TFTC: A Bitcoin Podcast - Ten31 Timestamp: Bitcoin Fixes the Energy Problem
Episode Date: February 16, 2026The AI revolution is accelerating faster than most people realize, but major institutions aren't accounting for it in their economic projections. While the CBO just added $1.4 trillion to this decade'...s deficit forecast, they completely missed the potential disruption from artificial intelligence. 🔗 https://bitcoinproducts.com In this episode: - The viral "something big is happening" AI post and what it missed - Why institutional adoption of AI tools faces massive inertia despite breakthrough capabilities - How the managerial class creates friction against disruptive technologies - CBO deficit projections ignore AI's potential economic disruption - Private credit losses pile up as AI disrupts software companies - Lightning Labs releases agent payment tools - the machine payable web arrives - Why Bitcoiners can't be complacent about agent payments - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TIMESTAMPS: 00:00:00 - Introduction from Bitcoin Investor Week NYC 00:02:06 - The viral AI post breakdown and institutional blindness 00:06:41 - Testing AI tools at TFTC - reality vs hype 00:09:00 - Managerial class inertia against disruption 00:11:05 - CBO deficit projections miss AI disruption completely 00:16:26 - Private credit losses from AI disruption begin 00:21:00 - Bitcoin and the machine payable web revolution 00:24:06 - Lightning Labs agent payment tools launch 00:26:00 - Competition for agent payments - Bitcoin must compete - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SUBSCRIBE › Newsletter (free): https://tftc.io/bitcoin-brief/ › YouTube: https://youtube.com/@TFTC?sub_confirmation=1 FOLLOW US › X: https://x.com/tftc21 › Nostr: https://primal.net/tftc FOLLOW MARTY › X: https://x.com/MartyBent TEN31 › Timestamp: https://www.ten31timestamp.com/ › John Arnold: https://x.com/JohnArnoldTen31 PARTNERS › Ten31: https://ten31.xyz - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TFTC #MartyBent #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #Lightning #AgentPayments
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome back to the 1031 Timestamp. Recap, I'm your host, Marty Bent, joined by the real John Arnold. We spent some time in New York last week in person. It was a great time, John.
It was. We didn't get to meet the other John Arnold, who is, along with me, we're collectively worth billions of dollars. But we still have not gotten a chance to meet in person and compare notes on our wealth. But maybe next time.
it's going to happen. It's going to happen one day. We have it up here. I think this is episode
three and we've noticed, Hey, we have no calls to action in the show. So want to highlight why we
come to do this, this video every Monday morning. It's because John writes the 1031 timestamp goes
out Saturday mornings, great little weekend read. And so if you want to subscribe to that,
go to 1031 timestamp.com that's T N three, one timestamp.com. Make sure you get on the list.
But as we said, we were in person in New York last week for Bitcoin Investor Week.
We spent a couple of days up there meeting with founders and investors around the city.
And we spent a lot of morning time together, particularly at breakfast.
Shout out Jack's wife, Frida.
We got breakfast there two days in a row.
