Ten Percent Happier with Dan Harris - The Antidote To Not-Enoughness | Robin Wall Kimmerer
Episode Date: November 20, 2024Radical strategies for the scarcity mindset.Robin Wall Kimmerer is a mother, scientist, decorated professor, and enrolled member of the Citizen Potawatomi Nation. She is the author of Braidin...g Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants, which has earned Kimmerer wide acclaim. Her first book, Gathering Moss: A Natural and Cultural History of Mosses, was awarded the John Burroughs Medal for outstanding nature writing, and her other work has appeared in Orion, Whole Terrain, and numerous scientific journals. Her new book, The Serviceberry, is about a plant whose behavior is a model not only for our individual lives, but potentially for rethinking the global economy.In this episode we talk about:Nature as a model for the economyHow to reclaim our stolen attentionPractices of gratitudeCounterintuitive advice on wealth and securityHow to change your relationship to the living worldThe science of biomimicryPlants as persons, and the study of plant cognitionAnd the importance of recognizing both Western science and the indigenous worldviewRelated Episodes:#546. This Scientist Says One Emotion Might Be the Key to Happiness. Can You Guess What It Is? | Dacher KeltnerWe Know Nature Is Good for Us. Here’s How To Make Time for It, Scandinavian Style | Linda Åkeson McGurk#505. The 5 Things That Are Ruining Your Meditation (and Your Life) – And How to Handle Them | Bonnie DuranSign up for Dan’s newsletter hereFollow Dan on social: Instagram, TikTokTen Percent Happier online bookstoreSubscribe to our YouTube ChannelOur favorite playlists on: Anxiety, Sleep, Relationships, Most Popular EpisodesFull Shownotes: https://happierapp.com/podcast/tph/robin-wall-kimmerer-861Additional Resources:Download the Happier app today: https://my.happierapp.com/link/downloadSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Wondery Plus subscribers can listen to 10% happier early and ad free right now.
Join Wondery Plus in the Wondery app or on Apple podcasts.
This is the 10% happier podcast. I'm Dan Harris.
Hello, my fellow suffering beings. How are we doing?
That sense of insufficiency, of lack, of not enoughness that you may feel sometimes or
all of the time, it is super common and also super destructive. Speaking personally, it's at the root of so much of my unhappiness
and so many of my dumbest decisions.
Part of the problem here is that so many aspects of our culture
and our economy are deliberately inculcating us with a scarcity mindset.
The idea that we'll finally be happy when we make the next purchase
or when we earn as much as our wealthiest neighbor or when we get the abs of our favorite influencer,
I could go on.
Today, we're going to talk about a deep but readily available antidote to this sense of
lack.
My guest is Robin Wall Kimmerer.
She's a mother, scientist, professor, and enrolled member of the Citizen Potawatomi
Nation.
She is perhaps best known for her bestselling book,
Braiding Sweetgrass.
She's now written a new book called The Service Berry,
which is about a plant whose behavior is a model
not only for our individual lives, but potentially for,
she argues, rethinking the global economy.
So we talk about that, and we also talk about
how to reclaim our stolen attention,
practices for gratitude, counterintuitive advice on wealth and security, and the fascinating idea of plants as people or the study of plant cognition.
Robin Wall Kimmerer right after this.
But first, a little blatant self-promotion. I want to let you know about an exciting new thing we're dropping in the shop
over at danharris.com. It is our first custom journal. We're calling it Dump It Here because
the science shows that getting it out of your head and onto the page, in other words, journaling,
can be a very effective way to reduce stress and anxiety. It's a sleek, black-bound journal with
lined pages, and it includes some suggestions for journaling practices that you might want to try.
For more on how journaling can be useful,
you can check out our most recent podcast
with Dr. Jamie Pennebaker, who's done the research.
And of course, you can check out the new Dump It Here journal
by going to danharris.com and clicking on the Shop tab.
Meanwhile, over on the Happier app,
they've got personalized meditation practices
that fit any schedule, which is especially relevant
in the midst of the holidays and all of the stress
that comes with it.
From quick meditations to mindful cooking videos,
Happier can help you stay grounded through the season.
And now through December 6th,
you can get 40% off a yearly subscription.
Go to happier.com slash four zero to get your discount.
My wife and I were talking just last night about the fact that we need to plan some trips
for the winter because she in particular really needs some warm weather to look forward to.
She has seasonal affective disorder in a pretty intense way.
So we've got some trips coming up.
We need to plan them, but they're definitely coming up. And of course, one way to fund said trip or trips would be to Airbnb, our
own home. Note to Selfish, talk to her about that. Whether you could use extra money to
cover some bills or for something a little bit more fun, your home might be worth more
than you think. Find out how much at airbnb.ca.
Listening to Audible helps your imagination soar, whether you listen to stories, motivation,
expert advice, any genre you love, you can be inspired to imagine new worlds, new possibilities,
new ways of thinking. Listening can lead to positive change in your mood, your habits,
and ultimately your overall well-being. Audible has the best selection of audiobooks without exception,
along with popular podcasts and exclusive Audible Originals,
all in one easy app.
Enjoy Audible anytime while doing other things,
household chores, exercising on the road, commuting, you name it.
My wife Bianca and I have been listening to many audiobooks
as we drive around for summer vacations.
We listen to Life by Keith Richards.
Keith, if you're listening,
I'd love to have you on the show.
We also listen to Sapiens by Yuval Noah Harari.
And Yuval, if you're listening to this,
we would also love to have you on the show.
So audiobooks, yes, audible, yes, love it.
There's more to imagine when you listen.
Sign up for a free 30 day audible trialudible trial, and your first audiobook is free.
Visit audible.ca, audible.ca.
Dr. Robin Wall-Kimmerer, welcome to the show.
Thanks for inviting me.
I'm glad to be here.
I'm glad you're here, and congratulations on your new book.
Speaking of which, I'm going to open with a very basic,
obvious question, which is, what is a serviceberry?
Oh, serviceberries are a beautiful native shrub
that produces these berries that are a cross
between like a blueberry and an apple.
They're really, really delicious.
There's all kinds of different service berries,
depending on where your listeners are.
They might have 10 different species,
but the one that the book is really focused on
is one called Saskatoons.
Why did you name a whole book
after the Saskatoon service berry?
Yeah.
Well, you know, I've been intrigued with thinking about the way that we create economic systems,
which are allegedly to deliver goods and services to people.
