The AI Daily Brief: Artificial Intelligence News and Analysis - OpenA-IPhone? Legendary Designer Joins OpenAI
Episode Date: May 23, 2025OpenAI has purchased the AI hardware design firm of legendary iPhone designer Jony Ive. The plan is, of course, to build AI hardware with fundamentally new form factors. But what exactly that means is...n't yet clear. Get Ad Free AI Daily Brief: https://patreon.com/AIDailyBriefBrought to you by:KPMG – Go to https://kpmg.com/ai to learn more about how KPMG can help you drive value with our AI solutions.Blitzy.com - Go to https://blitzy.com/ to build enterprise software in days, not months Vertice Labs - Check out http://verticelabs.io/ - the AI-native digital consulting firm specializing in product development and AI agents for small to medium-sized businesses.The Agent Readiness Audit from Superintelligent - Go to https://besuper.ai/ to request your company's agent readiness score.The AI Daily Brief helps you understand the most important news and discussions in AI. Subscribe to the podcast version of The AI Daily Brief wherever you listen: https://pod.link/1680633614Subscribe to the newsletter: https://aidailybrief.beehiiv.com/Join our Discord: https://bit.ly/aibreakdownInterested in sponsoring the show? nlw@breakdown.network
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Today on the AI Daily Brief, a design legend joins Open AI.
Before that in the headlines, checking in on the AI first companies.
The AI Daily Brief is a daily podcast and video about the most important news and discussions in AI.
Thanks to today's sponsors, KPMG, blitzie.com, and super intelligent,
and to get an ad-free version of the show, go to patreon.com slash AI Daily Brief.
Welcome back to the AI Daily Brief Headlines edition, all the daily AI news you need in around five minutes.
Over the last couple of months, we have had a number of companies declaring themselves to be AI first.
We've had Duolingo, Shopify.
Fiverr CEO wrote a note about how AI was coming for every job.
Maybe the earliest to this trend, however, over the last couple of years, was Klarna,
a by-now-pay-now-pay-later company that's been one of the early guinea pigs for pushing AI adoption.
Given that they've been in the midst of this AI overhaul the longest,
they give us in some ways the best chance to see what's working and what's not.
You might remember that last year they announced that they had,
used AI to develop their own internal systems that allowed them to cut out sales force and workday.
CEO Sebastian Samantkowski later acknowledged that the cost savings from ripping out 1,200 SaaS services
hadn't been great. The value, he said, had been in developing their own tech stack that fueled
productivity and wouldn't have been possible without AI. We also heard that the company had stopped
all hiring in 2023, with plans to enlist AI to replace the human workforce, largely focused on
customer service roles. And this has been a key hallmark of some of these AI first announcements that
we've seen recently, basically a soft freeze on new hiring until you could prove that AI couldn't
do the job. However, earlier this month, Clarna did tweak their strategy. While most news had reported
it as reversing course, it wasn't exactly that. Instead, what Clarna figured out is that there was
always going to be a demand among some number of their customers to have access to a human customer
service agent. And so while they were still very keen on using AI to increase efficiency in customer
service, they also wanted to respond to customer demand and have this available as an option.
Now, in my mind, this has always been the way that this was going to shake out.
And in fact, I think the opportunity is to take human-level customer service and actually
make it a prestige position in the same way that it is in luxury industries, for example.
The latest that we've gotten from Klarna is not announcements, but actual financials.
The company is now on track to reach $1 million in revenue per employee.
That's almost double their pace from a year ago.
Klarna says that most functions have become more efficient because of their AI efforts.
Looking strictly at the numbers, the largest impact has been from a significant cost reduction
in customer service. Overall, the company says that they've seen a 40% reduction in workforce
since they began their AI overhaul in 2022. The trade-off has been a big jump in one-time
costs related to downsizing. The company made a $92 million loss last quarter due to severance-related
restructuring costs. Clarna is currently looking to go public, although those plans are now on hold.
So there are a lot of expenses related to paying out stock awards.
More troubling for Klarna, not from the standpoint of AI, but just from the standpoint of the
industry they're operating in, the company also reported a 17% rise in losses from
defaulted consumer loans in the first quarter compared to the previous year.
These bad debts are now running at $136 million per quarter.
A spokesperson noted that the default rate has risen from 0.51% to 0.54%, so, quote,
a very slight increase but still very low.
These challenges are not due to AI, but due to broader economic conditions, but they are a good reminder
that efficiency isn't everything, and companies won't be able to use AI as a magic bullet that somehow
shield them from broader market forces. Still, they continue to put AI front and center. The earnings
call this week was conducted by an AI avatar of their CEO. TechCrunch writes, other than
AI CEMATKowski's admission, it wasn't obvious that this was AI. There were only a few subtle signs.
