The Athletic Football Show: A show about the NFL - Free agency day three: Maxximum Chaos
Episode Date: March 11, 2026Remember those couple days where Maxx Crosby was on the Ravens and the Raiders had two extra first-round picks to work with the in the next two drafts? Crazy, right? Anyway, that's done. Crosby's back... with the Raiders—for now—and instead Trey Hendrickson is the newest edge rusher in Baltimore. So yeah, we've got quite a bit to talk about here on The Athletic Football Show on the third day of free agency week. Robert Mays, Derrik Klassen and Dave Helman also discuss Daniel Jones' deal with the Colts, a couple new defenders for the Commanders, and more.Connect with The Athletic Football ShowYT: https://www.youtube.com/@TAFootballShowPodcasts: https://podfollow.com/the-athletic-football-show/viewX: https://x.com/TA_FootballShowIG: https://www.instagram.com/tafootballshowTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@tafootballshowDiscord: http://discord.gg/theathleticfootballshowBuy our merch! http://theathletic.lnk.to/tafsmerchCall us: 847-448-0701Email us: athleticfootballshow@gmail.comHost: Robert MaysCo-Hosts: Derrik Klassen and Dave HelmanExecutive Producer: Michael BellerVideo Producer: Katy DuffyAudio Producer: Michael BellerSocial Producer: Scott KrinchFollow Robert on Bluesky: @robertmays.bsky.socialFollow Derrik on Bluesky: @qbklass.bsky.socialFollow Robert on X: @robertmaysFollow Derrik on X: @QBKlassTheme song: HauntedWritten by Dylan Slocum, Trevor Dietrich, Ruben Duarte, Kyle McAulay, and Meredith VanWoert / Performed by Spanish Love SongsCourtesy of Pure Noise / By arrangement with Bank Robber Music, LLC Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome to the Athletic Football Show.
I'm Robert Mays.
We were a little bit worried as we were planning today's show yesterday
that we wouldn't have anything to talk about.
And the NFL never seems to disappoint.
Max Crosby come, or I guess the Ravens come through for us
and give us plenty to talk about today.
The Max Crosby trade nixed on Baltimore's side of it
because of a failed physical.
We spent a lot of time talking about whether this is a conspiracy,
see how much actually changed when the Ravens got to take a look at this, whether
Trey Hendrickson's availability played into this, how much it might have really enjoyed this
conversation with Dave and Derek. The other big bit of news today, Daniel Jones, science's
two-year extension with the Colts. I have begrudgingly come to a place where I think I understand
the Daniel Jones move for the Colts. We dove into that from a bunch of different angles.
And then the rest of the signings that have kind of rolled in over the last 24 hours or so.
chat a little bit about Rieck Wolland going to the Eagles,
some of the signings that commanders have made.
Kevin Byard went to the Patriots right before we started recording.
The Jalen Hawkins signing happened as we were recording,
spent a little time talking about the Jets after the Dylan Parham news came down,
a bunch of different stuff to sort through with Dave and Derek.
Let's get to that conversation right now.
And here we thought, as of yesterday afternoon,
that we might not have anything to talk about today.
Now we're going to have something to talk about that, like,
We've never had to deal with before, really, in the way that the Max Crosby thing went down?
You just reminded me of Ferris Bueller.
You said you weren't going to have anything.
You said we weren't going to have any fun today.
We're going to have plenty of fun today.
Last night was awesome.
I mean, just you see that come across the timeline.
It was very funny.
We were sitting there.
We're watching How to Go to Heaven from Belfast on Netflix, which has been very enjoyable.
But we're sitting there watching it last night and I pressed pause as I reacted to something on the internet.
And my wife goes, this better not be a football thing.
Oh, but it is.
And then I had to describe to her how crazy it was the way that this was unfolding.
And what was her care level?
Did not care.
She had like, for like 10 seconds, she's like, oh, that's kind of interesting.
And then she obviously went away from it almost immediate.
So not surprising that you see that come across the timeline from the Raiders.
And the fact that the Raiders got out in front of it the way that they did,
I actually understand them wanting to use that sort of language and to be kind of the first
bit of communication about it where it didn't say failed physical. All it said was the Ravens
have backed out on the trade. We will have no further comment on this time. The first place my mind
goes is, okay, so I assume he failed this physical. I assume that is the reason that this is no
longer going to happen. But then you kind of see the cascade of all of the thoughts aligned with
failing the physical and then everyone putting the pieces together of, okay, feels like with Tray Hendrickson
is still out there, Trey Hendrickson is now going to end up in Baltimore. And then every single one of us
woke up this morning to the news that
Trey Henderson was a member of the Ravens,
by the way, on the exact
amount of money that Max Crosby
had remaining on his deal.
That's so surprising. Wow.
That's so strange to me.
It is funny how I think anybody who follows
the NFL and has a pulse
could probably connect the dots and say,
okay, the Ravens really need Trey Hendrickson
now. That's probably where they'll go next.
To just be that tidy,
like 7.30 Central Time
Wednesday morning, you're just like,
Oh, yeah, they already did it.
Great.
We don't have to speculate about this.
We don't have to wonder when it's going to come down.
I appreciate them being quick about it.
So where do we fall on this between, okay,
there really was some sort of issue with the medicals.
They were no longer comfortable with this.
And full-on conspiracy theory,
they were looking for a reason to get out of this.
They wanted Trey Hendrickson all along.
Between those two polls, where do you land?
I don't know if they wanted Trey Hendrickson all along.
It's just I think this deal was done before the tamerickson.
period officially opened, obviously.
And then we get to Monday and through Tuesday and Trey Hendrickson hadn't signed.
There were a lot of reports that like May, maybe his market wasn't as good as people thought.
And so I think there's at least some chance that the Ravens thought, okay, if we can get
Trey Hendrickson for about the same amount of money and also not give up our two first-round picks,
even if he's a little bit of a worse player, a little bit older, that's a deal that they kind
of would like to make.
And so that's kind of where I lean, which is probably then closer to like conspiracy
theory side, but I think that's probably where I land.
People bring this up all the time.
I just Googled it.
I don't know this off the top of my head.
I'm not that big of a nerd.
Hanlon's razor.
Never assume malice where incompetence can be the thing that explains it.
That's kind of where I fall.
And look, I get it.
It's very convenient that Trey Hendrickson's price was dropping and we were going back and forth
about what he was actually worth as all this came together.
I do buy that the ravens were uncomfortable with what they saw on the medicals.
My thing is, and I don't think it's a conspiracy, I just think, I said when they did the trade,
we did a show on Sunday, two days after the trade, I said I didn't want to classify it as desperate.
I'm going back on all of that.
They did a desperate thing and they realized they were out over their skis.
That's what I think happened.
And my pushback on being uncomfortable with the medicals, my brother's in Christ, he's a 29-year-old edge who's played 90% of the snaps over
the last four years in the NFL. He is an iron man who doesn't take it down off unless his team
forces him to at the end of the year. And he had his meniscus repaired. Of course, the long-term
outlook of his knee is a little scary. If you needed to see it to know that, I'm questioning
some things. And so I don't doubt that they genuinely were uncomfortable with the medicals. How did you
get to the point where you signed off on two first round picks going to Vegas before you came to that
conclusion. So that's where I'm at. Like, you already knew it might be an issue because obviously,
like, repair. It is undoubtedly an issue. He had a meniscus repair. And but one, but he's supposed to be
on track to be back by like July and stuff, which they, we already knew based on the reporting was
probably going to be the case anyway. And so now I'm just looking at it and like I just, I don't know.
The fact that they backed out of it, I think is, is crazy. There are, there's so many layers to this.
The first one is, how much new information did you learn when your doctors took a look at this?
and when you saw maybe sought out other opinions beyond what the Raiders sent over.