And so I think about in the name of the serviceberry, think about all of the ways that it provides
for the ecosystem that it's part of, the way it provides for pollinators and
birds and soil and people. So it seemed to me to be a really good living metaphor
for thinking about the economy of nature because it's such a generous plant.
Can you say more about the generosity of this plant?
Yeah, you know, this is true
of almost every element of a habitat,
but it's one of the first plants to bloom in the spring
when pollen is hard to find.
So those early pollinators are fed by this tree. And then the berries start
to form after those flowers are pollinated. And they can be so abundant in the right years
that they bend the branches low. There are so many berries. And that notion of generosity
of the plant world is really key to thinking about nature as a model for economics,
because there's more berries there than that plant needs to reproduce itself.
And so it provides an interesting model to think about what do we do with abundance?
What is our response to abundance?
But there are all kinds of birds that rely on the serviceberry for the calories
and the nutrition that are there. Contemporary and traditional indigenous peoples have relied
on the serviceberry for cultural foods as well. In my Paruotmi language, the name for
serviceberry is Bozakman, which means like the superlative, the best
of the best.
And these plants and the berries that they produce were so abundant that they became
a really important element of pemmican, of a stored food resource that people relied
on and also became part of the indigenous trade economy, which is another reason that
it's an appropriate plant
to think about in terms of economic systems.
So just to see if I can restate your thesis thus far,
this berry, which in the right variety,
specifically the Saskatoon variety of the service berry,
is really delicious and you like it.
And the way the
shrub operates in nature is a model for how we could operate our economies, which
the economy sounds a little technical in some ways, but you just mean like how are
we going to interact with each other in terms of providing what we need in order
to survive? Precisely, yeah. At the most basic definition of what we mean by economics, of how do we provide
for ourselves and for each other.
And the way that the service berries do it, as indeed most plants do, is in providing
abundance for all in a reciprocal manner.
Because you know, those berries that are so delicious for us, or the robins, or the bluebirds,
or any of the others who are sitting there filling their bellies, is there is an exchange
involved here.
They're getting the delicious carbohydrates and the energy from those berries, but they're
also providing a service for the berry, right, of carrying those seeds to new habitats.
Plants can't move, so there's an exchange going on here.
They say, well, you birds can move, and so we're going to entice you with these delicious,
nutritious berries so that your gift of movement will reciprocate our gift of making berries.
Does that make sense?
Yeah. The service berry is not self-sabotaging
in its selflessness.
It is getting something out of the berries
it is providing to the world.
Yes, yes.
And that's the way most natural systems are based,
is on an exchange of goods and services
between different species. Those exchanges
are reciprocal. Maybe not directly reciprocal, but there are ways in which, in return for
the gift of those berries, the whole system thrives. In return for those early flowering
shrub branches that are so beautiful, all white
against the hillsides in the springtime, the reciprocity there is of course the pollen
to the pollinators, but then those pollinators become food for the warblers that are migrating.
And so in every step of the ecosystem there is, generally speaking, a reciprocal exchange between beings.
Nobody's hoarding the berries.
Nobody's keeping the gift and the energy.
It's all in motion.
And to me, that's the important thing about the economies of nature is that they're circular and that it's not a matter of accumulation by individuals,
but well-being flows from sharing what you have and reciprocating so that the product,
if you will, keeps being shared in ecological cycles.
You've already covered this a little bit, but maybe I'll prod you to put a really fine point on it. The balance and reciprocity
of natural ecosystems contrasts in your view with the man-made economy that is pushing
the earth in some quite unhealthy directions. Am I correct about that?
That's the central thesis of the book. Yeah, exactly.
Am I correct about that? That's the central thesis of the book.
Yeah, exactly.
Can you say a little bit more about what is out of whack in your view about the economic
system that is prevailing planet wide right now made by humans?
Well, there's a number of elements to it, of course.
And one of the ones that feels most important is this issue of overconsumption and hoarding of what economists call resources,
right, of wealth, where wealth is understood as an individual accumulating, in many cases,
much more than they need.
And sometimes that happens in nature, but not so often.
It's more a matter of saying that wealth is produced by sharing.
Wealth is produced when all beings in the ecosystem have what they need.
And I think that parallel is true for humans, human communities as well.
That service berry doesn't keep those berries for themselves. It doesn't keep the
sugars and the energy that they've made in that spring sunshine to themselves. They take what
they need in order to grow and flourish and then all the rest of that abundance is shared in the
form of berries that then have these ripple effects throughout the system.
So as I'm listening to you and in preparing for this conversation, there are, and please correct me if I'm wrong at any of this,
but in my view there appear to be two levels on which we can have this conversation, and they're connected of course,
but there's the structural level, how we're structuring our economy,
which I actually found totally fascinating.
And then there's the individual level,
how we're operating in the world.
That is the primary concern of this show.
They're, of course, linked, and I want to cover both of them.
But let me just stay on the individual level for a moment,
because while I find your work to be a very interesting critique of global capitalism, I also
find it to be a really useful prod for me out of my, and I don't think I'm alone in this pervasive,
often subconscious sense of lack, not enoughness, scarcity. And so I want to read in that vein a
quote from you, to you, to get you to say more about it.
You say that recognizing enoughness is a radical act in an economy that is always urging us to consume more.
Can you say a little bit more about that?
Absolutely. You know, the notion of contentment, the notion of homeostasis and balance is, I think, one of the things that we
seek as human people for our own well-being and the well-being of the land and people around us.
A capitalist market economy says, that's not good enough. All of the messages that we get is we have to consume more, we have to be more, we have to have more as individuals.
And what this metaphor, this natural metaphor offers us is to say, let's think about
enoughness.
When we have enoughness, that also means that all the abundance, that which is left over,
we have to be able to share.
So this idea of contentment and abundance as a radical act in a consumerist economy
is really, really important.
As we resist those messages to consume more, we then create justice around us.
But I think also we create for ourselves this sense of well-being and security, which after
all is what we're craving, right?
That sense of being taken care of.
And I'm going to be all right.
And I have enough to be sharing with others and creating justice and abundance all around me.
That's what I want as a human.
That makes me feel right and in good relationship with the world.
And that sense of abundance creates a kind of peacefulness, I think, to say nothing of
gratitude for the abundance that the natural
world provides.
You said a lot there that I want to unpack.
I guess my first question is, I find, and I'm speaking for myself, the idea of enoughness
to be very compelling and attractive, given that I am somebody who was raised in a capitalist
context and I think that sort that, as I mentioned earlier,
that sense of lack, I think, made its way into my marrow
in ways that I would love to uproot if possible.
