The a16z Show - a16z Podcast: Pulse Check on Consumer Tech Trends 2019, CES and Beyond
Episode Date: January 17, 2019with Benedict Evans (@benedictevans) and Steven Sinofsky (@stevesi) Every year, the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) puts the latest and greatest developments in consumer technology on display in Vegas.... But beyond the excitement and the hype, what's really here -- or not here -- to stay? Will televisions roll up into tiny boxes? Will Alexa find her way into electric carving knives? Which of these new gadgets will stand the test of time? In this episode of the a16z podcast, Benedict Evans and Steven Sinofsky share their take not only on what this year’s show had to offer, but the broader trends at play. From the evolution of the smart home and voice interfaces to the cycle of bundling and unbundling and the future of TV and entertainment, the discussion is a pulse check on where we're at. The content provided here is for informational purposes only, and does not constitute an offer or solicitation to purchase any investment solution or a recommendation to buy or sell a security; nor it is to be taken as legal, business, investment, or tax advice. In fact, none of the information in this or other content on a16z.com should be relied on in any manner as advice. Please see https://a16z.com/disclosures/ for further information. This podcast may contain forward-looking statements relating to the objectives, opportunities, and the future performance of the U.S. market generally as well as specific publicly traded companies. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of such words as; “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “estimated,” “potential” and other similar terms. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to financial condition, results of operations, and success or lack of success of any particular investment strategy. All are subject to various factors, including, but not limited to general and local economic conditions, changing levels of competition within certain industries and markets, changes in interest rates, changes in legislation or regulation, and other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technological factors affecting a portfolio’s operations that could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results. Such statements are forward-looking in nature and involve a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, and accordingly, actual results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. Prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements or examples. None of AH Capital Management, L.L.C. or any of its affiliates, principals, employees nor any other individual or entity assumes any obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, subsequent events or any other circumstances. All statements made herein speak only as of the date that they were made. Stay Updated:Find a16z on YouTube: YouTubeFind a16z on XFind a16z on LinkedInListen to the a16z Show on SpotifyListen to the a16z Show on Apple PodcastsFollow our host: https://twitter.com/eriktorenberg Please note that the content here is for informational purposes only; should NOT be taken as legal, business, tax, or investment advice or be used to evaluate any investment or security; and is not directed at any investors or potential investors in any a16z fund. a16z and its affiliates may maintain investments in the companies discussed. For more details please see a16z.com/disclosures. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hi and welcome to the A16Z podcast. Today's episode follows Benedict Evans and Steven Sinovsky's
annual visit to the Consumer Electronics Show in Vegas to figure out what's hype and what's not. The episode
covers everything from smart homes to the future of entertainment. Please note that the content here
is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal business tax or investment advice.
It does not constitute an offer or solicitation to purchase any investment or a recommendation to buy or
sell a security. In fact, the content is not directed to any investor or potential investor and may not
be used to evaluate or make any investment. For more details, please also see A16Z.com forward slash
disclosures. Well, it's great to be here. Thanks very much. I'm Steven Sinovsky. And I'm Benedict
Evans. And we just got back for combined excess of probably 120,000 steps or two marathons.
Yeah, I was just, I always think that the person who has the lowest step count at the end of the day
has to buy the drinks. Right. Well, the funny part is just to tell people, we actually don't see each
other at all during the show. I think we were within 100 yards of each other at some point
based on what pictures we were tweeting at the same time. We were tweeting, and then also we
send stuff to each other just to keep track. Like, we both discovered some booth of a company that
didn't exist before, and we were really close by at that moment. But you can't find anybody.
You know at CES anyway. So the big thing about the Consumer Electronics Show is, like, so many
people are like, oh, yeah, I don't have to go this year, or, oh, it's going to be boring,
or they're there, and there's like, there's nothing new. But like, why do you even go in the first
place? So I think there's kind of three or four things you see here. One of them is there will be
flagship announcements of new products that you want to see, and you want to have held it and looked
at it and said, well, what does this thing actually look like? I think the second thing is
you see like a sense of like, oh, wow, Google's having a really big push and everything has
got Google Assistant in this year or everything has Alexa in or oh wow everyone is doing curved
screens I've never seen a curved screen before let me go and look at some curved screens and see if
I think this is interesting or not oh wow last year there were loads of curved screens this year
there are no curved screens at all so that didn't work right and so that that whole notion of
the big companies you know they there is like it's not a group think it's they all are dealing with
the next parts of why you go to CES which is these ingredients that sort of bubble up and then they
take about the same amount of time for a big company to act, and they all show up with it at the
same time. Part of what you're seeing is a supply chain. So whether that's the screen manufacturers,
the chip companies, the mobile manufacturers, all the underlying building blocks, all the Lego
blocks. And what you're seeing here is like somebody took a shipping container of Lego blocks and
dumped them on the floor, and people are picking those Lego blocks up and putting them together
and thinking, well, what could we make, how would it's work, how could this get manifested in different
ways. And you see that at the big companies with like cars or curved screens or flat screens or
tablets. You also see this when you go kind of into the back halls and you get away from the
vast booths and you see hundreds and hundreds or even thousands of relatively small companies
who are just out there pushing and hustling. And that's actually the bit kind of I personally
enjoy most is just walking past and looking at hundreds and hundreds of people who are trying to
make a business. And you know, you're kind of seeing the grassroots kind of the raw,
creativity of the tech industry bubbling up there.
