The Bobby Bones Show - Home Lending Pal: Disrupting the Mortgage Industry with Cloud and AI
Episode Date: May 31, 2022Historically, there have been cultural biases that have complicated the home-buying process and made home ownership difficult for those in disadvantaged and underserved communities. In this episode of... Smart Talks with IBM, Malcolm takes on this subject with Jacob Goldstein, host of What’s Your Problem?, and Bryan Young and Steven Better, the cofounders of Home Lending Pal. These two visionaries are using IBM technology, including AI, blockchain and cloud, to create a home-loan process that’s more transparent, secure and equitable.This is a paid advertisement from IBM.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hello, hello, welcome to a new season of Smart Talks with IBM,
a podcast from Pushkin Industries, IHeartRadio, and IBM.
I'm Malcolm Gladwell.
This season, we're talking to new creators,
the developers, data scientists, CTOs, and other visionaries
who are creatively applying technology in business to drive change.
Channeling their knowledge and expertise,
they're developing more creative and effective solutions
no matter the industry.
Our guest today are Brian Young and Stephen Better,
co-founders of Home Lending Pal.
Home Lending Pal is a member of the IBM HyperProtect Accelerator,
an investment readiness and technical mentorship program
that supports impact-focused startups leveraging highly sensitive data.
Their story is a perfect place to start our season.
They recognized a perfect place.
profound problem, the horrible process of getting a home loan, especially if you're part of an
underserved community, a process that, as you'll hear, is not only confusing and complex,
but often deeply unfair. So Brian and Stephen teamed up to use technology to attack that problem
in a bunch of creative ways. You'll hear how they're tapping into blockchain to make the
home loan process more transparent and fair, using AI to help people live.
learn how to qualify for a loan, and relying on IBM technology to store consumers' most
sensitive information safely in the cloud. Brian and Stephen talked with Jacob Goldstein,
host of the Pushkin podcast, What's Your Problem? Jacob has covered technology and business
for over a decade, first at the Wall Street Journal, then at NPR. Now, let's get into the interview.
Let's start this like a rom-com. How did you meet each of?
other and decide to start a company together.
Stephen was supposed to come to a bachelor party in Miami and didn't show up and it broke my heart.
There's more to the story than just simply that.
One of my old employees introduced this. I've just left Marquetto. They've been acquired for
$1.4 billion and I am, you know, living the Miami lifestyle. You know, I have a condo on the
water and all the nice things that go with it. A guy named Michael Ramsey had asked me,
you know, would I help him do mortgage lead generation?
And I was like, you know, sure, I'm not doing anything else.
Why not?
And I meet Steve that he was in North Carolina.
I left a pretty fruitful career in banking.
I was an underwriter.
Underwriting loans means basically deciding who should get a loan
and at what interest rate, right?
Absolutely due diligence, right?
Which is understanding whether or not this particular individual
has the wherewithal to afford the mortgage,
also the credit risk that individual presents.
Okay.
But there was this disconnect in that process where you have hidden action taking place on one
side of the transaction while you have another side of the transaction that tends to hide information.
And just to be clear, it's the borrower who hides information and the bank that hides the action, the lender.
In most cases, but it's usually both sides of the negotiation.
Everybody's hiding stuff from everybody else when there's a loan loan.
Absolutely.
and it's like sort of inadvertent as well too, right?
In that process, certain things fall through the cracks,
and, you know, falling through the cracks means weeks without notification
from a borrower's perspective as to whether or not, you know, this deal is moving forward.
Okay, so the problem is a lack of information on both sides,
and that winds up leading to bad outcomes.
It winds up leading to long delays that are frustrating or scary for the borrower.
