The Adam Mockler Show - Pam Bondi FLEES after THREAT OF JAIL?!

Episode Date: April 9, 2026

Adam Mockler breaks down Pam Bondi’s refusal to comply with a subpoena tied to the Epstein files as lawmakers from both parties push for answers. With contempt threats looming and pressure building, the situation is raising serious questions about accountability and transparency. Click below for premium Adam Mockler content 👉 https://www.youtube.com/@adammockler/join 👉 https://adammockler.com/subscribe JOIN THE COMMUNITY: Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/AdamMockler/ Discord: https://discord.gg/y9yzMU3Gff Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/adammockler/ Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/adammockler.com/ Twitter: https://x.com/adammocklerr/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@adammockler Contact: [e-mail] Business inquiries: [e-mail] Adam Mockler - Mockler Media LLC Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Uh, where are my gloves? Come on, heat. Any day now? Winter is hard, but your groceries don't have to be. This winter, stay warm. Tap the banner to order your groceries online at voila.ca. Enjoy in-store prices without leaving your home. You'll find the same regular prices online as in-store.

Many promotions are available both in-store and online, though some may vary. When West Jet first took flight in 1996, the vibes were a bit different. People thought denim on denim was peak fashion, inline skates were everywhere, and two out of three women rocked, the Rachel. While those things stayed in the 90s, one thing that hasn't is that fuzzy feeling you get when WestJetting welcomes you on board. Here's to WestJetting since 96. Travel back in time with us and actually travel with us at westjet.com slash 30 years.

As one might expect, the Democrats on this committee, that the top Democrat, Robert Garcia, out with a statement just within the last few moments, saying that the subpoena is to Pam Bondi, whether she is Attorney General or not, she must come in to testify immediately, and they are threatening to begin contempt charges in the Congress. We have got to talk about what's going on with Pam Bondi. It's becoming clear, as you see from this breaking new screenshot from MS now today. Former AG Bondi will not appear for April 14th deposition on Epstein files. And I mean, just lawfully breaking now a second subpoena to come in to testify with

what she knows. And we also saw Nancy Mace today essentially go off on Pam Bondi and Nancy Mace's office, I should say, and her attempt to get out of this. So we're going to break all this down. I want to remind you of a few things because the Epstein files have not gone away as much as the Trump administration would like to, would like them to go away and would like to believe that they have gone away. So let's hop right into it. Before we start, though really quickly. My name is Chris Maury. I do a daily episode here on the Adam Ockler channel. If you appreciate the work that I do, it would mean a lot if you check on my YouTube channel, write it down below. You guys have shown so much support lately. Truly, I appreciate it.

And here on the Adam Mochler channel, we're trying to build something big to punch back against MAGA Media, all the Republican lives we hear, and we're trying to do it in like a Gen Z format. So I know you see me on here, you see Adam McClure in here. Sometimes you see Micah or Fawn on here. And so if you appreciate that work, you want to help us out. It always, it always helps. If you like on this video and make sure you're subscribed here on the Adam Mockler channel. Again, we appreciate each and every one of you. Let's start here with something we've very recently heard from Thomas Massey. Take a listen.

Are you confident you will see that? I don't know if we're going to see it in this administration. Why do you say that? Because Pam Bondi has, you know, she's been so against this. I would say from the beginning, but in the beginning, I think she earnestly was ready to release files. And then I think she wasn't in on the joke when they gave her those binders that had nothing in it. Then she found out she looked like a joke. And she shot off the angry letter to the FBI.

But at some point, somebody got to Pam Bondi and said, it's your job to cover this. So I'm actually really curious what people think about this. Because obviously, Thomas Maskey has been, you know, a main proponent of or a main fighter here in this particular fight. And going against Donald Trump, especially obviously as an election. Republican and him saying, you know, I actually think Pam Bondi wasn't in on it. And then someone got to her and said, it's your job to cover this up. Who got to her? And obviously Thomas Massey's privy to a lot of information, especially leading this fight that we are not. So very curious what you think in the comments down below. I do read all your comments. Obviously, I just

wanted to pull up this photo. I just want to, I want to take one of my apartment walls that's like, it's blank right now. There's nothing on it. It looks like I'm like living in a hospital room. I don't know if anyone's ever seen like a young kid. I'm 24, but I have like a baby face. I call myself like a college age kid. I don't have you ever seen an apartment like a young man has, but it tends to kind of, I call it hospital walls, like you just have nothing because it's not really at the front of mind.

