Ten Percent Happier with Dan Harris - 327: Uprooting Your Delusions | Andrea Fella
Episode Date: March 3, 2021I know you guys, and it is pretty clear you love deep dharma episodes. Today we’ve got a dharma episode that is quite timely. As you all know, we live in a time when most people are getting... their news from carefully curated information silos. As a result, we often create very specific views— about public figures, current events, our fellow citizens — and we can cling pretty tightly to those views. Today we’re gonna talk about how useful and even pleasurable it can be to dig into the roots of these biases and dismantle them— to pop our bubbles of delusion. It can be a relief. It can be eye-opening. It can change the way you relate to yourself and to other people. My guest is Andrea Fella. She is the co-teacher at the Insight Meditation Center and the Insight Retreat Center in Redwood City, California. She has been practicing Insight Meditation since 1996, and teaching Insight Meditation since 2003. She is particularly drawn to intensive retreat practice, and has done a number of long retreats, both in the United States and in Burma. During one long practice period in Burma, she ordained as a nun. Also: We are looking for a podcast marketer! If you love this show, marketing, and building relationships, we would love to have you on the team to help us grow Ten Percent Happier and our future shows. Please apply at https://www.tenpercent.com/careers. And don’t forget to check out the new ABC podcast In Plain Sight: Lady Bird Johnson, which you can find here: https://abcaudio.com/podcasts/in-plain-sight/ Full Shownotes: https://www.tenpercent.com/podcast-episode/andrea-fella-327 See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Before we jump into today's show, many of us want to live healthier lives, but keep
bumping our heads up against the same obstacles over and over again.
But what if there was a different way to relate to this gap between what you want to do and
what you actually do?
What if you could find intrinsic motivation for habit change that will make you happier
instead of sending you into a shame spiral?
Learn how to form healthy habits without kicking your own ass unnecessarily by taking our healthy habits course over on the 10% happier app. It's taught by the
Stanford psychologist Kelly McGonical and the Great Meditation Teacher Alexis
Santos to access the course. Just download the 10% happier app wherever you get
your apps or by visiting 10% calm. All one word spelled out. Okay on with the
show. to baby, this is Kiki Palmer on Amazon Music or wherever you get your podcasts. From ABC, this is the 10% happier podcast.
I'm Dan Harris.
Hey guys, a couple of things to say before we dive in.
One, you may be hearing some background noise.
That is one of our cats, Toby, who will not get off my lap so you'll have
to put up with some purring in the background here so it'll stop once we get into the interview.
But anyway, listen or beware. Here's the second item of business I wanted to get to before
we dive in. There's a new podcast I wanted to tell you about from our colleagues at ABC News.
It's called In Plain Site,
Lady Bird Johnson. And it's full of
new revelations about Lyndon B. Johnson's presidency and reveals the former first lady as LBJ's closest advisor and most
indispensable political partner. It's fascinating stuff. It's drawn from over 123 hours of Lady Bird's daily audio diaries.
The podcast presents a surprising and original portrait of the former first lady told in her own words, you'll hear how Lady Bird Johnson quietly shaped
the future of our country and influenced the Johnson presidency, including the decision
to end said presidency. Just search for in-play in sight, Lady Bird Johnson, wherever you're
listening right now, and
you'll be able to pull it up.
And also just for ease of access, we'll leave a link for you in the show notes as well.
Okay, let's get to today's episode.
I know you guys by now, I think I do.
And I think it's pretty clear that you love deep Dharma episodes.
Today, we've got a Dharma episode that is quite timely.
As you all know, of course, we live at a moment in history
when most people are getting their news
from carefully curated information silos.
As a result, we often create very specific views
about public figures, current events,
our fellow citizens, and we can cling to those views
pretty tightly.
Today we're gonna talk about how useful and even pleasurable
in a way it can be to dig into the roots of these biases
and dismantle them to pop our bubbles of delusion.
It can be a relief, it can be eye-opening,
it can change the way you relate to yourself
and to other people.
My guest is Andrea Fella, she's the co-teacher
at the Insight Meditation Center and the
Insight Retreat Center in California. She's been practicing Insight Meditation since 1996 and
teaching Insight Meditation since 2003. She's got a long history of intensive retreat practice. She's
done a number of long retreats both in the United States and in Burma. And on one of those long retreats in Burma,
she ordained for a while as a nun.
It's a fascinating conversation.
She's a fascinating person.
I suspect you'll enjoy it as much as I did.
Here we go now with Andrea Fella.
Andrea Fella, thanks for coming on. Really appreciate it.
It's pleasure to be with you. Nice to meet you.
I like what I see.
So I know from reading the notes of your discussion
with my esteemed colleague Samuel,
that you're interested in talking about
the subject of views and delusion.
Why that subject?
Why is that interesting to you?
And what do you mean by views and delusion?
It feels to me like views in our country right now
are creating a lot of stress and suffering.
And looking to me, I like to kind of look at what the interface is between what's happening
in the world and what the Buddha had to say.
The Buddha talked a lot about how suffering works, how stress, how people get into stress and difficulty, and the tools and
the analysis he made of our minds. It really speaks to us with all of the changes there've
been in the last 2600 years. There's not been a lot of change in how our minds work. And
so what he has to say about how our minds work
and the kind of problems and stresses
and suffering that we're in now as a world,
I'm interested in that kind of overlap
and what the Buddha understood in terms of how the mind works
can speak to us now, can help us to maybe find some ways
to navigate the difficulties that we're in.
In terms of delusion, delusion operates in a lot of different ways in our minds.
There's kind of a basic way that delusion operates, which is that we're not aware of what's
happening. That's the kind of most obvious way that delusion works. You know, when we're kind of checked out or spaced out or not really connecting with what's
going on, that's a form of delusion.
But that's not even the most kind of insidious form of delusion.
The more dangerous we could say or the more kind of hidden, even hidden forms of delusion,
because we all kind of know when we come out of being spaced out,
it's like, oh yeah, I don't even know what was happening.
Like we wake up after we were driving on the freeway,
it's like, wow, how did I get here?
We know that we've been lost,
but the kind of delusion we're not aware of
is when we are kind of aware of what's going on,
but not aware that how we're taking in information,
how we're interpreting the world is based on a perspective, based on a view or a belief.
