The Benny Show - WAR! Michelle Obama, Hillary Clinton READY To TAKE OUT Biden, Kamala in 2024 | It’s HAPPENING, with Guest ALX

Episode Date: February 16, 2023

New Poll Shows just 12% of Biden Voters want him to run in 2024, will Hillary Clinton and Michelle Obama fill the void, Elon Musk slams Globalism at “World Government Summit", and ALX joins the show Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Truck Month is on at Chevrolet! Get 0% financing for up to 72 months on a 2025 Silverado 1500 Custom Blackout or Custom Trail Boss. With Custom Trail Bosses available, Class Exclusive, Duramax 3.0L Diesel Engine, and Z71 Off-Road Package with a 2-inch Factory Suspension Lift, you get both on-road confidence and off-road capability. Dirt road ahead? Let's go! Truck Month is awesome! Ask your Chevrolet dealer for details. Today is Thursday, February 16th, 2022. A new poll shows just 12% of Biden voters want him to run again in 2024. Will Hillary Clinton and Michelle Obama fill the

void? And Elon Musk slams globalism at World Globalism Summit. What a legend. My name is Benny Johnson, and this is The Benny Show. We want to respond to you on this show. What does that mean? Well, when you're angry about something, we want to be angry. When you're happy about something, we want to cover it and be joyful with you. Mourn with those who mourn, the Bible says.

And be always present with your audience and always understanding like a connection to your audience. And so we try and bring the energy. We try and bring energy every single program. Now, sometimes it's hard. And most importantly, sometimes we are tired in the morning when we do this show. And that is why I drink copious amounts of coffee. I am always drinking coffee at all times of the day. And I have finally found a coffee company that actually reflects my values. I don't like giving money to woke communist corporations. And that is why I drink exclusively blackout coffee. It's not enough to simply taste great. You want to be proud and support a company knowing that they align with

your conservative values. And that's why I'm telling you, you must give them a try. I personally recommend Blackout Coffee because it is a company that is 100% committed to conservative values. From sourcing the beans to roasting process to the customer service and the shipping, they've got incredible work ethic and accept no compromise on taste or quality. Ladies and gentlemen, I drink it every single show. It really does legitimately keep me going, especially in these kind of news environments. Go to blackoutcoffee.com backslash Benny and use the coupon code Benny for 20% off your offer. Stop giving your money to woke companies that hate you.

Stay true to your values. Blackoutcoffee.com backslash Benny. We are energized this morning because we know something. We know what is about to happen. We often on this show tell you what is about to transpire in the future. And then you watch it happen. And we say, ah, told you so. And so this is going to be one of those told you so moments. So maybe one of those shows were like, ah, told you so. Got him. And this is it. They're going to backstab Joe Biden right in the side with a sharp knife, just like Caesar, ladies and gentlemen, metaphorically.

Politically, they're going to go after Joe Biden. They're going to break him. They're going to break his diseased, decrepit, degenerate, dementia riddled mind. And it's going to be harmful. It's going to be even worse than the elder abuse that you already see on stage. And what will they replace him with? Well, as you've seen, they don't really have a deep bench. They've got old, decrepit boozers like Nancy Pelosi and her husband, Paul, who was drinking in the police camera footage of his hammer attack.

What's in the what's in the coffee cup? What's in your Tumblr, Paul? Good questions, ladies and gentlemen. But those are questions for another time. You have degenerate, deeply old, deeply senile people. Chuck Schumer is very, very old. Bernie Sanders is very, very old. The heroes of the Democrat Party are ancient octogenarians. They look like crypt keepers. And so the Democrat Party is hard up. They must find something and someone to carry their mantle forward into the future. Now, who do they have? Who will run in 2024 if they are able to efficiently sacrifice Joe Biden. Well, again, they don't have a lot of great candidates. Gavin Newsom is, I think, the only person that sort of like filters up to the top.

But Gavin Newsom is in charge of the single worst economy in America. He's in charge of a state that is going to try and steal from people to give reparations to other people who have different melanin in their skin doesn't make any sense. Gavin Newsom was recalled by his own state. Gavin Newsom is deeply unpopular with the people inside of California. It doesn't seem like a good option. And so what are Democrats going to do? Man, who have been the only winners over the last 40 years in the Democrat Party? You have to go back 40, 50 years. Jimmy Carter running in 1980, getting his ass kicked by Ronald Reagan. And Democrats haven't really had a hero except for two last names, Clinton and Obama. Those are the two last names that carry a little

bit of shitspa, a little bit of weight inside of the Democrat caucus. Clinton and Obama were names that got people out to the polls, that won elections and reelections. They're the only really unsullied names inside of the Democrat Party that still have somewhat decent approval. Now, why is that? Well, what we have today for you, ladies and gentlemen, is a very in-depth piece of observational research about what is happening and the coalescing around Michelle Obama and Hillary Clinton as the first all-female presidential ticket. And this is what Democrats, we believe, are going to push forward into the future in 2024. We believe that this is going to be what they bring to the table, and we have the evidence to back it up. First piece of evidence, ladies and gentlemen, one of our favorites, Crystal Ball,

