The AI Daily Brief: Artificial Intelligence News and Analysis - How AI Could Accelerate Digital Nations

Episode Date: July 7, 2024

A reading of Balaji's 2013 ""How Software is Reorganizing the World" with a discussion about how AI is accelerating these trends. Read the original: https://www.wired.com/2013/11/software-is-reorganizing-the-world-and-cloud-formations-could-lead-to-physical-nations/ Concerned about being spied on? Tired of censored responses? AI Daily Brief listeners receive a 20% discount on Venice Pro. Visit ⁠https://venice.ai/nlw⁠ and enter the discount code NLWDAILYBRIEF. Learn how to use AI with the world's biggest library of fun and useful tutorials: https://besuper.ai/ Use code 'youtube' for 50% off your first month. The AI Daily Brief helps you understand the most important news and discussions in AI. Subscribe to the podcast version of The AI Daily Brief wherever you listen: https://pod.link/1680633614 Subscribe to the newsletter: https://aidailybrief.beehiiv.com/ Join our Discord: https://bit.ly/aibreakdown

Today on the AI breakdown, we're reading a piece by Balaji Shrinivasa on cloud communities and asking how AI is going to change how we think about terrestrial politics. The AI Daily Brief is a daily podcast and video about the most important news and discussions in AI. To join the conversation, follow the Discord link in our show notes. Welcome back to the AI Daily Brief. We are, of course, just coming off of the July 4th holiday in the U.S. It's time to think about politics and political discourse. and one of the really interesting themes for the last decade or so,

really since the beginning of the internet, is how much internet-based communities are currently or are going to in the future replace physical communities. One person who has thought about that and written about that more than almost any other is Balaji Shrinivasa. Perhaps his fullest articulation of this is his work, The Network State, which you can get for free at thenetworkstate.com, and which he sums up as technology has enabled us to start new companies,

new communities, and new currencies. but can we use it to start new cities or even new countries? This book explains how to build the successor to the nation state, a concept we call the network state. The network state came out a couple years ago, but that was hardly the first that Bology started thinking about this. So what we're going to do today is we're going to actually read a piece from Wired in 2013 called Software as Reorganizing the world.

In it, you can see the germs of the ideas that come to fruition with the network state and a really interesting early look at the time at least around this question of digital communities and how they compete with physical communities. Software is reorganizing the world. For the first time in memory, adults in the United States under age 40 are now expected to be poorer than their parents. This is the kind of grim reality that in other times and places

spurred young people to look abroad for opportunity. Indeed, it is similar to the factors that once pushed millions of people to emigrate from their home countries to make their home in America. Our nation of immigrants is tautologically a nation of emigrants. These emigrants, our ancestors, didn't bear enmity towards the countries they left, quite the contrary. They weren't going gault or being unpatriotic by leaving, as they often left out of sadness and melancholy, not anger. In many cases, they remained homesick for the rest of their lives, leaving only because they had to, not because they wanted to. Yet while our ancestors had

America as their ultimate destination, it is not immediately obvious where those seeking opportunity might head today. Every square foot of earth is already spoken for by one or more nation states, every physical frontier long since closed. With our bodies hemmed in, our minds have only the cloud, and it is the cloud that has become the destination for an extraordinary mental exodus. Hundreds of millions of people have now migrated to the cloud, spending hours per day working, playing, chatting, and laughing in real-time HD resolution with people thousands of miles away, without knowing their next-door neighbors. The concept of migrating our lives to the cloud is much more than a picturesque metaphor, and actually amenable to quantitative study, though the

separation between our bodies is still best characterized by the geographical distance between points on the surface of the earth, the distance between our minds is increasingly characterized by a completely different metric. The geodesic distance, the number of degrees of separation between two nodes in a social network. Importantly, this geodesic distance is just as valid a mathematical metric as the geographical. In fact, there are entire conferences devoted to cloud cartography, in which research groups from Stanford to Carnegie Mellon to MIT present the first maps of online social networks, mapping not nation-states but states of mind. Perhaps the single most important feature of these states of mind is the increasing divergence between our social and geographic neighbors, between the cloud formations

