The Adam Mockler Show - JD Vance Just Got Confronted Over His Dark Secret

Episode Date: October 30, 2025

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Now streaming on Paramount Plus is the epic return of Mayor of Kingstown. Warden? You know who I am. Starring Academy Award nominee Jeremy Renner. I swear in these walls. Emmy Award winner Edie Falco. You're an ex-con who ran this place for years. And now, now you can't do that. And BAFTA award winner Lenny James.

You're about to have a plague of outsiders descend on your town. Let me tell you this. It's going to be consequences. Mayor of Kingstown, new season now streaming on Paramount Plus. But there is something you guys are doing that is kind of disturbing me a little bit. Okay, go ahead. Thank you. You guys sent the military into Washington, D.C. and a few other cities that I can't think of off the top of my head.

All right, check it out. It only took a few college students to expose the fundamental flaws in J.D. Vance's worldview. Vance was debating college students at a Turning Point USA event in Oxford, Mississippi. after Charlie Kirk was obviously killed tragically kicking off the first event, the tour has continued with different faces rotating in. We had Megan Kelly hosting one event. We now have J.D. Vance hosting one event in Oxford, Mississippi. And I just want to break down a few key moments. There's one moment where a dude in a Trump hat asks him a really good question about the National Guard saying, hey, if you're able to mobilize a National Guard into certain states or into certain territory,

like DC, what stops the next administration from mobilizing it in the same way, maybe against a turning point USA event? It is a very good question and one that deserves to be asked. But first, let me show you the moment that's been going mega-viral, where a woman asks J.D. Vance, you know, a really, really heartfelt question saying Republicans have talked for years about the American dream, about people moving here, making the country better, people moving here and having a path forward, upward, upward mobility. But now you guys are trying to take that away and demonize the people who have moved here.

You know, I'm going to let her play this. I'm going to let her say this. Make sure you drop a like. Make sure you're subscribed to the Adam McClure feed to help boost the message. And let's listen to this. Hello, Mr. Vice President. Thank you so much for giving this opportunity to talk here today. I did not agree with many of the things that you said right ahead of this.

But I don't think that's my point to discuss here. I want to ask is you are married to a woman who is not Christian in her Wikipedia I mean I just looked at up I wanted to know what her faith was I didn't know this before but she still calls herself Hindu you are raising two kids three kids in internal ratio cultural racial religious household how are you maintaining or how How are you teaching your kids not to keep your religion ahead of their mother's religion? Or how are you teaching them that your kind, their dad kind, who got here just a few years or a few hundred years, a few decades ago, is different or is better than your mom's kind who got here just a generation before? How are you balancing that?

When you talk about too many immigrants here, when did you guys decide that number? Why did you sell us a dream? You made us spend our youth, our wealth in this country and gave us a dream. You don't owe us anything. We have worked hard for it. Then how can you as a vice president stand there and say that we have too many of them now and we are going to take them out to peace. who are here rightfully so by paying the money that you guys ask us you gave us the

path and now how can you stop it and tell us we don't belong here anymore so and one more thing I'm sorry one more thing do you have to be a lot there I don't know if I'm gonna remember all this but I will try I'm sorry I'm sorry I had to say all of this and please take it with do I mean I'm saying all of course no go ahead I have no intention of causing a scene here or anything We're not close to causing a city, don't worry. But we talked about Christianity, all of this. I'm not even Christian, and I'm here standing to sow support.

Why are we making Christianity one of the major thing that you have to have in common to be one of you guys, to so that I love America just as you do, why is that still a question? Why do I have to be a Christian? Okay. So there was a lot there. and I'm going to try to respond to as much of it as I can. So on the question of immigration, so first of all, I can believe that we should have lower immigration levels,

but if the United States passed a law and made a promise to somebody, the United States, of course, has to honor that promise. Nobody's talking about that. I'm talking about people who came in in violation of the laws of the United States of America, and I'm talking about in the future reducing the number, reducing the number of people sorry what can continue on that

because when you just said you are not stopping with the people who came here legally right but you are pushing out policies that hurt us and these policies are not even solving the problems these policies are just

creating chaos so again I'm gonna I'm gonna finish answering the question and then if you know If I've answered all nine of your questions in less than 15 minutes, then we can keep on going. We've got to have a little fun, right? I mean, it's a clever way of not answering anything substantively. Here's the thing.

I can believe that the United States should lower its levels of immigration in the future while also respecting that there are people who have come here through lawful immigration pathways that have contributed to the country. But just because one person or 10 people or 100 people came in legally and contributed to the United States of America, does that mean that we're thereby committed to let in a million or 10 million or 100 million people a year in the future? No, that's not right. We cannot have, I'll go and finish, we cannot have an immigration policy where what was good for the country 50 or 60 years ago binds the country inevitably for the future. There's too many people who want to come to the United States of America. America, and my job as vice president is not to look out for the interest of the whole world. It's to look out for the people of the United States. I don't know. Everybody cheers, but it kind of feels like he didn't answer the question.

