Ten Percent Happier with Dan Harris - How to Click With Anyone, Read Every Room, and Stop Absorbing Other People's Stress | Kate Murphy
Episode Date: May 25, 2026The neuroscience of human connection: your nervous system is picking up other people's signals all day without your knowledge. Here's how to use that. Journalist Kate Murphy's eclectic essays and arti...cles for The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Economist, Agence France-Presse, and Texas Monthly have been shared and commented on by millions. She is known for her fresh and accessible style and ability to distill complex subjects, particularly the science behind human interactions. Her first book, You're Not Listening: What You're Missing and Why It Matters, was published in thirty-two languages and has become required reading in interpersonal communication courses at high schools, colleges, and universities worldwide. In this episode we talk about: What "interpersonal synchrony" is and the science behind it Why some people just click — and others don't How individualism and technology are working against our need to connect What "affective presence" is –– and how much you can actually change your vibe Interoception – and why you need to understand your own body before you can read others The dark side of synchrony: emotional fusion and borrowed emotions Why audio-only calls are better than Zoom for real connection How physical distance controls your ability to sync "Emotional aperture" — how to read a room like a trial lawyer The secret to bonding with other people Get the 10% with Dan Harris app here Sign up for Dan's free newsletter here Follow Dan on social: Instagram, TikTok Subscribe to our YouTube Channel Additional Resources: Why We Click: The Emerging Science of Interpersonal Synchrony Join Dan, Sebene Selassie, and Jeff Warren for Meditation Party, a 3-day immersive retreat at the Omega Institute in Rhinebeck, NY, October 16–18. Grab your in-person spot here, or sign up to livestream here! This episode is sponsored by: Spark — Clean energy and focus with zero sugar. Get 30% off and free shipping with code HAPPIER at https://www.drinkspark.com. BetterHelp — Online therapy, matched to your needs. Get 10% off your first month at https://www.betterhelp.com/happier. To advertise on the show, contact sales@advertisecast.com or visit https://advertising.libsyn.com/10HappierwithDanHarris
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This is the 10% Happier Podcast. I'm Dan Harris.
Hello, everybody. How we doing? Do you ever wonder why you click with some people and not others,
or why some people are attractive to you, either romantically or as a colleague or as a friend,
and other people just are kind of repellent? And similarly, why some people just don't seem to like you.
The answer to all of these questions has to do with a concept called interpersonal synchrony,
which is basically the mind-blowing fact that we are constantly and subconsciously mirroring
the people around us, sinking with the people around us, our brain waves, our heart rates,
our hormones. It's wild. Today we've got a fascinating and very practical conversation
about how you can harness interpersonal synchrony to your advantage at work in your romantic life,
with your friends, et cetera. And specifically, we talk a lot about a very common pain point,
which is how to stop absorbing other people's bad energy.
My guest has a lot of tips for avoiding that problem.
Said guest is the journalist Kate Murphy, author of a book called Why We Click.
In this conversation, we talk about how individualism and technology are working against our need to connect,
our deeply evolutionarily wired need to connect with other human beings,
how much you can actually change your vibe, how to read the room, like a trial lawyer,
the secret to bonding with other people.
And I love this as somebody who hates Zoom.
Why audio-only calls are much better if you actually want to connect with the other person.
Speaking of audio-only, this podcast is usually available on video.
But this time we did it audio-only, specifically because Kate wanted to connect better with me via audio
and instead of having to stare at each other through a screen.
Before we dive in, just a quick plug for my newsletter.
I think many of you know that I've got this weekly newsletter, but if you don't know or if you're not signed up,
I want to encourage you to do so every Monday I send out a very quick newsletter that has some bite-sized wisdom that you can put to work in your life immediately.
It's just a nice thing to land in your inbox at the beginning of a week.
Plus, it's also the place to stay abreast of all the doings in the 10% happier cinematic universe,
including upcoming live events that I'm doing and also the ever-expanding library.
of amazing content over on my newish meditation app.
You can sign up for the newsletter at danharris.com.
This episode is sponsored by BetterHelp.
May is Mental Health Awareness Month
and a reminder that whatever you're dealing with,
you do not have to deal with it alone.
I actually just came through a little bit of a depressive episode
in my life.
It's super difficult,
but I got a ton of help from my therapist,
also my family and friends,
but my therapist in particular,
was just super available, really helpful with insights and recommendations and medication tweaks.
Really, that's what you need, I think.
For me, as somebody who's been in therapy since I was a child, it's just a must have
when it comes to personal flourishing.
So if you're in the market for a therapist, you might want to check out Better Help.
Better Help therapists work according to a strict code of conduct and they're fully licensed
in the U.S. Better Help does the initial matching work for you so you can focus on your therapy
goals. A short questionnaire helps you identify your needs and preferences and then their 12 plus years
of experience and industry leading match fulfillment rate means they typically get it right the first
time. You don't have to be on this journey alone. Find support and have someone with you in therapy.
Sign up and get 10% off at betterhelp.com slash happier. That's better help.com slash happier.
If you're like me and you've got a lot going on and there are demands coming at you from every
direction, you've got big goals. You need one thing, energy. And that is where one of our sponsors
today, Spark, comes in. Their product gives you energy and mental sharpness without tradeoffs.
It's called Spark Energy Plus Focus. It can be your go-to pre-workout ritual when you need
reliable energy to power through a lift, run, ride, or class. You just mix it, sip it, and get
dialed in and ready to go. It's got zero grams of sugar and essential vitamins and amino acids for mental
Focus. Spark supports reliable, sustained energy and focus without that jittery spike and crash feeling.
Make it your go-to pick me up for the 2 p.m. slump or swap coffee for Spark to start your day strong.
As you may have heard me say to before, I can't consume caffeine, so I can't personally talk about Spark Energy Plus Focus.
But many of the people on my team use it and love it. And I can tell you my team has high energy.
Spark Energy Plus Focus is offering 30% off and free shipping. Go to DrinkSpark.com.
use the code happier at checkout. That's code happier at drinkspark.com.
Kate Murphy, welcome to the show. Thank you for having me. It's pleasure.
