The Breakdown - Are We Headed to the Mar-a-Lago Accords?
Episode Date: April 9, 2025The Trump Admin has made clear that they end game for tariffs is a total restructuring of the global economic order. As countries start to come to the negotiating table, are we headed for a Bretton Wo...ods 2.0? A Mar-a-Lago accord? Sponsored by: Crypto Tax Calculator Accurate Crypto Taxes. No Guesswork. Say goodbye to tax season headaches with Crypto Tax Calculator: Generate accurate, CPA-endorsed tax reports fully compliant with IRS rules. Seamlessly integrate with 3000+ wallets, exchanges, and on-chain platforms. Import reports directly into TurboTax or H&R Block, or securely share them with your accountant. Exclusive Offer: Use the code BW2025 to enjoy 30% off all paid plans. Don’t miss out - offer expires 15 April 2025! Ledger Ledger, the world leader in digital asset security, proudly sponsors The Breakdown podcast. Celebrating 10 years of protecting over 20% of the world’s crypto, Ledger ensures the security of your assets. For the best self-custody solution in the space, buy a LEDGER™ device and secure your crypto today. Buy now on Ledger.com. Enjoying this content? SUBSCRIBE to the Podcast: https://pod.link/1438693620 Watch on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/nathanielwhittemorecrypto Subscribe to the newsletter: https://breakdown.beehiiv.com/ Join the discussion: https://discord.gg/VrKRrfKCz8 Follow on Twitter: NLW: https://twitter.com/nlw Breakdown: https://twitter.com/BreakdownNLW
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome back to The Breakdown with me, NLW.
It's a daily podcast on macro, Bitcoin, and the big picture power shifts remaking our world.
What's going on, guys? It is Tuesday, April 8th, and today we are talking about the Mar-a-Lago Accords.
Before we get into that, however, if you are enjoying the breakdown, please go subscribe to it, give it a rating, give it a review, or if you want to dive deeper into the conversation, come join us on the Breakers Discord.
You can find a link in the show notes or go to bit.ly slash breakdown pod.
All right, friends, well, stocks continue to digest the implications of tariff policy, but are no longer in freefall.
Yesterday's trading session didn't, after all, feature a Black Monday-style crash, but that doesn't mean that volatility has calmed down.
The opening saw a small sell-off followed by a tepid rebound, and suddenly, at around 10 a.m., the S&P 500 gained 3.4% in seconds.
Bloomberg characterized the news as coming from an obscure social media account who tweeted,
Hasett says Trump is considering a 90-day pause in tariffs for all countries except China.
Kevin Hassett being the director of Trump's Council of Economic Advisors.
The so-called obscure social media account was none other than news aggregator Walter Bloomberg.
Crypto Twitter is very familiar with his news summaries, which range from extremely helpful
to downright misleading. In either case, his tweets are always algorithm bait, and many crypto
traders have been blown out of leverage positions by a stray headline.
This headline captured the attention of Wall Street and was repeated on CNBC's telecast,
but later turned out to be deeply misleading.
Ten minutes later, the White House called the report fake news, and the market reverted in
an instant. As you may know, all Walter Bloomberg does is published a news feed from a Bloomberg
terminal. The headline was based on Reuters reporting on a CNBC characterization of a Fox News interview
with Hacet, so we're talking really about three degrees of distortion here. The actual source had
Hassett responding to a question about a 90-day pause by stating, I think the president is going
to decide what the president is going to decide. Peter Tuckman, a senior trader at Trade Moss,
who witnessed the event from the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, said that when traders,
quote, realized this headline wasn't right, everything sold off again. Now, every
everyone is getting their butts kicked. This is madness. Justin Wiggs, the managing director in equity
trading at Stiefel Nicholas added, the velocity of the moves was just staggering. It felt
swifter than anything I ever experienced during COVID and the financial crisis on a trading desk.
Chris Murphy, the head of derivative strategy at Susquehanna commented, the upside risk is just as scary
when markets rip 8% on a truth social post or false headline. This is one of the most volatile
events in stock market history and traders have a mandate to participate. But that doesn't mean
that anyone is having any fun. David Newhouse or the founder of Livermore Partners said,
I would say it's classic market chaos right now.
Unless you're ahead of the curve on the headline, you're not going to make any money.
I'm holding tight right here, watching for things to die down to determine whether it's a
buying opportunity or time to get out.
On behalf of all the crypto traders who have been whipsod by errant tweets over the years,
all I'll say to the Wall Street folk is welcome to the party.
The trading session ended with both major indices basically flat on the day.