of our heads and the physical communities surrounding our bodies. An infinity of subcultures outside the mainstream now blossoms on the internet. Vegans, body modifiers, crossfitters, Wiccans, diers, pinners, and support groups of all forms. Millions of people are finding their true peers in the cloud, a remedy for the isolation imposed by the anonymous apartment complex or the remote rural location. Yet this discrepancy between our cloud subculture and our physical surroundings will not endure indefinitely, because the latest wave of technology is not just connecting us intellectually and emotionally with remote peers. It is also making us ever more mobile, ever more able to meet our peers in person, and so these cloud formations of mind are beginning

to take physical shape, driving the reorganization of bodies. In the technology space, we have already seen this transpire at small scale, a cloud formation of two people coming together for 10 years facilitated by Match.comcom, comma, a formation of 10 people for a year in a hacker house, a formation of 100 people for a few months at a startup incubator and a formation of 1,000 people for a few days at an open-source gathering like Rails Conf. More recently, we saw the thousands that occupied Wall Street for a month, the 10,000 Redditors involved in John Stewart's rally, and the tens of thousands that took Tarrier Square at the height of the Arab Spring. Those trivial photo-sharing apps seem far less trivial in this light. But while these large rallies command deserved attention, something else of significance is happening more quietly. cloud formations are starting to take physical shape in the form of long-term friendly communities

that are geographically collocated like campus embassy network and the Rainbow Mansion. In some ways, this isn't anything new. The twin ideas of co-living in the same house or co-housing with separate houses in a shared community have been around in Denmark since the 1960s and the U.S. since the 1860s. What is new is the ease of finding compatible peers via web search, online forums, and social networks. And so the concept is spreading around the world, with hundreds of co-living and co-housing locations now accessible through the internet in the U.S., Canada, United Kingdom, and across continental Europe. It is not yet clear how widespread this phenomenon will become, but few humans are truly

so solitary that they would shun the very idea of shared communities. And from email to mobile phones, what technologists experiment with on the weekends has frequently foreshadowed what everyone else will be doing during the week in 10 years. And from there, it is simultaneously straightforward and radical to note that when cloud formations take physical shape, neither their scale nor duration has an upper bound. There is no scientific law that prevents 100 people who find each other on the internet from coming together for a month or 1,000 such people from coming together for a year, and as that increases to 10,000 and 100,000 and beyond, for longer and longer durations, we may begin to see cloud towns, then cloud cities, and ultimately cloud countries materialize

out of thin air. At first, this sounds rather implausible. Perhaps the internet will spur a wave of internal migrations as online communities begin gathering in person, but could this process really lead to a new city or country. Today's episode is brought to you by Super Intelligent, the platform for fun, fast AI learning. Super has a ton of new things going on. We recently announced our partnership with Spotify, through which users of that app can now access Super Intelligent content directly from their mobile apps. We've also just launched the AI learning feed.

In addition to seeing the tutorials that we're dropping, there are polls, news items with related lessons, and a chance for people to show off the projects and use cases that are making AI come alive for them. We've also just kicked off the Super Summer Challenge, where each week will share a new challenge that you can use to discover new AI tools and use cases. Go to Bsuper.com. And use code super fun for 50% off your first two months. That's Bsuper.aI. Today's episode is brought to you by Venice. The leading AI companies store your entire conversation history and attach it to your identity forever. Every question you ask, every answer you receive, every image you generate, every thought you share with the machine, it's all being spied on.

If you trust all the company's hackers and NSA board members that will ever have access to your AI conversations, then rejoice, for you are well served. For the rest of us, Venice is an alternative. Venice is a powerful AI app for text, image, and cogeneration that respects you as a sovereign individual and believes privacy and free speech are not only human rights, but are necessary for civilizational advancement. Private, permissionless, and uncensored. You can try it for free without an account at venice.aI. The future of technology is not really location-based apps.

It is about making location completely unimportant, yet the technical prerequisites are already well underway. Machine translation of signs, text, and speech brings down language barriers and facilitates ever more cross-cultural meetings of like minds. Immersive headsets, input devices, and telepresence robots further collapse space and time, allowing us to instantly be alongside others on the other side of the globe. Mobile technology makes us ever more mobile, increasingly permitting not just easier movement around a home base,

but permanent international relocation. Technology is thus enabling arbitrary numbers of people from around the world to assemble in remote locations without interrupting their ability to work or communicate with existing networks. In this sense, the future of technology is not really location-based apps. It is about making location completely unimportant. When physical goods themselves can't be digitized, our interface to them will be. But could everything really become that mobile, that portable?