In the Buddhist teachings, he talks a lot about the delusion based on taking what is impermanent to be permanent, what is unreliable,
to be reliable, what is not self-to-be-self.
We could also throw in there what is uncontrollable, to be controllable.
And those are deep forms of human belief or view that we tend to believe that what's
impermanent is permanent.
We tend to believe what is unremanent is permanent. We tend to believe what is
unreliable is reliable. But there's a kind of a middle ground place where views,
beliefs, ideas that come just from living. And by view, I really do mean kind of
what we normally mean in in our language about a view or a perspective
or a belief.
What I would call synonyms.
We all have views, beliefs, perspectives that are shaped by how we have lived in our
lives, shaped by our personal conditioning, shaped by our families, by our culture.
And this is the terrain I'm kind of interested in exploring
today, the terrain of what we might call the views and beliefs
that are shaped by our personal and cultural conditioning.
Because this is where I think a lot of our suffering
is happening right now in our world and our country,
in particular in the United States.
So the shaping of those views is natural.
I mean, the whole way that our minds work, our human minds are always
encountering the world and learning from it and shaped based on how we have
been trained,
what we've experienced.
This is just the conditioning of our lives.
Because I grew up in a particular family,
I learned certain things about how family is operate.
Because I grew up in a particular culture,
I learned certain things about how people
who are strangers interact, just things like that. And also, it's not just about the simple things.
It's about bigger things, too, like how we relate to
people who don't look like us,
people who are of a different racial or ethnic background,
you know, the beliefs and the views that are shaped
in our minds as we're growing up.
We often aren't aware of those beliefs and views as beliefs or views.
We often will take them to be just, this is how things are, this is the truth.
So the process is in our mind, and this is something that the Buddha speaks of a lot.
The processes that shape our mind are natural processes, and they can lead us in the direction
of stress and suffering and struggle, or they can lead us in the direction towards freedom,
towards not being caught by habits and patterns of greed, aversion, delusion, confusion.
So the processes are just their natural processes.
The conditioning process, it's a natural process in our minds.
We all will, of course, we will learn based on what our conditions have been.
One of the famous quotes of the Buddha is whatever one frequently ponders becomes
the inclination of the mind. And what we frequently ponder is not only, I mean the word ponder,
often we think of that as meaning we think about, but pondering I think also refers to or means
refers to or means what we are exposed to. We ponder things that we aren't consciously thinking about. We find ourselves in a particular environment and
we just absorb how things are in that environment. Like when I was a kid,
nobody sat down and told me, for instance, you know, this is how close you stand
to somebody you don't know. This is this is how close you stand to somebody you
don't know. This is how much eye contact you make with somebody you don't know. That was just absorbed.
And so it's a form of pondering when you're in a, it's kind of like we're in a soup with a particular
flavor and we are a vegetable in that soup and we're just absorbing that flavor. And we are unaware in many ways that we're
absorbing those views or those perspectives. We just take it to be, well, this is the flavor.
I guess the classic analogy is not seeing the water you're swimming in or not being aware of
the area you're breathing, you know, that that kind of shaping happens. And so it's natural for us to have perspectives,
for us to have views.
And I think in many ways, the system, the human system,
our human organism probably needs perspectives.
It probably needs views in order to navigate
the complexity of our world.
It needs to, if we had to like look around and figure out everything that's
going on every moment of the day, I think we'd just be exhausted.
And so this kind of absorbing of perspective helps us to navigate the world much more easily.
Helps us to know how to make choices, to engage with people. We learn all of that, and we
don't have to think about it moment to moment. And so the perspectives that we have, this
is not delusion. Having perspectives, I think, of is not necessarily delusion. Having
views, having beliefs, not necessarily delusion. But where the delusion comes in is when we do not know that we're acting out of a perspective,
or acting out of a belief, making choices based on a belief, receiving information even based on a belief or view,
or even an agenda, it's kind of amazing how much our minds are shaped by what we believe or what our
perspective is.
I really like what you're driving at here.
It happens to land from me at an opportune moment because I'm in the middle of writing
a chapter about my attempts such as they are to look at
and reckon with my own biases.
You didn't use the word bias,
but I think it's another synonym for the views
and beliefs that you're talking about here.
Well, I would say bias may be a view that's not quite seen.
It's a similar word, but often,
with biases are often hidden.
Yes.
When we see a bias, it becomes more of a view.
But that's just language, yeah.
Yeah, it's very similar.
I take your point.
I think that's a really useful clarification because the bias can live a level beneath
the conscious view.
Nonetheless, what I heard in what you said there is something that has been a really important
realization for me, which is that you can look at your own views
and the biases that may lurk beneath them.
And notice, oh yeah, this is horrible.
I think some pretty uncool things about other people,
based on skin color or chromosomal structure or whatever.
on skin color or chromosomal structure or whatever.
And the natural temptation, at least for me, has been to kind of recoil
like a vampire confronted with garlic
and get into sort of a denial or a defensive crouch.
But instead, if you see,
and I heard this kind of openness in your comments there,
just to see that this is just natural.
This is, it's useful.
We evolve to have biases and then, of course, views and beliefs, because we need to sort
the world so that we can navigate through it without figuring everything out afresh
every five minutes.
Of course, things can go haywire when you don't look forthrightly and frankly
at your biases and then beliefs and views and act them out blindly to the detriment of
other human beings. And by the way, also to the detriment of yourself.
Absolutely. Yeah. So I think that's an important piece. You touch on a couple pieces. The kind
of shame we often have when we see these views
and hidden biases, especially when they kind of run counter in a way to what our kind of
conscious perception of ourself is.
And yet, when we're not aware of them, I think one important piece is that being aware
that it's happening is way better than not being aware that it's happening. When we're not aware that it's happening, we are just going to be acting based on those
views, those biases.
We're just going to act out of them.
Things will pop out of our mouths and we're like, where did that come from?
It's like, we'll just act out of those.
But as we become aware more clearly of, oh, this is a viewer, this is a bias that's kind
of hidden there.
Then there's a little more opportunity for choice.
And we can also begin to see that this bias is operating,
that this view is operating, and affects how we see the world.
Views are not just views.
They come with a lot of baggage.
So seeing that there's a difference between people,
discriminating, discerning that there's
difference between people.
That's just part of how our minds work.
