The Ben Mulroney Show - Why are we trying to manufacture an EV Industry when there's not enough demand
Episode Date: June 11, 2025Guests and Topics: -Canada’s EV mandate must be repealed, Ford Canada CEO says with Guest: Greg Layson, Automotive News Canada -Liberals subsidizing summer jobs, ignoring the real problem If y...ou enjoyed the podcast, tell a friend! For more of the Ben Mulroney Show, subscribe to the podcast! https://globalnews.ca/national/program/the-ben-mulroney-show Follow Ben on Twitter/X at https://x.com/BenMulroney Enjoy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This is the Ben Mulroney show. It is June 11th, 2025. On this day in 1983, a certain
Martin Brian Mulroney became the leader of the Progressive Conservative Party of Canada.
And our lives, my life changed forever. Dad, I miss you every single day. Oh, and on this day,
I'm not gonna say what year, my sister Caroline was born. Happy birthday, Caroline. All right. So when the CEO of an automotive company comes out and says the that the appetite for EVs
has sunk like a stone has fallen off a cliff, and it is time to reverse course as a country
by getting rid of the mandate that would ensure that at a certain point, I think in 2030 or 2035, every single car sold in this country
is a zero emission vehicle.
It's time to reverse course on that.
That should tell you something.
Somebody in the thick of it,
a position of authority is telling us
that the appetite, the market has spoken
and the market does not want these mandates
and it's time to change and pivot.
We should probably pay attention. So when Melanie Jolie, market has spoken and the market does not want these mandates and it's time to change
and pivot, we should probably pay attention. So when Melanie Jolie, our Minister of Innovation,
Science and Industry gets in front of a microphone and says this, I've got some questions.
You know, I think our goal has been always the same to get to net zero by 2050.
We need to make sure that we take actions towards that.
And that's why it was part of our vision and our plan to have EV mandates.
I think also that what the government can do, which will help to increase the demand
is definitely making sure that we're bringing back EV subsidies.
And that's in our platform.
So we're looking forward to bring that back and of course continuing to engage with the
auto sector that is going through a very difficult time.
But I think that the auto sector is reacting to the fact that there's less demand than
anticipated.
I think that working on the demand side
through subsidies will be helpful.
So it sounds like the mandate isn't going anywhere.
And on top of that, we're gonna double down
by bringing back the federal incentive
for people to buy cars that they have already told us
that at this point in time, they don't want.
To discuss this
to make sense of this. We're joined by Greg Lason of the
automotive news Canada, Greg, welcome to the show. Thanks for
having me. Okay, so let's take a step back. And before we talk
about what we what we just heard, can you explain what
attributed the collapse? What what to what do you attribute
the collapse in the appetite for
EVs in this country?
Right now, currently, the appetite is not there because there aren't incentives. The
bottom line is this electric vehicles cost thousands more than their internal combustion
engine gasoline counterparts. And people just don't have the money up front. You know, a parliamentary budget officer report yesterday
suggests that in twenty twenty six, EVs will cost nine thousand dollars
more up front than an ice vehicle.
No one has that right now.
We are out of the people who could afford the early adopters,
the affluent buyers, the environmentalists, the activists,
they have all purchased their electric vehicles. Now the focus shifts to the middle class and
the middle class, the people driving minivans, the people driving pickups, the people driving
SUVs, they can't afford that $9,000 additional expense upfront or on their monthly payment.
Even though studies suggest you save money on gas in the long run up to about $5,000 over eight years, it's just not worth it for the middle-class Canadians.
Yeah, 10 years ago, if I had what I had, if I had in the bank, if I was making what I was making 10
years ago, I would be one of those people. My second car would be an EV. I don't have a second
car right now because my reality is different. I suspect a lot of people are like me.
