The Benny Show - COLLAPSE: Judge NUKES Trump Trial: 'Postponed Indefinitely' Stormy Daniels Testimony IMPLODES Case, with Guests Will Chamberlain and Christina Bobb

Episode Date: May 8, 2024

Trump's classified documents trial postponed indefinitely by Florida Judge, The Stormy Daniels testimony so lurid it almost derailed Trump's trial judge calls her 'difficult to control', Will Chamberlain and Christina Bobb join the show. Check Out Our Partners: Patriot Mobile: Go to https://www.PatriotMobile.com/Benny and get FREE Activation Allegiance Gold: Go to http://www.protectwithbenny.com/ and get up to $5,000 in free silver with a qualifying purchase Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

What's better than a well-marbled ribeye sizzling on the barbecue? A well-marbled ribeye sizzling on the barbecue that was carefully selected by an Instacart shopper and delivered to your door. A well-marbled ribeye you ordered without even leaving the kiddie pool. Whatever groceries your summer calls for, Instacart has you covered. Download the Instacart app and enjoy $0 delivery fees on your first three orders. Service fees, exclusions, and terms apply. Instacart. Grocer $0 delivery fees on your first three orders. Service fees, exclusions, and terms apply. Instacart, groceries that over-deliver. It's Wednesday, May 8th, 2024. Trump's classified documents trial postponed indefinitely. Stormy Daniels testifies in New York. Boom,odes the case. Everyone's in panic because Stormy Daniels just ended the case

against Donald Trump in New York. And breaking news, the second we went live, the Court of Appeals in Georgia will be hearing the Fannie Willis disqualification hearing. They aren't the ones who donated to Fannie. Oh, no, no, no. And so, ladies and gentlemen, there may be some pain in the rear for fanny oh it's gonna be an interesting show my name is benny johnson and this is the benny show so we got

so much news happening so quickly what keeps us connected patriot mobile you know patriot mobile they power our show they keep us online we're always using them use patron mobile to stay connected don't fund the left these people hate your free speech, they power our show. They keep us online. We're always using them. Use Patriot Mobile to stay connected and don't fund the left. These people hate your free speech rights. They hate our ability to communicate. They hate our ability to talk freely. Make sure that you are using, you don't have many choices, but you can choose your cell phone company, right? Like there are some, it sucks that there are some brands that like you have to, you have to just use. I want a non-woke tennis shoe company. That's what I want. Not everybody can have golden Trump sneakers, like, like producer ALX. Executive producer ALX got a pair of golden Trump sneakers. Some people aren't as lucky, okay? But you can choose your cell phone company. Use

Patriot Mobile. Patriotmobile.com slash Benny. Do Patriotmobile.com slash Benny. 972 Patriot. Get free activation today with the offer code Benny. 972 Patriot. And I haven't seen ALX wearing those golden sneakers. ALX, you got them golden sneakers? ALX got a pair of Trump sneakers. ALX, you got them? Can you wear them? Do you have a photo of them? We'll find out, ladies and gentlemen.

He hasn't gotten them yet. All right, okay, okay. When ALX gets the golden sneakers, he'll come on. And we'll get a full shot up in Massachusetts when you see ALX flossingoss, and Golden Sneakers. Okay, ladies and gentlemen, we got breaking news this morning. Oh, and by the way, I'm so excited for the show.

I'm so excited about the meme. I forgot to tell you that Christina Bob, Donald Trump's attorney, is joining the program today, along with Will Chamberlain, who has been so sharp on these Trump legal issues, his attorney himself. So again, we have a slam packed show. But the breaking news as of this morning, here we go, baby. Georgia appeals court

agrees to review the ruling allowing Fannie Willis to stay on the Trump election case. Oh, it's beautiful. This is a huge ruling. This is a massive ruling. This means that big fannies getting taken to pound town because this appeals court is a court that isn't somebody, the judge who made this initial ruling to say that half of Nathan's hot dog, you know, the half of the Nathan's hot dog had to leave the case, right? Had to take his hot dog to another wiener roller. Like, yeah, in case you're wondering, I have so many fanny puns. I've been waiting like weeks, months to like get all the fanny puns out. And now it's just open season, okay?

So Nathan's hot dog had to take his hot dog to a different wiener roller. The judge ordered it. He said, no, you can't do it. You've lied to the court. But that doesn't make any sense because how can you like kick off you? So you say that they're corrupt, but only half of them are corrupt.

I don't get that. It's like pissing in the pool. Like it doesn't just like stay. It's like you have to drain the whole pool. You have to drain it all. Yeah, piss in the pool. Yeah, somebody pees in the pool. You gotta empty the whole pool, all right?

You re-chlorinate everything. So you got to get rid of Fannie Willis too. You can't just get rid of one guy. Now here's the deal. The judge is a Fannie Willis donor, all right? This guy's Judge McAfee. He's elected. And so this guy is obviously going to rule on behalf of his former boss. You know, he worked for Fannie Willis back in the day. So he worked for Fannie Willis. He donated to Fannie Willis. He's elected position. Fannie Willis says she's going to run somebody against him. And so he has all this political pressure. Guess who don't got the political pressure? Oh, baby, the appeals court. This appeals court is going to be is appointed by the state,

by the governor. And these appeals court judges are not going to have the same, let's just say, confluence of factors that Judge McAfee had in this decision. Donald Trump's lawyer, Steve Sadow, is celebrating this. Steve Sadow, this is why you should get really excited about it. Steve Sadow says the Georgia Court of Appeals has granted President Trump's application for interlocutory appeal from the trial court's order, refusing to disqualify Fannie Willis. And he has three exclamation points. Uh, Steve Sadow, interesting dude. Um, we, we, we've, we've watched, he's an incredible lawyer. Uh, let's just say he's not an excitable individual. Okay. We, we obviously have, we obviously have high energy

on our show. Uh, he's not an excitable individual he's very like like donald trump selected him very wisely he's like a freight train kind of lawyer right just rolls along the track if steve saddow is using three exclamation points uh in this in this rule you should be excited phil holloway is a friend of the show. He's been on the show. He himself is a attorney, crime studier, analyst, and columnist from the state of Georgia. He's very, very smart on these things. Georgia Appeals Court will hear the Fannie Wills disqualification appeal, and he includes the order there. Upon consideration of the application of interlocutory appeal, hereby granted, the appellant may file notice of appeal within 10 days of this order. The clerk of the Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

Boom. Shaka. Laka. As they say in the highest courts in the land. So here we go, baby. Fannie Willis not doing well. So Fannie Willis, just real quick Fannie news that we have sort of glossed over because we haven't been getting a lot of news out of Fulton County recently. So number one, Fannie Willis almost fell down the stairs. As you can see here, Fannie Willis needed three men to carry her down the stairs. And what the hell's going on? Why? Like, it is amazing. It is such a, such an interesting thing. Ronald Dahl, um, uh, said it best, right. In one, in one of his, in one of his storybooks, like evil people, like miserable people, where their misery on the outside and they're miserable. And if they're gremlin like, and if

they're, if they're horrible individuals, they they're gremlin like, and if they're, if they're horrible individuals, they all end up looking like Joe Biden. They all end up acting like Joe Biden, Joe Biden, Donald Trump. I'm going to get in trouble for this, but Joe Biden, Donald Trump, not that they're like the same age. I think maybe Biden's like five years older than Trump, but like on a, on a sliding scale, they're very similar in age. All right. They're similar. They could have potentially been in the same high school together. Joe Biden's older than Trump. But look at the way that men move.