But what is more where the view becomes a bias perhaps, you know, where the sense of,
oh, these people are different from each other becomes a bias is when there's views and ideas about what certain people are capable of or what
their lives are like.
We often don't do the work because it's just so painful to look at this.
It's like an indictment.
We go right to the story of a horrible person and that shuts us down.
We're paralyzed by it.
Yeah, absolutely.
And seeing that it's conditioned, you know, that it's a natural process.
The conditioning process, somebody actually asked me the other day, is conditioning nature
or nurture?
And what I responded with is that the process of conditioning is nature. Now that we are
conditioned beings is nature. What we are conditioned by is nurture. So the field
we find ourselves in, the soup we find ourselves in, that we absorb these
flavors, that's nurture. But the fact that we absorb flavors, that's nature.
And so it's human. It's natural that we absorb the flavor that we're in. And for me, that's
an important wisdom understanding that helps me to navigate the whole mess that we find ourselves in helps me to recognize, oh, you know, of course
the mind has this flavor in it.
It's been stewing in that for so long.
So I can not take it personally that I have that flavor.
It's not our fault that we have that flavor, but it's our responsibility that we have the flavor.
And so to see that it is a flavor, to see that it's not just truth.
I mean, we're in that soup, we're absorbing those flavors, and we just take that to be the way things are.
Views and ideas about, you know, where all the isms come from, racism, sexism, genderism, ageism,
because we've absorbed particular views around what particular genders or races are capable
of and who they are.
So we've absorbed those.
It's not our fault that we've absorbed them because we've been in that stew, but it's
now our responsibility to see that it is a stew, that it is that flavor, that there's
different soups out there, there's different possibilities out there, that other people
and other cultures, other conditions have absorbed completely different flavors. So when we don't see that we've been conditioned that it's a view,
then we're just acting as if it's truth. We're just acting as if this is the way the world is. Often these views don't create suffering in and of themselves. The views, when we're in the stew that we're in,
it's not a problem.
When we're in that particular flavor,
it doesn't feel like suffering.
But when those views are challenged,
when we come across somebody who has a different perspective,
that's often when we feel the suffering of it.
And so that can be a time to get curious.
It's like like rather than kind
of retrenching to say, oh, this is wrong. This is bad. This shouldn't be this way. Is it
my fault? Is it their fault? Rather than exploring it from that perspective, it's like, oh,
we've met a different flavor. Let's see what's there. If we can recognize that our flavor is not the only flavor that can create conditions where
we're more interested in getting to know what other flavors might be out there.
It's a kind of an encouragement, I think, when I recognize.
So first of all, not only that I have views, it's useful to recognize that we have views.
And that's actually something I encourage people.
You know, when you find yourself suffering, when you find some kind of struggle or stress
happening in your lives, there is a view operating that's not clearly seen.
This is kind of like a foundational teaching of the Buddha that from the teaching, I'll drop this
in for those of your listeners who kind of know the Buddhist teachings a little more, the teaching
of dependent origination, which is a description of how our minds kind of create struggle stress,
suffering. It begins with ignorance. It's not ignorance of the not knowing. It's an ignorance of
not understanding of holding a view or a perspective. So the ignorance is really about holding a view
about the world. That's not in alignment with the way, you know, the world is in particular with
respect to the impermanent, unreliable, not self-uncontrollable nature of the world.
We tend to hold views that overlay permanence, reliability, controllability on the world.
And so the ignorance that shapes the suffering that happens, that's the base condition
the suffering that happens, that's the base condition in the Buddhist teachings for suffering.
And so when we're suffering,
there's some kind of view that's operating.
And so when we meet suffering, when we find suffering,
it's useful to check into that.
And I know that there have been podcasts
that you've had around looking at particular things
in this time around anger and difficulty
of navigating the
frustration and the anxiety of what's happening in the world.
So can we be with that?
Can we know the anxiety?
Can we know the anger?
This is the kind of basic mindfulness practice.
Can we be with what's happening?
That's really useful.
It's really, really useful. It's really, really useful. And yet another piece of this puzzle of how those emotions emerge is that they're kind of underneath them.
They're grounded in beliefs. Some views, some beliefs, some ideas, some attitude there. A question that can be useful when we experience suffering, when we know.
And suffering is a big word.
It might just be stress.
It might be unease.
It might be a dissatisfaction or a feeling of offness.
And when we experience that, to not only feel that, like, oh, yeah, it feels kind of yir,
yir, yir, yir, yir, it feels kind of off, it feels kind of
left, to not only know that, but then maybe be curious. And I find a question actually, questions
are not often talked about in terms of pure mindfulness practice, but one of my teachers,
Burmese teachers, Sayr Outinia, talks about using questions a lot.
We have to be careful when we use questions because we can go off in thinking about things, but he encourages us to ask questions kind of to just drop a question in and then just continue
being aware, being present for what's here. And often having dropped a question in, it will orient the mind to kind of see something
from that perspective.
So it's using a view essentially.
It's kind of using a perspective,
using a view to kind of dive underneath.
So asking the question, when there is suffering,
what's being believed right now?
That can be a really useful tool to see where the emotions are coming from.
We may or may not get an answer, let's say. Sometimes I find when I drop questions in like that,
you know, it's like, gee, you know, there's nothing coming. And I just continue being mindful,
just being aware at that point. But sometimes that question will kind of burst the bubble. It's like, oh yeah, this is what I'm believing right now. And then that view that's kind of been hidden can begin to be
seen, it can be revealed. And we can start to learn about it, start to see that it's there. And
then maybe even be curious about, wow, that's believed. Sometimes we'll see that. It's like, well,
I don't believe that,
but at some level in our system,
some deeply conditioned place,
that belief is believed.
It is kind of taken to be something
that's the way things should be anyway.
And so when we see that,
that's a place to then begin to notice
what is our response to that.
So shame, confusion, anxiety.
So again, working with the emotional field there in terms of our practice, in terms of our
meditation practice.
But another question then might be a deeper dive.
It's like, oh, there's this belief.
How did this belief come to be?
What was this do that created this belief?
For myself, I had a lot of self-negativity, thinking I should be better.
I often felt like I was failing.
The same time I had the belief that I was pretty good at things.
At some point, I saw that one was a set up for the other.
It's like, oh, I'm pretty good at things.
I'm not good at it right now.
That must mean I'm failing.