We've learned a lot about the process of how this happens with teams here in the last 24 hours.
I thought Albert Brier did a good job laying it all out and what he wrote for SI overnight.
What happens when a trade like this goes down,
team trainers agree to send whatever information they have about the injury back and forth about the players
so the acquiring team can take a look at it.
So was there any new information that the Ravens learned between what they got from the Raiders initially
and what they saw when they actually did the examination, potentially.
Even if that's the case, though,
I think there are two questions that come to mind for me.
Failed physical is not a thing, right?
Like, you choose if a guy fails a physical.
There's a sliding scale.
It's not objective.
You take on the risk.
So, if Max Crosby was traded for a third round pick
and not two first round picks,
do we think the trade goes through?
Yes, 100%.
Let's say Trey Hendrickson had already agreed to a deal.
If Trey Hendrickson is no longer an option for you,
do we think the trade goes through?
Yes, yes.
That's the one where I'm not exactly sure.
I think the first one is definitely...
Considering the price, maybe not.
Like maybe...
Well, considering there are other options, I think, no.
But like even, let's say,
let's say Trey Hendrickson is a cult,
which the report came out that that's
who was most heavily talking to him
prior to all this going down.
If Trey Hendrickson's a cult,
maybe the Ravens still nixed this trade
because they'd rather scramping.
and bring Jedevi and Clowny back and piece it all together and spend a top 15 pick on an edge rusher.
I could at least see that, but I still think if Trey Hendrickson wasn't available,
there's a better chance than not of the trade going through.
There are people who are saying they actually wouldn't want to Trey Hendrickson all along
if they had known this would be the price, and they just use this as an excuse to back out of it.
That is harder for me to believe.
Like, if that was the case, why wouldn't you have just wanted to be in on the Trey Hendrickson
market at the beginning?
Right.
My assumption is when the Trey Hendrickson thing started playing out the way that
they did. And they saw maybe one layer deeper on the medical side, they thought, hey, we don't
have to do this. There are alternatives here if we wanted to explore them. And is that shady?
Yeah, it's a little bit shady. I understand why teams are frustrated by that and why a lot of other
executives are using this as an opportunity to shit on the Ravens. But I also understand it from the
Ravens point of view. Like, you have new information and you are now using that new information to make a
decision. That's my thing, though, is how new is the information? Like I said. But the Trey Hendrickson
information is part of that. That's what I'm saying. That's part of the new information. I thought you meant
new information about Max. And that's my point where I'm like, if you needed to see the scans to know
that his knee might bother you a little bit, I don't really buy it. Like, I could have told you that
before you pressed okay on two first round picks. And so that's where my question comes in is like,
how bad over what you already knew about it would it have to be for you to nix the trade? If it was purely
about the medicals.
Like it would have to be like
nuclear grade like his and he's
never going to work again.
I think the Ravens,
I don't think that's necessarily true.
I really don't.
I think when you consider the price
that it's a massive price to pay.
You already,
by giving,
by trading away two first round picks
for a guy entering his age 29 season
that's already like into his third,
into his second contract,
you already were doing something
at a level of risk
that has never been done
in the modern NFL before.
We have not seen this happen in the last 10 years.
Since 2011 to me is like the start of modern football because of the CBA.
We have not seen something like this happen.
All the other guys traded for two first round picks are guys that were heading out to second
contracts or quarterbacks.
That's it.
It was the only players we have seen traded for this.
And so you're already doing something that is incredibly risky.
So it doesn't have to be he's never going to play again.
It has to be, do we think we can get three solid years out of him?
If your answer to that is no, but you thought it might have been before you took
look, I can understand revisiting the price because it's an insane amount to give up for a single
player if you don't think he's going to be part of your present and your future. And I guess my only
point would be, again, he's famous for never getting off the field. That's what Max Crosby does.
And he's 29 and he just had this procedure on his knee. And maybe it's even worse than they thought.
I'm not doubting their medical people. But if you needed to see it to be convinced that,
it wasn't worth the two first round picks,
maybe you shouldn't have been in this conversation
in the first place because, like, I
could have told you
you might be concerned by what you see
from this guy's medicals based on
everything he's been through in the NFL
to this point. But again, I think it's not just
about the medicals. And we know. Having true, right?
It's like having the alternative is one of the
reasons that you're willing to pull the plug.
I'll ask you. Oh, go ahead. I just, I also
don't think the alternative is better here.
So I was literally about to ask you this.
Okay. So in
Let's just say that the medicals aren't scary enough
where you would still move forward with it.
So this is a hypothetical world that I'm creating for you.
Would you rather have Max Crosby and give away two first round picks
or Trey Henderson be able to keep the picks?
Which one would you would rather have Max Rosh?
I think that's my answer to.
And I realize that's giving up a lot.
Like two first round picks is a ton.
But like I, one, I think Max Crosby is,
they're both great pass rushers obviously at their best.
Max Crosby, to me, is still a slightly better pass rusher.
And then as run defenders, it's just not close,
especially in a defense like this where we've already talked about like how important that is for the
Minter-McDonald, you know, Staley, Fangio style of defense.
Crosby gives that to you in a way that Hendrickson just doesn't quite.
And so for him to be like a true cornerstone, you can build the defense around this piece
as opposed to Hendrickson, who is a good player, but kind of just a race car pass-ruster for you,
I just, I would rather still have Crosby.
I described myself as a coward the other day and I'll stick to it.
but give me the option that gives me the best chance to pivot.
Because if Trey Hendrickson doesn't work out, you eat some money, you're disappointed by it,
and you have your draft picks, and you have ways you can go another direction.
If Max Crosby, if the knee really is bad, or for whatever reason, he just doesn't get back to that level,
you're not replacing him in the draft, like you're out on premium picks, your cap is getting screwed,
and you're not getting production from that guy that was supposed to be your cornerstone.
Missing on the Crosby deal is catastrophic.
missing on Hendrickson is something teams do every other year.
So I would go with Hendrickson.
It's funny that this is the place I thought the Ravens would be in coming into free agency.
Jaylon Phillips is the guy that I had in mind.
They wound up exactly where you thought they would be.
They wound up doing exactly what we thought.
And even this, though, I was on Barnwell show today and we talked about a lot of these things,
but the point that I think we made on the Sunday show,
other people have made about the Ravens Construction post-Max Crosby trade,
it's still the same when you think about the money allocated.
Obviously, the draft picks change the calculus,
but this is still the sort of move,
even when we throw the draft picks out the window
that the Ravens don't often make.
This is still a move where you're leveraging yourself.
There's less risk probably than the Crosby trade,
but you're still signing a 31-year-old pass rusher
to a $30 million a year contract
with $60 million guaranteed.
So the Ravens are still pushing themselves
to a place they don't often go
because of the level of urgency they're feeling at that position.
Like I already said, on Sunday I was unwilling to call them desperate.
They come across really desperate.
Like everything that's happened since Friday,
they seem desperate to up the talent level on their defense,
to strike while the iron's hot with Lamar,
which is totally fair.
Teams do that stuff all the time when they're trying to capitalize on a quarterback's window.
The bills traded for DJ more.
Like this is very normal stuff,
but I think we often assign this higher level of not.
and almost like a Zen-like composure to the Ravens.
And like the way they've moved this last week does not come across that way at all.
Are there any teams like that left where you're like unassailable?
You're just like this team knows ball.
They would never do something silly.
Not even that.
Just teams that are so measured in their decision making that we would look at something like this
and be like, oh, they would never do that.
Which team is it?
The Chargers and I get mad that they.
Which is mad that.
Which has Ravens DNA all.
over the place back way.
That's really funny.
That's really funny.
Yeah, okay.
No, I'm going to push back on that, though,
just because the Chargers haven't achieved the sustained success to, like,
give that sort of gravitas the way that the Ravens have.
