The Benny Show - BREAKING: Big Fani ORDER By The Judge Just DROPPED: ‘You Must FIRE Everyone!’ PANIC in Georgia, with Guests Mike Davis and Viva Frei

Episode Date: March 15, 2024

Judge releases decision on Fani Willis disqualification, Fani must FIRE Everyone and cut ties with Nathan Wade, Mike Davis and Viva Frei join the show. Check Out Our Partners: Blackout Coffee: http://www.blackoutcoffee.com/benny and use coupon code BENNY for 20% OFF your first order Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

What's better than a well-marbled ribeye sizzling on the barbecue? A well-marbled ribeye sizzling on the barbecue that was carefully selected by an Instacart shopper and delivered to your door. A well-marbled ribeye you ordered without even leaving the kiddie pool. Whatever groceries your summer calls for, Instacart has you covered. Download the Instacart app and enjoy $0 delivery fees on your first three orders. Service fees, exclusions, and terms apply. Instacart. Grocer $0 delivery fees on your first three orders. Service fees, exclusions, and terms apply. Instacart, groceries that over-deliver. Today is Friday, March 15, 2024. The judge has released his decision on Fannie Willis'

disqualification. Fannie must fire everyone or cut ties with lover boys nathan hot dog my name is benny johnson and this is the benny show man we're gonna break it all down today hot diggity damn not the result we were looking for let me just start with that not the result we were looking for. We were looking for total and complete disqualification for Fannie Willis. And while this is a partial disqualification, meaning Fannie Willis can disqualify herself or she can choose lover boy, she's already said that she's willing to emasculate a black man on the stands. Her words, not mine. Her words, not mine. So here we are, ladies and gentlemen, the judge has found the middle road and we are very angry about that. What do you need to do to get disqualified? What do you need to do to get held accountable as a Democrat in this country?

Democrats are like the special kids in preschool whose daddy's donated to the schools and they can do anything they want, whose daddy knows like the superintendent. They can do anything they want. They get out of any trouble. What do you have to do to get put in prison as a Democrat? Like, I actually shake thinking about the answer to that. As somebody who covered the BLM Antifa riots throughout 2020, I mean, I was witness to some of those most heinous crimes you could possibly imagine. I was witness to some of the worst human treatment to other humans that you could possibly imagine.

Remember, they wanted to force you to take experimental injections from the government or lose your job, lose your ability to eat. What does it take? And Dr. Fauci, is he not in prison yet? A reminder that Hunter Biden has been doing massive rocks and caught since he was 18. Hunter Biden's been pounding the powder. Joe Biden was happy to lock up hundreds of thousands of young black men, never once touched his son. What does it have to, what do you have to do? What do you have to do? Joe Biden's crime bill locked up hundreds of thousands of young black men. What do you have to do? Maybe Fannie Willis was part of those prosecutions. Really doesn't matter. It seems like the core tenet, the core tenet of the American judicial system, the American legal system,

the American electoral system, the border, which is, of course, just a power play by Democrats to create a new political underclass that they can control because blacks and Hispanics in America, as we've been covering, are swinging hard, right?

They've lost control. It seems like the only thing that they are good for is power policy. Protect our team at all costs. Push the agenda. Protect everyone. That helps us gain power. That is the Marxist mantra. Read the Communist Manifesto.

First thing we must do, says Karl Marx, is got to destroy the family. We have to destroy the ruling class. We have to destroy the state. We have to destroy capitalism. Let's just destroy everything that makes life worth living. Good leaders, bad leaders, doesn't matter. Take them out back. Push them all into the gulag. And so that stands in our way. We got to get rid of it. And like this, I just, we've been covering this for so long. I just need to take a second

here. We've been covering this for so long. The just need to take a second here. We've been covering this for so long. The criminality and the lies before the court are so egregious from Fannie Willis. The disgrace, the defiling of justice by this woman who behaves in such a trashy way, who is so disreputable to the court and the case. I mean, do you understand these are institutions that far outlive like any one person who's elected or selected to these institutions? Like these things, like you have to have faith in these things. And every single time that a Hunter Biden skates or a Bob Menendez skates or an Adam Schiff gets away with lying or a Joe Biden gets selected to be the president of the White House. Every single time that happens, the institution gets eroded and people lose all their confidence and faith in it. And it really, quite frankly, everything is hanging on by a thread right now.

A massive disqualification of Fannie Willis and sending her and then disbarring her for her actions would have told the American people that there is still justice, that there are still consequences for your actions in life, that you will suffer those consequences and they'll hurt because that's actually how real life is. It doesn't matter who you are. Gravity still hits. Jump out of a tree, jump off a cliff. Gravity is going to come for you.

And that's just the way the real world is. Real world is built on physics. And we used to have systems that reflected that. Do the crime, do the time, was the old saying. And here we have, ladies and gentlemen, the ruling, the ruling. And I'll start by prefacing this. The judge should have fired everyone. The judge is firing someone. It's not as good as it could have been. It's not as bad as it could have been. Quite frankly, we'll never get justice for Hunter Biden. We'll never get justice for the Bidens.

I'll keep pushing till my dying day. I'm not sure we'll ever get justice for Joe Biden. I don't know. We'll see. We'll see. We'll see. Can't live in the past. But I don't know. We'll see. We'll see. We'll see. Can't live in the past. But I'm not sure. I'm not sure we had the strength and stamina to actually get the justice.

At the very least, the judge did something here. And that something is still quite embarrassing. And we'll have to cover in the coming days, like as we watch all of this materialize and move forward, like what's actually happening and what kind of an effect this had, because now Fannie Willis has a choice. Right now, 928 a.m. Eastern Standard Time, Fannie Willis and the entire rat's nest, the entire refuse, the dumpster fire of her office should have been off the case. He should have disqualified the whole office. Instead, the judge chose to disqualify one or the other. And it seems like the choice is up to Fannie Willis, ladies and gentlemen. So I wonder, I wonder what she will choose.

Fannie Willis can stay on Trump election case only if she cuts ties with lover Nathan's hot dog. As judge slams her for tremendous lapse of judgment and acting in an unprofessional manner. Judge McAfee has said that he would decide the matter. This week, Willis and Wade, special prosecutor, confirmed they were having a romantic relationship and then lied to the court again and again and again and again and again. And we'll detail those lies. Fannie Willis, the Fulton County District Attorney, can stay on the Trump election interference case in Georgia, but only if she cuts ties with prosecutor lover Nathan Wade. Judge has dramatically ruled.

The ruling, no, a dramatic ruling would be you're all gone. You're done. That would be a dramatic ruling. Superior Judge Scott McAfee slammed Willis for tremendous lapse of judgment, acting in an unprofessional manner. Let's go ahead and read the actual ruling, shall we? Ladies and gentlemen, let's go ahead and read the actual ruling. Interesting indeed. Here is the document. Let's pull it up and let's go. How long is this ruling? It's pretty long, quite frankly. Order to the defendants motion to dismiss and disqualify. So let's be very clear as we like couch this correctly. This is the judge granting in part Donald Trump's team's request to disqualify.

In part, he is saying, yes, yes, we will disqualify. We're not going to disqualify the whole team. We're going to disqualify half the team. Remember, Nathan Wade was the lead prosecutor. So, actually, I'm going to have my, I'm going to have, hey, ALX, just go ahead and get me some of the juicier parts of this. It is a 23-page, I can't read 23 pages. I can't read 23 pages on live here, ladies and gentlemen. Here's what I'll do. I'll read you the conclusion, all right? I'll read you the conclusion. Whether this case ends in convictions, acquittals, or something in between,

the result should be one that instills confidence in the process. Well, you haven't done that. A reasonable observer, unburdened by partisan blinders, should believe the law was impartially applied and those accused of crimes had fair opportunity to present their defenses and that any verdict was based on criminal justice systems best efforts at ascertaining the truth. Any distractions that distract from the goals if remedial under the law, should be proportionally addressed. After consideration of the record established by these motions, the court finds the allegations of evidence legally insufficient to support defining the actual conflict of interest.

However, the appearance of impropriety remains and must be handled as the previously outlined before the prosecutor can proceed. The defendant's motion is therefore granted in part and denied in part, so ordered Judge Scott McAfee. Judges are elected in Georgia. Judge Scott McAfee now has a opponent that is backed by Fannie Willis. So in case you're wondering

if there's anything weighing on this, perhaps that's it. Maybe we shouldn't elect judges. I'm not sure. I haven't really looked into it, ladies and gentlemen. We are, quite frankly, astonished by this decision. It's not as bad as it could be. It's not as good as it could be. It is absolutely a mixed bag. How the judge said you cannot establish a conflict of interest which seems to be the core of this case is a stop is like gobstopping and while we are really excited to play you a bunch of fanny clips and while we're really excited um to jump into all of the reactions to this i think it's really important to like talk about the blinders on this judge lawyer Lawyer Harry McDougal, one of the lawyers on Trump's team,

established the conflict rules because that seems to be exactly where this case is set upon. That was the deciding point here. The conflict rules for disqualification are clear as crystal. Here, ladies and gentlemen, is the judge in the closing arguments, arguing on behalf of what the law says when it comes to a conflict of interest. Go. The general rule on conflicts of interest for lawyers is in rule of professional conduct 1.7. And we all know it's all drummed into us that we cannot have a conflict of interest. And if we do, we have to withdraw or we will be disqualified. The basic idea is that a conflict of interest impairs the lawyer's independent professional judgment. That's the test of a conflict and whether it can be waived and whether it's disqualifying.

And that conflict is not just financial. It can be any conflict that impairs your independent professional judgment. So the lawyer for Donald Trump went on in explaining exactly what outlines the conflict has on this case. This was without question the most compelling closing argument. This old school Southern judge, I'm sorry, this old school Southern lawyer really knew his stuff. Explain to me, ladies and gentlemen, how this did not convince the judge that there was a conflict of interest. Let's go. The root of all of the problems that we see in this court right now is a conflict of interest arising from their individual personal interests in perpetuating and concealing their relationship.

That's the original sin from which all of the other problems float. There are six different factual conflicts of interest in this case, any one of which warrants disqualification, but collectively practically compelling. First, the financial conflict that's already been covered. Second, the personal ambition, political ambition. Third, there's a dovetailed or complementary pattern of deceit and concealment of the relationship and the money. Fourth, the speech at the church. Fifth, the motion for protective order that the DA filed in Mr. Wayne's divorce case. Sixth, the way the state has conducted the defense of this motion to disqualify, especially the hearing.

So, ladies and gentlemen, it's quite clear based on the law that there is a preponderance of a conflict of interest here. That seems to be what the case was predicated upon. And the judge found that there wasn't a conflict of interest, but yet there was the illusion of impropriety, according to the judge. The judge effectively ruling that there was the appearance of impropriety, page 10. So what does this mean? Well, what this means is the judge is sitting there trying to have it both ways, right? Mr. Burger King. This guy is trying to say that I am upholding the value of our institution while ignoring an entire body of legal work that says I must disqualify you. I mean, she was lying to the court just off the top of my head,

and we're going to go through all of this and cover all of this. She lied to the court about when her relationship began. She then continued to lie to the court and badger her team, obstruct justice. She then lied to the court about whether she went to the White House or not. She then lied to the court about the nature of her relationship with Nathan Wade. They then lied to the court by meeting with the witnesses and trying to muscle the witnesses, meeting with her father, meeting with Terrence Bradley. Nathan Wade lied to the court in multiple instances about his personal finances.

Fannie Willis effectively admitted to open money laundering of taxpayer funds to Nathan Wade. And I think this is most important, when Fannie Willis bum rushed, which is the best way we could possibly say it, the stand. She behaved like an absolute lunatic, ranting, raving, throwing things, swinging papers around, yelling. She had to literally be put in timeout by the judge. Does it seem like the kind of cool level measured prosecutorial jurisprudence that you wish to have bringing one of the biggest cases and one of the most important cases in American history?

