TFTC: A Bitcoin Podcast - #424: Q1 2023 Monetary Base Update with Matthew Mežinskis
Episode Date: June 1, 2023Follow along with the charts: https://twitter.com/1basemoney/status/1664179527784734720?s=20 Matthew on Twitter: https://twitter.com/1basemoney 8:12 - Baltic hockey 17:17 - Debt ceiling bye bye 22:55 ...- New basemoney drop! 36:19 - Bitcoin base vs top fiat, reverse repo 49:41 - Bank failures 1:01:54 - Treasury markets 1:05:34 - Fannie & Freddie debt numbers 1:09:32 - Balaji says FedNow is a CBDC 1:17:02 - Sidebar on children 1:18:19 - Back on topic, centralization will continue 1:23:45 - Sovereign sat and gold stacking 1:34:41 - Quick stats 1:35:56 - Full reserve in Texas 1:45:37 - Wrapping up Shoutout to our sponsors: Unchained River CrowdHealth Bitcoin Talent Co TFTC Merch is Available: Shop Now Join the TFTC Movement: Main YT Channel Clips YT Channel Website Twitter Instagram Follow Marty Bent: Twitter Newsletter Podcast
Transcript
Discussion (0)
what's up free city boy marty here to introduce this rip with our good friend maddie mazingtious
back again for a quarterly update on the global monetary base
always a fun rep with with maddie great conversation talk some full reserve banking at the
end make sure you stick around for that before we jump into the sponsors got to read the top four
boost from last yesterday's
rip with Matt
Dines. Rip
423 retirement funds in the age of
Bitcoin with Matt Dines.
At tip underscore tingle
80,085 sats. A boobs
boost. Retirement funds? Hell
no, brother. Old tip only gets
hard for hard money.
Tip getting the hard tip
for hard money.
Love to hear it. At
Eric99, 50,000 sats. Stay humble.
stack sats at cryo
sats 333 sats threes
across the board palindrome boost
watch rumble pat cats
I don't like cats
I'm not going to do that
sorry cryo sats at pies
250 sats
great rip thank you guys
for boosting
rip 423 I hope you
enjoy rip 424
and then if you're listening today we got rip
425 coming out tomorrow it's a long one
Balaji Trinvonson
um great rip great rip this is a great rip too i love maddie we've been doing this
i think three or four years now he's been doing his monetary base update for five years
fives are high things are good rolling into the end of the week feeling high here
guess what river rebrand not really rebrand redesign
new design
and guess what they just added a new functionality
I just got the email before I sat down
to do the rips automatic withdrawals
are now available
so if you want to withdraw
to self custody automatically
after you buy on river river makes it
very easy to buy bitcoin to DCA
into bitcoin if you DCA using river
you're not going to pay any fees
on those buys now you can DCA
and send it straight to cold storage
it's a beautiful thing
what else do they have
they have river mining
if you want to get into the mining game
if you want to diversify your sat streams
you can buy ASICs on river
get them plugged in
at a hosting facility
with competitive rates
whether you're an individual
who wants to buy one ASIC
or a large institution
who wants to buy hundreds of ASICs
you can do it through river
they have some very cheap ASICs available now
that are already plugged in
so you can buy them.
They're already plugged in.
We'll start streaming sats
directly to your River account
pretty quickly.
So go to river.com
slash tftc
set up an account.
You get Bitcoin.
If you buy $1,000
worth of Bitcoin,
you're going to get $20
in free Bitcoin.
If you buy $10,000,
you get $80.
River.com
slash tftc
sign up today.
This report was also brought to you
by good friends at Unchained.
They're here
to build
the financial institution
of the future
that leverages
Bitcoin's native
multi-sig properties.
that's what everything in their suite revolves around is two or three multisig in their vault
which is a two or three multisig wallet uh cold storage wallet allows you to hold two keys
unchained holds one you have full control of your bitcoin as long as you have those two keys if you're
ever in a pinch unchained is there for you this model eliminates single points of failure in your
custody model it's important to eliminate single points of failure you could be your biggest enemy
sometimes losing your bitcoin and then on top of that they have their trading desk if you want to
buy Bitcoin and send it straight to that vault. You can do that. They have their lending desk.
If you want to use Bitcoin as collateral to get USD liquidity, you can do that. That's also built
on two or three multisig. You'll hold one key in that quorum. So you have visibility into the escrow
so that you know that your Bitcoin is not being rehypothecated. They have IRAs. If you want to
transition your IRA from cash into Bitcoin, you can do that in a very tax beneficial way. Again,
built a multi-sig two or three where you hold the keys you control the bitcoin in your ira it's a
beautiful thing go to unchained.com tell them the tftc sent you got some hot people down the hall
it's beautiful good talk to a hot person hit up their concierge team this art was also brought
to you by good friends at join crowd health well it's really crowd health join crowd health.com
slash tftc is the website you should go to to find out everything they have to offer but i'll also
tell you what they had to offer here it's a new way to pay for health care health insurance is
notoriously opaque impersonal expensive you are just a number in an excel spreadsheet who doesn't
deserve to talk to a human on the other end of the line who doesn't deserve to get best pricing
crowd health is here to get you best pricing to create a a personal experience you have a personal
crowd health advocate health advocate when you join the crowd health community and they're going
to get you best pricing because they go to the doctors that you're getting procedures from or
visiting for some reason or another and they're negotiating prices lower the doctors are willing
to negotiate lower because they get paid out in cash immediately how does the cash happen again
this isn't health insurance it's crowd funded health care you pay a monthly fee that builds
up an account if you ever have to go to the doctor have a procedure you get the bill crowd
health negotiates it lower then you pay the first 500 and the rest gets crowdfunded by the crowd
health community they have a very healthy community you have to hit some metrics to get in
and so the overall health care cost of the crowd health community is lower than what you would see
in the health insurance industry and so they're actually going to be able to lower monthly fees
next month i believe in july it is june 1st um yeah so go to joincrowdhealth.com
slash tftc sign up today last but not least this rip was brought to you by bitcoin talent co
a recruiting firm for bitcoiners by bitcoiners if you're looking to get into the space go to
bitcoin talent.co set up a profile if you're in tech finance banking your bitcoiner is stranded
in the fiat island you want to get into the bitcoin world bitcoin talent co is a great way
to get in maybe you don't know people in the industry they have companies that are looking
to fill roles and so if you have what it takes to join one of the bitcoin companies bitcoin talent
co can connect you with them and get you set up with interviews likewise if you're a company
looking for the best talent in the space bitcoin talent co not only built by bitcoiners for
bitcoiners but it's built by some of the best recruiters in the world andy the co-founder
build out the the recruiting team inside of uber went from like 10 to 10 000 customers or excuse
the employees he knows what he's doing they also went like way above 10 000 customers in that time
span as well um so go set up they'll they'll understand your needs since they're bitcoiners
they they actually can go find the talent for you they know what you need they understand
intuitively and actually understand bitcoin so they know multisig they know mining they know
lightning they're going to understand your needs very well get set up with them get onboarded with
them they'll understand your needs they'll go get you the best talent bitcoin talent.co tell
them the tftc sent you and enjoy this quarterly update i know i certainly did
you've had a dynamic where money's become freer than free
If you talk about a Fed just gone nuts, all the central banks going nuts.
So it's all acting like safe haven.
I believe that in a world where central bankers are tripping over themselves to devalue their currency, Bitcoin wins.
In the world of fiat currencies, Bitcoin is the victor.
I mean, that's part of the bull case for Bitcoin.
If you're not paying attention, you probably should be.
Have we ever not had technical difficulties?
I think this was only the first time, frankly.
This is definitely not the first time we've had technical difficulties.
Usually we get up and runny with these charts, no?
Sometimes.
At least I feel like they're pretty.
The mic thing messes up every once in a while.
I don't know, man.
How it goes, right?
It is how it goes.
What is up, freaks?
We're here for our quarterly update, Q1 2023.
