The Ancients - Caracalla & Geta: The Real Emperors of Gladiator II

Episode Date: November 14, 2024

The new Hollywood blockbuster Gladiator II features two of Rome's most villainous emperors - the brothers Caracalla and Geta.And in today's episode of The Ancients were delving into the real history of these scheming siblings. Their story is a blood-stained and chilling one. It stretches from their opulent upbringing to their tumultuous rivalry and culminates with a brutal murder in front of their very own mother in 211 AD. Joined by Alex Imrie, Tristan explores how much we really know about Caracalla and Geta, their rise to power and their relationship - or perhaps lack of one.Presented by Tristan Hughes. The producer is Joseph Knight, audio editor is Aidan Lonergan. The senior producer is Anne-Marie Luff.The Ancients is a History Hit podcast.Sign up to History Hit for hundreds of hours of original documentaries, with a new release every week and ad-free podcasts. Sign up at https://www.historyhit.com/subscribe. You can take part in our listener survey here.

Hi, I'm Tristan Hughes, and if you would like the Ancient ad-free, get early access and bonus episodes, sign up to History Hit. With a History Hit subscription, you can also watch hundreds of hours of original documentaries, including my recent documentary all about Petra and the Nabataeans, and enjoy a new release every week. Sign up now by visiting historyhit.com slash subscribe. It's early 211 AD. The Roman Emperor Septimius Severus lies on his deathbed in York. His two sons, already proclaimed emperors, stand nearby. They're young and roughly the same age.

Both have enjoyed incredibly lavish upbringings, driving chariots around Rome, pampered by yes-men, and indulging in the countless luxuries of palace life. But there's one massive problem. They cannot stand one another. Hatred between these two brothers ran deep. Severus wanted his two sons to rule together, to display peace and harmony, coexisting and cooperating at the peak of power. But these two young men, well, they had a very different idea. As soon as their father died, the clock was ticking, and it would end in blood, in murder, in fratricide.

It's the ancients on History Hit. I'm Tristan Hughes, your host, and today we're adding to the massive ancient history hype around the release of Gladiator 2. The movie is set a couple of decades after the original and features a number of characters loosely based on real figures, including the two young colourful emperors Caracalla and Geta. These brothers who ruled together in the early 3rd century AD, although not for very long. Thanks to this new movie, the names Caracalla and Geta have risen to the fore. So who were the real Caracalla and Getter?

What do we know about them? Their rise to power? Their relationship with one another? Or lack of? That is what we're going to explore. Our guest is Dr Alex Imrie from the University of Edinburgh. Now, I've known Alex for many years. He even marked one of my papers when I was an undergraduate at the University of Edinburgh back Now, I've known Alex for many years. He even marked one of my papers

when I was an undergraduate at the University of Edinburgh back in the 2010s. Alex, he's a great speaker who has been on the podcast in the past to talk through the stories of both Commodus, another infamous Roman emperor famously played by Joaquin Phoenix in the original Gladiator, the original villain. And Alex, Alex has also been on to talk through the story of Caracalla in depth. What a chaotic story this is. Let's get into it. Alex, it is such a pleasure to have you back on the podcast. I am thrilled to be here. It's a really exciting time to be a Severn historian, so can't wait to get going.

It's exciting to have you back on because I remember I said you're University of Edinburgh, so I have very fond memories of studying back then. And I believe you have had a look at some of my papers back when I was at university too. So the tables have turned, but I'm always very, very glad to get you on the podcast. And as you've hinted at there, to talk about these emperors that feature, they're right at the heart of Gladiator 2. I mean, How are you

feeling that your historical figures that you've studied for years are now at the centre of one of the biggest ancient history movies of recent times? I know. It's incredible. For somebody like me, this is just a pot of gold. If you'd asked me a decade ago when I first started studying these as a postgraduate student, would expect any filmmaker let alone somebody like Ridley Scott to devote time to the Severn family I would say well I hope so but I don't expect it so I am absolutely psyched it's brilliant I mean I'm sure on like the twitter sphere there's going to be a bunch of historians really already nitpicking but I am truly excited I think you're right and I think with this release, there is that more and more kind of popular interest in who these figures are.

And yes, we will explore the true figures of who these emperors are, what the sources say. And yes, I'm sure Gladiator 2 won't be completely accurate to that, but it is gathering interest, isn't it? It is because of that, that we're doing interviews like this so that people can then go and find out the real stories behind these titanic Roman emperors.

That's exactly it. I mean, I think about my own route into classics. And while I would love to say I was kind of immersed in classical literature from a very young age, that simply isn't the case. I mean, I started getting into the ancient past through watching things like Spartacus. And, you know, you have no idea how distraught I was to learn that there was no I'm Spartacus moment with Kirk Douglas. But that was the kind of vehicle that got me into the ancient past. And so, yes, having seen the trailers alone, there will be inaccuracies. There will be points where the directors have made some very interesting choices. But as a piece of

mass media it's worth its weight in gold to ancient historians like us to draw in people to learn more because the actual history behind these characters is just as entertaining if not more so I'd suggest. I think you're absolutely right and that's one of the key things that we're really going to delve into in this episode but thing, a bit of an overarching question first of all, Alex, who are Caracalla and Gaeta? So Caracalla and Gaeta are the two sons of the Roman Emperor Septimius Severus. Now Septimius Severus is known commonly as the African Emperor. Certainly he comes from modern-day Libya and is really the only emperor at that point to have come from that part of the Roman Empire to hold the imperial power. So Severus seizes power in a coup in the year 193 and by then he has his two sons. They're not even 10 years old at that point. Caracalla's born in 188,

Geta's born in 189, so only 11 months separate them age, and they are princes from a very early period. So Geta is the younger of the two, but as you've highlighted there, it's not like a huge amount of years between them. They are roughly of a similar age. That's correct, yep. It's a common thing in the sources that we might come on to later to infantilise Geta a little bit just because he's that younger brother, but in actual fact, there is only, as I say, about 11 months separating them. They are remarkably close as brothers. And what are these sources that we have to really understand the great stories that we have surrounding these two figures and this whole time period? So listeners, if they've dropped into my previous engagements with history and the ancients, this will probably sound like a little bit of a broken record to them.