Yeah, it's really fascinating.
You really have to understand, like, CES is really three shows.
Like, it's these big companies, and that's where way too much focus goes because they have
all the PR people, they hold all the events, they gather all the press.
They have like a big fiber gas mock up of a car.
Right, right, or a helicopter or a boat or whatever.
But that actually turns out to not be the interesting.
Like, the big companies are not super motivated to do announcements at the show.
I mean, a lot was made of Apple didn't even show up, and they just put up a sign.
but Apple's never been there.
Microsoft's not really there.
HP doesn't really have a big booth,
even though their printers and computers
fill all of the electronics stores.
Lenovo has just a restaurant.
Dell has like a restaurant
where they rent it out
and put up mostly food.
So the big companies are sort of there
and they occupy half the space
and the biggest crowd,
but they're not the most interesting.
And then there's really two kinds
of smaller companies.
There's the ones Ben and Talk about,
which is where all the energy is,
like the hustle and the excitement
it and like you walk past a booth and they literally just drag you back to it.
I would love to see like a small French or Taiwanese indie movie set entirely in the back halls
of Trade Fest.
Oh yeah.
And like all the small dramas of all these little stands, like all the kind of you can just
see the kind of actual real people there trying to build companies.
Like I walked by one and this, it was very clear.
It was the owner CEO of the company, which I could tell because the business cards had
his picture on them.
And like the booth, it was 10 a.m.
and the booth wasn't up and operating yet.
And he was giving what appeared to be his son a really hard time.
And they were like really tense and fighting.
And then later I went and went to the website and it really was his whole family.
Like his wife is accounting.
His son is biz dev and operations.
And like this is it.
Like this is the big bet that they're making.
And then there's a third kind of booth, which is this year they concentrated them all in this thing that
looked to be like a mile long.
Everybody is, it's a tent.
and it's like all of the parts.
It's like, do you need a hinge?
Do you need a key, a keyboard?
Do you need a piece of wire or a connector or a strain reliever?
And those have always been part of the show.
And they're there to do real deals.
And if you see, like, I actually saw a couple Apple people
spending a bunch of time with one of these people.
And it's interesting to see what the new things are in that tent.
Absolutely.
So, like, this year I'd noticed like six or seven people doing little small electric motors.
which weren't there last year.
Yeah, yeah.
And I noticed half a dozen people doing kind of well-made and interesting cardboard packaging,
like cardboard boxes to put your stuff in, which wasn't there last year.
But packaging is a really interesting one.
Like for years, there would be different kinds of packaging.
And so what you see is the evolution where they're finally looking at like what Apple does with packaging
and what Amazon does with packaging to bring it to sort of everyone else.
And like if you're this family doing a business, this is where you'll end up getting your packaging from.
I mean, so I actually did a tour, I took somebody from a consumer goods company around that hall, and I was saying, okay, so you go, you buy your screens there, you've got an injection molding company here, you've got a PCB company there, you've got a motor company here, here are six battery companies, there's a packaging company, here's a testing company that will get you certification, like you can start at one end and walk out at the other end with a complete smart speaker.
Right, right.
And yet, there is no one selling the speaker there, and there's no interest in.
And that, like you mentioned batteries, that's like a really interesting thing because batteries,
you can come in almost an infinite variety of sizes.
So you'll walk up to one of these booths and basically there's a giant wall with like every size
in shape and amperage of battery you can imagine with wire sticking out.
And then two people just sitting there and they're just going to take your order.
And you could listen to the conversations and guy will show up and say like, can I just get a sample?
And they're like, no.
You can have 10,000.
You can order 10,000 or not.
And the best is when you see somebody with like a really creative, like phone charger, like not the whole thing, just like a plug.
Yes.
And then somebody really wants like one for themselves.
And it's like usually like just a person checking out.
And the guy's like, no, really, you can have a hundred thousand and I'll give you a good deal.
But that's the best.
This is the thing.
It's not for the tech correspondent from a mainstream newspaper to go and look at the new thing that a consumer would buy, which is actually the funny thing.
It's called the Consumer Electronics Show.
you're actually not seeing the consumer bit.
Mostly.
Mostly what you're seeing is everything that sits behind the point of the sphere.
Right.
And of course, that's part of the reason for the show happening when it does in January.
Because the bulk of sales of consumer electronics happen in the quarter that just ended.
And so by having it now, you're really gearing up for a year from now.
Yes.
Like at best, or maybe two years from now.
It's fascinating looking at the badges of the people you see wandering around.
And you see somebody from like a chain of auto dealers in.
Milwaukee. He's there to buy phone covers and battery chargers and audio for audio upgrades for cars.
Right, right. And maybe he's interested in what the future of a smart car is going to look like
and what his business is going to look like in five years time. He's there to go and like spend
$50,000 or $100,000 buying stuff to put in his stores in nine months. Right. But what we could do now
is just sort of let's go through like some categories of devices and or areas that people really had a lot of
a lot of focus on.
I don't know.
Why don't we start with TV?
Because that was a really big one.
Well, we said this.
So this is part of the trend.
So there were 3D TVs.
3D TVs, as we all know, failed completely.
Two, three years ago, every stand had lots of curved TVs.
Now, curved TVs have totally disappeared except for a vast display on the outside of LG
stand and gaming monitors.