who has an interesting show. She was an MSNBC commentator. She has an interesting show with Sagar and Jetty. They have their own broadcasting news show called Breaking Points. They go on Joe Rogan's podcast here and there. And Crystal Ball was on Joe Rogan's podcast here and here and there. And Crystal Ball was on Joe Rogan's podcast two weeks ago saying that she actually needed permission from MSNBC to criticize Hillary Clinton. There's a reason why Hillary Clinton has decent name ID and still somehow, after everything, a decent reputation inside of the Democrat Party. It is because of mechanisms like this. Crystal Ball, former MSNBC host, claims that she needed to have the network president vet her commentary if it included any

criticism of Hillary Clinton before she ran for president in 2016. Oh, my goodness. Crystal Ball, former Democrat Party congressional candidate from Virginia, was a co-host of The Cycle from 2012 to 2015, a left-leaning cable news channel owned by Comcast. Ball, 41, recalled her MSNBC monologue in 2014 where she urged then-Senator Clinton to not seek the Democratic Party nomination for president. I did the whole thing and was like, she sold out to Wall Street. She sold out to all these people. She needed to have MSNBC approve her monologue. Apparently, Ball's advice to Clinton, who would go on to lose to Donald Trump, did not sit well with Phil Griffin, who was MSNBC's president at the time. Afterwards, I got pulled into his office and got told, everything's fine, but next time you have commentary on Hillary Clinton, you've got to get that approved by me.

Whoa. watch. I did this whole thing that was like, she's sold out to Wall Street. People are going to hate this lady. She's like the terrible candidate for the moment. Please don't run. And I was allowed to say it, right? I delivered my thing. I did it exactly how I wanted to do it. Afterwards, I get pulled into an office and, you know, great, Molly, everything's fine. But next time you do any commentary on Hillary Clinton, it has to get approved by the president of the network. Yeah. So there is a specific member of Congress, Democrat, that I am particularly close with. Why? Well, because in Washington, D.C.,

it's just proximity. So I've remained cordial. And this Democrat member of Congress is very interested in the work that we're doing. And I get a lot of insight as to how Democrats operate. And I talk with them. And this member of Congress who isn't particularly woke, you'd call them a blue dog Democrat, very rare, nearly extinct, sort of like a conservative, old, like union style Democrat. This particular member of Congress, FDR, right? Style Democrat, right? Your grandparent, if your grandparent was a Democrat. This person tells me that there is

one name you're not allowed to speak ill about, and that is Hillary Clinton. And why? Because Hillary Clinton owns the corporate press, owns them, owns them. And if you dare cross Hillary Clinton, then she will destroy, she'll bury you. She'll bury you in the press. And this member of Congress has actually felt Hillary Clinton's personal wrath before and wasn't able to get booked on any shows, had hit pieces written on them, had primary challengers, had money spent against them. This woman is evil, Hillary Clinton. And she will viciously and vindictively go after anybody. And we all know what happened to Jeffrey Epstein, ladies and gentlemen. That's the nature of the Clintons. And that's the nature of the machine around them. And so why wouldn't you want that machine on your side if you wish to run for

president? If you're someone like, say, Michelle Obama, who needs all of the help that she can get. In answering a simple question, do you think that Joe Biden should run again in 2024? Watch this. Biden will run again in 2024. You know, I I I. I will have to see. Your boy Benny's done his research. We know what's about to happen. Look at this poll, ladies and gentlemen. Just 12 percent of Democrats want Biden to be leader of the Democrat Party. Dire new poll shows president's backing dwindling among his own supporters ahead of 2024 announcement.

Oh, my. Oh, my. What's happening here? President Joe Biden is a distant second to a don't know in an open ended poll question asked by Democrats. This is the AP Newark poll. So this is a Democrat poll like the AP is so up the butt of the DNC. They are able to deliver a colonoscopy result, ladies and gentlemen. Biden, who is chief of the party, in addition to running the country for the last two years, was picked by just 12 percent of respondents in a new AP poll when asked who Democrats want to lead. Why do I tell you the bias of the AP?

Because the AP, they are doing the will of the Democrat power structures right now. And this is a suppression poll. These people are so vicious. They're so dirty. They're so dirty. They're so malevolent. There are two entities that control the Democrat Party, two names that have been unsullied, Clinton and Obama.

And those people are telling their apparatchiks. Remember, Hillary Clinton literally lock, stock and barrel owns the corporate media and the corporate press. Her daughter works at NBC. How do you think she gets a job like that? Ladies and gentlemen, it definitely ain't her smarts, as they possibly can into Joe Biden's ribcage. This is a Democrat poll intended on harming Joe Biden. This poll also doesn't state a name. It just says Joe Biden versus don't know. And Joe Biden loses versus the don't know.

That puts him ahead of new leaders bursting onto the scene, as well as longtime legislators, a vote of no confidence from his own party. Yikes. The news comes as the 2024 Republican field is beginning to take shape. South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley announced her decision to run against Donald Trump this week. Trailing Biden among Democrats was Hakeem Jeffries, who is a joke. He is tied at 5% with AOC. Please run AOC. Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders is at 5%. Sad. Man, they did Bernie dirty. They schlonged him in the words of Donald Trump. Pete Buttigieg and Kamala Harris, please, Lord.

