TED Talks Daily - How to fight (and win) an information war | Peter Pomerantsev

Episode Date: October 11, 2024

How do you reach people trapped in a reality shaped by propaganda? Exploring the dark psychology of disinformation, author and academic Peter Pomerantsev draws on lessons from a forgotten Wor...ld War II operation to suggest strategies for cutting through misinformation and rebuilding trust in facts today.

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 TED Audio Collective. You're listening to TED Talks Daily, where we bring you new ideas to spark your curiosity every day. I'm your host, Elise Hu. One of the most vexing problems in the world today is one of trust and information. Entire swaths of populations believe in an alternate reality, even in the face of facts.
Starting point is 00:00:28 In his 2024 talk, journalist Peter Pomerantsev sheds light on how to fuse forgotten research with technology to help break through echo chambers and propaganda in a way that has proven to work. Coming up after a sponsor message. Support for this show comes from Airbnb. If you know me, you know I love staying in Airbnbs when I travel. They make my family feel most at home when we're away from home.
Starting point is 00:01:01 As we settled down at our Airbnb during a recent vacation to Palm Springs, I pictured my own home sitting empty. Wouldn't it be smart and better put to use welcoming a family like mine by hosting it on Airbnb? It feels like the practical thing to do, and with the extra income, I could save up for renovations to make the space even more inviting for ourselves and for future guests. Your home might be worth more than you think. Find out how much at Airbnb.ca slash host. And now, our TED Talk of the day. How can one engage audiences that seem to be living in an alternative reality?
Starting point is 00:01:37 How do we reach people who seem smitten, besotted with the propaganda of sadistic strongmen? That's the sort of sadistic strongmen. That's the sort of happy stuff that I work on, that I write books about, that I research at university, and that has become very, very personal for me in the last couple of years. I was born in Ukraine, and since the full-scale invasion began, I've been going to Ukraine a lot to work with an NGO called the Reckoning Project to document war crimes and to tell the truth about them to an often skeptical
Starting point is 00:02:13 world. I'm afraid there's a lot of atrocities that we document. I was in the town of Bucha when it was liberated from Russian forces, entered the village to see hundreds of bodies strewn around, being placed in a mass grave. And these people were killed not because a missile landed on them by accident. They were just shot for fun by Russian soldiers just to prove they had the power over them. There was no military sense to this atrocity. And I remember talking to a Ukrainian general as we watched these dead bodies
Starting point is 00:02:52 being piled in to a grave, and he was in shock. He'd liberated the village. But he was also in shock because he'd actually spent a lot of time in Russia itself. He'd actually studied to be a soldier there. He had lots of former students that he'd studied with there, former colleagues. And ever since the war had begun, he'd been calling them saying, please do something to stop this horrific war. And they just throw the phones down. And so many Ukrainians were calling their Russian relatives, their, well, now former friends, and saying, please, do something to stop this war.
Starting point is 00:03:31 At least don't stop your sons from going to fight in this war. And at the other end, they'd hear people who they'd known all their lives answering in the clichés of Russian propaganda, saying, you're making it up, you've made some sort of mistake, or saying, you know, probably your side just bombed itself by accident, or saying, it's all fake, you're making it all up. And on Russian TV at the time, you'd hear these increasingly absurd, you know, propaganda pieces
Starting point is 00:04:00 about atrocities like Butcher. I'll give you one example. After the atrocities of Butcher. I'll give you one example. After the atrocities of Butcher were discovered to the world, mainstream Russian TV, 7 p.m., this is not some sort of kooky YouTube channel, mainstream Russian TV was claiming that the British secret services had engineered a fake atrocity in Butcher. The whole thing was staged. You know why and how they knew it was staged by the British? Because the place was called Butcher,
Starting point is 00:04:33 which in English sounds like butcher, and only the English, this very literary people, would concoct an atrocity in a place which sounded like the word butcher, and that was their proof and people would you know repeat this absurd propaganda and look Russia is an extreme a horrific example of people not wanting to live in reality but I've been living in the US a couple of years and I see quite a lot of it here tens of, maybe more people who seem to genuinely believe that the last election was rigged, despite sort of court cases proving that it wasn't.