Seeing these contrasting beliefs and then curious about,
well, where did this come from? And then seeing how often
I, in my life, based my whole identity, basically, around succeeding. And of course, I can't always
succeed. You know, this is nature too, the uncontrollable aspect of experience. Of course, I can't always succeed. Seeing, okay, this is the belief.
And then what was it coming from?
And even just simply recognizing,
this is a belief that's conditioned.
That really helps the mind to kind of step back and go,
oh, okay.
Helps it recognize it's not my fault, and yet it's my responsibility because this is
what's arising, and I have to live with this.
I have to navigate the world with this belief or view.
Another thing about seeing beliefs.
Often, when I'm talking to people, I will point them to kind of be curious about what beliefs are happening
underlying their emotional stress or suffering.
When you look at that, you may see, I kind of said earlier, that
you might not consciously believe it.
And so there might be a kind of like, well, I don't really believe that.
But, you know, there's something in us that does believe it. And so I often encourage people not to try to disbelieve their beliefs, but to acknowledge
this is what's being believed, because that's kind of bursting the bubble of delusion
somewhat.
I said that the delusion really is when we don't see the view or belief as a belief.
When we see a belief happening,
when we see that it is a belief, that's kind of bursting the bubble of delusion. We may not at that point then disbelieve it.
And in fact, some of these views we can see, oh, there's some use to some of that view, you know, so
can see, oh, there's some use to some of that view. So, okay, I know at least it's a view right now.
So when we know that it's a view, then we can kind of recognize that we are being shaped
by that, that we're taking in information from that perspective, that we're acting out
of that perspective, and so that can mitigate the impact of the view or belief.
And sometimes we can see a viewer belief operating that, okay, this one's useful right now.
I'll use this one right now.
So the seeing of the belief itself is really helpful.
The recognizing that it is conditioned or what has shaped it, to me that really helps speak to that point of
the shame that we feel.
When we see views and beliefs that are not really in line with what we wish were in our hearts,
you know, the recognizing that they are conditioned, the nature of that.
And for me, that's the next practice point that I often explore.
When I see some particular view shaping my experience and reckon is, okay, this is
conditioned, is, um, this is nature.
Of course, this is happening right now.
Look at the stew I've been in all of my life.
Of course, this is happening.
So that, of course, sometimes it's just the,
of course, recognition.
Sometimes I use the language that my teacher
Saito Tejanea uses.
This is nature.
And to me that speaks to kind of like
the natural processes of our system.
It's just like trees growing.
This tree grows because
that seed was planted and it got the conditions, it was watered, it grew, it had the conditions
to grow. That's why this viewer belief is there. And that brings in a lot of compassion.
For me, that's a great avenue to compassion, to recognize the wisdom teaching that this is conditioned.
So in many ways, the wisdom and compassion of our practice kind of feed each other
there, you know, that seeing there is the shaping of our minds helps our minds to step
back in and not own it, not take it as my fault, or I did this,
and yet having to recognize, yes, and I am living with this.
So, is there something different that can be done here?
And the very seeing of it, in my experience,
the very seeing of the views, the very seeing of the conditioning,
begins to shape something different.
And often, we think we should know how to go in and change our minds that we should somehow
replace this view with some other view.
But in my experience when I have tried to disbelieve a view, it has a rebound effect.
It's kind of like that view kind of goes underground and it
resists that. It's like, no, no, I, there's a reason why I'm believed here. And so being
seen and being acknowledged is, oh, this is what's being believed. It kind of was willing
to come out from behind the curtain and be seen and be seen for what it is that it is
a view. If we're trying to disbelieve it,
it kind of drives it back behind the curtain
so that it's kind of then operating,
it acts for us essentially.
So that's why I often ask people or tell people
not to try to disbelieve the view,
but to just see that it is a view, that it's happening.
And maybe because we do have different levels of belief, you know,
sometimes when we see the view, you know, a view is a thought. And there's the thought that happens
and it kind of comes with a believing process. And that believing process, the picking up the
thought and like, yep, I believe that, yep, I believe that. It kind of circles and it reinforces itself essentially by telling ourselves that we believe
it over and over again.
Sometimes when we see a view, we're well into that believing process and we're really
on board for it.
It's like, yep, I 100% believe that view.
That's something that is useful to notice too.
How strong is the belief?
Sometimes the belief is not that strong.
And even at the deeper levels, it's not that strong.
It's more of a habit.
And then when it's seen, it can just kind of go, oh yeah, yeah, you know, okay, I can set
myself aside right now.
I don't need that view right now.
It's kind of habit that that's working.
So seeing the level of the belief,
or how strongly we believe it is another useful exploration.
And then sometimes in that exploration,
we might find that there's kind of a cognitive dissonance,
a kind of a difference between the emotional belief
and the cognitive side.
And that may be partly what you were speaking to earlier,
the kind of the mind to earlier, you know, the kind of the
mind telling us, you know, gee, I'm not a person who thinks that people of different races are
less worthy, but there's something deep in there that there's a kind of belief. There is a
difference. You know, that's hard to see. That's hard to hold. And so the cognitive
dissonance between what we would like our hearts and minds to be and what's in there, that
can create a lot of stress of dissonance. And if we just kind of, like you said, like,
I don't want to look at that, we said it aside, that's going to drive the belief underground.
So we won't really get a chance to see it.
And having it be in the light of day is way more helpful.
That's another piece that helps me, too.
It's like, oh, yeah, this is painful to see, but I'd rather see it than not see it.
And also to recognize that there are times when the reactivity, the dissonance, is so strong that it may make
it difficult to actually be present with it.
It's like the capacity that we have to be with struggle, with stress, with dissonance.
It varies at times.
It's stronger sometimes, it's weaker sometimes.
So the capacity that we have to be with that, maybe weaker than the reactivity.
It may feel like we're being swamped by the reactivity.
At that point, it's useful often to not to repress what's happening, not to repress the
dissonance, not to repress the view, but to take a break and say, okay, I'll come back
to you later.
I need to let my mind settle for a little while.
So there are times where we shouldn't like just bear
ourselves into the stress or suffering
of the dissonance that we feel or of any suffering
that there are times when we should turn our attention
to something else.
Sometimes I would just say, okay, yeah,
whatever pattern, habit and mind is going on,
you can take a walk with me,
but I'm gonna pay attention to my feet walking,
so to just redirect.
