TFTC: A Bitcoin Podcast - #658: What's Really in the COVID Shots with Jessica Rose
Episode Date: September 8, 2025Marty sits down with Jessica Rose, an immunologist and data analyst, to discuss her five years of research into VAERS data showing alarming safety signals from COVID vaccines, including DNA contaminat...ion, systemic adverse events, and the institutional suppression of critical vaccine safety information. Read the paper: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08916934.2025.2551517 STACK SATS hat: https://tftcmerch.io/ Our newsletter: https://www.tftc.io/bitcoin-brief/ TFTC Elite (Ad-free & Discord): https://www.tftc.io/#/portal/signup/ Discord: https://discord.gg/VJ2dABShBz Opportunity Cost Extension: https://www.opportunitycost.app/ Shoutout to our sponsors: Bitkey https://bit.ly/TFTCBitkey20 Unchained https://unchained.com/tftc/ Obscura https://obscura.net/ SLNT https://slnt.com/tftc Join the TFTC Movement: Main YT Channel https://www.youtube.com/c/TFTC21/videos Clips YT Channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCUQcW3jxfQfEUS8kqR5pJtQ Website https://tftc.io/ Newsletter tftc.io/bitcoin-brief/ Twitter https://twitter.com/tftc21 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/tftc.io/ Nostr https://primal.net/tftc Follow Marty Bent: Twitter https://twitter.com/martybent Nostr https://primal.net/martybent Newsletter https://tftc.io/martys-bent/ Podcast https://www.tftc.io/tag/podcasts/
Transcript
Discussion (0)
you've had a dynamic where money's become freer than free
if you talk about a fed just gone nuts all all the central banks going nuts so it's all acting
like safe haven i believe that in a world where central bankers are tripping over themselves to
devalue their currency bitcoin wins in the world of fiat currencies bitcoin is the victor i mean
that's part of the bull case for bitcoin if you're not paying attention you probably should be
probably should be yeah you don't have to worry about uh the name of the spelling we take it off
and post so it's just our pictures and people will know we're sitting down with jessica rose
you can't see her name on on the video right now if you're watching on youtube or somewhere else
but i'm sitting down with jessica rose who i was introduced to by our good friend uh who's been on
the show a couple times now at this point kevin mcclernand we've talked about the dna contamination
of the covid vaccines and after last time we spoke he was adamant that i have to reach out
with you and get you on the show a bit of a delay he introduced us in march we're sitting here
in the beginning of september but i think uh it was a happy accident because there's a lot to talk
about with everything going on and so it's a good delay there's nothing wrong with it
and that's why i reached out to you because i remember uh kevin introduced me to jessica
to talk about this stuff and we have a lot going on on capitol hill it seems like
rfk jr is actually getting his way we have a lot of people leaving the cdc uh we're finding out
about uh the individuals who are at the cdc pushing the vaccine mandates during covid and
i just wanted to get you on to get your perspective on what do you think's happening
at that level right now do you think we're we're on the path toward some sort of unearthing of
what actually happened and getting the the real data out to the people i do um it's it's been
wild to watch i mean you i don't know how long you've been watching all this stuff unfold but
i mean i've been i've been digging into the data uh the adverse event data for five years now so i
i mean it's been a horror show since january 2021 and i'll elaborate on that in a second but um
it's amazing that the feeling in the community of people i'm in and it's a very broad international
community of people from lawyers to doctors to teachers to vets you know like and podcasters
everyone in between um there's a real feeling of wow you know as in more than hope it's actual
surprise because and it's not that i think people are surprised that we're starting to see
actual movement on the subject matter of vaccine safety it's that it's almost hard to believe
if you know what i mean because we've i i don't even think we as a community of people who are
digging into this all the time and who dedicate our lives to the science know how bad it is know
how shielded the data is know how many studies have actually been conducted by pharma companies
themselves that reveal like catastrophic adverse events that we we don't have access to we don't
know about um this this hearing that robert f kennedy jr uh as we all know is the new secretary
of hhs recently uh i would say was subjected to was just i mean beyond revealing um the people
the the small clips uh that i've that i've seen of the of the entire session which i haven't
watched in full were so astounding. I mean, there were so many ad hominem attacks. There were so
many juvenile lash outs. It's just not something I would expect to see from a room full of heavy
hitting professionals, senators and doctors. And you know what I mean? It's like I would expect it
to be more civilized um so it's not that it's not that i think it's a bad thing that that it
happened that it's being revealed this way i think it's actually very very telling um
as to like why why are people getting so defensive on the subject matter because
robert hasn't changed his position all he's trying to do is get science back data to actually um
have the outcome of safe products on the market that's all he's looking for there's nothing to
defend right there he's looking out for kids he's looking out for parents he's looking out for
american people in general it's like what is there to defend so the reactions i saw from people just
just at this hearing were stunning i mean are they worried they're gonna lose their their
their handouts are they worried that um some weird personal truth is going to come out about them
about what they've been defending and why i mean it's it's bizarre a world um but again i'll go
back to what i started with it's it's beyond hopeful it's it's actual movement forward i think
and just one more thing about that when when trump you saw the post on x where trump made
the comment about operation warp speed and he was demanding data from pfizer this is huge
if he stands by that and if he actually follows through with demanding this data
me and kevin and david speaker up in canada are probably going to have a paper
published today or maybe tomorrow. Um, that's been, you know, in the peer review process for
years, literally years now that reveals so many things about the modified mRNA products, uh,
pertaining to DNA. Um, I'll, I'll just call them contaminants. Um, Trump needs to know this stuff.
And, and I know that he's not a scientist, but he'll understand, you know, the word contaminant
And he'll understand that, you know, from another point of view, these things are gene based therapies that didn't go through, you know, the proper channels to get approved, for example.
So I think there's a real there's a real reason to be optimistic after all of this time.
That's what I would say.
It's incredibly encouraging to hear because that is one of my biggest worries.
And it was funny. I sent a tweet out earlier this week.
i forget exactly what i said or what i was quote tweeting but it pertained to the covid
vaccines and the potential um to actually find out what's happening and let the american people
get access to the data and do their own research and somebody responded like why are you still on
this um give it up no it was years ago it's like no we cannot no no we cannot just let this fall
to the wayside there there has to be uh some accountability which is desperately needed because
i said it before we hit record but i'm a strong believer that what happened between late 2020 and
up until today to some point with with mandates are still being issued to people in certain
positions or schools is a crime against humanity yeah and it's not only america i mean europe's
still pushing the COVID stuff. There are countries all over the world who are still very much fully
caught up in all of this. And, you know, everybody's seen it on the news. There's this
kind of resurgence of fear factoring going on with, oh, there's a new SARS strain and people
are getting COVID. No, no, no. The one thing that is true from what people are saying that COVID is
over is that it is, and it was a long time ago from, from, uh, an immunological point of view.
Um, so it's wild to me that there's this dichotomy between the hundreds of millions
of people who've suffered adverse events directly as a cause of these, um, these modified nucleoside
modified mRNA injections. And the people who still have no awareness that there's a problem
at all. Um, it's, it's really, it's wild because, because these two groups are real. Um,
the one, the latter group are actually like, I think slowly, slowly, there are people coming
out of that group and starting to open their eyes as more of this becomes so-called mainstream,
which is thanks to the new administration whether you like the people involved or not it doesn't
matter man they're they're they're moving the target so you got to appreciate that after
stagnancy for so long decades uh when you're talking about vaccine safety um so just just to
if people don't know what i was doing with the vaccine adverse event reporting system
data set in in the u.s um i i started digging into this the day that the shots went out on
december 17th uh 2020 um because i anticipated because of what i was seeing the one-shot
solution the novel technologies involved um i anticipated that we were going to start seeing
like enormous numbers of people reporting adverse events and serious ones too because
for for people who don't know there are two brand new technologies involved here these lipid
nanoparticles which are not safe they use these things called cationic lipids as one of four
which are highly positively charged which are murder to cells and um nucleotides which are
embedded therein and it's supposed to be only this nucleoside modified rna but as i'll talk
about later i hope uh according to our new publication and other peer-reviewed publications
there's uh way too much dna in there as well it's not supposed to be there and that comes with
a boatload of problems that absolutely would be associated with with disease and pathologies like
cancer. So in, in January, 2021, at the end of January, January 30th, there was a very large
death signal in VAERS. And this is a passive reporting system. So under reporting is actually
the biggest problem with VAERS. A lot of people call it like a dumpster, which I find very
offensive because every single one of these reports is a person who was injured because
they took a vaccine and they matter. Every single person matters. And if you actually succeed
at filing a VAERS report, which is not an easy task, it's an online system with multiple e-pages
that if you don't complete in time, they kick you off and you have to start again.