So I'm always thinking about getting a bunch of frames and putting political pictures there. Or I like The Economist a lot, and they have these really cool front pages on The Economist. This is a photo I'd really like to frame because it's very, very powerful. Nancy Mace, a while ago, or a few weeks ago, talking about this, and she has become, again, started to just slam this administration around this issue. Take a listen to this. And I believe that she's not told the full

truth. And we deserve the truth to get to the bottom of this. And I'm looking forward very much to having her depose for as many hours as it takes. Yeah, I agree 100% with Nancy Mace, which again, if I'm agreeing with Nancy Mace, it's a problem. As I said in my video yesterday, when we're calling for the 25th Amendment and I'm in the same corner, just, on this issue with Tucker Carlson, Marjorie Taylor Green, and Alex Jones. It is DefCon one. Okay, there is a huge problem. Things have spiraled out of control with this. Now, before I go back and show you the article and some of what we heard today from Nancy Mason's office, again, just reminding you of a few videos here. Todd Blanche is to the left of, excuse me,

Pam Bondi. Obviously, he's the one who now has control of the Epstein Files. Then fielding questions here a while ago about making mistakes with the Epstein Files, Pam Bondi, saying, just made a few, just a couple. Less than 1% error. Todd, do you want to add to that? Yeah, no, that's right. We said from the beginning that any mistakes that were made, and there should be no mistakes.

And so when you say lawyers have said something, that's not a fair question, and you know it. Because we took pains to protect victims. When someone identified that there was a victim, we immediately pulled that document down, fixed it and put it back up. Immediately. Immediately.

And so, of course, we, don't ever want to do anything to re-victimize anybody that was victimized by the horrible crimes of Mr. Epstein. But, but, and we didn't. And we didn't to the extent the mistakes were made and there were mistakes made because of the reasons the Attorney General just said. But when they were identified to us, we fixed them immediately. I mean, like, playing the victim there, he's putting it lightly.

You know, oh, you know, don't ask us that. We went through painstaking hardship to make sure that. there were no mistakes. You're talking about the most prominent, like the most well-known. I don't know if prominent is the right word there, but the most well-known sexual predator of our entire lifetimes and a conspiracy in some ways that spans so much touches so many different people. We're still asking so many questions and so many victims. And in this horrible atrocity, you're going to take the victim earlier that, oh, it was so painstakingly hard for the DOJ to follow the law. Frankly, go F yourself. I mean, I don't know what else to say. And it's, like,

Pam Bondi has got to follow. I don't know. If she doesn't follow this subpoena, she's got to be thrown in jail. Like, we have to know more. There's a lawful subpoena. You have to show up. And like this is the debt starts to become. Again, the definition of constitutional crisis, our system breaking.

People just aren't held accountable for this stuff anymore. Again, this, remember, her hearing around this was such a turning point, in my opinion. I actually had a friend of mine who was, I would call him indifferent, but often leans kind of right, breaking completely with, this movement because of this hearing alone and Pam Bondi's just disgusting actions in this hearing. These congressional hearings have no longer become helpful at all to anybody. They're so partisan, and Pam Bondi just, it just was such an embarrassment. It was truly an embarrassment for this country. Now, I've seen some of the unredacted Epstein files, and obviously, as you know, President Trump's name is all over them, but so are the names of other senior Trump officials.

Howard Lutnik, Secretary of Commerce, John Phelan, the Secretary of the Navy, and Steve. Feinberg, the Deputy Secretary of Defense. These men were appointed by President Trump to senior positions in his administration. All of them have clear and confirmed ties to Jeffrey Upstein. Attorney General Bondi, yes or no, has the Justice Department asked Secretary Lutnik about his ties to Epstein? Excuse me. Secretary Lutnik has addressed those ties himself.

I'm asking you, has the Justice Department, specifically asked Secretary Lutnik about his ties to Jeffrey Epstein. He has addressed those ties himself. Has the DOJ asked Secretary Phelan about his ties to Jeffrey Epstein? I don't know whether he has addressed those or not. Has Deputy Secretary Feinberg talked to Department of Justice about his ties to Jeffrey Epstein? Yes or no? Has the Department of Justice talked to Secretary, Deputy Secretary Feinberg about

his ties to Jeffrey Epstein, which are clearly spelled out in the files. It's a very simple question. It's not a trick question. I'm just asking you. Yeah, I'm stunned that you want to continue talking about. Oh my gosh. Okay. I'm re-claring my time. I'm asking you not a trick question, a simple question. Okay, so what is clear is. I mean, that is so, it's so, it's so disgusting the way she acts. I'm stunned. We're talking about Epstein instead of, and then takes a different political issue. It's all a team sport now. The executive branch has been hyper politicized and truly a way we have never seen before. Let me bring you back to some of the things we're learning again, this article today from The Daily Beast. Mace blast Bondi's bid to wriggle out of Epstein

