THE ADAM BUXTON PODCAST - EP.232 - PATRIC GAGNE ON BEING A SOCIOPATH & UPLIFTING MOVIE PICKS FROM PODCAST FRIENDS

Episode Date: November 11, 2024

Adam talks with Patric Gagne about her memoir Sociopath and shares some uplifting movie picks from friends of the podcastConversation recorded face-to-face in London on 15th April, 2024CONTAINS STRONG... LANGUAGEThanks to Séamus Murphy-Mitchell for production support and conversation editing Podcast illustration by Helen Green https://helengreenillustration.com/RELATED LINKSHE MARRIED A SOCIOPATH - ME by Patric Gagne - 2020 (NY TIMES - PAYWALL)INTERVIEW WITH PATRIC GAGNE - 2024 (PSYCHOLOGY TODAY)INTERVIEW WITH PATRIC GAGNE by Emine Saner - 2024 (GUARDIAN)PATRIC GAGNE INSTAGRAMUPLIFTING MOVIESTASH DEMETRIOU'S PICKSWORKING GIRL Directed by Mike Nichols - 1989 (TRAILER ON YOUTUBE)BRIDESMAIDS Directed by Paul Feig - 2011 (TRAILER ON YOUTUBE)NOW AND THEN Directed by Lesli Linka Glatter - 1986 (TRAILER ON YOUTUBE)RICHARD AYOADE'S PICKSSTOP MAKING SENSE Directed by Jonathan Demme - 1984 (TRAILER ON YOUTUBE)MONTEREY POP Directed by D. A. Pennebaker - 1968 (TRAILER ON YOUTUBE)AMERICAN MOVIE Directed by Chris Smith - 1999 (TRAILER ON YOUTUBE)GARTH JENNINGS' PICKAMERICAN UTOPIA Directed by Spike Lee - 2021 (TRAILER ON YOUTUBE)ALEX HORNE'S PICKNEXT GOAL WINS Directed by Taika Waititi - 2023 (TRAILER ON YOUTUBE)JAMIE DEMETRIOU'S PICKNEXT GOAL WINS (ORIGINAL DOCUMENTARY) Directed by Mike Brett and Steve Jamison - 2014 (TRAILER ON YOUTUBE)KIM DEAL'S PICKSTHE OMEN Directed by Richard Donner - 1976 (FULL MOVIE ON YOUTUBE)SMILE 2 Directed by Charlie Sarroff - 2024 (TRAILER ON YOUTUBE) Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 Ho Ho Ho, Adam Buxton here. In a few weeks, I'll be meeting Joe Cornish to record our annual Christmas podcast, and as usual, we'd like to include a few contributions from you. The address for submissions is adambuxtonpodcast.gmail.com. You'll also find that address on my website, adam-buxton.co.uk. A few things to bear in mind that'll really help us out before you start emailing. Thing 1. Please make sure the subject header of your emails is Adam and Joe Christmas 2024, followed by a description of the contents, for example, made up joke, egg corn, travel in tale, or superb anecdote. Thing 2.
Starting point is 00:00:36 No personal or work-related messages, please. Just things that will delight me, Joe, and your fellow listeners on Christmas Day. And please remember that whatever you send us might be made public. Think 3. Please keep it short. Just a few lines, ideally. We won't have time to read long messages or listen to long audio clips. I'm sorry.
Starting point is 00:00:52 Think 4. The deadline for contributions is Saturday the 30th of November at midnight. Joe and I look forward to hearing from you. Thanks. This advert is for Squarespace. Oh yeah! I wanted to get weathered times and finally build myself a website. Oh ho ho!
Starting point is 00:01:11 Unfortunately I don't got no computational skill. Confused emoji! And then I heard about Squarespace. Where you can build a website in the time it takes to make yourself a sandwich like a gourmet sandwich I went to Squarespace.com slash Buxton and started up a free trial. I was playing baby I found a template that I liked and typed some words and drags and pictures in it really made me smile Then when I was happy and decided I would buy it,
Starting point is 00:01:46 I was prompted for an offer code, I typed in Buxton, and I saved 10%! That's right! At squarespace.com slash Buxton! I'm a website guy! I added one more podcast to the giant podcast bin Now you have plucked that podcast out and started listening
Starting point is 00:02:10 I took my microphone and found some human folk Then I recorded all the noises while we spoke My name is Adam Buxton, I'm a man. I want you to enjoy this, that's the plan. Hey, how are you doing, Podcats? It's Adam Buxton here. Oh, come on, group hug. People are freaking out right now,
Starting point is 00:02:44 but here's what they don't get, Caddy K. He's an orange wrecking ball. Why is that important? Here's why. He's just made the greatest political comeback since Grover Cleveland, and that has a resonation. Okay? Here's what I predict, Caddy K. Okay, he's going to hire an all-British cabinet. He loves the British, Caddy K. He plays golf there in Scotch land and he likes wimpy and drizzle and he's gonna hire Phillip Schofield as his chief of staff, Caddy K. And Noel Edmonds as his defense secretary.
Starting point is 00:03:19 I'm running out of steam with my Scaramucci impression. Just trying to cheer you up a little bit. That's all, if you need cheering up. Okay, look, come on. Let me tell you about podcast number 232, which features a conversation with American writer, former therapist, and advocate for people suffering from sociopathic, psychopathic,
Starting point is 00:03:41 and antisocial personality disorders, Patrick Gagney. In her memoir Sociopath, published earlier this year 2024, Patrick writes, your friends would probably describe me as nice but guess what I can't stand your friends I'm a liar I'm a thief I'm highly manipulative I don't care what other people think. I'm capable of almost anything." That's a line that is typical of the book's frequently frothy novelistic style, and Patrick describes some hair-raising acts of antisocial and even violent behaviour in the course of telling her story. But the book is also an account of the frequently painful process of trying to better understand her diagnosis of sociopathy and its implications
Starting point is 00:04:31 for her and people like her. In an interview from earlier this year in Psychology Today, Patrick said, In pop culture, the term sociopathy has been misappropriated to represent every manner of evil. Any Google search related to sociopathy is likely to reveal little more than a list of serial killers alongside a decades-old behavioral checklist. These represent the most extreme versions of the sociopathic personality, and yet they've been co-opted to encapsulate the entirety of the disorder. This needs to change. Patrick also points out in that interview that there's a lot of confusion regarding the use of the word sociopath.
Starting point is 00:05:14 She says that there is a belief that the term was replaced by anti-social personality disorder. It's critical to note, she says, that you cannot diagnose sociopathy using the DSM criteria for antisocial personality disorder. The two have different diagnostic requirements and should not be used synonymously. This gap also means that the systems in place for dealing with most psychological conditions, from diagnosis to treatment to health insurance, aren't available for sociopaths. This isn't good for us, or for society. My conversation with Patrick, who incidentally was born in 1976 and raised in San Francisco,
Starting point is 00:05:59 California, was recorded face to face in London back in April of this year, and we talked about what the difference is between a sociopath and a psychopath. We also talked about the New York Times article that Patrick wrote back in 2020 entitled, He Married a Sociopath Me. Sorry, I'm really using the word sociopath a lot. There's not that much I can do about it. Anyway, in that article Patrick wrote about her condition in the context of her marriage in a way that many people were surprised to find was quite relatable. We talked, well I was surprised anyway, we talked about to what extent TV reality game shows and prank shows positively encourage sociopathic traits with passing reference to Ashton Kutcher
Starting point is 00:06:46 and Jason Goldberg's early 2000s MTV prank show, Punk'd. I also asked Patrick towards the end of our conversation about a few of the more skeptical responses that some people have had to her and the book, and I also just checked a few of my less desirable traits with her to see whether she thought I had anything to worry about. The fact that I was a little trepidatious before meeting Patrick perhaps speaks to the kind of prejudice that she's hoping to address with this book. Anyway, I really enjoyed meeting her and talking to her and I think she had a good time too, but I don't know know see what you think.