The AI CEO didn't blink as much as most humans do. The voice ink was good but not perfect.
and the AI was also wearing a brown jacket that looked a lot like one from a widely circulated
corporate photo of his human self. So troubling economic conditions are not, Klarna is still very
much on the AI train. Shopify, meanwhile, have launched a slew of new AI tools to help users
design their shopping experience. There's an end-to-end store builder, allowing users to generate
an entire storefront from a single prompt. There's an AI generator for creating elements like
banners without knowing how to code. There's also a big upgrade to sidekick the platform's
commerce assistant with added voice and screen sharing capabilities. There's also the ability to draw
real-time product data from the millions of Shopify stores. As another bonus, Shopify have set up their
own MCP server to make integration with external agents seamless, which will for some be a footnote in the
news, but I think actually could be the most significant part of this whole announcement. Given how much
we've talked about the productization of AI over the past week, all of this news from Shopify is a really good
example. The platform was always designed as a no-code tool to empower everyday people to dive into
e-commerce. But until now, that was through the customization of templates. We're now starting to
see vibe coding concepts integrated into no-code platforms, making them much more open-ended.
The suite is also a good example of taking a broad concept like AI coding assistance and narrowing them
down into a user-friendly package. I am 100% sure that this will not be the last example of this this
year, but it is a really good demonstration of how AI is on the cusp of changing everything in the
consumer software industry. Speaking of coding agents, Mistral have launched their first
first open source coding agent model. Called Devstrel, the product is a small 24 billion
parameter model optimized to drive a software engineering agent. Baptiste Rosieri, a research scientist
at Mistral said, we wanted to release something open for the developer and enthusiast community,
something they can run locally, privately, and modify as they want. This model is small enough
to run on consumer grade hardware and is licensed under Apache 2.0, so devs can pretty much use it
however they want. It benchmarks well compared to other small models. With Sophie Yang, the company's
head of developer relations writing, compare Devstrel to closed and open models evaluated under
any scaffold, we find that Devstrel achieves substantially better performance than a number of
closed source alternatives. And the idea isn't just to provide a high performance model,
but to pair it with a common open source agentic framework like OpenHans, sweet agent, and Open Devon.
Rozier said, we're releasing it with Open Devon, which is a scaffolding for code agents.
We built the model and they built the scaffolding, a set of prompts and tools that the model can use,
like a back-in for the developer model.
company continues to experiment in filling in market gaps.
Rozier said,
there will always be a gap between smaller and larger models,
but we've gone a long way in bridging that.
Lastly today, benchmarking platform, L.M. Arena,
has raised $100 million in a seed round that values the company at $600 million.
What started off as an academic project is now a commercial startup
with backing from Andresen Horowitz and the University of California Investment Fund.
Lightspeed, Felisus, and Klinear Perkins are also participating.
Until now, the platform had been funded by a combination of grants and donations,
from sources like Google, together AI and A16Z.
The platform has also faced a lot of scrutiny over this past year.
They were central to allegations that meta had gamed their benchmarks when releasing Lama4 Maverick,
which revealed that the platform allows AI Labs to submit multiple different versions of their models
that are specifically fine-tuned to perform well in the head-to-head testing.
It seems as though this fundraising marks a good time for a fresh start, however,
with L.M Arena writing,
we're focused on building a neutral, open, community-driven platform that helps the world understand
and improve the performance of AI models on real queries from real users.
Also, big news is coming next week.
We're relaunching Elam Arena with a whole new look built directly with community feedback
from the ground up.
I kind of think we're at the point where there's enough criticism of benchmarks that we're
actually likely to see some more innovation in that space.
So that is something I will be keeping a close eye on.
For now, that is going to do it for today's AI Daily Brief Headlines edition.
Next up, the main episode.
Today's episode is brought to you by KPMG.
In today's fiercely competitive market, unlocking AI's potential could help give you a competitive edge, foster
growth, and drive new value. But here's the key. You don't need an AI strategy. You need to embed
AI into your overall business strategy to truly power it up. KPMG can show you how to integrate
AI and AI agents into your business strategy in a way that truly works and is built on trusted
AI principles and platforms. Check out real stories from KPMG to hear how AI is driving success with
its clients at www.kpmg.org.us slash AI. Again, that's www.kpmg.comg.com slash AI.
Today's episode is brought to you by Blitzy, the Enterprise Autonomous Software Development Platform
with Infinite Code Context, which, if you don't know exactly what that means yet, do not worry
we're going to explain, and it's awesome. So Blitzy is used alongside your favorite coding co-pilot
as your batch software development platform for the Enterprise, and it's meant for those who are
seeking dramatic development acceleration on large-scale codebases.
Traditional co-pilots help developers with line-by-line completions and snippets,
but Blitzy works ahead of the IDE,
first documenting your entire codebase,
then deploying more than 3,000 coordinated AI agents working in parallel
to batch-build millions of lines of high-quality code for large-scale software projects.
