The Benny Show - Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Confirmation | Fauci, Big Pharma in PANIC as Trump Saves Kids

Episode Date: January 29, 2025

Robert F Kennedy Jr Testifies before the Senate and Trump White House sends mass email to government asking if they would like to quit. Check Out Our Partners: Advantage Gold: Get your FREE wealth protection kit https://www.abjv1trk.com/F6XL22/4MQCFX/?sub1=Youtube American Financing: Save with https://www.americanfinancing.net/benny NMLS: 182334, http://www.nmlsconsumeraccess.org Patriot Mobile: Go to https://www.PatriotMobile.com/Benny and get A FREE MONTH Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Today is Wednesday, January 29th, 2025. January's just flown by. It's never experienced a faster month in my life. RFK Jr. testifies before the Senate. Trump White House sends mass email to government employees to tell them all to resign. It's amazing. Thousands upon thousands of government employees

got a resignation offer yesterday from Elon Musk at Doge. And we have the resignation letters here for you and we'll read them live on the program. And ladies and gentlemen, the publisher of The Federalist, Sean Davis, who's very, very smart, quick as a whip, a father himself, will be joining the program.

When we have time for a guest. We are going to, of course, be prioritizing full stop the RFK Jr. testimony today. My name is Benny Johnson, and this is The Benny Show. Ladies and gentlemen, I told you yesterday I would bring in my Advantage Gold coin. Talk about preserving things from the wilderness. Look at that. Look at that. Beautiful. It's got like a little wolf on it. It's amazing. This is solid silver. It weighs. You can feel it. You can hold it in your hot little hands. It's real. It's authentic. It's practical. And it's a way that you can diversify your money, diversify your investments, and diversify into something that will withstand the test of time. Do you see how gold performed? If you'd believe me and listen to me a year ago,

two years ago, gold is the number one performing asset in the market year over year. It creates opportunities and creates a capacity for you to have wealth and generational wealth, actually. Gold isn't just an old school investment, it's actually cutting edge wealth preservation, especially in the time of scams and in the time of relentless instability in the markets. Okay? So if you're looking to own physical gold,

especially inside of your retirement accounts, text Benny to 85545 right now. And Advantage Gold, my friends, will send you a 100% free obligation gold investment guide. Plus, you could qualify for $1,000 in free silver right here. Boom. One time, text Benny to 85545. Join America's new generation of smart investors. Text Benny to 85545 and let Advantage Gold help you with your metal needs today. All right, ladies and gentlemen, talk about some heavy metal.

I want to get to this. I want to get to like a number of kick-ass RFK flashbacks from the campaign season. Obviously, the most powerful thing that RFK did during the campaign season was drop out of the race and unite with President Trump. And now we've heard behind the scenes from Tucker, Don Jr. and from Callie Means yesterday, who's like the de facto advisor and like health nexus behind RFK's movement. We've also heard from Nicole Shanahan this week, who ran for president with RFK, that this was something that happened after Trump was shot in Butler. RFK saw that and was profoundly affected.

In case you're wondering if God takes what man intended for evil and uses it for good, huh, let me show you Butler, President Trump getting pierced in the ear and realizing that there's no siding with evil any longer. I think President Trump actually in his first administration, and you know this because he's admitted to it, had the gloves off. He played nice with these demons. And then something happened in Butler and it was magisterial. It was spiritual. It was super tectonic and kinetic. And you saw Trump change forever. And now you're watching with the reckless abandon upon which he is laying waste to the government bureaucracy and to the people that tried to kill him and wantonly celebrated President Trump's near death. And you realize you cannot you cannot unite with evil. Tolerance is not a Christian virtue. As a president, Trump has been muscularly dispatching the forces of evil that sought to destroy him. And it's been

glorious. And while he set his eyes on those who deserve his vengeance, President Trump united with those who wish to fight alongside of him. And that was RFK. This is a really neat little nexus of how RFK came to drop out. Here's a short clip of that dropout footage, ladies and gentlemen. RFK Jr., this one's in the chat, Klein, ALX. Can you please, can you please, can you please log it here? Yeah, the love kids, please.

Love kids, ladies and gentlemen, in the way that you, like, you actually should, okay? In a way that actually creates policies that protects children, not in the Diddy Epstein way that, of course, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris would gladly protect. But no, actually, in the way that is moral and with certitude defends a child's life. Here we go. President Trump has told me that he wants this to be his legacy. I'm choosing to believe that this time he will follow through. His son, his biggest donors, his closest friends, and all support this objective.

My joining the Trump campaign will be a difficult sacrifice for my wife and children, but worthwhile if there's even a small chance of saving these kids. Ultimately, the only thing that will save our country and our children is if we choose to love our kids more than we hate each other. That's why I launched my campaign to unify America. My dad and uncle made such an enduring mark on the character of our nation, not so much because of any particular policies that they promoted, but because they were able to inspire profound love for our country and to fortify our sense of ourselves as a national community held together by ideals. They were able to put their love into the intentions and hearts of ordinary Americans and to unify a

national populist movement of Americans, blacks and whites, Hispanics, urban and rural Americans, inspired affection and love and high hopes and a culture of kindness that continued to radiate among Americans from their memory. That's the spirit on which I ran my campaign and that I intend to bring into the campaign of President Trump. Instead of vitriol and polarization, I will appeal to the values that unite us. The goals that we could achieve if only we weren't at each other's throats. The most unifying theme for all Americans is that we all love our children. If we all unite around that issue now, we can finally give them the protection, the health, and the future that they deserve.

Thank you all very much. Ladies and gentlemen, this is RFK Jr. unifying with President Trump, saying that we need to love our children more than we hate each other. If we love our children more than we hate each other, then we can save this country. What are you looking at? Obesity rates of 50% in teens and preteens, chronic disease, year over year, exponential explosion, kids addicted to pharmaceuticals from a very young age, everything from child mutilation to the abject electronic addiction and destruction of a child's natural desire to be bountiful and full of energy, desirous of light and outdoor time and space and actual nutrients. Have you ever raised a kid?

Have you ever raised a child? Are you a parent? Do you want to be a parent? Are you a grandparent? You know that that child desires actual real nutrition, nutrient-dense foods, non-toxicity, clean air and water, and the capacity to breathe and move. Children above all else want to move. We call it the raptor hour in my home. When it's like in Jurassic Park, when the cages fail. My wife and I laugh about it every morning. Get to the jeeps, I say to my wife.

When the cages fail and the raptors get out, this is my kids waking up. They come running. You know that? Little footsteps down kids waking up. Dun, dun, dun, dun, dun, dun, dun, dun, dun. They're gonna run it. You know that little footsteps down the hall, you know the vibe? Yeah, okay. Got baby fever?

You know it. Err! You can hear my, you can hear them tearing down the hall. Quick! The cages are failing! It's great. This is the way we were designed.

We were supposed to live like that forever. But there's something in our culture and there's something in our environment that steals that from us. And RFK Jr. has been speaking out against it. He's also spoke out against the Democrat Party. You want to know why Democrats are going to vote against him? Here's your explanation, ladies and gentlemen.

RFK Jr. saying the Democrats left me. Sixteen months ago in April of 2023, I launched my campaign for president of the United States. I began this journey as a Democrat, the party of my father, my uncle, the party which I pledged my own allegiance to long before I was old enough to vote. I attended my first Democratic convention at the age of six in 1960. And back then, the Democrats were the champions of the Constitution, of civil rights. The Democrats stood against authoritarianism, against censorship, against colonialism, imperialism, and unjust wars. We were the party

of labor, of the working class. The Democrats were the party of government transparency and the champion of the environment. Our party was the bulwark against big money interests and corporate power. True to its name, it was the party of democracy. As you know, I left that party in October because it had departed so dramatically on the core values that I grew up with. It had become the party of war, censorship, corruption, big pharma, big tech, big ag, and big money. When it abandoned democracy by canceling the primary to conceal the cognitive decline of the sitting president, I left the party to run as an

independent. Ladies and gentlemen, RFK then of course would go on to say he's endorsing President Trump, that he must unite to love our children more than we hate each other. It gets me in trouble. You know I love our president, but I would consider that arguably the most powerful line spoken in the 2024 election cycle. Obviously, it's a line that united RFK with Donald Trump live on stage in this moment that became then crystallized as one of the most iconic moments in American political history. Wild to think, ladies and gentlemen, that this was arguably just one of many exciting moments in 2024. Donald Trump. Yeah, yeah, we have it. Yeah, yeah. Let it roll. I think he welcomes RFK on stage here. Let's listen. Yeah, okay. ALX, we had a non-copyright.

This is the stupid Foo Fighters with a degenerate freak lead singer who's like a complete mess. It's amazing, the Trump curse is so real, man. Whether it's Tenacious D or the Foo Fighters, you know, they sued Trump for using this. We had a non-CR version of this. Anyway, if you play the Foo Fighters, you know, they sued Trump for using this. We had a non-CR version of this. Anyway, if you play their stupid hero song, then they'll come after you, right, to go take your channel down.

They came after the Trump administration, right? Even though the Trump administration purchased the license for this song. Anyway, I thought we had a copyright-free version, but whatever. Here we go. This is another angle of it, which is just completely epic. RFK welcoming himself into the MAGA and MAHA movement, uniting the movements together the moment that MAHA and MAGA became one. Freaking awesome. We are are minutes away ladies and gentlemen from the rfk junior uh confirmation hearing i'm really glad that we

have the time however and we can show you sort of the the senate here let's let's go ahead and look at the senate now pop over no no You can see him walking in right there. Yeah, you can see. So RFK Jr. just walked in. Just walked in. Need monitors on this. I want to be able to see that. Let's clip that and show him walking into his briefing.

You see everybody here. This is live. And you see everyone here. We are going to be your front row seat to the golden era, ladies and gentlemen. This is live right here inside of the confirmation hearing room. We are still minutes away from RFK Jr. actually taking the dais, and I want you to hear one final thing from RFK on the trail, which is RFK talking about how he's waited his entire life for this moment. He's prayed to God for this moment. I want you to see what's at stake here. Here's RFK Jr. explaining his relationship with God and that he's been praying for this his whole life. I started working on this issue 19 years ago. And for 19 years, I have got every morning,

without one exception, I have said a prayer to God to put me in a position where I could end the chronic disease epidemic. And on August 23rd of this year, God sent me Donald J. Trump. Just great. Just an amazing and unifying moment. We won, and we won. RFK Jr. walking in right now. Let's go.

Here we go. You can see there, RFK. Look at the swarm. Look at the people. A history of dark. Here we go. You can see there, RFK. Look at the swarm. Look at the people. A history of dark. Here we go. Look at him around. Thank you. It's just going to be them blathering. And I do not do not and not interested in hearing what liberal reporters in Washington, D.C. think. Ladies and gentlemen, we are creating a brand new style of news coverage here. Where we will be taking you into the seat with audio of... Okay, yeah, let's hop over.

Yep, hop over. Yep. Here we go. Look at the cameras. Look at the cameras. Look at the number of cameras. Megyn Kelly is there in the room today. A number of big time celebrities are there in the room today. RFK Jr., obviously, a fan of many celebrities.

Reverse that. He is, many celebrities are fans of RFK. And they are there in the room supporting him. His wife is a actress, Hollywood actress, who hated Donald Trump, but now is like going and seeing President Trump at the White House. Her husband's going to be cabinet secretary. Ladies and gentlemen, this is the confirmation hearing of RFK. Now the cameras are all over everything. There's RFK greeting.

The senators there. Oh boy, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders. Okay. Here we go. Here's the Republican side of the dais. RFK Jr. Look at the media. Look at all the press swarming. Goodness. I have not seen this level of media attention for any of the other nominees. A Kennedy back in Washington, D.C. in a cabinet position.

We haven't seen it in decades in this country. Mr. Kennedy. good morning. This hearing will come to order. I thank my colleagues and Mr. Kennedy for being here today. Mr. Kennedy congratulations on your nomination. Throughout this process Mr. Kennedy, congratulations on your nomination. Throughout this process, Mr. Kennedy, you have been accessible to members and staff on both sides of the aisle

and have demonstrated strong commitment to fulfilling the responsibilities of this role. The Department of Health and Human Services oversees our nation's largest health care programs, providing coverage for nearly two in every five Americans. Improving Medicare, Medicaid, and CHIP among other initiatives presents challenges, especially in the face of a rapidly aging population, stubbornly high costs, and persistent barriers to access. However, this also provides us an opportunity to live to deliver bold transformative solutions. As a committee we share a commitment to advancing common-sense bipartisan policies that improve the delivery of

health care in this country. This committee has worked to realign incentives in the prescription drug supply chain, to enhance access in rural communities, to expand the availability of telehealth and improve the broken clinician payment structure. Across these and other issues, I look forward to working with the administration to continue pursuing meaningful reforms that serve the American people more effectively and more efficiently. Too often, patients encounter a healthcare system that is disjointed and is a dysfunctional

maze. Complex and bureaucratic chutes and ladders have become the norm. Meanwhile, even as healthcare spending climbs, outcomes across a range of conditions continue to decline. Mr. Kennedy, if confirmed, you will have the opportunity to chart a new and better course for the federal approach to tackling both the drivers and the consequences of our ailing healthcare system. Your commitment to combating chronic conditions that drive healthcare costs will be critical

to our success. Prioritizing disease prevention and addressing the factors that fuel conditions such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, metabolic disease, Alzheimer's disease, COPD, and cancer will save lives, reduce costs, and build a healthier, stronger country. Private sector breakthroughs from groundbreaking cancer medications to curative gene therapies also offer hope. But misguided government initiatives and market volatility risk eroding American leadership in life-saving R&D. Your advocacy for healthcare transparency has the potential to empower consumers across

the country, promoting competition to enhance quality while cutting excessive spending for patients and for taxpayers. Today's hearing will provide a forum to hear more about your vision, particularly for the federal programs under this committee's jurisdiction. Mr. Kennedy, you represent a voice for an inspiring coalition of Americans who are deeply committed to improving the health and well-being of our nation. Regardless of political party, everyone in this room shares a common recognition that our current system has fallen short, as well as a common desire to make our

country healthier. I look forward to today's conversation as well as your testimony, Mr. Kennedy. And now I recognize Senator Wyden for his opening remarks. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. The question before the Finance Committee this morning is whether Robert F. Kennedy should be trusted with the health and well-being of the American people. This guy's a vampire. Committee staff have examined thousands of pages of statements, books, and podcast transcripts in a review of his record. The receipts show that Mr. Kennedy has embraced conspiracy theories, quacks, charlatans, especially when it comes to the safety

and efficacy of vaccines. He has made it his life's work to sow doubt and discourage parents from getting their kids life-saving vaccines. It has been lucrative for him and put him on the verge of immense power. This is the profile of someone who chases money and influence wherever they lead, even if that may mean the tragic deaths of children and other vulnerable people.

You're literally a vampire. He's fond of saying he's not making recommendations about whether parents should vaccinate their children. He's just asking questions and giving people choices. It's a slippery tactic to dodge any real responsibility for his words and actions. And it is, in my view, absurd coming from somebody who's trying to win confirmation for a job that is entirely about making recommendations. These recommendations are going to have life or death consequences for the American people.

Mr. Kennedy, if you are confirmed, your recommendations determine which vaccines senior citizens get for free through Medicare. Your recommendation will determine which vaccines are given to millions of kids. Peddling these anti-vaccine conspiracy theories as our chief health officer is going to endanger the lives of kids and seniors across the nation. Just look at what happened when Mr. Kennedy inserted himself into an anti vaccination crisis in the island nation of Samoa. He traveled there himself to push his views and pour fuel on the fire of a measles outbreak

that began due to low vaccination rates. In the end, 83 Samoans died, mostly kids, from a disease that is easily preventable. Americans cannot afford to import this experiment to our great nation. On other health care matters from abortion to universal health care, Mr. Kennedy has changed his views so often it is nearly impossible to know where he stands on so many of the basic issues that impact Americans daily lives. In a gobsmacking statement of irresponsibility. In November 2023, Mr Kennedy said that he wanted to pause infectious disease research for eight years.

Mr Kennedy has indicated he's open to restricting access to the abortion medication Mifepristone, which remains a primary target of the Republican crusade against reproductive freedom. I took this on back in 1990 when I chaired the first congressional hearing on the topic. The science was clear then. It's even clearer today. today methapristone is safe the only reason it's under question in 2025 is because people with a political agenda have been out lying about it women deserve to know if mr kennedy will abuse his power as our country's chief health officer to essentially implement a national abortion ban by restricting access

to the safe and legal medication. Meanwhile, as the Trump Budget Office threw the Medicaid program into chaos yesterday, Republicans in Congress are proposing deep cuts to the program that will rip away health care for millions of Americans who count on this vital lifeline. Cuts to Medicaid of this magnitude are going to jack up the cost of health insurance. It'll shutter nursing homes and rural hospitals, deprive seniors and Americans with disabilities of home-based care. That approach amounts to handing over our nation's health system to for-profit insurance companies who've made a fortune delaying and denying care.

Mr. Kennedy has virtually no knowledge or experience in handling these issues. It leaves him unprepared to take on a crisis like the nation witnessed yesterday when the Trump Budget Office shut down the federal Medicaid payment portal. After a careful review of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s statements, actions, and views, materials that I have reviewed personally and closely, I've reached the conclusion that he should not be entrusted

with the health and well-being of the American people. When he's taken every side of every issue, how can this committee and the American people believe he has anything to say? Let me close by saying I believe more strongly than ever, and I have specialized in health care during my time in public service, that we're a turning point with regard to health care during my time in public service, there were a turning point with regard to health care in America. There's one word to describe Americans' feelings towards the health care system.

It's disillusioned. At every single turn, people feel like they're rolling a load of dice, loaded dice, when they try to get health care. Americans are justifiably angry, fed up, and tired of a system that puts profits over patients. Instead of debating meaningful ways to improve Americans' health care, now the committee is being forced to relitigate settled science about vaccines and whether or not the

federal government should help Americans get affordable health care. I know where Democrats on this finance committee stand when it comes to an agenda to lower costs and improve care. I must say. I cannot say the same about the nominee sitting in front of me. And let me acknowledge, finally, Mr. Chairman, Terry Mills from Portland, Oregon, who is here to represent Nurses for America. And I'd like to enter a statement from her organization into the record at this time. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Without objection. You're a literal vampire. Thank you.

This remake of Not As Fraught As You Sucks. Mr. Kennedy, in a few moments, you will be given the opportunity to make your opening statement and respond to these attacks and other questions that the members of this committee have. I would say that with regard to the attack on Medicaid that we just heard, that was a false attack. It's been proven false overnight. The Medicaid portal is operating efficiently today and was never intended to be shut down. Would gentleman yield since he's mentioned my name? There was a significant amount of time yesterday where there was bedlam across the country over

the status of the Medicaid portals. I hope it's being corrected, but there were problems all through the day. There certainly were attacks yesterday. The problem has been clarified and Medicaid portal is fully operational as we speak. Mr. You dirty vampire. Mr. Mr. Kennedy, before I turn the time over to you to share your opening statement, I would like to give you a brief introduction. The son of Senator Robert F. Kennedy and nephew of President John F. Kennedy, Robert Kennedy,

Jr., has been an advocate for consumers since 1985. After graduating from Harvard University, Mr. Kennedy studied at the London School of Economics and received his law degree from the University of Virginia Law School and a master's degree in environmental law from Pace University. He has founded two advocacy groups and has spent the last 40 years working to restore and protect children's health. He was a former independent candidate be the HHS Secretary. In announcing his nomination, President Trump stated,

Mr. Kennedy will restore these agencies to the traditions of gold standard scientific research and beacons of transparency and end the chronic disease epidemic and make America great and healthy again before you give your opening statement mr. Kennedy I have four obligatory questions that we ask all nominees before this committee first is there anything that you are aware of in your background that might present a conflict of interest with the duties of the office to which you have been nominated? Mr. No, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Thank you. Do you know of any reason, personal or otherwise, that would in any way prevent you from fully

and honorably discharging the responsibilities of the office to which you have been nominated? Mr. No, I do not. Do you agree without reservation to respond to any reasonable summons to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of Congress, if you are confirmed? Mr. Yes, I do. Finally, do you commit to providing a prompt response in writing to any questions addressed to you by any senator of this committee? Mr. Yes, I do. Thank you, Mr. Kennedy. prompt response in writing to any questions addressed to you by any senator of this committee.

