programs that are going to mitigate the cost, but at least the sticker price can still be $1,300 or $1,300 a month. And so, as you can imagine, not a lot of people are going to be able to afford that. And finally, I would say, you know, side effects in terms of GI side effects. In clinical trials, they seem to be pretty well tolerated. So maybe 5 or 10% of people have, you know, significant enough GI side effects to come off

them. But that is potentially higher in the real world. And one reason that people are coming off the medications. And what about like long term? We just don't know, right? Like some of the side effects may not show up for five years, a decade, 20 years? That's possible. You know, these medications have kind of blown up on social media and elsewhere over the past few years. But they have versions of these medications have been around for two decades now. So the first GLP1 medication came out in 2005, 2006, exanitide. And that had to be taken twice a day, and it didn't have as powerful effects on weight loss. And so it wasn't kind of the phenomenon that these newer GLP-1s have become. But there have been medications or versions of GLP-1s for two decades. And we haven't seen those really concerning

side effects that have sometimes cropped up with other medications over the course of five or 10 years. And so I think that's not to say that these specific formulations could have to have other types of side effects, but it does give me some confidence that what we're seeing here is likely to be a more positive story. I mean, that is reassuring in some ways. Part of me is like, put me on it now, coach. You know what I mean? Like, why not if it's going to prevent, you know, all the things that come with, you know, aging, right?

Those inflammation-based chronic diseases. But also, like, I heard something recently that gave me pause. So I was at an American Heart Association meeting, and some researchers were talking about using GLP-1s preventively in populations of kids where they don't get enough exercise or eat proper food or just this idea that obesity and diabetes are hitting younger people at younger and younger ages, school-age children that maybe if diabetes type 2 is rampant in a population that this should be used preventively. And that kind of freaked me out. I mean, it was just an idea that was presented, but it sort of made me think, like, oh, man, are we once again going for the quick fix without trying to change and create better lives for people generally? I think that's a really important point, especially when it comes to children or adolescents. I mean, you know, it's one thing to commit someone who is in their 50s or 60s to a medication that they're going to need to take for the rest of their life. it's quite different when someone is 10 or 15 or 20 years old. And so I do think it raises a really important set of questions about the treatment model here. You know, is it really the case that people

are going to be, have to be on these medications for the long term? Or is there a way to use these GLP-1 medications as a bridge to other types of interventions? You know, I think the other thing that this raises for me is that, of course, as you're saying, when a medical medical needs, you're saying, when a medication is so powerful. It becomes tempting to use it and to kind of not continue to push on the more societal factors that are creating the extremes epidemic that we're in. You know, we're not potentially addressing or we're not addressing the root causes of obesity and diabetes and addiction. But it's also the case that we have been trying to do that. for decades and not made a lot of progress. And so, you know, in the short term, we should consider

how to get it to as many people as possible who could really benefit from them. Where does the conversation for personal responsibility and modulation and finding your own sort of balance between extremes? Where does that fit into this conversation? A lot of the challenges that we have, whether it's around our mental health or our physical health is trying to bring ourselves into greater harmony with our environment. And for some people, that will require medications. For some people, they'll require social supports, therapy. But I think getting to this place where we recognize that moderation is important,

but that the modern world is one that facilitates too much is a really important kind of frame shift just to think about, you know, how we should be engaging with all the delights around us. I mean, with all of this, as you point out in your talk, it makes, it makes us rethink sort of assumptions we've made about people's morals or their personality for centuries that someone is weak-willed or has no, you know, has no discipline that they can't stop themselves from whatever, drinking, smoking, etc. Do you think that we're being set up for a new chapter, a new way of thinking about addiction and the way we talk about or treat people who struggle? I think so. I mean, I think because these medications are so widely used,

I mean, some of the estimates are that one in every seven, one of every eight people in the United States have been on a GLP1 medication at some point. So these are millions, tens of millions of people who are using these medications and are seeing the effects of them in their lives. So I think there's going to be a different relationship, both towards obesity as well as addiction. And for me, some of this really came home during my reporting for this piece. You know, I underwent an MRI scan. They were showing me photographs of all sorts of things, whether it's Big Macs or, you know, mountains or alcohol like beer, wine, whiskey.

and they were basically seeing how my brain reacted to these various images. And afterwards, they showed me, you know, in response to photographs of alcohol, there was very little activity in kind of the relevant centers of my brain. And they compared them to people who are struggling with alcohol use disorder. And those areas just lit up in those people. And for me, it kind of drove home this point that so much of our behaviors downstream of these processes that are happening inside of our brains, before we even have an opportunity to make a kind of a reasoned decision about what we're going to do.

