The Breakdown - Jason Yanowitz and Michael Ippolito on the Most Important Stories of 2021
Episode Date: December 31, 2021This episode is sponsored by NYDIG. On the final episode of “The Breakdown’s” “End of Year Extravaganza,” NLW is joined by Jason Yanowitz and Michael Ippolito, the founders of Blockworks, ...a growing media company focused on the stories shaping the crypto space. Find our guests on Twitter: @JasonYanowitz @MikeIppolito_ Enjoying this content? SUBSCRIBE to the Podcast Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/podcast/id1438693620?at=1000lSDb Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/538vuul1PuorUDwgkC8JWF?si=ddSvD-HST2e_E7wgxcjtfQ Google: https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9ubHdjcnlwdG8ubGlic3luLmNvbS9yc3M= Join the discussion: https://discord.gg/VrKRrfKCz8 Follow on Twitter: NLW: https://twitter.com/nlw Breakdown: https://twitter.com/BreakdownNLW NYDIG, the institutional-grade platform for bitcoin, is making it possible for thousands of banks who have trusted relationships with hundreds of millions of customers, to offer Bitcoin. Learn more at NYDIG.com/NLW. - “The Breakdown” is written, produced by and features Nathaniel Whittemore aka NLW, with editing by Rob Mitchell, research by Scott Hill and additional production support by Eleanor Pahl. Adam B. Levine is our executive producer and our holiday theme music is “Spike The Eggnog” by Two Dudes. The music you heard today behind our sponsor is “Dark Crazed Cap” by Isaac Joel. Image credit: chekyfoto/iStock/Getty Images Plus, modified by CoinDesk.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
I think that this quote-unquote cycle will end with NFTs and Dow's getting way ahead of their skis,
which I think they kind of are, and a lot of the capital will rotate back into Defi.
And like the thing that I'm paying attention to right now is I think Defi is massively overlooked right now.
Like even just the boring old Defi 1.0.
I know there's Defi 2.0 and Rari and all these cool.
Defi 1.0 is massively overlooked right now.
Welcome back to The Breakdown with me, NLW.
It's a daily podcast on macro, Bitcoin, and the big picture power shifts remaking our world.
The Breakdown is sponsored by Nidig and produced and distributed by CoinDesk.
What's going on, guys? It is Friday, December 31st, and we have reached the end of the breakdowns end of your extravaganza.
Now, this has been an insane year on the show.
probably because it's been an insane year in the industry.
We had highs, we had lows, we had some of the most transformational moments in the history
of the crypto and Bitcoin space.
From El Salvador to the great hash rate migration, this has truly been something to observe.
Now, my guests today are Jason Yanowitz and Michael Epilito.
They're the co-founders of Blockworks,
and our two folks who I've watched in this space for years just continue to put
themselves and the people they work with around them to produce more interesting things,
to produce more interesting content, and to generally build an even healthier media space for
crypto, Bitcoin, and Macro Media. Given how much content they create and curate and have other
people create with their various publications and podcasts, it's no wonder that they have a really
interesting and diverse perspective to bring to these end of your questions. So join me in
welcoming Jason and Michael to the show, and let's get into it.
All right. What's going on? We are here with the Blockworks Boys, Michael. Jason, how are you guys? Welcome to the show. Blockworks Boys. All right. Blockworks boys. I heard that too. It's like we've never been called that. How have you never been called that? It seems so obvious. And I don't know.
Based to the trademark. DJ monitor. Yeah, there you go. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Well, either way, welcome to the show, guys. Super excited to have you. I think, you know, this should be super fun. Obviously, you guys are in a position to, you guys. You guys are in a position to, you know,
have a really wide-ranging view on the industry, and that's exactly what these conversations are
about. So let's dive right in, and let's start with what you think was the most important
story in crypto in 2021. And, Michael, I'll just start with you because you're on the left side of
my screen. Sure. So you just set a pretty high bar, and I'm going to say something super obvious.