Look at the differences in the men. Clearly, one man has lived a good life, a life of vigor, a life of value, and a life of energy, and a life of kindness, and a life of goodness, and has buoyancy, and has energy, and can go play golf championship golf. And then one man, one man, there's a clip going around where maybe Joe Biden took crap in the white house lawn. We don't know. Like one man can barely make it down the stairs. Just like Fannie Willis there. Like it's amazing what happens to evil. Like when these people, they're evil, it like actually weighs on them. It breaks their bones. They begin to like crumble. It is, it's fascinating seeing it. And you can see it. Maybe it's a curse from God. I don't know.

You know, I don't know. I don't like to sound off on those things. Right. That's like, that belongs to God. But like it happens all the time in the old Testament, right? Where you have these corrupt evil leaders and they get cursed, right? And they, they, they lose their minds. Joe Biden's lost his mind. He's lived a bad life and he's done bad things. And Fannie Willis has done bad things. Fannie Willis is clearly not of sound mind. Now we can prove that to you. Okay. We can prove that to you. Fannie Willis went on the stand and we're really looking forward to this because Fannie Willis on the the stand, and we're really looking forward to this. Because Fannie Willis on the stand was like the best thing to ever happen. We were live for like, I don't know, ALX.

We clocked it in one day. We were live for like 70 hours straight one week with Fannie Willis trials. Because Fannie Willis, it was so entertaining to watch her do this. So here's what she did. Fannie Willis took all his paper took all his paper and she had all these like crazy notes she had notes like the you ever seen the bum you know the bum at the the the bus station and he has like a plastic bag full of newspapers like fanny willis decided to bring that bag up on stage with her and she started

waving them around she started waving her papers around and throwing them right like she's crazy lady you crazy okay she started throwing her papers this is what the uh the smartest brightest political the smartest brightest legal mind in the country did to defend herself watch Watch. And where, when did he come to, I guess the condo, I'm not sure what you call the condo apartment. Would he come and stay at that condo or visit you there? I'm sorry, visit you there. What condo, what apartment? I want to be clear. So not your house. I know you classified one as house and one as condo. So I'm trying to use those terms. So there's been more, see what you don't understand is because of this case,

I got to move. And so I need to- Ms. Gershon, wish you could ask a more precise question please give me the time period mr wade visits you at the place you laid your head when has he ever visited you at the place you laid your head so let's be clear because you've lied in this let me tell you which one you lied in right here i think you lied right here no no no no this is is the truth, judge. It is a lie. It is a lie. Ms. Willis? Mr. Sano, thank you. We're going to take five minutes. Be back in five. Fannie Willis, dumpy, frumpy Fannie Willis sitting there with her dress on backwards, with her American flag pinned sideways and upside down looking like the hot mess and throwing her papers screaming. We don't have all the time to listen. It'd be fun to do a full Fannie Willis show. We're,

we're ready for it, but like, we got way more news to get to, but I got like, let's just do a quick countdown. Okay. Quick countdown. We're not gonna play all the clips. We have all clips to prove it with all the clips to prove it. All right. The greatest thing that ever happened in this case was Fannie Willis taking the stand and everybody getting to actually see what a tire fire that lady is. Okay. But here we go. Uh, Fannie Willis admitted to campaign fraud. Fannie Willis admitted to lying before the court about when her relationship started. Fannie Willis admitted that she's absolutely already made her decision in this prosecution about Donald Trump scream and yelled and hollered. You're the ones who stole the election, right? Like that

she's low IQ. Okay. Fannie Willis admitted to lying about when she visited the white house. There's another line before the court. And then Fannie Willis just in her own personhood was just such a mess. She is not. And we'll get, we'll get to this with story. She's not a credible witness. It's a credible, just somebody that, you know, you don't believe her. You're like, you're lying to me. Uh, why is she like, like, let's do more evidence that she's a mess. Here's a article from the daily mail. Uh, Fannie Willis's wardrobe malfunction while speaking at a Black leaders event in Miami, same time there was a debate. There's a Democrat running against her. There's Republicans running against her. Everyone's trying to take her job because she's such a

disaster here and she may get disqualified for her marquee case. Fannie Willis has a wardrobe disaster. Let's just say it's inappropriate. Okay. It's disaster. Let's just say it's inappropriate, okay? It's inappropriate. Let's just say, not a lady, okay? Not very ladylike, okay, on stage. Pretty gross. So more wardrobe malfunctions. Fanny Willis can't even walk down the stairs without help.

She's like collapsing. Her case is collapsing. This is what happens to evil people. It's biblical. It's the Old Testament kind of stuff. It's really collapsing. This is what happens to evil people. It's biblical. It's the Old Testament kind of stuff. It's really fun. It's really exciting to see. It's all collapsing.

And it's all falling down. If only, if only, and this is the last thing we'll say here, if only somebody could save her. If only she decided to choose as her lead prosecutor, a man whose face can be found on many piss stained, uh, uh, park benches and bus stops, uh, around Fulton County. If only she chose a man whose top legal achievement was getting somebody some money back for stolen, uh, speakers and also doing some name changes in the court. If only she chose one of the highest legal scholars ever to be on her team, a man named

Nathan's hot dog. If only Fannie Willis had chosen such a smart man who could answer the single question. And this is really when the case fell apart. Nathan Wade getting asked the toughest question that you can ask in a court of law it's you almost feel bad for the guy did you ever go to a cabin here we go did you go to a cabin with miss willis ever ever ever No. You never want no catnip. No. You're dancing. It's such a funny song.

Oh, come on, man. No, don't you want him back on TV? I want him back on TV. I want him back on TV. We're ready. We're ready on the program. We'll do it again. We'll do it again.

We'll be live. Alex telling me. Yeah, you're right. We were live for about 70 hours. He said it was over the course. He said it was over the course about two weeks. We were live for 70 hours covering Fannie. It was, it was, you know, we were on, we were on for a long time. It was fun. It was great. We'll do it again. We're ready for it. Bring it on. ALX, do we have any, uh, date on when the hearings will be? Let's see if we can find that and start to set our calendars. We really look forward to the disqualification hearing

of Fannie Willis. A lot of people, the good people are all saying, ooh, it's going to be smashing. And speaking of smashing, let's move on past the Florida Georgia line down to Florida here. Trump's classified documents trial nuked from space. Like the lady had a cannon. Her name is judge cannon. Judge Eileen cannon. If you were watching the show yesterday, you heard a Jew, the great Julie Kelly say that Eileen cannon was going to issue something blistering later in the day. You were prepared for this, but not even we were prepared for what Judge Eileen Cannon did. Judge Eileen Cannon says that the documents case against Donald Trump will be postponed indefinitely. Indefinitely. Oh, baby. Trump classified document postponed indefinitely. Judge ruling has a huge implications.

Ex-president avoids trial before the election. I don't think this thing will ever go to trial. That's my takeaway. After doing a ton of reading, after looking through all this and seeing what all legal experts have to say, they have created such an absolute garbage fire here, a dumpster fire here, that I don't think it'll ever go to

trial. Judge Cannon has delayed Donald Trump's trial date indefinitely, citing ongoing issues with the case. The Trump-appointed district judge Eileen Cannon ruled that the trial would be postponed indefinitely in order to resolve significant pretrial issues. Cannon wrote that the scheduling a date for the case would be imprudent and inconsistent with the court's duty and fully and fairly consider the various pending pretrial motions before the court. Oh man, this is so spicy. The reason why it's so spicy is that the judge is allowing effectively the, uh, the continuation of some major, uh, criticism and scope criticism of Jack Smith. So she's allowing, uh, Alex, can I get the Julie Kelly tweet on, can I get the Julie Kelly tweet on this? She's allowing effectively a trial of Jack Smith to carry on, to carry forward. So she set trial dates for,

is Jack Smith a legitimate prosecutor? Did the government tamper with or plant evidence on Donald Trump? Oh baby, this is smoking. Really exciting times. There is a lot of people that we know really, really excited about this. Again, much like Fulton County, all the right people are excited about this. Here is the breaking news. This case was supposed to go to trial in Fort Pierce, Florida on May 20th. That is no longer happening. That date has been pushed back. And while there is not a new trial date set, Judge Eileen Cannon has set some deadlines, many deadlines, at least a dozen going on late into the summer, pushing the trial back at least until the end of July. In an order just late this afternoon, about an hour or so ago, Judge Cannon announced she's extending several key deadlines in this case that take it out, as I said, till the end of July.