So then whether it's code-based refactors, modernizations,
or bulk development of your product roadmap,
the whole idea of Blitzy is to provide enterprises' dramatic velocity improvement.
To put it in simpler terms,
For every line of code eventually provided to the human engineering team, Blitzy will have written it hundreds of times,
validating the output with different agents to get the highest quality code to the enterprise and batch.
Projects then that would normally require dozens of developers working for months can now be completed with a fraction of the team in weeks,
empowering organizations to dramatically shorten development cycles and bring products to market faster than ever.
If your enterprise is looking to accelerate software development, whether it's large-scale modernization, refactoring, or just increasing the rate of your STLC,
contact Blitzy at Blitzy.com, that's B-L-I-T-Z-Y.com, to book a custom demo, or just press
get started and start using the product right away.
Today's episode is brought to you by Super Intelligent and more specifically Super's
Agent Readiness Audits. If you've been listening for a while, you have probably heard me
talk about this, but basically the idea of the Agent Readiness Audit is that this is a system
that we've created to help you benchmark and map opportunities in your organizations where
agents could specifically help you solve your problems, create new opportunities in a way that,
again, is completely customized to you. When you do one of these audits, what you're going to do is a
voice-based agent interview where we work with some number of your leadership and employees to
map what's going on inside the organization and to figure out where you are in your agent
journey. That's going to produce an agent readiness score that comes with a deep set of explanations,
strength, weaknesses, key findings, and of course a set of very specific recommendations
that then we have the ability to help you go find the right partners to actually fulfill.
So if you are looking for a way to jumpstart your agent strategy, send us an email at
agent at besuper.a.i, and let's get you plugged into the agentic era.
Welcome back to the AI Daily Brief. Some big, if not totally unexpected news.
In a deal that has been telegraphed for some time, OpenAI is buying an AI device studio from
legendary Apple designer Johnny Ive, who will be taking over design and creative control at OpenAI.
Now, they have been nibbling towards this for a while, we've covered it before, and really for people,
the big question is what they're going to build. But before we get into all the details of the deal
and speculation around what's going to come from it, let's set the context, which is that, frankly,
so far, AI devices have wildly underwhelmed. Although it's early days, there has already been
lots of interest in devices for the AI era.
And I think at core the idea is that AI represents a fundamentally different type of interaction with
computers. The relationship that we've had with computers where we have to strictly control them and
tell them exactly what to do, where we have to use our finger clicking on things as a way to
control the system, all of that has been changing, and it's changing extra rapidly in an
era when plausibly we can just talk to a device and have it understand. The two most high-profile
attempts so far at an AI device are the Rabbit R1, which was a collaboration with teenage engineering
to try to do something really cool in the real world, have it feel a little bit retro even as it was
able to take actions on the user's behalf, and the Humane AI pin. The Humane pin went even farther than
the rabbit in terms of changing the form factor of devices. The pin was entirely screenless
and was this big hunky thing you were supposed to wear on your clothes. These attempts have not gone
well. Humane has been completely absorbed into a printer company at this point. The Rabbit is still
a going concern, although it hasn't made any waves. In fact, at this point, Humane might best be known
for Marquez Brownlee's review where he called it the worst product he's ever reviewed. And while Rabbit
and Humane had lots of talent from other companies that had built great products, neither of them
had Johnny Ive. Johnny Ive has been prolific throughout the design world, but he is of course best known
for his work with Apple. It started with the late 90s colorful IMac, which was
of course the comeback product when Steve Jobs took over the company again. The fun, vibrant
personality set the tone for Apple to distinguish itself and start to become the behemate that it is
today. From there it was the iPod, but then of course that was just a stepping stone on the way to the
big one, which was the iPhone. The form factor is so ubiquitous now that it is hard to remember
how absolutely transformative it was. An iPod, a phone, and an internet communicator,
iPod, a phone. Are you getting it? These are not three separate devices. This is one device. And we are
calling it iPhone. Today, Apple is going to reinvent the phone. And of course, it just went on from there,
the Apple Watch, the iPad, et cetera, et cetera. But it's now been more than five years since Johnny I've
left Apple. In September of last year, the New York Times ran a profile on him and what he's been doing.
All of his projects were under the banner of a design firm called Love From, and the projects have
been fairly diverse. He's done a bunch in real estate. He worked with Airbnb and Ferrari.
The Ferrari work, by the way, was an interesting shift, where he actually insisted on returning
to physical buttons rather than simply adding as many touchscreens as possible. But then from one
of those clients, specifically Airbnb CEO, Brian Chesky, I've met Sam Altman.
Altman and I've started talking about products and devices in the era of AI and apparently found a real kinship very quickly.
About a year ago, the collaboration between Altman and I've got meaningful enough that I've spun out a new startup from Love From called IO products that was going to be focused solely on developing hardware.