Starting point is 00:05:13 So what can we do about it? You know, I'm in a community of researchers, of academics, of journalists, who've been trying many things for the last sort of decade, really. We've tried fact-checking, but we've also found that when facts challenge people's identity, they kind of just bounce off. We've found worthy, we've tried worthy journalism, these great liberal newspapers lecturing people about how important it is to save democracy. I've written many columns like that myself, but I know that I'm preaching to the. But I know that I'm preaching to the converted. I know that I'm within my own, you know, liberal echo chamber, basically. How do we
Starting point is 00:05:51 get beyond that? How can we reach the people who are somehow under the sway of this propaganda? And in a kind of despair, I started to turn to history. Might there be something in history that gives us a clue about what we can do today? And that's how I discovered a very strange and somewhat forgotten story about a covert British operation to subvert Nazi propaganda, perhaps the most or one of the most reality-denying, sadistic, dehumanizing propagandas ever, Nazi propaganda. And it was led by this man. His name was Sefton Delmer. A largely forgotten person, but very, very famous in his day. Sefton Delmer kind of shared a lot of the frustrations that I have. He felt that, you know, at the start of
Starting point is 00:06:45 the Second World War, liberal media, in his case, the German service of the BBC or various kind of like exiled pro-democracy groups who were still trying to communicate with the German people, trying to persuade them not to follow Hitler into his genocidal wars, he felt that they were doing it all wrong. They were lecturing people, a bit like we do today, about how democracy dies in darkness, how we must stop fascism. He felt all of that, just like a lot of media today, is trapped in its own echo chamber, preaching to the converted. He wanted to do something different, and he knew what he was talking about. He'd grown up in Germany. He was British, but he grew up in Germany. He'd then been a journalist in the 1920s inside Germany, and he got very close to the Nazi elites when they were
Starting point is 00:07:38 still rising, and he got to see their propaganda system from inside, and essentially, he could see that it was based on two or three principles which are really very common to strongman propaganda today. The first of these was identification with the leader. What do we mean by that? Look, we often wonder why do people follow leaders who are wildly narcissistic, sadistic, cruel, violent? When people first saw Hitler appear, they thought he was some kind of freak. And yet this freak had a huge following. And Delmar worked out that these leaders were popular because they allow you, they allow their followers to be the narcissistic, sadistic,
Starting point is 00:08:27 cruel people that at some level, many of them, and maybe many of us would sometimes like to be. They were normalizing our most vile feelings. Their very attractiveness was their nastiness. Secondly, he could see how people could sort of sublimate their agency through these leaders. These leaders could be their retribution. Yes, you're giving up a little bit of free will, but you could feel powerful through the leader. And thirdly, this propaganda and these leaders created a sense of community. Germany in the 1920s, a little bit, a little bit like America today, was a place where the old economic order was being destroyed, where the old social norms were in chaos,
Starting point is 00:09:18 where identities were in flux, even gender norms were being questioned. And in this time of exciting for some people, for others, very disturbing change, the Nazis said, we know who you are. You're true Germans. You're better Germans than all these immigrants over here. You're the true people. And we're part of one community, the Nazi folk, the Nazi people. We know who we are and we're together. So Delma realized that in order to subvert the connection between Nazi propaganda and its followers, you had to really climb into the dark operating of human desire,
Starting point is 00:10:02 the place where fact-checking can't really go. And so, based at Woburn Abbey, a rather fabulous British country house near London, he gathered around himself psychiatrists, spies, soldiers, academics, a lot of exiled cabaret artists from the German theater scene. He gathered them together and created this kind of covert media empire. Dozens of radio stations broadcasting into Nazi Germany and the rest of occupied Europe, newspapers, leaflets, this whole kind of factory of psychological subversion. And now back to the episode. Now, we don't have, sadly,
Starting point is 00:10:57 the recordings of all these radio shows. However, we do have the transcripts. And when I realized these transcripts were available, I went delicious. And I started going through them. I just delicious. And I started going through them. I just spent a lot of COVID going through them. And they've been declassified from the British and the American archives. And as I went through these hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of pages, I realized there was kind of a pattern to them.
Starting point is 00:11:21 They were experimenting like crazy. But there is, because this is a TED Talk, three, because always three with TED Talks, there's three basic principles that I think Delma kind of landed on through experimentation. Number one, break the monopoly authoritarian propaganda has on strong emotions. That's the root of their power. So Delmer's media, his radio stations, which were many and different, but they were all a lot unlike the BBC or the New York Times or the Washington Post. They were full of vitriol, anger, a lot of pornography. They were tapping into all the resentments that Germans were starting to feel about their leadership. They were full of these sort of like howls and laments about families that people were losing in the bombardment.
