The a16z Show - Crypto Creators: On Art Galleries to 'Tokenized' Collectibles
Episode Date: November 22, 2020This episode features Q&As with two artists who are exploring crypto-powered auction sites and marketplaces – this is part of our ongoing series on the creator economy. The big picture is that emerg...ing "tokenization" models, especially non-fungible tokens, or NFTs, are creating new ways for collectors and investors to buy, sell, and trade digital art. More broadly, these innovations open the door to the tokenization of any products or collectibles that can be captured and owned digitally. Marketplaces powered by NFTs open up new revenue streams for creators, because anytime digital work is resold or their tokens traded on these platforms, no matter how many times, the creator gets a percentage of those secondary sales. It's all transparent and governed by code on the blockchain, and it’s a big shift in creator economies. Our first guest is one of the biggest names in crypto art, and one of the most mysterious. Murat Pak is the artist and industrial designer who created the AI-powered image sharing site Archillect. Pak has made it a policy to separate their personal identity from their online work, and prefers to keep their quote-unquote real identity hidden, so we conducted this interview by email and converted Pak’s answers to audio using text-to-speech software. As Pak has expressed in other interviews, it's really the work that matters. And we do know a lot about the work, Pak has sold more than 60 pieces of digital art this year on the auction site SuperRare, for more than $350,000. And that’s just one of the several platforms on which Pak’s work is sold. In this Q&A, Pak talks with a16z's Zoran Basich about NFTs. These "non-fungible tokens" are unique assets that are not interchangeable. Dollar bills are fungible — each dollar bill is worth exactly the same as every other one. But works of art, for example, or any collectible, can be non-fungible — their value varies based on the market for that particular asset. With crypto, these assets carry digital ownership rights that can be easily exchanged. We start by discussing the whole concept of digital art, and why anyone would pay for something that (seemingly) can be easily copied. Our second interview is with Signe Pierce, a visual, digital, and performance artist whose work has appeared in major galleries in Paris, Los Angeles, and New York. She’s currently featuring her artwork on the creator marketplace Foundation. On that site, in addition to auction-style NFT markets, the price of tokens associated with individual works of art is something like you’d see on a stock market – the pricing is real-time, and dynamic and fluctuates according to demand by buyers, who might be investors, collectors, or fans. Signe discusses why she went from working exclusively with galleries to trying crypto marketplaces, how this move affects her work and her business, and how crypto could change the way she engages with her fans. She also offers advice for creators interested in getting into the world of crypto. She starts off by talking about how social media popularity several years ago opened her eyes to the idea of new monetization models for creators. Stay Updated: Find a16z on YouTube: YouTube Find a16z on X Find a16z on LinkedIn Listen to the a16z Show on Spotify Listen to the a16z Show on Apple Podcasts Follow our host: https://twitter.com/eriktorenberg Please note that the content here is for informational purposes only; should NOT be taken as legal, business, tax, or investment advice or be used to evaluate any investment or security; and is not directed at any investors or potential investors in any a16z fund. a16z and its affiliates may maintain investments in the companies discussed. For more details please see a16z.com/disclosures. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
The content here is for informational purposes only, should not be taken as legal business, tax,
or investment advice, or be used to evaluate any investment or security and is not directed at any
investors or potential investors in any A16Z fund. For more details, please see A16Z.com
slash disclosures. Welcome to the A16Z podcast, I'm Zorn. This episode features Q&As with two artists
who are exploring crypto-powered auction sites and marketplaces. This is part of our ongoing series on
the creator economy.
The big picture is that innovations like non-fungible tokens or NFTs are creating new ways for collectors and investors to buy, sell, and trade digital art.
And marketplace is powered by NFTs open up new revenue streams for creators because anytime digital art is resold, no matter how many times down the line, the creator gets a percentage of those secondary sales.
It's all transparent and governed by code on the blockchain, and it's a big shift in creator economies.
Our first guest is one of the biggest names in crypto art and one of the most mysterious.
Pock, the artist and designer who created the AI-powered image-sharing site Arcollect.
Pock has made it a policy to separate their personal identity from their online work
and prefers to keep their quote-unquote real identity hidden,
so we conducted this interview by email and converted Pock's answers to audio using text-to-speech software.
As Pock has expressed in other interviews, it's really the work that matters.
And we do know a lot about the work.
Pock has sold more than 60 pieces of digital art this year on the auction site super rare
for more than $350,000.
and that's just one of the several platforms on which POC's work is sold.
In this Q&A, we talk about NFTs and how they will be the basis for many new business models
in the future that go far beyond art.
But we start by asking about the whole concept of digital art.
Why would someone pay a lot of money for something that seems like it could be easily copied?
Here's POC communicating via text to speech.