So you got Donald Trump south of the border saying he's dumping all of the EV subsidies,
which probably had something to do with his schism with Elon Musk. North of the border, we're going to bring back the individual subsidy, incentive rather. And what do you think that's
going to, what do you think the impact of that those dueling
systems is going to have on the EV market in North America? In North America, very little in Canada,
if you bring back those incentives, you will see sales increase once again. And I suspect if they
make that incentive bigger, and now here's what I mean by this. Essentially, globally, the average incentive is about $10,000
Canadian. If you looked at Joe Biden's policies in America over the past few years before Trump was
elected, that incentive was $7,500 US. Do the math, that's about $10,000 Canadian. I think the only
way you increase sales here is by bringing back incentives. But here's the thing. We only represent about 2% of the global
auto sales. And so we are not going to move the needle for automakers to make more EV. That's not
to say they're going to stop making them. They still will. They're still a future in electrification.
It's just further out. Anyone ever anticipated. Yeah. The incentives come back, we'll buy them.
There are great cars being produced, but they're expensive. They're expensive to buy. They're
expensive to insure. Is there any truth to the stories that car companies lose money on EVs
because the cost of production is so expensive? Yes. We've run stories at Automotive News,
Tana, and Automotive News out of Detroit, our U.S. Yes, we've run stories that automotive news, standard and automotive news out of Detroit, our U S colleagues, we have run stories that
automakers lose upwards of $6,000 per unit. The reason being the auto industry is building a
supply chain from the ground up that has never existed. And it's reliant on China. That's also
a problem. It's relying on overseas batteries materials. That's a problem.
That makes it expensive.
And so when you don't have that in place
and you don't have economies of scale,
you don't make as much money on an EV
and you have to charge more for them
just to offset the costs of building a supply chain
from scratch.
And I understand the stubbornness
of various levels of government on a sort of, if not doubling down,
then sort of sticking with the plan, despite, you know, Ford Canada coming out and saying,
get rid of the mandates, because we have invested so heavily on being part of that supply chain of
the future. But it really does seem that we might be throwing good money after bad. And at some point you got to say like, maybe we, we bet wrong or we bet too early on this
EV revolution.
Now what do you make of a middle ground of possibly getting rid of the mandate or pushing
the mandate so that, you know, we, we hit that target of a hundred percent, I don't
know, in 50 years, as opposed to 15 years or now it's 10 years.
Like would that make sense?
We just discussed this on our editorial call this morning. That is what we as journalists are
watching for in this industry. We believe that there will be enough pressure applied by the
automakers to get Ottawa to tweak the mandate, maybe less than the panelists. Look to me,
the penalties are the bigger concern. less than the penalties. Look to me, the penalties are the bigger concern.
What are the penalties?
The $20,000 for every vehicle you fall short of that 20% that you're supposed to sell in
model year 2026. And right now with no incentives and faltering sales, none of the 26 models
sold this summer will count towards that 20% or you might, or sorry, you're losing those
sales because of the incentives.
So you're not selling as many as you thought you would.
And so those penalties are going to add up in a hurry.
And now here's the rub on that.
You have a few ways to pay it.
You can invest in infrastructure, which is good for the country, but it's on the automaker
to do that $20,000 worth of infrastructure.
The other way is to buy credits from your competitors
who sold electric vehicles.
I don't know many businesses,
whether it's muffins or coffee or cars,
that wanna pay their competitor $20,000 a crack.
These automakers are fretting over the penalty,
fretting over sales.
Something has to be tweaked and I'm with you.
I see this being pushed out to 2050. I see the
percentages falling over those years, not 20%, maybe 10 or 15 in 2026. And I see the penalties
being less. Greg, here's a hot take. And I'm not saying I support this, but if they want to get
more people into the EV market by making sure that there were low cost EVs available, flooding the
Canadian market with Chinese cars
is certainly one way to get there.
We've discussed this as well.
It is an easy solution for Mark Carney and his liberals
to open the doors to Chinese EVs.
But here's the thing.
You have to ask yourself this question
if you are Mark Carney and the liberals.
Is it morally and ethically smart to do so?
Is it politically smart to do so?
Look, the reason Chinese cars are so affordable
is because they are government backed
with an endless pool of money.
They use coal fired electricity to power their plants.
They have suspect and questionable labor practices
and don't pay their workers very much.