Guerrilling. If we scroll down here, fired attorney general Pam Bondi is trying to avoid testifying under oath about her handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files, but Republican Nancy Mace won't let her off the hook. Again, for the first time ever, you're saying the Trump administration, like, Donald Trump's grip on the Republican Party really starting to crack. And don't get me wrong, it's still a cult. He still has that grip. But I would argue this is the first time in 10 years. We've seen Republicans able to go against Donald Trump and still have a place in the party, whether it's elected officials who they have to fight uphill, but they absolutely still have a place in the party. Or it's members of the media, big media figures, Tucker Carlson, Alex Jones. I mean, Marjorie

Taylor Green is kind of in that in between, I'd say, you know? And it's like those are some of biggest figures right now of kind of the right wing and people that are being listened to consistently. And they are in some ways, in a lot of ways, in especially the most important ways, against Donald Trump. And that's so indicative of where this party is at. Before you go against Donald Trump, you like, no one hears from you ever again. I always say you get sent to the Republican dungeon. You go against Trump once, you're gone forever. No one hears from you again. You don't have a place in this party. Now we're starting to see that change. Quote, Pam Bondi cannot escape accountability, simply because she no longer holds the office of the Attorney General.

Mace's office said in a statement, and you saw Robert Garcia's office's statement in the beginning as well. Our motion to subpoena Pam Bondi, which was passed by the Oversight Committee, was for Bondi by name, not by title. Quote, she will still have to appear before the Oversight Committee for a sworn deposition. The American people deserve answers, and we expect her to appear as soon as the new date is set. Mace joined Democrats to subpoena Bondi to appear before the committee on April 14th, but the Justice Department is Trump. to get her out of it. A spokesperson, excuse me, for the House Oversight Committee revealed on Wednesday that the Justice Department said Bondi would not appear for her scheduled deposition next Tuesday because she's no longer Attorney General and was subpoenaed in her capacity as Attorney

General. Right, that's how that works. Quote, the committee will contact Pam Bondi's personal counsel to discuss next steps regarding scheduling her deposition. The spokesperson said, as Mace pointed out, Bondi was not subpoenaed as the Attorney General. She urged committee chairman James Comer to reaffirm Bondi is legally obligated to appear. or now you're starting to put Republicans in a hard spot. Mace teamed up with Democrat Rokana to send Comer a letter on Tuesday before the Justice Department tried to get Bondi out of testifying. It noted the Justice Department still has still not, excuse me, complied with the Epstein Transparency Act.

Obviously, the DOJ actively breaking the law. The letter told Comer that her being fired does not diminish the committee's interest in getting her sworn testimony on the Epstein files withheld by the department under her leadership. And again, this was what I just read. being posted on her Twitter. Todd Blanche was asked about this. Again, this is the man who is currently in charge of the Epstein Files, who is just equally as a disaster and only cares about, you know,

sucking up to Donald J. Trump. Take a listen. Now former Attorney General Bondi was facing subpoena from the House Oversight Committee. Do you expect that she will comply with that or will this administration, which Justice Department invokes some sort of privilege to block her from testify? So, look, as everybody knows, the Attorney General and I went, to the House Oversight a few weeks ago. We answered every single question asked for a couple hours.

What happens now that she's the former Attorney General, and there's the subpoena out there, is I think I'll leave to Chairman Comer and others to figure out. I don't have an answer to that. You won't be invoking a privilege or anything. Excuse me? You won't invoke any kind of privilege to block. I definitely did not say that.

I said I will leave it to Chairman Comer to work out with others. I just don't have an answer for you, but I'm not... Don't have an answer for us. Todd Blanche. Justice Swarm Noise has to ask. Donald Trump for what the best answer is. Again, I want to remind you before we end off. This is who we're dealing with. Currently handling the Epstein files, Todd Blanche. Thank you. You said this is the end of the Epstein, of your review of the Epstein files. So just to clarify, are, is the public going to learn the

identities of the men who abuse the girls with the information that you're releasing? And if not, why not? And then I have a quick follow. I mean, you just baked in an assumption into your question. that I have never said, and I don't know to be true, is the public going to learn about men that abuse these girls? Like, what does that mean? I don't understand what that means. It means exactly. I mean, that's so disingenuous.

What do you mean you don't understand what that means? Let me know what you think of all this in the comments down below. It's April 8th, so we will keep you updated as we get closer and pass this April 14th deadline. We've got to make sure Pam Bondi is held accountable and put under oath in a deposition to know what, to learn what she knows. Appreciate you watching this video. Once again, my name is Chris Maurer. I do a daily episode for Adam McClure. Make sure you're subscribed down below. And I'll see you in the next video.