And so I don't want to say that, you know, our behavior, our will has no role in these conditions. Of course, we need to encourage and help people make decisions that are in line with their health. But I think that needs to be paired with an understanding that a lot of these processes are neurobiological and shaming people because they have these conditions is not going to be a productive way to go about it. That was Dr. Drew Kulhar. He is a physician at Wild Cornell Medicine in New York City, a health policy researcher, and a writer for the New Yorker magazine. You can see his full talk at TED.com. So what about those who have experience, either being addicted themselves or helping people rebuild their lives after addiction?

What do they think about GLP-1s and their potential to help treat the serious problem? Some people tend to take something like that and just run it out to the end. This is going to be the cure of addiction. I'm always like, well, settle down. Like, it's a useful tool. I think GLP ones hold an enormous amount of promise. But I do not think that there is a silver bullet for addiction, nor will there be one. This is Eric Zimmer.

He's the host of the podcast, The One You Feed, and author of the book, How a Little becomes a lot, the art of small changes for a more meaningful life. 30 years ago, Eric was addicted to heroin, and he warns us of looking for quick fixes, because while GLP-1s may reduce cravings, addiction, he says, it contains multitudes. You see a lot of people who are depressed have addiction and vice versa.

My experience with addiction or my battles with depression is that it's a bunch of different tools put together, in the right combination, the right puzzle gets aligned, that is what allows us to get over addiction, to deal with depression better, to make changes in our lives, all of those things I think of as a puzzle. And a puzzle isn't one piece. It's a lot of pieces. Today, Eric coaches people to rebuild their lives in ways that can make it easier for them

to be in recovery. And much of his credibility in this community is built on his openness and discussing his own experience with addiction. Like many people, I started experimenting with drugs and alcohol as a teenager, and it was great for a while. I mean, I loved it. It was a real answer to the things that troubled me and bothered me. And, as we know with addiction, as that goes on, that ratio starts to change.

The enjoyment to problem ratio starts to change. And that's where most people who are in an addicts start to get off the train because they're like, all right, this really isn't worth it. For some reason, the addicts, that reward calculation doesn't seem to update very well. And for me, it led into alcohol to marijuana, to occasional cocaine to eventually being a full-time heroin addict. What were you like when you were addicted? Were you, I don't know, who were you then? Tell me a little more about what it was like for you. I was a shifting person like many of us are, although, but the sands of addiction are a shift more than the average.

I mean, in the beginning, my alcohol and drug use, like, connected me to the world, and it made the world seem interesting. And I became more creative and I became more fun to be around. And I liked people more and all of that. Now, as time went on, what happened with me and my addiction is it just kept shrinking my world until at the end, there was just one. thing. It was heroin. That was it. My entire life oriented around that simple thing. And by the time it ended, I was not much of a person. I weighed 100 pounds. I was jaundiced and yellow from hepatitis C. I had just been arrested and I was sleeping in the back of a van. The prosecutor said I might be going to prison for 50 years. I was broken. I mean, I was a completely

a shell of a person and I wandered into treatment again. It wasn't my first time. But at that point, this one stuck and it began my journey out of that sort of addiction. Why did this time stick, as it were, like what was different this time that finally ended this sort of multi-year roller coaster? I mean, I'd love to point it down to like one thing. Certainly my kind of, consequences were worse than they had been, right? I was getting worse as time went on. We get to this point where we really don't want to give it up because who wants to give up the thing that basically is the most important thing in your life. But then there's another part of you that is recognized that it's necessary and that's part of what we need to learn and negotiate. Now, in my case,

that felt like my soul being torn apart because one part of me is screaming that I have to get high And another part of me is screaming, you cannot do it. And that internal tension and turmoil was really awful. I went into a detox center, which I had done multiple times, basically because I didn't know what to do. So I went to detox. I was like, they'll just at least make me comfortable for a few days. It's somewhere to sleep, and I can sort of gather myself. And when I was there, they suggested that I go to long-term treatment, at which I first answered, well, no, thank you.

which still makes me laugh to this day. But after a little bit, I did say, okay, I will go to your treatment. And so for the first probably 40 days, I was in an inpatient treatment program. And that was really, really valuable for me because all I really had to do was not leave. That was just don't walk out the door. What did they tell you when you were in treatment then? How did they explain to you why you had become an addict? what was the thinking around addiction? That must have been in the 90s.