This is the case involving the classified documents found at Mar-a-Lago. Special Counsel Jack Smith hoped this and the other trial involving the former president here in Washington, D.C., over alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election results, would go to trial before Election Day in November. The Supreme Court, Brett, is currently weighing whether Trump should be immune from federal prosecution in that election interference case in D.C., meaning that case has been on hold for several months. The justices are expected to decide by the end of June. The former president is hoping to avoid both trials before the November election, and he may get his wish if Judge Cannon continues to extend deadlines in the Florida trial and does not set a date that could push things back post

election. If the Supreme Court gives sort of a mixed ruling or a ruling favorable to Donald Trump, that could push things back here in Washington, D.C. The bottom line, another day, another delay means just we're getting that much closer to the election. OK, baby, here we go. This is this is Julie Kelly. She's so good. She's the program yesterday for like nearly an hour explaining what's happening here this is what she has to say this is too good oh damn this is too good canon set hearing on key motions including selective prosecution unlawful appointment of special counsel jack smith really hoped to avoid a hearing on the scope of the prosecution including the biden white house she's putting the biden white house on trial that's called an uno reverse. You ever seen it? Uno reverse. Bam. I should get an

uno reverse card for the show. We should get a stinger actually that has uno reverse card on the show. Uh, we'll, we'll get that. We'll get that in production. So, uh, uno reverse, somebody who's very excited to talk about numero uno, dos, tres, and cuatro is Donald Trump's attorney, Alina Haba. Again, Donald Trump's attorney, Christina Bob, will be joining the show in just a bit. But Donald Trump's attorney, Alina Haba, saying, hold on, case needs to be dismissed right now. The fact that we have White House logs that DAs and AGs are all coordinating and on the South Lawn with President Biden also speaks volumes.

And we're going to hit each and every one of these cases like we have. As you saw with the boxes hoax today, this is disgusting. Jack Smith changing covers sloppy with evidence that he's now trying to blame President Trump when it was his hands in the cookie jar. Let's be clear on what is happening. Their plan is falling apart. It's going in their face. And frankly, all of these cases should be dismissed. All of them should be dismissed. Why? She said that they were sloppy with how they handled the documents. Kash Patel was on our show on Monday saying, hold up, here's what they did. Not only they

plant evidence, presumably inside of Mar-a-Lago because the government had all these boxes, GSA, and they shove them into Donald Trump's keep. But then also Jack Smith rearranged all the paperwork. Then also we have the reporting that Jack Smith brought all the classified document cover sheets and planted them. So planting evidence on Donald Trump, they're tampering with evidence. They're rearranging evidence. It's a crime syndicate. What is, what is the, what is enlightenment? If you watch the program, you know, enlightenment is understanding that your government is just an organized crime syndicate. There's a goon squad. They're no different than the mafia.

And these are mafia tactics. Cash Patel explains. Here we go. Jack Smith has just been exposed by Judge Cannon of doing what? Lying to a federal court. These guys keep doing it. The judge just unsealed documents in the Jack Smith case down in Florida, which says the prosecutors themselves have admitted to tampering with evidence, to moving the very boxes from one location outside of D.C. to South Florida before they ever even charged Donald Trump. How in the world can you not be prosecuting and charging these constitutional gangsters that are at DOJ?

And they learn it from the same place, the top down, the same AGs, the same DAGs, the same FBI directors who are cheering them on. I hope Judge Cannon, here's an actual fun legal thing that should actually be occurring. Judge Cannon should be implementing actual contempt proceedings against Jack Smith and the Department of Justice, lying to a federal judge and withholding evidence of exclusion and innocence from Donald Trump. Those contempt proceedings would be righteous, and I'd like to see those. Maybe we could put Jack Smith in prison. Oh, maybe we can put Jack Smith in prison. So Kash Patel, who many say will be in the Department of Justice and Donald Trump 2.0. I mean, here's a guy who was federal prosecutor

in charge, like working at the DNI, working at the Department of Defense, saying this is worth a full-scale investigation in Jack Smith. Jack Smith is the one behaving criminally here. Uno reverse. Uno reverse. Look at that. Julie Kelly on our program yesterday

effectively telling us the future. We love when this happens. We try not to brag, but it is a good reason to watch the show. It's a great reason to watch the show. It's always my honor to bring on guests who are going to tell you what's about to happen. And we have a really good record of that on the program.

Here's Julie Kelly yesterday telling you what was about to happen. And lo and behold, five o'clock strike, clock strikes five, and we are off to the races. Julie Kelly saying Judge Eileen Cannon is pissed. Go. They brought these cover sheets to the Mar-a-Lago raid for the sole purpose, they say, as placeholders for the classified files that they found, but for the sole purpose also of creating that stunt photo of the crime scene to make it appear that that is how the documents were found in those boxes. That simply is just one more lie misrepresentation, not just to the public, but to Judge Cannon as well.

So we should have some more interesting developments this week. Last night, Judge Cannon put a hold on a very important hearing related to what classified material the defense was going to present at trial. She has put a hold on that deadline, and I suspect that she is right now preparing a blistering order about this case to Jack Smith, the recent revelations about mishandling evidence and continuing to put this case towards trial, despite what we now know, prosecutorial abuse, tampering and doctoring evidence and withholding it, all of this information from the defense. All right, baby, man, do we have a meme for you about all of this? And there's only one person actually from only one organization that has been fighting for these results and has

been messaging the only lawyers with balls out here. I can say it right because he's not on camera just yet, but the only lawyers with balls out here that can actually fight and have been fighting for these cases and against this style of prosecution has been the Article 3 Project. Will Chamberlain, senior counsel at the Article 3 Project, joins us now. Will, I'm not going to say that you have balls while you're on camera here. I'm just saying that the Article 3 project is an incredible organization. And you guys are seeing some incredible results here. These are not great days for Jack Smith. No, this is a very bad day for Jack Smith. And I mean, it's a bad day also for the entire effort, welfare effort against the

president, right? We have the news that came out this morning that the Georgia Court of Appeal is going to hear the question of whether Fannie Willis should be disqualified. I predicted that the district court's ruling had this basic flaw, which is they said that there's this obvious appearance of impropriety, but yet you can cure the appearance of impropriety by firing, getting rid of only Nathan Wade and not Fannie Willis, too. That was just never going to work, wasn't going to stand up to scrutiny. And so I expect that now that the Georgia Court of Appeal has agreed to hear the case, it didn't have to.

It could have just sent it back to lower court. That case is Fannie Willis is about to get kicked off that case. And who knows if it'll ever go to trial, frankly. So you predict that Fannie wills is about to get kicked off that case and who knows if it'll ever go to trial frankly so you so you predict the fanny wills off yeah i mean the the basic reason is i think if there's an appearance of impropriety i don't think georgia wants to have a rule that prosecutors can stay on a case with an appearance of impropriety um that they should be kicked off and then uh the reason that i think it'll ultimately i don't think it'll ever go to trial is because it's such a mess of a case. Like it's this massive, complicated RICO case with 20 defendants,

all of whom have the resources to hire lawyers. What district attorney's office wants to be bogged down by that? The only reason you do it is for, you know, kind of political stardom and ambition. But if another district attorney's office has to take the case, I think they'll look at it and be like, this is stupid. We don't want it. We don't have the time. So look, so you're senior legal counsel at the Article 3 project. I was watching some of the commentary from some legal analysts that I really like yesterday with this whole delayed indefinitely thing with the Trump documents case. And many were saying like this thing has also such a tire fire that there's no way it's going to this case will see the inside of a courtroom. They don't think that

the government will actually push forward with it. Jack Smith has yet to identify like what the crime was, which is kind of it's kind of insane. I mean, it's it's there's a slew of problems because, you know, you have this whole classified evidence discovery problem, which is normally you just send back documents back and forth because the documents in question are classified. There's been this massive litigation dispute about like, okay, how did the defense attorneys get to review it? Under what circumstances? How do they get proper access? And so that's one problem. Then you have this new spoliation problem where apparently one, they staged the photo with all the classified, like the cover sheets.