The crux of the conversation was about the impact that AI is going to have on the job
markets and that viral post that went out last week which after time is set set in it seems like
it was a bit self-serving but john i'll let you do the setup from here because it was very
stimulating conversation last week at breakfast yeah i mean there's a lot we could get into but
as it relates to that post i think it's an interesting it's really interesting time
interestingly timed post um you know a lot has been said in the last week about i think that
kind of like 50 million views. If you don't know what we're referring to, just Google something
big is happening on Twitter or have your agent do it for you better yet. But basically a lengthy
post that some might call a doom post. Others might call it more exciting and optimistic,
whatever, but describing all the ways that the acceleration in artificial intelligence
capabilities across the frontier models are quickly and exponentially leading to
potential disruptions to the way that everyone does work in any knowledge worker, uh, it does
work and eventually any worker at all. And so go give that a read. If you haven't, there have been
a couple, a lot of different chains of thought of reactions around that. A lot of which, you know,
call it, well, this is just like an AI slot post, or this is a post from a guy, you know, promoting
his, his company. Uh, it's, it's, he's encouraging you to go spend money on a bunch of AI tools that
may benefit him in some way, you know, whatever. I think the one thing that's interesting about
that post, if nothing else, that's worth like pulling out is deep in the post, the author talks
about these tools, these models, and increasingly these agentic frameworks developing something like
taste and judgment, you know, doing increasingly things that you would previously have thought
would be like the irreducible component of humanity that's necessary to kind of guide
these tools and, and, you know, help them to, and force them to make kind of the right decisions
and exercise some level of what we would call, you know, abstract judgment on what, not just like
what, what is right in the context of any micro task, but how all the micro tasks kind of like
fit together and what's, what's the right thing to be pursuing, what's the right pathway to be
pursuing and what needs to be left aside. Whether that's ultimately true or not is, I think, a
question mark. I know, Marty, that you on our team have been probably the most active in playing with
a lot of these things. So maybe I'll pause and put a pin in it there and just say, like, I'd love,
you know, you've talked about this on other channels and if anyone's following Marty's
Twitter feed, I'm sure they've seen it there. But, you know, what's your 60 second reaction to that
claim because i think that's the most like controversial and interesting thing in that
post like we all know you know these bots can do coding well they can increasingly read legal docs
well they're kind of getting to the point where they can maybe do stuff in excel well so you can
kind of see the broad outlines of how it's like starting to trickle into white collar work but
like this idea of these things developing like taste and in judgment independently like what
have you seen without how did that strike you i've i haven't seen it as much as what in matt
i forget his last name um who wrote the post as he described in the article but i think definitely if
you're working at an ai company and specifically the the hyperscalers top tier models open ai
anthropic you're probably seeing that internally as somebody using open claw specifically and i
mean we've been using cloud code for for as long as it's been out we've been using we decided to
to use cloud internal cloud internally at tftc over a year ago and stuck to it so we've we've
been staying up to date with the latest models and now with open claw it's really sort of extended
what we can do and it's been honestly shocking over the last month implementing it and seeing
how it can help us tftc automate stuff on the back end so i can focus on a lot of the 1031 stuff
uh more as well and we've been leaning into it but when it comes to developing taste and
recognizing that development via my interactions with open claw i'll be honest haven't seen it
it's a lot of sort of prodding and iterative conversation that i have with my open claw agent
to get it to do exactly what i want to do and it still has memory issues and this could be
a product of my setup point being i would not be surprised if engineers inside of
anthropic open ai are beginning to see this taste develop i don't think it's hit mainstream yet and
to your point about the job disruption in terms of implementing these tools at companies i think
that's a lot of what we discussed last week there's still a massive learning curve even if
somebody's been playing with the top of the line tools for the last two years and a team that has
has been doing it i guess i guess we're a good example of a company these large language model
providers are targeting like we're a media company we're trying to stay lean i guess we're one
archetype of one company that that they could be targeting we've been experimenting with three
years now we're using open claw certainly helped us the taste isn't there point being if you're
thinking going down the list of every company that is going to need to incorporate this they're going
to have to go through that learning curve too and until that taste factor hits these mainstream
applications like i don't think i don't think it's i don't think everybody's going to see it as
as people inside the anthropic or open ai maybe seeing it up close and personal does that make
sense yeah for sure no i mean i think it's one so one of the things that we talked about last week
you hit on this point was this idea of like james burnham's framework for like the you know he wrote
like the 40s this book the managerial revolution about the emergence of like the managerial class
in the modern kind of western you call it capitalist but you know he might even kind
of dispute that term but the what we think of is like the modern you know advanced western economy
is is made up of these organizations that are themselves dominated by and controlled by like
managerial elites of all these different types and they have different functions things different
things that they're you know they excel at or don't excel at but one of his big kind of takeaways
is like, this is like, it kind of takes that structure, that infrastructure takes on a life
of its own. And it's really good at perpetuating itself and keeping itself alive and like finding
new ways to add to its fiefdom. You know, this idea of like, if you're ever going to manager
or talk to managers and kind of corporate America, you know, the idea of getting like
budget allocations or, or headcount allocations for your department is like a, you know, a badge
of honor, a badge of pride. It's kind of what you're optimizing for even in, in like less
functional organizations like you can end up optimizing for that more than like actual you
know relevant kpis that are theoretically most valuable to shareholders and certainly that's
even more the case in government institutions right so this i think there's this idea that
maybe certain like incredibly hyper intelligent hyper forward thinking like ai maxis have not
fully grappled with that just like it takes a lot longer than like a rational economic kind of model
would suggest for disruptive transformative technologies to actually break into these big
organizations just because there's so much inertia from the the way that the managerial class is kind
of set up and structured and the incentives are like not there for anyone to go disrupt their own
headcount um you know the incentives are not there for people to like train their replacements
basically right like whether that's a human replacement or like a robot replacement and you
You know, there are a lot of jobs that could have been basically like optimized away in both certainly the government, but also like corporate America over the last 20 years through a bunch of different advancements and just basic technology, SaaS products, you know, VBA and Excel.
