The Breakdown - Hester Peirce Charts a New Course for the SEC
Episode Date: March 30, 2025In comments this week, SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce articulated the new path for the agency, including how it was going to deal with numerous jurisdictional issues. This shows just how forward focus...ed the crypto industry finally gets to be. Source: https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/speeches-statements/peirce-remarks-dc-blockchain-summit-032625 Sponsored by: Crypto Tax Calculator Accurate Crypto Taxes. No Guesswork. Say goodbye to tax season headaches with Crypto Tax Calculator: Generate accurate, CPA-endorsed tax reports fully compliant with IRS rules. Seamlessly integrate with 3000+ wallets, exchanges, and on-chain platforms. Import reports directly into TurboTax or H&R Block, or securely share them with your accountant. Exclusive Offer: Use the code BW2025 to enjoy 30% off all paid plans. Don’t miss out - offer expires 15 April 2025! Ledger Ledger, the world leader in digital asset security, proudly sponsors The Breakdown podcast. Celebrating 10 years of protecting over 20% of the world’s crypto, Ledger ensures the security of your assets. For the best self-custody solution in the space, buy a LEDGER™ device and secure your crypto today. Buy now on Ledger.com. Enjoying this content? SUBSCRIBE to the Podcast: https://pod.link/1438693620 Watch on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/nathanielwhittemorecrypto Subscribe to the newsletter: https://breakdown.beehiiv.com/ Join the discussion: https://discord.gg/VrKRrfKCz8 Follow on Twitter: NLW: https://twitter.com/nlw Breakdown: https://twitter.com/BreakdownNLW
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome back to The Breakdown with me, NLW.
It's a daily podcast on macro, Bitcoin, and the big picture power shifts remaking our world.
What's going on, guys? It is Sunday, March 30th, and that means it's time for Long Read Sunday.
Before we get into that, however, if you're enjoying the breakdown, please go subscribe to it,
give it a rating, give it a review, or if you want to dive deeper into the conversation,
come join us on the Breakers Discord. You can find a link in the show notes or go to bit.ly slash breakdown pod.
Hello, friends. Welcome back to another Long Read Sunday. This week we had the DC Blockchain Summit,
the eighth annual such event, and it was definitely a different tone than we'd seen in the past.
This one was all about practical actions, legislation that is coming to bear. It is so about moving
forward. And a great example of that was the remarks prepared by SEC Commissioner Hester Perce.
Now, Commissioner Perce has always been a calm, rational voice on crypto, even in the dark times of the
Gensler era. And now you can feel how unleashed she is. This speech is an absolutely dense look at
specific ways that the U.S. can move forward dealing with very particular issues. This is the
opposite of highfalutin. This could not be more practical. In the speech, Perce offers a lot of
thoughts about how to actually put new rules regulations into practice, thinking specifically about
potential jurisdictional challenges. So now I'm going to turn it over to an AI version of myself
to read Commissioner Pers's remarks, and then I'll come back and discuss them a little bit more.
Miles to go. Remarks before the Digital Chamber's eighth annual DC blockchain summit.
Before I begin, let me remind you that my views are my own as a commissioner, and not necessarily
those of the SEC or my fellow commissioners. The poems of Robert Frost, born on this day in 1874,
were among those that filled my childhood. I memorized, stopping by woods on a snowy evening,
a poem about a traveler, accompanied only by his hesitant horse, stopping to admire the falling snow
in the forest. Although lyrical verses of securities law have since largely displaced more
traditional poetry in my mind's cluttered recesses, the closing stanza of Frost's poem hangs on.
The woods are lovely, dark, and deep.
But I have promises to keep, and miles to go before I sleep, and miles to go before I sleep.
Other Frost poems might better capture the season, Springs' flowers are upon us,
and Crypto Winter has given way to a sometimes too-a-bullient season.
Nevertheless, Frost's desire to pause the journey to watch the falling snow cover the forest floor
resonates with me.
I would like the luxury of stopping for a moment or more to watch and think in quiet
solitude about what a beautiful regulatory framework would look like, but I have promises to keep
and miles to go before I sleep, so I am pondering in public as the commission and its staff are
working on building the framework. I invite you to join us in determining how to get from
regulatory desolation to a place where the crypto industry can blossom without the weeds of
fraud, grift, and market manipulation. Indeed, the public already has stepped up to assist in the
task. The Crypto Task Force has had many helpful meetings with outside parties, and we already
have received approximately 50 thoughtful written submissions. The Task Force's first public roundtable
last Friday was a productive conversation among thoughtful experts with varied views.
Additional roundtables are on the schedule. All of this engagement is extremely helpful,
as we consider how the Commission and its staff can provide clarity about what is outside
of our jurisdiction and practical compliance solutions for activities that are within our jurisdiction.
