The Adam Mockler Show - JD Vance SECRETLY BURIES Epstein Trump PAST

Episode Date: July 21, 2025

Click below for premium Adam Mockler content 👉 https://www.youtube.com/@adammockler/join 👉 https://adammockler.com Adam Mockler with MeidasTouch Network breaks down JD Vance's secret meeting wi...th Jeffrey Epstein. JOIN THE COMMUNITY: Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/AdamMockler/ Discord: https://discord.gg/y9yzMU3Gff Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/adammockler/ Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/adammockler.bsky.social Twitter: https://x.com/adammocklerr/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/Adammockler Contact me at: contact@mocklermedia.com Adam Mockler - Mockler Media LLC Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 No Frills delivers. Get groceries delivered to your door from No Frills with PC Express. Shop online and get $15 in PC Optimum Points on your first five orders. Shop now at NoFriills.ca. Long Bendy Twizzlers candy keeps the fun going. Keep the fun going. There is a lot of heavy speculation going around the internet right now after we learned yesterday that Vice President JD Vance flew to Montana for a secret visit with Rupert
Starting point is 00:00:44 Murdoch, who owns the Wall Street Journal, and we don't know much past that. Now, we can speculate on the contents of this meeting. There are slight reports about what could have been said, but overall this seems to be another piece of this cover-up we've seen over the past few weeks. Let's read this. It says, J.D. Vance met with Rupert Murdoch hours before the Wall Street Journal released bombshell Trump Epstein story. The vice president's office did not announce this trip. It was secretive beforehand. Hence, the excursion was seen as a surprise and prompted local speculation. Well, not only local speculation
Starting point is 00:01:16 because now we are on this story. Make sure you drop a like. Make sure you subscribe to the Adam Mockler feed. You can catch me, Adam Mockler, on CNN tonight at 9pm Central, 10pm Eastern. Set your alarm. Don't miss it. I love you all. And let's just start with a tweet that JD Vance sent out a few years back. This reads, JD Vance doesn't want you to share this. On the left, JD Vance slams the Wall Street Journal and says journalists should be ashamed
Starting point is 00:01:40 for covering the Epstein story. But in 2021, JD Vance said that journalists should be ashamed for not covering the Epstein story. But in 2021, JD Vann said that journalists should be ashamed for not covering the Epstein story. The absolute metamorphosis that these people go through is impressive. It's offensive at some point because they're just gaslighting the American people. So he said in 2021,
Starting point is 00:01:58 what possible interest would the US government have in keeping Epstein's clients secret? Oh, dot, dot, dot. And then he said, if you're a journalist and you're not asking questions about this case, you should be ashamed of yourself. What purpose do you even serve? I'm sure there's a middle-class teenager somewhere who could use some harassing right now, but maybe try doing your job once in a while.
Starting point is 00:02:17 So this clear contempt for the media is oozing out of JD Vance even back in 2021. The funny thing is he was responding to Jack Bacowiak, who's the guy I debated on Piers Morgan. It's a very, very small world, but JD Vance is even more of a hypocrite. Let's read this one. He said on July 17th, forgive my language, but this story is complete and utter BS. The Wall Street Journal should be ashamed for posting it. It's kind of funny. He uses the same word ashamed here that he used back here when he said they should be ashamed for not covering the Epstein story. Which one is it, bro? He then says, Where is the letter? Would you be shocked to learn they never showed it to us before publishing it? Does anyone believe this sounds like Donald Trump?
Starting point is 00:02:56 Yeah, I do. I mean, it wasn't something he said, it was a voiceover script, so it sounds very, very plausible, and there are many reasons why the Wall Street Journal hasn't released the actual photo Maybe the source said they couldn't maybe they're holding off There are many there are a multitude of reasons But I just want to point out JD Vance is a hypocrite JD Vance said this back in 2016 when the Access Hollywood tape came out in which Trump bragged about groping women. He said fellow Christians Everyone is watching us when we apologize for this man. Lord help us. So, you can see in these posts, JD Vance's fall from grace, was he ever in grace?
Starting point is 00:03:32 Fall down into MAGA Trumpism. In 2016, he was saying, the Lord is watching us, please help us. Then in 2021, he embraces the conspiracies and says, the media should be ashamed but he wasn't full Trumpy until now he's just he's running defense for likely a pedophilia ring well let's continue with this it reads FBI is in full panic mode searching for Trump mentions in Epstein files confirmed by former analysis FBI personnel were reportedly told to flag any mentions of Trump in a spreadsheet so former FBI members multiple of, have reportedly confirmed that the intelligence agency frantically searched for any mentions of Donald Trump in the files on Jeffrey Epstein
Starting point is 00:04:14 following a Senate Democrat's claims. Illinois Senator Dick Durbin alleged that FBI personnel had been ordered to flag any mentions of Trump in thousands of pages of the files. Legal analyst Allison Gill turned to Blue Sky to ask any former members to confirm the report. In a response, a former analyst who had been designated as one of the reviewers, as well as several other members of the bureau, led her to confirm Durbin's whistleblower back statement. It's true. A thousand FBI personnel had been assigned to 100,000 files totaling 300,000 pages.