Starting point is 00:07:27 Hello, PodCats. Sorry for the sudden change of scene. I'm in London now because I finished recording the intro and then I had to get the train to London. I ran out of time before recording the outro but I wanted to flag that in the outro there will be a handful of movie recommendations from some friends of the podcast, including Richard Iowade, Alex Horne, Tash and Jamie Demetriou and Kim Deal. So stick around for that. But right now with Patrick Gagney, here we go. Have a ramble chat, put on your conversation coat and hide your talking hat. Yes, yes, yes. La, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la So I wanted to start really by asking you why you wrote the book in the first place.
Starting point is 00:08:53 I guess it came out of the New York Times piece, is that right, in 2020? Not exactly. I had written most of the book before that. And I remember saying to my husband, here's what I'm going to do. I'm going to try to write this piece for the New York Times. And if it's accepted and if it's understood, then I'll release the book.
Starting point is 00:09:17 Because at the time, I was very reluctant in releasing a memoir. I like to joke around that I did everything I could to not write a memoir. I tried sociopath self-help. I tried a sociopath for dummies type index, but ultimately it was the personal stories that people kept resonating most with. And I thought, all right, I'll write this memoir and then I'll write this Modern Love article.
Starting point is 00:09:45 And... Modern love being a strand in the New York Times where people write about their relationships. Correct. And if the Times accepts it, and if the greater public accepts it, that it was sort of my litmus test for whether I wanted to release the book. But the book for the most part was done before I wrote the article. And the response to the article was good. I mean it was Fulsome people were excited about it a lot of commentary about it
Starting point is 00:10:11 Did you follow that commentary were you aware of what people were saying how they were responding not really and that's This is where my husband tends to get into trouble because he does follow it a little too closely, but I Was overwhelmed by the emails that I received directly from people all over the world saying that they felt seen, that they could identify with some of the things that I had discussed on that Modern Love article. And for the most part, I discussed very little. There was hints of my personality type here and there,
Starting point is 00:10:44 but I was really encouraged by all of the people who for the first time said that they had a name for the way that they were feeling and they felt less alone. So that was my experience after the Modern Love article. I was really encouraged by how many people who identified with my personality type were feeling seen for the first time. So in the article you lay out briefly what your history is. I mean would you do that for me now? Would you sort of explain to me how you became
Starting point is 00:11:19 aware that you were... Would you call yourself neurodivergent? Completely. Mm-hmm. So I understood very early on that I was different. I had a sister, a younger sister, so I knew what complex emotional development looked like and I understood that I didn't have it. I also understood at an early age that talking about that, telling people that I didn't feel empathy, telling people that I didn't care about certain things that I was quote unquote supposed to care about was the quickest way to get into trouble. So I learned very early how to hide and it was a coping mechanism that because I was
Starting point is 00:11:59 never treated developed into a lifestyle. I started experiencing compulsions toward destructive acts. I didn't understand why. I just knew as a kid, if I knocked over this picture onto the glass, some part of me would get a release. There was a type of pressure that I remember experiencing. Looking back, what I've sort of pieced together is that it was most likely my brain's way of trying to sort of jolt itself into feeling. But what's important to note, and this is a question that I get asked a lot, is the difference between a psychopath and a sociopath. So a psychopath believes to suffer from biological abnormalities that make it impossible for
Starting point is 00:12:48 them to move through complex emotional development. So while they are born with the same emotions most people are born with, or all people are born with, joy, anger, happiness, sadness, they are unable to learn the so-called social emotions. So these are emotions that are taught to us as kids, shame, guilt, love, empathy. Psychopaths are unable to learn those emotions. That is different from a sociopath who is capable of learning those emotions. They just learn them differently. And that was very much my experience. I didn't connect to things inherently the way that a lot of my peers and my sister did.
Starting point is 00:13:30 But as I got older, I realized, oh, I can love. I just come through a different door than others seem to. And once I got my diagnosis and I really started researching the personality type, I was amazed at how little resources were available to people with my personality type. We're talking about 5% of the population is the sort of going understanding of how many people suffer from psychopathy. Yet there's nothing in any bookstore. There are no resource books or support groups or treatment plans.
Starting point is 00:14:13 I was sort of left on my own to figure it out, and I did the best that I could with what I had, which was a lot. When did you receive your diagnosis then? In my 20s. My father insisted that I start seeing a therapist and I did semi-reluctantly, but also not so because as I got older, my destructive behaviors started to escalate. And although I had done a decent job of managing them, I really wanted to understand what was going on with me. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:14:45 What are the main traits of a sociopath? I would say that the main trait of a sociopath is shallow emotion. So we have a difficult time internalizing the social emotions. We have a difficult time connecting with others, empathizing. Shame and guilt are not something with which I have a struggle, but we can learn them. I think that sociopaths are often judged for their behavior, which is very fair. However, not all sociopaths act the same way. And that was something I sort of picked up on when I was looking into the research. Everything about the research
Starting point is 00:15:31 was behavioral based. And I remember thinking, who's to say all sociopaths act like that? I remember also finding there to be a lot of gender bias. One of the hallmark traits of the sociopath is is social dominance So someone who is sociopathic is going to come in and they're going to be loud and physically aggressive alphas But that's really male as a woman. I don't assert my dominance that way. I do that through Charm and sex I'm not going to come in throwing punches and knocking people off chairs and I feel that those nuances are Missed in the diagnostics and just the understanding of the disorder in general, right? I suppose Sociopath is one of those terms that people like to toss around and have done so increasingly in the last
Starting point is 00:16:19 20 years or so a bit like Narcissist, you know, it's one of those things. Suddenly everyone is an expert in psychology. And so, yeah, that guy, he's a total narcissist. Or I think they're on the spectrum for sociopathy there a little bit. Everyone's on the spectrum. I mean, now it's frowned upon a little bit more
Starting point is 00:16:38 because people are more aware of autism and complex conditions like that. And they're trying to be more empathetic, broadly speaking, in society. People might take a beat before saying that someone is on the spectrum these days. But sociopath is still very much tossed around, isn't it? I guess people are thinking about, which you note in your book, popular culture, shows like Dexter, although Dexter's more of a psychopath, right?
Starting point is 00:17:09 I would imagine, although he has the discipline to understand what he's doing is wrong and he's taking the steps to take a pro-social approach to them. He only chops up baddies. Correct, which I think would speak to someone probably on the sociopathic spectrum more than on the psychopathic spectrum Okay, but I but he's a fictional character and that's a guess yeah, and also the character His character is able to bond. He has a close relationship with his sister
Starting point is 00:17:38 He has a close relationship with some of his friends the discipline that that character demonstrates I don't know if I've always been on the fence with Dexter. Yeah. Did you enjoy that show? I did. I really did. Yeah. I had a complex and conflicted relationship with Dexter.