For example, as the discussion at our recent roundtable highlighted, the Commission needs to think
separately about transactions and assets that are the subject of transactions. Many crypto assets
themselves are not securities, but primary offerings of crypto assets for capital raising purposes
are securities transactions. Accordingly, staff is open to inquiries about how to conduct such
offerings as either registered or exempt transactions, and the task force welcomes well-reasoned requests
for no-action letters or exemptive relief that can be finalized quickly to allow activity to start
soon. Lessons learned from these short and medium-term efforts can inform longer-term regulatory
and legislative efforts. We also need to think now about the longer term and do so with open,
inquisitive minds. What type of regulatory framework should Congress and the regulators be crafting?
How do novel offering and trading technologies fit with our statutes? How can the transparency of the
blockchain, the automated operation of smart contracts, and other aspects of crypto technology
facilitate regulatory compliance? What new uses for crypto assets and the technology underlying them
will emerge, including uses outside the financial realm, particularly once the securities label
is not reflexively affixed to every crypto asset? Given all of these outstanding questions,
in regulating financial crypto, we ought not be bound by the way we have long-regulated existing
financial markets. We should welcome the opportunity to reevaluate existing regulation in the light of
these questions to ensure its appropriateness for both traditional and new markets. The SEC and other
regulators can provide technical advice and reflections such as those I offer today, but Congress,
not implementing agencies, writes the statutes. Two market structure bills from the last Congress,
the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act, Fit 21, which passed the House,
and the Lummus Gillibran Responsible Financial Innovation Act, which was introduced in the Senate,
are informing work during this Congress. Under both approaches, the SEC and the CFTC, each of which has
relevant experience, would have a role to play. As a potential implementer of the legislative design
who has lived through past implementation efforts involving multiple regulators, I cannot help but
pay attention to jurisdictional questions. The jurisdictional status quo is a challenge.
SEC, CFTC, FTC, FTC, OFAC, banking regulators, state regulators, FINRA, international regulators, and more
play a role in crypto regulation.
Overlapping jurisdiction can strain the brains, bank accounts, and briskness of both regulators
and market participants.
The overlap is likely only to get worse because crypto assets can represent anything from
cash to a financial instrument, like a security or a futures contract, to a work of precious
art. As a result, many different regulators will have an interest in regulating crypto as it intersects
with their jurisdiction. The risk of burdensome overlaps and conflicts is therefore real. Today's
episode is brought to you by Crypto Tax Calculator. If you're looking for accurate crypto taxes with no
guesswork, check out Crypto Tax Calculator. Get accurate CPA-endorsed tax reports with full support for IRS
rules. For those who have fallen down the on-chain rabbit hole, CTC has you covered with more than
3,000 integrations. They have full support for defy staking in NFTs. Import directly to TurboTax or
or H&R block or share securely with your accountant. Create an account, import your sources, and review.
It's that easy. Hello, friends. I am thrilled to share that Ledger is once again partnering
and sponsoring with the breakdown. Many of you know, but for those of you who don't, Ledger is
the most secure hardware wallet for your crypto and logins. It's trusted by 7 million users and
secures 20% of the world's digital assets. What's more, Ledger is a lot more than wallets.
Over the recent years, they've built a comprehensive ecosystem of products and services,
all of which are designed to make digital ownership more secure and accessible.
You can buy your Bitcoin with Ledger and Ledger Live and so much more.
Basically, not only did they want to keep your assets secure, they want you to be able to do
more with them. Ledger's newest devices, the Ledger Stacks, and Ledger Flex, introduced the
world's first secure touchscreens, making it easier and safer to manage your transactions and
assets. Alongside Ledger Stacks and Ledger Flex, the company also launched the Ledger Security
Key app, offering a safer alternative to traditional passwords and enhancing your digital security.
If you are in this space, you owe it to yourself to at least check out Ledger and their ecosystem
what they have available to you. So thanks, once again, to Ledger for sponsoring the show.
Congress can mitigate regulatory overload in a number of ways. First, as it seems inclined to do,
Congress can work with existing regulators rather than creating a new one. Second,
Congress can make clear that any new statute applies only domestically, which will focus
U.S. regulatory resources on platforms set up in the United States or reaching into the United
States to serve U.S. customers. Third, when interstate commerce is involved, as it clearly
is here, Congress can preempt state regulation over areas covered by federal regulators
to alleviate overlap with 50 state regulators. Fourth, to reduce regulatory uncertainty
and the regulatory disputes that arise from such uncertainty,
Congress can clearly assign jurisdiction over particular types of crypto assets
to particular federal regulators.
These four approaches to minimizing jurisdictional overlap are pretty straightforward.
Three other approaches for mitigating burdens in a crowded regulatory field
are a bit more involved.