Gaming monitors were huge.
Yes.
On the other, no curved TVs.
Nobody on Earth bought a curved TV.
On the other hand...
Or a 3D1.
Or 3D1.
Yeah.
On the other hand, what...
we saw really kind of a big surge this year is sort of flexible OLED screens that can be cut
to any shape.
And so at one extreme, you have LG showing this fantastically cool thing, which is you've kind
of got a small low box that's like a quarter of the size of a sideboard.
It almost looks like a big version of a speaker.
Yeah, a speaker bar.
A speaker bar.
Exactly.
It looks like a speaker bar.
And there is a super high quality OLED screen that simply rolls up from it and turns into
a big, into an enormous screen in like five seconds.
Houdini levitating rug.
Yeah, it's like a projection screen
lowing from the ceiling, but in reverse.
And actually, one of the things that I thought was funny
is they didn't show it hanging from the ceiling,
which would have been like a natural place to do it.
And so what this means is you will not, you know,
this is going to be, I don't know how many thousands of dollars,
but in two and three years' time,
you will be able to buy something that's three foot long,
you put it on a shelf,
when you want to watch TV,
you press a button and a TV is there five seconds later.
And the box is about, say,
12 inches square,
which is clearly going to shrink over,
time as it gets the screen gets thinner and they can roll it tighter.
Exactly. So you look at this and you think what a fantastic piece, both of primary science
that you can roll the O-load and then the kind of the engineering of making it work and
everything else. On the other hand, the thing we talked about was the screen, the stand we were
both at like five minutes apart. What if you can just have that cut to an arbitrary shape?
Apple is doing this with rounded corners on the phone, but you can have it in all sorts of
rounded shapes and then just place that on a product. So you could have a speaker that has a round
speaker and it has a round screen wrapped around the edge of it. So screens don't have to be a flat black
rectangle embedded in whatever product you want. So if you're a product designer, you're making
speakers, you're making a fridge, you're making cars, you're making a washing machine, anything where
you want to have some screen on it, now that screen doesn't have to be a black rectangle. It can be
any arbitrary shape, it can be wrapped around any form that you want and it can still play video
just as good as a high definition screen. And so, you know, in five years time, I have no
problem imagining that this will just be everywhere.
Right. This is clearly a step
function in the manufacturing of screens,
which for years was based on
we make a size of a big giant
piece of glass and it's a super
crazy expensive. So we're going to cut it up
in the most maximally efficient
way, you know, sort of the A4,
A5, B4 kind of paper thing.
And now you're just going to be able to sort of custom
make screens. And then of course the most
extreme of that were these little
12 inch squares of TV that
Samsung did called The Wall, which were
OLED, like basically everybody gets like a giant sports screen.
Yes, edgeless OLED blocks, and you can just add them indefinitely to make a screen as big
as you want.
And in any aspect ratio or like a pyramid.
The other interesting thing going about going back to the component hall was I saw a stand
that was selling not OLED, just LCD screens in arbitrary shapes and sizes, which is
exactly your point about optimization.
It used to be you could only get them in certain sizes.
Now you can just have LCD in whatever shape and size you want.
It has to be rectilinear.
OLED can be in curves.
Right. But LCD has to be rectilinear, but you can have it long and thin, you can have it, you can have it any shape you want.
Which is also very close, it's almost a Moore's law-ish kind of thing. But as they built out all the factories for LCD, like, those are, they could either idle the factory or start to use them for like other stuff and just get more amortization and depreciation out of that investment.
Yeah. So you want a letterbox, you've got a product where you want a letterbox size screen. Okay, now you can have a letterbox size screen.
Or just like a very long, skinny one to go in front of a speaker bar.
In the past, that was impossible.
I mean, you know, you want something that's 15 inches by three inches.
Okay.
And in the past, you just couldn't have that because it was no, it wasn't economical.
Now it's possible.
This was all the discussion about like, you know, watches and can they have round faces?
Well, no, they couldn't.
And next year, year after, they could all be round and it won't matter to manufacture.
So we have this kind of fire hose of stuff coming out of the supply chain.
And we're seeing the iteration of that.
I think pretty the other interesting thing.
about is the higher level of how people are trying to put those components together and create kind of organizing layers for that.
Yeah.
You know, TV, the most interesting question for me is, like, what is TV to begin with?
Like, if you're an extreme audio person, you think of TV as the picture, and then you separate that from the content.
But if you're just like a normal person, you turn on the TV to watch stuff.
And what's really happening is this sort of unraveling, re-bundling, unbundling, to use cliche,
of the industry in terms of the content side of TV,
while the TV people think that we as TV people should be part of that unravel.
The TV manufacturing people.
Like the Samsung's and the Sonys and the LGs of the world want to be part of that.
Yeah, which is sort of a rerun of what happened with smartphones,
where the smartphone, physical manufacturers of a smartphone,
thought that they should have a role in creating content and services.
Right.
So we're in this kind of interesting, like, intermediate point
where, like, clearly we know everything is going to be on demand.
and clearly almost everything is now available on demand in some way
but you have to have 15 different apps
and you have to pay for all of those 15 different apps
and we're actually having more reconfiguration now
because the content companies are pulling their stuff out of Netflix
and they're pulling their stuff out of Hulu or wherever it is
and creating their own kind of direct-to-consumer propositions
and so Disney's going to have its own thing
and NBC is going to have its own thing
and you're going to end up with like 45 apps on your device
And that also seems very unstable.