But like we still have tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of jobs that, you know, have continued to persist like through that.
I think it's just a testament to how much friction there is and inertia there is in organizations to actually disrupt themselves.
and adopt new technologies that are going to that would potentially have a threat of leading to like
shrinking headcount or whatever right so i think it's like very much worth considering the sand in
the gears that will dominate a lot of these organizations that theoretically would should
benefit the most from like totally gutting their existing sass stacks and implementing something
else that's based on ai or like agentic frameworks but all that said you know these things move we're
not well prepared to think in exponents and like the way how quickly these things can move and so
like yeah it's probably not the case that six months from now like uh you're gonna have mass
unemployment because every organization suddenly realizes like they can cut a bunch of heads and
they can you know get rid of their existing software stack and totally replace it and
overhaul it um but it's also i think not a great bet to bet against like over time the the destruction
of or at least the reduction of like excess margin and a cost structure you know like the the
managerial elite dynamic is is like one big thing that pushes against that but it's like always in
competition with this countervailing force of you know what bezos said about your margins by
opportunity like the nature just abhors excess cost and like eventually it will like extract
its pound of flesh from excess cost in some way even if it can't like fully get it all
and so i think it's very much worth reading that piece with the mindset of like even if this is
sensationalist and like a little too, you know, too on the doomer side of things. And it assumes
things are going to happen faster than they are. You know, I think it's worth thinking about,
well, what if it's like 20% right over the next like two to three years, right? What would that
mean for every investable asset class and the economy? And I think maybe that's like a good
time to transition to the chart of the week here in the timestamp, because it was poetic timing
that everyone the internet was freaking out about you know this piece and these ideas and all you
know not just software stocks anymore this week it was everything from insurance to ratings agencies
to trucking companies were all going through like these kind of like darkly funny like rolling sell
offs every day of like you know the today like all the trucking companies are down 20 because
like somebody vibe coded like a freight forwarding you know software stack from you know from quad
code or whatever um and you're kind of seeing all that so it's funny that all of that was happening
coinciding with the release of the data underlying this chart so this is the the cbo just released
their annual annually they refreshed their projections for the next decade ahead on the
federal budget revenues and spending and deficits and you saw they they revised this decade's
deficit cumulative deficit up by 1.4 trillion over the next decade um and it was interesting
that they would put this out this week because if you if you go into the uh the piece that they
they released kind of giving voice over to the data and you control F artificial intelligence
or AI, I think you get like one hit back and it's like, you know, some, some like suggestion that
AI could lead to like increased productivity. Um, but there's no, there's no section in there
that's like, well, here's how we sensitize the scenario of if this guy, you know, if this thesis
is right, or even if this thesis is like 10%, right, here's what that does to like automatic
stabilizer payments or incremental unemployment payments or like new, like federal reskilling
programs we're going to have to roll up to make sure that we don't have like 20 unemployment or
whatever right it doesn't really think through any of that stuff and so i think it's just it's
very interesting like we're in like a the government is in a really tenuous position
in many ways but i think it's funny that you know again darkly funny that we're looking at these
budget deficit projections which are already you know if you look at their forward projections out
even beyond this kind of just assuming that federal debt to gdp held by the public is just
just up and to the right forever to like 200 in like you know 15 years or whatever it is we're
already in that position and this isn't even accounting for what happens if like some small
version of this massive disruption takes place and so yeah i think it all just like it's an
interesting like set of synchronicities this week to for all these things to kind of happen at the
same time yeah here's the here's the really the money shot chart for the next 20 years um i think
just tells you how how non-consensus this kind of still is outside of like schizopo thing twitter
like all of us you know are there are literally dozens of us or literally you know tens of
thousands of us who are thinking about this every day and kind of going down these rabbit holes but
it's not in the math yet right the math is already like tenuous and not great and this
massive disruptive force is is still like not even close to like baked into all these numbers
Well, that's one thing I've been trying to discern over the last week, particularly after our conversations at breakfast in New York is what percentage of the population do you think is aware of this stuff?