It's a pleasure to have you here. I'm going to start with a super obvious basic question,
which is what is interpersonal synchrony? Interpersonal synchrony is what I consider magical,
but now scientifically documented tendency of human beings to,
sink our mirror one another. And not only do we tend to mirror one another's gestures and facial
expressions and postures, recent advances in technology have shown that we actually also sync up
our heart rates, our respiration, our neural patterns, meaning our brain waves, our hormonal activity,
and all these other neurophysiological processes within us. So we're actually embodying the other
person. And the reason why we do that is for empathy and to understand the other person. You actually
become the other person in that moment. It's kind of like your spidey sense that helps you immediately
get a sense of the other person to tell whether they're friend or foe, not to mention sexually
compatible. I'm going to read a very beautiful passage from you back to you and then maybe you can
elaborate on it on the other side. Is that okay? Yeah, please do. Okay.
synchrony, this is you, synchrony between humans is nothing short of a superpower. Compared to other
species, we are not imposing in size or strength. We are not terribly fast or nimble. Our senses are
pretty feeble and our brains, while capable of astounding feats of cognition and imagination,
are nevertheless limited and subject to all kinds of processing errors. But thanks to interpersonal
synchrony, we can marshal and coordinate our bodies and brains to communicate, innovate,
create, build, sustain, and succeed in ways that far exceed what we could accomplish alone.
We are all tuning forks, and I love that.
We're all tuning forks roaming the planet, picking up vibes and finding resonance with those we encounter.
Yeah, so I just love to hear you just elaborate on that a little bit.
Well, another way to think about.
Another analogy is to think of yourself as like a radio receiver, where when you meet someone,
it's like you're tuning into their frequency.
And some people, you may pick up a little bit more static.
Other people, they may be broadcasting some music
that you don't particularly care for.
But when you meet someone and instantly click with them,
it's like they're playing music, a really groovy beat
that makes you want to turn up the volume.
And we've all had those moments where we've met someone
and felt like we instantly were,
this term, all these turns of phrase that we've said for eon,
things like resonating, being in step in tune on the same wavelength.
They're actually true.
Now the technology shows that we actually are resonating with them on all these
neurophysiological levels.
It's highly adaptive.
It is how we have adapted to be social beings.
And the thing that's so interesting about it and also really wondrous about it
is when you do have that moment of clicking or connecting,
and really having that resonance with another person,
you're flooded with all of these feel-good neurochemicals
that makes you want to continue the association.
And the opposite, of course, is where you get,
you're not clicking and you're not connecting
and not sinking in that way.
And that's the type of person where you're like, whoa,
and want to move away from them.
Just have that feeling that, okay, we're not connecting.
One of the many things I find interesting about this
is this idea of,
interpersonal synchrony, kind of cuts against the cult of individualism that we're seeing in
our society. And, you know, individualism has been around for a while, but it is now in a toxic
partnership with technology, which drives us further and further into our own heads and into our
own little information silos. And it seems to me that ignoring interpersonal synchrony really
just comes at our own peril. Oh, it absolutely does. Because of
that sense of individualism and that you determine your own fate and also you determine how you feel
about other people or how they feel about you. It's really this communication, this balance,
this sinking up with another person, which really requires you to attend to them, to be
present for them. And I love that you brought up technology because you can't achieve it remotely.
this really suggests that there are more senses than the five we take for granted.
And you just cannot achieve it in the two-dimensional or three-dimensional
if you're doing some type of virtual reality types of interactions.
It's just impossible.
And that's why people leave virtual interactions feeling somewhat empty.
It's not as satisfying.
I want to ask you later about Zoom, but let's put a pin in that for a second.
On a very basic level, if we all emit a distinct vibe, is there anything we can do to change our vibe so that we click more successfully with more of our fellow humans and, I guess, animals too?
Well, the thing you have to remember is there is sort of a basic vibe.
They call in the scientific literature, effective presence, whereas personality is how you generally feel.
effective presence is how you make other people feel generally. But we all have moods. We all have
changes where our vibe can kind of change throughout the day or throughout seasons and just because of
things that have happened to us. But nevertheless, there is an overriding, effective presence that we have.
That you can't really change, just like you can't necessarily change your personality.
But the thing that's so wonderful about interpersonal synchrony is that,
you can never tell how your vibe is going to interact with another person's vibe. And that can be a
totally different alchemy than with somebody else. So it's really hard to predict. But in terms of
what you can do about it, you can be really mindful of how you're showing up. For example,
if you're running late for a meeting and you arrive and you're sort of dramatic and say,
oh, I can't believe the traffic. You're coming in and you're bringing that energy with you,
and that energy is contagious. Versus when you arrive and you say something like, I am so glad I finally
made it. There's a big difference. And so being mindful of the energy you're bringing with you
into the room, because as we've discussed, people pick that up. They embody that. And this is
mostly subconscious, but you can really set the tone and the tenor of your interactions.
And so that would be a way that I would say that you could really be mindful of how you're
impacting other people and whether they connect with you or not.
All right.
So I just want to double click on that a little bit.
So I think you're saying is like, I cannot necessarily control my baseline affective
presence or vibe.
It kind of is what it is to a certain extent.
However, I do have agency in at least a small band of it.
Like, I can be aware of the energy I'm bringing into a room, what kind of comments I'm making,
and what kind of exhales I'm doing, whether I'm making eye contact, that kind of stuff.
That's where I do have some agency.
Absolutely.
You also have agency and whether or not you connect with somebody and whether you're even paying
attention to them, whether you're inside your own head.
and you're not attending to the other person.
Because synchrony is very much a dynamic process.
It's a dance.
And if you're not paying attention to the other person's move,
you can't sync up with them.
So part of it is just really, number one,
being aware that we even do this with another person
on all these subconscious levels,
but also really paying attention to people.
Actually, how I got this idea for this book
or what was the seed is my first book was about listening. And I was talking with a neuroscientist,
and he showed me how when the listener and speaker were really understanding one another and having a
sense of connection, their neural patterns, their brainwaves actually synced up. It blew my mind.
First, you would see these two people come together and you would see the different trends in the
scanners and you would see the lines going all over the place. And then at that moment of connection,
they totally synced up. It was a total mirror image. And that is something that you really do
have agency about, that when you do really listen to someone, that when you pay attention to them,
when you're aware of them, and you're not in your own head thinking about what you're going to
say next or waiting for their lips to stop moving so you can start talking, you're really
letting the person in to even sync up with you, that you do have agency in that way,
where you really are attending, listening, building, nurturing, kind of bringing this about
between you and the other person. It doesn't happen if you're looking at your phone,
if you're looking at the other way, or importantly, if you're inside yourself.
So just to reemphasize this, while we can't necessarily, like, change our whole vibe,
there really is a lot you can do to tune in to other people and to take advantage of this law of the universe,
interpersonal synchrony, which seems to be a fundamental reality just kind of the way gravity is.
Yeah, absolutely. This is a complicated topic, and it's hard to talk about because there is this sense that you do,
just like you have your personality, that you do have this basic effective presence.
But again, it's like tuning a radio.