Starting point is 00:17:53 I did think it was sort of entertaining, but a lot of the time I just wanted Dexter to fuck off. I know. He was just quite an annoying person. And actually, I was going to say gonna say like on the sociopathic spectrum Presumably there are dangerous people, right? Yeah, and that's that's the point I really want to make clear is that the reputation of of sociopathy to a large extent is well-earned there are people who are believed to have been sociopaths that committed heinous crimes, but
Starting point is 00:18:24 There are people who are believed to have been sociopaths that committed heinous crimes, but so have there been narcissists and so have there been schizophrenics. And to boil down a personality type to only the most extreme versions I think is problematic. In much the same way it would be if you were only choosing to acknowledge stage four cancer. If the only cancers you are willing to acknowledge are stage four, you're going to miss stages one, two, and three when they're still treatable. It all but guarantees more stages that are fatal and extreme. Who would do that? Nobody would.
Starting point is 00:19:02 And yet, that's exactly what happens with sociopathy These extreme examples only make up a very small percentage of the overall personality type and yet they've been misappropriated to define the totality of it and It's basically blocking people on the moderate side from getting the treatment and the the resources that they so desperately need but presumably one problem with the milder side of the spectrum is that there's a fine line between a sociopath and just a dick. It's true. And so I suppose one suspicion that people could have
Starting point is 00:19:39 of someone like you, for example, is that you're using sociopathy as a cloak of kind of neurodivergent interest to cover up antisocial acts to celebrate sort of various flaws in your own personality. Well, the only part about that I disagree with is that I'm not trying to excuse or condone destructive behavior. I have always been very clear that destructive behavior should always be addressed first. If anyone comes to see a therapist, any personality type who is engaging in destructive behavior, be it self-harm or harm to others, that behavior should stop completely. What I'm trying to get people to understand is the destructive behaviors in which I engaged
Starting point is 00:20:29 were driven by a compulsion, an almost an urge to act out. And that's very different from someone who is being intentionally malicious, getting off on harming others, getting off on causing distress to others. I don't ever remember feeling that way. I remember feeling, I have this opportunity to do this. I don't really want to, but I know if I don't, this pressure is just going to increase,
Starting point is 00:20:59 so I just want to get it over with. And what was the nature of the pressure? You call it stuck pressure in the book. Stuck stress. Stuck stress. And so can you explain to me what that is So I just want to get it over with and where what was the nature of the pressure you call it stuck pressure in the book Stuck stress stuck stress and so can you explain to me what that is and what that feels like it felt very claustrophobic I remember as a kid just feeling like I was trapped and What I have come to sort of piece together was that I was feeling apathy I was feeling nothing, which I have grown
Starting point is 00:21:27 to be very comfortable with. But as a child, the feeling of nothingness was a big indicator that there's something very different about you and if you don't find a way to either fix it or mask it, you are going to be othered. And it was that inner turmoil of, I have to feel something, I have to feel something. And if I waited to, if I pushed down on the compulsions, they would only get more extreme.
Starting point is 00:21:54 So I started engaging in smaller, but more disciplined acts of deviance as a way to sort of offset the larger, more spontaneous ones that tended to occur when I didn't act out, as soon as I start the pressure begin its rise. And so what were some of those? What were some of the smaller acts? When I was a kid, they could be anything from, I remember stealing backpacks a lot at school.
Starting point is 00:22:20 Sometimes I took them home, but most of the times I didn't. I would just toss them over some bushes. That was you. I was wondering when you were going to piece that together. Where's my fucking backpack? It's probably still in the bushes right through it. I knew it was you. But again, I didn't want these things. And I wasn't trying to, half the time I didn't even know
Starting point is 00:22:38 who the backpacks belonged to. It was just this feeling of do it, do it, do it, do it, do it. Right. And so then in your teens, those acts got more dramatic, more illegal. Is that right? Yeah. And they were, what sort of things were you up to in those days? The first thing I remember doing was following people. And I remember thinking, I'm not following these people to scare them or to harm them. I just, it was something that I knew I wasn't supposed to be doing, and it wasn't harmful
Starting point is 00:23:11 to others, but it really helped relieve some of the pressure. Because you have control over that person when they don't know that you're following them? Is that it? No, I don't think it has anything to do with the other person at all. This is something I'm not supposed to be doing. And I also think it had to do with I was alone. I felt the least amount of pressure when I was alone.
Starting point is 00:23:35 Again, what I've sort of been able to piece together is when I was alone, there was no expectation of emotion from me. There was nobody asking me, how do you feel? Or you look weird or why is your face like that? I was just able to not feel, it was glorious. And following people around allowed me to be with people but also not have anything to do with them at the same time.
Starting point is 00:23:57 I think that's why as a kid, I loved doing it. I loved watching people in their quote unquote normal environments and sort of picturing myself in those environments one day. That was my... my dream, as, oh, one day I'm going to be like them. I'm going to be normal like them. So, on a day-to-day basis, would you be sort of doing impressions of the way
Starting point is 00:24:20 you felt, quote, normal people behaved? Mm-hmm. Yeah. And it's... very taxing, because I didn't, especially when I was a kid, I didn't have a lot to choose from. I really relied on my sister and her emotional cues. She's not a sociopath. She's the opposite, she has vast emotional depths. So I could only fake it by acting like her for so long
Starting point is 00:24:45 because as I said, I'm not a very good actress. So I would tip the hand eventually and they would figure out, oh wait, you're not, not anything like your sister. She's younger than you. She is. But every now and again, maybe sometimes when you get stressed, you forget to do it or if you're in physical pain?
Starting point is 00:25:05 No, I would just, it's exhausting. I've explained, I've likened it to speaking a foreign language. So I can speak a foreign language conversationally, okay, but I've noticed that when I have to do it all day, by the end of the day, I'm exhausted. And that's how I felt a lot when I was younger, sort of masking and mirroring. It's a lot of work.
Starting point is 00:25:25 It's like the engine of a computer overheating, running all day. And when I got to be alone, it was, oh, I don't have to have any of that. I can just do myself. I mean, what you're describing is a little bit like most people feel. It really is.
Starting point is 00:25:37 And that's what I'm trying to get people to understand. It was funny when I started writing this book, I had friends say, I mean, you're a sociopath, but you're not a sociopath like that. And that's the whole point. Yes, the like that element is the extreme example. Sociopathy on the other hand, there's a lot of people that are more moderate and very relatable. I mean, everyone has that sort of front-facing persona that they always put on.
Starting point is 00:26:11 Sociopaths are not excluded from that. We all wear it. However, sociopaths seem to be the only personality type that, who are villainized for it. So when I'm masking, it's because I'm trying to manipulate you, I'm trying to charm you or pull one over on you. It's really not what I'm doing at all.
Starting point is 00:26:29 It's a coping mechanism because if I drop the mask and I present myself as my true self, I'm not going to be as pleasant. I'm going to be quieter. I'm going to be watching you, not because I'm trying to cause you harm, but just because I'm different. And I've learned that acting like a neurotypical person makes neurotypical people feel more
Starting point is 00:26:53 comfortable. It's not malicious. It's common sense to me. Yeah. I mean, lying is a big part of the puzzle, isn't it? And the New York Times piece focuses on a lie that you felt your husband was perpetrating or a lack of honesty, which was about the fact that you felt he had a crush on someone at work and he wasn't coming clean about it, despite
Starting point is 00:27:16 the fact that negotiations over honesty had been central to your relationship to the point where you had a kind of knickknack, a little sculpture, what was it? The Statue of Liberty. Statue of Liberty. And that would be, you would leave it out for him as an indication that you had done something sociopathic. And it wasn't even like that you had to sit down and discuss it and be honest.