Yes, I do. Thank you, Mr. Kennedy. And before you begin, if you would like to, you may introduce your wife and children. Yes. My wife, Cheryl Hines, is here. My daughter, Kit Kennedy. My son, Bobby Kennedy. His wife, Amaryllis Fox Kennedy. and my nephew Jackson Hines is here too.

We welcome you all. Thank you. You may proceed with your statement. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Chairman Grabo, ranking member Wyden, and members of this distinguished committee, I'm humbled to be sitting here today as President Trump's nominee. Oversee the U. S Department of Health and Human Services. I want to thank President Trump for entrusting me to deliver on his promise

to make America healthy again. I also want to thank Cheryl and kick and Bobby and all my other children who are here today and all the many members of my large extended family for the love that they have so generously shared. Ours has always been a family that has been involved in public service, and I look forward to continuing that tradition. My journey into the issue of health began with my career as an environmental attorney working with hunters and fishermen and mothers in the small town in the Hudson Valley and along the Hudson River. I learned very early on that human health and environmental injuries are intertwined. The same chemicals that kill

fish make people sick also. Today Americans overall health is in grievous condition. Over 70% of adults and a third of children are overweight or obese. Diabetes is ten times more prevalent than it was during the 1960s cancer among young people is rising by one or two percent a year autoimmune diseases neurodevelopmental disorders Alzheimer's asthma ADHD depression addiction and a host of other physical and mental health conditions are all on the rise, some of them exponentially. The United States has worse health than any other developed nation. Yet we spend more on health care, at least double,

and in some cases triple, as other countries. Last year, we spent $4.8 trillion, not counting the indirect costs of missed work. That's almost a fifth of GDP. It's tantamount to a 20% tax on the entire economy. No wonder America has trouble competing with countries that pay a third of what we do for health and have better outcomes and a healthier workforce. But I don't want to make this too much about money. It's the human tragedy that moves us to care.

President Trump has promised to restore America's global strength and to restore the American dream, but he understands we can't be a strong nation when our people are so sick. A healthy person has a thousand dreams. A sick person has only one. Today, over half of our countrymen and women are chronically ill. When I met with President Trump last summer, I discovered that he has more than just concern for this tragic situation, but genuine care. President Trump is committed to restoring the American dream and 77 million Americans delivered

a mandate to him to do just that due in part to the embrace and elevation of the Make America Healthy Again movement. This movement led largely by by Maha Moms from every state, you can see many of them behind us today, and in the hallways and in the lobbies, is one of the most transcendent and powerful movements I've ever seen. I promised President Trump that if confirmed, I will do everything in my power to put the health of Americans back on track.

And I've been greatly heartened to discover a deep level of care among members of this committee to both Democrats and Republicans. I came away from our conversations confident that we can put aside our divisions for the sake of a healthier America. For a long time, the nation has been locked in a divisive health care debate about who pays.

When health care costs reach 20%, there are no good options, only bad ones. Shifting the burden around between government and corporations and insurers and providers and families is like rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic. Our country will sink beneath a sea of desperation and debt if we don't change the course and ask why are health care costs so high in the first place? The obvious answer is chronic disease. The CDC says 90% of healthcare spending goes toward managing chronic disease, which hits lower income Americans the hardest.

The president's pledge is not to make some Americans happy again, or healthy again, but to make all of our people healthy again. There is no single culprit in chronic disease, much as I have criticized certain industries and agencies. President Trump and I understand that most of their scientists and experts genuinely care about American health. Therefore, we will bring together all stakeholders in pursuit of this unifying goal. Before I conclude, I want to make sure the committee is clear about a few things.

News reports have claimed that I'm anti-vaccine or anti-industry. I am neither. I am pro-safety. Get her. Go get her. Deport. Deportion. Deportation in exile. Please proceed, Mr. Kennedy. I am pro-safety.

I worked for years to raise awareness about the mercury and toxic chemicals in fish, and nobody called me any fish. And I believe that. All my that vaccines play a critical role in health care. All of my kids are vaccinated. I've written many books on vaccines. My first book in 2014. The first line of it is I am not anti vaccine and the last line is I am not anti-vaccine, and the last line is I am not anti-vaccine.

Nor am I the enemy of food producers. American farms are the bedrock of our culture, of our politics, of our national security. I was a 4-H kid, and I spent my summer working on ranches. I want to work with our farmers and food producers remove burdensome regulations and unleash American ingenuity. Maha simply cannot succeed without a partnership a full partnership of American farmers. In my advocacy I've often disturbed the status quo by asking uncomfortable questions. Well, I'm not going to apologize for that.

We have massive health problems in this country that we must face honestly. And the first thing I've done every morning for the past 20 years is to get on my knees and pray to God that he would put me in a position to end the chronic disease epidemic and to help America's children. That's why I'm so grateful to President Trump for the opportunity to sit before you today and seek your support and partnership in this endeavor. I will conclude with the promise the members of this committee, to the president, and to all the tens of billions of parents across America, especially the moms,

will propel this issue to center stage. Should I be so privileged as to be confirmed, we will make sure our tax dollars support healthy foods. We will scrutinize the chemical additives in our food supply. We will remove financial conflicts of interest from our agencies. We will create an honest, unbiased, gold-standard science at HHS, accountable to the President, to Congress, and to the American people.

We will reverse the chronic disease epidemic and put the nation back on the road to good health. Thank you. Thank you Mr. Kennedy. Mr. Kennedy, I will begin. Each of us will have five minutes to ask you questions and then at the conclusion of the hearing if there are further questions there will be an opportunity for those questions to be submitted to you and I ask that you respond to them promptly. Mr. Kennedy, you have emphasized the importance of nutrition in preventing and managing chronic disease, improving health outcomes and reducing health costs.

I share your interest in the relationship between our diet and our well-being. And if confirmed, I look forward to partnering with you on those efforts. Would you share with the committee why you are passionate about the nutrition-oriented disease prevention and what you have learned? Yes, Mr. Chairman. I had 11 brothers and sisters. I had dozens of first cousins. I was raised in a time where we did not have a chronic disease epidemic.

When my uncle was president, 2% of American kids had chronic disease. Today, 66% have chronic disease. We spend zero on chronic disease during the Kennedy administration. Today, we spend $4.3 trillion a year. 77% of our kids cannot qualify for military service. When I was a kid, the typical pediatrician would see one case of diabetes in his or her lifetime, 40 or 50 year career. A, one out of every three kids who walks through

her office door is diabetic or pre-diabetic. And the most recent data from NIH shows 38% of teens are diabetic or pre-diabetic. Autism rates have gone from one in 10,000 to one in 1,500, depending on what studies you look at. In my generation today, 70 year old men one in 34 in my kids generation we've seen a explosion of autoimmune disease of allergic diseases we are this is not just a economic issue it's not just a national security issue. It is a spiritual issue, and it is a moral

issue. We cannot live up to our role as an exemplary nation, as a moral authority around the world, and we're writing off an entire generation of kids. Thank you very much, and if confirmed, how could we work together to integrate nutrition-based interventions into our health care programs like Medicaid and Medicare? Well, there are many ways that we can do that. A federal funding of the SNAP program, for example, and of school lunch programs could be a driver for helping kids. We shouldn't be giving 60% of the kids in school processed food that is making them sick. We shouldn't be spending 10% of the SNAP program on sugar drinks. We have a direct ability to change things there. In Medicaid and Medicare, we need to focus on outcome-based medicine, on putting

people in charge of their own healthcare, of making them accountable for their own healthcare so they understand the relationship between eating and getting sick. Most importantly, we need to deploy NIH and FDA to doing the research to understand the relationship between these different food additives and chronic disease so that Americans understand it and make sure that Americans are aware of it. I don't want to take food away from anybody. If you like a McDonald's cheeseburger a Diet Coke, which my boss loves. You should be able to get them.

If you want to eat Hostess Twinkies, you should be able to do that, but you should know what the impacts are on your family and on your health. Thank you. Senator Wyden. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. Before I begin my questions, I'd like to start by entering into the record a letter the committee received from Ambassador Carolyn Kennedy outlining what she believes is Mr. Kennedy's lack of personal fitness for the office. Without objection. Mr. Kennedy, you have spent years pushing conflicting stories about vaccines. You say

one thing and then you say another in your testimony today under oath you denied that you were anti-vaccine but during a podcast interview in july of 2023 you said quote no vaccine is safe and effective in your testimony today in order to prove your're not anti-vax, you note that all your kids are vaccinated. But in a podcast in 2020, you said, and I quote, you would do anything, pay anything, to go back in time and not vaccinate your kids. Mr. Kennedy, all of these things cannot be true. So are you lying to Congress today when you say you are pro vaccine?

Or did you lie on all those podcasts? We have all of this on tape, by the way. Yeah, Senator, as you know. Because it's been repeatedly debunked. That statement that I made on the Lex Friedman podcast was a fragment of this statement he asked me and anybody who actually goes and looks at that podcast and will see this he asked me are there vaccines that are safe and effective and i said to him some of the live irish vaccines are and i said there are no vaccines that are safe and effective and I was going to continue for every person every medicine has people who are

sensitive to them including vaccines all right so he interrupted me at that point I've corrected it many times including on national TV you know about this Senator Wyden so bringing this up right now is dishonest. Let's be clear about what you've actually done then since you want to deny your statements. For example, you have a history of trying to take vaccines away from people. In May of 2021, you petitioned the Food and Drug Administration to not only block Americans from having access to the COVID vaccine, but to prevent any future access to the life-saving vaccine. Are you denying that? Your name is on the petition. We brought that petition after CDC recommended a COVID vaccine without any scientific basis for six-year-old children.

Most experts agree today, even the people who did it back then, that COVID vaccines are inappropriate for six-year-old children who basically have a zero risk from COVID. That's why I brought that lawsuit. I don't want to emphasize this. have a zero risk of COVID. That's why I brought that lawsuit. I don't want to, I want to emphasize this. I don't. Mr. Kennedy, the facts, the facts. The committee will be in order.

And to the audience. Senator Cronin, I just want to say a couple words about First Lady and Mr. Kennedy. To the audience. Senator Conlon, I'm so skeptical about first-leggering, Mr. Kennedy. To the audience. Comments from the audience are inappropriate and out of order. And if there are any further disruptions, the committee will recess until the police can restore order. Please follow the rules of the committee. Mr. Kennedy, you may proceed. I also want to point out that your recitation of what happened in Samoa is absolutely wrong.

And you know it's wrong. We'll get to that in a moment. Right now, we're talking about the petition that you filed to block Americans from having access to the vaccine and to prevent any future access to the vaccine. Those facts are on the record. My third question to you is, you made almost $5 million from book deals, mostly promoting junk science. In 2021, in a book called The Measles Book,

you wrote that parents had been, quote, misled into believing that measles is a deadly disease and that measles vaccines are necessary safe and effective the reality is measles are in fact deadly and highly contagious something that you should have learned after your lives contributed to the deaths of 83 people most of them children in a measles outbreak in Samoa so my question here is mr. Kennedy is measles deadly yes or no the death rate from measles historically in this country in 1963 that year before the introduction to the vaccine was one in 10,000 let me explain what happened in Samoa. In Samoa in 2017 or 2015 there were two kids who

died following the MMR vaccine and and and the vaccination rates in Samoa dropped precipitously from about 63 percent to the mid 30s so they've never been very high. And in 2018, two more kids died following the MMR vaccine, and the government in Samoa banned the MMR vaccine. I arrived a year later when vaccination rates were already below any previous level. I went there, nothing to do with vaccines. I went there to introduce a medical informatics system. I would digitalize records in Samoa and make health delivery much more efficient. I never gave any public statement about vaccines. You cannot find a single Samoan who will say I didn't get a vaccine because of Bobby Kennedy. I went in June of 2019. The measles house break started in August. Oh clearly I had nothing to do with the measles. Not only that,

Senator, not only that, if you let me finish. If you let me finish, Senator, if you let me finish. There are 83 people died when the tissue samples were sent to New Zealand, most of those people did not have measles. We don't know what was killing them. The same outbreak occurred in Tonga and Fiji, and no extra people died. There were seven measles outbreaks in the 13 years prior to my arrival. I would like to get my time back. The nominee wrote a book saying that people had been misled into believing that measles is a deadly disease. He's trying now to play down his role in Samoa. That's not what the parents say. That's not what Governor Greene says. It's time to make sure that we blow the whistle on actually what your views are. At least we're starting.

We need to move on. Senator, I support the measles vaccine. I support the polio vaccine. I will do nothing as HHS secretary. That makes it difficult or discourages people from taking either of those vaccines. Anybody who believes that ought to look at the measles book you wrote saying parents have been misled into believing that measles is a deadly disease. That's not true. We need to move on senator grassley welcome i'm going to do like i did in my office i'm just going to make some points to you i got about seven i want to quickly get done and then at the end i'm going to ask if you disagree with anything I say and then address those things you disagree with.

I'll make sure I save time for you to do that. A key responsibility of each member of Congress is oversight. Oversight allows us to hold bureaucrats accountable to the rule of law, and it helps keep faith with taxpayers. I expect HHS to provide timely and complete responses to congressional oversight. Number two, PBMs, something you and I discussed in our office. I've been working to hold pharmacy benefit managers

accountable in order to lower prescription drug prices. I expect you to work with us to hold PBMs accountable and that may even ask in your support for legislation that's before the Congress. Drug pricing. Senator Durbin and I have for a while been trying to get a bill passed that requires price disclosures on TV ads for prescription drugs. Knowing what something costs before buying it is just common sense. President Trump tried to do this by regulation in his first term. Vice President Vance co-sponsored our bill last Congress.

I ask you to support this bill or if you can do it by regulation, to do it by regulation. On rural health care, the previous administration dragged his feet in opening up slots for rural community hospital demonstration programs. It also ignored concerns from rural pharmacies when implementing changes to Medicare Part D, and ignored rural needs when it comes to distributing physician residency slots. I expect you to prioritize rural Americans' health care needs on agriculture. In our meeting earlier this month, we talked at length about agriculture. You prefaced the conversation by saying you will not have jurisdiction over these issues. I expect you to leave agricultural practice regulations to the proper agencies and for

the most part that's USDA and EPA. On dietary guidelines, I've sent letters to the Secretaries of Agriculture at HHS requesting that they provide information regarding conflicts of interest on the Dietary Guideline Advisory Committee to increase transparency. I expect you to provide Congress with confidential

financial disclosures from the advisory committee before finalizing dietary guidelines so we know that nobody has a vested interest in it is having undue influence. HHS, Office of Refugee Resettlement Oversight. Last year, I expanded my investigation into HHS's Office of Refugee Resettlement. I wrote two dozen contractors and grantees whose job it is to place unaccompanied children with sponsors. In many cases, children have been placed with improper vented sponsors, placing them at risk of trafficking. The Biden administration's HHS directed these taxpayer funded contractors and grantees to not respond to my inquiry. This is obstruction by the executive branch. I expect you to produce to me the records and data I've requested and instruct HHS contractors to fully cooperate with my investigation.

I also expect HHS to not retaliate against any whistleblowers including those who identify ORR's failures to embedding sponsors unaccompanied. You got 45 seconds to respond if you want to. I agree with all of those provisions, Senator. My approach to administration HHS will be radical transparency. If members of this committee or other members of Congress want information, the doors are open. I've spent many years litigating against NIH and its sub-agencies, I mean HHS and its sub-agencies, NIH, CDC, FDA, on FOIA issues, trying to get information that we, the taxpayers, paid for,

and oftentimes getting back redacted copies after a year or two years of litigation. That should not be the case. And if Congress asks me for information, you will get it immediately. Thank you. Thank you. Senator Cantwell is next but until she returns I will move on to down the list and that would be Senator Cornyn. Mr. Kennedy welcome to you and your family and congratulations. I appreciate Senator

Grassley raising the issue of the Office of Refugee Resettlement within the auspices of Health and Human Services. I think this may surprise people, but that's actually the responsibility of HHS, the Office of Resettlement Relocation. Under the previous administration, as Senator Grassley alluded, there were roughly 500,000 children, unaccompanied minors, that were placed with sponsors in the interior of the United States. The previous administration took the position that it was not the federal government's responsibility once these children were placed with these sponsors. But the New York Times,

in a series of investigative stories, pointed out that tens of thousands of these children, when they tried to follow up and find out how they were doing, whether they were going to school, whether they were being trafficked or abused, there was no answer. And they took the position it was not their responsibility. So I look forward to working with you to find those children and to make sure that they're not being abused. Millions of Americans are experiencing mild to moderate mental health and substance abuse issues, yet many struggle with timely and effective access. Primary care physicians are most likely to be seeing these individuals as opposed to a specialist, and it makes it important that these individuals primary care physicians be trained in patient centered care which would strengthen the integration of behavioral health care

with primary care services is this something that you are concerned about something you'd be willing to work with us on in order to implement? Yes, Senator, let me just reassure you that President Trump has personally spoken to me about locating those 300,000 children who disappeared over the last four years. I don't think anybody has a fully accurate number, but it's hundreds of thousands, I agree. And many of them we know have been sex trafficked and childhood slavery and we—it is a blight on America's moral authority and we need to find those kids. In terms of addiction services and substance abuse services, I—this is a priority for me.

It was a priority for me when I was running for president during my campaign. I was a heroin addict for 14 years. I've been 42 years in recovery. I go to 12-step meetings every day, so I hear the stories every day. I hear the many stories about the barriers to access to care. We need to improve that and answer specifically to your question, I think we can do that through GMA, which is a program that is funded by HHS. That is the largest funder for medical school students and that's one of the things for primary

care physicians should be, should understand addiction care. Addicts almost always go through a cycle where there is a moment where they hit periodic bottoms where they're ready to go into treatment, But it's fleeting, and it's momentary. And we have that opportunity to save their lives. And then if we miss that little short window, they're off to the races again. Let me—I appreciate your answer. Our time is short. Let me get to one more question that I think is very important.

Under the first Trump administration, the number of people receiving HIV treatment in Africa through the president's emergency plan for AIDS release, otherwise known as PEPFAR, it increased. This is during the first Trump administration from 13 million people to 18 million people across 50 countries, primarily in Africa. Africa has about 1.3 billion people today, or in 2021, it's projected to have 2.5 billion people by 2050, or 25% of the global population. In 2020, PEPFAR reported that 2.8 million babies were born without HIV. That was something that would not have happened but for the PEPFAR program. So it has simply been one of the most successful public health programs in the world and saved approximately 26 million lives.

