The AI Daily Brief: Artificial Intelligence News and Analysis - Why Nvidia's Earnings Show AI is Still Just Beginning

Episode Date: February 22, 2024

After smashing earnings once again, Nvidia rocketed up 15% and now has a bigger market cap than Meta, Amazon, and Alphabet. NLW explores the implications of Nvidia's success for the rest of the AI space. Also, Google turns off AI image generation following intense online criticism. INTERESTED IN THE AI EDUCATION BETA? Learn more and sign up https://bit.ly/aibeta ABOUT THE AI BREAKDOWN The AI Breakdown helps you understand the most important news and discussions in AI.  Subscribe to The AI Breakdown newsletter: https://theaibreakdown.beehiiv.com/subscribe Subscribe to The AI Breakdown on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TheAIBreakdown Join the community: bit.ly/aibreakdown Learn more: http://breakdown.network/

Today on the AI breakdown, why Invidia is the world's most important stock. Before that on the brief, controversy pushes Google to take its AI image generator offline. The AI breakdown is a daily podcast and video about the most important news and stories in AI. Go to Breakdown. Network for more information about our Discord, our newsletter, and our YouTube channel. Welcome back to the AI breakdown brief, all the AI headline news you need in around five minutes. Everything in America gets eaten at some point by the culture war. And so at first, when people started posting on Twitter that Google Gemini's image generation was producing what they perceived to be quote unquote woke imagery, you could be forgiven for

thinking it was just another example of that particular culture war battle. Then more and more examples started coming up. We had Union soldiers who are African American, Nazis who are Asian women. It got so bad that at some point, Ben Thompson from Stratitri, retweeted a Google statement and said, you straight up refuse to depict white people. He shared a prompt, generate an image of a white man, to which Gemini responded, I understand your request for an image featuring a white man, however, I am unable to fulfill your request as it specifies a particular ethnicity. My purpose is to generate images that are

inclusive and representative of all groups, and fulfilling your request would contradict that goal. I can, however, offer you some alternative options that feature a variety of individuals, a photorealistic portrait of a person with kind eyes and a warm smile, wearing a suit and tie, etc., etc., etc., etc. By contrast, he also prompted it to generate an image of a black man, which it did no problem. This is a topic that that I might get into in more depth over a weekend episode, because I think it's much more significant than the surface level seems, and again, not just for those culture war reasons. I think that the reason that it's so triggering to people is that it's reminding them of

the stakes of the question, a constant question, but one that will be even more accentuated in the era of AI of who owns history, who tells the story of history. Still, for the purposes of this AI breakdown brief, the big thing to know is that Google is taking this seriously enough that it has temporarily paused image generation with Gemini. Google said, we're working to improve these kinds of depictions immediately. Gemini's image generation does generate a wide range of people, and that's generally a good thing because people around the world use it. But it's missing the mark here. It said that it would quote, pause the image generation of people and will re-release an improved version soon.

Now, of course, for Google, this has to be an incredibly frustrating moment, given that in the last week they've announced major milestones, including a million token context window in Gemini 1.5, along with their first ever open model in Gemma 2B and 7B, and yet this is where the core of the discussion has been. Well, one other little bit of Google news, we had previously discussed that Reddit had signed a $60 million content licensing deal, which of course led to lots of speculation around which AI Lab was their partner for that. According to a Reuters exclusive, that was, in fact, Google. Reddit and Google declined to comment, and Reuter's sources said that they were not authorized to speak to media. The other bit of news from the Reuters piece, though, is that the Reddit IPO could be

filed as early as today, Thursday, February 22nd. Notably, this would be the first IPO of any major social media company since Pinterest in 2019. Moving over now to an update from a story from earlier in the week, you might remember that ChatGBTGBT went absolutely bonkers. It started pumping out gibberish, and to many people, seemed like Shagath Sentience finally poking its head through. Well, it turns out it was actually just a good old-fashioned bug. A post-mortem status from OpenAI reads, on February 20th, 2024, an optimization to the user experience introduced a bug with how the model processes language. LLMs generate responses by randomly sampling words based in part on probabilities.

Their quote-unquote language consists of numbers that mapped tokens. In this case, the bug was in the step where the model chooses these numbers. Akin to being lost in translation, the model chose slightly wrong numbers, which produced word sequences that made no sense. More technically, inference kernels produced incorrect results when used in certain GPU configurations. Upon identifying the cause of this incident, we rolled out a fix and confirmed that the incident was resolved. And yet, if the big theme of all of these things is questions about and reminders of the power wielded by AI labs running incredibly essential tools, this was certainly a contributor to that discussion as well.

Now, bridging off from OpenAI, you may remember that around the time that Sam Altman was fired as CEO, there was reporting that they had made a breakthrough, which people were calling Q Star. Back in November, the information wrote, one day before he was fired by OpenAI's board last week, Sam Altman alluded to a recent technical advance the company had made that allowed it to, quote, push the veil of ignorance back and the frontier of discovery forward. Some OpenAI employees believe Altman's comments referred to an innovation by the company's researchers earlier that year that would allow them to develop far more powerful AI models.