Starting point is 00:27:45 It was just like an indication to him that you wanted to be honest about where you were at. If he wanted to know, I would tell him. Right. Okay. Yeah. Regardless of how sociopathic it was, like if you did something very bad. No, it was just anything.
Starting point is 00:27:58 It would be you. That was our deal. He wanted to know anytime I did something destructive, whether it was extremely destructive or very minor, he wanted to know any time I did something destructive, whether it was extremely destructive or very minor, he wanted to know. Yeah, yeah. And you stuck to that policy of honesty in your relationship, did you? I did.
Starting point is 00:28:14 Yeah. So then you got annoyed when you felt he wasn't being honest with you. I mean, that's something obviously that anyone could relate to. I thought so too. Those kinds of negotiations in a relationship. And how did the rest of that conversation go then? Did he ever admit that, oh okay yeah I do have a crush but I don't think it's useful to to admit to
Starting point is 00:28:35 it? Yeah and I think it really opened up a healthy conversation because my husband is Italian Catholic and he was raised to feel guilt about a lot of things. And I think that when he started developing feelings for this woman, he felt badly about them, as if he had a choice or a say in the way he was feeling. And that's what I was trying to get at. It's really natural for you to have feelings for someone else.
Starting point is 00:29:06 I don't believe as human beings we're naturally monogamous. I believe it's a choice that we make. And I think that the best way to nurture that choice is to be honest. If my husband sees someone in a bar that he finds attractive, I want him to tell me about it. I want us to have that conversation. So when I could tell that he was having feelings for this woman, I wanted him to tell me about it.
Starting point is 00:29:31 And he wouldn't. And I think it's because he was lying to himself first and foremost, and that's eventually what he sort of came to understand as well. It's okay for you to have feelings for someone else. It's okay for you to have feelings for someone else. It's okay for you to find someone else attractive. And to your point, I think that's really, really relatable for all types of personalities and all types of relationships.
Starting point is 00:29:55 Yeah, it is. But the reason you're not completely transparent about those moments in a relationship is that you never know how it's going to go. Correct. And you don't want to blow it up either because you can't face it. But usually it's just because, well, I don't want to create this block in the relationship, this point of conflict, which will be exaggerated beyond what it actually means.
Starting point is 00:30:27 You know what I mean? It's like crushes come and go and obsessions come and go in that way. Right. So why not have that be a part of your relationship? I think that it's problematic because so many people believe that when they get married or when they commit to one person that that's it and they're never going to find anyone else attractive and they're never going to find anyone else interesting. And if they do, that means something's wrong.
Starting point is 00:30:52 And what I was trying to explain to my husband is I think that by choosing to deny reality doesn't make that reality any less true. It just makes you less safe within that reality. So let's just acknowledge what's going on. And in his case, he didn't have to worry about how it was gonna be received because I was telling him, I know, and it's okay,
Starting point is 00:31:17 let's just talk about it. It was his refusal to talk about it and his refusal to admit these feelings. And that was hard for me because to your point, I was asked to do the exact opposite, to work hard to have increased self-awareness, increased understanding of my urges, increased understanding of my emotions or lack thereof,
Starting point is 00:31:41 and it felt very hypocritical to me that he wasn't willing to do the same or wasn't able to do the same at the time. And are you honest with him? Do you sort of get crushes in the same way? And are you honest with him when that happens? I don't get crushes in the same way, but I'm very honest if I find someone attractive. And I try to lead by example. So I'll say, I saw somebody cute today. You want to hear about it? And then he'll decide whether he wants to hear about it
Starting point is 00:32:07 or not, he always says yes, but yeah. Yeah, I mean, I do relate to this a little bit. I've had the, I get frustrated with my wife because she claims, well, she's a bit inconsistent. Every now and again, she'll say, oh, he's quite attractive and it'll be some absolute monster. It'll be like a, it'll be a sort of more grotesque, hairier, more troll-like version of me. And she goes, oh, he's attractive.
Starting point is 00:32:37 And I just think, are you saying that to make me feel better about being a bit of a hairy troll? Or do you genuinely find hairy trolls attractive? And that's why- I hope you say that. I hope you ask. Do you say that? Yeah, I do. Yeah. But she won't admit it. I hope you say that. I hope you ask. Do you say that?
Starting point is 00:32:45 Yeah, I do. Yeah. But she won't admit it. And every now and again, I'll say, I'll see a very good looking guy. I'm like, look at that guy. I bet you wish you had a slice of that fellow. And she's like, no. I'm like, don't, why you don't lie.
Starting point is 00:33:00 What's wrong with the guy? Look at, there's nothing wrong with that bloke. But she insists that she only finds trolls attractive So I don't know maybe maybe it's true, but I just can't believe it. I don't know I think what men think women find attractive is not the same as what women and sometimes it is But I I've had similar conversations where that's stereotypical, you know, quote unquote hot guy, I'm just like, eh. And it'll be someone else and he's like, really? So I don't know, I think it,
Starting point is 00:33:31 I think that men have a very skewed perception of what some women find attractive. Maybe not all. Yeah, fair enough. Music You talk very interestingly about your relationship with music in the book. Your dad, is he still with us, your dad? Is he still in the music industry? Here and there. He'll consult occasionally, but mostly he's retired a talent manager
Starting point is 00:34:26 Is that right? He did a lot of things he started in radio and Did record promotions and then he the end of his career was spent in music management Okay, and that's something you did a little bit as well. Did you work for him? Right, and then were you ever independent? Did you sort of set up on your own? No. No. Nepotism, all the way. Okay. How long were you in the music industry? Gosh, like 15 years maybe. But again, it's hard to, I was just working for my dad.
Starting point is 00:34:53 You know, I don't want to get it twisted. I didn't carve some niche for myself or stand on my own two feet. But it was sort of peering over his shoulder at first. And then I did work full time for him, sort of after college, towards the end of college. You also worked on Punk'd for a while? No, no, no. One of the artists that my father's company made, yes, they were tapped to be victims.
Starting point is 00:35:19 They were going to be Punk'd. Mm-hmm, mm-hmm. Actually, I think it happened more than one time. Okay, right. And so then you went along and watched the punking. Yeah. I wish I could have worked for punked. That sounds like it would have been a great job for me.
Starting point is 00:35:33 They must have a few sociopaths working on that show. I'm sure. Well, I've always felt with any kind of pranking, it takes a certain amount of, well, there's got to be some careful management of shame and guilt and... Yes. I was speaking to someone recently about the show, Traders. Oh, yeah.
Starting point is 00:35:54 And how I started watching it and I was really blown away by how quickly all of these people dropped immediately into their, you know, quote unquote sociopathic selves. But yeah, like punked and, and traitors. I mean, this is, it requires, I would say a surplus of sociopathic fluidity. Yeah. People like Sacha Baron Cohen. Oh yes. Come on. The greatest prankers of the world are also possibly the most massive wankers.