Will they even be able to bring a case? I think is the big question. That's a question that Jonathan Turley asked seconds ago on Fox News, one of our favorite political commentators, because the judge has also struck down six of the charges that make up the mass preponderance of the case. So can Fannie Willis even bring the case forward any longer, given the fact that she can't bring forward the core of her

charges any longer. She's not allowed to argue those. The judge automatically ruled, nope, you're not allowed to even present these in court. That's a great question. Ladies and gentlemen, here's legal expert Jonathan Turley. I actually think that part of what we're seeing here is the result of improvisation on the law. Much of this is improvised law. What is happening in New York with Alvin Bragg is improvised to be the point of the theater of the absurd. I mean, it's using a statute in a way that I don't think can be used.

I'd be surprised if it could be upheld. In Georgia, you had Willis put together the most attenuated, in my view, weak racketeering claim to somehow bring together these 18 defendants into a single conspiracy. It doesn't hold well, even when you read the prosecution's own papers. It's just you're left at the end with like, what? I mean, it's almost a random aspect as some of these people being put into this overarching conspiracy. And I think that's the problem is when you improvise, you make mistakes. And we've seen those mistakes, obviously, in this case. In fairness to the judge, you know, he is saying, I don't buy the fact that Willis, you know, brought this case essentially

because she was going to bring in her lover and get free trips out of it. I get that. I mean, I think it's very clear that the motivation of Willis was not romantic, but political. That doesn't make it any better. But I can see why the judge said, even if I accept a lot of this evidence, I don't necessarily believe that that was the purpose of the case or how the case was unfolding. My problem with the judge is that these two prosecutors stand deeply contradicted, not just by witnesses, but by cell phone evidence. I find it hard to believe that the judge accepted their testimony as completely credible.

So if you believe that, they may have lied on the stand. So the reason this is all falling to pieces, from our perspective, because I'm not trying to be a doomer. I'm a very optimistic person. I was obviously ravenously cheering for total and complete disqualification. I believe that it was merited. And I would put our show up. I mean, I'm trying to be as humble as possible here.

I would probably put our show up against any show in the world when it comes to the coverage of this case. We've been live for many dozens of hours, perhaps even hundreds of hours at this point, at least nearing hundreds of hours, bringing you live this case, sometimes seven, eight hours in a row, testimony, following, listening. And so I got to tell you, we don't claim to be experts. I went to community college, all right, don't have a law degree, but man, we have been paying attention to this case. And Fannie Willis is guilty. This entire trap now that they're caught in seems to be a trap of their own making.

Not only is the judge striking down really the support beams for the entire Rico case. But now, of course, he's ripping the prosecutors. I mean, what kind of a delay is this going to take? What if Fannie Willis takes herself off the case? I mean, I don't know. It doesn't seem to be in step with who she is. What if Fannie Willis decides she's going to step down? That's the decision. One thing has to happen. Nathan Wade goes or Fannie Willis and her entire office goes. I think I know what's going to happen. But the reality is the case is now going to be delayed in perpetuity. This case, ladies and gentlemen, will not go forward until this decision is made. This is what was discussed from the courthouse this morning by the on-the-ground Fox News reporter

describing the next steps here. Again, I think if you're arguing like what percentage of this is good, what percentage of this is bad, it's probably like 60-40, 70-30 our side. Because what this does is it just blows another massive hole in the independence of this office and in this prosecutor's ability to bring a case. Guys, do we have, let me, let me, the court finds, this is directly from page 15 of the ruling, the court finds that the judge did spank big fanny in this ruling and big fanny is well faced with quite the decision right now obviously nathan wade was the gravy train this was the guy that the whole purpose of doing this was so that they could embezzle taxpayer and federal money on federal charges. And so now the case cannot go forward until this decision is made.

Ladies and gentlemen, the reporting on that. Much greater. That's what the judge is saying. In a broader sense, and this goes a little bit to the conversation we're having with Professor Turley there. The case that's been successful so far was in New York, and that was the E. Jean Carroll matter. And I think what a lot of people don't realize is that New York State, New York City changed the statute of limitations for her to bring that case. They created a law.

It expired after one year, and now it goes away. In the Alvin Bragg matter, he's prosecuting Trump as well on the checks that he wrote before he became president. It's my understanding that that statute of limitations had to be altered also. So it look, it almost feels like an entrapment here in New York in order to prove whatever it is you want to prove depending on the case. For E. Jean Carroll, it was an allegation that went back, what, 30 years it was? And for Trump, I think the statute of limitations was either three or four years and it was altered to extend a longer period of time. Now, does that seem fair to you, Andrew?

Well, I think it was the left who was complaining about novel legal ideas a few years ago, and now it's the left who's bringing novel legal theories against President Trump. Sorry, do you agree with that? Do I agree that they're bringing novel? Yes. Yes, absolutely. I mean, when we look at the way the prosecution here in New York City, we see that they had to essentially creatively turn it into a felony in order to have the statute of limitations be sufficiently long in order to prosecute him. The nature of the case in New York is really just a misdemeanor case. And they're creatively trying to bring in federal law to essentially create this into

a felony prosecution. It's very creative. It's very novel. This has never been done before. We've never seen a president prosecuted. How could it be anything other than that? And I think that there's a lot of respect that is owed to the executive, to the presidency in America. And I think that this is a great challenge to it. And I hope we get through it smoothly because every president,

left or right, is going to. It seems like entrapment, says Bill Hemmer. That, by the way, was not the reporting I was wanting. And we'll play that in just a moment. That was Bill Hemmer's reporting saying it feels as though the judge is piece by piece ripping down this case. The delay in the case, of course, is going to be horrors for libs who are crying salty rock tears right now. We have clips inbound from all of the major news coverage of this right now, MSNBC and CNN. They are pissed. They're quite angry at this. And when our enemies are angry, we like to drink their salty tears, the lamentations of their women, the burning of their villages. Oh, it brings us such warmth in the heart. Ladies and gentlemen, here is the reporting from outside of the court talking about the delay in the process here.

Remember, every single delay, the goal of all of this is to put Donald Trump in jail before he can run for president. And now it doesn't seem like they have any option to do that. This was the last thing they had. This was it. This was the last Hail Mary. Everything is going down in flames. In the documents case, everything is going down in flames with the Supreme Court. This was the last Hail Mary case.

I suppose if you're being overly optimistic here, the judicial system is working. The gears are grinding very, very slowly here and are delivering results, quite frankly, on behalf of the president. 9-0 decision in the Supreme Court. You can't just rip them off the ballot. The Supreme Court looking at the immunity clause. And that's going to be probably a very, very simple decision. That Jack Smith's case is complete bull. That Donald Trump does have presidential immunity.

Ladies and gentlemen, the reason to speed these cases along, obviously, must put Trump in jail to protect democracy. Hmm. Really interesting, that thinking. How does that thinking work? What kind of a pretzel you got to twist your mind into to come up with that? I don't know. But they're crying because this trial will now be indefinitely delayed and, quite frankly, hamstrung forever based on the fact that. They're not sending their best in Fulton County. Here we go, ladies and gentlemen.

Say that it created some potential problems as far as public perception and some interesting quotes here. He said that he referred to Wade's divorce case. he said Wade's patently unpersuasive explanation for the inaccurate interrogatories he submitted in his pending divorce indicates a willingness on his part to wrongly conceal his relationship with the district attorney. As the case moves forward, reasonable members of the public could easily be left to wonder whether the financial exchanges have continued, resulting in some form of benefit to the district attorney, or even whether the romantic relationship has resumed. The judge goes on to write, put differently, an outsider could

reasonably think that the district attorney is not exercising her independent professional judgment totally free of any compromising influences. As long as Wade remains on the case, this unnecessary perception will persist. OK, our reasonable people persist as well and still no answer on when she needs to give the judge her answer? Yeah, actually, my understanding is that the judge has not issued a deadline for D.A. Fonny Willis to make the decision. However, he has said that the trial against former President Trump and his associates will not be able to move forward until the DA makes the decision whether she recuses herself and her entire office or whether Nathan Wade steps aside. So this case is indefinitely delayed and libs are crying about this. Libs are seething about what's going on right now, and I suppose that does make us quite happy. There is still salt flowing. We thought this would be a much saltier day. The

total and complete disqualification of this case, plus the destruction, therefore, of the Trump case in general in Fulton County, was the result we were looking for. But what we do have now is further encumbrance, embarrassment piled on, and maybe even the forced Fannie disqualification of herself, which is what we're looking at. Here on CNN, the salt was flowing. Salt, ladies and gentlemen, must flow on this program. Our salt shaker shakes on our lib friends as they cry salty, salty tears. Our salt that lib of the morning. CNN having a cope and seethe therapy session live on air let's go a case he does have some considerable criticism for her he's saying look without sufficient

evidence that the district attorney acquired a personal stake in this prosecution or that her financial arrangements had any impact on the case. So there he's addressing the fact that they didn't really prove that she benefited from Wade being on this case when she was in a romantic relationship. She said the defendant's claims of an actual conflict must be denied. She's like, look, you didn't prove that she had any sort of benefit that she received from the money Nathan Wade is making from this case. But he said this finding is by no means any indication that the court condones this tremendous lapse in judgment or the unprofessional manner of the district attorney's testimony during the evidentiary hearing. Rather, it is the undersigned the judge's opinion that Georgia law does not permit the

finding of an actual conflict for simply making bad choices. So this is pretty significant. I mean, he is suggesting that she or he's saying that he she had a tremendous lapse in judgment, that she was unprofessional when she testified. Remember, she was getting pretty contentious, pretty fiery with the defense attorney, insisting that she was not on trial when in fact they were asking her questions because the judge was assessing whether she needed to be disqualified and then also saying here that she made bad choices. And look, even though she's going to stay on the case, all of this, especially this language from the judge,

and we're just skimming the opinion right now, I'm sure there's likely more. It's really a gift to former President Trump and his co-defendants because they're not only going to fight this case on the merits, they fight it in the court of public opinion. Optics here matter. He has tried to undermine trust in the justice system. And if you have a judge who's overseeing a case calling the prosecutor, again, unprofessional, saying that she made a bad decision, she had a lapse in judgment. So he did go actually and make sure, make sure, guys, as you're reading this, send me send me the judge going after Fannie Willis. I do think that this, again, like is being the touch light of a feather. Because of something Marjorie Taylor Greene just posted.

Let's go ahead and get that. Let's go ahead and source this and get it up on the screen as soon as possible. Judge McCarthy. This is from this is from Marjorie Taylor Greene, worked for Fannie Willis and donated to her campaign and has now ruled that Fannie can keep prosecuting Trump, but only if she removes her lover, Nathan Wade, off the case. Judge McAfee should have recused himself in the first place because this is obvious bias. Now, this is very, very interesting. He worked for Fannie Willis and he donated to her campaign. Hmm. Hmm. Interesting that. Fannie Willis lied under oath and in his courtroom. Fannie and Wade conspired with the White House in the January 6th committee to talk about RICO charges that we know that is bona fide,

guaranteed 100% true. Fannie Willis, and she lied about it, overpaid her lover Nathan Wade as he had zero experience with RICO cases and abusive taxpayer funds. And the Georgia Ethics Board needs to seriously investigate both Fannie Wills and Nathan Wade. I filed multiple complaints. The corruption in Fulton County, Georgia, is some of the worst in the nation, and it makes most of us in Georgia sick. Yeah. Absolute savagery from Marjorie Taylor Greene. Ladies and gentlemen,

Marjorie Taylor Greene, pretty upset. Libs are pretty upset. This judge tried to find a third way here. But we'll see. We'll see if this case even can continue. Judge in Fulton County's Trump case donated to Fannie Willis. Here's the article, ladies and gentlemen. Really can't explain enough how corrupt this all looks on its face. I mean, if your job is to maintain the judicial integrity of a system and the judge is working for the defendant, the judge has donated to the defendant or the prosecutor, depending on which way you flip this. And then the prosecutor is able to lie with impunity. This lie under oath time and time again. About the case before the judge. What other lies won't she tell? We have a good example of this, right? So the most simple example of this is Fannie Willis talking about going to the White House. Fannie Willis was asked,

did you go to the White House? This is her answer on this simple question. Did you go, Fannie Willis, to the White House? Go. My next question is based on her opening the door and therefore i'll just ask it and your honor can decide whether or not it's appropriate when you went to dc did you go to the white house i did not go to the white house no well apparently i'm going to get the answer anyhow there you have it next question okay okay fannie wills did go to the white house like we can do this all day maybe we will maybe we'll do this for the next 17 hours i mean i'm not sure the judge has already ruled, so I'm not sure what good it will

do, but maybe we'll do this. Like here's the record of Fannie Willis going to the White House. What more do you need? Shouldn't this be enough? Shouldn't this be enough? If she'll lie about this, the interesting thing about liars is that if they lie about little things, they'll lie about big things. The interesting thing about liars is if they like if they if they lie about whether they were at the White House, even though there is a secret service record of Fannie Willis being at the White House, what else won't they lie about? Fannie Willis, of course, should face felony charges for these lies. The Georgia Senate is one of multiple bodies now investigating Fannie Willis. Jim Jordan has fired off subpoenas and may hold Fannie Willis in contempt of Congress. Fannie Willis may be arrested by Congress. I mean, that's a real possibility. Like,

this is exactly what they did to Peter Navarro. Exactly what they did to Steve Bannon. Fannie Willis has not responded to Jim Jordan. And Jim Jordan saying, OK, we're going to hold you in contempt. And vote to hold Fannie Willis in contempt. Because they're investigating Fannie Willis' misuse of federal funds and silencing of whistleblowers. So is that what's up next? Ladies and gentlemen, the Georgia Senate is also investigating Fannie Willis and her conduct. Here's how that hearing went as it pertains to these demonstrable lies to the court.