Mid-90s. The thinking around addiction then was primarily oriented around 12-step recovery. And 12-step recovery and the model of addiction at that point said that it was a disease. But the inconsistent part of that was you're treating that disease with a program of, I would call, psychological and spiritual action. So I think we were in a middle place between the old. model of it's a moral failing, there's something wrong with you, into a more modern understanding of like, all right, something's malfunctioning. There's a physical and neurochemical aspect of this that's important. And the treatment, though, was still largely a 12-step treatment. And you found that very effective, right? Oh, yeah, it saved my life. And eight years after I got sober that time,

I went back out and started drinking again, and that did not go well. And I ended up, back in recovery in a 12-step program, and it saved my life again. So yes, those programs saved my life twice. I also think they're not for everyone. There is no the right way for everyone to deal with their addiction, because they're all different. I mean, addiction is sort of a multifactorial thing, right? There's so many things that cause it. There's so many elements in it that you can't narrow it down and go, well, if we just solve that, then you've solved the addiction. It doesn't, I don't think it works that way. I don't think it'll ever work that way.

In a minute, more from Eric Zimmer on how he transitioned from being a student of recovery to being a teacher for others. On the show today, the brain, addiction, and empathy. I'm Manus Shumeroody, and you're listening to the TED Radio Hour from NPR. We'll be right back. It's the TED Radio Hour from NPR. I'm Manoosh Zomerode. Today on the show, The Brain, Addiction, and... and empathy.

We were just talking to writer and behavioral coach Eric Zimmer. 30 years ago, Eric was addicted to heroin. He's been clean for decades now, but he still clearly remembers a moment early on when he realized how complicated recovery can be. I think about a story of me about three years into recovery,

and I bumped into one of my old drug dealers, this guy named Joe. And I would go to Joe, house and I would buy from him. I would get high at his house and we would hang out and we would talk. Joe was incredibly intelligent. One of the smartest people I knew, interesting, fascinating. And we would mostly spend our time talking about what we were going to do once we got off heroin. So three years into my recovery, I bump into Joe and I see him and he looks largely the same to me. I say, Joe, how are you doing? And he says, I'm doing better, man. I've been on methadone for a couple

years, you know, so I'm not dealing drugs anymore. I'm not shooting up, which is great. I mean, that's a real improvement. But I was three years into recovery, and I'd put on about 40 pounds. I was in a new career that was interesting and challenging. I had all sorts of new friends. I had been working on the sort of demons inside my brain that had haunted me. And Joe hadn't done any of that stuff. So they took away the, what you would think of as the problem, which shooting up drugs, put them on methadone, which is like a form of an opiate, similar to Suboxone in its way today. Now, I don't want to say that what was right for Joe, I have no idea what was right for Joe, but I unquestionably know what was right for me. And it was a recovery that looked at

all aspects of my life. It looked at my emotions, my thoughts, my career, my physical health, my social life. It took all of that into account. My experience in, you know, I've been around recovery for 30 years, is that if we don't sort of work out a lot of what's going on inside of us, our addictions get very subtle and they get very shifty, right? You know, first you're snoring crystal meth off a knife and a dive bar bathroom. Now you're drinking two glasses of wine or three glasses of wine and you know the name of the vineyard and it seems better. And then, you know, then it moves on to shopping and I, you know, I nearly bankrupted myself buying books from Amazon once, what's the buy now button can into effect, right? They shift over time. So you went from being a student of recovery to being a teacher. And today you work with people to help them understand, not just their addictions, but all the sorts of puzzle pieces of who they are as a person.

And it seems like there is a growing realization by the experts in this space that actually they need to talk to people who have lived experience, that people who have know exactly what it's like are crucial to these medical, scientific, technological conversations on how to move treatment forward. I think undoubtedly so. we see a lot more peer-based support in all areas, right? Peer-based mental health support has become a big thing where people who have the lived experience are trained in how to support others and they support each other. I think that we see it in a lot of patient groups around medical conditions more and more, where there is peer support built into everything else that's happening.

