Ten Percent Happier with Dan Harris - Annoying Partners, Aging Parents, Impossible Coworkers: Buddhist Advice for Conflict, Communication, and "Patience with Teeth" | devon and nico hase

Episode Date: September 30, 2026

Which conflict style are you? Plus: avoiding the "trance of nice," walking the high wire, and an uber-hack for getting over irritation. devon + nico hase serve as guiding teachers of the online dharma community Refuge of Belonging. They teach at the Insight Meditation Society, Spirit Rock, and other centers, offer online and in-person retreats, and speak with students in one-on-one sessions. They are the co-authors of How Not to Be a Hot Mess and the new This Messy, Gorgeous Love: A Buddhist Guide to Lasting Partnership.  In this episode we talk about: Why friction in relationships is a feature, not a bug The three directions of listening Why joy isn't a nice-to-have How contemplating death can dissolve everyday irritation Whether you're a volcano, a diplomat, or a dodger How to rupture like a pro Why real patience has teeth What it means to walk the high wire in a conflict Related Episodes: The Sex Episode Get the 10% with Dan Harris app here Sign up for Dan's free newsletter here Follow Dan on social: Instagram, TikTok Subscribe to our YouTube Channel To advertise on the show, contact [e-mail] or visit https://advertising.libsyn.com/10HappierwithDanHarris

Hello, everybody. Welcome to the 10% Happier Podcast. I'm your host, Dan Harris. In my opinion, having been alive on this planet for several decades now, one of the ultimate life skills is the ability to handle conflict. Interpersonal affairs are messy often, and conflict is inevitable. And if you can handle it smoothly, you are much more likely to have healthy relationships. And as we know, healthy relationships are the key, according to vast scientific literature, the key. The key, to a happy life. So I was very interested when I heard that a pair of Buddhist teachers who happen to be married to one another had written a book, a whole book, about how to manage conflict. The teachers in question are Devin and Nico Haza, and they have a book called This Messy Gorgeous

Love, a Buddhist guide to lasting partnerships. And this is not just, I should be clear, not just about how to manage conflict in your romantic relationships, but also at work and beyond. a little bit of background on Nico and Devin. Nico, who's the husband, spent six years living in a monastery before he earned a PhD in counseling psychology and then became an insight meditation teacher. Devin teaches at the Spirit Rock Meditation Center in California and also starting in October, so very soon, she will be the teacher of the month on my meditation app, 10% with Dan Harris. This is Devin and Nico's second appearance on the show.

Devin and Nico Haseh, welcome back to the show. Thanks, Dan. And it's so great to be back. Let me just start by asking. It seems like one of the most treacherous relationship challenges one could ever imagine endeavoring upon is writing a book together. Did you guys ever plan some sort of homicide during the course of this? We tell all our conflicts.

We tell all our secrets in this book. And so we're very happy to share our book process with you as well. You want to go ahead and explain some of that, Nico? Yeah, so actually, this is the second book that we have written together. And we worked out a lot of the kinks in that first book, which was called How Not to Be a Hot Mess. And we were on this podcast last time to talk about that book. So by the time we got to this book, we kind of knew what we wanted to do. And we had a whole process of how to do it, which was basically outlining in detail together.

and then I wrote the entire manuscript in 30 days with no break, locked in an apartment, talking to no one. And then I handed the whole manuscript over to Devin, and she rewrote the whole thing while talking to everyone. Like, she rewrote by committee. And then we spent an entire month going through it together and hashing out all of the last details. And there were definitely tensions,

but there was no murder play. I consider that kind of a proof of concept of the fact that you were able to do this together. We really worked with the principles in the book while writing the book. Well, and we tell stories in the book about our differences, you know? Like, Nico's, he's an introvert. He's very good at self-regulating, and he loves working alone. So that process where he just locked himself away and was so single-focused on writing really worked for him. And I'm an extrovert. I'm all about relationships and people. And so I needed to write by committee. It was so fun to like go to our, you know, communities and ask about their opinions,

our stories, all these different crowdsourcing the whole time. And we had to balance that. I mean, we know our differences. And so we kind of crafted it in a way that we could each write according to our style. Let me ask a foundational question before we jump into the ideas and practices in the book. The book is primarily focused on romantic relationships, you're a married couple. But this conversation, and I just want to check that we're all in the same page, this conversation really will apply to all sorts of relationships. That's the idea.

So in writing the book, we were focused on partnership, but what we found out through writing was that the principles and the practices that we are offering in this book can be applied to any kind of relationships. So people who have kids have talked about how useful it has been, to apply what's in the book to their parenting. And then people who are dealing with their aging parents, maybe, are talking about how useful it has been to apply with those relationships. We had one workshop participant just last weekend tell us that they were there with their partner, but they barely thought about their partner at all because they were so focused on a conflict

that they're having at work. And it was incredibly useful to use the partnership workshop and all the things that we were saying to go back to work with a fresh set of eyes and figure out how am I going to be in harmony? How am I going to work with this person? So it can apply across the board to any kind of relationship. Great. So now that we've established that, let's talk about the ideas in the book. And Devin, I'll start with you. One of the things you talk about is the Buddha's first noble truth and how that applies to relationships. Can you just start by explaining what the first noble truth is and then we can talk a lot about how it's relevant in this context? Absolutely. Yeah. So the very first teaching the Buddha ever gave was this framework of four

noble truths. And the very first one he started with was he calls it Dukha. The human condition. Being alive, being a human, is Dukha. So Dukha is a poly word, kind of ancient word, that has been traditionally translated as suffering. So in Buddhism, there's this widespread understanding. First Noble Truth is life is suffering. But we really think that's an unfortunate translation because Dukha has so many different connotations. It really is looking at the whole span of like really serious suffering. But all the way runs the gamut to like just a little discomfort, right?

The kind of agitation that runs. underneath a lot of our experience. And so our first chapter, we call it relationships are rough. We tell our stories about having been together almost 20 years and still finding conflict, still finding some of that duca, the sense of stress or unreliability, or realizing that relationships actually are a lot of work still. And when we start with that principle, to me, It's a very powerful sort of countercultural around this messaging that relationships should be easy, actually. Like, mostly our culture emphasizes this happily ever after thing. Like the search, you just have to find your partner.