Please, please, Lord. Please, Lord, let Kamala Harris and Pete Buttigieg run on a unity ticket of low information morons. Chuck Schumer is at three percent. And here's where we get it, baby. Here we go. Term limited former President Barack Obama is also at three percent, meaning that the Democrats would change. Three percent of Democrats would change the Constitution in order to let Barack Obama run again. Of course they would. Of course they would. Among Republicans, there is a substantial plurality that I don't know or didn't answer.

34% said that they want Ron DeSantis, leads among Republicans who want to lead the party, beating Donald Trump, who is 20% more than two years after losing to Joe Biden, blah, blah, blah. Polls are all over the place. Some of them show DeSantis by a teeny margin. Some of them show Donald Trump by like 20 points on everyone else. They're all over the place. You got to let people announce. You got to let people start campaigning. Polls are totally worthless until people are in the race and campaigning. And it's Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina. Those are the deciding states. So they're starting to poll Barack Obama against Joe Biden, even though it's unconstitutional to do so. And Democrats are saying, we'll take Obama. We'll change the Constitution.

What does that say, ladies and gentlemen? Democrats prop up Harris-Clinton for 2024 if Biden doesn't run. This This according to The Hill. Former Democrat presidential nominee Hillary Clinton trails only Vice President Harris in a hypothetical 2024 Democratic matchup. Oh, my. Topping a field that includes both new names and familiar faces. In the poll of 102,000 people, Harris topped a Democratic field without Biden with 32 percent. Clinton garnered 20 percent support. So Clinton is within a three percent margin of error of being within 10 points or less of Kamala Harris, who is the sitting vice president. OK, that's a little interesting. So what is Hillary Clinton having to say about this?

Like, for instance, what does Hillary Clinton have to say about Kamala Harris? Well, it ain't pretty. Watch. But after the Washington Post hit peace, the Times finished her off with a blistering piece, digging her an early grave. And Hillary playing the role of undertaker, the so-called warrior for women, made a gutsy move and told the Times that Kamala doesn't have what it takes. Quote, two Democrats were called private conversations in which former secretary of state Hillary Clinton lamented that Miss Harris could not win because she does not have the political instincts to clear a primary field. So Crooked's claws are out and that sends a signal to women that it's OK to come out against Kamala. So, OK, a couple of things here. Notice how Hillary, how dirty these people are. They're so dirty. They're so good at playing

the game with the press. It's never Hillary Clinton saying anything. It's always people close to her. It's always her aides. It's always somebody who knows her and the ching, ching, ching, champagne, crystal glass cocktail party circuit. Hillary Clinton is committing right now a kamikaze attack on Kamala Harris. And, oh, by the way, she's going to the Pan Pacific in order to do that. So Kamala Harris is, you know, a large, largely reliant on her demographic ancestry, which is half Jamaican and half Indian. Right. I think your mother came from India. Her father came from Jamaica. Well, Hillary Clinton found herself in India just this past week, curiously helping other women, making sure that everyone knows that Hillary Clinton is here to help women in India, unlike Kamala Harris, who has Indian heritage. And Hillary Clinton is going to make the world, the sun stop being hot because that's what Hillary

does. Watch. Being very similar is going on in India now, where Hillary Clinton has been having a very, very, her very own eat, pray, love moment. Watch this. Hillary arrived in India to visit a meditation camp. She must be trying to connect with herself and have a spiritual journey. She's been visiting salt pan workers and caves. And there's not a pantsuit in sight. Hillary's dressing just like the people. So why is Crooked clearing her head?

Is she getting ready to run again? It would sure explain a lot because this week she went after Kamala and said Kamala didn't have what it took to be president. And let's not forget, this is Crooked's glass ceiling. And what better place to go to tweak Kamala than India, the home of Kamala's ancestors. Hey, Kamala, I'm on your home turf. I'm all up in your caves. What are you going to do about it? So beautiful. What great trolling. What did Hillary Clinton have to say in India? Boy, she was looking rough and she was talking about the. Hotness of people ensuring that people in India will never be hot again.

Women in India should not be hot again. I kid you not, this is literally what Hillary Clinton had to say. Watch. But this trip isn't just about clearing her head. Crooked's always got an ulterior motive. You see, Hillary's been raising a lot of awareness on this trip about the left's favorite issue, global warming. You have overcome so many obstacles, broken through so many barriers, but now you face an additional challenge, the challenge that climate change Of heat. Heat like we have never seen before.

Heat like we have never seen before. So inspiring. So what's Crooked doing about all the heat? Well a $50 million global climate resilience fund to work with SEWA, which, as you may know, consists of women who are self-employed working primarily outside, whether it is agriculture or the salt pans we saw here today or street vendors or construction or waste recycling, all of those jobs, they are in the heat outside. And the heat, as you know, has gotten much worse. I've never seen Indian women look so excited. So she's starting a fund to make women in India less hot. True. But that's literally what she said.