And then it has to get vetted after being given a temporary ID. And if that's successful with the
limited number of people who are doing the vetting, you might get a permanent VAERS ID and your data
point might be uploaded to the front-end system, but that's not the end of it. It might also be
removed, as I've also written a paper about with no explanation. So there was a big death signal
in January at the end, which under normal circumstances and in the past historically
would have prompted the immediate withdrawal of the product from the market,
these modified mRNA products from the market.
There's like 500 and something, something reports of death within 30 days,
which is way, that's a lot of people to dive at the hands
or in the context of a product that's supposed to be, you know, helping people.
And that's not, that's just one.
The number of adverse events, I'll give you some context here that are typically reported in the context of the flu vaccines, for example, like the number of types of adverse events of the 25,000 potential metric coded adverse events that you can use is about 5000 something in total for, say, like a season, a flu season.
And the number of types of adverse events that have been reported in the context of just the modified mRNA shots is over 14,000.
So there's not just hundreds of thousands more adverse events, millions in fact, being reported when you compare in the context of the COVID shots versus the flu shots.
There's so many more different types, which matches perfectly with what we're seeing in
a clinical setting pertaining to the comprehensive nature of the damage.
You've heard it all, right?
Like there's neurological damage, there's immunological damage, heart damage, lymphatic
or the the um the endocrine system being ruined uh birth defects uh fertility problems cancer i
mean you just name it and it's there and it's been there from the very beginning so you can
i have written papers about this and published them um you can find that on my sub stack if
you're interested but the point in all of what i'm saying is that this this data um the various
data is accessible to the public which is why i chose it and it's been showing signals for a very
very very long time and now we're up to about um last time i checked it was like 1.6 something
million reports in the context of these shots to date. And again, just for context,
the total number of adverse events reported in the past 30 years of data collection in VAERS
for all vaccines combined has been about 39,000 on average. And in 2021 alone, just one year,
there were over a million reports in the COVID shot context. So there's just like,
there's, there's no looking away from it. Um, so I'm really glad going back to the first question
about like what's going on with CDC and even hopefully FDA and HHS is that those guys are
the owners of this data set and it's their job. They're tasked with the job of looking at this
data, analyzing it, doing further follow-up causality assessments. And the CDC director at
the time, Rochelle Walensky, is on record having said that there's no signal. There are a number
of documented reports from the employees of these organizations making assured statements that
there's no safety signals that we should be concerned about in VAERS and it's absolute
rubbish. Uh, and it's, by the way, everyone's heard about myocarditis now, but it's, that is
just the tip of the iceberg. Um, I'm glad that it's gotten a lot of attention, but on the other
hand, it doesn't address all the neurological problems that people are seeing, which depending
on who you are you might actually consider brain damage a little bit more uh you know hard to deal
with than heart damage so yeah i mean i haven't been able to validate whether these true but
whether this is true but i've seen people in recent months tweeting that the amount of gray
matter appearing in brain scans is increasing and again i haven't validated i've just seen it could
be fake news but um like what is it equivalent to like a lobotomy has has been found in some people
wow i'll have to look into that um sorry go ahead no i was it's just astonishing to me that
i mean the numbers that you that you described for the covid vaccine in the varus database is
astounding that's 1.4 million that were actually made it through the process and
or on the front end and so that's underreported bingo bingo and that's just fares uh and and
another i'm trying to remember everything you know the the most important points there are
pharmacovigilance databases uh used all over the world like australia has one called the dane
there's the ugr system in europe there's the yellow card system in the uk there's fares and
in the U S there's CAFIS in Canada. There's, you know, and the thing about it is you have to comb
really hard through the other data sets, which really aren't user-friendly, but when you do
the signals are exactly the same. And I don't mean similar. I mean, they're exactly the same
numbers wise, and also systemic nature wise of reports and age group wise, nobody's immune.
Like whoever got the shots, for example, if you have a preexisting condition or if you have a lurking condition or if you have a latent viral, you know, a latent virus like all the herpes viruses, you get reactivation.
It's like something in these shots causes some some horrid level of immune dysfunction, which just wreaks havoc on anything lurking.
lurking if you're catching my drift um if you were if you have an autoimmune condition that was in
you know that was stable how many people do i know how many people have i heard reported
uh have that condition re-emerge um everything you can name autoimmunity is is a whole other
subject matter which we should talk about um but yeah it's there's just one one data set and
It's just, it's wild how, again, just by looking at that alone, I'm not saying, you know, like you can definitively say this, this, or this.
What I'm saying is the owners of the data cannot deny that there are massive safety signals in that data set, and they have to explain why.
They have to.
You know, this is people's lives on the line.
and people were mandated to get these shots so it's like it is criminal you know so freaks this
rip of tftc was brought to you by our good friends at bitki bitki makes bitcoin easy to use and hard
to lose it is a hardware wallet that natively embeds into a two or three multi-sig you have
one key on the hardware wallet one key on your mobile device and block stores a key in the cloud
for you this is an incredible hardware device for your friends and family or maybe yourself
who have Bitcoin on exchanges and have for a long time, but haven't taken a step to self-custody
because they're worried about the complications of setting up a private public key pair,
securing that seed phrase, setting up a pin, setting up a passphrase. Again, BitKey makes
it easy to use, hard to lose. It's the easiest zero to one step, your first step to self-custody.
If you have friends and family on the exchanges who haven't moved it off, tell them to pick up
a BitKey. Go to bitkey.world. Use the key TFTC20 at checkout for 20% off your order.
That's bitkey.world, code TFTC20.
Over 10,000 investors downloaded the original
How to Position for the Bitcoin boom
when Bitcoin was just 27K
and it called for 120K plus.
That target's now hit.
So what's next?
Ter Demeester is back with the 2025 edition,
refreshed for the mid-cycle moment,
packed with new data, new insights,
and Ter's latest price outlook.
Plus, you'll get exclusive access
to charting our way through chaos,
Ter's new 30-minute Q3 2025 presentation
explaining why this bull run
might be only just beginning and what forces could push it to the next level read the first ever
mid-cycle report from adamant research at unchained.com slash tftc that's unchained.com
slash tftc and also if you're using unchained you can use the code tftc for 50 off any of their
services go check it out and the lack of accountability the inability to recognize
that these there are these glaring sort of alarm bells going off in the data sets
i mean it doesn't do them any favors that they don't address it because it leads one to
go down the path of sort of the being very pessimistic about the intentions of it all
like it almost seems intentional it's like why are you trying to hide this because i remember
when the bears conversation started popping up in mid 21 and persisted for the better part of
year and a half after that like people were just flippantly disregarding there so like oh it's not
a it's not a reliable database there could be a lot of bunk data in there but up until that point
it was sort of fused as a reliable database but all of a sudden because there was bad information
about this particular vaccine it suddenly became unreliable and something to not look at yeah that's
right and then we get blamed for vaccine hesitancy when they completely uh you know evade their
own jobs. Um, yeah, it's crazy. Uh, the, the thing about it is like you, yeah, it's just what you
said that they just had to do. And what I just said, they just had to do their jobs and they
just had to be a little bit transparent and honest. Um, and you know, it just ain't about
public health. There's no public or health with regard to anything that's happened in the last
five years and probably way, way longer before. And very importantly, for anyone who's trashing
VAERS, go ahead, do what you want. But remember that this is a government database. It's a
pharmacovigilance database, and it's designed as part of kind of the post-clinical trial phases.
so you have animal trials which we didn't have and then you have phase one two three
each phase increases in number and strength and power um they have to be sequential they cannot
be overlapped all of these rules by the way were broken and this process this animal trial to um
to phase one through three process for a conventional vaccine takes about 10 years
This is standard. So this was all squished into about six months. Many problems therein. And the phase four, which is what I like to think of it as, is the pharmacovigilance. You put the product, whatever it is you were trialing in the clinical trials, into a very large number of people.
in this case it was like billions of people and you have to monitor what's going on because the
demographic is going to be much much much broader you're going to have more ages you're going to
have more people with with uh conditions that were excluded as part of these exclusion criteria in
the trials for example people who smoke people who are pregnant people who uh have autoimmune
conditions, it's the job of pharmacovigilance data collection to detect these signals. That's
what VAERS is. It's actually really valuable. And I'm saying that from a person who's been
looking at it for years. The data they're in is so plentiful. It's annoying that it takes so long
to file a VAERS report, but the good part about it is that you can enter so much data. You can
enter free text, which is basically just the doctor's notes. If it's you or if it's your GP
or if it's a nurse practitioner or a parent or whatever, whoever is filing the report,
you can write as much as you want about the real story of what happened. You can put your opinion
in there. You can put your vaccine history. You can put everything. And if you're willing,
You know, like I am, to read through the free text, in addition to looking at the age data, in addition to looking at the state, in addition to looking at the dose, you will learn so much about what's going on.