Right.
Like, in the Chargers, this is your three of the regime.
That's all I mean.
But the reason I posit it that way is that I said this to Sando when we were doing the live show.
There are probably four or five teams in the NFL to whom we would describe this sort of thinking,
where it's just like, they are measured, they're methodical,
they don't get out over their skis,
they don't make these big splash signings in free agency,
they don't throw away draft capital.
There is a process to how they do things consistently.
And if I had to list off four teams that over the last decade
have embodied that sort of thinking,
the teams I would say are the Green Bay Packers,
the Pittsburgh Steelers, the Baltimore Ravens,
and the Dallas Cowboys,
every single one of those teams in the last like 16 months,
I don't remember when the D.K. thing happened,
probably 12 months, have made,
massive trades that include at least a high second round pick and a huge extension,
all four of them.
So who are the teams left?
And I'm not even saying that's a bad thing.
Are we at a place now where you should operate that way?
So in order to get yourself over the top, you need to be, do you need to cheat a little
bit and you need to cut these corners that maybe previously you weren't willing to cheat?
It makes me think of another team that is very highly thought of, but you can't say that
they're so methodical and
and zen like and all that stuff.
And that would be Philadelphia.
Philly does wild shit all the time.
Yes.
But they're just,
they're unafraid to make mistakes.
And I think there's a recognition that mistakes will be made.
But if you're aggressive,
direct and smart about the way that you do it,
you'll come out in the positive over time.
Like that's the way I view Philadelphia.
You can go down their ledger and find all kinds of hilarious mistakes.
But when the cap jumps the way that it does,
when you can use the draft and maneuver around it the way that they do,
you can mitigate those mistakes, maybe not easily, but effectively.
And so, yeah, I think you're probably better off.
Of course, you want to think about this stuff and be measured with it,
but you're better off sometimes just ripping it and trusting that you can fix it pretty quickly if you're wrong.
Because we see teams prove that true all the time.
Seattle doesn't have any of those moves from last off season,
but, I mean, the darn old thing, there is a level of risk and aggression to that
where you're not just going to sit there and play with the status quo.
And if you go back even further, like a couple more years,
like the Leonard Williams trade is a really aggressive choice,
even if we're a couple years removed from it.
And then if you want to rewind even further back than that,
like think about how the Rams won the Super Bowl.
Think about how the Rams built the team that they did.
The Niners have been hyper-aggressive
in some of the things that they've done.
Like I think we're kind of running out of teams
that are just going to sit there and be like,
you know what, we trust our process.
We're just going to see it out and we're going to be patient
and we're going to let it come to us.
there aren't really any teams around the league
that have stood by that sort of approach
over and over and over again
when you look at the past three or four years.
And think about how short-lived it was
where teams like the Rams and I mean
the Eagles bottomed out after the first Super Bowl
and think about how quickly they were back on their feet.
Like you eat shit for a year and you're fine.
Bottoming out is fine.
It's fine.
It's okay to bottom out.
Especially if you bottom out while striving to be great.
And that's why I don't like to,
kill teams, you know, like, as
catastrophic as it's been
and as unfun as this year looks like it's
going to be, I don't like killing the
dolphins for going for the gusto, because
it is better than living in that just
boring middle. There are two different
things that can happen when you bottom out. I think
there's a bottoming out when you're Howie
Roseman or you're less Sneed where you
have, and the Sneed thing is
like, it's Sneed McVeigh, right?
Yeah. So McVeigh will have that job as long as he wants it.
And when you know that, you're allowed
to operate a different way. That's
when you can bottom out there,
then it's just part of a process
where the bottoming out actually benefits you
because it helps your draft position in a single year.
There's also the bottoming out
where you're going to lose your job, right?
And so, but either one of those, to me,
that is more appealing than just kind of staying the course,
staying the course, staying the course,
trying to win nine or ten games every single year
because I think, again,
it can be hard to win nine or ten games every single year
and there can still be the justifiable conclusion
that that shouldn't be the goal.
Like both of those things can be true at the same time.
And so I'm fine with these teams going forward a little bit.
And more and more, that just seems to be the approach that a lot of these teams are taking.
It would be really ironic if, like, I'll go as far as to say,
I think less of the Ravens overall operation over the last like five days than I did before.
But it would be really funny if this experience unlocked a little bit more of a reckless attitude in them
that made them a more admirable front office, which we'll see.
I think it's important to acknowledge also that what happened over the last year,
it probably is affecting their decision-making and their thought process.
So, just in terms of how the AFC fell apart?
No, or just like Eric Acosta at the press conference where they were announcing,
where it was him and Bashati, and they were talking about the harbaw firing, what would come next.
Eric Takasta was very open about the fact that my shortcomings in building the roster
are part of the reason John got fired.
And so there are two different things
that things can play into that.
One, does that just make you a little bit more aggressive
because you want to atone for that?
And two, does it make you a little bit more aggressive
because you're starting to feel the heat
a little bit more than you would otherwise?
And so I think this process,
I don't know if it makes me think less of the Ravens front office,
but I think the last year
makes me think that the Ravens front office
isn't this very patient, controlled, methodical group
that's just like going to go by the book over and over and over again.
There's a level of like urgency and scrambling to them that I don't think we've usually seen
in the past.
That's a more fair way to say it, if not less.
Like I said, for the longest time, you think of the Ravens as like this Zen like just like a monk,
like unbothered by anything.
And I just, you come to learn like, nope, they're bothered and urgent and nervous and anxious
just like everybody else.
And they can do stupid things too.
And I think we get so scared when teams make these like high leverage moves where it's like,
doesn't work out, then they're completely screwed.
But I think that's also true of these teams that, like, take a little bit slower,
draft and develop all that stuff.
Well, if you have two draft classes in one free agency class where you bat like 150,
you're in the same spot that all these teams who they over leverage themselves are bad.
And so I think that's kind of where the Ravens had ended up over the last year or so.
So the Ravens, while we were talking, made another football move.
Okay.
Jalen Hawkins headed to the Ravens two years, 10 million bucks.
$5 million a year for Jaylen Hawkins, by the way.
I'm really into that.
I'm extremely into that.
Here's, this is the comparison I'm going to make.
Third contract, third contract.
He's played on like four different teams.
He's bounced around.
He's 28, so he's a little bit of an older player.
What are the chances that the Jalen Hawkins contract from this cycle looks like the camcourl contract from two cycles ago?
Pretty good, especially on that defense where like all you got to do is just be a competent body next to Malachi starts and allow Kyle Hamilton to play the nickel as much as he wants to.
Like, that's kind of all that this contract has to be.
Which that was a big thing.
And to go back to the top of the show, a big reason I don't buy that there was some kind
of conspiracy by the Ravens is I know, like, they were never in on Linderbom for those prices.
And I'm sure they weren't interested in resigning every single player that left their building
over the last two days.
But they lost at least a couple guys where maybe if you don't trade for Max Crosby,
you could be more in on Charlie Kohler, like holding on to a guy like that.
Or you could be interested.
I would have said prior to right now,
maybe you're trying harder to keep Alohi Gilman.
But if you can get Jalen Hawkins for that price,
they're probably not all that worried about
Alohi Gilman leaving anyway.
I think this is overblown.
I think the idea that...
Losing the players they did?
I think that's overblown.
I'm not sure there's a single guy
that walked out the door
where it's like, oh, man,
because they signed Trey Hendrickson
to the exact same contract
that they signed,
that Max Crosby would have come with.
Like the money that the earmarked for Crosby
just went to Trey Hendrickson.
So I'm not sure their thought process
would have been any different.
I would, like I said, like, certainly not all, I think it's like nine of them by now,
but I would imagine at least a couple of them.