Volatility remains at a five-year high, but for now the S&P 500 is only down 17% from all-time highs,
narrowly avoiding a technical bare market. The same can't be said for crypto assets, with total
crypto market cap now down 30% from the December peak. Yes, indeed, the first crypto president
has managed to cut the value of the asset class by a third in his first three months in office.
Bitcoin and most of the majors actually had a pretty decent showing on Monday. Bitcoin regained
80,000 on a 2.5% gain, and most major all coins had solid single-digit percentage gains.
On-chain analyst checkmady sees the light at the end of the tunnel, tweeting,
almost 100% of short-term holder supply is now underwater and holding losses.
This represents over 25% of the Bitcoin supply.
We've now reached the lower bound of the 75K to 86K air pocket I started describing back in December.
Wild times, folks, sit tight.
Considering many were expecting a 20% crash, circuit breakers going off all day,
and utter devastation for the stock market,
things could be a lot worse.
Most of the damage was limited to active Wall Street traders trying and failing to keep
up with markets moving at Twitter speed.
Still, the bounce on Walter Bloomberg's tweet demonstrates that everyone
is hanging out for a conclusion to this self-imposed crisis. Speaking of which, yesterday also featured
the start of global negotiations on trade, and unfortunately things aren't going so well so far.
The EU has proposed a zero-for-zero deal on industrial goods where both parties reduce their
tariffs to zero and commit to free trade. When asked if eliminating all tariffs was enough,
Trump told the media, no it's not, they're screwing us on trade. Assuming no deal can be reached,
the EU is also preparing to retaliate with 25% counter-tariffs. They will target a range of
U.S. goods, including diamonds, eggs, dental floss, sausages, and poultry. Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu met with Donald Trump at the White House to do his deal in person.
Israel had already eliminated all tariffs against the U.S. ahead of last Wednesday's announcement,
but were still hit with 17 percent tariffs. Netanyahu pledged to go further, stating,
we're going to also eliminate trade barriers, a variety of trade barriers that have been put up
unnecessarily. This doesn't seem to have been enough for Trump, who said he wouldn't pause Israeli
tariffs. In comments to the media, he said, we're not looking at a pause. We have many, many countries
that are coming to negotiate deals with us, and they're going to be fair deals. In certain cases,
they're going to be paying substantial tariffs. There will be fair deals. We've been ripped off
and taken advantage of by many countries over the years and can't do it anymore. The traditional
joint press statement was canceled, which is never a good sign in foreign relations.
One of the few nations not coming to the table is China. Yesterday, a Beijing military
spokesperson said, if the United States follows through with escalating its tariff measures,
China will resolutely take countermeasures to safeguard its own interests. The so-called reciprocal
tariffs imposed by the United States on China are entirely groundless and constitute a typical act of
unilateral bullying. China had already imposed a 34% counter-tariff on Sunday. Trump responded with an
additional 50% tariff bringing the total over 100%. Simultaneously, Beijing had slowly begun to weaken the
yuan, with the soft peg floating up over the past few days. Yesterday saw the yuan traded a new post-financial
crisis high of 7.3 to the dollar. It is becoming clear to folks that Trump should be taken seriously
and literally when he frames the actual trade deficit rather than tariffs as the problem.
The EU and numerous other countries have now proposed completely free trade, but that doesn't
seem to come anywhere close to satisfying the president. In an interview with CNBC, White House Trade
Advisor Peter Navarro explained how he sees the world, stating, let's take Vietnam. When they
come to us and say, we'll go to zero tariffs, that means nothing to us because it's the non-tariff
cheating that matters. Navarro included the examples of Chinese products being routed through
Vietnam, intellectual property theft, and a value-added tax on domestic consumption.
The point here is that the administration views a wide range of policies aside from tariffs as
quote-unquote cheating and views the trade deficit itself as the quote-sum of all cheating.
Now, not everyone in the administration is quite as intransigent as Navarro.
Yesterday, Secretary Scott Besson tweeted,
following a very constructive phone discussion with the government of Japan,
the president has tasked me and the U.S. trade representative to open negotiations
to implement the president's vision for the new golden age of global trade with Prime Minister
Ashiba and his cabinet.
Japan remains among America's closest allies and I look forward to our other.
upcoming productive engagement regarding tariffs, non-tariff trade barriers, currency issues, and
government subsidies. I appreciate the Japanese government's outreach and measured approach to this
process. Now, one of the major critiques of the tariff policy is that the objective isn't clear.
