The Benny Show - Spencer Pratt Goes Scorched EARTH! Exposes Entire Fraud Industry in LA as Woke Communist ‘Wins…’

Episode Date: June 9, 2026

California ballot dumps boost Raman over  , DOJ investigating fraud, Trump roasts reporter, then crushes her mic on live TV, Roxane Hoge and  Will Chamberlain join the show. American Financing: Save with https://www.americanfinancing.net/benny NMLS 182334, nmlsconsumeraccess.org. APR for rates in the 5s start at 6.327% for well qualified borrowers. Call 888-528-1219 for details about credit costs and terms. Visit Americanfinancing.net/Benny. Average savings based on borrowers who save over $199.99 Ethos: Protect your family with life insurance from Ethos. Get up to $3 million in coverage in as little as 10 minutes at https://ethos.com/benny. Application times may vary. Rates may vary. Patriot Mobile: Go to https://www.PatriotMobile.com/Benny and get A FREE MONTH Advantage Gold: Get your FREE wealth protection kit https://www.abjv1trk.com/F6XL22/4MQCFX/?sub1=Youtube Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

All right, ladies and gentlemen, I am going to do my best this morning to have some composure and no mercy for the communists in Los Angeles and the Democrats in California. We're going to use this as an instructive learning opportunity for what Democrats plan on doing to our nation if they ever seize power again. It's important to know thy enemy and to know what they are doing, and we hate to brag, but we were early. We were right. Six months ago, we traveled to L.A. and told you exactly what was going to happen. We'll show you on the show. And more importantly, we'll talk about how to fix it with our illustriest guests today. Will Chamberlain will be joining the program, expert attorney, and extremely,

sophisticated mind when it comes to solving election fraud, as will the GOP chairwoman of Los Angeles to give us any type of update as to how they're going to fight this. Is there any way to fight it? The feds are starting to. Donald Trump is absolutely smashing through the election fraud wall, smashing the mics of NBC News. As he storms off, we'll have that clip for you. Today is Monday, June 8th, 2026. The California ballot dumps. got them exactly what they wanted. A dirty communist versus another dirty DEI communist in California. Then the machine doesn't have to work as hard to keep power in L.A.

That is exactly the purpose and the point. They take away a massive spotlight that Spencer Pratt had shown on what Democrats were doing in Los Angeles. That was the purpose here. Lib Targe are going on TV like I saw it on CNN this morning. Oh, no, Democrats wanted Spencer Pratt. No, they didn't. They didn't want Spencer Pratt. They needed controlled opposition, which is what you get with Nikki Rahman.

You can't do a business with the guy like Spencer Pratt. You burned his house down. You nearly killed his family. Trump Rose reporter walks off TV. Ladies and gentlemen, my name is Benny Johnson. We'll have Will Chamberlain and Roxanne Hogue joining the program momentarily. First, get your house in order. American financing certainly is the place to do that.

If you have high interest credit card debt, you must lock in, get out of that debt. The market has gone haywire ups and downs. Apparently, we're going to have a peace deal this week. Who knows? What I do know is this. You need to get your own house in order. You can't control what's happening in the Great Beyond in this wide, insane world. Nobody can even control what's happening inside of the LA elections, although we'll show

you exactly what happened in the LA elections. Ladies and gentlemen, don't get robbed. of your future, just like Spencer Pratt was robbed. Call American Financing today. 888-528-1219. That's 888-528-1219, Americanfinancing.net slash Benny. ALX, I need something right now. I need something.

I just thought about this. Please get me the clip of CNN going after Nick Shirley on the ground in Minneapolis. Give me that clip. I need that clip right away. I need that clip immediately. Because I'm going to show how the principles apply to the right and the left in circumstances of fraud.

So whether it's election fraud or whether it's Somali fraud with daycares, the way that journalists cover this, thank you very much, the way that journalists cover this is going to be incredibly instructive because it it establishes why what we're doing here is so important. why this program, the culture that we're building, the culture of truth, why this is so critical and important. I want you to pop it up as soon as you got to climb. Load her in. Let's go. Okay, here we go.

Perfect. Wow, that was really fast. Okay, so CNN here in this clip, we don't got to show it. I'm sure it's four minutes long, but let me just toggle through this thing. So CNN goes and covers Nick Shirley interviewing Somalis and exposing Somali fraud in Minneapolis. At first, I thought, wow, like CNN's. actually covering the Somali fraud. But it turns out what CNN was actually doing, was covering up for the Somalis and attacking Nick Shirley. And how is this related to election fraud in California?

Well, it is directly related. You'll be able to see here. What happened with this CNN reporter? They sent, of course, their no-name lowest-tier journalist out to do this. What happened here, was this journalist goes into the street, attacks Nick Shirley and says, where's your proof of fraud? Where's your proof? Where's your proof? Where's your proof? Where's your proof of fraud? Even though he had literally exposed it. Everybody could see. Everybody could see these were fake daycares.

The Leering Center isn't real. These are empirical observations. We're going to talk about mathematical, statistical and empirical this morning. The mathematical, it goes to HHS, when they can actually run. on the books and the DOJ and show you that none of the numbers add up, right? The Smollies weren't feeding children. They weren't serving children in these daycares. They're fake daycares.

Nobody bothered to check. These are observable and circumstantial what Nick Shirley is showing you. So it's like, don't believe your eyes and ears kind of thing. Here's CNN attacking Nick Shirley in the street. Unmute this. The indictments. The cases have been going on, you know, for years. And why did I show up one day, Minnesota, and go to all.

these daycares, no children, they're receiving millions of dollars. We encourage you nearly a hundred million, 110 million dollars in fraud in one day. How do you know that all the allegations that you're making are true? There it is. There it is. Right there. Okay. So I need you to remember this because they just did the same thing with Trump. I need you to understand what we are up against. You have to realize like what's like the game that is played here. So Nick Shirley has the most viral video in the world. he shows all the fraud. It's empirical. It's observable. It's, you can check it mathematically and statistically in the books. You can actually go in and find the hard evidence of fraud. But CNN put it. They're the journalists. They're attacking Nick Shirley for his observations that he made on camera

that are irrefutable. They're attacking him going, where's your evidence? Where's your evidence? Where's your evidence? Instead of CNN going and doing the work, Wouldn't that be like the, wouldn't that be the point of CNN is to go investigate the fraud themselves? Let's go ahead and check and see the CNN investigate fraud. How do they do it? We showed you guys what was happening. And then you guys can go ahead and make your own analysis. We're coming. So we can make our own analysis. Are you 100% sure you're true? Yeah, I am 100% sure I'm true. CNN is looking into. First of, are you 100% sure you're true? Go ask your wife that tonight.

See what happens. You get a black eye. What kind of a question is that? Are you 100% sure you're true? I'm telling you, they sent the bottom of the barrel from CNN here to Minneapolis. But here, watch what happens. Here's this CNN, this dorky CNN reporter in her hotel room, in her $150 a night hotel room, doing her investigation. Watch this. To Shirley's claims.

Hi, my name's Whitney Wild. I'm a correspondent for CNN. We reached out to several of the daycares featured in the now viral video. Only one daycare facility answered. said they are a legitimate business. That's it. That's it. That's what CNN did.

The videos, you know, purporting that somebody's daycares don't have kids inside. Minnesota Republican. They didn't even leave the answer on tape. Do you understand the game we're up against? Now, load up. Now, throw me, Kristen Walker. Let's go. Do you understand the game we're up against?

Because we're going to talk to California. We're going to talk to California ballot fraud. the observable but also statistical and mathematical um like like empirical data that shows that they stole the election but you have to understand what we're up against and why what we do on this program is so important and so critical to the future of this nation i'm not trying to gas ourselves up but please know that we are up against a trillion dollar propaganda machine that is there to deceive you and to attack us, you, me, this movement of truth. So Nick Shirley shows the fraud in Minneapolis, CNN attacks him for it, and then does their own investigation by defending

the fraudsters. None of the fraudsters picked up their phones. That didn't bother CNN at all. They just called them and said, are you committing fraud? No, okay. See, we did an investigation. We did one. We did it. investigate. We did it. Oh, it makes me so angry. So this is exactly the game that Christian Walker played with Trump. So before we had the new numbers out of Los Angeles, where no name, no energy, no support, no voters, no future, Nikki Rahman, somehow miraculously and historically, because this never happened before in American history, overtook Spencer Pratt in the small hours

of the evening last night. Before that happened, Donald Trump, stormed. Donald Trump smelled this thing from a thousand yards away and went beast mode on NBC yesterday. Actually smashed their microphone. He was so angry. I've never seen anything like it. Here's President Trump. Kristen Walker plays the same game with him. We've all seen the fraud. It's empirical. It's observable. It's statistically an abomination. It's mathematically. It's mathematically possible. But Kristen Welker, instead of going out and doing the investigation on behalf of the American people and saying nobody believes your elections, she goes, where's your evidence? Where's your evidence? Where's your evidence? As though it's up to Nick Shirley and Donald Trump

to sit there and provide them the evidence. You're the media. Calm down. You're the media. It's your job to go out and say, the American public doesn't believe your elections. Show me all the ballots. Show me this is—why are you doing it this way? Why could Peru had an election last night? They counted 27 million votes in one night. Democrats had only like three million votes in this entire election. It is now day seven.

If you include early votes, they've been voting for three months in California. You include early in mail-in votes. Three months of voting, they can't count three million votes. They do it on purpose. They do this on purpose. And then they ask Trump to prove the fraud. Well, where's your evidence? Where's your evidence?

Instead of them, do you understand the game that's played? No. Before I played this clip, if President Trump, if a right-winger, if there were a bunch of, I mean, this would never happen, right? Because we're all Christians. But like, you know, this isn't part of it. of our culture. Like,

the, thievery isn't baked into our culture. It is. In Somali Islam, it is. It was literally hard-coded into piracy culture.

But like, let's say there were a bunch of daycares and, you know, the Reddust County in Alabama, and they were bilking the taxpayers. Do you think that Christian Welker and CNN would investigate that? And they were, all of them were like MAGA hats and Trump's DHS and Trump's,

HUD were just like stroking checks to these people, left and right, hundreds of millions of dollars, billions of dollars. Do you think that would interest the media? Of course it would. Do you think that if right-wing candidates, MAGA candidates were winning, we're coming in third on election day, but then winning in landslides in statistically and mathematically impossible probabilities, winning every single ballot drop after election day, by totals that are eye-watering that would make dictators blush? Do you think that Kristen Welker wouldn't investigate that? That they wouldn't be looking at every election official naming them, shaming them, filing lawsuits on behalf of media companies, which they do, do that? They'd be doing everything. They certainly wouldn't be looking

at the Democrat who got the election stolen from them and going, hmm, where's your evidence? Where's your evidence? No, they'd be doing their job. They'd be doing, like, this. This is the information warfare. This is the info war. This is what we're up against. Play the clip. In the Oval Office, what they did to the lives of people, they destroyed people. They sent people to jail who did nothing wrong.

Just to be very clear, there's no evidence of what you're saying. But there's a lot about Todd Blanche. Listen to me. Listen to me. Let's talk about Todd Lange. This tremendous evidence is nothing but evidence. The election was rigged. It was a dirty election.

And it's happening again right now in California. It's happening right now in California. Right now it's looking, look at what's happening. Where's the evidence to that? It's four days. In California, it's, oh, they're not there. They're dropping fast because it's a rigged election. Let me tell you, it's four days and they aren't even close to coming up with it.

You know why they're doing that? Because they're cheating on the election. Do you have evidence to support that? You have to do as well. There you go. All I have to do is look. And I listen and I listen to people and let's see what happens. But sir, that's not evidence.

You think it's appropriate that they count the votes in California? You think it's appropriate that they have an election and five days later they're nowhere close to pick any one? State local officials acknowledge they are slow. They're urging. No, they're crooked. They're urging the votes to be counted quickly. That's how they vote in California. They're just like you're crooked, your press is crooked and meet the press is crooked.

To be fair, I'm not crooked. But let's- Really? Well, you play right into their hands in. Let's continue. You're either crooked or you're stupid. You're stupid. You play right into their hands with this rap.

You know that these elections are rigged. Your network knows that they're rigged. You know that I won an election in a landslide, and I got 94% bad press. But Mr. President, you know why I got that? Because you have no credibility. But you've never presented evidence that it was rigged. Let's keep talking about. I want to talk about top.

You have more evidence. There's more evidence than ever presented. Let's talk about. Your elections in this country, we're like a third world country. Your elections are crooked and you're crooked and Mr. Press is crooked. And so is ABC and CBS and CNN. But Mr. President. You're one-sided crooked networks.

So I let's call it quits because I've had it up. Thank you, darling. Have a good time. Mr. President, let's please, I travel all the way to Wisconsin. I travel all the way to Wisconsin. I know. I travel all the way for an hour. On and off in the rain and I've given you enough time.