I wonder. OK, so in that testimony, did she deny the start date of this affair? Yes. She said it started in early of 2022. There was some discrepancy between them, you know, a month or two here and there, whether it started. Generally, it was around March is what Mr. Wade and Mrs. What are the consequences for an attorney to give sworn testimony that she did. If you're Bradley, what is it, Yerkey? Yerty. Yerty, your trackhawk data,

your other independent verifications are found to be truthful. It's a crime. It's a felony. You'd lose your license. It's perjury. Same for Wade. Yes. And we have rules that i are one of the i mean outside of privilege and confidentiality we cannot suborn perjury so if i if i have a client

who tells me i did it i can't put them on the stand to say i didn't do it i mean i i would lose my license over that i cannot do that so did she meet with Kamala Harris and the White House in the January 6th committee before bringing this indictment of Trump? Oh, hell yeah, she did. Here's the proof. Open records for the White House access. And we had records that Ms. Willis and the mayor of Atlanta were at meeting with the vice president. Okay, and so this is the access history. How does that work? The White House keeps records of anybody that comes in and has any kind of official meeting for sure?

Yes, and my understanding is it's highly regulated who can access the White House, and so you have to apply in person or apply ahead of time, and then they give you a time when you make the appointment and they give you a time when you're allowed to be in and when you have to be out by. And they track you. And I mean that makes sense. They don't want anybody lingering in the White House. But they keep that.

And so these are called WAVE records, I believe is what they're called. And I'm not sure what that's an acronym for. But they're publicly available. They're open records. And this record that's shown on the screen shows Fannie Willis was a visitor with V. POTUS. I presume that's vice president of the United States. Yes. Yes, it was. And what was the date of that back in? Was that February sometime of 23? February 28, 2023. Is that before the indictment? Yes. So that's the evidence presented to the Georgia Senate, who's also investigating Fannie Willis, along with the United States House. Along with the governor of Georgia, who has just signed a law for judicial review and removal of prosecutors who are not prosecuting criminals and are instead going on political adventurisms like this. A big law that was just signed into effect

as of yesterday. And so, ladies and gentlemen, the disqualification of Fannie Willis will be the end of this case. Fannie Willis, hope against hope, but if Fannie Willis decides, hey, I'm not going to be moving forward with this prosecution, this thing's a dumpster fire, I'm done, that means the entire case is done. Here's MSNBC having that conversation, saying that the disqualification of the prosecutors on this case is the death knell for the case because Georgia is a supermajority Republican state. And that that supermajority, of course, anywhere else other than Fulton County would never bring these charges. Watch again. I think this shows that Judge McAfee is taking his his duty seriously with respect to really not letting politics play a part in his decisions whatsoever. I just wonder if he would go there, if he would dismiss charges, if he's planning to throw out

the case or remove it from Fannie Willis altogether, as we await that decision over the question about whether there was misconduct with her relationship and Nathan Wade. Yeah. I mean, it shouldn't have anything to do with it. These are completely distinct legal issues. And certainly his decision on the disqualification, as we all know, does not kill the case in and of itself. He wouldn't dismiss the indictment. It would just be reassigned to sort of a governing body in Georgia to then be reassigned. However, I myself feel and many other people feel that that would, in effect, essentially be the death knell for this case because, you know, another time when

Fannie Willis was removed from a case for, in this very case, for a conflict of interest, that case is still languishing at that body. It hasn't been reassigned yet. I don't know that there are many other prosecutors in the state of Georgia that would want to take on this case that have the resources, the expertise. And so this, you know, could be sort of death by a thousand cuts. That seems to be one of the smartest assessments. And I can't believe that it's coming from MSNBC of all places. But inside of a state of, like, you're on perilous grounds here. And it's going to lead to me having a larger and broader attempt to instill some testicular fortitude into our party. You ever seen a map of America? Like a map of America is a massive red country,

like a county by county map of, let's say, the 2016 election. Get me a county by county map of 2016 election. We live in a red country. The country is red. The vast majority of every state, including every Democrat state, is red. The vast majority of California is red. The vast majority of New York is red. We live in a red country with teeny blue dots. And those little blue dots are where these charges get brought.

But that's insane. Because the rest of the country could also reasonably bring charges like this against Democrats. where these charges get brought. But that's insane because the rest of the country could also reasonably bring charges like this against Democrats. Turnabout is of course fair play. Yet you see nothing happening from district attorneys in places where Hunter Biden did business,

Jim Biden did business, James Biden did business. You see no movement in states like Arkansas. Love Sarah Sanders, friend of the show. But that's where the Clinton Global Initiative is founded and still exists today. The Arkansas district attorney is like a MAGA, like super America first Republican. The district attorney there. So are the federal prosecutors. So why aren't they bringing cases against the Clinton Foundation and the Clintons?

That don't make no sense. Why are we not fighting fire with fire? Boys, get me the map of America, please. I want to show this because what you can see, as you can see, if you look at a county by county level, that they're screwed. In places like Illinois, the entire state is red. Every single county votes Trump, except for one, Cook County. In Fulton, the entire state is red, except for Fulton, in Georgia, except for Fulton County. The entire state is a brick of red, except for one dot. And then they use, Democrats use that leverage, because they actually use leverage,

to prosecute Donald Trump. When are Republicans going to wise up? When are Americans going, like when are Republicans going to like recognize that like these kinds of things matter? That if you fight, by the way, this is not the map I want. I want the 2016 presidential election map, this is the 2022 map. If you fight these kind of battles, expect a country that is prepared

to fight back. They can't move the case out of Fulton County because no other prosecutor in the entire state of Georgia would ever touch it. Georgia is a Republican supermajority state with a end to end Republican legislature. House, Senate, governor's office, supermajority. Secretary of State, all the boards, everything appointed by Republicans. So why does Fannie Willis get so much power in a state like that? How can this not be shut down? The way that it got shut down here in my state, there was a Soros prosecutor in my city that refused to prosecute state law. I live in Tampa. What did Ron DeSantis do? He said, nope, you work for the government of our state.

You're done. And just removed him. The guy sued and screeched and whined and everyone cried. Nope, he's gone. And Ron DeSantis appointed someone else. Did the same thing, I think, in Orlando with a Soros prosecutor. That's how it works. This is how governance works, ladies and gentlemen. And so when are we going to fight back? Fannie Willis could and should be removed from her position here. Fannie Willis is making a humiliation, an embarrassment, a mockery of the system. And yet she's allowed to continue by a judge who donated to her and worked for her. Does that sound like justice to you? By the way, this is what it looked like in 2016 when donald trump ran for president what does that country look like to you oh by the way like states like mine in florida

have gotten far redder i think democrats won counties. Now, there are many states that have gotten far redder since this map, since this election result. Look at this map and then remember that these people spent the better part of the last eight years saying Donald Trump stole the election. And you can see sort of where Georgia is right there. Just a speck, just a little speck of blue, just a sprinkling, right? Yeah. Just a sprinkling. One or two blue counties kind of clustered together. Yeah. That's the country. This is the country we live in. So we live in a red country with teeny blue dots, and that is where these criminals operate. So I've had enough of it, ladies and gentlemen. CNN has been on air saying that,

listen, this entire trial may well be just a massive screw up, that this is like turned into a sideshow and that this isn't, frankly, going to end well. This isn't the ringer that they all thought it was. Here, ladies and gentlemen, and CNN sort of admitting what we've all been covering and what we've all known for quite a while. That phone call is still part of the case. There are other charges in the case that squarely relate to that phone call. For example, the first count in the indictment, which is the very broad racketeering count, will still include that conduct. There are other fraud counts that would still include that conduct. So I don't think this ruling changes the type of evidence that the DA is going to be able to introduce, but it does knock out some of the charges. And look, it's embarrassing for prosecutors. It's a screw up by prosecutors

when you bring a charge and then a judge throws it out before it even goes to trial. So. Hey, listen, CNN, MSNBC, all of them are crying on air. That does make me very happy. Apparently, though, there is some fangirling going on over Fannie Willis and her team. Over on MSNBC, they are saying that Fannie Willis is just, it's just, it's just so sad what's happening to her. Truly, it's really hurting our feelings, what's happening to Fannie Willis. MSNBC has decided that they're going to go full fangirl. So expect this, that I predict the next portion of the media protection racket will go, hey, you can't make fun of Fannie Willis. You're not allowed to make fun of Fannie Willis. Fannie Willis is an icon. Get ready. She's going

to get the full Stacey Abrams treatment. The full Stacey Abrams treatment is going to happen with Big Fannie. MSNBC doing their very best at propagandizing how what a smart, what a deeply intelligent, what a wise person Fannie Willis is. Remember, she only pays for everything in cash and that cash only only stays where she rests her head. Remember, Fannie Willis lied at least demonstrably five different times in her testimony. But yes, but yes, Slay Queen. He started before the special grand jury was even put together. He he kind of spearheaded this investigation. So he kind of he took this investigation. He fed it into the special purpose grand jury, got those results, and then he also participated in the grand jury. And so you have to think about the institutional

and historical knowledge that Nathan Wade has. All of that being said, if the solution here is to move forward with D.A. Fonny Willis and the rest of her team, including the other skilled and incredibly competent special prosecutors in Anna Cross and in John Floyd, who we know is the king of RICO or the, you know, kind of the professor of RICO in Georgia. Again, like I say, Mika, it's a no brainer. That's what you do. So, hey, listen, it's a no brainer. This is a gift to Fannie Willis we'll see we'll see how it plays out uh the legal experts are beginning to sort of ponder at this decision and say this doesn't really like hold water seems kind of twisted uh recent segment on fox news sort of talking about how this decision will affect the rest of the case ladies and and gentlemen, calling it twisted legal steel.

Let's go. But as one of the guests said, he did say it was legally improper because you're providing a public comment that creates dangerous waters, he said for the district attorney. So again, we know what the choices are. The judge's main concern was that he wants people to have confidence in the ultimate findings at the end of this trial. Okay. All right. So we're going to see whether or not people have confidence, Shannon, right? Because a lot of folks are going to look at this and think that it was twisted legal steel. Can you understand that? Absolutely. Because as Professor Turley and others have pointed out, it feels like this goes in a number of directions. He does say reasonable people,

the judge says, could find or feel that there was untruthful testimony from Willis or Wade. And yet he said there was not enough evidence for me to find actual conflict of interest. So all of those, you know, travel records and all of those things, he said, we did not get to that standard. But I can understand why some people think maybe they didn't get the full truth from these people who took the stand. So for that reason, it's going to be a win and a loss on this motion for both parties. You're going to win some and lose some. Ultimately, the trial stays on track. If Fannie Willis decides to stay in charge of it, she has her option to, you know, Nathan Wade can step away. But ultimately, what I want to make sure the judge says is that people feel at the end of the day we've done things properly.