She says, like, I want to make women less hot. Please put a bunch of vegetables around my neck and let me look just like the old Hagrid lunch lady inside of your public school or George Soros. A lot of people are saying she her transition into George Soros and the demon incarnation that is that man is almost fully complete. Hillary Clinton looked deeply rough. She certainly didn't look spry, but, you know, evil never sleeps. Watch. So today I am proud to announce that the Clinton Global Initiative, started by my husband, will work closely with SEWA and with our partners, the American India Foundation, the Adrian Arsht Rockefeller Foundation Resilience Center, the Desai Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Council for Inclusive Capitalism and the Algorand

Foundation to launch a 50 million dollar global climate resilient fund for women. Dude, she looks just like George Soros. And so she's going on to Kamala Harris's home turf there and she's doing it to roast Kamala. Mark my words. Listen to this from the Daily Mail. Top Democrats are questioning Vice President Kamala Harris's leadership abilities and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton even reported reportedly has her doubts. Members of Congress, Democrat strategists and other party figures all said that Harris has not made herself a formidable leader on Monday in an article in New York Times. The piece said that two Democrats recalled Clinton, Hillary Clinton, privately discussing Harris's chances of clearing the presidential field. Why would Hillary Clinton be talking about clearing the field? Why would Hillary Clinton care? Primary field because she lacked

the necessary political instincts. Two Democrats recalled private conversations in which Secretary Hillary Clinton lamented that Ms. Harris could not win because she does not have the political instincts to clear a primary field. A spokesperson for Clinton pointed out their strong bond, although the Times didn't quote him, issuing a specific denial of Clinton's reported thoughts. They have built and maintained a strong bond. Speaking of Clinton and Harris, any characterization is patently false. Wink, wink, nod, nod as they sharpen the knives, right? And as Kamala cackles off into the distance. Yeah. Kamala, look at the sunset. Let's all go out on the boat together. It's not going to be pretty. These people are dirty,

dirty people. Tulsi Gabbard, of course, didn't hold any punches back from Hillary Clinton. Tulsi Gabbard famously called out Hillary Clinton during the 2020 presidential nominating campaign. Tulsi Gabbard ran against Joe Biden and the decrepit disease institution that was the DNC. She ran as an outsider. She had a lot of threat. She provided a lot of threat to institutional power. And so institutional power went savagely at Tulsi Gabbard. Hillary Clinton, that same parasite spokesperson for Hillary Clinton, his name's Nick Merrill. He's the person commenting to the New York Times there in the last story. He said that Tulsi Gabbard was a Russian asset, a T-T-he-he-he-he-he-he. Tulsi Gabbard, who served in the U.S. military and Hillary Clinton

only ever uses the U.S. military as cannon fodder when she's landing in Bosnia under sniper fire. Listen to Tulsi snipe herself at Hillary Clinton and her chances of running in 2024. Do you see the significance in this India trip the way primetime does? First of all, Jesse, I was really hoping that you'd have her on live here on your show so we could actually have a debate. I've always wanted to have a debate with her. Never had the opportunity. Look, Hillary, I think, is envious of Joe Biden. She sees him as commander in chief. I'm kind of surprised because he's actually channeling her, you know, warmongering ways. But ultimately, you and I both know there's never been a war that

Hillary has seen that she has not loved. I was just thinking about her gleeful cackle when she said about Gaddafi, what is it, we came, we saw, we came, and he died. And so, you know, her desire to be commander-in-chief that she's had for a very long time has nothing to do with ensuring the safety and security of the American people. It has everything to do with the fact that if there's a war to be fought, she wants to be the one with her finger on that proverbial trigger. If there is a nuclear war to be had, she wants to be the one who's in that place to launch those nuclear weapons,

which should concern everyone. But this is what happens when you have someone like her in a position of power who loves war, but she's never actually been to war. Man, talking about going nuclear, way to go, Tulsi. Gabbard's so based. Love Tulsi so much. So they obviously have the very, very long knives out for Biden and Harris. And now you're getting the Obamas in on it. Now, reminder here that Barack Obama could save Joe Biden at any time. Barack Obama is silent. His 200 million plus followers, he's not telling them to support Joe Biden. He's not saving Joe Biden from the classified document scandal. Barack Obama is the sole individual living right now today that could save Joe Biden and say, oh, yeah, I let Joe Biden take classified documents and I have plenary power of declassification and therefore Joe's in the clear.

Barack Obama isn't lifting or raising a finger. He's not lifting his voice. He's not saying a word in order to protect or save Joe Biden. In fact, you could argue that it's Barack Obama who packed these boxes going all the way back. Ladies and gentlemen, Barack Obama has not liked Joe Biden. Barack Obama only ever used Joe Biden for expediency and in taming a specific branch of the Democrat Party that might not like his communist manifesto ways. Joe Biden was very good at the colloquialisms and the jokerisms and being a doofus and appealing to union halls and VFW halls all across America. And so he was

a useful idiot for Democrats. And now he's no longer useful, ladies and gentlemen. He's not useful at all. In fact, what would be useful is to be getting another Obama in the White House. You might mistake what Michelle Obama is doing right now for the beginnings of a presidential campaign. So first you have a manufactured white racism panic. That's a clue. But the clincher is menopause. Unlike every other woman over 50 in all human history, Michelle Obama, we're sad to tell you, has menopause. It's not clear where she caught it. Maybe there was an outbreak in Eggertown, but it's bad. At one point, Michelle Obama gained up to six pounds. You don't know how much she suffered. Let's put it this way. Baton death march survivors. She laughs at you. You can't fathom her pain. Watch her talk about it

on TV. I am still physically active and my goal now, instead of having Michelle Obama arms, I just want to keep moving. Just keep moving. If I can walk, move, I don't have to run. I don't have to beat everyone. So I've had to change the way I see myself in my health space. I never used to weigh myself. I'm not trying to stick to numbers. But when you're in menopause, you have this slow creep. You have this slow creep. And no, she's not talking

about Joe Biden here, who is technically one of the slowest creeps in America. She's talking about her own thighs. Now, why is Michelle Obama telling you about her menopausal thighs on a TV show? Possibly because she's a crazed narcissist who thinks her own thighs. Now, why is Michelle Obama telling you about her menopausal thighs on a TV show? Possibly because she's a crazed narcissist who thinks her own thighs are interesting to you.