There's a difference between whether or not you will pick up somebody's station and really know what they're playing and understand them.
And whether or not you really feel like you are totally connected with that person.
And that's the person that you want to have, spend your holidays with.
Do you know what I mean?
There's sort of a different of whether or not they're playing this, you know, wonderful song and whether or not you are really understanding them and can have a working productive relationship with that.
person. Does that make sense? It does. Given that, and this is an overlooked fact, given that other
people are so important to our well-being, it's overlooked in, as we've said, a tech-drenched and
individualistic culture. And I think it's also overlooked because we are aware of the downside of
human interaction. Other people can be a giant pain in the ass. Yes, I can. There's a reason
why Jean-Paul Sartre said that hell is other people. So all of that,
that's true, but it is also true that hell is not only other people, but it's the lack of other
people. And so we really too need as difficult as other humans are. I think some poet called us
the glory and scum of the universe as difficult as other human beings are. We need human interaction.
And so given that that's true, we really can use the concept of interpersonal synchrony and
tune into our ability to harness it as a way to make ourselves happier.
Exactly. And to really be mindful of when you're talking about this sense of health, it is as crucial
to have these moments of synchrony all through the day as it is to eat and drink. It is something
that is so essential to our well-being. And if you think of your social life, your social world,
the people that you interact with during the day, and it doesn't matter if it's the checker
at the grocery store or your spouse, it's all a part of your social diet.
And you really want to have those moments of synchrony, even if they're fleeting, even if they
aren't like this deep cosmic connection that you might have, where you really have this
resonance on all these different levels. It's really, the people that become your intimates in your
life are where you have, it's this sense of degree and duration of synchrony, that the people
who become your intimates are people that just really, really,
profoundly you sync with on all these different levels, whereas you might sync with somebody else
on, I like to think of it as an orchestra, like each of us is this walking symphony orchestra,
and some you might only sync with their horn sections, some people only the string,
but nevertheless, each moment of synchrony connection on whatever level is part of that basic
diet of social interactions that keep you healthy. And yes, you can, you can foster.
that by being aware of other people, not being so absorbed in your technology that you don't even
notice who is in front of you, asking questions when you are talking with someone and not just
spouting off about yourself, giving yourself a chance to really connect with them on a deeper level.
These techniques you're talking about, and some of which we're going to go much deeper on,
these techniques for harnessing interpersonal synchrony, I kind of think of them, and I want to gauge
your reaction to this term, but I kind of think of them as like benevolent manipulation. How does that go down with you?
I don't know. You're going to have to expand about that a little bit. Well, I mean, I'm using, I'm being
tongue in cheek, but like there are ways to learn how to get along better with everybody who crosses your
path. And I guess you could broadly and kind of darkly characterize that as a kind of manipulation,
you know, getting other people to kind of get on your program. But of course, I think it's as a
benevolent manipulation where you're just learning how to be a better listener and make eye contact
and tune in with people in ways that boost your happiness and theirs. And of course, those two things
are intermash. I'm not sure I would go with manipulation because it's like diving in. It's swimming
with the current or getting into the, you know, mosh pit and dancing with people and really allowing
yourself not to be separate and not think of yourself as this individualist and to really
acknowledge, which I think a lot of people don't, that we are so profoundly affected by one another,
that it's almost impossible for us to pull the strings on another person, because the only way
to connect is if you both enter into it and reach a groove together. So you're not manipulating
them, you're not getting them onto your team and onto your wavelength as a way to get them to do it you
want, you're just getting into the dance of human interaction and who knows what's going to happen,
but most likely it will lead to more thriving. I think absolutely. I read your book, by the way,
in preparation. There was a moment in it where you talked about interviewing the Dalai Lama,
and you were talking about how during the course of the interview that you started to lean forward
and you started to acquire, as you put it, the most beatific expression that you could achieve.
And that's a lot of what happens with synchrony, because he was participating in that,
and you were participating in that.
It wasn't that one of you was trying to manipulate one another, but he is so charismatic
that some people are able to sort of move you more towards their wavelength than others,
but I don't think it's necessarily conscious.
I think part of it, particularly with him, he radiates something, but part of it is because he becomes so focused.
And you talked about also how a signal of him not being engaged is leaning back.
And we all sort of have these signals or these ways of engaging our fostering synchrony and cutting it off by either our movement, our attention, really our interests,
and also really crucially, how much we are within ourselves, how distracted are we, and how
concerned are what we're going to say next, and is this person liking me? And then you can see
you've lost it. It's almost like when you're engaging with another person, you're becoming
totally tuned into that person like you would if you were watching a movie and you were totally
engrossed and you lost everything else around you. And that's wonderful when you can achieve it.
it doesn't always happen because, you know, there is stuff going on in our head. It's kind of like
meditation when you are engaging with another person to acknowledge you have these distractions,
but then bring yourself back to the focus, which instead of being breathing or some type of chant
or something, your focus is returning to the individual and to this interaction between the two of you
and trying to maintain or build that sync with the other person. I love that. Can you say a little bit
more about how you stay in sync in the face of like the chaos of your own mind in all the
random thoughts that come up or the urge to leave the room or check your phone or whatever.
Like how do you come back to the interaction you're in given the hurly-burly of your own mind?
Well, I'm pathologically curious.
So I mean, I am so interested in other people.
That's probably why I became a journalist.
But, you know, in times when maybe I am distracted and I'm thinking.
about something else, I think really the best way to stay in it is ask questions. Be curious.
Ask questions. Let anything about the other person that you're curious about, ask that question.
Ask that question because people, I'm telling you, you know this as well as I do, I'm sure,
being a journalist, is people want to tell you. They're looking for an opening to share with you.
And when you ask a question, you're kind of invested in the answer, because you've asked it.
And you also have to pay attention to come up with a question in the first place. So it kind of gets
rid of the extra distractions in your head if you start focusing on that. Everybody is interesting and
absorbing if you ask the right questions. I do think asking questions and also just developing that
curious inner toddler mindset that is so focused on the other person and has no fear of asking a question
and wanting to get to know that person.
And I think that's a real way to stay in the interaction
instead of being inside your head.
That makes a lot of sense.
Let me go back to something you said right before that,
which is like these aren't the exact words you used,
but I believe it's an argument in your book
that you really can't learn how to read other people
and connect with other people
if you're disconnected from yourself.
And I think the word for this,
and it's come up a lot in the 10 years I've been hosting the show is interception,
like the ability to get a sense of your own body states.
So in your view, how do we develop that skill of interception?
I'm glad you brought that up because it is very important.
You cannot tune into another person if you're not tuned into yourself.