I mean, I know you don't want to talk about special teams, but Jordan Stout was all pro last
year.
Like you're not trying to make a competitive offer to keep him.
I am going to go out on a limb and say they don't care.
That the Max Crosby thing had nothing to do with retaining Jordan Stout.
I agree, but if you hadn't, like if that money hadn't been earmarked on Monday afternoon,
could he have re-signed with Baltimore?
I think that's fair to wonder.
I'm not sure it matters that much.
Again, because they just use the money.
I think the vast majority of those guys would be gone anyway.
And I certainly don't think any of their losses are going to cripple the team,
especially since you've addressed the edge rush issue.
All right.
So let's play this out just from purely a football perspective now.
Let's in this hypothetical world say Mattabike comes back.
It's obviously like the biggest thing looming over this.
We have no idea whether that's going to happen.
But they've accounted the resources for him.
So if Mattabeeke comes back,
We have Trey Hendrickson now in the fold.
You just signed Jalen Hawkins.
What do we think about this Ravens defense with Jesse Minter?
I probably still want one more body at depth along the defensive line.
Like I think that they could still use a little bit more pop there.
Guess what, buddy?
They have the 14th overall picking the drafts.
I kind of was missing the calculation there.
Yeah, I mean, if they can spend that on defensive linemen that they like.
Or honestly, even a corner, like, you know, I think there were some talks about like,
is Marlon Humphrey potentially?
it was going to be a cap casualty.
I know they just re-signed Chidobie Ouzier,
but that is very much like a...
Oh, did they bring back Chito?
Yes.
And that can be like a very much like,
he can start if we need him to.
We're going to probably keep the door open
to start somebody else and potentially if they like,
you know, a Jermond McCoy at 14 or whatever it might be.
And so I kind of like the way that the defense is looking.
Again, I still would much rather have what Crosby gives you on the edge in run defense
and what they're going to get from Hendrickson.
But I think that this can be good.
And Hawkins, too, is like, the perfect style of safety for them.
He's not the best athlete out there.
I think range-wise, he can be a little up and down,
but he is a very, very smart player.
And I think if you're going to play safety in a defense like Jesse Minter's,
that makes a lot of sense,
especially paired next to Malachi Starks,
who I think had like a very underrated rookie season.
Like obviously M. and Worry got a lot of hype,
but I thought Starks was awesome.
He didn't take off or start making it.
And the stats just don't.
Like it was, the Ravens were bad by the time Malachi Starks started playing well.
That's, I think, the big issue for him.
but I agree with you.
Speaking of Patriots'
Safeties, J-Wan Hawkins moving on to Baltimore,
Kevin Byard heading to New England.
Sounds like a one-year, $9 million deal.
What do you think about swapping out Hawkins for Byrd
with a little bit of an uptick in price?
They're very different players to me
because Hawkins, to me, is a little bit more.
I trust him a little bit to come down a little bit more.
I think I just talked about Hawkins's range,
but I think Byrd at this stage in his career
probably has a little bit less.
And I question some of what,
what Byard can do as a tackler, especially deep down the field when he's kind of the lone man at
this stage. But I don't know. I kind of understand the Patriots, I mean, Vrable wanting to just
be like, okay, I'm going to get a few more of my guys. And I think next to him, Craig Woodson
played really well as more of that box safety. So it's probably fine, especially given it's
only going to be a one-year deal. And the rest of the secondary is awesome. So it will probably
be fine. All right. Before we move on, let's take our first quick break.
The other big bit of news today, Daniel Jones, signs his deal.
with the Colts. Two years, $100 million, $88 million guarantee.
Excuse me, it's a really two year $88 million deal that goes up to $100 with a lot of incentives.
The incentives, I don't know if you guys have looked at them at all.
They make perfect sense in terms of like if he does these things, refined playing the
deal, he gets, I believe, $100,000 for every win that he plays 50% of the snaps.
There's a bonus that comes with each playoff round.
There's a million dollar bonus that comes with the Super Bowl.
And so I'm sure his team, obviously there's been a third.
ton of back and forth negotiating in the media where the Colts wanted to give him something
closer to the darnel deal. His team wanted $50 million a year. So because it's up to that $100 million,
his team can champion where we got the $50 million a year. They've also been very loud about
the fact that it's the biggest two-year contract in NFL history, which congratulations to them.
We talked a lot about the Daniel Jones money when they gave him the transition tag and how we
felt about that compared to the alternatives. I've sat,
with this a lot over the last week as I've thought about how this might play out.
I have my thoughts about it, but now that you see the deal and now that you see the end point
that the Colts have reached, giving Daniel Jones this contract plus retaining Alec Pierce,
how do you feel about how this all went down?
I don't not think this team is going to be able to do what they did last year or even
like midpointed because my thing with Daniel Jones is obviously a lot of what they did with
him was it was kind of based on his ability to move around.
It was moving him out of the pocket.
It was using him in the run game, a lot of their spread gun stuff.
and I just am worried about what that's going to look like next year.
Obviously, it's only a two-year commitment, so it's not that big of a deal.
And I will say on the other end, once you transition tag him, you kind of have to do this.
And so if they wanted it's not that you kind of have to have to do it.
It was like if they wanted to make the decision to go elsewhere, they would have had to done it before they do the tag.
So once you do the tag, you kind of have to make the deal.
But I think I'm still in the same boat that I was coming out of it is that, or coming out of the season, is that I would, I know things went the way that they went last year.
and he played really well for eight, 10 games, whatever it was.
And I'm sure that they like him in the locker room as a guy and all that stuff.
And obviously you have proof of concept here,
but I just, I would have rather hopped on the quarterback carousel again,
which I know is like a scary and insane thing to say given how long that they've been on it.
But I just, I am dubious of this amount of money working out for a player like that.
I'm going to appeal to your sensibilities.
I've been thinking about this all week.
There's a 30 rock joke where Jack Donagie's talking.
about NBC's strategy.
And it's like, make it 2007 again by magic or by like, I think it was 1998.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Oh, yeah.
Make it 1998 again by science or magic.
Yeah.
I feel like that's what the Colts are doing here.
Just like just get us back to September of 2025 no matter what.
Like, Alpiers, sure.
Daniel Jones, sure.
Whatever, whatever gets that band back together is what we want to do.
And I don't know.
I hope it works out for them because I did enjoy watching them play during that
stretch, but I don't feel good about it. Like, I feel like you're, you're trying too hard to recreate
something without the assurances that it's going to be that good again. Because look, I'm not saying
he lights the world on fire, but like the thing that I liked so much about the Colts, and I remember
saying this so many times last year, is the way that it all fit together in harmony to, like,
make a better picture. And how well are you going to survive? Even like, even if you don't think
Michael Pittman's the man, how well do you survive taking that piece?
out. How well do you survive? Cudos to them. They replaced two offensive linemen in 2025 and we're
great, but Braden Smith now not being part of it. Like, can you completely recreate it as beautifully
as you think you're going to be able to? And if you can't, is it worth paying Daniel Jones this amount
of money? And I'll say it for the 10th time. If he was fully healthy, I don't even know that I'd
spend a lot of time thinking about it, but he's not and that scares the hell out of me.
Here's why the health part of it matters less to me now that he's on the extension.
You've given yourself a two-year runway.
If it was just the transition tag and you were betting $37 million on one year coming off of the Achilles,
then I think that's a losing battle.
There's just almost no way he's going to be good enough in that one year to justify that amount of money.
But because now you've given yourself two years to get this right.
And at the end of the day, I think I'm okay with how this all went down.
But so we're betting two years out from now
that Daniel Jones will be a good quarterback again.
Like I think that to me is just a little bit scary.
Okay, so what would you rather have done?