Failure to continue this program, in my view, would risk ceding that leadership to adversaries like China. And I'd like to know whether you support the objectives and goals of PEPFAR, and would you work with me and my colleagues to make sure that this program continues to provide life-saving antiviral drugs to people who are most in need. I absolutely support PEPFAR, and I will happily work with you to strengthen the program. Thank you. Senator Bennett. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you, Mr. Kennedy, for being here this morning.

And I think that, Mr. Chairman, we are truly through the licking glass this morning here in the U.S. Senate, and this committee is being asked to fulfill a really important responsibility, which is to decide whether to confirm Mr. Kennedy to one of the most important health care jobs in America. And the reason I think it's so important is for many of the reasons you said in your opening statement, which is that we live in the richest country in the world and we have some of the worst health outcomes of any industrialized country in the world. We live in the richest country in the world and we have some of the lowest expect healthy life expectancy rates of anybody in the industrialized world. I was a school superintendent before I was in this job Mr. Chairman and I can tell you that Mr.

Kennedy's right you know that when I look at the kids in the Denver Public Schools if we don't change the way we eat in this country 40 percent of them are going to suffer adult diabetes as a result of their diet. These are—and we're, as I said, spending more than any other country in the world, and our families, every single person's constituents in this Senate are facing chronic shortages when it comes to health care. My friend from Texas, Senator Cornyn, has been a champion on mental health care. We have an epidemic, as he knows, across this country in mental health care, partly because of what the massive social media platforms that were sitting behind the president of the United States have inflicted on our children for their profit in the last decade or so.

So we have no shortage of challenges to confront, and I even agree with some of the diagnosis of Mr. Kennedy. What is so disturbing to me is that out of 330 million Americans, we're being asked to put somebody in this job who has spent 50 years of his life not honoring the tradition that he talked about at the beginning of this conversation, but peddling in half-truths, peddling in false statements, peddling in theories that, you know, create doubt about whether or not things that we know are safe are unsafe. Not that every vaccine in America is unsafe, not that you can't possibly have an adverse reaction, but that parents and children in my old school district and school districts all this country would be better off not getting vaccinated than getting vaccinated unlike his own children who

are vaccinated unlike the people he invited to his house in los angeles for their party who were vaccinated for everybody else it's about peddling these half-truths. And he says it with such conviction that you want to believe him. And Mr. Kennedy, I just have some, there are many, many things in the record, but I hope that you could answer these questions, yes or no. I've tried to ask these in a manner that's faithful to what you actually said, because I didn't want to have a debate about whether you actually said them. So I'm asking asking you yes or no, Mr. Kennedy. Did you say that COVID-19 was a genetically engineered bioweapon that targets black and white people but spared Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese people?

MR. I didn't say it was deliberately targeted. I just quoted an NIH-funded, an NIH-published study— Did you say that it targets black and white people but spared Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese? I quoted a study, Your Honor. I quoted an NIH study that showed that certain races of these people— I'll take that as a yes. I have to move on. Did you say that Lyme disease is highly likely a materially engineered bioweapon? I made sure I put in the highly likely. Did you say Lyme disease is a highly likely militarily engineered bioweapon?

I probably did say that. Did you say that— And that's what the developer of Lyme disease said. Okay. I want all of our colleagues to hear it Mr. Kennedy. I want them to hear it. You said yes. Did you say that exposure to pesticides causes children to become transgender? No I never said that. Okay I have the record that I'll give to the chairman and he can make his judgment about what you said. Did you write in your book—and it's undeniable that African AIDS is an entirely different

disease from Western AIDS? Yes or no, Mr. Kennedy? MR. I'm not sure, if I may. THE PRESIDENT. MR. Okay. I'll give it to the chairman, Mr. Kennedy.

And my final question, did you say on a podcast—and I quote— I wouldn't leave it, abortion, to the states. My belief is we should leave it to the woman. We shouldn't have the government involved, even if it's full term. Did you say that, Mr. Kennedy? Senator, I believe every abortion is a tragedy. Did you say it, Mr. Kennedy? I believe— This matters.

It doesn't matter what you come here and say that isn't true, that's not reflective of what you really believe, that you haven't said over decade after decade after decade, because unlike other jobs we're confirming around this place, this is a job where it is life and death for the kids that I used to work for in the Denver public schools, and for families all over this country that are suffering from living in the richest country of the world that can't deliver basic health care and basic mental health care to them. It's too important for the games that you're playing, Mr. Kennedy. And I hope my colleagues will say to the president, I have no influence over him. I hope my colleagues will say to the president, out of 330 million Americans, we can do better than this.

Thank you. We need to move on. Senator Cassidy. Mr. Kennedy, President Trump has sworn to protect Medicare. Republicans are exploring reforms to Medicaid that could help pay for Trump administration priorities. With this context, what will you do about dual eligibles? About dual eligibles? Well, dual eligibles are not right now served very well under the system. Those are people who are eligible for both Medicaid and Medicare.

And, you know, I suppose my answer to that is to make sure that the programs are consolidated, that they're integrated, and the care is integrated. I look forward to working with you, Dr. Cassidy, on making sure that we take good care of people who are too eligible. And how would we, how do you propose that we integrate those programs? Does Medicare pay more, Medicare pay less,

Medicaid pay more, Medicaid pay less? How do we do that? Well, I'm not exactly sure because I'm not in there I mean it is difficult to integrate them because Medicaid is Medicare is under fee-for-service is paid for by employer taxes Medicaid is a has is fully paid for by the federal government, and it's not fee-for-service. So, it's, I don't, I do not know the answer to that. I look forward to exploring options with you.

Republicans, again, are looking at ways to potentially reform Medicaid to help pay for President Trump's priorities, but to improve outcomes. What thoughts do you have regarding Medicaid reform? Well, Medicaid is not working for Americans, and it's specifically not working for the target population. Most Americans, like myself, I'm on Medicare Advantage and I'm very happy with it. Most people who are on Medicaid are not happy.

The premiums are too high, the deductibles are too high. The networks are narrow. The best doctors will not accept it and the best hospitals. And particularly, Medicaid was originally designed for a target population, the poorest Americans. It's now been dramatically expanded. And the irony of the expansion is that the poorest Americans are now being robbed. Their services have dramatically decreased, even though we've increased the price of Medicare by 60% over the last four years,

the target population is being robbed. We need to figure out other options. Obviously you've thought about that and I appreciate that. What reforms do you recommend again that would improve services I suppose but also make it more cost-efficient? President Trump has given me the charge of improving quality of care and lowering the price of care for all Americans. There are many things that we can do. I mean, what we want to, the ultimate outcome, I think, is to increase transparency, to increase accountability, and to transition to a to a value-based system rather than a fee based system so

I'm not a service based on Medicaid in particular can you just kind of take take those kind of general principles and apply it to the Medicaid program you know I listen I think that there's there many, many options with telemedicine, with AI right now. And you know, there's a, including direct primary care systems, we're seeing that move and grow across the country. There's one of the largest providers. So, going back to Medicaid though, and speaking of these specific advances, what reforms are you proposing with these ideas vis-a-vis Medicaid?

Well, I don't have a broad proposal for dismantling the program. Of course not saying that. I think what we need to do is we need to experiment with pilot programs in each state. We need to keep our eye on the ultimate goal, which is value-based care, which is transparency, accountability, access. Mr. And one more thing, going back to Medicare. You mentioned you're an MA.

You mentioned earlier the Medicare fee-for-service. Do you have any kind of thoughts as to whether or not patients on fee for service should move into MA or how should we handle that? Whether patients who are on Medicare fee for service- On traditional Medicare? Yes. Well, that's their choice right now. Well, I mean, I think 32 million Americans Americans are 30 million Americans on Medicare on

traditional Medicare and then another 34 or 30 34 on Medicare Advantage roughly half and a half and I think more people would rather be on Medicare Advantage because it offers very good services. People can't afford it. It's much more expensive. In answer to your first question, there are all kinds of exciting things that we can be doing including cooperatives, which President Trump has supported, including health savings accounts, which President Trump has supported including health savings accounts which President Trump has supported all of these things to make people more accountable for

their own health and so we'd bring the co-operatives and the health savings accounts into Medicare and Medicaid exactly we try to we try to increase those the use of those and to direct primary care to continue to transition into a value-based program that is private. Americans don't, by and large, do not like the Affordable Care Act. People are on it. They don't like Medicaid.

They like Medicare. And they like private insurance. We need to listen to what people, they would prefer to be on private insurance. Most Americans, if they can afford to be, will be on private insurance. We need to figure out ways to improve care, particularly for elderly, for veterans, for the poor in this country, and Medicaid, the current model, is not doing that. I would ask, you know, any of the Democrats who were chuckling just now, do you think

all that money, the $900 billion that we're sending to Medicaid every year has made Americans healthy? Do we think it's working for anybody? Are the premiums low enough? We do need to move on. Senator Warner. Well, I got to tell you, for literally hundreds of thousands of Virginians, Medicaid is what prevents them from health crises on a daily and weekly basis.

And some imaginary new plan. And if there was a new plan that was to be the basis of what Trump was going to do in repealing Obamacare, I would have thought by now we'd have seen it. I got to tell you— SENATOR COHEN, MR. SENATOR COHEN, MR. SENATOR COHEN, MR. SENATOR COHEN, MR. SENATOR COHEN, MR.

SENATOR COHEN, MR. SENATOR COHEN, MR. SENATOR COHEN, MR. SENATOR COHEN, MR. SENATOR COHEN, MR. SENATOR COHEN, MR. SENATOR COHEN, MR. SENATOR COHEN, MR. I appreciate our visit. I know you take your views seriously. And I don't reflexively vote. I voted for four of President Trump's nominees already. Got a lot of grief from folks on this panel.

But I got to tell you, I saw an email that you put out Monday night, or your campaign did, in a funding—fundraising email. Your presidential campaign celebrated that the freeze on all new regulations, guidance, and announcements is a way to protect unelected bureaucrats from further undermining our health freedom. Then you ask your donors to help pay for your campaign debt. Did your campaign, and you put out that— I don't think my campaign exists anymore.

All right, well, listen, I got to tell you this. Somebody's out there soliciting money for it. Maybe you ought to find out who is. So the fact that you celebrate this freeze, do you think that was a good idea to put all of this on hold for 90 days, funding and any kind of further work, NIH research? As Chairman Crapo pointed out— I'm not asking for... I love Mike Crapo I'm asking you you're up very very important position. As he pointed out Senator the portals were closed were not closed as a result of the Trump administration.

Let me just tell you I'd like you to explain to a domestic violence center in Richmond that's saying because this freeze, they may have to close down where those battered women go. Or a rural nonprofit I've got in the Chenault Valley is saying that freeze is going to potentially shut down their ability to operate. So I don't I guess if you deny or don't know what your campaign's sending out, you don't know if you raised a lot of money Monday night. I'm saying that the Trump administration. You don't know if you raised a lot of money Monday night. I'm saying that the Trump administration has— You don't know if you raised a lot of money. The Trump administration has made clear that it does not want to freeze benefits for any Americans under Medicaid or Medicare, and I do not want to dismantle Medicaid.

The freeze is affecting beyond Medicare and Social Security. I would hope you would have known that to be able to answer some of this. Now you've said publicly you want to immediately get rid of 600 NIH workers on job one, on day one. When we had our meeting you said you actually like to get rid of 2,200 people from HHS. Which offices are you going to start cutting and get rid of 2,200 people from HHS. Which offices are you going to start cutting and riffing these 2,200 workers from? Senator, there's 200 political appointees that are changed during every administration. So if you got rid of those 200 political appointees, you're not going to replace them with your political appointees? Well, President Biden this year changed 3,000 employees at HHS, 3,750 at NIH.

So, you're 2,200. What departments are you going to pick them from? Well, the same as President Biden did when he changed 3,000 out. I'm down to a minute, minute 30. The chairman's been generous with colleagues on both sides. I may have to go a couple minutes over. But let me just say—so I'll just answer—this would be—I hope, since you're asking to become the top healthcare official in the United States in terms of HHS, huge ramifications, and part of this job is to be the senior advisor to the president on health issues. So when we're looking at this purge and we're looking at laying off workers, when

we're looking at potentially the president's illegal offer to try to buy out federal employees, which I would say to any federal employees, think twice. Has this individual in his business world ever fulfilled his contracts or obligations to any workers in the past. But if you are in this position, will you pledge that you will not fire federal employees who work on food safety, work on trying and preventing things like Salamonella? SEN. There are 91,000 employees. SEN.

So, I take that as a—I take—that's a simple yes and I'm going to take that as a no. SEN. Do you think I can run that agency without being hit? SEN. I take that as a no. You think I can run that agency without being hit? I take that as a no. Will you actually—we talked about protecting Americans from cyber criminals, something we need to do a lot more on. Will you commit not to fire anyone in the health arena who currently works on protecting Americans from cyber attacks in their health care files?

I will. I will commit to not firing anybody who's doing their job. Based on your opinion, based upon your opinion, or your political agenda, or Mr. Trump's political agenda? Based upon my opinion. I guess that means a lot of the folks who've had any type of views on vaccines will be out of work. Will you freeze grant funding for community health centers? Will you freeze federal funds for community health centers the way the current administration does?

The White House has made clear that no funds are going to be denied to any American for benefits in any program. Do you know what happens at community health centers? Those are direct— Are you talking about the Indian health centers? No, I'm talking about community health centers across the country. I understand that. I mean, I strongly support—

So you're going to excuse Indian health centers, which is good, but others are not? They're going to get their funds frozen? I strongly support community health centers, as does the president. So does that mean you're not going to freeze the funding that is currently frozen? I strongly support community health centers as does the president. So does that mean you're not going to freeze the funding that is currently frozen? The White House has made clear that none of that funding is supposed to be frozen. Sir, the direct payments are different than how the government operates. We fund the federal government down to community health centers. As a former governor, there's lots and lots of state programs

that are related to health care that come from the federal government, they come down to the state, then it goes to local programs. All of those don't directly pay out a dollar at a time, but they come from federal funding. They are all, you know, even though they keep changing the guidance on a minute-by-minute basis,

based upon 9.45 or 10.30 or or 1045, whatever time it is today, those funds are still frozen. Sir, I just honestly, I want to give you a fair shot, but I don't feel like you approach this job with the knowledge and candidly your willingness not to commit, try to recommend to the president to make sure these funds are unfrozen and that people's lives were at stake is a very disappointing answer. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Senator Lankford.

Mr. Chairman, thank you. Mr. Kennedy, it's good to see you again. We had some great visits in my office. We've done some follow-up calls to be able to go through. You and I have talked about a hundred different issues and backgrounds and things. You've been able to address a lot of them today and just different questions to be able to clear up social media rumors and the things that are out there on it. So I do appreciate that. We've talked about pharmacy benefit managers. We've talked about

the nursing home rule the Biden administration put down. We talked about your views on agriculture and commercial and row crop agriculture we've talked about food issues and you made it very very clear you're not going to tell americans what to eat but you do want americans to know what they're eating and i think that's a pretty fair perspective on that i do want to talk to you about some areas that you and i have talked about as well we have some disagreements you and i on the issue of life and when life begins on that you've been very outspoken on that, and we've had some good opportunities to be able to talk about that.

Title X is specifically in the HHS area. This has been an area that has been interpreted for a long time, and President Trump in the first administration interpreted that rule to say that his administration will prohibit the performance, referral for, or promotion of abortion as a part of the Title 10 program. He made that very clear in the first administration. Obviously, that's his decision to make again on that, on how he wants to handle that. And he's made a lot of public statements on that. The Biden administration not only reversed that, not only rescinded that rule, but they

went one step the other direction. In my state in Oklahoma, as you and I have talked about, the Biden administration cut off funding to the state of Oklahoma for AIDS testing, for breast cancer screening, and for other areas of poverty health care because my state didn't promote abortion. It wouldn't provide if my state wouldn't promote abortion in the state. We got cut off for federal funds for AIDS testing and for other things. My simple question to you is, how are you going to handle Title 10 on that? I saw how President Biden handled that in the punitive measures that came on my state for those that are in rural healthcare.

How are you going to handle Title 10? SEN. I'm going to support President Trump's policies on Title 10. I agree with President Trump that every abortion is a tragedy. I agree with him that we cannot be a moral nation if we have 1.2 million abortions a year. I agree with him that the states should control abortion. President Trump has told me that he wants to end late-term abortions, and he wants to protect conscience exemptions, and that he wants to end federal funding for abortions here abroad.

That's Title 10. I serve at the pleasure of the president. I'm going to implement his policies. Mr. Thank you for that. President Biden, when he came in, immediately closed down the Office of Civil Rights and Conscience Protections within HHS. There's a statement that's come out recently that he's going to reopen that office again

to be able to protect the civil rights of Americans. One of the things that Javier Becerra did immediately when he came into HHS was conscience protections for medical professionals that were being compelled against their conscience to perform medical procedures that violated their conscience. Javier Becerra stepped in immediately into HHS and withdrew that and said, no, the federal government will tell you what you believe about these issues. You don't have conscience protections anymore and refuse to protect those folks. Will you step in and say that health care individuals have the right of conscience again

as the federal law allows? Yeah, I mean, the first thing that occurs to me when you ask that question is what patient would want somebody doing a surgery on them that you know believes that surgeries against their conscience being forced to perform that I don't know anybody who would want to have that have a doctor performing a surgery that the doctor is is morally to. Listen, I came from a family that was split on life and choice. I have cousins today who believe that abortion at any stage is equivalent to homicide. Now, there are other people who believe the opposite. But the good thing in my family that I really loved is that we were able to have those conversations and respect each other.

And I wish that we could do that nationally. Somebody to participate in a medical procedure as a provider that they believe is murder does not make any sense to me. We need to welcome diversity in this country. We need to respect diversity. And we need to respect each other when we have different opinions and not force our opinions on other people. Yeah yeah thank you for that the FDA under the Biden administration changed the rules for the chemical abortion drug and said you no longer need to see a physician so if you have an ectopic pregnancy or all kinds of

don't even go anymore to see a physician but they also changed in the area that has been something's been very particular you've talked about a lot that's transparency they changed the position and said, don't tell us if there's a side effect on this drug unless she dies. But other than that, don't tell us anymore. Literally, don't give transparent information to the American people or to the women who take this drug anymore. We don't want that reported. My question question to you is will FDA move to be able to actually give transparency to the American people and to say this drug is no different than any other drug we don't I can protect it just because it's

political for some folks people should know side effects on this drug and there should be reporting yeah I mean it's it's against everything we believe in this country, that patients or doctors should not be reporting adverse events. We need to know what adverse events are. We need to understand the safety of every drug, mifepristone and every other drug. And President Trump has made it clear to me that one of the things he is not taking a position yet on,

if it's a detailed position, but he's made it clear to me that he wants me to look at safety issues. And I'll ask NIH and FDA to do that. Thank you. Senator Whitehouse. Thank you, Chairman. Mr. Kennedy, I only have five minutes with you, and I've got a lot of experience with CMS, so you're are going to need to hear a clear and trustworthy recantation of what you have said on vaccinations, including a promise from you never to say vaccines aren't medically safe when they in fact are and making indisputably clear that you support mandatory vaccinations against diseases where that will keep people

safe. You're in that hole pretty deep. We've just had a measles case in Rhode Island, the first since 2013, and frankly, you frighten people. Two, I want to air harms that Rhode Island has experienced from a remorseless, senseless CMS bureaucracy. from a remorseless senseless cms bureaucracy cms has for years maintained a reimbursement system that the bureaucracy could never explain never justify that persistently pays rhode island providers less than neighboring Massachusetts and Connecticut providers.