It seems remarkably unstable.
And this is one where, again, like the tech crowd, I don't think is always in touch with this,
because the idea of, like, you have all of this knowledge.
You're immersed in all of this discussion all day long.
And certainly in Hollywood, they will be like, people in Hollywood will know what streaming
service a program is on because they were part of negotiating the deal and they know about
studios.
But, like, everywhere else, people know some brands.
Like, I want to watch CNN.
Well, it turns out in this world today, that means.
means another app. Like, there's not another place you can get CNN. And if there's a special on CNN, how you get there and find it. And then forget the, like, oh, everybody is talking about home organization and condo now. Like, how would you know where to find that if you were just at home and someone said, have you seen that home organization show? Like, there's just, there's no guide in this world. And so people had hoped that, you know, like an Apple TV would do that or a Roku would do that or a TiVo would do that.
What's happening is all of these stations, all of these apps.
Well, the incentives don't work for that.
The incentives don't work, but it's even deeper than just the incentives, I would say.
Like, the incentives are just, like, who's paying.
But then there's this thing where, like, Netflix has invested a massive amount in discovery.
So if you don't know what you want to watch, they want to help you find something on Netflix to watch.
They're not interested in, like, helping you browse what might be on Hulu.
And the same, like, Disney is just going to want to keep feeding you more of...
More Disney.
More Disney.
like, you know, more superheroes and more old characters and stuff.
And so I just don't see this as like a viable consumer offer.
Well, it's interesting as well because you have this challenge in that half of these questions are kind of Northern California, Silicon Valley questions.
The other half are Southern California, L.A., Hollywood kind of questions about what does the right structure look like and who owns that and why are they doing this rather than doing that, which are kind of questions that people.
And people in Northern California tend not to understand.
the Southern California questions, and people in Southern California tend not to understand
the Northern California questions.
Right. But you don't have, like, what happened with smartphones was kind of the phone people
didn't understand Apple, and Apple kind of didn't understand the phone people, but it didn't matter.
Because there was California versus, like, Texas and Seattle.
Yeah, but the point is Apple just rolled over the phone people. Right, right. And what you don't
yet have is kind of a critical mass in either direction where any one of these people can roll over
the other people. And so you kind of got this kind of fragmentation and confusion in the
position. And importantly, at least now, none of these, none of the companies with the content
side of it, which would sort of maybe have an opportunity to play that role of Apple, feels any
external, has voiced any external commentary on like wanting to own programming that isn't theirs.
Like nobody wants to do sports. Nobody wants to do news. And those are like big sources of programming.
And so I feel like we're in this very uncertain period. And the thing that's making it like,
less than even satisfactory a little bit,
is that the TV people are playing the role
of the old phone makers.
And they just keep thinking
that they're going to make their TVs
smarter and smarter and add more software.
Yeah, TV people are feature phone makers.
They're not smart phone.
They're not smart TVs.
They're feature TVs.
Right.
And so then I like, God, you know,
you're never going to have all the apps
on the TV that you want.
The apps that are there
are going to be the old ones or the outdated ones.
They're all the J2ME apps.
Right.
They're controlled by a TV remote,
not your phone.
Like they're weird.
And so everybody made a huge deal out of Samsung watching, showing iTunes stuff.
And like, really it was the worst way to watch iTunes that you could imagine.
With a Samsung remote.
Yeah.
It's with a Samsung remote.
And then, like, they're basically telling you, like, the features that they may have.
Like, if you pause a show and you return later...
It may sink.
It may sink.
I mean, to me, this was...
I mean, it's funny.
Some people looked at this and thought, oh, my God, fundamental to strategic shift by Apple,
they're going to decouple services from hardware.
you will now be able to have all of Apple's services without buying any Apple hardware,
and it will be a separate standalone business that will have some overlap with the hardware.
I looked at this and I thought, this is just Apple doing Airplay to third-party hardware.
This is Apple putting QuickTime on Windows.
It's Apple putting iTunes on Windows.
You know, it's BD people doing what BD people do
and extending kind of the halo around the core products of the hardware
and the experiences around being an Apple customer.
So I didn't look at that and get excited at all.
I just thought, well, yeah, that's just kind of Apple, do BD people doing.
BD stuff. I actually looked at it and got less than excited because I, like, negative excited,
if I could, because I felt like it was definitely what you said about BD people just doing these
kind of deals that happen 100 times a year in the industry. But it was this idea that it would be
good on the TV. And that would encourage the TV people to do more of this stuff. And I really
think it was... So you think actually this is like the Motorola iTunes phone. Yeah, I think it's like,
that's a good analogy. I just think like, if people would stop doing these deals with the TV people,
maybe the TV people would build TVs that are less in my way of using my phone.
But the challenges that is asking the TV people to retreat to being manufacturers of generic black rectangles.
A guy can dream.
You're basically asking the TV-BD people to give up and go home.
Right.
Well, the thing is that they need people to talk to.
Yeah.
So I had this conversation like five or six years ago, do I want to go and work in a strategy at a big mobile operator?
And I kind of looked at this and I thought it looked at their strategy and I said,
if I went there, I would tell them to disband the strategy team and just not do any of this stuff.