Much more of my conversation with Andrea Fella,
coming up right after this break.
Celebrity feuds are high stakes.
You never know if you're just gonna end up on Page Six or Du Moir or in court.
I'm Matt Bellesai.
And I'm Sydney Battle, and we're the host of Wondery's new podcast, Dis and Tell,
where each episode we unpack a different iconic celebrity feud from the build-up,
why it happened, and the repercussions.
What does our obsession with these feuds say about us?
The first season is packed with some pretty messy pop culture drama, but none is drawn out
in personal as Britney and Jamie Lynn Spears.
When Britney's fans form the free Britney movement dedicated to fring her from the infamous
conservatorship, Jamie Lynn's lack of public support, it angered some fans, a lot of them.
It's a story of two young women who had their choices taken away from them by their controlling parents, but took their anger out on each other. And it's about a movement to save
a superstar, which set its sights upon anyone who failed to fight for Brittany. Follow Disenthal
wherever you get your podcast. You can listen ad free on Amazon Music or the Wondery app.
I want to pick up on something that I think is a theme that is kind of threaded throughout
your comments, but I want to make it a little bit more explicit.
The theme being sort of compassion or warmth, which is a really important ingredient when
you're looking at your own biases and views and beliefs, I think.
You know, it showed up in your comments just in that last little bit there
about how, yeah, sometimes looking at the stuff can be really hard and maybe part of the art is
just knowing when to focus on something else because you're overwhelmed. Another area in which you
talked about, and I think you're explicitly talked about compassion is when you're seeing the
tension between what you consciously think you believe that everybody's equal,
when you see the tension between that and what some lizard part of your brain is telling you about how somebody who looks different than you do or acts differently than you do is somehow inferior to you.
When you see the conflict there, it can be really helpful and compassionate just to drop back and see, I didn't ask for this.
It's nature.
It's part of how the mind reacts when it's put in a particular soup.
So you've invoked compassion here within the context as I understand it of a traditional
insight or mindfulness practice where you're watching your thoughts come up and and trying to not
Fight them or feed them or numb out in the face of them
what about an explicit
loving kindness or compassion practice that
Can I
suspect?
To talk about not trying to fight your beliefs not not trying to create new ones, just let them
play themselves out in fizzle.
But I wonder whether loving kindness meditation, compassion meditation is a kind of creation
of new biases and of new beliefs and new views, a counter programming.
It's worked that way for me. Absolutely. And for a lot of people, that can be a doorway in for helping to have a little
more ease around all of the stuff that we see in our minds. It really varies person-to-person.
For myself, my own doorway to compassion came through the mindfulness practice early on in my
practice when I was exploring and trying to consciously aim towards the loving kindness
practice towards the compassion practice. Essentially, it's like you're putting different
thoughts in your mind. Like, may you be happy? May you be healthy? You know, may you be
free from suffering in the case of compassion? So you're putting different thoughts in your mind for myself. What my mind told me was like trying to disbelieve what I was experiencing.
You know, so it created so much tension in my mind to do it early on
that I realized that that was not a practice that was a good one for me to start with.
And often when I talk to people about meditation practices,
I encourage people from my own experience,
go in the door that's easiest.
Where is it most natural for you to cultivate being
present and what supports you to have ease of heart and mind?
And so for some people, compassion practice,
loving kindness practice, is that doorway, is
a place where it feels supportive.
It helps to balance the mind out when it's looking at all the stuff that it sees coming
up.
We will see a lot of stuff that we don't want to see when we look at our minds.
And so for some people, many people, roughly, a third of the people have a relatively easy or time
with the compassion practice, maybe a and metapractus, maybe a third of the people really struggle with it,
and then a third of the people are kind of more in the middle, just where they're both equally
harder, easy. And so, yes, absolutely, for a lot of people that direct cultivation of compassion
through putting different thoughts in your mind, it is a retraining. It's putting yourself
in a different soup for that time, essentially. And part of the compassion practice where
for me it actually began working. I was trying to just put the thoughts in my mind and somehow believe that that would
be moving me in the direction of feeling compassion or loving kindness.
And at some point, I got the instruction from one of my teachers, Guy Armstrong, the
one who gave me this instruction, to really settle back back each time you make that wish, offer that wish
of kindness or express that phrase of compassion.
May you be happy bringing somebody into your mind and explicitly wishing for a particular
person.
May you have ease in your life to not just focus on the wish and the other person, but then come back and look at,
how did that land in the soup that I have?
How did that land?
What is it kind of bumping up against?
Because the meta practice, the compassion practice,
put this in a different soup
and we'll experience some dissonance
of being in a different soup.
And if we're not aware that that's actually part of the process, to kind of feel like,
or aiming your mind towards compassion or kindness, and you're bumping up against what feels
like not compassion or kindness, that's a natural part of how that practice works.
And so when I understood that again, to see the compassion practice and the loving kindness
practice as a conditioning, that it is a conditioning,
and that it's going to bump up against other conditioning.
And of course, there's going to be essentially the opposite.
One of the things that Guy Armstrong also told me,
he said, the meta practice is like running a meta magnet
over your heart.
And what does a magnet do? It pulls out its opposite. So when you see the opposite of meta-erizing, when you're doing the metapractis, the loving kindness practice, you'll see the opposite.
And when that gets pulled out, that is how it begins to be seen.
So essentially, the loving kindness practice, the compassion practice,
is another way, I think, to begin to see some hidden views, some hidden biases.
When we're in that field and stepping back to, and how did it affect me to make that wish?
We may see some dissonance there, and that's a place maybe where we can also see some views
that are hidden underneath the surface.
I totally agree, and I've had that experience myself,
that I'll be sitting there thinking,
I'm a failed practitioner of this stuff,
because I'm trying to wish well to myself or anybody else,
and I'm actually having homicidal thoughts.
And so I feel like a failure,
but actually it's a misunderstanding of what,
I think the magnet metaphor is quite useful,
but for me, it kind of got stratasphirically useful
was as I've done the practice,
this practice that I resisted so hard for so long,
as I've spent the last couple of years
really quite seriously exploring it,
I've noticed that when it pulls shards of judgment
or ill will or whatever out of my thorax
while I'm moving this magnet over it,
not only am I able to view the uglier parts
of my psyche with some mindfulness, but also because I'm doing this
practice more intensely, the mind is flooded with warmth.