And I'm curious what you think the root is
to that sense of enoughness.
What can we do to feel that?
I love that question, Dan.
And to me, much of that sense of enoughness
and the way that that has been stolen from us
by corporate America is the way that our attention
has been hijacked.
What do we pay attention to?
You know, one of the things that,
the statistic that I often offer up, which has been that, you know, one of the things that, the statistic that I often offer up, which has been that,
you know, our ancestors knew the names of hundreds of plants and animals and birds around
us, but today the average American can recognize a hundred corporate logos and fewer than ten
plants.
To me that's a stunning piece of evidence about our disconnection from the natural world.
How can we possibly see the abundance of the natural world if we don't even know the beings
who are around us, right?
So it seems to me that one of the mechanisms that has promoted this is stealing our attention.
Our attention from the things that really do take care of us, really do create beauty
and balance and wellness in the world.
And so don't pay attention to those plants in your backyard, pay attention to this pharmaceutical,
pay attention to this product, you'll feel better, you'll feel happier.
Well, I think rarely is that true.
But the kind of wellness that happens when you know the trees around you,
when you know, you know, an example that I love to use is there's a little plant
that is probably in the backyard of almost all of your listeners in North America anyway,
and that little plant is called Heal All.
You know, if you learn any plant, how about one called Heal All?
There are these plants with all of these gifts that are right there, but we don't pay attention
to them anymore.
So I think one of the powerful ways that people can participate in this resistance to consumption is to reclaim your attention.
Reclaim your attention from what economic and market forces tell you to pay attention to,
and instead cultivate an attention to what really sustains us and an attention to gratitude.
So I want to draw a line onto that because I think it's important I want people to understand it, to what really sustains us and an attention to gratitude.
So I wanna draw a line onto that
because I think it's important I want people to understand it
and I wanna make sure that I understand it for myself.
I think what you're saying is if you're looking
for that sense of contentment, enoughness,
one route is to stop staring at Instagram
and instead get to know the natural world around you.
That is a great encapsulation of what I'm saying. Absolutely.
You know when you travel and you go someplace where you can't read the street signs or the store signs
or hear the language or engage with people because of a language barrier.
That always makes me feel uncomfortable and I feel like I can't create the relationships
that I might want.
I don't feel as secure and joyful when I don't know who's around me.
Or in your apartment building, if you don't know the names of your neighbors, how can
you go knock on their door?
Either to invite them over for tea or because you need help?
And to me, that's the same kind of contentment and security that comes from knowing who are
the plants and animals around you.
Is it because, I mean, I can imagine the contentment derives from several sources. First of all, if you turned off social media
and were focusing on pretty much anything else,
I think that would lead to greater contentment.
But if you make it a one-two punch
and turn off social media
and get in touch with the natural world,
I think that is, I think there's plenty of evidence
to suggest that would be an anti-anxiety pill
that would be free and with no side effects.
But I'm hearing something else,
at least probably several other notes that you're sounding.
One of them is that, and I think I'm hearing this correctly,
but you'll correct me if I'm wrong,
is that getting to know the plants and animals around you,
it kind of takes you out of the story of you,
this misapprehension that we walk around with,
that we're like isolated egos,
threatfully navigating a hostile world.
Whereas if you actually can create a sense of connection
to the nature around you, that story softens somewhat.
How does that all go down with you?
Exactly right.
First of all, to your first point, yeah, there's tons of biophysical evidence about how nature
engagement with the natural world is good for us, right?
That's a whole different story about the way it lowers stress hormones, increases attention, betters
our immune system, lowers blood pressure, all of those things simply by being in a green
place.
But yes, if you take it one step further beyond all those wonderful benefits of breathing
forest-breathed air, right, You get to a place of feeling cared for
by the living world as well.
That's so interesting.
A word you've mentioned a couple of times
and it comes up in your book quite a lot is gratitude.
Maybe say a little bit more about that.
Yeah, gratitude to me is a really powerful form
of attention that grounds me in my daily
life.
I have daily gratitude practices that bring me into what feels like a really peaceful
and joyful relationship with the living world.
But you know, with real gratitude, and I don't mean just like, you know, the polite thank you that we throw off, you know, 100 times a day without thinking about it. I mean the kind
of gratitude that comes when you recognize that your life is contingent upon the beingness
of all these others. One of my favorite ways to practice that is because I can do it either here
in a rural landscape where I live or when I'm traveling in urban places and I feel
really kind of lost and estranged. What I do is that think about the gratitude in breath,
Think about the gratitude in breath. To think that when I'm breathing in, to go beyond that I am breathing in and all the
goodness that comes from that, to say, well, where did that air come from?
I am breathing in oxygen that just moments ago was breathed out by plants. And that creates for me this real bond of, oh, my life is completely contingent on the
breath of plants.
And to me that is just, it fills me up, not only with breath, but with gratitude.
To think, oh my gosh, I live in a world where photosynthesis keeps everything going, which draws your attention
to the sun and to the winds and to the trees who are all around you.
And then in that breathing in, sending gratitude to all the beings who makes that breath possible.
But then of course there's the exhale. And in the exhale, as I'm breathing out carbon dioxide, that carbon dioxide, minutes later,
is taken up by the plants in order for them to live.
And so there is very literally the practice of my breath is your breath, your breath is my breath.
And so creating that sense of reciprocity makes me feel like I belong here and it engenders
this big sense of gratitude for all the other beings who are around me, acknowledging that my very existence
is based on them. And so that's to me the kind of gratitude I'm talking about, of really deeply
understanding the permeability between the life of a human being and the life of a maple tree,
or the grasses in the
log.
I love that.
You mentioned that you do several gratitude practices.
Is there another one that's worth sharing?
Yeah.
You know, on a good day, not every day, but on a good day, I love to begin my mornings
with kind of a gratitude inventory. I walk up to the top of
the hill behind my house or sometimes if I've got a meeting coming up, just the tree in my backyard.
But to do a gratitude inventory of to send out my gratitude to that blue jay who is calling for those warmth of
the sun on my face, for the mushroom that's sprouting up from the ground around that tree.
It is a kind of opening to everything around me that takes me out of me and into the world.