You want to straighten out your press because you know what? A country can never be great with a dishonest. Listen, we traveled all the way to Wisconsin for the interview. Okay, so like, by the way, you can see here absolute alpha move by Trump. Not only does he rip the microphone off and throw it on the ground. You can see here the move, rips the mic off, Chuck's on the ground. But then Trump smashes the mic with his foot right here. Let's have to listen

With a dishonest We travel all the way to Wisconsin Here we go And crush the mic Yeah there you go I just like Oh please Mr. Buzz We travel all the way to Wisconsin for you

Oh please pick me It's like the ugly girl at the bar Oh I believe I I got all dressed up Okay I know I'm joking There is perfect beautiful

Uh yeah Trump has every reason to be furious because of the way that not only these elections are run or the fraud is run in this country, but because of the way that the media has zero, zero interest in covering or exposing any of it. This is what we're up against. Say all that to say this. Thank you for your support. Because we called this thing. We called this from a third. thousand yards away, dude. We went out to LA. First week of the year, six months ago, check the timestamp. We went out to LA and we exposed the homeless industrial complex fraud that is being, to their great humiliation, funded by Donald Trump's housing and urban development that gives untold billions to California for their homeless industrial complex. Your money is squandered on this. Your money is used to rig these elections. It's something that we

are going to go hard in on today. Welcome to California. We went out there. We went to Skid Row. We explained how this was going to work. We explained, and it was not a fun shoot because it's filthy and you smell the rotting flesh and you get attacked. Klein P. Like Klein Klein knows this, we were filming from our car. Homeless people came up, smashed our window in our car. Kick the side of our vehicle. Attacked us for going there with a camera. It was filthy and dangerous and disgusting. And the governor of the state viciously libeled me and attacked me, attacked my family for going out there. Like, like Gavin Newsman was taking time. out of his day to come after me because I didn't stand in line with NBC News and CNN and everybody

else and look the other way and say, where's your evidence? Where's your evidence? The evidence is sitting right in front of your face. Here's what we found when we went out to California. We found a system that registers voters without ID. They'll register voters to anywhere, a stop sign, an underpass the dumpster behind a Burger King parking lot. It's just a in order to get as many ballots into the system as possible so they can control the outcomes. Homeless people all get registered to vote. George Soros NGOs and dark money left-wing groups go and register homeless people. They feed them crack.

They feed them drugs. They pay them. It's all on camera. We have federal indictments for this behavior. They pay them to register to vote so they can have the ballot in the system. They never deliver the ballot. The homeless person doesn't vote. They just need the ballot.

They fill it out. They ballot harvest it. You can drop off as many ballots as you want. Nobody, no questions asked. You can bring in a garbage bag, and people do, full of ballots. All you need is the name and the address. And what do we find? We found toilets that had 26 people registered to them.

Street corners, underpasses, bridges. We exposed it all. We said, this is how California is going to rig their votes. Not only do they get extra electoral seats, because the census is going to count all these homeless people, but they also are able to have as many balances they need in the systems in L.A. Because they have so many homeless people in L.A. 100,000 homeless people in L.A.

We called it and we said, this is what they're going to do. And we were right. We got destroyed for this. They attacked us. You know, it turns out that they only attack you when you're over the target. Why would Gavin Newsom take time out of his day to go after my family? to go after me Why would you

Why? Why would you label? Why would you go ad hominem attacks? You know, like dude, you know, dude posts memes. Why would Gavin Newsom take the time to go to, because we were over the target. And we're the only people who did it. The only people, Nick Shirley also went out to California,

did amazing work. Obviously, we love Nick on this program. He's on a lot. James O'Keefe has since gone out. They've both been savagely, and viciously attacked by the governor until James O'Keefe showed on camera, them paying for the ballots. They paid for the ballot. James got it on camera. I don't have the same undercover camera operation as James does. They got it on camera. But we, like, we're the Pied Piper. And these rats,

they followed us out there. And you could see it. You can see it in our documentary. Anyway, we were six months early. We showed what they were paying per homeless person. Obviously, there's a huge grift here, but this is exactly what happened to Spencer Pratt. Look at this. Here's the election results. There it is. Nikki Rahman is in green. Spencer Pratt's in orange.

Now, the law of averages, let's just talk really quickly here about the math, the math behind all of this. We'll talk about the empirical, observable realities. We'll talk about the mathematical statistical realities. Law of averages is a frequency of a certain event, eventually evens out and aligns with their underlying probability. over a period of time. This is a popular everyday principle that is used regularly, especially in statistics. So what you're seeing here on the first day of counting is what the true vote was.

This was the true will of the people. This reflected all polling. Nikki Rahman got blown out during the debates. She has no support. She had no one, no one, she was paying people to go out to her rallies. That was well documented by the LA Times. She had no name. Nobody knew how to pronounce her name.

She's an embarrassing track record as a city councilwoman. He was in charge of the homelessness in L.A. solving that problem. Well, that's convenient, isn't it? Because the law of average is actually held on day two of counting. Here we go. Election night. Then day two of counting, June 4th through, 0.

Look at this. It actually held. Nikki Rahman actually underperformed. Like Spencer Pratt did great. And so did Karen Bass. So Nikki Rahman is actually faltering. That's why Nikki Rahman, just so that we understand the time frame that we're at here. This is why Nikki Rahman was giving blubbering, crying, sobbing speeches, apologizing to her family and friends for failing so badly.

She conceded on election night. Let me say it again. She conceded the race. She said, I'm done. I'm done. I'm done. I'm finished. That's what she said, through tears.

Then what happens? Oh my. Here we go, June 4th through 5th. Suddenly, magically, Nikki Rahman starts winning every single late vote dump. Once they realized where they needed to get to with Spencer Pratt, once they had the money, once they had the target, they knew exactly how many of those unaccountable, unnamed, unmarked, unsigned for, homeless ballots to dump into the race. That's why the number of ballots that needed to be counted kept increasing exponentially. You know that there's 40% more people voted in its election than voted in 2022 in L.A. Yet L.A. has lost millions of residents. How is that possible? You're telling me that Nikki Rahman and Karen Bass just inspired so many people to turn out. They had a 40% increase in turnout. Bull. They had a 40% increase in the machine turning the ballots.

out. That's what happened. And that's what's happening here. And then you can see with every single dump, Nikki Rahman kept winning. Now, now suddenly she's beating Karen Bass. Well, you know, that's really interesting because Lib Tards will tell you and they'll tell me, well, you know, what's going on here is that Democrats just like late voting and voting by mail. Okay. Well, that entire sorry, retarded theory is destroyed by the fact that none of these late-breaking votes went for Karen Bass. You can see Karen Bass actually getting lower in her percentages of the late-breaking votes while Nikki Rahman skyrocketed. So wait a second. Just Nikki Rahman Democrats vote by mail? Not Karen Bass Democrats? That don't make no sense. Look at this. Karen Bass's percentage of the late drop versus Nikki Romans versus Spencer Pratt's.

Oh, okay, just certain types of Democrats. The whole thing makes absolutely no sense. Not statistically, and certainly, not empirically. Because what we were able to observe is that this has never happened in American history. Chat GBT, GBT, GROC, all the AIs that we asked, we said, has there ever been a third place candidate that has been able to win subsequently every single drop, seven days straight, get 40% of the next drop, blowing out the laws of average, the laws of averages, blowing on all mathematical and statistical probability, and then getting to the point

where she actually overtakes the second place candidate. And the answer was definitively, no, demonstrably, no. That's never happened in American history. Like, there is a, there is a sciop that is going on so hard right now that says, Oh, we can. This is just how LA does it. Nope. It's never happened before.

But get a load of this. The second she overtook him, the second, the instant she overtook him. The second. The instant she overtook, this was last night. The instant that they had enough, motor ballots to pump into the system, they announced her to the winner. They called it instantly. It was the same second thing. The face of fraud.

the face of absolute fraudulence. He wasn't born in L.A. She wasn't born in California. Nikki Raman wasn't born in America. Nicky Raman went to the East Coast for school. She's Ivy League educated. She has no connection to California. She's been a complete dumpster of a career.

Nobody liked her. Nobody showed up for her. Yet we're supposed to believe this happened? No. No, you have to be brain dead. functionally brain dead to believe that somehow this is, this is real and not fraud. That's exactly what the president is saying this morning. Donald Trump, no way this could have happened.

Rigged election. Fury erupts over California elections after woke socialist candidate squeaks by Spencer Pratt, an airtight race. Oh, really? Mm, okay. Trump blasts crooked California elections. Look at this. Here it is.

This is. What I wanted to show you. Look at her go. Look at her go. If you know Los Angeles, so the gold is Spencer Pratt. These are going to be like the, you know, more suburban, nicer areas of L.A. Palisades, Beverly Hills, Spencer Pratt won. These are going to be the ghetto black areas of L.A.

Truly like the places where you go to get killed. Karen Bass, of course, wins there. they have voter, like complete and total voter fraud operations throughout all of these. These are all like dense urban housing and they just go hoover up all the ballots. Where's Nikki Rahman win? Well, she doesn't win her district. Nikki Rahman lost her district. This is again.

This is again how this operation works. Nikki Rahman is so unpopular. She lost her own district. Where did she win? Well, if you know downtown L.A., you'll know what this is. Nikki Rahman won Skid Row. Nikki Rahman won where they're putting, shoving all the homeless people. Nikki Rahman won the homeless encampments.

I just, I couldn't believe it when I was actually looking at the data here. These are the only places that Nikki Rahman won. Spencer Pratt, a net swing of more than a 43,000 votes since Tuesday. Huh, 43,000. Where have I seen this number before? This is from Nikki Rahman's own web page. he was in charge of the homeless problem in LA he wrote this we have 43,000 people

that experience homelessness at any given night in Los Angeles hmm it's very convenient there very convenient that so Nikki Rahman's pulling big numbers from Skid Row sickening pretty interesting the density view all right ladies and gentlemen I'm sorry I've been

just absolutely on a rampage here I want to get to Will Chamberlain my apologies for my, my rants. How do you, how do you register to vote? A gym card, an employer ID, a credit card, a prescription drug, label insurance card. Hmm. Got it.

All of them could be provided by the state directly to a homeless person. Where's your white pill? I don't know. Let's, let's do a white pill here. Here's the white, here's the white pill, ladies and gentlemen, the Spencer Pratt post. Klein, give me a white pill. Spencer Pratt says, they're not the only ones who know where to find the votes. Okay.

I guess we'll see. Nikki Rahman has now been declared the second place candidate. Here we go, ladies and gentlemen. On to Will Chamberlain from the Article 3 Project, who's been very patient as I rant here. I'm angry about it all. And I also want to explain how the system works and how we're thankful to you for supporting our program because we were right.

You hate to brag and nobody likes a braggert, but we collectively were right. We had the correct instinct. We went out, we exposed this, we showed you what was going to happen six months ago. The only one. And we thank you. We could want to do a lot more of that.

Anyway, Will Chamberlain calling it, calling it from the nosebleeds from the Article III project. Let's go. Yo, Will, what's up, man? I'm sorry. I'm just on a bender this morning. You're fine. I mean, I used to live in downtown L.A. And, I mean, if you know anything about Skid Row, nobody lives there except homeless people.

Like, it's completely, it's the biggest homeless encampment in the world, probably, or at least certainly in the United States. States. So nobody lives there. Everybody who does live there is a drug addict, basically. Yes. Because if you are actually just homeless and trying to recover, you know, whatever temporary financial issue, you would be in a shelter. The people who are living on the street in Skidrow, they're addicts. These people are not voting on their own of court. So if there's a huge impile of ballots from Skid Row, that means that that is, you know, that really kind of, that's a good place to start for Bill O'Saley and the U.S. Attorney's Office in Los Angeles. Yeah. Okay. So, you know, I would really like to know how would you carve up this whale.

We have this density map. This is amazing. Can you pop that up? Please, I don't know if you got it. If you got it, Klein. Throw up that density map, please. Best is unbelievable. So you can see where the Nikki Rahman votes, the map I was showing, it's very unique.

Like, you could see that Nikki Rahman only one. Look at those spikes. Look at those spikes. The incumbent didn't get any spikes like that. Look at those spikes. Visit BetMDX. Casino and check out the newest exclusive. The Price is Right Fortune Pick.

BetMGM and GameSense remind you to play responsibly. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please play responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact connects Ontario at 1-866-531-2,600 to speak to an advisor. Free of charge. BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with Eye Gaming Ontario.