So I'm actually viewing all of this stuff,
like, oh, okay, okay, you know,
there, it's not just this kind of clinical sense of,
this is just natural, or, you know,
I can view this with some non-judgmental remove.
It's like, yeah, yeah, on some level, these views were serving me.
You're trying to help me.
The organism trying to protect itself,
and can I just kind of hug this stuff rather than recoil?
Absolutely.
I mean, so much of our suffering actually comes from our organism
trying to protect itself.
Essentially, it's kind of based in that movement
to take care of ourselves that we end up with
all of this mess.
And so, to kind of recognize, oh yeah,
that habit or pattern, it has been trying to take care of me.
And you're right, when the mind can be flooded with warmth,
that's with the kind of sense of the oh yeah quality of,
oh, of course, of course this is here,
that there's a kind of the tenderness around seeing it,
rather than like you said, sometimes we might think
of pure mindfulness as having that kind of clinical
remove, we think of perhaps equanimity or non-reactivity
as being robotic almost. But my experience is that with the true equanimity comes compassion
and meta, the experience in the compassion practice where it kind of brings in that flavor of the warmth.
That begins to give the mind a little bit of an education about that possibility of holding
what's happening, no matter what it is, with that warmth.
And that flavor of warmth is a flavor that's connected.
It's connected with compassion, but when the mind is in that place of
non-reactivity, the Buddha often talked about freedom coming with the absence of, not the presence of,
right? I mean, he talked about the absence of greed, the absence of a delusion, the absence of aversion, being the place of freedom in the mind.
And our minds tell us that the absence means nothing's there.
But with the absence of those, when we can really start to look at what's present when
those things are absent, you'll see non-reactivity, you'll see equanimity, you'll see joy, you'll
see compassion, you'll see equanimity, you'll see joy, you'll see compassion, you'll see love.
And for me, that was an expanding. I needed to, for a long time, when I was looking at my mind,
it was more that clinical kind of just distancing. And it was kind of interesting because I would talk
to people and they would say, how much compassion they felt coming from me
and internally I was thinking, gee, you know, I'm feeling not reactive, but I'm not really
feeling the compassion.
I talk to a bunch of people about that, some of my colleagues, some other teachers to kind
of be curious about, you know, and many of the teachers said, don't worry about it, the
compassion's there.
And I'm like, well, that doesn't help me.
But at some point, one teacher encouraged me to,
when I was in that space where I felt like I was non-reactive,
to turn towards the relationship,
to turn towards the connection.
And when I did that, the compassion became clear.
The compassion became obvious.
And so the different way is sometimes you can start with the compassion practice and find
your way to it through that.
And then you get the taste of that and then you can apply that or bring that to bear on
your mindfulness practice.
For myself it came the other direction. When I found my way to the
compassion and the love from the mindfulness practice and this like, okay, be curious about the
relationship as opposed to the non-reactivity side of it. You can kind of lean towards non-reactivity.
You can lean towards compassion. And I didn't know how to lean towards compassion,
but this one teacher was very astute in saying,
look at the connection between you and the other person.
And it was instant that the compassion was there.
And so that was my doorway.
I often like to offer people many doorways to compassion.
The compassion practice, the compassion practice, the
meta-practice are really useful tools.
For some people, perhaps, bringing that warmth in, that can be remembered as you meet something
with suffering.
You can remember that warmth and allow that to infuse how you're with your experience. There's an even larger point about practice that's coming to mind that every mind is different.
And everybody's different based on your conditioning.
And so some practices work really well for you, but wouldn't work really well for me.
And some practices work really well for me right now, but wouldn't have worked really well for me 10 years ago and same for 10 years hence.
So it brings it to mind an expression from my teacher, Joseph Goldstein, who likes to
say, you know, whatever works.
Exactly.
Yeah, I'm a fan of that philosophy too.
Absolutely.
Back to delusion for a second.
As you know, but I'm saying the following for listeners and Buddhism, we talk a lot about
the three poisons or the defilements, greed, hatred and delusion.
Greed and hatred are always kind of obvious to me.
I can see both of them in my mind at any given nanosecond.
Delusion has always been the harder one for me,
like, what is that?
What is that really getting at?
And as I understand it, the fundamental delusion
the Buddha was pointing to was this idea
that we're separate solid egos in the world,
but not really in it because we're peering out
fretfully behind these eye sockets.
Do I have that right?
Well, I would say he pointed to three fundamental delusions.
That's one of them.
And I said earlier, that's the delusion.
We tend to take what is not self to be self.
We tend to attribute a self to this unfolding
process of mind and body.
It's human.
It's human.
I mean, it's the rare human that does not have a sense of self and believe it.
That's one aspect of the delusion.
The other two are that we tend to take what is impermanent to be permanent and we tend
to take what is unreliable to be reliable.
They kind of interweave with each other,
those three aspects of delusion, because things are impermanent, you know, and that we tend to
attribute or take impermanence, attribute, and it's even with a very simple reflection,
we can see the impermanent nature of experience. There's nothing that we experienced that lasts for very long.
And we can know that.
We know intellectually that we're going to die, but we don't behave that way.
So there's a kind of a belief underlying in our immortality, even though we know consciously,
this is kind of the same thing of that, thesonance, essentially, between what we believe and what's emotionally true.
You know, that belief in our own immortality, essentially.
You know, we can't fathom a world without us.
So it wouldn't exist in a way.
You know, that's what we think.
So there's that the impermanent nature of the world.
And because of the impermanent nature of the world,
there's nothing reliable in the world
that we can have
for any length of time that will make us happy, that will be the thing that we can get
or have or hold that makes us happy for the rest of time.
We can get something for a few moments, the happiness of that last for a few moments,
but then we're off on a loop of trying to get more things that make us happy.
And then the sense of self is essentially kind of trying to navigate the world to find
things that will make us happy.
Those three are connected.
The not self teaching, I think, is a very foundational teaching of the Buddha.
But there's also an understanding that the insights that will lead us to kind of letting
go of greater version of delusion. Those insights might come through the recognition
of the impermanent nature of experience, might come through the recognition of the impermanent nature of experience might come through the recognition of the unreliable nature of experience or might come through the recognition of the
not self nature of experience.
So yeah, I think that they're all three really powerful delusion bubbles that we are operating
with.