But he admits there are things that did not add up in the testimony. Does it stay on track, especially when you consider that the Georgia Senate is looking at this and the governor, Brian Kemp, could as well? Listen, if Fannie Willis decides to stay and keep her team together absent Nathan Wade, they can get right back on track with this trial. But remember, there are all kinds of other things that have to happen before they get to this trial, including finding a jury who has been hearing about this nonstop, not only on national stations, but they're locally in the Atlanta papers, the Atlanta stations. You've got to find a jury now and cobble them together who doesn't have some opinion about what they've heard in this

disqualification trial. So there are many more steps, many more challenges I expect to come from these defendants as they move forward in the wake of Judge McAfee's decision. Well, I guess this does, frankly, there is a silver lining here, Rolls-Royce, and that silver lining is that we can go to Fulton County and we can ask people about Fannie Willis. I mean, hey, listen, we've already done our best here. We've gone to a Trump rally, wore the mugshot t-shirt and asked people at the Trump rally what they thought and to give a message to Fannie Willis. We had a heck of a good time doing that. We look forward to doing far more of that. Ladies and gentlemen, Mike Davis will be joining the program here. We've been live for more than an hour. I want to get a legal expert to sort of weigh in on what happened here. We've been reading you the opinion. We've been like sifting through it. Nobody expected this at like before

9 a.m. We were live within 10 minutes of it dropping, but it barely gets you time to like actually sift through this. I want to bring on legal experts. So we are obviously going to be doing that for you. What what Fox News just mentioned there, though, is really important. Like, how do you even get a jury pool that is unbiased? You're going to get liars, right? You're going to have to stack the jury pool with psychotic, TDS, Trump-hating sycophants that just want to see Donald Trump in jail. And there are some of those people in Fulton County. How do you possibly get like a reasonable jury pool here? How do you get people that haven't already been biased

by this case? This judge is a coward. I mean, I'll just straight up say it. It could have been worse. The judge could have done nothing. It could have been like the actual correct result. The correct result

was to disqualify Fannie Willis. Ladies and gentlemen, we went to a Trump rally and asked people about fannie willis's mugshot gift to all of us and um but we had a great time we think you'll enjoy have a look what's your message to donald trump thank you for being here why do you like donald trump because he makes america great free donald man yeah free trump hey man i love you make america great again hey he's Why do you like Donald Trump? Because... He makes America great. Free Donald, man. Yeah, free Trump. Hey, man. I love you.

Make America great again. Hey, he's a big-time gangster, man. You know what it is, man. Yeah. That Donald right there. Vote for the Trump, man. F-Biden. They scared of the Donald, man.

Joe Biden don't want no smoke, man. They ain't stepping for Donald like that. They ain't riding for Donald like that, man. We riding, man. Look at my African-American over here. Look at him. Are you the greatest? You ain't black. On August 24th, 2023, Donald Trump received this mugshot from Fulton County. This event created the largest political backlash the world has ever seen. This mugshot did not ruin Donald Trump,

it made him an icon, a legend, a gangster. Boy, this dick gangster can't lie to you. In the moments after the mugshot, people were in the streets of Fulton County screaming, free my boy Trump. Rappers are getting tattoos of this mugshot on their bodies and even snoop dogs coming out saying i've got nothing but love for donald trump we decided to go to a trump rally in the deep south and see what people thought about this mugshot by wearing one on our shirt this is benny on the block trump mugshot edition let's go possibly the longest line I've ever seen for a Trump rally. What do you think of my t-shirt, ma'am?

I love the mugshot. Thank you, Georgia. This is straight gangster. Gangster. I love it. It's awesome. I love your shirt. People putting this on their sheet cakes on their birthday, getting tattoos of this.

Absolutely. Even rappers getting like full thigh tattoos of this. Yeah. Yeah. Don't tell my wife. I got one too. Yeah. It's a tramp stamp. On the back. How did you know? I knew. I love your shirt, ma'am.

It's beautiful. You have great fashion sense. Thank you very much. What a beautiful mugshot. It might be the most beautiful mugshot ever. Good. He's a gangster. He What a beautiful mugshot. It might be the most beautiful mugshot ever. Oh, good. He's a gangster. He's a gangster.

Yeah. I love it. I wish I had one to wear tomorrow night when I DJ, because I'm ready for Trump to get back in office. Love it. Love it. I mean, just, you know, better profile that, you know, that he's had in the years that he's been in office.

It says something to the community. And it really means a lot to people, ordinary folks that represent freedom and love, people that stands up. And even our president, what he's doing, he's standing up for us. Man, your shirt is awesome. When I saw it, I was like, Vinny, yeah!

I think your shirt's awesome. That's my favorite picture of Trump. Like, I love that. Once people saw that mugshot, they were just like, I can't do anything but vote for this man. I mean, it's pretty gangster. I mean, the mugshot. I think it's pretty funny.

I've seen the memes and stuff, and I think it's pretty good stuff. This is like backfire, right? Because this makes Trump a gangster. Yeah, so jibby. Yeah, he doesn't surrender. I love this guy right here. This makes Trump a gangster. Yeah, so jerky. Yeah. Yeah, he doesn't surrender. I love this guy right here. Let me get this guy.

I love this guy right here. Yeah. Hey, man. Yes. Ladies and gentlemen, that entire video will be up and out this weekend. We are doing our very level-headed best to ensure that you have the most accurate information, the most entertaining information, and that you are, quite frankly, entertained. Sorry, I just got a notification. Mike Davis will be joining the show, ladies and gentlemen, momentarily to talk about this. The thing that I really want to always bring to our coverage of these moments are expertise and people's opinion of this stuff. Like from our perspective, we learn so much about the system and what's going on when we bring on legal experts.

And when we bring on people that actually know the legal system. Mike Davis has created what could, if there is a Republican defense, judicially, of Donald Trump, Mike Davis created it. And so Mike Davis will be joining the program here, ladies and gentlemen, momentarily. Perhaps, perhaps we can talk to Mike Davis about this very special moment during the testimony where Terrence Bradley, the attorney for Fannie Willis, was brought back onto the stand and was asked to account for obvious egregious lies of Fannie Willis talking about when their relationship began. This leading, of course, the very famous oh dang moment. How guilty are these people? I mean, it's really disgusting. We have this tweet here that shows when the judge donated to Fannie Willis. We actually have the receipts here.

Judge McAfee donated to Fannie Willis in 2020. McAfee is allowing Fannie Willis to remain despite Terrence Bradley saying, dang, after realizing texts prove Nathan Wade and Fannie Willis were in a relationship before Willis hired Wade to get Trump. Trump won't receive a fair trial. There is the actual receipts right there. 150 bucks, doesn't matter, could have been $1, the judge donating to Fannie Willis. There it is, ladies and gentlemen. Really, truly, truly breathtaking. Just a coincidence, says Jack Posobiec, the Fannie Willis ruling was assigned to a Jack Posobiec, that Fannie Willis' ruling was assigned to a judge

who used to work for Fannie Willis. Nothing to see here. Nothing to see here. Ronnie Jackson, another politically motivated judge. Fannie Willis should be disbarred. Her boyfriend prosecuted and fired. All charges need to be dropped. Americans are sick of these endless witch hunt

for election interference. Truly. I mean, is there any justice in the state of Georgia? Is there any justice? Is there any justice anywhere? It really is infuriating. Listen how guilty these people are. Here's Steve Sadow, Donald Trump's attorney,

questioning Terrence Bradley and getting him to go, oh, during all this. OK, in Defense Exhibit 26, which I showed you last time, was two pages of text messages between you and Miss Merchant, correct? Correct. All right. Now, the first page starts off by saying, Ms. Merchant, like just date, don't hire him. Do you think it started before she hired him? You see that? Yes. Yes, I see it. Yes. And your response to that was absolutely, correct? I'm going to object, ask an answer, and keep looking.

All right. So after the word absolutely, you on your own said it started when she left the DA's office and was judged in South Fulton. They met at the Municipal Court CLE conference. That's what you said, correct? That is correct. Oh, dang. Is that the words of a person who's innocent when presented evidence of a crime oh dang yeah the conversations get even worse the conversations reveal more lies just a reminder hell i mean they were friends so it was interesting to see him so adversarial on the witness stand. But this one from January 5th, 2024, they had been texting back and forth about Fannie Willis and Nathan Wade's relationship. Ashley Merchant texts. Do you think it started

before she hired him? Terrence Bradley. Absolutely. Terrence Bradley says it started when she left the D.A.'s office and was a judge in South Fulton. Then we got into that part, Phil, where Ashley was talking about this in court. She texted back to say, is this accurate? Upon information and belief, Willis and Wade met while both were serving as magistrate judges and began a romantic relationship at that time. Terrence Bradley text back, no, municipal court. She says, thank you. And he goes on to say, but you can't put where they met because not many people know that. It's he was on the stand.

Phil's. I can't recall. I can't recall. I can't. It's right here in green and black and white. How much more. Act. I mean, again, we asked the question at the start of the show. We asked the question at the start of the show. 9 a.m. We started the show.

Ruling was 105855. Where will there ever be justice? Like, I mean, at what point? This like reminds me of Joe Biden. There's so much evidence. There's such a preponderance of evidence. Will there ever be actual justice? Will any of these people ever face any consequences? The Clintons, Obama? Or is there a protection ruling that says that these people will forever be allowed to, with impunity, break the law, loot the treasury, commit crimes, partner with the communist Chinese, and we get nothing? No justice will ever happen. When taking the stand, Fannie Willis literally had a meltdown. She had to be put in timeout by the judge. She threw papers. She had a meltdown and started throwing papers and screaming. Here's what that looked like. And where when did he come to, I guess, the condo?

I'm not sure what you called it, condo apartment. Would he come and stay at that condo or visit you there? I'm sorry, visit you there. What condo, what apartment? I want to be clear. So not your house. I know you classified one as house and one as condo. So I'm trying to use those terms.

There's been more. See, what you don't understand is because of this case, I got to move. And so I. If you could ask a more precise question. Please give me the time period. Mr. Wade visits you at the place you laid your head. When? Has he ever visited you at the place you laid your head?

So let's be clear because you've lied in this. Let me tell you which one you lied in. Right here? I think you lied right here. No, no, no, no. This is the truth. Judge. It is a lie.

It is a lie. Ms. Will? Mr. Sano, thank you. We're going to take five minutes. Be back in five. It is a lie. It is a lie. Ms. Will? Mr. Sano, thank you. We're going to take five minutes. Yes. Be back in five. Is that the actions of an innocent person? Somebody who, like, takes the papers and starts screaming about herself?

And she's done this. She did this throughout the entire, I mean, little did we know, ladies and gentlemen. She did this throughout the entire, I mean, little did we know, ladies and gentlemen, she did this throughout the entire process. I mean, it's wild. It'll let you know exactly how rigged this system is against Donald Trump, exactly how weaponized it all is. This clip, this clip where Fannie Willis has a meltdown and says that she's not on trial. These people are on trial for rigging an election, for trying to rig an election, trying to steal an election. Fannie Willis says. Projection, anyone? Was there any signature

verifications in Fulton County? Apparently there were 150,000 votes in Fulton County that had no signature verification, just ballots shoved through machines. Nobody knows where they come from. This is in Fulton County. This is the place that Fannie Willis is overseeing. Fannie Willis having a meltdown, declaring that she's already found Trump guilty. She's already, she already is determined. No prosecutorial jurisprudence. She's already found Trump guilty. I'm not on trial. Trump's on trial. Watch. So your office objected to us getting Delta records for flights that you may have taken with Mr. Wade. Well, no, no, no. I object to you getting records. You've been intrusive into people's personal lives.