Oh, we're always going to do it, my man. We've always got to do it. Absolutely. I'm always happy to talk about these sources because there's a lot to say. We have three main sources that we work with for re-establishing the history of Caracalla and Geta as individuals. Ironically, two of them really don't say a tremendous amount about Geta in particular. We will come on to that sort of distinction maybe later. We have firstly the historian Cassius Dio.

Now Cassius Dio was a senator during the sort of later Antonine era under Marcus Aurelius and Commodus and served as a senator through the early Severan period as well. He writes about his contemporary era in a very dour way. He's not tremendously fond of any of the Severan rulers, it has to be said. And so we have a fairly negative character portrait of Caracalla built up very early and very little is said about Geta until about midway through that contemporary account. The other source we have that is near contemporary is the author Herodian. He's probably writing a little bit further into the third century. We get a little bit more maybe of Geta's personality coming through in that source, but the focus tends to be very much on the mutual animosity that builds between the two

brothers. Now, ironically, the best source we have for constructing anything that we might have to consider character portraits of these two comes from the Historia Augusta. Now this is a very late 4th century, maybe even early 5th century, set of Latin biographies and the caliber or the quality of this set of works is still a huge matter of academic disagreement. Historically people thought they were just absolute trash. They were fictionalized accounts that just pulled facts and indeed sources out of the air. There was a bit of a shift back in recent years to think that these might be kind of clever literary games going on within the set of biographies that comprises the HA, whereas now

more recently people are thinking that the author of the Historia Augusta is really reliant on other late Latin historians such as Aurelius victor and there's there's been a couple of really good publications about that particular relationship in recent years it has quite a lot of colorful information i'm guessing that the you know and it's debating whether it's truth or fiction is that what we're kind of looking at there that's absolutely right we get very clearly defined character pictures of both men both both boys, through these lives, through these biographies. But whether there is much truth to them is another matter. Okay, so let's go back to the beginning with Caracalla and Geta. So late 180s AD,

and then that last decade of the second century AD. I mean, Alex, paint us a picture of the world that these two brothers are born into, because it's a really interesting time of change in the Roman Empire. And also that can kind of link us in with key figures from Gladiator 1 and another figure that you've done an episode with us before about Commodus. So piece that all together, this kind of rise in status of Caracalla and Geta and that whole decade at that time. So when the two boys are born, so 188 and 189, they're born into an empire which is, with hindsight we can see, is coming to the end of one particular era, the Antonine era. This has been the so-called Golden Age, the Pax Romana, where we've had emperors transition power peacefully and stably for the best part of a century at that point.

This is the end of the era that really commences with Nerva and Trajan, and Marcus Aurelius is regarded to be the final good emperor in that set of five that cover the second century. Now, Marcus Aurelius is not just the kind the kind of sagely richard harris type character that we see in gladiator one and it's only in some later latin sources that we have this question of marcus aurelius maybe regretting having to hand over the empire to commodus which is again what we see with the richard harris version the history the reality is though that there doesn't seem to be this moment where marcus aurelius says that he's going to restore the Republic.

I mean, that was never really a reality at this point in the empire. What happens is Marcus Aurelius hands over the reins of power, or brings in, rather, his son Commodus to share imperial rule with him. Commodus in in the mid-170s, following a bit of a fright for his own regime, which is where one of his provincial governors, the governor of Egypt, Ovidius Cassius, rises in revolt. Now, there's a lot of convoluted literary tragedy that's sort of injected into that tale, but ultimately the reality is Marcus Aurelius has been frightened that his regime isn't tremendously safe and so he brings Commodus in as the official future of the dynasty. He'd been made a Caesar as a young boy, that heir apparent. He was made a co-emperor alongside Marcus Aurelius really for the last decade pretty much of Marcus Aurelius's reign. Now when Marcus Aurelius dies, Commodus is the last man standing. He is the only emperor. There is no shared principate, like we've seen in the earlier phase of Marcus Aurelius' rule. And we appear to have a fairly

stable first couple of years of Commodus' reign. There is a question of whether there's a bit of internal plotting going on. And from the outset, Commodus, it seems, is faced with a bit of unpopularity within the senatorial order, especially. This is something that's reflected in Gladiator 1, where we have, I think it's Derek Jacoby give us the voice of the senate who are none too impressed with the rather showy, flashy, wannabe gladiator that is the Emperor Commodus. And we have this sense that Commodus is kind of just going from one small crisis to another

across the 180s and this culminates around the year 190 or 191 where we have a great fire in Rome as well so nothing seems to be going tremendously well for Commodus and he is assassinated at the very close of the year 192. So when Caracalla and Geta are born in the late 180s, they're in an empire that is, I think, in the midst of what will become painful change. It's a painful transitional process. Now, they couldn't have predicted that, obviously, at this point. When Caracalla and Geta are born, their father doesn't even seem to be anywhere close to the imperial throne. He is just one of many regional governors. imperial throne. He is just one of many regional governors. He is the governor of Gallia Lugdunensis,