You know Los Angeles. These are the homeless encampment areas of downtown L.A. With skyscraper level spikes for Nikki Rahman, just in these small, extremely dense areas. It just screams fraud. It just screams fraud. There's no other explanation for this, Will, or am I wrong? I mean, that's honestly, I think it's, you know,

there's this possible explanation that Nithia Raman socialist voters are just, you know, just so happened to be the coalition of people that happens to vote late by mail. Okay? Like, that's possible. I mean, the basic approach of people who are criticizing this or people criticizing Republicans for taking issue with it is I think their theory is, as long as you can come up with a possible theory of how the election was won legitimately, then you're not allowed to question it, which is kind of the reverse of what it actually should be. You know, I've had a lot of arguments of people. People are, what's happening is so many liberals are doing this. Like from Tim Miller to Ted Liu, they'll, I say, you know, I put out a thread where I basically

said, your elections lack so much integrity. I don't have a theory of how they were stolen. I just presume they were stolen because it's obviously possible to steal them. So in a million different ways. And they're like, well, this one theory I came up with doesn't make any sense. So how dare you say that? I'm like, well, I didn't say that theory. I literally just said, on its face, your elections don't demonstrate that the elections were one legitimate. So prove that you won them, right? Prove that you actually won them with legal votes. All the cast legal. You can't, so I don't have to take them seriously. And I think that's the breadth of the number of people. I mean, I'm not going to out anybody who likes my tweets, but the breadth of opinion who likes my tweets,

it's the entire gamut of right-wing opinion from populace to elite, to business, to policy. It doesn't matter. So we're all basically in agreement. These elections are ridiculous, on its face silly. Your insults don't matter. Sorry, leftist. Like you can't just, you know, like guilt trip us or trying socially change. us into saying these elections are good. No, they're fraudulent. And, you know, I mean, obviously, like everybody's talked about the Save America Act, but I'm going to be a big proponent of one very simple fix that if the Supreme Court doesn't solve this with the election day issue, my simple fix is this. The way that these elections matter federally the most is in the House,

right? California is always going to win its Senate seats, obviously it's a Democratic state. But there's plenty of contested House races that will be close-ish. I think Mike Johnson and the House and the Republican House caucus should, in November, look at the results and say, if you are a California representative and you weren't ahead on election day, we're not going to seat you until we do a full investigation of your specific election and you prove you won. I think that's the simple way. That would, and you can announce that in advance. I think that would wake up California to realizing because, remember, this is a democracy

in multiple ways. It may be a localized democracy in California, but it's also a federal democracy, which means we have the right, if the, you know, if the Republicans are the majority currently, we have the right to say to Democrats, we don't trust your elections. And so we're not going to trust the results of your elections and, you know, deal with it. Like, we're not going to seat your representatives unless you fix this, because we're just not, we're not putting up with it anymore. You think Mike Johnson have the balls to do that? I think he will. I mean, I think the Republican House was willing to pass the Save America Act. It's the Senate where we've had these issues and

the filibuster and all that stuff. The beauty of this is, this is in the Constitution. Article one, Section 5 says each house is the judge of its own elector, of its own members and their qualifications, right? So it's just within, the Senate has no say in how the House decides to seat people. We don't need to pass new law. It literally, I think the only restrictions on it are based on some other constitutional ideas that each member will have to be given individualized process. So you can't just blake it, say you're not seating everybody. You have to provisionally not seat them and then send them to get an individualized hearing. But I see no reason why you couldn't, you couldn't do that. You basically could, you know, it would be unprecedented. We haven't done this before. Basically,

this power has only been used in individualized cases where there's been really, you know, like criminal indictments for corruption, that sort of thing. But California's weakened its own election integrity so much that I think, and I think every Republican would think that the presumption is flipped. Like, if you weren't ahead on election day and you get some late mail-ins to push you over the top, we're going to assume that's fraud and you need to prove otherwise. where would you advise bill assaili to begin in an investigation here we hear that these investigations have been ongoing he was asking for fraud tips yesterday a week could go through all of the systems that they have created in l.A. in order to legalize fraud which is what they've done right so they've they've made the fraud impossible to track based on the way that they count and they've they've reverse engineered election security to do the opposite of election security. So it's going to be very hard.

Where would you advise him to begin? I think you start with, I mean, you want to start, I think, I mean, it's possible you start with Kalshi and people who were like, you know, maybe we're involved in. So this sort of thing, you want to look for like the earliest big bets on Nithia Raman to come out of the primary. Like it looked, because on election day, it looked really bad for her. And then all of a sudden the money started moving in. And so you'd start there.

You'd also start looking at the homeless encampments. and who are these people? How are they registered? Where are they registered? Where are their votes? Try and track them down, see if they're still in Los Angeles. See if they're, you know, they'll admit they actually voted or if their vote was cast by somebody else.

Because I think that that's, you know, I mean, I've seen enough about how, like, you don't actually have to, you know, there's signature verification, but you don't actually have to sign. You can just leave a mark. And then somebody else can go see you and say that somebody else can sign and say, oh, yes, I saw this person vote. But that person's signature can't be verified. Like, it's just, it's an endless pile of nonsense that that obviously enables fraud.

So you'd start there, right? Like, in the moment, you can start proving a few homeless people didn't, you know, because, like, if there's all these votes from homeless people, I'm sorry, like, you're registering a whole bunch of homeless people. Those people aren't voting in their right mind. Guarantee. They're all addicts. None of them are showing up at the polls in their right mind.

So that's just, like, the obvious source of where is this fraudulent, you know, ballot stuffing happening? And, I mean, if, as you say, Nethi Rahman is, winning among these in these sort of homeless registered places, then it's just, hey, hi, a giant fraud. And I think the important thing is to realize, like, nobody should never take the bait on saying, oh, you're a conspiracy theorist. I have no, I have like possible theories, I guess, but I'm completely agnostic about them. And all I, you know, we're just going to start with a presumption that here's the way, I guess this is the thing, Ted Lou came at me yesterday. And I said something to

Ted Loo. I was like, Ted, you need to understand this. We don't, trust you, and we have no reason to trust you, right? The California government is a criminal organization independently of the elections. Think about the high-speed rail boondoggle. So we don't trust, why would we trust you to run an election properly if you can't, if you're obviously stealing hundreds of billions of dollars on your high-speed rail? So if you want us to care and trust what you're doing, maybe you should run your elections in an obviously unimpeachable way that says, well, even if you are corrupt, clearly you have to be telling the truth. Like, for example, in Florida, Democrats might think Ron DeSantis and the forwarded Republicans are

totally corrupt, but they can have no question about whether our elections, the elections in Florida are on the level, because there's so many obvious ways in which you just can't cheat and nobody has time to cheat because the election results come in two hours after closing. You can't cheat. It's not possible, even if you think we're a bunch of corrupt names. Well, California's gone the other direction. They know the rest of the country thinks they're a bunch of corrupt knaves, and yet they flout every election integrity measure that is widespread throughout the Western world, you know, like ID, mail-in ballots, ballot harvesting, allowing to count seven days out, like these month-long to returns. If this was a third, you know, if this was an election in the

third world dictatorship, the state department would be saying that we'd be treating the winner as like Maduro. Right. We'd be doing a regime change. Yeah. Or we'd at least like open the possibility up. Like we, I mean, maybe if they were hostile to us, we'd do a regime change. If they weren't, maybe we'd give them the pass. But, you know, that's what we'd see. it as we'd see it as, okay, this is just clearly an illegitimate leader. We don't have to treat these results the way they're printed on. And then here's the thing, is the State Department ever called like conspiracy theorists for looking at low integrity elections and saying these election results are clearly unsurious? Like, we don't have, the State Department's not asked like, well,

what's your theory for exactly how it was stolen? Like, that's not how the debate goes. It goes, like, your elections have no integrity, so we don't have to treat the result as worth more than toilet paper. And so you're not a legitimate leader, the end. This is exactly how. how California election results should be treated. I love that solution. I love that that that amelioration of this because at some point there's going to have to be a break because they're going to do this nationally will. And that's the thing that concerns me and why I want to spend maybe the whole week on California elections. We're going to head back out to California. I'm going to do a zombie voter. I'm going to do a zombie voter piece where I'm going to go track. I'm already working with

people right now to go track down. I'm going to track down homeless people. I'm going to track down the people who've been voting in the last 50 elections, and they're 170. I'm going to go do that. I want to say one thing because I forgot to do this, but I pulled this bookbook off my bookshelf, the Means of Assents by Robert Caro. This is a book, if you are at all interested in the topic of American elections. Oh, LBJ, what a dirty dog.

Just the dirtiest election thief ever. It's a whole series, right? Every election he was in, he stole. Every single election he stole the 1948 Senate election. And that's how he got into the Senate. Yep, right? He literally... Stuffing boxes, stuffing all those boxes, right? Is that...

Yeah, they basically... Sorry to interrupt you, but please. One of the most corrupt election. I mean, it was, and it's, it is, Robert Carrow is like the ultimate establishment liberal, right? Like, one of the most respected authors of all time. Liberals read his books, have read, but, I mean, so the means of assent by Lyndon, John, by Robert Carrow is just one of, like,

I highly recommend it to anybody. It's a great read to do. It's really entertaining. Carrow is an incredible writer. I think he would have won the Pulitzer for this stuff. But if you ever want, you know, when people tell you, oh, why would you ever suspect that an election was stolen? Like, you just need to read some American history to realize that this is not uncommon. And, you know, we got tired of it.

And technology has gotten better and it's made it harder. But when you have California doing stuff, like creating, you know, these reservoirs of homeless votes, like that can be somehow, that dropped off in a mailbox. Like, this, you're just like history. History doesn't repeat, but it rhymes. It rhymes very much with how LVJ stole his election in 1948. Any other solutions off the top of the head? I mean, you've been sparring all weekend over this with some big names. Any other solutions off the top of that?

So the Mike Johnson solution, that would take some real guts. We would love that. We'll champion that with you. Voter ID, obviously we've had Carl DeMaio and the voter ID contingency in Los Angeles and in California. They've done incredible work. They have two million ballot signatures to get voter ID on the ballot for referendum in November. We'll see what happens with that. Any other solutions, Will, to this? I mean, I think the Supreme Court is going to probably come in. I think this, and I'd be optimistic, Supreme Court's probably going to come in and say election day means

election day, which means you can't accept ballots that arrive after election day. And I think that'll help a lot. That'll, that's a, you know, in effect that they're kind of saying, the Democrats from themselves with that, I think, honestly, in terms of like having, you know, making sure, ensuring that forcing them to have reasonably high integrity elections. I couldn't believe. I couldn't believe it will when I saw this. That, that, that you don't even have to get the postmark stamped and dated because they, they're like, if it's in the mailbox on election day, it'll count. Right. Apparently you can write it. You can write it on the envelope and just say, I voted on this day. I got it. Right. Like, do they think we're stupid?

They just think, and it's, I think, uh, what it, Walter Kern had a great line about what this was. He called it cooling off the mark, uh, which is like, the idea is if you con somebody, you, after you've conned them and stolen their money, you want to, you know, kind of reassure them, explain how you get them to believe it was a little bit their own fault, so they stopped making a big deal out of it. Like that's, that's the phase we're in now. We're getting told, it's like, well, obviously socialists just do well with like counted

ballots and obviously like, why do you think Pratt could have won in a city as Democrat as L.A.? It's like, no, screw you. I mean, I think. Somebody pointed out that in Seattle, apparently the socialists also did well there with late mail at one point in a previous mayoral election. And I do know that makes me think. I'm like, oh, so DSA is a criminal organization. Like, not surprising, these people are communists. When have communists ever broken the law to try and achieve a political objective?

That's never happened in the history of humanity. Like, right, right. Are you, you think you're persuading me that you're making some compelling argument that no fraud happened here by pointing to a different mayor election where DSA has, benefited from late mail? Like, give me a break. You're a really bright. You're like such a smart architect when it comes to fighting and winning and strategy. What would you advise Spencer Pratt to do right now, Will? Would you advise him to go to court? I mean, I'd want to go to court. I wouldn't, you know, I saw there was some noise about where I can find ballots. Don't say stuff like that. Like I can find ballots, but just like, you know, lawyer up, right? Go for it. And don't stop. Right.

like lawyer up, don't concede, like treat this election the way everybody else on the right is treating this election. It's phony and, you know, and don't buy into the idea. One of the things I don't think Trump did a great job of in that clip, and I love Trump to be wrong. But like he was talking about, oh, look, there's tons of evidence. I think the right way to frame this is it is not my job to provide evidence when your rules make it possible to commit fraud and need no trace. Thank you. I'm sorry, I took like 10 minutes to say that this morning, but that's a much better and concise way to say it. Like the way CNN, the way Christian Walker goes at this is the same game every single time. Yeah. Where's the evidence? There's the evidence. Yeah. I don't, I need no evidence.

Your rules are farce. You must provide evidence that despite this farce, you in fact, one legitimately. That's right. Thank you, Will. I need to bring you, thank you. This is called counsel. This is why people pay for lawyers. Actually, it's called counsel. I hate that game. I hate that game that they play. And I'm going to go back out to help. Everybody knows that that's the problem, right? Like that, that game is based on this false presumption, right? Like, there's no presumption. If it were you, if it were you making $50 million off of a daycare, you'd have CNN with their cameras so far up your ass.

You'd, I mean, you'd have it, you'd have every, you'd have every single news network in the universe parked outside of your home in camps, like on a tripod, pointing a camera at your door. Right. If you, a Republican and somebody who's close with the administration and who advocates for these things was found to be committing tens of millions or hundreds of millions of dollars of fraud. Right.