And then second, the fact that they didn't record exactly where the documents were, they didn't do a good job preserving the evidence. All that bears on President Trump's intent. So like, you know, depending on the condition of the documents, where they were found, it goes to the state of mind necessary to actually prove a crime under the classified documents issues. And that doesn't even get to the fundamental issue. If he's a former president, he has the right. He had the right to see all these documents. He had the right to classify them unilaterally if he so chose. Yeah. So the story that was told is that Donald Trump grabbed the nuclear secrets,

shoved them down the front of his pants and sort of flopped the red tie over it and wobbled out of the White House with those documents. That is totally untrue. And now the emails are showing that the GSA had pallets of Trump documents and then they forced them into Mar-a-Lago. Effectively, the FBI said, you've got to take all these. And they shipped them down to Mar-a-Lago. Jack Smith doesn't know which document was in what box. How the hell are they ever going to prove that the government didn't plant classified documents at Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago? How can you prove that? I don't think you can. And I think that's why any sound prosecutor at this point would dismiss the

case. I mean, they just don't, they don't have the ability to prove this case beyond a reasonable doubt that they didn't, they, I don't think they did before and they certainly don't now. And it's, and it's really remarkable when you compare it with, you know, Joe Biden and the classified documents that were found in his garage. I mean, and the big difference there is he had no authority to declassify. He had no authority to take those documents out of the skip. He saw those when he was a senator, some of them. And when he was vice president, that's he doesn't, you know, classification authority flows from the president.

And, you know, he's only getting off because obviously the Robert Hurd, the special counsel found him to be a feeble old man. Could you, could you explain to me, um, like what is it that judge Eileen Cannon is going to hear when she has a hearing with this? She didn't schedule some hearings. One hearing was on the legality of Jack Smith as a special counsel. Now that's very interesting. Ed Meese, obviously legend in the legal profession, uh, under Reagan, works with the Heritage Foundation. Ed Meese is like, Jack Smith isn't legal and shouldn't have these rights. And that got me to sort of stop.S. attorney's office. So somebody in, for example, the Southern District of Florida, that person is appointed, nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate. And that's what gives them the authority to exercise the power of the federal government. Lying prosecutors obviously are not appointed, right? You're just assistant district attorneys, but their authority flows from their boss who is confirmed by the Senate. Jack Smith runs his own office and he should be under law a Senate confirmed attorney, a Senate confirmed U.S. attorney, but he's not, right? He's a private

citizen. He was a private citizen when Merrick Garland tapped him. He never faced Senate confirmation. And as a result, the entire prosecution therefore just doesn't have a legitimate basis to flow from, especially because he's a special counsel. He's barely reporting to Merrick Garland, much less so than normal standard US attorneys. So basically, they managed to circumvent the entire process of Senate confirmation. And as a result, we have this bizarre circumstance where the attorney general just has his personal appointee doing all this work. And you're from the DMV area. I know that perhaps you're familiar with McDonald versus the Supreme versus the United States, the Jack Smith's famous case where he was over overruled. I know inside of a liberal Supreme Court for doing a very similar hatchet job on Bob McDonald,

who is a very popular governor of Virginia, might have run for president against Barack Obama. And shockingly, as we looked through this case, we're not legal scholars, but we can read the we can read the ruling. They said that Jack Smith didn't prove intent. It's the same thing. It's the same case. He didn't prove intent and wasn't able and wasn't able to prove that the governor's acts didn't fall within his official duties. And so the Supreme Court like smashes the guy over the exact same case, although he was able to destroy his career, which seemed to be the actual goal. Yeah. And it's not, I mean, Democrats have been doing lawfare against Republicans like this to have political, with political consequences for decades. I mean, you can go all the way back

to Ted Stevens and Obamacare. So think about this. Ted Stevens was a Senator from Alaska. Under Obama, they went after him hard. This was when there was like a 51-49 majority in the Senate or something. They went after Ted Stevens hard. They indicted him for a similar bribery idea. And in this case, it wasn't the Supreme Court that slapped him down. It was actually post conviction in the district court. Evidence was revealed that some of the FBI agents and the attorneys were lying to the court and weren't fully can't, you know, were weren't, you know, in the spirit of candor, weren't actually revealing everything that they knew. And Judge Emmett Sullivan, who later obviously was not great in Michael Flynn, but Judge Emmett Sullivan actually overturned the conviction. And I think some of the lawyers in that case got disbarred and there actually might've been some prosecutions of the government agents involved.

But you know what? It didn't matter because Ted Stevens lost his election and that gave Obama the super majority he needed, I think, to get Obamacare through. Incredible. They play on a different level. It's so evil. It's so banal. And it's so important to have people that are willing to fight. And it's so important to have the Article 3 project because you guys are the only one. I've been friends with Mike for a long time. You guys are the only ones who have actually thrown people in lockers around here and are like actually fighting against this. And we're deeply appreciative for it. Odds on of Jack Smith

being able to remain special counsel if this actually gets a hearing? I mean, it's not better than 50-50, honestly, I don't think. I think that I mean, it's a it's a novel issue. So I'm reluctant to just go ahead and prognosticate on how the Supreme Court's going to rule. But I mean, I read Ed Meese's brief. I thought it was persuasive. I think it's the right argument. And it's sloppy of Merrick Garland. In the past, when Trump appointed special counsels, for example, the way you get around

this problem is you take somebody who's already a U.S. attorney somewhere, who's already gone through the confirmation process, and then you put them on the special counsel investigation as the leader so that that's how you get around you solve the problem of whoever's running the special counsel office needs to be a senate confirmed person they just didn't do that here he just literally found like this super hyper aggressive prosecutor that was hanging out at the hay prosecuting european war criminals and just yoinked him over here and said, OK, you're prosecuting the president now. It's not how it works. Does seem like a big yoink.

The whole thing is a perfect adjective. There's a big is a big giant yoink job. Ladies and gentlemen, if you don't want to be yoinked around, you got to follow Will Chamberlain. Make sure that you follow Will and the Article 3 project. He is at Will Chamberlain on X. And thank you so much for being on the show, Will. Absolutely. Thanks for having me, Ben. Oh, baby. Okay. So we got to move on. We're moving so quickly. Donald Trump's lawyer,

Christina Bob, will be joining us in just a moment. So let's move very quickly to Stormy Daniels in New York. Apparently, Stormy Daniels absolutely, absolutely destroyed the case against Donald Trump in New York yesterday. Here are the headlines. Stormy Daniels testimony so lurid that it almost derailed Trump trial. How porn stars lively claims about spanking and condoms and STDs sparked a slew of objections before the judge called her difficult to control. Whoa. This is wild. Okay, so get a load of this.