Yes, a lot of consumers just,
don't have anywhere to go. If you go online, everything is too broad and generic, especially if you
know you're not ready to buy at that moment. If you talk to a lender or a realtor, if you're not ready
to buy at that moment, they'll help you, but it's not the same level of help, but you're not going
to get that same level of support over months because, you know, buying a house isn't like
buying a piece of candy online. And so we really looked at, okay, well, how can we give people this
safe environment to go explore and understand what homeownership could look like for them based on their
personal information. And that's kind of when I reached back out to Stephen around August of 2017 and
said, hey, you know, we need to do this together. You understand the back-ins side from a lender
underwriters' perspective. And I understand the plight of the consumers. And if we come together,
this could be something that could be really unique. A capitalist solution to a social challenge is
probably the best way to put it. So, Stephen, you're sort of coming from the banking side. And
Brian, you're sort of coming from the tech side. Absolutely. What exactly is?
Is this the problem that you guys are trying to solve when you start this company?
In its simplest essence is data democratization.
The ability to take complex information and simplify so that someone that isn't an expert
like Steven can understand what's going on.
And in this case, specifically, what is the data that you're trying to democratize?
Underwriting data.
So the decision or the data that is utilized to determine whether or not you are approved
or declined for a home loan.
So right now, if I go apply for a loan, they approve me or they decline me, but do I know why?
Not real.
I mean, you get a letter of an adverse letter, but it's still very broad and generic.
It doesn't really tell you what to focus on next, but you do have a very high level sense of why you're declined.
Yeah.
There's no true guidance from that point of rejection, right?
There's no fundamental understanding as to what could I have done better.
And that's really what sets this platform apart and also why it's important how we're sort of reframing this data workflow.
I want to get into the details of that, but just as we sort of understand the problem a little bit more.
I mean, one piece of it that we haven't talked about is race and the home ownership gap.
Can you guys talk a little bit about that and how it fits with what you're trying to do?
Yeah.
I mean, the homeownership gap, at least for African Americans, is larger now than it was 50 years ago when segregation was legal, which is quite saddening. But it's not just African Americans. And when you look at declines, whether you are a woman, whether you are a minority, whether you're a part of the LBGTQ Plus community, it shows that there's a higher level of declines for these communities than there are for older white males. So, you know, in our perspective, there has to be a lot of.
that needs to be done in terms of resetting, reconfiguring the system to make it more fair and
equitable for all.
So if I understand you correctly, you're saying basically, in the current system, white men
have an easier time getting a mortgage than anybody else.
Well, you said it.
I'll just agree with it.
I think you said it.
I think if I understood you correctly, you said.
Yeah, that is what the data shows us.
It's not just my perspective.
That's what the data shows us.
And so how are you?
you trying to help fix that problem? By turning everybody into corn, in essence. By turning everybody into
corn. I like it. Yeah. What do you mean by that? Through the power of math, right, cryptography specifically,
we are able to make everyone look the same. And the underwriter just simply understands the fundamental
attributes that ought to drive that approval, disapproval decision, right? In order to help us,
and also to help our government understand where these biases are coming from,
our lenders are required to ask you, what your race, what your sex, even your age, right?
All of this comes with this application scenario.
But does this information inadvertently create the bias?
Can we make everyone look the same and start to remove or better identify where these issues are sort of coming from?
So you're trying to use technology to blind all the decision makers in the home loan process to race, ethnicity, gender.
Specifically, blockchain.
There are three big tech ideas behind Home Lending pal, at least three that we're going to talk about today on the show.
And blockchain is big tech idea number one.
You may have heard of blockchain because it's the key idea behind cryptocurrency.
But the idea of blockchain is bigger than just digital money, and much more than just a new way to store information on the internet.
Blockchain is a shared, immutable ledger that facilitates the process of recording transactions and tracking assets in a business network.
Brian and Stephen want to use blockchain to gather up the information on race and gender that's required by law
without showing it to the lenders making the decisions about who gets a loan.
Our argument or our thesis is that with the leverage of a mutable ledger such as blockchain,
you're able to still collect the information that is necessary for the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act
or HMDA, as Stephen was referring to.
But then with a smart contract, you don't have to release that information until after the decision
the approval or decline is made for the consumer.
So you have this big idea for what you want to do as a business,
what you want to do socially.
But how do you make creative use of technology
to do the thing you want to do, to make it real?
You know, we're trying to build something
that hasn't been done in the mortgage industry,
especially when we talk about artificial intelligence
and a virtual assistant.
Most people think of that as just a one-way street.
