The Adam Mockler Show - Trump Voters PANIC after BRUTAL LEGAL LOSS

Starting point is 00:00:00 And here's some of the reactions. Please check this out. Please look at how mad MAGA is. All right, check this out. It's important that you watch this two-minute clip that has Trump supporters pissed off. They are incredibly mad at Trump's own Supreme Court Justice pick, Amy Coney-Barr. Now, keep in mind, Trump chose ACB to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg at the very end of his first term in the hopes that she would be ideologically aligned with him on every single issue. And don't get me wrong.

Starting point is 00:00:29 she is a very conservative justice, but I guess not far-right maga, anti-America enough for Trump voters, because now they are pissed at her once again after she snapped at a top Trump official during the Supreme Court's oral arguments on whether lower courts have the right or the authority to block Trump's end to birthright citizenship. The fact that this is even a debate in the first place is wild, but now Trump supporters are pissed en masse. I'll break this down. We have articles like this one.

Starting point is 00:01:01 Magum melts down after Trump appointed justice argues against ending birthright citizenship. They said, quote, remove this imposter. Amy Coney Barrett is a disgrace and an embarrassment, one user declared. Someone even called her a DEI hire, which like, they're just saying that because she's a woman. She was hired, she was picked by Trump. What do you mean, DEI hire, bro? This Trump supporter says, Amy Coney Barrett is proving once again that she may be the worst go pick ever by a Republican. She has a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court because of Donald Trump, yet you can hear her disdain for the Trump administration. Okay, there is no disdain for the Trump administration in this clip I'm about a play. I want to break down what happens here because there's a lot of cross talk and it is rather confusing for me. I had to listen a few times. So just so you guys know, what Amy Coney-Barritt does here is call out Trump's legal team, the dude on the left, sour, for intentionally dodging the court.

Starting point is 00:01:58 and the legal mechanisms that are used to resolve this case. So she interrupts him, John Sauer, not to defend a liberal justice, really, but to defend the integrity of the court and to defend the judicial process that Trump supporters and that this dude undermines. So the legal issue at hand is whether one judge should be able to issue a nationwide injunction and stop the president from ending birthright citizenship. And it starts when Supreme Court Justice Kagan asks a reasonable question. If plaintiffs form a class action lawsuit, could the court resolve this matter more quickly?

Starting point is 00:02:32 And this could avoid thousands of lawsuits and save so much time. And I'll play this clip in one second, but just to break down the article, Amy Coney-Barratt tears into Trump official to defend liberal justice. Supreme Court justice Amy Coney-Barrant ripped into Donald Trump's solicitor general for disrespecting one of the high court's justices. Barrett, who was appointed by Trump in 2020, has recently drawn the ire of MAGA. She stepped in and said, sir, are you really going to answer Justice Kagan by saying there's no way to do this faster or expeditiously? Let's play this clip, but just remember, she's not just defending Kagan. Amy Coney-Barrid is defending the process. And then right after this clip, I'll show you the MAGA reaction.

Starting point is 00:03:13 Keep in mind that you can drop a like to help boost this pro-democracy message. Take a look. Opinions and judgments here. Did I understand you correctly to tell Justice Kagan that the government wanted to reserve its right to maybe not follow a second. Circuit precedents say in New York because you might disagree with the opinion? Our general practice is to respect those precedents, but there are circumstances when it is not a categorical practice. And that is not just a new policy. This administration's practice or the longstanding practice of the federal government? And I'm not talking about in the fourth circuit,

Starting point is 00:03:45 are you going to respect a second circuit? I'm talking about within the Second Circuit. And can you say, is that this administration's practice or a longstanding one? As I understand it, longstanding policy of the Department of Justice. Yes, that we, generally, as it was phrased to me, generally respect circuit president, but not necessarily in every case. And some examples might be a situation where we're litigating to try and get that circuit president overruled and so forth. Well, okay. So I'm not talking about a situation in which, you know, the Second Circuit has a case from 1955 and you think it's time for it to be challenged. That's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about in this kind of situation.

Starting point is 00:04:20 I'm talking about this week the Second Circuit holds that the executive order is unconstitutional. And then what do you do the next day or the next week? Generally, we follow them. So you're still saying generally? Yes. And you still think that it's generally the policy, longstanding policy of the federal government to take that approach? That is my understanding.

