The Benny Show - Trump Speaks LIVE After Calling for DOJ to Release ALL Credible Files: ‘Give Them Everything...'

Episode Date: July 16, 2025

President Trump speaks live from White House, President Calls on DOJ to release all credible files on Epstein, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin and Rep Andy Ogles  joins the show. Check Out Our Partners: Advantage Gold: Get your FREE wealth protection kit https://www.abjv1trk.com/F6XL22/4MQCFX/?sub1=Youtube Allio Capital: Text ”BENNY” to 511511 Patriot Mobile: Go to https://www.PatriotMobile.com/Benny and get A FREE MONTH Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

No Frills delivers. Get groceries delivered to your door from No Frills with PC Express. Shop online and get $15 in PC Optimum Points on your first five orders. Shop now at nofrills.ca. Today is Wednesday, July 16th, 2025. President Trump will speak live soon after calling for the release of the Epstein List. Release it all says Trump with a caveat and we're going to talk about that caveat. Is it fair? I've thought about it. I'm going to get into it today. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin is on the program rocking and rolling with another admin official

on the show along with representative Andy Ogles, making a ton of news. And I hear we might have some other special guests on the show. Ladies and gentlemen, we'll see. Locking in today, we're so thankful that you joined us yesterday with the speaker of the house,

12 other members of Congress making huge international news. That is what this program is all about. Power to the people, it's your boy boy Benny. This is the Benny show. Lock in, make sure that you have power and what power looks like in your bank account is diversifying outside of just, you know, securities or American dollars and you need assets in your account that actually generate wealth. Do you mean like so the number of dollars they can just print more of them.

So they're finite. And the value of the dollar has actually collapsed, like about close to a hundred percent over the last hundred years. It's because you can just print more. You can't make more gold. And that's just a moneymaker in my account. I diversify, you know, you diversify a little bit

and you got gold. It's just been great throughout all time. It's been great forever. That's why Trump covers his buildings in it. It's why it was a precious gift to the Christ child. And ladies and gentlemen, it should be a gift to yourself in your own bank account. Diversify into gold, advantage gold, ladies and gentlemen.

The dollar's dominance is certainly under attack. Gold has become the number one hedge against the global currency shifts. Your IRA or 401k can be converted into physical gold tax and penalty free. And you can get $10,000 in free gold and silver with qualifying account today. Friends at Advantage Gold take care of you.

Text Benny to 85545, that's Benny to 85545 or go to AdvantageGold.com. AdvantageGold.com data and message apply, performance may vary, you should always consult your financial professional. I love the one that cold, meaning the video that we played to start the show includes a clip of ours. That's the goal of this company.

The goal of this company is to carry your voice deep into the heart of the halls of power and to not be ashamed in asking questions or not be told what questions we can and cannot ask. And that was really important. Just a really quick recap of yesterday and how we changed. Well, everything actually yesterday. And I guess like before we jump into the details

and some highlight clips and so on, I wanna like just very briefly set the table, why is this important? Why this question about Jeffrey Epstein and his predator ring is important is because we don't want to pay taxes to the people who protect them. We're a moral people, we're an honest and good,

salt of the earth, hardworking people, and we're proud of this country. And we don't like it when our federal authorities protect petrists. That's the end. I mean, that's like the final question. And I think that the Trump administration has put themselves in a tough position here. I think it's totally self-inflicted. And I think that they're trying to work their way out of it, given the positive pressure

from all of us. It never needed to happen this way. And it makes me very frustrated that it did. It's like a massive miscalculation of doing this like right now in this moment. It doesn't make any sense to me. It never will. But what does make sense to me, and what's very binary,

and just say, call me a Luddite, okay? Call me whatever you want. Say that I'm dumb. I don't care. Everything that can be said has been said to me on the internet every day Every second of the day in my DMs You know I went to community college but maybe that just like gives me the world in simple binaries and the simple binary is that

child predators are evil and the people who enable them are evil and the people who participate with them are evil and That this is a class warfare question, actually. And that's really gets down deep into the bones of what's happening here. It's class warfare question, and this is a moment of class warfare in this nation. The elites have gotten obscenely rich and have abused us. And we know that as a matter of fact.

And that's true, and you should be against that. Like it's not actually capitalistic at all. Being a good capitalist means that people should be allowed, people should be able to, you know, buy a home, right? Like afford a house. Like that's what I want for my children. And that's vanishingly like out of hand and out of reach for so many. And there are elites in our society

that could care less about the lives of the hundreds of millions of regular people in this nation of which I am and you are. And in fact, they abuse us. And they abuse us as tax cattle to fund their foreign wars. And they abuse us as sex slaves, like when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein, who according to all available documentation, sent Julian Maxwell to go cruise trailer parks, to go find

broken women from broken homes, uh, to entrap them and abuse them. And then serially abused them throughout the world. That's just what, that's how the operation worked. It's well documented. That's what they did. They preyed on the working class. They pay, they preyed on people that were not's how the operation worked. It's well documented. That's what they did. They preyed on the working class They pay they preyed on people that were not born with the same privileges or had the same intelligence Relationships as they did with domestic and foreign powers that could plunk millions of dollars in their bank accounts to go buy private jets and islands

Most people don't have that okay. Nobody I know has that and So we see this like the way that this is seen, the lens that this is seen from, and I'm trying to reorient this because I've thought like maybe the messaging isn't getting through, but actually the messaging is getting through and we'll cover that in just a second.

I need the recap tweet, please boys, as quickly as possible. The message is getting through in fact, but I've done my, I'm gonna do my level-headed best to just put it into a MAGA prism here, shall we? The MAGA prism has always been President Trump calling out the elites to their faces.

The prism has always been Donald Trump looking into the, into the skull of Hillary Clinton and going, you created ISIS, you created these wars. You're going to attack me for loopholes that you wrote. Donald Trump is the king of class warfare, even though he does come from quite a privileged class, meaning he is himself a billionaire. And it's the magic of Donald Trump to understand these issues. And so that's why we call out from the wilderness about them.

And we try and explain what this is truly about. Maybe it hasn't been framed correctly for the president. I'm not sure. I don't know. But it's up to us to frame it and to make it make sense and to be ideologically consistent and to be pure. Meaning like, can does my opinion on this match the opinion that I had four years ago, three years ago, two years ago.

And the answer is yes. And the reason you can see that is that the reason you can see that and we're just honored and it's not because I'm particularly smart. It's actually because I'm quite a simpleton and I can just like see things in a simple binary. Like we just, we just see the black and white here. We see a spiritual warfare and it's also class warfare. It's the elites versus us. It's then coming down here and abusing us

and abusing these poor, poor broken people who come from the same place you and I come from. Right. I was raised near a lot of trailer parks lot of trailer parks. And I'm telling you like that them getting away with it is one of the is like the last straw for so many people. It's like the most in your face insult to the working class. It's the most in your face insult to all of us who have like calluses on our hands and, and dirt under our fingernails and who build things and who work, you know, in order to like make an honest dollar. It ain't much, but it's honest work. And so it's up to the, it's up to our show to go into the halls of power, to look them

in the face and to call it out and to say like, this is the, this is the work. This is the call of the working class. Actually. Final thing. If you were to get rid of all the hedge fund managers today, no one would care. Nothing would change in our country. Nothing. If all the poof, all the hedge fund managers disappeared, all the people who

just like take a, take money, digital ones and zeros and plop it into more digital ones and zeros time and time again and then make hundreds of millions by doing that and not lifting a finger. It's all done by AI anyway these days. Like those guys if you were to get rid of them, no one would do it. Nothing would stop nothing. Not a single train would not run on time. Right? Not a single car would not run on time, right?

Not a single car would go flying off the road. Like the country would continue on as if nothing had happened. But if you were to get rid of the guys who lift manhole covers every single day. We all know that the world has become increasingly divided politically, socially, and economically. But many of these divisions could stem

from a deeper misunderstanding of how money markets and policy actually work. Wouldn't it be great if there was an investment app that was designed by people who understand the macro perspective of how global events can affect your finances? Now you can have that power in the palm of your hand with the Alio capital app powered by Altitude AI, which helps identify shifts in inflation, interest rates, and global risk and then adapts your portfolio in real time. Alio is designed for hands-on or hands-off investors,

macro investing for people who want to help understand the big picture. This is me. I use Alio myself and it's done great for me. I'm very hands off. I spend my days in the studio and I check in and it's remarkable. It just adapts to the news and events that move the markets and make sure that I'm positioned correctly. You should download their app today in the app store or Google Play. You can text my name, Benny to 511-511. That's A-L-L-I-O, capital. Text Benny to 511-511. Download the Alio app or text Benny to 511-511 today. Investing involves risk,

including potential loss of principal. Past performance does not guarantee results. Consult with your financial professional before making an investment decision. See terms and conditions at aliocapital.com. Message and data rates apply. This is a paid advertisement for Alio Capital. If you were to get rid of the guys who, like on my block,

there was a dude fixing an electrical wire on my block, you know, up in one of those lifts. If you were to get rid of those dudes, then the country would grind to a halt, we would immediately become South Sudan. And that's the violated class, and it's always the violated class. Those are always the people

who get trod upon, spit upon, who get kidnapped by the likes of Jeffrey Epstein and his pals, and then passed around, serially abused, and then dumped off for dead. And they did literally kill Virginia Roberts. I'll just say it. Of course they did. Her family says they did. Very smart people on the show says they did who come on this program no more than me. So they just kill them and that's what Epstein was. In the end, here's why this matters and I'm sorry for the monologue. I'll finish with this. Epstein, why this murder of Epstein sits so roundly in the public consciousness, was that we all saw them sacrifice to us this monster. And they said, here, here's the body of this dead guy. Okay.

Here's his corpse. He did bad things to your class, you know. There's like thousands of us, there's hundreds of millions of you. And we don't want class revolt. And so here's the body of some dead peterist. Here's your token. Now go away. We all saw that happen. And while maybe a different generation would

have just shrugged it off and said, Oh yeah, look at that. Kennedy got a hole in the head. Too bad. Oh, I guess we'll just believe the government. This is a very different generation, a little bit more of a chip on our shoulder, huh? A little bit harder edge. A little more black-pilled. And we said, that's not good enough. In fact, you can't just like trot out the body of a dead pederast and say, up's all done now, stop asking questions. Shut up. We looked into it. Shut up. Move along. It doesn't work that way. Maybe it worked that way with my grandparents when they watched Kennedy's head get blown off and then his body get manipulated and the autopsy get manipulated

and the people who killed him seize power and all the forces that wanted him dead celebrated, literally insulting his family, kicking them out of the White House. That's exactly what LBJ did when he got to the White House. Literally showed up with moving trucks to get Jackie out of there. As a matter of fact, like the day Kennedy died, they were doing this stuff. They had it all planned.

They're monsters. And we just found out this past week, I mean, of all weeks for this to be blowing up, it's amazing how God works. Of all weeks for this to be blowing up, We just found out that Lee Harvey Oswald was practically a CIA agent, according to documents that were released by Congress. So, I mean, you know, you've been lying to us for 60 years, for nearly seven decades about your murder of a US president.

And it was done from inside of the government. And that's all the proven now. Here's the article in case you think I've gone nuts. Here it is. Ladies and gentlemen, CIA has been lying to you about this. What else will they lie to you about? And so forgive me for my soap box. I'll step off now, but that's why it matters.

That's why it matters. They murdered Jeffrey Epstein and rolled out his corpse to us and said, yeah, have a great time. You know, look, have a great time. You know, look, he's dead now. The Bill Clinton, Bill Clinton, Bill Clinton, Bill Clinton could only be asked this. Just one final clip, the first, Bill Gates. While he's dead, give me that.

While he's dead, while he's dead, you can see the way that they actually, you can see the way that they actually, you can see the way that they, you can see what they think about you in this answer. This is the perfect distillation of what this op was, right? You caught us dead to rights. We were abusing children.

We were abusing people from the working class that we abducted practically on a private island in international waters as part of an Intel op. And we were all having a great time with it. And then you caught us. And in order to shut you up and shut up your questions, we're just gonna murder him and then hang his body from the castle walls.

Listen to this. You know, I've said I regretted having those dinners. And there's nothing, absolutely nothing new on that. Is there a lesson for you, for anyone else looking, looking at this? Well, he's dead. So, you know, in general, you always have to be careful. Look at the smile, look at this. Look at him. Look, look.

Do you know what to believe me? Look with your eyes at this clip from PBS. Look at him. Look at the grinning. Wow, he's dead. Who talks like that? They're monsters. These people, they're monsters.

So that's why it matters. This was the op. They hung Epstein's body from the castle wall and told you to move along peasant. And we're not, and we're not. And we're having a profound effect. And I just want to like shout out this audience and this chat, ladies and gentlemen, right here, you can see the chat rolling. It's right there on the corner. This chat and this audience And this movement has made and created a profound change in this country. Uniting with some of the more powerful voices in the movement. And off the top of my head, you have Charlie Kirk, you have Tucker Carlson, you have Megyn Kelly, some people who won't be shutting up about this at all.