You know, we are trying to build this human-like interaction
where it is able to not only understand,
but to respond and then to leverage those responses
and create a roadmap towards allowing you
to achieve your goals, which is probably one of the most creative things that I've ever done personally,
but it also requires you to be willing to accept constructive criticism from the people that are
going to be using it up front. And a lot of what we're doing is really trying to find creative ways
just to get them involved in that conversation to say that, hey, you know, we are trying to build this
to help you. Right now there's about 21 million mortgage-ready millennials today that are qualified
to buy a loan, even though they're not trying. They just don't know. We're trying to bring great
greater trust and transparency to this process.
Yeah, I guess from my perspective, beyond just simply understanding the technology and what
it's able to do, I think it takes the will to go ahead and take on that complexity to try
something new.
We were challenged constantly with why not a simpler solution, right?
But in reality, the problem is much more complicated than the simplicity, these forces wanted
to bring it into the table. You have to have vision. You have to have a desire to want to make
fundamental change. Yeah. New tech built on old broken processes doesn't allow for systemic change.
You know, we have to try to find ways to not only just to make it easier for people to connect
to lenders, but at the core of what we were trying to build, we really wanted to address the
systemic issues in the home buying process. And that required us to try something different, basically.
And I think that's the most creative thing you can do in an industry that typically, as Stephen mentioned,
and wanted us to do is simpler.
Yeah.
So one of the ideas you guys have is that transparency can help reduce bias.
So in what way are you using technology to bring more transparency to the home buying process?
When we speak of transparency, when we speak of trust, what we're really talking about is just the natural
features of the blockchain, right? It's transparent because all participants within this framework
have access to this decentralized ledger. So we are all seeing how these pieces are sort of moving,
right? We're playing poker with our cards facing up. When we're speaking to trust, right,
we're speaking of the mutability of this information, knowing that if an action is taken,
It's there on the ledger and we can't just simply remove it.
So these features lead to this forceful curing of certain biases that tend to form within certain systems.
We're not saying that we're going to remove all bias, but what we're saying is that we feel very confident that we'll be able to reduce it significantly without regulatory reinforcement.
by the simple nature of this technology stack that we're developing.
So was there some moment when you guys had the light bulb, the aha idea that you could do this?
The moment that made me realize that this was doable was when our first group of lenders invested.
It was a group called the Mortgage Collaborative.
They are a collection of about 325 lenders, I believe, across the country.
They represent about 25 percent of overall originations that happen in the U.S.
when they kind of stepped in and were like, hey, you know, we're going to lead your development
before your Series A. We're going to try to help you there. I think that was the moment for me. And then
we had shortly after that, joining that round was a group called Kuno Mutual or CMFG Ventures,
their discovery fund. And they are one of the largest collections of credit unions in the industry. So,
you know, typically you have an issue where, you know, consumers feel like there's a problem that's not
truly being solved, but to see that lenders were looking to try to find solutions like ours. I think
that was the aha moment for me that said, hey, you know, this could be feasible for us.
That the people who actually have to work with you want to help you. Like that's a good sell.
Great. But just tell me how will it work? Like walk me through. I'm a ordinary person. I want to get a
loan. I come to home lending, pal. What happens when you're fully, you know, fully up and running?
How's it going to work? Yeah. So you will spend about five minutes going through our onboarding.
process where you're connecting your online bank accounts, you're authorizing a soft FICO pool.
There's a credit report, basically. A credit report. Yeah, most people don't realize. So lenders are
utilizing your FICO scores and most of the places online that you're able to go to are showing
vantage scores. So that's kind of the first level of disconnect. And so we're solving for that
first. So you go to that process and then after you've signed up, our virtual assistant,
Kev begins doing his work. He's analyzing your profile.
He's really geared towards helping you understand really three or four critical elements.
You know, one, your likelihood for success or approval.
Two, some financial modeling and forecast and give you a better understanding of when you should begin the process to apply for a home.
So how long will it take you to become a homeowner or to close on a home?
Three, the best loan product for you.
And then for the lenders within our ecosystem that present the best chance of success with them as well.