Here's what CNN had to say. You don't know how bad it is. Here's what CNN had to say about the dumpster fire, the absolute lot lizard dumpster fire of Stormy Daniels is testimony yesterday. The cross exam. Boy, her responses were disastrous. I mean, do you hate Donald Trump? Yes, of course she does. That's a big deal. When the witness hates the person whose liberty is at stake, that's a big damn deal. And she's putting out tweets, fantasizing about him being in jail. That really undermines the credibility. The fact that she owes him $500,000, by order of a court,

owes Donald Trump a half million dollars and said, I will never pay him, I will defy a court order. The defense is going to say she's willing to defy a court order. She's not willing to respect an order of a judge. Why is she going to respect this oath she took? So I thought it went quite poorly on cross-exam. At the end of direct, I thought, okay, they got what they needed, but I think the cross is making real inroads. Dude, how bad does it have to be when CNN's like, you just destroyed your case? How bad is that? I mean, it's really bad. Dude, let's move on over to MSNBC. MSNBC was like straight up panicking

on air saying like the judge was pissed off at Stormy Daniels in the courthouse. I really wish there were cameras in that courthouse. Let's go. Basic feeling is like, wow, this is a colorful, maybe hyper colorful witness. But how much more is the jury also watching Donald Trump and maybe his reaction to some of those very, just let's say, details of that sexual encounter? Right. So I looked for that pretty carefully. It was mainly on Stormy. They were taking her in. I was looking at Trump some, and he had a general kind of impassiveness. Not glowering exactly, but obviously not happy. But the basic dynamic was jury to Stormy. And then, again, I haven't seen Mayor Chun in this trial be so sort of irritated.

And it came across I think as being irritated with her level of detail that's something if you're the DA you're worried about because you don't want them to think that he the judge is actually I'm displeased in any way with the witness wait so the judge is pissed off at Stormy Daniels this This is how MSNBC, that guy was in the courtroom. And he's like, what the hell is going on here? It's getting bad. So there was a federal judge who went on CNN. So there's a federal judge, goes on CNN,

and says this just destroyed the case. Get a load of this, watch. The material that came in was not relevant to this criminal case at all. And I think it shows that she was trying to get Trump. I actually thought there was a motive there. She said she hates him. She said she'd like to see him in prison. I think she was purposely throwing out this stuff to make sure the jury jurors were prejudiced, particularly the women jurors, but probably half of the men, too,

were really put off. So, ladies and gentlemen, we have a massive problem. Our hands are here. It's not a problem. It's really exciting. There's total collapse. It's all collapsing. Everything, New York, Georgia, Florida, it's all being destroyed. Every one of these cases is being destroyed. It's all collapsing in real time.

You can call it providential. You can call it an act of God. Call it whatever you want. Alina Haba, I was really looking forward to this clip. Alina Haba destroying Stormy Daniels, the lady that signed a document saying that this affair never happened. The lady who owes Donald Trump $600,000. Alina Haba taking no prisoners.

That the prosecution whose case, frankly, in my opinion, has been destroyed is completely discredited. And now they are saying as of yesterday that they want another two weeks. And that to me says it all, Sean, and the American people need to remember one thing. This case is not about defamation. It is not about a woman. It is about a record keeping category that was frankly correct, made in Trump Tower by the Trump organization. Somebody in accounting who did nothing wrong, who's never spoken to President

Trump while President Trump was doing what in the Oval Office running the country. And that is what D.A. Alvin Bragg is trying to now put a former president on trial for. It's not about the felony counts. It's not about what we heard today. That is a distraction. It is about one thing, Sean, you know it and I know it, and that is to keep Donald Trump out of the campaign trail because Biden can't beat him, period, the end. His poll numbers are amazing and he's not even campaigning. So this is what they have to do. And then put an unconstitutional gag order so that on the days that he can campaign, he can't speak. He can't defend himself. What I have seen is absolute demise of American judicial system.

You you said it perfectly in your monologue, Sean. I can't believe what I've seen for the last two days in that courtroom. And now you've got a judge who will not grant a mistrial when they violated parameters that he gave. They did not care. They went ahead and put salacious information that was frankly false. We know that from from words that were said prior to this trial. And now we're sitting here scratching our heads, wondering where taxpayer dollars are going. That's such a great point there at the very end there. They're paying. They're making us pay for this. They're abusing these offices, making us pay for

this. I am more I am more in agreement, ladies and gentlemen, by the day with Mike Davis scorched earth policy of you should find Trump plus 50 districts here in Florida, judges who donated to Donald Trump, prosecutors who worked for Donald Trump, right? Come right over from Donald Trump's DOJ and you should go try Biden. Do it. I mean, at what point, like, listen, the prosecutor, Michael Colangelo, worked for Biden's DOJ, took money from the DNC. So let's get RNC prosecutors in to go try Biden in Trump plus 50 districts with Trump judges wearing MAGA hats. Okay. It's the exact same thing. It is the exact same setup. It's such a fraud on the American people. And there are people who are now finally seeing the truth. Somebody who's been speaking the truth for a very long time. Somebody who's

worked with Alina Havis and he's worked with Trump. Somebody who's been like at Trump's side. And we are so honored to have on the program is the senior counsel to the RNC. Christina Bob joins the show live now. Christina, it's such an honor to have you on the program. Thank you so much for joining us. I don't think you were in the courtroom in New York, but it didn't look good. Didn't look very pretty from what we saw. No, this is what happens when you bring bad cases with bad charges with bad facts. It has a hard time standing up under its own weight. And I think that's what we're seeing happen pretty much across the board. There isn't any good news if you are Joe Biden over the last 24 to 48 hours. In fact, there is a lot of reason to be like reaching for the bottle of Xanax, right? Okay. And another like pack of adult diapers, right?

Yeah, I think they have overplayed their hand. Every time they overplay their hand, we go, oh my gosh, they're overplaying their hand. And then they double down and double down and double down. And they're getting to the point where they can't stand up under the weight of their own corruption, under the weight of their own lies, under the weight of their own deceit, under the weight of their own fraud, all of this propaganda that they're trying to perpetuate among the American people through the court system. I mean, it's just falling apart. So this is really interesting because you've been by Donald Trump's side for a very, very long time. And maybe you could give us, I mean, it's been

years, right? Like maybe you can give us some insight into how the man is aging in reverse, how the guy seems to be handling all this so well. I mean, did he know that the documents case was going to be delayed indefinitely? Did he know the appeals court was going to pick up that Fannie Willis stuff? It's remarkable. It's really remarkable. And I don't know what to chalk it up to other than what you said earlier. Is it divine providence? That's the only thing I can think of because I genuinely believe, I have spent a fair amount of time with President Trump. I've worked with him and I've gone through really difficult times with him as well. And I can tell

you, I do not believe that he has the ability to cave. He doesn't have the ability to give in, to make his life easier, to make it all go away, just to get them to stop. He's just not built that way. So when they put this plan into place to go after Donald Trump saying, oh, we'll get them to stop. He's just not built that way. So when they put this plan into place to go after Donald Trump saying, oh, we'll get him to break, we'll get him to bow out, we'll get him to go away quietly so that we can still keep control of the United States government, they picked the wrong person because he's not going down. And what they're doing is going to end up taking down their entire criminal structure that they've put together to try to criminalize political opposition.

Yeah, that's exactly right. It really does seem like there's a big Uno reverse moment happening right now. We haven't we haven't exactly built we haven't built the graphics package yet for the show, but we're going to build the Uno reverse because everything seems to be flipping. OK, so let's let's let's zero in on just two or three quick things from breaking news. And I'd like to talk about the RNC in a second. So breaking news at, at time of show, at time of going live today, Fannie Willis appeals court is gonna hear the Fannie Willis disqualification case. Um, we likened it to pissing in a pool. Um, it's the best we could come up with. You got to drain the whole pool. Okay. You just get rid of half the water. You got it. You got to drain the whole pool. Sorry for this sort of crude allegory there, but

perhaps you could illuminate for us. Like, what are your thoughts on that case? What do you think? I mean, what are the chances Fannie will is going to continue on? I actually think it's the perfect analogy and I've used it myself. When you pee in the pool, you can't separate it anymore. The damage is done and you have to drain the whole pool. And with Fannie Willis, the thing that struck me as odd as an attorney, when two attorneys are conflicted, that means both attorneys are conflicted. It's not like, oh, well, one gets to keep the conflict and the other one has to go away, which is what the trial court had ruled. No, if you're conflicted, you're conflicted. Neither of you should be able to stay. So I hope that the

appeals court takes a real serious look at this and says, you know, we probably should follow the law once in a while. Because that's the way every other attorney conflict works is if both attorneys are if they have a conflict with each other, and they started the case together, and they did the case together, meaning they put together the grand jury, right, and they got the indictment together, they're both indictment together. They're both conflicted out. You can't just keep one and make the other one go away. This is a high school prom. They both have to leave the case. So I don't know what the appeals court is going to do, but that's what they should do.