But let me provide a little bit of nuance here, too. But I think the biggest most important thing to be
aware of in 2021 is just that the store value meme became a reality. And I think that Bitcoin became
a bona fide macro instrument. So that's obviously pretty obvious, right? We've all seen like the
money printer go burr memes and that kind of stuff. But I think it actually had a really important
takeaway, which is basically for the entirety of crypto and Bitcoin before this, most conversations
started off with what if Bitcoin goes to zero. And I think with the store value meme becoming cemented
in the institutional framework is nobody asked, what if Bitcoin goes to zero anymore? And if you think
about the average of Bitcoin's price being like everyone's collective opinion in this entire market,
then the what if Bitcoin goes to zero thing was dragging it down quite a bit. And basically,
now that no one thinks, hey, Bitcoin might not be worth $50,000, but it's definitely not worth
zero, then the entire floor for the industry has been reset to a higher bar. So overall, I think
by folks not asking that question anymore, what if Bitcoin goes to zero? It's allowed to say,
okay, well, Bitcoin is going to be a thing. It's here to stay. Now what's next? And I think if you
look at the over the course of 2021, Bitcoin has been a really important thing that's happened.
But if you look at a lot of the other interesting developments, it's been in the layer one space,
in this whole metaverse narrative, that kind of thing. I would piggyback on that. I think the most
important thing that's an interesting thing that's happened in crypto is just the diversification of
sectors. Like Nathan, I mean, you remember when there were three, there were three sectors in
crypto. It was basically Bitcoin, E, and like privacy coins, right? Like, we were excited about
like Monaro, right? And so, and I remember in like 2018 and 2019, the most interesting things,
it was like Pustody Solutions were launching. Like Anchorage was raising 10 million bucks. And now
you have different sectors, which is really, really interesting. You have DeFi, you have Metaverse,
you have these NFTs, you have Dow stuff popping up. And then also you have, I would tie that in with
the different layer ones actually got, there are real ETH competitors.
I don't want to call them ETH killers, but there are ETH competitors in 2017.
These were not, I would call them real.
And now they're actually real, things like Avalanche, things like Solana.
And that is further the sector diversification of the space.
How much do you guys think that the, how distinct, I guess, are the actual sort of subsectors versus permeable barriers?
I think this is relevant as people look at kind of, it's almost a way of asking like how much
do crypto Twitter debates actually reflect the real world?
As are, you know, are these things competing in some sort of zero-sum way or are they actually
emerging into distinct, you know, distinct use cases based on different tradeoffs?
I think there are a couple of different ways to answer that question.
I think, let's just say in extreme market, in like extreme volatility.
then all correlations go to one, right?
So I think in like a parabolic rise or something like that,
you'd see basically everything move up in a case of extreme fear
where like the bottom fell out of the market,
then everything would go down together.
That being said, I think there's inter, let's call it,
like competition that happens within sectors,
so intersection competition,
and then how these different sectors move in comparison
or relative to one another.
So I think, you know, how different sectors move relevant to one another.
I think you could see that they're actually very different.
There is diversification happening.
So if you look at blue chip defy, for instance, you could argue that that's been in something
that looks like a bear market for the last nine months or so.
Bitcoin has largely traded sideways.
I think it's been actually pretty good last six months for something like ETH.
The alternative layer ones have done extremely well over that period of time.
Metaverse assets have done extremely well.
So I do think you can look at basically, you know, chop up whatever time period you want,
like three months, six months, the last 12 months.
You can see different sectors of crypto performing very different.
I think within sectors, so like looking at something like Eith versus Solana versus Avalanche versus
Luna, whatever, I mean, maybe that's like the most interesting sector to look at. So those
performances do look pretty different. But I don't, I think those are all pretty correlated at this
point in time, to be honest. Like I think the timing would be pretty different. Like,
Heath had its run before, you know, Salana and Avalanche and Luna. But I think those are all pretty
similar, to be honest. So let me, let me frame it just slightly different. I think that all makes
sense. Are there any of these sectors that are or have the potential to be a set of users and
use cases that are really different? And maybe let's hone in on NFTs, because that's really the
interesting question to me in some ways. Are these all still crypto people who may be cycling
in and out of things and changing their perspectives, or do any of them have the potential to be a
really like kind of a breakaway group that doesn't care about other parts of the crypto industry?