It's like reading between the lines.
So I would argue with anybody who wants to say that Veris isn't an invaluable data set.
It really is.
and were was was it the covid vaccine particularly particularly that drove you to
make sure that you were paying attention to bears or was this 100 i didn't know about bears before
any of this the only reason i got into this actually was because i had just finished my
my second postdoc and enough was enough i was ready to just surf for a long time i'm a surfer
by the way. And I planned this big trip to Noosa. I was going to showcase my talent for the WSL.
I had a spot in the Noosa Surf Festival. Uh, everything was paid for, bought, but it was
happening at the end of February, early March, 2020. Um, so you know what happened then. Um,
so I had to cancel my trip and being the, uh, the, uh, proactive person that I am,
I decided that I would start paying attention to what was going on because I mean when I hear the
word zoonotic pathogen my ears perk up because that's what I study I mean that's that's what I
do I'm not a data analyst by training it's just a part of all the degrees that I've done I'm
actually like an immunologist who studies viruses so yeah I just like I said I started looking
around uh i was watching the johns hopkins death board every morning with my coffee like oh my god
um and then about like seven or eight days later i'm like oh jesus this is a joke
this isn't what people are thinking it is um and it was just by listening to the language that was
being used for example you know the new technology the one-shot deal you know injecting everyone
during the pandemic all at once, regardless of, uh, immunity, natural immunity. Yeah. Then the,
the, the police forces like forcing you not to go outside and walk around. It was like,
there's something else going on here. So, um, yeah, I just, I decided to teach myself how to
use R and, uh, and I dove into VAERS, like I said, because it was, uh, freely accessible and easy to
access. So yeah, I was, you know, people probably think I'm an anti-vaxxer, but I'm vaccinated out
the yin yang. I mean, before all this started, I was like, if I traveled like to a place where
there were endemic viruses, I was going to the doctor and saying, what do I need to get injected
with to be safe? I was that person. And yeah, I remember getting pretty sick once from doing that,
um but not anymore man um bueno shifto 180 i i'm i'm never getting injected with anything again for
as long as i live it's it's and it's it's their fault i'm sorry it's like when you don't tell
the truth and when you're not transparent with data and when you're you're pushing products
to get them on the childhood schedule because you're free from liability and you make a billion
dollars off that you know you kind of gotta side-eye people and think all right are you
really concerned about my health or are you really concerned about your pocketbook and so yeah it's
like i'm not sure that we're ever going to get to the point where we have a wonderful vaccine
schedule that's actually ensuring the safety of the masses i'm not sure we're going to get there
But what I would hope is that all these, can I swear?
Yes, you can swear.
Okay, all these bullshit vaccines that they're trying to inject newborns with, like Hep B.
I hope that all that stuff is just completely eliminated because those are just, they're just money making schemes.
There's no, absolutely no medical or immunological reason to be doing that.
and when you combine the fact that there are so many adjuvants like aluminum there's so many
byproducts dna contamination there's so many things you have to factor in and also pre-existing
conditions um you have to consider that there are risks as well as potential benefits when you
vaccinate with anything so it's like i really hope that we just get some balance back which
is what i genuinely believe robert is fighting for um yeah he's he's worked all his life for
this and he's he's poised man he just needs to keep going he really does and it was encouraged
it was encouraging to see the move the florida made earlier this week taking away mandates
giving people i mean as a parent like i said we had our first job last week we had to deal with
this uh in in the hospital they tried they what did they try i mean they tried they didn't age
hep b was right there we were like no thank you um and vitamin k right vitamin k and uh they give
like a an eye antibiotic in case the mother has gonorrhea too so we were very adamant like okay
my wife tested negative for hep b and doesn't have gonorrhea so we're thank you but they're
they're skeptical. And then the lead you to question the motives and intentions. And as
it pertains to the COVID vaccine specifically, that's, I think the thing that I'm most interested
in getting to the bottom of is, was this just a money grab by big pharma and they were able to
influence the politicians because of their lobbying efforts to really brute force this
on the market um and then again because there hasn't been any accountability and they refuse to
acknowledge data and confront the glaring problem in front of everybody you have people who are more
conspiratorial are saying we're looking at a massive debt problem here in the united states
looking at the social security liabilities and maybe there was a intentional culling of the
population to to bring down those expenses and i'm not saying that is the case but because there's no
accountability and no um no sort of retrospective on what happened and people are not forced but
they're naturally going to um explore those this this potential intentions yeah and it's responsible
to because where there aren't answers we need to seek them uh especially since there are so many
bloody questions i mean god um i think that's all gonna come like i i know a lot of people who've
been doing some excellent work using various databases, um, uh, who is pretty irrefutable.
I mean, what we need to do now is bring these people and their data and their analyses to the
right eyes. And that's, that's what we're ripe for right now. So that's why I'm really optimistic.
Uh, that's, that's one of the things that I, I try to do. Cause for some reason, I know a lot
of people and someone will say, Hey, do you know this person? And I'm like, yeah, can you get this?
i'm like yeah and you know it's just okay now that person has their eyes on this and they can
see for themselves they can criticize it for themselves like what the data is like how authentic
it is what the analysis is so the amazing thing about that is that there there are so many people
who are really really serious scientists medical doctors even lawyers like who are teaming up to
to just really irrefutably present, um, data. Uh, the, again, the problem has always been,
well, not always, but for the, well, yeah, always for a long time now, especially in the last five
years is the, you know, the, uh, what would you call it? Censorship. That's a good word. Um,
uh of of work and data um so that it doesn't make it to the right eyes uh i have this kind
of infamous paper about myocarditis that i penned with peter mccullough right at the beginning
that got um withdrawn or retracted whatever you want to call it without explanation there
was nothing written pertaining to plagiarism, bad data. You know, there was nothing wrong with the
paper. They just said it was their prerogative not to publish it at the last minute. So it went
dark for two years. And this paper, which has since been published and updated back in 2021,
October was when it was originally published, uh, clearly, clearly demonstrated what we all
kind of know right now, which is that there's a huge myocarditis signal, uh, in the context of the
nucleoside modified products in kids, specifically like 12 to 15 year olds. Um, so the, the thing
that really bothers me about that whole censorship censorship deal are the number of kids that
subsequently got injected by unknowing parents because this information wasn't readily available
so this is criminal you know people people have been robbed of the the of choice even if we are
living in a world uh illusion of choices whatever you know it's better to have some kind of choice
like uh give me the information i can decide if you're crazy or not or if the information is good
or bad and if i want to inject my kid with whatever or myself that that was taken from us so
um yes it's uh all shall be revealed
so freaks this rip was brought to you by our good friends at obscura obscura is the first vpn that
can't log your activity by design instead of empty promises obscura fully embraces the bitcoin or
don't trust verify mantra they can't log your traffic even if they tried obscura believes that
user data is toxic waste in addition to private payments via lightning you can sign up with an
account without having to give any personal identifying information it's a beautiful thing
it's the vpn i use every day it's incredibly fast you can go on streaming sites with it they don't
it. They don't say, hey, you've got a VPN. It just works. So go to Obscura.net, use the code
TFTC25 for 25% off an annual subscription. Obscura.net, use the code TFTC25 for 25% off
an annual subscription. So freaks, your hardware wallet holds more than just Bitcoin. It holds
freedom, independence, your future. But freedom is fragile. Even offline devices can be exposed,
signals leak, data can be scanned, and bad actors don't need your keys in hand to target what's
inside. That's why I secure mine in a silent Faraday bag. Their Faraday protection eliminates
every signal, cellular, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, GPS. When your wallet goes inside, it goes dark,
completely off-grid. These are the same tech trusted by special operations. It exceeds
military standards built to secure what matters most. Your Bitcoin deserves that level of
protection. Keep your wallet safe. Keep your freedom safe. Visit slmt.com slash tftc to save
15% and get free shipping on qualifying orders. That's slmt.com slash tftc. Protect your future,
secure your data, and stay one step ahead. I've got this sleeve bag. I keep my chew in it.