And that was like, that's not going to happen.
And it's the PC industry with like, there's just no way you could get the PC makers to stop putting extra software on PCs.
Like, it's just not, there's not an option for that to exist.
Like, you could try and try.
I tried.
It's just not.
So TVA's unresolved.
The other thing that's unresolved is smart home.
Yeah.
The smart home thing is it, I would say actually that one is one where it resolved some of it in spectacularly amazing ways.
Yeah.
Some of those questions got answered.
For like two of them.
Like one, alarms.
Like the perimeter alarm for homes now, if you want one and need one, like, I can't think of
an easier product to get than you pick from a half dozen vendors where like for free or
for a very small amount of money because they make it on the annuity, we'll sell you,
we'll send you, you know, four door sensors, you know, smoke alarm, fire alarm, glass break
detector.
And in an hour, you put with sticky tape, you put up all these things, turn on the 3G modem
modem, you know, base station.
This is my experience in London like seven years ago,
except none of it used I-Tli standard.
Oh, right. It's the same thing.
Some weird X-10, blah, blah, blah, or whatever.
Yeah, but, you know, I called up ADT,
and the ADT guy Kai comes, and he spends an hour
walking around my house, putting stuff up,
and he plugs something into the wall, and that's it, it's done.
Right, so this is an example of very specifically
where there were a bunch of proprietary things
that alarm companies had that were all basically
not based on these standards and were just like electrical wires
routed to your power source.
Then they got this technology,
to use low energy Bluetooth and things like that.
And then people came along and said,
why is that secret to these expensive companies with human beings?
And they made a direct consumer play.
And then two years later, it's everywhere.
And everyone can do it.
And it's just truly amazing.
But then it falls off a cliff.
Because it's like, oh, I want to get a doorbell with a video camera.
And then the company you have it from doesn't have that.
Or I just want cameras and the company doesn't offer it.
Or the cameras are really hokey.
and they all have power bricks.
There's a bunch of dynamics in this stuff.
I mean, one of them is the analogy I talked about earlier,
which is kind of the discovery question.
So you have all of these components.
Basically, all of this stuff is using smartphone components.
It's smartphone camera, smartphone Wi-Fi chips,
smartphone CPUs, smartphone radios, smartphone Bluetooth, etc, etc.
So all this stuff is there.
So if you want to make a smart connected camera,
now a smart connected camera that can do people recognition or face detection,
that stuff is just there off the shelf.
You can buy the bits.
Anyone can do this.
And so now you'll want to feel.
50 on the shelf in Home Depot or you're one of five on the shelf doing the alarm.
If you want to do the whole alarm, it's a bit more work, but it's basically all commodity
components, so there's no kind of moat around it.
Then, like, the evolution you've seen over the last, like, maybe three years at CES
has been to look at doorlocks.
Right.
And so the question was, do the doorlock people learn smart, for one of a better term, quicker
than people making software doorlocks learn how to get the thing to market and make it at the
the right price and make it durable and waterproof and all of this kind of stuff?
And so it was really interesting, like three years ago, on one side of the hall, you'd see the startup,
and on the other side of the hall, you'd see the guys from Yale.
And the guys from what Yale, Kickset and Schleg.
And they're each in their own uniforms.
So one sort of, they're kind of in the hoodies and the oversized jeans.
In the other side, they're in the polyester slacks and the black polo shirt with the logo embroidered on it.
And what seems to have happened is that the locks guys won because there's not really a network effect.
There's not actually very much software to the lock by itself.
it just has to lock and unlock based on something you do on your smartphone
and they can buy that from a chip manufacturer or a third party and just integrate it
and they know how to make locks and they know the route to market
and they can make 45 of them in different shapes and sizes and styles for different holes in the door
and do you want a classic or modern or do you want buttons or do you want this or do you want that?
They have the whole like supply chain manufacturing process route to market thing ready
and for them to use like the Clay Christensen analogy this is sustaining innovation.
They just put a chip in the lock.
And they put a chip and a motor in the lock, and they're kind of done.
As opposed to the, and you could see something similar in like, is your oven going to be smart?
Will your oven turn off if it smells burning?
Yes.
Is that an opportunity for a startup?
No.
That's World Pool and Samsung and LG.
That's oven companies.
As opposed to, like, the broader question of how does all of this stuff talk together?
And how do I say, turn off my oven and lock the door and tell me if there's anybody in there's a garage door?
shut, and that's where we're seeing, like, the connective tissue emerging, which is the Alexa,
Google Assistant, Apple relaunching HomeKit. Like, is there connective tissue? Do you want
connective tissue? What would that be? What are the aggregating layers here? And that's where
we're still sort of stuff is still sort of emerging. Yeah. So the key is, is that the lock people just
completely didn't get disrupted. Like, it was, it's actually quite phenomenal. And just a harp on this
little bit, because we startups tend to really underestimate the route to market and the go-to-market
for, like, existing sort of heavy industry. But, like, locks are complicated. You can't change the
door of a house. Like, that's really expensive. So, like, to get a lock, you need to have what size
hole is it, and how thick is the door, and is it one or two, and then it has to fit in with the decor.
And so just the skew proliferation alone to enter the lock market is quite a bit. Now, you then go,
oh, we'll just go do new homes.
And it's like, well, if you want to do new homes, it turns out, then the route to market is you have to know all the architects.