Like we're very online, particularly on X.
And I think since we're experimenting with this and reading as much content about Bitcoin, AI and the intersection of both, we're definitely getting fed a bunch of sort of positive news about the proliferation of this technology just because of the algo and picked up on us liking this content and consuming it rather voraciously.
and that's what i'm trying to discern this is like what percentage of the overall population
have these ideas actually penetrated to like is it 0.1 is it one percent is it five percent
my gut tells me it's less than one percent yeah no i think it i think it's absolutely right you
know i think most people that i talk to anecdotally this isn't very like useful data but like most
people that I talk to, you know, really have their, their exposure to any of this is like,
they've used chat GPT a couple of times, right. And it's, you know, something that the author of
that piece kind of wrote about that you use it a couple of times it, you know, maybe you're on the
free version and you're at like a, you know, using a severely degraded model relative to kind of
what's available on the frontier, or even just with like a $20 plan. Right. And it kind of maybe
it hallucinates once, or it doesn't fully like understand what you're asking for. And it's like,
oh, well, this is basically just kind of like a different version of a Google search. I'll just
go back to Google. And I think that's, there's a, there are a lot of people out there that for whom
that is like the case. Um, and so, yeah, I don't, in my anecdotal conversations, like there's very
little understanding of how quickly a lot of this is moving on the frontier. None of that is
necessarily to say that you can totally extrapolate forward and think that in two years, all the white
collar work will necessarily be fully automated, but I can guarantee you it like that isn't even
in like the, as you think about like the, the decision tree or like the scenario tree for the
next year two years five years the vast majority of people don't have any scenario on that table
that involves something like that happening right and the probability may of that may only be like
10 and ai maxis think it's like 100 right maybe it's only 10 but most people you know for most
people it's zero percent right in the way that they're thinking about it so all that is to say
yeah like i i think all of this is quite non-consensus still and if it's even partially
true if it even if some version of it turns out to be true you know i think it's going to have
meaningful implications for what the government is going to have to do in a bunch of different
domains over the next five years and that's going to have implications for how you want to have your
assets allocated and also what you might want to just be kind of getting started on you know
getting experience with with with some of these tools over over the next year or two yeah it's
it's a while so that's another thing i've been thinking through is how like what shocks the
public awake and maybe not even the public but large large companies large corporations particularly
the publicly traded ones and i'm sure as on all the radars but you have to imagine that again
going back to the sort of managerial framework that you described earlier there's a lot of inertia
and people are probably not in a rush to replace themselves and so i think the shock that is really
going to wake people up is just you have something like a startup or one man startup vibe coding
something that completely takes out one of these incumbents undercuts the cost has a user experience
that's at parity or superior and is widely adopted very quickly and i think we have maybe a glimpse
of that it's not really disrupting incumbents but it's disrupted a ton of the vc capital that's been
deployed into ai agent wrappers over the last couple years which is open claw this open source
ai wrapper that adds an incredible memory engine to your to your cloud code or gpt models that
you're using and makes them incredibly more useful um and so peter steinberger for those who are
unaware got picked up by open ai yesterday open claw is going to be an open source foundation
at least for now we've seen the story with open ai before but point being is you had this guy
vibe coding in his apartment for three months and basically got taken out by open ai over the
weekend and there's been hundreds of millions billions of dollars of capital allocated towards
companies that are supposed to do what he did by himself well eventually wasn't by himself it
became a very popular open source project rather quickly but i think that's an example of this
disruption which we're trying to highlight here yeah no i mean i think it's it's a good dynamic
to think about because, you know, I put in the newsletter this week as well that I think it was
UBS highlighted that, you know, they're estimating something like a hundred billion dollars of
write-offs or other credit losses in the broader private credit complex, which is like trillions
of dollars. So right now it's kind of a drop in the bucket, but attributing those losses to
different software companies or other companies that have, that are seeing, you know, disruption
on the margin from how quickly ai is moving and they highlighted in their report as well that you
know they're saying it's 100 billion dollars but there are you know tail risks where it could be
like quite a lot higher and if you go look at i believe it was bruce richards from marathon
it was on cnbc this past week as well kind of giving an interview about kind of the same dynamic
noting he's increasingly expecting something similar you've had orlando bravo from tomo bravo
come on cnbc a couple times in the last couple weeks to talk about it's a private equity firm
focused famously on software companies and SaaS among other things, but, you know, talking about
how, you know, he, he doesn't see that being the case and he's kind of defending the thesis. And,
you know, I have no dog in a fight or, or a view on necessarily where it's going to go
with software in the next year, but there is definitely like a, there's a lot of leverage
tied to that sector, like the legacy software sector. And, you know, there used to be this
meme that like software contracts are better than first lien debt. Like you're just, you always pay
To keep the business running and the lights on, like you're always going to pay the, you know, the software contracts, the enterprise software contracts.
