The Breakdown - Another Pro-Crypto Appointment in the Biden Administration?
Episode Date: January 23, 2021On this edition of the Weekly Recap, NLW argues that while bitcoin’s price was the short-term story of the week, the medium-term story was all about the transition of power in the U.S. to the new Bi...den Administration. In it, he discusses what the appointments (reported or confirmed) of Janet Yellen, Gary Gensler, Michael Barr and Chris Brummer suggest about the future of crypto policy. -- Earn up to 12% APY on Bitcoin, Ethereum, USD, EUR, GBP, Stablecoins & more. Get started at nexo.io -- Enjoying this content? SUBSCRIBE to the Podcast Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/podcast/id1438693620?at=1000lSDb Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/538vuul1PuorUDwgkC8JWF?si=ddSvD-HST2e_E7wgxcjtfQ Google: https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9ubHdjcnlwdG8ubGlic3luLmNvbS9yc3M= Follow on Twitter: NLW: https://twitter.com/nlw Breakdown: https://twitter.com/BreakdownNLW The Breakdown is produced and distributed by CoinDesk.com
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome back to The Breakdown with me, NLW.
It's a daily podcast on macro, Bitcoin, and the big picture power shifts remaking our world.
The breakdown is sponsored by nexo.io and produced and distributed by CoinDesk.
What's going on, guys? It is Saturday, January 23rd, and that means it's time for the weekly recap.
Now, of course, from a short-term perspective, the story of this week was the price action.
It started nice for the Ethereum folks who finally had their moment getting up above the
widely agreed upon marker of 1420 as the Ethereum all-time high.
They got their moment of celebration before it quickly went back down again, which the Bitcoin
community obviously understands as we had that long two-week period between 19,000, 674, and
20,000, where we were all debating whether we actually hit that all-time high or not or if it
even mattered.
Anyways, by the end of the week, it had gotten ugly for absolutely everyone, but especially the Bitcoiners.
On Thursday, prices dipped all the way back down under 30,000 before rebounding again on Friday.
Theoretically, this was all about a fud cycle. There was Janet Yellen Fudd when she testified as part of her confirmation hearings to become Treasury Secretary and said that crypto was mainly used for illicit activity.
There was the persistence of tether fud, the idea that there's a huge scam waiting to unravel
and it'll take the whole Bitcoin industry down with it because it's the genesis of Bitcoin
success. And then of course there's the double spend fud, which happened on Thursday and which
was really a story of reporting gone wrong. I explained yesterday why I think those were not actually
the cause of this dip, but simply narrative fuel helping sophisticated buyers take advantage
of what was an inevitable correction after such a massive move up.
But if that price was the short-term story,
I think that they're sitting right in front of our faces
was also the more significant medium-term story.
That's the story of the transition of the Biden administration
and what it's going to mean for this industry.
President Joe Biden was inaugurated on Wednesday,
meaning he is formally in go-mode.
He has signed an absolute flurry of executive orders,
many of which are meant to undo previous President Trump actions, and one of which was meant to freeze
last-minute Trump administration actions. For example, remember that whole boondoggle with FinCEN and self-hosted
wallets and it got the most comments that FinCEN had ever seen? That is now on ice, which is to be
celebrated. That said, it doesn't mean that everything is rosy for crypto. We don't know exactly
what this administration's treatment of Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies is going to be. There's some
concern after seeing Democrats introduce things like the Stable Act that it may not be particularly
friendly to crypto. I think for now the best tea leaves to read for what a Biden administration
might look like for the industry is to look to the appointments, to look to the specific people
who are being put in positions of power and influence. Let's first recap some of those we've discussed.
Probably the most airtime has gone to Janet Yellen. She's the former head of the Fed, who is now
the Treasury Secretary. We have her past statements from
back in the day around crypto and Bitcoin, but everyone has been waiting to see what the update was,
have her opinions changed or evolved. And this week, we got our first inclination. At her hearing,
she effectively said that crypto was mainly used for illicit transactions. In fact, it wasn't
just effective. That was exactly what she said. This, as you might imagine, arose ire from the
industry that has been trying to fight this narrative forever. Interestingly, on the same day that
those comments happened, Chainalysis issued its annual report, which showed that the
that in fact, the percentage of on-chain volume that was for crime in any sort of way was down
to 0.34% from 2.1% the year before, a tiny, tiny fraction of the overall activity. This compares
to the UN estimate that 2% to 5% of global GDP is used for illicit activity. Now, importantly,
Yellen walked these comments back pretty meaningfully in her written testimony, which I would
TLDR as, we want the good parts of crypto and fintech innovation, just not the bad. Some might argue that you
can't really hack it apart like that when it comes to an open permissionless censorship-resistant
technology. However, you have to think that it's a better starting point than just crypto is all
bad. Next on the list of people we might discuss is Gary Gensler, President Biden's choice for
SEC chairman. When it comes to Gensler, the reaction of the industry has been cautiously optimistic. On the one
hand, Gensler is not afraid to try to wrench the private sector into regulatory frameworks. He proved that
during his tenure at the CFTC. On the other hand, he has enough knowledge about this particular industry
that he has taught a course about Bitcoin and blockchain at MIT. In other words, he has a long
horizon of knowledge that gives us a base to have real discussions with. Basically, this industry might
still have some pretty fierce debates with Gensler, but hopefully they won't be about or come down to
fundamental misunderstandings about this space or underdeveloped knowledge around the technology.