You're confused. You think I'm on trial. These people are on trial for trying to steal an election in 2020. I'm not on trial no matter how hard you try to put me on trial. what a, what a, what a wise and shining testament to the value of our Jesus. Like there should be, there should be total, like these prosecutors as prosecutors in places like this should be appointed quite frankly by the governor, like should not be elected. Like it's different everywhere around, around the country, but But judges and prosecutors, they should be appointed by a board. You shouldn't have somebody in such low functioning be able to lie and be able to disgrace the courtrooms. I mean, there's a lot of people who live in Fulton County. Does anybody think they're ever going to get a fair trial?

When you look up on the stand and you see this? Here, this, for instance. The judge saying, this judge that worked for Fannie Willis and donated to Fannie Willis, saying he's going to strike her testimony because she's losing her mind. Watch. That's before I had to abandon my home, Judge. And at my home in South Fulton I never he never came there. Okay, so if you don't come someplace you can't live there.

Ms. Willis, I'm going to have to caution you. This is going to be my first time I have to caution you. We have to listen to the questions as asked and if this happens again and again, I'm gonna have no choice but to strike your testimony. So I need to break this down. This merchant's question, I believe, is asking whether you lived anywhere other than South Fulton. So, the judge is saying, I'm going to caution you that I'm going to strike your testimony. I'm going to, like, kick you off the stand. Effectively. This is the guy who used to work for her and donated to her. Fannie Willis is supposed to be in charge of an enormous amount of money, federal money, and state dollars to go prosecute Trump.

But does Fannie Willis know how to account for, let's say, $1,000 or, in her words, a G? And then he tells me how much it is, and I give him the money back. I don't, just like you're asking me about the money with Robin, I don't do my friends like that. So if you tell me it's a G, then you're going to get $1,000. Whatever it is, I didn't ever make him produce receipts to me. Whatever he told me it was, gave me the money back isn't it if you told me it was a g you're gonna get a thousand dollars you want a g i mean is that is that is that what they're gonna like if they find donald trump for this are they gonna find him in g's and get a uh interpreter there one of the craziest moments

from fannie willis's testimony is when she was talking about like he's being she's being asked by donald trump's lawyer steve saddow about her relationship with nathan wade and she decided to instead of just answering the question start screaming about emasculating black men ladies and gentlemen one of the one of the wildest scenes i've ever seen on tv you want me to emasculate a black man what are you talking about like listen to the poor prosecutor being like judge i don't know what the hell she's saying. This lady is clearly mentally unwell. This clip will prove it to you. Last area, briefly. Yes, sir.

You had contact with Mr. Wade in the year 2020, correct? Oh, I had some contact with Mr. Wade. Would you explain when you say some contact? Please tell us, talk about 2020. I had some contact with Mr. Wade in 2020. One of the reasons your allegations are so preposterous or mismerchants that you have joined is- Ma'am, I didn't ask you about the allegations.

I asked you about your contact. That's all I ask you, your contact so I ask you okay I appreciate that that you want to say something but I'm interested in did you have contacts with mr. Wade in 2020 and your answer so far has been yes correct very limited contact because mr. Wade had a form of cancer and makes your allegations somewhat ridiculous I do appreciate the characterization. I'm not going to emasculate a black man, but I'm just telling you. I'm sorry, what?

I'm not going to emasculate a black man. Did you understand that? All right, let's get back on track. Mr. Sato, next question. What a, I mean, do you see like the way that she's speaking? And like the venom that she's spitting? And the way that she's speaking and like the venom that she's spitting and the way that she's just talking? She clearly despises Donald Trump.

She despises the prosecutors. She's a despicable human being. How is Donald Trump supposed to get a fair? Truck month is on at Chevrolet. Get 0% financing for up to 72 months on a 2025 Silverado 1500 custom blackout or custom trail boss. With custom trail bosses available, class exclusive Duramax 3 liter diesel engine and Z71 off-road package with a 2 inch factory suspension lift. You get both on-road confidence and off-road capability. D two-inch factory suspension lift you get both on-road confidence and off-road capability dirt road ahead let's go truck month is awesome ask your

chevrolet dealer for details trial here how is anyone supposed to get any justice in fulton county joining us now ladies and gentlemen somebody who has gotten a good deal of justice for Donald Trump, somebody who's responsible for the Supreme Court justices, three of them that Donald Trump was able to appoint, somebody who has created the sort of rock ribbed integrity of jurisprudence from the Republican Party, a party that needs much firmer testicular fortitude to ensure that something like this doesn't happen. You know, you stop something like this happening. You bring cases like this to Hunter Biden and the Biden family everywhere they've ever done business. And then it stops. You flip it around. Ladies and gentlemen, I wonder if Mike Davis will

agree with me on that. Mike Davis joins the program now. Hey, Mike. Okay, your take on the ruling. We've been like, we're disappointed, quite frankly, but maybe we're missing something between the lines here in the legal space. Well, it's not surprising given that this judge is facing an election this November from a Democrat opponent. And this Democrat opponent just appeared after this judge heard this disqualification, this motion to dismiss from the Trump co-defendants. And so, you know, look, if the judge followed the facts and the law, there's no question he should have disqualified Fannie Willis and her office because Fannie Willis has an illegal financial stake in a criminal prosecution.

You cannot have that as a prosecutor. And she has this illegal financial stake because she illegally hired her secret unqualified boyfriend, Nathan Wade, to bring unprecedented RICO charges against President Trump and 18 co-defendants. She paid him $250 an hour, $700,000 and counting. He colluded with the Biden White House, including the White House counsel, before she brought this indictment. He billed his time for those meetings, so that's undisputed. He also billed 24 hours in a single day in return for hiring this unqualified boyfriend. He took her on lavish trips to the Caribbean, to Napa, to Belize.

She lived the high life, right? She said she paid him back with cash because her Black Panther father told her to keep six months of cash laying around the house, but she didn't explain how she replenished that cash after she reimbursed him thousands of dollars as a Black Panther cub to her Black Panther father. She's lying. She committed perjury in this court. She suborned perjury. She obstructed justice. She took bribes. She violated the gift ban in Georgia, in Fulton County. There's no question that this judge should have disqualified her from this case if he followed the facts and the law. But instead, he caved to the politics. He's scared of Fannie Willis.

You saw that at this evidentiary hearing. He couldn't even look at her when she was dragging Scott McAfee, this young new judge with young kids around his own courtroom. And the Democrats put up a Democrat opponent for November in this overwhelmingly Democrat Fulton County. So he caved to the political pressure. There's just no other way to look at it. Is there any justice at all? I mean, again, we have an optimistic show, but it just seems like time and time again, everyone skates, whether it's the Clintons, the Bidens, whether it's Fannie Willis. We've been covering this, Mike, for what seems like hundreds of hours live. We've been

tuning into every single trial, listening in, going live for seven hours at a time. We don't claim to be legal experts but we are experts on this trial and there are just demonstrable lies that she told so is the rule now you can just go and lie to the court you just lie like that's the rule you just lie the most egregious thing that she did was she knew that there was a false affidavit submitted in Nathan Wade's divorce proceeding. And Nathan Wade and Fannie Willis got eight other attorneys in the Fulton County DA's office. So 10 attorneys in the Fulton County DA's office submitted this false affidavit from Nathan Wade's divorce proceeding

in response to co-defendant Mike Roman's motion to dismiss in this criminal proceeding in front of Scott McAfee. So Fannie and her dumb boyfriend, Nathan Wade, knew that this affidavit was false. They put the careers and lives of eight other attorneys, their subordinates in the Fulton County DA's office in serious jeopardy. And they submitted this to Judge McAfee. And Judge McAfee knows that this affidavit was false, that they submitted. He knows that she lied numerous times in her courtroom. She knows that she suborned perjury and he caved to the political pressure. So in every single other legal vacuum that this judge should have simply said, you're disqualified, and maybe then some. You're not allowed to be a

lawyer anymore. If I were this judge, I would have, at a minimum, Fannie Willis and her office should be disqualified. This case has been illegally tainted since before its inception. Before she brought this indictment, everyone concedes that their relationship, that Fannie Willis's relationship started with Nathan Wade before they brought this unprecedented indictment, this RICO indictment against Trump and 18 others. And then now we understand why she brought a RICO indictment because, you know, Nathan Wade can make a lot of money off of this indictment at $250 an hour, $700,000. He's such a dumb, unqualified, bad attorney that this judge dismissed six of the 41 counts because they were

incomprehensible. And I knew, look, I knew this judge was going to do this all alone just because he's a Kemp judge. He was a Kemp appointee. He couldn't look at her in the courtroom when she was being highly inappropriate in his courtroom. He couldn't even look at her to get her under control. But when he started doing radio interviews before this ruling talking about this case. And when he dismissed those charges that really don't matter, I knew that he was trying to split the baby here. I knew that this would be a political decision because he fears Fannie Willis, he fears her political machine, and he fears that he's going to lose his job this November. So, I mean, he may well lose his job anyway. So why not just rule correctly? You would think so. This showed horrific judgment on the judge's

part. Horrific judgment. He put politics above the facts and the law. He put his political career above the law. So what going forward here? I mean, this then sort of demonstrates to the entire world that this is an entrapment case for Donald Trump and that the judge, the jury, the prosecutor whoaving lunatic on the stand screaming that she already has decided Donald Trump's guilty here, right? Like, it just shows kind of that this is all a farcical demonstration to put Donald Trump in prison, right? I mean, is that it? Like, that's it? We just have to accept that reality? No, we don't have to accept that reality. What we need to say is we're not going to let Democrats, prosecutors, and Democrat lawyers, and Democrat lawmakers, and Democrat judges, and Democrat juries, and these Democrat hellholes like New York, D.C. and Atlanta decide who is our next president. The American people get to decide the next president. And this lawfare

will end when the American people go in on November 5th, 2024, and tell these Democrats to shove it up their asses. We're going to pick the president and it's going to be President Trump. So maybe you can talk me through like game theory this. What happens next? So does this actually go to trial before the election? It very well could. And I think that President Trump and these co-defendants should appeal this ruling. I think that they've indicated that they're going to appeal this ruling because this is clearly, Fannie Willis is clearly illegally conflicted. Her entire office is illegally conflicted. She took a financial stake in a criminal prosecution. No wonder they brought RICO charges. No wonder they charged

19 defendants with the most absurd legal theory imaginable. It is not a crime to object to a presidential election. It's allowed by the Electoral Count Act of 1887. You don't see Democrats in prison for objecting to Republican wins in 1968, 2000, 2004, and 2016. It's also not a crime to twist arms politically and put pressure on politicians and other government officials. That's protected by the First Amendment, right? And they're saying that there were fake electors that Trump submitted. No, they were alternate electors, like what happens with every election challenge, like 1968, 2000, 2004, and 2016, you need to have contingent electors.

So if you legally prevail, your electors can vote for you in the electoral college. And for them to say that those were fake electors is nonsense. No one was duped by the fact that Trump put up contingent electors, which is the practice. It's not like Rudy Giuliani had the real electors tied up in his trunk and gave fake electors fake IDs and masks to go in and vote for Trump. They weren't fake electors. They were contingent electors. This entire legal case against Trump in Georgia is what we call legal bullshit. Pardon my language, but that's what this is. This is lawfare and election interference. And you would think you would have judges who had the fortitude to make the right calls by following the facts and following the law. But our judicial system has been tainted by politics and it's destroying the legitimacy of our federal and state judiciaries.

Yeah, I mean, we read the ruling live on air. He's like, we didn't find an actual conflict of interest. I mean, that in and of itself is, in your words, such bullshit. We listened to the trials. We've played the evidence time and time again. How is illegally hiring your boyfriends lawful? How is paying this unqualified buffoon $250 an hour to bring a RICO case against Trump and 18 others and then taking kickbacks, illegal kickbacks? Fannie Willis took illegal kickbacks

from this in the form of these lavish trips she lied about it she got other people to lie about it she obstructed justice she she suborned perjury this is bribery her defense is that oh no no no i paid him back because my black panther father told me to keep six months of cash laying around the house like I'm a prostitute or a drug dealer. And then I paid back this dumb boyfriend of mine, Nathan Wade cash, but she doesn't have any ATM receipts or bank statements showing how she replenished her cash stash, her Black Panther cash stash around her house to replenish the thousands of dollars that she supposedly paid Nathan Wade in cash for these lavish trips to Napa, the Caribbean Belize. I would say this, and I've said this before, and I actually mean this. After watching her testify, I don't think

that Nathan Wade has been paid enough. I don't think $700,000 is enough to be in a relationship with that slob. So you've talked what happens when Trump wins and you talked about how this ends. The question I have for you and the final question I have for you, Mike, is I live in Tampa. I watched how a George Soros funded prosecutor was just ripped from his office here in Tampa because he just wouldn't enforce the law, let criminals free, and wouldn't follow the laws of Florida. And the governor here, Ron DeSantis, said, nope, sorry, that's not how it works here. You're gone.