And there's a lot about the ups and downs of finding your other half. But then once you do, it's kind of smooth sailing, right? And what the Buddha does and what we want to do is actually dismantle that optimization. We want to say, actually, that's when the work starts. And this is true for any friendship, any long-term relationship, working relationship. It takes a lot of effort to be genuine and healthy in connection with others. And to me, it's like when we don't expect things to be perfect, when we start with this principle of life is unreliable, life is inherently shaky, impermanence, too.

All meetings actually are going to end in separation. So when we come to reckon with this, like the nature of things being uncontrollable and just a little shaky, like a bumpy ride, then it changes our whole attitude around what it means to be in long-term relationship, whether it's in family or working relationships or siblings, whatever, partnership. So we talk about the etymology of Dukha actually is this really interesting image of a wheel that doesn't fit well. on its axle. So if you have a wheel that doesn't fit well, what's going to happen? It's going to be a bumpy ride. And it's that simple. That's what we want to say. It's like relationships are a bumpy ride. Of course, they're beautiful too. They're not all suffering. But it really takes this kind of clear-eyed honesty to realize, even in the best of circumstances, I'm going to have to put some effort into this thing. And we're not always going to see eye to eye. And maybe both of us are kind of

bumpy wheels. So from there then, we can do the work that actually makes relationships transformative and perhaps even a path to awakening. It's interesting what you said about the misconception, as our couple's therapist often says, that we expect in our culture to go from one enchanted evening to happily ever after. And that's how we get in so much trouble. So I get that. But are you saying, and Nico, I'll go to you for this one, are you saying that Duka or suffering is a feature, not a bug, or are you saying this is just a thing to manage? We are saying that Duka, that kind of rub, is a feature, not a bug, that no matter what kind of partnership you're in, or any kind of relationship you're in, there is going to be an underlying friction. And the more

intimacy you have with another person, the closer in you are, the more likely there is to be that friction. So just taking partnership as an example, it's really wonderful to have a honeymoon period. Like you fall in love, you see everything good about this person, then you load up some of your projections onto them that might not even be there. But pretty soon, maybe you move in together. Now you're sharing finances. Now you're sharing a dishwasher. And you're you're having an argument about whether the forks need to go into the dishwasher right side up, or do the spines go down? And it's like insanely important that they do it the right way. And you start to get all of your edges and all of your craginess and they're bumping up against each other.

What we're saying is that is the thing. Like that is what partnership is. That level of intimacy is going to bring out all of these parts of yourself that you would rather other people do not see, and it's going to bring all of the parts of your partner out that they have been able to hide until you got this close, right? So if we can allow for that, if we can even accept that, it's not that relationships are suffering all the time. It's just that there's going to be this baseline of difficulty and friction, and we can make that a kind of, of Dharma practice, a meditation practice. We can use the rub for our own transformation. And that makes the same rub go from something like suffering to something like actually inspiring and

interesting. We want to move closer to it and find out about it. You have probably heard our mutual teacher, Joseph Goldstein. He often says, don't waste your suffering. And I think that's kind of what you're saying here in a relationship context. Precisely. There's plenty of conflict. Most of it, I think, pretty healthy in my personal and professional lives. But it's not like fun. And sometimes I don't learn anything from it.

I just soldier through it. So how do we use this as an opportunity to grow and learn? I mean, it turns out the Buddha was a really relational teacher. There's a suta called the Satipatana Suta, which if you've been on a retreat, you probably followed those instructions where the Buddha's inviting us to be mindful of our body and then the different feelings and thoughts and emotions. And in the Suta, 13 times, he repeats, he's inviting us to be mindful internally, externally, and then being mindful internally and externally.

So there's just three ways of being mindful, these three directions. And in the book, we translate mindfulness as listening. It's a simple listening practice. So when we're meditating, mostly we're going inside, we're listening internally. But also it's pretty important to learn to listen externally, you know, to anybody who we're connecting with. This external listening is a mindfulness training the same way that we're training to know what's happening in us. And then the third one is really interesting. How do we listen both internally and externally?

And we could talk a long time about what the Buddha meant by that. But in the book, we translate it as listening to our relationship itself. Like listening to this connection. You know, what's the context for our relationship? If it's long term, it's probably going through all these different phases. There are different conditions and situations. So there's a kind of subtle refinement where we can be listening to all of these three different spaces and then responding in ways that are much more skillful.

So we can see the conflict as information and then learn, okay, how do I want to be? want to be in this moment. What do I want to say that's onward leading? So this deep listening, and we have practices in the book where we do it just personally, and then we can do it as a relational meditation that has really transformed for me that sense of like, you know, assuming that everything should go smoothly and then also being kind of stuck and like we're just having conflict, but like you said, you just buckle down and kind of get through it. It actually means I can learn a lot through these, you know, mostly for me these days, it's through friendships. Like, long term friendships have so much potential for listening, you know, the different changing conditions,

changing contexts, and then how do I want to be? How do I be a good friend in this particular context? I think what you're saying is that there's a fundamental attitude shift of let's look at the duca or suffering of relationships, not as a thing to be soldiered through or a thing to resist, but as something to get interested and curious about because it's actually an opportunity to grow. So that's the fundamental attitude shift. But then you made reference to practices that would help us listen to ourselves, listen to other people, and then listen to the relationship itself. So maybe it's worth unpacking a little bit like what those practices would be really just so that the listener can walk away with something or viewer now, because we're increasingly doing this on video.

The listener or viewer can walk away with something that she or he can operationalize, you know, right away in their own life. Absolutely. So the first meditation that we offer in the book and essentially what Devin is talking about, these listenings, these are kind of meditations, is just to close your eyes

if you feel comfortable or leave your eyes open and soften your gaze and just bring a warm awareness, a kind attention to your own feet. Right? And then bring that same attention after a minute or two, to your hands. And then after a minute or two,

bring that same attention, that listening to your heart. And then spend a few minutes, three minutes maybe, really listening to your own heart. And this is a really profound and, in some sense, countercultural move.

I mean, you know this so well, Dan. And just that turn of attention away from all of the shiny objects of the world that are constantly moving and distracting and changing and turning our attention back and just feeling my own heart and recognizing, oh, maybe I feel a little tense right now, or maybe I feel afraid, or I'm actually really irritated, or whatever, there might be deep contentment that I find here. Sometimes it'll surprise you. that is the first level of just learning to listen once we learn to listen in that way we really feel

like we can eavesdrop on our own nervous system and sense that when we have that deep listening then we can extend it to another and one way but we talk about extending it to another in another meditation in the book is you just imagine your partner so you're in meditation for five minutes and you just imagine your partner, or you imagine a really good friend or a parent or a child or a coworker, and you kind of bring them into your mental space and you hang out with your image of them and listen. It doesn't sound like anything much would happen, but in my own experience, I, this like all of these projections that are unconscious and they're all in the space with me and there's all this friction and stuff going on.