They're very, you know, sticky and low, low churn, good pricing power because they're so kind of locked into the workflows and everything.
And I think a lot of that's still true, but I think a lot of credit has been issued on that kind of framework.
Right. And so, you know, it doesn't really take that much given how levered the whole system is broadly, not just, not just like private credit, but like the water that we swim in.
it doesn't take that much for a few funds to on the margin you know the the laggard funds
that are exposed to the worst opportunities like if you start seeing those losses pile up
you know for reasons that most people aren't don't even have reason to be aware of yet you
could start to trigger some like you know meaningful financial instability that the
authorities would need to respond to quickly and so i wonder if something like that could also be
a kind of a wake-up call that like oops we kind of like borked the financial system because like a
few, you know, the bottom quartile, like software companies are getting disrupted. And that means
that a bunch of private credit funds are getting disrupted. And that's going to have daisy chain
impacts on the broader credit complex in the US. And well, we need a new Fed facility to respond
to that, right? So I do wonder if something like that ends up actually being the thing that shocks
a lot of people and companies awake to kind of what's going on. Yeah. Great time to own Bitcoin.
And speaking of it, I mean, it's just, it's probably going to be a recurring theme because
AI is evolving at a rapid pace. We'll probably be talking a lot about this. So will be important
to highlight the intersection of Bitcoin and AI as it proliferates and particularly the agentic
economy. And so this week to highlight that intersection, we're going to talk about Lightning
Labs, what they released last week, which is basically a revamp of their L402 protocol and
making it so it's very easy for agents to get set up with Lightning wallets and interact with
lightning invoices and so they announced they released a set of tools that give agents native
access to lightning network and get for automatic l402 payments mcp for node operations remote
signing for key isolation and scope credentials for spending control machine payable web starts
now and bitcoin makes it possible and for anybody who is unaware of this machine payable web
idea has been around in bitcoin since 2015 i spent one whole bitcoin in 2015 on a 21 co computer and
For those who are unaware, Balaji Srinivasan, he was the CEO of 21Co, and they revolved the
company around this idea of the machine payable web. And you got this computer. It was a very
small computer, but it was hashing and quote-unquote mining Bitcoin. You were getting
Sats payouts. But the idea was that you would use these Sats payouts on-chain to enable this
machine payable web. And like many ideas in Bitcoin, it was a great idea. It was just too early.