Tucker Carlson, I think doing like a very big live presentation on who Jeffrey Epstein was and what the op was. That'll happen tomorrow. Anyway, the point is, is that we've changed things. I'm just gonna go through what we've changed. Just sort of the past 24 hours. Well, the past 24 hours, the Speaker of the House

has said the administration has broke effectively with the past 24 hours, the speaker of the house has said the administration is has broke effectively with the administration. Hey Alex, give me that Axios article, please. This is a, because of our, this is because of our interview yesterday, but speaker of the house Johnson, who was teed up, he was like ready to answer this. I didn't know what he was going to say, you know, but he straight up said, no, got to release it all. What's wrong with you?

You know, get it out there. I respect like that this is a sensitive topic, but let's get this behind us. You know, why, why agitate? Why, why agitate more over this? It's true. He's right. He's right.

You can fix it. And there's easy ways to fix it. We've gone through that. Dozens of members of Congress on our stream alone called for Jelaine Maxwell to testify. And the Maxwell family said, let's do it. There you go. This was, this was a reporting from, from our, this is one of probably thousands of articles written about our interview yesterday. Yeah, they're late. But anyway, let's continue. Julian Maxwell's family being like, the government lied. Okay, whatever.

You know, have your day. Look, let's, let's have it out. Let's have all the information. Who's hiding what here? Trump said twice yesterday that the DOJ should release all of the credible files. And we'll talk about that in just a second. I actually think that that's reasonable, but we'll talk about it, okay? We can have it out in the comment section, shall we? Growing calls for a special counsel, that happened multiple times yesterday.

Lauren Boebert made huge news saying, I am endorsing Matt Gaetz for a special counsel. What do you believe? Matt Gaetz for special counsel? Have we pinned a question yet? Can we pin that one? Bipartisan support for the release, getting dumb ass Democrats, like singing songs about the release. Like they're all frauds. They didn't call for any, they could care less. They tra, they trafficked

hundreds of thousands of children into this country. They're all monsters, but whatever. I'll take it. Okay. Whatever. I'll take it on principle. I'll take it. Okay. It doesn't mean you should give them any credit. They're all, they're, they're truly like as evil of monsters as Epstein. Again, the reason Epstein can operate is because of Democrats, not only was he best friends with all these Democrats, but also because the Democrats allow for sex trafficking into the country by the hundreds of thousands. Okay. We're not going to let that bone go. No, no. So the, they should have no moral high ground on this, but either way I'll take the bipartisan support. Like that's

fine. Let's, let's, let's close this chapter. Shall we? And a massive cultural exposure of satanic predators and elites. You know, the, the, the, the issue is more electric than ever. This is winning and stop blackpilling. Now I didn't add to that, that, um, also there are members of Congress calling for the hanging of Jeffrey Epstein clients after trial and found guilty. And that would be a Tim Burchett who was on our show yesterday. Okay. So don't ever think that you can't have an effect. Don't ever think that you can't change things. I

was out with a reporting earlier this week, that there is a large energy shift inside of the administration when it comes to disclosure around this issue. And that energy shift is come comes from audiences like this. You are having a profound and real effect. You are powering us to deliver your questions to Congress and your priorities to the halls of power. And we're deeply humbled and grateful for that opportunity. And we don't take it lightly. And we're going to keep going. We're going to keep going.

And that's just it. Now they've made this like they've drawn a line in the sand. And so let's go. This was, I think pretty fascinating yesterday. And it's probably because potentially of our interview, I'm not sure. I don't know. We're the first people to ask Mike Johnson about this question. Now this clip has gone everywhere. It's gone thermonuclear viral. Mike Johnson, yesterday, the clip B is that the full is that the full clip ALX? Thanks. All right.

Here's Mike Johnson yesterday, getting asked by us about this issue. And the way that we framed it was, here's what Congress could do. Mike Johnson ain't in charge of the DOJ. It's unfair to pick on him. What do I mean by that? Like Mike Johnson can't wave a wand. Like there are some people who could wave a wand

and release everything. There are people who could do that. There are people that have that power. You know, he's not one of them. He could subpoena through a committee, Mike Johnson. Mike Johnson could have Julian Maxwell testify. And so that was the framing of my question. You know, can you do what you can do, right?

Like it's unfair to like bang a pot over his head when he doesn't have the power to do things that the DOJ or FBI could do, right? And it's really, the ball is in their court, particularly the DOJ, especially the DOJ, like actually a hundred percent the DOJ or FBI could do, right? And it's really the ball is in their court, particularly the DOJ, especially the DOJ, like actually 100% of the DOJ is the holdup here. That I know as a matter of fact, Dan Bongino and Cash Patel are in favor of more release,

more releases and a special counsel. I kid you not, like, take that to the bank. Okay. So Mike Johnson answering, he decided instead of shying away from me to his great and endearing credit, and I didn't know about Mike Johnson, I'd never met him until yesterday.

Live on the stream, I met him live. I've never met Mike Johnson ever. So I'm not doing some old friend to favor or anything. I didn't pull my punches. Oh, you want to be fair. So like Johnson, instead of like dodging the question, and doing like, we're gonna have to see where the committee goes with this, you know, that would have been like the, like, fake ass, DC, you know, worm his way out. No, Mike Johnson went straight to the heart of it. And said, this is being

mismanaged. And you got to be honest with the American people. And this is a test of that go. But the question here about it that concerns either testifying or testimony for Julian Maxwell potentially before Congress, or if you would support members like Marjorie Taylor Green or Annapolina Luna on the release of subpoena subpoenaing the Epstein documents from the DOJ whether you would have support either of those. Yeah I haven't talked to Marjorie or Anna about that specific subject but I'm for transparency we're

intellectually consistent in this. Look Reagan used to tell us we should trust the American people I believe in that principle I know President Trump does as well and I trust him I mean he put together a team of his choosing and they're doing a great job it's a very delicate subject but we should we should put everything out there and let the people decide it I mean, he put together a team of his choosing, and they're doing a great job. It's a very delicate subject, but we should put everything out there and let the people decide it. I mean, the White House and the White House team are privy to facts that I don't know. I mean, this isn't my lane. I haven't been involved in that.

But I agree with the sentiment that we need to put it out there. And you know, Pam Bondi, I don't know, when she originally made the statement, I think she was talking about documents as I understood it. They were on her desk. I don't know that she was specific about a list or whatever, but she needs to come forward and explain that to everybody. I like Pam. I mean, I think she's done a good job. We need the DOJ focusing on the major priorities. So let's get this thing resolved so that they can deal with violent crime and public safety and election integrity and going after Act Blue and the things that the president is most concerned about as we are.

So I'm anxious to get this behind us. Yeah. I can see that because there's so many victories and so many wins that are happening. We just had the most incredible six months of any administration, arguably in the history of the United States. There are so many accomplishments. It would take us a stack of papers aside. And yet we're having to spend our time talking about this. Let's get it resolved.

That's gonna be wildly refreshing for this audience and to speak on behalf of them, to hear somebody just say, let's just have transparency with your American people, get it out there, and there's no reason to protect predators, right? So, I mean, of course. What, you know, this is the Family Values Party,

let's just do it. What Epstein was involved in was an unspeakable evil. We've got to stand against it, not just in word, but indeed. And so we'll see what happens. Look, I do trust the president. I know his heart and head is in the right place. I don't, I don't question that at all. And, and I'm convinced they're going to sort this out. You never know what you're going to get. You assume that somebody that powerful, you know, he's third in line for the presidency. He's like, you know, obviously one of the top allies of the president. You never know what you're going to get. You assume that what you're going to get is pablum and you're going to get a non-answer

and you're going to get the shrugging off of we're just going to have to wait and see what happens. You know, that's what, that's what I assumed would happen right? But nope instead that dude stood and delivered and speak of the house has made international headlines I mean, I know we have like a series. I know we have a series of them grab the asset, please There you go. Hey guys send that here's just like a short like a short Snippet of like everything it's in the asset chat guys, the war room breaking chat.

Like the headlines that were made from yesterday spanned the globe just by that answer. And it's not like we're not tooting our horns, we're just doing our job, you know, we're doing our job like we do every single day. Look at this. I mean, this is one slide of like seven that we have capturing all the headlines made

from just that commentary. So to his great credit, this is an energizing issue and moment, dare I say a bipartisan issue. And it seems like, according to my sources, Donald Trump's hurt us. Now, President Trump just posted on Truth Social, something that I think is, you know,

something that perhaps changes the dynamic, but I'm not sure. Let me show you what the president said yesterday. Some people criticize me for saying that Donald Trump's now calling for the release of the Epstein files, which is the title of this program. I have never lied to you and I never will. Donald Trump did call for the release of the Epstein files yesterday. He did it twice. Okay.

That's how you know, it's not a mistake. He did it twice. He said, give it to them all the give them, give it to them. Talking about the media and the Epstein files, all of it. I'll play the clips right now. Trump puts a caveat in there. Anything credible. Listen, man, I'm willing to be like a very, very reasonable person here.

And I want to like state what we've always stayed on this show. It is a smear and a slander against people who want truth on this issue to say we just want like predator material on the internet. Of course we don't. We want the opposite of that. So like I hate that. Of course there needs to be stuff that is protected. You don't want to re-victimize people.

I get that. I totally understand. In fact, it's the opposite. I want to shame and name predators and elites who did bad things. I do want them destroyed in order as a warning sign to everyone else who wishes to engage in this kind of behavior that we as a society refuse to accept it and that we will punish you if you do this. We know that this is an evil that happens. We've read the story of Sodom and Gomorrah. We get it, but we're trying to not be that actually in this country.

And part of that is like punishing the predators, right? But not by revictimizing people and releasing a bunch of like horrible images or videos or whatever is in there, like out in the public. That's not what we want. So what Trump's saying here is that we should release what is credible. Okay. I guess we can argue over the term of like what that means. But twice yesterday, he says, release all credible evidence. Here's the proof. Here we go. President, your daughter, Mr. President, your daughter in law said that there should be transparency in the Epstein case. Do you agree with her, sir? The Attorney General has handled that very well. She has really done a very good job. And I think that when you look at it, you'll understand that.

I would like to see that also. But I think the Attorney General, the credibility is very important. And you want credible evidence for something like that. And I think the Attorney General has handled it very well. How many more? If we're honest, the Attorney General briefed you on the DOJ and FBI review, the findings of that review. The Attorney General briefed you on that. On what? On the DOJ and FBI review?

On what subject? On the review of the files. Attorney General Pan-Bondy briefed you on that. A very quick briefing. What did she tell you about the review? And specifically, did she tell you at all that your name appeared in the file? No, no. She's given us just a very quick briefing and in terms of the credibility of the different

things that they've seen. And I would say that, you know, these files were made up by Comey, they were made up by Obama, they were made up by the Biden, you know, and we went through years of that with the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax, with all of the different things that we had to go through. We've gone through years of it, but she's handled it very well and it's going to be up to her. Whatever she thinks is credible, she should release. Yeah. So this is the first time since Trump has become president that he said, whatever's credible, you should release.

And I want to go back in history here and grab that old Fox interview. I don't see it. Is it in the script? I want the old Fox interview where Donald Trump says the exact same thing. So Trump knows something about this. So Trump knows more than he's letting on. Obviously, he always does this. Here's President Trump's second answer yesterday.

And then I'm going to play you an answer from a year ago, almost to the day, an answer the year ago, and you'll see that it's the exact same answer. And in fact, now, why don't we know about this answer? Because Fox edited the clip. I kid you not. We can, we can, we can prove it. Right. Fox edited the clip, but Donald Trump has said the same thing about this about a year

ago. Here's Trump's second answer yesterday that was even more clear that he wants the DOJ to now go about releasing as much as they possibly can on Epstein. Go. People can move on, but I'm curious, why do you think your supporters in particular have been so interested in the Epstein story and so upset about how it's been handled? What do you think it is?

Why they would be so interested? He's dead for a long time. He was never a big factor in terms of life. I don't understand what the interest or what the fascination is. I really don't. And the credible information has been given. Don't forget, we went through years of the

Mueller witch hunt and all of the different things, the Steele dossier, which was all fake. All that information was fake. But I don't understand why the Jeffrey Epstein case would be of interest to anybody. It's pretty boring stuff. It's sordid, but it's boring. And I don't understand why it keeps going.

I think really only pretty bad people, including fake news, want to keep something like that going. But credible information, let them give it. Anything that's credible, I would say let them have it. Mr. President, a question on AI. How do you want America... Let them have it. Mr. President, a question on AI. How do you want America to have it? Let them have it. Any of those credit will give it.

Empty out the vaults. Go. That's an order from Trump yesterday. Now, I find this particularly interesting for two reasons. One, President Trump said pretty much the same thing. You know, like, listen, we're not Trump haters at all on this channel. We are massive fans of MAGA and the base and the incredible thing that President Trump has built here and that quite frankly, I think is divinely inspired in the sense that, well,

so many impossibilities, including assassination, survivals and so on, have happened over the course of the last year. And I believe that the country has been delivered. They wanted a funeral and they got a revival and it's special. And we should appreciate that. I am trying to just give tough love and speak on behalf of the base. And we have millions of people in this audience that are frustrated by this. And we're just trying to give a voice and a distillation, I guess, of what that means. What is that exactly? That's what we opened our monologue about.