A differential of 23 and 26 percent in our regional healthcare market. The pending AHEAD program can begin to remedy this, at least for value-based care, and it must. There has to be payment parity in the region. Rhode Island's healthcare system is bleeding out because we aren't paid what neighboring hospitals and doctors are paid, and the one act CMS took on this years ago was to make it worse. The CMS bureaucracy has also attacked one of the best accountable care organizations in the country,

Rhode Island's Integra family doctors. Tried to throw them off the shared savings program because they said Integra years ago briefly fell 137 patients short of the 5,000 patients that ACOs need. CMS wouldn't listen until a court found that to be unjustified, likely illegal, irreparable harm to this high-performing ACO and its patients and Contrary to the public interest that must stop Last CMS has refused to approve waivers granted elsewhere for Rhode Island from rules that are stupid for Medicare patients who are nearing the end of their days

Here's what families see. Granny is home dying. She needs to transfer to a nursing home, and Medicare insists on putting her three days and two nights in a hospital. Expensive, frightening to granny and the family and stupid. Granny's home dying and can't get palliative and curative care together, inhumane and stupid. Granny's home dying and can't get home care if she can still get out into the yard or be driven to see the shore, to see Narragansett Beach, one more time to recall childhood memories before she dies, inhumane and stupid. Granny's home dying and the family's exhausted, and the respite care benefit is not to send a nurse or a caregiver, but to stuff Granny in an ambulance and haul her off to a hospital.

Some respite. It's all expensive, frightening, inhumane, and stupid. But the incensed CMS bureaucracy takes a court order to be awakened to the harm they cause. I have had enough. CMS should let Rhode Island try humane end-of-life care through CMMI. Let's see if it works at a state. I bet it will save money, serve families better at a very, very delicate time, and perhaps even make a model for better healthcare everywhere. I've said a lot. My time is out.

You're welcome to respond in writing. Ask unanimous consent that the order declaring CMS's actions to constitute irreparable and like illegal harm be put into the record without objection let me let me just respond very briefly senator whitehouse i'm an implacable enemy of tyrannical insensate bureaucracies and stupid rules and i will work with you to make CMS responsive to the needs of Rhode Island and to remedy those disparities that you talk about. I am familiar with the Integra health plan and it is a template for what we ought to be doing is a value-based plan and I look forward to you to making sure that we we create

pilot programs like this around the country unfortunately mr. chairman one of the things I've learned in my tenure in the Senate is that a nominee saying that they're willing to work with me amounts to exactly zero we need to get this fixed thank you well I guess at point, then we will move on to Senator Dades. Mr. Chairman, thank you. Mr. Kennedy, I'm glad to see you here this morning. I listened to your opening remarks and you mentioned you want to make HHS the gold standard of science. I have found my engagements with you, both behind closed doors in my office as well as listening to you publicly, to be very thoughtful and science-based.

I applaud that. I thank you for that. And I realize this will likely be a very partisan vote on this committee and on the Senate floor, but let the record state there are three medical doctors on this side of the dais i'm a chemical engineer we believe in science i'm thankful that you do too and you made that comment in your opening remarks i want to talk about agriculture for a moment we we talked about our common love for montana you've been to montana many times it's a wonderful state a lot of folks have discovered it.

They watch the show Yellowstone and people are coming and moving into our state. But it's an amazing place. But as you know, agriculture is our top economic driver in Montana. We produce some of the highest quality crops, the best livestock in the country and the world. Our farmers and our ranchers are truly some of the most effective environmental stewards in ensuring we have a safe food supply chain in the world. I share your view that protecting the integrity and safety of our food supply is utmost importance. I appreciate the research happening in places like Montana State University to help farmers produce resilient, healthy, and safe crops, as well as their agricultural practices. You mentioned you were a 4-H kid growing up. I think our 4-H kids

and our FFA kids are some of the best kids in America. My question for you Mr. Kennedy is if confirmed as I'm listening my farmers and ranchers talk about the future will you commit to working collaboratively with partners at USDA at the relevant federal agencies as well as our Montana farmers and ranchers before implementing any policy that might affect or impact food supply absolutely we'll make that commitment I have as I shared with you a personal commitment and a long career working with farmers I want to make sure I understand the very, very narrow margins, the slim margins that American farmers and ranchers are dealing with. I don't want, under my watch as a single farmer, to have to leave his farm for economic reasons

or for regulatory or bureaucratic reasons while I serve, if I'm privileged to serve, to be confirmed as HHS secretary. Even more important, President Trump has a very, very strong commitment to farmers. President Trump was is is probably historically and modern history the best farm president in our history of farm income spiked for the first time in decades under his last administration he got solid support from farmers across the country farm country is Trump country armors across the country

supported him during this election he has specifically instructed me that he wants farmers involved in every policy and that he wants me to work with Brooke Rollins at USDA to make sure that we preserve American farmers, that all of our policies support them. Mr. Kennedy, thank you. And if confirmed, I look forward to having you and Brooke Rollins out to Montana to spend some time with the farmers. You have my commitment to come there any anytime, particularly during ski season or hunting season. Deal. I want to shift gears for a moment. As we discussed in the meeting we

had in my office, mefapristone was approved in 2000. The FDA has been under scrutiny and brought to court for failure to properly assess this drug, as well as subsequent deregulations Senator Langford described that occurred over the past 25 years. Some of these deregulations included ending the requirement that these drugs be prescribed by a doctor, ending reporting requirements for adverse events, and allowing these pills to be obtained through the mail. In fact, the FDA's own prescribing label mentioned that three to five percent of women taking this drug end up in the emergency room. My question is, if confirmed as Secretary of HHS, will you

commit to working with the FDA commission to review these deregulatory actions that are threatening the safety of women? Sorry, Senator. As I said to Senator Langford, I think it's immoral to have a policy where patients are not allowed to report adverse events and where doctors are discouraged from doing that. President Trump has asked me to study the safety of Mephibistone. He has not yet taken a stand on how to regulate it. Whatever he does, I will implement those policies, and I will work with this committee, make those policies make sense. Thank you, Mr. Kennedy. Senator Hassan. Thank you, Mr. Chair and Ranking Member Wyden,

and welcome, Mr. Kennedy, and to your family as well. I want to start with a couple of concerns I have and just briefly on Medicaid. States share in the funding of Medicaid. Millions of disabled children in this country are alive because of Medicaid. Millions of people with addiction in this country are in recovery because of the services provided to them by Medicaid. And millions of chronically ill people who, until Medicaid expansion was enacted, who couldn't get health care and therefore couldn't work because they were too sick, got health care through Medicaid expansion, then went back to work, and now they're on private insurance.

So those are some facts about Medicaid that you might want to brush up on. Now, I'm also extremely concerned about your endorsement of radical fringe conspiracies that if implemented at HHS would put American families' lives at risk. Vaccines are one of our greatest public health triumphs. And you don't need—I'm not talking about abstract medical science. One of the people who helped raise me was my grandfather, who was a pediatrician. He practiced medicine in this country from 1921 until the mid-1980s. And I heard details about the difference those vaccines made in saving lives in the children

who were under his care. Vaccination has helped to eradicate many deadly diseases in the United States, including polio and smallpox, something we should be proud of as Americans. I am extremely concerned that as secretary, you would be able to halt critical vaccine research and to exploit parents' natural worries by advising them not to vaccinate their children. This will lead to more children getting sick, and some will even die. Before the measles vaccine, about 500 American children died a year from measles. This is too much of a risk for our country, and there is no reason that any of us should believe that you have reversed the anti-vaccine views that you have promoted for 25 years. For example, you have previously falsely suggested that the polio vaccine killed many, many, many, many more people than polio ever did

by causing fatal cancers, while rigorous safety studies show that to be completely false. Now, let's go to something we agree upon. I am really heartened to see that one area where we agree on is on women's reproductive freedom. In your own words, it's not the government's place to tell people what to do with their bodies. You said that, correct? Yep. Mr. Kennedy, in 2023, you came to New Hampshire and said, quote, I'm pro-choice. I don't think the government has any business telling people what they can or cannot do with their body. So you said that, right? Yes.

Yep. But you also said we need to trust the women to make that choice because I don't trust government to make any choices. You said that too, right? Yes. What's better than a well-marbled ribeye sizzling on the barbecue? A well-marbled ribeye sizzling on the barbecue that was carefully selected by an Instacart shopper and delivered to your door. A well-marbled ribeye you ordered without even leaving the kiddie pool.

Whatever groceries your summer calls for, Instacart has you covered. Download the Instacart app and enjoy $0 delivery fees on your first three orders. Service fees, exclusions, and terms apply. Instacart, groceries that over-deliver. It's remarkable that you have such a long record of fighting for women's reproductive freedom, and really great that my Republican colleagues are so open to voting for a pro-choice HHS secretary. So Mr. Kennedy, I'm confused. You have clearly stated in the past that bodily autonomy is one of your core values.

The question is, do you stand for that value or not? When was it that you decided to sell out the values you've had your whole life in order to be given power by President Trump? SEN. your whole life in order to be given power by President Trump. Senator, I agree with President Trump that every abortion is a tragedy, that we can't be a moral authority in this country. Right, but that isn't what you said back in New Hampshire in 2023. My question is exactly when did you decide to sell out your life's work and values to get this position?

Senator, I agree with President Trump that every abortion is a tragedy. So what you're telling us, just to be clear because my time is limited, is that regardless of what you believe, regardless of what values you have, if President Trump tells you to do something, you're going to do it. You said just now the discussion about Mifepristone. Oh, he's asked me to study the safety of it. Here are the safety studies that tell us Mifepristone is safe and effective. And I ask, Mr. Chair, that these 40—about 40 studies be admitted to the record by unanimous consent.

Mr. Without objection. Ms. So the studies are there. The safety is proved. The science is there. But what you're telling us is if President Trump orders you to take action to make it harder for women to get direly needed healthcare, you'll follow his order. If Mr. Trump, as he did yesterday, orders a halt on Medicaid payments that are essential for taking care of people with disabilities

all around this country, you're gonna follow that order because you are willing to sacrifice your values, your knowledge, if President Trump tells you to do that. That to me is unacceptable in a Secretary of Health and Human Services. As I explained before, the White House has issued a statement saying that that policy will not deprive any American of benefits. Yeah, the problem is the White House issued that statement only after we pointed out the damage it would do, and it became politically uncomfortable for them. You know what else that freeze on federal funding did? It halted funds for critical research that could cure pediatric cancer.

So if the president tells you to do that, you're going to stop that too. That's enough. What an insufferable witch. Senator Cortez Masto is next. Thank you. Mr. Kennedy, thank you for coming into my office and having the conversation that we did. I appreciate your passion and your belief, and you've spent years really talking about the issues that matter to you, and I appreciate that. Let me ask you a couple of questions, though I just need some

clarification. Right now, there's a 40-year-old law that requires hospital ERs accepting payment from Medicare to actually provide emergency care to patients. So let's say a woman experiencing a life-threatening condition, like a heart attack, goes to the ER. As a lawyer you would agree that that federal law protects her right to emergency care, correct? Yes. So now a pregnant woman with life-threatening bleeding from an incomplete miscarriage goes to the ER. Let me rephrase that so you can hear. A pregnant woman with a life-threatening bleeding from an incomplete miscarriage goes to the ER, and her doctor also determines that she needs an emergency abortion.

But she's in a state where abortion is banned. You would agree also, as an attorney, that federal law protects her right to that emergency care, correct? I don't know. I mean, the answer to that is I don't know. Let me ask you this as an attorney. Doesn't federal law preempt state law? The federal constitution does. Sometimes not every federal law preempts state laws. It could be unconstitutional.

I'm not trying to be evasive, Senator. I'm just telling you I don't know the answer to that question. I appreciate that. But what authority do you have over this as the director of HHS? What authority do I have? Yeah, to enforce the law. In what regards? To make sure that a hospital that receives payment from Medicare is ensuring that they are providing the necessary emergency care to patients it's actually the EMTALA law so what authority as HHS director do you have with respect to Intala? My understanding is that I have budgetary power and that it's pretty much limited

to that. But if you tell me I have another authority, I don't even think that we have a law enforcement branch at HHS. Well, let me tell you, you do. Actually, you do, and that's CMS. CMS actually investigates complaints of Intala violations, as well as the Health and Human Services Inspector General, who, by the way, was just recently fired by Donald Trump. So you will be enforcing EMTALA laws, and it's important that you understand their impact and don't play politics

with the patient presenting at the ER based on a position that this administration has taken. Let me ask you another question. When we met in my office, you said about lowering drug prices that when big pharma price gouges, American people suffer. I think we both agree on that. And I think you're sincere in your belief that you want to reduce prices for Americans, correct? Yes. MS. Yeah. The Inflation Reduction Act empowered Medicare to negotiate prescription

drug prices. It penalizes drug companies for price hikes above inflation, and it caps seniors' out-of-pocket drug costs, along with reducing insulin prices to $35 per month. But your future boss, Donald Trump, on his first day in office, revoked President Biden's executive order that actually directed the health secretary to examine ways to reduce drug prices and improve access to innovative therapies for the American people. And unfortunately, Republicans in Congress want to repeal the Inflation Reduction Act, which means reversing all of those things that we worked on to lower prices for Americans. So my question to you is, what do you do? Why are you there?

Are you there to be a rubber stamp to this administration and cave into all of these positions that they're taking, even though you know they're in disagreement with your positions on lowering drug prices and that they could harm Americans? How do you handle that as HHS director? Senator, my understanding is that the White House issued an executive order, I believe today, supporting the drug negotiations under the IRA. President Trump was very aggressive during his first term about negotiating drug prices. He has instructed me, and I've met with him repeatedly, as though we need lower prices than the seniors in this country. And others are—

AMY GOODMAN- So let me ask you—let me ask you this, because I only have so much time. So we've already negotiated lowering prices for 10 drugs with Big Pharma. And Big Pharma, by the way, opposes this. They have not only—are asking for a pause, they have filed lawsuits, but we've already negotiated the first 10 drugs. And we want to expand it to the next 10 to 15 that the Biden administration has put forward. Would you agree and continue that path of really mandating that big pharma come to the table and negotiate drug prices for Medicare so we can lower those prices

for Americans? My understanding is that the executive order that was issued today, which I haven't seen, but I've read a summary. Well, let me ask you this then, because you keep citing the Trump administration and you're just going to follow what they say. Is that what you're doing? You're just a rubber stamp for them in this position? So it doesn't matter that you're before us. It could be anybody coming before us as long as they're a rubber stamp for this administration, and disregarding your beliefs and what you think. I guess my question to you is, if it really is fundamental to what you believe, how do you live with that? How do you address those issues as you're moving forward, knowing that it's going to harm Americans?

Do you want me to answer the question? No, I'm asking you. OK. President Trump has asked me to end the chronic disease epidemic and make America healthy again. And I am a unique position. Is that the only reason why you're at HHS? Is that the only reason why then you're at the HHS to address that one issue? President Trump has asked me, because I'm

in a unique position, to end that. And that is what I'm in a unique position, to end that. And that is what I'm doing. And if we don't solve that problem, Senator, all of the other disputes we have about who's paying and whether it's insurance companies, whether it's providers, whether it's HMOs, whether it's patients or families, all of those are moving deck chairs around in the Titanic. Our ship is sinking.

Our 60% increase in Medicaid over the past four years is the biggest budget line now, and it's growing faster than any other. No other nation in the world has what we have here. No other nation has chronic disease. We have the highest chronic disease burden of any country in the world. During COVID, we had 16% of the COVID deaths in a country. We only have 4.2% of the world's population. We had a higher death count than any country in the world,

and when CDC was asked why, they said it's because Americans are the sickest people on earth. The average person who died from COVID, American, had 3.8 chronic diseases. This is an existential threat economically to our military, to our health, to our sense of well-being and it is a priority for President Trump and that's why he asked me to run the agency and if I'm privileged to be confirmed that's exactly what I'll do. Senator Barrasso. Thanks so much Mr. Chairman, Mr. Kennedy thank you for taking time to visit with me in my office prior to today's hearing to talk

about a lot of the important issues affecting health care in my home state of Wyoming as well as the nation. I appreciate your willingness to serve our country. During our meeting we discussed the challenges that health care providers and patients are facing in rural America. Financial obstacles facing rural hospitals, workforce shortages, issues of OBGYN, and then new regulations that are painful that have come out of the Biden administration hurting our ability to provide nursing home staffing. So let me start, if I could, with rural hospitals and the closures of hospitals like that. There are a lot of challenges facing hospitals in rural communities and frontier areas. We have 33 hospitals in Wyoming. 26 are really located in various locations, often hard to get to.

Weather impacts them. Six of the hospitals are at risk of closing. Two are at immediate risk of closing in the next two years. Ten have had to cut available services. And this is a concern of rural hospitals in both Republican and Democrat states, either way, bipartisan, critical that the workforce challenges, financial challenges that we're facing are addressed. Can you commit to working with us on a plan to address the critical nationwide issue of rural health care?

SEN. Yes, Senator. And I would say that during my visits—I visited almost 60 senators so far, and the most common unifying I would say issue among both Democrats and Republicans, there were two. One was PBM reform and the others were all hospitals. And our nation made a commitment over 100 years ago to put a hospital within 30 miles of every American. We generally succeeded in doing that. made a commitment over a hundred years ago to put a hospital within 30 miles of every American we generally succeeded in doing that it's absolutely critical it's

life-saving and rural hospitals are closing at an extraordinary rate right now they not only provide important health care the localities, but also they're economic drivers for localities all over this country. President Trump is determined to end the hemorrhage of rural hospitals, and he's asked me to do that through the use of AI, through telemedicine, which these are innovations that I saw the other day.

A Cleveland clinic has developed an AI nurse that you cannot distinguish from a human being that has diagnostics as good as any doctor. And we can develop, we can provide concierge care to every American in this country, even those the remote parts of Wyoming, Montana, Alaska, et cetera. We also have opportunities at HRSA and at the GMA to finally live up to GMA's mission of serving, of providing personnel to rural hospitals. And I intend to use all of my power because I've seen the priority that is given by both Democrats and Republicans on this committee.

I intend to make that a priority of mine, if I'm privileged to be confirmed. Well, I appreciate it because often with financial strains on a local hospital, one of the common services to be cut in rural hospitals is maternity services. And now we have women in Wyoming having to drive over 100 miles to access care. Thirteen counties in Wyoming don't have access to OB. And we're talking counties larger than the states of Vermont, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New Jersey, Delaware, counties larger than those whole states. So will you commit to working with my office to find solutions to help address these specific

maternal health challenges in rural America? Yes, Senator, I look forward to it. Another issue we specifically spoke about was this harmful Biden administration rule that had really been bad for our rural nursing homes. And it's a rule that would triple the bad for our rural nursing homes. And it's a rule that would triple the registered nurse requirements in nursing homes. This is going to lead, there just aren't enough registered nurses in our state to be able to comply with this. This would lead to nursing home closures across our state. Will you commit to working with me to fix this serious

problem that was a result of a rule that came out by the Biden administration who clearly doesn't understand rural America. Yes, Senator, I think the rule was well-intentioned, but as you've said, and I've heard from many rural senators, it will be a disaster for their states. Some of the nursing homes, these are staffing rules that require 24-hour staffing by medical professionals some of the nursing homes in rural areas simply do not have the available personnel or the economics to be able to do that it will mean the closure of nursing homes in rural areas across our country which means the parents elderly parent will be moved a great distance from the local community and their family.

