The Breakdown - [CORRECT] Fed Minutes Slam the Door on Rate Cuts—Bitcoin Hits New Lows
Episode Date: November 22, 2025The latest Fed minutes show a deeply divided committee but a clear signal: no December rate cut is coming. Markets reacted fast, sending Bitcoin tumbling to new lows as leveraged traders piled in and ...ETF investors pulled out. NLW unpacks what the minutes reveal about the economy, why rate expectations are shifting, and how this is shaping crypto’s end-of-year outlook—including Kraken’s IPO filing and a major Bitcoin bet from Abu Dhabi. Enjoying this content? SUBSCRIBE to the Podcast: https://pod.link/1438693620 Watch on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TheBreakdownBW Subscribe to the newsletter: https://blockworks.co/newsletter/thebreakdown Join the discussion: https://discord.gg/VrKRrfKCz8 Follow on Twitter: NLW: https://twitter.com/nlw Breakdown: https://twitter.com/BreakdownBW
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome back to The Breakdown with me, NLW.
It's a daily podcast on macro, Bitcoin, and the big picture power shifts remaking our world.
What's going on, guys? It is Thursday, November 20th, and today we are talking about the Fed Minutes sending Bitcoin to a new low.
Before we get into that, however, if you are enjoying the breakdown, please go subscribe to it, give it a rating, give it a review, or if you want to dive deeper into the conversation, come join us on the Breakers Discord.
You can find a link in the show notes or go to bit.ly slash breakdown pod.
Well, friends, the Bitcoin drawdown continues as Fed Minutes took rate cuts completely off the table.
Minutes for the October FOMC meeting were released on Wednesday and made it clear that a deeply
divided Fed is not likely to cut in December. The minutes underscored the two-sided risks in the
economy, with several members pointed to slowing job numbers and depressed labor demand,
as signs the economy could be heading into a steep downturn. On the other side, many committee
members noted that inflation hasn't shown any signs of returning sustainably to 2%, with tariff shocks and
sticky prices for services still an issue. Mostly, the meeting seemed to demonstrate a two-sided
outlook on the committee itself. The Minutes said that only several participants said further
rate cuts would be warranted to move policy closer towards neutral. However, many argued that
rates should remain on hold for the remainder of the year. The Minutes stated, in discussing
the near-term course of monetary policy, participants expressed strongly differing views about
what policy decisions would most likely be appropriate at the committee's December meeting.
Now, none of this is particularly shocking given how the October meeting played out. That decision to
cut rates featured two dissents, with one member preferring to cut by 50 basis points and another
preferring to hold rate steady. During his press conference, Jerome Powell frequently referred to a
deep division on the committee, saying at the time, there is a growing chorus now of feeling like
maybe this is where we should at least wait a cycle. Renaissance macro research wrote,
The minutes shown what we've known. The hawks are more hawkish than the doves are dovish.
To the extent that there's new information, it's simply that the committee is leaning heavily
towards a rate pause. By a quick headcount based on public statements, it seems that only
governors Miran, Waller, and Bowman are strongly in favor of a cut in December. Three regional Fed
presidents with a vote in December have expressed a desire to hold rate steady, and the remaining
three voting members, including Powell, seemed to be leaning towards a rate pause. In the language
of the Fed minutes, the many outweigh the several, and this release was enough for the markets to take
a December rate cut cut off the table. The CME Fed Watch tool had a rate cut price that around 44%
on Wednesday morning, by the evening markets were pricing just a 32% chance of a cut. Part of
the issue compounding all of this will be a lack of data heading into December's meeting.
The October jobs report is canceled due to the government shutdown, and the November report
won't be available until the morning of the meeting.
Richmond Fed President Tom Barkin remarked on this issue on Wednesday stating,
Without compelling data, it's actually hard to get people who have pre-existing perspectives
to all come to consensus.
You could argue it out, and maybe that's what we'll do.