I'm arguing against our own programming here because I'd love nothing more than to see Fannie Willis with her dress on backwards, with her upside down American flag pin, throwing papers, right? Lying under oath. I've never been to the White House. Well, the Secret Service says otherwise. How stupid are you? It would be great for daytime television. Doesn't seem like the brightest bulb in the box.

Seems like she's got some other major problems going on with firing whistleblowers. It's a bit of a tire fire down there in Fulton County. Well, if you think about it, those are the kind of people that the crazy globalists need to bring cases like this. Because smart, hardworking attorneys who care about their bar license and who care about their ethical obligations don't bring cases like this. And so you have to find someone willing to do it. And the problem that they have is the people willing to do it are people like Fannie Willis who bring a plethora of their own problems. So I don't think they're going to have a clean case in any of these cases. I think they're all going to be quite difficult because of the caliber of the case being brought. It's

quite low. So Ed Meese at the Heritage Foundation, obviously a legend in the legal space and one of the smartest, most thoughtful legal scholars there is, issued to the Supreme Court a brief saying Jack Smith's illegal, right? And then we saw yesterday Judge Cannon say, I'm going to hear that. I'm going to hear that case as to whether Jack Smith has the lawful authority to be the special counsel. Now, that's super interesting to me, along with the delay of the indefinite delay of the trial. Do you think that Jack Smith has legal authority as special counsel? Well, I don't I don't think he does. I don't think he is a correctly appointed and confirmed special counsel. And he's certainly not from without the outside of the government. He doesn't

meet the actual definition of being outside the government. He doesn't meet the actual definition of being outside the government. He's from the Department of Justice. So I think it's a very good motion. And I read that motion a while ago. And at the time that I read it, I thought it had a lot of merit to it. So I'll be real curious to see what Judge Cannon says about it. But we have to start holding the line on the law. This is what happens when we have attorneys and judges go, well, it's not really legal, but okay, you know, okay, fine. We don't want to fight you on it. Okay, fine.

And everyone says, okay, fine. Okay, fine. Well, suddenly you have cases like Fannie Willis in Georgia or, you know, the Jack Smith case where people go, you know, I don't think anything about this is legal. How did we get here? And we get here because quite honestly, conservative attorneys haven't been fighting and they haven't been pushing back and they haven't been saying, no, we are going to stand on the letter of the law. We are going to make sure the law is enforced and we're going to enforce it exactly as it's

written. And we haven't really been doing a good job of that in this country for a while. And now, thankfully, we're starting to see kind of a resurgence of conservatives saying, no, no, no, we're actually going to make sure the law is followed. And I really hope that the judges follow suit. Again, you've worked with Donald Trump for a long time. I have no idea how long you've been an attorney, but you've risen up in the ranks about, you know, really high. You must be great at your job. I, as somebody who went to community college, I'm no lawyer, but even I know that if you go to a crime scene and you're a member of

law enforcement and you decide to doctor the crime scene in a way that looks worse for the, for the accused, then, um, you become the criminal, right? Like if you plant evidence at a crime scene, that's no bueno. Um, you might get an Uno get an uno reverse on that. And that is exactly what we've just learned over the last 48 hours. Jack Smith did. He affixed classified document markings to classified documents. He reorganized where all the documents were. The documents were held at GSA and then shoved onto Trump's property. So who knows if the government actually planted the evidence there, where the classified documents were, and then we know that all the photos were staged. So how does this case

continue? It shouldn't. I mean, those are really concerning facts. And what's so great about the way these cases are unfolding, now don't get me wrong, I don't believe they should have been brought in the first place, but they chose to bring these wild and crazy cases. So they're bringing them and they're unfolding in a way as you just so eloquently pointed out, you don't have to be a lawyer to see that it's complete bunk. Anybody can look at this and go, there's something wrong with that. And so I would say the silver lining of all of the turmoil that we've all been put through over the last several years is it's so obvious that the media is having a hard time covering it up you know it used to be they could kind of tweak things

here and there and throw in some legalese and legal mumbo jumbo to where the public was like okay i don't really get it but i okay i guess it's fine uh they can't do that anymore it's falling apart and anybody can see hey they're treating donald trump one way they're treating joe biden who actually did have classified documents who actually was not authorized to have them and stored them in a very insecure area. They're treating them very differently. I'm not a lawyer, but I can see that. That's not right. So I would say that's the silver lining to all of this is it's plain as day what they're doing. So silver linings. You're now at the RNC. We've been waiting for somebody with some brass to come

into the RNC and really like tighten the ship up a little bit. Like where the hell, where the hell were you the last couple of years? Right? Like what are you doing with the money? I don't, whatever. I didn't go. Okay. So, so time gone by new leadership, Laura Trump, big time, Michael Watley, Laura Trump fans around here. And the question that we have is obviously what happens in the lead up to elections and on election day to preserve the integrity of our election? Yeah, absolutely. So I'm thrilled with Chairman Whatley and co-chair Laura Trump. They both care very deeply about election integrity. And certainly that's something that is really important to me and something I've been working on for the president for the last few years and reporting on it prior to working for the president.

So that's great news that this is something that they are really focused on and care a lot about. The RNC has a program called Protect the Vote. You can go to protectthevote.com and sign up to be a part of it and get trained as a poll worker observer in your area. The lead up to the election in my my calculated opinion is that we need a lot of people involved. This is not an election where you can just vote or just donate, although we're very grateful for donations. We need people. We need people involved to work the election. If you, you know, can't get in touch with the RNC, get in touch with your state party. If your state party is, some are more organized than others, and we're working really hard right now to kind of beef that up to make sure that the state parties have what they need to really serve the grassroots and serve

the volunteers, but get involved some way. And there's a lot of great groups outside the RNC, outside the state parties, if you feel strongly, you know, I know some people have strong opinions about it. So there are other groups out there as well, but whatever you do get involved, we need everybody involved. This is an all hands on deck moment. Yeah. We work very closely with a turning point. Turning point action is fantastic group.

They're doing an amazing job with get out the vote, working closely with Scott Pressler as well. He has his own organization. And so it is. It's going to be a massive team effort. We're very, very excited about some major events coming up. There's a Turning Point Action event that's going to feature Donald Trump in Detroit

in a couple of weeks. So we'll be at that one as well. So moving forward, strategy, 2024. Well, I think for less than six months, I think we're less than six months. Christina, what is the strategy? What are the main key takeaways for winning this thing? It does seem like you got the wind at your back.

It's crazy to say. Yeah, no, certainly. The strategy is the American people. I mean, this comes down, this is the American people's time to determine who comes down, this is the American people's time to determine who their leaders are. And I know there's a lot of concerns about illegals registering to vote

and cleaning up the voter rolls and a lot of the concerns with election integrity. If you have concerns about it, the way you help alleviate those concerns is to get involved because the more people are involved, the more you gain the momentum yourself to realize, hey, there's a lot of us.