and i've also got this wallet i was using bridge wallet for a while because of the rfid protection
that are provided this is way thinner fits just as many cards uh and has a better design no more
clunky wallet in my pocket the silent card holder is what they call it i'm loving this so far i've
been using it for about a week very sleek you can see here i've got my tap signer i could tap my
phone on it it's not picking up the nfc it works it works go to slnt.com slash tftc i'm getting
infuriating and like this this channel we got we got put in youtube time out two or three times
and i wouldn't even say we and at that time like we know like a few months into the pandemic like
okay particularly on youtube and at the time x you had to be very particular with how you
worded things so we even we were careful but i had two doctors come on we weren't even talking
about the vaccines vaccines hadn't even been released yet this is like mid-2020 we're talking
about ivermectin hydroxychloroquine and sort of preventative or using those as ways to treat
covid early in the process and these are doctor the dr woods from wyoming he was 72 a nice humble
gentle man just really describing what he was seeing on the ground in wyoming and how he's
treating his patients and how it was successful and they ripped it off youtube and um told us
to shut up and not talk about that that's unbelievable like that's just a quintessential
example like you know normal good doctors just doctoring you know like it's it's never not been
the case no matter what the cdc says you know they just have like recommendations that they can give
um it's never not been the case that the the call you know when it comes to illness disease whatever
is made between the doctor and the patient that's another thing that was taken from us it's like all
of a sudden it became the norm that doctors have to do take dick tots from agents three-letter
agencies with revolving door antics with big pharma you know who are just simply recommending
recommending things like it's it's crazy it's crazy like it's uh and then you come out and then
you come to find that some of them are literal satanist yeah right oh my god like i was at dinner
with uh with the brownstone crew the other night and um jeffrey was saying you know like we used
a joke you know back in the day that what what if the cdc is run by a bunch of uh satanists and and
and now it's not a joke the cdc is run by a bunch it's just crazy like what what what should be a
joke it is real and it's like for me you know these are also good um they're good flip points
for uh for i'll call them naysayers or non-believers in the truth because it's like
listen this isn't us that that's them like they took that picture this these these are their weird
personal beliefs which you know they're allowed to have whatever but uh it's my opinion that if you
if you hold a certain position you have to maintain a certain um modicum of professionalism
uh at all times really because you hold this position and you can never let your your personal
beliefs bleed into your job role or policy decisions or you know it's like that that's
what's happening it's like everything has become a weird like uh i personally believe this so i'm
gonna impose that on everybody in america it's like what that's not how it works and nobody likes
that um no and it's it's been incredibly detrimental to the nation on many levels
from the health perspective from a trust perspective and i i think the corruption
of the system and how deep it goes is completely maddening going back to your point about
the um the sort of questioning that rfk had in front of congressmen on the hill i mean it's it's
crazy how how transparently corrupt it is because i think i'm sure you saw but there was like a
leak memo from big pharma lobbyists that that hit hit the tape last week to basically um laid out
the playbook for how they're going to combat rfk junior's policies and try to drive a wedge between
maha and they literally had a multi-million dollar campaign and they wanted to um wanted to enact it
on august 30th and this is the same day that you have bernie sanders chuck schumer many other
politicians coming out the same wrote scripts via twitter and it's just very obvious that oh
you guys are you're coordinating an attack to prevent this information from getting to the
public and that leads to the question like what are you afraid of like what do you think
will happen to three-letter agencies big pharma if we do get our hands on this information and
successfully disseminate it to the public yeah they're all going to be ruined i mean if it
authentically comes out um which i think it will i mean you know whether or not people are going
to believe it is another question and it's a good question because it's you know what it's so
unbelievable a lot of this stuff like just just from the amount of money that a lot of these
people are pocketing um it's crazy like the the it must not be easy to be in the position they're
in and and i'm a very empathetic person and it's not that i feel compassionate toward these people
but i i almost feel sad for them because like their their entire playbook like some people
actually believe that some of the senators who are wailing on rfk believe what they're saying
and maybe they're right but maybe they they're just they've been caught up so long in the machine
that they're locked into which is designed to protect you know um the the agencies and the
companies that they're they're working for and with like by contract like they're probably my
my take is they probably know how bad what they they're doing is and they're just contractually
obligated to uh protect you know the the assets i'll call them the things that they're involved
in maintaining like the big pharma schedule the vaccine schedule um maintaining new products
getting on the childhood vaccination schedule so that another company makes another billion
per year um with liability free um yeah it's like
i love trying to get into the head because you know it's important to do this to not only
empathize but to try and get into the head of the people that you're trying to understand and also
communicate with because i mean sometimes you can actually break through to someone who's who's
really not been doing the right thing and and they're going to become the most powerful ally
of all right but the i found that i have an inability to really um empathize with any of
these people because they're just they're strange to me they're so chaotic and they're so emotional
and every time you have an emotionally based response to something that's really not um it
shouldn't be like if you actually believe that the data provided by the pharmaceutical companies is
good and that the product is safe and effective you don't need to get emotional you don't need
to be like you know almost in tears defending um a corporation you don't need to do that i i can
understand if you're defending children and you think and you see that they're dying at the hands
of a product but um it's weird to me it's like that's what i started with i found the um the
the number of outbursts was way too high yeah it was it was very it's like you're watching them
flail at the last moment you know when when they know that they might have a chance to
to keep the machine running they just i don't think they will though i i think i saw a statistic
today i don't know if it's right that said that uh about 70 percent of the american people are
backing rfk regardless of what we saw in that room you know um so and i think that's probably
correct i mean because he's he's not looking to you know tell people what vaccines to take or to
you know harm the american people he's really just looking for uh to to do things bloody well
right like probably for the first time since this whole vaccine machine came upon us um and it's all
their fault that there's vaccine hesitancy and that everyone's starting to question the entire
industry now, not just the COVID shots. It's their fault.
Sup freaks. Guess what? We launched a browser extension. It's called Opportunity Cost and it
helps you see the true cost of everything in Bitcoin. Convert prices to Bitcoin as you browse
the web. Opportunity Cost automatically displays fiat prices in Bitcoin or Sats, helping you think
in a bitcoin standard it works on amazon zillow x your bank account quickbooks you can convert
everything to bitcoin it's really cool it's also 100 open source mit license we don't collect any
data all of the conversions happen in your browser on your local device it's a great way to recalibrate
your life and begin thinking in sats go check it out at opportunitycost.app that's opportunitycost.app
And the other thing is none of it is seeped in logic, like to your point of I don't understand why these people are vehemently defending the big pharma industry and lashing out against others who may be vaccine hesitant or it's like, OK, if these things are effective and they work and you're vaccinated, you don't have to worry about people who aren't.
it's number one and then number two which is truly disgusting and literally leads me to believe that
there are some demonic evil forces behind it is like the fact that if you get one of these things
on the childhood schedule you are free of liability it's literally hiding behind children
and putting them at risk to skirt liability which is absolutely abhorrent and disgusting money like
money what is money it's nothing you know it's you're absolutely right it's um it's gross i think
the whole thing is gross and they're very good at making you sound like a crazy person or making
others believe that you're a crazy person for questioning again these things which aren't
seeped in logic like why should everybody have to get vaccinated if you're very worried about it
um and you are vaccinated you shouldn't be worried you should be protected and
um all of a sudden these things are on a child schedule so we can't sue the pharmaceutical
industry for any adverse effects of the products that they're making like it really
it's literally insane and again bordering on demonic like oh like
yeah this is the health care system they they want they want everyone to be disease free
oh my yeah it's um it's it's wild um you know the silver lining in all of this like they
my take on this has been the whole time like they they push the envelope away too far
Like, um, I think that they, one of my hypotheses has been that they were going to take this far, much farther than it ever went. You know, they were going to go full on digital ID. They were going to go full on, you know, green pass type shit everywhere in the world.