In the meantime, the sharp repricing of rate expectations sent Bitcoin for another tumble.
Price action had been fairly weak on Wednesday morning, but plunged to 88,500 on release of
the minutes.
It's now clear that the Fed isn't riding to the rescue to end the year, so Bitcoiners will
need to put a floor on this market themselves. Velti Lunday of K-33 research is skeptical, with traders preferring
leveraged bets to the kind of spot buying that can actually form a bottom. In a research note on Wednesday,
he noted that Perp's open interest had seen its largest weekly growth since April 2023. In combination
with a rising funding rate, Lunday said this looked like knife-catching behavior rather than defensive
positioning. He wrote, the growing funding rates likely stem from resting limit orders being filled
in hopes of a swift bounce with prices pushing below six-month lows. However, no bounce has materialized,
and now, this leverage represents excess overhang, increasing risks of amplified volatility driven
by liquidations. The market structure was enough to change his view on a recovery, with him adding,
while we have been vocally bullish in the early stages of this downtrend, we view this as a
sufficiently dangerous omen, making the case for reducing overall risk. Lundia is now looking
for a bottom around $85,000 or failing that at $74,500, which coincides with the April
bottom and micro-strategy's average cost basis. Now, while leverage crypto traders were trying to catch
the falling knife, ETF investors were simply getting out of the way. The Bitcoin ETFs have seen
a staggering $3 billion in redemptions this month, putting them on track for their worst month
since launch. February of this year is the current record holder with $3.5 billion in redemptions.
BlackRock's Ibit saw its worst day of outflows this Tuesday, with over half a billion
redeemed in a single day. Yet, it's not all bad news. On Wednesday, the Bitcoin ETF saw
inflows for the first time in a week. It was only a tiny $75 million, but that's much better than
the persistent nine-figure outflows that had become the norm. Legacy internet and infrastructure
are brittle, plagued by downtime, coverage gaps, and outdated financing models. Communities and builders
are left behind while capital sits locked out. Althea is changing that. Since 2018, their technology
has powered resilient, sustainable networks across the U.S. and abroad. With Althea L1, they built the
world's first blockchain purpose built for utilities and telecom, turning infrastructure into a
transparent, investable asset class. Through liquid infrastructure, networks can now be financed in real time,
operated more efficiently and scaled to meet the $3 trillion-dollar telecom and utilities market.
This is fintech for infrastructure, connecting capital directly to builders and returning revenue
seamlessly to funders. No middlemen, no bottlenecks, just sovereign, resilient infrastructure
that works for people, communities, and investors alike. Learn more at althea.net and find them
on Crackin to join the future of infrastructure finance. Outside of markets, there's actually
a fair bit of good news to turn to. In Washington, Senate Banking Chair Tim Skye,
has said he's hopeful about getting the market structure bill ready to move forward in December.
He told Fox Business, next month we believe we can mark up in both committees and get this to the
floor of the Senate early next year, so that President Trump will sign the legislation making America
the crypto capital of the world. The bill saw a major breakthrough two weeks ago with the Senate
Ag Committee pushing a bipartisan discussion draft. There's still a lot of issues left to negotiate,
but the draft was a promising indication that the two parties were ready to come to the table.
Also in the Senate, Mike Selik has sat for his confirmation hearing as CFTC chair.
The nomination process for this position has been a bit of a saga, with A16Z head of policy
Brian Quintends put up by the administration and then knocked down by a public campaign,
including notably from the Winkle Boss Twins. That means the CFTC has been without a confirmed
chair for the first 10 months of the administration, crimping their ability to move crypto policy
forward. Selig, meanwhile, is an uncontroversial choice among crypto industry folks.