And interception, as you've accurately described it,
is how well you read what's going on within your own body,
whereas perception is how you perceive what's going on outside of your body.
And to develop interception, there are a lot of people that are trying to help people improve
their interoception with things like float therapy, where you kind of neutralize outside
stimulus and you're submerged in water, which makes you much more aware of what's going on
inside your body. But meditation is an excellent way to get more intense.
tune with yourself. I was reading a study actually is relatively recently that showed that meditation
helped you not only become aware of your own physical signals, but you start your heart rate
and your brain waves start to sink up, actually. They've measured the EEG and the EKG of people
who meditate, and those start to sink up. So you've developed this sort of feedback loop within
yourself where you are more in touch with yourself because you're focusing on your heart rate,
you're focusing on your breathing, and your neural patterns, apparently, according to the study,
start to fall into sync with that as well. And then they did another study that showed that
people who were meditating together, that all of their heart rates and respiration and neural
patterns started to sync up in the room together. So there were no individuals anymore.
They were part of a larger organism.
And another piece of that is when these people left the meditation space, people stayed
in synchrony.
When they measured them later, they were still synced up in their heart rate and their
neural patterns.
So that just shows you that when people get together in social situations, and I use social
situations, meaning when people are just together in a room, what they're doing.
But that's another piece of it is we started out talking about how you can build better interoception.
But also when you do communal activities, you tend to sync up with the people who you're with,
whether it's meditation or dancing or biking or whatever.
But to rewind back to how to develop interoception, people who are athletes now,
that's something that you can really build your interception if you're not hooked up to a fitness tracker
or if you're not listening to earbuds or listening to a book or something while you're running
and you're really paying attention or walking or whatever you're doing for fitness,
to really pay attention to your breath, to really pay attention to what your body's feeling like.
We've become so divorced from our bodies by things like fitness trackers and oral rings
and all of these things where you're almost relying on technology to tell you how you're doing
versus how you yourself feel and doing this internal survey or surveillance.
of yourself, of how you're feeling, and also getting in touch with how your emotions feel within
your body. A lot of people have a really hard time connecting because every emotion comes from
a physical signature that your brain then interprets us that emotion. The way that you feel fear,
Dan, is probably different in where I put my fear in my body. And to,
really think about when you're feeling these different emotions of where am I putting this?
Where does this go? Do I feel it in my neck? Do I have muscle tension in my back? Does it make me feel
cold? Does it make me feel hot? To really get to know yourself in those different emotions.
And once you become conscious of that, you're able to, when you're interacting with another person,
when you are embodying those signals that are coming from them, you're able to then interpret that
within your own body, which in turn helps you interpret the other person, how they're feeling
and what they're doing. We do this all subconsciously, but again, as you rightly point out,
it breaks down if you're divorced from your own body and your own sensations. You can't pick up
the other person if your receivers down.
Much more with Kate Murphy coming up.
Throughout this conversation, we've been operating on the thesis
that picking up other people's signals is basically a good thing.
But of course, it can be a bad thing
when you're around somebody who is imposing their bad vibes on you.
So I want to talk about how we can avoid
what I think you call emotional fusion.
But maybe just start by talking about the downsides of interpersonal synchrony.
I think we can all relate.
to, I talk about this in the book, the bad apple effect, where you've got like one person,
whether it's in a work team or a social group or a volunteer organization that tends to
really drag everyone down with that person, whether it's through their anger or complaining
or being very depressed, that kind of thing. And so the moods and attitudes and beliefs and
behaviors are all very contagious because of this sinking instinct that we have.
Psychologists call it emotional fusion or meshment. It can happen in couples where they can be
very much in love and a very in sync couple, but it can work against them where like one of them
gets stressed and then the other one gets stressed, which boomerangs back on the first one.
And so you have this climbing the ladder of escalation of arousal until there's like a big blowup
And the two of them don't even really know where it came from when it was really this magnified
reaction of this physiological states that both of them were in. So a way to deal with that, which I have
found this incredibly helpful in my own life, is first of all, being aware that this has happened,
that you take on other people's emotions, feelings, and that physiological aspect. All these turns
a phrase like getting under your skin, a pain in the neck, all of these things are really true.
Or they've really gotten in my head. Yes, that's all very true. And there's, first of all, the
awareness piece, but then also when you're in those moments, where you feel like you're
ricocheting, whether it's anxiety or anger, back and forth off of one another in these particularly
fraught conversations, one technique that a clinical psychologist who specializes in these being
synced or over-synced relationships, is he says to imagine there's a mute button on the other
person at that moment and really think about their level of arousal versus what they're actually
saying and how you might be unwittingly matching that level of arousal and to try and pull back
from that and to really be aware what you're taking on from the other person and recognizing,
okay, this isn't mine. I'm going to let you have your feelings. Empathy is great, but we can take it
too far when it drags us both into a place where neither of us want to be. So it's not so much that
you stop listening to them. It's kind of like you're still there, but you're not, you're kind of
dialing down your own level of synchrony in that moment in some way. Yes. And I'm talking about
particularly fraught situations. I'm not saying, okay, just totally stop listening to this.
other person, but when things are getting really out of control to really start to think more about,
okay, let me see how I might be matching the other person in their arousal level. And yes,
pull back and think, okay, what am I taking into myself that is not mine? This is their arousal.
This is their anger. This is their stress. This is their anxiety. And I'm sympathetic to that,
but I'm going to let them have that. And it's a way of, again, doing that survey of the body.
Am I getting really tense? Is this getting behind my solar plexus? Do I have an angry expression on my face?
Am I mirroring the other person? And try in that moment to break the sink, to actually step back.
Because all of us, we move into and out of synchrony all the time throughout the day.
The relationships that last are the ones that you're in sync more than you're not.
But to really maintain our own sense of emotional regulation and just sense of self, you cannot be and do not want to be totally in sync with another person all the time. It's unhealthy. Just like having too much foods unhealthy or too much water's unhealthy. Too much sinkings unhealthy as well.
You have this concept, I believe, like mentally returning borrowed emotions.
Say more about that.
It's this sense of couples talk about it, but it can happen with friends, it can happen with colleagues,
where you take on their stress or their sadness or their anxiety.
And you're almost not aware of it.
You can go back, you can even be separated from that person and just start feeling off
and not really be aware where it's coming from.
Because again, when we embody someone else, it feels like it's coming from within us.
So you have to be vigilant of, okay, why am I feeling this?
way. Where is this coming from? And to be able to say, okay, this is hers or this is his. And I'm going to,
again, let you have your feelings. And I'm going to maintain where I am because I can be much
more helpful to you if I'm outside of that than if I'm in it. What does it mean to practice
energy hygiene? That's really to think about it on the other side. What am I transmitting to other people?