how you doing it looks beautiful over there it is uh you know just won the bronze medal in the
world hockey championships beat the usa beat the mighty usa that's huge for us man i mean
you got to think about team sports and when you talk about the national level like it's not often
where you get a nation of two million people first of all beating a country of 330 million
let alone meddling in a world either world championship or cup slash olympic uh you know
major event it's pretty it's pretty uh it's pretty cool so it was like they declared a national
holiday on monday today let's go yeah it was big man it was huge how many like how many lafians are
in the nhl uh i think none at the moment there's a few in the ahl but i don't think there's any
at the precise moment that are still playing in the nhl so um and there's a lot playing in europe
we left this continental league which was this russian league after the invasion of ukraine
so it's been a lot of turmoil a lot of craziness but yeah just winning it's big man i mean you
think like you remember iceland qualified for the world cup a couple years ago new zealand as well
like these are small countries new zealand's bigger than latvia but iceland is not iceland's
300,000 like they didn't make it out of the group but it's still huge it's huge you make something
like the world cup and we've tried like again and again and again to get to the medal rounds
in both the uh world championships this is of course i'm speaking post soviet union even though
we were you know i think the origins of hockey there were probably some international massive
matches before world war ii but uh you know that's it's pretty rare when you have like a such a small
country in a team sport medal so like it really is a huge thing and in the the semi-finals playing
canada we were up uh to one with 10 minutes left in the third and i'm losing it unfortunately but
but it doesn't matter winning that winning the bronze medal game was just absolutely huge like
lithuania has done it a few times with basketball in the olympics which is huge for them but i can't
think of like another country when you're talking about you know one two million people where you
can can represent like it's just a cool thing i mean it's a bit odd you know because you have
obviously you know the u.s doesn't pay attention as much to these international sports as we do
but uh you know it's it's still it's it's a pretty it's a pretty big thing it's good to
represent through sport right yeah not through not through other nonsense but just do it through
sport if you want to show off your culture and people it's perzingis the uh the biggest uh star
latvia for latvia uh yeah you have uh some good lithuanians you have valentunas you have sabonis
sabonis's father obviously he's a legend like top five center but um yeah i mean it's you know
we have good players and they definitely compete on the international level both in hockey and in
basketball but uh it's rare i mean it takes it takes time to build up you know every few years
to get the guys to gel together and have a good streak so it's pretty cool is jokic serbia yeah
yeah he's in the finals what the hell's going on there don't know it's uh seems crazy yeah it's
crazy uh that's a part of the whole european mission that nobody seems to have gotten right
ever like going back 100 years so well that's actually i don't know i told you i uh recorded
with bellagio yesterday five hour podcast for east get ready for that that'll drop tomorrow
congrats i want to talk about it no the one thing about the five hour podcast we talked about the
dissolution of uh the ussr actually we talked a lot about the baltic states and how they benefited
the most because they defected first and didn't take any of that that sovereign debt with them
basically had a clean slate out the gate yeah that's interesting that you talked about it i
mean it's a it's the most remarkable i think example of how freedom can peacefully you know
secede from tyranny uh we had some benefits though like we had free nations before uh they
occupied us illegally in in after world war ii so like between world war ii and world war ii we
were like fully free but then even before that you had like the polish lithuanian commonwealth
which was basically it was like the biggest european state for 450 years um but from you
1800 from 1800 on you basically had the czarist empire of russia pretty much dominating eastern
europe so now obviously we see these repercussions coming to this day but our our countries have had
like kind of a again it's funny when we talk about this like a libertarian right like some people
think power is a good thing or like a good historian you know a good uh powerful history
is a good thing it's you know it's a proud swede or a proud norwegian a proud viking
these types of things um it's just kind of funny like that of course i'd reject that that like you
need to have a strong history to have a good identity although we did it's just we were
more oppressed over the last uh you know 200 years and it takes time for countries to you know get
past that i think obviously i'm referring as i always do like the most typical example right
now is what's going on with ukraine so they didn't have they tried they tried to have their own
revolution uh after world war one but unfortunately it failed and like the bolsheviks won and they
became part of the soviet union whereas we uh lenin uh did not pursue the baltics going for
fully you know modern independent nations so yeah i mean it's the history is interesting for sure
um but we yeah like we're we're a good we bucked the trend in a lot of examples you know paul
krugman was pissed he's getting in fights with uh tomas ilves who's the former president of estonia
back in the 08 crisis because paul krugman was trying to say like oh you just need to devalue
devalue have the imf come in there devalue like always and we said like absolutely not we're just
not going to do it we've seen what happens to too many other nations we're not going to do it
and we didn't do it we we could afford to devalue internally like to to to lower public wages we
actually did real austerity and uh we didn't devalue the currency we were pegged all three
currencies the estonian croon the latvian latin the lithuanian lita were all pegged to the euro
and we didn't devalue and it was very good it was very good that uh you know we we did the hard work
internally we didn't let the globalist imf come in and devalue the currency and that was like a
major thing that's a big egg on the face of paul krugman i mean he's just yeah he was destroyed
by two more sales the president of estonia on twitter it's great so we bucked the trend in a
lot of ways there and obviously you know i'm proud about a lot of it but uh yeah you just gotta keep
carrying on and uh it's it's unfortunately a powder keg part of the world right like i wish
we had more you know i wish we didn't have a major war in our lands like since the u.s had one civil
during the civil war you know i wish it was that long i wish we could recover and you know have
more peaceful times and stuff but uh it's just not like that around a lot of places in the world so
we've been doing well i mean it's like it's good for it's good for us like we're stoked obviously
this week as well when we went in you know non-military uh competitions as well it's great
but yeah it's uh for for a lot of the countries around here it's it's still pretty tough and uh
you know it's going to be the story for for sure for the next day i was saying this
eight years ago when when ukraine was first uh you know taken over by uh by the little green men
so um yeah that's it's just going to be a battle it's good to see that austerity can work
it's very topical here in the united states with the debt ceiling impasse seems like that's going
to get raised again i heard it was uh raised and not even raised it was just eliminated until the
end of biden's term until the end yeah until 2025 till january 1st 2025 they can spend as much as
they want yeah which is great i mean it's a it's a hilarious it's a hilarious uh little voodoo
sort of uh ceremony that we go through every few years with that ceiling like everybody knows
it doesn't mean anything but we act like it does it's a mirage it's actually nauseating because
i've read a newsletter about it a few weeks ago it's just every 18 months now we have the debt
ceiling debate the left is like raise it immediately everything's gonna go to shit
the right's like we're gonna hold the line and then at the last minute
the right bent the knee the ceiling gets raised and nothing gets fixed the u.s does again bucks
the trend or at least what you would think about the modern uh ideas of debt has done it many many
times i did a short on this as you know i've been starting these youtube videos this year and
it's taking a while to get some youtube stuff to get a get trending but it was still my best short
on the u.s debt was like 100 years uh 250 years of u.s debt and you go from like first of all
they owed debt to the french the spanish and the dutch after uh world war uh after the revolutionary
war which i would encourage anybody who just you know if you want to be a full-out non-interventionist
that's good i understand you know i know you had this discussion with constantine kishin and other
people but uh like it's it's also okay to help other countries the u.s was helped against britain
in its revolutionary war like that's a fact you can't you can't deny that they were they were
helped uh and then the u.s paid off that debt right andrew jackson paid it off but he also was
like not very good at the indians so it's not like there's any angels in that story necessarily
but then after uh the civil war the debt remained from the civil war to the founding of the fed
that remained pretty flat after it exploded during the civil war um you know it went up from like
basically nothing right because he extinguished it in the 30s andrew jackson and then lincoln
exploded it during the civil war but after it goes up you know billions during the civil war
it remained basically flat for the next 50 years or so and that was the greatest growth of an
economy in the history of the world was the u.s u.s post-civil war period so u.s has a lot of
great history of bucking the trend there as well like you you don't need debt to grow an economy
we did it actually better than anyone ever had in the 1870s 80s 90s and before the founding of the
had well then why today flat or even went down even went down a little bit yeah and then today
let's see the people in power seem to think that's an impossibility
it's the gravity of the debt situation is a lot a lot bigger than it was you said man
everybody's in a mirage and just making up stories on their their own ways on their own
side on their own political party no one would look at the economic history facts
you just don't so as always that's why we need bitcoin just got to force their hand on it yeah
eventually it will be it's that's the other thing i in that newsletter i mentioned
that's what i really leaned on it revolved around with thomas pain quote like if there's going to
be trouble let it be in my day so that my children don't have to do it and that's
where both of us have young children.
And that's what I'm beginning to think more about.
It's like, fuck, like, I'd rather just rip the Band-Aid off now.
Stop kicking the can down the road.
I don't want my boys to wake up a decade, two decades from now
and just live in some debt-fueled hellscape.
Accelerate.
You also have that, yeah.