What about transportation, infrastructure, food, shelter, the clothes on our backs? Consider transportation first. Car ownership is already declining, and the combination of Uber, Lyft, their public transportation analogs, and new shareable car fleets will greatly reduce traffic and emissions. On-demand rental will ultimately become more convenient than the burden of outright ownership,

especially in an autonomous car world, and will make us vastly more mobile as a result. And many more things can be transported on-demand once we have the on-demand car. With respect to infrastructure, projects from neighborhood pothole repairs to bridge changes are being crowdfunded or driven through private public sector partnerships. In fact, entrepreneurs built roads for most of American history.

And with autonomous cars coming, technologists are going to need to reinvent roads again. Google's Vannevar is moving construction to the cloud. Much of shipping logistics and the supply chain is going there as well, and robots can already build small buildings and operate autonomous mines. The net result is that both core infrastructure and many of the mechanisms for building and funding it are becoming computerized, and thus deployable in new locations. And from the road, we turn our eyes to the sky. Next up will be a carbon-friendly computer infrastructure for safer air traffic control to guide the emerging fleets of drones doing everything from photography to surveying to delivery. As for the physical items used in daily life, the present,

let alone the future, is already a time where everything from food to shelter to clothing to transportation to your very wallet and keychain can be accessed on demand from your mobile phone in more cities every day. So when it comes to the constraints on mobility imposed by the physical world, the rule is simple. When goods themselves can't be digitized, our interface to them will be. The benefits of such high mobility are much more than convenience to the people who supply these goods. For example, with online food ordering, an owner of a small restaurant is finally able to prepare meals in batch, order ingredients in bulk, and reach repeat customers without wasting valuable limited resources in guesswork. With the advent of mobile microtasks, we are seeing the emergence of new digital assembly line jobs

that offer greater flexibility, less risk of injury, and hourly wages comparable in some cases to those of new hires at GM. And with autonomous mines, workers can extract needed minerals without risking black lung. disease. This is why location is becoming so much less important. Technology is enabling us to access everything we need from our mobile phone, to find our true communities in the cloud, and to easily travel to assemble these communities in person. Taken together, we are rapidly approaching a future characterized by a totally new phenomenon, the reverse diaspora, one that starts out internationally distributed, finds each other online, and ends up physically concentrated. What might these reverse diaspras be like? As a people whose primary bond is through

the internet, many of their properties would not fit our pre-existing mental models. Unlike rugged individualists, these emigrants would be moving within or between nation states to become part of a community, not to strike out on their own. Unlike would-be revolutionaries, those migrating in this fashion would be doing so out of humility and their ability to change existing political systems. And unlike so-called secessionists, the specific site of physical concentration would be a matter of convenience, not passion, the geography incidental, and not worth fighting over. Today, one of the first and largest international reverse diaspras has assembled in Silicon Valley, drawn by the internet to the cloud capital of technology. In fact, an incredible

64% of the Valley scientists and engineers hail from outside the U.S., with 43.9% of its technology companies founded by emigrants. But the geocenter of this cloud formation is only positioned over Silicon Valley for historical reasons, as the semiconductor manufacturing that was made easier by the temperate climb of the South Bay has long since moved away. Nothing today binds technologists to the soil besides other people. In this sense, Silicon Valley is nothing special. It is best conceptualized as just the most common X, Y coordinates of a set of highly mobile nodes in a social network whose true existence is in the cloud.

And this global technology cloud truly stretches over the whole earth, touching down at various locales both in the U.S., at SendGrid and Boulder, Tumblr in New York, Rackspace in Austin, Snapchat in L.A., Zipcar in Boston, Opsco'd in Seattle, and outside it, Skype in Estonia, Tencent and Shenzhen, SoundCloud in Germany, Flipcard in India, Spotify and Sweden, line in Tokyo, and Ways in Israel. Cultural connections forming between people in this cloud are becoming stronger than the connections between their geographic neighbors. Palo Alto's Excel invests in India's flip cart, Estonia's Skype is folded into Seattle's Microsoft, Israel's Ways is merged into Mountain Views