I think if you approach it from that lens, you don't have sectors yet because I kind of see
NFTs right now. Eventually the use cases will evolve. NFTs right now are community gatekeepers.
And they kind of cross over and start working with what will eventually be social tokens as like the
currency of that community. And then like the wrapper around all of these things is oftentimes
Dows. And the place that they all live in is becoming the metaverse. It'll become really
tough to talk like right now people talk about crypto gaming and NFTs like they're different.
A year from now, that won't make sense because the assets within crypto games will be NFTs in the same
way that within Axi infinity, the axes are NFTs themselves. The other side of that argument, though,
is that, you know, look at what the NFTs are doing.
Like, I think that there are a lot, you know, FTCS is launching the thing with
Steph Curry.
Like, there are a lot of people who don't own any crypto assets except for an NFT.
And so that's the counterargument to what I'm saying, I think.
Yeah.
Do you have more, Michael?
No, no, I agree.
Yeah.
So I think it's super interesting.
So I guess to play this out more is, does it follow from that when we look at, for
example, these layer one battles, that there will actually be winners and losers, or is that not
the natural conclusion? Because there's a world in which there's a, you know, different use cases.
And I think maybe it's easier to think about the difference between something like Bitcoin,
which is obviously chosen extreme decentralization, focus on censorship resistance, all of that
sort of things, versus, for example, Layer 1, Heath competitors.
Heath kind of sits in the middle where it's competing on both axes or it's competing in both
directions where it sort of wants to be the base smart contracting layer of everything,
but it's also got this aspiration to be, you know, the kind of store value for the world.
You know, what's your perspective on where these things shake out?
Not in terms of who you think is going to win or anything, but what is the battle actually
going to look like?
Is everyone ultimately going to be competing when you add in layer twos for the same pie?
Or are there going to be different chains for different use cases?
Question of the year.
It's a rather big question.
I mean, this is like,
that's kind of the question of the year.
Yeah.
Once you figure out.
Answer that and then.
Yeah.
Let me know.
Yeah.
Yeah.
This is you start Blockworks Ventures
is answering that question.
Yeah,
well,
I mean,
let's ask it from the same way,
rather than putting you guys on the spot,
you spend a lot of time observing
the conversation around this as well, right?
You guys cover it through the digital publication.
You talk about it on your podcast.
What have you observed about that conversation over this year?
Perhaps how people's perceptions of that conversation have changed.
I mean, I can kind of present the two, the narrative, the way that I see it being framed,
at least on Twitter and different conversations right now.
So basically there's a lot of, I mean, even going back to 2017, 2018, there was a lot of emphasis
on this.
I think everyone has seen potential in kind of the smart contract base layer, right?
Everyone has kind of looked at that and said, okay, this makes sense fundamentally as an idea.
We think there's a lot of value that's going to be built on these things.
And the question has always been, is there just.
going to be one, right? Are the network effects going to play out in such a way that all values
just built on one kind of underlying protocol, or is there going to be this like multi-chain world,
right? And I think what you're starting to see is it's kind of stacking up as in like there are some
people who really support Ethereum and they say, okay, the, you know, whatever the, you know, the underlying
aspects of the ETH protocol is, this is where we want value to be built in, in this new world,
in this new crypto economy. And the reason why we want it to be built on Ethereum is because,
because it's been built with the principles of decentralization at the heart of everything.
And the way we're eventually going to scale that is by building these layer two solutions, right?
That's where most of the apps and users are actually going to eventually interface.
And in the meantime, there have been, you know, other layer ones that say, well, hey, we actually think we have good tradeoffs, better tradeoffs, actually, that we can, you know, build these platforms and compete with you today, essentially.