If you did a voter fraud, if you or one of the candidates you worked with or for or liked or one of your friends went from third place to first place in every single ballot drop after election day, Kristen Welker would be sleeping on your couch with a microphone, waiting to like ask you the toughest questions on Earth. Russia gave the entire theory was that Russia influenced the election in a outcome determinative manner in 2016, right? The Democrats are not above this sort of analysis. They pretend to be holier than that. That's exactly right. They never asked that question. Well, where's the evidence of Russia gate? They never asked that question. Oh, well, show me the evidence that the Russians

cheated the election. They never asked. They just went directly to the conclusion. Right. Man, it's sickening. It's so tough. Okay. Just really quick. I want to like leave people, not with doom and gloom. So, so Mike Johnson, uh, voter ID, Mike Johnson not seating, voter ID, Spencer Pratt potentially loyering up any other solutions that you see for how we could fight this?

I mean, I think we just start there's other ways you could basically punish California at the federal level like beyond not seating their representatives like you just say we're not, various things

we're not funding like your state's a third world dictatorship. You know, eventually I think we, I think 180 years of statehood has been enough honestly. Like I think California

should return to territory status. You stripped of its electoral votes. We can govern it like the northern Mariana Islands. Would there be any precedent for that? I mean, yeah, you know, Britain's governorship of Hong Kong. There you go.

Voting doesn't work for you guys. Sorry. Like we're just governing. Like turning into Guam, just like turn it into. Yeah, I mean, Guam. Maybe they can vote for their local elections, but maybe treat it like, again, or like the federal district. Like, it's just like, you know, Trump can come in and just change everything and, you know,

do what he wants, like whatever basically we turn into a federal protectorate instead of an independent sovereign state. That would, that might stick. Turn every single representative into Stacey Plaskett, right? Right. Yeah, they get, they get like 50 Stacey Plaskets who have no voting power. We found this solution. Ladies and gentlemen, Will Chamberlain, you got to follow him, man.

He's the best. You got to follow him. Obviously, he works with our, with our dear friend Mike Davis at the Article III project. he's regularly on Pierce Morgan's show, bodying, uh, libs and libtards and, and,

and then retard right and everyone, it's like amazing. He's done great job. Uh, and you must follow him. He's got hundreds of thousands of subscribers. You need to be one of them. He's got a half million,

uh, there. Well done, will. Godspeed. Thank you so much. Thank you, Benny.

ALX, please check the war room chat. Hate to do this on the live, but please check the war room chat. I've been sending messages there. You need something up. Uh, okay, ladies and gentlemen,

just checking back in with our, checking back in with our production here. Joel. Oh, man. Oh, no. Wow. I'm sorry. We've gotten behind today. And just because I'm hot-blooded on this issue. And I need to step back and let the experts speak. How about Joel Pollock, ladies and gentlemen, from the California Post, a man who is, I think, neighbors with Spencer Pratt, who lived in lives up in the palisades, who knows L.A. better than almost anyone alive and does the best coverage out of L.A. Joel Pollock joins the show live right now. Joel, I apologize. I was having

too much fun with Will Chamberlain talking about how we need to make California territory again and remove statehood from California. So I'm sure you're going to, I'm sure you're going to take that personally. But over here in Florida is just like these things seem rational at this point. Well, we don't really have free and fair elections in California. So, you know, we don't maybe have the fundamental prerequisite for statehood. I don't know. It's, it's an odd situation. That's what we were saying.

So, you know, you're already seeing this with the Kristen Walker clip where Libs are going to go, well, prove it. Democrats vote late by mail. Well, they didn't vote for Karen Bass. So only specific Democrats vote late by mail. And then we actually have the graph here. I'd love for you to break this down for me, if you wouldn't mind. We have the graph here of vote. density and consolidation by Nikki Rahman throughout Los Angeles.

And it's just unbelievable. She just skyrocketed. She built an entire empire of skyscrapers in Skid Row and in like Skid Row alone and in some of the more dense areas and homeless infested areas throughout LA. What does this map say to you about how the election ran, please? Well, yes. portions of that map, if you see, I believe hers would be the green skyscrapers. Is that correct? That's correct. Yes. Sorry about that. Yeah, some skyscrapers downtown. And also where it says Beverly Hills, those green skyscrapers are actually Westwood and around UCLA.

So you're looking at students voting over there. Oh, interesting. And the other interesting thing about Nithiaraman's background, I'm relatively new to L.A. I've been in L.A. for 15 years. Nithya Rahman's been there for less time than I have. And the first job she had in L.A. was working for a homeless services organization. She also now chaired the Homelessness Committee in the L.A. City Council. She's done absolutely nothing to solve that problem, but she does know the infrastructure that exists within the neighborhoods that have the highest concentration of homeless people. So I think the evidence is starting to point us toward a boat harvesting operation that probably targeted Skid Row and other areas where there were many homeless people who could be registered to vote and could be encouraged either to sign their ballots in favor of Nithyaraman or to give them to people who would collect the ballots for them or whatever happened. But I believe we will probably find something like a turnout operation that concentrated on areas where,

she could get votes. And that's because she knew those areas better than Spencer Pratt, probably better than Karen Bass. Karen Bass has her own turnout operation that's run by the public sector unions. She did particularly well in black and Hispanic parts of L.A. that has always been her strongest foundation, same places that voted for her in 2022. Spencer Pratt did well, where Rick Caruso did well in 22. He did well in Palisades on the west side, parts of San Fernando Valley, which is a more suburban part of L.A. So he also did well in South Bay. These are middle-class areas, sometimes wealthier areas, but generally middle-class

Angelinos who work for a living and understand what it takes to run a business, to get to work. And it's a three-way split, essentially. I mean, we're talking about small percentages that divide the candidates. I mean, the big picture story there is a very weak incumbent, Karen Bass, very weak after a poor performance on the LA fires last year of Palisades Fire. She would point to some improvement in homelessness, but it's come at a massive cost. I mean, the amount of money the city has spent has been astronomical. And not much vision.

If you listen to her budget speech a few weeks ago, she really didn't say very much about where she sees the city going. No real plans for the World Cup, no real plans for the Olympics. It's all, in a way, tangential. to what she sees as her job, which is just to hold a coalition together. Ramin was part of that coalition and then broke away. And she broke away because of the success, in my view, of Zaraan Mamdani winning in New York. I think Mamdani has energized a generation of far-left activists to believe they can repeat what he did in New York in other cities. And he's had some really terrible failures already in New York, but he's also had a run of good luck.

I mean, tonight's game three of the NBA finals, the Knicks might actually win a championship, you know, and of course he's going to take a victory lap for that. And a few other things have happened. He was able to dip into state funds to balance a city budget that had a massive deficit. But the left doesn't know that he went into the state funds. All they know is that he balanced the budget and they're all celebrating like he's doing a great job. He makes these bizarre statements about foreign policy and people are heading for the exits in New York because of his attack on wealthy people. people and, you know, he had this second home tax that he's now put into place with the help of the state legislature. In San Diego, by the way, among the other election results in California,

voters rejected that. They rejected the sort of Mamdani tax in San Diego. But the left is decided that they can do what he did. And so she went after Bass. Look, what we're probably seeing is what we saw in 2020, which is a legalized process of fraud. And it's something that goes back to 2010. 10, really. We are living in an era where the parties don't believe in running the game in a fair way anymore. I think Republicans tend to believe it just because Republicans tend to be a little bit more adult. I compare the parties by calling the Republicans the adults and the Democrats, the teenagers, you know, the adults have to pay the bills and make sure everything is done properly. The teenagers get to rebel and complain, but ultimately they still depend on the adults.

So that's kind of, it's kind of a model for how I think about it. It doesn't mean that that's necessarily a perfect analogy, but it is something that I think helps explain a lot of the behavior. And I think Republicans do take some of these institutions more seriously than Democrats. It's why Republicans won't get rid of the filibuster, whereas Democrats will probably do that the first time, the first day they take the Senate back. Yes.

But basically what happened in 2010 was Barack Obama came in and pushed Obamacare through on a party-line vote. And that was the first time anyone had passed that kind of, massive sweeping entitlement with only one party's support. And that inaugurated an era of zero-sum politics in the United States. Whereas before people had cared about the rules of the game, people had cared about keeping conflict within bounds. Obama brought this Chicago style mentality, which was we don't actually accept the legitimacy of opposition and you're not a real politician if you're not willing to do this kind of thing. And in a way, Trump is an answer to that. Trump is an answer to the Obama style of politics. So he's doing things within the

limits of the law, but he's doing them right up to the limits of the law and the Constitution. He gets overturned a lot less than Obama and Biden because they often went outside the Constitution. But he is basically the response to that. And Democrats are not going to fix the voting system either in California or anywhere else unless there's some kind of... This spring, denim gets a softer, lighter update. Introducing Old Navy's drapey denim wide leg, a new fit. A new fit. that moves with you. It's everything you want denim to feel like for summer. Easy, breathable, and effortlessly cool. With a fit that creates natural movement and a wide leg that feels modern, not overwhelming. Plus that signature, wait, for this price, moment. Old Navy's drapey denim wide

leg. Massive federal intervention because nobody is going to make a change right now, even if it's fair, even if it's principled. Nobody is going to undertake a change that could disadvantage their side and give the other side an advantage. People feel there's too much at stake. Nobody wants to give any quarter. And so what happened in California, around the same time, all this was happening, Arnold Schwarzenegger was on the way out as governor. And he had been a kind of surprise candidate when he ran in the recall several years before, got reelected, didn't do a fantastic job as governor, but at least temporarily disrupted the Democrats' single-party dominance of California. And the Democrats decided that could never happen again. And so they started making

changes to the California voting and electoral system that basically ensured Democrats would win in perpetuity. There has not been a single Republican who has won statewide since Arnold Schwarzenegger left office and left with some of the changes like the jungle primary. And then in 2016, Jerry Brown signs the law that allows ballot harvesting. And before this election, Gavin Newsom barred federal officials from seizing voting machines. All of these things are designed to reduce transparency and increase the likelihood that there will be a Democrat elected to every office of significance. It doesn't mean Republicans can't win, but look at Proposition 50 last year. I mean, Gavin Newsom, in my view, broke the California Constitution to put this in front of voters

before he had the authority to do so, redrew the congressional map. He says to counter Texas redrawing its congressional map, but Texas at least was complying with federal law and Supreme Court precedent on the revisions to districts that had been drawn along racial lines. California just made it up. And, you know, Gavin Newsom still pretends he supports independent redistricting commissions. He doesn't. He did that this was a longstanding plan in place. They very quickly knew where to draw the boundaries. They clearly had done their demographic homework long in advance of Texas doing anything. And this was Gavin Newsom's play. And this is how Democrats run California.

They run it as a one-party state. Now, as someone who has a home in California, You look at this and you could feel a sense of despair. The one comfort you take is that it doesn't work. Nothing they do works. Zero. Nothing they do works. Everything they do fails. Now, the illusion we were under in Pacific Palisades was that it's okay if they fail in

L.A. They fail in the rest of California because we've managed to carve out a little life for ourselves here. We have a little slice of small town America. We've got the Little League going on weeknights and on Sundays and we've got people going to church and we've got people who help. each other out in the 4th of July parade. It's like a little small town, 1950s era, sort of little town in L.A., and it was wonderful until the Palisades fire. And then Palisades fire happened.

No fire engines, no police, no water. And we suddenly had L.A. hit us in the face. And the dysfunction of L.A. and the dysfunction of California made that life impossible and now basically a distant memory. So those of us who are still fighting in, in Palisades, are fighting to change the way L.A. runs, changed the way California runs. And Spencer Pratt stood up for us. And you don't have to like him. Some of my neighbors don't. Some of my neighbors don't like Karen Bass,

but they're not huge fans of Spencer Pratt for whatever reason. That's fine. But I think everybody expected that he would be in the running against Karen Bass in the general election. There were polls that showed Rahman could be in second place. I actually did a video about one of them before the election. And there are reasons for that. But basically, the way this happened is so disconcerted.

to watch a candidate clear of his closest rival by seven points on election night, then get pulled back as the mail-in ballots come in. And Democrats who are pretending this is all above border, making the problem worse because it just isn't. There's no other free society in the world that governs itself this way. And these people like Newsom and Jacob Soberoff and Kirsten Walker and all these people, like you said, demanding evidence. I mean, as you point as, as, as Wilk pointed out, they didn't demand evidence in the Russia collusion case, but now they're demanding evidence here. to divert the discussion to 2020 rather than talk about what's happening in 2026. And it's basically the same process.

I mean, this process of legalized fraud. We don't know if there was actual fraud. We may find that there was. I think more likely you'll find these ballot harvesting operations going on. But this is not how a free society governs itself. It just isn't. And it can't be because it destroys public confidence in elections. And the reason for all of these rules that allow late ballots and all this

stuff. The reason they'll give you is, well, we want to make it as accessible as possible, as easy for people to vote as it possibly can be. But it's actually having the opposite effect, because a lot of people are just checking out. They're not going to vote because they just think the whole process is rigged. So you're actually reducing public participation, not helping it. We talked with Will, and that was such an eloquent analysis and architecture of sort of the ground up how we've gotten to the place where nobody believes in the systems anymore. The systems have been designed to fail the integrities of the systems. Fail, the State Department.