Many investors want to be a part of the next bull run. Others seek to build their dream home,
finally launch that startup, or fund their education. Try Nexus's instant crypto credit lines
and borrow against any major cryptocurrency with no minimum or maximum withdrawal amounts,
no fees whatsoever, no credit checks, and flexible repayment. Not to mention, the APR starts at just
5.9%. Stay on top of your investment game. With Nexon,
And remember, it's your crypto, your credit, your choice.
Get started at nexo.io.
What about the Office of the CompTroller of the currency?
I'd be willing to bet that before Brian Brooks took this role last year, most of us hadn't
spent a moment thinking about this bank regulator.
I certainly hadn't.
Brooks, however, showed just how significant the role is.
With a number of guidance letters, he effectively transformed how bank
and federally regulated financial institutions can interact with stablecoins,
crypto custody, and blockchain as a settlement layer.
We're already seeing the impact of some of those changes with banks like Goldman Sachs,
historically anti-Crypto Goldman Sachs, reportedly getting into the game through crypto custody.
These changes that Brooks brought are some of the most important to watch,
given that some in Congress have straight up asked Biden to repeal them.
Brian Brooks' replacement looks to be Michael Barr,
the dean of the public policy school at University of Michigan. We don't know much about Barr in the context of
crypto, except that he joined the board of advisors of Ripple in 2015. Now, boards of advisors are as
fuzzy and wishy-washy a position as exists. And as I mentioned on the brief a couple days ago,
Barr has never tweeted about Ripple or crypto or even really Bitcoin other than a couple of retweets.
Presumably, however, if he joined the board of advisors six years ago, he's had at least passive
familiarity with the evolution of the space, which is more than you could say about a lot of folks
who might have gotten this job. But finally, I want to talk about a new character entering our game
that appears poised for an important role as the head of the CFTC. Former CFTC Chairman Heath
Tarbert was a very pro-crypto figure. During his tenure, he declared Ethereum a commodity, which was
something that his predecessor, Christian Carlo, had done for Bitcoin. Tarbert is stepping down
as chair, but will remain a commissioner, so that's a force for positive energy, even if he's not
at the head anymore. So what do we know about his likely replacement, Chris Brummer?
Brummer is a professor of international law at Georgetown and was nominated by President
Obama in 2016 and 2017 to be the CFTC commissioner. It never came to a floor vote,
however, and the nomination was eventually withdrawn when Trump took office. What was Chris doing
during this time that he wasn't at the CFTC? Well, for starters, he was editing a volume called
crypto assets, legal, regulatory, and monetary perspectives that featured a chapter by none other than
our very own Nick Carter. He also spent a ton of time addressing questions turned up by Facebook's
Libra. He was on dozens of shows discussing Libra. He's written a huge amount about digital
dollars and central bank digital currencies. He's hosted conversations with other central bank leaders.
Now, I've only had a chance to go over this output briefly, but if I had to make a rough estimate,
he seems to be in the Chris Giancarlo camp when it comes to a digital dollar.
As I mentioned, Chris Giancarlo is the former CFTC chair who is now leading the digital
dollar project, advocating for the U.S. to take a leadership position when it comes to
central bank digital currencies. Giancarlo's position is that the U.S. Constitution prevents
unlawful surveillance of people's assets and that because of that we desperately want the
world to have a U.S. digital dollar rather than, for example, a Chinese digital yuan, because
the U.S. won't be able to abuse their power for more surveillance. Skeptics might of course say that the
surveillance apparatus in this country hasn't necessarily always respected the Constitution,
but I think intellectually at least it's an important voice in the conversation about digital
dollars and central bank digital currencies. On his blog, Brummer has also written about other aspects
of the crypto industry. Here's a line I know many of you will love from a post about custody.
He writes, on the one hand are what can be described as the non-custodial wallets, though I prefer to describe it as self-custody.
Now, this sounds like a small thing, but self-custody is an idea that is much more protected.
Having ownership over our own property, not being forced to have someone else hold it for us is an intrinsic right that Americans expect.
A lot of what former Secretary Mnuchin was trying to do with his last-minute rule was minimize self-custody,
in part by reframing the language to this non-custodial non-hosted wallets.
You have to think that's a positive indication for both Brummer's depth of understanding of this space,
but also where he stands vis-à-vis the rights of the individual and what crypto assets do for them.
We don't know for sure that Brummer will actually be nominated,
but it was reported by Reuters and they tend not to push out things that they're not pretty convinced of, at least.
What's more, we don't know how someone would behave in the context of a leadership position like this,
even if they've written about it on their blog.
But again, it would be another agency head
who at least had tried to engage deeply and thoughtfully
with this industry for years before being called to do so
in a regulatory capacity.
Seems to me like if we get one of those at the IRS as well,
we've got kind of a clean sweep
when it comes to at least good partners to be engaging with.
There are plenty of reasons to be pessimistic
about any sort of interaction between Bitcoin and governments and crypto and states,
but for me at least it feels a little bit cautiously optimistic just based on who we've seen
in positions of power so far.
Anyways, guys, looking forward to keeping an eye on this with you.
I hope you're having a great weekend.
Until tomorrow, be safe and take care of each other.
Peace.