And to me, that's the gratitude practice that means the most to me is it's an opportunity
to remember that I'm not alone here, that we're all connected, you know, the notion
of interbeing with all of those beings. And so rather than being kind of a rote recitation
of what I am grateful for, I try to be really alert and attentive to everybody around me
so that I give my gratitude to them. And almost always it's the magic of thinking, oh my
gosh, how lucky am I? How lucky am I to live in a world that has the smell of grass in the
morning and it creates that sense of abundance and contentment. But even more so, I think it is that
importance of cultivating then what I'm going to call a sense of humility, of recognizing that I'm not alone here.
I'm not in charge of all of this.
I am the grateful recipient of the gifts of the world,
which then opens the questions,
what am I going to give back in return
for all of this abundance?
What am I going to give back?
You brought me exactly where I was hoping to go there
with that question you asked at
the end, like, okay, now I'm grateful.
How do I give back?
And I'm going to read another quote from you to you.
And this is a counterintuitive notion, I think, but it certainly lands for me.
The wealth and security we seem to crave could be met, and this is me interjecting here, I think this is the counterintuitive part,
the wealth and security we seem to crave could be met by sharing what we have.
Can you say a little bit more about that?
Yeah. You know, I think a lot about why do we consume too much, why do we accumulate too much,
and at root, some of it has to be our sense of security. We want those things in order to know that we'll be safe and well, and the people we
care about will be safe and well.
And that is certainly one way towards security, is to get everything that you can and hang
on to it.
And that is a very Western notion, right? But the other way that you can be secure is in having good relationships with people around
you.
And in this case, I would include the more than human people as well.
But that idea that when we share with others, we create these bonds of gratitude. We create bonds of belonging and good feeling toward each other
so that I don't necessarily need to own a power drill. Not every one of us has to have a garage
full of tools, but we have to have good neighbors that I can call up my neighbor and say, hey,
could I borrow your drill?
I can have the wealth of that without owning it.
So it's good relationships that I think provide security as well.
You know, Dan, it feels to me like we have kind of created an economy which is all about accumulating belongings, but what
we really crave is belonging. And that belonging can come from those relationships and sharing
with each other. And you know, my neighbor might have a power drill, but I make a mean elderberry pie.
So I'm going to, you know, bring a pie to him.
And it's not a direct exchange, but it's making of relationships that reciprocal kinds
of relationships that to me create a sense of security, which is more enduring than owning
everything for ourselves.
Yeah, this is a very different vision of security and contentment and enoughness than the one
we're sold by the dominant narrative.
I had a guest on a couple months ago, Mia Birdsong, who points out that there's an etymological link between the word freedom
and the word friendship, which is I think incredibly compelling that we're kind of looking
for happiness in all the wrong places.
And instead of getting more likes for your Instagram posts or getting the next promotion
or making the next purchase, and I'm not against all of those things, but instead of pinning all our hopes on that stuff,
actually having positive relationships with the humans
and non-humans around us, that is,
and again, there's a ton of evidence to support this,
is the quick and reliable route.
And the enduring route, the enduring route, right?
Because it can take so many different forms
in terms of acting on those
relationships. What can you and the folks you're in relationship with create together? And, you know,
back to the notion of the ways in which the living world, the natural world, plant the world,
teaches us this. You think about trees, for example. Trees are so long-lived, they can't
run away from resource shortage, right? They can't run away from pests, they can't run away from all
sorts of negatives. So what does that mean? How do they survive then? It's because they're long-lived, they create good relationships.
They thrive when they create a multiplicity of good relationships with a pollinator, with
a squirrel who carries the fruit, with the mycorrhizae who are feeding the soil.
I think trees in particular are really good teachers of what does it mean to create relationships that sustain us over
the long term.
And in that case, it's like the service berry, how do trees do that?
By not accumulating everything that they have, but by sharing it.
And they create enough good relationships that allow them to have security over time.
MUSIC
Coming up, Robin, while Kimmerer talks about how to change your relationship to the living world,
the argument that competition may not actually be the primary factor of evolutionary success,
and the science of biomimicry.
This episode is brought to you by Peloton. science of biomimicry. Peloton has a variety of training programs. They've got Pilates, 5K, 10K, half and full marathon programs, strength training, boot camps.
There are many, many ways to challenge yourself
via Peloton.
Workouts for every mood.
If you're looking for an early morning run
or a late night hike, Peloton has you covered
no matter what you're in the mood for
or whenever it is you want to move.
Like I said, I use the Peloton bike all the time.
I'm a big fan of Alex Toussaint,
who's actually been on the show.
He does a weekly ride called Club Bangers
that I really like.
Peloton is a great workout.
When I do a 45 minute spin, whew.
I'm pretty much tired the rest of the day,
but in a good way, you know what I'm talking about?
Anyway, check out Peloton, find your push,
find your power with Peloton at OnePeloton.ca
I'm Alice Levine.
And I'm Matt Ford.
And we're the hosts of Wondry's podcast, British Scandal.
And in our latest series, we're heading to the 80s.
And yes, we'll be talking about perms, shell suits, and enormous mobile phones, but that's
alongside a scandal that is guaranteed to blow your mind.
Yes, get ready for gold, greed and betrayal.
We are telling the story of one of the biggest heists
in this country's history.
And how what started as a slick operation
spiralled into absolute chaos.
We're gonna be unraveling the true story
behind the Brinks Mat heist,
the double crosses, murders and the global hunt
for the missing gold.
And the romancing.
Oh, always the romancing, Matt.
Turns out there's quite a lot in London, Shady Underworld.
To find out the full story and why it'll make you take a long,
hard look at your gold jewellery, follow British Scandal wherever you listen to podcasts.
Or listen early and ad free on Wondery Plus, on Apple Podcasts or the Wondering App.
Lots cooking over at danharris.com, including live guided meditations and ask me anything
sessions.
Would love to have you over there.
Meanwhile, over on the Happier app, they're offering 40% off the yearly subscription.
Now through December 6th, go to happierapp.com slash four zero.
All right, let's bump up to the structural level for a second. This is not an area where
I'm an expert at all. But I'm always struck when I have guests on who level critiques against capitalism,
it forces me to think about what are my attitudes about capitalism?
And I'd be interested to explore this with you because I don't think my ideas are fully
formed.
But I think if forced, I would say capitalism has a lot of flaws that are really showing
up right now in the various ecological disasters we're looking at,
but also in some of the psychological ramifications, hyper individualism, loneliness, disconnection, division.
And I have not seen a system that works better and that there is some brilliance to market forces.