And we know that the single greatest driver of high-quality nursing home care is the involvement, the proximity of family members. When you move that nursing facility away from the community where the kids live, you're going to get much worse care. So the intention, although it was noble, was in reality, for rural areas at least, it is going to be a disaster. Mr. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Thank you.

Mr. Senator Johnson. Senator Johnson. Senator Johnson. Senator Johnson. Senator Johnson. Senator Johnson. Senator Johnson. Senator Johnson. Senator Johnson. Senator Johnson. Thank you for being here. Thank you for your decades-long advocacy for a clean environment, for children's health.

I can't say as I'm surprised by the hostility on the other side. I'm highly disappointed in it. I don't know if you remember when you called me up and you were contemplating setting your political differences aside, joining forces with President Trump on an area of agreement, addressing chronic illness, trying to find the root cause of all these problems facing this nation. My first response was, Bobby, this is an answer to my prayers. We need to get to the answers of this, but even more, we need to heal and unify this divided nation. I'm not necessarily the most optimistic guy, because we've got enormous challenges facing

this nation, but I thought, wow, here's somebody from the left, somebody I don't agree with on many issues politically, coming together with President Trump and focusing on an area of agreement, something that the American people desperately want. Finding out the answers. What has caused autism? What is causing chronic illness? Ms. Kennedy, I know, I think I've come to know what's in your heart.

I think I know the personal and political price you've paid for this decision. I want to say publicly, I thank you for that I truly appreciate what you're doing here can't we come together as a nation and do this can we do aren't you aren't you getting tired of this? I'm getting tired of this. So again, Mr. Kennedy, I need to enter in the record. These are just 11 letters of support signed by 63,000 people, thousands of doctors. From the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, Independent Medical Alliance, the North Carolina Physicians and Freedom Group group governor Jeff Landry for Louisiana these are Americans nonpartisan a lot a lot of

these people I've know because I've you know advocated with you a lot of them are Democrats they put their political differences aside so mr. chairman I'd like to enter this in the record without objection objection. I also do want to, Mr. Kennedy, as long as I have you here, I've written over 70 oversight letters to the federal health agencies under the Biden administration. I've virtually gotten squat out of them, okay? What I get is we get, for example,

50 pages of Anthony Fau fauci's emails redacted by the way the latest one was 17 pages instead of issuing a health alert on the myocarditis myocarditis they knew was impacting young men early in 2021 instead of issuing an alert on the health alert network they developed 17 pages of talking points those read this was given to the public under a for request they had to go to court they've got a new way of redacting they don't black things out they just give you white pages you don't even know what they have redacted so again I've issued a subpoena now to cover the information I've requested in 70 oversight letters my question to you

is as Secretary HHS will you honor these requests from Congress and will you make HHS transparent? SEN. Yeah, my approach to HHS, as I said before, Senator, is radical transparency. Democrats and Republicans ought to be able to come in and get information that was generated at taxpayer expense that is owned by the American taxpayer. It shouldn't get redacted documents. Public health agencies should be transparent. And if we want Americans to restore trust in the public health agencies, we need transparency. I want to say something

about what you first said. When I launched my campaign, it was about uniting Americans Democrats Republicans there's no issue that she's night it's more than this chronic health epidemic there's no such thing as Republican children or Democratic children these are our kids 66% of them are damaged I know what a healthy kid looks like because I had so many of them in my family. I didn't know anybody with a food allergy growing up, peanut allergy. Why do five of my kids have allergies?

Why are we seeing these explosions in diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, neurological diseases, depression, all these things that are related to toxic to the environment. Why can't we just agree with each other to put differences about so many issues, intractable issues aside, and say, we're going to end this. I don't think anybody is going to be able to do this like I have. Because of my peculiar experience, because I've litigated against these agencies. When you litigate against them, you get a PhD in corporate capture and how to unravel it.

I've written six books about these agencies. I know a lot about them and I know how to fix it and there's nobody who will fix it the way that I do because I'm not scared of vested interest. I don't care. I'm not here because I want a position or a job. I have a very good life and a happy family. This is something I don't need. I want to do this because we're going to fix it.

The other thing is we are attracting now a caliber of people to HHS like never before in history. And they're entrepreneurs, they're disruptors, they're innovators of immense talents that are walking away, many of them, from growing concerns. They're not coming there or positioned. They're coming there because they wanna save our country. And they're from across the political spectrum.

And all these Democrats are opposed to me for partisan issues they used to be my friends agreed with me on all the environmental issues I've been working on for my whole career now they're against me because anything that President Trump does any decision he makes has to be lampooned, derided, discredited, marginalized, vilified. We need to move on. Senator Warren. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. So, Mr. Kennedy, I want to start with something that I think you and I agree on.

Here we go. And that is that the new pharma has too much power in Washington. You said that President Trump asked you to, quote, clean up corruption and conflicts. Sounds great. You've said that you will, quote, slam shut the revolving door between government agencies and the companies they regulate. That also sounds great. So here's an easy question. Will you commit that when you leave this job, you will not accept compensation from a drug company, a medical device company, a hospital system, or a health insurer for at least four years, including as a lobbyist or a board member?

SEN. Can you just repeat the last part of the question? Can I commit to what? MS. You're not going to take money from drug companies in any way, shape, or form. Who? Me? Yes, you. Oh.

I'm happy to commit to that. That's what I figured. I said it's an easy question to start with. And I think you're right on this question. I don't think any of them want to give me money, by the way. Let's keep going. You're right to say yes, because every American has the right to know that every decision you make as our number one health officer is to help them and not to

make money for yourself in the future. So I want to talk more about money. I'm looking at your paperwork right now. In the past two years, you've raked in $2.5 million from a law firm called Wisner Bomb. You go online, you do commercials to encourage people to sign up with Wisner Bomb to join lawsuits against vaccine makers. And for everyone who signs up, you personally get paid. And if they win their case, you get 10% of what they win. So if you bring in somebody who gets $10 million, you walk away with a million dollars. Now, you just said that

you want the American people to know you can't be bought. Your decisions won't depend on how much money you could make in the future. You won't go to work for a drug company after you leave HHS, but you and I both know there's another way to make money. So, Mr. Kennedy, will you also agree that you won't take any compensation from any lawsuits against drug companies while you are secretary and for four years afterwards. Well, I'll certainly commit to that while I'm secretary. But I do want to clarify something because you're making me sound like a shill.

I put together that case. I did the Science Day presentation of the judge on that case to get it into court. Mr. Kennedy, it's just a really simple question. You've taken in $2.5 million. I want to know if you will commit right now that not only will you not go to work for drug companies, you won't go to work suing the drug companies and taking your rake out of that while you're a secretary and for four years after. I'll commit to not taking any fees from drug companies while I'm secretary. I'm asking about fees from suing drug companies.

Will you agree not to do that? You're asking me to not sue drug companies. No, you can sue drug companies. SEN. BERNIE SANDERS, No. SEN. BERNIE SANDERS, And I'm not going to agree to that, Senator. SEN. BERNIE SANDERS, You can sue drug companies as much as you want. SEN.

BERNIE SANDERS, I'm not going to agree to not sue drug companies or anybody. SEN. BERNIE SANDERS, So let's do a quick count here of how, as secretary of HHS, if you get confirmed, you could influence every one of those lawsuits. Well, let me start the list. You could publish your anti-vaccine conspiracies, but this time on U.S. government letterheads, something a jury might be impressed by. You could appoint people to the CDC vaccine panel who share your anti-vax views and let them do your dirty work. You could tell the CDC vaccine panel to remove a particular vaccine

from the vaccine schedule. You could remove vaccines from special compensation programs, which would open up manufacturers to mass torts. You could make more injuries eligible for compensation, even if there is no causal evidence. You could change vaccine court processes to make it easier to bring junk lawsuits. You could turn over FDA data to your friends at the law firm, and they could use it however it benefited them. You could change vaccine labeling. You could change vaccine information rules. You could change which claims are compensated in the vaccine injury compensation program. There's a lot of ways that you can influence those future lawsuits and pending lawsuits while you are Secretary of HHS, and I'm asking you to commit right now that you will not take a financial stake in every one of

those lawsuits so that what you do as secretary will also benefit you financially down the line i i'll comply with all the ethical guidelines that's not the question you and i you have said you're asking me senator you're asking me not to sue vaccine look no one should be fooled here. As Secretary of HHS, Robert Kennedy will have the power to undercut vaccines and vaccine manufacturing across our country. And for all of his talk about follow the science and his promise that he won't interfere with those of us who want to vaccinate his kids. The bottom line is the same. Kennedy can kill off access to vaccines and make millions of dollars while he does it. Kids might die, but Robert Kennedy can keep cashing in.

Senator, I support vaccines. I support the childhood schedule. I will do that. The only thing I want is good science, and that's it. How about Vince say you won't make money off what you do as Secretary of HHS? I think it would be important for me to make it very clear that Mr. Kennedy has gone through the same Office of Government Ethics process as every single other nominee in the Finance Committee this year and in previous administrations. In addition to listing his assets, including the items that you've identified, he has signed an ethics letter that has been reviewed by the Office of Government Ethics concerning any possible conflict in light of its functions and the nominee's proposed duties. And we have a letter from the Office of Government Ethics that he hasn't complied completely with all applicable laws and regulations governing conflicts of interest.

Mr. Chairman, point of information here. Have we had a single nominee come through who's made two and a half million dollars off suing one of the entities that it would be regulating and plans to keep getting a take of every lawsuit in the future? Have we had that before? I haven't reviewed the past documentation of every other nominee's financial interests, and so no. But I know that every single time we get a nominee, their financial interests are attacked. That's why we have the Office of Government Ethics. That's why they've reviewed everything that's in his record, and that's why he has even, I think, and I don't know that I want to ask him to get into it, but he has listed his assets and has gone through a discussion of the responsibilities under our ethics laws and has complied with all of those requirements.

Senator Tillis. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Kennedy, how's your morning going? So far, so good. You came prepared. I'm glad that you did. You, I believe, addressed to my satisfaction a question about Title X and the president's priority with respect to Planned Parenthood. Can you just affirm that you are 100 percent behind the president's policy on Title 10? I'm 100 percent behind it. Thank you. You know, it's amazing to me that people—well, first off, you need to understand, I was in a judiciary hearing this morning. It's very clear to me that some of these

nominations are going to be shirts and skins. So no matter what you answer in the affirmative, they're going to ask you one more question so that you won't be able to answer in the affirmative. That's just the way the game gets played when we have nominees like yourself. So I think you're handling yourself well. I've got a real quick question for you. Are you a conspiracy theorist? SEN. That is a pejorative senator that's

applied to me mainly to keep me from asking difficult questions a powerful interest I was told that I was a conspiracy theorist that label was applied to me because I said that the vaccines, the COVID vaccine, didn't prevent transmission and it wouldn't prevent infection. When the government was telling people, Americans, that it would. I was saying that because I was looking at the monkey studies in May of 2020. I was called a conspiracy. Now everybody admits it. I was called a conspiracy theorist because I said red dye caused cancer. And now FDA has acknowledged that and banned it. I was called a conspiracy theorist because I said red dye caused cancer and now FDA has

acknowledged that and banned it. I was called a conspiracy theorist because I said or I'd lower IQ. Last week JAMA published a meta review of 87 studies saying that there's a direct inverse correlation between IQ loss. All right, so I'm going to assume a lot I'm gonna assume I go on for a week is there any one of them that you can say you got me that really was a conspiracy theory or are you in a position to submit for the record I think it just be helpful for every one of these narratives for you to submit that maybe for the record you said

something about snap lunch I was in the statehouse in North Carolina before I came here, and anytime I'd go visit an elementary school, the first thing I would do is go to the trash cans in the cafeteria. And what we have now are kids that are not eating the food because the dictates of the federal government have made it something that they don't want. But they say, well, it's a healthy alternative. It has processed materials in it, and it's not particularly attractive to them. So they throw it away. Trash can's full of food that these kids didn't eat. So then what do they do?

They go eat snacks, or they drink a sugared drink. The SNAP program, everything you've said about the SNAP program, I agree with. I think that we should be very, very strict about that, and it's going to make some people uncomfortable in the food manufacturing segment, produce healthy foods that we can put in the SNAP program. That's the way to address it. But we also need to look at the school health program. I was PTA president 21, 22 years ago at my daughter's high school. And I feel like we've got these kids that need help. We've got to guide them through a process. Many of them are probably on Medicaid, and Medicaid's fouling them. Everybody here says Medicaid is sacrosanct. Nobody's admitted that Medicaid is not producing

positive health outcomes. Is that your problem with Medicaid right now, in the program or the outcomes? It's the outcomes. We're spending $900 billion. Our people are getting sicker every single year. Yeah, so anybody who's building it— And President Trump wants people to have—Americans to have high-quality insurance. Anybody who's building a case for the status quo of Medicaid is, by extension, saying that they're happy with the outcomes.

I think it's unacceptable. I do have a question for you on Project Warp Speed. We supported the CARES Act. We had 97 people in the US Senate vote for it. Everybody here, there's only one member of Congress that voted against it, I believe. And Project Warp Speed had CDC, FDA, NIH, and BARDA very much in the mix. Now some people think that you're gonna come in here and insert yourself into those agencies in a way that's never been done before. Let's say that they're a part of a future Project Warp Speed. Is it your intent to go in and do something that's never been done before, based on my staff's research, and insert yourself in a discussion

that the scientists are dealing with in those different agencies? No, Senator. What I want to do is, I'm not a scientist. I want to empower scientists. I want to make sure that science is unobstructed by vested or economic interests. That's good. I've had culture, and I'll just say about Operation Warp Speed, it was an extraordinary accomplishment, showed demonstration of leadership by President Trump.

When he promoted Operation Warp Speed, he was looking at all of the different remedies, including vaccines. Therapeutics, everything. Therapeutic, ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, femtetivine, even chlorine dioxide, and he was not looking at shutting down our country for the year, forcing people to wear masks for a year, forcing all social distancing that did not

have any scientific basis, which Dr. Fauci has now acknowledged. He said we took it out of thin air. Oh, but my, but all of those changed during the Biden administration. And it became very narrowly focused. We ended up with the worst, the highest death count of any country in the world. Mr. Chair, if I can just ask one final question, and I think it's a one word answer. I've heard a lot of people complaining about health care delivery, Medicaid, on the other side of the dais here, who's been responsible for healthcare policies over the last four years? The Biden administration. I mean the president, the Biden, okay. So that I'd like to have heard more of those

in oversight hearings over the last four years. I haven't, but I'm glad that there's an acknowledgment that you're inheriting a problem that needs to be fixed. Thank you. Thank you, Senator. Senator Sanders. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Kennedy, thanks for being with us. I very much like the slogan that you coined, make America healthy again. And I strongly agree with that effort. Despite spending, as you indicated, two or three times as much per capita on health care as other nations, we have 85 million people who are uninsured, underinsured. We have all kinds of chronic illnesses. Our life expectancy is lower than other countries, and for working class people in this country, they are living six, seven years shorter lives than the top 1%.

We got a problem, okay? And I'm going to suggest some ideas that I think can remedy that. Last year, the insurance industry in this country made over $70 billion, while at the same time, 85 million Americans are uninsured or underinsured. Do you agree with me that the United States should join every other major country on earth and guarantee health care to all people as a human right? Yes?

No? right yes no yes or no answer that question human right is health care a human right in the way that free speech the human right yeah I would say it's different because if with free speech doesn't cost anybody anything, but in healthcare, if you smoke cigarettes for 20 years and you get cancer, you are now taking from the pool. And so are you guaranteed the same rate or is there also a duty? I'm sorry. I'd love to talk for an hour with you. We got a few minutes left here. All right.

Every other country says health care, whether you're poor or rich, younger or older, human right. I'm not hearing you say that. All right. You've talked about the drug companies, and maybe we agree on this one. As you all know, despite the drug companies making over $100 billion in profits, paying CEOs outrageous compensation packages, we in some cases pay 10 times more for the same drug. Will you support legislation that I will introduce which says that in America we should not be paying a nickel more for prescription drugs than people around the rest of the world? Yes? No?

SENATOR BERNARDO GENERAL DE LA FUENTE To equalize it? SENATOR BERNARDO GENERAL DE LA FUENTE Not to equalize it. That we should not be paying more than other countries for the same damn drug. President Trump has asked me, in fact, I had a meeting with President Trump a week ago where we showed him the charts. He knows the charts. We're paying 10 times more from Europe. That's right. And are you going to commit to us that you will end that absurdity?

I think in principle we can. We should end that disparity. Good. Okay. That's great. All right. I happen to believe that climate change is real, it's an existential threat, and it is a healthcare issue. Donald Trump thinks that it is a hoax originating in China.

Question is, in your judgment, is climate change a hoax, or is it real, causing devastating problems? PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT I, from the beginning, from our first meeting, agreed to disagree on that issue. I believe climate change is existential.

My job is to make Americans healthy again. You disagree with Trump. You don't think climate change is a hoax is what I'm hearing. My job here is to make Americans healthy. I'm just asking you that, Mr. Kennedy. Not a trick question. I answered your question, Senator Sanders. Okay.

You disagree with the president on that? I answered your question. I answered your question, Senator Sanders. Okay, you disagree with the President on that. I answered your question. Okay, I'm going to pick up on a point that Senator Hassan made. Look, there is no question that abortion is a divisive issue in this country. I would say a majority of the people are pro-choice. There's a strong minority who are pro-life. A year and a half ago, you went to New Hampshire, running for president, gave a speech, and you talked about government should not tell a woman what she

can do with her own body. That's her choice. Now, I think everybody on that side is pro-life. I think everybody here is pro-choice. I have never seen any major politician flip on that issue quite as quickly as you did when Trump asked you to become HHS secretary. Tell me why you think people should have confidence in your consistency and in your word when you really made a major U-turn on an issue of that importance in such a short time. Senator, I believe and I've always believed that every abortion is a tragedy. But you told the people in New Hampshire that it was their right. All right let me do a last question because I'm running

out of time. I think the gist of what you were trying to say today is you're really pro-vaccine. You want to ask questions. You have started a group called the Children's Health Defense. You're the original. Right now, as I understand it, on their website, they are selling what's called onesies. These are little things, clothing for babies. One of them is titled unfaxed unafraid next one in the sold for 26 bucks a piece by the way next one is no vacs no problem now you're coming before this committee and you say you're pro vaccine just want to ask some

questions and yet your organization is making money selling a child's product to parents for $26, which casts fundamental doubt on the usefulness of vaccines. Can you tell us now that you will, now that you are pro-vaccine, that you're going to have your organization take these products off the market? Senator, I have no power over that organization.

I'm not part of it. I resign from the board. That was just a few months ago. You founded that. You certainly have power. You can make that. Are you supportive of this? I've had nothing to do with leadership.

Are you supportive of these onesies? I'm supportive of vaccines. Are you supportive of this clothing, which is militantly anti-vaccine? I am supportive of vaccines. I want good science, and I want to protect the vaccines. But you will not tell the organization you founded not to continue selling that product. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Senator Blackburn. Thank you so much, Mr. Chairman, and thank you so much for being with us today. And I have no doubt that you will be confirmed, and you are going to do such a solid job for the people of this country. And I do have several issues I wanted to talk with you about and didn't have time to

cover them all when we met prior to the meeting. But rural health care is very important to me and the people of Tennessee. 78 of our 95 counties are rural counties. Now, over the last few years, we've seen hospital closures. So we have focused on access in rural areas. And my rural health agenda, which is bipartisan, focuses on innovation, telehealth, access points. It focuses on work shortages. And also, Senator Warner and I have together focused on making certain that we address the area wage index and do that fairly for our citizens that are in rural communities. So I would like a commitment from you that when confirmed, you and your CMS administrator will work with us to make certain that the area wage index is balanced and that it is fair to rural areas.