I would have rather like, I mean, I guess because of the timeline of the
Kyler-Murray thing and like when he got cut,
it makes it obviously really complicated with the transition tag.
But again, like I-
Let's not even do that.
Let's just say you can sign Kyra Murray for a million dollars.
Yes, easily.
Okay.
In a vacuum, right?
Yes.
That is better.
The production per dollar.
with Kyler Murray in a million dollar contract
is probably better than what you're going to get
for Daniel Jones coming off of Achilles
making $44 million.
If Kyler Murray had played well,
now you're tagging Kyler Murray
for $45 million the year after that.
I'm okay with that.
He's a better quarterback.
I think when you play it all the way out
and the fact that we've,
there are so many different factors leading into this.
as a theoretical exercise, yes, I would rather have Kyla Murray for a million dollars.
But the fact that we've seen it happen with Daniel Jones,
like there is an appeal of that to me.
There's an appeal to that.
Like I understand chasing that again because you've seen it happen.
And the other thing that I kind of keep coming back to,
and again, kind of moving from the theoretical to the actual
and why I'm okay paying a little bit of a premium for this,
if what you're saying right now,
it's what I was saying about J.J. McCarthy, right?
And I know J.J. McCarthy is more of an unknown than Connerner.
You get what I'm saying.
And I said this a couple weeks ago, and I heard myself saying it,
where it's just like, well, just do it again with the next guy.
You just did it with Daniel Jones.
The burden the hand thing to me, even, again, I know he's hurt,
but if he can be as healthy in 2027 as he was this year,
the fact that you know he's already on the roster and that you don't have to play it out
with an unknown, I think I'm willing to pay the premium for that,
because this group has two years anyway.
And so I know that $44 million for Daniel Jones
versus a million dollars for Kyra Murray,
of course, that is a worst decision
when you think about optimized application
of the resources that you have.
But I still feel like because we knew what it could be
with Daniel Jones, playing it out this way
and trying to play out the string with it,
I think it's okay.
I get it only insofar as like
we are so far into the Chris Ballard thing
that it's like he's probably back into a corner
where you can't jump on the quarterback carouselie.
And if this was...
Not even that you can't.
Would you want to?
Right.
Yeah, if this was his third year on the job
and the Daniel Jones thing was like the first time
he's trying to do it, I think it would probably make sense.
It's an entirely different set of circumstances.
Even with that being the case,
I still think that these are the exact circumstances
that you bind yourself to a quarterback
that you're probably going to regret.
I think all of this is fair.
And I think what you have just laid out makes sense
if I was a Colts fan, I would want to throw up hearing somebody say,
in 2027, this could be great.
I hate that so much for Colts fans who, what,
haven't made the playoff since 2020,
haven't won the division, I believe, since 2014.
The only reason I'm saying that is because the last two times
we saw these quarterbacks come off of Achilles' injuries,
they looked worthless at the beginning.
I know.
Daniel Jones is significantly younger than both of those guys.
That's true.
There's at least a world.
And they've, they're saying,
he's going to be ready for week one.
And so I'm only writing off 2026
just because all of the recent evidence that we have
is that that N plus one year from the quarterbacks
coming off the Achilles are pretty worthless.
But there is absolutely a world,
and they have more information about this than we do,
that he might be ready to go
and he might be a good enough version of himself this year
where you're not punting on this season.
So if that's the case, then I think it looks even better.
Like I said, excuse me.
Even better.
If that's the case, then I think it looks a little better.
I want to be careful about my language there.
I hope the Colts are, I hope they look as good as they did last year.
They were a very fun story.
I enjoyed being pleasantly surprised by them.
I don't have a warm, fuzzy feeling in my stomach about it.
But I also, and we said this before free agency, like they got screwed by fate a little bit.
And so considering the choices in front of them,
I'm not going to kill them too hard for thinking
they can recreate the Daniel Jones magic
as opposed to take another roll of the quarterback dice
and hope that they wind up in the same situation a year from now.
I understand that.
Yes.
I think believing you can is a worth,
that is a fine decision given the alternatives.
Because when we do this, we're like,
oh my God, I can't believe you give Daniel Jones $44 million.
I think you have to say,
like, well, what are the alternatives?
And for them, there's a couple different layers to this.
They don't have a first round pick in either of the next two years.
And so that alternative is kind of off the table.
And then again, I get that Kyler Murray may even be a better quarterback than Daniel Jones.
But how's it going to fit into what we do?
What does the personality stuff go?
Like, there's so many unknowns with that.
Is that, is the familiarity worth paying $40 million for?
Probably not.
I also, I don't fully believe this.
but given Daniel Jones's recent arc,
it's also pretty terrifying to think about letting him out of your building
and find even a modicum of success somewhere else and say,
like, Kyler Murray's not guaranteed to be good.
I mean, I think we're on the same page that we think
Kyler Murray can be good, but by no means is that a guarantee.
And so if Daniel Jones were to land back in Minneapolis
and have another redemption arc,
then that's uncomfy for the Colts as well.
So I don't think there are a lot of good solutions to this problem.
I don't blame them for landing here.
What is more likely you recapturing the Daniel Jones magic?
And like even almost the price is almost like beside the point.
Like it's like who gives like I understand that that gap,
it absolutely has to be worth exploring.
But in this situation, again, $45 million is a premium that even if it seems crazy,
it's a premium worth paying at quarterback, right?
And so what is more likely?
at some point over the next two years,
you can recapture the magic that you had with Daniel Jones
or Kyler Murray gives you the quality of offense
that you had with Daniel Jones.
Which of those two things is more likely?
I think probably the Kyler Murray thing.
I just don't know if it is.
Given they're losing their right tackle,
they're losing one of their best receivers,
they're not going to have first-sharm picks to replenish this thing.
Like, I do not think that they're going to be able to recapture the Daniel Jones thing.
I don't think they are either.
Even 80% of it, I think, would be kind of,
I don't feel good about any of it.
And so I get trying to roll with what you saw.
I mean, it was such a supernova of a moment.
I don't blame them for being fixated on trying to recreate it,
even if I don't know if they can.
And that's why I think this is a little bit different than what the Giants did, right?
The Giants were like smoke and mirrorsing their way.
Yeah, that was bullshit.
the 14th best offense in the league
by marginalizing the quarterback,
even if the other elements of the offense
were doing a lot of heavy lifting
as to why the Colts were the most efficient
offensive league for the first eight weeks,
the quarterback was making throws.
He was a part of what they were doing.
This is a very different thing
than what the Giants were.
And again, I think that at the end of the day,
if you're Chris Bauer and you're in Shane Steichen,
you know this is it anyway.
And so tying yourself to this
and being like, we got two years to make
this shit work and if we can't, we're all fired no matter what. I understand how you arrive here.
And again, just to be very clear and put a point on this, this is not optimized decision-making.
This is not like the best possible thing you can do with the resources that you have.
But I think when you kick all the contextual elements into account, I can understand this,
the Colts being in a spot where they say, this is our best option. This right now is our best
option, even if you have to hold your nose a little bit when you look at the price tech.
between the Anthony Richardson pick
and the sauce gardener trade
you had plenty hand in landing yourself here
so you choose
your best course for getting yourself out of it.
Got a few signings to run through here
that have happened over the last day or so.
The biggest one just on an AAV level,
the Philadelphia Eagles signing Tariq Wolan
one year up to 15 million.
I have not seen any numbers aside from 15 million.
Yeah, what that means.
I don't know what the actual base
number is. I'm sure up two is doing a little bit of lifting there, but what do you think about
Tariq Wollin, Philadelphia is the other outside corner? I think this is nails, dude. Like,
I kind of love it. I kind of love it. Who doesn't? Like, the only people that don't like this
are people who get tired of podcasters praising Howie Roseman or like rival fans, you know,
NFC East fans. Fair or not. Tarik Wallen is the exact sort of player where the landing spot was
going to determine 100% of how I felt about the contract. And that's the thing. I like this. I like
this for Tariq Wollin.