so a section of Gaul, modern-day France, the headquarters or the capital of which is in modern Leon. So it's a fairly cosmopolitan city by Roman standards in the Latin West, and they're probably brought up as relatively well-to-do aristocratic children in the first couple of years. Now, they moved to Rome before the fatal event. So, as aristocratic children, I'm guessing, learning Latin, learning what it meant to be a civilised Roman, I'm guessing. Absolutely. So, brought up in not just Latin, but trained in Greek as well, Greek being pretty much the lingua franca at this point rather than Latin, and given all sorts of insights into the cultural capital that one will need as a well to do Roman. So they'll be trained in oratory and rhetoric. They'll be given education about

history and philosophy. It's a fairly rounded or multifaceted education for a young up and coming Roman child at that point. And they'll have been drilled into with stories of great heroes like Alexander the Great, who will become much, much lauded by Caracalla in particular later. So from those beginnings in Leon, in Lugdunum, in Gaul, where does their journey take them following, as you've hinted at, this great turmoil starts to seize the empire? So it's interesting in as much as from what we can establish in the sources, it doesn't seem like the children follow their father through his later gubernatorial roles, because Severus, their father, will become governor of Upper Pannonia, so a very militarized region on the Danube frontier.

And he will be in that position in the year 192-193 when Commodus is murdered, and we have a variety of crises affecting the empire within a very short order. The children, it seems, are in the city of Rome, from what we can establish. This just reflects the fact that they're not tremendously important characters, maybe in their own right, being so young at this point, but they are housed in the capital. Now, we can tell that because when civil war begins and Severus starts to march on Rome eventually, the boys have to be ushered out of the capital in secret, it seems. So there's a suggestion there that they were just living a fairly regular life as far as

Roman aristocratic children can, but had to be ushered out of the city at a point where there may have been danger to their lives owing to their father's attempt to take the imperial throne so this is almost like they could either be taken they could be killed outright or be taken as hostages in this time where and he's saying so this is the 193 so year of the five emperors which is a massive time and severus is making this big play isn't he so all of a sudden his young children caracalla and getter i mean not of their own choice but because of their father's actionsa, I mean, not of their own choice, but because of their father's actions, their trajectory, the whole trajectory of their life has changed depending on the outcome of Severus's actions of his march on Rome.

100%. I mean, when 193 starts, even then, there's no real sense that Severus is even in consideration, as it were, for becoming an emperor. We have the throne handed to the aged, very experienced senator and multifaceted governor, Helvius Pertinax. And in many ways, he seems the ideal candidate for the throne. He has a wealth of senatorial and military and gubernatorial experience. He seems to be the man to kind of take hold of the reins again and restore a little bit of stability to the roman state after the the arguably wilder eccentricities of commodus's final years with all

the games and all the the wannabe hercules type vibes that were coming out of commodus's regime then that regime of pertinax however crashes within like two or three months it's only i think 80 87 days i think no days, I beg your pardon, before he is assassinated by his Praetorian Guard. And it's at that point that we have the infamous episode, the auction of the empire, as Cassius Dio calls it, where we have a couple of senators bidding to receive the good graces of the Praetorian Guard.

Now that's in Rome. The winner of that is one Didius Julianus, who is apparently very wealthy, but doesn't seem to be terribly well equipped to actually rule an empire now that he's got it. Maybe a bit of buyer's remorse comes in quite quickly. Now it's at that point that we see Severus raising his standard. His legions in Pannonia, they acclaim him emperor. And as he's not alone, there are a couple of other regional governors who are also proclaimed emperor at this point. We have Clodius Albinus in Britain, and we have Piscinius Niger in Syria, both at the head of multi-legion forces. But Severus being on the Danube frontier is physically the closest. And this allows him to perform what is effectively a lightning march on the capital.

And Dio and Herodian, the sources tend to agree that he meets very little resistance on the closest. And this allows him to perform what is effectively a lightning march on the capital. And Dio and Herodian, the sources tend to agree that he meets very little resistance on the way. This is, on the one hand, a marker of maybe Julianus' rank unpopularity with pretty much everybody. But it's also, I think, it's also an indicator of just how much military force Severus has behind him on that frontier, being able to persuade not only his own legions but a couple of neighbouring governors to back his cause as well. There's very little to oppose him at this point but his children are at risk. They could be taken hostage, I would imagine that would be the most likely outcome of events if Julianus had been able to take custody of them. But he doesn't and so what happens? So Severus, is he victorious?

Severus is absolutely victorious over Didius Julianus in an extraordinarily short period. As I say, he marches from Pannonia, meets basically no resistance, enters into Rome, he receives the quick acclamation of the Senate. Julianus is cast away, he's declared a public enemy and is murdered in the imperial palace in relatively short order, then Severus has a successful march into the capital itself. Now it's interesting here that Dio and Herodian offer us slightly different takes on that. In one telling we have Severus marching in full armor, his army behind him, a very unsubtle image of imperial power projected. But in another telling he stops at the gates almost and then changes out of his armour into a toga and comes in in a very civil mode of introduction to the Roman capital. The reality is, though, the armies behind him in either case doesn't really matter what he's

wearing. There is very little ambiguity about who or where the real power resides. And so it's no surprise really then that the Senate, I think, opt to support his claim in the year 193. Now, Severus will spend the next four years fighting civil wars. Albinus and Niger will not give up without a fight. Those are other rivals who want the throne, aren't they? The other claimants, yes, Albinus. That's correct. So he goes against Piscinius, Niger and Syria first. He spends the first year and a half of his reign waging a war to the east against the Syrian legions, which he manages to conclude relatively swiftly, relatively successfully. And it's at that point that Caracalla becomes really important to our story. That's a very nice kind of teaser as to what we're going on to next, Alex, which is, of course, the roles of Caracalla and Geta under Severus when he's emperor. Yes, how does this affect,