Senator, both Dr. Oz and myself recognize that rural healthcare is in crisis in this country and that is catastrophic for our entire country and I talked a little bit about my commitment to rural health earlier in this hearing the uh the regional uh price points as you know are set by congress and not by HHS but I will certainly and I know Dr Oz will certainly work with you to make them sensible. We look forward to that. Also, you and I, before you came forward as the secretary, the nominee, we had talked in years past about over-medicating youth and concerns over that. And I was looking at a report from TennCare, which is our Medicaid program in Tennessee, and I was concerned when I saw a number that TennCare had spent $90 million in 2024 alone on ADHD. This was 417,000 of our children, and $90 million.

To me, that is is heartbreaking what is happening there. So how will you prioritize oversight of prescribing practices while promoting alternative solutions such as counseling, behavioral therapies, community-based interventions for our youth. Exactly, and that's the solution. Fifteen percent of American youth are now on Adderall or some other ADHD medication. Even higher percentages are on SSRIs and benzos. We are not just over-medicating our children. We're over-medating our entire population half the pharmaceutical drugs on earth are

now sold here 70% of the profits from pharmaceutical companies are from the United States even though we only have 4.2 percent of the world's population not only that but a recent study by Cochrane Collaboration founder Peter Ghosh found that pharmaceutical drugs are the third largest cause of death in our country after heart attacks and cancers. Oh, they're not making us healthier. We need community health initiatives. We need access to treatment.

We need exercise. We need better food. Okay, let me talk to you about one of those access points in treatment and this highlights a problem we have in the federal Medicaid law since Medicaid's enactment states have been prohibited from using Medicaid funds for care provided by institutions for mental disease we refer to them as IMDs. These are psychiatric hospitals, residential treatment facilities with more than 16 beds. This is a discriminatory

exclusion, and it denies payment for medically necessary care based on the illness that is being treated, and it has perpetuated unequal coverage in mental health care. So if you're confirmed, when you're confirmed, will you commit to working with me on repealing this discriminatory exclusion and ensuring equal access to mental health care for Medicaid beneficiaries? Yes, Senator. Thank you so much. I've got a question on PBM reform, one on artificial intelligence in health care in the interest of time. I will yield back. I look forward to seeing you help make us healthy again. Thank you, Senator. Senator Lujan. What? No, I'm next. You're next.

I'm next. Excuse me. I made a mistake. It's Senator Cantwell. Thank you so much. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And just congratulations on your nomination, Mr. Kennedy. I've been absent only because I've been in another hearing with the nominee to be

the Commerce Secretary. So I will review everything that you've said today and look at that diligently. But one of the things that I wanted to discuss with you is I represent a very big innovation state, an innovation in healthcare specifically, innovation like NIH funding to the Fred Hutch Cancer Center that helped develop the HPV vaccine, which has the potential to eliminate over 95 percent of cervical cancer. NIH also funds a lot of jobs and grants nearly 11,000 people in the state of Washington and over $1.2 billion worth of grants. So while I agree with you on healthy foods, I definitely am troubled by the medical research side of innovation and some of the things that you have said. In fact, this issue about laying off 600 employees at NIH or giving the fact that to quote

give infectious disease a break for eight years. So I we've had a chance to talk about this a little bit but the most striking example of this is when COVID hit and we were the first in the nation. We had the first case, and it really was the fast response by the University of Washington that really helped save lives. So I just want to know that, are you aware of how harmful these issues could be for public health, that public health in and of itself could be affected by these kind of anti-science views? Senator, I have always been a science person, a pro-science person.

I believe in evidence-based medicine and gold standard science. What I said, and I've explained this before you came in, that 600 people out of a workforce of 91,000 is pretty typical. Last year alone, President Biden replaced 3,000 people at HHS and 700 at NIH. I want to say this. I said give infectious disease a break because that's been the principal preoccupation. Infectious disease, chronic disease is 92 percent, accounts for 92 percent of deaths in this country and almost nothing is studied at NIH about the ideology of our chronic disease epidemic.

But right now— The money is going to infectious disease. But I get your point. It's an interesting point. The problem is we had to respond. And it's actually the Gates Foundation and a flu cohort that figured out what was wrong and that we had an outbreak of COVID that was going beyond the very first case. And so we had to build a very fast response. So I take this to the University of Washington has

conducted groundbreaking stem cell research on fetal tissue. To me, I know there's probably a lot of people that may not agree with this, but we're making regenerative heart tissue now at the University of Washington. So yes or no, do you commit to protecting stem cell research for scientific agencies if confirmed? Dr. I will protect stem cell research. Stem cell research today can be done on umbilical cords and you don't need fetal tissue. You'll protect the laws that are on the books today and the research that's done. My job is Senator to enforce the laws.

Okay, so I want to move to PBMs because PBMs are driving up drug prices. And one of the biggest things that we need to do here, I think, in a new administration is get a handle on everything that is driving up prices and lower them. The report found that PBMs generated $1.4 billion from spread pricing. That is where they are able to basically set the price, not reimburse pharmacies, and then pocket the rest. We've had bipartisan legislation in several different committees now to get at this. What do you think the solution is? The President of the United States,

Mr. Well, I think one of the really notable achievements of this panel was the PBM legislation that they put together in a bipartisan way. I haven't met a single senator. Well, actually, one only. But of the 60-odd senators that I talked to, all of them talked about PBMs and how important it was and work. President Trump, during his first administration, pushed through a law or pushed a law to give transparency to BBMs. It got overruled during the Biden administration.

Luckily, this panel is resuscitating that. President Trump is absolutely committed to fixing the PBMs. My time is running out, so I just want to clarify. You believe that we should pass these laws that now have been proposed in the Senate? I haven't read the entire law, so I don't know, but I think that we need to reform the PBMs. I think we need to get rid of all of these vested interests that are draining money from the system.

Okay, somebody suggested though that you thought we should, you should convene the PBMs and talk to them about some sort of self-regulation. So I am trying to distinguish between these people who basically are doing illegal activities and ripping off, really they're creating pharmacy deserts in my state. So I'm asking you whether you believe that we have to legislate in this area. Again, I'm not being evasive. I just don't know exactly what the law says. I met with the PBMs. I met with pharma. My job is to meet with all the stakeholders. I've been meeting with stakeholders for 40 years, people I was suing, people I was... you want to hear from the other side. Well that doesn't mean I

would let the PBMs write their own ticket. I think... I support the... I support the efforts of this committee to come up with bipartisan legislation. President Trump wants to get the excess profits away from the PBMs and send it back to primary care, to patients in this country, to high quality health care. I'll ask you for the record since my time has expired to look at the legislation that came out of the Commerce Committee that defines the legal activities that they are doing to drive up prices and get us an answer for the record. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

In principle, I support that legislation. Thank you. And let me just tell you the list as we have to move forward to the ending here. Senator Lujan will be next, followed by Senator Marshall, Senator Warnock, Senator Smith, Senator Young, and Senator Welch. And let me say again, Mr. Chairman, this is a matter of such importance. A number of my colleagues would like a second round, and I think it would be important to offer, say, a modest amount of additional time to get into this on both sides. I know I have some questions, but I want my colleagues to have the opportunity to raise

their concerns as well. Well, I've said, as I have indicated to you, Senator Wyden, I'm not going to do a second round. I have been very generous with the senators. I think almost every single senator has had seven minutes at least. I will give you a second as is our practice between the two of us. I think I'll then divide my time up with my colleagues. Okay, you are welcome to do that.

Thank you. Senator Lujan. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Kennedy, when we met, you stated to me that it is not your goal to take away programs that work for Americans. Do you stand by that statement? Yes, Senator. Mr. Kennedy, do you know how many Americans rely on Medicaid? About 72 million plus the 7 million kids who are on CHIPS.

Appreciate that, 72 million. Yes or no, is it important that expectant mothers and newborns have access to health coverage? Is it important that expectant mothers and newborns have access to health coverage? Absolutely, Senator. Mr. Kennedy, do you know how many babies born in this country are covered through Medicaid? I would guess. I don't know the answer, I would guess about 30 million. I have it Mr. Kennedy. About 41% of 1.4 million babies births are financed by Medicaid according to the National Center for Health Statistics.

Yes or no, do you believe that Medicaid is a critical program? I believe that Medicaid is a critical program, but that it's not working as well as it ought to be. And President Trump has asked me to make it work better, that most Americans are not happy with. The premiums are too high. The deductibles are too high. And everybody's getting sicker. Too much money is going to the insurance industry. I have a series of yes or no questions. They're pretty simple.

Because you heard we're not going to get a second round of questions, I ask for your indulgence to be able to get to them. Yes or no. In New Mexico, as you know, Medicaid is often measured state by state. It might surprise you if you look at some of those surveys. In New Mexico, the response was 90% of New Mexicans on Medicaid report satisfaction getting care. 80% getting specialist care. 85% getting urgent care. 95% ease of filings out of focus.

Not to pick on any one of my colleagues, but in Louisiana, 86% of people on Medicaid are satisfied with their interactions. 83% are satisfied getting care. 85% are satisfied getting specialized care. 82% getting urgent care. I can go on state by state, but we don't have the time today. Yes or no, do you support cutting Medicaid or reducing, and especially in an area where you and I spoke about with the federal investment in Medicaid, which is known as FMAP?

I'm going to call it a restroom break. President Trump has not told me that he wants to cut Medicaid. He's told me to make it better. Do you support cutting? Yes or no? Let me ask you this way, since it's only about President Trump. I support making it better, Senator. If President Trump asks you to cut Medicaid, will you do it? Oh, it's not up to me to cut Medicaid.

It would be up to Congress. You don't want to answer? I'm going to work. Mr. Kenney, you don't want to answer? I'll move on. Do you know how many states will end? Mr. Chairman, if I may pause my time. So I understand that people are getting asked to leave if they stand up with signs. But there's a lot of other as well, Mr. Chairman.

So it needs to be extended to everyone. As Mr. Kennedy said, we should respect each other when we have a difference of opinion. We're just trying to do our jobs here and trying to ask questions. That's all. And that's all I'm doing with Mr. Kennedy said, we should respect each other when we have a difference of opinion. We're just trying to do our jobs here and trying to ask questions. That's all. And that's all I'm doing with Mr. Kennedy, folks. So I just hope that we can— Senator Lujan, you were right, and I ask the audience to please be respectful. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

I appreciate that very much. Mr. Kennedy, do you know how many states will end their Medicaid expansion if the federal share of Medicaid drops? Well, there's 40 states that have signed on to the expansion. It's a smaller number. So, it's nine states would quickly have to end their expansion because of the laws that they have. That's about four million folks across the country. And in New Mexico, Iowa and Idaho,

they have triggers that it would immediately have to go into effect if in fact that gets cut. The reason I'm asking those questions is there's been a lot of chatter and conversations around Medicaid. Now I agree we can always do better and we must be doing better in America. But Medicaid has been shown to improve health outcomes including mortality, quality of life, and access to preventative care as well. And there's some areas Mr. Kennedy that you and I touched on specific to Native American communities. One of the concerns that I have are these programs matter to folks. You shared your passion about

caring for folks. I believed that passion. My question in this area is, as you know, when folks are doing research and they're going to check to see if medicine works on someone, if they're not included in that trial, it often doesn't help them. That's what all the evidence shows. So, what are you going to do when programs are eliminated to require the inclusion of Native Americans in clinical trials when it comes to life-saving medicine? I'm gonna do everything I can to make sure there's Native Americans clinical trials. As I said to you when I visited your office, I spent 20% of my career working

on Native issues. My family's been deeply involved with them. My family, my father and uncle were big critics of the Indian Health Service, the failure to deliver good health results or healthcare on the reservations. I'm gonna bring a native, and for the first time in history, into my central office, that all the major decisions in my office will be, that he will have it, he, we've already interviewed a candidate interviewed candidate a very very good candidate

will have direct impact on all the major offices one of my priorities is you know i appreciate that i have a follow-up in that space specifically will you commit to finalizing the congressionally mandated fda guidance to increase clinical trial diversity? Just repeat that again I'm sorry. Will you commit to finalizing the congressionally mandated FDA guidance to increase increasing clinical trial diversity? Yes. I appreciate that. Will you commit to reinstating all of the pages that that were eliminated and people that were fired from this administration that have this responsibility.

Mr. I cannot commit to that because I don't know who they are. Mr. Well, there's some folks out there doing the work. Mr. I'll commit to working with you to make sure those positions are adequately staffed. Mr. I will follow up in writing in those specific areas because I think there's some commonality here, but answers matter. And so I'd like to get those as timely as possible. The last thing, Mr. Chairman, that I'll say is one of the conversations I had last before this hearing

was with a family that I've been working with to work with my Republican colleagues when it comes to autism and federal programs and making a difference in these families' lives and this little girl's life. What I'm asking now, Mr. Chairman is unanimous consent to enter into the record an article from Autism Speaks titled quote do vaccines cause autism end quote. And I'll note that the first sentence states quote vaccines do not cause autism end quote. Thank you. I yield back. Without objection. vaccines do not cause autism end quote thank you without objection and before we move on we've had a request from several quarters for a quick restroom break we will take a five minute

recess i'm sorry to those remaining five or six senators who must wait a few minutes but we will have a quick break we will be back as soon as we can goodness gracious holy smokes he oh he's getting the cheers here let's listen listen to that listen to this everybody's cheering for rfk for the people it's amazing you don't often hear that, but the old, degenerate, big pharma lobbyists, senators, are really doing a number to dance for their dollars.

What a bunch of sickos. We have some very interesting information for you about many of the senators who are asking questions of rfk you'll be shocked to know that many of the in fact all of them are massive massive recipients of big pharma dollars we can start of course with elizabeth warren elizabeth warren is Elizabeth Warren. Elizabeth Warren is somebody who received, let's just go ahead, let's check the tape here. Ian Carroll tweet production team that I saw,

but it's all over. Let's go ahead and check while the team pulls it up. Elizabeth Warren. Let's go ahead and look. I'm looking at it right now. Where did she receive her money? Top Industries federal election data for Elizabeth Warren, $2.3 million from Big Pharma. Would you look at that? Well, well, well, well, well. Let's continue here, ladies and gentlemen.

Is this Ron Wyden or Elizabeth Warren? All right. Here you go, team. There you go, boys. There you go. Here you go, team. Just want to get the right number. I will always give you the documentation.

We didn't know there was going to be a five-minute break, so whatever, we'll just let it roll. Next slide, please. Here we go. Pharmaceutical and health products, you see here, for Elizabeth Warren, $625,000. This is for a single cycle, ladies and gentlemen. This isn't lifetime of Elizabeth Warren's long career.

I think she's been in office for close to two decades. We're talking just a single cycle of donations. Three, four million dollars when you add it all up for big pharma, big corporate pharma interests. And then Elizabeth Warren goes on a literal rabid rampage against RFK Jr. saying, don't you dare sue my donors. What a freaking fraud this lady is. But we have more. Why not? We have more. Here we go. Ron Wyden. Ron Wyden is the chairman of the committee. Ron Wyden, of course, is somebody who looks

like Natsus Fratu. He looks like a vampire. Don't trust anybody when their eyes look black the way that a great white shark's eyes look like black and soulless, ghastly and deathly. Ron Wyden, up from his crypt. Nobody looks more like a actual lizard person in Congress than Ron Wyden. He actually does not look real. He looks much like the Joe Biden sort of wax figurine, Madame Tussauds. It looks like somebody made a creepy wax Halloween prop statue for a horror house of someone named Ron Wyden. But here we go. Here's Ron Wyden's receipts. And please, producers, grab me more. These are all over the internet. Grab me as many as we can. I just want to call these people out. These absolute effing frauds. Ron Wyden, what did he get? Oh,

let's see. Financial insurance, real estate, 3 million bucks health. Amazing how they say health health has nothing to do with health. Ladies and gentlemen, it has to do with protecting corporate interests and keeping Americans as sick as possible because the more sick Americans there are in beds, the more that these companies make money. It's absolute, absolute trafficking in human misery. $1.5 million for one cycle? Like these aren't, this isn't lifetime. For one cycle, they're breaking in millions from big Pharma. Millions. Goodness gracious. Just sickening. This has been a very interesting conversation that has led us all the way to Bernie Sanders

screaming about baby onesies. Did you know we'd get there? Okay. Are we back? All right, I have more ranting to do. Alright, R.K.'s back. Baby onesies! That's what we're talking about. Bernie Sanders, talking about the baby onesies. Seriously. They're not serious people. This committee will continue and come out of recess and go back into session. Before we go to you, Senator Marshall, I'd like to just tell everybody the remaining

list. before we go to you Senator Marshall I'd like to just tell everybody the remaining list Senator Marshall Senator Warnock Senator Smith Senator Young and Senator Welch and then I did indicate earlier that I would give another five minutes to Senator Wyden I understand he has distributed that five minutes to a few of the other senators so we will have a few more quick questions and then we will proceed and I would like to thank the audience again. I know we had a couple of outbursts earlier but I want to thank the audience for being respectful and encourage the audience to continue to be respectful as we conclude the hearing. With that Senator Marshall. Thank you Chairman. Obesity, diabetes, heart disease. Obesity, diabetes, heart disease.

Obesity, diabetes, heart disease account for probably 80% of health challenges in America. You know how many times I heard my friends across the aisle mention any three of those? I don't know if we've lost the forest for the trees here. Vaccine is a critical issue, I understand that. I don't see how we've lost the force for the trees here. Vaccine is a critical issue. I understand that. I don't see how Mr. Kennedy's position could be any more clear that he's going to support the vaccines, he's going to support the science and empowerment to parents and their doctors to make these choices.

60% of Americans have a chronic disease. That there's an epidemic of chronic diseases across the country. And this Make America Healthy Again movement is palpable to me. It started on the campaign trail in 2020 when moms I'd never met, that never involved in the political process came up to me and said, look, I wanna make these choices about my children

with my doctor, not the federal government. That it's a very real thing. Moms, dads, grandparents across the country grab me and say, look, why do 20% of our children now, why are they on a prescription drug? So Mr. Kennedy, what is your prescription to help make America healthy again? What's your vision, what does that look like to you?

Thank you, Senator Marshall. We're having epidemics of all these chronic illnesses, autoimmune diseases, neurological diseases, allergic diseases, obesity. When my uncle was president, 3% of Americans were obese. Today, 74% of Americans are obese or overweight. No other country has anything like this. In Japan, the obesity rate is still 3%. And epidemics are not caused by genes. Genes may provide the vulnerability, but you need an environmental toxin.

Something is poisoning the American people. And we know that the primary culprits are changing food supply, the switch to highly chemical intensive processed foods. We have 10,000 ingredients in our country in our foods. Europeans have only 400. If you buy McDonald's French fries in our country, there's 11 ingredients by understanding. In Europe, there's only three. If you buy Froot Loops in our country, they're loaded with food dyes, with yellow dye, red dye, blue dye, and many other ingredients.

The same company makes the same product with different ingredients for Canada and Europe. And at age—we don't have good science on all these things. And that is deliberate. That's a deliberate choice not to study the things that are truly making us sick, that are not only contributing to chronic disease, but to mortalities from infectious disease. We need to get a handle on this, because if we don't, it's an existential threat.

Our country is not going to be destroyed because we get the marginal tax rate wrong or because we get one of these culture war issues that we've been talking about today wrong. It's going to be destroyed if we continue down this trajectory of chronic disease. We need to fix our food supply, and that's the number one. Thank you, Mr. Kennedy.