and then you also have that uh allegory quote that joe rogan likes to bring up right it's like
good men you know hard hard men what is it hard times make hard men hard men make good times good
times make soft men soft men make hard times that cycle so that's i think there is some truth to
that as well uh unfortunately it's kind of like yes as you say it is incumbent upon us but the
unfortunate fact about a lot of this more history you read the more you see it right the
the repetition i mean it's just uh you know might not be fully repetition but it definitely rhymes
and yeah it seems like we we whether whether we can actually do it for our kids and then
our kids kids will be okay is a totally open question i think obviously you and i both believe
bitcoin is going to be a big part and hopefully hopefully that that that can be the case that
it's a much more optimistic future but then there is something to be said too about the cyclicality
of history is people having to relearn the same lessons and getting soft and not working hard
you may say we're creatures of habit to a certain extent
you may you may speaking of habit it has become a habit here on this podcast over the last three
years to do our quarterly update that's what we're here to do in the last yeah buddy the last
three the last two we've had some interactive charts we went through a lot of technical
difficulties to make sure we get the charts up on this this particular rip that's what i was just
to defend myself that i don't think we had any other technical difficulties besides for those
big charts but anyway um yeah yeah it's uh it's it's actually the fifth full year this was five
years this uh this posting five five years i've been tracking the shit and it's only getting
better central bank uh monetary based central bank currencies get what is getting better
the quality of the content the the breadth of the content
no i thought you were going to talk about the uh the printing of the money is getting better
or something like that well if you're i mean it's getting worse but depending on how you
depend on how you view it yes depending on how you view it it's certainly getting better
in some people's minds it's crazy expansion yeah we can uh we can go into that one um
but let's look at the interactive because i just as we talked about uh last quarter you know when
we did the show last quarter that was about the time that balaji made his big bet conveniently
you just talked to him so it might be interesting just to look at it again uh i'll put it up here
uh if you're ready logan there you go i've replaced myself and um so we got the old price
chart you can see this okay right yep okay so this is when i do a lot um you know no stock to
flow nonsense just use a uh single variable regression it's a trend line the best fitting
for bitcoin it's 95 r squared it's a power trend line just tracks tracks the growth and the 95
simply means that the price moves around the average 95 better or with 95 less variance so
it's a pretty good trend line if it was 100 it would literally track the trend line exactly the
price would obviously we know that can't happen so here's his bet i understand he paid it out
what like already a few weeks ago right maybe a month ago yeah he gave up on it yeah so here's
the expiry he spent a million to let us know they're printing trillions right right um but
this is yeah this is a little bit of nuance totally separate from the monetary based stuff
but still it's interesting to look at um remember this this is the great trend of 2011 2010s is even
more insane but if you go out so you can use these predict and once i predict it's a loose
term i'm not to you i'm not saying i know the future it's a statistical term here but the trend
of 2011 shows three billion dollar you're not reading that incorrectly three billion dollar
bitcoin by uh by december 31st 2030 so unfortunately we we have bucked that trend as well we're off it
be great if we get back on but we're clearly off it uh at the time it was 85 percent r squared but
i'm just not looking at any more pricing data up until after 2011 so just shows you the difference
and then you might remember as well another trend line this is not on this chart but you remember
that so the trend line that we're on will take off 20 uh let's take off 2011 now the trend line
that we're on has basically been the same since 2016 which is pretty cool we can come back to
that next quarter all the different trend lines different years but like this does not move too
much as bitcoin has gone on from 2016 2017 2018 2019 you may think like it's always fallen right
So here's 2011. Here's the current. 2011 is the dotted. The current is solid. You may think that
the tendency of this trend line is to always fall, but it's actually not true. I don't go too on
this because I don't have all the trend lines. But if I showed you the 2016 trend line, it'd
actually be below the all-time trend line, this black trend line. So just something to keep in
mind, right? And then biology came along a couple months ago, said Bitcoin's going to a million by
june 15th he would have to be on this trend line all right now this is the gradual trend line but
he'd have to hit it and uh you can actually look at the observations throughout history you might
remember i showed you this last time we did hit it just a couple days we hit his trend line in 2011
so uh it's actually a three to four sigma event is what he predicted a three to four sigma so
remember three sigma is 99 six sigma was the jack welch like you know insane amount of you know uh
good production per per million or whatever like you have like i don't know six six defects or
something that's that's the sigma it's basically just you know how many observations uh are are
below the trend line here so three to four sigma it's not as insane as six sigma but it'd be pretty
crazy to catch the trend and even if you looked at a three sigma trend line that's here and we
can just look at it uh three sigma is a half a million bucks per bitcoin all right our current
trend line is fifty thousand dollars per bitcoin all right we're not even at the current trend
line right that is the trend line but we're not at it we're under trend at the moment
and the biology needed to be right about here uh a million bucks that was his trend line and that
means it was above three sigmas actually what not as high as four sigma but it's between three and
four sigma so very very rare we didn't hit it uh i told you we weren't going to hit it but you know
i think most people understood that but i just wanted to show you the actual statistics of how
it worked and uh as we suspected it didn't but i understand you didn't talk about the bet after
after you talked with him for five hours you didn't talk about any of this no we went deep into
the history i'm sure it's awesome it was a big history talk it was a big history talk
yeah yeah he's good he's good he can he can pull a lot of good stuff out for sure so i don't know
i we don't have to go more into this do you have any other questions no do you use this as
like uh i do i do videos on this a lot i mean this is the kind of stuff i do anyway for the
day job which is not really crypto bitcoin related but um i mean we don't try to give
out financial advice here but to use this like definitely no financial advice to ape in like if
it's a certain standard deviation away from the power regression i have i have yeah i mean here's
three sigma down right so this means 99 of the observations uh would be above this line okay
it's actually 99 and a half percent but let's not worry about all this because you know you
got to count the top side too and then let's show you one more thing two sigma down is an
interesting one right that that's actually kind of is some long-term support you see that i bumped
here let me take the three let me take all this shit off this is just two sigma down okay so
What's two Sigma? It's two thirds of the time. All right. So, uh, no, sorry. One Sigma, one Sigma
is two thirds of the time. That's one Sigma line is the blue. The purple line is two Sigma. That's
95% of the time. And three Sigma is 99% of the time. Roughly. These are rough. It's just the
rough, uh, meaning of these, uh, deviations. And so you can see that one, it does break below.
it has you know like during the crypto winter it did uh it did a little bit here in covid and then
it did with our our good uh goofy friend from the bahamas it broke it but interesting look at the
two sigma down it has kind of acted as some pretty strong support it's very very rare i mean you'd
have to go back to here which is basically just nonsense data right i mean it's like very very
thin markets i start this at bitcoin pizza day you know sub penny uh bitcoin so everything from
bitcoin piece of data is data that that counts equally but still regardless it's an amazing
trend that bitcoin does hold and um yeah too simply down is something to i think pay attention
to i do videos on this people are interested but also another thing to think to think about as well
is it's extremely rare when you even cross the line like just look at the how many times it
crosses like even ignore the very early times but like it's just got one two 2011 just ignore that
three four five six seven eight down nine ten it's only 10 days in like we're getting on something
like 6 000 days of pricing history here is what's represented on this chart and 10 times
it's crossed the trend line so these are major it's a major major trend and those are like
that's a major event if it crosses and we went down in 2022 and stayed down obviously like really
puked because of uh because of the scumbag in in the bahamas yeah so it's only crossed the two
sigma below 0.16 percent of the time that bitcoin has been trading with pricing data
uh 0.16 yeah something like i mean it's like 90 uh no no it'd be it's 95 it's two and a half
it means two and a half percent below this line two and a half percent above the other line the
other two signal on the top side it's 95 of observation of the outside of these purple bands
two and a half on the top two and a half percent on the on the bottom yeah i just
divided by six thousand oh no no that's uh that's a different calculation that's how much it's
crossing the uh just the trend line that's just what i said this out how many how many times the
prices shot across the trend line itself yeah yeah totally yeah yeah it's just a different
it's a little bit different i don't i'd have to actually count it i don't think it works that way
that's a good question no it doesn't work that way because
you'd have to it could cross the trend line like
yeah it could cross the trend line 10 times like it has so i don't know i don't think it
really matters that way anyway that's how it is so uh yeah we're below trend like in my opinion
that's uh still quite bullish area we're not as bullish obviously i mean everybody knows nominally
it was pretty good buy here in hindsight but still as you see here below trend below uh above
above the two sigma downtrend right at the one sigma so it's kind of an interesting
uh level and yeah it's just something to keep in mind like i'm not really a trading view guy
like just like drawing crazy things off of wicks and stuff definitely if you want to if you want
to do that i think people can make a lot of money doing that but i'm it's not for me i just i just
like looking at the long picture you don't create any nine nine hammers no i don't i don't
told you a lot of people with that back in the day yeah he did he did
so we're below trend right now as it stands if we're following the power trend bitcoin should
be trading at like 52 000 i think that's what i saw yeah 50 grand is the trend line
and again keep in mind that's not the all-time low like 2016 and i think 2020
are below this trend line and when i say like what does it mean when i say those years it just
means i'm calculating data only from 2016 or only up you know from 2016 and before let's say up to
2016 and up to 2020 when i say 2016 20 trend line it's like the 2011 trend line you're only looking
at data from the very beginning up until 2011 it's a crazy awesome trend line but we just we
obviously fell off of that trend line but the amazing thing is with bitcoin is that from 2016
um you know you're pretty much you're pretty much right around this black line 95 are squared
and you know we're close to the to the ballogy bet so that's where the you know again i i totally
sympathize with with the with the message good on him for spending a million bucks to basically do
it and talk about bitcoin for three months and get like mainstream press about it but
statistically it was it was above a three sigma move if it was going to happen yeah i think the
marketing value of the uh million dollar bet was over a million dollars i think it was a good
you think i think it was a good media deal that's good putting myself back on i think we're good
there hell yeah so i mean the price has been pretty flat well it actually bumped up pretty
significantly the first quarter of this year how did that affect uh bitcoin's pecking order
or or place in the pecking order on the monetary base about the same um yeah logan if you could
pull up the tweet thread i mean i could just i'll just tell you the uh so the the best chart
actually for this is i'm not sure but it's basically we're we're 10 i keep going down i
think right there that one with the bar chart up up a little bit that one yeah so this is basically
the top 10 fiat currencies base money central bank money reserve money has nothing to do with
bank money has nothing to do with fiduciary media yes banks are not good in this day and age i'm
sure you talked about that with biology i mean like we're we're becoming ever more monopolized
every day fdic insurance all this stuff is just a mess never should have been initiated uh but the
but none of that is like bitcoin so that's why i always that's why i do this this project basically
so i've been doing it for five years no matter what you think about where bitcoin is going to
go for scaling in the future i think it's going to be great i'm sure it's going to scale but none
that stuff we'll compare economically because it's it's using banks it's not using the monopolistic
central clearing settlement or it's not using the prior market clearing settlement media which was
primarily gold before that silver so that's why i include gold and silver as well
the actual stock values of gold and silver that are available available up ground uh everybody
kind of here's the 10 trillion number with gold it's actually closer to 11 trillion so it's always
it's always number one it's ahead of every other central bank money got the top four there
euro the dollar chinese yuan and the japanese yen are the top four and in that order at the moment
and then the last mid-major that bitcoin has not cleared yet is the british pound it has never
passed that it has passed switzerland and india before 2021 uh it has fallen behind and it's like
basically right at india like if if the price when i posted it was 27 500 or something probably
would have been above india you know so this is where it's a it's a little bit of a dull report
because again i hate to i i wish i could give you like fully updated information but these central
banks i mean that some of them don't even publish until a month after so as i always say right so
it's like it's june 1 now and you're looking at monetary base values as of march 31st and i didn't
get them until like at least start of may so uh it's just how it goes but anyway you see there
the bitcoin comparable price at the level of each central bank's monetary base so uh we'll soon pass
india again whenever we get on the next run switzerland should be pretty easy as well
silver as well we've passed silver before and uh it's just it just comes back to the
the old british pound we probably did you see the 64 000 like we did get above 64 000 right
in i think november 2021 but we never closed these are always month end closing sort of data sets
right so we've never closed ahead of the british pound ever that's the last mid-major currency to
take to take down and then coming for the sorry i think i think we'll get the pound in 2024.
