The Breakdown - A Win for Privacy as Tornado Cash Addresses are Unsanctioned
Episode Date: March 25, 2025A big win for privacy and the crypto space came surrounding the Tornado Cash sanctions, but as NLW points out, there is still battle ahead, as the Treasury is not saying that Tornado Cash is okay goin...g forward. Sponsored by: Crypto Tax Calculator Accurate Crypto Taxes. No Guesswork. Say goodbye to tax season headaches with Crypto Tax Calculator: Generate accurate, CPA-endorsed tax reports fully compliant with IRS rules. Seamlessly integrate with 3000+ wallets, exchanges, and on-chain platforms. Import reports directly into TurboTax or H&R Block, or securely share them with your accountant. Exclusive Offer: Use the code BW2025 to enjoy 30% off all paid plans. Don’t miss out - offer expires 15 April 2025! Ledger Ledger, the world leader in digital asset security, proudly sponsors The Breakdown podcast. Celebrating 10 years of protecting over 20% of the world’s crypto, Ledger ensures the security of your assets. For the best self-custody solution in the space, buy a LEDGER™ device and secure your crypto today. Buy now on Ledger.com. Enjoying this content? SUBSCRIBE to the Podcast: https://pod.link/1438693620 Watch on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/nathanielwhittemorecrypto Subscribe to the newsletter: https://breakdown.beehiiv.com/ Join the discussion: https://discord.gg/VrKRrfKCz8 Follow on Twitter: NLW: https://twitter.com/nlw Breakdown: https://twitter.com/BreakdownNLW
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome back to The Breakdown with me, NLW.
It's a daily podcast on macro, Bitcoin, and the big picture power shifts remaking our world.
What's going on, guys? It is Monday, March 24th, and today we are talking about a huge victory
for the crypto industry and privacy more broadly. Before we get into that, however, if you're
enjoying the breakdown, please go subscribe to it, give it a rating, give it a review, or if you want
to dive deeper into the conversation, come join us on the Breakers Discord. You can find a link in the
Show notes, we go to bit.ly slash breakdown pod.
All right, friends, well, the Treasury has dropped tornado cash from the sanctions list,
but there's a lot more to the story.
On Friday, the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control or OFAC removed tornado cash
from the sanctions list.
In a press release, the Treasury wrote, we have exercised our discretion to remove economic
sanctions against tornado cash.
We remain deeply concerned about the significant state-sponsored hacking and money laundering
campaign conducted by the Democratic People's Republic in North Korea.
They warned that the Treasury will continue to closely monitor transactions that, quote, may benefit
malicious cyber actors or the DPRK, and U.S. persons should exercise caution before engaging in transactions
that present such risks. In comments that demonstrate the difficulty of navigating this issue
amid the administration's new position on crypto, Treasury Secretary Scott Besant added,
digital assets present enormous opportunities for innovation and value creation for the American people.
Securing the digital asset industry from abuse by North Korea and other illicit actors is essential
to establishing U.S. leadership and ensuring that the American people can benefit from financial
innovation and inclusion. By way of background, Tornado Cash was sanctioned in August 2022,
after becoming the favored money laundering vehicle for North Korean hackers. Since then,
Coinbase, Coin Center, and a host of other individual plaintiffs have been fighting the
Treasury in court. In January, a judge ruled that sanctioning Tornado Cash fell outside the scope
of the Treasury's powers, and therefore the sanctions must be removed. Specifically, the ruling
was that immutable smart contracts are not property, so can't be the subject of sanctions
in the same way as bank accounts, financial assets, or physical property like yachts or cars.
The Friday statement from Treasury removed dozens of eth addresses associated with tornado cash,
so theoretically, U.S. citizens are now free to interact with the protocol again.
However, Zach XBT warned that the main front end is still compromised,
and there are numerous fake frontends attached to wallet drainers.
In other words, while the threat of being locked up for sanctions violations is gone,
using the protocol is still very risky unless you're interacting directly with the smart contracts.
Still, this is undeniably a major victory for those who have been fighting for the right to financial
privacy in the crypto space. Jeff Park of Bitwise tweeted,
the U.S. government lifting tornado cash from the sanctions list is the first real deeply meaningful
win for the movement of crypto, absolutely monumental. Juan Manuel Sobrawl, the community lead for
Ethereum Uruguay wrote,
Tornado Cash is no longer sanctioned. A key moment, code is speech, not crime. Software itself
isn't the enemy, how it's used is. The freedom to program must be protected.
developers are starting to fork tornado cash onto new infrastructure, seeing as the protocol is open source.
Gunboats, a developer working on Mega-Eath said,
I thought, maybe someone should try to deploy it on the hottest thing right now.
There is no change in code needed, and that's really a good thing.
Carter McAllister, a contributor to Alliance Dow, has also deployed a tornado cash fork.
He added, quote, counter-measures against North Korean depositors,
namely needing to draw a silly mustache on Kim Jong-un's face
and write something derogatory about the dictator before the transaction will go through.
The mood was celebratory over the weekend.