The fact that he gets to go to a spot where he's playing opposite Quinyon Mitchell and with
Cooper Dijin in the slot.
And again, like the pass rush, I know that they just lost Jalen Phillips, but like the
pass rush and the rest of the defense should still be good.
Like, this is a very good spot.
If you are a young player looking to like go and prove that you are worth it and you
are worth that caliber of contract, this is the exact spot to go do that at.
I said this yesterday.
Like, Tariq Wollin had to have had longer offers on the table.
Oh, absolutely.
He's going here to maximize his value.
for 2027.
Outside of getting re-signed in Seattle,
where would you rather land for 2026 than Philadelphia?
I mean, you know,
there are some places that come to mind,
but this is a very strong defense
with now one of the best secondaries in the entire league,
Vic Fangio pulling the strings.
And the Eagles got it like in terms of like high upside starter potential
and for all of his boneheadedness,
that is what Tariq Wulin is.
What like,
what's the down?
side for Philly. Oh, oh no, it might be dramatic and blow up in their faces. That happens every
other year anyway in Philadelphia. Even if he's like 75% as good as people want him to do, that's a lot
better than Adori Jackson was last year. Like it's insanely better. It's so much better for them.
All we did last year was talk about CB2 being like the problem that they could not get away from.
And I mean, this is this is an answer. And I'm sure he will come with headaches of his own, but
I think it's awesome.
And like it kind of warped
the way Philly had to play defense last year.
I know the way that Fingfangio calls it
they play a good amount of coverage six anyway,
but they almost every snap they could
were trying to play half to the side
that Adori Jackson was on because they just didn't want him covering guys.
Rik Wulin is imperfect.
He will give up an explosive play every now and then,
but you do not have to like baby him
in terms of the way that the coverages are being called.
All right, so you just mentioned the pass rush.
We probably should have had this discussion
when we were talking about Max Crosby.
I came, I arrived at this today.
And now I can't stop thinking about it.
Think about Max Crosby's potential landing spots.
Let's say it's June 3rd.
Howie Roseman calls John Spitech.
He's like, I have a disgruntled receiver that doesn't want to play for me.
You have a pass rusher that doesn't want to play for you.
Just straight up.
Max Crosby for A.J. Brown.
By the way, $30 million in cash for each of them this year.
It's the exact same amount about money.
So they both come out kind of even on the books, basically.
AJ Brown's option bonus is $27.5 million plus his base.
and Max Crosby, I think, has a $30 million-dollar base salary this year.
Okay.
That's pretty good.
I'm trying to think if there was a team, like which team would want more?
Or do you think one-for-one is fair at this point in their career?
So the reason that I think this is something that the Raiders should explore,
based on where the Raiders are in their team-building process,
I think the picks are more valuable and more important to them than a 28-year-old pass-rusher.
But because you're drafting a quarterback number one overall,
a star receiver to me might be more valuable than the picks
because I'm going to go to another 30 rock joke
when Jack is selling NBC to CableTown
he's like it's a baby that they have to keep alive
that's how the Raiders have to feel about Fernando Mendoza
like all that matters is us keeping this little baby alive
as long as we can and trying to get AJ Brown in the mix
and give yourself like a true number one receiver
we have seen this over and over and over again
happened with Jalen Hertz where you have this young quarterback
you give him a receiver like this.
And I know he's a couple years older,
but it happened with Stefan Diggs.
It happened with Tyree Kill.
Like, we've seen these teams trade real capital
to get these guys for the young quarterbacks
and how important that's been in their development.
And so I think for both sides,
again, if AJ Brown is like steadfast
and he does not want to play there anymore,
think about this Eagles defense with Max Crosby.
It's just a better version of what Jalen Phillips was giving them last year.
Considering what we've already talked about
with the finances of trading AJ
and how like it doesn't really make sense for Philly
until June anyway.
I think that's great.
Well done.
I mean, I don't know if it's going to happen,
but it's A plus podcast, food for thought.
And I do love it for the Raiders,
not only because AJ Brown's still a good player,
you get a number one for Fernando Mendoza.
All their guys are either smaller or like slot middle of the players.
It's like Trey Tucker, who's more of a speed slot,
like Jalen Naylor, kind of the same thing.
You have those two tight ends,
but you don't have a, can we put him right out
the numbers and he can do something for us.
AJ Brown, that's kind of all he gives you
at this stage. If it's not Philly,
which teams do we think should still be
sniffing around Max Crosby and how much do we
think the price changes?
I think San Francisco should think about it.
That's the one team. Barnwell and I were talking about this today.
That is the one team that did not come up that I absolutely
think should be considering it.
Because they just don't like, I know
they like spent a bunch of young pieces
on their front. And obviously you have Fred
Warner and Nick Bose as like your
veterans there, but you still need, I think, a guy that you feel very, very comfortable is like a good
running mate with Nick Bosa. I think it allows you to not be that worried if Michael Williams right
now is really only more of a run defender for you. Obviously, he was banged up for a lot of last year as
well. And then Nick Bosa is still a very good player, but I don't think he's quite the ace that he was
obviously two, three years ago. And so I think getting a little bit more juice opposite him and Max
Crosby, obviously a really good front defender. Like I, if they're trying to supercharge this
defense and just hoping that the offense will be what it always is under Kyle Shanahan.
That's a pretty good way to take control of the NFC West again.
What do you think Nick Bost's 2027 cap hit is?
$70 trillion.
$52 million.
So they will have to touch that because it would be very funny if they were allocating
$80 million of the cap to two edge rushers.
But I think that's a team that makes sense.
And I'm not even just saying this.
I truly think that when you consider need and financial flexibility,
if the price is going to change,
this is absolutely something
the bear should think about.
Absolutely something we should think about.
Oh, you're on board now that it's not two ones.
If it's not two ones,
if it's a one and next year's two,
if you look at their and it's beyond even what they can do,
you can zero out the Crosby contract
and he'll have like an $8 million cap hit this year.
Their cap moving forward because in 2027,
they can get out from under the O'Dango contract
and the Grady Jarrett contract.
Their multi-year cap outlook is not that ugly
and they'd be able to move enough money around
where they could absolutely absorb it.
Let me ask you this, because I've been debating it since everything blew up.
Crosby lands back in Vegas after having four days to think this through.
The Raiders have spent $290 million.
All of a sudden, considering Fernando Mendoza is about to be their quarterback,
I don't think the Raiders is that troubling of a place to be anymore,
and I wonder if Max Crosby feels the same way.
Let's add one more layer to it.
Okay.
The Raiders, I think they pissed him off, right?
When it came to, we're going to shut you down for those last couple games.
He did not take that well.
But they honored his request for a trade.
And I think based on everything that I had seen,
they reached out to him immediately after this happened.
He's back in the building, now rehabbing.
And his farewell message was like very nice and above board and respectful.
Is this a, hey, maybe the grass isn't always greener,
sort of experience for Max Crosby,
where he actually is open to coming back to a place where there has been a lot of love for him.
And this also isn't that bad for the Raiders.
I saw when the, you know, when the trade got done,
well backed on people were like, oh, the Raiders just spent so much money.
How can they afford this?
They had so much money that it was actually fine to keep it on the books.
To Robert's point about maybe the Ravens didn't miss the guys they lost.
Like the Raiders had so much money.
They did not, they don't give a shit about Max Crosby's money landing back on their cap,
at least not in the short term.
But if I'm Max Crosby.
By the way.
On their cap.
They have $38 million.
Exactly.
Like, they are not pinched for any of this.
Like they are totally okay.