Starting point is 00:36:22 I'm not, I'm not saying that Sacha Baron Cohen is, but. possibly the most massive wankers. I'm not saying that Sacha Baron Cohen is, but. But he certainly is able to step in and out of pro-social and anti-social activity. That's why those films are extraordinary, is because you're watching people doing things that most of us would never be able to do, because there are too many things
Starting point is 00:36:42 preventing us from doing so. And if people are being honest, there's a bit of wish fulfillment in there. Sure, yeah. I wish I could be doing that. Well, why can't you? You know? Because I'd get punched in the knob. Have you ever talked to anyone who works on those kinds of shows? I have. They have one of the best jobs in the world. The producers on those shows, the ones that are on the field with them.
Starting point is 00:37:07 I have a friend who used to do that for a living and listening to her stories, it sounds like... It's what I always wanted as a kid, to be right in the middle of this... absolute chaos, but you're not expected to participate. In fact, you're prevented from engaging at all. So you're just... BOWEN Total voyeurs. SITTING there watching it all go down.
Starting point is 00:37:26 Yeah. Do they screen for more extreme personality types? Are they sort of trying to be responsible and going, well, look, we can't have a real, someone with real problems like an extreme sociopath with dangerous tendencies. They might make great TV, we know they will, but we can't have that.
Starting point is 00:37:47 I mean, do you want to know how they really screen? They ask for a list of medications and they screen that way. So if they have your medications, they know what you're struggling with mentally. I remember hearing that and thinking, that's genius because you can't ask someone if they struggle, or you can, but you're not going to ask someone what mental disorders you have, but if you get a list of their medications, the medications will tell you what they're struggling with.
Starting point is 00:38:16 Oh, that's dark. I mean, I think that's changing a lot, I'm sure. All shows do not do that. I'm sure, and this is from a while ago. Right, right. Because people have taken their own lives on some of those, after being on some of those shows. Yes, they have.
Starting point is 00:38:30 So the pastoral care is a lot better now. But still, even so, I mean, they can all kid themselves as much as they like that there are no consequences. But going on, even traitors, which was pretty good-natured, people were invested in it in the right spirit, they understood. But you can see watching the show, the emotions are real. And afterwards, after you come out of a show like that, when you are made aware of the way that people are responding to it online or wherever, and the depth of genuine anger
Starting point is 00:38:59 and passion that there is from people watching the show, that's got to do something to you as a person. Did you ever used to get into, or do you still get into confrontations when things are unjust like I know, well, for example, getting into rouse with public officials or whatever who are being petty or anything like that? No. No.
Starting point is 00:39:22 If I'm going to do something about it, I'm going to, it's going to be subtle and, and you're not going to know about it. I forgot to say when we were talking about music, I really liked the way that you customize the lyrics of some of your favorite songs to express how you actually felt about certain things Do you remember your customization of how soon is now by the smiths? Of course, of course I am the queen and the heir Of a numbness that is criminally vulgar. I am the queen in air of nothing in particular
Starting point is 00:39:59 You shut your mouth. How can you say I go about things the wrong way? I am human with no need to be loved, not like everybody else does. That's a good customization of Morrissey there. And yeah, because I was interested in how you engage with popular culture, modern culture, films, TV shows, et cetera, that are all constructed around narratives of generally conventional sets of emotions and impulses and How do they appear to you and and how do you get your head around them? How do you engage with them? That's different from us other people Music was always my companion
Starting point is 00:40:40 I remember feeling less alone because music was something that everybody seemed to like, myself included. And yes, I had to adjust the lyrics from time to time in order to make them fit. But again, it was sort of like, as my young self, I was standing outside of department store glass, and on the other side was this colorful world of emotion and all these people connecting. And I think I say this in the book,
Starting point is 00:41:06 yeah, it's in the scene. I know exactly where it is. I wrote, it's so hard to explain because I don't relate to other people the way you do, the way most people do. I don't care about things normal people care about. I don't like interacting with people because they don't connect to me and I can't care about things normal people care about. I don't like interacting with people because they don't connect to me and I can't connect to them. But just because
Starting point is 00:41:28 I can't connect doesn't mean I don't wish I could. And that was really how I felt. Watching movies and television, it gave me again this proximity to normal that I couldn't get elsewhere and so I might not have been able to connect to everything. I liked the company. I liked sitting in it. It was it was I think nice in the same way that someone who's neuro-typical would find it nice. Yet you got company. They might not be like you but you got company. They might not be like you, but you got company. And yet that seems to me at odds with not caring, which seems a central part
Starting point is 00:42:12 of your psychological makeup as well. It's a sort of blanket statement, like I don't care. I don't tend to care about things that neurotypical people care about. So there's a lot of fixation on what other people think. There's a lot of fixation on people pleasing, on what I ought to do, on what I should do. To your point, what irks you, what offends you,
Starting point is 00:42:34 nothing, I don't care. But I do care. It's just I care differently. And film and television and music gave me the permission to care in the way that came naturally to me without any repercussions positive or negative. I wanted to ask you about when you were writing the book was there a conversation about how you were going what style you were going to use for example when you're recounting
Starting point is 00:43:05 presumably true moments and incidents and conversations, you are recounting them in detail and you're talking about, presumably you're sitting there and you're embellishing real recollections and you're sort of semi-imagining them. So I remember some things I remember with absolute clarity. Other things I remembered the way that I felt in that moment. If I can, sometimes they were verbatim quotes and sometimes they were, I know that this person
Starting point is 00:43:36 didn't say exactly this way, but this is what they meant when they said it, so I would write it that way. And everyone with whom I've spoken that's in the book has been really pleased with the way they're presented. Okay, I was going to ask. Yeah, because presumably you've got pseudonyms for most people in there. Presumably there are a few composite characters. Yes. But I'm sure- Very few. I can only think of two. Yeah. But presumably there are some people who could identify themselves. Oh, for sure.
Starting point is 00:44:08 I mean, you laugh when you're reading the section in the audio book in a way that sounds very candid and genuine. When you're talking about your husband's boss and you're going for dinner and your husband's boss has made it clear to your husband that he doesn't like it when women use bad language. And so it may as well have been a dare. So you go to dinner and inevitably you drop some F bombs. Um, but does your husband just not know that guy anymore? So it's not an issue or is that awkward?
Starting point is 00:44:40 That kind of thing? I never liked that guy. He was a untrustworthy person. And my husband did not feel the same way, but hindsight is 20-20, and he was very okay with me relaying that story. Okay, right. People are obviously fascinated by what's real and what's not.
Starting point is 00:45:00 And actually, you know, I'm interested in the sort of novelistic approach to the memoir form, because it does blur the lines. And it does make it confusing for a reader, they are wondering, like, is this real? How much of this can I take as gospel? And then when you are also talking about serious subjects, it raises the stakes and people then get antsy about it. And then they, you know, because at a certain point I sort of, it occurred to me like, well, what's to say that this person, Patrick, hasn't just invented this entire personality, this
Starting point is 00:45:39 entire persona. Five years ago, your backgrounds in acting and comedy to some degree. You think, here's the thing. I have these atypical personality traits. I could create this character who is a sociopath. I could write about her life from a first person point of view. It would make a good story. I've had some interesting experiences. And you know, I suddenly had this thought, I was like, well, I should check that that isn't the case. So I was sort of looking online for hits for Patrick Gagney 2015 or whatever, just to see if you had a life online beforehand.