it would be great i would be i would look forward to that that uh quarterly update we have to you
know shit talk to all the boe people mark carney wherever he is doing his his green energy
company initiative uh all these jokers so yeah it's real it's real stuff i mean this is like
this is where this is where i do think you got to be a little bit rigorous and go through the
numbers which like nobody apparently does which is hilarious like you cannot find this stuff on
like bank bank for international settlements imf they don't track the monetary base but it's you
can basically think of it like the central bank's balance sheet there's a slight asterisk one
asterisk for the uh for the dollar because they have this huge reverse repo facility which can
basically think of it's like base money for non-banks money market funds hedge funds basically
institutions and entities that are in the market that don't have a banking charter and sometimes
they can even be like a sister company of a bank but they just they themselves don't have a banking
charter and the fed has even opened up their liquidity to them and there's like a two trillion
dollar plus repo facility it's a repurchase agreement for the fed it's a reverse repurchase
agreement for these companies but it's just insane so like the fed's balance sheet is actually i mean
it was it's it's closer to nine trillion nine trillion dollars um this is only the money that
exists the core of the banking system that's what the that's what the monetary base means so that's
why that's why but the fed is just doing crazier and crazier things and it has the last few years
as you know well speaking of the crazy things with the reverse repo and the entities that have
access to that market particularly that was one of the insane things that happened after the spasm
in 2019 that's when they expanded the access to that pool of money to these they they blew it up
yeah pretty much from there it was it was like up and down it was higher uh a little bit before that
and it was coming down just like the rest of the balance sheet right after and this is another
thing like i always say try to be rigorous like how many bitcoiners i've said this a thousand
times for me saying it but bitcoin is from like 2016 2017 it's like all the fed does is print
money print money no actually they weren't at that time from 2014 until that moment that you described
the spasm in september 2019 they were keeping their balance sheet flat or declining it that
means they were keeping the monetary base flat or declining it decreasing it uh and it was solely to
just try to get back to normalcy that's what they said they wanted to do get back to normalcy and
couldn't do it and i think that surprised them that so many non-banks caused that repo rate to
skyrocket that they're like holy fuck like we got to do we got to do something with them too
like we thought we were you know just dealing with a banking system and now we have to deal with them
and so all of the non-banks now like the fed basically has a facility it's a base money
facility for non-banks it's not going out into the economy but it's not good either it's just
to bail out like park your money we'll give you you know a safe interest rate take it it's good
no problem like there's no question that's going to be inflationary down down the line or just wreck
you know well so that was that was a rumor in 2019 is that it was like a 0.72 millennium
i believe citadel as well they got into trouble and that's when they expanded the facility
um of individuals and entities that have access to the reverse repo and they included like the
fic i believe which is like a proxy for those hedge funds and so essentially they were funding
hedge fund margin balances um that obviously were going into financial assets yeah yep absolutely
it's a it's just a spot where they can park cash i mean they don't they don't uh
you got to be careful with some of that because like if you just go back to the traditional
money multiplier right or like the uh what banks would traditionally lend uh how much they might
issue fiduciary media beyond the value of base money that's the that's the money multiplier
just in the traditional banking system even today like there are many countries the european union
is one of them i mean the zone the eurozone countries ecb uh many many central banks that
don't have a reserve requirement at all and until march 2020 the u.s was actually one of the rare
countries that had one for the largest banks and it was 10 10 reserve requirement um
um all of that's just gone out the window though from covid i mean from covid it's like
whatever you want to do we're there for you don't worry about it uh you know store if you need to
put liquidity and make you know give yourselves a trustworthy counterparty why go anywhere else
but us and that's basically what's what's happening um you can you can you can say that
uh it's like they can margin that up and go outside like they but actually for the for the
non-banks it's a bit more really for both for the banks and for the non-banks it's a bit more uh
you never know you know like everybody's trying to be like if you actually look at the reserve
ratio it's huge right now i mean there's there's a lot of base money in the banking system right
which you see is right there in the chart that i that i showed the bar chart that five trillion
five six trillion uh even just looking at that not the not the repo facility it's just sitting there
and they're not lending out like they were before 2008 even so um well i don't know it's just a
long-winded way of saying like you never know what's going to happen but for sure the central
bank doesn't know what's going to happen and they're the more that they increase this base
and then the more they increase the like the base of the non-banks which never happened before at
all like just giving them this security this feeling like okay if you really need it you can
come to us there's just lots of unintended consequences that will come from that and that's
the that's again it's the theory of like free banking like if you didn't have this entity you
would have many other banks that would have just failed very quickly would have been over with
been done with and and that's it but just keep kicking the can down the road that's the
it's a long-winded way of saying i guess how i'm doing it well two things here i think mentioned
that first i've been paying attention to i mean a lot of the talk around the debt ceiling and
the massive need to roll over a bunch of treasuries in the coming year
has stoked conversation about the treasury being able to uh put their hand into the
reverse repo markets to fund their operations what's the mechanics there no i haven't like
the treasury themselves i mean the treasury the way that the banking usually works is still
through the fed like the treasury has an account with the fed um they could they could expand the
treasuries balance sheet like they did during uh covid during covid they basically issued all this
subsidy right they issued it all out like pump money pump pump pump like all this uh
like the easiest way to think of that is the stimulus check all right so when you have from
the treasury a check that's like which is hilarious that the u.s still uses checks that
want to do it with cbdc eventually but when you got a instrument from the treasury that says okay
this is money you can put it in your bank account it's a check right uh once they couldn't sell
enough bonds in the free market to cover that amount of money that they had to put into the
bank so they needed the fed yeah do it themselves so the fed uh basically just credited their count
and bought the bonds directly which is totally something that they never have done before ever
i did a i did a video on this on my uh on my channel people want to check it out uh and um
once they pull up the tweet logo because this is what i'm referencing once you do
those checks it comes down but it takes time yeah um so this is what stuck that don't let
claire tweet out last week and i saw other people talking about it um will the treasury look to
replenish its coffers by issuing short-dated paper at higher rates which will likely be
neutralized by a drain and reverse repo uh so that turning over of short data bonds with a higher rate
will force people to seek liquidity and reverse repo it's not the treasury directly accessing it
well every yeah everybody's trying to figure out how to do that right now i mean like that's that's
the story of svb as well it's just higher dated on or uh you know shorter uh excuse me rising
rates with longer dated bonds but in the short term you're gonna have to revalue your books at
some point uh that's that's where all the pain comes from and that's obviously
where the madness happened in february march well that's what i'm looking for right now is
when we last recorded was before after that was the second thing i wanted to ask did the banking
failures happening before after our last which was probably before but um
that the balance sheet did expand they took it down uh a few hundred
uh billion
i'm gonna make my my numbers correctly i'll just look it up they peaked at nine trillion all right
So again, you can count all of it, count the reverse repo, count the monetary base.
They almost hit $9 trillion.
And then they reversed it just before the banking collapse.
They're trying to cut it down.
And just before the banking collapse, they raised the balance sheet again,
like by 50% of what they had decreased the balance sheet by.
So basically, they lost 50% of the effort.
that they had tried to make basically in all of 2022 uh two yeah the famous jackson hole speech
all that stuff like i'm gonna raise rates which you like told everybody would that was kind of
a pivot from what he'd been saying for years before and yeah i mean when you raise rates
you're gonna have lower values now of course people aren't taking these losses all of them
you don't have to mean like jp morgan's not taking it they have a big mark to market
non-mark to market losses i should say um you don't have to take the loss is what i'm trying
to say so they're they're uh it just depends it depends on how much uh people trust your
your banking system and i mean the the fact that you have this central bank that's just
stepping in all the time to bail out it's just another horrible signal to the market whereas if
again if you just if you just let banks fail and work through it themselves it would be okay
but you know there's plenty of history of this in the united states too of them screwing up
you know it's like canada had a free banking system and they uh had a worse great depression
higher unemployment than the u.s had in their great depression and like 10 000 u.s banks
failed in our great depression in canada you know how many banks failed in canada
no zero zero zero they had no they had no uh central bank so uh you know the system was just
much better much bigger better regulation it was more uh decentralized it was more i mean the u.s
just had a horrible like all these thrifts that like you couldn't branch between states
in the u.s before the federal reserve the federal reserve was the first bank besides the first and
second national bank which which andrew jackson stopped the second but uh the prior two central
banks there's a bank of north america as well but prior yeah that was before that was colonial time
so the prior two central banks during the course of the united states they were the only banks that
could branch uh interstate like go go beyond you know the state charter banks the east coast yeah
no state of charter banks could branch and often i mean most of the time they couldn't even they
couldn't branch at all not even just outside of their state but outside of like their city is
the most unbelievably stupid system that was the national banking system and um so you know you had
all these bad banks that had no idea what they were doing they had no idea like how the economy
was in the neighboring market in the neighboring state or whatever and so the federal reserve was
the first bank to branch so it was like a great example of the united states just again taking a
cue from like the worst keynesian teachers of history like saying oh yeah this is great like
we need a monopolized federalized bank that's the one that can branch uh it's going to be great
you know everything will be fine and safe and everything and then 20 years after it was founded
the banks were actually going to the federal reserve to take loans they don't do that now
but for the first 20 years which no one talks about during the creation of the federal reserve
that was that was what the discount rate was called they would go to the discount window to
the fed and they would just uh draw on the federal reserve they would take loans from the fed and that
and that caused the uh great depression 1933 1913 1929 1929 1929 yeah october 29 yeah people
give different end dates but i mean some people argue it didn't end until world war ii yeah
so well that's the other thing too like going back to like perverse incentives
you mentioned just let the banks fail and that's like the weird thing that the fed has done this
year particularly it's like it's let certain banks fail and others not uh that's not new right
lehman uh aig like you had these different uh examples right wamu yeah like different uh
examples of you know banking and financial services industries where some were looked
on more favorably some weren't bear stearns obviously so uh they just they've been fucking
that up for years and i think probably go back to like ltcm long-term capital management this is
jim rickards's firm he was a lawyer there um in the 90s they had a big blow up um and they were
but even you go back before that you go to the savings and loan crisis in the 80s they were
bailed out it's just they're always bailed out again and again and again they're bailed out so
that is an important point to keep in mind is that it's just nothing new the regulated centralized
entity that is the federal reserve will always come in and bail out and that will give more
distortion to the uh to the system and anybody that's trying to work with it and work with banks
that are in it yeah i'm not being rude here i'm looking for the particular chart i'm sure you've
seen it the bubble chart of the magnitude of the banks that have fallen this year compared to 08
yeah let me find yeah it's uh it's a good example
because it's biology that one a lot too that's like the crazy the crazy thing right now is
how massive this banking crisis is compared to
oh hey already we've only had five or six banks fail
and the value of those banks compared to the value in 08 yeah you're comparing
different you know 08 versus 2023 but the value of those banks is much bigger
much bigger yeah i can't find the chart but i'll search for it um i wrote about it somewhere
I have it.