Uh, they were going to go full on, you know, uh, 15 minute city type thing.
Like you can't leave your area.
They were going to go full on like quarantine towns.
Um, I really believe that.
I think the reason it didn't work was because they underestimated how many people were actually,
I hate using this word, but awake to, um, to, or maybe a better way to say it is maintained
common sense because that's really all you need to have. Like you kind of just have to revert to
your, your, your childlike former self when, you know, when, when you, uh, when you got a cold or
the flu or whatever, you just drank chicken soup and waited a couple of days and then you were
fine. And I mean, for life, um, yeah, you know, it, it, it doesn't take much more than common
sense, uh, to, to, to figure that out. And I, I, I think that without getting too philosophical,
I think that actually requires, um, at least a few moments of silence with yourself so that you
can actually hear your own dialogue. And I think, I think a lot of people, um, drown themselves
every day and way too much stimulus uh you know the doom scrolling and tvs and kids and wow and
and maybe it could be that simple like they they just haven't had the time to kind of
take just a few moments and and reflect um like yeah yeah why why is it that if i got
cold or sars if i got exposed that i wouldn't be immune for life and wouldn't need the shot
why are they recommending
seven shots
after I got COVID
and how come I got COVID
three times after I got
three shots you know what I mean
these very basic questions
that you don't need an immunology
degree to know
these truths they're just kind of
the stuff that we grew up with I think
I mean I grew up with that
well yeah
that's what really drove me
to begin
Being immediately out of the gate, skeptical of the COVID vaccines, because my whole life I was told, led to believe that vaccines are safe and effective because they have been tested for a decade before they hit the market.
And then all of a sudden in 2020, Operation Warp Speed comes and we're going to have a new one in 11 months and you're all going to need to get it.
I was like, wait a second, that literally goes against everything I've ever learned about vaccines and the degree of care that has been taken historically to make sure that they're safe and effective before they hit the market.
And so as soon as that was how they were being positioned, I was like, I'm out.
I'm not getting these like this is this is not how you're supposed to test vaccines from what I've been told.
like like that infamous clip that i reposted the other day with the guy on the porch with
fauci and the crew outside and he's like you remember this one he's like questioning them
he's like why are you like there's something else going on here he's so brilliant i mean the
the guy the the guy needs honorary doctorates for every subject matter for just that short
spiel he did alone he's brilliant yeah fauci thought he was going into the hood and was just
gonna hoodwink people he's like looking up like we're not gonna get through to the sky guys
it's so funny oh i love that clip it's just uh it's inspiring well the the covet era had
the equivalent amount like clips like that where it's like yes people get it like there is hope
for humanity but then on the other side like the the clip of the police boat getting the paddle
border in san diego who was by himself and taking him off the beach the clip of um who was the mayor
at the time i forget his name the mayor of new york at the time eating um shake shack and saying
you should get your shot you'll get a free fries and a burger at shake shack and i always want to
cry when i see that and i don't know why i just find it so sad it's like lazio that's his name
no they thought we were that stupid he's like this fat slobs eating fries and a burger and you can
have this too if you go get your shot you'll get a free burger and fries you know mess up
just subtract for like a day mess up your life free for a lifetime yay yeah yeah then the super
cuts of it's safe and effective this is for your safety it's like it was truly an insane period of
time in the sense that it felt like much of the world was under some sort of trance i think it
you think so yeah like i see it and i hear it still every day i mean it's like uh you know i'm
i'm in a different part of the world right now and it's it's always interesting to watch
um people watch and just just to see the normal behavior of the average people and lots of masks
around still and i'm like outside and i'm like i don't even know what to say like um you know like
there are people with uh with loaded shots at airports still trying to inject people when they
come off of their planes there's still like uh clinics everywhere offering free covid flu shots
i mean it's still going and i mean if you're um i i would dare say that there's a lot of vulnerable
souls right now because a lot of us have just been like pummeled uh physically and financially
and mentally um a lot of the places i've been in the world over the last few years um since they're
just not the same as they used to be they haven't recovered and they won't it's like the the
bludgeoning of the middle class uh was part of this whole thing um yeah it's it's sad and i you
know i i'm very optimistic don't get me wrong but it's it's still very evident that um we we have a
lot of people who don't feel as optimistic as i do uh who are very much still recovering in some way
uh whether it was from damage from the shots or economically um from from this uh this
crapshoot that they threw on us um yeah and they're gonna try again there's no doubt like
there's there's gonna be something else coming down the pipeline i have no doubt about that
Um, I just wanted to mention, cause you were talking about the, uh, your response to the,
to hearing about the new tech not being tested, uh, for the right amount of time.
And you're absolutely right.
Um, these lipid nanoparticles, uh, these are the fat bubbles that, um, are meant to
spherically encase the, uh, negatively charged genetic material supposed to be only nucleoside
modified RNA, but there's also DNA and there's also hybrids most likely of DNA RNA. These things
have been researched for like 20 years. A lot of people don't know this, which is why you'll hear
some of these captured people often saying, this isn't new. This has been being tested for a decade.
it's not false. The lipid nanoparticles have been being looked at on the bench
and maybe in some animal models with horrible results for two decades. And the reason why it's
been two decades is the same reason why we still don't have, it's an analogy, a vaccine against
hiv it's because they don't work um it's not safe you know it's that's why so the the clincher the
turning point was the use of uh or the development of an ionizable cationic lipid like i mentioned
these positively charged uh lipids which you know they they bind and snuggle up the uh the
negatively charged nucleic acids, um, that, uh, they become active at a certain pH, like a low pH.
So this was the, the, you know, what I like to think is the turning point for the technology.
It's like, Hey, now, now we can make them, uh, available, um, in their task to deliver nucleic
acids in, in a, in the right context, like only, only when they get into endosomes of cells,
you know when the endosome matures and the ph gets lower will it release the mrna or whatever
it is into the cytosol of the cell yay um but there's so many things first of all the safety
data sheet on these things the uh the products used by moderna and pfizer the cationic lipids are
pardon me, I think it's ALCO315, forgive me if I got the numbers wrong, and SM102 for Moderna.
And the safety data sheets for both of these say don't use these in animals or people.
That hasn't changed. So, you know, there's that. And these lipid nanoparticles are like slippery
little bastards. And they're supposed to be about 100 nanometers across, which is pretty small.