Oh, okay. So this is like...
It's related.
Yes, it's related, but it's not self-protective. It's more like community service.
Yeah, exactly. Exactly. It's like wearing your mask or whatever. It's realizing, okay, what am I bringing to this interaction?
Am I showing up angry because of a fight I had with somebody before? Is it that I'm worried about my kids and I'm bringing that anxiety into this work meeting?
it's kind of like essentially erasing your emotional whiteboard before you go into the next interaction
and really doing a survey of how am I feeling, how am I presenting what is going on in my body right now
and how am I going to release that, refresh, reboot, whether it's a few moments of meditation,
going for a walk, trying to just get in a different rhythm because you're still carrying the rhythm
of the encounter that you just had.
One of your other recommendations along those lines is to the extent that we can control
our own calendars, and we all have varying degrees of agency on the score.
But if we can control our own calendars to schedule 45-minute meetings instead of 60-minute
meetings as a way to have some time to erase the whiteboard or to recover from somebody
with whom we were overly enmeshed.
Yeah, absolutely.
And actually, I stole that idea or gave him credit in the book.
But this was someone in senior management in the C-suite.
And he was telling me that that was one of his hacks to maintain his emotional hygiene.
Because, you know, he was in back-to-back meetings all day long.
And he was realizing he was bringing the emotions from the previous meeting to the next meeting.
And he really felt people deserved to have him fresh.
Another thing that he said that he did that I think is a good idea myself,
that I don't think people take advantage of,
is those first few minutes of a call, just that opener, that icebreaker where people are just not
diving right into the agenda where there's just a little bit of social talk in the beginning
to really lean into that to reset yourself, to reboot, to ease into the next interaction and
get rid of the residue of the one that was before. And I think, you know, a lot of people feel like,
okay, I'm on a schedule here. Let's just dive right in and let's just start. And that's a temptation.
I mean, I'm, you know, I'm as guilty as anybody else.
You know, I got other things to do.
I've got a busy day.
But to really lean into that and give yourself, it's almost like taking a deep breath and really
focusing on that person, this is who's in front of me right now.
Give yourself a chance to sync with that person and have a better interaction and not mingle
it with the energy that you're bringing from the previous interaction.
I like that.
One other thing you talk about when it comes to preventing emotional fusion, protecting ourselves from other people's bad vibes, is to break physical sync, like to somehow not be so physically enmeshed with the other person.
What does that mean?
Does that mean just like leaving the room?
Well, it could be that.
It could be leaving the room.
But that's the thing is to become aware subconsciously.
I mean, it is crazy when you look at the research that when people come together, they really do.
they mimic each other's facial expressions.
Have you ever been to a movie and seen somebody's face like mimics whatever the actors
and actresses are doing on the screen?
Have you ever seen people do that?
I'm not looking at other people in the movies.
Okay.
Well, I told you I'm pathologically curious, but people do do that.
And they do that with one another.
And you may not be able to see it as clearly as sometimes you do in a movie, but it's all
these micro expressions.
But it's also your physiology.
people start to, they touch their hair at the same time, they touch their face at the same time, they cross their legs, they lean forward, they lean back.
People are really in this subconscious physical dance with one another and also within them as well.
Their heart rate, their respiration, all these, you know, hormonal activity, pupil dilation, all of that is starting to sink up.
So if you can think about when you are in an interaction with another person and things are not going well, are you are interpreting because you've improved your interaction,
that you're getting really tense to just do things as simple as take a deep breath, cross your
legs the other direction, lean back, relax your shoulders, even look away for a moment, break that
rhythm with the other person. I'll give you a good example. When I first started working on this
and I was reading all this research and didn't even quite know I was writing a book yet,
but it just every day I research this, I was like, no way. You just don't realize how much
you are sinking with another person in spite of yourself. We all like to think we're not unduly
influenced by other people, but that's just a myth, you know, if you look at this research,
and also just notice your own behavior. But the example I want to give you is I was asked to
speak at, and I won't say which university, but I was invited to speak at this university,
and one of the deans asked me out to lunch beforehand. So I went out to lunch with this guy,
and he was just a socially awkward person. He was very nervous, and I was getting really nervous, too. And I don't think had I done this research, I would have really known what was going on in my body, but I was exactly mirroring him. I was really closed off. I had, you know, my arms were crossed, my legs were crossed really close together. I was tense in my shoulders, and I was talking really fast. I was just uncomfortable.
And then I realized, oh my God, I'm becoming him.
Exactly what I described, I realized, okay, my shoulders are really up around my ears.
You know, I mean, not that far.
It's really subtle, but I realized I have a lot of muscle tension right now.
You know, I uncrossed my legs.
I sat back.
I took a deep breath and I slowed the cadence of my speech.
And the thing that's so miraculous is not only did I feel better because I had broken away from whatever internally was going on with him,
But he started to sink to me.
He started to relax.
So the whole encounter, you can really have a lot of agency over how things go just by how you react.
Do you get swept up in the other person's energy or do you to allow them to have it and sort of release it?
And they really, most of the time, will come and meet where you are and start to relax as well.
Yeah, that's a really empowering thing.
One other piece of advice that you have in terms of, like,
gauging whether you really sync with somebody
and whether this is somebody you want to, like, keep in your life.
And I think this is probably particularly useful when it comes to dating
is to pay attention to how you feel after you're with the person,
to do a little audit after you've parted ways, like, you know,
a little interception after the encounter.
Can you say a little bit more about that?
Yeah, and you can even go through your contact list. It isn't just, you know, who you're dating.
Does this person make me feel better or worse? Do I feel energized or drained? Do I like myself
when I'm with this person? Or do I become somebody I don't recognize with that person or
somebody that I don't want to be with that person? I think those are real important questions
to ask because if you think about your social interactions as your daily diet, what do you
feeding yourself and also turn it the other way. What are you feeding other people? Really think about,
am I leaving this person better or worse than I found them? Because it goes both ways. It is a dance.
Sinking is something that is going back and forth. That's why I think I resisted the manipulation.
It is this mutual thing that happens between two people that is really beautiful and magical.
And it can last a moment, like when you have that moment of connection with somebody, like when you're checking out of the grocery store and you just have that moment of connection.
Again, it's not like you're going to end up spending all your holidays with them, but you had that moment, that little surge of neurochemicals where you felt better and you felt connected to the world and the other person did too.