You see, that's a tricky question.
Because the newcomer assumes that it can be copied, but in reality, the collector of the
NFT does not obtain a digital file, they get a unique and signed token that cannot be copied or
owned by anyone else. So, assuming that NFTs can be right-click save as copied is very similar
to the assumption of going to the Louvre to take a picture of Mona Lisa to own it, or taking a
picture of a plane ticket to copy it. NFT is not about the visible object, it's about the permission
and access to a thing. It's only a matter of time until it becomes accepted in a wider sense.
Every new medium for art had this struggle for acceptance.
Having this struggle is not bad, it's good.
When the argument is over, this conflict and resolution will be the thing that will make
crypto-based art valid.
From my personal perspective, this is not a conflict or questioning of, is this art or not.
It's more of a questioning of, is this unique enough or not?
And sooner or later it will be understood.
What was the dominant commercial model for artists in the past and how might
crypto changed that? I've never categorized myself as an artist even though a portion of what I do,
design, surely touches art. Therefore, I believe, a better word for a crypto artist, should be
crypto creator. From a design point of view, the options are working full time for studios,
working as a freelancer, or having your own studio. For crypto art, it's currently closer to the
second one, the freelancer model, however, there is an important detail. A
design client needs your work, but an art collector wants your work. Sometimes it feels better to be
wanted than needed. What was your first exposure to crypto and how did your interest develop?
I was able to meet Bitcoin and make moves before its initial explosion. Being interested in value
concepts as long as I can remember, I was instantly charmed by the idea of how value is transformed
to this new exchangeable form. NFTs, on the other hand, are new to me. The first time I met
with NFTs was when Cryptokitties contacted me to create an Arkelect kitty when they were forming.
Today, NFTs are more than just little fun pieces. I believe in the technology it defends,
therefore, I am happy to make waves in this branch of technological revolution and evolution.
How do NFTs make it more attractive for creators to become crypto creators?
It's similar to cars becoming electric cars. Crypto creator is not a term that defines a
special group of creators in my opinion. It's only this now new, soon to be norm term for digital
tradables. In other words, when it's so easy to make it happen for any creator, why not?
So most of the activity around crypto is financial, trading, borrowing, lending, and investing
in cryptocurrencies. What are the characteristics of crypto that might hold appeal for artists,
designers, and other creators? Creation and destruction of value is always charming for any kind of
creator. What advice would you give creators who are interested in exploring crypto as a new model
for selling their work? Experiment. So, Pock, you've been working at the intersection of technology and
art for some time. Apart from their possible financial advantages for artists, do crypto in the
blockchain or the idea of a decentralized technology in general hold some deeper cultural meaning
or symbolism in your view? Anything can carry symbolism. It depends on the receiver rather than the
source. I value innovation. I value creative. I value creative.
of value and I try to exist on that line, where something new pushes the limits of what's
widely known. Of course, decentralization of things holds a future of a new culture of technology,
many new norms and standards, and many branches in unknown directions, and that's exactly the
reason to be there. Almost like the internet just before it went mainstream. So let's talk about
revenue for artists. Will NFTs lead to a relatively small number of creators making good money?
this has generally been the case in traditional art business models.
Or do you think the distribution of wealth might become more equitable with crypto?
Art auctions are a completely different world,
and it would not be fair to estimate NFTs based on that.
Of course, NFT-based and supported art will have its own audience,
and I expect to see similar dynamics with the traditional art world
in terms of how things are evaluated.
On the other hand, NFTs can be used for many other things,
this is what makes it powerful.
Anything that can be digitally owned can be supported with an NFT.
It has a lot of uses in media and entertainment,
real estate, gaming, identification, or any kind of asset or collectible.
It's a technology that's slowly going mainstream for art,
but it's not limited to that.
Therefore, I do not think it will be only a small number of creators making good money.
It's going to be the base of many new business models of the future norm.
Our next guest is Cygney Pierce, a visual, digital, and performance artist,
whose work has appeared in major galleries in Paris, Los Angeles, and New York.
She's currently featuring her artwork on the Creator Marketplace Foundation.
On that site, the price of tokens associated with individual works of art
is something like you'd see on a stock market.
The pricing is real-time and dynamic and fluctuates according to demand,
which comes from buyers who might be investors, collectors, or fans.
Signy discusses why she went from working exclusively with galleries
to trying out these crypto marketplaces
and how this move affects her work in her business.
She also talks about how crypto could change the way she engages with her fans,
and she offers advice for creators interested in getting into the world of crypto.
But first she talks about how social media popularity several years ago
opened her eyes to the idea of new monetization models for creators.
I really had a big swing on Tumblr in the years 2014 to 2017,
when Tumblr was kind of popped off.