You got it.
Yeah, let me put it in the chat.
Yeah.
Or I can just do it myself.
Actually, I'm not set up.
Can you take an email on your phone?
Or you guys get it ready?
Yeah, we're going to get Telegram.
I don't have it set up.
I don't have it on this computer.
Will the email work or no?
Yeah.
it's coming there you go anyway this is one of them that's not the uh it's the bubble chart it's
not there's a there's a bar one two but it's this is this one actually is better
logan's got it uh it's different than the one i sent you but yeah that's also good
it's the same same same deal yeah but if we look at this we have wamu the biggest bank failure
in u.s history on the left that big circle around 08 and then fast forward 2023
and we have the second, third, and fourth biggest.
Yeah, the Wamuu is actually bigger.
It's funny, on the bubble that I sent you,
how much is Wamuu on that one?
I can't read it.
How much is it, Logan?
$307 billion.
It says $427 on the one I sent.
Open up the one I sent to you.
It's in color.
It's more interesting because you can see the...
It's kind of weird, actually.
It's $427 here.
It's bigger.
regardless uh you're right wamu was the only major one compared to these three
yeah that's like do you think the banking crisis is over
or are we just in uh oh hell no i mean that's like in the eye of the storm
it's the same thing as always right i mean like
it's gonna be more uncertainty gonna have to lower rates
lower rates are going to cause problems
and they have to raise rates
I mean it's just the same charade
again and again and again
I do think
that
as we were just talking about
all these facilities
all this implied security that you're getting
on one level
and then on the other side
the other assets
that are not as secure as a bank reserve right which is the base money asset but like have a
term to them and have interest rate risk have duration risk to them as we're talking about i
mean well you know i'm not a fan of measuring inflation uh per se like as the uh the price
inflation right i mean there's so many different indices you can find people argue about this
ad nauseum i mean you can look at like chapwood index which is like i think one of the better
ones really good shows you but then you can look at like some crappy federal reserve one you can
say look at john williams who's not really publishing anymore but he was always saying
it was at least double the inflation the real price inflation rate was at least double what
the federal reserve and the bls the government agencies published so you have that issue you
have that problem and you know that's just different for every sector of the economy not
only every sector but you know every type of economic actor whether a household whether
your business whether your government actor which is way too big a part of the economy at the moment
right so that's the problem is you get your your asset value of your books are really going to get
crushed even if you don't have to realize them those losses immediately due to some banking
again bad banking regulations um it's still going to bite you at some point those out of whack uh
maturity values i mean it's still like where did i see this i mean fanny and freddy are still just
these most zombie like the debt on fanny and freddy to this day is just insane it's never
gonna get paid back it's an insane amount of debt trillions hundreds of billions trillions
trillions trillions it's the biggest debt uh holders like in the world private private i mean
it's public private partnership but they're they're the biggest the companies with the largest
debt in the world still fannie and freddie and that a lot of that zombie debt is held as an
asset by the federal reserve they hold the at the asset side of their books but who holds that
liability it's fannie and freddie and this is just it's it's just that's your perfect example of how
this this this plays out right like if you want to know what happens 10 years from now like what
happen with fannie and freddie their only solution is to zombify more banks and non-banks at the
moment which is the problem with this reverse repo facility because let them all fail that would be
the normal free market free banking solution uh that would be the normal thing to do yeah
well like bring this back to treasuries too i'm not sure if we discussed it i checked that's what
one of the things i was checking the last time record was march 23rd so the banks have failed
like a week before yeah yeah yeah like a week before yeah but with the debt ceiling
getting raised again or about to be raised again the conversation has shifted
to treasury markets in the fact again i mentioned it earlier but at some point over the next two
three years a lot of the treasury debt is gonna have to be rolled over
and if interest rates stay where they are at significantly higher rates uh and then on top
of that on top of that excuse me you have janet yellen coming out and choreographing that they're
open up the the treasury buyback window for the first time since 2001 in early 2024 so one what
does that rollover at a higher rate mean for the financial health of the united states and then
number two what does the treasury buyback window opening up in 2024 signal to you nothing good man
i mean i i can't i don't i don't have a crystal ball here like everybody else that's why i prefer
the trend lines of the bitcoin price uh it's the most reliable but um yeah i don't know what are
your thoughts i can't i can't like uh i think we we the what we just discussed is probably a good
way to summarize it again because i'm gonna find it for you the fannie and freddie values i mean
it's just that it's just a zombification of already illiquid poor uh made bad decisions yet
we're gonna decide to bail you out because we don't want to take the pain situation uh that's
how i would that's how i would again reiterate it yeah well then but it also like it sends a signal
to me at least that we're close to the end game because if you have to roll over something like
50 percent of the treasury market at the rates that they're at now if the fed doesn't reverse
course obviously that increases the the payment on the interest that we owe for the debt
and then the treasury buyback opening up is
yelling essentially signaling like hey nobody's going to want to buy our treasury so
we're going to buy them ourselves
and if you have to refi rollover the the treasuries at these rates like again when we're
talking about the amount of debt that we are now 30 trillion arguably it'll be a bit higher than
that when when the rollovers start like those are significant increases on the interest payments
owed by the federal government look at this uh i'm just i'm doing on the phone here i'm sending
this you've seen this website it's actually pretty good it's called company's market cap
i have no idea if it's the same dude that did coin market cap and sold out to finance
they explicitly say on the website we are not associated with coin market cap
but uh they do pretty good scraping of data and put it together in a helpful way
i sent you uh freddy by the way i found the chart that you were uh the actual generator
for the chart both the inflation adjusted and the absolute value ah that's what it was inflation
adjusted yeah got it cool makes sense again although i'm sure they're inflation adjusting
it in a poor way but you know that's just me again harping holy shit look at that balance
sheet size of freddie it's 3.17 trillion right now and and in 2010 after the full bailout look
at that number after 2010 2.3 like what are you doing what are you guys doing i mean this is this
is all you need to see right here this is that it follows perfectly as you as i was saying in 2014
2015 2016 they actually tried to normalize you see that their debt levels fall here as well
and now it's like 80 higher or whatever that turns out to be right
yeah it's 60 higher 60 higher uh probably 80 if you took the nadir like that you know 20
15 level but from the the height of the post crisis right 20 you know it's 2010 level there
60 percent higher this is this is the insanity this is all you have to see right here it's a
great website by the way really uh respect to put this together i don't know how they're doing it
but they're like you can you can sort by market cap you can sort by debt you can sort by revenue
for like a plethora of companies it's got it's got eight billion in market cap in 3.1
that's insane oh my god so what is that it's 10 10 it's open up uh times three
in the search bar go to fanny do fanny do fanny in the search bar
f-a-n-n-i-e yeah you got it and then over to the on the more that's market cap go to the more in
total debt i mean what are you guys doing
no one even no one even knows about this no one even talks about these are the largest
this is the largest debt in any company in the world and their and their market
caps 1.87 billion so that's like a 3 000 4 000 x like
it's that's not going down man how do you unwind this how do you unwind this you do not you do not
unwind it's zombification i mean it's what we've been talking about for five years now
well are debt jubilees on the table like do they need to be
i saw arthur hayes mentioned that with uh peter mccormick
um what are your thoughts on jet debt jubilees
it has been a thing uh it has been a thing and uh like when you look at that it's like
yeah what are we gonna do the the problem there of course is like you're having the people that
cause the problem solve the problem and are they going to solve the problem in a fair and equitable
manner like the answer is most surely no um on the other hand we we haven't had like this sort of a
uh choose my words carefully here a well-oiled uh fiat machine in a digital age like we've never
had that yet right the next step would be the cbdc and i'm sure you talked to biology about that
you know then you could you could grease the skids even more very easily like you don't have
to do checks just airdrop cash all the time so they there are still options to get people by
and to pay it's just you got to optically manage that price inflation risk on the other side of it
while you bail out the same people uh you know simultaneously that are causing all the problems
Well, we did talk about this, and you're not going to be happy.
You're not going to be happy.
Why?
Prepare yourself.
Pelagio thinks FedNow is a CBDC.