And you have to know Home Depot.
And you have to know all the general contractors.
And you have to know all the developers.
And all the developers.
And like, that's really hard.
It's fragmented.
It's geographic.
It's very, very tricky.
So the lock people really did use all of their strengths very, very effectively.
So I just, I'm so impressed with it that I want to talk about.
Like, you go to QuickSet and they have like from dumb locks all the way through.
to, you know, like the connected smart lock that I can add codes and modify it from, you know, Europe while I'm on vacation.
But they did a very clever thing, which is not only do they have the dimensions of like brass and chrome and stainless steel and for different doors and thicknesses, but they also have different levels of connectivity, which a startup making connected locks would never do.
Yeah, do you want a keypad?
Do you just want a keypad with a nine-volt battery that lasts 10 years?
Yeah.
Do you want a keypad with a nine-volt battery but also can do Bluetooth and, you want a keypad?
and be programmable, like have the codes programmable from your phone,
all the way through to varying stages of connectivity,
like, will it work with other systems or it will work with only other locks in your house
so you can coordinate the front door and the back door?
I mean, like, very impressive, like, in the product line sense.
And a lot of that as well is back to our component thing,
because, of course, they didn't build this.
Right.
They built roughly half of it.
The other half is chip companies and middleware software companies
who went out, who got on a plane and went to these companies.
Right. So before we get to Alexa, like let me give an example of a company that did that since we now, I know the data now, because they told me, was like, was first alert smoke alarms. And they went out and acquired mesh Wi-Fi. They went and found like mesh Wi-Fi. And like, duh, they're just going to put it in the smoke alarm. Because your smoke alarm is hardwired at US code. It depends on where you live and stuff, whether or not your smoke alarms have to be hardwired or not to electricity or battery. But if you live in a place where you're
the smoke alarms have to have electrical wiring, like what better place than a $5
Wi-Fi chip in it than to put mesh Wi-Fi in it. And so all of a sudden they're like,
oh my God, this is crazy. Because it turns out they were all along putting Wi-Fi in their
smoke alarms anyway so that you could get alerted on your phone. Like, you know, smoke alarm went off.
And so they very comfortable, because like really nobody wants to make smoke alarms because that's
like super easy and massive liability. Like it's like a scary. It's like a scary,
business to enter. And plus, you have to know all the fire codes all around the world.
Yeah, it's to the lock point. It's hard. There's lots to the... It's super hard. So, like,
very, very interesting to see this stuff. And so then, so then all these companies are now like,
okay, we can't literally make everything. Like, where the locks, we get locks, we're good at
locks. But people want, like, when the lock is unlocked, the security camera to turn on or
off or the garage door or something. And how are they going to connect them all? So then enters
Alexa and Google Voice. Yeah. And that also comes.
through the intermediary of their chip supplier.
Right.
So whoever the chip supplier is, their chip supplier has done the deal with Alexa.
As much as it is, Schlajure or Quixet has done the deal with Alexa.
Right, especially if...
So it's a switch you can flip on your chip and they say, right,
the chips that we're going to give you next year will have Alexa and Google Assistant
and maybe HomeKit in them.
And they might have like a place on the board like to plug in a microphone if you want.
Yeah.
Like they're ready for any of the integration scenario.
Exactly.
So there's actually part of the point who is what's the level of aggregation.
and the level of aggregation in a lot of smart home stuff
is actually the chip vendor.
It's not the hardware.
Right.
The hardware guys will carry on being hardware people,
and they own that,
and now they will buy a chip.
And so the insertion point is the people who sell chips to those people.
It's not actually making the lock necessarily.
But the problem is, and this is where it gets to, like,
my view of, like, how smart should something really be
and where is the right place to put the smarts?
Is that we really had two different approaches
to enabling connectivity between all of these.
gadgets. One was what Apple tried with HomeKit, which was, well, we really want it to work,
not to be rude about it, but they really wanted it to be seamless and nice. So Apple put in a
requirement that to be HomeKit, you had to do some stuff to your hardware. Well, to Benedict's
point about the supply chain, that just eliminates everyone. Yeah, nobody could actually do that.
No, and so basically that in recently. So nobody implemented HomeKit. So nobody implemented HomeKit,
except for like, I have a garage door that has like nine parts and it took me four hours to get all work.
So it didn't really live up to the expectations.
And then the other end was like Alexa and Google Assistant,
which was like it's five lines of code.
And then all of a sudden your web interface is now controllable by voice.
But it turns out to not enable you to do very.
It's like a parlor trick now.
Like you can say, Alexa, door, unlock my door at home, front door,
you know, some sequence of...
It becomes a command line.
Right.
So Alexa, so.
So Alexa, CD colon slash front door slash unlock slash.
I really want to harp on that because I wrote that in my write-up,
which is like if we had shown up and said like the future of the smart home is a terminal window
where you type in a very specific syntax and nine out of ten times it says wrong syntax.
People would have just laughed at the homemaker.
And so for some reason the idea of saying that was viewed as like a huge breakthrough.
Where you have to know, but you still have to know the exact syntax.
You have to know exactly what you would have had to type.
and said in the right order.
And it's only because voice got recognition of the words you're saying got so perfect.
But it didn't make the syntax any easier.
And so I'm really critical of this approach of like, which I think if you were being cynical about it,
you would say this was just a race to see who could have the most number of people with logos for their voice thing on their devices.