Ben Hunt of Epsilon Theory tracked the narratives around the tariff as they evolved. He found
that reshoring manufacturing, protecting domestic industry, and replacing the income tax
were big narratives at the beginning of the year. More recently, the narrative has evolved to include
border protection, pressuring other countries to lower their tariffs, and forcing allies to pay
for their own defense. Some of these narratives are contradictory, and it's not at all clear if the desired
outcome is zero tariffs in free trade or heavy protectionism with sky-high tariffs in place.
If reshoring manufacturing is the goal, then it's going extremely poorly so far.
News articles are replete with examples of capital-intensive projects being canceled or postponed
due to uncertainty and cost-overruns. For companies that don't already have facilities in the U.S.,
reshoring involves imported construction materials and machinery, which are all impacted by tariffs.
Bloomberg is now reporting that administration officials are debating the merits of an exporter tax credit
to negate the harm of tariffs on the manufacturing sector. The credit would compensate them for the cost of retaliatory tariffs imposed as a result of this trade war.
Trump enacted a similar policy during his first administration to compensate farmers for Chinese tariffs on ag products.
Estimates vary as many of the programs were at-hoc, but it appears that over $30 billion was spent to bailout farmers.
Spencer Hakeemian of Tulu Capital Management commented,
and here come the bailouts to keep these companies afloat.
So not only will American consumers pay the tariffs, but American taxpayers will now be bailing
out American companies to keep them afloat. Economic illiteracy of the highest degree.
Now, of course, reasonable people can differ on whether support for the manufacturing sector is worth
it. But I think that the policy being decided on the fly, rather than as part of some pre-existing
plan, speaks to the general sense of how the tariff rollout is being handled.
Today's episode is brought to you by Crypto Tax Calculator.
If you're looking for accurate crypto taxes with no guesswork, check out Crypto Tax Calculator.
get accurate CPA-endorsed tax reports with full support for IRS rules.
For those who have fallen down the on-chain rabbit hole,
CTC has you covered with more than 3,000 integrations.
They have full support for defy staking in NFTs.
Import directly to TurboTax or H&R block or share securely with your accountant.
Create an account, import your sources, and review. It's that easy.
Hello, friends. I am thrilled to share that Ledger is once again
partnering and sponsoring with The Breakdown.
Many of you know, but for those of you who don't, Ledger is the most secure hardware wallet for your
crypto and logins. It's trusted by 7 million users and secures 20% of the world's digital assets.
What's more, Ledger is a lot more than wallets. Over the recent years, they've built a comprehensive
ecosystem of products and services, all of which are designed to make digital ownership
more secure and accessible. You can buy your Bitcoin with Ledger and Ledger Live, and so much more.
Basically, not only did they want to keep your assets secure, they want you to be able to do more
with them. Ledger's newest devices, the Ledger Stacks and Ledger Flex introduced the world's first
secure touchscreens, making it easier and safer to manage your transactions and assets.
Alongside Ledger Stacks and Ledger Flex, the company also launched the Ledger's security
key app, offering a safer alternative to traditional passwords and enhancing your digital
security. If you are in this space, you owe it to yourself to at least check out Ledger
and their ecosystem what they have available to you. So thanks once again to Ledger for sponsoring
the show.
Meanwhile, political support for Trump's tariff agenda appears to be collapsing.
In late March, a Wall Street Journal opinion poll found that 77% of Republicans thought tariffs
would be beneficial and help create U.S. jobs.
However, according to a Ugove poll conducted at the end of last week, 42% of Republicans agreed
with the statement, voters understand tariffs or taxes they'll pay on anything from abroad,
and they'll hold Republicans responsible.
TLDR, Republican voters are still generally in favor of tariffs, but they recognize there
will be consequences at the ballot box. Several large donors, meanwhile, are starting to get extremely
outspoken. We already covered Bill Ackman calling for a 90-day pause to reconsider the policy.
Now Ken Ligone, the co-founder of Home Depot, is giving some incendiary quotes. He said the 46%
tariff on Vietnam was BS, and he didn't censor that, and that the additional tariffs on China
were, quote, too aggressive, too soon, and don't give serious negotiations a chance to work.
He commented, I don't understand the goddamn formula. I believe he's been poorly advised by his
advisors about this trade situation. Elon Musk, meanwhile, has been tweeting clips of Milton Friedman
advocating for free trade over recent days, seemingly breaking with the Trump camp on this issue,
and Stan Drucken Miller, the mentor of Secretary Besant, weighed in in a rare Twitter post, stating,
I do not support tariffs succeeding 10%, which I made abundantly clear. This was in response to a stock
trading influencer implying that Druck is in favor of using these tariffs to increase revenue.