But also in President Trump using this framing, and I want to put up Trump's truth here, because Trump just posted about Epstein like a couple minutes ago on Truth Social. Get ready, you know, for a new round of news because Trump keeps posting, you know, messages like this, it's going to cause a new news cycle right on it. Maybe that's the point? I don't know, man. I'm not sure. But listen, Trump saying, and he says again that the Epstein list is a hoax.

You know, we got the Steele dossier and we got the evidence for the Intel agents line. And we got the evidence for the Intel agents line. If anything, releasing all of the Epstein evidence would prove perhaps that things are fake or things were created, or there was a illusion that was presented by the Intel agencies that were operating him. You know, the only reason that we know, the only reason we know that Hunter Biden's laptop, so he says here, Steele dossier, lying 51 intelligence agency,

laptop from hell, which Dems swore came from Russia. No, it came from Hunter's bathroom. And even Russia, Russia, Russia's scam itself is totally fake and made up. Correct, true. And we have railed until our voice broke on those issues on this program. And they're, they were an evil visited upon president Trump. They were all lies.

They were presented as truth. And the only way to discern that they were not true was to investigate, to ask questions and to put a shoulder to the wheel and to start to really hammer against them. And slowly, through the course of disclosures in Congress, the release of evidence, subpoenas, trials, jury findings, you're able to discern that, yes, all of these things are hoaxes. It took enormous, it took special prosecutors, in fact, to discern the true nature of the

SEAL dossier. John Durham spent five freaking years looking into the SEAL dossier in order to like determine what its true fundraising sources were. And that was the Clinton campaign lying. And in one of the great, one of the greater injustices of my lifetime, having to pay a hundred thousand dollar fine for lying about creating that document. Now we'll see if they're going to pay even further. James Comey, John Brennan and so on being wrapped up in what is called a grand criminal conspiracy by the FBI that is currently ongoing.

We talked about it on the program a couple of days ago. There's been no new news on that. We'll see. But my point to the president respectfully is the only way we know that all those are fake and that that's all garbage is that the federal is that eventually we got all of the information, or at least enough of it in order to discern that none of us just believed it based on vibes. None of us just like thought it was all fake. Of course we thought it was fake or made up,

but it really helped cement it to release all the evidence. It really helped cement it when people just played ball and we got the text messages. Is Trump really going to win? Remember that? It's like burning the back of my brain. Lisa Page to Peter Strzok. Is Trump really going to win? Remember that? It's like burning the back of my brain. Lisa Page to Peter Strzok. Is Trump really going to win? No, we'll stop it. We've never seen our FBI talk like that.

And they released the evidence. They didn't want to, but they released the evidence and it really showed us the true nature of what was going on there. Good. You know, good. Good. You know, good. So like by Trump's own logic here, we should be releasing everything, which I think would be a great pressure release valve for all of this.

Now here's where, of course, I will be siding with Trump and we have been consistent on this issue since day one of this conversation is you like Jeffrey Epstein did have a gardener. He has somebody who cut his grass right or or or or like cleaned his house probably in his address book. Some like working class dude in his 60s who by no fault of his own was like hired to trim the hedges. And like, do you want that guy's name like dragged through and tortured through in all this, you know, and everybody looking him up? I

mean, I believe that that would be reckless. I do. I don't like that, actually. And so like what President Trump is saying is technically right in that when you release, if you just released all, if you just released everything without any context or explanation or due diligence by the feds, then there would definitely be some people that would be totally destroyed in this who don't deserve that. And I am not in favor of innocent people having their lives destroyed. We have spent the better part of the last three years on this program, defending president Trump from having his life destroyed by garbage, indictments and trials and cases.

Some of our very closest friends were all ensnared in that. And so I hate that and I don't like it. As I've talked about before on this program, time and time again, we were invited to Trump's January 6th speech. I sat there in the front row and listened to the president on January 6th. It was a fricking freezing cold day. And I didn't go to the Capitol, but you know how it works. You know, it works.

If you looked at the Capitol building that day, you could expect a Fed to kick in your door. And I've lived, you know, we lived under the Biden regime, assuming that that was gonna happen to me one of these days. Like my wife and I had, you know, we talked about it regularly. Like they were just literally,

literally anybody that posted about January 6th, that looked at the Capitol. Enrique Taro, uh, he's the guy in charge of the Proud Boy. Like he wasn't even there and he got 22 years in prison. He wasn't even there that day. Right? So what about me? I went to the speech, you know, as an invited guest, what, what, you know, what happens next sat right next to Alex Jones.

Weirdest moment, one of the weirder moments of my life. Sat right next to Alex Jones and Alex Jones like saw what happened, what was happening and then like got up and sprinted across the field nearly got like shot by the Secret Service. Because Alex Jones realized that like there was a plot afoot, that guy has like, that guy has crazy spiritual energy.

He realized there was like a plot afoot and like he went sprinting off to like, to, to fix it, to try and stop it. It's very interesting times. That's not what this show is about. What I'm trying to say is that they, I am not for innocent people. I'm not for innocent people getting destroyed. We've defended J sixers. We defended president Trump. I don't want innocent people getting destroyed. We've defended J-6ers, we defended President Trump.

I don't want innocent people to have their lives destroyed. So I totally get this. And President Trump has, if anything, been actually weirdly consistent on this. Here's the unedited Fox News answer. Fox edited his answer. I'm not saying there was anything evil about it. They just had the, you have to edit for time.

The essence of Trump's answer is the same, but Trump gives a little more context here in the unedited full explanation. One year ago being asked, will you release the Epstein file? Listen to this. Hey, the FBI, all of those institutions. You're right. Some people think that one way to build trust is to declassify things that everyone's talking about. I know you talked earlier about it. I don't want to be a conspiracy theorist. So if you were president, would you declassify — you can answer yes or no to this.

Would you declassify the 9-11 files? Would you declassify JFK files? Yeah. I did a lot of it. Would you declassify the Epstein files? Yeah. Yeah, I would.? Yeah, yeah, I would. Alright. Yes, I would.

I think that less so because, you know, you don't know. You don't want to affect people's lives if it's phony stuff in there because there's a lot of phony stuff with that whole world. But I think I would, or at least I would. Do you think that would restore trust? Help restore trust? Yeah, I don't know about Epstein so much as I do the others. Certainly about the way he died, it would be interesting to find out what happened there because that was a weird situation and the cameras didn't happen to be working, etc.,

etc. But yeah, I'd go a long way toward that one. The other stuff I would, I would definitely do the January 6th because... Yeah. Oh, beyond all of them. Because what happened? This clip has just been reupped in my timeline and it seems wildly consistent. Trump knows something. Be nice to know.

But he knows something. Something has been meddled with. There's a lot of phony stuff he says in there. Okay? The best sunlight, the best disinfectant is sunlight. There's a lot of phony stuff he says in there. Okay. Best sunlight that's disinfected is sunlight, but that's consistent. And I, you know, as we have explained, I am against innocent people having their lives destroyed.

So I get it right. You had lunch with Jeffrey Epstein one time, right? Back when he was his, his entire op was wormholeing his way into polite society and you've done nothing wrong. And then you get your, you know, you get your life completely blown out of proportion. And this is why, this is why our stance in this program has been extremely consistent. Explain, show your work, show your work. Come out with it, show the evidence,

show how you came to these conclusions. You know, Alan Dershowitz is out saying, yeah, you know, freaking, of course there's a list. There is a list. The DOJ has the list and there are, you know, there's lists of like just innocent people that were his gardener. And then there's lists of criminals.

And I'm talking about like just explaining the differences, right? And then more importantly, or as importantly, explaining like where'd the money come from? Like how was he operationally able to do this? What were the relationships? Here's Dershowitz, who was Epstein's lawyer, explaining exactly that the government knows exactly client list or anything that the Trump administration could release tonight?

No, there is no client list and never has been a client list. A client list suggests that Jeffrey Epstein made a list of people to whom he trafficked women. What there is, is a redacted FBI affidavit from accusers, there are several of them, from accusers that accuse, Jeffrey, that accuse various people of having improper sex. And that has been redacted. The names of the people accused have been

blacked out now of course because i was the lawyer and i did all the investigations i know who all these people are i could figure out based on everything that i saw who mister x's mister y's and mister z's i can tell you right now none of them are public figures who are currently in office. Some of them were previously in office. Some of them are dead. But there is no client list. And the redactions could be undone if you go to court.

So many of the things that are being suppressed are being suppressed by two judges in Manhattan, and they're doing it largely to protect the alleged accusers who are, in their view, the judges' victims, even though we don't know what their actual status is. But the judges have issued orders, which is why I can't disclose things I'd love to disclose. Applauding for this chat because you were right. We were right. We've been proven right every single step of the way, man. I'm telling you, we've been proven right. Every step of the way we told you that the administration there's now like major push inside of the administration to fix this problem. And for more disclosure, we've told you that that is those calls were coming

from inside of Congress. We proved that yesterday. And that from internally in the administration, you saw president Trump saying, okay, out with it, just out with it. Out with the evidence, out with the credible evidence. Okay. I mean, like, listen, I agree with that, actually. Totally. Let's not destroy people's lives. And now we told you that there were judges that were locking down all of the evidence that you seek, that there were

judges in the Southern District of New York that were locking down and protecting people and were operating as a protection racket. And the DOJ needs to muscle their way in and can fix this. And there's Dershowitz confirming that reporting that a week old on this program, you heard it here first. We had these conversations, we had them with people internally at the DOJ. We know exactly what's going on and the FBI and the Trump family. And this is us just being, this is just us being good friends. That's it. We want the MAGA base to continue. We want the MAGA base to be as strong as possible. People have, there's obvious realignments that always have to happen. This is just one of those moments. And this is how we fight through and stay strong.

Here's Laura Trump saying the same thing that Mike Johnson said, saying, you know what? It just even the impression that like predators are being protected. Like, let's just be out with it. What do you have? You know, what do we have to hide? Let's do it and expect more. And this is like just such a positive, positive clip from Laura. Here we go.

This was the topic of conversation. What would be your advice in order to take the temperature down on this issue from within the administration? Well, I do think that there needs to be more transparency on this. And I think that that will happen. I mean, look, I don't know what truly exists there, but I know that this is something that's important

to the president as well. He doesn't want transparency on all these fronts, that everything we're talking about. You have a lot of choices for cell phone service with new ones popping up all the time. But here's the truth, there's only been one cell phone company that stands in the gap for every American that believes in freedom

and believes that freedom is worth fighting for, and that's PatronMobile. The good news is you can switch to PatronMobile today without sacrificing quality or service. Worry about coverage? Don't be. Patot Mobile uses all three major U.S. networks. If you have service in this country today, you'll be good or better with Patriot Mobile. Think switching is a hassle? It's not. You can keep your number, your phone, or upgrade. Patriot Mobile's 100% U.S.-based customer service team will get you activated in minutes from the comfort

of your own home. If you're stuck in a contract and you owe money on your phones, don't worry Patriot Mobile has a contract buyout program. And that's how we win folks by aligning our spending with our values. Every dollar we spend matters. Go to patriot mobile dot com slash Benny or call nine seven to Patriot. Use the promo code Benny and get a free month of service. Switch today. That's patriot mobile dot.com slash Benny or call 972-PATRIOT. Because it's frustrated him as well. He sat for four years like the rest of us did and saw it lie after lies,

our country just being sent down the wrong path. And it was really frightening and very upsetting to a lot of people to see. And I would actually say over the past 10 years, we've all kind of endured this. Prior to that, it was probably happening, Benny, but we just weren't as aware of it. It wasn't until Donald Trump came down that golden escalator that he just kind of blew the doors off of everything and people starting to wake up and realize,

wait a minute, things are not as they have always been presented to us. And I do believe that you will see that now as it relates to the president. I know that this is probably not his number one thing he's focused on. He's focused on a lot of other important things. We've got this big announcement with Russia going on, I think, as we're speaking right now at the White House. We have, you know, a Middle East, we're trying to get peace over there. We're trying to make sure that Iran's nuclear arsenal is obviously

completely decimated. We want to make sure everything is on the right track for this country. Fortunately, you see no border crossings in the last month. Zero, by the way. I think that's incredible, and no one's talking about that enough. Zero illegal border crossings in the month of June. Amazing how that's all gone.

So I don't know that this was top of mind for him, but he hears all the noise, and he hears all of the consternation out there. And I think he's going to want to set things right as well. So I believe that there will probably be more coming on this. And I believe anything that they are able to release that doesn't, you know, damage any witnesses or anyone underage or anything like that. I believe they'll probably try to get out sooner rather than later because they hear it and they understand it.

So hopefully we see that happen sooner than later and that I guess that would advice, but to everybody out there who's all worked up about it, there's no great plot to keep this information away that I'm aware of. I do just believe that maybe it's been slow rolled for reasons that hopefully we understand down the line. And I think we're probably gonna get more transparency on it very soon. Ladies and gentlemen, I'm pulling up something

from a friend of mine who again has nothing but love for the president, who many people actually call the president's fifth son. Charlie Kirk. I did an interview with Mike Benz yesterday and his interview with Mike Benz, he goes through the 10 reasons and 10 ways that you could fix this like immediately, actually not, not like really deep dives in a way that only Charlie can. And I want to go through this now as I think it's absolutely important. We know both these guys.