It's like, great. When you go through and you read a State Department cable about a rigged election, it doesn't say we found all the ballots that you stole the election with. It says your systems are broken. And therefore, we do not trust the results of your election, which is exactly how the State Department and any logical American should approach, I believe, in California election. How do you, Amelia read that?

If this was a foreign country, country, we would submit a report that said the election was not credible. We'd be invading, Joel. The state department would be like, time for a regime change. Yeah. Someone said this morning, yeah, if this was Venezuela, we would have removed the leader already. You know, it's something that we can't verify. These results can't be verified. And what I mean by that is with ballot harvesting, we don't know who's turning the ballots in. It's basically an honor system, whether they filled the ballots out themselves or had the voter sign it. in their presence. And you can dial up or dial down the sensitivity of the signature checks.

We saw that, you know, for example, several years ago in the 2020 election, the error rate in ballots that were read by the computers was reported as something like less than 1%. In other words, voters that filled out their ballots and submitted them by mail had an error rate of less than 1%. That's really low. But then a few years later, when people tried to recall the district attorney, who was at George Soros plant. The error rate was magically 27%. How do you go from 1% to 27%? Well, the answer is you have a different process

and you're much more rigorous in checking the signatures when you don't want something to count. And you're much less rigorous in checking the signatures when you do want something to count. So they kind of dial it up and dial it down. And with these ballot harvesting operations,

there's no way to be sure that the vote is actually legitimate. You have to accept it on an honor system. And that's basically the argument for everything. I mean, Democrats say voter fraud doesn't happen because it's already illegal and that's enough of a disincentive. But you can't check independently whether it's happening.

So, yeah, I mean, I think there are many of us who are prepared to accept a flawed system. I think what is different is if the system is going to give us one result on election night and then give us a different result a week later, that's automatically going to make people think it's illegitimate because it's indistinguishable. from a system where people arrive and stuff the mailboxes full of ballots. It's just how would you know that's happening? How would you know it's not happening? I mean, I feel at this stage, the burden of proof should not be on the people who feel

there might have been fraud. The burden of proof is on the people who think there wasn't fraud, because you have to show me that these votes are legitimate after you have these kinds of wild swings. It has to be explained to people. And again, I don't think it's fraudulent. I think that we have a system that is terrible and they're taking advantage of it through legal means. But I think the ordinary person coming to this without any baggage looks at it and understands this is wrong. You know, when I was a kid, my first baseball game I

ever went to, I grew up a Cubs fan, but the first time I ever went to a baseball stadium was Comiskey Park in Chicago. And I was sitting next to a couple of drunks, and they had the all-star ballots, you know, for the all-star game. And these guys were just grabbing stacks of ballots and punching as many holes as they possibly could so that whichever, you know, second or third rate White Sox player they liked would make the All-Star team. I mean, that's how this thing works when there are no checks on who's submitting ballots. You know, how do you know? I mean, a bunch of paper arrives and then you count it all.

And that's that we have the equivalent of all-star balloting as the California system. It's basically, it's a joke. And it's designed to be a joke. It's going to stay a joke unless there's massive federal. intervention. And of course, that's only going to trigger more of this kind of internecine conflict because right now, where we are as a republic, I mean, it's unfortunate on our 250th anniversary, but we are moving away from the common things and the sense that the game has to work no matter who wins. And that's partly because of Barack Obama, frankly. I mean, the guy who

ran on no red states, no blue states, he came into office and he divided people to win. He divided people to push his left-wing agenda. And that became the default in the Democratic Party. That's why you're seeing it move further and further left and why moderate Democrats are basically disappearing. One guy you haven't heard of is this guy, Matt Mayhan, who is the mayor of San Jose, probably the most accomplished Democrat in the race for governor. And he had all the Silicon Valley money behind him. And it didn't help in the end because Democrats have no appetite for a moderate candidate, even one who has actually achieved something with regard to housing and homelessness. the Democrats all competed with each other in this gubernatorial race about who could be more anti-Trump.

And that's where the Democrats are. Republicans, I think, want the country to work because Republicans tend to have more invested in institutions, in homes. You know, I said before it was like adults versus teenagers. We've almost become a society of owners versus renters. And again, it's a generalization because there are plenty of Republicans who are renters, too. But, you know, if you think you still believe in owning, investing, you care about the long term, you're thinking about political choices differently. If you're a renter, you don't have any hope of owning.

You think about redistribution because you want your needs to be met. You think the people who have something have taken it from you. And that's how you're encouraged to think by your college or your political leaders in your culture, you know, Jimmy Kimmel or whoever you're listening, TikTok, I don't know. But it's definitely a kind of a renter paradigm versus. is an owner paradigm. And right now, the renters have all the momentum, partly because they're out of power politically on a national level, but partly because they have organizing tools that the owners haven't really learned how to use yet. And in this case, well, again, what we might find

is Rahman had organizers who went to these homeless areas like you did when you were in L.A. And, you know, you found dozens of people registered at parking lots. I mean, how difficult would it have been to submit those ballots? Probably pretty easy. So I think that's probably what we'll find. Yeah, I mean, maybe we could, maybe we can end on this, Joel, like, is like how perhaps you could break down like how easy this operation would be to rig, like how the legalized rigging of elections work on a step-by-step basis. And then how do you stop it? Is voter ID going to pass in California, for instance, on the November referendum? Well, the way it works is typically the person who registers you to vote will also turn in your ballot. That's how ballot harvesting works.

I talked to a Republican leader when they started experimenting with ballot harvesting among Republican voters in California, they got nowhere because Republicans don't want to give up their ballots. Republicans consider their ballot to be a secret. They take voting very seriously. It's a private thing between you and God, basically. And Democrats might think that the secret ballot is important, but what usually happens is they vote in groups and they vote as part of a team exercise. It's almost like a social activity, which is why the genius of Obama's 2012 re-election was to say to people, make a plan to vote. Not just vote for Obama, but make a plan to vote. And they did it in groups. And so what's happening in California is that the people registering you to vote come back six months later and say, hey, I'm here to pick up your ballot. So you've already seen this person.

You trust them. You hand them your ballot. And they've already let it be known that they're Democrats and a little bit of pressure. right, you're going to vote for the Democrat, right? I mean, they're not supposed to do that, but you know who they are, you know where they're from, they know where you live, they're at your door. And so there's more of an organizational aspect to it. And so what's happening, I think, is that in nursing homes and in these homeless encampments

and so forth, the people registering people to vote are also the ones who pick up the ballots or collect the mail and may even deliver the ballots and say, hey, you know, I've got a pile of ballots here. It's voting day. everybody wants to vote come vote here and you know i i was um i won't say where i was at because i don't want this person to get fired but let's just say i was shopping for something pretty cool not that i could afford it just yet but a kind of a fun vehicle let's put it that way and uh and and i i wrote around with this person who was an incredible sales lady just amazing super nice person

she told me confided in me that she had voted for karen bass and she was embarrassed about it and has done a terrible job. And then she says to me, if you vote for Spencer Pratt, I'm not selling you this product. And that's the kind of peer pressure that exists in L.A. And she thought that was funny. You know, I think she said it half jokingly, but, you know, that's the atmosphere. So are you really going to tell the person who registered you to vote that you're going to vote for a Republican? If that person is a Democrat, it's really hard. So I think Democrats basically control the voting process. It's a throwback to the late 19th century before the secret ballot was invented. That's how people voted. You would go into like some kind of a room and you would say out loud who you were voting for

and the party would be there and they would watch you voted for. And eventually it was so susceptible of the fraud that dozens of states adopted the secret ballot. I think it was Harrison, the second president Harrison who was elected and there was massive fraud by Republicans in Indiana. And so that was such a scandal that they instituted the secret ballot. And that's the way it was for a century. But Democrats basically have reintroduced the partisan ballot. They control the process. And this ballot harvesting thing that California does is the kind of epitome of that. That's fascinating.

That's exactly right. Because you get rid of the secret ballot when all the ballots are shoved in a mailbox. Right. You get like 50 mail-in ballots for every person that ever lived at your domicile. There's nothing secret about it. It's like embarrassing. There's another problem which is that who delivers the ballots, right? Is the postal union.

Well, the postal union endorses candidates. So are you really going to be comfortable if you're a Republican voting by mail, handing it to a mail carrier who, who, you know, I mean, look, they're supposed to deliver it, but I'll tell you this. I was displaced by the Palisades Fire, okay, but I have a forwarding address. I never got my ballot. My wife never got her ballot. I voted in person. I voted in person in California, but I never got my mail in ballot. Now, what's that about?

You know, like, I mean, it's so, you know, people who are. are supposed to deliver the mail, they have their own favorites. And that's a problem. What a mess. What a mess, Joel. You know, you run the California Post. You unbelievable work there, everybody needs to subscribe to the California Post and read it with a regular basis. They're connected with the New York Post. Joel's been doing such incredible work with Andrew Breitbart, has this a storied legacy of exposing the truth about these systems. Please follow Joel. Obviously, he has so much to say about this issue and the topic, but also, he has a really clairvoyant way to see through these issues and to tell you what's really going on.

Because it's more simple than it's all fraud. It's an entire system. It's a system that's built and designed for fraud and designed so that you can never challenge it. And that's the purpose. They reverse engineered it. Joel has hundreds of thousands of subscribers on X here. You should be one of them. Godspeed, Joel.

Thank you. Thank you. Man, Joel talking about losing his home. Talking about losing everything in the Palisades fire, as so many people did. And when you have families and children, the number one thing that you think about on a regular basis is loss. Something that you have to think about when it comes to a year like we've had, when we've seen so many tragic losses. Assassinations, assassination attempts. It's happening all across the country.

Ethos, ladies and gentlemen, is a life insurance company that we really like on this program. life insurance might seem like a crazy thing to think about when you're relatively young. That's actually exactly when you have to think about it when you have the most to lose. You have little children running around and wife, family, God forbid something would have happened to you. And again, if there's one thing this year has proven is how fragile life is and God is the author of life and death. Do you think about your parents, your spouse, your close family, your children, you're becoming a new parent. Life insurance is something you've got to think about considering. the world that we live in. Accidents do happen. Circumstances change. Ethos makes getting life insurance

fast, easy. It's 100% online. You can get a quote in seconds. Apply in minutes and get the same day coverage. No medical exam. You just answer a few questions and you can pay, you can get up to a $3 million coverage plan. Some policies are as low as $30 a month. That's like a Chick-fil-A order. Crazy. It took my kids to the Chick-fil-A. We don't often go to fast food ever, but my wife was leaving for a conference, and so I took the kids out to Chick-fil-A so she could get out without them all crying. The $30 just to get the kids fed. That chicklets say crazy what's happened, man. Anyway, the point is that you'll get the lowest rate from network carriers.

And ethos has 4.8 out of five stars on Trust Pilot with over 4,000 reviews. Take 10 minutes and get covered today with life insurance through. Ethos, get your free quote at ethos.com slash Benny. That's ethyos.com slash Benny applied today. All right, ladies and gentlemen, let's go ahead and check in with the producers here. Roxanne is ready to go. Roxanne Hogue is the chairwoman of the Republican Party in Los Angeles. Go ahead and to slide now. Roxanne, thank you so much. for being here. I know that you're traveling right now, and so we really appreciate your time. Everybody's concerned about what's going on in Los Angeles. Can you give us an update? Is the Republican

Party going to plan on fighting any of this? And how will they fight? Well, I've been listening to all your guests this morning when I could. And I think what people don't understand, Joel, of course, nails a lot of it because he's from there, but is just how baked in the cake everything is. So the cake was baked in 2012, 2013. They instituted driver's licenses for legals, then they instituted motor voter. Before that, they instituted top two, which sadly was a Republican idea. And so this morass of what the rest of the country is seeing and calling fraud, which is completely legal and codified in California, is the basis for the landscape. We still don't know the denominator for this election because ballots can be arriving

up until Tuesday, the end of the day Tuesday. So by the way, when you showed that precinct level map, it's not of the current situation. It's of what happened the night that they closed the election in person. So that precinct level map, that is just from a portion of the votes. 80% of the votes in California, definitely in Los Angeles, are mail-in ballots. So there's so much stuff going around. And, you know, the L.A. County Republican Party were the largest Republican County Party in the country with over 1 million, almost 100,000 registered Republicans.