seems Caracalla mainly as he's the elder one, but only just, as you mentioned when he's emperor. Yes, how does this affect, seems Caracalla mainly as he's the elder one, but only just, as you mentioned, he's only a few months older than Geta. But how does Severus becoming emperor and consolidating his rule and defeating these challengers, how does this all affect the likes of Caracalla and Geta? Well, Caracalla first, it probably changes his life, I would say, more than Geta's in the short term, because he is used by his father to consolidate the Severan dynasty as a nascent regime. He's also really put into the fire line because it is Severus elevating Caracalla to the rank of Caesar in 195 that causes the second civil war that Severus has to fight. So at the end of his campaign against Niger, Severus retroactively adopts the entire Severan family into the Antonine household. It's a very bizarre political conceit to kind of retcon

the history, which bolts his family onto that of Marcus Aurelius and Commodus so that he has lines of legitimacy it seems going every direction. His rule is unassailable on terms of legitimacy. Now the problem for Severus is that in doing that, in putting his son to the fore like this, he has basically broken a treaty with Clodius Albinus, the governor of Britain. He had made this treaty in 193 with Albinus to name Albinus his heir apparent, his Caesar, as a way of buying off that rival to the west to allow him to wage a war in the east. It's clear that in 195, with Niger defeated, Severus feels no need to hold on to that treaty for any longer. And Caracalla is the vehicle, he is the weapon that is used to signal

to Albinus that Albinus is getting no bite of the cake anymore and it's war. And he's less than 10 years old at this time, Caracalla. So he is just being used by his dad. Yeah, he's not even 10. He's just before his 10th birthday probably is when he is named the Caesar and the heir apparent. Now, again, that's quite a bold statement to have a child as your heir apparent.

And it's exactly that. That's quite a bold statement to have a child as your heir apparent. And it's exactly that. He's used as a tool to signify that the Severan regime is ready to stand on its own feet and will brook no alliances with other factions anymore. And it triggers a bloody civil war. In 196-197, we have a fairly intense campaign where it seems that Clodius Albinus brings most of the military power from the British Isles over into Gaul and ironically meets Severus in battle at Lugdunum, at Leon, where Caracalla is born, the year 197. And Cassius Dio tells us that this has about 150,000 men on

either side duking it out on the fields outside Leon. And this is the largest single Roman land battle in history, if we believe Dio's numbers. And to think that Caracalla has a role in that, although it's not of his choice. It was quite interesting at this time, Alex. I mean, Geta, is he just very much in the background because he is the younger of the two sons? And I know generally the sources don't really focus on the time when they're children. So at this time, we not really hear of Geta at all? And it is only just Caracalla because how he's basically used as a pawn in Severus's games to consolidate his new control over the empire and establishing a dynasty.

That's right. I mean, partly we just don't hear about Getter tremendously much. And that, it seems, is a literary choice on the part of the authors, I think, in order to accentuate or emphasise maybe the role of Caracalla within think, in order to accentuate or emphasize maybe the role of Caracalla within the imperial succession, etc., at least initially. Now, I mean, the literary portrait is one thing, but the reality is that Severus doesn't actually give Geta any role or any constitutional importance at that point. When he elevates Caracalla to Caesar, Geta gets nothing really at all. And when eventually after the civil war against Clodius Albinus is concluded, Severus goes and wages another war against Parthia, basically I think to recoup some booty and some material gain and to focus all his

legions on an external enemy. At the end of that campaign, he elevates Caracalla again to become Augustus, so a co-emperor with him. That's probably the early days of the year 198, and that's timed, it seems, to coincide with the anniversary of Trajan's Day of Accession, his Diaz Imperii. So Severus, again, is trying to play all the propagandistic games and using his children to attach his regime to all of the best and all of the best liked facets of Roman imperial history over the preceding century. So Caracalla is made Augustus at that point and it's only then that Geta's brought in and given anything and he's made Caesar at that point. So although there's only 11 months separating the brothers, Caracalla is far more senior in the line of succession

than Geta is at this point. It's interesting what you highlighted there. So it would be Parthias, that's kind of Mesopotamia, that's the Iraq area today. you've also mentioned so caesar is heir apparent the title caesar caesar is not a name it's kind of the title is at that time and augustus is that basically the the position of emperor but severus is also emperor so are they going back to kind of co-emperor ruling father and son so yeah so on

the point of terminology yes the caesar and augustus begin as names from within that julian family line so julius caesar and octavian augustus they take on relatively rapidly official titles or they become rather relatively rapidly official titles. Augustus just refers to the emperor and Caesar refers to the heir. Now, and you're right, when Caracalla is made an Augustus in 198, that is a shared position now with his father. And this evokes, it seems, the shared empire of Marcus Aurelius and Lucius Verus. This is something that I think, again, Severus is well aware of the visual language of this kind of move and is exploiting that to elevate this idea of an Antonine link between his family and that of Marcus Aurelius. It's so interesting how you see time and time

again with Roman emperors or Hellenistic generals, for me the great interest is after Alexander the Great's death, is how they time those big announcements, those propaganda announcements, with either a big military victory or an anniversary or something like that. And Severus, he is the master of that, it's sounding, Alex, and I'm guessing that will continue. Oh, absolutely. I mean, I've seen Severus called the master of the arts of revolution. He is just somebody who, if he's not incredibly skilled personally with PR, he certainly has somebody within his court that knows what they're doing because he is really terribly good at it. And this whole Antonine association isn't just a kind of passing reference. It becomes a core pillar of the visual