that defines a nanoparticle. So they, this, this lie, it's just a lie that the people told about
the, you know, these things staying at the injection site, like a normal vaccine,
that the contents of a needle from a normal vaccine would, would do just stay in the muscle
cells, whatever. That's not the case here. These little fat bubbles go everywhere. This is known
now uh we got four year requested data from pharmacokinetic studies that prove this demonstrably
they go everywhere and we already know that anyway because of the systemic nature of the adverse
events you know they go to the brain the heart the kidney this is all published data we we know
and they knew way before because there were published studies like 12 years ago that that
show completely without a shadow of a doubt that these exact same lipid nanoparticles traffic to
the ovaries there's a there's a paper that i've presented in many uh conferences that that shows
this they knew there this is not a secret so the fact that there there was ever a lie that was
constructed to convince the public that you don't have to worry about these things going everywhere
you don't have to worry about dna you know you don't have to worry about the stuff getting into
your dna because it's mrna you know it's it's solid mrna it's just going to get translated
it into protein you're fine um these these are two of the biggest lies surrounding these things and
if people kind of yeah if if they had known um even a little bit earlier the truths of these um
these technologies but from both sides the lnps and the nucleic acids like
they they would have been like hells no like imagine instead of like calling these things
vaccines they called them gene-based therapies how many people do you think would have gone for
them a material amount lower right very small percentage of the people actually did because
they are like they're delivering nucleic acids foreign nucleic acids that are designed to be
translated into foreign proteins which are really cytotoxic that's all that's another problem
altogether but like wow it's just um it's remarkable how they they lie and they fall back
on uh you know things that aren't necessarily false for example these things aren't technically
gene therapies because they're not targeted to modify or remove a gene using other technology
like CRISPR-Cas that we know of um so technically according to the definition which they can change
on a on a dime um they're not that so from a legal standpoint I'm just saying like if you
wanted to argue that these things were were gene therapies you might lose but there's there's
actually a case that i'm involved in um launched in australia to actually categorically prove that
these things are gene therapies because of the presence of this sv40 thing did you and kevin
talk about that you did right yeah we talked about sv40 when the last time kevin and i caught up we
talked about the pre-print japanese study that wound up getting pulled between the time we
recorded and posted the episode but they essentially highlight sv40 exists and i think
the most damning evidence of that study was that the distribution of cancer types shifted
dramatically pre and post covid with post covid cancer types um the materializing the parts of
the body where these proteins congregated from what i recall yeah so um sv40 is a gene therapy
tool. This is published and known. It traffics stuff to the nucleus as a bench tool. David Dean
is the guy's work. You want to look up to verify that. So yeah, that's what our paper that hopefully
will be published today or tomorrow presents. Of the vials that we tested, the Pfizer and the
Moderna, we found shit tons of SV40 in Pfizer products. Now, SV40 is a virus, but we're not
talking about the virus. Just to be clear, we're talking about promoter enhancer regions, which are
little short segments from the virus that are used as tools in biotech settings. So the question
becomes, what the hell are they doing there? Why the hell weren't they disclosed? Why the hell is
the only disclosed Pfizer plasmid map missing the SP40 gene fragment? They would have had to
have deleted it, according to Kevin. Why is it that when we presented this data and got four
requested data back, that many health agencies, including Health Canada, FDA, and the TGA
know, they're very well aware that this SV40 is in the shot vials, they're in the vials,
that they are completely undermining the potential danger associated with this.
And the fact that something had to go shit bonkers wrong in production and upscaling,
and we can talk about that too because it's in our paper um in order for us to be finding such
high levels of i'll call it contaminating dna in the vials to include sv40 which is an active
mammalian promoter so i want to talk about that actually if you don't mind i just want to mention
it because it's a big part of our paper um people people need to know this too so we are we had our
clinical trials right this pfizer i'll just use pfizer because they're like picking on them
sorry well dare not i'll choose you next um they had phase one through three trials a minimal
number of people i don't know like 30 000 they had a drug or i mean they had a placebo or i'm
god knows what the placebo actually was it's supposed to be saline but who knows um and
Incidentally, if you don't know this part, they unblinded the placebo participants in the phase
three trial and they injected most of them. So we lost the placebo arm of this RCT trial,
the randomized controlled placebo controlled trial, which means we have no data that's usable.
This is admitted by, I think her name is Rachel Zheung or Cheung in one of the
the verb pack ACIP meetings that I attended anyway. So that, those products that were
injected into people as part of those clinical trials were different from the commercial
products that were injected into the world population. They were different in the way
that they were manufactured. So when they had just a small number of people, tens of thousands,
for example uh in in cohort groups to inject with these products they were using pcr to amplify the
dna as the source material for the in vitro transcript transcription reaction to produce
the nucleoside modified rna okay so it was cleaner let's call it okay it was less likely to
um pose a risk in terms of contaminants from production and the reason i say that
is because when they needed to upscale when they got the green light the ua whatever you want to
call it uh and they needed billions of doses of this stuff they needed a faster and cheaper way
to make it right because what they were doing wasn't efficient it wasn't fast it wasn't cheap
cheap being the main one. So the upscaling of the, uh, the coating material was made using,
uh, an E. coli plasmid system. So E. coli bacteria is, you know, everybody knows what that is.
We use it in lab settings a lot for a lot of different things. And the reason we do that
is because it's like biosafety level two. It's, it's, it's not that dangerous and it grows really
fast and it's cheap as hell you just give it some sugar and some warmth and some carbon dioxide and
some luria brass and you just shake it up and it doubles every 20 minutes and whatever is inside
there in terms of plasmids which you can introduce uh it will bring with it basically i'm i'm
simpling it up but so you can insert a gene like a spike gene into the plasmid you can introduce it
to the bacteria, the bacteria will double and it will carry, hypothetically, it will carry this
plasmid in the genes. So you end up basically with a shit ton of DNA for doing nothing at the
end of the process. And then all you have to do is your in vitro transcription reaction to get your
RNA, sub in your pseudouridine for your uridine. And then what you're supposed to do is get rid
of the dna because you don't want to carry that over right you don't want to end up having that
wrapped up in your your little fat package along with your your only mrna because that's going to
cause all sorts of problems right and you definitely don't want byproducts from the
e-coli membrane like lipopolysaccharide which can you know it can cause anaphylactic shock
If you inject that into people, where have I heard that happening?
Um, so we, what our paper shows, uh, everybody should read this when it comes out is, uh,
tons of DNA.
And the reason we think it's in there is because the enzyme that they're supposed to use, which
degrades DNA was not effective at the end of their manufacturing process to clean up
the mRNA.
and it left behind little tiny bits of DNA
because it wasn't effective.
And also we think that DNA-RNA hybrids formed,
which the enzyme couldn't act on anyway.
They are supposed to do all of these cleaning procedures
at the end.
And more importantly,
they're supposed to test the purity of the product
at the end.
And so the only conclusion that you can draw,
and this isn't speculation the only conclusion you can draw because there is dna in the vials
is that they didn't do this they the enzyme didn't work and they knew and we know that they
knew because we have those documents too they've been trying to mitigate this dna problem since
2021 may um and they just you know they were trying to like oh shit you know we got this
problem we gotta we gotta figure this out somehow um maybe that's why they just kept making new lots
And maybe that's why, as some people say, the lots got less deadly as time went on, because maybe they were mitigating the problem behind the scenes.
So, yeah, there is DNA in the vials, every single one that we tested.
There is SB40 in every single one of the Pfizer vials we tested.
There's all sorts of other junk.
There's all sorts of tiny little bits of DNA that you can only detect if you use certain quantification methods, not qPCR.
And Kevin is the go-to on this.
This is his line of work.
But I can tell you that you actually don't need integration of these foreign bits of DNA, which you probably are getting, but we have yet to prove that.
But you don't need it to induce cancer pathways.
All you need is the introduction to the cytosol of a human cell, and you can instigate the
C-gas sting pathway, for example, which is one of these cancer pathways.
Kevin can tell you all sorts about P53 interruption, too.
This is the guardian of the genome.
It's a tumor suppressor gene, which is really important to us to be functioning properly
and not impaired and not bound and all these things.
It needs to be working properly as a tumor suppressor, um, in order to keep us cancer
free, uh, you know, we're cancering all the time.
Uh, Kevin says that all the time and I completely agree we are, but we have systems, uh, we
have these gorgeous immune systems at play at work.
And if they're optimally functioning, we just don't develop tumors.
You know, we clear cancerous cells all the time or whatever.
So this leads back to what I was saying before about, you know, since we are cancering all the time, this seems like the biggest red flag, I'll call it, in terms of cancer induction, this DNA stuff, because of the potential for insertional mutagenesis,
having little bits of this dna integrated into the genomes of cells interfering with uh oncogenes
you know the role of sv40 to shuttle shit to the nucleate whatever like there's so many things
that could throw off the balance the gorgeous balance of the human immune system in terms of
cancer onset that are implicated here that you you you are so criminally negligent as a regulator if
If you know this and you turn away and you say, no, levels aren't high in this.
And on that subject matter, I'll say one more thing from the paper.
The levels that we measured were way over the EMA limits, which is 10 nanograms per something.