And when you pop one of them, it tends to kind of get to the others as well, in a way.
So that's the fundamental delusion.
I sometimes call that the level of human delusion, that we have these beliefs, things are permanent
reliable, controllable, that I exist, that there's something stable or solid.
And that's another way that the sense of self has an imputation of permanence.
So that loops back to that particular understanding that we attribute a permanence to our sense
of self.
That's the level of human delusion.
That the deepest level, you're not going to find pretty much anybody, any human being
on the planet is going to share those delusions.
And then the level of delusion we've been talking about more today is kind of this intermediate
level.
The processes are similar in terms of the way views work. I mean, basically, taking what is impermanent to be permanent,
it's a view. It's a belief. Taking what is unreliable to be reliable, that's a view or
belief. Taking what's not self to be self, that's a view. In fact, it's often called
psychiatry in the poly-identity view. So it's a view that's held.
And so it functions in very similar ways
to this kind of middle level that we've been talking about
mostly today, the kinds of personal conditioning views
and beliefs that have been shaped in our lives.
Those personal views and beliefs are kind of informed
by some of the deeper habits of mind around
taking what is impermanent to be permanent, what is not self to be self. Our sense of self
is shaped very personally by our culture, by our conditioning. So I think it's useful
to not always drop down to that very deep human level of just looking at things. Well, this is not self.
It's useful to look at that middle layer sometimes to see,
well, how did this sense of self get shaped?
What is the personal conditioning?
What is the soup that shaped this sense of self?
Because that can be a kind of a more accessible level or layer of seeing what's going on. And the delusion is, again, taking the view
to be true or not seeing that it is a view. So when we take what is
not self to be self, that's a view that is being held that we're that we're not seeing.
We don't see that that's happening.
You touched on this a little bit, but I think as we head toward the home stretch here,
the interview, it would be nice to put a really fine point on this.
What is the self-interest? Now, I'm not referring to the the not self here. I'm just saying, what's in
it for us to do this work? Because it is hard. The Buddha generally tended to go through
the pleasure centers of the brain. Why should we do this work?
We are suffering so much. You know, the Buddha at one point had the kind of poignant reflection
before he went out looking for an answer to his question.
I mean, his question really was,
is it possible for human beings to not suffer?
He said possible.
He looked around and he saw suffering everywhere. I mean, we age,
we get sick, we die, the suffering in our cultures, in our communities, in our families. It's like
they're suffering everywhere. It's not hard to see that they're suffering. What our minds tend to do
What our minds tend to do is to kind of take the quick route to like putting a band-aid over
a limb that's been chopped off. We try to do something that will like make us feel better in the moment and you know it does make us feel better for a few moments. But then we're back into trying to find the next
thing that will make us feel better. I'd say most people who come to this practice, not all, I know
people who came to it through intellectual exploration, but most people who come to this practice come to it because
of suffering.
And the poignant reflection that the Buddha made as he kind of went into his own journey
was, does anybody out there know a way or two out of this suffering?
And that was my own question when I met this path.
I felt like I kind of hid bottom, very painful, very painful time in my life.
And it's like everything that I've tried, I've tried everything that I know of to be happy
and it's not working.
Does anybody out there know a way to navigate this? And at that point, I was fortunate enough
that a friend sent me a book about the Buddhist practice. It's like, well, I don't get how this works,
you know? The first thing that I learned from looking at that book was like, pay attention to your
difficult mind states, you know? And anger was ruling me at that point. I was so angry, a particular situation had happened and I was so angry.
I would find myself just frozen with anger and non-functional.
I was pretty non-functional at times with that anger.
And the book that I got, it said something like, well, look at the anger, be with the anger.
You know, it's like, how is that going to work?
I had no clue how it would work.
But because I hit rock bottom, I was like,
well, I don't get how this is gonna work,
but my friend says it's useful.
So I'm gonna see what happens.
And within a very short time, within a couple weeks,
it was very clear to me that this practice was useful. So it can be a big hump
to get in, in a way. For me, I had to hit rock bottom. I had met mindfulness 15 years earlier,
but it hadn't taken because I wasn't suffering enough, essentially. What's in it for us,
and I think many people
who start the practice, pretty quickly,
will get a little bit of a flavor of a different way
to navigate the world, a different way to
be with their minds, essentially.
That shift of, can I look at anger
versus just like following, believing the anger, you know, in a way, you know, even a state of mind like anger, at a certain point, I understood
there were lots of beliefs in there. The fundamental belief was this is going to help me make the other
person feel miserable. And what I missed, what I was missing with that belief was that it was making me miserable.
And very quickly, turning with mindfulness to the experience of, well, what's it like
to feel anger?
It's like, wow, this is making me miserable.
It's not doing nothing to that other person.
It just popped that belief, that delusion around, this is going to make the other person miserable. And pretty
quickly through being with the experience, there was a shift. And it was only a couple of weeks before
I was no longer non-functional with the anger. It was another many years, it was two or three years
before that pattern of anger really dissipated and fell away.
But pretty quickly, there was a lot of understanding.
And I even remember a moment in my life,
I think it was two months into my doing this practice.
And I wasn't even meditating at that point.
I wasn't even interested in meditating.
I was just looking at my mind and daily life
and looking at the anger when it came up.
And at a certain point, I saw a kind
of pattern fall apart in the mind around the anger that had me on board for life. I saw a pattern
the mind heading towards anger before it got angry. And the mind let go of the anger.
It just let it go.
And in that moment, seeing, it's like,
the person who I was angry with had come up in my mind.
And I saw that thought.
I saw the intention to like jump on that thought
and think more thoughts to get angry,
new from the experience that anger was suffering,
new from the previous weeks of looking at being with anger, that that was not a good direction to go, and the mind just let it go.
And that was what was so inspiring to me in that moment, was that I didn't do the letting
go of the anger at that point. It just let go. And so seeing that,
seeing that was life changing for me, that moment of seeing. I saw directly that the practice of
looking at the anger in the last couple of months had contributed to the mind letting go of it.
And so at that point, when you said, what's in it for us, why would we do this?
When we get those tastes, when we get those senses of a different possibility, it's like
the mind can't go back from those.
It understands, the mind begins to understand, that there's a completely different way to move in the direction of
happiness than our habitual way of just getting the next thing or getting rid of the things that we
don't like. Those little tastes of shift in the mind, little senses of, oh, it's possible not to be
caught by anger, but just be with it, whatever pattern or habit
we're looking at, just to see it.