And that's, of course, true. But there may be other reasons. How repulsive is it to hear her say Michelle Obama arms? These people, their narcissism, they're black hole narcissists i mean they are like they like like suck in and absorb themselves inside of their own the the vacuum it could bend space and time itself pride cometh before destruction man their hubris will be their downfall michelle obama they're talking about her own thighs talking about her menop, talking about her menopause, talking about Michelle Obama arms, whatever those are. Why? Well, because mail-in voting exists in a lot of states and it's very easy for suburban women to cast ballots from their homes and Michelle Obama is going for that vote.

They've run the numbers and Michelle Obama is going to run at the top of the ticket and say, I'm going to be the suburban mom. I'm going to be I'm just like you to ignore my multiple mansions on the water. Ten million, 20 million, 40 million dollar mansions on the water. Ignore all that. I'm just like you. Hey, ladies, look at me. And then look at Hillary, you know, with her hand shaking over the nuclear button. That's what they're going to do. Again, Michelle Obama asked point blank whether Joe Biden, the person who is a complete end to end creation of the Obamas, because Joe Biden was just a backwater jackass in the Senate with no future until the Obamas snatched him up for political

expediency. But he's no longer useful. He's a useful idiot that's no longer useful. Remember this. And remember Michelle Obama's tortured face when asked point blank if Joe Biden should run again. Biden will run again in 2024. You know, I I I I will have to see. I will have to see. So break it all down. They think they already got Joe Biden out. Joe Biden hasn't made Joe Biden hasn't made the decision to run again. OK, so it's like so.

So they're already breaking. They've already broken biden like like he's straight up said it joe biden doesn't hasn't made the decision to run again that is not a a done deal even though we've reported a couple times otherwise apparently joe biden hasn't made the decision important to watch i think you're running i've made that decision that's my intention i think but i've made that decision permanently i. I've made that decision. That's my intention, I think, but I've made that decision firmly yet. I've made that decision. OK, so they've clearly gotten to Biden. So they're going to torture Biden. They're going to say, hey, you can have your you can have your retirement

and your son and you can be out of shackles, not be sent to Guantanamo Bay as a traitor if you just don't run again in 24. So that's the devil's bargain they're striking with Joe Biden. They're coming after Kamala. So then they have to get rid of Kamala. We talked to you about the New York Times, but what is proof positive that the left is coordinating on something when it's in the New York Times and in The Washington Post? It's so embarrassing, such an embarrassing poker face. The Washington Post did this massive, you know, 4,000 word hatchet job on Kamala where they say people are poised to pounce on anything, any misstep, any gaffe, anything she says. And she's probably not getting the benefit of the doubt, says one of Kamala's backers in Georgia. Wild. Wild. Don't know enough about what she's doing, but it doesn't help that she's not a great communicator.

OK, good. It's some Democrats are worried about Harris's political prospects. The entire the entire article ends like just so savagely. The right to every woman in every state and every country to make decisions about her own body is on the line. Harris said at a rally. I've said it before and I'll say it again. How dare they? As Eric Allen, chair of the Cobb County Democrats, asked himself, a Harris loyalist says that unfortunately forces inside the party and the country are pushing against Kamala. Wait, what? This is how the Washington Post ends this like 5,000, 4,000 word screed against Kamala Harris by citing a Kamala Harris advocate and saying, well. Whether you own a bustling hair salon.

A painting company that just landed a big job. Or the hottest new bakery in town. You need business insurance that can keep up with your evolving needs. With flexible coverage options from TD Insurance, you only pay for what you need. Get a quote in minutes from TD Insurance today. TD, ready for you. The forces inside the party and the country are pushing against Kamala. So this is just the Democrats admitting that the game's already lost. They've already decided. Kamala Harris and Joe Biden was a failed experiment.

Lightning's not going to strike twice. We're not going to survive a united front against these two jackals. And we're going to put these clowns out to the clown pasture for retirement. And what are we going to do in the process? Well, we're going to humiliate them. It's going to put these clowns out to the clown pasture for retirement. And what are we going to do in the in the process? Well, we're going to we're going to humiliate them. It's going to be a wild two years. It's going to be very, very fun. But they're going to humiliate these two in the process. They're going to degrade, denigrate them.

They're going to force their spouses, for instance, to kiss on camera. As we saw this last week. Oh, man. Kamala Harris, ladies and gentlemen, had to sit there along with Joe Biden and watch their spouses lock jaws during the State of the Union. And then Kamala was forced to go on TV

and talk about it. Oh, man. These people are dirty. Watch. Kamala does two network news interviews. No one brings it up but the spanish tv guys obviously ask the most interesting question what is wrong with our media they force her to do it in spanish it's just gonna be humiliation porn at this point they are they have it set i mean don't let the us distract you. Don't let any of this other flim flam distract you in our press. They have the long knives out for Biden Kamala. They're going to go after him, baby. It's going to be they're going to disgrace them. They're going to humiliate them on TV. These people are evil people and they're Marxist. They're neo-Marxists. So public humiliation is actually a thing that they do.