I spent the last couple of days in Wisconsin with a bunch of the grassroots groups out there. And it's just really encouraging to see everybody on the ground. I know you work with turning point and see all of those groups. When you're part of a group like that, you get really excited and go, okay, we can do this. We can do this. But the key, truly, truly the key to securing and prevailing in 2024 in November is people

involved, people involved. We like to say, you know, the left controls the media. It's a very far left media with the big megaphones and all that. But we have the people, the American people support Donald Trump. The American people support America first values. And so we need the American people involved. So please get involved. Go to protectthevote.com, go to Turning Point, go to whatever group you like, but whatever you do,

get involved because there's a place for you. We need you, whatever your skillset is, however extroverted or introverted you are, there is a place for you. So please get involved. So that you just bring up something I have to ask a follow-up question on. Criminal illegals voting in the election, That is something that is a D of obviously deep concern. And many people were saying that was the play in the first place with the open border. Uh, how do you counteract that? Um, and are you focused on that at the RNC? A hundred percent. That's one of, uh, one of our biggest focuses actually. And it's hard. I'm not going to lie. It's a very challenging issue because you want to make sure that you're protecting people who have the lawful right to vote. And you don't

want to be disenfranchising anybody. But yeah, it's very concerning to see massive groups of people flooding across the border and then see, I'm sure you've seen a lot of the undercover reporting coming out and information coming out saying that these groups are then registering these people to vote in all 50 states and the states that they show up in. So it's very concerning. How do you, it's again, it's like peeing in a swimming pool. How do you undo it? So what I would say is we need people involved at the county level, working for the counties, the people who manage voter rolls and are responsible at the counties for ensuring that lawful votes are cast. When the mail-in ballots come in, we need to have people there making sure,

following the law to make sure that those votes that are coming in are lawful votes and only lawful votes are counted. So it comes down to eyeballs. How many eyeballs can we get on in the, basically the chain of custody where we legally can have everybody? We need people involved because yes, I genuinely believe this is their plan for 2024. And the way we stop it is by having as many people as possible in the chain of custody

for the documents to make sure that it's the lawful votes that are counted. So you genuinely believe that the plan is to have the 10 million plus illegals that have come into this country illegally vote in the election, register them to vote, and that will push Joe Biden over the line in a close election. I think that's certainly part of their strategy. I think it's a big part of their strategy. And I think they care less about the illegals actually voting and care more about the registration. We've seen that they have a very robust, whether you want to call it ballot harvesting or ballot trafficking, depending on whether it's legal or not. You know, we're seeing that these nonprofit organizations are stepping up to justify the residency. They are saying, yes, these illegal immigrants are staying with us,

their residence is with us. So when the mail-in ballots go out, they're just getting mailed to these nonprofits because supposedly that's where these immigrants are living. So yeah, I definitely think that's part of their plan. What else they're going to do, God only knows, but that's certainly a large part of it. Yeah. But you're illegal. You're illegal. You don't have a social security number. Nobody knows where you're from. Illegals can get social security numbers. They can actually. So then this is the play then? It's a large part of it. I don't know that it, I wouldn't say it's the only play,

but it's certainly a part of it. Yes. And I'm not trying to scare anybody. We can combat this. Please don't misunderstand. We're preparing for it, but we need the American people's help. We need people to get involved, to have eyes on, to make sure that it's legal voters and legal votes that are cast and that our votes are not being diluted by this invasion across our southern border. So I'm not trying to scare anybody. The size of the problem is big, but we absolutely can secure it, but we can't do it without the American people. Nor am I a doomer or anything, right? We do our best to be chipper on the program, but I just don't know how an election monitor looks at somebody with a social security number who came here illegally, who has a ballot. Like, I don't know how they stop somebody who is unlawful to vote, but yet the system has allowed them to vote. Like, I don't

know how that stopped, right? Well, yeah. I mean, it's going to depend on each state and the voting procedures for each state. Again, we're not allowed to ask the voters their citizenship, which certainly plays into allowing the legals to register. So there's a lot of challenges to it, but it's not insurmountable. But there are challenges to it. The best solution is to make sure that as many American citizens who can legally vote and legally participate are involved in the process. I mean, that is democracy, right? I know we have a constitutional republic, but as far as democracy goes, isn't it best to have as many people involved in the process as possible to get the best result?

That's what it is. And so that's what we're trying to encourage is have as many people involved in the process as possible. Too big to rig is my favorite campaign slogan. I like that. For the president, that's my favorite. I hope that he trots that out. I hope he continues that level of messaging. You have to activate people who haven't voted in the last 40 years and let them know. I think there's enough people pissed off at Joe Biden that it really won't matter. That's what we

see in the polls. Yeah, no, I think that's right. I genuinely think that's right. I think there's enough people pissed off at Joe Biden that it really won't matter. That's what we see in the polls. But, you know? Yeah, no, I think that's right. I genuinely think that's right. I think President Trump is going to prevail in this election. I don't even think it's going to be close. Of course, we're preparing for a very close election, but I honestly don't think it's going to be.

I think it's going to be a decisive victory for Donald Trump. We should have an answer on election night. We're prepared if we don't, but if we have enough people involved, just like Virginia in 2021, they had a result on election night, even though it was so close to 2020. And I think we can do that again here. So that's the goal. So you're ready. So you're ready with lawsuits. You're ready to like lock down these polling locations and say, no, you know, no more voting, no more ballot drops at 3 a.m. Well, we're prepared to have eyes on and do everything that we legally can do. Yeah. I mean, I don't have control to lock down polling locations, but certainly having eyes on and

collecting the evidence. I sincerely hope we don't get to that. I worked post 2020 and I don't want post election challenges this time around. I would much rather just win outright. And that's certainly the goal. So if we have post election challenges, go be it. But my every intention of mine is to make sure we have an outright victory and there is no post election challenge. Good. Okay. Well, that would be amazing. That would make for an easier night, I suppose for us, we'll have champagne and we'll be ready to pop it.

Christina, Bob, we say thank you so much for your work. I mean, obviously, it's like so great to have somebody who's willing to fight and able to fight. And please come on the show again. The audience loves you. Oh, thanks, Benny. Thanks for everything you do. Your voice is so powerful and I'm grateful for all you're doing all right godspeed all right ladies and gentlemen okay so we have with so many stories that we didn't get a chance to get to but there is something that we're doing regularly, uh, with our program where we are allowing Donald Trump,

uh, the capacity to speak. Uh, this is a clip E, uh, Eric, Eric, this is a clip E Donald Trump. We didn't get a chance to, to go to the president and allow him to speak. This is Trump after stormy Daniels's testimony yesterday, uh, again, which was a lizard lot tire fire. And you got Donald Trump saying the case is done. It's all collapsed. It's all finished. We always want, because Trump has gagged and because Trump can't get out on the campaign trail, we feel like this is our obligation to let the president speak. Here's Trump from yesterday. So this was a very big day, a very revealing day. As you see, their case is totally falling apart. They have nothing on books and records and even something that should bear very little relationship to the case. It's just a disaster for the DA, for the Soros-backed DA. It's a disaster.

This whole case is just a disaster. If you read the legal scholars, you'll see, because they're writing about it, they've never seen anything quite like it. And neither have I. I should be out campaigning right now. We're leading in all the polls. I'd like to be campaigning. We'll be leading by a lot more. But I just want to appreciate, I appreciate the job you're doing. It's not easy standing there all day waiting, but you're hearing the same things that we're hearing. On another matter, as you know, it's Biden's backers that seem to be funding what's going on with the Palestinians, probably not Palestinians, agitators, bad agitators, really bad.

And I think our government ought to find out who they are, where they're from, and treat them the same way as they do the J6 hostages. You've got to treat them the same way. These are agitators. They're really hurting our country. It's happening all over the country in cities. So what happened last night at the Metropolitan Museum, these are agitators. And in some of the colleges, I think it's about 20% student and 80% others. So this is a big problem, but they better nip it in the bud. And it's a problem from the left, not from the right. This is a problem from the left. And I hope you're going to stress that.

