The Ben Mulroney Show - Chrystia Freeland's leadership launch was railroaded by Protestors
Episode Date: January 20, 2025Chrystia Freeland's leadership launch was railroaded by Protestors Guest: Warren Kinsella, Former Special Advisor to Jean Chretien and CEO of the Daisy Group If you enjoyed the podcast, tell a friend...! For more of the Ben Mulroney Show, subscribe to the podcast! https://globalnews.ca/national/program/the-ben-mulroney-show Follow Ben on Twitter/X at https://x.com/BenMulroney Enjoy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Calling all sellers, Salesforce is hiring account executives to join us on the cutting edge of technology.
Here, innovation isn't a buzzword. It's a way of life.
You'll be solving customer challenges faster with agents, winning with purpose, and showing the world what AI was meant to be.
Let's create the agent-first future together. Head to salesforce.com slash careers to learn more.
Breaking news happens anywhere, anytime.
Police have warned the protesters repeatedly, get back.
CBC News brings the story to you, live.
Hundreds of wildfires are burning.
Be the first to know what's going on
and what that means for you and for Canada.
This situation has changed very quickly.
Helping make sense of the world when it matters most.
Stay in the know.
Download the free CBC News app or visit cbcnews.ca.
And last week was all about Mark Carney's launch, his bid to replace Justin Trudeau.
Christy Freeland is next on deck.
She threw her hat into the ring.
And I gotta say, her launch was preceded by a video,
an online video where Freeland,
prior to the word Freeland appearing on screen,
it was free land.
And then those two words came together to form Freeland.
I liked that very much.
What ensued at the launch was,
well, I'm sure there was some good,
but people seem to be focused on the bad
with the popping up of protester after protester
after protester and rapid succession
that really deflated the energy in the room.
Let's listen to one of the many protesters.
We have voters, how can we have voters
that they won't trust?
Keep watching, keep watching. How can we have voters who will trust in the great will of justice? Keep walking.
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a
This is a This is to explain it away. The time has come for us as a government, as a country, to do two things.
I think we all know we have to fight against climate change. We all get that. We need to do
it for our kids. We need to do it for the planet. Liberals believe in that, and that is a fight that has to continue. But it is also the case that we need to get better at listening to
Canadians and at listening to what Canadians are telling us.
And we have heard very clearly from Canadians in provinces where there is a
consumer facing price on carbon that they don't like it.
All right, to give us his unvarnished opinion on this as someone whose opinion I value a great
deal in these matters, Warren Kinsella, former special advisor to Jacques Retzian and CEO of
the Daisy Group. Warren, happy Monday. What did you make of this launch?
It was, well, good morning. And yeah, it was like the arsonist preaching about fire safety,
like in fairness. I felt it badly for her that her event was disrupted about 20 times,
but it was quite symbolic. You know, she was deputy prime minister and a senior cabinet
minister for a decade during a period when extremism and anti-Semitism
has surged across the country.
She and her colleagues did precious little about it.
And so it was ironic in the extreme to see these same people show up and basically wreck
her event.
They totally destroyed her event.
So kind of an irony there, but also an irony in terms of when she finally got around to saying some things about what she wanted to do, you know, casting doubt on the carbon tax. It's like seriously.
Yeah, she voted over 40 times in favor of the carbon tax, including touting it as recently as two months ago. So to me, she's just she's going where the votes are. It's not about deeply held beliefs. It's and if you don't believe in anything,
then you stand for nothing.
Exactly. And that is something that every voter gets. You got to
believe in something. I mean, even Donald Trump, as much as a
lot of people in the country don't like him, you at least know
where he stands most of the time. And in Freeland's case,
it's like, well, what are your core beliefs? What do you believe in?
Like the carbon tax was a prominent feature. It wasn't just a line or two. It was a prominent
feature of every liberal election campaign document going back almost a decade. They believed in that
policy. And, you know, in fairness to them, polling showed at the outset, a lot
of Canadians believed in taxing polluters as well, until they figured out that the government
regarded them as polluters too. But it, you know, it's just, when you do these kinds of
reversals, voters then do a calculus and they say, well, how should I, why should I believe
anything that comes out of your mouth? Because this one thing that was
a cardinal, you know, was in your catechism. It was something
you believed in in your soul. Now you're saying you didn't
really mean it.
Warren, I want to talk to you about between Mark Carney and
Christia Freeland, who has the most likely chance of success as
presenting themselves as an agent of change, because on one
hand, you've got Mark Carney,
who when he speaks, certainly sounds
and makes you feel very differently than Justin Trudeau.
There's the dramatics and histrionics aren't there.
And you can tell that when he speaks,
behind his words are thoughtfulness and deliberate nature.
But he is the Trudeau candidate.
He's got the cabinet behind him.
He's got the machinery behind him.