Public humiliation is something that they are masters at. And they want to make sure that they that Biden and Kamala know they are no longer welcome. So take it to the bank. We are predicting a Obama Clinton unity ticket inside of the Democrat Party. All the signs are there. You can't criticize Hillary. You can't criticize Barack Obama. They're running suppression polls against them. They're forcing Joe Biden to say he's not running. They're going long knives out after Kamala Harris in the CNN going after Biden. New York Times going after Kamala. Hillary Clinton going after Kamala.

Michelle Obama going after Biden. The Washington Post going after Kamala. The stars are aligning. It's all there. That's what they're going to do. What are we going to do? Well, I mean, very dangerous world, actually, if Michelle Obama and Hillary Clinton took over. A very, very dangerous world. We have to coalesce, and we'll need to coalesce quickly. It's why I'm a huge advocate that we have major challenges ahead and we have got to decide on a direction for the country. And it's got to be a strong one. And so I won't be endorsing. People are announcing like crazy running for president on the right. Nikki Haley, John Bolton, Tim Scott. Now people are announcing. Will Ron DeSantis announce? Will Mike Pompeo announce? We hear the whispers.

Will Mike Pence announce? It's going to be a big race. Donald Trump has already announced. You know my feelings on all these people and you know my feelings on all this. I will wait to see how everyone performs in the debates and in the primary process. That's just me as an Iowan. That's where I was raised.owa that's where i went to school you watch and you see how people perform and so we'll see we'll see king of the jungle baby it's a blood sport and we look forward to it it's a war zone as elon musk has often said about twitter this is a war zone and you want warriors and boy damn it we'll need warriors with michelle obama and hillary clinton running don't count it out. Don't say, oh, America would never go for that. America would totally go for that. So we must be prepared to fight. Thank God we have the best tool that we

could possibly have offered to us by Elon Musk, a free and open social media platform where we can get information out there and truth out there. That is what Elon Musk did when he bought Twitter. And he released Twitter from the predations of evil globalists like Klaus Schwab, who is hosting a world globalist summit right now. Klaus Schwab saying that the people who master AI, they will be the ones in control. I don't know if this guy's a simulation or auditioning for the next bond villain we'll see watch and we are just now where we move into the exponential phase and i agree artificial intelligence but not only artificial intelligence, but also the metaverse, new space technologies, and I could go on and on, synthetic biology. Our life in ten years

from now will be completely different, very much affected, and who masters those technologies in some way will be the master of the world. So this is Klaus Schwab talking about the importance of AI and saying that this has a deep and abiding threat to our power. If we want to maintain power, we're going to have to continue to develop and to become the masters of AI. Very interesting. Interesting terminology here. Klaus Schwab, such an evil individual. However, he did invite Elon Musk going hard in against globalism at the World Globalism Summit. Man, the balls on this guy.

So based. Watch. One thing I should say, I know this is called the World Government Summit, but I think we should be maybe a little bit concerned about actually becoming too much of a single world government. If I may say that we want to avoid creating a civilizational risk by having, frankly, this may sound a little odd, too much cooperation between governments. You know, if you look at, say, at history and the rise and fall of civilizations, really all throughout history, civilizations have risen and fallen. But it hasn't meant the doom of humanity as a whole, because there have been all these separate civilizations that were separated by great distances. And so, you know, say like, while Rome was falling, you know, Islam was rising. And so you had like, you know, the sort of caliphate doing incredibly well while Rome was doing terribly. And that actually ended up being a source of preservation of knowledge and many scientific advancements. And so I think we want to be a little bit cautious about being too much of a single civilization because if we are too much of a single civilization, then the whole thing may collapse. Elon Musk is a genius, man.

I mean, what an absolutely beautiful point that he makes is that if you have everything so co-interdependent on each other, then it all collapses. We saw this in two world wars throughout Europe and that Europe essentially committed suicide. Europe was America was a backwater. America was never supposed to be the world dominating power. Europe was the world-dominating power. Europe had all the culture and all the institutions and all the banking, and Europe committed suicide against itself. But thankfully, we had independent nations that were able to fill the void there. And then America and Russia

filled that void, and then they fought, and America won off of better virtues and value systems, which is how governments should operate. What if America was in league with the communists? What if we had the same system of government? We would fall just like the communism and we just like the communists did. And we'd have another dark age. And that's what Elon Musk is warning against. Elon Musk said that open and free debate and the purchase of Twitter was in order to save civilization. Elon Musk talked about why he purchased Twitter at this conference. I think this is something that is probably agreeable to reflect the values of the people, as opposed to imposing the values of, essentially, San Francisco and Berkeley, which are somewhat of a niche ideology as compared to the rest of the world. But, you know, Twitter was, I think, doing

a little too much to impose a niche San Francisco, Berkeley ideology on the world. So, you know, I thought it was important for the future of civilization to try to correct that thumb on the scale, if you will, and just have Quota more accurately reflect, like I said, the values of the people of Earth. That's the intention. And hopefully we succeed in doing that. Man, what a brave man. What an incredibly brave – like the iron in his spine, the brass in his balls, the gunpowder in his gut to talk about the woke ideologies of San Francisco, putting the thumb on the scale of big tech. He just came out and said it.