So there are plenty of reasons
why Chinese EVs are affordable. The
question becomes, do you support the way in which China makes those? And we know Greg, Greg, we got
to leave it there. Thank you very much. I would say that there are certain people on the left side
of the spectrum who are performative enough that that is something that they would bite on. Thank
you very much for joining us in the conversation. I appreciate it. You're listening to the Ben Mulrooney show. Welcome back to the Ben Mulrooney show.
Thanks for spending hump day with us. We appreciate it. Look,
it's coming to the end of the school year for kids in high school.
And this is a time of year where if they don't have a summer job, they are,
in years past, they were gearing up to get that summer job.
They might be going in for interviews
at this point in the hopes of starting as soon as the school year ends to make that
extra cash to build up their their resume for when it comes time to go to university.
But we're living in an increasingly difficult time for young people to find those summer
jobs and Ottawa is coming to the rescue. They are going gonna spend $25 million in reallocated
internal funding to help subsidize an additional 6,000 jobs.
That's about $415 per job.
And this reminds me, and I'd like you to call in
so that we can discuss this.
This to me is the single use plastics problem all over again.
You know, the idea of we were gonna ban plastic straws
to save the environment.
When plastic straws are a fraction of a fraction
of a fraction of the pollution in our oceans,
something like 40% of that pollution comes from
the massive fisheries industry,
where they've got these plastic nets.
And when they become a burden, rather than fix them,
they just cut them loose.
That's the problem.
And rather than going after that problem,
they go after the performative fraction of a fraction
of a fraction percent,
making your life more difficult and my life more difficult
and not helping
the environment at all.
This to me does not address the underlying problem where businesses are incentivized
to hire temporary foreign workers to take jobs that used to go to students in Canada.
Our youth cannot find jobs because the big companies out there are incentivized to hire
temporary foreign workers. So again, it's performance over result. It's let's make an
announcement, cut a ribbon, hand over a giant check that doesn't fix the underlying problem.
And this new liberal government is falling into the trap that was the stock and trade of the old liberal government. I am not saying
that just because they're liberals, they do this. I'm sure governments of all
stripes do this. But look, we are promised a different government. We were
promised this is not your father's liberal government. This is not Trudeau's
liberal government. And yet here we are not solving a problem,
but spending a lot of money to fix a fraction of a fraction
of a fraction of the issue.
And I'd love to hear from you.
Give us a call here at the Ben Mulroney show.
Because this happens way too often in this country
where we love making bold pronouncements.
And then we don't follow through with the requisite work required to solve the problem.
We have, and think about the knock-on effects.
If our kids, the kids who want,
you want them to be taxpayers one day,
their parents are taxpayers.
By virtue of their parents being taxpayers,
they are entitled to having a job market for their kids.
And that job market has been taken away
You are depriving future taxpayers from getting into the job market from learning the skills that could allow them to become better
employees higher skilled employees
From from paying into it from being a taxpayer today by having a job today
You're preventing the future taxpayers from becoming taxpayers today
It is it is nonsensical to me that we're gonna spend 25 million dollars
subsidizing
6,000 jobs that's a drop in the bucket required to fix the problem
It is not fixing the problem
It is busy work and I've seen it way too many times and I'm getting really tired of it
You want to solve this problem? work and I've seen it way too many times and I'm getting really tired of it. You
want to solve this problem? Take away the incentive that you as a government or
your predecessor created making it so that is more in the interest of that
corporation to hire temporary foreign workers who are not from here than it is
to hire a Canadian. And think about what that must do to a young Canadian who
their first kick at the can trying to get that first summer job they knock at every
single door and they are turned away at every turn what does that do to their
psyche what does that do to their self-worth what does that do with how
they view themselves in society I tell you what if it were me I would go right
back to my room play fortnight for the rest of the summer. I don't know how
that helps anybody. But if nobody wants to hire me, then
I'm going to say to myself, Geez, I really don't have a lot
of value here. So I'm going to go back to my room and not
provide value to anybody. Hey, John, welcome to the Ben
Mulroney show. Thanks for calling in.