Open AI took a 23% stake in that company, and that's the company that they've now agreed to acquire in an all-equity deal valuing I.O. at 6.5 billion.
They released a video about the announcement, hinting at what might be coming.
And so I.O. is merging with OpenAI.
Formed with the mission figuring out how to create a family of devices that would let people use AI to create all sorts of wonderful things.
The first one we've been working on, I think, is, has just completely captured our imagination.
You know, Johnny called one day and said, this is the best work our team has ever done.
I mean, Johnny did the iPhone.
Johnny did the MacBook Pro.
I mean, these are like the defining ways people use technology.
It's hard to beat those things.
Those are really wonderful.
Johnny recently gave me one of the prototypes that the device for the first time to take home,
and I've been able to live with it.
And I think it is the coolest piece of technology that the world will have ever seen.
And, yeah, that is the type of enigmatic information that they are giving at this stage.
about what they're trying to build.
The announcement itself gives no more info.
Other than to perhaps provides a bit of a mission statement
about what they're trying to achieve.
They write,
this is an extraordinary moment.
Computers are now seeing, thinking, and understanding.
Despite this unprecedented capability,
our experience remains shaped by traditional products and interfaces.
And so presumably the idea is that what they are building next
is the next generation of interfaces.
In one of the poll quotes from the announcement,
I've said,
I have a growing sense that everything I have learned over the past 30 years has led me to this moment.
While I am both anxious and excited about the responsibility of this substantial work ahead,
I'm so grateful for the opportunity to be part of such an important collaboration.
Again, no details, but I will say, these folks are not underhyping this thing at all.
Now, in terms of the deal structure, Love From will continue to operate as an independent design house,
but OpenAI will absorb the 55 member staff from I.O., which includes engineers, scientists, product developers.
OpenAI will also become a customer of Love From, with Love From receiving a stake in OpenAI.
But the big detail is that I've and his team will now lead product design at OpenAI.
That means more than just a headline device, whatever it ends up being, their influence
will also presumably extend to future versions of chat GPT, audio features, other software products.
And yet still, it's very clear that this family of hardware devices is the real focus.
At another part of that announcement video, Altman said,
I think we have the opportunity here to completely reimagine what it means to use a computer.
Of course, the vast majority of the discussion online has been around what are they going to make.
The New York Times described some of the early efforts last year as an effort to create a,
quote, computing experience that is less socially disruptive than the iPhone.
In their video, Altman gave the example of the current chat GPT experience,
saying that if you wanted to check something, he would need to put down his espresso,
stop the conversation, pull out a laptop or a phone, and use a keyboard to consult AI,
adding, I think this technology deserves something much better.
The Verge staff compiled their predictions, which range from her style earbuds plus puck controller
to a robot dog, to a levitating orb that follows you around, to a smooth bracelet that you
can talk to with no screen.
Now, what's interesting is how much the form factor actually matters at all.
Or more specifically, whether it's the form factor that's the core part of the device
or the interactive modality.
It feels almost certain that instead of pointing...
and clicking at a thing and looking at it, you're going to be talking to the thing. And so is the idea
and is why they're hinting at the notion of a family of devices, that it could be glasses,
bracelets, necklaces, pendants, basically anything that you can wear, as long as it has the
ability to listen to what you're saying. Now, aside from the obvious fact that this announcement is
even visually and referentially positioning Sam Altman as the new Steve Jobs, and OpenAI as the
new Apple, it is interesting to come back to our discussions from throughout the
the week about the nature of AI competition. Tang Tan, the former lead designer of iPhone and Apple Watch,
who departed Apple last year, made the observation that his team at I.O. isn't tied to a legacy
and has an opportunity to rethink the space. Compare that to Microsoft and Google, who we heard
from earlier this week. As much as those companies are innovating, as much as they are being
creative, their AI products are ultimately tied intrinsically to their legacy products. Wall Street
is judging them on how, at least initially, AI contributes to their existing revenue lines.
Yes, at some point, maybe they do something new that creates a new growth business,
but for now it's all about cloud revenue.
Smartphones are the great cash cow for a company like Apple,
and we've seen how risky a new form factor can be.
The lesson of the Apple Vision Pro, for example, might be taken that if a new product line
isn't an immediate smash hit, markets will punish the company and the product will be
deprecated.
None of these limits apply to OpenAI.
They have a completely blank slate,
except for the fact that obviously they are resource constrained
in the sense that even they don't have unlimited time and money,
although fairly close to it at this point.
When push comes to shove,
I think pretty much everyone believes
that there is something that will come after the iPhone.
And for many, the odds on betting
is that the guy who made the original iPhone
might be the one to figure it out.
For now, that's going to do it for today's AI Daily Brief.
Appreciate you listening or watching, as always.
And until next time, peace.
Thank you.
