The Adam Mockler Show - They ate themselves alive.
Episode Date: December 19, 2025Shop Adam's new merch collection ➡️ https://shop.adammockler.com/ Click below for premium Adam Mockler content 👉 https://www.youtube.com/@adammockler/join 👉 https://adammockler.com Adam Mo...ckler with MeidasTouch Network breaks down the intensifying "civil war" within the MAGA movement. The report highlights the clash between center-right figures like Ben Shapiro and the far-right Groypers led by Nick Fuentes. It also exposes the hypocrisy of figures like Vivek Ramaswamy, who recently condemned anti-Indian bigotry after staying silent on hate directed at other marginalized groups. JOIN THE COMMUNITY: Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/AdamMockler/ Discord: https://discord.gg/y9yzMU3Gff Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/adammockler/ Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/adammockler.com/ Twitter: https://x.com/adammocklerr/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@adammockler Contact: contact@mocklermedia.com Business inquiries: adammocklerteam@unitedtalent.com Adam Mockler - Mockler Media LLC Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Canada can be a global leader in reducing the harm caused by smoking, but it requires actionable steps.
Now is the time to modernize Canadian laws so that adult smokers have information and access to better alternatives.
By doing so, we can create lasting change.
If you don't smoke, don't start.
If you smoke, quit.
If you don't quit, change.
Visit unsmoke.ca.
I want to run you all through a thought experiment regarding this current MAGA Civil War.
On my channel, we've been covering how Tucker Carlson interviewed Nick Fuentes, which in turn pissed off a lot of the more center-right figures who defend Trump, but who realize that Trump has paved the way for all of these far, far-right movements to become mainstream.
People like Ben Shapiro, who, yes, is relatively center-right compared to the far-right movements popping up, Ben Shapiro is holding the,
line because he, along with every
American, every human, has an incentive
to stop anti-Semitism from spreading
stop people like Nick Fuentes
and his far-right Groyper movement
from gaining power. But
the thought experiment that I want to run you through
regards Ben Shapiro's moral
clarity surrounding this issue. Ben Shapiro
has had a lot of moral clarity
for a while surrounding Nick Fuentes
and his hatred of Jewish people,
as he should. Nick Fuentes is a despicable
human being who hates black people, Jewish
people, all minorities. If you think that you'd be
safe, you're not. That's the mistake that
some people make. They think that, oh, Nick Fuentes
went, no, no, no, conservatives watching
this, you'd be gone to.
But the point is, if the Trump
administration, and if Nick Flentz
were only ragging against trans
people in this thought experiment,
say that they wanted trans people to be
tortured, they wanted trans people to
have experiments run on them. Would
Ben Shapiro speak out with as much
moral clarity as he does
is when it affects him personally with this
anti-Semitism? And I know it's a really
crude way of thinking about it, but I feel like these
conservatives don't speak up
about the bigotry that bubbles up in
their own movements until it
backfires and hits them personally.
You know another really good example of this
is Vivek Ramoswamy
in a New York Times guest essay.
Yes, a New York Times guest essay
from this MAGA Trump-Lite
Vivek Ramaswamy guy. He wrote
quote, if like Mr. Fuentes
you believe that Hitler was really
effing cool or if you publicly
call Usha Vance a slur for
Indian people, then you have no place in the conservative movement, period.
It is another example of somebody realizing the bigotry is affecting them.
So when Vivek Ramoswami realized, whoa, there's a lot of anti-Indian bigotry popping up in the
Nick Fuentes movement, the far right movement, and now it's becoming kind of normalized, kind of
mainstream.
Now Vivek Ramoswami has a bunch of clarity about this.
He did not speak up about cruelty when it was trans people.
He did not speak up about cruelty towards black people.
He did not speak up when they were throwing around fake statistics to make all black people seem violent.
He did not speak up when it was random teachers being targeted by libs of TikTok for just being free.
He did not speak up when gay people wanted to express their rights and were being bullied for it.
But all of the sudden, all of the sudden, anti-Indian bigotry is the line.
Which, listen, you should not be a bigot.
I'm not advocating for any bigotry.
I think all bigotry is awful.
We draw the line at all bigotry.
So I'm not advocating for anything here.
I'm just saying it's really.
convenient that that is where you draw the line. Leah puts it in a really solid way. She says
there's a set of actors in the Republican Party who seem to believe they can hold the line
against anti-Indian racism and anti-Semitism while then engaging in a free-for-all hate
fest against Haitian, Somalian, and Muslim immigrants. And that's just not how it works. Such a
satisfying way to put it. You can't just engage in a free-for-all hate fest on a daily basis where
Elon Musk is constantly boosting the most vile rhetoric about black Americans and
trans Americans, Mexican Americans, immigrants of all kinds, except for white immigrants from
South America for some reason. And then you try to draw the line right when it affects you.
This person puts it well, no, no, no, you misunderstood. I said, fuck your feelings. My feelings
are very important and must be handled gently, like a tiny little hummingbird. Matthew Gertz,
not Matthew Gates, but Matthew Gertz said,
movement in disarray over whether to discriminate against Muslims or whether to discriminate
against Muslims and Jews or Muslim Jews and Indians. Which one, they don't know like which
group to discriminate against because Ben Shapiro was trying to hold the line right when it
affects him personally. Let me just play a minute of this. I actually do find the infighting
to be kind of interesting. I've been covering it a lot and I've been following it. The context for this
is that Ben Shapiro was speaking at the Heritage Foundation. Remember, the Heritage Foundation
crafted Project 2025.