But we are just 20-something percent of L.A. County and only 14.7 percent of the voters in the city of L.A. I'm a volunteer. Everyone who's with the party is volunteered. I'm literally not allowed to be paid. So that's a very long way of answering when you say, what are the Republicans going to do about this? I'm going to tell you what your next rant is going to be about. It's going to be about LA specifically in California exporting millions of dollars to elect every one of those explosive deletes in the House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate. They all, a lot of them get elected with California money and then they use California as a punching bag. So we're a punching bag in an ATM. And now that we finally had a great candidate in Spencer Pratt articulating what should be talk about commonalities,

know, getting rid of corruption, crime, and grime, which is what Carl DeMaio always says, now all of a sudden they're like, yeah, what are you guys doing about it? We'll give back some of the money. Send help national Republicans. Speak up. Do something for us. Yeah, I mean, we've done as little as it is. We've tried to go out and expose how this operation worked.

And six months ago, we were right that the homeless industrial complex is used in order to rig these elections. but it's funded by the Trump administration. The housing and urban development pays a, strokes a check to California in order to fund the homeless complex. So what's your message? What's your message to them?

Like Shurla, you know, I said a few days, I love the president, I really love the president. But it is very clear that, and I wasn't talking about people like you, I'm talking about literal congressmen and senators who, LA donors, if they give them $100,000, they get elected because you can buy TV in Nebraska with $100,000, whereas in L.A. you can't even send mail in one district, right? So my message is invest in California, invest behind the blue curtain. It is Soviet-level stuff that's going on here. Performance Auto Group's 37th annual sale event is back. Now for three days. Leaser finance from

0% plus loyalty incentives and maximum trade in value. Shop thousands of Instarrow. new, pre-owned and demonstrator vehicles. June 11th to 13th across all Performance Auto Group retailers. Make your move this summer. Performance Auto Group's three-day sale. 72 hours of savings. Shop now at performance.ca slash three-day sale. Driven by Performance Auto Group.

I'm an immigrant from Jamaica, and it's an insult to third world countries like my, like my homeland, to say that L.A. is third world. We wish we were third world, because in Jamaica, we can count our ballots overnight. What would be the scenario in which Spencer Pratt could be back in the race? Is there any, or is this cake been baked, as you said? Was there ever a chance for Spencer Pratt? There was always a chance because what I saw, which made me sad, but it made me happy,

most of his supporters were Democrats. They were not Republicans. Republicans weren't going to ever, we would give a boost. but the only way you win an election in L.A. is with the majority of the people who vote. And the majority of the people who vote. By the way, Verte turnout for this election is still hovering around 32%. Again, we don't have the denominator until the end of the day,

probably went closer to Wednesday. But it was always going to take disaffected Democrats and NPPs. The problem is in a primary NPPs don't vote. He was so good. He is so good. He started a conversation that needed to be had. And what is striking and that the rest of the country doesn't understand is the level of delusion, much like the German, I mean, I'm sure you remember this from when the Germans had their migrant crisis. And one of the volunteers was sexually assaulted by a migrant and said, oh, but I couldn't report it because poor migrants. That's what we've got. We've got Stockholm syndrome. We've got an electorate that's basically like abused. lives that sees poor broken souls. By the way, Spencer called them zombies, but those are all somebody's son or somebody's daughter or somebody's dad. They're dying on the streets. Democrats are, let me adjust. We have a battle in L.A. between Democrats and DSA. So Karen Bass is a

doctrinaire, you know, Cuban revolutionary trained leftist. Nithia Raman is next level. So when people say, oh my god nobody loved this woman in her own district she didn't win how could she because dsa is a force democrats come to me and ask me and by the way donate to the republican party in order to fight that but we need more and bigger help to do that that's very interesting okay so yeah how does niki raman lose her own district yet win in greater los angeles how's that possible it's possible because when you see the results of what nithia has done to her home district and all my friends who live in very nice houses south of the boulevard and Sherman Oaks, they're the ones getting broken into. They're the ones whose businesses can't be entered because

there is a body or someone defecating in front of their actual place of work. So the people in her own district know that. Everyone else just goes, oh my God, look, this is so great. She's a progressive. And I think it's sort of analogous to the 2016 election. Remember, the battle was between for the hearts and minds of the unheard people was between Donald Trump and and Bernie Sanders. So she's like the Bernie Sanders in this race like, oh look, I'm cool. I want something new. I can't vote for basses in the toilet

as an incumbent. Incumbents generally skate to re-election here with the 50% plus one. So anyone who was uncomfortable, but they didn't want to be icky. They literally, their entire talking point was, we've already had and tried things with one white male reality TV star. I just, I got to tell you that I'm seeing some people dooming on LA. Maybe I'll leave you with this final question.

A lot of people are saying like, let it burn, right? So maybe the system was rigged, but nothing's ever going to happen because it's institutionalized, legalized fraud. LA just needs to suffer. and it just needs to be something like a lesson hard learned. What's your response to that? I would say the rest of the country lets L.A. burn at their peril. We are like the petri dish for every bad idea that gets exported to the rest of the country. And by the way, think, tell me to move all you want, but I already fled these people.

And they come after you at the point of a gun and the tip of a spear. I saw as a child family friends get raped and murdered. because of what drives leftists, which is envy, and they are coming for you, and they're coming to your red state. Already, your textbooks in your safe red state, wherever you are, they're printed to comply with California standards. Our little election ideas about letting non-citizens vote and having all mail-in because it's so convenient and all those things, they're coming for you.

So make fun of us all you want, but send help and get on your knees and thank God there are those of us who are willing to stay and fight like Joe, like me, like Jen Van Laar, like my husband, Bob Hogg, like all the people, Corinne Rankin, who's our chairman, there are tons of us here behind the blue curtain, and you better believe you need us. Wow, what a powerful answer. And I couldn't agree with you more because if you want to strike the heart of darkness, it'd be so great to defeat leftism where they are trying to incubate these ideas and expand them. If you can't defeat them there, then you're going to have to defeat them on your territory.

You want to fight an offensive war, not a defensive war, always. And this is such a great strategic point. Follow-up question on strategy. Should Spencer Pratt sue? Is there any legal remedy? Did you just have to lick your wounds and accept that the machine is too strong, too big, too rigged? What should happen? I'm clearly delusional because I came to L.A. to be an actor.

And then I took on the chairmanship of the Republican Party in Los Angeles County. So I'm always like, yeah, we can do it. But there is, first of all, I'm not a lawyer, but I have played one on TV. You have to have standing to sue. And there has to be something that has been against the law, which is the perniciousness of them changing all the laws. But trust me, we have eyes on everything right now. A recount can only happen if you're within a narrow band of a vote count.

Spencer's looking at that. We're curing ballots. Again, this wasn't a Republican-only issue. This was a common-sense issue. And so there are a lot of Democrats looking around today who go, wait a second, I voted for this guy because what he said made sense. I would say to every Democrat in blue territory, it's time to drop the D. It's time to change your registration. If you're in California, you can be an NPP.

And if you're an NPP, it's time to, you know, Naomi Wolf had a great article. I don't know if I can say this, that said, I'm not brave. You're just a P word. Be brave. Be a little bit brave. because bravery is contagious. And yes, I've lost jobs. Yes, I've lost friends.

But what good is it if you lose your entire country and you lose your soul? So stand up, do something. We're behind Spencer, whatever he chooses to do. He's an amazing. He diagnosed the problem. He suggested solutions to the problems and he articulated them well. And I hope he sticks around and is part of the conversation for a long time to come. And it ain't over until the first.

fat ladies, I'm sorry, it ain't over until the large identifying, female identifying person sings. I think we can say sings. I would love to see LA get broken up, man. There's no reason that Palisades or Brentwood or any of those neighborhoods need to be in actual Los Angeles, like all those Spencer Pratt areas that needs to become its own, that needs to become its own jurisdiction. We, that's why I think should happen. By the way, the San Fernando Valley tried to tried to secede and guess what they did. They changed the rules to secede so that if your area wants to leave the city of L.A. proper, you have to get all the other areas to agree.

So that's the challenge. They keep changing the rules. It's Calvin Ball. It's Calvin Ball. I love that reference. I love that reference. Roxanne, please come back. Everybody should follow Roxanne Hogue.

She is the chairwoman inside of a battle. of darkness versus light. It's really less red versus blue, Republican versus Democrat. It's really good versus evil when it comes down to it in L.A. And so please give her a follow here and support those who are fighting for you. Thank you, Roxanne. Please come back. Thank you. We will be out in Los Angeles. We will be going to the Patriot Mobile 500. That's going to be racing in California. And we're going to go out and hit the bricks this month. We have a very busy week this week. We're going to Texas, then we're going to DC, but we're going to go out this month and we're going to hit the bricks in California. We're going to keep telling this story.

Patriot Mobile will be our friends and allies when we do that. Patriot Mobile, ladies and gentlemen, fighting back against leftist censorship, taking background culturally inch by inch. This is why they're sponsoring NASCAR races and so on. It's an awesome company. They've just been a long time friend of us. And I just don't know how we could do. the work that we do, like for instance, going to Skid Row, traveling without Patriot Mobile.

Their hotspots, their wireless hotspots are incredible. The service is incredible. You know that we need to stay connected. PitcherMobile gives you premium priority nationwide service on all three major networks. And you can get international roaming unlimited data plans, mobile hotspots, which work great, and 100% U.S.-back customer support. It's easy. Keep your number, make the switch in minutes.

Go to pittremovil.com. slash Benny call 972 Patriot. Use promo code Benny for a free month of service. That's Patriot mobile.com slash Benny. Call 972 Patriot and make the switch today. All right, ladies and gentlemen, the great Laurel Logan. Man, I'm excited about this. Laurel Logan is on and is locked and loaded.

Somebody that I asked for before we went live with the show today. And I'm so thrilled that she was able to join us. She's been calling out this election fraud from the bleachers. And, well, I'd like to talk some solutions. with Laura Logan Live Now. Laura, thank you so much for being on and for your patience this morning. We had an absolutely stacked show because it's a stacked topic. How can you have a fascinating listening to your guests?

Don't apologize. How can you have a country that runs an operation like this? You obviously were an international reporter. You've been to, I don't know, 50, 100 different countries around the world. I'm not sure. You've traveled the world. Have you ever seen anything as corrupt and broken as California elections? No.

And in fact, you know what's interesting about California, especially the city of Los Angeles, is that the company, that voting machine company that still runs Los Angeles is SmartMatic. And if you, I know you've been following this subject for a long time. You know that the digital voting in America began with SmartMatic. And SmartMatic was a Venezuelan company that was started because Nicholas Maduro, who was then president of Venezuela, he was elected, of course, you know, as a Marxist, promising to redistribute wealth and to do good for the country. By the time he was facing a referendum in 2004, most of the country more than 80% were living below the poverty line, and he was absolutely certain to lose that election.

So his friends in Cuban military intelligence said to him, don't worry, we have a solution for you. We got these lottery machines that we learned how to rig, and we've learned how to rig voting machines, and we can make sure that you do not lose this referendum. Why is this relevant? because that is what has led to where we are today with an entire system that, yes, I heard your guests talking about the mail and ballots. No question about it.

The mail and ballots are absolutely part of the fraud. But the digital technology is what enables you to know how much fraud you're going to need and how to compensate for that. That's what all the data is about. That's what all these automatic voter registration, I heard your previous guest talk about motive, vote right. I don't know if people know what that is. That basically means there are states where the moment you get your driver's license, you are now registered to vote. Why is that important? Because you're not legally able to vote until you're 21. So that gives them three years, three years when you are on that voter roll for them to be able to vote in your name before you ever show up a polling

station to use your right to vote. And they do this all over the country. So whether it's mail and ballots in California, which are just staggering, absolutely. staggering because the idea that you can put a handwritten note with a date on that ballot, and that that is supposed to be legal. Someone posted a copy of a ballot where someone had actually signed it with a smiley face. Now, I don't know if they accepted that ballot or not, but you might as well. If you have no signature verification, then this is a joke. This is not an election. This is a joke. And I tell you what, at least in third world countries, you know, when Hosse Mubarak would win the election with 90% of the vote,

Everybody knew he cheated, right? Nobody was pretending that it was a real democracy. These people actually pretend that it's a real democracy. And I think one of the most powerful things I read this morning was a guy who said that they made a big mistake in California because they managed to unite. They managed to do something that no one else has been able to do except for COVID, which was to unite Democrats, Republicans, and people in the center. because we all watched in real time as this election was stolen.

And for the people saying that there's no evidence, that is the most disgusting thing I've ever heard. That is so disrespectful to the American people because we have spent years putting out a plethora of evidence. We're drowning in evidence. And the fact that somebody can go on television and actually try to say to the president, there's no evidence, who do these people think they are?

Yes, please, given the fact that you have a rich background in corporate media and broadcast and international reporting. What would you say to Kristen Welker? What would you say to CNN that is constantly going on and saying, well, there's no evidence. There's no evidence. You don't provide the evidence. We went with the Russia collusion hoax, of course, for years. You know, the way that they reverse it is remarkable.

They do the same thing with Nick Shirley. What's your evidence that there's fraud being committed by the Somalis? They play this game. Isn't it their job to go investigate? The evidence You're the problem. You need to go get the evidence. You're the journalist.