And again, Mike Benz is a massive fan of the administration and so is Charlie. So let's go. 10 immediately, immediately credible action items that can be done right now. Some of these acronyms, I don't know. Okay. OPR DOJ report should be released immediately. DOJ should move to unseal all Maxwell grand jury testimony, bring Acosta in for a full

interview and find out what he knew about Epstein working for intelligence, release all non-C-SAM, that's abuse material, underlying facts about Epstein indictment. Why not? It all happened under the Trump DOJ. Show your work. Need full report on why 2007 Bush-Comey investigation of Epstein was so bushered. You know, who was in charge when Jeffrey Epstein was initially found guilty was Robert Mueller.

Do you understand? Do you get it now? In 2005, Jeffrey Epstein was put under investigation for trafficking 50 young women. He started working with the FBI. Robert Mueller protected him and the charges went away. Greenlight Maxwell to speak freely. Klein and you just scroll.

Greenlight Maxwell to speak freely and learn what she knows and get to the bottom of how Epstein got his money and gathered bank records and financial statements. Release the names of the prisoners on the prison floor that night that Epstein was murdered, overrule the prisoner privacy rules and get maybe their testimony. Like did they hear anything? Nobody's ever interviewed or asked any of the prisoners anything. We'll actually be speaking

with a prisoner who shared a cell with Epstein tomorrow on the program. Get ready for that announcement. Get the missing minutes of the prison footage, press, conference, ASAP to explain any confusion. Comments below, any other ideas? This is what it looks like to be constructive, right, in all of this. Back to Mike Benz's response, please. 100%, this will go a long way in restoring the trust.

And I'd note that we, uh, I'd note that what we need are the investigative sub files that went into the OPR and I don't know what that's the office of professional responsibility. Office of professional responsibility. Thank you. DOJ report. Now the report itself, which did not provide the transcripts of the interviews, obscene intelligence ties to bars, CIA, and so on. Seems perfectly reasonable. There's probably so much of that available. Now that Jelaine Maxwell is saying that she wants to testify, her family yesterday said she wants to testify.

Do we have that? Jelaine Maxwell's family yesterday saying, get Jelaine in front of Congress. And we went, thank you. And we went to Congress and asked about this. Jelaine Maxwell's family breaks their silence with bombshell claim. Trump decision to close the Epstein case triples triggers maggot civil war.

Julane Maxwell's family has broken their silence. It says she is innocent subject to government misconduct. Okay, fine. Prove it in an unscrupulous effort to blame someone for Jeffrey Epstein's crimes when he died. So what's going to happen next? Her family maintains that Jelaine did not receive a fair trial and says prosecutors stopped at nothing

to convict her during the public's appetite to face justice on Epstein's behalf after his death. Well, right. If you're going to engage in the coverup, this is it. The, you know, you got to put away the physical evidence, right? Uh, the family argued that Maxwell should have been protected under an agreement with Epstein entered into the department of justice in 2017. Well, let's look at that. Why, why is Jeffrey Epstein the world's foremost pederast given a special agreement in 2017 in which they vowed not to prosecute any of

the co-conspirators as he paid fines and paid victims millions of dollars and served 13 months in prison. They, he didn't actually serve 13 months in prison. Julian Maxwell is alive and not really, not actually that far away from where we broadcast she's in a prison in Florida. In fact, that'd be interesting. And we should check and see if she's in a prison in Florida in fact. That'd be interesting. We should check and see if she's able to do an interview. Yep. The council representing Maxwell said I'd be surprised if President Trump and his lawyers were asked the Supreme

Court to let the government break a deal. He's the ultimate deal maker. I'm sure he'd agree that the United States gives his word it should keep it. With all the talk about who's being prosecuted and who isn't, especially unfair to Julian Maxwell to remain in prison promise the U S government made and broke family said is that they profoundly concur with Marcus's comments. Okay. Um, I don't think Julie Maxwell is innocent. I think she's a monster based on what we've read. No. And with the evidence that has been presented to us, but there is some, there is truth in this that there was a unspeakable plea deal struck in 2017 when Epstein belonged to intelligence and that so many people were able to skate on it.

Why did the government strike that deal? The Trump administration wasn't in power. Donald Trump was a TV host at the time. None of these people were damn much, you know, was a secret service agent at the time, right? Evil people made these deals decades before president Trump's administration got into power. So they should answer for it.

Meaning the people that made the deals, not the Trump, not Trump's administration. And Trump's administration, as we have been arguing, should wash their hands of it and put these people on, put these individuals on blast, these agencies on blast that did this. You know, we have the FBI documents saying, hey, you know, shut up, move on from Epstein. He's like, he's a protected informant, ladies and gentlemen.

And we have our own tapes from yesterday. Ladies and gentlemen, on Capitol Hill, asking these questions. Just a just a really quick round of what we were able to accomplish yesterday with the power of this program.

Ladies and gentlemen, here we go. That would be most likely the committee where a Jolene Maxwell would testify. Would you be in favor of that? Absolutely, yes, yes. Of course we want answers. No one is satisfied with what has been received or lack thereof.

No one is satisfied with the rollout of this. Of course we've heard that Dan Bongino is not satisfied with the rollout of this either. And, you know, I mean, I think you hear time and time again what an honorable standup man Dan Bongino is. President Trump, he obviously thinks highly of Attorney General Pam Bondi. I don't know her personally, but I know Dan. And he's a wonderful man. And I have no reason to doubt him and I think moving forward we need a special counsel that has got to happen there has to be a special investigation into this if we aren't going to be provided information maybe Matt Gaetz can lead the special counsel would you vote bear of that absolutely best advice for Pam Bondi is what very quickly

uh you know take take the ball and run with it. People want to see accountability. There have been a lot of investigations. The deep state has been exposed thanks to Radcliffe and Cash Patel. Let's start prosecuting these people. Let's set some examples out of some people. Will you be in favor of Jolaine Maxwell testifying? Absolutely. Absolutely. I've posted on this and if she were to testify, I think she could answer a lot of questions that could help put all of this in perspective. People really want to know

what's going to happen next with Epstein. They wanna know, like what, like what, like can the FBI review the terror, here's one from knock, can the FBI review the terror bites of information? Can we get Jolene Maxwell before Congress? Would you support that? I fully support the transparency on this issue, Benny.

I 100% support that. There are probably hundreds of minutes of questions that we asked yesterday. And now here we are. All right. So ladies and gentlemen, I want you to, I really sincerely want you to pray for the administration. I want you to pray for darkness over light, for light over darkness.

Ladies and gentlemen, that good will conquer evil and that all of the good energy that is being gathered on all of this from the base and the forces of darkness do not overcome what we're building here. Because we simply want to save this country and make it a damn good country for our children to live in. The next guest that we have on our program does want just that. I know this as a matter of fact. I know this man.

He's an excellent man. He gives an incredible tour of the EPA building in Washington, D.C. It was sort of like the Haunted Mansion actually at Disney in the sense that it was just ghosts. There was nobody working there. I can't wait to check back in with the great Lee Zeldin, who's the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency. Here we go. Mr. Administrator, welcome back to the program. I'm gonna start off by just kicking it into high gear here. I am so sick and tired of seeing the planes

flying over my house with all the trails or whatever it is, the geoengineering that seems to be like a massive issue and you went viral by being the first EPA administrator to speak out against it and say, you're gonna investigate it. And that's refreshing actually, that level of transparency. Well, my thought is that everything that the agency knows, everything that I as administrator of EPA knows

should be provided to the public. And then the public can ask additional questions, can be able to have a dialogue with each other when they have that level of answers back from their government, the conversation can move forward. Unfortunately, what happens too often is that on all sorts of different topics people have a question for the government and then government ignores them. You know, will label them as conspiracy theorists say that everything that someone says that people say is just not true or it doesn't even merit an answer and then what happens is distrust of government grows.

And the disconnect between the people and government grows. And I think that we are able to help in this process by just letting the public know whatever it is that we know. And quite frankly, there'll be people in the public who will read through what we have and say that they are satisfied with some of it or not happy with other parts of it.

That's fine as long as we don't hold anything back, as long as we're just fully transparent with letting the public know what we know. Mr. Administrator, I cannot tell you how encouraging that is to this audience. This audience is an audience that loves the president and loves this administration and cheered from the rafters when we started to see disclosures from Tulsi Gabbard, who I know you know very well, on JFK. And it was something that the president promised. And it was really like spectacular because what happened was there was this pressure cooker that had built over decades of just this assumption that the government was lying to us and then by releasing all these documents and releasing all this evidence that that the pressure Release valve like hit and everyone's like well

Maybe they didn't like the results or they you know, or maybe they're upset about what was you know What was it? But at least the government was playing ball, right? There's a gold standard It was an incredible thing to see it's wonderful to see that you're doing that at the EPA Yeah, well, let me talk about an extreme Right? It was a gold standard. It was an incredible thing to see. It's wonderful to see that you're doing that at the EPA. Yeah, well, let me talk about an extreme. So like, let's say some artificial intelligence video drops an hour from now and shows something that is, you know, like a US government plane,

you know, just dropping what looks crazy, insane, and it spurs this conversation, the video goes viral, and there are people who are just concluding that based off of this AI video, that the Trump administration must be intentionally releasing all of this stuff on this video. Like, that's an extreme, right? Yeah.

I would just caution to people who are out there is just not to get duped by anything that you see on the internet that's just not true. All I'm interested in, all I'm interested in is just IDing hard facts. And the fact is that geoengineering is real. It's something that the US government has acknowledged for a long time.

Solar radiation modification, stratospheric aerosol injection, marine cloud brightening, weather modification, cloud seeding. Some of this stuff has a history that's going back many decades. Some of this stuff has history of government funding as recently as over the course of the last few years during the Biden administration.

So the questions that the government, that the people are asking of government is very fair. It's important for the people and the public to make sure that they understand what these things are individually And you don't just confuse it all like if you just see some some picture of a whole bunch of high-altitude aircraft Over your house where the conditions are very hot

Jet fuel exhaust is coming in contact with conditions are very hot, jet fuel exhaust is coming in contact with low temperature air in high humidity that is causing that cloud exhaust fume to be, that cloud to exist for longer than a few minutes. What you shouldn't do is say, that is stress-ferric aerosol injection, that is solar radiation modification, that is geoengineering. You start confusing terms and definitions, you will start losing your own credibility of your own question of your own argument. Here's the thing with us. We want to treat everybody respectfully. We want to treat everybody

respectfully. We want to respect everyone's intelligence. We want to answer the questions. We want to be thorough. I will tell you in advance as we're putting out this information, there are people in the public who, you know, they just won't like what they receive. I've told my team, I don't want to bias anything of what we put out. All I care is what is the history? What is government funded? What is government known? What do we know that has not been put out to the public or can be re-emphasized? And then you engage in a respectful dialogue to build trust with the public and sometimes it takes time so we posted a a webpage for example at EPA dot-gov

slash Geoengineering it's right here. It's on screen I would encourage you know the listeners to go click through the links and if you you see something there you're learning. That's new That's great. You can investigate, you know, do your own research, learn more. Maybe you have a question of something that, you know, you thought maybe EPA knew that's not there. I'm telling you, there's nothing that I know as administrator of EPA that is not on

what we posted onto the internet. If it's not there, then like it's either not true or it's something that I have not come in contact at all as administrator or the agency. Now there's different agencies that have been involved as we note on the website. There have been times where National Science Foundation, NOAA, FAA, other agencies have their own equities. And through this process, we weren't just having conversations and meetings internally within the EPA, but we were also doing research and engaging with other agencies and asking questions of others so that we could give as thorough of information as possible.

But anyone out there who cares about these issues, we want to continue to engage with you. And we want to make sure that there is a respectful, honest, non-biased factual conversation that follows. And so my heart's singing, we rejoice in this. And this is precisely why Trump wanted a landslide. This level of transparency and honesty with the American people, we have your website up right now.

The entire, I encourage everybody watching to go to this website and to look, and if you wouldn't mind entertaining Mr. Administrator, just a simple question from me about cloud seeding. What is the argument for it? It is real. You know, that was something that we were all, somebody put a pot on our head and banged it, right? You're shut up,

you know, shut up. This doesn't happen. But it does happen in fact. And your website goes into detail about it. Could you please educate me as to what and why would cloud seeding be happening in our country? So this is something that's actually been around for many, many decades. I share specific concerns with cloud seeding on the website, and I would encourage your listeners, your viewers to read through some of the concerns that I expressed that are there.

There are people who are on the opposite side of all of these different issues that are listed as it relates to geoengineering and weather modification. And they say that, you know, listen, we need to combat global warming. So let's deflect the sun and the, you know, the sun rays back up into the sky.