So that's how you've gotten, like, you know, Solana and Luna and Avalanche.
more recently, et cetera. And I think what's really interesting is that, you know, a lot of the
criticisms that are being levied at these new chains from the ETH community were literally word for
word levied at Ethereum, you know, back in the day. And I think you've seen kind of guys like
Suu come out and say, hey, not everyone thinks about Ethereum the way that you guys all do,
you know, you 2017 entrance, basically. I kind of think he's got a point. Like if you talk to a lot
of the people that came into this ecosystem in 2020 or 2021, they actually had this really unique thing
where they could come in and actually start using blockchains, right? They became users of these
protocols and it wasn't just like some hypothetical thing for them. And one thing that I've noticed
talking to some of these newer entrants is that they actually all still use Bitcoin or have Bitcoin
and kind of have bought into that narrative, but they don't really love Ethereum, actually,
because it hasn't been available for them to use when they first got into the ecosystem. So in the same way
where it's like Bitcoin's layer two solution was lightning. And even though it works, it's kind of like,
okay, but you're too late. We've all moved on to doing other things in the meantime. I think there is a
compelling, there's at least one very possible future where you're starting to see something like
that play out. And it's like, okay, well, layer two, ETH is going to take a while. And in the meantime,
I already really like operating on Solana or Avalanche or Luna or whatever it is. Yeah. No, it's, it's
super interesting. I've noticed some of the same thing in the conversation, which is, which I think
is fascinating. Probably has a lot to tell us about just the shifting value set of people who are in
this industry. Nighting sponsors this podcast, and they are the go-to Bitcoin company for banks and
credit unions as well as corporate treasuries, fintechs, and hedge funds. Learn more at nightig.com
slash NLW. That's nydig.com slash NLW. Let me move to some of the other kind of more big
picture questions as well. What's something that happened this year that you would have never
predicted? And Jason, we'll start with you. Um, something I mean, the NFTs is the obvious.
I feel like everything that happened this year, nobody predicted. I think NFTs are the really
obvious one. Like, I think NFTs, um, NFTs going completely mainstream. Never could have predicted that.
I mean, I remember when OpenC was like a barely making it super rare had raised a couple million bucks.
and was almost kaput, right?
And now to think that, like OpenC at some point,
we'll either IPO or like, I don't know,
it'll be a multi-billion dollar company right now.
And, you know, you've got all the,
every single celebrity taking NFTs mainstream.
I think that's my thing.
I also thought, I mean, DFI is really underperformed.
And I didn't see that coming.
I thought DFI would have done better this year,
than it did.
Do you think those two things are related to one another
in terms of just a limited number of people
who are kind of driving the attention in the space?
Yeah, I do, actually.
I think that a lot of attention right now has been,
the attention of the past 12 months has been on NFTs.
It's starting to cycle into DAOs and DAWS and both of those things in my mind are feeling
pretty frothy.
Like, I think that DAWS and NFTs, this, I mean, depends if we're in a super cycle
or what this cycle really is and like, what is the cycle really.
But like, I think that this quote-unquote cycle will end with NFTs and DAWS getting way
ahead of their skis, which I think they kind of are, and a lot of the capital will rotate back
into defy. And like the thing that I'm paying attention to right now is I think defy is massively
overlooked right now. Like even just the boring old defy 1.0. I know there's defy 2.0 and Rari
and all these cool. Defy 1.0 is massively overlooked right now. Michael, same question for you.
What's one thing that happened this year that you would have never predicted?
Facebook changing its name to meta, honestly.
I feel like that's a slept-on thing and people on our industry know and say, hey, that was a big deal because it kind of supports this like emerging metaverse narrative.
But just remember that when Facebook announced Libra, that was like that fired the starting gun on stablecoins.
I'm pretty sure when they did that, you know, the whole market cap for stable coins was like $4 billion or something back in 2019.
You know, fast forward 18 months later, it's $140 billion.
in market cap.
And, you know, there's still, like a lot of regulatory scrutiny that's getting centered
around stable coins in general.
I think a lot of lawmakers and people that thought, hey, this is like some fun experiment,
kind of woke up and it's like, wow, this is actually really quite serious.
And I think Facebook gave it that legitimacy and credibility because people know what Facebook's
capable of executing towards.
So I think when Facebook pivoted to meta, they said, we're going to invest $10 billion over
the course of the next year.