Oh, my God.
He even said, I saw a tweet from him a while back where he admitted that it's not.
Well, it's functionally not, but Logan, go to the pictures in this tweet.
so if you look the fed fed now is in the middle of all this everything touches it
actually what's important is the next the uh explanation here um next get the next picture
there's more pictures yeah this one zoom in uh step three the fed now service validates the
payment message for example by verifying that the message meets proper format specification
specifications and complies with applicable controls so he's pointing at this particular
line and saying that there are particular controls that people integrated with fed now
have to comply with which have you heard the term have you heard the term intermediated cbdc
no it's uh it means that the banks themselves are kind of like playing around with cbdc but
you and i don't uh touch it like have the cbdc doesn't want to touch it it's kind of getting
there but it's still not okay i mean i i'm just like i'm not defending fed now i'm not defending
like any of these things but but uh europe has had the exact same system it's called sepa for 15
years no one has been up in arms about cbdc what's going on right here with this all it is is a
program that certain banks can apply for and once you apply for it like you said if you meet the
formats of this tokenized message system whatever you want to say i mean even the word token was
probably a uh would trigger people or something it's uh it's still it's not it's it's intermediated
it's it's like a clearinghouse working together with the banks it's it's just not a cb it's not
a ledger that everybody can hold the cbdc on their phone it's just it's just not it's uh
i'm not defending it separate in europe and then there's like upi in india vietnam i believe
yeah yeah it's similar i don't know that's in vietnam or it's called that that as well but
maybe uh i'm sure i'm sure they have something like that i mean they're communists so the more
communist regimes will absolutely love this as we know because the it's the more control you get
more control that you have um look we're talking about all this we're doing this shameless plug
we're doing the cbdc tracker for the human rights foundation with uh janine from this month in
Bitcoin Privacy and Nick Anthony from the Cato Institute, you know, working with Alex and
People's Human Rights Foundation to create it. So by the end of the year, we will have one and
you will see. But it's just not, I can't put it on. It's not made like a CBDC. This is great.
This is good. You brought this up. A CBDC is an actual thing that needs to be recorded somewhere.
Okay, it needs to be recorded on the Fed's balance sheet. That is the supply of the money on the monopolistic money suppliers balance sheet. What Fed now is, is playing around with the bank reserve portion. All right. It's like, I told this with Peter McCormick, right? It's like, you're Wells Fargo, I'm Bank of America, old school checks. I have a billion checks I send to you, a billion dollars worth, you have a billion and $1 worth of checks that get to me by the end of the week or whatever, when we filtered all that.
out and we know that this is the day that we want to clear these we only need to clear one dollar
that's how it works that's how bank reserves work that's how that that's that's why base money like
that is the is the core system it's just i'm not defending the system i'm not defending the
monopolization of it it'd be much better to clear with gold or bitcoin for sure in a free market
system no question or have something like lightning and other things yeah i'm just describing it but
the cb like fed now is a cbdc it's just a slight changing of that current system to make clearing
of bank reserves faster that's all it is it's like instead of the analog checks where i have
a billion dollars in checks to send to you you have a billion and one dollars checks that you've
already sent to me like they're in my coffers they're in your coffers we like all right we
want to just be done with this let's set all our liabilities uh you owe me one dollar right
or you wonder i can remember my example regardless you get the point you just you settle and it takes
time like you do this a day end and even at that you know that you're two or three or four maybe
like a week out from all those checks making their way into the to the teller's offices and
the banks all this shit it's got completely antiquated so all that fed now does is it
automates that with a central clear which is the federal reserve but that was the federal reserve
already it was the federal reserve already so again i'm just saying it's not it's not like
Europe has had this for 15 years, then they had SEPA instant for five years, the same exact process, there's nothing. So a CBDC, it is also going to be a liability on the Federal Reserve's balance sheet, just like, sorry, if it sounds like I'm getting exasperated with this with you, obviously, no, I'm not. It's just with people that talk about this, you know, like, there's physical currency. And there's those bank reserves. Those are the two things that make up the monetary base there, this will be a third thing, a third line item on the Fed's
balance sheet, central bank digital currency. And the example that I always say is, before people
run off and get too crazy ideas about CBDC, don't forget about CBPC, central bank physical currency.
That's also included in this monetary base update. I didn't even tell you the number,
by the way, this quarter. It's $28.2 trillion. That's the latest number. It's a little bit down
from prior years because the dollar is still stronger. It got up to $30 trillion. But how
much is the physical component of that monetary base nine trillion dollars nine trillion dollar
equivalent that's not nine trillion dollar bills that's nine trillion of the dollars only like two
trillion of that it's it's nine trillion uh euro un yuan every fucking currency in the world the
top 50 but that's like mass vast majority of the value all right so don't forget about cbpc
that's nine trillion dollars worth of physical currency in the world and it's growing at 10
and a half percent per year. It doubles faster than seven years. And that is a 50 year trend.
And that trend is increasing. That trend is going up. It's not going down. So whatever anybody tells
you about if people are or aren't using physical cash, they are. Just look at India from four or
five years ago. Remember that they tried to demonetize the 500 and 1000 rupee notes? Yep.
That money supply is up three, four X, maybe three X from that amount. So point is, physical
physical currency is increasing much faster than you even realize like no matter what anybody tells
you cbpc is a part that that is a physical thing on the balance sheet that they have to account for
and by the way global population increases one and a half percent per year over the last 50 years
it's doubled once so think about that when you want to talk about purchasing power those are
the real numbers like to think about like physical currency doubles every seven years
on a blended weighted average us as people we have doubled once over the last 50 years
we've gone from four to eight billion so just think about that um that's the first thing second
thing just very quickly is that banks are going to hate this system sorry my daughter just woke
up can you hear the background she needs she needs a bottle no no my uh my wife's got her but
you know just uh yeah can you hear that yes okay okay we um i haven't gotten sleep the last two
nights yeah i had the oldest in bed from 11 p.m till till morning two nights ago then the youngest
decided to wake up at 3 a.m last night he's getting an attitude now he turns one soon
he was this little lovable
just stayed still
laughed
smiled
now he's crawling
causing chaos
slapping me in the face
it's incredible though
it is man
I love it
love to hear it
how big is he?
how much does he weigh?
I don't know
22?
25?
I don't know
yeah
I think that sounds right
he's short and fat
i'm sure he's a lovable chap that gives you so much joy it's a great thing man really is
best thing i've ever done for sure you can tell that to all the dear listeners and viewers out
there um just to finish the thought though about the cbdc the second thing is like banks don't like
it so uh well like they're gonna the only other play if you're not gonna take it from physical
currency all right and and bank reserves is not a real thing like that's not for you and me
so don't worry about that uh then um the only other place where cbdc could come from is
bank deposits and banks own the federal reserve do you think banks are going to be happy
with deposits draining from their nice loanable funds to uh some finicky crappy
uh fed you know fed cbdc uh app on their phone what if they essentially become the same thing
because with this banking crisis we're seeing the consolidation accelerate up into it's funny
too they change the vernacular it's no longer too big to fail tb tf now it's sfi systemically
important financial institutions they change the words on the go emerging markets global south
too big to fail sci-fi c-fi systemically important financial institutions but it seems like
particularly with the fed policy the posturing from janet yellen and the treasury and then
the fdic that that leaked um video from november of last year i'm sure you saw it where they're
like people cannot find out how bad the banking system is and how little money we have to actually
support the the insurance we tell people we have could you see a scenario where it consolidates
into the c5 banks jp morgan's wells fargo's bank of america city i guess i think those are the big
four and then it's just like they're they're okay with the cbdc because they have this buddy
relationship with the fed and they're essentially just like a front end for the cbdc that is used as
a what's the word i'm looking for um when it's used to um plausible deniability to say we don't
have a cbdc we have these banks these banks are running the money but it really effectively it's
cbdc with the commercial bank front end yeah i could see it i mean you're just talking about
more nationalization of banking infrastructure and makes perfect sense that it's going to happen
again when i don't know are we in the end game maybe you know i mean i've been telling you for
many years like never say never you could have been that gold bug in 1980 wait 20 years for that
that bull market turn around but it doesn't seem when you stack up all the things in the negative
column and then you stack up like the few things in the positive column about the
whatever global financial system but certainly the u.s financial system uh it doesn't seem
great and certainly when we have the threat of even higher rising interest rates or the threat
of more volatility in that you know and managing your book that way none of that seems uh good so
i agree like it definitely could happen it's a nationalization of the system and uh it's not
gonna be good it's not gonna be good if a few banks are in control of our money this is why
we need bitcoin it's like the long road to failure of this generations and this like sort of era's
epoch of central bank money you know it's it's like started 300 years ago a few holdouts a few
good countries uh you know for a time the best you know uh sweet uh scotland and canada sweden
as well before their central bank really wasn't like a central bank like the bank of england's
even though they had a technically older central bank but uh-oh you lost your audio there
sorry i don't know i must have lean with a random with now with a random key yeah
hit that i don't know what it was but um what i was just saying like the the free banking systems
have been great uh they've shown us a lot like i said about how you can handle crises with not
having a lender of last resort without not having all of this monopolistic marketing propagandistic
stuff that you need to save people it's bullshit basically so we've had that we've had that we have
had the lessons but despite all of the good lessons despite all of the good free banking
history it has all failed i mean every nation in the world has a central bank right now every
nation in the world has a at least some monetary authority that pegs themselves to another stronger
currency like the dollar and we're we're going to continue to centralize and i think that you're
probably right that like that's a very viable option the few big banks they take over they're
able to manage their interest rate risk better all of the non-sib or whatever the other new act
you know systemically important banks the non-systemically important banks will fail get
rolled up and yeah but this is this is precisely why we need a free market neutral money like
bitcoin yeah and speaking of which let's get bullish on bitcoin some things have happened
particularly the mining industry in the last few months since we last met due to the fact that they
got swept up in the bankruptcy proceedings of block fi and celsius became known to the world
that the sovereign wealth fund of bhutan has been stacking bitcoin not only that mining bitcoin with