But after a few minutes, a lot of that settles down, and I can just kind of hear what is going on for this person. Of course, it's limited. It's still my own perspective, but it's like a little better at just being like, oh, they're tired. They're so tired in their life right now. They're so busy in their life right now. A lot of the difficulty we're having,

it's not even coming from them. It's even not their fault. And it's not my fault. It's just like, whoa, things are intense. And there can be a kind of like softening or a forgiving. And then doing that same meditation for the relationship itself, the history of the relationship, the context of the relationship, just sensing into that.

So that's the three-way listening. And we go into much more detail in the book about how to do these practices. But you can make it an actual practice. You can do it as an exercise. And that's when it actually becomes transformative. If I could simplify it and hopefully not over-simplify it, learning to just get in touch with your own mind-body system or, as you said, to eavesdrop on your nervous system in meditation,

in mindfulness meditation, can allow you to not be so yanked around by your emotions when you're in contact with another person. it can also allow you to extend that mindfulness to the mental and physical states of the person you are with in the moment. And then finally to the to the in between, to the state of the relationship. So I know there's a lot to what you just described in terms of the practices that are in the book, but on a very basic way of understanding it, it's really just, if you do mindfulness, you're going to be able to apply it to relationships. Well said. Exactly it.

And I think, I mean, it's been really fun to write and teach about this because it seems simple. It sounds so obvious when we say it that way. But actually, we're not necessarily trained to do that. We're relational beings. You could say we're in relationship all the time, even if we're just talking about our relationship with the moment. And so the external listening and the in between, listening to the in between seems like a territory for, in general, meditation culture, mindfulness practice now as it's getting trained. translated here, there's so much possibility and potential for really taking this seriously, just as much as we do as our daily meditation. But, you know, what would happen to our relationships if we brought this kind of depth and commitment to, like, I really want to know what's going on for you, you know, like, tell me everything. And then same thing with the relationship itself. Like, there's a lot of potential here for not wasting the duca. When I first started meditating, I got extremely lucky. I was able to meet and befriend. some of the world's greatest meditation teachers, people like Joseph Goldstein and Sharon Salzberg.

I know, of course, that that is not possible for most people, which is why I have created a whole meditation app designed to give you the experience that I've been lucky to have in person. On this app, we've collected some of the world's most amazing teachers, including Joseph and Sharon, but many, many others who are teaching courses and doing weekly live sessions. is really designed not only to give you all of the things you get on a normal meditation app, but also to give you community. Direct access to me and the teachers in our weekly live video sessions where we meditate and you can ask questions. Also the opportunity to connect with your fellow users. We know from the science that social support, that's the term that researchers

use is one of the most powerful ways to create and keep up with a habit like meditation. Go to Dan Harris.com and sign up for the app. It's called 10% with Dan Harris. There's a free 14-day trial if you want to check it out before you buy. Danharris.com join the party. We'll be right back after this. One of the knocks, and I think this is a fair critique of Western Buddhism, is it is too focused on the individual, either shooting for enlightenment or or just plain old stress reduction. I have nothing negative to say about stress reduction or enlightenment. But if that's all you're focused on in a kind of solipsistic, individualistic way,

it is missing a lot of what the Buddha intended to teach. You talk about using mindfulness to improve your relational fitness. There's also, of course, loving kindness meditation. And just for the uninitiated, that's the, practice where you sit, close your eyes, bring to mind a series of beings, you either envision them or generate some sort of felt sense in your body, and then you hurl phrases at them like, may you be happy, may you be safe, live with ease, et cetera, et cetera.

I'm being slightly tongue and cheek here. I've noticed just doing this practice at a reasonably high dosage for the last decade has just overall warmed me up. I often joke about how my factory settings are firmly at, the frosty New Englander and just doing the practice has, has boosted my friendliness quotient significantly. But adding my wife into the rotation has just boosted my warmth toward her. And yeah, just wonder what you think of this as a tactic. So good. So good. And I think we love teaching meta. We love teaching all these different

heart practices. But actually, they're fairly advanced. You know, the ability to imagine our close ones and then to feel, generate these feelings and then to offer phrases, what I find offering them for beginners is like they need some basic, like, what does friendliness feel like, you know? And so I would say maybe what we're doing here is like very, like step number one, like tiny little like practices for learning how to listen and feel that friendliness for us, you know, that curiosity of like, I want to know what's here. And then same thing, if we can just imagine another person and who they are and how they are in the world right now, that's kind of the preliminaries for then the meta phrases and the meta practice that you're naming. So we love teaching all these different kinds of meta, but I think the phrases in particular are like take a lot of concentration and a lot of training to really get into. In the book we do kind of like compassion, joy or equanimity, you can look at your person through all these different glasses, right? You can really contemplate their suffering and get into the compassion side of it. Or we have a whole chapter on joy.

You can think about this person in all of their strengths, right? What you love about them, what you celebrate about them. And often we forget to do that. So that feels like a pretty subversive practice in itself to be like, oh yeah, I chose you for all these reasons. And then to celebrate that. And then same thing with equanimity, you know, really taking the whole person in the strengths, the weaknesses, what really ticks me off, what I love about. you, there's a kind of equanimity of like, yeah, and I'm in it with you, right? I'm here for it that helps us kind of commit to that steady balance that is equanimity and connection.

So I think I love that you're bringing in the Brahma Biharis, and I think these are all kind of like little ways that we can scaffold in our heart practice so that it becomes like, yes, daily, you know, we can really build those muscles over time. Yeah, I want to let's go deep on this subject of joy because I know you, you're You have a lot to say for anybody who doesn't know what the Brahma v. Haras are. You know, Devin just talked about this, but I want to make sure it's super, super clear. Meta, often translated as loving kindness, that can be practiced in the way that I just described earlier, where you envision a series of people and then send them these phrases like, maybe happy, et cetera, et cetera.