So you mentioned a virtual advisor, Kev.
Virtual meaning it's not a guy named Kev, right?
It's named after one of my good friends from college that passed from a rare form of germ cell cancer.
He was probably one of the most helpful, friendly people that you've ever met, and it didn't matter who you were.
So we really wanted to encompass his personality into the solution itself.
But yes, Kev becomes a friend, a pal.
So even if you're not ready to buy, he just doesn't pass you off and say, hey, I'm not going to help.
It really analyzes your profile and begins to create a path that you can follow to become a homeowner.
We have arrived at Big Tech Idea number two.
Kev, the virtual assistant, is built using powerful artificial intelligence tools.
The AI takes the potential home buyer's information and runs it through algorithms that tell you things like
how likely you are to get a loan,
and what loan makes the most sense for you,
and how long the whole process is likely to take.
You can ask Kev questions, and it'll give you answers,
but Kev is more than your average responder chatbot.
It speaks conversationally.
It knows who you are, understands your needs,
and helps beyond just providing a frequently asked questions link.
Brian says he thinks a lot of people might be more comfortable talking
with an AI-powered virtual assistant
than with a human loan officer at a bank.
I think it really solves a cultural problem.
There are cultural barriers that prevent different segments
from becoming homeowners,
or at least impact their buying decisions
in terms of how they explore homeownership.
So the first part is to try to use this virtual assistant
just to make them feel comfortable
getting into the process of what homeownership could look like.
And then from there, it is about preparing them,
getting them better qualified,
so that once they are ready to say, hey, I want to become a homeowner.
I found the house that I love allowing that transaction, that process to be a lot smoother
and easier through the use of blockchain, basically.
So when you say cultural, I mean, does that include, in part, race and ethnicity,
people who have traditionally been excluded from the banking sector from housing?
I mean, it's the dream that sort of AI can help people who've been excluded become more included?
Yes. Most white people have resources. They have other friends and family who have gone through this process successfully
multiple times as opposed to just the one time. Within our communities, it's difficult just to find the one person that you can discuss this process with.
And most of the time that one person has gone through a negative experience in that, right?
Brian's parents have experienced difficulty in the sense of my parents have experienced difficulty in this process too.
It isn't until you get to our generation where you have family members that have gone through this process multiple times and have been successful.
So when we speak to Kev being culturally relevant, it's because Kev is there to provide you accurate support that historically hasn't been available to these marginalized groups.
Stephen, you mentioned your own families, your and Brian's family's experience with getting home loans,
with the banking system, do you guys mind just talking about that specifically? What have been your
family's experiences with getting loans? Yeah, Brian, please. Yeah, yeah. I mean, back in the subprime
mortgage crisis, you know, my mom nearly lost her dream home that I fought for. It was primarily
because we were in an arm, even though we should have been in a VA loan because she was a military
veteran. An arm, an adjustable rate loan. Somebody sold you a loan that was way worse than the mortgage
it was way worse. I mean, you know, it started out better just because you paid less, but once that
interest rate flips, it becomes way worse if you're not prepared for it. And I think, you know,
again, when we talk about these cultural factors, there's really five that you deal with. There's,
there's cultural itself. So things like the subprime mortgage crisis where African Americans are
hurt the most coming out of that, you have redlining, reverse redlining, etc.
Redlining is basically the history of lenders not making loans to people in predominantly black
neighborhoods, essentially. Exactly. Or picking which areas they will lend to,
specific groups. Yes, and those areas were predominantly white historically. And predominantly
white, yes. So you have those elements. You have the economic elements where there's this
concept of it's just being unattainable for us. You have the psychological elements of being
misunderstood, thinking that the only way I can buy a home is having 20% down to put down
towards a down payment. And that's just not true. So our ultimate objective is just really
to make that more attainable for everyone. And it's really for all load of moderate income,
hours these days just because with rates increasing, with the supply shortages that we have,
you know, homeownership is really going to become a lot more difficult for a lot of people,
regardless of their age, sex, and race.
So you have this industry that suffers from a lack of transparency, from historical bias in
terms of race and gender.
You start this technology-driven company to try and fix those things.