Please, you're your response to Christian Welker. So I really have to take a breath, right? I have to take a breath. And I have because it makes me so upset. I've been a journalist for more than 35 years. More than 35 years. Okay. And when I see somebody doing what she's doing,

it is so disrespectful to disregard the American people like this. I know what a story is normally in the media world, right? So when you have a woman like Victoria White, who was an unarmed protester on January 6th, who was pushed into the West Tunnel, this woman was beaten over and over and over again. I mean, she had blood running down the face. She's unarmed. She's like a ragged old, been thrown about in the crowd. And when I did a story on this, because I bothered Benny to do my job as you as you run. rightly put it, and I bothered to investigate and look at all these cameras, I found that while she was being savagely beaten by Jason Baxhill, who's now been promoted, by the way, who's still in the Capitol Police, by Officer Baxhill, she's being beaten by at least two or three other Capitol police officers at the same time. And these batons that they carry, these asps, these can kill people. Okay, this is so painful. So this poor tiny, slight woman, who was doing absolutely nothing, got savagely beaten.

I don't know how Victoria White did not die. I mean, if ever there was a justification for the weaponization fund, living in one single human being, it is Victoria White. And she is not the only one. So when I see someone like Kristen Welkis, say to the president, you know, there's no evidence of weaponization of the government, are you out of your tiny little mind? You know, at this point, you have become, I mean, not just part of the problem, you're much more than part of the problem.

Because what you're talking about, Benny, when people went with Russia collusion with no evidence, that's not the same thing as what we're talking about here. Because now all this evidence is out there. They don't even have to do their jobs. They can actually just look at the work that other people have done. And they still deny it. They still put people on television today, people like John Brennan, to imply and suggest and mislead the American public and pretend that Donald Trump has this special relationship with Russia. And, you know, remember, John Brennan's the one who said that Putin was his handler, right? And Donald Trump was a Russian spy. They still put these people on television. They still treat them with credibility.

They still do all of this. And I have, you know, I mean, I interviewed many presidents. in my lifetime. And I have never seen anyone be as rude to a president as these journalists are to President Trump. Now, on the other side of that, they would probably say, well, no one ever called us stupid and fake news. You know, it's the only thing that keeps you sane when you watch the treatment of President Trump is to see him fighting back. Because going back to that first term, where I think people have forgotten. I still have PTSD from it. I don't have PTSD from being gang-raked in Egypt when I was on assignment for 60.

minutes. I don't have PTSD for my many, many, many years on the battlefield. Not as a soldier, by the way, not as a soldier, as someone who just told their stories. Okay, and that's a really important point that I want to make today. You've got journalists out there, you know, I have friends who were wounded. I have friends who died on the battlefield, but that is not the same thing as a soldier who carries the weight of combat and the risk of death with every single step that they take. And all the sacrifice that they do, the degree to which they put themselves in harm's way is nothing. Compared to journalists who just parachute in and out, most of them, not all, there's a small few that spend time on the battlefield. But there really are not a lot.

Most of the time, they come in and out, they're there for four and a half seconds, and they want to compare themselves to the people who live that every single day. I mean, I just think we've lost our way here as journalists. Journalists have forgotten to be journalists. We're not lawyers in a court of law trying to prove a case. We are not activists. We don't go out there and campaign. That is not our job. Our job is to figure out the truth and not little bits of the truth

so that we create a false... I can defend each thing individually, but now I've created a false and misleading picture. That is so profoundly dishonest. And in the beginning of this, you could have said, okay, well, there's important people like the director of the CIA is saying that Trump's a Russian spy. Maybe he is. There's no excuse for this kind of thing at this point. If you look at Georgia,

if you look at Maricopa County, if you look at Michigan, I mean, we can go on and on and on. And by the way, it's disrespectful to all of the American people who have spent years now and investigating and exposing election fraud. It's disrespectful to them to say that there's no evidence because you're too lazy or too corrupt or too stupid or too ideologically blinded or all of the above. I don't really care. But when you ignore people like Victoria White and when you allow elections to be stolen, you may think, you know, your earlier guest said people don't want to admit this because they get caught up in the my side's going to win, my side's going to lose thing. We all lose when elections are stolen. You know that and I know that. No one wins if you allow the

entire system to be corrupted. I want to pivot to your time covering some of the chaos and some of the upheaval internationally because I believe there's a really good argument to be made here that we shouldn't be trusting or absolving California for their broken systems in the process. It's not up for me to prove fraud. Your systems are so broken. I can't trust your results. And you can't You are the one who should be able to prove that your election was clean and secure and you haven't been able to do it. In fact, the Supreme Court is now going to have to be forced to come in and reign in these states. Hopefully, let's pray that they do. But have you, like, how would the state department, you've covered the state department?

How would the state department be treating a nation state that does the type of things that California is doing with their ballots right now? You know, Benny, there isn't a simple answer to that question because unfortunately, our state department has been involved in election fraud in other countries. Of course. Right? I mean, think about when Ashrafgani won the election in Afghanistan. He was polling at less than 2% of the vote. Okay. That's the Obama administration for you.

Unfortunately, what has happened is that while there has always been election fraud, right? I live in the state of Texas. It is a standard thing here. Everybody says it. Dead Mexicans got Linda Johnson elected, right? So this is not the, it's not the first time, it's not the last time. Of course, people are going to cheat. The difference is that we now have the technology that allows people to cheat all across

the world, all across the country, all in one moment, just like that. The problem that they have is the cover up. Okay? Now, in third world countries, that's not a problem because there are no institutions that are doing oversight of the election. There is no First Amendment. So there are no supposed journalists, right, who are working to expose this. And the voice of the people just doesn't matter because even if they go out on social media, if they're brave enough to go out on social media or, you know, in a country like Iran, you can be killed for that, right? you can be executed.

Well, even if they're brave enough to do it, they don't have the rights that American citizens have. So, you know, comparing these things is not really fair because the United States of America is meant to be the gold standard of elections for the whole world. It's not okay to say, you know, okay, well, you know, there was a problem here, or maybe there was a problem there.

That's not okay. because everyone, everywhere is watching this country right now. You know, this L.A. race is not just the mayor's race in one city. And let's be clear here. Los Angeles and New York, just population-wise, can elect the president of the United States with a popular vote. Right. So these are very significant cities. The size of these cities is so important.

That's what makes L.A. such a significant test case. And what I was saying to you about Smartmatic, that's why it's so significant that the only city in America, where SmartMatic is still able to operate and run the election is in Los Angeles. Because the cover-up is what allows them to get away with this. This is why the Republicans who don't do anything about this are so disgusting to the people, right? This is why they're seen as traitors and cowards. This is why John Thune not passing the Save Act, not bringing it to a vote. This is why J.D. Vance not going into the Senate and exercising his rights, right, to make the same act pass. That's why these are such big issues, because everybody recognizes that without fair elections, you have nothing. We know what the Democrats have planned. They're not hiding it. Susan Rice came out and said, the gloves are going to be off. We're not playing by the rules anymore because they don't play by the rules. Come on. They're going to, they have stated.

that they're going to impeach Trump. They're going to go after people like Pete Hegset. They're going to go after everyone they hate and the family. They're going to go off the family. And you know what? They're going to use Republican traders and rhinos and cowards to help them do it, just like they did with January 6th, where they got Republicans to stand up.

Isn't Tillis? Tillis is one of the senators who is still saying, you know, acting like January 6th defense or some violent insurrectionists. How dare these people? But the one thing, Benny, that I would say, none of this will stop without accountability. That's the bottom line. If you leave the leaders of Antifa's terrorist networks free to operate, they will continue to operate. If you leave them free to continue to fund these riots, it will lead to violence. Someone else will get killed. Ice agents will be targeted. They will be hunted,

down and persecuted by a democratic administration. If you allow people to get away with treason and sedition, you have no country. Because these people that were engaged in the Russia conspiracy, the treasonous conspiracy, they're still engaged in the same conspiracy. You ask any attorney worth their salt, and they will tell you that for a conspiracy to end, the conspiracies have to acknowledge the conspiracy and they have to end it. None of those things that happen, all these morons out there talking about, you know, statute of limitations. No, when you're, every time the media participates in this conspiracy as a co-conspirator by pushing more false narratives that deceive the American people, they are restarting the clock on the statute of limitations.

They restarted every single day when they keep pushing these lies that there is so much evidence to disprove, I don't even know where to start. I spent two and a half years investigating election after the 2020 election. I didn't think an entire election could be stolen. I had no idea what I was dealing with. And there are a plethora of people out there who have risked absolutely everything. I mean, Georgia is a case in point. Fulton County is a case in point. And so what I would say, if you're looking to the State Department and you're looking, you know, to these institutions, the State Department functions as an arm of the CIA. And we all know, look at Ukraine, right?

The Orange River, the color revolution in Ukraine, when the State Department and the intelligence agencies participated in the overthrow of a government there. I mean, dirty elections are what the intelligence agencies do best. But with machines and with corrupt officials, now what we have is that election officials have made this, they've drawn party lines, and now they're like,

We're going to defend the fraud. Make sure. We are going to make sure that we defend this to the death. And if there's no accountability, they're going to keep doing it right in front of your face. Wow. So you're saying that you see a through line between the way that the CIA and Intel agencies rig elections in third world countries and California. Yep, without a doubt. And I'll tell you something that is quite troubling.

And I, with all due respect, I say this. The Trump administration went off to. Nicholas Maduro in Venezuela because they rightly knew they had worked for 12 years on an indictment on Nicholas Maduro, right? Venezuela was involved, directly involved in the theft of the 2020 election. They stole that election from President Trump, working with Iran, working with the CCP, working with others. We know a lot of the details because there is a Venezuelan, very senior Venezuelan, sitting in prison who was actually a witness, an eyewitness to the theft. But what President Trump's administration did not do is they did not go after all the other

people in Maduro's administration who were involved in the theft of the 2020 election. You know what they did instead? They took the woman, Delci Rodriguez, the vice president under Maduro, and they made her the president. And that is because, from what I understand from people dealing with this firsthand, That's because among others, the intelligence agencies were convincing the president, oh, you can't risk having the regime collapse in Venezuela. That's going to hurt you and so on. Delsey Rodriguez and her brother Jorge Rodriguez,

who presided over the theft of the 2020 election, are 100% complicit in the theft of elections in 72 countries worldwide. You want to know why President Trump doesn't get the support that he needs from a country like Spain? because the cartel in Venezuela, the cartel that runs the country, Cartel de los Soles, they selected the Spanish Prime Minister. Why does America get all this heat all over the world? Because the globalist, Marxist, Islamist alliance that has these cartels as their army,

they all work together. So we don't face one enemy. The election in L.A., the corruption there, the corruption in the system, this isn't about one enemy. this is about all of America's enemies working together. And all of those illegal immigrants in that sanctuary state of California who not only distort California's representation in the house, but who also get, they're on jury,

so they're involved in the criminal justice system. I mean, all of these people, what they're doing is they are diminishing citizenship. They want to take your individual sovereignty and your national sovereignty, and they want to make it mean, nothing. And that's what they're in the presence of doing, in the process of doing. And what did they do at the same time? They imported the most violent people from Venezuela's prisons. Do you see,

Benny, how these things line up, you know, smartmatic and Venezuela being involved in the theft of the election is only one part of it, frotting the country. Cartel, you know, Trenda Raguay is the cartel everyone knows about. They're like the ultra-violent army, sort of the, you know, the, the, the, the dumb guys that do all the violence for the Venezuelans. Literally, they were created by going into Venezuela's prisons and recruiting the most violent people and creating this organization that is a paramilitary force. It is a violent, armed, trained paramilitary force

that was infiltrated into out towns and cities. And these are the people that are in front of the ICE detention centers and helping to fuel the protests. So you have them, they fight on every single front. Elections is one front. It's only one. And the idea that you could have a Marxist, when Marxism has forced out,

eight million Venezuelans, has failed people worldwide, has been responsible for the death of how many people worldwide. And we are still glorifying it and glamorizing it. And where does much of that propaganda come from? It comes from the city of Hollywood. The city of L.A., coming out of Hollywood. So these things are tied together and you can't fight on one front.

You have to fight on every front and you can't pretend that LA is just a city in the west on the west coast. No, what happens in the state of California is actually tested there and then it's proliferated all over the country. That is a stunning answer. And so bone chilling to see the greater overall architecture of how this works. and it's why we won't give up on this. And it's easy to just say we'll abandon it and dump it into the ocean in California and maybe we should make it a territory again.

That'd be really fun. But this is something that really does have a lot of meaning to the rest of the nation and to Western civilization as a whole. This is what is the quote from Stephen Miller? The fight for Western civilization will be lost for one on the streets of L.A. And so something does not give up

and we shouldn't give up anything to the communists. The communist should get nothing. You get nothing. Laura, I wanted to just give it. It's giving you background with 60 minutes. I wanted to just give you one opportunity here in closing to sound off on some of the hysterical hysterics of 60 minutes presenters like Scott Pelley or Anderson Cooper on their way out. As 60 minutes gets changed, they are throwing many temper tantrums over there.