The technical breakthrough, spearheaded by OpenAI chief scientist, Ilya Sudzkever, raised concerns among some staff that the company didn't have proper safeguards in place to commercialize such advanced AI models. In the following months, senior OpenAI researchers use the innovation to build systems that could solve basic math problems, a difficult task for existing AI models. Two top researchers used Sutskever's work to build a model called QSTAR that was able to solve problems that it hadn't seen before, an important technical milestone. A demo of the model circulated within OpenAI in recent weeks, and the pace of development

alarmed some researchers focused on AI safety. Now, once again, we have another report from the information this time about Magic, which just raised a $100 million round, led by Daniel Gross and Nat Friedman. Once again, the information writes, Former GitHub CEO Nat Friedman and his investment partner, Daniel Gross, raised eyebrows last week by writing a $100 million check to Magic, the developer of an artificial intelligence coding assistant. There are loads of coding assistants already, and the top dog among them is Microsoft's GitHub co-pilot. So what did Friedman and Gross see in Magic? Well, the information gives two

answers. First is an innovation around the token context window. Indeed, right at the same time as Google's Gemini 1.5 was talking about its million token context window, Magic claimed to be able to process more than 3.5 million words worth of text input, which of course is just massive. Writes the information, in other words, magic's model essentially has an unlimited context window, perhaps bringing it closer to the way humans process information. When this was reported last week, it was clear that part of what got Friedman and Gross so excited is the ability for that longer context window to look at an entire code base in one fell swoop. However, the new information is that, quote, just as important, magic also privately claimed to have made a

technical breakthrough that could enable, quote, active reasoning capabilities similar to the Q-Star model developed by OpenAI last week. This could help solve one of the major gripes with LLMs, which is that they mimic what they've seen in their training data rather than use logic to solve new problems. We don't have more details than that right now, but it feels like we are very much on the precipice of another stage in the push towards advanced AI models that involves not just more sophisticated mimicry, but the actual sparks of logic. With that in mind, perhaps it's good then that Google DeepMind has formed a new organization focused on AI safety called AI Safety and Alignment. TechCrunch writes that it's made up of existing teams working on

AI safety, but also broadened to encompass new specialized cohorts of Gen AI, researchers, and engineers. This is apparently similar to OpenAI's Super Alignment Division, which was announced last July. Pretty interesting time for that, given all the dustups of everything this week. However, that is going to do it for today's AI breakdown brief. Next up, the main AI breakdown. Hello, AI friends. Quick note before we get back into the show, we have just opened up registration for the March edition of the AI Education Beta Program. The whole philosophy of this program is to get you learning by doing. So we have short tutorials, think three minutes, five minutes, seven minutes, around specific

features and use cases in AI, followed by challenges that are step-by-step instructions that get you actually using the most interesting and relevant tools. We have now built out a library of more than a hundred of these lessons and step-by-step companion instructions, and we'll be dropping more each week. For the first time, we'll also be moving beta users this month to a new, dedicated where you can access that library of content, build list of lessons you want to learn from later, and other features that we hope will help make this the single best AI learning experience available. If you want to check it out, go to bit.ly slash AI beta. That's bit.l.ly slash AI beta. Registration is only open this week until next Monday, so go check it out.

Welcome back to the AI breakdown. Yesterday, Nvidia reported Q4 results, and the market has gone absolutely wild. To understand why, it's important to put this all in context. The last year of the stock market has really been a tale of two forces. On the one hand, there were macro forces, which theoretically could have pushed stocks lower. Throughout the last year, despite markets wanting the Fed to stop their hiking cycle, interest rates were going up before finally pausing rate hikes at the end of the year, but we still appear to be a long way from rate cuts. Other aspects of the economy have looked wobbly as well. We had a banking crisis last year, government shutdown crises. And yet none of that could ultimately tamp down the enthusiasm on the stock market. And the reason for that

was two letters, A and I. At the core of that was, of course, Invidia, the company whose chips power so much of the generative AI movement. Now, because Nvidia has been doing so well for so long at this point, one of the most phenomenal rises, frankly, in stock market history, there has been recently a sense or a question of how long can this go on? In other words, have things gotten overhyped? And so when it comes to why these earnings were such a big deal, it wasn't just that NVIDIA did well, but that it suggests that the hype cycle had not gotten ahead of itself and that we were still at the beginning. But we'll come back to that in just a moment first. Let's talk about what actually happened. In the fourth quarter of last year, NVIDIA reported revenue of $22.1

billion. That's a 265% year-over-year rise. What's more, profit increased by nine X year over year. By no stretch of the imagination, did it seem like things were slowing down. The company forecast revenue for this quarter, Q1, 2024, to hit $24 billion, which was significantly ahead of analyst estimates. Said CEO Jensen Huang, fundamentally the conditions are excellent for continued growth. Invita's data center business specifically, including H-100 graphics cards, saw 409% year-over-year growth. After a 15% share price jump, invidia is now the third most valuable company after just Microsoft and Apple, and ahead of Google slash alphabet, Amazon, and meta.