excess electricity at their hydroelectric dams we had marathon digital here in the united states
announce a joint venture announce a joint venture with abu dhabi city in the uae uh
so we have signals out here nation state signals obviously abu dhabi is
not a not a nation but i think i think we can sort of uh throw it in that bucket
they're all sort of interesting over there in the uae what they're trying to do with different
cities yeah so the game theory seems to be playing out like bhutan i think is a massive signal
because if they didn't get swept up in the bankruptcy proceedings they probably would
still be under the radar stacking bitcoin mining bitcoin but that's been one of the
long-standing theses of hyper bitcoinization or bitcoiners in general they say hey the smaller
countries that have little to lose much to gain by getting into bitcoin early will do so that seems
to be have been validated in the last few months since we last spoke we had a professor on our show
from columbia recently and he's iranian he thinks that's it's possible he doesn't know for sure but
he thinks it's possible that iran is as well i mean we just add up everything that's happened
to that country of course there's a lot of human rights abuses and things that need to be fixed
there too uh but you know that's up to them obviously but um the fact that you're having
so much you know the economic weapon used to be called so much sanctions by the western world
against these countries yeah they're going to take uh take another avenue so
i i think it's definitely gonna happen i'm i'm not the person to talk to like to really champion
champion those things i'm not saying that the examples you used are like super bad with human
rights but you know i mean this is the same story right china russia like gold bugs use this i think
it's the most bizarre thing like we have bricks box gold gold back currency and like you know
old guys on twitter like are tweeting about how it's great that china is stacking gold bars to
this day you know and like i'll talk about this a little bit in prague some gold history versus
bitcoin history you know bitcoin history and what bitcoin can learn from it um you know i just don't
i don't see that as we've already had very very bad examples in world war ii with you know nazi
gold um and very very bad centralization practices uh i don't know how you can possibly think that
you're going to have some salvation from a government that is a human rights abuser
communists all the things that i hate i don't know about you know everybody but i i just you
know where i am in eastern europe you know my my stance so i don't i just don't think that that's
like a something to hang your shingle on that like this okay this is where it's going to be
um this is like this is gonna this is gonna bring us monetary freedom i'm speaking from the gold
bug perspective right and then when you add that to bit when you when you transpose bitcoin on that
i think it is different it's different it's definitely like there's more security in holding
bitcoin even in a centralized way mining bitcoin in a centralized way there's more resiliency there
but there's certainly just as much ease of theft by a corrupt crony dictator i mean it's just as
easy to steal bitcoin as it is to steal your oil and gas resources is it you know if you control
the keys and you're mining it i'm saying if i'm saying if you're a sovereign i'm saying if you're
a sovereign that's my only point if you're a sovereign and you loot your country like russia
like russia has stolen everything from their citizens i mean literally all
you know they're they're the most resource rich nation in the world and um look i know a lot of
Bitcoiners love it when it's, you know,
Russia could be the next great Bitcoin country,
like El Salvador or something like that.
I mean, hold Bitcoin on your own,
control your own private keys, things like that.
But I'm just saying as the sovereign,
I don't see any difference necessarily compared to say,
we've had a lot of bad track records of gold running countries.
And by the way, United States isn't immune to that either, are they?
No.
i think they can order 6102 obviously 6102 in reverse that's yeah the difficulty adjustment
epox is indeed 2016 but i agree i mean my perspective is so i've read about this or i
talked about it about a month ago in the mining industry it's pretty well known if you talk to
brokers who are selling asics that some of the larger manufacturers are selling more asics to
russia than anywhere else in the world right now and yeah some people can be like yes there's a
validation of bitcoin's value prop which it certainly is um but my perspective is like hey
we need to get serious and luckily over the last couple weeks here in the united states
uh part of the debt ceiling deal nicks the excise tax on mining out of it that's good
uh here in texas the cap on miners ability to participate in ancillary services particularly
demand response was nixed as well so we've gotten good signals that the mining industry at least for
now uh broadly in the united states and particularly in texas uh is going to be allowed to flourish to
a certain extent as of right now but when i see stuff like that butan i'm happy a nice small
kingdom up in the himalayas getting smart increasing their economic wealth via bitcoin
love to see that when like you bring like russia venezuela iran china into the picture i'm not like
yes you have to objectively um recognize that it is a validation of a political money peer-to-peer
network you can access but too it's like all right we need to get serious here in the united states
over in latvia about competing and not letting them out compete us and the the race to accumulate
as much hash rate as possible.
You know what I'm talking about, though.
Like, I 100% agree with you.
It's just for mining, I mean,
when you're mining Bitcoin as a nation state,
like, the people aren't going to be controlling those keys.
No, and that's why I think
we have an incredible opportunity here in America
to just, and we've done a great job.
We have probably the most hash rate concentrated here
compared to anywhere else in the world,
which is good.
And that hash rate is owned almost 100%, I think.
I don't think there's any states
or certainly not the federal government mining Bitcoin
by private entities, entrepreneurs.
We just need to keep fostering that
and letting that flourish
and send that out as a signal to the world,
like, hey, we're letting the free market
take care of Bitcoin here
and hopefully attract some great minds from abroad
that want to live in a free nation.
yeah completely agree come to the country legally just don't walk through the border just
get in line do your stuff completely agree there's maybe some municipalities localities like uh in
montana or something we're mining bitcoin this is like years ago i'm just pulling this deep from
memory but like yeah definitely not no state level that i've heard and but um even if there
are local municipalities it's still better it's much better it's still corruptible but you know
not as uh regardless like i totally agree with everything you said and um i think that that's uh
that's what we got to do and also it's a neutral money it is a validation of it um
and it's in some way maybe maybe it can be better than like a gold you know obviously gold mines
are totally toxic this has been discussed in many places right in bitcoin land comparing gold
mining to become mining over the you know over the many many years now uh but yeah i i think it's
it's most laughable it's most laughable when you get old old gold bugs on twitter quoting about how
awesome it is that bricks bucks is coming and you know china's increasing its gold reserves
by the way there's less central bank reserves sorry it's one more thing there's less central
bank reserves now than in 1965 uh and the overall gold supply is about 3x higher it's like rough
round numbers like 2 billion ounces in 1965 totally uh like including jewelry and now there's
6 billion ounces 6.4 billion ounces so that tells you something right there about the dilution of
gold versus in central banks versus outside and just in total all right yeah so central banks
were holding more gold in 1965 in 1965 and that was a bigger concentration of the total
because there was only two billion ounces and they held more than they do today i don't remember the
exact percentage but now uh that now the percentage is like a sixth of the total total gold maybe a
fifth if you count available gold but now it's like a six it's about a billion ounces central
banks hold and yeah so it's like 50 percent uh in 1965 monetary central bank official gold
uh now i mean gold has been 3x in the last 50 years bitcoin can't be 3x
no uh as far as supply so it's another great thing for bitcoin but yeah i just i just find
it hilarious that like these human rights awful communist abusing countries like these gold bugs
yes just stacking gold bars i will agree with the the gold bugs but not for the reasons that
want me to i want them to stack the gold bars because bitcoin is just going to leapfrog gold
let them go back to that chart 580 000 bitcoin yeah let them accumulate uh the analog bitcoin
and we'll uh manual bitcoin whatever the the pet rock as people like to call it
we'll get the good hard i love it man i love it good stuff uh you want to wrap it yeah we got more
i got just two i got two stats for you um because i've been posting shorter threads i used to post
like 60 tweet threads and now i've been posting a little bit shorter but i also think i'm shadow
banned on twitter uh people have been saying that which is weird i haven't really checked
these third-party sites but they said that i have been uh the uh turkey over the last year
increases monetary base 65 you've probably heard what's happening to turkish lira 65
argentina increased their monetary base 52 in the last year the argentinian peso black market
i don't know if you've seen a chart it's insane it's over 500 it's over 500 pesos per dollar
where the official is like 200 i mean it's so sad i mean it's like everybody knows there what's
going on they got to get dollars they got to get bitcoin it's this is a story that everybody knows
but if you just think about it in terms of actual percentage increase it's 58 50 53 percent uh
increase of the base and you you can see the black market is at least double yeah official rate
and argentina just sent their their interest rate to 97 which is insane yeah uh one thing
maybe we should talk about before we wrap up what we're talking about before we hit record
the uh the texas law that did pass down here uh is that bitcoin exchanges bitcoin companies have
to be fully reserved and you were sharing a tom woods clip with pierre about the praxology
for full reserve you're saying it's not
well they just fraud i yeah i just i'd like to hear you know some full reservists get their
story together it's basically two things it's either uh it's fraudulent or it causes the
business cycle or it does both uh they can't agree on it themselves uh there are many many people
that say that's the fraudulent side of it's not the story at all no one even believes that no one
talks about it uh i got lots of quotes as i told you that tom wood show is one of them because i
you know i'm interested in this stuff i follow it i like i like freedom i think banking is just one
of these weird things where walk us through the individual argument fraudulent business cycle both
all right it's uh i try to do it in very very short time for it period um the fraud argument
is i think pretty straightforward people think that uh even though this has been litigated on
and adjudicated on for two millennia uh it's not recognized by the people like primarily the
followers of Rothbard that, um, my daughter's coming in here. Hey, Bob, good off camera. Um,
it's, uh, it's not, you know, it's not, uh, recognized by the, uh, Rothbardians that
these are legitimate market transactions. I mean, Murray Rothbard is the most famous person. He
actually argued in man economy and state his tome he argued for the state to abolish fractional
reserve banking think about that an austrian arguing yeah an austrian arguing that the state
abolishment of fractional reserve banking is a good thing again i can think of no other
sector, business, anything, where an Austrian wants government intervention to make the market
better. This is the only one. And it's only for this sort of, my buddy Fernando, he always calls
it quicksand, right? It's like, you tweak these words, you don't talk about assets and liabilities,
you don't just talk about normal market things, but this is fraud. Forget the fact that we all
signed a bank agreement. This has been two millennia of adjudication and legislation on
this stuff. It's fraud. And then Tom Woods quote that I posted, he said this years ago, again,
I wrote it down because it's easy to, and it's a good point. And I agree with it. He said, well,
the Austrians, they don't like to argue that Rothbard talked about it, but we don't talk
about fraud anymore. That's not actually where it's at. It's not fraud. But we do think that
it causes the business cycle. And the business cycle is just a part of the credit intermediation.