He just came out and said it. And what happened when these Marxists took over Twitter? The Marxists did exactly what they always do. They censored people and they censored and they tried to destroy individuals who were speaking truth. And one of them works on our program as our executive producer and is our in-house Twitter expert. He's back on the platform. His name is The Great ALX. ALX The Great. I think that's what that's going to do. ALX The Great. Alexander The Great. These clips are going wild. Elon responded to you tweeting, I think, the clip about world government. Yeah, he actually responded to like three of them.

So I said that it was fairly because he got a lot of criticism for speaking at this globalist summit. That's one of the comments I was seeing from one of my initial tweets talking about, you know, free speech on Twitter. And people are like, why is he even speaking at such a globalist event um so then he came out and said it he's like i have concerns against world world government he's like i know it's a world government summit and everything but there are dangers to you know putting your eggs all in one basket because if it collapses then the entire civilization of earth would collapse um so i tweeted that clip and then he responded to that and then he's like yeah i thought that was the appropriate venue to make those comments at um sort of a little like snarky comment there which is perfect and this kind of goes into the same vein as like the wef when i

when that was all going on he was like criticizing them and i saw some people criticizing donald trump for having spoke there but then a couple clips went viral of what he actually said on the stage at WEF. And he was talking about how we should endorse Americanism, not globalism. So I don't have a problem with people speaking at these events. It's the message that they bring. If Elon is going to go to these events and speak to these events, he wants to try and change some of these people's mind and use their platform to get across what the real message should be, which, you know, you should put your country first and to reject the idea of globalism. I think it's great that he's even invited. I, you know, Elon is so, so good at this, but he's also

right, incredibly based. And I guess these days, based just means allowing people to speak freely. He's bringing back virtually everyone back to Twitter. I mean, am I wrong? He has made good on his promise to restore Twitter to a free speech site. Is that correct? Yeah. So they've been working on Amnesty for the past two months. Pretty much a lot of people that I know that were banned have come back. There are a few glitches that some people are seeing. So what they've done is they redid the entire process of appeals now. So if you appeal your account and you weren't suspended or you were not brought back under amnesty, they're using the amnesty guidelines to now review accounts.

And then they're also going to be getting rid of the ban evasion reason to keep people banned. So that's how they got you, right? Yeah, exactly. So and that's something that I expressed that I expressed with them is that there are accounts that were banned maybe 10 years ago, five years ago. And the initial thing was you had to go and appeal that initial suspension. People don't remember number one, their usernames, their passwords, all of this. So that's like a big issue. It's like, yeah, I was suspended from Twitter like 10 years ago. I don't remember like anything. And, you know, they even said that they were having trouble finding the reasons that people were originally suspended on the like the internal side.

So there are a lot of like weird things happening. So they're just going to do away with it and like, you know, basically give people that deserve a second chance, a second chance. So that's really good. And like I said, almost everyone that I know of has been brought back. So it seems like Elon Musk has sort of a through line in both of the clips that we played when, as it pertains to Twitter itself and why he bought it or as it pertains to world government, which is about as big as you can get around here. The through line is that you shouldn't have hive mind, that hive mind hurts people and diversity of thought and diversity of opinion and diversity and freedom of movement uh that that helps people and it's always the collectivist nature and the neo-marxist

nature to like create a hive mind and that's sort of what he speaks out against uh with twitter right he's like what happened here is the same problem globalism just the collectivism of like a small group of people speaking in circles. And then it destroys the capacity to think. And I think you saw a lot of that on display when they dragged in Yul Roth and when they dragged in Vijay Gade in front of Congress last week, did you not? Yeah. So one of the most tone deaf things and actually Elon replied to this as well. I tweeted both the clip and the Zero Hedge article. He he replied to the Zero Hedge article. Gilroth said something to the effect of the fact that we allow more free speech leads to less free speech. And it was the most tone deaf thing ever, because if you think like you look at what he says at a surface level it's like how does that even make sense what you're saying allowing more speech is actually making more like censorship like so his argument

is we need to censor more to allow free speech it's the most backwards and perverse thing ever and then like everything that came out like what they were prioritizing they were prioritizing censoring uh you know political content over illegal content. It's just like it's borderline criminal. And the fact that like they were dragged before Congress is it's just hilarious to see. Like in the last five months, it went from them all confident Elon isn't going to take over. Donald Trump isn't going to be reinstated. All of these statements. And now they're before Congress testifying. So I hope we see some accountability there. But yeah, it's just the tone deaf attitudes of these people at Twitter. They're like, oh, I didn't have any bias at Twitter. And then they hold up the tweet of saying, here is you calling Trump supporters Nazis. How can you how can those

two things exist? You're working at Twitter and enforcing policy against people that support Trump and then also tweeting on your personal account. Oh, yeah. Trump supporters are Nazis. There's actual Nazis in the White House. Like those two things can't be true at the same time. Now, I'm no lawyer. I don't think you are either. But there was a member of Congress that said that this is just the start and arrest will come soon. His name is Clay Higgins. He's from Louisiana. He himself is a prosecutor. He's now, of course, a seated member of Congress. And he asked Twitter these questions signaling that arrests will soon be coming for people that defied the Constitution. I mean, what would be the process here? Do you have any insight on that? Yeah. So what I've heard from him is that he's going down the vein that he was, you know, Twitter

and those Twitter executives were communicating with the FBI and that they both had insight on the criminal implications of the Hunter Biden laptop story. So his case would be the fact that Jim Baker had insight into the criminal nature of it and then also was using his position at Twitter to suppress that. So it didn't get out to the public. So his argument would be that, you know, Jim Baker had knowledge that the rest of the public didn't. And he's helping cover up like potential criminal activity that was on the laptop. So I don't know the exact charges or anything that he was thinking of, but that's what he was getting at there. So the future of Twitter, I think, is profoundly important to civilization.