language of this regime as a whole. And that's something that really comes to characterize Caracalla and Guetta. In the late 190s into the early 200s, we have Caracalla and Geta appear on coins, appear in statuary, and they are presented as young Antonine children. They have this kind of cherubic kind of facial feature going on. They have this lovely, soft, fluffy hair style kind of thing happening. And importantly, importantly on coins if it weren't for the titles i think many people would struggle to distinguish between the two so i mean that's another interesting facet of this and as much as well caracalla is definitely given more constitutional authority nominally i mean he's a child how much is he actually doing in terms of the propaganda that

the regime is pushing out and the mass media that they're pushing out the severan children are almost indistinguishable and i think that's's by design. I think Severus is saying with this that he has two children, that the future of the dynasty is assured, and that these two brothers are, while they may have different stations, they are indivisible and almost indistinguishable from one another. That's how close they are. That's how wonderfully loved up the Severan family is. And I guess this idea of peace, isn't it, after this rough time of a decade of turmoil and hostility and civil war, which once again you see again and again in the Roman Empire and the late Roman Republic. Let's go on then, Alex, to the 200s and

Severus's reign as it goes on. What do we know about Caracalla and Geta as Severus's reign goes on over those next 10 years or so? Now it's interesting in that we have further evidence that Severus wants to use them in this idea of a vast program of family unity being promoted. The two boys feature very prominently for example in the secular games of AD 204 where we have, I mean this is a large cultural set of games that has gone on from really the earliest phase of the imperial era. And it has huge religious overtones and the imperial family usually plays a significant part. Severus has every single one of his family members play a significant role.

They each lead different sections and delegations of this set of games. Beyond the family propaganda, though, we have a sense that not all is well in the House of Caesar. We have a sense that the two boys, while being very close in age and while being presented as indivisible princes, just don't get along. I mean, the pair of them just don't seem to enjoy each other's company and we have early early signs that they're intensely competitive with one another although much of this will only come out in our sources when the sources get onto the mid first the middle point of that first decade in the 200s because what happens before is that attention is focused on the problematic praetorian prefect, Plotianus.

Because it seems, at least in Dio's telling, that Plotianus, a prefect who is alleged to have staged or attempted to stage a coup in the year 205 to overthrow the Severan household, Dio claims that he's almost like a pressure valve that holds the boys' competition in check. And it's only when this troubling Praetorian is eliminated and executed that the boys competition in check and it's only when this troubling praetorian is eliminated and executed that the boys rivalry really starts to accelerate and explode because there's nothing to hold it in check there is no external force that the boys are both focused on rather than on each other so the dam is breached isn't it and then they kind of that really goes to the fore i mean is that rivalry is that hostility is it emphasized through different factions are like

the top of different factions in the court? I mean, what do we know about how this rivalry starts getting out of hand as we get towards the two tens? So in the early phase, it seems that both boys just, as you might expect young princes to have, sizeable entourages who seem to just encourage their worst impulses. They are a bunch of yes-men. Spoiled teenagers as well, I guess, as well, aren't they? Yeah, absolutely. Well, this is it. They are teens. And I think that's something that even scholars sometimes overlook, the fact that they are probably just quite natural teenagers, moody and hormonal and not very predictable. And yet they are facilitated by huge entourages who

encourage them to compete with one another. This is seen in Dio, for example, where we have them at the chariot races. If one boy, one teen, one prince chooses one faction, Dio will be sure to pick an opposing faction because, God forbid, they pick the same faction. And it

seems to intensify and the public rivalry that grows between the two boys gets even more visible. Dio tells us, for example, of one occasion where the two boys themselves were engaged in chariot racing. One presumes just through the middle of the capital and there's a chariot crash and Caracalla breaks his leg in that competition. And Severus is lauded at that point for kind of just ignoring the two of them and getting on with his work but it's an indicator that this is a public problem now for severus and it gets increasingly embarrassing as the first decade of the 200s draws to a close so it's not

confined to the palace there will be you know everyday romans in the streets there'll be rumors galore they'll be talking about the teenage boy emperors, and I guess, well, the teenage boys enrolled for that rule in future. But they'll be talking to each other, there'll be big rumours, there'll be slander, thinking, can you believe it that we've got these annoying teenagers who hate each other, potentially going to be the one who succeeds the emperor in time? I'm a bit of a film buff. And this image of Caracal and Geta chasing through the streets after one another in their chariots actually put me in mind of the animated Prince of Egypt cartoon. I don't know if any of your listeners

will remember that, when the Ramesses and the Moses characters basically destroy an ornamental city in their chariots. That's very much the image I got from this. These two tearaways, not really caring whose way they get in or what they damage or destroy as long as they get to have their little competition with one another. So this is becoming a much more public embarrassment for Severus that he has to do something about. And at least partially, it's this animosity between his two sons that seems to prompt his decision to take the entire imperial court along with a huge army over to Northern Britain when the governor writes to Severus and claims that there's some trouble on the frontier. He takes an expeditionary force of about 50,000 men. I mean, this is a ridiculously large force for what is ultimately, sorry Britain, a relatively insignificant frontier at this point. And it seems to be partly to remove his sons from the corrupting influence of Rome and to expose them to austerity and military life so that they might start to behave like emperors.