So that's one of the Brahma viharas. That's the ancient term for four interrelated mind states that all can be trained through various forms of meditation. Brahma Vihara's translates into the divine abodes that sounds kind of grandiose and maybe out of reach. But essentially, these are innate capacities we all have that can be trained. So one of them is loving kindness. I prefer to translate meta, which is the ancient term, not as loving kindness. loving kindness, but as friendliness, because that is actually, I believe, more accurate and also just less gooey. The other three Brahma Viharis are equanimity, which is just the ability to be with whatever and whoever is in front of you with some evenness.

A third is compassion, which is the, and equanimity is very helpful in this regard to be able to approach other people suffering with the attitude of how can I help. And fourth, and these are not really in any particular order, but the fourth is sympathetic joy, or just the opposite of Schadenfreude, the ability to take pleasure in other people's happiness. That lands us nicely on joy, which you brought up, Devin, so I'm just going to go with the flow on this. And, Nico, I'll turn to you, I believe one of the arguments you're making in the book is that joy is not frivolous. It's not like an extra or a nice to have. A hundred percent. And we also say in the book, we're not great at that as a couple, you know.

So it's been a real training for us to prioritize joy. And I think we joke in the book that we had, you know, three main things that we were really focused on for the first 18 years of a relationship. And the first one was get enlightened. Second one was find some way to make a living. and the third way, way, way, way, way down on the list somewhere was have some fun. And what we have noticed over the last couple of years is that we need to bring that fun, that shared joy up the list a lot more.

Now, what's interesting is that in true Buddhist fashion, in the book, we start our joy chapter by contemplating death. And I'll just give you an example. So Devin teaches at Spirit Rock Meditation Center in California, which is a very beautiful campus and beautiful buildings. And in the teacher village, each one of the rooms is made for one person. They're not expecting you to bring your partner along. But often I go with her to Spirit Rock. And maybe I'm doing some teaching in California too. And I'm hanging out in this room that is small. smaller than your average motel room. And I am a, I'm a minimalist. When I travel, I travel with a small carry-on, three pairs of pants, three shirts, not much else. No underwear. You're just, you're just like commando all the time. Yeah. Devin is a maximalist. I definitely have all the underwear. She travels with this giant bag full of goodies.

So one day, actually in the middle of writing this book, I had been in a writing session down in the offices at Spirit Rock. I came in to the room that we were sharing. Devin was off giving a talk. And I walked into the room. And everywhere I looked was Devin's stuff. The bathroom was filled with all these, I don't even know, cosmetics and creams and all these things. And there was a blender. There was literally a blender

on the desk that she had carried with her. Papers everywhere. She's very neat actually, but like clothes hanging from all these different places because there's not enough room in the closet. And I had this moment of irritation. Like, where am I even supposed to be here? And then very quickly on the heels of that moment of irritation, I remember. that we're going to die. It sounds really strange, but in that moment of, oh, wow, what would it be like if I walked into this room

and none of Devin's stuff was here? Because I don't know how much time I have in this life. I don't know how much time Devin has in this life. I don't know how long our connection will last, But one thing I know absolutely for sure is that it won't last forever. And in that moment of recognizing, just remembering, oh my gosh, we're going to die. It was like magic. All of my irritation kind of popped like a bubble.

And that kind of insight is really helpful for the strange, small things that annoy you about your partner. it requires the practice of remembering impermanence. And this is something we talk about in the final chapter of the book. We call it death is the mother of beauty, which is a phrase that we're picking up from the poet Wallace Stevens. If you remember that everything is changing, if you remember that everything is not going to last, there's this kind of poignancy that brings you more intimacy

it brings you closer to the moment. And this is true in partnership, but this is very true in all of our relationships. My parents are now in their 80s, and I have wonderful parents, but sometimes, like every relationship, they do get on my nerves. If I can remember in those moments,

well, I really don't know how much time we have together. It doesn't matter that they said the wrong thing, did the wrong thing, have certain personality quirks that I find challenging. And this is true for all of our relationships. So I think cultivating the awareness of impermanence

and particularly remembering how short this life is is not only a very, very, very Buddhist way to approach these things. It's also seriously effective for not sweating the small stuff. Buddhist really know how to party. I put myself in the category. I think I do the five daily remembrances, you know, twice a day. I should explain what that is for people who are new to this. I've talked about it before on the show just remembering twice a day,

five things, you know, this bodies of the nature to grow old, this body is of the nature to get sick, this body's of the nature to die. I'm someday, this is the harsh one. I'm someday going to lose everything and everyone I hold dear. And then finally, as our mutual friend Vinnie Ferraro says on the fifth remembrance, the Buddha kind of pulls the knife out. You know, the fifth thing to remember is that in this context of perpetual change, the only, the closest thing I have to real possessions are my actions.

And I think actually now that I'm saying these five remembrances allowed, that fifth remembrance in particular seems like a real relationship takeaway. Absolutely. Absolutely. And I think this also is very subtle and complex, though. Because another way that we try to address some of these misunderstandings, it's like I think Dharma culture, given our contemplations of death, our work on the heart practices, our emphasis on kindness and patience and skillful speech, sometimes we can get a little conflict avoidant. And there's this kind of super ego identity that can come through Buddhist practice where it's like

a good practitioner, a good Buddhist wouldn't actually be having. conflict in their intimate relationships, in their friendships, at work, right? Like, a good Buddhists would be patient all the time. And there's different ways in the book we address this, but I do think this is a big shadow side of like, we're really trying to cultivate goodness. We're trying to do the right thing. We're taking responsibility for our actions, our karma. And I think it can lead to some overly simplified ideas about what long-term healthy relationship looks like, which we want to give conflict, a good, big place in long-term, healthy relationships. So we have a whole section. We call it rupture like a pro because we want to bring in some of those skills in terms of normalizing conflict

and then knowing this is also part of Dukkah and we don't want to waste it. So how do we do that skillfully? I think this is so important. I want to hear a lot more. I've had guests on the show have talked about the difference between high conflict, which is what many of us engage in. where the ego gets involved and we get, you know, we dig trenches and fire shots from those trenches at the other person. And you see this in our politics in particular. And by contrast, healthy conflict, which is, which recognizes that, of course, there's, there's, it's inevitable when you're in relationship with anybody that there will be disagreement, but how are you going to manage it, um, skillfully? And, and I believe there's, there's evidence, uh, research

to suggest that people who know how to engage in healthy conflict are much happier. So with that framing, Devin, you brought up rupturing like a pro in the context of rupture and repair, which is a commonly used phrase in psychological circles. How does one rupture like a pro? So there's lots of ways we'll talk about it, but I'll maybe give you an example of one of our Vegas conflicts. This is also, it was very transparent the way that we tell our. our stories, just trying to normalize. Like, we've been together for 20 years. We've been practicing