Certainly, I share your concern with ultra processed foods. On the other end of this food chain are my farmers and ranchers back home. Would you just take a second and share your compassion, how you feel about farmers and ranchers that they respond to the market, they don't dictate the market, they grow what the market is wanting them to grow. And Senator Hawley told me the other day that his brother-in-laws are all farmers. And he said four out of every five of his brother-in-laws has Parkinson's disease. And that kind of cluster we're seeing across farm country of cancers, autoimmune diseases, obesity, etc.

We can now not export American food to Europe because the Europeans won't take our food. That's not good for farmers. We're also destroying our soil because some of the chemicals that farmers use destroy the microbiome and that causes the erosion of the soil you can't get water infiltration water pools up and wash the soil off agronomists now estimate that we only have if we continue doing these processes only 60 harvests left before our soil is gone. Farmers are using seeds and chemicals that over the long term are costing them and us. And what we need to do is we need to support the farmers. We need the farmers as partners if we're gonna make the maha work.

And I don't want a single farmer to go out of business under our watch. I don't regulate farms, if I'm privileged to be confirmed, I'm not regulating farms, that's under USDA. But I wanna partner with all of my decisions with USDA and with the farm community to make sure that we don't lose more farmers in this country, but that we also transition. We offer and incentivize transitions to regenerative agriculture, to no-till agriculture, and to less chemically intensive.

And by the way, I've also met with the chemical industry and the fertilizer and herbicide companies and they want to do the same thing. And I think we're on the trajectory to do that and we need to incentivize initiatives to accelerate that trajectory. Mr. Chairman, if I could, you know, the great news is that my farmers in Kansas are selling products to Europe, that today's regenerative practices, soil health, all those things are priorities for Kansas farmers. We are, many of us are doing many of those things already. We just need it to be more widespread. If I could just wrap up my remarks, though, is that, again, going back to the big picture here, 60% of Americans have a chronic disease. Mr. Kennedy, I believe for such

a time as this that you're not just one of 300 million people. I think that you are the person to lead HHS to make America healthy again, that God has a divine purpose for you, and I look forward to your confirmation and working with you to make America healthy again. Thank you, Senator. Thank you. Senator Warnock. Thank you. Thank you so much, Chairman Crapo and Ranking Member Wyden. It's great to be here. Mr. Kennedy, welcome. Welcome to you and to your family. Thank you for meeting with me a few days ago. I'd like to follow up, if I might, with some of the issues that we discussed in my office.

I want to talk to you first about the CDC, or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. I'm proud of the work that the CDC does, proud that it's located in Georgia with more than 10,000 employees in my state. If confirmed, you would be the cabinet secretary over the CDC, representing HHS. It's about 29% of the federal budget. CDC is a part of that. Do you agree that the CDC's work is critical to Georgia, critical for our country, and the health of the entire world? Yes.

Senator. Senator Isakson, my Republican predecessor would agree, would have agreed with that. Bless his memory. He was a fierce advocate for the CDC, as am I. The CDC is an agency filled with hardworking, dedicated public health servants. They wake up every single day working to keep us safe. I think we don't think often enough about their work because it's easy not to celebrate the folks who are protecting you from that which doesn't appear because of the work that they're doing. So grateful for the work that the CDC employees do. Some of them are members of my church. I saw that deep commitment firsthand when I visited the CDC just last summer. Mr.

Kennedy, you have compared the CDC's work to Nazi death camps. You've compared it to sexual abusers in the Catholic Church. You've also said that many of them belong, this is a direct quote, many of them belong in jail. For me, those are disturbing characterizations of the CDC workers that I know who are trying to keep the American public safe every single day. And as you are presenting as the nominee for this position, I need to know, do you stand by those statements that you made in the past, or do you retract those previous statements? Senator, I don't believe that I ever compared the CDC to Nazi death camps. I support the CDC.

My job is not to dismantle or harm the CDC. My job is to empower the scientists, if I'm privileged to be confirmed. So you retract those statements? I'm not retracting it. I never said it. Well, actually, I have a transcript. Of me saying that it's a Nazi death camp? Let me read your words.

It says that the institution, CDCc and the vaccine program is your description of their work is more important than the children that is supposed to protect and you know it's the same reason we had a pedophile scandal in the catholic church it's because people were able to convince themselves that the institution of the church was more important than these little boys and girls who were being raped. That's pretty provocative language. You said in another statement, to me, this is like Nazi death camp. I mean, let me finish.

I'm just reading your words. I mean, what happens? What happened to these kids? One in 31 boys in this country, their minds are being robbed from them. Yeah, I was not comparing the CDC to Nazi death camps. I was comparing the injury rate to our children to other atrocities. And I wouldn't compare, of course, the CDC to Nazi death camps to the extent that any statement that I made has

been interpreted that way. Yeah, I don't agree with that. In 2003, the United States Congress Government Oversight Committee ended an over a year investigation of the CDC and used almost that same language. They said that the CDC, just one division, one branch, the Immunization Safety Office, had put institutional self-interest and pharmaceutical profits ahead of the welfare and health of American children so that was a conclusion by Congress and I repeat that. I'm asking you because you're the nominee for HHS it sounds like you stand by those statements. Senator my objective is to

support the CDC there's nothing I'm gonna do that is gonna harm CDC I want to make sure that our science is gold standard science and it's free from that same government oversight investigation committee. The panels, the ACIP panel within CDC, I think 97% of the people on it had conflicts. I don't believe that that's right. I think we need to end those conflicts and make sure that scientists are doing unobstructed science. So I want to enter this statement, by the way,

into the record without objection. Without objection. Last week, the White House gagged HHS and the CDC, preventing them from communicating all important public health information to anyone, including all of our allies—including our allies in the United States on global disease prevention? Can you just answer yes or no, because I'm running out of time?

Do you agree with that action? SEN. I was not consulted on it, but that's pretty much standard operating procedure for incoming administration, Senator. MR. I'm asking you—so you agree with the action that gagged HHS and CDC from communicating important public health information to the public? MR.

That directive made sure that no public health and only nonessential travel and mass communications were temporarily suspended pending the confirmation of a new HHS secretary. This is standard operating procedure for every administration. I get it. I don't think what we've seen over the last several days is standard operation for new administrations. I think we're seeing some unprecedented actions, but you agree with it. Last night, members of the CDC, along with other federal employees, were actually invited to resign, these buyouts.

And I got text messages, and folks I know were from the CDC—for the CDC that do this important work, who got that note. And it's really important, because my experience is that when you send out that kind of note, the folks who resign are the folks who you least likely want to see resign. They got other options. They're gifted folks. They got a lot of expertise. They have options. A lot of them are doing this work because of their patriotism, because of their commitment. Do you agree with the buyouts that were presented to CDC employees just last night? I agree at the vast majority of the scientists and experts at CDC are patriots and good government servants. Can you tell me yes or no?

I don't think anybody's going to resign who's committed to making America healthy again. Can you just answer yes? Okay, you agree with the buyouts. In our meeting, I asked you to confirm your support for the Affordable Care Act. You also mentioned that you and President Trump want to fix the ACA by making premiums more affordable. Can you answer me yes or no, as I don't have a lot of time? Did you know that tax credits that help families afford health insurance and save Georgia's an average of $531 per month per person are set to expire at the end of the year?

Did you know that? I do. We need to move on. Do you support Congress extending these tax credits so that Americans can continue to afford health care? I, you know, Congress has to make its own decisions about that. My instructions from President Trump is to make the— Mr. Chairman, you're saying I'm running out of time, but I'm having a lot of trouble getting the witness to answer yes or no to a yes or no question. Well—

I've got one more question. You're almost at nine minutes. Well, I need him to answer yes or no. Yes or no. I'm not going to answer yes or no to a question that's not susceptible to an honest yes or no answer. We need to move on. I think that the fact that you've shot up to answer basic questions is deeply troubling for me. As you present yourself, I need to run HHS. Thank you so very much. I've been in courts all over the country.

Mr. Chairman, you told me I'm out of time. And it continues to filibuster even after I said I'm done. Well, I can done. Low IQ. Senator Smith. Mr. Chair, thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chair and ranking member. Literally the dumbest senator. Welcome, Mr. Kennedy.

Maisie Hirono level is stupid. So, Mr. Kennedy, I don't have a question for you on abortion. I think that my colleagues on both sides of the aisle have covered this, but I want to say I can respect people who have different views than mine on this issue, but it's hard for me to respect people who won't give a straight answer to what they think on this issue in particular. Mr. Chair, I just want to note that I understand that anti-choice advocates have said that in these hearings they were looking to hear Mr. Kennedy provide some reassurance that he is on their side, and I'm not hearing that. And I think most Americans are looking for some hint that the decisions that people make about abortion

should be personal and private, and they should be free to make those decisions without government interference, and I'm not hearing that either. To make it worse, the answers that you have given tell me that the Trump administration is more than willing to restrict or even ban medication abortion without a single act of Congress, and even in states where abortion is legal.

And what is clear to me is that you and President Trump are dangerous to women's access to Mifepristone. So, having said that, I want to move to a different topic. Mr. Kennedy, I appreciate Senator Cornyn's questions about mental and behavioral health, something that I care a lot about. I know that you and your family have had personal experience with mental health challenges, as have I, and I agree that the mental health crisis in this country is a crisis. So let me ask you, in an interview in 2023 and again in 2024, you blamed school shootings on antidepressants. You said, and this is a quote,

there is no time in American history or human history that kids were going to shoot schools and shooting their classmates. It really started happening, coterminous, with the introduction of these drugs, with Prozac and with other drugs. So do you believe, as you've said, that antidepressants cause school shootings? This should be a simple question. I don't think anybody can answer that question, and I didn't answer that question. I said it should be studied along with other potential culprits like social media.

But I don't know. I would never make—because there's no science on that, Senator. AMY GOODMAN- Well, there is, Senator. I mean, excuse me. There is, Mr. Kennedy. SEN. KEN HARDY- Thank you for the promotion. AMY GOODMAN- The science shows that there is no link between school shootings

and antidepressants. And in fact, most school shooters were not even treated with antidepressants. And of those that were, there was no evidence of association. You know, my question is— SEN. KEN HARDY- I don't think I don't think my question is because HIPAA rules. Nobody knows. Well, that is Mr. Kennedy. Do you think that people who take antidepressants are dangerous?

I think I listen. I'm not going into HHS if I'm privileged to be confirmed with any. So you can't say that people— DAVID SANGER- —to impose any preconceived ideas that I may have. I just want to have good science. AMY GOODMAN- So you're not saying that they aren't dangerous, which means that they could be dangerous. DAVID SANGER- I'm saying—

AMY GOODMAN- Let me ask you this. DAVID SANGER- That's not true. AMY GOODMAN- You've described Americans who take mental health medications as addicts who need to be sent to wellness farms to recover. Is that what you believe? DAVID SANGER- Of course I didn't say that anybody should be compelled to do anything. AMY GOODMAN- No, but you said they should be sent to wellness farms to recover. Is that what you believe? Of course I didn't say that anybody should be compelled to do anything. No, but you said they should be sent. I said they should be available to them. I didn't say they should be sent. You said that folks that take

antidepressants are like addicts. That I can provide that, Mr. Chair. Oh, I think they should have the availability. Listen And I know people, including members of my family, who've had a much worse time getting off of SSRIs than people have getting off of heroin. The withdrawal period is—and it's written on the label. I have some experience with this myself, Mr. Kennedy. This is personal for me. When I was a young woman and I was struggling with depression, thankfully, I had the resources

to help me get through it, including a new generation of SSRI uptake re-inhibitors, which helped to clear my mind, get me back on track to being a mom and a wife and a productive, happy person. And I'm really grateful for that therapy. So I have some experience with this, and I think that everyone should have access to that care. And your job as secretary is to expand access to care, not to spread lies and misinformation. And, you know, the things that you say, Mr. Kennedy, they live on. They have impact.

And, you know, we're having this conversation at the same moment that my Republican colleagues are looking to try to figure out how to save money any way they can. So they want to cut Medicaid. Let's just think about this for a minute, because you're going to be, should you be confirmed, you would be responsible for CMS, which provides mental and behavioral health care to millions of Americans. Close to 40 percent of folks on Medicaid have a behavioral health condition and you would be part of this administration that would be looking to cut Medicaid. So Mr. Kennedy, these statements that you've made linking antidepressants to school shootings, they reinforce the stigma that people who experience

mental health every day face every single day. And I'm very concerned that this is another example of your record of sharing false and misleading information that actually really hurts people. Thank you, Mr. Chair. SEN. Are you mischaracterizing my statements? MS.

I am only putting into the record what you have said, Mr. Kennedy. SEN. You're mischaracterizing my statements. And I'm happy that you had a good experience on SSRIs. Many Americans have a very good experience on it. Others have not. MS. But that would be an issue between them and their physicians and not for the

future head of HHS to be putting out misinformation about the dangers of SSRIs and other anti-depression medication spreading the stigma and the fear that we're actually trying to overcome. SEN. BERNIE SANDERS, Do you think physicians, when they make that prescription, ought to have access to good science? AMY GOODMAN, Of course they do. SEN. BERNIE SANDERS, That's all I believe, too.

And you and I are in agreement, Senator. AMY GOODMAN, And to your point that you made when you made these statements, it was not based on good science. I don't know what it was based on. SEN. I was saying that science needed to be done. I was saying these are potential culprits. We're coterminous.

And I named other things. I said video games. I said social media. I said SSRIs. The SSRIs have a black box warning, warning of suicidal, homicidal behavior. AMY GOODMAN- Mr. Chair, I will submit to the chair the information that I have about what mr. Kennedy has said linking antidepressants to school shootings thank you senator young thank you mr. chairman good to see you mr.

Kennedy to follow up on that spirited exchange in talking talking with you and reading about your vision for the department, you said one of your goals is to return public health agencies to the gold standard of scientific review. You've alluded to the gold standard a number of times today. So I'm going to give you an opportunity uninterrupted, but hopefully not too extensive, to tell me and others what

you mean by this gold standard. MR. The gold standard means real scientific research with replication of studies, which very rarely happens now at NIH. We should be giving at least 20 percent of the NIH budgets to replication. We should make sure that all the science is published with the raw data. We should make sure that the peer reviews are also published. I'll give you a quick example. Twenty years ago, NIH scientists did a study on Alzheimer's, which they said it was caused by amyloid black.

After that, NIH shut down studies of any other hypothesis. Twenty years later, we now know that those studies were fraudulent. NIH has funded 800 studies on a fraudulent hypothesis, and we've lost 20 years in figuring out how to cure for Alzheimer's. And that's just one example. I could give you hundreds. We need to end that.

We need to end the old boy system. We need to have replicatable science and be completely transparent about our data. Thank you, sir. In recent years, particularly during the COVID pandemic, there's been a lot of skepticism about our public health institutions. Some of this, I would say, is warranted, but it's now created a pervasive lack of trust from the public that these institutions are acting in bad faith or failing to act with objective criteria, failing, in short, to act in the best interests of the public.

If confirmed, Mr. Kenney, how will you work to regain the public's trust? I suspect it will take some time in these important public health institutions. I'm going to—through radical transparency, I'm going to make these the reason people don't trust the public health agencies because they haven't been trustworthy. And you gave the example of COVID at the beginning of COVID. Everybody was rushing to get that vaccine. We had over 90% vaccination uptake. Yes, sir. CDC's most recent recommendation is that Americans take the eighth booster. Only 23 percent of Americans are complying. That means 77 percent of Americans no longer trust CDC. And that is the problem. Yes, sir. In the absence of full information, might it—to—I think I agree with you, but I want your response. Might it make sense to share that absence of full information with the American people, that uncertainty? I think one of the things, by observation and experience, that I saw during the pandemic, because we had certain prominent doctors appear on television and

indicate, no, you absolutely must not wear a mask. Two weeks later, it's yes, you must wear a mask. But they were certain. And they even demonized people for not following the latest science, knowing there's a high level of uncertainty in that science. Would a measure of humility and, as you say, radical transparency demonstrates humility help rebuild trust over a period of years? MR. Absolutely. We need to tell Americans what we don't know. We need to make sure studies that reach a null hypothesis are also published. And that doesn't happen. MR. Sir, I think you are right about why health care costs are so high in the first place.

The answer is, indeed, chronic disease. Ninety percent of our health care spending goes towards managing it, as you say in your open statement. It's not in the main because of waste, fraud and abuse, although we know some exist. It's not in the main because we have greedy executives at innovative, world-class companies. It's not in the main because we haven't yet adopted an unsustainable Medicare-for-all scheme. It's because of this. So I'm encouraged that you intend to make that a point of emphasis as it pertains to your future leadership. I

will say with respect to COVID, it's not over for a lot of Americans. It's not over. I know the mission accomplished banner was convenient for the last administration, but as we continue to navigate the ongoing impacts of the COVID pandemic, we have many individuals here in the United States and around the world who are suffering from long-term health effects that significantly impact their quality of life, work, and daily activities, and they've been largely ignored. Funding for long COVID research was appropriated by Congress in December of 2020, followed

by additional funding directed by the Biden administration in February 2024. Patient groups and industry publications have criticized the slow pace of clinical trial design and enrollment. If confirmed, will you collaborate with healthcare providers, researchers, and effective communities to better understand and mitigate long COVID's impact? Yes or no, please. Absolutely, Senator. There's 16 million Americans. Will you commit to prioritizing long COVID research and integrate this work into broader

health care policies? Yes or no, please. Yes. Patient groups, experts, and industry publications have raised concerns around existing long COVID funding being spent on observational research. In particular, criticism was directed towards recover funding being used to duplicate existing findings instead of funding trials for potential treatments or diagnostics. If confirmed, Mr. Kennedy, will you work with Congress so that going forward, long COVID funding will be directed primarily towards trial or novel research directions

and not replicating existing observational research? Yes or no? Long COVID funding will be directed primarily towards trial or novel research directions and not replicating existing observational research. Yes or no? Absolutely, Senator, with enthusiasm. Thank you so much. If confirmed, how will you create a balance between your personal priorities of chronic disease and healthy lifestyle and the ongoing critical work of the department in areas that are focused on incentivizing and advancing innovation in modern medicine and pharmaceutical discovery?

I think innovation is going to be the key to public health. And we have a unique opportunity now in history because of AI, because of telemedicine, and because of the quality of people that are now coming to HHS to actually save public health. But it's all going to rely on innovation. And I don't want to do anything that inhibits or impairs the pace of innovation. Mr. That's encouraging. From approving AI algorithms to determining Medicare coverage, we certainly need more innovation and we need good people in the department to assist with that effort.

So I'll follow up with a question about how you're going to attract and retain good people. Thank you, Chairman. Chairman Weiss Sorry to shut you down a little faster than I did the others, Senator Young. We are up against a vote deadline here, and we have one more senator who gets his full time. I hope you'll keep it as close to five minutes as you can, Senator Welch. And then I've promised Senator Wyden, what, five more minutes? Senator Wyden To be divided one minute with my colleagues. And then if we can do that, we can get over to vote before they call the vote on the floor.

Thank you very much. Thank you, Mr. Kennedy. And as you know, I have great reverence for your family from Massachusetts. When I got out of college, I was in the first class of Robert Kennedy Fellows, the memorial created by your family to honor the service of your father. I do community organizing in the west side of Chicago. And I certainly admire your energy in your effort here and desire to serve. You know, there's a couple of things that are really important here.