We feel a difference.
We experience a different quality in our heart and mind.
Even if the anger or whatever, just a reactivity doesn't go away in that moment.
It's like there's space around it.
There's a piece of our system that understands this is a deeper way to well-being.
So there's plenty of times that it feels really hard to practice plenty of times,
it feels really hard to look at that difficulty. But the more we practice, the more we get those little hints, those little flavors of there's a different
way. And at a certain point, it feels like that different way that the mind has had a
taste of, that becomes the gravitational pull. And I've talked to students too who say
this. It's like, I tried to stop practicing and I couldn't do it.
It's like, I didn't want to look at this anymore, but I didn't have any choice, partly because what happened when they stopped looking at it, or stopped trying to be with it,
it's like, they felt even worse. I think it was Joseph actually who used this image. He said,
it's like, we're in a bowl.
You know, I've got this, like you can see this,
but nobody else can.
You know, we've got a bowl and we're kind of in the bottom
of the bowl and we're trying to climb up the edges
of the bowl.
And it's hard, it's hard work.
You know, we have to work really hard
to meet our experience, to hang in there
when it's really hard. And, you know, we get a little way up the in there when it's really hard.
And we get a little way at the bowl
and then it gets really hard and we let go
and we just slide back down to the bottom of the bowl.
He said, but at some point in practice,
it's like the bowl flips.
And then it becomes hard to stay at that point in the bowl.
It's hard to stay at that point
because you can't stay at that point. You slide down.
So at a certain point in our practice, there becomes a kind of a gravitational pull towards
the letting go of greed, aversion, and delusion because the mind so clearly understands that
is not the way to happiness.
And it feels the suffering of the greed of the aversion, the delusion, so much more clearly.
So starting is hard.
When we start to look at our minds, oh my gosh, really humbling, really painful.
And I think this is where some of these teachings that the Buddha offers around condition can help us hang in there in that time.
And the tools of compassion can help us hang in there around that time.
What else is in it for us is that as we do engage with the practices,
as we either kind of settle our minds in concentration,
we get tastes of feeling like we're just infused with well-being.
Or in the compassion practice
like you said with that kind of sense of where it really started to
Turbocharge was when you got that taste of that warmth
so we get those tastes and
That's what's in it for us to you know, we get those tastes of those qualities that
Really help our mind to recognize. This is a whole different way to find ease and peace in our lives.
Bikuboti points out, he's a translator of many of the teachings of the Buddha, he points
out that to get on the path of practice.
First of all, you have to have an encounter with suffering, like the Buddha, where there's
a kind of curiosity. Does anybody know a way or two out of the suffering? Does anybody know
a way or two out of the suffering? And then you also have to be in contact with a teaching
that points away out.
It's the rare person who would find their way out on their own, even meeting, suffering,
without having some kind of pointing of, do this.
I mean, like, I got that book.
It's like, you know, look at the anger.
Like, how is that going to work?
I didn't get it.
But it was pretty quick once I started looking to see, oh, that look at the anger. Like, how is that gonna work? I didn't get it, but it was pretty quick
once I started looking to see, oh, that's how it works.
So you get the kind of the encounter
was suffering combined with the teaching
and then that may spur some interest to.
And for me, there was faith to from my friend,
the friend who sent me the book.
It's like, well, she said it's useful.
So I'm to try this.
So some of what gets us on the path is pure faith, pure kind of, somebody said it's going
to help.
And then once we're on the path, in my experience, once we started, it actually doesn't take
that long for us to understand and taste some of those benefits.
And then when we've tasted those benefits, that's what can keep us going. People do find times
where it's like, I just can't keep going. It's like, well, think about how it was five years ago.
Think about how it was two years ago. Whenever you started, think about what it was like then.
two years ago, whenever you started, think about what it was like then. Have you seen change because of the practice? And they almost always say, Oh, yeah, I see that if I hadn't been doing this,
I would really be struggling right now. It's like, Okay, use that knowledge to help you get through
this time. Well, I've really enjoyed this time with you and and I appreciate you taking the time to come on and answer questions and talk to me.
Before I let you go, for folks who want to learn more about you, where can we do that? Is there a place on the internet or their books?
Where would we go?
Where would we go? I don't yet have my own website.
I'm working on that.
But the main place that I teach is the NCITE Meditation Center,
different from the Entite Meditation Society,
although I also teach at IMS.
But my home center is the NCITE Meditation Center
in Redwood City, California.
And there's a website for that community, www.insightmeditationcenter.org.
Corresponding with that community, we have the recordings and podcasts of everything that we do,
or most things that we do, found on audio-dharma www..audio-add-i-o-d-h-a-r-m-a, audio-dharma.org.
And so almost all of my talks are found on audio-dharma.
That's a good way to get introduced to my teaching in particular.
And then I teach retreats.
I teach retreats at Spirit Rock, meditation center.
I teach retreats at The Insight Meditation
Society regularly teach the three-month course at the Insight Meditation Society. And then
I also teach at a couple of other centers around the country occasionally.
Great. We'll put the links in the show notes so people can just click them. Thank you again
for doing this. You did a great job and it was great for me to sit and talk to you.
It's a pleasure.
Big thanks again to Andrea Fella.
One more thing before we let you go,
we are looking for a podcast marketer.
If you love this show, if you love marketing and building relationships,
we would love to have you on this team to help us grow the 10% happier podcast and the other podcasts that we hope to be launching as soon as this
year. So if any of this sounds appetizing to you, please apply at 10% dot com slash careers.
10% dot com slash careers. There will of course be a link in the show notes. This show is made by Samuel Johns, DJ Cashmere, Kim Baikama, Maria Wartel, and Jen Plant with
audio engineering by ultraviolet audio and background purring from Toby. As
always a hearty salute to my ABC News comrades Ryan Kessler and Josh Kohan. We'll
see you all on Friday for a bonus meditation from fan favorite 7a Celessi.
Hey, hey prime members! You can listen to 10% happier early and ad-free on Amazon Music.
Download the Amazon Music app today, or you can listen early and add free with Wondery Plus in Apple Podcasts.
Before you go, do us a solid and tell us all about yourself by completing a short survey
at Wondery.com slash Survey.