Did the same thing in Orlando and replaced these prosecutors. Is there any system like that in Georgia? Does Brian Kemp lack the testicular force? Does Brian Kemp just not want to do that? What are the recourses inside of a state that we checked super majorities for Republicans in every chamber, unified control of the government for Republicans in Georgia? So what gives? Yeah, so Brian Kemp, the governor of Georgia, and Chris Carr, the attorney general of Georgia,

have the power right now to open a criminal probe on Fannie Willis. They have the statutory authority. They have the statutory duty. The Article 3 project has been calling for this since January, and nothing has happened. They also just passed a law in Georgia where you can investigate these prosecutors. Look, I would say this. These cases, to Kemp and all these other people who don't like Trump, these cases, this lawfare and election interference against Trump is so much bigger than Trump. They're not just going after Trump. They're going after his top aides, his attorneys, his January 6th supporters for trespassing and taking selfies on the Senate floor. They're going after parents outraged by gender chaos in schools and the resulting rapes in high school bathrooms. They're going after Christians praying outside of abortion clinics while they give amnesty to, while the Democrats, Biden, Justice Department, and these Democrat prosecutors give amnesty

to the abortion industry activists who are terrorizing Supreme Court justices outside of their homes while cases are pending, while sending them to safe houses, even after the 1 a.m. assassination attempt against Justice Kavanaugh's wife, Ashley, their two teenage daughters. These trans-terrorists are terrorizing Catholic churches and crisis pregnancy centers. BLM, Antifa, Hamas, their riots are a lot more deadly and destructive than anything that Trump's supporters did on January 6th. We have a politicized and weaponized justice system by these rabid Democrats and these total pussy Republicans. Put it on a bumper sticker and then Trump can run on that. And I think there would be

so many like make the Republican Party not a party of pussies. Yeah. OK. I think I like I think to put it on a bumper sticker, slap it on the back of my car and you win 49 states. Mike Davis, we know that the president listens to you. We hope he continues to listen to you through this. Please, ladies and gentlemen, I beg of you. Mike is one of the very few. If there is even one, it's Mike who is fighting for some testicular fortitude for the Republicans in the judiciary. Please follow the Article 3 project. Please follow Mike Davis. By the way, you will be very entertained when you follow Mike Davis. Did we get Mike Davis a new avatar, ALX, Robbie? Did we get Mike Davis a new avatar?

That's happening today, Mike. My apologies if we did not actually follow through on that. Robbie and ALX are on it. You got to follow Mike. You will be wildly entertained. And if you wish to save the country, then you need to go and support the Article 3 project, which Mike runs and is the founding and is the founder of. Ladies and gentlemen, thank you very much. Mike Davis, thank you very much. Thank you, Ben. So yesterday we had a long interview with Laura Trump and they're doing their best to remake the

RNC into like an actual battle station that fights for us. Michael Whatley is the new RNC chair. Laura Trump is the co-chair. And they have decided that they are going to fight these legal battles and they're going to fight fire with fire. And that is a wonderful thing. We've been sent over a clip of the new RNC chairman. It's a very short clip. The new RNC chairman, Michael Watley, responding to this. And of course, Ronna McDaniel is the reason why all this is happening.

The fact that there is there was no strength at the RNC. Nobody had any fear of anything. And there was no fear of anyone ever like getting hit back, right? You just walk up and punch somebody and no one's ever going to fight back. Well, the RNC is now fighting back. The RNC has released statements on this decision. And Michael Watley was just on Fox responding to this decision. We thought we'd give, we were going to like, we're going to like withhold judgment. Trump is putting together a brand new RNC. Laura Trump is co-chair, the chairman now of the RNC, hand-selected by Donald Trump, somebody who fought for election integrity in North Carolina and won. Michael Whatley responding to these charges. Let's see if we

got any, let's see if we got any gunpowder in the gut from the new RNC. So now, just to update you, awaiting a response now from Fannie Willis. What's the DA in Fulton County going to say after the judge ruled that she can remain on the Trump election case if she removes her lead prosecutor? That is Nathan Wade. Our next guest is brand new to the job. He is the RNC chairman, Michael Watley. He previously served as general counsel for the RNC, a tar heel out of North Carolina. And, sir, thank you for your time. And, well, I guess your timing is pretty spot on. So thank you for being here today. You're happy to join with you.

Thank you. Your reaction to the news in Atlanta. Look, I will defer to the president's attorneys on this. Obviously, they are the ones that are dealing with it on a day to day basis. But I think it's just one more example of what we're seeing is improper conduct. We're seeing the conflict of interest. And this is just one more instance of there being, you know, legal partisan attempts to go after the president. It's frankly election interference. OK, so we will wait to see what Fannie Willis does. Generally speaking, you're being rather proactive for this election when it comes to election integrity. And when I asked you about that in a moment here. But what do you think in the bigger scheme of the cases facing

the Republican presumptive nominee? Do you see again? I'm going to defer to the president on each case. I apologize, Mr. Wiley. Do you see any of these cases being resolved before November at the moment? Look, I will defer to the president's attorneys on the specifics for all of those cases. But I do think it's important for the American voters to understand that these are partisan actors that are bringing these cases to influence the election. And the fact is that they're trying to deflect from the fact that Joe Biden, under his rule, under his presidency, inflation is out of control. Gas prices are up. Housing prices are up. We are seeing nine million

illegal immigrants come across the Mexican border. We don't know who they are. We don't know where they are. We don't know what they're doing. And so, you know, America is not safer than we were four years ago. You look at the world stage. We're not in a stronger place than we were four years ago. This is an election that is about contrasts. And we just need to continue to focus on the fact that for all American families, they were better off and will be better off under President Trump than they are under Joe Biden. What I find so inspiring about this current moment in time is that it seems like we are actually getting refined by fire. It seems like there are people and voices that are

emerging right now that wouldn't normally have had a seat at the table. You'd have the old fuddy-duddy legal scholars with the dust and the cobwebs on their books and the dandruff on their tweed Brooks Brothers jackets. And they'd be saying, yes, but also yes, but hitherto. And well, we understand what Scott McAfee is saying here.ald trump is indeed orange man bad right but there are now legal voices that are uniting there are new voices at the rnc there are new voices across the political landscape i mean geez laura trump told us last night they're like the number one thing i'm gonna do is like hire scott pressler what world are we living in what

a great world we are living in actually now. One of those voices that is sort of like risen like a phoenix is Viva Fry, who is himself a lawyer and is really sharp on legal issues. Viva has a fantastic channel and also really excellent and thoughtful takes and takedowns of these issues. Viva joins the show right now. Man, I'm reading through your breakdown here, and it's so concise and it's so smart. It's better than anything you can find on cable TV. So, Viva, the floor is yours. We have your tweet thread up. Can you talk us through this ruling? We we are sorely disappointed.

But also the reason why we're disappointed, I'll just preface the whole show for you. Been live for two hours. The reason we're disappointed is because we followed this trial. And to us, the non-legal observers, like this seems like such a simple decision. Benny, we're frustrated because the decision is wrong, period. It's not wrong because I disagree with it. It's wrong because it's contradicted within the four corners of the decision itself.

I should also specify, I'm a former lawyer. If I never see the inside of a courtroom again as a lawyer, it'll be too soon. I'm irritated having followed this and gotten my prediction wrong. I said she was going to get disqualified along with Nathan Wade. And I could twist it and say I'm part right and more right than wrong. She didn't get yeeted in this decision. And I'm not angry because my prediction came out to be wrong. I'm frustrated because the decision itself is illogical, incoherent. I mean, I'm going through it. I'm reading it. I was like, okay. He says, we don't really believe her. She's made many mistakes on the stand, many poor decisions, but she hasn't provided, what was it? Inherently unbelievable explanations for having reimbursed

the gifts that she acknowledged having gotten. A little frustrated with some typos in there. I couldn't edit the typos out, but it's like the decision says we don't believe her. She's made a lot of mistakes. Her church speech was legally improper, and yet there's no legal consequences for her as a result of this very same decision. So the judge says no actual conflict. I think we can all fundamentally disagree with that. There was an actual conflict. We saw it in real time. But let's say we disagree with that. No actual conflict. The judge says there was an appearance of conflict, but not sufficient to warrant removing her from the file, that she made repeated mistakes, that her demeanor on the stand was, I forget the word in the decision,

but he reprimanded it. We know that she lied under oath. It's there for all to see. And yet somehow the judge says, look, I don't want to rock the boat too much. I'll include enough verbiage so that there could be ethics complaints against her, so that maybe if this goes to appeal, based on my finding of facts, an appeal court can say, will we come to a different conclusion of law? But it's just untenable on the drafting of the decision itself. That's why it's irritating. So, I mean, yeah, from us sitting there watching, we're sitting there observing Fannie Willis' testimony, the testimony of Terrence Bradley, the testimony of Nathan Wade, and we're able to fact check through Secret Service records, through other witnesses, through everyone who knew they were together before he got hired

for the money laundering operation to charge Trump. We're able to just put all that together. We don't we don't claim to be particularly like genius level IQs here. We're just alive and we pay attention and we can follow patterns. And they lied. They lied to the court. I mean, are you allowed to just go in and lie to a court? It seems like the judge even says here in your highlights, the judge says that she lied to the court. Is that permissible? It's obviously not permissible. I don't know if there's still a standing accusation of perjury that she's going to have to deal with.

But it's like it's this is what you call motivated reasoning. The judge wanted to come to a certain conclusion. Give some but not all. I may be rather I think it's the first time people have said it but you know in splitting baby justice the judge has killed baby justice like you can't split justice like this and then say well okay everybody gets a little bit of push and give and pull this is a this is a uh what's the word it's a desecration of justice the judge comes out and says her behavior was terrible, legally improper. There's no actual conflict laughable on its face because her cash repayment of gifts was not inherently implausible.

And then goes on to cite preponderance of the evidence as being the standard in this context. But look, whether or not the judge did it to try to preserve the best chances in his reelection or his election campaign now, now he can win over the Fannie supporters because he didn't boot her from the file. But he gave her enough of a judicial spanking in this case that it's fodder for future complaints for that new legislation that Kemp is putting out just past the buck down the street. The problem is everybody saw this in real time. And having seen it and anybody who's going to go read the decision, they're going to say this judge knew what he had to do and for one reason or another couldn't bring himself to do it. And that's that's an injustice. Yeah. So how is that injustice righted? Perhaps you could like educate us on why Fannie Willis can't be removed through the review of the governor's office and the attorney general. That happened in my city where multiple Soros prosecutors who weren't prosecuting crimes and who, in fact, were prosecuting against the state, like we're doing the opposite of what the law says to do. They were just ripped out of office. Right. But is there any kind of recourse there?

I would I would you should have on a man, a gentleman named Phil Holloway, who's a Georgia attorney. I'm actually going to ping him and ask him what he thinks of this. I would defer to the experts of the jurisdiction at issue, but look, you know, Kemp is floating some legislative amendment that would allow for the removal of office of corrupt DAs. Good. The problem is the judge had the power to do it there. It wouldn't have been the end of the world to say, I'm sorry, whether or not there's an actual conflict, I have come to the factual finding as he did in his judgment there's an appearance of conflict how can you then say you can stay on the file despite an appearance of conflict and uh what it's a legal improper conduct by getting in front of the church

uh implying that the defendant is the one who's maliciously going after your prosecutor because he's black. I mean, how can you then say, well, there's an appearance of impropriety, legal improper conduct, but you get to stay on to the extent that you fire Nathan Wade and the rest of them? It is, I think it's going to be a laughable decision as an ultimate conclusion, but it's damn damning. It's damn damning is what it is to Fannie Willis because it ratifies everything that everybody saw in the context of that trial. So everyone saw what was going on. And what we've been seeing now is a screenshot that's ping pong balling around X that's going quite viral of Judge McCarthy donating to Fannie Willis.