for a couple decades, you know, or more. And still, this is what we do. So we, starting in 2019, we actually engaged in a non-traditional three-year retreat guided by our Tibetan teachers. And that's a whole story in itself. But we were basically in solitude for those three years, working still a little bit, but definitely not seeing a lot of our friends or, you know, not traveling at all in that period. And so this was now, we came out about three years ago. And the first thing we did was we bought a van. And this was kind of a life dream. Like we're very nomadic. We thought it'd be great. Our van was kind of like our dream home. And we just figured we set up all of these different teaching events and we got to go see our friends, you know, visiting around the country. And the very

first place we went was Canada because our one of our teachers, our llamas, lives in Vancouver. And we had also gotten this handwritten letter, like dropped out of the sky in the middle of our retreat from a benefactor offering us retreat land on Salt Spring Island. And it sounded ideal. It was like waterfront property. She's like, I want to help build this whole community, a retreat center. And so we thought coming on a retreat, like, maybe this will be our next big thing. So we took our van up to Salt Spring. And we've never been there before. And because it was a handwritten letter, this donor just gave us like latitude and longitude. She didn't even give us like an address. And she also said you can't access it by road.

It's a trail. So you basically have to like go to this particular point on the waterfront in the other side of Salt Spring Island and then walk to get there. So we're pretty, we're out of retreat. We're like fresh or confident. We've got our van. We're like, we're going to go. So we get out the ferry. We're driving this huge van through like an idyllic little town, the ferry landing. And then the GPS, we could see on the map the latitude and longitude was on the other side of the island. So basically we just have to drive across the island is what we thought. But pretty soon the road gets very steep. And our van, all of our new possessions are rattling around in the van.

I'm very anxious. Nico's driving. And I say, maybe we should slow down a little bit. And he's like, if I slow down, we will not make it over this mountain. So he's gunning it. We're doing this kind of fish tail. a little bit. There's these switchback turns. We get up over the mountain. It's pretty steep on the other side too. So we're like kind of just gingerly going down. There's switchbacks. And then it looks like

there's a straight shot, very steep, steep and narrow. The road gets very straight, heads right to this parking lot at the ocean. It's what it looked like. So we're like, great, we're just going to head right there and then find the trail. But we end up finding this road just dead ends. There's no parking lot. It's just we're sitting there looking out over the open ocean, 20 feet above on a cliff. So I'm pretty anxious, got a lot of adrenaline going at that time. I was like, what do we do? We're stuck, right? We can't back up. It's too steep. We're just kind of new driving this van. It's a 20 foot long van. And it's a cliff. And Nico, this is how he does stress. He gets very calm. He says to me, oh, don't worry, we're fine. I'm just going to swing a little K-turn. It's going to be

no problem. So very confident. And I say to him, I don't think there's room to swing a K-turn. He's like, no, no, I'm just going to drive up the cliff a little bit, you know, back it up, drive it up, back it up. So he starts, he starts driving up the one side and then backing up, and we can hear and we can see the camera. It's like, be, beep, beep, beep, beep, beep, really like, there's like red lights going on. And then we hear that. And then we hear the back wheels drop off the edge of the cliff. Our new fan. And at that point, you might think, like a good Buddhist, like me, would be like, I forgive you, I'm patient, it's okay. But in the moment, of course, that's not what I did. I was like, some expletives, I'm having a panic attack,

I'm going to get out of the car, I need some space, I'm going to go for a walk. And to his credit, Niko was like, I get it. That's kind of my bad. I'm going to call AAA. He's like, go take a break. I'm calling AAA. So it took us some time to actually resolve what had just happened, right? My beloved life partner had just almost driven our van over the side of a cliff. I was mad. I was mad about it. And so my practice in that moment was like, this is not good, right? Like, I need some space here. And he, I mean, luckily, the Canadian AAA are amazing. We have a. the video actually we could show you of them like pulling the van it almost tipped but it did not

pulling it back getting it turned around so in that you can kind of see i mean neko and i are what we call volcanoes there's different conflict styles which we can go through that is kind of like refining what our knee-jerk reaction is to conflict do we explode do we get into it that's volcanoes diplomats practice a lot of diplomacy so if you you have a diplomat conflict style, you're really into talking things out. And then the third conflict style is what we call Dodgers. So Dodgers dodge, right? They don't really like conflict. They know how to take space. So there's these different like, you know, whether it's family conditioning or personality style, we have these different automatic reactions that we get into with conflict.

None of them are better or worse than any other. And this is another kind of dismantling of a Buddhist idea because I think Buddhists might think, oh, it's about being really kind all the time or not really getting into conflict. But volcanoes exploding sometimes that can be very Darmic too. It's about understanding our conflict style and then training in the learning edge. Like what new skill do I need to bring so that I can balance out my conflict style with whoever's in front of me? That was all very interesting. I'm kind of stuck on the three-year retreat. And I'm just channeling.

I often joke that I have this supernatural capacity to channel the thoughts of my listeners and viewers. I can imagine somebody watching or listening thinking, wait, these guys did a three-year retreat. Yeah. Something I will never do. Yeah. And yet Nico retained the capacity to do some very stupid. shit with his van and Devin retained the capacity to panic and get pissed off about it. And so if I'm never going to do a three-year retreat and these guys are still acting like dummies, what hope is

there for me? This is an excellent question, Dan. It is, first of all, extremely true that despite having done tens of thousands of hours of meditation and literally years of meditation retreat, we both act like dummies at times. It's not only true for us, we now know essentially, we know many, many, many senior meditation teachers who have been practicing for decades, who are rightfully revered in their field, who sometimes act like total dummies.