And my pictures were just getting like hundreds of thousands of reblogs.
And I just kept kind of really returning to this idea of why is there no valuation around this energy?
And maybe how could there be?
How could we like turn likes into money or something?
You know, how can I sort of flip the attention economy into an actual monetization form?
And that was what really got me thinking big about, yeah, I actually really can understand why this blockchain technology and tokenizing artwork could potentially be a really major disruption to the art world way of doing things, as well as married to my vision for just a more prosperous world for artists and for people to enjoy art.
Yeah.
So how did you come to start working with foundation?
I was put in touch with the curator Lindsay Howard.
We talked at length about kind of our vision for wanting to find some new ways of doing things
and make it so the artists have a little bit more stake in their work.
I think partially because there's a curator that I really trust who was inviting me in
as well as the fact that I could just sense that they had a finger on the pulse.
All of that was what swayed me into wanting to work with them.
Which of your art is there now, like sort of,
walk us through what that looks like and what's being presented there at the moment.
So I have done a specific run of three works, which are from what I call the
Jangular Lilies series. I've offered two prints editions of 100 and then one video at an
addition of 10. I wanted to create a run that serves as this kind of cool crypto training
wheels for people who might be interested in this but are nervous to get their feet wet.
Let's see what happens, you know? And at the end of the day, you can experiment with the
crypto. And it's been really exciting kind of too to watch the trading aspect of it.
You know, when they trade in their tokens and they get to have the exchange, it's just kind of
been like a new frontier for me personally. And the interesting wrinkle is that so people can
come, fans, collectors, and they can buy.
your artwork at the price at which it's listed.
And when you are ready to produce that artwork, they will get a physical copy of it, right?
Or while they're waiting for you to kind of complete the artwork and fulfill that order,
they can also trade the token that is associated with that artwork.
And so the price of that artwork is kind of going up and down in value or it's dynamic, right?
It can go up and down.
So that kind of goes to the point of what you were saying about people being able to trade it.
And that's really what makes it interesting here, because now you're talking about not this static,
price, but rather a dynamic price that can lead more people to perhaps get involved with this
from sort of a purely trading or investment aspect on top of the kind of collectible or fan
aspect of it. I know not all artists are going to like this and not all artists are going to
find this to be their jam, but I see this is kind of an interesting way to involve, you know,
think about kind of our works like stock in a way. And I'm interested in watching the way that that's
playing out in this sphere because it's new and it needs to be
pioneered in order for it to become normalized.
So from the buyer's perspective or from the collector's perspective,
they can wait for the price to go higher and trade it and make a profit on that
and not end up owning your physical piece of art, correct?
Yes, exactly.
And I think that's kind of also a cool way for people to support the artist.
Yeah, you might not necessarily end up with a print if you don't decide to redeem your
token, you're still supporting me, the artist, in a little way, just by engaging with the trading.
And I think that's, again, a cool way to kind of get people into the world of crypto and
supporting the arts.
Yeah, and one thing we should mention, you just touched on it, is that every time anyone
trades one of these tokens, you receive a cut of that, like the artist receives a cut of that.
Exactly.
That plus the fact that as the sale, you know, as the additions decrease, aka the more,
more editions that are sold, the price increases.
And that is also a really exciting aspect of this.
And how do you think about pricing?
How do you decide what the initial price will be
and how big the limited edition will be?
I've spent a lot of time thinking about this.
I'm going to kind of keep my works that are dealt through gallery systems
and the art market.
I'm going to purposefully keep them low and, you know, rare.
They come with kind of the full package.
of framing and, you know, serious fabrication.
With these works, they're high-quality digital seeprints.
It's just larger additions,
and therefore the price kind of matches the fact
that there isn't as much scarcity attached to them.
But again, I kind of, I'm finding there's a sweet spot for me wherein.
I'm still able to work with the fine art market,
but I'm also able to make it so that the work is accessible to more people,
I think my work is valuable. I take it very seriously, and I want it to be valued appropriately, and I want it to appreciate over time.
And I think the fine art market finesses that opportunity, but I don't want it to be completely forbidding to everyone else in the world, because that goes against my general ethos of art being for the people.
So to me, that's my personal approach. Again, not everyone's approach, but this is my way of making it so that we can kind of play both feel.
I'm not giving up on the fine art market or the fine art world,
but I'm also really interested in trying new things
and inviting more people into that,
into the opportunity to become a collector.
So when you go to the site and your artworks are there,
it's like a stock market, right?
There's a price and it shows like how much it's risen or fallen.
I think I looked this morning and all of yours were up over 100%.
Congratulations.
We're doing pretty good.
How often do you look at that?
How often do you look at that?
and what's that like. It's just a whole different kind of insight into what it's a real-time look at how people are responding to your work, right?