The fifth way to mitigate burdens would permit flexibility relating to where crypto assets can
trade.
For this discussion, let us assume that under new legislative authority,
the CFTC will regulate platforms that trade either exclusively non-security crypto assets or a mix of
non-security crypto assets and other instruments already regulated by the CFTC. Congress could make clear
that a crypto asset sold in a primary transaction conducted pursuant, for example, to an SEC safe harbor,
could trade on secondary markets on a CFTC crypto asset trading platform unless the asset
itself, apart from the investment contract, is a security. While nothing in the SEC
statutes or regulations currently prevents non-securities from trading alongside securities,
some people might dispute the SEC's authority to regulate transactions that have no security
component, even if they occur on SEC regulated platforms. Congress could expressly authorize exchanges
and alternative trading systems, ATSs, regulated by the SEC to trade non-security crypto assets,
and give the SEC explicit authority to regulate these transactions. Congress could ensure that the
SEC's regulatory and enforcement authority extended to all transactions occurring on one of its registered
platforms. This approach would offer market participants the opportunity to decide where best
to house their crypto asset trading activities and would dispel difficult operational questions
about transitioning assets from one type of regulated platform to another. Customers would benefit, too,
as SEC registrants could have integrated backends for all the crypto assets, securities,
and non-securities that they make available to customers, potentially leading to increased
efficiencies and lower costs for end users. A sixth way Congress could mitigate the burden of regulatory
overlap is to apply lessons from the SECs and CFTC's regulatory experience in traditional markets
to the regulation of crypto assets and the platforms where they trade. We can draw on the principles
that have guided SEC and CFTC regulation over the past decades, while making changes where
appropriate to address the unique features and risks of these assets, and to excise extraneous
requirements that have accreted over the years without proportionate benefit for investors and
markets. Crypto-trading platforms could register as something more akin to an ATS than a national
securities exchange. Principles-based regulation would give them broad latitude in making
decisions about the products they offer for trading and how such products trade. Trading platforms
would be able to serve retail customers directly. Customer protections could include
include proof of reserves and exchange act rules 15C31 and 15C33 to protect custodied assets,
allowance of atomic settlement to remove credit and counterparty risks,
customer priority in bankruptcy and insolvency,
information barriers and other protections to guard customer trading information from
affiliates, employees, and other customers,
electronic disclosure of transaction costs,
and the provision of standardized material information about crypto assets by the trading platform.
regulators would have the ability to monitor and examine trading platforms and bring enforcement actions
for violations of customer protection rules, insider trading, and disclosure violations.
Finally, Congress can mitigate concerns about regulatory overlap and burdened by safeguarding
a basic American liberty, the right to transact with one's peers. Protecting people's ability
freely to interact directly with one another, including through software, will provide a healthy
check on regulatory accretion at centralized trading platforms and serve to acknowledge software
developers' First Amendment rights. Centralized intermediaries are not going away. Welcoming the
entrepreneurs who are building to disintermediate and decentralized finance is consistent with
fundamental American values. It also helps to appropriately calibrate regulation of centralized
intermediaries. If regulation of centralized intermediaries is too heavy, too light, or simply not
right, people will be able to use decentralized and disintermediated alternatives.
While this moment calls for us to think about crypto market structure, perhaps these discussions
also will help us to rationalize the regulatory framework for our traditional equity markets
that has grown in regulatory micromanaged complexity over the last 90 years.
Blockchain technology might even be an agent in that streamlining initiative.
But I will save those musings for a subsequent journey when there is time to stop and think
in the quiet solitude of an ivory tower.
As I mentioned at the outset, the task at hand requires greater alacrity and less solitude.
Although we have some hard miles ahead in our journey, together we can make rapid progress.
A well-crafted regulatory edifice lies just on the other side of the forest.
All right, back to Real NLW here.
So as I said, this was a dense speech.
This is the type of remarks where every sentence does some seriously heavy lifting and is not repeated.
And when I said the commissioner pursues off the leash, what I mean is that you can feel in this,
this intense desire to be practical, move forward, solve problems, and rock and roll with crypto in the
U.S. I do love that Hester at the end came back to this one big idea of safeguarding the right
to transact with one's peers. While yes, all of these jurisdictional issues are important,
and yes, the conversation has moved from the theoretical to the very highly practical and
specific, it is a good reminder that there is an underpinning around all of this that should keep
us rightly framed. Lastly, I am very excited for the tease that she gave at the end. This idea that
perhaps in our discussions of streamlining and improving the regulatory framework around crypto
and crypto market structure, we might pick up a few ideas that we could reapply to traditional
equity markets as well. That, of course, is the topic for another episode, another long read
Sunday sometime in the future. For now, appreciate you listening as always, and until next time,
be safe and take care of each other. Peace.