This is a fact. I'm so sorry to disappoint all of our listeners, but it turns out that meditation does not make you perfect. It actually just makes you even more human. And so the depth that you gain through meditation is not becoming some shining light who never makes mistakes, who never gets upset. But it makes you very much at ease

with being imperfect, kind of silly sometimes. And that can make you very at ease with other people being imperfect and kind of silly sometimes. And the second thing I think that meditation does very, very well is help you bounce back from difficulty. So yes, Devin did have some panic and yes, Devin did have some anger. But 20 minutes later, she didn't have panic and she didn't have panic. and she didn't have anger, right? And in that moment, yes, actually Devin just downplayed what I did. It was way dumber than what she just said. But, you know, in that moment of having driven our van most of the way off a cliff where it was teetering on the edge of the ocean 20 feet above the ocean, I think it

probably helped that I'd done all these many hours of meditation. I just felt like, oh, well, I'm an idiot. it. This was one of the dumber things I've ever done in my life. So now, what will we do next? So the fruits of meditation are real. Like, it is so useful to have done so much meditation, but they're not really necessarily what you would expect. It's humbling. I mean, isn't it? It's so humbling to just get to know your mind so well. And I think, you know, this three-year retreat is the whole story. We dreamed about it for years and years and saved up and had all these planes. And my sense is we always talked about writing a book, you know, that would be about our retreat. And I thought it would be about esoteric wisdom shared from the mountaintop, right?

Like all the ways we got enlightened. And this, this is our product. Our humble product was how we learned to live together through those years. We got kind of sticky. There were stuff that we had to work out, you know, in retreat together. But we really did have like a deep training. and how to be a human being. And that's what we're writing about here.

It's like all the stuff we discovered about each other, also about being in relationship as a relational being, and then how we use that to get enlightened, which is not what we expected it would be. So you feel like you did get enlightened? It might be a verb. I feel like now I have a lot of confidence in how it works. Like it feels freer.

You know, there's more spaciousness. still a lot of dumbness, stupidity, mistakes, for sure. But the attitude about them, like I have a sense, if we just keep going in this attitude of spaciousness of grace, of friendliness for ourselves and others, I could see by inference where it goes to. So it's certainly not arrived in any way. But it's baby steps. And I can really feel with a lot of confidence, like, okay, if it just keeps going this way,

that's, I think, what the Buddha was talking about in terms of freedom. Spaciousness is a interesting word because it gets used a lot in Buddhist circles. I worry that people aren't going to know what it means, but I understand spaciousness to be, just if I'm channeling you, Devin, in the moment when your husband's being a ferocious, dumbass with your new van, you experience anger, you experience panic, but you're actually, you have some ability to watch. it come and go. And so that's the space around it. Instead of being totally engulfed by the emotion, you're like, I sometimes describe it as the difference between being dragged by your head by a motorboat as opposed to being on water skis. And the latter would be spaciousness. How am I doing? Am I in the right neighborhood of what you're trying to describe? I love that. That's a great metaphor. I love the water metaphors. The one I use a lot is like I'm an amateur surfer. And so like getting all churned

about by the waves sucks, right? Like that's when we're completely in the turn and the push and the pull and the reactivity and there's no control. But if we are learning how to stay on our board, you know, how to like stay with some balance, understand the rhythm of the waves. That's exactly what we're talking about. I mean, in the first chapter I tell this story about how I was also kind of dumb. Also on our van trip, same kind of season. We were staying with friends. We were super tired. We were teaching way too much. And we were in Vermont at peak season for pictures. So we had to take these like head shots, right, for our new website. And I was really grumpy. I did not want to take these pictures. And we got into a whole tangle about it because Nika's like,

we got to have the head shots. It's a perfect day. Our friend Isabella's, this excellent photographer. And I just felt like a big old hot mess and I said, no, I'm not going to do them. And we had this argument. But in the middle of that, I could see, this is what I've been my spaciousness. There was some space between what was happening in the fight and my observation of it. Like I could see, oh, I'm just making all these kind of dumb choices along the way. But at any moment, I could actually turn. I could make that turn. And I did. I said, okay, let's pause, right? without too much time going by, we paused together. And that was the turn that mattered, right? We were able to then breathe together a bit, didn't take too long to recognize what was happening was I was just really tired.

And when I named that and apologized for some of my moodiness, we were able to settle. And then, of course, we did the photos anyway. And that's actually what's all over the internet. Those glowing photos that we took that day was like preceded by a big old argument and conflict. So I think you're right on. I think what I mean by space is like there's a little bit of ability to see with more perspective what's going on. And then agency to choose differently, the more we understand what's happening. We can make a different turn, make a different choice. You don't have to apologize for being booty. I'm sure Nico was in the, you know, at fault here. It probably wasn't even wearing underwear.

So don't worry about. It probably wasn't. You're right, Dan. I mean, that's half the problem. Exactly. That's spaciousness. So, sorry. I'm glad I'm no longer regulated by the FCC on this program.

I've kind of knocked you off trajectory a couple times here. Several minutes ago, you, Devin, were talking about how we can know our conflict style and use that to our advantage. So Nico, do you want to say a little bit more about how to do that? This has been so helpful for us. So, Devon already named these, but I'll go through them again a little more slowly. There are three conflict styles. And this is us drawing from the work of John Gottman and then kind of making it our own. So the first conflict style we call volcanoes.

Volcanoes explode. That is the nature of being a volcano. The great thing about volcanoes is you never have to wonder what they're thinking. Devon is kind of a volcano, and it's great. She will always tell me what she's thinking, sometimes in a loud voice, right? I'm also a volcano. I will always tell you what I'm thinking. The disadvantage of being a volcano is that it creates rupture sometimes. And so if you are a volcano, you need to get really good at repair. the art of the apology. So the second kind of conflict style is we call diplomats. There are a lot of diplomats in Buddhist culture. Those are the people that you know that have taken the nonviolent communication course and they've taken like insight dialogue or they're doing some kind of check-in practice. They just, diplomats are really good at talking through conflict and using all of their skills, the problem with diplomats is that they can talk until the cows come home and it gets

so exhausting after a while. And what diplomats need to learn to balance out their strength is to let it go. Like, we've talked about it enough. We don't need to get to the bottom of every single thing tonight. We can leave something for later, right? And then there's the Dodgers and the Dodgers dodge, right? So these are the ones that avoid conflict. Dodgers kind of disappear, like they may even stay in the room with you, but you have the sense that they're not there anymore. Or they will actively physically leave the room rather than engage in conflict. And there's a lot of wisdom to being a Dodger, to knowing when it's just not the right time to have this conversation. What Dodgers could learn is,

to come back and to make sure that they address all of the issues that need to be addressed, or else a lot just gets swept under the rug, and friends, partners, coworkers can end up with this sort of simmering resentment in this lack of intimacy. So each one of these three conflict styles has their own strength, has their own weakness. And the most important thing is probably to not try to change your conflict style. There's so much pressure on us to try to change our conflict style, but it really, it doesn't work that well. And also, it doesn't work that well to try to change my friend's conflict style or my family's conflict style. What works a lot better is to just notice, oh, well, this person is a dodger. So they're going to dodge. How can I work