Absolutely, and that's exciting. It feels very modern, and I'll be super honest and say I'm not like a finance guy.
I'm an artist, but I'm still, you know, I'm a modern artist, and I really, I'm interested in modernity in the future as well as looking at the way it works, understanding it in order to better think about it.
So when I get to kind of see in real time the valuation of the work, that's kind of thrilling.
Because, again, I'm so used to this kind of Tumblr culture where you get to see your numbers going up and you're like watching likes and reblogs happen.
But there's nothing actually attached to it for me other than minor dopamine bursts.
So this actually creates a little bit of capital to it to make it a little more fun, at least, rewarding.
Is it an experiment where, yeah, you might make a little bit of cash, or is it a significant amount of cash that's possible?
Like, how much of a revenue stream does this represent for you?
At the end of the day, I'm making money, making my work, and that's exciting.
And there is profit.
I'm making a profit from this.
And it's another avenue for revenue for me to make my art and get it out to the people.
To me, these are all wins.
while the profits are not as gigantic as if it was on the fine art market immediately,
but that's just for one work, you know?
This is multiple work that over time, it is similar numbers, you know, in fact, sometimes
more.
So maybe it doesn't make that much sense for me to only be having, you know, extremely high
prices and there's only one period.
And then you have to wait for that appreciation and value.
And then if it flips on the secondary market, I don't get to really see off and don't get to see that unless I've contractually negotiated it.
How do you think about digital art versus physical art? Because I think in this case, right now, you are going to produce physical pieces that you're going to send to people.
There's like a reproduction cost involved there, which presumably cuts me a profit, whereas digital work is more easily reproduced.
Totally.
But then also digital art historically has been hard because, like, how do you stop it from being copied?
but with crypto, there's this kind of additional thing of the token where, you know, the provenance,
and you know it's like this unique piece of art that cannot really be owned in that same way.
So how do you think about those things as kind of part of a business model?
That's a really great and important point slash question.
And I think that people are and have been struggling with getting their head around the idea of like paying for a video or paying for a gift.
And how can it have value if it's not tangible,
if it's done a physical artwork.
And it's taken a lot of thinking and pioneering
from a lot of artists and, you know, technologists.
And to me, like you said,
like the provenance of blockchain technology,
which guarantees authenticity of the work
is essential to make this possible.
Once we can kind of get the collective consciousness
head around that,
I think it could be a really revolutionary
for how art continues to be made and traded and collected.
I want to talk about fan engagement too because this opens up really interesting possibilities
as well.
It's happening now with your artwork where people are engaging with your work in a financial
way, but tokens also potentially enable other kinds of engagement as well.
You know, people can become quote-unquote superfans or have access to certain things
in your life or in your work that like non-token holders may not have.
So have you thought much about that, like the kind of evolution of fan engagement
as it relates to crypto?
I think that there's totally so much potential for this.
Accessibility, the access points are what's going to be a really big part of that fan engagement
generation.
There's all kinds of different ways to approach this.
I just want to do it in a way that I think is actually cool.
Honestly, one of my big things about what I'm trying to design is like, I wanted to work
in a way that I would actually want to do it.
I'm interested in figuring out how we can work.
with fan engagement in a way that I really would feel comfortable asking my fan base to participate in.
When I kind of like flip the script and I think about an artist that I love, what would I be interested in
paying to gain more access to their work? And that really is kind of the decision of the artist to
configure what the different tiers of value are. So I'm interested in your perspective on what
artists who are kind of interested in this, who are trying to break free of this rut, this traditional kind of
commercial system around art, what should they know as they look to explore crypto and how much
do they need to know about crypto before they get started? I think it's always helpful to have someone
hold your hand a little bit. If you don't have a natural direct resource to introduce you to
this, throw yourself into some research and teach yourself about it. I mean, I've really had to do that
for myself with this. I mean, I fairly scratched the surface of fully understanding how all of this
works because again I'm an artist. It's not necessarily like my nine to five attention span to be
reading about advanced blockchain technologies. But because I'm an artist who's interested in future
models and methods, it's important for me to sit and focus on these ideas to get it into my head.
So that's part of it. But another part of it, I think, is also kind of just this fearless,
kind of entrepreneurial spirit of like, what do I have to lose? If you're currently not making
much money or any money, reeling and dealing your art, what do you have to lose, but to kind of
throw yourself into something new and see if it sticks, you know? And I think that's a really important
energy for people to hold in general is just this kind of like, let's go, let's try something,
let's try something new. And if enough people host that innovative spirit, that's when things
start to crackle and spark and change. Awesome, Sigmany. Well, thanks so much for being with us.
It's been a pleasure to talk to you. Absolutely. I had a great time. Thank you for this opportunity.