Starting point is 00:04:37 Okay, so, but it sounds to me like you accept a Cooper versus Aaron kind of situation for the Supreme Court, but not for, say, the Second Circuit. Like where you would respect the opinions and the judgments of the Supreme Court, and you're saying you would respect the judgment, but not necessarily the opinion of a lower court. And again, I think in the vast majority of instances, our practice has been to respect the opinion as well in the circuits as well. But my understanding is that has not been a categorical practice in the way respect for the precedents and the judgments of the Supreme Court has been. So you're not hedging at all with respect to the precedent of this court? That is correct. I believe the quotation from our application directly addresses that and we stand by that completely.

Starting point is 00:05:17 Okay. All right. So that is Amy Coney-Barritt getting rather assertive. And just to back up and lay some groundwork before we dig into the MAGA reaction. Amy Coney Barrett was obviously picked by Trump, and she actually went against the MAGA grain when it came to executive authority. And now she's continuing that. She was basically saying, what happens if the Trump admin decides to ignore a ruling just because he disagrees with it? And Trump's legal team argued that his admin generally respects decisions. You probably heard the word generally a lot there, but might not always follow them, especially if the ruling comes from a lower court.

Starting point is 00:05:54 And Justice Barrett was not having that. She pressed him, and that's when she said, is it really the policy of the federal government just to pick and choose which ruling is to obey? She says that in this video. And why does that matter? Because of the birthright citizenship ruling that is being challenged by certain courts as unconstitutional.

Starting point is 00:06:12 This brings us on to an article that reads, MAGA melts down after Trump appointed justice argues against ending birthright citizenship. Quote, remove this imposter. I hope I've done a good job at laying the groundwork thus far about why that argument. argument happened. I know I had to listen to the clip like three or four times. If I had done a good job, make sure you drop a like and subscribe. But people are saying Amy Coney-Bart is an utter

Starting point is 00:06:33 disgrace and an embarrassment. I mean, even if I scroll through Twitter right now, it says, I don't trust ACB or Roberts. Someone says, I'm baffled by ACB hectoring here. Oh my lord. They say, so the executive branch has to not only abide by court orders, but also must agree with the underlying opinion? I've listened to this over and over and I still don't understand what she's getting at, this Trump supporter says. That is not what ACB is saying. She's not saying you have to agree with the underlying opinion. She's saying that you don't have to agree with every single ruling. You can actually challenge them through legal means. She's demanding obedience. It's not an issue of whether the Trump administration likes a ruling. It's whether they

Starting point is 00:07:15 follow that ruling and then follow the proper procedures to challenge that ruling. You can't just deny it. That's not the process. That's not process at all. That's nothing. Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney-Barritt triggered fierce backlash from MAGA loyalists after forcefully questioning the Trump admin's top lawyer invoicing skepticism overending birthright citizenship during a heated Supreme Court argument. Since taking office, President Donald Trump has pushed for an executive order to end birthright citizenship, a constitutional guarantee under the 14th Amendment that grants automatic U.S. citizenship to anyone born on U.S. soil. challenges block the order from taking effect, and the case is now tied up in a broader

Starting point is 00:07:55 legal battle over whether federal judges can even issue a nationwide injunction to hold executive actions. And this is the truly... And here's some of the reactions. Please check this out. Please look at how mad MAGA is. One person said Amy Coney-Barritt is a disgrace and an embarrassment to the United States. Someone said Amy Coney-Barritt is a traitor. Someone as far as to accuse Barrett of undermining conservative goals, asking the admin to, quote, remove this imposter. Quote, remove Amy Coney

Starting point is 00:08:26 Barrett. She does not align with the mandate of the American people. Dude, you're not just going to remove a Supreme Court justice because Trump wants to deny judges' rulings. Someone said Amy Coney Barrett showed us who she is on Murthy v. Missouri. The first major government censorship case

Starting point is 00:08:42 before the court in a generation, and she does not sign in favor of the First Amendment. Now, I haven't read about this in a bit, but I can almost guarantee ACB not supporting the First Amendment was her having a rational take. One Trump supporter said, remove Amy Coney Barrett. She does not align with the mandate of the American people. Well, dude, Trump claims he has the mandate and Trump is the one who picked ACB. Why am I trying to debunk these people? They make no sense whatsoever. I'm going to end this video by saying, make sure you drop a like. Make sure you subscribe. If you made it this far in the

Starting point is 00:09:12 video, comment, hi, Adam. Go watch my interview with Pete Buttigieg on my channel from yesterday. Peace out. See you next time.

Your Ad Here

The Adam Mockler Show - Trump Voters PANIC after BRUTAL LEGAL LOSS

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.