Hey, Ben, how's it going? It's funny, you know, we use the
term and they're using the new liberal government. 50 fifty percent of the the same old higher liberals that were
there before and now if people would take the time to watch the House of
Commons I watched Michelle Rembroke who's a rainbow sorry for our beat sorry
Alberta was talking about immigration yeah talking to immigration officer
and she presented some facts and she turned around and said those are
incorrect facts and that's misinformation. She turned around, she paused and Michelle
said I got these right off of your website. Then I watched, I list yeah it's
not even the funny part, it's funny but it's not. Yeah. The crazy part and then if
you listen to the the public safety officer he was asked some simple
questions about just what a pal is,
some simple acronyms you should know about, you know, gun control and having a gun. He
couldn't answer the question. So I'll say this, if anybody thinks anything is going to change.
Yeah. Well, thank you very much for adding that to the conversation. Look, we have a lot of crises that we have to untangle
and take rest control of in this country.
And to his credit, Mark Carney, as a leader,
is taking a lot on his shoulders.
He's got a lot of balls in the air right now.
I will absolutely give him credit
for managing these crises right now.
Solving them is a different thing.
And when it comes to solving it, you have to rely on your team.
And it does feel like we are erring on the side of Trudeau
and prioritizing making it look like we're doing work,
as opposed to actually doing the work.
And if that is, in fact, the case,
then what we're experiencing, what we've experienced time and time again,
which is being very unserious about very serious issues.
I have no doubt that Mark Carney himself
takes these issues seriously.
But it feels like there are people
that he has put in charge of certain things that do not
have the requisite depth of knowledge
to handle the problem in front of them.
And that is going to come and bite us in the butt.
Mark, welcome to the Ben Mulroney show.
Thanks so much.
Yeah, good morning.
Good morning.
So I was a little confused by your comment there
because when I was, I'm in my 50s,
when I was growing up, none of my friends were working.
Because I think that the foreign workers,
the temporary foreign workers are mostly for
like the agriculture,
if I'm not mistaken.
I could be wrong, but it's mostly so that the jobs that teenagers used to get back in
the day, I hate saying that, but back in the day was out of Tim's or out of McDonald's
or out of that's that that's not temporary foreign workers.
That's unfortunately grown adults.
I'm not anti-immigration,
but none of us are. None of us are. Well, yeah, but it's, it's, we have grown adults who can't
find other jobs who are now taking the jobs of kids who would normally start their working career,
whatever you want to call it. So I don't think it's a temporary foreign workers. Oh, I've been
into enough Tim. I've been into enough Tim's to know that that's not, that that want to call it. So I don't think it's a temporary foreign worker. Oh, I've been into enough Tims to know
that that's not the case.
They're not just brought here to work on farms.
They are, their reach has expanded
into the service industry.
Hey, thank you very much, Mark.
I really appreciate it.
And I hope you have a great day.
Bianca, welcome to the show.
Hello. Hello. And I don't think I will, I don't think I will say anything new. I fully agree with you fully agree with the with the caller, our previous caller. There aren't jobs for our kids.
And there aren't jobs for people who want a part time job for seniors for adults, because they are,
they are covered by temporary workers who come
here, students from other countries. And again, I'm not against immigration. I am an immigrant.
My entire family is. But to bring in temporary workers or to give these jobs to students who
come here to study, and then our kids, when they go look, I have a recent, not recently, a current situation
where my two nieces are looking for jobs.
They are university students and they can find jobs.
And it must weigh on them.
They want to be out there.
They want to be productive.
They want to be useful.
They want to lay the groundwork so that they are even more
attractive to employers in the future and if they
can't get their foot in the door now what's gonna happen exactly and they they've always had a job
they are looking for a job they can't find a job because it's covered by these people bianca thank
you very much and i'm really i really hope that both of your nieces get those jobs uh because it
does sound like they have an appetite to work and that's what we should be rewarding. So thank you all for your calls.
The best high concept sci-fi rig of a role
in the universe is back.
What the hell?
Oh, how long was I out?
Close airlock seven.
Seth, please let me out.
Rick put you in there for a reason, Speed.
Mom, just say it!
Get back here! This is for your own good!