Starting point is 00:12:17 And then blaming the Nazis for not having provided the right air defense. They talk about how the SS, the Nazi elite secret police type units, how they were living this corrupt life while normal German soldiers were suffering. Here's just a little clip from one of the shows. The SS wear the German uniform, but they drag the German name in the mud. They should send them to the Eastern Front. There, everything else but their penis would get stiff. There, they would get an idea how hard the German soldier has to fight for his good name, while the SS clique does not give a shit about it. It was full of expletives as well. There were all these scenes. This is actually the most sort of like, you know, unexrated bit of pornography I could find, which relates kind of like an orgy at an SS man's house. Like SS man Tinaman has a Polish lover at home who's personally in charge of the bamboo canes, twigs, thin and thick leather
Starting point is 00:13:16 straps with which Tinaman and his guests are strafing her fat and large buttocks. And I had to cut it there because it gets quite, it goes on. So, you know, there's a reason to this, yeah? He wants to disrupt the emotional bond that people have to the Nazis. He wants to cover the Nazis in what he called a layer of filth and slime as thick as the Nazis had covered the Jews. But his aim, once he's disrupted that, once he's sort of taken strong emotions back, is to create a space where you can introduce facts to people. He gave people advice about how to fake illness so that they could be sent home from the front. So it wasn't just any facts. It's facts that gave people back their agency, made them less
Starting point is 00:14:07 dependent on their leaders. And thirdly, he fostered alternative communities. If the Nazis gave you a sense of identity, a common sense of being part of the people, the folk, Delmer's shows stressed the church, the army, family, as these alternative bonds that people had. It's a very important thing in his shows. Basically, most of the shows he created would claim to be German shows. They would say, we Germans. They would be hosted by soldiers who'd just become POWs of the British. But the audience was meant to understand perfectly well that these were the British dressed up as Germans. Now, why did Delma do that?
Starting point is 00:14:57 Firstly, it made it safe for people to listen to the shows. If the Gestapo came along, you could say, I had no idea this was subversive. I thought this was German. It was psychologically safer. It was more comfortable for people to hear the word, our soldiers, our boys, than you Germans, you enemy. But even more so, he was saying something else. He was saying, look, we're the English dressed up as Germans, and we understand you, your gripes, your anger, what matters to you better than the Nazis. And if we, your enemies, not in a culture war but in a real war, can understand you better than your bosses,
Starting point is 00:15:33 do you really need them? Are they really looking out for you when they say they're going to be your retribution? Or are they just thinking about themselves? 40% of German soldiers that were surveyed by the British in these little sort of snap polls they did said they listened to this content. So how can we bring that all back to today? Whether we're thinking about reaching Russians,
Starting point is 00:16:00 whether we're thinking about reaching audiences caught up in what some academics call the far right echo chamber. If we take Delma's principles, they are much easier to activate today. We know far more from things like, I don't know, online sentiment analysis. We know far more about what makes people emotional, what things they react to in a visceral way. Delma was just kind of shooting stuff, or literally shooting stuff into the ether. We know that so much more from today's data.
Starting point is 00:16:35 When it comes to finding the facts that people care about, Delma had to do it through partisans, by opening up the letters of Nazi officials. Today, even in a country like Russia, we have nonstop leaks about the corruption of mid-level officials. We can use satellite imagery to understand, essentially, has a road been fixed in a town, and do a story about that.
Starting point is 00:16:59 We have so much more data than Delma had, but do we know how to use it to give people the facts that actually matter to them? And when it comes to fostering communities, there are so many digital tools that we have today that can show how a media is responsive to its audience. I mean, there's a great project called Harken, for example, which algorithmically collects what people care about in a town or a topic and then gets journalists to really focus on the things that they're worried about. And there's so many digital tools that we have. So if we put these things together, the visceral emotion, the data that tells us the facts that people really care about,
Starting point is 00:17:45 the online use of communities, we can do something much more powerful than what Delma did. So, look, I know it's easy to despair. It's easy to despair when you hear people denying atrocities. It's easy to despair when we hear vast swaths of the American population living in an alternative reality. But before we give up, before we surrender, I think we can at least take some of Delma's lessons, fuse them with modern technology, and really, really try to reach them. Thank you.
Starting point is 00:18:22 Thank you. Support for this show comes from Airbnb. If you know me, you know I love staying in Airbnbs when I travel. They make my family feel most at home when we're away from home. As we settled down at our Airbnb during a recent vacation to Palm Springs, I pictured my own home sitting empty. Wouldn't it be smart and better put to use welcoming a family like mine by hosting it on Airbnb? It feels like the practical thing to do, and with the extra income, I could save up for renovations to make the space even more inviting for ourselves and for future guests. Your home might be worth more than you think. Find out how much at airbnb.ca slash host.
Starting point is 00:19:09 That was Peter Pomerantsev at TEDx Mid-Atlantic in 2024. If you're curious about TED's curation, find out more at ted.com slash curation guidelines. And that's it for today. TED Talks Daily is part of the TED Audio Collective. This episode was produced and edited by our team, And that's it for today. TED Talks Daily is part of the TED Audio Collective. This episode was produced and edited by our team, Martha Estefanos, Oliver Friedman, Brian Green,
Starting point is 00:19:32 Autumn Thompson, and Alejandra Salazar. It was mixed by Christopher Fazi Bogan. Additional support from Emma Taubner and Daniela Balarezo. I'm Elise Hugh. I'll be back tomorrow with a fresh idea for your feed. Thanks for listening. Looking for a fun challenge to share with your friends and family? TED now has games designed to keep your mind sharp while having fun. Visit TED.com slash games to explore the joy and wonder of TED games.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.