That is so interesting because normally with that big campaign of Severus to Britain, with more than 50,000 troops, you think of it, oh, he's wanting to show that he's done Parthia in the east and how he wants to show that he can conquer the whole of Britain. But as with all of these things, it's normally so much more complicated than just one reason as to why an emperor or this big figure is doing this massive action and i never realized that another reason for it could have been that he's just fed up with his two young teenage sons you know being decadent being spoiled brats and he wants to teach them in maybe in his eyes as a military man discipline on the harsh frontier of britain yeah i mean i tend to obviously hope think that the british campaign

has a little bit more complexity to it than the likes of dia wants to tell us but i i am tickled by the fact that this old soldier who has spent a lot of his reign at war in a in a kind of military context thinks that that might be the answer to get his boys out of the city away from the soft life and make them live in a tent for a few years and come to their senses. Well how do they fare? Talk to us about Caracalla and Geta in Britain for those years. So if Severus's intention was to get the boys to see sense and work together he doesn't seem to go about it in a tremendously effective manner. When they're in Britain from 208 until just after Severus's death in 211, the pair of them seem to have completely

different remits. So Caracalla, as a co-emperor from the outset, is given command at least of part of the military. He seems to go on campaign with his father in the year 208-209, and in 210, when Severus, it it seems is becoming increasingly ill and physically unable to lead a force himself Caracalla seems to be handed the mantle of command and takes an expeditionary force into what is now modern-day Scotland. So he's very much the military one of the pair. Geta by contrast seems to be getting trained at least in a much more administrative capacity. From all accounts we don't get a sense. Geta, by contrast, seems to be getting trained, at least, in a much more administrative capacity. From all accounts, we don't get a sense that Geta ever leaves the imperial headquarters at Ibarakam in modern York. This situation is complicated, of course, though.

It's never just as simple as that, because Severus does something else when the family's over in Britain. I've said how Geta basically gets no slice of the cake. He's made Caesar in 198. In that intervening decade, he basically gets nothing more. He's made a pontifex, so he's made a priest. Some people want to mistakenly call that, oh, well, he's made Pontifex Maximus. He's not. He's not. He's not made the head priest. He has made a priest. In 209, however, Severus makes the decision that the time has come and that Geta will also be elevated to the rank of Augustus. So you've got three now. Wow. So in 209, we have a tripartite principate.

And for me, that is one of the core moments for understanding this pair of brothers. Not just how Geta might feel, finally being given a bit of a share in the imperial power alongside his brother, who he's had to be in the shadow of for the best part of a decade. I also try to think about it from the perspective of Caracalla. I can only imagine that being really a jarring moment. He has assumed, perhaps, that he is going to share imperial power with his father for all of his father's life. He will succeed his father, and then he'll decide what happens. Whereas no, in 209, he is forced to share the imperial mantle with his brother, who we've just said he's fought hammer and tongs with for the best part of a decade.

This is a very interesting constitutional move. I'm still not sure I understand Severus's logic, to be honest, but it does change the dynamic within the Severan imperial household. Shall we also quickly mention the role of their mother, Julia Domna? Does she have quite an overarching presence on the two, even when they're in Britain, even at this stage? Because we talked about Severus's influence, which is always there in the sources as the emperor. But obviously, I'm presuming their mother also has a big influence too. She absolutely does. There's no doubt about the fact that she is a pivotal figure in both young men's lives at that point. In Britain, given that she's a member of the imperial court but obviously

would be in no way attached to the military, it's more likely that she spent more time with Geta during that campaign. Now that said, Julia's role in our literary reconstructions of the period is fascinating because it shifts depending on the source. Dio very much has Julia as an ambitious political operative in her own right. We get the sense that she is hungry for power behind the scenes and that this kind of characterizes all of our decisions. In Herodian, we get what I tend to think is probably the most likely relationship between Caracalla and Geta and their mother, that Julia Domna is the voice of reason. She is the rational one within the household and is always trying to bring her wayward sons together. After Severus dies, we have this allegation in Herodian that Caracalla and Geta loathe each other so much that they just decide

they want to split the empire in two, and that caracalla will rule from the west and geta will rule from the east caracalla in rome geta probably in alexandria and that the two armies will almost face off against each other at the hellespont so that they can monitor each other's movements it's a kind of wacky situation if you sit down and analyze it yeah it's almost like north and south korea in a weird kind of way with that demilitarized zone being yeah a, a channel as a DMZ. It's an extraordinary proposition. Probably isn't historically, there's no real reality to it probably,

but it's a very good vehicle for Herodian to show what kind of character Julia is because Julia is the voice of reason who stops her sons from this course of action, emotionally appealing to them that they can't divide their mother into. So that's the kind of thing that they would be doing by carving up the empire in doing this so julia is very much this voice of reason it seems within the imperial household and the senate

it's not just the literary the senate also seemed to want to believe this as well because when severus dies she is given a couple of really unusual titles by the Senate which reflect this idea of her as the peace bringer. She's given the qualities of Pia Felix, so pious and sort of Felix lucky or happy, and she is made Mater Sanatus. So she's almost made a de facto guardian of the Senate in their interest to stop these two kids from tearing the empire apart. So we've got the image of Julia as the rational one. That is not really what we get in the Historia Augusta, of course. The Historia Augusta is not interested in something so mundane as that kind of image. The Historia Augusta tends

to use Julia in order to attack Caracalla from whatever angle it chooses at that point. Now, in the Historia Augusta, we get an allegation that Caracalla and Julia are excessively close, and there's an allegation of an incestuous relationship between the pair. That's in the life of Caracalla. Now, in the life of Geta, we get the sense that Julia is not, in fact, Caracalla's biological mother, and that Julia, therefore, is always championing Geta's cause. And the reason for Geta's elevation is owing to Julia's intervention behind the scenes with Severus. Now, that ties into the kind of wicked stepmother trope that Caracalla will face as well. So there's a lot of literary baggage around here. But my advice to you and your

listeners is basically, if you want to establish anything about Julia and the Sons, avoid the Historia Augusta. Stick with Herodian because you're getting nothing of real value out of the A.H.E. at this point. well now let's move on to the climax of the story of caracalla and getter so let's go from the death of severus so 211 york alex talk us through the death and what then happens with Caracalla and Geta. Okay, so the British campaign was in its third year by this point and had not produced really any decisive outcome. Severus had claimed a quick victory and had given himself and his two sons the the imperatorial title of Britannicus. This may well be another reason for the campaign as a whole just to get tea and medals for Caracal and Geta. But they're still stuck there, and it looks like they're going to be stuck there for a while. And in February 2011, the situation changes only with the death of Severus on the frontier.