Starting point is 00:46:18 And then in the process of doing that, came across a series of posts on Reddit, where they're talking about the novel. You know, there's inevitably going to be some kind of discussions about what's real, what's not. Are we being taken for a ride here? Is this person's credentials all legit? Are they just sort of exploiting this condition to get a book out of it? And if it's okay with you, I wanted to put some of the specific comments that I found there to you. So, I mean, I think we've dealt with some of these over the course of the last hour
Starting point is 00:46:51 or so. Someone here says, this is the Kraken, says, I could understand someone trying to declaim the term sociopath, but this article, I think they're talking about the New York Times article, also felt like an unethical way to publicly accuse her husband of dishonesty and at the very least emotional infidelity. When that's coupled with the fact that she doesn't post her credentials or have much info about mental health in general on her website that is supposedly dedicated to mental health advocacy, I get funky vibes.
Starting point is 00:47:24 That's fair. To the first point, my husband actually edited that New York Times piece before it went out. I don't show anyone anything before my husband sees it out of respect to him, but also because I don't have the best barometer for what's okay, and he does. So everything goes through him. And I've never been someone who was a sharer. When I got my PhD, I did that for myself. I wish I could say that I was an altruistic person, but really it was selfishly motivated.
Starting point is 00:48:04 So although, yes, I work in advocacy, all of my work has just been my own thing. I haven't tried to be public. I haven't wanted to be overly vocal about it until now. And that website was just sort of a placeholder. I didn't think about it in terms of credentials or believability. I didn't consider that at all. When you say your PhD was selfishly motivated, that's because you wanted to understand what was going on with you. Now, over the course of my doctorate,
Starting point is 00:48:37 I realized, oh, I'm going to have to learn about these other personality types too. But it was a gift that I'm incredibly grateful to have received, if not reluctantly, because understanding other personality types really helped me understand the world and my place in it and neurodivergent places in it. Here is a comment from someone about the dissertation, saying, her dissertation is legit according to the school's registrar, but it's not available online. As most dissertations are, the entire point being
Starting point is 00:49:13 that they're meant to contribute to public knowledge and most schools require students to have them made available. The average grad student leaves a track record. So they're just sort of worried about, like, why isn't it more visible, easily found? I understand, it wasn't a requirement. All I was required to do was log a copy
Starting point is 00:49:29 with the school library, which I did, and then I was done. I think a lot of people want to contribute in a way, want, especially if you're pursuing like a researcher track, that wasn't what I was doing. I was just trying to get my degree and get out of there Mm-hmm. I think we've sort of covered this but someone called member spice says how she gone through her entire life doing all this crazy illegal shit and zero consequences because I'm white and I'm blonde and I've got enough money that I can slide beneath the radar. There is no question
Starting point is 00:50:04 You know sociopathy is sociopathy, but how that experience is lived differs greatly dependent on race, gender, and socioeconomic stratas. And I understand that. And I would not be here today if I hadn't had the resources to pursue a degree, pursue a graduate degree, and spend years in therapy. And I had also the luxury of time where I could sit in libraries for hours on end,
Starting point is 00:50:35 researching this stuff. That's a great answer to that, but I wonder if we could preface that now by just sort of running quickly through some of the more extraordinary things that you did. Is that okay? Of course. There's a whole motif in the book about a woman that was trying to blackmail you at one point. Is that all true?
Starting point is 00:50:52 Oh, yeah. I mean, you'll be hard pressed to find any, I mean, there are going to be some things that might be composites. So details have been changed, but the stories are true. Hmm. I mean, you certainly were driven to the point of getting so upset and angry with her that you thought about hurting her. That was that was tough. That was a real, especially because
Starting point is 00:51:18 of that. This was at a time in my life where I was really teetering on what's the point? the point? I get the same result, whether I give in to my darkest impulses or not. At the time, my then boyfriend and I were struggling. I didn't really like my job very much, and I remember thinking, I could do this, and I could get away with it, so why don't I just do it? It was a real struggle, especially because this person was so vile and I I
Starting point is 00:51:49 Felt at the time that I had all the justification in the world to do something to her even though I really didn't need the justification and To explain for people who haven't read the book book she was trying to blackmail you because her son Was managed by your dad at a certain point and she was unhappy with how that had gone Why didn't she try and blackmail him directly? She reckoned that she had pictures of him getting up to all sorts I think that she thought I was an easier target right when, okay. When, boy, was she wrong, she should have gone for him. Yeah. And then after you resisted the impulse to do anything violent,
Starting point is 00:52:33 did that feel good or was that just frustrating? No, it was frustrating. So I remember keeping her on the line for a while, like just like a fish on a line. I would tug at it just because I didn't, I could have paid her off and made her go away. I could have just ignored her, but I didn't. I would answer the phone calls. I would toy with her. And I kept that going for longer than I should have because I got a jolt just from messing with her. But did it upset you? Did it frighten you that this person was? No. It delighted me in the sense that, ah, okay, now I don't need to look for anything.
Starting point is 00:53:11 I don't need to look for my jolts of emotion because I have free meat on which I can feed for as long as you'll keep giving it to me. It was an excuse to give in to all sorts of bad behavior. And sorry if you've sort of said all this before, but I still find myself confused by the idea that you are bothered by certain parts of your behavior. Isn't that the same as guilt? Isn't that just guilt in another form? No, because I don't feel guilty about my behavior.
Starting point is 00:53:43 I didn't like that I was unable to make the urges dissipate without being reliant on destructive behavior, because overall, it wasn't an effective strategy. I was able to get away with it for a while, but I wouldn't have been able to get away with it forever. And ultimately, I wanted to get married. I wanted to enjoy the perks of society and I knew that the two lifestyles could not coexist. I had to choose.
Starting point is 00:54:15 Well, I wanted to be able to exist among the normies. Okay. And I knew that breaking into houses and stealing cars, that wasn't the best long-term strategy. Have you ever come across someone socially and thought, oh, mate, you are so sociopathic and you don't know it? Yeah. And I think it's... What it boils down to is just sort of like the lights are on, but
Starting point is 00:54:41 no one's home type thing. So they're saying all the right things, they're doing all the right things, they're very, very charming. But you'll ask them, you'll get them talking about maybe their significant other, you know? Really like, oh, I'm so in love with it. You'll get them talking, talking, talking,
Starting point is 00:54:56 and then you'll say, what's your favorite movie? And they won't know. Or what's your favorite song? And they won't know. Or just anything beyond an extension of themselves or an extension of what they're quote unquote supposed to say, they can't back it up with any actual knowledge of the person, that's usually a pretty good giveaway.
Starting point is 00:55:18 Unfortunately, it's also a giveaway of a narcissist. So, fuck, sorry. Tick and tick. I thought I would share with you some of my borderline sociopathic traits and see what you thought. Please, always happy to be in good company. All right, good.
Starting point is 00:55:36 I did a bit of stealing when I was younger, but a lot of people do, don't they? A lot of people do. Go through some shoplifting phases. Yes. Well, I had one incident of stealing some chewing gum when I was really very little. I saw it on the floor of a shop, took it home,
Starting point is 00:55:53 and knew that I shouldn't, but justified it to myself because it was on the floor. I thought, wow, they don't want it anymore. It's fine. I can have it. And then my dad found it. He's like, what are you doing with this? This was not paid for. And then he burned it.