So anyway, I say all that just to not,
I don't have a pointed question to you,
but just an invitation to think about this together.
I would really welcome that Dan,
because this is the moment when I say, I'm a botanist.
I'm not an economist.
As an ecologist, as an environmentalist,
I see the wages, the outcomes of unrestrained
extractive capitalism.
But I'm not an economics scholar or even an economic thinker.
I'm just asking the question, why have we created an economic system that destroys what
sustains life.
That doesn't make any sense to me.
And so then I turn to the natural world and say, well, how does the natural world create
abundance and sustain life and what could we learn about shaping an economic system
that does that. And so that's really the inquiry to look at economics based on give and take, of unreciprocity,
on what would an economy look like where the currency of that economy was gratitude.
That exchange comes because we have good relationships with other people and we have a responsibility
to act on the gratitude that we feel for how they shared with us.
And so we share with them.
And I don't have any illusions that this notion is going to topple capitalism anytime soon.
I'm not making that argument at all, rather that we ask that same
question of why have we created this system?
Why do we tolerate a system that destroys the planet?
And what could the planet teach us about alternatives in gift economy and in economies based on
sharing and cooperation rather than accumulation and competition.
You may or may not be aware of this
given your relationship to social media,
but this notion of just asking questions
has gotten a bad rap recently.
I think unfairly, I think just asking questions
is a great thing to do,
but I think there are some people who have abused
the just asking questions posture
to say a bunch of provocative shit that's not very helpful.
But I personally think that what you're doing here of asking these questions
and then infusing it with an area where you do have genuine expertise,
which is botany in the natural world,
is really compelling and provocative in a good way.
So just to be clear about what your goal is here,
and kind of to restate what you've already said,
you're not trying to say, I know how to fix capitalism.
What you're trying to say is, we have a problem clearly.
I don't think, I mean, I think we can stipulate to that,
most reasonable people, we have a problem
with some of the excesses of capitalism.
Let me look at what I know about a system that I know
that does naturally lead to balance and reciprocity
and see if I can pose some questions
and make some observations that would help
change the tone and tenor of this discussion.
That's exactly right.
You refer to this vision you have for a different way
to do economics as the gift economy.
And you're not the only one to talk about this, the gift economy, it's a real thing.
And you point out some examples of how this operates
in the real world.
Can you tell us a little bit about some of these examples?
Yeah, sure.
There's a way in which we can understand
that the service berry, for example,
provides an exemplar of a gift economy.
But in our own daily lives, we have lots of examples of micro gift
economies, right? Of the ones I think about are things like the simple example of when you're
done with the book, you give it to somebody else. You don't go buy another one. You don't hoard it.
You share it, right? That's a micro gift economy. But there are many examples coming
up at the grassroots level, at community level, all around us of gift economies, of sharing
material wealth, of saying, let's have a community tool shed so that we don't all
have to own something, so that everybody in our community has access to what they need, not
by owning it individually, but by having neighbors and sometimes infrastructures to do that.
Those are some examples.
You asked, what is my relationship with social media?
Just about zero.
But at the same time, I am blessed by being surrounded by students who have a, shall we
say, deep relationship with social media.
And they led me to think about social media as a gift economy.
I understand sometimes it is monetized, but they say, oh no, it's a gift economy of knowledge.
You can learn to do anything out there because of sharing of knowledge.
So that's an example.
Another familiar one that I love is the little free library that is on many street corners
where we live.
The gift is ideas and books.
And you don't have to own those books.
You put them all in a little place in your neighborhood so that everybody has
access to them.
Food co-ops, free farm stands, there are just lots of examples out there in our lives of
gift economies.
And so I ask the question of how and if we should scale those up.
What does that look like? And scaling up from passing a book to a neighbor, to a little free library, to the public library.
That is, I think, a continuum of scale, of gift economy.
And so then how does our economic and political system provide adequate support for those places where resources
are shared, like public libraries, like open space, like clean water, the commons.
I keep leaping back and forth between the structural level of this discussion and the
individual level of this discussion.
So now I'm going to ask a question that kind of gets us back to the individual.
Would it be correct for me to conclude based on all of the foregoing that your
argument is that sure, this discussion may not topple global capitalism.
And I, Dan Harris, I'm not even sure we should or what would come after it.
But if you're interested in taking a few steps towards at least infusing global capitalism with some of
the spirit of the natural world and the gift economy. You don't need to try to
like boil the ocean and get it all done this afternoon. You can just start
participating in some of the gift economies around you or even if there
isn't none around you, if there are none around you, to start one on your own. Yeah, exactly.
Right?
You know, when we think about the world as gift, which is really part of my ethos and
very much part of our Potawatomi conception of the world is that we humans, as the younger
brothers of creation, get to take advantage of all the gifts of all the other beings that
are around us.
But in our way of thinking, gifts come with responsibilities.
So then when we are the recipient of gifts, we have to ask ourselves, how will I reciprocate?
And that our purpose as humans is to figure out what our gifts are and how to give them
back in
the world. So it creates a sense of agency and purpose that serve the gift economies around us.
Bringing your own energy and attention and practice to your community is a gift exchange too.
and practice to your community is a gift exchange too. So, yeah, it is absolutely an invitation to say what would happen if we did think about
the world as gift and that we as individuals can then say, how will I reciprocate that gift?
And there are so many ways that we can answer that question of what do I, as a human being,
have to give back in return for everything that I've been given,
and even more so in return for everything that we have taken.
If memory serves, that word gift is embedded in the indigenous word for berry.
That's right. And that's one of the reasons I choose a berry,
a berry bearing plant as the standard
for talking about this.
The word min, M-I-N, appears in almost all of our words
for berries from strawberries, raspberries, blackberries.
They all have min in it. But min is also the
word that means, that is the root word of the words for gift. So it is telling us right
there that the plant world, the berries in particular, are giving us a gift. And when
you start thinking about the world as gift, I think everything changes.
As opposed to commodity, right?
Capitalism asks us to think about the world as commodity.
One of the examples I like to give about that is to think about something that you buy at
the store.
Let's say it's a nice wooly hat to keep your head warm because winter will be here
before we know it. And think about the hat that you just bought at the store and next to it,
you have a hat that your grandma knit you. Do you have different relationships to those two hats,
which serve the same purpose of making you look good and keeping your head warm.
But the one that's a gift, you're going to take way better care of that, right?
You're going to wear it at least when your grandma's around.
You have obligations to that because you're conceiving of that product, if you will, as
a gift.