D.C. investor wrote,
The Tornado Cash-O-FAC reversals may be the biggest legal and policy developments so far
in a sea of massive developments over the past few months.
Big props to CoinCenter, Coinbase, and all the individuals who stepped up to sue the government
for their right to transact privately.
Bologi Shrinivasa tweeted, Privacy wins Tornado Cash is legal.
Peter Van Valkenberg, the executive director of Coin Center, however, caution that
we're not out of the woods yet, tweeting, after countless posts, meetings with members of
Congress and agency staff, critical letters written to Treasury from leaders of both parties,
and two lawsuits, the tornado cash contracts have been delisted. We won. But even with the sanctions,
gone, the fight is not over. Days after the sanctions, Alexei Pricev was arrested in the Netherlands.
He would be held for months without trial. Later, Roman Storm was arrested in the U.S.
and charged absurdly with unlicensed money transmission.
Perzzev is currently out on house arrest while he waits an appeal in the Netherlands, while Storm
is set to go on trial next month in New York. Storm commented,
Although Treasury's decision sets crucial precedent, the SDNY prosecutors still haven't dropped their case against me.
So while we have won a big battle, the war is far from over. I look forward to the community's continued support as I head to trial,
and my legal team seeks a dismissal from the judge or acquittal by the jury.
In updating the sanctions list on Friday, the Treasury made minor modifications to founder Roman Seminov's entry,
but he remains a sanctioned individual even though he never interacted directly with money launders.
Variant Fund Chief Legal Officer Jake Chavinsky wrote,
Treasury has delisted tornado cash from sanctions, meaning U.S. persons can lawfully use the protocol again.
Great. But Treasury did not delist Roman Seminoff, appearing to take the absurd view that it's okay
to use non-custodial software, but not to create it. Not good enough.
And so the really big question is what the Treasury plans to do next. This wasn't a situation
where OFAC acknowledged they were in the wrong and made a course correction to get in line with
the administration's pro-Crypto stance. The lawsuit is still in the interim period where the
judge has made their verbal ruling and is waiting on proposed written orders from the parties.
Over recent weeks, the agency filed various proposals with the court,
which would allow them to go back to the drawing board and find a legal way to reinstate the sanctions.
Another filing was placed on the court docket on Friday.
In this document, the Treasury claimed there was no need to proceed with formal orders
because the sanctions had been removed, rendering the case moot.
Coinbase Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewell commented,
Power does not recede voluntarily.
It gasps, then it gasps until it no longer can.
The Treasury filed yet another late Friday pleading against tornado cash.
After grudgingly delisting tornado cash,
they've now claimed they've mooted any need for a final court judge.
judgment. But that's not the law, and they know it. Under the voluntary cessation exception,
a defendant's decision to end a challenged practice, moots a case only if the defendant can show
that the practice cannot, quote, reasonably be expected to recur. Grewill listed a 2024 precedent
where the FBI removed someone from the no-fly list and produced a declaration that they would
not be added back to the list once the case had been resolved. That wasn't good enough for the
court who proceeded to enter final written orders. Gruewell commented, here, Treasury has likewise
removed the tornado cash entities from the SDN, but has provided no assurance that it will
not relist tornado cash again. That's not good enough and we'll make this clear to the district court.
Today's episode is brought to you by Crypto Tax Calculator. If you're looking for accurate
crypto taxes with no guesswork, check out Crypto Tax Calculator. Get accurate CPA-endorsed
tax reports with full support for IRS rules. For those who have fallen down the on-chain rabbit
hole, CTC has you covered with more than 3,000 integrations. They have full support for
defy staking and NFTs. Import directly to TurboTax or H&R block or share security.
securely with your accountant. Create an account, import your sources, and review. It's that easy.
Hello, friends. I am thrilled to share that Ledger is once again partnering and sponsoring with
the breakdown. Many of you know, but for those of you who don't, Ledger is the most secure
hardware wallet for your crypto and logins. It's trusted by 7 million users and secures 20% of the
world's digital assets. What's more, Ledger is a lot more than wallets. Over the recent years,
they've built a comprehensive ecosystem of products and services, all of which are designed to
make digital ownership more secure and accessible. You can buy your Bitcoin with Ledger and Ledger Live
and so much more. Basically, not only did they want to keep your assets secure, they want you to be
able to do more with them. Ledger's newest devices, the Ledger Stacks and Ledger Flex, introduced
the world's first secure touchscreens, making it easier and safer to manage your transactions
and assets. Alongside Ledger Stacks and Ledger Flex, the company also launched the Ledger Security
key app, offering a safer alternative to traditional passwords and enhancing your digital
security. If you are in this space, you owe it to yourself to at least check out Ledger and their
ecosystem what they have available to you. So thanks once again to Ledger for sponsoring the show.