Yeah, I mean, the worst of this is you have devices that have Alexa in, but Alexa can't actually control the device.
Oh, yeah, yeah.
So you've got a light that has Alexa, but you can't use Alexa.
to turn the light off.
So it's very, very frustrating.
And this is where I think that like,
because you can sort of imagine the scenario.
You have like all the marketing people saying to the product team,
please do assistant, do Alexa, do home kit,
do any of them that come along.
And we want all the logos on our device.
You can imagine.
You're the oven team at LG.
Right.
And you can, yeah, you're the oven team at LG.
And it's like, we need all the logos, says marketing.
And then the test team is like,
our heads are going to explode because the test matrix for all of this is ridiculous.
And then like you have.
the engineer saying, look, each one's like five lines of code and I can do the demo, so it's
great. What we're missing is somebody going like, what's the product for all of this? Like,
what do we want to really accomplish? Yeah, I mean, this is, it kind of comes back to the VCR that
is always flashing at 12. Amazon gave this number that there's 100 million devices out there with
Alexa on them. They didn't say how many of them are alive. They didn't say how many of them have
actually been connected to Wi-Fi and connected to Amazon. They didn't say what the usage is on those.
And it feels like there's a kind of step one, Alexa has been an absolutely brilliant strategy for Amazon.
They have an end point in maybe not 100 million homes, tens of millions of homes have an endpoint that just wasn't there before unless you had opened a web browser on a smartphone and typed in Amazon or open the Amazon app.
So they have this endpoint.
They have this point of leverage.
Right now, that might be used for unlocking the door or turning a light on.
It probably is used for doing unit conversions and timers in the kitchen and playing music.
that has no strategic benefit to Amazon.
And so there's actually two Amazon questions
or two Google questions here is.
One of them, how do you get from having lots of Alexa
or assistant stuff in your home
to that actually being useful and being used
as opposed to it just being a VCR that flashes at 12?
My oven has Alexa in, but I've never used Alexa.
That is a thing today.
Oh, I have no idea that it had Alexa in.
There's like an Alexa sticker.
I don't even know what Alexa is.
The other is, okay, presume for the sake of argument
you get all this stuff actually connected to Wi-Fi
and talking to each other.
What is the benefit to Amazon of that?
Do people buy stuff with that?
Are people more loyal to prime with that?
Can you use it to drive deliveries?
Like the delivery person can open the door
and leave your parcel inside your door because of Alexa.
And so, like, step two for Amazon is, like,
you've got the point of leverage in.
Fine.
What's the lever?
What are you trying to lift with this point of leverage?
What are you actually doing with that end point?
And, like, huge credit to Amazon and Google
that they've got this thing out there and they've ridden this wave.
There is kind of a second part to that, which is okay.
Now what?
Well, and I think there's two things that occur to me in that now what kind of thing.
One is that it really is like a few lines of code to integrate.
If you have like a device that already had like a web enabled element to it,
which you probably did because the supply chain just gave it to you
and the thing was like a web server to begin with and you didn't even know.
And you didn't even know.
So then you're in this phase, the old smartphone phase,
where the platforms really kind of are pretty much the same.
And in order to answer the question of why is an Alexa or why is a Google assistant or why is any of these in the home,
those companies are going to end up diverging.
Like Google is going to have a different set of ideas for what you can do with this device than Amazon does.
And once the platform start diverging, the idea of it being five lines of code and you get both for sort of for free is going to really change.
And whether they imply more hardware constraints or more software,
The idea that you work seamlessly and equivalent on both of them is really very short line,
particularly because neither of them do very much.
And so this is how things fade from CES.
Like, everybody does them.
And then they are all these companies that have like R&D budgets and marketing.
And they just, the first step is they stop talking about it.
And then the second step is it just sort of fades away.
And I think that that's a very interesting thing that when it comes to the support.
And then the other one is is that this really does.
open up the opportunity for a brand new player. Because now that somebody is seen like,
okay, there's a speaker and it could be the home hub, but it doesn't control everything and it's super
hard. But this is, it could have been that home kit was too early. Yes. And that what really is needs is we
need home kit now. And that if all of these makers saw home kit, they would go, well, we could
join the the land war of assistant versus Alexa, but nobody will ever buy our product because of that.
Well, there's a point, I mean, I think we talked about this last year, which is, I mean, I think the analogy you gave was everything in the kitchen got a DC motor in the 70s and 80s. And it turned out that everyone in Britain gets a kettle, everyone in East Asia gets a rice cooker, everyone in America has a coffee maker. Some people have toasters, lots of people have a microwave, nobody has an electric carving knife. And so you're in this kind of discovery mode of which things does it make sense to get smart in. By extension, there's also a discovery of which things does it even make sense to connect.
So absolutely I can get
Most people will have an oven
That will turn off if it smells burning
Most people, many people will probably have a door that's smart
Or and a camera that recognizes people
Yeah, exactly
Many people have some combination of these things
The more you start adding scripts
And you're saying, if this, then that
And also this other thing and do this thing
If somebody else happens,
The more you've just lost 98% of the Earth's population
Well, and that's really important
Because the tech enthusiast crowd
That goes and looks at all of these
actually just thinks that scripting them and setting them up and managing them.
Like I always joke with a friend of mine who loves this stuff.