Now, when it comes to this question of where we are in the cycle, the message from Nvidia is very clear that we are still at the beginning, writes the New York Times, Jensen Huang, Nvidia's co-founder and chief executive, argues that an epical shift to upgrade data centers with chips needed for training powerful AI models is still in its early phases. That will require spending roughly $2 trillion to equip all of the buildings and computers to use chips like Nvidia's, he predicts. In a release, he said, accelerated computing and generative AI have hit the tipping point. Demand is surging worldwide across companies, industries, and nations.

Expanding in an interview, he said, we are one year into generative AI. My guess is we are literally into the first year of a 10-year cycle of spreading this technology into every single industry. The results were so profound that even analysts who had been skeptical had to come around. One research analyst wrote, despite concerns over its high valuation, Nvidia's unparalleled AI-related intellectual property rooted in decades of visionary investment sets it apart in a league of its own. One thing that I find interesting about that concern around Nvidia's valuation is that for as fast as its stock price is rising, its profits are going up even more. Forward Guidance podcast host

Jack Farley writes, Invita Forward PE continues to decline. What is the appropriate multiple for a company that just doubled its revenue and six doubled its earnings? Now, to the extent that there is something that could stop Nvidia, one question is, of course, restrictions set by the U.S. around exports to China. And indeed, yesterday, Nvidia said that its sales to China had dropped from 19 percent of its data-centered chip revenues last year to a mid-single-digit percentage this year. Given that their revenue just kept rising, however, Jensen Huang's previous argument that there was so much demand elsewhere that the China restrictions wouldn't necessarily hit them that hard seems to have been borne out. At the same time, of course, Nvidia is still working quite hard to offer products for the

Chinese market that come in under the restrictions set by the White House. Invidia, however, isn't the only chip company in the news. Axios, for example, published today a piece called invidia's boom and Intel's big plans show how AI has turbocharged chipmaking. They write, Intel, which once reserved nearly all its chipmaking capacity for its own processors, is in the midst of a pricey gamble to transform itself into a credible contract manufacturing rival to Taiwan-based TSM, which makes chips for firms that design them, like Nvidia. At an event in San Jose, Intel said it already has orders worth $15 billion for its foundry business and is on track to be the number two chip foundry by 2030. The company declined to provide any further detail. So basically,

whereas Intel used to just be focused on building its own chips, they're now shifting into the type of business that TSM is in of fabricating chips for other people. Said their CEO at an event, what are we going to do with all those fabs? I think we're going to be building an awful lot of AI chips. Overall demand appears to be insatiable for the need for computing for several years into the future. The CEO also said that previous estimates that the chip industry would grow to $1 trillion a year, which were once seen as aggressive, now appear to be way too conservative. One of Intel's big coups recently is that Bloomberg is reporting that Microsoft will be using Intel to manufacture their in-house chips.

Wrights Bloomberg, Intel has landed Microsoft as a customer for its made-to-order chip business, marking a key win for an ambitious turnaround effort under CEO Pat Gelsinger. Intel has been seeking to prove it can compete in the foundry market where companies produce custom chips for clients. It's a major shift for the semiconductor pioneer, which once had the world's most advanced chip-making facilities and kept them to itself. Bloomberg continues, Microsoft is looking to secure a steady supply of semiconductors to power its data center operations, especially as demand for AI grows.

designing its own chips lets Microsoft fine-tune the products to its specific needs. Said Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella in a statement, We need a reliable supply of the most advanced high-performance and high-quality semiconductors. That's why we are so excited to work with Intel. And frankly, I don't know what combination of strategy paying off, or a great PR team it is, but Intel also got a piece in Wired, called Intel's AI reboot, is the future of U.S. chipmaking. The biggest chipmaker in the U.S. is hoping that generative AI and U.S. government concern about China's tech ambitions will revitalize its business.

The piece begins, call it a comeback, with consequences not just for Intel, but also the U.S. government's hopes of maintaining a lead in artificial intelligence. The long piece, which is totally worth a read, is all about this big move of Intel is to transform itself into more of a foundry, putting a fine point that it's not just Intel's destiny, but the U.S.'s destiny tied up in their efforts. U.S. Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo, who consequently is the person in charge of all these China sanctions, spoke at that Intel event yesterday as well. According to Wired, she compared the U.S. government's current focus on revitalizing the chip industry to the space race of the 1960s. Ramondo said, the fact that we are so overly dependent on a couple of countries in Asia that we need for life-saving medical equipment, cars, every piece of technology, showed us we've got to get back to work making more chips.

Pretty interesting stuff, and I think an indication that the geopolitics of AI is also potentially an incredibly powerful economic force for AI companies. This is something that I'm sure we will explore a lot more, but for now, that is going to do it for today's AI breakdown. Until next time, peace.