In that moment, we see almost like a light switch. The two boys, now forced to share power together but alone without the influence of their father, seem to make every effort to conclude the British campaign within a matter of days, weeks if not days. They immediately call a treaty with the northern tribes insofar as they're able. They may believe a small military force in northern Britain, but the pair of them then race back to the capital. They're in one big train though, and this is kind of an interesting point about this. It seems that they start to just completely separate from one another. They barely have any contact at all. They're also already on the way

back to Rome. They're not even left Britain and they're trying to angle the courtiers towards their faction. They're trying to get their people in the right places within the imperial court to support them over their brother, adversary, rival. I don't even know what we would label it at this point. And this continues when the boys get back to Rome. I mean, the funeral stuff for Severus we've got is earned, it's back in Rome, that's all fine. The brothers seem to divide the imperial palace into two. And this may be where Herodian gets his idea about wanting to divide the empire into the imperial palace, more or less as a partition wall put up in it, and the two boys never meet one another. They are intensely worried about each other, poisoning them, so they have huge

bodyguards start to grow up around them. Now indeed, they continue to promote this idea of family harmony that Severus has tried to do for the last decade. One of the big themes in the imperial coinage and inscription of this period is Concordia Augustorum, so the harmony of the emperors, which I mean, anybody who knew these two surely must have seen this as an utter fallacy. Now, Dio, who loves a good old man or portent, gives us a sign that this situation, this rivalry, but this kind of cold war will only last for so long. He says that anybody who could see this knew that something terrible was bound to happen. And he offers us this sort of beautiful set piece of the Senate trying to meet with the priests of Concord to sacrifice in the emperor's honour. But the people who want to make the sacrifice get lost

and can't meet each other and they're wandering around rome and the palace trying to find one and they can't do it they can't make this harmony sacrifice work so something bad is going to happen and this is where it comes to head well i mean i mean just before that alex i mean because we've got it too there is that image isn't there they're in the coliseum and they're sitting together they're laughing like maniacally they're being portrayed like megalomaniac mania is the way to portray it we don't know of anything like that in that year of them participating together sitting in the royal box together overlooking gladiatorial games or anything like that we don't see them together for those kind of things we're not told about any sort of big events or things where they try and appear together, but Dio tells us that in public appearances, they do try and maintain the conceit that is

familial unity. So I would say in scenes like that in the Colosseum and Gladiator 2, yes, it wouldn't be uncommon, I would think, in this period for the two boys to be sat together as co-emperors. Whether they are maniacally laughing genuinely with one another, as Gladiator 2 has it, is another question. I think that ultimately the atmosphere within that royal box might be a little bit more icy cold than Ridley Scott would have us believe. All right then, come on then. You said that it gets to a head. So what is this? Cold War turns hot. It does, and then and then some i mean if severus is dead in february 211 the whole situation comes to its violent conclusion before the end of december

211 wow so the boys have been living in rome in this kind of partitioned life for a while growing bodyguards much suspicion only barely holding on to the imperial conceit that they're together now it seems that they're both trying to outmanoeuvre one another and to assassinate the other one, basically. I mean, Daioh tells us that Caracalla wants to do it from the moment Severus dies, but is held back or can't make it work. Herodian tells us that the pair of them are equally as bad as each other and are just continually plotting in an escalating fashion. Now, matters come to a head when they realize, I think, that they're not going to be able to get around each other's huge bodyguards at this point. So Dio at least tells us that Caracalla petitions his mother, Julia Domna, to call a meeting between the two boys,

at which the pair will arrive unarmed, without all their bodyguards. And that seems to make sense. That is something that the Empress could and would have done and it seems that the meeting is to arrange a reconciliation. So Caracalla and Geta both attend this meeting in Julia Domna's chambers and we have different tellings of what happens next. In Herodian's telling, we have Caracalla simply losing the plot, going feral. The actual act of the murder is lost but using interpolations from other sources, we get the sense that Caracalla just launches himself at Geta in a frenzy and stabs him dozens of times in the chamber there right in front of Julia Domna. So he does it personally. He doesn't get his bodyguards to do it. He does it personally.