How are you possibly able to preside over a person who you worked for? He worked for Fannie Willis. How are you possibly able to preside over a person who you worked for? He worked for Fannie Willis and then donated to Fannie Willis in an election that does on its face like seem like something that is shouldn't be allowed. Well, I mean, look, I didn't downplay that. I sort of contextualize that it was one hundred and fifty dollars when the maximum donation is like several thousand. It was at a time when I forget the name of her predecessor, who was even more corrupt than Fannie and everybody wanted him out. So they would support anybody. 150 bucks legal world. Everybody works with under at some time, you know, at some point or another with, with, you know, other people in the field. I don't think that's the determinant thing here. And if he wanted to be that partial to Fannie, he would have said, well, I believe her testimony.

Not that it's not manifestly improbable. Oh, I believe her. I don't believe Terrence Bradley. I don't believe Yurdi. What he said basically was, yeah, Yurdi, the Yurdi, the woman who said, I let her use my condo where they were knocking boots and they had a cell phone record to prove late night visits. He said, yeah, she lacked context, lacked detail. Terrence Bradley, because he was so wishy-washy on the stand, I disregard that. But I don't believe Fannie. If he was so wishy-washy on the stand i disregard that but i don't believe anything like if he was out to protect fanny he wouldn't have drafted the decision like that to me it's like give as much as you can to just pass the buck somewhere else

because you know what needs to be done but the 150 bucks three years ago i don't put much stock in that uh but now people who want to accuse this judge of being compromised being beholden to fanny well they're certainly going to go rely on that as evidence and you're not going to be able to blame them for doing it. So you're saying that cowardice is the true crime here. It's cowardice. It's politics. I'm thinking like there's a little bit of a political angle to this.

The outcome might very well be the same because although he didn't disqualify Fannie, he's like fire your team, fire Nathan Wade, who you've already, who's already built close to a million bucks i mean let's see how that plays over well the money wasn't wasted because he did good work now fire the guy that you've invested a million dollars in to prosecute this case or withdraw yourself while at the same time i've come to the conclusion of legally improper conduct an appearance of conflict mistake after mistake of poor judgment but go along Fannie Willis and prosecute this case. It's Georgia, it's Fulton County, but if you're in a normal court of justice, who's going to deem this prosecution to be legit after a judge says that about the DA?

So he's compromised the case. And I made a joke also that, you know, how long until Fannie Willis goes after the judge for election interference? Because issuing this judgment while she's running for reelection, she's caught to the core. It's wild. Yeah, there is a saying, just rip the Band-Aid off, right? Like, it's going to hurt. You might as well just get it over with. Like, there's no point in doing it slowly.

Like, it does seem like the Band-Aid is half ripped off here. And now it just is more annoying because everybody knows this is fraudulent everybody is aware of what a rigged system this is against trump i mean you have the judge there like protect like there's nobody who watched these trials but said fannie willis is innocent not even fannie willis could no it's not it's not like you you saw the trial and then disagree with the judge's decision. The judge in his own decision makes findings of fact that are legally inconsistent with his findings of law, in my humble view. So my only question is, and this I would ask to a Georgia attorney, you know,

the findings of fact, improper, legally improper conduct, appearance of conflict, you know, poor decision making. That's a finding of fact. His finding of law was it doesn't warrant disqualification. If they decide to appeal this, they go to the court of appeal and the court of appeal says, yeah, based on those finding of facts, we are entitled to come to a different finding of law and we agree that she should be disqualified. I mean, I presume that this is subject to immediate appeal, but I'm not a thousand percent certain I need to verify that. But the bottom line is his findings of fact in the decision cannot support his finding of law not to disqualify Fannie Willis within the four corners of that third. How long was that judgment? Twenty some odd pages?

Twenty within the within the four corners of that judgment, his findings of fact contradict his findings of law. So something that you talk about quite a quite a bit on Viva and Barnes, and we just absolutely love the show and we encourage everyone to go to locals and follow here's the page we'll put it up again but like please go and follow and support the show it's an amazing show um and also you look way better with the hair right now I mean I think that was when I ran for office so I had like a nice skin fade I was looking at things proper but you're better like this I know you you just yeah you like this is a sharp this is a sharper i appreciate the this aviva look both you're a handsome man okay both look fine but there you look like a guantanamo bay inmate and here here you look here you look way more rad so here's the

here's my question for you and it's a little esoteric it's my final question for you viva uh you you clearly care about this you you care about justice. You care about the rule of law. And you're one of those few people that really put your shoulder into this institution to preserve its integrity. And that's what seems to be truly at trial here for somebody like me, who's just a passive observer, right? And who's saying, man, there really is no rule of law, actually. There's just rule of politics. There's rule of power. And nobody ever gets indicted. Nothing happens to Hunter Biden. Nothing happens to Joe Biden. Nothing happens to the Clintons. Nothing's happening to Fannie Willis. And if Donald Trump puts his chewing gum in the

recycle bin, right, there's another 50 charges in New York, right? Donald Trump says if he flies over a blue state, then they'll prosecute him. And and it's really started starting to form for the American people. And my question is this. How do you fix that? Because you actually have to have rule of law in the for a country like ours to work. It's really a question of life or death for us. It can't continue like this. You know, I mean, it's the rule of law.

We always used to, you know, coming from Canada, we would always say, oh, America is a very litigious society. Everybody sues you trip on a doorstep and you sue somebody. The way that you avoid people fighting in the streets is to have them feel that their fights can be resolved by the courts when they no longer feel that their differences can be resolved within the court system. That's when conflict spills out of the judicial system and into the streets. And you're damn right, I do care about this. I've, you know, temporarily or permanently, we'll see what happens, move from Canada, because you see what happens when systems get compromised, when systems can no longer be relied on to not provide the security, but to not provide the

political interference to screw with your daily life. If it goes down in America, if the constitutional republic and this beautiful experiment of America falls, there's nowhere else to go. Like in as much as nobody's moving to Russia, really. I mean, some people are, but not very many. If America falls and if the system becomes so corrupt that nobody has faith in the most fundamental aspect of a civil and orderly society, there's nowhere else to go. So it is time for people to start waking up. I think the political tide is turning and this judge's decision is maybe an indication that the political tide is turning but it is damn good evidence of the corruption of the judicial process and that some people are untouchable and other people

literally you know spit your gum out you'll get accused of toxic hazards uh leticia james can use her election campaign funds as a slush fund to live off of a lavish life of luxury trip after trip but trump allegedly overvalues a property and a bank doesn't care and a bank doesn't complain and the bank gets repaid in full and they make it into a 450 million dollar judgment if anyone were to apply the same standard to leticia james she'd be bankrupt and in jail in a month. So if the system fails in America, there's nowhere else for people to go. A quick follow-up to that, because I think this is really important. It's something we push, but maybe we shouldn't. And I'm learning a lot, actually, through this interview. Should Republicans fight fire with fire here? Should DAs in Arkansas and Little Rock go after

the Clinton Global Initiative, right? Like the biggest criminal slush fund in the world, right? That's a Republican America first DA in Arkansas that oversees that. So the question is always the metaphorical, metaphysical one. Like if you become the monster you're trying to slay, you haven't killed the monster, you've just replaced it. That being said, fire with fire when it comes to the law, I say go after the Clinton Foundation because I know enough to know that there's a lot more indication of fraudulent criminality there than there ever was with We Build the Wall, than there ever was with Trump and anything he did in New York. Trump lived, operated for 40 years in New York, and they only now, when he's running for reelection, discovered all of these alleged crimes. Horse crap. So I say

fight fire with fire legally, lawfully, but especially when it's warranted. The Clinton Foundation was a pay to play, obviously. Why no one ever went after it, I don't know. Did they think they were gonna get in the Democrats' good graces? No. Is it a uniparty potential issue there?

Possibly. But yeah, when it comes to the law, legal fire with fire, but not the kangaroo court communist persecutions that you see in New York. Don't go after innocent people for the sake of making a political point. But sure as hell hold the political power to account. It's too late for the Clinton Foundation. It withered up as soon as she was no longer in power. What does that tell you?

Everything. But it might be time to start, legally speaking, employing the same tools in context where it's warranted. And there's a number of them. They could do it. We cannot encourage you enough, ladies and gentlemen, to follow Viva and to follow his work. It's it's so it's so sharp. And he does his homework. And there's a typo here or there. Who the hell cares? He really highlights these documents. Subst documents substance over form benny every day of the week exactly right substance over form it's like the difference between the two vivas on screen right now and and i'm telling you man you won't be disappointed uh thank you so much on locals you can find the viva uh viva barneslaw.locals.com and i'm going live at noon. I'm going to go through this decision page by page.

And I won't be drinking yet because it's noon. But I'll do a wrap up tonight. I think we all who've been following this case closely deserve a drink. And if it was Fannie Willis bartending, it'd be a Grey Goose. I have a Grey Goose martini. Oh, man. What have we just lived through? We're not even through it yet.

We're like, we're in the thick of it. It's going to, I don't know if it gets worse before it gets good, but it's still, it's very interesting. And, you know, what a time to be alive. Yeah, you're so right. We may well see Fannie Willis asking Donald Trump questions. Like, it's like, what a world. What a world we're going to live in. Here we go prepare prepare it

gets worse it always gets worse uh thank you viva thank you very much benny have a good one ladies and gentlemen um gotta tell you we're we're doing our best to hit the news cycle. The production team at the show has been working like dogs, like animals, like getting this together. We did do a full review of every time this judge has released a ruling. I had this long talk with Alex last night and he's like, oh, the rulings come 10 o'clock. That's when the court opens. And so we just crunched everything together to get the show up and going. Part of the reason why we were able to do that, and this is an absolute matter of fact, you can ask my wife this morning, was blackout coffee. Blackout coffee is totally done. There is no coffee in this

mug. I have now drank like three of these blackout coffees this morning because we needed the extra energy to rock and roll in a breaking news environment. Ladies and gentlemen, this is blackout coffee. There have been some other scandals with some other coffee companies. There are very few things that you can be certain of in life, but you can always be sure the sun will rise each morning. You can bet your bottom dollar that you'll always need air to breathe and water to drink.

And of course, you can rest assured that with Public Mobile's 5G subscription phone plans, you'll pay the same thing every month. With all of the mysteries that life has to offer, a few certainties

can really go a long way. Subscribe today for the peace of mind you've been searching for. Public Mobile. Different is calling. the mysteries that life has to offer, a few certainties can really go a long way. Subscribe today for the peace of mind you've been searching for. Public Mobile, different is calling. to your American values, 0% grift, and delivers that spicy, delicious, fantastic jolt of caffeine that our bodies so desperately need. Go to blackoutcoffee.com slash Benny and use the coupon code Benny for 20% off your first order. Get onto that webpage and check out the gear section. Pretty awesome, actually. Blackoutcoffee.com slash Benny. Be awake, not woke. Something. I love that little segment there. Be awake, not woke. Ladies and gentlemen, as we sort of ponder where to go from here, That is, you know, that is effectively the ruling.