And when you're talking about dating, that's what people, I'd be really careful about trying to
date online because an algorithm can tell you who your perfect match is. Somebody can seem like
your perfect match online. But again, as we talked earlier, you're not going to get the full
complement of these neurophysiological signals from the other person. That's why they can look
like the perfect match online. But then when you finally meet them in person,
And all you can think about is what you'd rather be watching on Netflix.
It's not there.
And you can't make yourself be attracted to someone any more than you can make yourself not be attracted to someone.
And so there's still some magic to all of this, which is wonderful.
I mean, anyone who's fallen in love with somebody, there is a mystery.
It isn't, you know, where you can check these boxes or lean in just the right way or do this and the other person will fall in love with you or you will fall in love with them.
But you can miss that person because you weren't paying attention.
You weren't engaged.
You were too much in your own head.
And you didn't allow yourself to sync with that person, to dance with that person in this special neurophysiological way.
And I do fear with technology, just even looking at a phone, they've shown that when people are not paying attention when they're not looking at each other and significantly when they're looking at their phone, it breaks the sink.
It keeps you from developing these wonderful synchronies with other people that not only feel good in the moment, but make you healthier and make you feel more secure in the world.
Yeah, and there's all this data about even just having a phone on the table can fuck things up in this regard.
Correct.
I guess a question, this is a little bit random that's popping into my head.
It came up especially around romantic relationships.
To what extent is sent engaged with?
we talk about interpersonal synchrony.
Oh, I love that you ask that question.
The research isn't totally clear, but they think it's very significant.
I don't know if you know this, but a lot of women know this, but when you're around other
women for a significant amount of time, you sink your menstrual cycle.
You all start having your period at the same time.
And they think that's related to olfactory, sensory, those pheromones, and that's why that
happens.
So if that happens in that way, you can imagine all these other things that might cause you to be in sync with people.
And there's a ton of research about how women will smell sweaty t-shirts of a guy, and that that person ends up being the person, that the ones that's the sweaty t-shirts that they like the best.
I haven't participated in that study, but I find it interesting.
Those are the people that they end up being the most attracted to.
And significantly, that they are the most genetically compatible.
In terms of having children, that would be the most genetically healthy.
Isn't that interesting?
It's really interesting.
And the body is sending you so many signals that your prefrontal cortex or rational content-oriented brain just doesn't pick up.
Absolutely.
Something that I hope people will take away from reading the book is we've sort of been fed the steady diet that you should be able to like everyone.
and that everyone should like you. And if you just did these things or the other person just did these things,
then you all would like each other. And the research shows that that's not necessarily the case.
Now, we can all get along and certainly should all be kind. But it's really a kinder way to think of this
is that sometimes you're just not a good fit with the other person. And it's no harm, no foul.
It's not a default in you or the other person. I think when people,
people don't click, when people don't connect, they either have two reactions. One is, what's wrong
with that person? And the other is, what's wrong with me? And the kinder and more accurate
way to think about it is we just not sinking. We haven't developed interpersonal synchrony.
And that could change tomorrow, but in this moment, because it's a very much moment-to-moment
thing, in this moment, we're not. So it doesn't do any good to wag my tail all the harder and
try and get this person to like me or be hostile because this other person does not like me or
I don't like them is to just realize, you know, shrug your shoulders, hmm, not sinking at this
moment and be okay with that. But you're saying that if we're not sinking at this moment doesn't
mean we couldn't have a flourishing relationship, romantic, professional, whatever at some point in
the future. Like the opportunity for synchrony isn't deleted. No.
It is not deleted. We move into and out of sync with other people all the time. I do think that there is
sort of this basic baseline attraction, not attraction. Like I said, you can't make yourself be attracted
to somebody. And this may be more in the sexual realm, but you can't make yourself be attracted to
someone any more than you can make yourself not be attracted to someone. And so there can be something
chemical. I mean, you know, in the past we called it chemistry.
but it's really synchrony.
And if you don't have it on some baseline level,
you may never,
but that's not to say you will never.
Let me go back to the technology.
You said earlier, like beware of,
or at least be wary of online dating.
You also earlier on said something about like virtual meetings,
Zoom, et cetera, et cetera.
What can we do about this practically?
What should our attitudes be in this era of remote work,
specifically about these interactions that we, I think, most of us need to have virtually.
Yeah. Well, you know, to the degree you can meet with other people and prioritize meeting people
or at least have a regular meeting with the people that you work with, that, of course,
is best. The research is pretty clear about Zoom, about video interaction, that it actually
causes people to be less in sync. They've done some really interesting studies about people who just
did audio only versus video, were more in sync, neurophysiologically, did better on common task,
interrupted less, were more in sync in their communication, that kind of thing. I mean,
if you think about it, the way video conferencing and video technology is done really to preserve
bandwidth, the way it's coated and patched and synthesized, it introduces all these artifacts
that like freezing, blocking, out-of-sync video, out-of-sync audio, that kind of thing,
which really scrambles our ability to sync with one another. Because we're looking at this person
who looks like they're on a security camera at a convenience store, essentially sort of that
sort of blocky. They're not looking at you. You can't have eye contact and how they look.
on the camera angle. So I would recommend, you know, people, I mean, certainly show a PowerPoint,
you know, say hello in the beginning. If you have product developments you want to show by video,
great. But if you're really trying to have a meaningful conversation and have that sense of
connection and intimacy over the phone, I mean, over a communication system, I would use the phone,
audio only. I think that that is a better way to go. Certainly research supports that.
you know, Zoom fatigue is real. It's because you're scrambling to try and sync up with the other person,
and you have all this faulty information that's being transmitted to you. Like you can't make eye contact.
You can't really read those subtle facial expressions, so your brain is just scrambling to find it and can't find it.
And that's what makes you feel tired.
Coming up, much more with Kate Murphy.
Okay, I have a bunch of more practical questions for you about harnessing interpersonal synchrony to our advantage.
There's another term proxemics. What does that mean?
Yes, that is the spatial dimension of communication.
And that was actually developed. This idea is developed back in the 1960s by an anthropologist.
But it's essentially, it's sort of like the volume control on your ability to synchronize with another person.
Because the closer you are to another person, the more of these signals you're going to pick up from the other person.
And the farther you get away, the signal starts to diminish, sort of like Wi-Fi.
But sometimes if someone's too close to you, and I think we've all had that experience where
somebody stands too close to you at a party, and that's too much signaling.
It's sort of like the person's too loud.
You're getting too many of those signals from them, and so you step back.