Whereas the hat that you might have bought at the department store,
you have no obligation to because you think of it as property. And property doesn't come with
relationship. It can, but property is control. You own that, you can decide its fate really,
without any moral jeopardy. But when that is a gift, you do have the risks of moral jeopardy if you mistreat it.
So we take that very simple concept that we can look and say, yeah, yeah, I get that gift
versus commodity. Our relationship is totally different. So what happens when we take that
idea and apply it to the natural world? To see that all that we receive from the natural world is a gift,
not a commodity. Those relationships are attached to giftness. And I think that has the power to
fundamentally change our relationships to the living world. Can you imagine that ideology taking hold? You know, I struggle a little bit because I agree with what you're saying that it is all, of course, a gift.
And given the imperatives of the capitalist system, I don't know that the gift ideology is going to make its way into the boardroom.
It's going to take a while. We're talking about cultural transformation really to a different worldview.
And to me, the question of does it scale up to the boardroom governed by very different
priorities is less important to me than the fact that it creates agency for you and for me and for listeners. To be able to say,
you know, I am not going to topple Monsanto. I'm not. But I am going to live as if the world
was a gift. And when the world is a gift, to me, that means you consume less, you love it more, you cherish.
You cherish what you have, which creates a sense
of abundance, and a sense of abundance has been shown
over and over again to limit consumption.
When we feel like, oh, I've got everything I need,
when you feel content, you're a little more immune to the messages that say, go buy some
more stuff.
You really need this new iPhone, or you need this.
You say, oh, really, I'm good.
I have what I need.
My well-being is grounded in a sense of peace with the living world, a sense of belonging.
And again, back to that not rooted in belongings.
And that's something that every one of us can choose.
And I think that collectively, when we choose to treat the world as gift, that's how culture
changes.
And so many of us feel like we're powerless, right?
We're powerless against the forces, a raid fossil fuel industry, for example, but we
have absolute agency of what we choose to pay attention to, how we choose to think and
relate.
And so to me, it's an invitation to live your values.
And collectively, that really matters.
Are there arguments against the gift economy?
Sure. I think the places in the world where we see gift economies flourish
tend to be in situations where there's a lot of cultural accountability.
And that is in small, tightly-knit communities.
And in those communities, you know who's been generous
and who hasn't.
You know who helped you out last time
and who you have respect for.
So gift economies tend to flourish
in small, tightly-knit communities
where there's accountability.
So the argument can be made that that can never work in the society that we have created,
where oftentimes we feel anonymous and powerless.
But to me, it's a call to say, well, if we value gift economies, does that mean that we need to create smaller, mutually accountable communities based on good
relations? In order for gift economies to work, that is what needs to happen. And I think that
that is in general, a really good social goal, again, to support that sense of belonging.
You know, and I know on your show you've talked about
this, what has been named the epidemic of loneliness, right? And what we're talking about
all serves the goal to create more connection, more mutual accountability to one another that
accountability to one another that can be an antidote to loneliness.
And you know, eco-psychologists have a term around loneliness too. We know a lot, many of us experience the consequences of human loneliness, but eco-psychologists have created
this term called species loneliness, the estrangement
that we feel from the living world when we don't know the beings who are around us and
we're lonely for birdsong and we're lonely for walking through the woods and looking
around and knowing that every medicine, practically every medicine, many of the medicines
that you need are growing right there at your feet.
That kind of intimacy with the living world that makes you feel, not only feel, but in
a very material, pragmatic way, makes you cared for by the land.
We forget that the land cares for us, has the potential to care for us. And so including this notion of species loneliness in our conversations about human loneliness
is I think another really valuable element.
One of the questions that comes up every time we talk about community, belonging, loneliness on the show is, well, how do I find a community?
I mean, for example, I recently started an online community, and one of the things I'm hearing in
the chat from people is, you know, how do I meet people locally who care about meditation?
This seems to be a real issue. I get that I need good relationships in order to be happy, but I don't know how to find
them.
Yeah.
And of course, showing up, showing up is taking the risk to show up is, I think, one of the
answers.
But the investment of attention, and again I'm thinking here about creating community
with the more than human world, is showing up with curiosity and attention and humility
about the ones who are around you.
You know, again, there are a lot of digital tools that can help people create relationships with
the living world.
iNaturalist and Merlin the Bird app and the Plant Identification app, all of those things
are ways to begin knowing the ones who are around you.
I think one of the really hopeful mechanisms that I've seen of people wanting
to create relationship with the living world comes in gardening.
And starting a garden is a great way to come into relationship with soil and seeds and
insects and plants, of course.
But some of the real joy comes in community gardening and coming together with your neighbors
in a gift economy like, I'm going to grow the tomatoes, you grow the green beans,
and let's exchange. We don't each have to do exactly the same thing. And community gardens,
whether rural or urban, are wonderful places to create community and are well recognized as hubs for that. In fact, I know of a number of community
gardens who actually have gift economy as an essential piece of participating in those community
gardens. So that's an important way that people can both create human community
and develop relationships with the living world that are pragmatic in
terms of putting food on your table and creating that sense of gratitude for the green beans
and those soils and your neighbors who are going to share how to grow the juiciest tomatoes
in a gift economy.
The best possible neighbors.
I'm leaping back now to the structural level.
And I know you've said that you're not an economist,
but you did a non-trivial amount of research,
it appears to me, in writing this book.
And there's a quote here that has to do
not only with the economy, but like who we are as a species,
you know, as the constituent parts of this economy.
You write that ecologists are reevaluating
the assumption that intense competition is the primary force regulating evolutionary
success. I'd love to learn more about that.
Yeah. For a long time, we have understood or thought we understood that it is competition
which sets the ground rules by which natural communities form.
It is competition that shapes evolution of the gifts that different species have.
All true.
But there's a bit of social Darwinism that followed from those beliefs in terms of thinking
that because competition is important in natural
communities and a natural economy, that it is justifiably the right way to structure
human communities as well. And there's a lot of merit in that. But the mistake comes when
we think it's the only force. It's the only force shaping communities. And some of the really
interesting research that has been done in ecology and evolution tells us that cooperation
and indeed mutualism among organisms is often the principle on which communities are grounded.
And we kind of overlooked that by having this veneer of human valuing, of competition
and competitive exclusion. And now we're coming to appreciate the roles of symbiosis, of mutualism,
simply because people are asking different questions and questioning the dominant assumptions
of how we thought the world worked. And you know, Dan, it seems particularly relevant right now because in that literature, what
we're seeing is when, what are the circumstances under which cooperation and mutualism seem
to be most important in the natural world?