What's your take on this? Well, it breaks my heart in many ways because 60 Minutes used to be the gold standard for journalism and investigative journalism and storytelling worldwide. It's very difficult to do 60 Minutes well. It really is a unique form of storytelling where every word is supposed to count. And if you do it properly, you know, it brings investigation and characters and images and great writing. it brings everything together. And there are some wonderful people who have worked at 60 minutes over the years

and probably still some great people there now. But if you have no moral courage and if you are not honest in your work, then what you do loses all of its value. If you go a step beyond that where you actually participate in the conspiracy, then you have gone to the point of sedition. When you put people on television that talk about insurrection and you don't challenge them in the context of January 6th,

you're not doing your job. You are doing a great disservice to the American people. You are disrespecting and disregarding the American people. If I can find Victoria White, then everyone at 60 minutes can find Victoria White. Right? And the woman who was beaten so badly on January. And so there's no, my point is that there's no excuse for not doing your job. This isn't an isolated story. They didn't come out. I would have had respect for my, for the show that I love so much.

If they had come out when all the evidence came out and said, you know what, Russia collusion was a conspiracy and it was wrong and it was corrupt. And here is the truth. But there was no reckoning there. And it really surprises me in many ways. I know I, shouldn't be surprised. I've seen it happen over and over and over again, but I just still cannot believe because it's so, it's such a powerful thing when you truly and utterly believe and you give your life. It's to being a real journalist and it's in your DNA. It's in the air that you breathe. It's everything that you do. And you work with great people like that. I mean, I want some of the best people possible. But instead, what you get is people that literally,

attack Ron DeSantis about, they say, because he hasn't put enough vaccine clinics in, you know, black neighborhoods because he's trying to kill black people from COVID. Are you out of your mind? Are you out of your mind? You have literally lost touch with reality. First of all, it's not even accurate because the vaccine was available, the vaccine, the kill shot was available in a republics, in a store in Florida. And so even the math that they did about access was a lot. But how could you do that? How could you do a story about Bill Gates, inflating Bill Gates, making him out to be this great man and this great philanthropist? And you never ask him about the young girls in India who were sterilized as a result of his vaccines. You don't ask him about the kids in Sudan who are disabled. Okay, I grew up in Africa. I'm one of the few journalists that actually went to Sudan during the conflict there, which is now, I think, resumed. I've been all over that country. And I can tell you, because I've been all over that continent and worked all over.

When you're in a village in Africa and you're disabled, do you know how much help you get? Nothing. There's nothing for you. Your life is pretty much relegated to the bottom of society. You exist only on the love of your family and the people around you. But so the destruction of people's lives by Bill Gates and 60 Minutes puts him on and they don't even challenge him on any of this. He was sanctioned by the Parliament in India and banned until he talked his way, bought his way back into the country. And 60 Minutes did nothing about that.

And I could go on it. I mean, the election integrity, good Lord above. You're going to take Chris Krebs, an operative and a puppet. Remember when he was head of Sessa? Do you remember the role that 60 Minutes played in cementing the cover-up of the stolen election in 2020? When all of this was going nuts, right? And Trump wasn't accepting the result. And everyone in conservative media at places like Fox was under pressure to come out and publicly accept the result.

And there were Republican leaders that were going on the floor of the House. And they were saying, you know, Trump lost and trying to force all of us to buy the lie. What did 60 Minutes do? They put Chris Krebs, the head of SISA on, and the critical infrastructure agency that was charged supposedly with securing the election. And you know what he said? He said those fatal words, the most secure election in history. Remember that?

So think about the role that 60 Minutes was playing there. You know, Chris Krebs, I mean, I knew people working for Chris Krebs in the run-up to the election. They were reporting fraud and anomalies that were happening prior to the vote. and they were being shut down. So that just tells you that, you know, with all that stuff at 60 minutes, all that money, because they get paid, I mean, you know, millions of dollars at the top

and very well all the way down. They have access to lawyers. They have access to broadcast associates, interns, associate producers. I mean, they have access to the entire news division. They have all the money in the world. They have all the time in the world. They don't have to worry about doing ads,

uh, Benny, like you're doing in between segments. They don't have to do that. They don't have to worry about sponsorships and, uh, and subscriptions. Everything is paid for for these people. Everything is paid for. When I see someone like Kristen Welk, saying to the president, you know how far I had to travel?

Are you serious? On a private jet with 20 producers and a makeup person. Serious. And a lunch caterer, right? Yeah, exactly. Yeah. And a, in a limo to take you wherever you need to go. and people fawning all over you and give me a break.

I mean, I just, all I can think is that if you go back, you know, there will be people who say, oh, she's the Benghazi girl, you know, she's the one who got it wrong, all the rest of it, and she's the one who got canceled and she's bitter. It really is not, that is not the case at all. In fact, there was no journalistic reason at the end of the day for CBS to get rid of me, so they couldn't find him. That's the truth of what really happened there. And I don't need to relitigate that.

But what I am so sad about is I think that that was the beginning of the destruction of 60 minutes. After me, they went after Jeff Fager, the executive producer, who was an unbelievably talented, amazing journalist and a great boss. And then they began to systematically dismantle the moral courage of the show and of the people who work there. Not their talent. they're still very talented, not their work ethic, they still work very hard. But it took their moral courage.

And so what it does is it encourages people to be cowards. And that is what happened to 60 minutes. Now, some of them go beyond that, right? Some of them go beyond that to where they're actively pushing. Like, I don't know why people that are still pushing the narrative that January 6 was an interruption. It's absolutely incredible to me. But I can tell you this.

I have a friend who works with vaccine injured. He spent so many years trying to get them coverage at 60 minutes. He would call me over and over again because when he would send out those press releases of people whose entire lives had been destroyed, some of whom were paralyzed, confined to wheelges, people whose children died. People whose children died. And do you know that those emails would remain unread? They wouldn't even touch them or they just would ignore them.

because a show where people are supposedly, you know, they occupy this position where we're the fourth estate, right? We're the guardians of the First Amendment. That's why the New York Times is the Grey Lady and we're the mighty 60 Minutes. I mean, you heard comments about, you know, I don't think the president's done what I've done. I've been to war, right? You heard those comments. I mean, nobody can tell me about going to war. I live five years in Baghdad at the height of the war.

I lived years in Afghanistan. I mean, I would go from Iraq to Sudan, to Darfur, to the war there, and go back to Baghdad. Okay, and then I would go to Kabul and go to the war there. And I didn't live in the green zone. I didn't parachute in and out. And I'm not saying I'm any better. I'm not. All I'm saying is, when we are journalists, we're just witnesses.

And yes, we pay a price. There are journalists who pay with their lives. And there are journalists who are very, very brave. But that doesn't give us the right. I spent, you know, two months with Navy SEALs, so does that make me an 80 SEAL? You know what I mean? I mean, they were going on high-value target rates, and they were the ones actually in the fight. I wasn't in the fight, you know?

I was there just to witness, and they actually risked their lives to keep me and every other journalist alive. So, you know, I mean, I walked three and a half, four months pregnant through sewage canals for a month in Helmand, for a month in Helmand, province. You know, I went nine, eight and a half months pregnant to the mountains of Afghanistan at a forward operating base on the Pakistan Afghan border at 10,000 feet. I'm not telling you this because I'm saying I'm so great. I'm telling you this because if anyone knows about combat reporting and being a war correspondent, I know what I'm talking about. So when I say to people, you know, don't dishonor these soldiers by putting yourself on the same level. Don't pretend that you served because you didn't serve.

Okay, that is not the same thing. That is not the same kind of service. No, what you got is you got accolades and awards, and you got paid millions of dollars, and you got to go out and opine and disregard the American people. You know, you got to do all of that as well. And so to me, it's insulting to the soldiers. I'm not dishonoring the sacrifices of every single journalist who've ever been out there.

You know, great people like Zhao Sober who lost both his legs as a photographer for the New York Times. My amazing friend Prasondros, who was killed in Libya, you know, Sean and Cole Douglas, you know, who were killed covering the war in Iraq in Baghdad. I mean, there are many. The list is many. But that doesn't, that, what we do, sure, it's brave, sure, it's dangerous, but it's not the same thing. Don't say that you served because you didn't live and walk with the weight of combat in every single step and every single decision that you made. You didn't live for years without your family.

You didn't, you know, I mean, there's so many things that I could say about this, having not just lived on the battlefields, but also lived. I'm married to a soldier. I know the cost. I know what that price looks like, because I've seen it. I've seen it up close, not just in him, but in all the many people that come through our door. And I just, I cannot believe the hubris.

The hubris are putting ourselves on the same level. We are very fortunate. I thank God every day that I was given the opportunity to witness what I have seen and that I was able to come home with all my fingers and toes and intact. But that doesn't make me a soldier or a warrior. I'm not. Ladies and gentlemen, if you needed a explanation as to why you should subscribe to Laura Logan, not only on X, but on her brand new podcast, going rogue with

Laura Logan. That, well, is far better than anything I could ever conjure up my poor capacity to explain why you should subscribe to Laura. Thank you so much for joining the program. and for your deep analysis and feeling on all of this because it comes from a well of experience. And we appreciate that. Godspeed, Laura. Thank you.

Thank you so much, Benny. I appreciate it very much. Well, ladies and gentlemen, we have the flip right here on Pauley Market. You can see the data. The flip. Somebody always knows, man. On election night, you can see that Spencer Pratt and Karen Bass had a 76% chance of making it to the runoff, and then election day happened, and there was a flip.

This is still while Nikki Rahman was well below any conceivable replacement rate for her votes, there's no historic, prescient, precedent for this. Statistically, mathematically impossible. somebody always knows. I think this would be a great place for them to start, ladies and gentlemen, looking at who knew what and when. Ladies and gentlemen, here's what I know, that if you are somebody who's a betting man,

if you're somebody who's wealthy or if you're somebody who's rich or come from a good family, then you're not going to buy depreciating assets. You're going to buy things that appreciate. That's why rich people buy property and land and art and gold. You can buy gold. I can't afford a mona. Right?

I can't afford a Van Gogh. Rich people can, but you can afford gold. Small amounts. That's what I own. But it's physical. It's real. And it appreciates over time. It does not depreciate.

And the appreciation for gold has been exponential. As nation states and very rich people are buying, you should get in today. If something's paper, then it's losing value on inflation every single year. You're not building a legacy. You're handing your offspring a melting piece of ice. Gold has been money for 5,000 years. It's held value across all empires that have ever existed.

I trust Advantage gold to carry us through. I'm giving my listeners a free gold investment kit. Absolutely free. Text Benny to 8554545. That's BNNNY to 85545 today. you'll discover how diversifying into gold, especially in your retirement, is really a winning strategy. Now, ladies and gentlemen, our winning strategy is pray. That's it on the show.

1. Peter 310 is our prayer today. Verse of the day, who, or whoever would love life and see good days must keep their tongue from evil and their lips from deceitful speech. Don't lie. I become allergic to lying. You know, there's like a difference in us energetically, like screaming about the news and wanting to deliver the most entertaining product is possible with outright deceit, lying in theft, just what the California election is. It's a lie. It's a lie that we can all see. And nobody can prove because the systems themselves make it so that you can't do that.

But if you want to see good days, get rid of the lies. Call them out. use your lips to call out deceitful speech and evil when you can. And that's what we've done for. Two and a half hours, ALX and Klein. Holy moly. We'll leave you with that today. It's your boy, Benny, march with us on to victory. We're going to keep on winning because we're going to keep on fighting. And because Christ is king. And the Lord is with us. Thank you for joining us on this show. See ya. Stand up strong Gattle through the night the Benny shows here bringing liberty to light from the speeches to the bates

Benny sharp like a blade coming through the lives watch the truth cascade with the burious heart this man never fades you know it's prime town when Betty invades from saving the nation to stories untold the Benny shows the storm see the truth unfold stay in the loop let freedom take hold salt in all the lips soul never sold it's the Benny show where the truth gonna be TV screen stand up strong battle through the night the penny shows here bring your liberty to light liberty to light bring your liberty to light liberty to light bring a liberty to light bring liberty to light from the speeches to the baits benny sharp like a blade coming through the lives watch the truth cascade with the warrior's heart this man never fades you know it's prime time

and benny invades from saving the nation to stories untold the bennie shows a story's Don't see the truth unfold Stay in the loop Let freedom take hold Sorting all the lips Soul never sold It's the Beni show Where the truth gonna be

Faith and freedom on your TV screen Stand up strong Battle through the night The Benny shows here Bring a liberty to light Bring your liberty to light Bring a lipa eat a light Bring a lipa eat a light

The Dan Bonjino show It's our movement Okay, it's ours. We built it. Hard truths. There are a bunch of people out there pulling you into an information vortex, dumping the dead pig in the well, hoping you jump in. Don't jump in the well. It's a trap.

Find a way out immediately. This is the nothing is happening. Trap. And it is an inverted sense of reality. If we don't correct it and your kids believe it, I'm sorry this shows for nothing. The Dan Bongino show. There's only one choice, man. Follow and listen on your favorite platform.