And we do this all the time to encourage or discourage our interactions with other people,
and there's these different space circles that you can think about.
there's intimate space, personal space, and social space, and public space, where we kind of, it's
sort of, again, like our volume control, where we're turning it way loud if we want to be in the
intimate space, which is like no space at all, like if you're kissing the other person, to 1.5,
and that personal space is more like 1.5 to about 4 feet. So if you think about it, you can make someone
uncomfortable by getting too much in their space and giving them too loud a signal. And then you can
also keep yourself from really connecting with them because you're too far away. A lot of interior
designers now are paying attention to proxemics and really designing spaces, whether they're public
spaces or personal spaces where people can gather and have their personal space, but keep other
people that they don't know in that social space that's farther away. Is this why you were so in
favor of booths at restaurants? Yes, exactly. And it's amazing, you know,
once you learn about it, it's amazing how many stores or coffee shops or restaurants or fitness facilities
are not paying attention to proxemics. And people don't know why the space makes them uncomfortable.
They just don't go. And that's why they don't survive. You can be at a restaurant where the tables are
really too far apart. And you don't get that vibe. You don't get that feeling of being in the social
space. Or they can be too close together. And you feel like you're really crowded.
and so you won't go back. So both of them, there's a sweet spot that we all want. And so, yeah,
but it all has to do with this ability to sync up with another person and whether the signal
is too strong or too faint. Super interesting. Okay, another practical thing I wanted to ask you about
is reading a room or working a room. This gets back into the neighborhood of manipulation,
but not in the majority. What are your thoughts on how we can, you know,
everything we've been talking about to be the most effective in a room. Okay. There is this concept
known as emotional aperture. And people who have really excellent emotional aperture are people
who are really good at reading the room. The people who can come in and get a sense of,
okay, this is going well, you know, whether it's a performance or a speech can come in. They don't have
to talk to anyone. They don't even have to look at particular faces. They can just read the
energy in the room. And people who are really good at that are people who become really terrific,
let's say, evangelical pastors, politicians, generals, you know, and armies who are trying to
rally the troops. They're the people that really can read that by. I use the example of auctioneers
in the book. But there's also, again, you know, reading people versus reading the room. And there's
a lot of research that shows that people who are really good at one are not so good at the other.
But there are people who, kind of like trial lawyers, for example, who are really good at reading the room, how the argument's going over, but also looking at individual jurors and really building a connection or a synchrony with them. So it's sort of sinking with the energy in the room versus sinking to the individual. There is some research about how to improve your emotional aperture, being able to read a room better. And they do that by showing people videos where they flash slides of different images.
And the first slide, it shows a whole bunch of people with a neutral facial expression.
And then another slide with a whole bunch of people, but they're sort of varying expressions.
And you're supposed to tell them immediately, I've done this. It's interesting.
And it gets almost like a pointillist painting. If you think about it, you realize you can't look at individual faces.
You have to almost look at it like a pointillist painting and then you see the image.
I think anyone who's done public speaking, I think some people will say, oh, you need to focus on one person.
in the room, that probably isn't the best idea. If you want to read the entire room,
is to look more towards the back. But I think you really hit on something when we were focusing
on the interoception is to really try and get out of your own head and just experience. What are you
experiencing? And your body will tell you. But most of us know that. When we've walked into a
party that's not going well, like maybe we're late, walking to a dinner party and, you know,
somebody's just, you know, the dog's just thrown up on the floor, but you don't know that,
but you can walk in and like, oh my God, what just happened? You don't know what happened,
but you know something happened. But there are some more affirmative actions we can take,
like maintaining eye contact or using expressive storytelling where we're making either small or large
gestures. You say just a little bit more about those practices. Oh, absolutely. In terms of
getting people to sync with you, when, and this could be somebody,
before an audience are just with someone individually. The people that tend to foster the most
synchrony with other people are people who are more expressive. And if you think about it,
it's sort of like turning up the volume a little bit, kind of like being closer to somebody,
because you're giving them more to work with. You have your gestures, you have this facial expressions,
and if you think about the people that are the best storytellers, they're the people that kind of do
someone else's voices when they're talking and they reenact a scene for you. And you don't realize
that. I mean, now that I'm bringing it, you will notice it in so many conversations where somebody will,
they'll mimic their boss and be like, then my boss said, you know, and get a deeper voice when they're
marrying their boss if their boss has a deeper voice or, you know, it's this mimicry. And it puts people
in the scene. And because we sync with another person in their expressions, in the feedback that they're
giving us that if you make it more pronounced, people are more likely to pick up on it and sync to
you. Say a little bit more about eye contact specifically because I can see how maintaining eye
contact can be effective, but it also can be a little creepy if overused. Absolutely. And particularly
in a manipulative way, that's the thing about synchrony is we have a really good bullshit detector
when people are just doing the same thing as we are trying to develop synchrony in ways.
that are trying to get them to be on the same wavelength,
but it's just more of a mimicry rather than an actual sinking.
But yeah, I do think that people can develop a sense of synchrony with another person
by maintaining eye contact.
But if you do it too long or you're doing it with an intent to unsettle the other person,
somebody at one of the events that I've done was talking about a boss who would just stare at people.
and make them uncomfortable. And I think, you know, if you've read a Walter Isaacson's book about Steve Jobs, that was something he did, where it just made them really uncomfortable. So there's a soft looking at the other person and there's a hard looking at the other person. And so if you're looking with curiosity and mirroring the other person and really focusing on the other person, that natural pupil synchrony, a pupil dilation where people sync that up will occur. But yeah,
I do think you really, you need to look at people.
And if you notice they're getting uncomfortable and looking away, then that'll be some good
feedback that maybe you are boring into them rather than having a soft glance at them.
Last thing I wanted to ask you about is you write about the overlap between synchrony and
synchronicity.
So maybe define synchronicity as in contrast to synchrony and like say a little bit about what
the overlap might be.
A synchronicity is a Jungian concept where it talks about meaningful coincidences, where something
happens that seems, like, for example, I was in Amsterdam recently, and I ran into somebody
I hadn't seen in a very long time who is from Texas, but somehow we both ended up there at the
same time on the same street in Amsterdam. And Jung would say that that was because
there was something meaningful about that, that we were thinking about each other. And I think people
have that experience where someone calls you that you were just thinking about. And the thinking about,
and, you know, again, this is not proven, but that because we sink with one another and we
develop these resonances with one another, and we carry those resonance with us after the
encounter, that that is why you may start to think like the other person. And they've shown this
in studies that people's neural patterns of close friends, of family, are more similar than
those of strangers. People literally do shape our thinking. And so that would explain these synchronistic
moments, these synchronicity type of moments that Jung described, that you do run into somebody. You
had just been thinking about are who was calling you because of that similarity and neural
patterns that were developed by intense and connected interactions.
In some level, I'm open to that.