I feel like the question was largely based around the attitudes towards legal immigrants and this conflation that comes from the administration where they try to bring up, you know, violent criminals or drug dealers every single time they bring up immigration. They try to draw a connection between. these two, even when they're talking about legal immigration. So essentially, I feel like she was asking a few different questions, but at the core of her question is, why are you demonizing immigrants, both legal and illegal, but even legal immigration? You're making the pathways harder. You're removing temporary protected status. You're making the barriers for H-1B visas

higher, saying you have to pay $100,000. Over and over, I can list these examples of then making legal immigration tougher unless you're coming from South Africa and you're a whites person or you're a Christian of some sort which is what she was saying but he didn't really get to the heart of that he then started going for the easiest stuff

and attacking illegal immigration saying hey listen we just want to minimize the amount of illegal immigration happening of course everybody wants to minimize the amount of illegal immigration happening let me show you this next clip of a dude asking J.D. Vance

about the National Guard. This one's quite lighthearted. I mean, they joke around a bit, but the question is quite serious. Like, we need an answer to this question that's quite serious. J.D. Vance's is not satisfactory. Take a listen.

Hello, J.D., how you doing today, man? Good. How you doing? In the wise words of Ricky Bobby, I don't know what to do with my hands. Don't feel bad. Neither do I half the time, man. Okay. Okay.

Brutal lack of laugh from the crowd. At the time, man. Okay. Okay. First off, yeah, laugh it off, laugh it up. Okay, first off, I just want to say I am a huge supporter of the Trump administration. I was three months too late to vote for you guys, but if I could have, I would have. So I'm a huge supporter of you guys before I make my argument, but there is something you guys are doing that is kind of disturbing me a little bit.

Okay, go ahead. Thank you. You guys sent the military into Washington, D.C. and a few other cities that I can't think of off the top of my head, which first off, they've had wonderful results. Like, no one, no one can deny the results of that. It's wonderful. I mean, you can deny the results. People going to restaurants at a 40% lower rate means people aren't really going out as much. And when people aren't going out as much because there's military on the streets, that's clearly a short-term solution. I mean, what are you just going to perpetually have military on the streets of Chicago? For example, where I live in a recorder, just always have military out there forever,

and that's going to solve the crime problem. Are we going to turn into North Korea? Some might even say the greatest. They, uh, I'm a comedian. I like this guy. Who is this guy? You can make the crowd laugh more than J.D. Vance can. Thank you, J.D. I like you, too.

Now he's going to, now he's going to ask the question about all the shit that we did wrong, but that's okay. Go ahead and ask your question. But yeah, I'm just wondering, well, it's not necessarily something you did wrong, but it's what could someone else do wrong? Let's say we get a complete tyrant in office, and let's say we're having, let's say, turning point USA is having a huge protest against, you know, something really bad that we don't like. And let's say he's, a president is saying that it's getting violent. How can we, what is, I'm trying to think, my mind's kind of blah. How, what is the, what is the difference between what you're doing and how could we, how could we prevent someone from a, abusing that power.

It's a really good question. He's basically saying it's a slippery slope. If one administration begins to mobilize a National Guard illegally against the explicit will of the governor, the mayor's in the state, everyone who lives in these states, and he just continues to do that, which is incredibly authoritarian and illegal, especially after posting memes of the city on fire, but that's a different story, then, hey, we're all laughing now. We all think it's like funny, fun now.

but what if the next Democratic president isn't as nice and decides to just mobilize the National Guard into red states? It's not as funny then. It's a slippery slope. Yeah. So look, look, I understand where the question is coming from, and I think it's a fair question. And it's going to sound like I'm being sarcastic,

and it really is not meant in any offense. But when you talk about what could another administration do, to take a wild hypothetical example totally off the top of my head, What if Joe Biden sent the Federal Bureau of Investigation to start arresting his political opponents? Oh, that's bullshit. Okay? So, so here's something that I want conservatives. I want every conservative to remember it's an important part of my entire political philosophy is we cannot be afraid to do something because the left might do it in the future.

The left is already going to do it regardless of whether we do it. That is the takeaway of the last 40 years. We're not. No Democratic president has mobilized a national guard against the will of the people who run these states. No Democratic president has started crypto schemes. No Democratic president has tried to run for a third term or joked about it this much and posted AI memes. I mean, no Democratic president has tried to sign executive orders that overturn birthright citizenship or other constitutional amendments. When J.D. Vance tries to point to some not.

example from Biden. What do you mean Biden ordered his FBI to go after anybody? They keep saying this, but they have no actual example of Biden ordering his DOJ to do that. I proved this on CNN by, you know, asking Scott Jennings over and over, what's your proof? They never have any. But not only that, to make matters worse, Trump literally did ask Pam Bondi in a truth social post directly. He said, hey, Pam, go after these three people. And two out of those three people have been gone after ever since that post. It's so directly, clearly, obvious. It's persecution. And J.D. Vance is not answering that kid's question. The dude's question is very, very, very, you know, savvy. It's smart. He's saying, hey, dude, we're all sitting here cheering while you're arresting opponents and mobilizing

the military. Could this potentially backfire? And J.D. Vance is, no, no, no. J.D. Vance is like, no, this is already all happened. Trust me. Like, the Democrats have already done all this before, bro. If you think Merrick Garland and Joe Biden were out there doing radical shit, then you weren't paying attention. And obviously, he's just grifting, trying to consolidate power as much as possible. I'm going to leave it there. If you appreciate the videos on the Adam McClure channel, all that I ask is that you drop a like, subscribe.

I'll see you on the next one. And peace out.