Starting point is 00:04:44 Individual analysts were told to flag mentions of Trump by document and page personnel had been assigned to 100,000 files totaling 300,000 pages, individual analysts were told the flag mentions of Trump by document and page number and logged them in an Excel spreadsheet. Think about this. Trump's name is littered so thoroughly throughout the files that they had to create an entire Excel spreadsheet listing off his names. Absolutely absurd. The legal analyst noted that, according
Starting point is 00:05:06 to one source, typical restrictions on access to the files were not used with the entire information management division allegedly having access to the files through a shared drive. Sources also alleged that the process was disorganized. Sometimes personnel were often waiting for new instructions and those instructions changed frequently. As all of this is happening, there's no way you can't call this a cover-up because then we then learn JD Vance met with Rupert Murdoch hours before the Wall Street Journal released the story and I want to break this down.
Starting point is 00:05:33 Now there are a few lines of thought here. Let's say there are three plausible theories. Number one, JD Vance was going there to kill the story, to tell Rupert Murdoch not to post a story. We know that Donald Trump tried to get Murdoch to kill the story. So this is plausible. This is not out of the realm of possibility. Some people are speculating that JD Vance went there behind Trump's back in order to plant the story about Trump and take power. I don't find that one as convincing. We know that Trump's team knew about this trip. Trump sanctioned this trip. I don't think JD Vance is going behind Trump's back quite yet, but I get where people are going. Or number three,
Starting point is 00:06:10 it was just a coincidence. I don't know if I find that quite convincing that JD Vance just coincidentally met with Rupert Murdoch behind closed doors right before this article dropped. So those are the three. I'll let you choose which one you think it is. Let me know in the comments. But this reads, Vice President JD Vance reportedly met with News Corp founder Rupert Murdoch just hours before the Wall Street Journal published a surprise story about the friendship between Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein. Vance traveled to Montana on Tuesday to attend the meeting of Murdoch, chief of News Corp, which publishes the New York Post and the Wall Street Journal.
Starting point is 00:06:41 Two way varying different publications in terms of quality. The New York Post, the Wall Street Journal is way varying publications in terms of quality. The New York Post, the Wall Street Journal is really solid though. Murdoch's son, Lachlan Murdoch, was also present at the meeting, along with various other Fox News executives. And listen, obviously we ideologically disagree with Rupert Murdoch on many things, but something that I've been reading over the past few weeks is that this man does not back down. Especially as it pertains to his businesses or lawsuits with his businesses, he doesn't back down.
Starting point is 00:07:08 He actually cares about the Wall Street Journal's integrity. Let's continue. He allegedly traveled to the family's ranch in southwest Montana near Dilling. Two people familiar with the trip told the Associated Press. The vice president's office did not announce the trip beforehand. Hence, the excursion was seen as a surprise and prompted local speculation. Just hours after Vance met with the Murdochs and members of their team, the Wall Street Journal released a bombshell report indicating that President Trump had written a birthday letter for disgraced
Starting point is 00:07:34 New York financier Jeffrey Epstein. Happy birthday, may every day be a wonderful secret. President Trump then took the truth social and threatened to sue Murdoch, then proceeded to file a ten billion dollar lawsuit because he's an absolute baby, so the question then becomes What was JD Vance there for and even if even if we find out that JD Vance was there for a completely innocent reason Even if I were to grant that it is still a cover-up broadly when Pam Bondi says the list is on her desk Then the list all of the sudden disappears that is by definition a cover-up broadly. When Pam Bondi says the list is on her desk, then the list all of the sudden disappears. That is by definition a cover-up. While all of this is happening,
Starting point is 00:08:09 I just want to make sure that we are not being distracted by some of the other core issues. So the Epstein case is incredibly important to talk about. That's why we talk about it so much. But just a few weeks back the big ugly bill was passed. That will hurt the on-the-ground lives of over 15 million Americans even more long term. That 15 million number is on the low side so the big ugly bill needs to have attention brought to it what about this Trump just radically overhauled the EPA and its mission over the first six months in the EPA is essentially now toothless the Environmental Protection Agency can't serve its sole purpose of protecting our environment,
Starting point is 00:08:46 which is scary. And I find it scary that the news moves at such a fast velocity that it's almost easy to miss this. Now, here's the dilemma that we almost find ourselves in. In covering all of the stories about Epstein and all of these things, it's hard to have space for every other story. So that's why I'm going to start start making longer more thorough videos about Trump radically overhauling the EPA What about this one quote were caged like chickens say Italians and alligator Alcatraz later on I'm gonna make a video regarding the big beautiful bill alligator Alcatraz and Epstein We're gonna talk about all of these things. So we're making sure we're not falling for the distractions I just want to say I'm eternally grateful for all of you. Thank you for everything.
Starting point is 00:09:25 Remember tonight, catch me on CNN, 9 p.m. Central or 10 p.m. Eastern time. Thank you guys and peace out.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.