And those times, those places are in times of environmental stress, in times of resource shortage, and
environmental stress generally, those organisms who can engage in cooperation often have the edge in
natural selection. And our past behaviors, our continued degradation of the living world has put all of us, humans
and more than humans alike, in a position of incredible environmental stress.
And so it is, I think, really important to think about what can we learn from the natural
world in the embrace of cooperation in those cases,
and how do we create that cooperation in human societies as well.
This idea is, of course, tied up in the emerging science of biomimicry, of saying, what can
we learn from the living world about how we might live. And oftentimes the science of biomimicry brings us products that are modeled after the way
nature solves problems.
And that's all to the good.
But what really interests me is how can we think about the principles of community and
economic organization and think about what the living world has to tell us
in those cases.
And that too is why the service bearing,
what does looking at the economy of a generous plant
offer us in thinking about how we might organize ourselves
for wellbeing as well.
It's so interesting, the first part of your last answer that, you know, it just got me thinking
that hyperindividualism, hypercompetition, the de-emphasis on collaboration led us to
the ecological stress that may in turn force us back into collaboration and cooperation.
Yes, exactly. There's a kind of reciprocity between those forces, huh?
Yep, absolutely.
Coming up, Robin talks about plants as persons
or the study of plant cognition
and the importance in her view of recognizing
both Western science and the indigenous worldview.
Western science and the indigenous worldview. suits and enormous mobile phones, but that's alongside a scandal that is guaranteed to blow your mind.
Yes, get ready for gold, greed and betrayal. We are telling the story of one of the biggest
heists in this country's history.
And how what started as a slick operation spiralled into absolute chaos.
We're going to be unravelling the true story behind the Brink's Mat Heist, the double
crosses, murders and the global
hunt for the missing gold.
And the romancing.
Oh, always the romancing, Matt.
Turns out there's quite a lot in London, Shady Underworld.
To find out the full story and why it'll make you take a long hard look at your gold jewellery,
follow British Scandal wherever you listen to podcasts.
Or listen early and ad free on Wondery Plus on Apple podcasts or the Wondery app.
I'm Mike Bubbins. I'm Ellis James and I'm Steph Guerrero and we're convinced that our podcast the The Socially Distanced Sports Bar, is going to be your new favourite comedy podcast with just a little bit of sport thrown in.
You don't have to love sport, like sport or even know anything about sport to listen.
Because nobody has conversations which stay on topic and it's the same on our podcast.
We might start off talking about ice hockey but end up discussing, I don't know, 1980s
British sitcom Aloalo instead.
Imagine using the word nuance in your pitch for aloalo.
He's not cheating on his wife, he's French.
It's a different culture.
If you like me and Mammoth, or you like Alice in Fantasy Football League, then you'll love our
podcast. Follow the Socially Distant Sports Bar wherever you get your podcasts.
The Socially Distant Sports Bar, it's not about asymmetrical overlords.
James, podcasting from his study, and you have to say that's magnificent.
Let me ask you, before I let you go, a few questions about your sort of general worldview. You are a scientist, a botanist, but you
started out interacting with plants from, if I understand it correctly, an indigenous or
and maybe animist point of view. And I've heard you say that in science, plants are objects,
but in the indigenous worldview, they're subjects. Can you say a little bit more about that?
the indigenous worldview, their subjects. Can you say a little bit more about that?
Oh, happy to.
Although you said it very well right there.
The notion of personhood and agency
that are associated with subjectivity
are part of the indigenous worldview,
or I would say at least our Potawatomi worldview,
but it is more widespread than that,
that the plants are not only providers I would say at least our Potawatomi worldview, but it is more widespread than that, that
the plants are not only providers for us of food, oxygen, et cetera, they're providers
of lessons for us, of models for us, and that all living beings from the plants to animals
of all sorts are understood as our relatives, not as objects.
They are understood as persons.
And this is, you know, in our language, for example, it's impossible to say it about
a plant or an animal.
We refer to them with the same grammar that you and I would use for each other.
In English, we talk about that tree over there as it is growing by the fence.
But in Potawatomi, you can't say that.
You have to refer to them with an animate pronoun.
So English, the language of global capitalism, has a structure which speaks of other members of our species, respectfully,
but everyone else is viewed as an object, the living world as thing. I think it's no mistake
that English is the language of global capitalism because the language itself gives us permission
to objectify the living world. And that's simply not true in many
Indigenous languages. So yes, in Indigenous worldview in general, there is a sense of
animacy and respect for the other beings who are here before us and have intelligence, gifts,
and responsibilities of their own. Whereas in my scientific communities,
we are instructed to think and interact and research
with those beings as if they were just stuff,
as if they were solely objective material entities.
So notwithstanding your scientific training,
is it your sense and is there any evidence
for the idea that plants would have a consciousness and a point of subjectivity?
Yeah.
You know, there is right now an emerging science of what has been called plant neurobiology,
plant cognition. It's a science in its infancy
at this point to recognize the way that plants make choices, the way that plants behave.
It's an emerging discipline within plant physiology, for example, that is so exciting and I think will
be really revolutionary.
At the same time, I would say that it is in its infancy.
There's a wonderful new book out that provides some of this wonderful storytelling about
the science that's going on in plant cognition.
It's called The Light Eaters written by Zoe Schlanger.
And it is a wonderful account of the research which is helping point us to understanding
the potential for sentience, decision-making, and indeed intelligence in the plant world.
So just to restate that, having grown up in an Indigenous context, actually that may not
be true if I now am remembering that your family
wasn't living with the Potawatomi tribe, but you had that in your
consciousness in some ambient way. I want to make sure I don't mangle your biography.
Yeah, like many people of the indigenous diaspora, by virtue of the
products of the boarding school, removal et cetera, my family and indeed many
Potawatomi families don't live on our reservation, but I did live with Potawatomi values and
stories and teachings.
So I'm so grateful for those stories that were passed to me.
So yes, I grew up with that, Dan, but I also had the great good fortune of growing up in the woods
and in the field. And you know, as a little kid, I was wandering around hanging out with plants.
So not only did I have the teachings of my culture to help me think about those plants,
I also had the plants themselves. And you know,, I was, I suppose gifted with this very particular kind of attention to
what plants might be teaching me from an earliest age.