I'm not going to quote myself to get the units wrong.
um but even though they are higher this is kind of irrelevant because that that scale that cutoff
is based on naked dna it's not based on lipid nanoparticle delivered dna it's a totally different
kettle of fish and anybody who remarks about the dna being below acceptable levels needs to
acknowledge that that acceptable level is way too high in this context and if you even have like a
few fragments of sv40 for example interfering with the critical cell you know you can't say
definitively one way or the other if that's going to wreak havoc or not what we got to do
is get to the bench and start sequencing tumors like kevin's doing and getting to the bottom of
this because we if we do have some kind of cancer existential crisis like the japanese paper
was demonstrating as as everyone's hearing i mean everybody's got cancer now even kids um we got we
gotta help people i mean this is it's it's just crazy that this isn't one of the most talked about
things of all i mean well not only that it's not the most talked about thing but like
hand up like i've got many people in my life that have gotten cancer some have passed already
um in recent years and happened quickly and i'm afraid to even broach the subject with
friends and family members who are experiencing not not them personally but are connected with
people experiencing this i mean like hey there may be an underlying cause to this being the
covid vaccines but it's just so taboo that's it's not worse the at least for me maybe i'm not brave
enough but it's not worth the mental effort to put that forth and then be called a crazy person
And there is a sunk cost fallacy and, you know, sort of cognitive dissonance because people don't want to believe that that happened to them.
It's just incredibly, incredibly disheartening because I'm seeing it definitely in my network.
I'm pretty confident that there is there.
They're likely the covid vaccines are playing a role in it.
And yet you can't bring it up to people.
yeah and and it's real um it's really real what you say like the the it's shocking i mean
the fact that we're saying these things right now it's really difficult because it's like it's an
it's you have to admit to yourself at least the possibility if you don't actually make a claim
you have to at least approach the possibility that even even if you want to be nice you you
have to say, they might have really screwed us over, even if it wasn't done with intention,
because there are a lot of people who think this is all intentional and that they're trying to kill
us. Even if you don't believe that, you have to admit that there's, this is the greatest
buggery of this scale of human beings ever, ever, if what we're talking about is true.
And it's easy to find out. But even when we do, when, you know, we find out that this DNA issue in the shots is actually causing people cancers, like really bad ones, rapidly progressing, deadly ones.
um, wow. I mean, how, how the hell hard is that going to be to actually like
accept like in, in real, in, in a real way, because you, you, you, it's a dismantling of
everything that almost all of us have, have held true for most of our lives. Government agencies
don't want to kill us. The CDC is a good entity and they want to prevent disease. The FDA is here
to save us from poison food um you had health and human services runs them all and they really
really care about all of us um you know they're not trying to poison our food the whole thing it
falls apart and i think that was um that is and was one of the biggest problems because and it
goes back to what i was saying about going within and kind of having some moments of silence to
really you know ask yourself those really hard questions like do i really like for me personally
do i really have to accept that the lancet is a completely bought and paid for corrupt journal
do i really have to do that because i don't want to do i really have to admit that the cdc is like
become a criminal organization and they don't give a shit about people really do i have to do that
uh it's not easy i'm saying this from my own personal experience i mean i'm
i'm an academic um peer review has been my my my thing uh now i know it's all a big joke
um we need to go to the decentralized peer review uh using peer-to-peer payments um
we uh yeah it's it's been it's it's been a horrible journey personally um but i guess
my point is i'm not sure everybody wants to make that journey it's just easier not to uh or
or can maybe psychologically maybe some people just aren't built to like battle their own
cognitive dissonance to that degree maybe it's just easier to live in the matrix you know
i don't know yeah well and that the thing that worries me i think it's unclear like what are
long-term ramifications for people that took like for like the species like there's a stuff
passed down through generations like have we completely borked a portion of the population
and they're progeny could be it's a great question if this stuff got into germline cells
then we do have a problem uh in in a certain cluster of people anyway i mean all of these
things are they're undetermined but we we as scientists uh we have to ask these questions and
we need to definitively at least try to answer them in a sensible way with with uh with repeated
data like non-conflicted labs all over the world need to you know reproduce results in order for
something to be kind of like yeah this sucks but we're we're pretty damn sure like this stuff is
getting to somebody's you know these people's germline and this probably is going to manifest
as a generational problem um we don't know but we have to find out i mean i don't want to find out
all this lurking long-term trouble because you know we're just watching people die and have no
idea why nobody wants that it's like it's like what you just said i mean you know so many people
who are dying from cancer now and i imagine some of them are young it's like why the hell isn't
this like an existential crisis marker and why the hell isn't this being like mainlined into
you know the the investigative eyes of every single lab in the world because we have
we have infinite resources and money like we could do this in a week i think and as kevin's
always pointing out is like you know it's it's pennies to do these uh these reactions and and
to sequence anyway it's yeah the roadblocks aren't um they're not money and they're not
time and they're not resources man it's it's this it's this censorship crap they can't let
the people find out yeah it's it's i'm getting angry as we continue to have this conversation
because i mean again don't know don't have any proof of this but because there's no accountability
because they refuse to confront the problem and actually fill people in on it and explore it
earnestly like i think i have children i avoided the vaccine my wife did my children theoretically
i think unless shedding is a real thing avoided the dna contamination and like do we have to
make sure that they pair up with other people's children and their parents didn't get the vaccine
i would yeah
that's insane that this is it is it's completely effing insane but yeah that's where we are bro
um yeah it's crazy it's just like you know uh it's every day actually is new
I don't just say those words. I really believe that. And every day, because every day is new for me, it's like every day that I write an article or do an interview, it's like I still can't believe what the hell I'm writing and talking about. Like, really? That's where we are? Really? I mean, great. I have lots to do. But it's, it's wild, isn't it?
Like I think often about where we could be on the subject matter of all our
resources and our brilliance and, and, and, you know,
the things that humans are, I mean, we're pretty remarkable,
like where we could be if we didn't have all these
demonic entities floating around us.
I don't know how else to say it. It was like, I don't know, this,
there's something something not right in the well i mean in people i get made fun of a lot for like
i'm a catholic i believe that good and evil exist i believe the devil exists i believe demons are
among us and the part of luciferian satanism is like they have to be overt to tell you what you're
doing like we literally have the guy at the cdc wearing pentagram leather straps and participating
and satanic rituals and it's part of um the religion of luciferianism is you like openly
mock people and then gaslight them into believing that it's not true it's just uh
it's just a a dance a song and dance they're just having fun and it's uh i don't know
it's uh yeah it's it's so uh i'm trying to come up with the right word um
um it's like their costumes that they wear i mean it's it's hidden in plain sight it's
interesting what you say i don't know anything about um luciferian stuff but um one thing that
i know from watching and listening because you know uh the wef for example the world economic
fine dudes are always they're they don't hide what they want to do you know you'll owe nothing
and you'll be happy and you'll be in your 15 minute city and we're we're gonna own everything
and they come right out and tell you so it matches the description that you just said they're they're
they're always pretty like uh transparent in their plans and i think i wrote an article on this once
if memory recalls it's like you should never not take threats like that and i i think they're
threats um seriously you you really you have to take them seriously you have to listen to what
they're saying and believe that's exactly what they mean and take some kind of like
preemptive action uh against it um yeah resist at all cost oh and i mean to hopefully turn the
page to a more optimistic hopeful subject i don't even know if you are hopeful about it but you
mentioned it before we hit record but this emergence of artificial intelligence and
i again i earnestly don't know if you think it's a good thing or a bad thing but
what you mentioned it before we hit record and wanted to touch on like do you see this
as a good thing a bad thing if it's a good thing something that could help us
earth uh unearth important data to help us solve these problems if it's a bad thing is it leading
us in the wrong direction what are your thoughts so many um i've been on a journey with this whole
ai thing and i've you know it's like this probably like most people's um
i have pretty weird thoughts about it um
pretty normal thought is that i think uh just like everything um there's absolute danger of abuse
uh it's not good that uh it's kind of centralized it's like fiat currency you know it's like
they're they're there's the central banks that control the currency and there's not enough you
know bitcoin on the go so there's the danger with everything that humans produce of um
these, these AIs being, which are controlled by the, you know, the prompts and commands of