On the other hand, Crypto Critic J.P. Koenig noted something odd about the list of addresses
removed from the sanctions list. He tweeted, OFAC was only required to delist tornado
cash's immutable contracts, which is what the court ruled on, but it appears to have delisted all
tornado contracts today, even the mutable ones like the relay or registry. Why did OFAC over-compli?
is, we don't know what's going on behind closed doors at the Treasury Department. There's the
possibility that political appointees like Secretary Scott Besson have put their foot down in an attempt
to roll back the entire policy. While the sanctions got a lot of press, they didn't do that much
to slow down money laundering from North Korean hacks. Compare operations from the tornado
cash era to the $1.5 billion by-bit hack that was moved into Bitcoin within a few weeks.
Sanctions only restrict U.S. citizens, so they were always more about the chilling effect than
anything else. We could also be seeing the Treasury trying to retain as much optionality moving forward
as possible. Someone in the chain of command clearly wants to be able to try again at a later date,
either with tornado cash or the protocols that have sprung up in its wake. Their legal strategy
appears to make it clear that they don't want a solid court ruling on the books even after they
lost the case. This has always been an extremely complex issue where reasonable people can't
actually disagree. It's not a particularly controversial take that money laundering is bad,
and that serious measures where viable should be taken to slow down North Korean hacking operations.
At the same time, the removal of tornado cash was a massive downgrade for on-chain privacy,
and of course the implications for digital rights go far beyond this one case.
And adding even more complexity to this, we might not even get full resolution through court cases alone.
One of the points the judge made in their ruling was that the sanctions were technically illegal
and the Treasury should go to Congress if they want expanded powers.
What the ruling didn't suggest is that those powers would be improper or unconstitutional.
In other words, an L now could become a W later.
if Treasury actually went and asked for the powers that it had deployed in a way the judge said
wasn't technically allowed. Still, if we were going to be living in a world of complexity around these
issues, I'd much rather have it be complexity but pointed to the side of the positive rather than
complexity pointed to the side of the negative. And so net net, it's been a good couple of days
for on-chain privacy. Now, since today's theme was talking about where the Treasury stands,
and it's all part of the broader unwind of the Biden administration-era policies,
The one other story that I wanted to talk about today was that another pillar of Operation
Choke Point 2.0 has been torn down with the OCC ending reputational risk assessments for banks.
Financial institutions are officially scored along five major categories during oversight.
Capital adequacy, asset quality, managerial quality, earnings quality, and liquidity.
These are largely pretty objective factors other than managerial quality.
Since the Obama era, a sixth hidden criteria was established in regulatory handbooks, which is reputation risk.
the logic goes that a bank with a bad reputation might generate negative headlines and suffer a bank run as a
result. Somewhere along the way, this was twisted into a silent mandate to avoid disfavored industries
or suffer a regulatory downgrade and the increased compliance costs that come with it.
During Obama's version of Operation Chokepoint, this was payday lenders, gun stores, and the sex industry,
among others. During Biden's presidency, the reputation risk was squarely about crypto and fintech.
In a statement, acting comptroller of the currency, Rodney Hood said,
the OCC's examination process has always been rooted in ensuring appropriate risk management
processes for bank activities, not casting judgment on how a particular activity may fare with public
opinion. The OCC has never used reputational risk as a catch-all justification for supervisory action.
Focusing future examination activities on more transparent risk areas, improves public confidence
in the OCC's supervisory process, and makes clear the OCC has not and does not make business decisions
for banks. The statement noted that references to reputation risk have been removed from OCC
handbooks. One of the interesting things coming out of the unwind of chokepoint policies is more data
about just how much fintech has been suppressed in the U.S. The Claros group published a study
comparing community banks who have fintech incentives and those who don't. They found that, on average,
community banks with fintech programs, paid 15 cents more on compliance for every dollar of revenue.
Claros noted the same change in compliance costs wasn't observable from the major banks.
Austin Campbell, the CEO of WSPN payments commented,
punchline. If you like having to wait in line at the bank, using paper checks and freezing our financial
system in the 1970s, you were a strong supporter of the Biden-in-min approach to financial regulation.
If you want to use the internet ever even once, you were not. Ben Fam of Strive funds commented,
there's about to be a banking boom in fintech and crypto, access to capital like never before,
especially attractive loans and debt financing. Hopefully all banks are treated fairly in regulations
and policy don't disproportionately benefit big banks. Does this mean once and for all that
operation chokepoint is over? Not quite yet, according to Custodia Bank's CEO, Caitlin Long.
She said, it's premature to say that debanking is over. There are two crypto-friendly banks under
examination by the Fed right now. An army of examiners was sent into these banks, including the examiners
from Washington, a literal army just smothering the banks. Touching on how long this will take to change,
Long added, the Fed is the outlier and the Fed is still controlled by Democrats. Trump won't have
the ability to appoint a new Fed governor until January 2026, so therefore you can see the
breadcrums leading up to a potentially big fight. Because if the OCC and FDIC overturned their
anti-crypto guidance but the Fed does not, where does that leave us? We will of course continue to keep
track of these changes. It is not mutually exclusive to say that things are headed decidedly in the
right direction, but there is a lot of fight that remains. For now that that is going to do it for today's
breakdown. Appreciate you listening as always and until next time, be safe and take care of each other.
Peace.