On the other side, you got Chrystia, who walked lockstep with Justin he is the Trudeau candidate. He's got the cabinet behind him, he's got the machinery behind him.
On the other side, you got Chrystia,
who walked lockstep with Justin on so many key issues.
And even though she's doing an about face on these things,
I don't think she can escape those.
So both are presenting as a simulation of change.
I don't think that they have the patina of change,
but not real change.
Which one has the best chance of succeeding
in presenting themselves as that change agent?
Neither one, neither one. Like they're just if that is what
they're going to do, it's gonna blow up in their face. Carney is
surrounded by the entirety of Trudeau's inner circle. He's
been advising quietly on the QT. He's been advising Trudeau
about economic policy for years now, not just
months. And the person that Trudeau wanted to replace Freeland with after he fired Freeland
that fateful Friday was Mark Carney. So for him to depict himself as, as an outsider,
he literally said those words. I mean, if he'd been hooked up to a lie detector,
would have knocked out the power on the Eastern seaboard.
And then in Freeland's case, it's the same deal.
It's like, you know, hey, Krista, here's this,
let's take a look at your LinkedIn profile.
We're talking about you being the deputy prime minister,
the minister of finance, the minister of global affairs,
and you've been with Trudeau
from the earliest moments of his leadership. You've been with him through the entirety of his government
as a cabinet minister. Neither of them is an outsider. I think what she did was a bit smart.
Yeah.
She had a better launch than him. His was a, it was kind of dud. He sounded like a central banker
trying to be a politician. She had a video launch that would preceded this terrible events that she had that was disrupted
by the pro Hamas people. And she framed herself as the anti
Trump person like Trump has said he doesn't like her. So she was
smart. She leaned into that. And so if you're looking for
somebody to face off against Trump, it's not me, not the
other guy, not the banker. So I thought that was a good that was a good strategy.
So So how do you see it playing out between the two of them? Because I think
she did something very interesting as well worn by by saying that even if she
loses, she's going to fight in the next election. I think what she's not saying
is, do you really think that Mark Carney if he loses, intends to
to fight for you. He's in this for himself. He he's he's enjoyed being an account an unaccountable influence on the
government. He wants to be Prime Minister and only Prime
Minister if he doesn't get that he's gonna take his toys and go
home.
And that's the truth. That's what he's told. I've spoken to,
you know, you speak to people in politics, I speak to people in
politics, he is told, members of parliament, he's not going to stick around if they lose. And she has said, I'm going
to stick around. So that's one of the things liberals want to hear. But what a, you know,
I've been involved in the liberal party since I was a little guy. And the one thing I know
about liberals, they're not so hung up on carbon taxes or anything else. It's winning.
Who can win? And we'll all know at the same time who they're going
to go with. Because if the polling shows the Carney is more favorable of choice to Canadians,
that's where liberals are going to go. That's in fact what the polls are showing right now.
And the fact that you got Mélanie Jolie on board, does that speak to him having a strong
ground game to
bring in members in Quebec?
Well, there is this mythology that she's got this great team in Quebec, if that were so why didn't she run for the
leadership? No, what I think it actually is more meaningful is
Freeland had, you know, these pro Hamas people disrupting her
event, as we talked about a few minutes ago. And the most pro Hamas minister in the government
of Canada is Melanie Jolie lining up behind Mark Carney.
Yeah, I think that is a meaningful development on both
fronts. I think if the Jewish community is looking, you know,
who, who would they be most comfortable with? I think it's
gonna end up being Christopher England.
Interesting, interesting. And then of course, you've got you've
got the wild cards
like the Karina Goulds of the world.
So make sense of that.
She is the rumor there,
because nobody could pick her out of a police lineup
and she's gonna lose her riding.
How do you win the country if you're gonna lose your riding?
The view there is,
where does she get the $350,000 to run
and the $5 million limit, you know,
to spend on your campaign.
The rumor is that she is a stalking horse for Mark Carney.
And what that means is, you know,
and I know in politics is it's basically somebody
who knows they don't have a chance
and they're kind of a kamikaze candidate
who is in there to go after Krister Freeland
and say things to Freeland that are critical that Carney
cannot say himself.
So he can stay above the fray.
Hey, Warren, thank you so much.
A really insightful conversation and I hope you come back again soon.
Absolutely.
That was Warren Consell, the former special advisor to Jean Chrétien and CEO of the Daisy
Group.
Home Network is here.
I love it.
Discover the best shows and your favorite trusted experts all under one roof.
Are you kidding me?
Every Thursday, watch heartwarming programs like an all new Extreme Makeover Home Edition
at 8.
We are so lucky to be a part of this.
And Honest Renovations, starring Jessica Alba and Lizzie Mathis at 9.
Changing these homes, we can change families.
There's no place like it.
Home Network, stream on STAC TV.