Now, Trump himself doesn't need the support of these wealthy donors, assuming that we're not
going to try to get elected for an unconstitutional third term, but there are, of course,
many Republican lawmakers who could be out of a job after the midterms if this policy doesn't work
out well. Now, one way that this could all end is if Congress reasserts itself and takes away the
keys from the president. The bipartisan Senate bill is being pushed that would require congressional
approval for any tariffs and allow the Congress to end tariffs at any time. Seven GOP senators
have signed on to the bill. A statement of White House policy issued yesterday said,
if passed, the bill would dangerously hamper the president's authority and duty to determine our
foreign policy and protect our national security. It added that the president would veto the bill
if it lands on his desk. Senate Majority Leader John Thune told the media,
I don't think that has a future. The president has indicated he will veto it. I don't see how they
get it to the floor on the House. He added that Senate Republicans haven't discussed the legislation,
but he thinks that lawmakers are largely, quote, waiting to see what's going to happen next.
And so, it doesn't really seem like political pressure, negotiation, or Congress are going to bring
into tariffs, so what would the resolution look like, assuming Trump continues to take his plan
to fruition? Tumath Palahapatia of the All In podcast tweeted,
My current best view, Trump lets tariff reactions play out for a few weeks, sees the trend of
capitulations, and is emboldened to keep going. He fields offers from everyone, negotiates with no
one, then brings everyone to Mara Lago in a month or two and puts an offer on the table.
Breton Woods 2.0. It's simpler and more effective to have one grand bargain than negotiate piecemeal
with 80-plus countries. I'm focused on figuring out what terms matter most for the Mar-a-Lago Accords.
I have a few in mind, which are obvious and would king make the U.S. I don't buy this whole
end of U.S. hegemony. This is the moment to go for the jugular and establish world order
around America. Now, the Mar-a-Lago Accords were an idea put forward in a paper by
Council of Economic Advisors Chair Stephen Moran last year, called a user's guide to restructuring
the global trading system. The paper advocated for slow and escalating use of tariffs to
slowly rebalance global trade. That part isn't playing out the way that Moran drew it up,
but the rest of the paper has some insights into what the endgame could look like.
Moran's key point is that the U.S. has provided a security umbrella and financial stability
in the form of the global reserve currency without compensation for decades.
Yesterday, Moran made a speech at the Hudson Institute laying out the administration's demands.
He explained that the global public goods of the security umbrella and the global reserve
currency are costly to maintain and called on the world to sign on to burden sharing.
Moran said, President Trump has made it clear that he will no longer stand for other nations
free riding on our blood, sweat, and tears, whether in national security or trade.
Now, the cost of maintaining global security are obvious measured in the sacrifices of the men and
women in uniform. But regarding the financial side, Moran commented, the reserve function of the
dollar has caused persistent currency distortions and contributed along with other countries' unfair
barriers to trade to unsustainable trade deficits. These trade deficits have decimated our
manufacturing sector and many working class families in their communities to facilitate non-Americans
trading with each other. Emphasizing the N. Goel Moran stated,
the best outcome is one in which America continues to create global peace and prosperity
and remain the reserve provider, and other countries not only participate in reaping
the benefits, but also participate in bearing the costs. By improving burden sharing,
we can enhance resilience and preserve the global security and trading system for many decades
into the future. He specifically listed five forms of burden sharing countries could adopt.
First, accepting tariffs without retaliation, acknowledging that this is payment to finance
these global public goods. Second, to open their markets and buy more from America.
which he framed to stopping unfair and harmful trading practices,
third, boosting defense spending and procurement from the U.S.,
fourth, investing in factories in America,
or fifth, finally, simply writing a check payable to the U.S. Treasury.
Some are comparing this to the Nixon speech in 1971,
when the president closed the gold window and ended the first Breton-wood system.
Bloomberg researcher Stephen Hu said that the speech,
quote, represents one of the most concise and clearest articulation
of the Trump administration's worldview.
As far as I can tell, they think of the Pax-America global order
as a club membership, for which the U.S. has under charge for the past few decades.
Basically, they want to charge a membership fee to pay for the global order system.
This is a massive change to the global order, but if there's some silver lining,
it sounds like it's more a radical reform than a total abandonment of Pax Americana,
and at least as per this speech, not a total decoupling either.
Damien Ma, the managing director of think tank macro-polo China, wrote
that Moran's speech is at least clear about their logic and POV.
That is, everyone has been more or less free-riding on American beneficence for like 50 years.
If you want to ride it any longer, you got a pony up for it.
We live in a subscription-based world.
That is the latest for now. We'll see if we have some crypto news tomorrow. For the moment,
everything is tariffs all the time. Appreciate you listening as always. And until next time,
be safe and take care of each other. Peace.