Starting point is 00:56:10 No. It's such a weird thing to do with chewing gum. It really is. I was not expecting that. I just remember seeing it dribble down the fake coal and thought, that's not the way to deal with stolen chewing gum. How about someone like Donald Trump, and I know this is a cliche thing to say, but would you look at someone like him and go, yep, he's on some kind of spectrum, or at least
Starting point is 00:56:40 he is operating without certain governing emotions that most of us have to reckon with. Again, you know, I'm going to go back to what you said before. You were talking about how your own, like the things that you did, what it was that was sociopathic, the stealing. I would look at the motivation for that behavior. And that's really what this all boils down to, because everybody has those bouts of thievery when they're kids, or they're up to something, and even into adulthood or adolescence. What is motivating that behavior? My guess is you weren't stealing those things
Starting point is 00:57:13 because you felt apathy and you were trying to force a pop of feeling. Same with someone like Donald Trump. You're looking at this anti-social behavior, I look at the motivation behind the behavior and what I see is a lot of emotion. I don't see a void. I see a surplus. So I would rule him out of the sociopathic camp for that reason, that I see him as being a very emotional person. Right. Okay. And his emotions are, depending on whether you like him or not, for someone like me, I don't admire the guy. And if there's emotion there, it is directed at improving his lot in the world and accessing power. And that leans more toward narcissism than sociopathy.
Starting point is 00:57:58 Right. And also, narcissism is also associated with grandiosity to a large extent. So if you look at everything has to be the best, everything has to be perfect. And that also speaks to him and his lifestyle. I'm still thinking about what my wife's favorite film is. I don't know if I know.
Starting point is 00:58:20 Well, you might be in trouble. Shit. You can probably tell me your favorite genre. Yes, I would say it's generally romantic comedies with Jennifer Aniston. Although I've said that publicly before and she goes, fuck off, it's not. But I think she does like those. I'll tell you what her favorite film is. See, here it is.
Starting point is 00:58:40 It's Alpha Papa with Alan Partridge. Have you ever seen that? It's pretty good. But it's not as good as she thinks it is. And I refuse to watch it for the sixth time. This advert is for Squarespace. Oh yeah. I wanted to get with the times and finally build myself a website
Starting point is 00:59:05 Oh ho ho Unfortunately I don't got no computational skill Confused emoji, bleh And then I heard about Squarespace Where you can build a website in the time it takes to make yourself a sandwich Like a gourmet sandwich I went to squarespace.com slash buxton and started up a free trial I was playing baby!
Starting point is 00:59:33 I found a template that I liked and typed some words and dragged some pictures in it really made me smile then when I was happy and decided I would buy it I was prompted for an offer code I typed in Buxton and I saved 10% that's right at Squarespace.com slash Buxton. I'm a website guy. Continue. If you believe that God makes miracles you have to wonder if Satan has a few up his sleeve. Fuck off, Dexter.
Starting point is 01:00:15 Hey, welcome back, Podcats. That was Patrick Gagney there. I'm very grateful to her for making the time to talk to me. There's a few links in the description of today's podcast if you'd like to do some further Patrick related reading. So as you can hear I'm in London as I said at the end of my intro. I just timed everything wrong. I thought I had enough time to record the intro and the outro before I left for London but I didn't so that's why I'm here now. In East London I'm staying tonight recording with another podcast guest tomorrow and I have a
Starting point is 01:00:50 couple of meetings but I thought rather than just record this in my room on my own I'd come out and you could enjoy the sounds of groovy East London. I'm just off Brick Lane right now. I'm looking over towards Rough Trade Records. Anyway, as I said at the end of the intro, I wanted to share a few recommendations for movies that you might find uplifting if you could use a break, or you know, you just fancy a bit of an uplift. I think you've earned it. So rather than just trotting out my usual ones, which I might end up doing anyway at some point, I ended up texting a few former podcast guests to ask them for some recommendations. I got some nice responses, a few well-known titles, some
Starting point is 01:01:42 a bit more obscure, several I hadn't actually seen. So I thought I would share a few of them with you over the next few weeks. Today I'm going to do a few people's recommendations, and maybe it might be too much, but what you can do is just watch a few trailers that you think sound interesting. I'll put links in the description. and then you can make your choice. I'm trying to give you as many options as possible even though sometimes it's better to have fewer options. Shut up buckles just give the recommendations. Alright calm down. So first of all I texted a friend of the podcast Tash Demetriou. She said I'll
Starting point is 01:02:23 have a think. Top of my head home alone, too Because there's that guy in it that I love Donald Trump Bit of humor from Tash there. I've never seen home alone, too Maybe she genuinely likes that movie, but she also picked working girl Which I like to actually directed by Mike Nichols 1989 Tess an ambitious young secretary played by Melanie Griffith aspires to become successful financially its very 80s and aspirational big hair big shoulder pads when her boss gets injured
Starting point is 01:02:56 her boss played by Sigourney Weaver during a skiing accident she takes advantage of the opportunity to make headway in her career with the help of Harrison Ford. Everyone's on good form in that movie. Melanie Griffith's brilliant in it. I agree with that choice, Tash. I like that movie too. Bridesmaids, of course, quite a few people said bridesmaids. I mean, I've said before many times on this podcast that never fails to cheer me up. The Plain Scene especially directed by Paul Fiege 2011 I
Starting point is 01:03:32 don't really need to tell you what it's about it's about some bridesmaids it's Maya Rudolph is in there Rose Byrne Melissa McCarthy Chris O'Dowd is fantastic I mean they're all brilliant in that. Kristen Wiig though, oh my goodness, amazing. And a movie I haven't seen which Tash recommends for uplift, Now and Then, directed by Leslie Linker Glatter, 1986. Four childhood friends gather to prepare for the birth of Chrissie's baby. It's Chrissie's baby! They wonder how the girls they were at 12 years could possibly have become the women they are now.
Starting point is 01:04:09 It stars Rosie O'Donnell, Christina Ricci, Demi Moore, Melanie Griffith, Gabby Hoffman and Thora Burch. It looks a bit like, you know, it's a sort of Rites of Passage, teen friendship movie. Not totally unlike Stand By Me, but maybe a bit more cuddly. But I haven't seen it. It looks fun. So those are Tash's recommendations. Now here is a voice message from friend of the podcast, Richard Iowadi. Hi Adam. The one that came immediately to mind was Stop Making Sense, but I suppose you have to, well I don't know that you have to already be a Talking Heads fan but if you don't like their music it's probably not that uplifting, but I'd say
Starting point is 01:04:58 by the end of that film when everyone's standing up and you've gone through the various David Byrne jivings. It's pretty good. Monterey Pop Festival, I'd also say it's consistently uplifting. Now for whatever reason, I also find the American movie documentary that Chris Smith made incredibly uplifting, although it's got melancholy in it. Okay, hope you're well, bye. There you go Richard Iowadi. Wow, I love Stop Making Sense. Regular podcasts may have heard me getting teary about it back in the day when Jonathan Demme died,
Starting point is 01:05:37 but I do love that film directed by Jonathan Demme, Talking Heads concert film, thought to be one of the best concert films ever made, and it is absolutely uplifting. American Utopia is brilliant as well, the film of David Byrne's concert, directed by Spike Lee, I think, which came out three years ago or something. That's very good.