They are the backbone of conservative policy.
Then Kevin Roberts came out and refused to condemn Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes' interview.
He did it in a really sloppy way.
He was like borderline running defense for Nick Fuentes' craziest belief, saying that they're a welcome in the conservative movement, that they're a big enough tent to welcome Nick Fuentes.
Then they were mass resignations from the Heritage Foundation.
People were confronting him at this town hall that they held.
Then he issued three different apologies.
I mean, this was all a mess.
Now they're having Ben Shapiro speak and play cleanup.
Let me just play a minute to give you some context.
The conservative movement is in flux.
It's in flux because of the systemic failure by conservative leaders to do what any good leaders must do.
Define and maintain the foundations of that movement.
He's actually very, very right here.
The onus is on people like Donald Trump.
People like J.D. Vance, mainly.
I mean, I wish people like Elon Musk, if he was actually a sentient to human being and not just a vehicle for ketamine the entire time.
But J.D. Vance should speak out with absolute clarity.
They're saying slurs about J.D. Vance's wife, Ushah, and he won't speak out with clarity.
So Ben Shapiro is right when he says the leaders of the movement must speak out.
In flux.
It's in flux because of the systemic failure by conservative leaders to do what any good leaders must do, define and maintain the foundations of that movement.
This is our job. If we care about conservatism, if, as Heritage Foundation proclaims, our goal ought to be to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense, then we must stand up against those who would pervert and twist the conservative movement into a movement without principles, or worse, a movement that promotes the very opposite of the principles that conservatives hold dear.
conservatism means something. And if we refuse to stand for it and fight for it and defend it,
it will disappear. And with it, so will the last best hope of mankind. The alternative is a
conspiracism that demoralizes, a conspiracism that argues that our ideals embedded in the
Declaration of Independence are insufficient, that our systems embedded in the Constitution frustrate
human purpose. Okay, okay, I won't play too much Ben Shapiro. He's going on his normie conservative
rant. He wants to uphold the more Reagan-esque party. So when I talk about this divide,
between the far right and the center right.
There is some interplay between them.
Donald Trump, Ben Shapiro, a lot of these people have created space, have normalized and
allowed this far right movement to grow and bubble up by allowing this type of bigotry
to just run rampant in their movement.
Of course, Donald Trump fans the flames of these far right movements, tells the proud boys
to stand back and stand by.
Ben Shapiro never had the moral clarity about that that he's talking about now.
So he's calling on J.D. Vance.
He's not saying J.D. Vance, but he wants the leaders of the conservative movement on mass to stand up against this type of bigotry.
But he didn't have the moral clarity necessary when that happened.
So I'm not saying that Ben Shapiro didn't make way for the far right movement because he did.
But I'm just saying there is a delineation between what they believe.
And it mainly is just whether or not you should hate Jewish people or Indian people.
Now, to continue, friend of the show Tim Miller points out, I have to say that Ben, Ben,
Shapiro continues to be a voice of reason in these intra-maga disputes, mostly because the people
he's in coalition with have con totally batshit insane. But having one prominent non-bat shit voice
on the MAGA right is better than zero. And this isn't us praising Ben Shapiro for being right
on every issue or anything. But in these conversations with the Daily Wire, he tends to actually
give some pushback, like in this clip here. You know, if you have a purely creedal idea of identity,
then, you know, I don't know, half of the people we went to college with would not be American,
even if their parents came on the Mayflower.
And, you know, if we have this, I don't know, we don't really have a purely racial basis for
America, certainly happened in a long time.
And so what, you know, what do you do about the problem?
What do you do about the total collapse of social solidarity that this problem represents?
Well, I'm for assimilation.
I'm for like, yeah.
Yeah, I mean, again, I think that we are, in fact, a creedal country and there is no other
definition of Americanism that tends to hold historical water.
The notion that we are, you know, a heritage-based country, meaning that you're more American because you're great, great, great, great, great, great-grandparents got here as opposed to your great, great, great, great-great-great-great-grandparents got here.
This right here is the fundamental divide.
They're basically arguing, as Vivek Ramosami writes about in his article, what American identity is.
Is American identity something tangible, like you are a white person, you are this percent white, or is being an American more of an idea?
Like you support freedom of religion, freedom of expression, liberty, personal property.
You support some of these core American tenants, meaning anyone can be an American.
I heavily, heavily lean towards the latter and will always argue about the idea that America is simply an idea that anybody can become American if they integrate into society within the right way.
I don't care if you are the whitest person ever.
If you are the whitest person ever and you were born in America or you immigrated to America and you hold,
beliefs that are antithetical to that of America, the core of America, like freedom of belief,
freedom of expression, diversity, freedom of religion. Like a lot of these far, far right maga fucks are.
They're not even MAGA at this point. They're so far right. They reject MAGA and reject Trump because
they say that's not far right enough. These people are not American compared to somebody who could
have immigrated, like my grandpa, who came from Syria, who built a business. He built a small business
into like a medium small business. It's still a local business in Indiana, but he built it.
out of nothing from working in his car.
And he's an integral part of the community now.
And he prays, he goes to Friday prayer to the mosque.
He prays five times a day over and over and over.
But he is an integral part of the local community.
And that's America.
Is him accepting his Jewish neighbor.
And then they have a Catholic neighbor.
They're all good friends.
That is America.
Not whatever these far right fucks want.
I'm going to leave it there.
If you appreciate this, drop a like, subscribe.
I love you all.
Peace out.