Google, and the SoundCloud engineer on a laptop in Berlin builds a deeper relationship with the VC in New York than the nearby Bavarian Bank. Today, the geocenter of the global technology cloud is still hovering over Silicon Valley. But in a world where technology is making location increasingly less important, tomorrow the reverse diaspora may well assemble somewhere else. Of course, it would take some time for a reverse diaspora assembled in a new location to advance from small communities and existing buildings to the infrastructure for towns and cities, let alone to starting new countries. If history is any guide, it took almost 170 years to go from 1607, James Town, to 1776, America, 90 years to go from 1857, Sepoy Mutiny to

1947, India, and 52 years to go from 1896 Hertzl to 1948, Israel, though at internet time things could happen more quickly than that. And we can't know from today's vantage point where that first reverse diaspora might assemble outside the U.S. or what those cloud cities or countries will be like. They could be countries formed by internationally recognized processes similar to the ones that created 26 new countries over the past 25 years, a pattern noted by Mark Andresen. They could be regions of the world set aside by global agreement for experimentation, as discussed by Larry Page. They could be floating cities in international waters, as put forth by Peter Thiel, or one of the more ambitious 80,000 person colonies on Mars desired

by Elon Musk. The specific location is still unknown. In a real sense, it matters far less than the people there. What we can say for certain is this. From Occupy Wall Street and Y Combinator to co-living in San Francisco and co-housing in the UK, something important is happening. People are meeting like mines in the cloud and traveling to meet each other offline, in the process building community, and tools for community, where none existed before. Those cloud networks where people poke each other, share photos, and find their missing communities are beginning to catalyze waves of physical migration, beginning to reorganize the world. Will this ultimately end in a cloud country of our own, as Page, Thiel, and Musk

propose in different ways? We can set this as a long-term, goal, like the kind of dream that propelled so many millions to exit and come to America in the first place, but it's unclear what the future holds. We do know this, however. As cloud formations take physical shape at steadily greater scales and durations, it shall become ever more feasible to create a new nation of emigrants. All right, back to Real Not AI Me. So obviously, a lot of these trends that Bologi is identifying all the way back in 2013 have done nothing but gets stronger since. One of the things, for example, that Bology would recognize, is that there has been an entirely new category of infrastructure formed in the form of

blockchains and cryptocurrencies that aren't reliant on any one single nationality or monetary system to work and exchange value. For the purposes of this podcast, though, the question that I'm interested in is what AI's impact on all of this is. One thing that's very clear to me is that AI is going to accelerate some serious conversations we need to have with ourselves as a society. Most notably, in a world where huge portions of the things that people do for for work today are rendered irrelevant because machines can do them more quickly, efficiently,

and cheaply, we're going to need to have an entire conversation about a changed social contract. What should a meaningful contribution to society look like? Does it mean less hours worked? Does it mean that we just have to reskill everyone to work on new things? Does it implicate universal basic income? All of these are questions that were present before the rise of generative AI and the emergence of chat GPT in November a couple years ago, but have gotten supercharged ever since then. There's another whole piece of this, which is agentic AI. Basically, holding aside questions of what it'll mean for individuals who find their livelihoods fundamentally changed, there's also the reality that each of us is going to be able to have an army of assistance to do

things for us. Right now, exactly how that plays out, is still very speculative. There are, of course, a huge number of companies exploring and trying to build towards that future, but we haven't got there yet. We don't know yet what the use cases of agents will be that actually take off. We don't know how normal it will become for the random average person to have an army of agents versus it being something that is still in the province of, for example, entrepreneurs. It is quite possible, though, that in a world of superpowered agents that expand each of our individual capacities, that we also have a different sense of how we organize community. Certainly already people are thinking about the implications for how they organize companies. Sam Altman, for example, earlier this year,

said that he believed that with the help of AI, a single person could create a billion-dollar company. This has sparked a ton of conversation around exactly how that would work, along with not a few people who are trying to make it so that they are the one to start that first solopreneur billion-dollar company. The point is that all of these trends which have been emerging for decades now are, like everything else, being supercharged in the time of AI. It is going to take an incredible amount of societal will to have these important conversations in a way that is productive, not just chaotic and angry.

And hopefully those conversations start with lots of thought and consideration. For now, I appreciate you guys hanging out today and listening or watching the show. Until next time, peace.