Starting point is 01:06:02 Garth Jennings, another friend of the podcast, recommends that one. Even if you're not like the biggest Talking Heads and David Byrne fan, I would recommend that one. If you like music, check it out. American Movie as well, that's a great shout. I haven't seen that for years, not since it came out. That was released in 1999 and Chris Smith, the director of that film, he was on the podcast talking about Jim and Andy, the documentary he made about Jim Carey playing Andy Kaufman. And he's also directed a load of other excellent documentaries. He directed a great documentary about Wham! that's on Netflix that I really recommend.
Starting point is 01:06:47 That came out last year, in fact, and that will really put a smile on your face, I think. And American Movie, yeah, I'd forgotten. That's a beautiful film. Chris Smith and Sarah Price, they spent two years documenting the making of Mark Borschadt's short film Coven, or Coven as he calls it. He's an American independent movie maker and it's a film all about ambition and friendship and perseverance and overcoming creative and
Starting point is 01:07:19 financial challenges and it's so lovely and inspiring and funny and ridiculous. Thank you very much Richard for those. Now here's a recommendation from brilliant comedian and taskmaster creator Alex Horne. Hello Adam. I would really recommend a movie called Next Gold Wins. I found it really uplifting when I watched it on an aeroplane recently. I think it was written by Taika Waititi and Ian, who did The Inbetweeners. I've since been told that the documentary is much better. It's about a football team in the Pacific Islands
Starting point is 01:08:10 who don't normally do very well. But you've guessed it. In this movie, they do quite well. In this movie, they do quite well. And it makes you feel good. Next goal wins. Thank you feel good. Next goal wins! Thank you very much. Alex, musical recommendation. Beautiful. Next goal wins. That is the dramatised version
Starting point is 01:08:35 of a documentary that was released in 2014. So the one that Alex was talking about was directed by Taika Waititi, who I'm sure many of you will know, directed Hunt for the Wilder People. That is another film that will definitely provide some uplift, I would say. I haven't seen Next Goal Wins, either Taika Waititi's version of it or the documentary version, which coincidentally was also recommended by, well actually someone who hasn't been on the podcast yet, but he's definitely a listener and a friend of the
Starting point is 01:09:11 podcast and I hope he will get on here at some point. It's great comedian, great guy, star of Stathletes Flats, brother of Tash Demetriou, it's Jamie Demetriou. The documentary Next Goal Wins by Mike Brett and Steve Jamieson is my instinctive response when anyone asks for an uplifting film. It's about the American Samoan football team who received the highest battering in the history of national football, 31-0 against Australia. To this day, it's the only film that I've ever reached the credits of and then just immediately clicked the button that takes you back to the beginning of the film
Starting point is 01:09:52 to watch it again and then after the second time I did the same thing again. So I suppose the only thing that wasn't uplifting about it was me worrying that there was something wrong with me that I was willing to watch this documentary for about four and a half hours on the drop. There we go. So that is high praise from Jamie. I've got to watch that film. Next goal wins.
Starting point is 01:10:12 Finally, in this inaugural roundup of uplifting movie recommendations on the podcast, it's a text one. And this is from someone that I have recorded a podcast with, but it's but we're still waiting on a few clearance issues to be resolved. But it is musician Kim Deal of Pixies and The Breeders. Her album, Nobody Loves You More, comes out towards the end of this month, November 2024. And I asked Kim for some recommendations for uplifting movies and she texted back and said uplifting um when I'm depressed I like jump scares I like screaming no well my fingers are stretched out in front of my face I did this during the whole pandemic with my sister on FaceTime
Starting point is 01:11:05 and it worked wonders. It really elevated my mood. I'll be doing this again a lot. Here are some for you to try with your family and friends. So she's gone for horror movies, that's how Kim Deal is uplifted, and her picks are The Omen, directed by Richard Donner, 1976. That's a classic. But to be clear, it is a horror film. It's about the son of Satan. And it's, you know, not what everyone would consider uplifting. She also recommends Smile 2, directed by Charlie Seroff.
Starting point is 01:11:44 That came out this year. I haven't seen that one. And I've heard people saying, "'It's even better than Smile 1!' Which I also haven't seen. About to embark on a new world tour, global pop sensation Sky Riley begins to experience increasingly terrifying and inexplicable events, overwhelmed by the escalating horrors and pressures of fame, she must face
Starting point is 01:12:05 her dark past to regain control of her life before it spirals out of control. That smile too. So that's where I'm going to leave the movie recommendations this week. That's probably way too many. We'll streamline the idea if we continue with it. I've got a few more, like loads of people came back to me. So I will share some of those with you over the coming weeks in the outros. But that's it for this week from here in glamorous East London. Thank you very much indeed once again to Patrick
Starting point is 01:12:36 Gagney. Thanks to Seamus Murphy Mitchell for his production support, conversation editing and general greatness. Thanks to Helen Green. She does the beautiful illustration for this podcast. Thanks to all the A-Cast who continue to work hard, keeping the show on the road with my sponsors, but thanks most of all to you for listening, for coming back. You listen right to the end again. Thanks. You're the best. You, you are the best one of the listeners. The others, they say they like the podcast, but do they really?
Starting point is 01:13:11 I was talking to a friend of mine this week, and he was saying that he'd seen some guy say, oh yeah, I used to like Adam Buxton's podcast, but then I listened to the Robbie Williams episode, and I didn't like the way he treated Robbie on that one. I thought we had some good bands me and Robbie. But maybe it was uncomfortable. You never know what's going to turn people off. But you guys, you've stuck with me through thick and thin and I appreciate it.
Starting point is 01:13:40 Now I'm going to risk looking a little bit crazy surrounded by the groovers here outside Rough Trade. Give you a hug. Good to see you. Until next time we're together, I'm obviously not going to shout at the top of my voice out here because I'm too weedy. So take care. And for what it's worth I love you.
Starting point is 01:14:05 Bye! Give me like a smile and a thumbs up. Nice like a pant when me bum's up. Give me like a smile and a thumbs up. Nice like a pant when me bum's up. Like and subscribe. Like and subscribe. Like and subscribe. Please like and subscribe. Give me like a smile and a thumbs up. Nice like a pant when me bum's up. Give me like a smile and a thumbs up. Nice like a pant when me bum's up.
Starting point is 01:14:32 Nice like a pant when me bum's up. Give me like a smile and a thumbs up. Nice like a pant when me bum's up. Nice like a pant when me bum's up. Give me like a smile and a thumbs up. Nice like a pant when me bum's up. Nice like a pant when me bum's up. Nice like a pant when me bum's up.
Starting point is 01:14:40 Nice like a pant when me bum's up. Nice like a pant when me bum's up. Nice like a pant when me bum's up. Nice like a pant when me bum's up. Nice like a pant when me bum's up. Nice like a pant when me bum's up. Nice like a pant when me bum's up. Nice like a pant when me bum's up. Nice like a pant when on the thumbs up Nice second hand when we bump up Give me a like and subscribe Like and subscribe Give me a like and subscribe
Starting point is 01:14:51 Like and subscribe Give me a smile on the thumbs up Give me a like and subscribe When we bump up When we bump up When we bump up When we bump up When we bump up When we bump up I'm going to be a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a
Starting point is 01:15:08 little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a
Starting point is 01:15:24 little bit of a little bit of a Thanks for watching!

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.