He's a crypto lawyer who worked through the past cycle for Wilkie Far. He tends to have a thoughtful
and academic view on crypto issues, generally seen as a subject matter expert and consummate
professional. Making his pitch to the Senate Ag Committee, he said, we need clear simple guidelines,
we need consumer protection, and we need to stop with the regulation by enforcement. This is a real
opportunity to develop a framework that can allow software developers to thrive for new exchanges
to crop up that are going to protect investors and have the type of controls that you would expect
in an exchange. Committee Chair John Boosman questioned Selig about his preferred approach to defy,
which has been one of the big sticking points in negotiations around the market structure bill.
Selig responded, when we're thinking about defy, it's something of a buzzword, but really we
should be looking to on-chain markets and on-chain applications and thinking about the features of
those applications, as well as where there's an actual intermediary involved. On the Democrat side,
Selig didn't face any personal concerns. Instead, the issues raised were largely about how the
CFTC has operated this year. Ranking Senator Amy Klobuchar noted that zero commissioners are
currently in place, and there's no guarantee that the administration will appoint any Democrats at
all. Selig hedged his response, stating that it's, quote, very valuable to have a diversity of
viewpoints and that he would, quote, work with whoever the president chooses to appoint.
CFTC funding was also repeatedly raised by Democrats. The CFTC has just 540 staff, around a quarter of the
size of the SEC, so there's concerns it won't have the workforce to adequately police crypto markets.
Selig didn't want to rock the boat, stating that he would be better placed to make a judgment on funding
once he's installed as chair. Overall, the hearing seemed to be very uncontroversial when it came to
crypto. The vote should take place over the coming days, so hopefully we'll soon have a new
CFTC chair and the agency can get moving on crypto policy. In institutional news, new disclosures
show that the Abu Dhabi Investment Council tripled their Bitcoin position last quarter,
the Sovereign Wealth Fund now holds around $500 million worth of Ibit.
We've seen several of the institutions that popped Bitcoin earlier in the year scale up their
position, notably the Harvard Endowment tripled their holdings to around $440 million.
But the disclosure from the Abu Dhabi Investment Council is a rare glimpse into the secretive
fund.
They invest mostly in private equity, infrastructure and real estate, and we have very limited
knowledge about the makeup of their portfolio.
Even more rare, Bloomberg managed to get an on-the-record statement from the fund about
how they think about Bitcoin. An ADIC spokesperson said, we view Bitcoin as a store of value similar to
gold, and as the world continues to move more towards a digital future, we see Bitcoin playing an
increasingly important role alongside gold. Both assets contribute to diversifying our portfolio,
and we expect to hold them as part of our near- and long-term strategy. Nothing we haven't heard
before, but this could be a glimpse into how the top tier of Middle Eastern fund managers view Bitcoin.
Lastly today, Cracken has filed for an IPO. In a Wednesday, notice Cracken said that they had
confidentially filed their IPO paperwork with the SEC. The filing comes shortly after news broke of
800 million in new fundraising that took their valuation to 20 billion. That was the first publicly
announced fundraising in many years, so it set an independent market value for the company.
Interestingly, co-CEO Argent Sethy had been fairly noncommittal about going public. Earlier this month,
he said that Cracken won't, quote, race to the door as quickly as possible to get an IPO done.
Now, the confidential filing process is relatively new and allows companies to have their paperwork
reviewed by the SEC without disclosing everything to the public. We therefore have,
have no knowledge of IPO timing, how many shares will be sold, or pricing. Multiple other crypto
companies have used this process earlier in the year, and there's typically a month or two between
the filing and the IPO. The time frame could be delayed by the SEC returning to work after the
government shutdown, but we can reasonably expect everything to be ready to go for early next year.
At the same time, Krakens' $800 million in fresh funding means that there's absolutely no
rush to go public, so if market conditions continue to slump, there's a possibility they could hold off.
If they do decide to go, however, everything is now in place for arguably what would be the biggest
crypto IPO of the cycle. So still a little gloomy out there, but there is more happening behind the
scenes. For now, that is going to do it for today's breakdown. Appreciate you listening as always,
and until next time, peace.