He kills his brother right there. So says Herodian. Oh, wow. Now, Cassius Dio gives us a slightly different telling cassius dio does tell us that he basically delegates the task cassius dio tells us that when the meeting is underway caracalla gives a signal and at that point 10 centurions presumably picked from within the praetorian guard burst into the room and this is an even more harrowing scene i think if it can be than caracalla murdering geta by hand because in daio's telling at the sight of the centurions bursting in armed and dangerous obviously geta runs to julia domna and clings to her and pleas for his life and nobody pays attention the centurions

launch themselves at geta whilst he is in his mother's arms and assassinate him right there and daio tells us that julia in trying to shield getta also received a wound to her arm in the midst of this so taking pause for a minute because i mean it's always entertaining to talk about these wild emperors and their murderous tendencies but i try and get my students to think about this moment in time just for a second if there's any historical reality to it it is absolutely heinous and it is highly traumatic. We have Caracalla either murdering or ordering the murder of his brother and co-emperor in their mother's arms in the imperial palace. This is an unprecedented act of political murder and in the aftermath Caracalla immediately runs from the chamber and petitions the Praetorian Guard for

their support. He claims that he was the target of a plot, which, you know, looking aside from the literary agendas of the sources, may well be true. But the act of murder itself is pinned wholly on Caracalla at this point. Wow. And that is another case of ancient fratricide, which makes it even more horrible. But as you've already highlighted, Alex, they didn't seem the most amiable of characters to start with. But at the same time, it still comes to horrific conclusion. We will continue the story of Caracalla and his soul reign in the next episode, and then the figure who comes after Caracalla, who's also in Gladiator 2, the figure of Macrinus. But last thing, to kind of wrap up the story of Geta, alex what does caracalla do in the aftermath of

murdering getter because naturally this time there are lots of statues as you've mentioned earlier that severus has ordered which shows that concordia caracalla with getter all this beautiful artwork depicting the two in harmony what does he do with all that now that he has brutally killed getter and get us out of the picture? Well, you're right. I mean, after murdering Geta, this whole family line about the family being lovey-dovey and unified can no longer hold water. Caracalla engages in the practice that we give the modern label, damnatio memoriae. And this is an, it's not just a condemnation of the memory, it is an abolition or a destruction of the memory. Now, this is well seen in modern times. For example, in Stalinist Russia, you have the idea of the vanishing commissars, people just disappearing out photographs.

In antiquity, it usually involved defacement, destruction of statuary, inscription which recorded their names. inscription which recorded their names, any kind of public presentation of that condemned figure was eligible for destruction or vandalism. And Caracalla is renowned to have engaged in the most violent, the most extensive, the most virulent example of damnatio memoriae during the Roman imperial period. Our literary sources tell us that not even the coinage which bears get his devices was spared from caracalla's wrath he attacks statues there's a scene where i think it's dio tells us caracalla literally with a sword himself hacks at statues of bearing get his likeness and image we have evidence from our coinage that survives that it has been brought back in, counter-stamped. Bits of Geta's face have been chiseled off the coins. His inscription around Rome is completely wiped out. There's a really good example of this on the Arch of the Silversmiths

in modern central Rome, where you can see on the actual arch, the inscription has been chiseled out and there's a very, very conspicuous gap on the family portraits where geta would have been and that's kind of the point it's not an erasure to make everybody forget so to speak it's a deliberate act designed to make people remember that this person is condemned and is damned for for eternity so yeah it's it's, very extreme reaction, but it's also a component in Caracalla's new rationale for his regime. He can't claim to be one of the family indivisible anymore. He has to change the narrative. And as part of that, Geta is condemned as somebody who plotted against him, somebody who looked to overthrow him. And so the act of damnatio memoria, extreme as it is,

is politically consistent. It really is. And it's such an extraordinary end to Getter's story, as you say. And my mind also goes, I've got a picture on my other screen as I finish that panel showing Severus, Julia Domna, Caracalla and Getter. And you just see where Getter's face is. It's just brown. It's just been covered over completely. And that was one of many. That is probably one of my favourite images from the Severan era as well. It's actually my laptop's desktop background. This is the so-called Berlin Tondo and it's a relatively small artefact. It was made in Egypt but you're right, it has a beautiful family group, or what would have been a beautiful family grouping, except for the smudged out face, conspicuously smudged out face of Geta in

the bottom left field. But we still have the neck and shoulders. It's just a conspicuous rubbing out of the face. And I think I'm right. I've said this before, I think, in other places. I think I'm right that chemical analysis has showed that dung or feces might even have been used to erase the face of Geta on that image. So it's a double insult, it's a double condemnation. If they can denigrate as well as erase, they choose to do so. And as a final marker of Caracalla's wrath, he doesn't deify Geta. Geta doesn't initially get made a god in the way that some previous Roman emperors have been made. Instead, Caracalla seems to keep offering sacrifices to the manes or to the departed spirits of Geta. Now you might think that sounds like a relatively nice move but what it does is it basically locks get a soul in the

underworld and stops him from from becoming a god in his own right so even then it's petty and it's cruel what a story alex this has been absolutely fantastic you'll be back very soon to continue the story and then to get to the figure of Macrinus with our good friend and your colleague Matilda MacDonald-Brown. But until then, Alex, it just goes to me to say thank you so much for taking the time to come back on the podcast. Thank you for having me. It's been great. Well, there you go. There was Dr. Alex Imrie talking you through the horrific story of Caracalla and Geta, climaxing in Caracalla's murder of his younger brother in his mother's arms. It is a gruesome story, but the story is not over yet, because Alex will be back in a few days time to continue the story of Caracalla ruling alone,

but then focusing in with another special guest on what happened afterwards, after the downfall of Caracalla, when he too was murdered and his throne was taken by another, a figure who also features in the new Gladiator 2 movie, Macrinus, played by Denzel Washington. That is coming in a few days time. In the meantime, thank you for listening to this episode of The Ancients. Please follow this show on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. You can also follow me, I am on Instagram and TikTok, simply search Ancients Tristan, you will find me. You can also listen to us and all of History Hits podcasts ad-free and watch hundreds of TV documentaries when you subscribe at historyhit.com slash subscribe. And as a special gift, you can also get 50% off your first three months

when you use code ANCIENTS at checkout.