As you're building the company, how do you come to work with IBM?
Our need for data protection and security.
So you're talking about digitizing documents, digitizing information to allow greater access to underserved,
underrepresented groups.
And IBM had their hyperprotect accelerator, which was entirely focused on that, taking small
startups like ours and allowing them to basically run the pilots that we ran without having to worry
about people's information getting stolen in essence.
And then Steve and I were just very aggressive in terms of just reaching out to different VPs.
different executives at IBM kind of saying, you know, here's what we want to do, here's what we
need, will you help us? And being in an industry that is so regulated, it helped us really get
to that door just because, you know, every bank has a vendor onboarding process that requires a very
high level of data security to even work with them in essence. Here's the third big tech idea
in the home lending pal story, protecting data in the cloud. Think about the problem. Think about the
problem this one is solving. Brian and Steven have this little startup. They need to collect
super sensitive data from people, everything you have to show the bank when you want to get
a mortgage. This data has to be secure. IBM's hyperprotect accelerator enables small
businesses to store sensitive data in the cloud and keep that data secure. Brian says it
lets home lending pal do something they would never do on their own.
From a technical perspective, you have different compliance checks that you have to meet to work with banking institutions or financial institutions.
So it allows a small startup like home lending pal to still be able to meet those checks and balances to bring a innovative solution to the table for a financial institution where more than likely as a startup, you're not going to have the ability to do that on your own just because it is so expensive to either have internal servers or to try to do it on your own as well.
So people have to trust you to use home lending, pal, right?
Like, I'm giving you everything.
How do you convince me?
How do you convince customers that you're going to keep their data safe?
Absolutely.
Part of it is doing stuff like this where we're acknowledging and making the consumers aware
of our relationship with IBM and how IBM is handling our storage of the data and the
sensitive data itself.
Technically, the IBM description of it is their confidential computing services or cloud
services. And it's basically saying that even though the information is stored in the cloud,
IBM is going to do a lot to help home lending pal protect this sensitive data. Part of it is being
able to show IBM's logo on our website. You'd be surprised how much logo recognition helps people
understand that this is a legit business, a legit company, if you will. And then there's also
stuff like, you know, people seeing the address of the business, contact information for the business.
Like all this stuff factors into why people will be willing to give us their data.
But a lot of that is very contingent on just people seeing the IBM logo and saying that, hey,
you know, we can, if we don't trust home lending, pal, we definitely trust IBM with this aspect of the business.
So what is the sort of story of working with IBM on this?
I mean, did you just figure out that they had the thing you need or did they sort of work with you to build the thing you need?
We told them what we wanted.
I think there's a, a service.
special relationship that we have with IBM. As I mentioned, you know, Stephen and I are very
aggressive both internally and externally in terms of getting things change in this industry,
especially when talking about systemic change. And sometimes that requires you to make very big
ask, you know, swing for the fences and see what happens. And as we found out more,
as we hired better talent, as we understood more of what we were trying to do, it made it a
lot easier for us to really share this vision with IBM. And then now,
they're able to recommend products to say, we see you're trying to do it this way, but maybe you want to use our
internal product and do it with this instead. And so that makes it a lot easier for us to try to bring
artificial intelligence and blockchain to an industry that hasn't historically accepted new
technology that well. So where are you in your journey as a company? I know you're still sort of
working on it. What can customers do now with your product? They could get recommendations right now.
We're fully licensed in Colorado, Florida, and in North Carolina.
So right now, customers from those states can expect to be connected with a lender with full guidance as to what exactly they're getting into and what pricing expectations they ought to be presented with.
Have you heard back?
I mean, I know that this is kind of a weird question given that the whole point is that people can be anonymized.
But are you able to talk to your customers?
Have any of your customers told you about how it's helped them?
Surprisingly, a lot of our customers will reach out to us and give us use cases.
We've had local TV interviews where they've interviewed them about those success stories.
We'll have customers that will reach out to us with challenges that they're having,
hoping that we can help them through those, even if we have to manually connect a borrower to a lender
in a state that we don't operate and we're more than happy to do that.