They would argue in favor of it. I would express some very strong concerns and say that that is something that's a path that we shouldn't be going down. Yes. There are people who you know who have advocated in favor of cloud seeding. I would defer to them to argue why they think it's a good idea. I've expressed my concerns with it

But they would say that it would help to add Precipitation in an area that might be plagued by drought. I just feel very uneasy with that idea of Messing with the weather like that. It is obviously a very unnatural thing to do. And I would, all I could do is double down and triple down and reemphasize and caution the concerns that we are expressing on our website as it relates to these different forms

of both geoengineering and weather modification. And that includes cloud seeding as referenced on the website. I have a personal question for you as just an American and somebody who wants to raise your family here healthily. I mean, are you satisfied with the studies that have been done on this to ensure that we are not putting the type of chemicals or elements into the air that can be then rained down upon us and then make perhaps the weather toxic

or not healthy to the American people? This has not been studied enough. And when I say that, I'm not advocating for any outdoor studies. When I say there aren't enough studies, I'm not saying that we should be going out and experimenting more to check that box. If somebody wants to conduct some type of a research project in a lab setting to try

to get more answers, they're using their own science, technology, it's some project that's going on in a university. That is one aspect of studying a particular issue. It's a whole other thing to say, okay, now I'm going to be loading up the atmosphere with sulfur dioxide, and I'm going to try to combat global warming, you know, through this, you know, billion dollar grant that I just received yesterday. And I'm just going to go ahead and do it. Hey, government, I'm giving you a heads up that I'm going to do it.

You have no power to stop me. Now fortunately there's been nothing to scale, like nothing massive that has taken place. The one thing that first alerted us to an issue in 2025, and it wasn't new to 2025, but it was once President Trump was inaugurated, once I was confirmed, this company that was out there called Make Sunsets, they happen to be doing it to a much smaller scale. But you could just tell by the way that they are engaging in this that if they had the resources to scale it up, they would. And it's a reasonable conversation debate to be had amongst the American public and in Congress as to whether or not some private actor should be able to just say on their own that they're going to go ahead and just do it. Government doesn't have the power to stop them. And they're just going to, you know, kind of decide to play God on our own.

And if you ask me for my personal opinion, I have a problem with that. Yes, sir. And we put on the website our many concerns, and I'll just end with this, to answer your question again the same way that I answered it when you first asked here at the beginning. It has not been studied enough. It hasn't been researched enough, but absolutely don't. Nobody out there should take that answer as me advocating for more outdoor experiments. The problem is the concerns are too great and I would not be encouraging more outdoor studies

of these different topics. Yes, and I'll due respect, like you serve with Robert Kennedy Jr. who spent his entire, many decades of his young life fighting against toxins and poisons being pumped into our water supply, which I think every human in this country of sound mind agrees that's terrible. We don't want our kids to be drinking toxic water,

obviously, but it seems as though there is like free range in order to do that into the atmosphere. And that seems like prima facie wrong, Mr. Administrator. Yeah, so there's a requirement to notify NOAA when engaging in the activity that that one company company makes sunsets Announced that they were going to be engaging in there was a notification requirement, but there is a lot of concern over a lack of current authority under

current statute to be able to stop these activities if The activities get scaled up now. I feel like that is a problem. That is something that we should be talking about. But I just I want to again caution all of your viewers out there just to take the time if you care about these issues to study each of them individually realize that they're not all the same. Do not combine all of them or confuse these different topics. Not all forms of geoengineering are equal. Not all forms of weather modification are equal. And don't think that every single time

that you see condensation trails above your house that this is some type of an intentional release of chemicals to conduct population control or mind control. There are some people who are out there on the internet who might be very unhappy with me saying this, but I'm going to just shoot straight. I deal in facts. There have been planes flying at high altitude for a very long time. And when you look up and you're seeing these condensation

trails that are lasting longer than they normally do, it is caused by higher humidity conditions. You have very hot jet engine exhaust coming in contact with very cold air, and the circumstances, the conditions at high altitude are often very different than the conditions that you might be experiencing on the ground when you look up at the sky. So that concern that's out there when you look up and it's like, oh my gosh, look at all of these different airplanes intentionally releasing chemicals on us because they're trying to harm us.

They're trying to harm the environment. And then you start using these other terms that we've been talking about during this interview and you combine it all and you confuse it all. What will happen unfortunately, maybe unintentionally, is your own argument ends up getting undermined. So let's all just deal in facts. We'd be respectful of each other,

have a thoughtful dialogue, and we can advance this conversation and then help inform that debate inside of Congress. Like I saw, so Marjorie Taylor Greene put a new bill out in Congress. And Brendan Boyle, who's a congressman in Pennsylvania, posted on social media mocking Marjorie Taylor Greene for having a position of concern

about geoengineering and weather modification. Now, Brendan Boyle can disagree with the proposal, can say, you know, Brendan Boyle might say that we should be doing solar radiation modification, we should be doing stratospheric aerosol injection, we should be doing marine cloud brightening. We should be doing cloud seeding. If Brendan Boyle as a member of Congress wants to take the position that all of that stuff is okay to do, that's a member of Congress's decision on a position to take and then we debate it. But don't be insulting Marjorie Taylor Greene who wants to have a conversation Marjorie Taylor Greene, who wants to have a conversation and to look at statute because she's concerned that if one of these entities scales up their activity, that an agency that exists in the federal government may currently be lacking the authority to stop it.

And you know what? From that standpoint, what Marjorie Taylor Greene is putting out there for Congress to have a conversation about is something that Congress should be respectfully and substantively debating on, but don't mock her as if it's not a thing. The U.S. government, long before President Trump was elected, long before President Trump was even a candidate for his first term, have recognized these different activities and in some cases the government has even been funding these activities. So it's imperative for members of Congress if you disagree with

Marjorie that's fine this is America you're free to do so but don't don't make fun of her as if what she is saying about these different forms of geoengineering that we talk about on our agency website, don't talk as if like that stuff's just not true. Go to our website. This stuff was put together working with dedicated career staffers here at EPA

and others where we asked the tough questions on behalf of the American public, whether or not we or the American public was gonna be happy with the answers, we're just dealing with facts. It's just breathtakingly refreshing. The audience is cheering you on. The chat's going wild, Mr. Administrator,

for a federal official to just be this honest with us, because if just a few short years ago, you had said the government controls the weather, maybe you'd be fired from your job, or you'd be deleted from the internet. But now you're on this program, and with your website, which you can go to right here, you're sitting

there telling us, yes, in fact, the government has attempted to, and in many cases has manipulated weather patterns and is in the active process of doing so. Well, just to be crystal clear, some of what we're listing is stuff that the US government is not actively engaged in. Again, we can't combine all of these into one term. There's not all forms of geoengineering are equal, not all forms of weather modification are equal. Cloud seeding, for example, is legal

in a number of United States states, but throughout the country, in most states, it isn't allowed. There are some states taking action on these topics. In recent years, Florida has acted and there's been a debate inside of the state legislature. Everything that we put on that website is accurate. It's been vetted. It's there as a public service to let the public know what I as an administrator of EPA knows. But in some cases, when the government is funding these activities, the government has funded research into these activities. And what I want to express concern about, one, the American public should always know

where their tax dollars are going, period. Every last dollar the American public deserves to know where their money is getting spent. As it relates to research of these topics, I have concern when the research that's being done is being done outdoors and we express on the website What our concerns are with some of these different forms of geoengineering and weather? Modification and why outdoor experiments can be an issue, but what I don't want to have

Misinterpreted about the website that you have up on your website that we're talking about here, that you have up on your screen that we're talking about here, is that we're not saying that the government is out there, you know, actively engaged in scaled up activities to do all of these different things. That's actually not true. And that's an important point that I want to put out as well. However, if we're silent about this topic, let's just say the pendulum swings. And some climate alarmist, some activist is now inside of the White House. It's now President AOC in a few years down the road, and she decides that she wants to start funding outdoor research and activities to combat climate change because the world's about to

end. And something that you see on our website gets scaled up. One of the things that we could do, all of us, as a service in this moment in 2025 is to get informed on the truth. Whether or not, by the way, when the truth hits us in the face, we're happy with it. All that matters is that we deal with facts and to also ensure that and never, you know, it's August, you know, it's August 16th of 2025. It's a month from now and some bonkers artificial intelligence video pops on social media and it starts going viral. Don't just assume that that's true because there are attempts to play Americans and it's really important that we're never duped by any of that.

And I know that you have to go. I just, if you wouldn't mind one more follow up on this and it's very simple one. And it just comes from my inability to perhaps comprehend it. The man who helped shape U.S. monetary policy just released a bombshell book called Our Dollar Your Problem. In it, former IMF chief economist Kenneth Rogoff warns the U.S. dollar's dominance is under attack. If the U.S. dollar fails, your savings account could be very much at risk.

That's why Advantage Gold wants to give away a free copy of Rogoff's book to you if you schedule a one-on-one precious metals appointment today. Text Benny to 85545. You'll discover why gold is becoming the number one hedge against global currency shifts, how to move your IRA or 401k into physical gold tax and penalty free, and how to get $10,000 in free gold and silver with qualifying account. Get your free copy today while supplies last. Text Benny to 85545. That's Benny to 85545 or go to AdvantageGold.com.

That's AdvantageGold.com. Data and message rates apply. Performance may vary. You should always consult your financial and tax professional. Why would the government ever allow any weather modification? Like is God not good enough? I don't understand. So there is a proponents believe

that we should be combating global warming by deflecting sun rays off of the earth. That we should be using clouds to be able to make sure that we're not getting heated here at Earth's surface. These are very simple points here in an interview as to what type of arguments get made. And then there are others who are just interested in the science and the research. And again, what you decide to do inside of a lab, inside of a university that is controlled is one thing, but starting to experiment by releasing sulfur dioxide out into the environment

and just telling the American, you know, giving the middle finger to the American public and the US government and saying, we're just going to do it anyway, you can't stop us. Well, that's something that we all should have a problem with. And as far as the weather modification, the cloud seeding, arguments have been made that to combat droughts, to help with keeping farms and agriculture, receiving the precipitation that is believed to be needed to keep the crops growing, that they feel that it's a good thing

to pursue that cloud seed. Again, I'm just answering your question as the arguments that I have heard in favor of it as far as my positions And what we have heard as far as concerns here at the agency Everything is down there at the website to sum up the concerns that we have. Yeah I remember this great documentary called the matrix where the human beings blotted out the sun and didn't end well, right? Like, yeah. It just seems like out of a Hollywood movie plot, but it's actually real life and you can actually find out. And I think you've taken the absolute,

you've taken the perfect approach, Mr. Administrator, in just being honest with the American public here. Here's the website once again, ladies and gentlemen, for you to go see this level of transparency from the EPA. And Administrator Lee Zeldin as the geoengineering website. And here's the URL right there, epa.gov slash geoengineering.

We appreciate your time. I have 50,000 follow-up questions. Hopefully we can book maybe a long-form interview on this and we'll come up to DC and do another one, Mr. Administrator. Here's where you can follow Administrator Zeldin, 250,000 Americans, follow him, fight with the people who are fighting for you.

Godspeed. Thank you, sir. Thanks, buddy. I'm very honest about like what I know and what I don't know. I'm very honest about like what I know and what I don't know. I'm never going to pretend to you that I'm some type of really smart person. That dude, I'm a dude. And that stuff blew me, that kind of conversation like blew me away. It's crazy.

Now I've seen Lee Zeldin and his posts on social media about it. He got a lot of praise for just being honest about it. By the way, I think that here's the arrival at the White House of world leader. Let's get the name of the world leader. Trump's going to do one of the famous world leader round tables at the White House here, um, and take questions. So I'm sure that will be wildly entertaining. Here's the president, uh, greeting the leader.

I know that some guys, uh, something I know, I know it's some are roasting me in the comments. That's fine. We love you all. I like, forgive, forgive me. I don't study. I don't study weather modification. I have not like fully studied weather modifications.

This is why we have a show in order to talk to the experts. There we go. President Trump meeting the crown prince of Bahrain, the crown prince of Bahrain. Uh, yep. The Crown Prince of Bahrain. No audio. Yep, and there they go. No audio yet. The president will be live inside of the Oval and we will go to that. As President Trump taking questions these days is,

as ever, quite newsworthy. Goodness, that interview, in my opinion, was newsworthy. Uh, I... My producers are telling me I'm getting roasted in the chat. Well, I apologize. I'm asking just honest questions. But, like, listen, we have an EPA administrator that's looking the American people in the eyeballs and being like, yeah, we modify the weather.

Uh, okay, I look... So I'm sorry. Like I, I not, you're not going to please everyone all the time, but I think that that's good. And, um, you know, we've been asking every, we've been asking literally everybody, including the speaker of the house yesterday, who's third in line for the presidency. Um, you know, about these major government cover-ups. And I think that this seems like a thing that's not being covered up, and I find that honorable, quite frankly. But either way, we enjoy, we enjoy, we enjoy,

we can't be like here, we can't be like, is it going on and on about how we like, you know, how we're pushing back without listening to our chat as well. So ladies and gentlemen, we understand. Is it, it's the matrix. All right, producers, give me the breakdown of the chat.

What was it? Were people angry? Are people angry at me for not, are people angry at me? Cause I have to stay locked in with the interview. So I can't read the chat. Are people angry at me for not, are people angry at me? Cause I have to stay locked in with the interview. So I can't read the chat. Are people angry at me for not asking the right questions on weather modification?

Is that it? Or you don't care about weather modification? Is that it? You don't like weather modification? Well, neither do I. I tried to ask some pretty aggressive questions on it. I'm not an expert. I'll tell you that.