So Crosby,
Crosby now gets back to the strip
and Quitty Pay is on the line with him.
Quay Walker and Nacobo Bine are at linebacker.
Taron Johnson is in the secondary.
Linderbaum plays center.
They brought back Eric Stokes.
Brought back Stokes.
And Fernando Mendoza is going to,
the number one pick in the draft is going to be
playing quarterback.
Like if I'm Max Crosby,
you get back and you're just sort of like,
this is pretty nice.
I don't know.
Like I wouldn't be surprised if
the urgency to get out of there isn't as strong as it was a week ago.
And obviously the Raiders have come out and been like,
our plan is to move forward with Max Cross because that's what they have to say that now, right?
Like they have to take that line in order for teams not to think this is some sort of fire sale.
But I don't know.
It's going to be fun.
If I were a team like the Bears,
I'd call and just see what the possible price was because if it's going to be less than
that and they can fit him in under whatever in any sort of financial way that they need to,
I think that is a team because Dallas has already said they're out.
They've already allocated the money to Rishon Gary.
I wanted to say that, though.
Like the swiftness with which the cowboys told everyone in the world,
they were out made me think where I'm just like,
are you really out or are you posturing because you don't want people to think
that you're just willing to rejoin the sweepstakes for a one and a two,
which was the price before he went to Baltimore.
Well, I think there's a couple different things there.
One, they did already, you know, even if it's not finalized,
they went through with the Rishan Gary trade.
And two, their doctor was one of the guys who gave the outside opinion on
Max Crosby's knee, I think, that led to the decision that the Ravens made.
And so do they know too much now?
That kind of killed my conspiracy theory when I heard Dr. Cooper was involved or I was like,
all right, Dallas is probably out.
But the way that I don't trust a doctor that wears that hat?
No, weird hat.
You should know, that's a good, no trust.
It's a Texas thing.
I don't know.
If I walked into a doctor's office and I saw that guy wearing that hat, I'd leave.
I'm pretty sure he wears it, he wears it as an homage to like the original Cowboy
doctor if we're like going down that wormhole.
He doesn't wear it in the office, you think?
No, no, I don't think so.
I'm pretty sure if I saw him.
We've never been in the office, so we don't know.
Because all the pictures of him that have circulated over the last day,
he is wearing the hat on the sideline.
Yeah, he wears it.
He wears it on game days.
It's so funny, the stuff that I don't bat an eye at having lived in Texas for 10 years.
It's like, yeah, that makes sense.
All right, guys, before we move on, we're going to take one more quick break.
Sticking in the NFC East
The Washington commanders have been busy
Just during this tire free agent period
But since the last time we did the show
A lot of interesting signings
Guys that came up a lot when we were talking about
Who we'd be intrigued by their landing spots
Three different players
I think of interest to the people at this table
Leo Chenal headed to Washington
That was one of the teams that we threw out
That we thought might make sense
Based on Tarante Jones getting there
as a defensive coordinator
Three years, 25 million
Which is a pretty good price man
I think that's really good
That's like a slight uptick on like what a lot of the like low number two linebackers are getting basically,
probably because he's a little bit younger than a lot of those guys.
And even it's kind of in between.
It actually is funny because this is kind of the player that he is.
It's right behind the aging number two guys and the defined number three guys like Stranad.
It's like right in the middle of those two contracts.
And I think that's exactly what Leo Channal should get paid in the NFL because he kind of falls between those two things.
He's like a linebacker two and a half that's a little bit younger.
And he gives you a lot of the same things that Bobby Wagner was giving you where like he's not the greatest coverage guy.
He's probably better. He's a little more mobile than Wagner was at this stage of his career.
But like between the tackles, knocking around guards, like holding up grass, like he can be very, very good at that.
And then I think he's going to be in coverage.
Exactly.
He has the added bonus of he played like half his snaps for Kansas City last year on the edge.
So like they can do that with him.
So I'm like, this is a really good signing, I think.
I mean, he's a player that I think every now and then you get.
players at positions where it's like just kind of like weirdly backlogged on the team that they were on maybe they can jump into a bigger role shanaul is kind of one of those guys for me
and they also signed clav and chasin one year 12 million they already have odafe owe and so now you start kind of play it with and playing with it in your mind it's like they're gonna line up these guys all over the place i mean the body types they now have
it's still like we don't have any like real true scary difference makers in this group but if you're trying to ascribe the ideas from the viking's defense to this group.
group of players out front. I don't know. I'm interested to see it with this guy with this group compared
to what they had heading into free agency. Oh, way more interested. Dorrance Armstrong is still there.
Like, they've got some bodies for the pass rush to be pretty fun, I think. And I mean, it's only a
year deal, but 12 million for K Levan is like we theorized. He might only get like five or six a year
depending on the size of the length of the deal and who wanted him. So not the long term security,
but that is a, it's a hefty salary for him. And if you weren't already interested enough, oh, I saw.
Nick Cross, two years, $14 million to head to Washington.
I'm furious about that price.
That's ridiculous.
That like Nick Cross should be getting paid more money.
Why do you think in a world where as we saw the market gets set at twice that,
we're heading into free agency where $13 million was the going price for a lot of those guys,
where you see Nick Cross a half of that?
I honestly don't know.
I think maybe there's a little bit of like a lot of the other guys that are getting signed
or a lot of the guys that people like maybe like a Jalen Thompson.
and there's a little bit more in the box,
out of the box flexibility.
Whereas with Cross,
I do think in my mind he's a little bit more,
you just kind of want him down near the line of scrimmage,
hit and stuff.
And so obviously he's a good player at that,
but I think in a world where everyone is trying to do a little bit more too high,
use our safeties in all these sort of ways,
he's just not quite that kind of player.
Coming across the timeline, as we're sitting here,
one of the contracts I still felt like it was one of the bigger,
like this is a starting caliber player,
where does he end up type D?
deals. Dylan Parham to the Jets, two years, 20 million per Ian Rappaport.
You look at that Jets offensive line. I mean, that starting guard spot was really the one thing
that was a question after they lost John Simpson in free agency. So now, I mean, you've got a
really young group of offense. I mean, now it's set, right? Like now from left to right,
I think you have all five of your starters. And I don't know, it's an interesting group.
And this is offensive line works this way. The secondary works this way. I've talked about it with a number
players. Dylan Parham is not great, but if he's your worst starter instead of being your second or third
the way that he was with the Raiders, that goes a long way for a player like him. And so if he just
looks solid next to Olufashanu and Josh Myers, it's probably pretty good for them. I haven't taken
the time to look this all over because deals are still happening and we're still in the moment. But
if I lined up all of the free agency activity around the league, I think what the Jets have been doing
the last few days would be one of my favorite team.
Like I think they'd be on my short list of like,
ah, I like the vision here.
I see what you're doing.
If you could like...
But that goes against all of my instincts as somebody that follows football.
And also if you could like men in black erase how bad watching last year was
and just kind of look at the roster,
it would be like, this is not that bad.
Yeah, that's a fair point too.
Here's the problem.
The coaching, not the coaching staff,
but the coach who oversaw the how bad it was last year defense is still in charge.
That's what I'm saying.
If I could men in black memory erase this thing, it might be okay.
Because if I didn't know anything about Aaron Glenn's defense last year, I'd be like,
ooh, Aaron Glenn calling the defense.
We're in a good spot.
Hey, this isn't going to make anybody feel any better.
But it feels almost like no lose for the Jets because you're either surprisingly frisky
or it all blows up and you're starting over but with like big, big time capital.
And at least a few of these deals they've done.
Like a few of the guys that have joined the team this week.
week will be there and be useful for whoever's next.
That's exactly right.
I think that there are a couple of different things happening here.
And you can look at the collection of moves that they made.
And I think that's why it's a nice collection of moves when you're trying to have like
that line of thinking about it.