In exchange for that, they're basically helping us build out this.
new process. And so that's kind of the beauty of the system is that, you know, customers are coming in
at all stages of the buying cycle. You have some that are still renting at that daydreaming phase
where they're really trying to understand, you know, is homeownership a feasible option for me?
And then you have some that are, you know, trying to test out new features like optimal character
recognition software where they're able to upload documents and see how those documents transfer
to lenders. So I really think that is the beauty about what we're building is that the people
have helped us build it so far.
Are there any particular stories you've heard from customers that have stayed with you?
Honestly, I think the one that's most relevant to me that sticks closest to my heart is my mom.
You know, she was looking to try to buy another house and we were able to get her approved for
a little bit over $650,000, which was about $50,000 more than what she had heard from anyone else in the area.
So, you know, we've really been excited, at least I had really been excited about that one.
That's great.
You're not going to do better than your mom.
Right.
You helped your mom.
For me, that was the whole reason I built the systems.
So that one really sticks closest to me is because we've had some users that have gone through
the entire process and have helped us go from our initial phase.
And we've really been launching in phases where at first it was more show just showing
the affordability amount, like, you know, what was the amount of home that you could afford?
And now as Steven mentioned, we're getting into this much more interactive conversational
dialogue where consumers are not only showing kind of what they want to buy,
but also getting into kind of what their feelings are, what are their sentiments that they're looking for in a potential relationship with a lender.
So we're really excited when consumers come in and they test new features and they say, hey, this is working great.
This isn't working.
You know, what about this?
And we think that's really going to lead into our series A raise here in the next couple of months where we'll go out and raise hopefully eight figures or more to really flush out the features that consumers have said they want it the most is really what we're most excited about.
What's your dream for home lending, pal? If you think, whatever, I don't know, five years in the future, 10 years in the future, where are you?
I want to see at least a million people, hopefully a million minorities become homeowners by utilizing our product.
You know, we operate in an industry that's very lucrative for a lot of people.
Having supportive IBM will hopefully help us from a business perspective.
But I don't want us to lose sight of our social impact goals and the things that were really set out before, which was to make the process more equitable for everyone.
You know, I think if we were to be acquired or to do an initial public offering in five years and we're not doing that, then for me it would not be as sweet as if it were to ensure that we're actually doing stuff to close the gap for people.
Thank you guys so much for your time.
I really, it was great to talk with you.
Pleasure.
Well, thank you. Absolutely.
Malcolm Gladwell here.
To end today's show, I want to talk about someone who we didn't hear from in the interview, but who we heard about.
Brian's mom, because her story really is the story of home lending pal. Remember how Brian told us that back
in the odds, his mom got that crappy mortgage? The one that left her paying higher interest rates than she
should have been paying? That happened to a lot of people, particularly people of color. It was that
story and others like it that really inspired Brian to team up with Stephen to build home lending pal.
They wanted to fix a home lending system that had been opaque and unfair basically forever.
Most people applying for mortgages aren't thinking about the technology that's behind the scenes.
We all just want a good mortgage with fair terms.
And because Brian and Stephen made creative use of IBM technology, using AI, blockchain, and cloud to rethink the home loan process,
that is now possible for all of us.
On the next episode of Smart Talks with IBM, as AI becomes more widespread,
how do we ensure that it is built and deployed responsibly?
We talk with Fadro Bonadiris,
trustworthy AI practice leader within IBM consulting.
Smart Talks with IBM is produced by Molly Sosha,
Alexander Garroton, Royston Reserve,
and Edith Russelo with Jacob Goldstein.
We're edited by Jen Guerra.
Our engineers are Jason Gambrell,
Sarah Brugher and Ben Toliday.
Theme song by Grammiscope.
Special thanks to Kali Migliari,
Andy Kelly, Kathy Callahan,
and the 8-Barr and IBM teams,
as well as the Pushkin marketing team.
Smart Talks with IBM is a production
of Pushkin Industries and IHeartMedia.
To find more Pushkin podcasts,
listen on the IHeart Radio app,
Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts.
I'm Malcolm Gladwell. This is a paid advertisement from IBM.