We've done our show on Michelle Obama and Hillary Clinton maybe running for president. You're going to need to be able to hit back against that. And inside of the censorship regime that they run effectively through the corporate press and through social media, that's why they're screaming bloody murder about disinformation and shutting down conservative sites because they need to be able to protect the two of them. You know, these two criminals that would be running for office and an open and free Twitter is a huge threat to a Michelle Obama, Hillary Clinton ticket. I mean, obviously. And so Elon Musk talking about the future of Twitter and what's about to happen, I think is very important. He said this at the conference when he was asked about it. I'll play the clip and I'd love to get your reaction. But how do you see Twitter if we say five years down the road? What's your vision for this platform? What should it do?

Well, I think it'd be, I'd like to, you know, have this sort of long-term vision of something called x.com from way back in the day, which is kind of like a, sort of like an everything app, where it's just maximally useful. It does, you know does payments, it provides financial services, provides information flow, really anything digital possible, and also to be like a source of truth. Like if you want to find out what's going on and what's really going on, then you should be able to go on X, the X app uh and find out so alx elon musk is pretty pretty open about the x everything app

he's tweeted about a couple times he wants to turn twitter in a payment processor all this you're a technologist you see these things well into the future uh final question here what should twitter become do you agree with this and what would it look like? Yeah, I totally agree that making Twitter into something that's more, you know, inclusive of everything in everyday life, like a payment processor. We've had that issue with PayPal and Venmo that they want to get rid of people for what they said. So if we have an alternative and have someone that we trust in his pro-free speech, I see no reason why we shouldn't have more things that could be switched over to that app, whether it be news, whether it be our speech, whether it be payment processing. And one of

the things I'll say on this too is it should be a source of truth and news. This week, we saw Pete Buttigieg finally respond to the crisis in Ohio simply solely because he was trending on Twitter. Yes. And yes, that's the power of something that, you know, they can't censor. So, yes, your comment on Michelle Obama and all of these people running for president, they see the writing on the wall here. And this is basically a 2015, 2016 moment where Twitter was uncensored and it helped win Donald Trump the presidency. So the people who no longer control Twitter are the ones most who fear Twitter right now is because they have no control over it. And now they're the ones being forced to respond to trending topics because Pete Buttigieg ignored that the entire time and was finally forced to respond when he saw his name trending at the top of Twitter. It makes you wonder how much they got away with.

It really does. It makes you wonder how much they got away with, not just in the social media era, but in the era when there was a couple of networks. Right. And there were just small time papers. Like, what were they able to get away with when they controlled everything it would be a different country and we're glad that it is and we're certainly glad that users like you are back everybody go follow alx alx where can they follow you at alx on Twitter at Alex the Lord on Instagram and getter and then also at alx on true social alx the great ladies and gentlemen listen to him he's always right see you man well what do you think let us know in the comments let us know literally what do you think? Let us know in the comments. Let us know. Literally,

what do you think? Do you think we're wrong about Michelle Obama and Hillary Clinton? We're not wrong about Elon Musk. We know that for sure. But what do you think? Do you think that's that they're not going to run? Do you think they're going to try and prop up the old Crypt Keeper once more? Man, he'd be like 86, 86. Oh, we don't know. We don't know. But we do know one thing. We know that regardless of who this clown car spits out to run in 2024, that we don't need to worry about that. These people aren't actually in charge. God is in charge. And that is our confidence. And that is our hope. And that is why we bring you a Bible verse every single show. May the God of hope fill you with all joy and peace in believing so that the power of the Holy Spirit, you may abound in hope. Two mentions of the word hope there from Romans 15, 13.

Two mentions of the word hope. The power of the Holy. two mentions of the word hope the power of the holy spirit you may abound in hope are you abounding in hope this morning well perhaps you should be that's what good word says we are abounding in hope we are actually most mornings because we structure our lives correctly god first family then country And we care about those things. And we care about them in that order. And that gives us peace. And it also gives us a will to fight. And so we fight, ladies and gentlemen, for America. We fight right alongside with you. We'll be here for you every single day. My name is Benny Johnson. This is The Benny Show. See ya. Nightly Scroll with Haley Karania. I'm Haley Carania. I scroll with the homies here in the live chat,

and I love my long scrolls on my phone at night. The show is literally called Nightly Scroll. My screen time has reached astronomical levels, but I do it to get all of the videos and all of the content that you won't find anywhere else. I don't want to be surrounded by an echo chamber, so I hope you join me. Someone just said the show is great.

Keep it up. Thank you. I will. Nightly Scroll with Haley Caranilla. Follow and listen on your favorite platform.