Like, you know, this person's nirvana is like opening up the door and saying, you know, my assistant, like, it's time to relax.
And like the lights dim to 37%.
The fireplace turns on to 15%.
But you put Barry White comes on the speaker system.
Like all of this.
And I'm like, good Lord, how many times do you relax exactly like that?
And he's like, oh, like one out of five.
but I have like relax two, relax three, relax four.
And you're like, really, like nobody is going to do that.
Bondi, you should read a spontaneous one, spontaneous two.
Right, right. Exactly. Exactly.
And so I just, I tend to think that we're going to see all of this fading of stuff,
that like a whole bunch of stuff was going to end up being electric carving knives.
Like I saw a bed that you could talk to Alexa via.
Well, the best one of this was somebody tweeted a toilet that said it offers a first smart,
immersive experience.
Yeah.
There's a fairly obvious jokes about immersive toilets here.
So a lot of that will fade, and it'll basically look like internet connected.
This comes back to what we're saying right at the beginning, was people go and they complain and they say, I hate this stuff, it's terrible, there's all these stupid gadgets.
What we're seeing here is experimentation.
And some of this will be the electric toaster.
And I'm sure there are people 50 years ago saying, why on earth do you need electric toaster?
Just hold the piece of bread in front of the fire.
It's way easier.
Why on earth do you need an electric kettle?
Just put the kettle on the gas.
And dishwasher was my grandmother.
Yeah, my mother, my grandmother didn't have a dishwasher or washing machine.
And actually thought that they were bad.
Yes, why would you have that?
And she grudgingly had a freezer.
Yeah, yeah.
Why would you want that?
In hindsight, it's obvious, well, that was made sense and that one other did, that other one didn't make sense.
What we're seeing now is all of that stuff, some of which will last, some of which won't.
But you kind of have to have all of it in order to work out what will work.
And it may be both completely wrong about the connectivity.
And like, it will be made seamless and smooth, and it will have machine learning and it will learn what you want.
And it will make suggestions.
and eventually you'll walk in and the lights will kind of turn on as you walks through the home and that will just feel normal.
But we're in this experimentation phase of this discovery phase at the moment.
And I think that that's really important when anybody attends CES or writes about it or thinks about it to remember that by and large this is a show about experiments.
That's the part that you see.
Behind the scenes, it's a show about transacting business.
It's somebody buying 150,000 phone charges.
Right, or like a Midwest retailer with five store.
is picking up a new line or a new product that he or she is excited about,
like for their wholesaler, their distribution network or whatever.
But still, there are fun things.
So, like, we want to wrap up and each share, like, a couple of things that just,
we couldn't help but laugh, even though the people were, and never forget,
these are makers, they're founders, and they're very, very serious about what they do.
Yeah, so I love the emoji power banks.
So, like, the emoji poop power bank or the unicorn power bank, it's just, it's a, as we're
saying. Some of you buy batteries, you buy a charger, you buy a chip, you go to the foam rubber
manufacturer who's also making all sorts of other stuff out of foam rubber that will never go to
CS. You go to the packaging guy and there you are. You have a unicorn poop emoji charger.
That reminds me of like the old like sushi USB memory stick. Yeah, exactly. Exactly. So I had two
that I have to talk about because it really is the, it's the cultural part of CES and then the founder part.
The cultural part was there was a booth that had Japanese hand clapper. So this is a,
literally like plastic hands, big red like clown hands. And they clap. And they clap in unison.
You could have 20 of them all connected by Bluetooth and they clap. And it's basically a riff on,
and it's a Japanese vendor. And it's a riff on Miniki Nico and the Welcome Kitty that is,
you see in every business. But it's really about showing appreciation or having a birthday
celebration. And they talk about having carts of them that they use in restaurant. And people are
just staring at it. And it was like the most amazing thing because like really, they have all
these pictures of it being used all over Tokyo. And I was just in Tokyo when I actually had seen
them at this restaurant we went to. And so I thought that was very cute. The other one was just
the reminder to me of like the entrepreneur hustle. You know, because it's like the scale of
investment for a tiny company to show up at CES is insane. Hotel rooms are all jacked up.
Like everything is expensive. And then you toss in an international flight. So there was one booth
that had a founder and an employee from a company in Ukraine doing notebooks, like paper notebooks.
With paper you can't tear, and you write in any pen you want, but you can erase the ink later.
I don't understand the utility, but I know everything about the product because the founder
just saw me walk by and said, have you been to Ukraine?
Let me show you the innovation in Ukraine and grab me.
And I had to watch the whole demo and hear from the employee, the marketing pitch and everything
because it was like the chutzpah and the hustle and all.
And there's 5,000 of those, like everywhere you go.
And that, you just, you can only experience that if you just walk around and see the floor and give the people the time and just don't walk by going, oh, never buy it, never buy it.
That's dumb.
Never buy it.
And you can't, you just can't do that because people are trying.
And maybe for all we know, like, eraseable, non-terrible paper is the future of paper.
Yeah, look at Moleskin.
Who would have thought that would be a business?
Exactly.
Exactly.
So with that, that was another year of CES.
That was a long hallway we just walked around.
That was definitely a long hallway, not as long as the, you know.
design build hallway at CES, which is a mile long or so.
All right.
So thank you.
This has been Steven Sinovsky.
And Benedict Evans.