You know what?
I've certainly had it happen where I'm thinking about it actually happened this morning.
My wife was texting me about a third person and that third person emailed both of us during
the text exchange.
So I've definitely had that experience.
However, I mean, my more clinical.
skeptical lens would argue that it's just a coincidence.
Like, how many times are you thinking of people and they don't text you at that moment or they
don't call you at that moment? We don't really pay attention to all of those. We do pay attention
to the ones where it seems like a synchronicity. Well, I agree with you. I think there are a lot
of people who will say that it is just chance. But, you know, because of these advances in
technology where you're actually seeing that people's neural patterns, they carry them away with one
another and the people that you spend your time with shape you neurophysiologically, it does stand
a reason that it's sort of like this idea of quantum entanglement. I agree with you. It does,
and I hesitated even put this in the book, but they're actually physicists start studying this.
To me, I would not be doing a service to readers by not pointing all of this out because, you know,
I don't know, and I don't think other people do either, but I'm certainly not willing to say it's not
true in the same way I'm not willing to say it is true. But the research is really pretty compelling
that your neural patterns and your wife's neural patterns and probably this friend have become
very similar because of your engagement with one another and you're sinking in the moments that
you're together and you carry that synchrony away with you. I mean, we really are a composite
of our social interactions, these synchronies, these vibrations that occur within our
bodies. I mean, it does, I agree with you. It does sort of sound like, well, this is getting kind of woo-woo.
And it does, but unless you start looking at all of these studies and looking at the actual
clinical science where they have people hooked up to all these machines and you're like,
oh, my God, their brainwaves are exactly the same right now. How did that happen? We don't know,
but it's happening. Well, I agree with you that we don't know, you know, you know, on the
synchronicity tip specifically, like, we don't know. And that's the only, I believe, the only
honest answer. I agree with you, because I'm not advocating one way or another, but it's fascinating
to contemplate. Indeed. Kate, anything you were hoping we would get to that we didn't?
Yes, actually. We did not talk about how when people do synchronized activities, behaviors,
how it builds these feelings of affinity and rapport. People are more likely to share information.
They're more likely to be helpful and kind. There's abundant research showing that.
And if you think about it, just going back historically, how people bonded, how people came together was by doing
synchronized activities. And that would be religion, where people bow, sing, pray, resuscary,
prayers at the same time. Think about the military people marching in sync. And it develops this
sense of camaraderie that's built in. Again, you know, the research is, you know, well, why is that?
Don't really know. But the thinking is that because our brains are metabolically expensive,
there are only 2% of our body weight, but consume 20% of the calories. And just like we tend to be
lazy physically. We like to conserve our energy intellectually, cognitively, that when you're around
a lot of people doing the same thing you are, it kind of puts us in our happy place. We relax
because we don't need to predict what people are going to do next. Your brain is a prediction
machine. And when we don't have to predict, because when we're in sync, what are they going to do?
The same thing you're doing. So there's something about synchronized behavior. And when you're talking
about dating. If you're thinking about what to do on a date, of course, you know, dancing has been a part
of the courtship ritual for forever for good reason, because that's something that actually
fosters this feeling of connection. But it could also be going for a walk with somebody,
going for a run, rowing. And if you want to connect with other people, try and think of things like
that, even volunteering, maybe at a food pantry where you're boxing things or putting cans
on a shelf at the same time these synchronized activities, even housework with your spouse,
if you're doing it together at the same time is thought to make for a happier marriage.
There's been some research on that too.
But yes, that was the only thing I can think of that we didn't cover.
It's super helpful.
Like what about for me as a business owner and trying to get my team bonded?
I know historically companies have done all sorts of goofy things like Trust Falls or whatever.
What could I do?
And I don't want to get everybody roller skating.
I'm not, you know, like, yeah.
How can I take advantage of this without, you know, forcing people into awkward situations?
Actually, a lot of Eastern companies, I mean, we all know about doing the calisthenics or maybe we don't.
But in Japan and China, a lot of companies have exercise programs where people do like just maybe 15 minutes and some, it's only four minutes of stretching or doing a light exercise in the morning.
You could also, you know, crank up some music in the afternoon where everybody's hearing the same beat in the afternoon, which, you know, people just unconsciously start to tap their foot at the same time. That'll sort of get you in sync. But if you think of some of the, like, really business people who, they would have walking meetings. You know, if you think back to the peripatetics walking around the Lyceum, but also, you know, look at Steve Jobs. People he wanted to influence, he would take on walks with him. I also read Lauren Michael's biography, and he takes people.
that he's working with on long walks around New York City. So, you know, you could arrange walks.
But also, if you just arrange to have a meal together, because, you know, that in its way is a
synchronized behavior. Yeah. You're all sitting down together. You're having a meal together.
You know, so it doesn't have to be military marching around or doing dance steps, though the
research has shown that really helps. There was a publishing company in Germany that had their
employees do a nine-week exercise program. And it showed that absenteeism went down, feelings
of morale went up. And it wasn't just the exercise because they also had a control group
that did the exercise, but separately. So there was something about doing it in a synchronized
way that built this rapport and built cohesion. Yep. That makes complete sense to me. And I've done
workouts with colleagues before and I found it to be really helpful and of course my wife.
Golf. I mean, you know, that's probably why golf is such a thing. You know, you're walking together
and you're spending all that time together, but it's in a synchronized activity. Yep.
Kate, thank you so much. Everybody, I just want to remind you of Kate's books, the most recent one,
which we've been discussing why we click the emerging science of interpersonal synchrony, her book
before that, which we touched on a little bit. You're not listening, what you're missing and why it
matters. Kate Murphy, again, total pleasure.
This was super interesting and helpful. Thank you.
Thank you, Dan.
Thanks again to Kate. Awesome to talk to her.
Don't forget to head on over to Dan Harris.com to sign up for my newish meditation app.
We've got a growing library of meditations from amazing teachers, all my friends.
You can get ad-free access to all of our podcast episodes.
You can come to our exclusive weekly live stream events where we meditate,
and you can get your questions answered.
It's also a great place to connect with other people who take this weird meditation thing.
Seriously, Dan Harris.com.
There's a free 14-day trial if you want to check it out before you buy.
And again, the app is called 10% with Dan Harris.
Finally, thank you so much to the people who work so hard to make this show.
Our producers are Tara Anderson and Eleanor Vassili.
Our recording and engineering is handled by the great folks over at Pod People.
Lauren Smith is our managing producer.
Marissa Schneiderman is our senior producer.
DJ Kashmir is our executive producer, and Nick Thorburn of the band Islands wrote our theme.