I'll be honest with you. I don't like it. I think that they're putting toxins in our air and those toxins are obviously going to travel down to our children. And I don't like that, but I'll never pretend to be, you know, you haven't found me like doing essays on it, um, because I don't know, and I'll be honest when I don't know. And I'll bring on the experts to say, do you want, like, do you want more conversations about weather modification or do you want less, right?

Or would you like for me to ask more questions? I wasn't trying to go easy on them. I just think never in my lifetime, I'm almost 40 years old. Never in my lifetime. If I had a government official come out and being like, yeah, we control the weather. That's kind of like, I found that I find that to be at the very least like honorable and transparent. So I don't know.

We all, I have like, just to let you know how much, just to let you know how much we love the chat, not only do we have your chats on screen, except for during interviews, because it would potentially cover the face of the person being interviewed. Not only do you have your chats on screen so that your voice is heard,

but also we have producers monitoring the chat, like monitoring for sentiment. that your voice is heard, but also we have producers monitoring the chat, like monitoring for sentiment. So I'm looking at the producers to just say like, you know, I'm looking at the producers to, you know, to get, to make sure that like you're heard, right? Or if we miss something, that you're heard. And so there it is. Obviously, obviously the government controlling the weather

is a hot topic issue. And people care, people care greatly about. Well, we've made no shortage of international news on the Epstein topic over the last few days. This is, you are at, you are inside of the only show that has talked to direct members of the Trump family and direct people in line for the presidency. Uh, yesterday about Epstein, including a number of members of Congress. And we may have a few members of Congress joining our show today.

Also to continue to talk about it. What I really want to get to the root of is, and we, is like, will we get a Jelaine Maxwell testimony? And I asked that multiple times yesterday in Congress, but I wanna like really nail that down. There were multiple people who told me that they were, you know, most of very powerful members of Congress who told me they're totally in like in favor of that,

including but not limited to the Speaker of the House. So there we go. So there it is, ladies and gentlemen. I think, I mean, my take on the whole, I'll stop with this because again, I'm not an expert on weather modification. I'm sure maybe perhaps you are, perhaps you're somebody who studied this a lot.

And maybe you could ask, maybe we should do another, hey Alex, maybe we should reach out to Zeldin's team since he clearly wants to talk about this. And maybe we go back up and do like a long form interview and we take questions from the audience and we bring those questions so that we get more knowledgeable questions. My take on this, why isn't God good enough?

Really, the government is gonna come in and control the weather. Is God not good enough? Really, the government's gonna come in and control the weather. Is God not good enough? We don't trust God, right? Send the rain. I don't, you see how like on its face, this seems like an insult. Seems wrong, but a little old me, who knows.

Ladies and gentlemen, there are some things you can't control in life. There are some things that you can. Where and how you invest your hard earned American dollars and assets is something that you can absolutely control. Alio Capital is a app run by a company that loves this country and that loves taking advantage and seizing on the best technologies to make sure

that you are invested wisely and that your investments are growing and that you can go about working your regular job, which I assume you're possibly not a day trader, and that you would like an AI and some really smart technology to manage from macro perspective your investments. I invested in Alio and I just sort of did a trial run

and the AI has been incredible. It's called Altitude AI. It's a capital app that powers the investment strategies based on shifts in inflation, interest rates, global risk, weather modification, whatever. Then it adds your portfolio in real time. It's for hands off and hands on investors, depending on how you wanna manage.

For me, it's gonna be very hands off. Okay? No good at this. Don't take me to the casino. You know what I mean? No crying in the casino. No crying in the casino. Buckle up, buttercup.

So Alio helps guys like me. You can download Alio right now, App Store. Google Play, text Benny to 511-511. Text Benny to 511-511, download the Alio app. Text Benny to 511-511. Investing does involve risk, no crying in the casino. Potential loss of principle, past performance does not guarantee results.

Consult your financial and tax professionals before investment decisions. See terms and conditions, apply. Message and data rates also apply. And this is a paid advertisement by Ali O'Kappel. All right. You know what? You gotta take it, you gotta buckle up.

Fascinating. All right. How do we proceed? President Trump's gonna be live in the White House soon. We'll cover that. Victories. Thank God. GOP blows through second hurdle

in order to get finally a legislative win for Doge. We are massive fans of Doge. We still have, you know, we still have like a big heart for the Doge team and what they're trying to do. We really truly wish that there was more, but what Doge was able to do at the very least with the criminal enterprise of Axe Blue and USAID is excellent.

And now it's become law or it's very close to it. It's all but law at this point, right? It's called a rescission package. JD Vance had to go into the Senate in order to save this package, even though there's a 53 seat Republican majority. JD Vance had to go into the Senate in order to save it with his tie breaking vote.

But it passed, ladies and gentlemen, let's read. Senate Republicans, again, coalesced behind Donald Trump's multi-billion dollar spending clawback passage and propelled the legislation through to its final procedural hurdle with the help of Vice President J.D. Vance. Lawmakers will now go back and forth for 10 hours of debate on the bill where the Senate Democrats are expected to bleed time and slam the legislation for cuts to foreign aid in public broadcasting. Trump's smaller $9 billion package passed with nearly all Senate Republicans.

Guess who held out? Lisa Murkowski, who's opined about potentially changing her party. Susan Collins, who's barely a Republican. Mitch McConnell, obviously, who's in a wheelchair. So here we go, ladies and gentlemen. who's barely a Republican. Mitch McConnell, obviously, who's in a wheelchair. So here we go, ladies and gentlemen. Once the debate wrapped on the bill, lawmakers will go through another voter-rama where an unlimited number of amendments

can be offered to the bill by either side of the aisle. Democrats will likely try and sideline or derail the package while the GOP is expected to offer an amendment that would spare 400 million in international HIV funding. Okay. All right. Here we go, ladies and gentlemen, President Trump live in the White House. An interesting time. So that is for certain. This is President Trump again with the leader of Bahrain. Do we have his name? What's his name? The Prince of Bahrain.

Crown Prince of Bahrain. Here we go. Well, it's a great honor to have the Prime Minister and the Crown Prince of Bahrain. That's a fancy two titles, I want to say. I don't know if I'd rather be the Prime Minister or the Crown Prince. I think I'd take the Crown Prince. And very importantly, your son, your beautiful son, who has a great reputation.

You know that. The President's great reputation as a smart, hardworking guy. So it's good to say hello to you. Congratulations. We've had a tremendous relationship, I have, personally, with Bahrain over the years. And it's been a fantastic ally.

And anything they needed, we helped them. And anything we needed, they helped us. And we're going to be talking about a lot of different things, including the most perfect military maneuver that anybody has seen probably in 50 years, which took place a few weeks ago, when Iran knocked out their entire potential nuclear capacity.

And it was obliterated. You know, they — I used that term. They said, well, maybe that's too much. I said, no. It turned out it was more than obliterated. They can't go back. And we're just really going to talk about some things, including trade.

We're going to be discussing trade. We do a lot of trading with Bahrain. And we're going to have lunch after this, but we'll take some questions. At first, I'd like to ask the Crown Prince to say a couple of words. And he's — he also has a father who's living and well and doing fantastically, as I understand it.

He is. And somebody he's respected all well and doing fantastically, as I understand it. He is. And somebody he's respected all over the Middle East and all over the world. Thank you very much for being here. Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, to put into action the relationship that exists between our two countries. We will be discussing security issues. We'll be discussing trade and investment, which is very important.

We're very happy to be announcing $17 billion worth of deals that are coming to the United States. And this is real. This is real money. These aren't fake deals. These are real deals. They don't have to borrow the money. We don't have to borrow it.

It's coming in. And it only builds upon a legacy that we're very proud of. We have had a relationship in the civil side between our two countries since 1893 and formally since 1948. So may it long continue and we look forward to many, many more years of productive partnership. Thank you, Mr. President. You honor us. We will have that indeed. Many good years.. I'd say right now is your top year. And we appreciate the investment. It's great.

We left, as you know, Saudi Arabia. We were just there in Saudi Arabia. And Qatar was so great. Qatar was great. We had Goyi. We had a couple of other visits, but all great places. And we left with $5.1 trillion of investment. And they all want to be investing in the United States.

We have, I think, I think we have over $16 trillion of investment coming in, which is a record. And we're only a little bit into the year. And let's say the first two months I sort of Took it easy because we had to fix up the oval office I had to devote my time to fixing it up, but now we had to fix up our country So we have I think everyone is saying we have the hottest country now anywhere in the world. We're dead a year ago we are dead country and now we have the hottest country anywhere in the world and

It's great honor to have you here. Thank you, Mr. Any questions? Well, I can't comment I think I'll ask Marco to say a few words on Syria. Yeah, it's complicated Obviously these these are historic longtime rivalries between different groups in the southwest of Syria Bedouins The Druze community and it led to an unfortunate situation rivalries between different groups in the southwest of Syria, Bedouins, the Druze community, and it led to an unfortunate situation and a misunderstanding it looks like between the Israeli side and the Syrian side. So we've been engaged with them all morning long and all night long with both sides and we think

we're on our way towards a real de-escalation and then hopefully get back on track in helping Syria build a country and arriving at a at a situation in the Middle East is far more stable so in the next few hours we hope to see some real progress to end what you've been seeing over the last couple hours. Mr. President, Jerome Powell, do you have plans or if you're back considering firing Jerome Powell and what's your justification if you're back considering firing Jerome Powell. What's your justification

if you're thinking about this to do this? He's always been too late, hence his nickname too late. He should have cut interest rates a long time ago. Europe has cut him 10 times in the short period of time and we cut him none. The only time he cut him was just before the election to try and help Kamala or Biden, whoever the hell it was, because nobody really knew.

Obviously, that didn't work, but he tried to cut him for the Democrats, Kamala. And how did that work out? You'll tell me. It didn't work out too well, did it? But he's, I think he does a terrible job. He's costing us a lot of money. And we fight through it. It's almost the country's become so successful that it doesn't have a big impact, but it

does hurt people wanting to get a mortgage. People want to buy a house. He's a terrible Fed chair. I was surprised he was appointed. I was surprised, frankly, that Biden put him in and extended him, but they did. So no, we're not planning on doing anything. We're very concerned. He's doing a little renovation for 2.5 billion of the Fed, building a renovation, and they have a close to $900 million cost cost overrun and it's a shame. But the biggest cost overrun is the cost overrun for interest rates because we should be paying three points lower and we would save a trillion dollars a year in interest if that were the

case and all it is is the stroke of a pen and that goes for his board too because his board is not doing the job because they should try and rein this guy in. So he's doing a lousy job but no I'm not talking about that. Fortunately we get to make a change in the next what eight months or so and we'll pick somebody that's good and we'll pick somebody. I just want a fair job. We want to see lower interest rates. Our country deserves it. We're making a lot of money. We're doing great as a country. We have no inflation. Record stock market, record business, record everything. Everything's a record now. We had the worst inflation in history under Biden and now we have almost no inflation. We've done a great job and we should have the interest rates cut. So you're saying it today that Scott Besson,

you're so happy with him at Treasury that he's not your top option to replace Trump, however that may be, whenever you decide what you want to do with him. Scott's doing a very good job. I'm very happy with Scott. Is Kevin Hassett on the top of your list? Kevin's somebody we consider.

Kevin is fantastic. We have a lot of good people for that job. It's not a tough job to be honest. Assuming you're smart, it's not a tough job. If you're a dummy, then I guess it's a tough job. But it might be one of the easiest jobs I've ever seen. And now on top of it, he's building a close to three billion dollar little nest tank for himself. He's not doing the right job. We should be saving a trillion dollars a year in interest, you know, when he talks about cause. We should be saving, think of it, a trillion dollars a year. Add that with the tariffs and everything else, but he just doesn't want, he's a knucklehead. But we'll see how that, we'll see how he's listening to this. That's a strange conversation.

But, you know, we like to say it like it is. But we have a lot of people that want that job very badly. And I'm only interested in low interest people directly, because you don't need, I know. So they had a, you know, the 71 different economists and people that they experts that they picked About a month ago. I was the only one along with one person from Maybe the Wharton School of Finance the two of us got it, right? 69 people including Powell got it wrong and he wants to hire thousands of new people to help him Decide where we're going in the future.

It only takes one good mind. It doesn't take 5,000 good minds. So they're expanding the Fed. It's the dumbest thing I've heard of. But you know, it's very autonomous. Are you completely ruling out the idea of firing Jerome Powell? I think it's highly unlikely unless he has to leave for fraud. I mean, it's possible

there's fraud involved with the 2.5 2.7 billion dollar renovation. This is a renovation. How do you spend 2.7 billion dollars and he didn't have proper clearance, etcetera, etcetera. So, you know, that's going on. So, you

know, there could be something to be done. So, you know, there could be something to be How do you spend $2.7 billion? And he didn't have proper clearance, etc., etc. So you know that's going on. So there could be something to that. But I think he's not doing a good job. He's got a very easy job to do. You know what he has to do? Lower interest rates.

Have you drafted a letter? So you didn't show a letter to Republican lawmakers last night? No, I talked about the kind of letters that you have to send to the House. You decide that you are going to fire him. Have you drafted a letter? So you didn't show a letter to Republican lawmakers last night? No, I talked about the kind of letters that you have to send to the House. You decide that you are going to fire him.