fast forward 11 years and now we're at the point where the machine payable web
makes sense on top of bitcoin specifically because we have payments networks sub protocols on bitcoin
that actually make this feasible it didn't make sense in 2015 because agents receiving and sending
on-chain payments to get tasks done in milliseconds just doesn't make sense with the lightning network
it's now incredibly possible so this has also been a big topic of discussion within the bitcoin
sphere over the last two months is okay agents are here they're going to need to spend money
what do we need to do to make sure that they're able to spend bitcoin easily we've seen many
people rush to get developer kits and mcp protocols to market lightning labs who created
the l402 protocol being one of the latest i believe breeze has one out there um money dev
kit nick slaney is building that out that's that's existed for a few months they implemented with
replit at the end of last year and so we are seeing the machine payable web emerge and the
sort of value prop of lightning emerging alongside it or being reconfirmed alongside it yep and i
think like one of the most exciting things about this moment too is like we've been talking about
as you as you referenced like l4 l402 for a while we wrote some some pieces back in the day a few
years ago on kind of the eventual use of that and the intersection of bitcoin and ai that we thought
would eventually happen i think the a really interesting element of what's going on right
now though is matt corral a long time bitcoin developer had a post last week about how we're
now in a position where you know a few years ago if you had i mean the l42 concept has existed for
for years and it was highlighted a few years ago as ai really started to ramp up but only now are
we at a point where the the barrier to entry to like do something with that has collapsed
like essentially zero like a few years ago you know if you had seen that post from lightning
labs you basically say like okay that's great that's cool now let's wait for like someone to
go get like dc capital and with a few million dollars you know hire like a few engineers and
spend something up and then you know wait to get product market fit and try to find traction before
they could really kind of start to scale it or let's wait for some big corporate to like have
somebody on the inside who wants to push for directing some internal resources to this and
you know whatever it's like this kind of abstract primitive that doesn't necessarily have like an
an immediate path to realization like well matt's point was now we're at a place where like you or
i with no no technical experience to speak of other than like some vibe coding or like you know
taking like a replica 101 course right like we we can just sit down and like potentially if we have
an idea like we can just start using that and leveraging that and i know you've already been
doing it right to some extent with your with your agents so yeah it's like it's a really interesting
time for the the compounding like flywheel of not just like bitcoin and ai have this intersection
but also as AI gets more and more powerful, like random Bitcoiners, people who are just interested
can like sit down and like do something with that potentially really like really useful. Um, just
the only limit, right. Is, is effectively like their creativity and like their patience with
like playing with the tools, but it doesn't require like, you know, a multi-year software
bootcamp or time spent, you know, working at like a massive tech company to kind of like
get their, get their feet under them. Like they can just start and like, you know, they can just
do things right. As the meme goes. So really, really interesting and exciting time, crazy and
somewhat scary but also a lot of a lot of opportunities yeah and just to build on that
point and then and wrap it up here it's the the possibilities here that's like you can like you
said i've been implementing a sort of bitcoin payments with my agents for the last month it
works it's very easy there's many ways to go about it there's many ways to skin the cat of doing it
but matt corallo and callie and callie quote tweeted that matt corallo message and callie's
the founder of the creator of the cashew protocol you charlie m protocol the point they were both
making was like hey not only is it possible but the onus is on us to actually go build these
things because i think many bitcoiners naively believe like oh the agents are just going to pick
bitcoin it's the best native digital native internet currency that's ever existed of course
they're going to pick it it's not true like i said earlier it's not at that point at least on
the consumer apps where it has that taste a component maybe well in the future but right
No, it doesn't.
And the agents are going to do what you tell them to do.
And if you tell them to implement a stablecoin protocol, maybe it's Coinbase, I think they
have a base MCP that makes it easy to send and receive stablecoins.
Visa came out and announced that they're going to create a framework for agents to use their
network to send payments in a secure way.
Obviously, Stripe's going to be working on this.
And so there's going to be a ton of competition for agentic payments outside of Bitcoin.
And if we're being frank, they definitely have more firepower in terms of capital behind them to go after these implementations.
And so not only was what Matt's saying like a message of, hey, this is possible now, but it was also the onus is on us to make sure that Bitcoin payments become prominent in the agentic world.
It's not just going to happen.
There's competition out there.
And I fully agree with that.
actually had a pretty long conversation, excuse me, with Justin Moon. And we talked about this
at length. It was released on Saturday on the TFTC feed. If you guys want to go watch that,
I highly recommend that you do actually. This is the point. It's like, we can't be complacent.
It's not going to happen just because Bitcoin is the best money. We truly believe that. I think
it's objectively true, but work needs to be done to make that a reality in the agentic world.
Once again, go sign.
Crazy time to be alive. Great time to be in Bitcoin.
no doubt in a world with seismic shifts in the global economy geopolitics domestic politics
a lot of uncertainty being able to find certainty in a monetary protocol that is
very simple very easy to audit and very hard to change has a lot of value we'll be back next week
Thank you.