I feel like that's huge, actually. I don't really know what comes to that exactly, but it's
certainly legitimized the entire narrative. And I think it's going to make people in crypto wake up
and realize they have to compete against Facebook. There is that. So I don't know, I swear that this
question wasn't sort of meant to be apropos of that answer. But what do you think of the biggest
risks to the crypto industry in 2022? The obvious, I mean, I feel like everyone you invite on this is
going to say the same thing. It's regulation, right? You actually have said you have had different
answers for all of these than almost everyone I've had so far. Wow. All right. We're unique, Jason.
Yeah, there we go. I mean, the obvious one is regulation. And I guess maybe other people aren't saying that.
I think regulation is the biggest risk. And I think that's an obvious thing and we don't have to
dive into it too much. I think the other big risk is actually to go off Mike's point is Facebook,
building much faster than
crypto Metaverse can actually build
and just having more capital
and having the actual hardware to build.
I do worry that a risk to the crypto industry
could be Facebook building the Metaverse
faster than Crypto Metaverse can build
and the key for Facebook is do they allow it to be open?
Do they allow interoperability with ETH
and crypto-native things?
If they do that, Facebook's going to win the Metaverse battle.
I hate to say it, Facebook's going to win it.
if they allow access to things like E.
If they don't, then crypto has a chance because that's the value problem.
I was really surprised when Facebook or when meta became meta and everyone was like,
oh my God, this is like an amazing thing.
Like, woo.
I don't know.
I feel like people took it for granted right off the bat that it was like, oh, yeah,
Zuckerberg's going to, because there was like one line in the announcement about how we're
open to building on like open protocols or something like that.
It's like, what about Mark Zuckerberg's history suggests?
to you that this is a guy that just likes to build on top of other people's stuff and like share
the pie and all that kind of stuff. The DNA of Facebook is like we're going to build it and we're
going to own everything. I mean, they have like three billion users, right? The entire history of that
company has been making gigantic grabs like land grabs and successfully executing on that. So there's just
like nothing about the history of Facebook or the DNA of Mark Zuckerberg that suggests to me that
he's just going to become like this like good-natured community participant of the ecosystem and push
something forward for everyone. I'm like a little split on it, but I, it was surprising to me that
everyone just saw it as a good thing right off the bat instead of a competitor. I don't know.
I will say that it's rather notable to me that Libra kind of breathed its last breath for all
intents and purposes right around the same time that meta was announced.
What's something that you are paying attention to, that you're surprised that others aren't paying
as much attention to?
I think one thing that I'm honestly confused by but looking at and paying attention to that
no one I feel like is talking about is permission to defy.
On one hand, I'm like, oh my God, am I the enterprise blockchain guy from 2017, like
screaming about enterprise blockchains?
and I very much well might be very possible on the other hand I'm looking at like compound launching
their you know compound treasury for for institutions k yc aml right I'm looking at one inch announcing
that they're launching that they raised 175 million bucks for permission defy I'm looking at AVE arc right
which is a KYC AML version of Avey even on Solano right it's a soul rise is the first KYC decks that I'm
aware of so on one hand I'm like
it's either a Dex or it does KYC.
Like you don't do both.
But on the other hand,
I'm seeing all of these Tier 1 DFI projects
who want institutional capital
and they're launching KYC AMLDFI.
And then I'm talking to the institutional funds
saying we want to access things like AVE,
but we can't because our mandates don't let us
because we don't KYC AML.
If only they KYC AML does,
then we can access it.
So just permission defy is something I'm paying attention to.
Super interesting.
That leads us to the question that I'm ending on for all of these.
And obviously, we could go a lot longer because there's so much to dig into.
But what's a prediction that each of you guys has for next year?
And obviously, that can be about anything.
It's not a price prediction thing.
Who wants to take it first?
I can take it first.
I have got a little bit of a doomer prediction, actually.
And I think it's less likely that this ends up happening.