skillfully with this person who is a dodger, or knowing, okay, well, I'm a diplomat, and I've got strengths as a diplomat, but it's not necessarily the only way to do things or even the best way to do things. So just knowing these categories and being able to lightly, sort of non-neurotically, place ourselves in others in these categories of how we approach conflict is really enlightening for how we can stay close and intimate, even though we have differences. If you're working with or in a relationship, a romantic relationship with somebody who's conflict avoidant, how do you handle that? Yeah, I would say tread carefully. So the thing with Dodgers is that they get scared pretty easily and they kind of shuffle away. So you probably

need to let them shuffle away to some extent. And it depends. It depends. It depends. It's depends on the level of intimacy how you are going to engage with them. So if you're in a partnership with somebody who was a Dodger, then you're going to have loss of opportunities for when they come back and a soft approach, like a soft entry into the next conversation so that they feel secure and they feel okay and they feel safe is probably going to be really useful. With a coworker, there's less intimacy probably than with a partner. So you're going to have less opportunity to really be deeply honest. I mean, this is one of the things that we talk about all the time

is that in sort of human potential movement culture or wellness culture, there's this idea that we should be honest with everybody all the time no matter what. And I don't think that's really very functional. But basically, understanding another person's conflict avoidance can help you navigate that conflict avoidance. So coming in a little softer is usually the first step. And I think, you know, these other practices we're offering like the three listenings.

We have a partner practice, relational practice. We offer called checking in, which is just what it sounds like. Seems really simple. We've probably all done them maybe even in work meetings or, you know, it's basically just agreeing to take time to share what's going on. And doing it in a kind of more formatted way. So you have a timer and you kind of take turns. checking in, that can be a way for somebody who's conflict-avoid it to feel safe enough to kind of name what's going on for them without it heading into a big fiery thing. Because there's agreements

about how you're going to listen. You're not going to interrupt them, right? You might not even comment on what they say. So also rain. We talk about rain. I know you've had Tara on the podcast. We do her version of rain, which is a really beautiful meditation for working with emotions. So the rain, it's an acronym for recognize, allow, investigate, and nurture. You can do it journaling. You can do it as a mindfulness meditation. But you can also do partner rain, which is sort of Tara's innovation. And then we discovered this in our retreat, actually, and did it daily.

And it was such a helpful way to kind of be in relationship while we're recognizing our feelings, allowing our feelings, you know, kind of together in that. So I think for conflict avoidance, there's softer ways like Nico saying to use these tools. You invite them into some communication without it being too scary. The Tara in question here is Tara Brock, and I'll drop some links in the show notes to the many times that Tara has been on the show. There's a term you use, patience with teeth. What does that mean? Maybe I'll start and then maybe you can add some, Nico.

I think this is, again, we're talking about some of the shadow sides of Dharma. of Buddhist culture. And so I think the chapter is actually, it's called Patiences for Amateurs. We can get into this thing called, we call it the trance of nice, which really comes from my own experience as a people pleaser. And I loved all those teachings on the beautiful qualities that we cultivate in meditation. We cultivate this kindness that we've been talking about. We cultivate patience. We cultivate a kind of selflessness. There's this kind of encouragement to foster all of these qualities without understanding that true patience, I think in the Buddhist context, actually has a kind of ferocity to it. So it's not a trance of nice. It's not a passive,

like, this two shall pass. I'm just going to hang out and wait for my partner to get over their anger, right? A little bit like the, you named in the beginning, we have all these conflicts and sometimes we just double down and we just like live through them, which is a kind of waste of Duka, that's the kind of dumb patients that we're talking about, patients that's for amateurs. But patients with teeth, it's a little bit like what we were practicing in the van episode. It's like, I'm in it with you. I can be patient with my own anger, right? Nico's okay with that I'm having a pan attack.

He's like in it. He's going to call AAA. We're having this big altercation. And we're in it. We're not collapsing. We're not like character assassinating. We're not like doing the good Buddhist thing, leaping to a problem. apologize. We're being real with each other. And that's a lot of like that honesty, that kind of

getting real is what this book is about. Like let's not gloss over in some Buddhist super ego kind of way that I'm like always a patient person. Sometimes I'm not. But patience with teeth knows that and can be with impatience, right? It can be with all of my own foibles. It can be with all of my partner's difficulties. And I'm not actually using the practice as a subtle form of violence or a subtle form of like, I'm just going to wait this out until, you know, goes under the rug or something changes. So it's another way, I think, to talk about Joseph's saying of not wasting our suffering, like being really honest about it and being willing to be uncomfortable for as long as it takes because that's what intimacy really looks like. More to say on that, Nico. I thought that was so

beautifully sad. No more to say. It's a great term and it was well, well described. Thank you. Let me just go one click deeper, though, on patients with teeth. When you're in a conflict and you want to both, you know, have some compassion and equanimity and friendliness and kindness toward the person you're in conflict with and you want to have some self-respect and stand up for yourself, how do you speak clearly without being overly volcanic and, without being avoidant. Well, you're pointing to something that is extremely important to us that we call Walking the High Wire,

which we talk about in-depth in the book, and there's a whole story around it. But walking the High Wire is basically, if you imagine yourself as an acrobat on a high wire, walking, you would maybe think that a really professional acrobat who's walking a high wire is just in balance. But actually, if you talk to somebody

who does this for a living, who's a professional acrobat, what they will tell you is that they are constantly coming into balance. That walking that high wire, they're falling a little to the left and then they're coming back. They're falling a little to the right

and then they're coming back. And the continuous process of coming into balance is what the middle way looks like, right? the middle way being one of these really important Buddhist terms of not falling too far into, say, self-indulgence or not falling too far into self-denial. But you're continually falling a little bit into self-indulgence or a little bit into self-denial. And then you're noticing it and you're coming back. And you're noticing it and you're coming back. And this brings us right back to the

beginning of our conversation around that deep listening. So your body will often take tell you what is true. If you can really deeply learn to listen to your own nervous system, to your own body, your own heart, your own mind, you can notice like, oh, I'm starting to drift into self-righteousness. I'm just getting caught up in my own perspective. I just have my own idea. It'll feel tense and uncomfortable in your body when you drift in that direction. Likewise, if you find yourself falling into a kind of self-effacement, I don't matter, my needs aren't important. You, if you're paying attention, you're going to feel that physically. There is a contraction that happens around that, you know, self-denial.