So that idea of plants as person was something that was not only came from culture, but from
lived experience.
But there must be such an interesting relationship between your scientific training and your lived experience and cultural upbringing
in a Potawatomi context to the extent that that was available to you.
On the one hand, science refers to plants as its, your lived experience and cultural heritage pushes you toward viewing plants as them,
conferring a kind of subjectivity upon them.
And now the science is starting to perhaps embrace the indigenous worldview.
I think that's fair to say, yes.
There was a time in my life, Dan,
when I viewed carrying both of those
ways of knowing with me and practicing both of those ways of knowing as a real burden.
It made it difficult on the pathway to becoming a scientist. But what it forced me to do was
to have a very clear understanding of each of those worldviews and what they could and couldn't do and could
and couldn't tell us. And so for me, it's been really, in a sense, a gift because it
has sharpened my understanding of both of those worldviews because I have lived in an
environment of academic science which devalues and historically
has dismissed indigenous knowledge.
But the way that it comes as a gift is that today, after years in my career of having
that dismissed, we now have the Center for Native Peoples and the Environment at an environmental college where both ways of knowing
are being embraced in thinking
about environmental problem solving.
And that kind of intellectual flexibility
and cross-cultural fluency gives us more solutions
to try to address complex environmental problems
than using one of those cultural lenses alone.
Is there any danger to mixing these two? I mean, I'm very intrigued by the mix, but science obviously
has limitations and you've talked about, you and others have talked about the risks of scientism,
you know, privileging science over every other way of knowing. And as you know, people who are
non-scientists can confer more gravity and
finality upon science than actually is there.
It's really just an ongoing argument taking place in public science to the extent that
I understand it as a non-scientist.
So at the very least, science does deal in allegedly provable, knowable facts, whereas
other ways of knowing sometimes those facts are harder
to confirm.
And I'm just wondering, is there a slippery slope where you end up cosigning on things
like creation science or devaluing evolution, et cetera, et cetera?
Yeah, super important questions.
And that criticism often comes forward when we try to advance greater recognition for Indigenous science.
But I think the real key comes in, I think you began your question, Dan, perhaps appropriately with saying,
well, what happens when you mix these things?
And I want to be perfectly clear, I'm never talking about mixing them.
I'm talking about recognizing both of them.
Recognizing both of them as powerful intellectual traditions that are tools for answering different
kinds of questions.
Western science is, boy, that's going to be my choice for hypothesis testing about the
biophysical world every time.
But what if that's not the question?
Science is super good at asking true-false questions.
But sometimes the questions aren't true-false.
They're laden with value.
They need emotional intelligence.
They need spiritual knowledge to give us a sense of direction as well.
So I, too, get very concerned when people talk about mixing or blending.
They are really different from one another.
I think it's really important that we have a sharp focus on the strengths, the gifts
of each of those and to not be confused about the kinds of power that they have.
Robert, it's been great to talk to you.
I've wanted to have you on for a long time, so I'm glad we finally made it happen. Just two last questions here.
One is, is there something you were
hoping to talk about today that we didn't get to?
I don't think so.
Great. Then the final question is,
can you just remind everybody of the name of your new book,
and while you're at it, maybe talk a little bit about
your previous books and maybe if you have a website.
I would love if you would just plug everything, to the extent you're at it, maybe talk a little bit about your previous books and maybe if you have a website. I would love if you would just plug everything to the extent you're comfortable.
To the extent I'm comfortable. That would be about zero.
Yes, I'm really excited to see this little slim volume called The Service Berry about
abundance and gratitude in the natural world coming forward on November 19th
from Simon and Schuster. It is very much an expansion from my book, Braiding Sweetgrass,
Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge, and the Teachings of Plants, which explores many
of the ideas that we've been talking about today, Dan,
that comes from milkweed additions.
And before that, what got me started in the departure from only writing to a scientific
audience to the embrace of multiple ways of knowing and multiple ways of telling a story,
a scientific story, my first book was Gathering Moss, which really embraces
what can we learn from these most humble of plants, the mosses beneath our feet. So I'm
very excited about sharing these ideas and seeing how they resonate with human communities.
Dr. Robin Wall Kimmerer, thank you for coming on. Thank you, Dan.
Thanks for your thoughtful questions.
Thanks again to Robin Wall Kimmerer.
Great to have her on.
We'll be talking about this latest episode over in the chat today on danharris.com.
Also if you're a subscriber, you will have received in your inbox a summary of the biggest
takeaways from today's episode along along with time-stamped
highlights and a full transcript.
So sign up at danharris.com.
Eight bucks a month, we'd love to have you.
Before I go, I want to thank everybody who worked so hard on this show.
Our producers are Tara Anderson, Caroline Keenan, and Eleanor Vasili.
Our recording and engineering is handled by the great folks over at Pod People.
Lauren Smith is our production manager.
Marissa Schneiderman is our senior producer, DJ Cashmere is our executive producer, and Nick Thorburn of the band Islands wrote
our theme.
If you like 10% happier, and I hope you do, you can listen early and ad free right now
by joining Wondery Plus in the Wondery app or on Apple podcasts.
Prime members can listen ad
free on Amazon Music. Before you go, tell us about yourself by filling out a short survey at
Wondery.com slash survey. I'm Lindsey Graham, the host of Wondery Show American Scandal.
We bring to life some of the biggest controversies in US history, presidential lies, environmental
disasters, corporate fraud.
In our latest series, the Houston Astros shocked Major League Baseball by going from last place
to winning the World Series in just four years. This remarkable turnaround seems to vindicate
Astros General Manager Jeff Luno, whose unconventional use of data and the latest
technology stirred controversy around the league. But when two reporters uncover
that some players and coaches have been using that technology to cheat, it casts doubt on the
Astros' culture of winning at all costs. Follow American Scandal on the Wondery app or wherever
you get your podcasts. Experience all episodes ad-free and be the first to binge the newest
season only on Wondery Plus. You can join Wondery Plus in the Wondery app, Apple Podcasts, or Spotify. Start your free trial today.
Make this holiday season wow with a brand new way to play from Wondery Kids and the
number one kids podcast, Wow in the World. We are making STEM toys fun like never before.
For the first time ever, be wowed with exclusive, engaging companion audio that comes with each STEM toy.
Each STEM kit includes a bonus science tool
and three months of Wondery Plus free.
Shop the full Wow in the World toy collection today
at amazon.com slash Wondery Kids.