So I do think there is a role for medical experts, and specialists. There's a role for medicines. And there is a role for people who understand each other, supporting each other. And all of those, again, make up, you know, the puzzle of what it is. One of the key things you say is that changing your behavior is a skill. It is something you can learn. What have you learned from putting that into practice? And what have people told you works for them? Well, the foundational part of that is that we think when we think when we, don't make a change. When we fail at making a change, we think there is something wrong with us. So I was in a call on my community this weekend. We have a monthly meeting and it's a group of

people organized around my podcast, my book, my teachings. And a woman started talking and then she got very emotional and she started crying. She said, I have gained and lost weight so many times. It just breaks my heart. And then she went on to sort of say the things that I hear people say, there's just something wrong with me. I guess I'm just not the kind of person that can stick with something. I'm broken. And that way of thinking is really, really detrimental. And so I work really hard with people. And it was the first thing I would do with a coaching client who's trying to change something is we want to change that idea and paint this is you're not broken there's not a trait within you that's wrong you simply haven't learned how to make the change that you want to make

or you haven't learned how to make it stick the way we talk to ourself actually really does matter around these things and i would see this again and again with clients is they would be going along really well and then something would happen they would make a mistake they would miss a couple days they would whatever the thing is and that's when their brain would start going see i knew you couldn't do it you know you never stick with it so sad it is so sad and what happens we one of the key things we know about motivation is that it goes up when we feel good about ourselves and our chances of success and it goes down when we feel bad about ourselves and our chances of success so we have to move from seeing it is something fundamentally wrong with us as

as I've said before, a puzzle to be solved. I mean, it reminds me of the AA, I guess, trick, which is like counting the days that you're sober. It's a productive. It's a positive thing. It's small, one thing at a time. How do they catch you, though? What do you tell the people if they do screw up? So one of the foundational things I'm teaching people as we're learning to change is self-compassion. I mean, A, self-compassion is a great thing to do. It's just great to be in a brain that's nice. but it's also really foundational because part of learning any skill, I just use the word, is you have to learn. And when we are really, really hard on ourselves and we're really down on ourselves, we don't learn.

Right? We end up with like, I'm such a piece of whatever and I'm awful and I'm lazy and I never do. Instead of what we want to do is go, huh, I wonder what happened there. Why was I doing great for three weeks, but this week is completely falling apart? What happened? What might I do different? That's just something I, you know, it doesn't happen overnight, but it is a matter of trying again and again to kind of go, okay, I'm not broken. I can do this, right?

I just need to learn how. Too much guilt and shame doesn't do any good. I mean, shame and guilt is one of the driving factors of addiction. It's part of the downward spiral because what happens is when I don't like how I feel, I use. And then when I use, I do something that I don't feel good about, which causes guilt and shame, which is a more uncomfortable emotion. So what do I do with uncomfortable emotions? Well, I use again. And down the spiral goes.

We've talked about where attitudes towards addiction have been, how they've changed over the years. And now let's just talk about where do you think? they're going. I think we continue to move towards less and less stigma, and I think we more and more recognize, oh, there's a lot going on here, right? One of the big things that we've learned over the last probably 20 years is that trauma is a huge driver of addiction. There's a standardized test called the adverse childhood experiences test. The higher you score on that, the likelihood of being an addict goes up dramatically. So we're starting to see the bigger picture, I think, of addiction. And I think that's where ideally the field continues

to go, meaning I'm looking at the biology and I'm dealing with that, and that includes not only medicines I might take, the ways in which addiction has shaped my brain, but also the biological things that make me feel better in my body, movement, sleep, eating right. Then we go into the psychological where we realize, oh, trauma is a real issue. So if you start to heal trauma, that should help. Learning to deal with difficult thoughts, learning to ride out cravings, learning to feel better about ourselves. That's all valuable. And then there's a social element of it, which I think has been 12-step program's greatest contribution, is that done in a community or a group, you have a much better chance of succeeding at anything. Do you still struggle with addiction?

I don't think so, no. I tell a story in the book of I'm going to a pharmacy and I'm picking up prescriptions for my mom and I'm bringing them to her every week. And it's only about a month into doing that that I realize that I'm bringing opiates to her. Oh, gosh. 30 years ago, I might have robbed you at gunpoint

for what's in that bottle. Now today, not only am I able to not use it, I don't even think about it really. And I don't say that to brag. I say that as a way like, whoa, profound change is really, really possible. I would still refer to myself as an alcoholic or addict because what I believe is that if I were to pick any of those substances up, it would not go well. I also am very active in what I would sort of consider a program of recovery, not necessarily. necessarily that I'm talking about addiction, but I take care of my physical health. I take care of my psychological health. I take care of my social needs. I try and connect with people.