So so much of the key of this is learning to pay attention physically, to listen deeply to what is happening in your own body, your own heart. your own mind, and then come back into balance, come back into balance, and then come back into balance again. And I would say also, like, this principle of the middle way is another one of these deep Dharma concepts, so brilliant, that I think has a lot of potential for applying to daily life relationships, right? How does the middle way feel, as Nico is saying in the body, and also understanding, like, it's always a negotiation. You know, I loved actually the episode of you and Bianca, you know, you guys talking about your relationship together was like, yeah, there's knowing each other so deeply, you know each other's needs, but you also know your

idiosyncrasies, the ways that were not well matched, you know, and in some ways, maybe enlightenment in this sense, the middle way is like knowing all those things and having a sense of humor about it. Like, yeah, I have a tendency to be kind of a princess sometimes. It's true, right? Like, I'm a maximalist. It's taken years of training to admit that because I'm also a Buddhist. But, you know, we have to kind of match our different styles. I prefer to live in a small town. Nico is urban. He wants to live in a city.

Like, how do we compromise on that? It is walking this high wire. We use the example of Philippe Petit who trained to walk the between the Twin Towers in 1970s. Amazing feet. But he trained for thousands of hours, tens of thousands of hours to get that middle way, right? And I think that's what we're doing too in any of our relationships. It's like coming into balance, negotiating, compromising a lot. Like that's what the middle way feels like when it's in the nitty gritty of our daily life.

This applies to parenting. This applies to caregiving, to leading teams at work, to be a good colleague. I think it's all about this kind of finding the middle ground, knowing what my needs are, what the other person's needs are. Understanding might not always match. And so how do we find each other in the middle there? I love all of that. And let me let me just keep picking at the,

please do. The practical expression of walking the high wire in a moment of conflict. Again, collie, kid, spouse, whatever. Are you saying, look, you can listen, learn to listen to your body and to whatever signals you can pick up from the other person. and in between, you know, the state of the relationship to get a sense of when to say what? Yes, that's exactly what we're saying. So I'll give you an example from a student of mine who recently came to the workshop, has this big conflict at work, and she was using all these principles, not with her partner, but with her colleague at work. And what she noticed during the

workshop was that she was so charged up and she was so defensive that what her only real intention when she was honest with herself was to convince him of how right she was. And the deep assumption was that if she could just convince him how right she was, then their relationship would smooth out and they'd be able to work together and things would be great. So in that particular circumstance, she is drifting in the direction of, let's call it, self-righteousness in what she needed to understand for herself. This is not me saying what she needed to understand. This is her report of what she needed to understand, was how caught she was in her own perspective. And when she could listen to him in her own mind, just in meditation in the workshop,

And she could see his perspective and where he was sitting and what his values are and what he wanted from the situation, she was actually able to give him a lot of that. Like, he's not wrong. What if I give a little here and give a little here and give a little here? When she did that on Monday, they had a completely different kind of conversation, and they were able to work with each other much more skillful. much more smoothly. But there could be another example when you went totally the other direction where you're like, I'm not lost in my perspective. I'm just letting you say and do whatever you want,

trample all over me. I'm a Buddhist doormat. I don't matter. And then it would be listening to yourself and listening to the other. And then you probably are going to have to come to that conversation quite differently where you begin to offer your perspective, where you begin to talk about what you are seeing in this situation and what you think is needed here. So it all depends on which side you are drifting toward in any one moment, and you're probably drifting toward different sides depending on the moment, depending on the relationship, depending on what is happening. So the way through is to pay granular close attention first to your own body, which is going to give you so much information and then also to the other and to the situation, that's where wisdom comes from.

To his point of being able to tap into other people's perspectives, I have an 11-year-old son, and sometimes he amazes me with his simultaneous capacity to be a total dumbass and to be really brilliant and precocious. And this is a story of the latter. He taught me a new word recently. I guess he picked this up from some YouTube video. Sonder, S-O-N-D-E-R. It is the realization that other people's lives are as vivid as your own. And this is so important. And for an 11-year-old to be able to grok this is really impressive.

But we're all in our own movies. And I think relating successfully to other people is to understand that they're, they've got, as the kids say, main character, energy the way we all do. Because we are the protagonists of our own movie and it's very hard to break out of that. But if you can, even for a minute, just glimpse that other people have their own story, it just opens up a whole world of successful relationships and increased happiness that would otherwise be unavailable. agree or disagree. So beautiful. I love knowing that word, Dan.

We're going to use it now maybe. Because I think in some ways that is the fruition of all this loving kindness practice, all the heart practices that we named, those four qualities. That's what these practices allow us to do is to kind of get out of our own story and then have the perspective, have the sort of altruistic and also the empathy, the interest, the curiosity, to have even like a little sliver of experience of what it might be like in another person's movie. And if you can imagine what a gift that is to any connection that we're growing, like, I want to be in relationship with people like that.

Devin and Nico Haza, always a pleasure to talk to you. Your first book, and I'll drop a link to this conversation in the show notes. Your first book is, how, not to be a hot mess and you came on this show back in 2020 to talk about that. And your new book is called This Messy Gorgeous Love, a Buddhist Guide to Lasting Partnerships. Yeah, thank you both for coming on the show. Great job today. Yeah, it's so good to be with you. What a delight, Dan.

Thank you so much. Yes, and just to say for listeners, Devin will be teacher of the month on the 10% with Dan Harris meditation app coming up in October. So much more from Devin. Nico, we're excluding you. Well, thank you for telling me up front. Very honest. We're getting real. That's how we find joy.

Thank you very much for listening to the show. I really appreciate it. And if you enjoy listening to the show, if you get anything out of it, please do me a solid. Leave a rating or a review. I know every podcast host asks for this, but it really makes a difference. It helps boost the visibility of this show.

We view this show as a mission to help people become nodes of sanity and an insane world. And so by taking a minute and giving the show a rating or a review, you're really helping us out and helping us achieve our mission. Thank you again. And now on to the credits. Thank you so much to everybody who works so hard to make this show. 10% Happier is produced by Tara Anderson, Marissa Schneiderman, DJ Kashmir, David Hart and Hayden Broome. Our recording and engineering is handled by the great folks over at Pod People, and Nick Thorburn of the indie rock band Islands wrote our theme.

Thank you for listening. Peace.