This is not just about a debate on vaccines. It's a debate about the qualifications, experience and priorities as to the person that will head Health and Human Services. And it's not just about what your answers are today as to the person that will head Health and Human Services. And it's not just about what your answers are today or what the questions are. It obviously has a lot to do with your whole record and your whole history.

You know, your sister in her letter, or pardon me, your cousin in her letter said, "'You've always been charismatic, "'able to attract others through the strength "'of your personality, "'will willingness to take risk and break rules. That's, I guess, an attribute, but it can be a danger. The question I fundamentally have is whether your willingness to disrupt and maybe break rules is going to be dangerous and destructive. The character questions we didn't go into here, but there's some sketchy things.

You've acknowledged your history with heroin. You've gotten over that. But there's incidents that do, I think, concern the question of whether the stability is there to be in charge of this major organization. And that's compounded by my concern that you don't have any experience managing a by my concern that you don't have any experience managing a large organization, that you don't have any experience in government. So those are

things that have to be taken into account. But the issue for me is also priorities. A lot of your engagement in health has been on vaccines, big important issue. You actually disagreed, as I understand it, with President Trump about Operation Warp Speed. I think President Trump deserves a lot of credit for Operation Warp Speed. He knew we had to get a vaccine. And these other issues about a mask and whether you should wear it, whether when you got your groceries, the bag had to be left outside—remember that in the very beginning? Those are incidental to the core question that the president believed we had to have a vaccine. And you contested that. That worries me. That really deeply worries me. The other questions, Senator Cassidy asked you some

questions about our health care system. I happen to believe that our health care system is profoundly broken. And it's not just about the chronic illnesses. That's about our diet. That's about our exercise. But we are getting premium increases in Vermont of 20 percent a year, 25 percent a year. And it's busting the bank for taxpayers. It's busting the bank for our wonderful Vermont employers who care about having health insurances they can apply provide to their employees senator Cassidy asked you a couple of questions about how you

would reform Medicaid and I didn't hear an answer you mentioned that you thought Medicare Advantage was good you have a good plan no no focus on what an incredible ripoff was reported in the Wall Street Journal by United Healthcare, which was marketing Medicare Advantage and then paying doctors and nurses where they had assignments essentially to over-diagnose illnesses that didn't exist. So they made billions and billions of dollars. And I've seen nothing coming out of the Trump administration, and I've seen nothing coming out of your advocacy that is going after what is a rampant abuse by the insurance companies and

overcharging people in not doing the job. And by the way, the UnitedHealthcare people, when they did that, they overdiagnosed. When the person really got sick, they dumped them. They dumped them. Go to the nursing home on your own. That's a broken healthcare system. We spend the most and get the least. And I think there should be collective anger about this on both sides, because all of our people are dependent on that health

care system. And you're going to be working for a president who's on a lawless rampage right now, OK? He has done something reckless with the pardons to these cop beaters. I'm appalled by that. But that's just reckless. That's not illegal. He's impounded money. So right now, the Medicaid website went down.

He's impounded money. So the community health centers that Senator Warner was talking about are up in the air. So what they can do. Do you believe that a president can impound money that has been appropriated by Congress. Senator, let me answer the question about Medicare first. I have never defended that program or the rapacious behavior by insurance companies or the PBMs. I understand that's a huge problem. All right.

I don't have time. I've got to get over to vote. So we can do this. But you've asked me five questions. That's a huge problem. And— MR. All right. There's—I don't have time. We've got to get over to vote. So, we can do this— MR. But you've asked me five questions. You've got to give me a chance to answer one of them. MR.

Please be brief. MR. Yeah. I've appoint—I brought in, if I get confirmed—I've already appointed a general counsel. The first time in history as a former prosecutor who prosecuted the biggest Medicare fraud in the case in the state of West Virginia. I brought in a prosecutor for that job instead of a bureaucrat precisely to address the important issues that you raised here.

The only reason I didn't talk about these before is because I wasn't asked about them. I agree with you 100 percent. What about impounding a president, impounding money that among other things goes to healthcare? And you're saying that that's illegal? That's correct. Well, my job is to uphold the Constitution. I'm going to take an oath to uphold the Constitution and I will administer the law and uphold the Constitution.

Thank you. will administer the law and uphold the Constitution. Mr Chairman, I believe under what we've discussed. I control five minutes. I'm going to take one. Give one to each of my four colleagues that remain. All right, and I would just say we really this vote. They're going to call it in about eight minutes. Thank you. Okay, We have very little time to two hours ago, colleagues. I asked Mr Kennedy to come to the House and say, this vote, they're going to call it in about eight minutes. Thank you. Okay. We have very little time. Two hours ago, colleagues, I asked Mr. Kennedy to reconcile his many anti-vaccine statements with his handful of pro-vaccine statements. Instead, he gave us a word salad and ducked the issue. The same was true, Mr. Kennedy, with respect to measles, where you wrote a book playing down the threat of measles, even though American families are

very concerned about it, and apparently families are still mourning in Samoa. And my last point would be that Mr. Kennedy said today really wasn't about him. I just want to tell him it is all about you, because I find your presentation to be both untrustworthy and unprepared, because my colleagues have been seeing back and forth between Medicare and Medicaid, and it's not clear which program you're using when. So I want colleagues to know there is a lot more information to learn about Mr. Kennedy before we vote.

I'm going to urge that to my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to not make decisions on the basis of this session. I thank you for the additional time. And I guess my next minute is Senator Whitehouse, Senator Warren, and Senator Smith. SEN. And again, one minute each, please. SEN. There's been a lot of conversation about long, late-term abortions here, and I just want to make clear what Rhode Island OBGYN doctors describe as what is almost always happening when a late-term abortion is needed.

It is a childbirth gone wrong. The family has painted the room, it has bought the crib, maybe even decided on the baby's name, and has gone to the hospital to welcome the new baby into their family in what is supposed to be a happy event. And then things went wrong. Then the alarms started pinging. The lights started flashing. The medical professionals started rushing in.

And the question became, who lives and who dies? The mom's life is often at risk, and she may have other children she needs to care for. The baby's life may be at risk, and one or both may die. In that environment, the doctors and the family own that decision. Government has no place in that room at that point. what you're dealing with is a tragedy that is happening to a family who wanted that child and have suddenly been confronted with a moment in which they have to make what is probably going to be the worst decision of their lives and to try to shove the state legislature into that room is really offensive really morally wrong and I just want to make very clear

what Rhode Island OBGYNs tell me is the situation when these procedures have to be deployed. Senator Warren. Thank you Mr. Chairman. So Mr. Kennedy I wanted to ask about your role in the 2019 measles outbreak in Samoa. In July 2018, two children died immediately after receiving a measles vaccine that nurses had mistakenly mixed with a muscle relaxant. The nurses get charged with manslaughter, but vaccination rates go down. I asked you about this in my office. You told me flatly that your visit to Samoa had nothing to do with vaccinations. We now know that's not true. I have the documentation. You met with the prime minister. You talked about vaccinations. You met with an anti-vaccine influencer who described the meeting as, quote, profoundly monumental for this movement. So what happens? Vaccinations go

down. There's a measles outbreak and children start dying. But you double down. You didn't give up. Just four days after the prime minister declared a state of emergency, 16 people already dead. You sent a letter to him promoting the idea that the children had died not from measles but from quote defective vaccine. You launched the idea that a measles vaccine caused these deaths. You are a very influential man. In fact, you are called the leader of the disinformation dozen. Multiple UNICEF and WHO, the World Health Organization, investigated this. They say the claims are false.

It is not biologically possible what you claimed. And yet, ultimately, more than 70 people died because they didn't get vaccines. So my question is, do you accept even a scintillant, just even a sliver of responsibility for the drop in vaccinations and the subsequent deaths of more than 70 people? Anything you do differently? No, absolutely not. After the, there were two incidents which children died in 2015 and again in 28. 2015, it was from the measles vaccine. That's what the New Zealand General Hospital found.

The government of Samoa banned the measles vaccine after the 2018. I arrived in July of the next year after the ban had been in place for a year. Mr. Chairman, understanding that you wanted to hold this to a minute and that I don't get to present all the facts and documentation I've got, how about if we just decide to make entries for the record on exactly what the record shows about Mr. Kennedy's participation. And I think he's answered the yes or no question. He takes no responsibility.

Senator Warren, we will do that. And Mr. Kennedy and to all the senators, every senator knows that following this hearing, they will be able to ask you questions off the record and you will be able to put answers back onto the record. So please give that answer. I apologize that we're shutting you off for giving a full response right now. Senator Smith, and we are way over time. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

So, Mr. Kennedy, you have said that you want to give infectious diseases a break for about eight years. You spoke about this with Senator Cantwell. My question to you has to do with avian flu. Over 100 million birds called. The disease has spread to dairy cows, and there are now 67 confirmed human cases and one death. So Mr. Kennedy, do you intend to give research on bird flu a break? No, I intend to devote the appropriate resources to preventing pandemics. That's a central part of my job.

What do you think is causing the avian influenza? This will go to my office. I think the H5N1 virus is. MS. So that's good to hear because in a recent book, I will submit this for the record because we don't have that much time, Mr. Kennedy has questioned the scientific basis for germs causing disease and the power of vaccines and antibiotics. SEN.

I've never questioned that, Senator. MS. Well, I will submit that for the record. SEN. Thank you. Senator Warnock, one minute. SEN. I like the way you said that to the. SEN. Thank you. Senator Warnock, one minute. SEN. I like the way you said that to the Baptist preacher.

Thank you so much, Mr. Kennedy. Based on our conversations, it's my understanding that you support work requirements and Medicaid. In 2020, Trump—President Trump approved a proposal from Georgia's state leaders requiring Georgians to jump through a number of onerous bureaucratic hoops and fill out even more paperwork to verify work and get access to health care. I ask this as someone who represents a state that has not expanded Medicaid. Federal government, because of this waiver, spent $70 million on Georgia's Medicaid waiver.

Eighty-two percent of that went to administrative costs the point that I'm making is that the folks that they're insisting need to work 90% of those folks are working they are they are caregivers or they have a disability let me give you one example a woman I think of all the time her name is Heather she's a traveling nurse from Dalton, Georgia, who falls into the Medicaid coverage gap. Heather experienced a series of small strokes, leaving her unable to work full time. She's dedicated her life to caring for patients, but now she can't afford her own medical care, out-of-pocket costs because she doesn't make enough to qualify for tax credits to buy private insurance.

What does Heather need? Does she need work requirements or does she need access to health care so she can finally get healthy and get back to work? The individual that you described would need health care and not a work requirement. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. And we are done with the questioning now. Mr. Kennedy, I apologize to you, to the audience, and to all of my colleagues to have to rush it here at the end, but we have a vote on the Senate floor that they're going to close in about three minutes. I want to thank you for appearing before this committee.

You have been accessible to the members and staff on both sides of the aisle of the finance committee throughout a rigorous process and I want the whole world to know that you spent hours on in meetings answering questions outside of this hearing and providing documents and responses on issue after issue after issue. You've gone through the most thorough vetting process that any committee in this Congress puts anybody through. And I think that you have come through well and deserve to be confirmed. I would like to remind my colleagues that the deadline for submitting any questions for the record is 5 p.m. today. 5 p.m. today. And Mr. Kennedy, we ask that you respond to those questions as quickly as you possibly can. With that, I'm going to leave you in this room

and run over to vote. This hearing will be adjourned. I still encourage the audience to be polite and respectful no matter what side of the issues you may be on. And Mr. Kennedy, I look forward to working with you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman for adjourn. Yo, yo, yo. There we go. Mr.

Kennedy goes to Washington. Listen to those cheers. The Maha Moms. Are ma happy. With that. Shaking the hand of the great Senator Ron Wyden. Sorry, not Ron Wyden. Ron Johnson.

It just happens when you're live for four hours. Ron Johnson, not Ron Wyden. Ron Wyden is the vampire. Ladies and gentlemen, we've got to speed quickly through all of this. There's too much going on for a total wrap-up. You can go ahead and check our X account if you want to see all of the play by plays, but I will show you what is the most important in all of this, which is, of course, the memes that have been created, some of them created by us. Ladies and gentlemen, this screenshot now going thermonuclear viral all across the internet, captured by our team because we are, well, the absolute most psychotically obsessed

with catching these moments. And President Trump is going to be signing executive orders live. We want to give our studio a second to cool down and get ready for that. And so I want to just tell you right now that RFK Jr. is going to be confirmed. I'm texting with multiple senators right now. RFK Jr. will be confirmed. It might be close, but RFK Jr. will be confirmed. And they can't help themselves they keep doing the meme a bunch of bunch of female a bunch of deeply unhappy cat lady female

senators telling us they're on ssris and they're so happy that it makes me so happy you don't seem happy and rfk literally breaking the fourth wall as he's being screamed at this is the meme of the day doesn't this perfectly encapsulate what these hearings have been like i couldn't even do that if i try like if i like could you imagine if this was a face you made on camera and you let them actually broadcast how do you even do that so I tried. Like, could you imagine if this was a face you made on camera and you let them actually broadcast it? How do you even do that? It's not a straight up Cruella de Vil cartoon face. We're expressive, but like, we don't do, I mean, dude,

I mean, look at this. Gollum. It's actually Gollum. Somebody showed the precious to Gollum. Look at it go. The audacity to have that number of black fillings in your mouth and to actually look like a white walker and to be screaming at rfk about health defending your big pharma lobbying buddies who pack your bank account so full of dirty pharma money,

you absolute corporate fraud. Like, what's more fraudulent? Elizabeth Warren saying that she's a Native American in order to cheat actual literal minorities out of money to get into school. Nobody ever talks about that. You don't ever talk about the fact, like we call it Pocahontas.

You don't talk about the fact that Elizabeth Warren took cash from impoverished Indians and shoved it into her back pocket by lying and saying she's a Native American because she has high cheekbones. Elizabeth Warren took cash from big pharma companies and corporations, corrupt vaccine manufacturers, and shoved it into her back pocket. Stole from her donors, claimed she was for the working class. Senators paused RFK hearing to announce the next round of questions are

brought to you by Pfizer. The chances of RFK becoming the next HHS press secretary skyrocketed today. They actually dipped a little bit and then skyrocketed all the way up to nearly 90% now. Here we go. Bernie Sanders. Vaxxed and unafraid. Bernie Sanders in a onesie. Oh, my. Bernie Sanders bringing up the onesie.

What a bunch of frauds. Here we go. Ladies and gentlemen, the meme of the day. There it is. Just perfect. They can't help just, they can't help themselves. They can't help themselves. They gotta do the cat. Mr. Kennedy, are you a conspiracy theorist?

Uh, uh, uh, JFK's uncle 62 years ago. RFK intensifies. Leave the multi-billion dollar drug companies alone, Bobby. We will fight. We will fight. We will fight. One final one. Main buyer team. Just to, just proof that,

proof that they literally can't help themselves. They actually can't. Reintensifies. And just stare at the fourth wall. Just literally, just laugh. Who's your favorite, ladies and gentlemen? Just stare. Oh man, what a freaking, what an absolute total mess.

We wish we had time to play the full rundown, but I'll show you this. This is the post that we did that went, and that's popping off right now. It's my official take on this. Democrats take multi-millions of dollars from big pharma, viciously attack RFK Jr. with blowhard virtue signaling speeches.

They dance for their evil demonic Democrat donors. Ladies and gentlemen, they'll do anything for money from big corporations. They tell you, therefore, the little people. But they're the ones who supported COVID vaccine mandates, forced masking of your children, and remained silent when Dr. Fauci got a pardon. These politicians are totally and completely evil. They have no moral high ground. You should not respect them or even look up to them. They are worthy only of your shame and sc evil. They have no moral high ground. You should not respect them or even look

up to them. They are worthy only of your shame and scorn. They are the worst type of people who slither and crawl on their bellies for money, will do anything. They have sick, creepy, personal lives. They are unhappy in their souls. As many ssris as they scream at you they're happy i'm so happy i'm a ssris okay you're not doing a great job proving that ladies and gentlemen they've never made a single day or a single thing better for regular americans they have never protected america's children they've done everything they possibly can to make their lives worse. We are protecting our children, ladies and gentlemen.

These senators are unworthy of a serious and moral nation. We are the ones actually leading the charge to save our country and to save our children in so many ways, from the life issue to the health issue to the vaccine issue to big pharma. We are taking charge, and RFk is a good man who simply wants to protect our children our generation senators must confirm rfk or face the absolute whirlwind of some very very powerful forces of maha and maga that will absolutely torch them and will destroy their careers because you've proven to us what you actually believe and who you actually are.

And so, ladies and gentlemen, we'll end with that. We'll say thank you for joining us on this exciting stream with an exciting back and forth, probably the most fireworks we've seen thus far yet. Tomorrow, we will have Kash Patel live. Kash Patel live tomorrow, ladies and gentlemen. Kash Patel live. The hearing is happening. Let me pop up the graphic just real fast. The hearing is happening. We're very excited about it. We've even made our own graphic for this exact moment. I'm not sure if this is the final version,

but you know what we share around here. Lethal FBI weaponization. Let's go. We're gonna be making more of these movie poster graphics. I just can't get enough of them. I think they're very fun. Our verse of the day, ladies and gentlemen. Perfect for today.

Isaiah 41.10. Do not fear, for I am with you. Do not be dismayed, for I am God. I will strengthen you and I will help you. I will uphold you with my righteous right hand. Ladies and gentlemen, we played you the clip. It's the most profound thing I've seen in politics in a long time, is RFK saying he prayed on his knees for 20 years that God would put him in a position to save America's children and to end chronic disease. And we are this close. Now is the time

to go and to win. March with us onto victory and onto a healthier, better future. It's your boy Benny. Subscribe to this channel. Grow our numbers. We are winning. You can't defeat an army of happy warriors. Maha and MAGA, together, we will win. See ya. Did your life change once a month because of your period? Still using pads? Tampax can change the way you feel without your period. Tampax tampons protect internally, so you feel cleaner. No pack can do that. Feeling cleaner is more comfortable. Plus, more women use Tampax than any other tampon or pad. Now that's something. Remember, there's a feeling with Tampax. It can actually change the way you feel. Anyone who brings candy into this camp is not your friend. I am carrying extra weight.

Anyone who brings candy into this camp is not your friend. No dinner, no lunch, no breakfast. Looks like my man's packet. Who would like to own up to this treasure trove? My grandma runs faster than you, and she's only got one leg. Oh, look. a deli meat i eat success for breakfast with skim milk you disgust me well congratulations you just joined the 76 percent of americans who forget to stretch before physical activity. you drank i hope it's something healthy as general millie walks the plank guess what guess what

everything will be okay guess what day what day it is it's hump day get it on Holiday The biggest ships in the sea All owned by the oldest kings And a dying legacy Media deal means So will the Benny show Come to mind the salt from lives for fun Feed the gold and bring the gun We sail for number one Soon will the Benny show come to mine the salt from lids for fun.

Leave the gold and bring the gun. We sail for number one. The biggest ships in the sea. All owned by the oldest king. Former MLB All-Star Sean Casey, a.k.a. the Mayor, keeps hitting it out of the park. Take my 30 years of experience. Take the wisdom and knowledge I've learned from the failures. When I got sent down my rookie year, all the injuries I had to overcome.

Your mind is the most important tool you have in life. Be relentless. Keep charging. It matters how you talk to yourself, how you look at the world. That matters. We talk about that. I don't know. I'm fired up. Baseball's back, and it's going to be incredible. I love it. The Mayor's Office with Sean Casey from Believe. Follow and listen on your favorite platform.