Have you drafted a letter? So, did you decide that you are going to fire him? Have you drafted a letter? So, you didn't show a letter to Republican lawmakers last night? No, I talked about the concept of firing him. I said, what do you think? Almost every one of

them said I should but I'm more conservative than they are. We talked about it. In fact, we had 11 of the 12 people here yesterday, for a very big bill having to do with crypto, et cetera, and other things. And all of the votes are going with us, every single vote. But during the conversation, when we were talking about it, I asked, what would you do about that? They all said we'd fire him. Mr. President, thank you for taking the question, sir. You it. I asked, what would you do about that? They all said we'd fire him. Mr. President, thank you for

taking the question, sir. You were in Pennsylvania yesterday when they'll $92 billion worth of investments. One of those jumped out to $15 billion at Homer City to build the largest natural gas power plant ever. I was at the rally where you

told Homer City residents, you would not forget them when the biggest coal plant in Pennsylvania closed down. Delivered to them yesterday. What message do you have for those residents? Well, I'm happy. Homer City. I was there and I said, I'm going to produce something. I don't know what because they shut down this massive coal plant, one of the biggest in the country.

It was just purchased by the gentleman that you met yesterday, very substantial man. I don't know if he's maybe not as you met yesterday, a very substantial man. I don't know if he's maybe not as substantial as you, I'm not sure, but he's pretty substantial. You know who I'm talking about. And they're going to spend billions of dollars on rebuilding it, and it's going to be the largest plant of its kind in the world, I believe, actually in the world. And it's gonna be great. So we really fulfilled that promise to Homer City, but it's to Pennsylvania basically.

I won Pennsylvania and very conclusively won Pennsylvania. So I owe them a big debt of gratitude. Thank you for bringing that up. We raised 92, it's actually going over 100. So it'll be over 100 billion dollars to be invested in Pennsylvania's Pennsylvania Energy Project. So we had everybody was there. Larry Fink was there. I mean, everybody was there and done a great job. The Senator did a great job. And we were very proud. That was a great meeting yesterday. Thank you very much.

Mr. President, actually for each of you. So for the Crown Prince, are you planning on taking any of the Patriot missiles that you're going to receive from the United States and divert those to help Ukraine? We have no current plans as we have an operational requirement inside Bahrain to keep them there for the present time. He's got plenty of them, too. And Mr. President, on the Fentanyl build. They're wonderful pieces of kit.

They work very well. American technology is the best. Yep. And on the Fentanyl build, you're saying? Maybe the most important part of this, here's this choice of everything, and we make the best military equipment by far in the world. There's nothing close, right?

Far none. Thank you. And on the fentanyl bill that you're signing today, do you hope that that's going to restart law enforcement cooperation with China on getting the fentanyl? Yeah, I think China's been helping out. I mean, it's been a terrible situation for many years with Fentanyl but since I came here, we're talking to them and they're

making big steps. They're also being penalized. You know that they're being penalized with tariffs because of the fence and all but they want to do something. We'll see what happens. They want to do something. We'll see what happens An American from Tampa was

Beaten to death he was held by Israeli settlers in the West Bank His family has been calling on you to help prosecute his killers Are you gonna do that an American from Tampa? Yeah, your first Sentences, go ahead. An American citizen from Tantan, Florida has been killed in the West Bank. His family has been asking a new to prosecute him. Are you going to help finding his family? Well, first of all, have you seen yesterday Ambassador

Huckabee has asked the Israelis to conduct an investigation? We want to get all the information about who was involved. We protect all American citizens anywhere in the world, especially if they're unjustly murdered or killed. So we're gathering more information. But I hope you saw yesterday Ambassador Huckabee in Israel asked the Israelis authorities to produce an investigation

and concrete information about who was responsible for his murder. We're reporting that tomorrow. We have a meeting on it. They're going to be reporting that tomorrow. Can have a meeting on it. They're going to be reporting that to me. Can I ask a question, please? Do you think that the Gulf area now is more secure, and do you believe that a negotiation with Iran is necessary at this stage?

Well I definitely believe that the volatility of the situation has been reduced. And we didn't know where it was going to go on the Sunday. We were very glad when we found out on the Monday. Let me put it that way. And should the Iranians want to negotiate, I believe the ball's in their court. That is the true reality of where we stand today. They are the ones that stand to benefit from a negotiation. And they do. They want to negotiate. They want to negotiate badly. We're in no rush because, you know, we said we could have made a deal. They should have made a deal. And then we bombed the hell

out of their various places. We're in no rush, but if they want to negotiate, we're here. Yeah. Mr. President, Mr. President, I know you want to move past all this intrigue over the Epstein files, but I do want to ask you to clarify something you said this morning. You said this was all a hoax. Has your attorney general told you this was a hoax? What evidence have you seen?

No, it's not the attorney general. I know it's a hoax. It's started by Democrats. It's been run by the Democrats for four years. You had Christopher Wray in these characters and Comey before him. And it's a bad group. It started actually look at the steel dossier that turned out to be a total hoax. The 51 agency intelligence, so-called intelligence agents, that was a hoax.

It's all been a big hoax. It's perpetrated by the Democrats and some stupid Republicans and foolish Republicans fall into the net. And so they try and do the Democrats work. The Democrats are good for nothing other than these hoaxes. Republicans and foolish Republicans fall into the net. They try to do the Democrats' work. The Democrats are good for nothing other than these hoaxes.

They're bad for policy. They're bad for picking candidates that can get elected. Like in New York, we have a communist running. He may get elected too, actually, but he kill destroy the city. No, no, I call it the Epstein hoax. Takes a lot of time and effort. Instead of talking about the great achievements,

we've had a great gentleman, yesterday as you know, went on CNBC and he made the statement that Trump may go down as the greatest president of all in the United States. And instead of talking about the things we've achieved, we've had tremendous achievement. They're wasting their time with a guy who obviously had some very serious problems, who died three, four years ago.

I'd rather talk about the success we have with the economy, the best we've ever had, and all of the things we've done, including the Middle East. I mean, you see it. Instead, they want to talk about the Epstein hooks. And the sad part is it's people that are really doing the Democrats' work. They're stupid people. Yeah, go ahead.

Mr. President, there's lots of reports coming into this meeting that you planned on firing Fed Chair Jay Powell, Mark. Is that right? Those are reports, but they're not true. So what would be useful to know, are you committed to picking someone from the outside? Are you going to interview individuals that are on the board right now?

I have so many people that want that job. I have people that I've known a long time, they're calling me begging for the job. You know what, you need a smart person with common sense, but you need a very smart person for that job. I think it's one of the easiest jobs in government. You show up once a month You need a smart person with common sense, but you need a very smart person for that job. I think it's one of the easiest jobs in government.

You show up once a month and you make a statement about where the economy's going, and we're going to raise our lower interest rates. It's probably the easiest job I've ever seen. That's why I'm trying to figure why does he want to expand and add more people? He's going to add more economists to tell them what to do, but the economists, I was right, all the economists were wrong. They admitted it this morning.

Quiet, quiet, quiet. Go ahead. Mr. President, you mentioned fraud in an earlier answer. Are you saying you want to investigate the Fed chair for fraud related to this renovation? Well, I think he's already under investigation. He spent far more money than he was supposed to on rebuilding. I didn't see him as being the kind of guy that would want to have parks, rooftop parks

and everything else on top of buildings. But who wants to spend that money for the Fed? The Fed is supposed to sit there and say where interest rates are going and a couple of other very easy things to do. And he spent two and a half billion dollars I think he's you know I think he's got some problems. Thank you sir you also recorded a surplus a monthly surplus in the month of June. 25 billion dollars ton of money with these new tariff rates coming into effect on August 1st, and we're bringing in even more tariff revenue specifically.

How much revenue do you think we can consistently bring in from these tariffs? And how big of a game changer is this? Not only for the economy, but also fiscal responsibility. Well, we're gonna be bringing in, already we've brought in over a hundred billion dollars. We'll be bringing in hundreds of billions of dollars. And the tariffs really haven't kicked in that much

other than automobiles and steel. August 1st is a big day. August 1st is when very substantial money comes into our country. We've made deals with a lot of great places, but we had one yesterday, you know, that was announced. We have another one coming up, maybe with India. I don't know. We're in negotiation.

When I send out a letter, that's a deal. In other words, that's a deal. They don't want to ever say that, oh, how many deals have you made? The best deal we can make is to send out a letter. And the letter says that you'll pay 30%, 35%, 25%, 20%, in one case, 50%, Brazil. And because what they're doing to their former president is disgraceful. I know the former president, he fought like hell for the people of Brazil, that I can tell you.

And I believe he's an honest man. I think what they're doing to him is terrible. So yeah, we have some pretty good deals to announce, but every time we send out a letter, that's a deal. The big one really is going to be on the 150 countries that we're really not negotiating with, and they're smaller. We don't do much business with them. Because you have a lot of countries, you have over 200 countries, and a lot of people don't

know this, but we'll have a, you know, well over 150 countries that we're just going to send a notice of payment out. And the notice of payment is going to say what the tariff. And we're, it's all going to be the same for everyone, for that group. They don't, you know, it's not, they're not big countries and they don't do that much business.

It's not like the ones that we've agreed with, like China, like Japan, where we're negotiating with them, but I think probably we'll live by the letter with Japan. We're very close to a deal with India where they open it up. Indonesia yesterday was, it wasn't an open country, now it is. And they have tremendous copper, quality copper and probably the most copper. And we made a deal with Indonesia, we pay no tariff, zero, and we have total access to trade. That's a phenomenal deal for our companies.

And we've agreed even more than that, which is okay. But we have a little larger piece of land, right? We do, sir. We have, we're number one in the world in oil, and we're drilling, and today it hit $64 a barrel, which is great. And that'll help stop wars, actually, if you want to know the truth, it's going to help stop wars.

And we hope to get it down a little bit more. But we have oil down to $2, $2.25, $2.50 in numerous states. We hit one at $1.98 a gallon. And that's a great thing. That's one of the reasons that inflation's in check. When you can do that, you stop. What Biden did is he ended our policies, went to his policies. He doesn't have a policy.

Some lunatic around the desk had a policy. Whoever operated the AutoPen had a policy. Which is, by the way, I think the biggest scandal, that's the scandal they should be talking about, not Jeffrey Epstein. The scandal you should be talking about is the AutoPen, because I think it's the biggest scandal, the uh Jeffrey Epstein. The Seattle you should be talking about is the auto pen because I

think it's the biggest scandal, one of them in American history. So, the economy is doing really well and uh people are seeing it. Yeah. Will you ask attorney general to release more documents to finally put this controversy to bed? Whatever is credible, she can release it. If a document is credible, if the document's there that is credible, she can release. I think it's good. But it's just really, it's just a subject. He's dead, he's gone and all it is is the Republicans, certain Republicans got duped by the Democrats and they're following a Democrat playbook and no different than Russia, Russia, Russia

and all the other hoaxes. They're started by the Democrats and some Republicans, in this case I was surprised, but they got duped. But have you talked about it? Have you talked about it with the last few days? First of all, you were high ranking officials, whether it's been your FBI director or Pam Bondi, they have made some inconsistent statements in the past. Well, I don't know. I can't speak about him, but I can say that Pam Bondi,

I really think that she's done very good. She says, I gave you all the credible information. And if she finds any more credible information, she'll give that too. What more can she do than that? I mean, honestly, what more can she do? And we do have bigger problems. We have problems with millions of illegal people that came in here and they're killers

and murderers. We have 11,888 murderers that were allowed into our country by Biden, sleepy Joe Biden, stupid Joe Biden. He allowed them into our country. And you know what? We got to do something about it. She's got a lot of things she's working on. And, you know, it's very sad that somebody can be waylaid, just get waylaid, but I think she's doing a great job. You mentioned past supporters when you were talking about the Epstein issue. Does that mean that you're effectively disowning any supporters who are now?

I lost a lot of faith in certain people, yeah, I lost, because they got duped by the Democrats. The Democrats are good for nothing. They've done a terrible job. They almost destroyed our country. If I didn't get elected, all these numbers you're hearing about, they found $25 billion and another 25 is coming in and hundreds of billions of dollars is pouring into our country. And we just got the biggest tax cut in history. We just got the biggest regulation cuts in history. There'll be no tax on tips. There'll be no tax on Social Security. There'll be no tax on overtime.

There'll be no tax on so many other things. You're allowed to deduct your interest from a car payment that's never happened before. You borrow interest. You borrow money to buy a car if the car is made in America. And by the way, factories are being built all over America, car factories, AI factories, but you get a deduction on your interest. Nobody ever thought of that before. It never happened before.

And these are the things that they should be talking about. The big, beautiful bill is one of the greatest pieces of legislation ever in this country. And the Democrats have nothing to combat it. So they say, oh, it's death, death. Oh, that's good. And then they give it to the fake news, which is you and a few others. And the fake news talks about the bill is death. The bill is actually life.

The bill is life and it saves our country. This bill is incredible. The bill is actually life. The bill is life and it saves our country. This bill is incredible. Look at the results already. So we have $16 trillion being invested in our country. And this great gentleman and his family just came in with another billions of dollars. And if he didn't like the country, if he didn't like where we were going, he's very smart. He would, he'd come, maybe he'd come, maybe he wouldn't like the country, if he didn't like where we were going, he's very smart. He would come, maybe he'd come, maybe he wouldn't even come. I think maybe it wouldn't even come. You'd save your time.