So there's two things. Fraud, I think I just addressed the fraud. And this is where I would not absolutely at all agree with any law from any state that encourages more government intervention in a business, in anything. So I don't know why banking is an exception. So that's that.
uh the as far as the business cycle theory goes uh that's that's where most of them hang their
hat on now i think most you know followers of rothbard or followers of again i like stuff
rothbard says i like his reading it's great stuff he's great with the market uh he's just got this
thing about fractures their banking that he's like he's really he has a soft spot for gold
right macy's had it macy's never never explained it in the way that rothbard he was very explicit
about that he wanted 100 gold reserve dollar standard many things were written about that
but um in any event uh i think i addressed the fraud the second thing would be does it cause
the business cycle because in banking you intermediate credit uh you're basically
borrowing short and lending long but when you're lending long you're lending with a possible
maturity mismatch right where you have loans which are assets on your book as a bank that
could come do you know like like we have long dated maturities right 10 years out but you have
on-demand liabilities and this was precisely what happened to svb by the way and especially in a day
this day and age where um you have bank runs and you can have them on your phone i mean i mean in
this day and age you can bank run on your phone that's what i meant to say so you can very easily
withdraw cash you know in 60 seconds you know this is fiduciary media bank deposit you can
transfer from one bank to the second bank if you have that bank account uh that can certainly cause
problems all of which i would agree with it's just they go further and they say like this causes the
business cycle this and that all of those things i would agree with in the context of the central
bank this is where the writings of george selgin larry white come into come into mind that when
the central bank does all these things that we've just been talking about the whole episode
increases the base money with no concept of how to deal with the demand for that money because
they're, you know, as Friedrich Hayek says, this is the pretense of knowledge. No planning board
can do this. Soviet Union taught us this. No planning board can do this. No one, no one in
the economy knows what the reserve ratio should be. The Federal Reserve, as I told you earlier,
the 10%, which is only for big banks, some central banks have 0%. No one even knows that. No central
bank knows that. Like you got to go down to the micro level, to the individual bank level, to a
branch level. That's how you would solve these questions in my mind, in a free market,
in a free banking society. So that's my response to them. Hopefully it was clear as basically,
I completely agree that free banking, or excuse me, fractional reserve banking causes problems
in a central banking context, but it clearly has not under free banking context. I gave you the
example of Canada earlier, zero banks failing where 10,000 American banks failed. You can go
on and on and on. I mean, the Scottish free banking systems for 200 years, they had like
1% of gold in the vault. And compared to the banknotes that were outstanding, the deposits
outstanding represented by banknotes. And that's simply because that's what the depositors preferred.
And that's how the banks worked out better. And then the final, final thing I should say about
this, which again, these just kind of top of my head, I wasn't, you know, thinking you're gonna
ask me about this, but like the sacred demand deposit, this is where it always comes down to
Somehow, like, I think after a lot of these guys, they're thinking about these things. Okay, fraud, we can't really say fraud anymore, because we do sign the bank agreement. But we have this sacred demand deposit. All right, it's sacred. We it's just a thing. Everybody thinks they have it. You know, the ability to go withdraw their cash on demand. That's like false marketing. It's bad marketing.
unfortunately for these guys with this uh this idea the demand deposit represents like two percent
of all loans outstanding in the united states maybe even less now maybe one percent as far as
total money supply which i've calculated as well i've done videos on this demand deposits
prior to 2008 by the way the the percentages i'm giving you are prior to the the loans are correct
But what I'm about to tell you right now is prior to 2008. It has exploded, as we talked about, because there's no reserve ratio anymore. But prior to 2008, apparently a fractional reserve bank is supposed to cause that crisis. Demand deposits were sub 10% of the money supply, even sub 5%. I can't remember off the top of my head, but very, very low. And as a proportion of all loans, like 1% to 2%. So the demand deposits, they're just not relevant to this situation.
And even if they were, it should be up to a bank and a free market system to intermediate as they wish.
And if you're an untrustworthy bank, withdraw your money and the bank should fail.
So that's the solution to the problem.
And then you get into this circular recursive argument because, again, some people ignore the fraud thing.
Some people just focus on the business cycle thing.
And then as I just explained both, and then let's say they, of course, disagree with me.
they're like well no but it's fraudulent you know even though i just said uh you know you can
withdraw your money everything like no it's fraudulent yeah but this is we have a monopolized
system which i'm not a fan of if we had a free banking system you could easily withdraw your
money and anyway the fraud argument is like no one no one even worth their salt will make the
fraud argument right now rothbart did and he turned a lot of heads that way but as tom wood
said in 2016 which is the quote that i made for like a decade probably even more no one wrote
seriously about the fraud i mean selden and white just destroyed the fraud argument it's just it's
destroyed like you sign a bank agreement it is not fraud that you open up a bank account if like
why are you even holding a bank account if you think that it's fraudulent and then if they say
oh because it's a monopolized system i agree with you but that doesn't mean that you should
engage in fraud yourself if you think you're in some you know fraudulent and lending your money
to the bank or whatever so again you get to these circular arguments it's quicksand i've already
talked longer than i wanted to i hope my point got across it got across uh it's basic stuff man
it's it's not i don't even find it intellectually stimulating anymore or interesting like it's not
you know it's it's a very very niche small portion and look if you were if you're a
bitcoiner you want fully reserved bitcoin fully reserve your bitcoin withdraw your bitcoin i
encourage it i do it myself use multi-sig be private don't be an idiot like you and me doing
podcasts be private use multi-sig be safe yeah i agree it's the more intellectually stimulating
thing is just accepting all that and then figuring out how we can bring hal finney's vision of a free
banking system built on bitcoin to life may or may not happen i'm even open to it not like i would
love a lightning only world you know we saw some struggles with that with the ordinals right on and
off ramps we don't have to get in a lot but i'm saying i'm like i said i think i might have said
this on your show i say it a lot like it's not just uh it's not just a nuclear it's like use
nat gas use renewables it's certainly not just renewables like germany germany already answered
that question for us it's not just renewables so when you have this energy mix you got to use
everything and i would just simply apply that logic to scaling payments because at the end of
the day that's all we're talking about is scaling payments yes and if you want to just go through
this nonsense withdraw your bitcoin bitcoin makes everything easy by the way you don't own your
bitcoin when it's on exchange you don't own nothing you but you have a claim on bitcoin
we've talked about peter peter todd peter todd made a great quote he's like what's the probability
that you own that Bitcoin or something. I'm like, you have 0% BTC, you have 100% IOU. That's what
you have. When your Bitcoin is on a claim, when your Bitcoin is on an exchange, just like when
your real physical dollars are in a bank, you have a 0% title. Legal, you have no title to that. All
you have is a claim. It's called an IOU. It's called a deposit. It's called a mutuum. In Roman
times, it was called a mutuum because it was mutable. You give back something like kind.
i don't know on and on and on man it's it's uh it's a it's a dead argument as far as i'm concerned
it's not it's not even interesting bitcoin makes everything easy all right so freaks you didn't
have to listen to last 10 minutes of the show is not interesting so yeah i'm kidding it's always
interesting with you, Matthew.
Thanks, buddy. You as well.
Enjoy Prague.
Yeah, will do.
Very much looking forward to it.
Taking the fam. It's going to be great.
Send my love to all the Bitcoiners
who will be in Prague next week.
And
yeah, I think the next one
should be interesting.
Q2 is what? We got 30
days. Yeah, the
Bitcoin price is probably going to be flat.
But I'm sure
there'll be stuff that goes on between now and the end of june and actually the end of july
we'll do some different we'll do some different interactive charts next time not just the trend
lines okay we could do some balance sheet stuff we can whatever you want man yeah don't forget
the freddy and fanny balance sheets they're freaks yeah it's interesting stuff look for that it's a
great site i'd like to know more about who's making that and why but uh he's ripping some
interesting data putting out there for everybody to see yeah zombie companies they're everywhere
don't be a zombie don't be complacent take full reserve bitcoin into private keys that you control
well they're public addresses associated with the private keys but you know what i'm trying to say
matthew it's always a pleasure thank you for never sure congrats on five years it's a big milestone
thank you my friend really appreciate it marty how long do you think you'll be doing this decades
a decade cbdc tracker is just starting up so let's see all right well we'll still be here
doing this as long as it's going on so i think we probably will all right go enjoy your night
i'm gonna go get ready for rabbit hole recap thank you freaks for joining in the live chat
on VEDA
everywhere
peace and love
take care