The question is, what now? Sadly, in my gut, and I think in your gut probably as well, we've been sort of trained to not have any faith in these institutions, sadly. And so while Fannie Willis deserves to be disqualified, she was not disqualified in total. She'll just kick Nathan Wade to the curb, obviously, and that'll be that. And that's what's going to happen. And then she's going to continue on with this prosecution of Donald Trump. Yesterday, we had Donald Trump's spokesperson on. We'd love to have the president on. We're actually working on that. Interesting and exciting things to come. But we had the president's spokesperson on last night

on our show, Tenant Media in the arena, Caroline Leavitt. And we asked her specifically about Fannie Willis. And we thought her answer really reflected like how the campaign is going to approach this issue, regardless of the decision. And it's a good one, ladies and gentlemen. Here's Caroline Leavitt talking about Fannie Willis last night. This is the spokesperson for Donald Trump. We're confident that based on the facts and based on the allegations that have been made and arguably proved based on all of the evidence that the defendants have have applied in the courtroom, that Fannie Willis is clearly incapable of leading this case anymore. There's a clear conflict of interest here. And President Trump's legal team has been calling for the very beginning of this case, long before these allegations were even made, for this case to be dismissed, because it has no legal grounding based on the law. And obviously, these allegations of misconduct

just prove that this case should not move forward. So we're hopeful that truth will win in the end. Okay. Ladies and gentlemen, my production team is telling me, got to run with Jonathan Turley on Fox right now because Jonathan Turley on Fox is just saying that this isn't over. There are a bunch of other avenues for dismissal. So something that we've been working with our guests on, Viva and Mike, you can actually see the production process as it happens here, then talking about, okay, where does this go from here? Well, apparently there's a definitive answer. There are a bunch of other avenues to dismiss this case. This is not over. The first avenue, ladies and gentlemen, would be obviously appealing.

And here are the experts weighing in on what happens next. It's far from over. And Fannie Willis may not be safe. There are other avenues for her dismissal. The Georgia Senate has opened its own misconduct investigation. In fact, Governor Kemp or Georgia Attorney General Christopher Carr could appoint a special prosecutor to investigate and possibly disqualify Willis, depending on its findings. Your take? Well, I think that's certainly true. This is going to continue to undermine the prosecution. From the very beginning of this controversy, Willis has put her interest and those of Mr. Wade ahead of her case, ahead of the interest of the people of Fulton County, and ahead

of her office. That's one of the things that is most shocking about this. She should have recused herself weeks ago. And there is this disconnect in the opinion. I get much of what the judge is saying. I think the judge has done a fine job. He's been fair. He's tried to get it right. Liar. See, this is why we have on our experts. This is why we have on our experts. Because that's like the we we generally like Jonathan Turley, but that's like the fuddy

duddy like, oh, but we like we he did it. He did the best job he could. Right. That's what you've gotten from the Republican Party. Nope. Sorry. We're a party of brawlers now, ladies and gentlemen, that's not going to fly, not going to fly any longer. We are a party that actually like stands up to things like this and don't say like, oh, great. here's your here's your, you know, best attempts award right now. No, Fannie Willis deserved to be disqualified. She was not. That's wrong. The judge found that the facts of that case is wrong. And so we very much look forward to the appeal and we will continue to follow this very, very closely. Ladies and gentlemen,

here is the article showing that Brian Kemp, the governor of Georgia, just signed a law that says rogue prosecutors that don't prosecute crimes, and there's an enormous amount of crime in Fulton County, those rogue prosecutors can be removed from their offices by the governor's office and review. So he just signed that two days ago. What's going to happen? We shall see, ladies and gentlemen. We shall see. We have some questions. The Ask Benny segment of our Benny Brigade. We take your questions, ladies and gentlemen, and let's jump into them right now. Here's the Ask Benny question. Do we have a stinger on that? No. No? All right. Yeah, let's build a stinger on this. So you got a nice,

nice, good Benny brigade stinger. I want like a, I want the Benny brigade tank, like rolling over, rolling over Hill to ask Benny. That's what I want. Okay. Here we go. You get to watch a lot of the show get, get built in real time today. Question one, Benny, I love your scripture reading at the end of your broadcast i'm happy to know that you follow jesus how did you come to the lord just curious everybody's story is so different thank you lisa sapino so we read the scriptures at the end of the show for me not i mean for you but like for me It's really important, especially when especially when you have especially when things are going really well and they are to like remind yourself Uh, who's really in charge? It's important when things are going really badly

Which they have There are some days I really don't want to do this shit this program some days I really don't want to do this because. Some days I really don't want to do the show because the news is bad. Today is one of those days. Today sucks because I really wanted the disqualification of Fannie Wills. I wanted there to be justice in this country. But it's important for me to read that scripture at the end of the show, no matter what.

And to like get the centering that God is in control and that God is actually our judge. And we shouldn't fear Satan. We should fear God. God's actually the creator of everything. And his son, Jesus Christ, is our salvation. My salvation story, I was raised a Christian. And that is a wonderful privilege to be raised a Christian, just to have that foundation, something important to like have in your life as a foundationally. And it is such a, it's such a blessing, like having a two parent home, such a blessing. You're at such a disadvantage if you're, if you don't have that bedrock to fall back to. I'm not sure I would even call, I'm not sure I would have publicly claimed I was a Christian through some of my adolescence years, right? When like society

really does a number on you, not like ever abandoned the faith, but like you go and you search. And then, man, you get married as a man, you grow up, you mature, you get married, you fall in love, you have children. You realize that the children are actually angels sent to you by God. You as a father, I consider myself a really tough guy, right? You won't find me crying on this show. You find me sobbing like a baby when I hold my babies in my arm. I'm crying. And you'll see men, like giants of men who work on factory lines, who like do are coal miners and they cry when they hold their newborn child. Did you, if you're a man, if you're a wife, if you're a mother, did you watch your

husband get emotional when he held his newborn? Yeah. The reason why that happens is because that's legitimately God giving a gift to you. It's like the gates of heaven open and like an angel falls into your arms. And when you realize that with the weight of that and the power of that, then and the responsibility that you have, then you rush, you run to the scriptures, you run to your Bible and you run to like reorient and recenter your life so that I can give my children the same foundation. And so I don't mean to sound selfish here that I'm saying I read the verse for myself and not for you. I'm so thankful, Lisa, that this verse is it means something to you because it really means something to me.

We don't just do it as like a skit. Right. We don't do it as like a funny little hook at the end of the show. We literally do it because that is the cornerstone that the show is built on. That is why we show up every single day. And I thank you, Lisa, for your question. Ron Anderson asks, are there any local get togethers coming up in the Tampa area? I've long wanted to like just rent out a brewery or a bar. I even know the location I want to go to. American Social is what it's called. Awesome, patriotic American spot on the water. I'm like, rent that out and just do a meetup. Ron, thank you for your question. The answer is yes. We'll totally do a meetup here. I'd love to do it as part of our Benny Brews because we've been doing this series called Benny Brews where

we bring in a big name guest and get somebody like, you know, we had Vivek at one then. OK, well, then let's get a Don Jr. right at one or a Byron Donald's. And we sit down and we have like sort of a like we get to meet everyone and hang out. We hung out for like two hours after the last Benny Bruce just get to meet everybody. But then we also provide some entertainment. Right. We use our show and the muscle of this program to bring in a big name, somebody famous to like sit there and like talk, have an important conversation with so that there's also you know some meat to the bones right so ron you've we've we've been looking at like the rnc to do something like this but you've like sort of like jarred me here we're like we should be doing it also in our hometown here of tampa because we know there's a lot of people in florida obviously that are wonderful patriots and would probably like to come out to something like that. So thank you for the inspiration, Ron. The answer is yes.

Okay, here we go. From Debra Rodalia. Rodalia. I hope I got that name right. I just joined your brigade. I love your show and you. Thank you for all that you do for our country. May God bless you and protect you and your family.

Thank you again. You have no idea how much that means to me. We're simple Christians. We're like simple patriots. I went to community college. I was raised on a farm. My wife was raised on a farm. We don't come from some prestigious blue blood background with our fathers in broadcast.

And nobody on the show does either. Like everybody who works on this show, just like loves their country a lot and loves this place a lot. And that is using their talents and the very specified and special talents to try and save this place. And it's quite literally our motivation. That's our motivation every single day, Debra. Like, do you have, do you have kids? Do you have grandkids? Do you want to have kids? I don't, I don't know. I have little kids and I want them to have a country. I want them to have a country when I'm gone. What a, what a curse to like, not, I don't know. There's a photo you got to see from this morning. There's this, here you go. Here's my motivation. Want to see my motivation?

Pretty simple. Pretty simple. Pop it right up. These are my kids driving me into work. Driving me, well, they can't drive yet, but these are my three kids, and this is them dropping me off at work this week because daddy was on the road. They missed daddy and they wanted to bring me to work. So this is me every single morning before the show. There's my motivation. Pretty I've never lied to this audience. I will only ever be honest with you. That's it.

This is what drives the show. That's it. I want to provide a godly, stable, free country for my children to live in. And you are a cursed generation if you don't aim for that. If that's not what you wish for in life, then you truly have, you are a sunken generation. And so we have to fight. The founders fought, the people before them fought, The people after them fought. Like this stuff doesn't come easy. Freedom. Well, I mean, you know, a lot of it's a saying that a lot of people say freedom ain't free. Man, freedom is tough. Freedom is hard to maintain.

And we see that every single day as we're in the trenches with you. But we thank you. We thank you, our brigade members. You can go to BennyJohnson.com and sign up for the brigade if you wish to support us. Like by doing that, you keep our show independent and we wish to just simply show up for you, ladies and gentlemen. So here is our verse of the day, ladies and gentlemen. Such great questions. Thank you for those those we're going to do that we're going to do that segment more often and it's um you know we're in a movement together right this isn't me talking at you this is us in a movement together like collectively all of us like going forward and saving the country it's the thing that they fear the most is that we're going to actually have

connection and we're going to actually like care about each other. And like, you can't defeat an army of happy warriors. From first Peter, be sober minded, be watchful. Your adversary, the devil prowls around like a roaring lion seeking to devour. Man, the devil is, you can always see, Christ says, judge people by the fruits, judge the tree by the fruits. So you can always see the fruits of Satan. Steal, kill, and destroy. Steal, kill, and destroy. That is what motivates me. Here's a photo of my kids again.

I do not want Satan to steal steal kill or destroy um these children or their futures and so this is why we fight ladies and gentlemen that's it you can always tell you can always tell who's part of that product who who on this earth are stealing from people killing people and destroying people like who on this earth and we're not talking like we destroyed joe biden today on the show you know what i mean although i'd be happy for joe biden to be in prison if a court found like if a court would actually take up those cases and i think there's plenty there same with fannie willis justice is something that you obviously fight for and i want my children to live in a just country.

I do not want somebody to steal, kill, or destroy anything from my children or their future. And so we fight Satan. Ultimately, we don't fight flesh and blood. We fight spiritual battles here. That's kind of frankly what it's all about. It's why, and we'll send off uh with this why we were uh really touched when somebody from angel studios contacted us said we really like your programming we love the way that you like

talked to jim caviezel when he was on talking about sound of freedom can you help us promote a new movie and we said totally uh but we have to see the movie first. And they came in and they did a screening for Cabrini in our studio here, right? We just set up a projector. Angel Studios slash Benny, you can go and get tickets to this movie. It is an incredible movie. Can't think of a better story to like lock in and send you off into the weekend with motivation for how tough life has been for Christians in this country. The first, this is the story of the first saint in America, the first American saint. But how one person can make a difference, how we all collect, how we all can make a difference.

It's truly inspiring. And so I'll say this to you as we head into our weekend. May God bless you. May you understand that we do fight battles of the spirit and that we have the victory on our side. God's already won. Boom. We're celebrating Easter here in just a little bit. God's already won. Christ is raised from the dead and we are the victors. We are the victors. Sure, we're going to have a day like today. Today is disappointing for me, but like, you know what? We move on. We keep moving on, right? Because we're already victorious. We've already won. What did it special, put a special battle to fight the battles that you've already won it's great it's great may god bless you um have a wonderful weekend and this still the greatest country on earth it's your boy benny see ya former mlb all-star sean casey aka the

mayor keeps hitting it out of the park take my 30 years of experience take the wisdom and knowledge i've learned from the failures when i got sent down my rookie year all the injuries i had to overcome your mind is the most important thing you have in life be relentless keep charging it matters how you talk to yourself how you look at the world that matters we talk about that i don't know i'm fired up baseball's back and it's going to be incredible i love it the mayor's office with sean casey from believe follow and listen on your favorite platform