But, you know, it's one of those things. But if he didn't like where this country was, he wouldn't be investing billions of dollars in this country. But think of it, $16 trillion more than has ever been even contemplated before. And we haven't even started yet. So that's what I want to talk about. I want to talk about the success. And the Democrats have nothing to show for what they do.

They almost destroyed. They allowed 25 million people to come into our country, gang members, jailbirds, from all over the world, not South America, from all over the world. They allowed them to come into our country from mental institutions, insane asylums, just walk right through. They couldn't come into your country. They couldn't come into any country in the world except our country.

And they came in from the worst places, gang members, drug dealers. They all came in. Turn it off, please. They all came in and I'm doing something about it. We have it under check right now. We got rid of a lot of the murderers already. Some of them we put in our prisons because they're so bad. We don't wanna take a chance in putting them

in a foreign prison, have them come back. But we've done a great job. Our country is in great shape. We literally have the hottest country anywhere in the world right now. And it's true what the King said, what a lot of people said. We were a dead country.

One year ago, one year ago, we were a dead country. We were left at all over the world. We had Afghanistan, with that horrible embarrassment, most embarrassing moment in the history of our country. Look what happened with Russia and Ukraine. That should have never happened. Look what happened with Israel. That would have never happened.

Hamas had no money. Iran had no money. There was no money to do an attack like that. All these things that happened that wouldn't have happened if you had good leadership, and that's what go, let's go. Thank you, thank you for having us. Thank you, thank you. Come on guys. Thank you for having us. It's another day in paradise. Thank you.

Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Alright, another day in paradise as Trump says. Four abstain questions in that round of questioning from the press. And I don't know what to say here, man, other than what we've already said on the show, which is that memo dropped by the DOJ is why we are talking about this.

This was not like an Epstein show. We weren't doing deep dives. I know it was something we were concerned about and then something that we covered with regularity when there was information that was brought up. So much of that information brought up was by president Trump. So much of that information brought up was by President Trump. And it's just an important thing to make sure that you're not living in bizarre world as a massive Trump supporter who has spent hundreds of thousands of hours on live streams. Obviously advocating for these policies and these administrations,

defending the administration. In fact, the most viral clips on the Epstein topic has come from this show because it's a winning topic, frankly. And we spent the entire first hour explaining why. And I wasn't planning on playing this clip, but well, it's here, so why not? Donald Trump

Began his political career Talking about Jeffrey Epstein Which we'll just play it very quickly here like bringing this into the public arena Was President Trump? That's a matter of historic record. It's not up for debate. I'm Saying that's a good thing like Like, yes, thank you for doing this. Donald Trump, it was 10 years ago, a decade ago, on stage, before anybody ever heard of Prince Andrew or Bill Clinton and Epstein Island. No one knew about those things.

Donald Trump's like, these people are monsters and they deserve to be called out. And I'm running against one of the families who's totally implicated here, the Clintons. And this is what Trump said at the time. Bill Clinton. Nice guy. Got a lot of problems coming up, in my opinion, with the famous island with Jeffrey Epstein.

You raised the question of Jeffrey Epstein in your remarks about the Q&A. Well, I think he's got a problem. I don't think the problem will be. I don't know, but that island was really a cesspool. There's no question about it. Just ask Prince Andrew. He'll tell you about it. The island was an absolute cesspool.

Nobody, nobody ever heard of Bill Clinton on a predator island before Donald Trump brought it up or Prince Andrew. And it's commendable because Donald Trump was right. Bill Clinton did go to that island. There's tons of evidence of that, including, but not limited to, the victim testimony. And of course, Prince Andrew paying 10 million plus pound sums in order to silence victims.

I mean, Trump was telling us before anybody knew about this. So when I say that this is a problem of the administration's making, well, I mean, there's an enormous amount of evidence to back that up. We don't run a channel here to like talk nonstop about Epstein. It's certainly a topic that we cover along with thousands of other topics. But the DOJ memo that was released last Sunday forced the hands of people who covered the topics of import and note on the internet because people said what the hell with this memo given the preponderance of clips and evidence. And here's an article where Jeffrey Epstein

brags about being a CIA agent. Just one article. It's just one piece of example. And so like, you know, it's the point I'm trying to make here is that it's the administration and their handling of this, which is why everyone's talking about it.

It didn't have to be handled this way It's been abysmal and people aren't satisfied and that's what all available polling shows and There's so much evidence that the government has that could be released to engage in the pressure release valve Whether it's weather modification JFK release valve, whether it's weather modification, JFK, Russiagate, as we have. I thought I find it stingingly ironic. Thank you for that article.

I find it stingingly ironic that Trump compares all of these things to this, to these hoaxes. And the reason we know they're hoaxes is because evidence was released. I don't believe Trump is guilty of anything. I don't. I don't because I know these monsters that had fought Trump and tried to put a bullet through his head on live TV. They would have released everything. If there was a single scintilla of incriminating evidence against Donald Trump in there, it would be out in the public. You know it. You watched it happen with the Access Hollywood tape, right? President Trump on a bus, you know, some B-roll that never aired. President Trump's hot mic, right? They dug through everything. How many hundreds of thousands of hours did they dig through in order to get that

clip? So you're telling me that they had Donald Trump in the Epstein videos or files or whatever and that they held onto it because of their principled stance? Shut up. That's not, it's certainly not what I'm saying. But because of what I believe to most likely be an intel operation that the federal government doesn't want to give any more evidence of. They've already given an enormous amount of evidence that Jeffrey Epstein was an Intel asset that President Trump is being pushed to move on from this topic. And it's just a very different base. You know, that our grandparents who were told, oh yeah, we just shot a president's brains out on TV

and you can do nothing about it. It's very different. It's just a very different audience. And so we didn't want to do a week of shows on Epstein. I had a lot of questions to ask the speaker of the house that I thought were very interesting that you sent in. But of course, we're going to ask that one because it's what everyone's talking about. When we booked that interview, it's not like I went up there, you know, before the DOJ memo, we would have never asked, maybe we would have asked Peter

Mike Johnson about Epstein, but would it have been at the very top of the list? Would it have made international news? Most likely not. As you know, if you follow this channel for a long time, it has been a topic that we certainly cared about and tried to try to handle honestly, been asked about it for years. But the reason why we're talking about it now is 100% due to this memo right here that was released in the dark of night on a Sunday, 9 0 7 PM leaked to left-wing media to whitewash the entire operation and say, you're never going to get anything. It's officially closed. Shut up, move on.

And that's just that dog. Don't hunt anymore. And I don't know what to say. Power to the people is all I can say. Power to the people is all I can say. Power to the people. The people want truth on this matter. Am I wrong, Chad? People want disclosures and truth?

And it's a pretty noble reason why they want it. The reason why is that we want to hurt and damage the petrists and the predators. We want to ensure that we're not paying taxes to pedophile cults. And ultimately it's a class warfare issue. It's an opportunity for us to potentially grab a couple of them and throw them in jail, right? For their crimes, their constant and ceaseless

and endless crimes against the working classes in this great nation, the honorable and dignified working classes in this great nation. And that's what it's about. It's about something way greater than the list. And the reality of the matter is, well, ladies and gentlemen, especially with press conferences like that,

I don't see it going away. I don't see the pressure release valve getting hit on this issue for quite a while. And that makes me sad because it didn't have to be this way. This has been mishandled. And we've said it again and again and again. It's spiraled from a PR crisis

into now something just much broader and more culturally kinetic, right? You can feel it. So there you go. Stay up to date with all the breaking news on all this and the functions of the, the functions of your government by locking in with Patriot Mobile today.

The reason why I say stay up to date is because they are the cell phone service that is the backbone of this company. They keep us connected on the road, just like yesterday. We were recording videos on our phones, part of the premiums, part of the promos, and it was Patriot Mobile keeping us locked and loaded at the Capitol with all of our mobile devices.

If you're worried about your coverage, you shouldn't be. Patriot Mobile uses all three major US networks. If you have service in the country today, you'll have even better service with Patriot Mobile. Think switching is a hassle? Nope, they're 100% US-based customer service team can get you switched and ready and locked in today. If you're stuck in another contract,

or you owe money on your phones, no worry, Patriot Mobile has a contract buyout program. This is how we win folks, by aligning our spending values. That's for sure, make sure that every dollar matters. Go to PatriotMobile.com slash Benny and call 972 Patriot. Use promo code Benny to get a free month of service. Switch today, PatriotMobile.com slash Benny.

Call PatriotMobile.com slash Benny. Call 972 Patriot. Okay, patreonmobile.com slash Benny, call patreonmobile.com slash Benny, call 972 Patriot. Okay, ladies and gentlemen. And I, you know, I guess we're just gonna let it, we're just gonna let it be what it's gonna be, right? We'll just, we'll see how the cards work. You know, we'll see where the chips lie. It's not up to me, sadly, we're doing what we can do.

And we're honoring our audience. And that's what's most important. We're connecting with our audience and we're honoring you, we're respecting you. Ladies and gentlemen, some people may want to plead the fifth, just a little bit of breaking news here. Jill Biden's work husband just pled the fifth inside of the house as they dodged questions about the coverup probe of Joe Biden's work husband just pled the fifth inside of the house as they dodged questions

about the coverup probe of Joe Biden's health. Is there anything not being covered up in DC? Like that's, that's the problem. This guy is going to just shadow. It's going to shadow all the other incredible work. This is James Comer who was on our show yesterday talking about what was happening with Anthony Bernal is the dude's name. This is the breaking news out of Washington, non-Empstein related.

Here we go. The Hill, Anthony Bernal was one of the lead assistants with Jill Biden during her time as first lady. He was responding to a subpoena to answer questions behind closed doors. And apparently a moment ago, he took the fifth. James Comer, Republican out of Kentucky, leading up this investigation into the AutoPen et al.

And this is what Comer said a moment ago. Well, unfortunately that was quick. This is the second witness that we've brought in via subpoena for a deposition that has pled the fifth. And they've stated they're not gonna answer questions. I to read the first two questions. Just so everyone knows, these are the the types of questions we ask. Was Joe Biden fit to exercise the duties of the president? He pled the fifth. Second question, did any unelected official or family member execute the duties of the presidency?

And this is Joe Biden's chief of staff. Now, former senior advisor is Anthony Bernal. So he took a similar tack that the doctor, the physician for Joe Biden took last week. What was interesting about the testimony from last week is that we all thought it was confidential behind closed doors, but in the evening they released the videotape of him saying, you know, on the advice of my council I'm not gonna answer that question. So we'll see whether or not there's a video that's produced from this Testimony that all right, probably I guess you could say did not okay In order to have a functional government and a functional country there has to be some level of trust with the American people the majority of the American people that's you the majority of the American people, that's you, the majority of the American people and those who govern them and the functioning bodies and institutions that govern the country.

And that's what we're trying to establish. Every, you know, nobody had any faith that Joe Biden was alive, you know, as you can see there. And that led to a disaster of a presidency without question. The one of the worst presidencies of anyone's lifetime. And we want there to be no trust with the Trump administration. And that's what we're calling for. That's why we keep covering this. And that's why we won't stop.

It's, it's an act of, it's an act of truly understanding this moment and what people care about. That's what we're here for. Ladies and gentlemen, we're here to give you hope and faith. Remember, as we have said many, many times on this program, don't find that in a political party, don't find that in men. It's always fools gold. Don't find it in anything other than our Lord and Savior,

Christ Jesus, and in our scriptures, ladies and gentlemen, today from Exodus 14, 14. The Lord will fight for you and you shall hold peace. The Lord will fight for you and you shall hold your peace. You can always tell the people who are locked in because they are actually peaceful. Sure, I know that I bring a lot of energy, but tell you what, man, I sleep like a baby at night. I read my Bible, I get down on my knees and I pray, and I acknowledge that there is a God that is greater than me and

greater than all of this, and that God wants to bring light unto the world and not darkness. Salt and light. And that's what we're trying to be on this program. Thank you for marching with us. Remember, no matter what, in the end we win. All right? So take that into your hump day. Ladies and gentlemen, it's your boy Benny.

See ya. The Guess what? No list, guess what? No arrest, as if a million QAnon Cried out in terror and suddenly silenced But guess what? Guess what day it is? It's hump day! Hey, hey, hey, guess what day? Guess what? Guess what day? Hey, hey, hey, guess what day? Guess what? Guess what day? Hey, hey, guess what day? Guess what, guess what day? Hey! The biggest ships in the sea

All owned by the oldest kings And their dying legacy Media deal weeds Soon will the penny show come To mind the salt from lives for fun Feed the gold and bring the gun We sail for number one. The biggest ships in the sea, all owned by the oldest king. Vince Colonais is redefining News Talk.

Hi, I'm Vince Colonais, host of the Vince podcast. These conversations where we can air all of this out without the filters, without the sensors, without people with judgment. That's how you get a healthy country. Adult reasonable sober conversations. That's all I want. In depth interviews, live caller interactions and a front row seat to the most important conversations of the day.

That's why I'm so grateful that we get to do this every day. You are really the best damn audience in media. The Vince Show. Follow and listen on your favorite platform.