The economy is not doing well. You see inflation is through the roof. They're not going to be able to lower interest rates if they do. It's purely political, but it'll be very bad if they do. From the standpoint of getting rid of inflation. You have to get rid of the inflation. Inflation, as you probably have heard me say, it's a country buster. It busts countries, and it has for a thousand years.

You go back and you look at old-time Germany, you look at a lot of countries that went through the kind of inflation we're going through, and they're busted. They are just broken up, broken up in many cases into little pieces, and that's what could actually happen to us. So we have to get inflation under control. We have to get prices down so that people can breathe, people can live, so they can live.

But again, this was a very revealing day in court. Any honest reporter would say that. I would recommend you read Jonathan Turley and Andrew McCarthy and Alan Dershowitz, Greg Jarrett, Mark Levin, very talented people, and others. there that are writing about this trial. They're calling it a disgrace. It's a disgrace. In the meantime, I'm stuck. I'm here. Instead of being in Georgia, instead of being in New Hampshire, instead of being in Wisconsin and all the different states that we wanted to be in, we're not able to be there because we're stuck in this trial, which everyone knows is a hoax. Thank very much thank you it's amazing like have you ever heard joe biden talk like this it's like just an aside here but we're like sitting in the studio we're just like man he's like trump's just he's just on fire he's entertaining

he's talking about the collapse he's like off the top of his head rattling off all the legal experts who are sounding off on this he's able to just go extemporaneous for three and a half minutes. You ever seen that with Joe Biden? You ever seen Joe Biden talk for 30 seconds? It's remarkable. There is so much good energy out there right now. I got an amazing meme from one of my favorite meme makers, Dre, Drefenzer on, on X. I've been wanting to play this, and I thought right after the Trump clip would be a perfect time to play this. If you're a Dark Knight fan, you're going to love this.

Okay, hold on. Let's play it again. Let's play it again. Jack Smith, watching the DC. Boom. Okay. Okay. let's play it again let's play it again jack smith watching the dc okay okay all right good uh donald trump giving his commentary at the court with his uh gold with his gold tie looking sharp donald trump's property are ensconced in gold and that's because gold connotes value there is value ladies and gentlemen in gold there's a dependability actually in crazy times and i think times are about to get much crazier you're donald trump talking about america

going the way of weimar germany with the inflation and over printing of the money i think this is something that's going to happen here obviously and you should prepare go to my friends at allegiance gold legion's gold can help you out they can convert convert your 401k and convert your IRA. And you can save value in doing this. Obviously it is a tumultuous time to be investing. You see that every single day. And imagine what's going to happen after the election when they don't have Joe Biden's economy to prop up. Don't gamble with your financial future. Go to protectwithbenny.com today. Call 844-66-BENNY. Right now you get $5,000 in free silver with a free qualifying purchase. ProtectWithBennie.com today. We have no idea what chemical effect salt has on gold. We don't know.

We don't know. We're not sure. We should look it up. But we do know that there is a salty, salty clip out there that we will play for you right now of Jen Psaki. Jen Psaki is the former spokesperson for Joe Biden. There are very few things that you can be certain of in life, but you can always be sure the sun will rise each morning. You can bet your bottom dollar that you'll always need air to breathe and water to drink. And, of course, you can rest assured that with Public Mobile's 5G subscription phone plans, you'll pay the same thing every month. With all of the mysteries that life has to offer, a few certainties can really go a long way. Subscribe today for the peace of mind you've been searching for. Public Mobile. Different is calling.

He was on her little MSNBC show. The show show that by the way, she had already signed a contract for while she continued to be Joe Biden spokesperson. Okay. Think about that. So she was, she was in the white house acting as the spokesperson for Joe Biden. She'd already signed her MSNBC contract three months earlier. And so she's able to do that those jobs simultaneously in case you're wondering like what a fraudulent system we live in we got our salt here ladies and gentlemen we got also our salt shaker that was made by a wonderful brigade member here we go so we got dual salt jen saki is giving advice to her old boss saying um hey, Hey, uh, Joe, you should just stop talking. You need to stop talking. Don't do any interviews. You're old. You smell like milk of magnesia mixed with moth balls.

You have applesauce dribbling down your face and you'll walk like you have a diaper to change. And so there really is no reason for you to ever speak to anyone here. Ladies and gentlemen is our salt that lib of the day drop salt in the comment section. We'll put it up on screen. Allow us to add some extra sodium to Jen sodium salty sake. Let's go. There's been a lot of criticism of Biden most recently from the New York Times that he's held the fewest interviews and press availabilities of any president since since Reagan. I personally think it would help dispel some of the concerns about his age if he did more. What would your advice be to the White House in

terms of his accessibility to press? Well, I think the benefit of the media environment right now, there's a lot of challenges, but I'm sorry, the optimistic side is that there are so many choices. And when you're communicating from the White House, I mean, respect for freedom of speech and freedom of the press is important. But you're also really just trying to communicate with the with the American people. Right. So my view is he should come on The View before he does a press conference. Thank you. He should because people want to have real conversations. First time I'll ever say this, Joe Biden, you should listen to your really smart advisor,

Jen Psaki. We actually, you should totally go on the view. We'd love that. That would be hilarious. Do it, do it live. Let's go.

We've, we've, we've, we've seen what it looks like when Joe Biden goes on late night TV. We've, we have clips of Jimmy Kimmel literally needing to cut off Joe by Joe Biden, having senior moments spiraling and Jimmy Kimmel cuts them off. And Joe Biden. Joe Biden having senior moments spiraling and Jimmy Kimmel cuts them off and is like, let's go to a commercial break.

Okay. I gotta get out of here. Do it. Just do it. Kamala Harris on Drew Barrymore's show, right? Creepy, cringy little show. Do it. You frauds. And then by the way, have make, like make the view, bring Donald trump on their studios in new york bring on donald trump come on oh we're here for it ladies and gentlemen and we are here for you are you here for us well if you appreciate our programming please make sure that you sign up for the benny brigade at benny johnson.com you can go and sign up for the benny brigade and you can support our programming you get special access to our guests, ask questions, the Ask Benny Anything Friday, along with a ton of other awesome perks. We will mail you. Every new Brigade member gets the official Brigade keychain mailed directly to them.

And most importantly, you support what we do here. And we really deeply, profoundly appreciate that. Costs less than a McDonald's french fry per month, and well, free speech is priceless. And McDonald's french fries have a lot of salt on them, so we also like salt. So there you go. I'm not telling you to go eat french fries. I am going to tell you the truth, though, right now at our verse of the day. We say a lot on this program, but we ensure that we always speak the truth for our verse of the day from Psalms. The Lord is with me. I will not be afraid. What mere mortals can do to me? What can they do? If the Lord is with me, I will not be afraid. Christina Bob said, hey, maybe what's happening here is providential. We don't know, but we know this. You can fear not. In fact, you're commanded to fear not 365 times in the Bible. It says fear not.

So make sure that you, like, tighten up, right? Don't fear. Don't be fearful, ladies and gentlemen. Like, keep your head held high and keep your chest upright. Stand upright and march on. March on with us. It's your boy, Benny. We're on to victory.

We'll see you. Former MLB All-Star Sean Casey, aka The Mayor, keeps hitting it out of the park. Take my 30 years of experience. Take the wisdom and knowledge I've learned from the failures when I got sent down my rookie year. All the injuries I had to overcome.

Your mind is the most important tool you have in life. Be relentless. Keep charging. It matters how you talk to yourself, how you look at the world. That matters. We talk about that. I don't know. I'm fired up.

Baseball's back, and it's going to be incredible. I love it. The Mayor's Office with Sean Casey from Believe. Follow and listen on your favorite platform.