So a lot of the like aging players that they signed on defense, those are guys who are
going to be gone after next year anyway.
And so those contracts, and even like guys that aren't necessarily aging, but like Minka,
Nishon Wright, DeMario Davis, David on Yamada.
all of those guys, if this thing bottoms out,
and they're going to move on from them anyway.
And then the other, the multi-year deals you've signed for guys like Joseph Osai,
the trade for Devandre Sweat, Don Parham,
that can be part of whatever 2027 looks like if you have a new coaching staff.
So there's really not a lot of downside to any of the things that they're doing.
And so that's why it just teams that when you have like a lame duck staff
and you're throwing tons of money around, it's like, oh man,
like are you going to saddle the next group with a lot of like,
like really bad contracts and you're going to put them in a really shitty situation.
And the answer for the Jets is no.
Like they're not compromising their future really in any way with some of the moves that they're making.
The only thing is that are you going to cut off development pathways for some of the young players
that you're going to have on the roster because of some of the guys that you've signed?
And I'm just not sure that's really going to be the case.
Like where would that actually happen?
If you have a corner that you draft in the first round, he's better than Sean Wright.
He's just going to play.
Yeah.
Yeah, or Brandon Stevens, is there other outside court?
Yeah.
If you draft the first round corner, like, you know, whoever it might be,
like if he's going to be better than one of those guys, you would hope,
and that's not going to block anything.
Yeah, I just, it's hard for me to get upset at really anything that they've done.
I mean, the only real downside, we talked about this yesterday, is the offense,
and I don't think this is going to happen.
I still think they're probably going to be pretty bad,
but the offense ends up being a little bit too good and you play yourself out of the range for a quarterback.
That's it.
But if you have three first round picks in 2027, then you can hope,
hopefully overcome that.
And we do this all the time
where we try to like play it out in advance
of like, you know,
you should be really, really bad and get the number one pick
almost never happens that way.
Like the teams that get the number one pick
often accidentally get the number one pick.
Like when the Bengals got,
I don't think the Bengals thought they were going to be that bad
when they got the first over.
The Raiders.
Yeah, the Raiders did not think they were going to be that bad.
Well, and then, you know, there's so many times too
where the team that heads into the season
as the prohibitive favorite to be number one overall is
surprisingly.
frisky. I think about it all the time. The Saints were probably pretty high up there.
The Saints were the prohibitive favorite to pick first. And then in Gannon's first year in Arizona,
we were joking about how they were tanking. And they were a surprisingly interesting team.
Like, it's just, it's never as easy as you think. It might be as easy as you think for this year's
Cardinals, though. It certainly looks that way right now. Because at least the Saints gave them,
like, the tire shock thing is at least an unknown. It could be better than you think. We probably
know what we're getting with Jacoby percent if that's what they end up going with.
It's March, man.
What if what if Ty Simpson is a cardinal in April?
You know, like you never can say for sure.
Speaking of the Saints, Caden Ellis back to the Saints, three years, 33 million,
23 million guaranteed.
So, Ken Ellis is a useful player for what Caden Ellis is.
And so the Saints defense, it's something we'll revisit this off season when we do
lingering questions.
Like, how did the Saints finish with like a top 10 defense over the back half of the
season because they did.
They were sneaky. The only question I have about that, and Ellis is a very competent
player, especially obviously as a blitzer guy moving forward. I do wonder how much of the mental
stuff they lose because of DeMario Davis being just like true communicator glue in the middle
of the defense. I wonder how much of that they lose, but Ellis is obviously a good player and
about as good moving forward as you can get at that position. It's really fun to sign a 31-year-old
linebacker and get significantly younger at the position.
Is it weird
that I'm starting to like develop
some real optimism about the New Orleans Saints?
No.
Oh, actually I was joking about this.
I get it, but I'm trying to like temperate.
I was joking about this in the Discord a couple days ago.
By the time we get to the draft,
we will be tired of hearing
that the Saints are the trendy worst to first team.
Like look through the divisions
because obviously when we get to June and July,
you're going to be looking for the worst to first contender.
You can bring up the Titans if you want to,
but like the Saints are going to be the old.
overwhelming favorite because of the division and because of what they look like and what they've done.
I think everybody's going to be on the Saints as like a trendy surprise playoff team.
Not to spoil your hopes and dreams, but the offensive line is where it starts.
Offensive line looks great.
You have the young tackles.
You get David Edwards in there now with the way the quarterback played last year.
They have a ninth overall pick, right?
Are they picking more seven?
No, eight.
Eight.
They pick an eight.
So they're picking eighth, which I don't know, based on what everything,
that I understand about the draft, which is not much at this point.
Like, some of those, like, Carnell Tate might be like,
I mean, if they wanted to have another, like, bigger bodied receiver to go along with the Lave,
like, I don't know, man.
There would be a receiver there for them very likely or an edge, probably, if they wanted to go that way.
Like, I think it's fair to say they're not going to draft Jeremiah Love now,
but everything else is on the table.
Starting to happen.
Starting to get a little optimistic about the Saints.
That's why this is the best league is because last summer,
we were just shitting on them
for being the prohibitive favorite
to pick first overall.
And now we're like, I don't know, man.
Saints look like they could be a 10-win team.
Got Capspace back again starting next year.
A lot happening with the Saints.
Maybe that's why it all feels new and fun.
A team that I think is a little bit harder
to get excited about,
but they made a big move yesterday.
It's a continuation of a lot of the moves that they've made.
Elton Jenkins, heading to the Browns,
two years, 24 million.
You look at that contract
and you look at some of the other moves that they made.
It seems like they might have him play center,
which I'm not sure I love.
Let me play out two versions of this for you, okay?
The Brown's offensive wine can have,
I was going to do this without looking at it,
but I think I probably should look at it.
You can have Zion Johnson at left guard.
You can have Elton Jenkins at right guard,
and you can have Titus Howard or right tackle.
Or you can have Zion Johnson at left guard,
Elton Jenkins at center, and Titus Howard at right guard.
Which one would you prefer?
I'd probably rather have the option
where I could get Titus Howard at tackle.
And also like the whole thing with Elton's a guard
And Jenkins at guard
And because the whole thing with Jenkins playing center is like
He did not want to do that
No
They kind of ended up in a guard
Yes he was better as a guard
And they ended up in a spot where Green Bay
Where it was just like
This is kind of the guys we drafted
And this is where we ended up you have to move
And he was clearly unhappy about that
And so it would be a little bit
Not shocking but I would probably want to see him play guard
If they can get it
Maybe there's something they're going to get done with Wyatt Teller
To bring him back at guard
I don't know but I would be dubious of him playing center
This to me feels completely
Lee, just a, we need five bodies.
All of their moves have been that.
We'll figure it out later.
That's exactly what the Browns are doing along the offensive line.
And given the state of the situation, I don't mind it.
All right.
Those are all the big ones that have happened since we last recorded.
We will be back here tomorrow for one last show.
We probably won't spend as much time tomorrow running through the signings that have happened
just because most of them will have already come down by that point.
So we'll probably do a little bit of zooming out tomorrow.
and looking at what free agency has been like up to this point
to some signings we've liked, some fits that we've liked,
do a little bit more of a bigger picture look at how the last few days have unfolded.
But very excited to have one more show coming your guys' way.
We'll be here at 3 p.m. Eastern again tomorrow.
We will not have a show on Friday.
We'll be just be back to a regular five podcast,
five podcasts a week, daily podcast is probably a good way to say that.
We'll be back to having a podcast for you guys every day starting next Monday.
So tomorrow will be our last live show as it relates to free agency,
and then we'll be back on more of a normal cadence.
But have really enjoyed this week.
Hope you guys have as well.
We'll see you tomorrow.