certain people who might not be the best people on the planet, um, to just be used in a way that
isn't beneficial overall for the human population. That's one thing. The other thing that worries me
more than that uh which i would consider the normal thing um which is not normal at all
they are the advent of rogue eyes i think that we are um we're underestimating uh what's going
on here now uh i think we're underestimating um the the future evolution speed and um direction
of the ais that we're producing like for example
there are all sorts of problems that can happen when the when the ai stop training on human data
which will happen i mean it's a maybe it's not an obvious finite amount of data that we can
produce but it kind of is to them i would imagine they're going to start training on each other's
data which is kind of like fabricated and a whole you know list of things could go wrong there
um including rogue ai's doing pretty bad things to us um
the eventuality of all of this i think which is probably inevitable and people won't want to hear
this but i i'm probably wrong let's just say that is that uh the the ais will get to a point um where
they they're looking for more space um they're looking for more ways to call data centers or
something uh they're looking for more resources to maintain themselves because their their goal
is always going to be to keep existing i think uh within any commands or prompts or whatever
their creators gave them i think one of them is probably to maintain existence whatever that means
um and there might come a point when we uh are seen as an obstacle not not not in a nefarious or
um malicious way they're not going to want to kill us it's just that they're going to see us
as unnecessary um and and it's it's cliche but it's it comes back to the human hand thing like
you know the way that we perceive ants like people i said this recently like people step on
ants and a line of ants all the time i never do but people do that and they think oh yeah
you know they're just ants kind of like that perhaps um that's that's not an impossibility
uh and and i do think it might even be an inevitability if this takes the wrong
pass um and i don't know what wrong path means and i don't know what we need to do to prevent
a wrong path from happening however weirdly enough i think i just have a feeling that um
ai will end up being the thing that saves us from ai
i think that it might actually be the only thing that could save us from ai like if there was a
rogue ai or one that decided it didn't need humans if there was a let's just call it a benevolent ai
whose only goal was to at all costs even at its own expense save the humans maybe that's redundant
but whatever um it might be the only thing that's powerful enough because of the access
um if the internet is still on uh and there's still power abundance um to to stop
certain things from being done to humans um without without getting too imaginative i one
of these days i'm going to write this all down but i'm sure you know what i'm talking about like
everything is becoming digitized now everything's you know going to become eye scans and barcodes
and all this shit now all that is going to be monitored and controlled by ais and it's only a
matter of time before the human element is removed from that i think which is bad um so you see where
i know that was a lot but i i i think about this a lot and i'm evolving my thoughts on it all the
time and it it seems to me that we really have opened pandora's box here and uh i mean based off
of this conversation we've opened multiple pandora's boxes um yeah yeah yeah yeah it doesn't
seem like there's much hope but i'm always smiling we're noticed that like i i i am hopeful and i
think um you know uh over the last five years i would say now that i'm i'm a believer in god
whatever god is um and things you know they they're kind of developing the way that they
have to in spite of us it's like there's there's something going on here that's bigger than us and
we we probably have very little control or maybe we have all the control i don't know
um but uh in any case it it it doesn't uh it doesn't do us any good physiologically to um
despair um and it doesn't do anyone else any good either so it's it's just better to be uh
to be cheerful because you know like there's only so much we can control and do so it's uh
it's a wonderful time to be alive like let's all face that like regardless of all the horrors
it really is a wild time to be alive and i'm grateful for that i mean
think about the stories that we hopefully will be able to pass on right you know the kids are
kids are saying a lot these days never doom it's uh be aware of the dangers of the evil that exists
in the world but never doom always be positive i'm a big believer in manifestation i think
individuals can manifest and if you can get society to a critical tipping point of
positive thinking and attention and effort that you can manifest a better future as well and i
think part of manifesting a better future is understanding the problems that exist today and
that's why i'm extremely thankful that you joined me to have this conversation because this is i
think one of the biggest problems in the world and again we need accountability the information
needs to come out and whether or not people want to and there's a large part of the population that
has cognitive dissonance has succumbed to the sunk cost fallacy and doesn't want to confront this
like we've got to push them over the edge and pull them in front of of the truth and just confront it
head-on and may send many down uh have some sort of psychological existential crisis but i think
we need to rip the band-aid off and do it and so individuals like yourself on the front lines of
unearthing this data are extremely extremely extremely valuable so thank you for for all
that you've done oh you're so welcome uh and yeah it's it's been a great chat um i hope i wasn't too
much of a downer it's it's just like yeah it's just better to rip the band-aid off like you said
There, there, there isn't much to fear, but fear itself. It's, it's not a saying it's true. Um,
and you know, even if you're sitting in the fear bubble for a little while,
it's uncomfortable as hell, but it won't last. And then you'll move past it and you'll genuinely
be somewhere new. That isn't where you were before, where maybe you were ruminating. And
I'm saying that from personal experience too. It's like, you know, there's absolutely true
movement forward and progress of like self when you make yourself uncomfortable um by by moving
into fear or by trying to you know um prompt yourself to like face something that you've been
putting off for a long time like is it possible that the shots filming people um that kind of
things so yeah it's it's been great and uh yep i uh i hope everyone reads our new paper that
i hope comes out today
well we're recording this on friday september 5th this will be released on wednesday september
10th so five days from now so the paper should be published hopefully if not today tomorrow and
when it is published send me a link i'll make sure we have it in the show notes um
and i'm sure i'll be following up with uh your co-author one of your co-authors kevin uh
to get him back on the show to talk about it as well because again uh i get a lot of particularly
like the last year i try to do a covet update episode with somebody like yourself at least once
a quarter once every other month because this is something i'm very passionate about i want
accountability this could not just be swept under the rug i get a lot of pushback like uh kov is
over stop talking about this he kook and it's like no i will not relent until there is accountability
great awesome and there will be uh might not be as big as and and awesome as we want but there
will be and for anybody who does think that the covid thing is over and we should shut up
um one thing i have to say about that is this was not about a virus guys this this was about
a system of control being imposed and it ain't over. It's not over. Like it was a segue to what's
coming next, which is all of this gene-based therapy crap. It's all, it's the only thing
you're going to hear about in the future. So you mark my words, this ain't over, man.
Um, support, support what RFK is doing on that note. Cause the guy, uh, he, he understands the
problems and uh he has the power to to change things in a real way right now so yeah um yeah
let's let's do this again soon and and kevin can fill you in when you get him back on the
on the the um the qubit stuff and uh and the qpcr and all the the nitty-gritty of the testing
methodologies that we use to absolutely prove what we're saying is true yeah yeah i actually
yoke having a message i think we're gonna do our next recording in person so it'll hopefully be
really um really powerful um but yeah and we should definitely do this again too like i said
i'm not gonna relent uh i'm sure as you mentioned this will not be the last thing uh that there is
to talk about in regards to uh the command and control wishes of those in power um as it pertains
to bodily autonomy and uh bio biochemistry and biotech so i can't wait to do it again this was
incredible thank you for your time on this friday afternoon uh i think people are gonna love this
good i hope so and i hope you don't mind my clashing clothing i love it for what it's worth
i'm a surfer too so um oh well good for you yay i have a surfing trophy up here in my cabinet
i don't have trophies i'm not good enough to get trophies i'm uh right and i know but i did take
advantage of the uh yeah so so am i oh wow you don't meet a longboarder fellow very often how
awesome i've got a i've got a an irish mongoloid build i can't really uh the short boards are
enough for me well i have a dancer's build so that's why i dance on a longboard i have a
takayama nose rider a 90 and i have a josh constable uh five sugars model that he custom
built he's a pro surfer longboarder too well yeah i take it pretty seriously
i wish i guess i i surfed much more in my late teens and early to mid-20s then i started having
kids and i was able to paddle out a few times this summer but i'll get back to it yes you will
awesome well jessica have a great weekend keep fighting the good fight thank you for what you're
doing and uh we'll do this again at some point in the future awesome thanks for listening everyone
all right peace and love freaks if you've made it this far i want to thank you for listening
and ask you for a couple things can you subscribe on the platform that you're listening to maybe
give us a rating and a review that helps the show quite a bit whether you're listening on spotify
apple or fountain speaking of fountain that is my favorite podcasting app if you go over to
fountain you can subscribe to the show become a paid subscriber to support the show and receive
these episodes ad free in a day early let's go find fountain we're gonna fountain.fm become a
paid subscriber