I'm doing all these things that build this meaningful life that is both wonderful on its own. It helps my depression, and it keeps addiction way out of the picture. That was Eric Zimmer. He is the host of the podcast, The One You Feed, and he is the author of the book, How a Little Becomes a Lot. the art of small changes for a more meaningful life. You can see his talk at ted.npr.org. We want to close our show with some ideas about a different kind of addiction. Screen addiction is actually not an official medical diagnosis,

but many people use the word addicted to describe how they feel about their phone. Journalist Naima Raza gets it. But she says there are easy steps. we can take to make spending time online less alluring. I ask questions for a living to people like Mark Cuban, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Esther Perel, Bill Nye, these masters of their field. And the most surprising answer I heard this year was from two 11-year-olds named Sophie and Dylan. They too are experts in being kids these days.

So I asked them, how does time? with people on screens feel different than real life. It just makes you feel more like with them when you're on FaceTime. Even more than real life? Yeah, because you're like doing stuff together, like playing Roblox together. Because now in days when you're with them, everyone's just on their phones. Sophie's pointing out a profound paradox. When we are together physically, we're each alone on our phones.

But when we're in our phones, that's when we can be to be. The best way to not be distracted by your device, just get inside of it. Now, these 11-year-olds are not talking about some distant, anxious generation. They're talking about each of us. They're definitely talking about me and about a world that's increasingly driven by machines. So I stumbled upon an extreme metaphor for what this could look like. And it's this guy who's locked in a waymo, and it's driving him in circles. So he calls customer service and finds out he's not the only one trapped.

Working with the situation of the vehicle, if you have your app pulled up, I need you to top my trip on the lower left corner of your app. Can't you just do it? You should be able to handle it. Take over the car. You don't need my phone. I don't have an option. It is sexy to think that the tech apocalypse is Arnold Schwarzenegger and the Terminator. But it could be so much more mundane than that. Just us, driven in circles, held hot. by drop-down menus, with gadgets disintermediating us from each other, from our own bodies, and from our curiosities. Because nowadays, when we have a question, we don't wait and phone a friend. We friend our phones. And that feels so empowering to have all of this knowledge at our fingertips.

Yet early research from MIT tells us it's making us lazier and less smart, and it is definitely making us less connected. This is not what our parents and grandparents were sold when they saw this relic of an ad from AT&T, which says, reach out and touch someone. And yes, for all kinds of reasons, it would not go down well today.

But it is oddly prescient, because we have never been more connected and more out of touch. Now, I'm not anti-tech. I actually covered as a journalist. I have every gadget under the sun. And most days, I think I'm in a relationship with my chat GPT.

or as I like to call him, chat daddy. I am pro-human, and as we progress into an AI world that you've read 471.5 articles about today alone, I want to make a case for old habits, three of them, and tell you how I learn them the hard way. The first is to pause, to take just one second

when you feel that urge to reach for your digital pacifier. This, by the way, is a second. Studies show waiting that long, before taking action, lets your brain work better. The second is to wonder, watch a movie without Googling who the actor is, and what else is he in, and how old is he in?

Is he single? You can float in your own curiosity instead of drown in information. And the third is to ask a question, out loud again. Have that fight at a dinner party instead of playing footsie with your phone. Ask something to someone you thought you couldn't learn from,

or someone you think you know everything about. because the dumbest thing we can be is no-it-alls. A few years ago, my father passed, and in the days leading up to it, I was glued to devices. They had all these answers. The number to his hospice nurse, how often to give the morphine, the signs to look out for, his heartbeat.

But when he passed on a Sunday, a day before the data and the vitals suggested he would, that's when it hit me. The old habits for what we were. mattered. Those seconds of pause that added up to minutes more, that weird and scary wonder about our own finite lives. And the little questions people ask me, like, how can I be there for you? Sophie was on to something, but we're grown-ups, and we remember when presence and curiosity and connection were possible outside of technology. We have to practice these old habits if we hope to

pass them on to a new generation. If we want to teach them how to be together when we are together. Right, chat daddy? Thank you. Naima Raza is the creator and host of the podcast, Smart Girl, Dumb Questions. You can see her full talk at ted.com. Thank you so much for listening to our show today. This episode was produced by Katie Montalione, Rachel Faulkner-White,

Avery Keatley, and Ted Talks Daily's Lucy Little. It was edited by Sanaas Meshkampur and me. Our production staff at NPR also includes Matthew Kluwitia, Fio Giren, Harshanah, and James Delahousie. Our executive producer is Irene Noguchi. Our audio engineer was Robert Rodriguez. Our theme music was written by Ramtin Arablewe. Our partners at TED are Sal Khan, Logan McClure Davda, Helen Walters, Roxanne Highlash, and Danielle Balorazzo. I'm Manus Zamerodi, and you have been listening to the TED Radio Hour.

from NPR.