But there was a period of time where I was pretty convinced that if NFTs were able to
be used as collateral, that that would be the end of this bull market. And I can explain why that
is. I think most growth actually in crypto is some form of money illusion in the sense that,
typically like Bitcoin or more recently Bitcoin and ETH lead, everyone feels very wealthy in that
currency, Bitcoin, and then they chuck it into something else, right, the more speculative,
risky part of the market. In 2017, that was ICOs. In this cycle, it's been NFTs. So if you go back
to 2017, what happened in ICOs is that there was a force-selling dynamic, right, which eventually
kind of popped the bubble. So again, Bitcoin and ETH goes up. Everyone feels very wealthy.
They chucked that wealth into ICOs. The ICOs go even higher. Eventually, back then,
those ICOs actually had real-world operational liabilities, right? They had to pay for like
vendors. They had to pay salaries, whatever it was. And that created this force-selling dynamic.
And then, like, the whole bubble kind of went over like this. I think something very similar happened
with NFTs in this cycle, ETH went up like this.
Everyone was like, oh, that's a cool profile pick.
Let me chuck to ETH into that.
So then that kind of sent the NFTs this much higher.
And then I think if NFTs could ever be used as collateral, right?
That's just basically a way of taking leverage out on a super illiquid instrument, right, which is the NFT.
So if you could borrow, if you could put up your NFTs collateral and borrow against that
NFT, that's just injecting a whole other layer of leverage to the most risky speculative part
of the entire market.
And that would create one more leg up and then the whole thing would cascade and tumble down.
Unfortunately, I think what's actually going to happen is much more boring than that.
We might just get a crab market for another year where macro concerns are kind of weighing down
everything, right?
Because I feel like that's what's slowing everything down right now, which is okay.
We thought we were going to get all this fiscal stimulus, right?
We thought we were going to get build back better.
but that's actually not happening because now people are worried about inflation.
And I think it's just kind of taking the air out of everything.
So I think the most likely scenario for next year is we just trade sideways basically for a year.
And that's probably our bear market.
So boring, Mike.
I feel like that's what's going to happen now.
So boring.
I need a price prediction.
10x.
Are we looking out of here?
No, no.
Probably right where we are right now.
That's my price prediction.
The worst possible prediction.
Fine.
What do you got, Jason?
You're going to go more exciting than that?
Yeah, I don't know.
I'll try to give people something juicy because Mike's so boring.
I think, I mean, these layer ones have pumped like crazy, obviously.
Like, you know, Salana, you know, Sam Bankman-Fried, one of the best tweets of the year.
I'll buy all your Salana at three bucks, right?
Solana rips up to 200, most obvious trade of the year if you are a Sam, like a cult follower.
And, but if you actually look at the layer ones, like Avalanche,
Solana and Luna right now.
Luna is like 30 million, 30 billion.
Avalanche is like 25 billion.
And Solana is like 50 billion, 55 billion.
It's like 110 billion market cap.
E is 450.
So the cumulative market cap of all three of those L-1s is less than 25% of Ethereum.
And when I just think about what's happening on top of Luna right now, what's
happening on top of Solana, what's happening on top of Avalanche, that 25% number does not make
sense to me. At a bare minimum, the cumulative market cap of Solana, Avalanche, and Luna should
probably equal Ethereum or should be close to it, right? And I think that would surprise a lot
of people who have kind of written off L1 saying that that full run already happened. I think there's
still a long way to go. I like it. This ended up being like the L1 conversation. I didn't anticipate
that but it's actually really good because I haven't been able to drag anyone into
into that brawl space right now so I appreciate you guys diving in welcome to our like
our 10 p.m. chats yeah right you know you guys know I'm a fan of you guys and the content you
create and the work that you do so thank you for all that and thank you for being here on the breakdown
look forward to the next time dudes yeah of course cheers thanks for having us and there you have it
that is the end of the breakdown's end of your extravaganza
It's also the end of 2021.
I feel quite confident that this year will go down as one of the most notable, memorable, confusing, chaotic,
and ultimately special and important years in crypto history, in Bitcoin history.
And I'm really thrilled to have spent it here with you.
Tomorrow, we're off for New Year's.
I hope wherever you are, you're going to spend some time with family or just with yourself,
thinking about what you want out of the next year,
and getting ready to go seize it with everything you have.
So until January 2nd, until 2022, be safe and take care of each other.
Peace.
