The Breakdown - Senate Democrats Push for Bipartisan Role in Crypto Market Structure Bill
Episode Date: September 23, 2025On today’s Breakdown, NLW looks at the latest twists in the crypto market structure bill. A group of 12 Senate Democrats is pushing for true bipartisan authorship, raising the stakes as time runs sh...ort to move the legislation forward this year. We examine what their demands could mean for stablecoins, DeFi, and the overall momentum of U.S. crypto regulation. Plus, updates on Treasury’s next steps for the Genius Act, Greyscale’s new crypto index fund, and Bito’s IPO filing. Enjoying this content? SUBSCRIBE to the Podcast: https://pod.link/1438693620 Watch on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TheBreakdownBW Subscribe to the newsletter: https://blockworks.co/newsletter/thebreakdown Join the discussion: https://discord.gg/VrKRrfKCz8 Follow on Twitter: NLW: https://twitter.com/nlw Breakdown: https://twitter.com/BreakdownBW
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome back to The Breakdown with me, NLW.
It's a daily podcast on macro, Bitcoin, and the Big Picture Power Shifts remaking our world.
What's going on, guys? It is Monday, September 22nd, and today we are talking about the latest in the market structure bill.
Before we get into that, however, if you are enjoying the breakdown, please go subscribe to it, give it a rating, give it a review, or if you want to dive deeper into the conversation, come join us on the Breakers Discord.
You can find a link in the show notes or go to bit.ly slash breakdown pod.
The market structure bill keeps moving, and now Senate Democrats are pushing for more input as the process
comes together. On Friday, a group of 12 Democrats released a joint statement, which said,
We hope our Republican colleagues will agree to a bipartisan authorship process, as is the norm for
legislation of this scale. Basically, they're asking for a role in drafting the language of the bill
rather than just providing input on a GOP written bill through the committee process. This is the same
group that released a competing framework for the market structure bill earlier in the month.
Their major asks were closing the loophole that allows stable coins to pay interest through third parties
and a string of enhanced compliance measures.
One of the most concerning parts was a demand to, quote,
address bad actors' use of defy platforms to circumvent illicit finance controls.
With no further details, some worry that Democrats would push for another backdoor defy ban.
Still at this stage, it's reasonable to think that this Democrat block at least is working in good faith,
as this is an entirely separate faction from Elizabeth Warren in her anti-crypto army.
Instead, the major consideration is simply time.
In their statement that Democrat senators said,
Given our shared interest in moving forward quickly on this issue,
we hope they will agree to reasonable request to allow for true collaboration.
For this process to work, it must start from a place of mutual understanding.
Republican leaders were attempting to get this bill moving by the end of the month.
It now looks like that won't be the case with Politico reporting that Senate banking GOP staff
have indicated openness to waiting until the week of October 20th for a markup hearing.
The bill also needs to go through the markup process in the Senate Ag Committee.
before it comes to a vote. All of which means we're running pretty low on time. Even small delays
could easily push the bill into next year, given that there's only eight weeks for the Senate in Q4.
The Senate is out of session this week and next week will likely be taken up by a fight over another
government shutdown. If the bill gets punted into next year, that could kill momentum and could
very well mean that nothing gets passed before the midterms. At this stage, banking committee
chairman Tim Scott is striking a very conciliatory tone. His spokesperson told Politico that Scott and
the GOP members of the banking committee have, quote, a proven track record of bipartisanship,
adding, it's been quite some time since we've seen such bipartisanship on the banking committee.
Chairman Scott and his colleagues have worked hard to build trust and hope their Democratic
counterparts will come to the table to make America the crypto capital of the world.
The group of 12 Democrats have enough votes to make or break this bill when it comes to the
Senate floor, so they're holding a lot of cards.
Senator Lummis's office has also indicated a willingness to work across the aisle.
In a statement on Friday, Lummas said that she and Scott, quote, have worked tirelessly to
promote a bipartisan and transparent process in crafting comprehensive market structure legislation.
Her spokesperson did suggest a little frustration with the process being snagged once again,
adding in comments to Politico, the Democrats' recent market structure framework demonstrates a
shared commitment to ensuring the U.S. leads the world in digital asset innovation.
While we have been actively soliciting feedback from our Democratic counterpart since July without
receiving input, we remain committed to bipartisan collaboration. We're hopeful the Democrats will
work with us to help achieve this shared goal and secure our financial future for generations to come.
Now, the crypto lobby is fairly quiet on Twitter, suggesting that they might be working behind
the scenes to build consensus. Justin Slaughter, the VP of Regulatory Affairs at Paradigm simply commented,
good statement from the Democrat senators, important for the bill to be truly bipartisan to provide lasting clarity.
Meanwhile, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong spent last week in D.C. taking meetings along with numerous
other crypto executives. In a press tour that ended the week, he said, the crypto market structure
bill has bipartisan support and will pass by the end of the year. Comments from Lummus
comparing passing a bill to giving live birth to a porcupine spring to mine once again.
The question here will be what the intention of the Democrats is. Given how obstructionist
that side of the aisle has been over the past couple of years, it's reasonable to have some
skepticism and think that the reason that they're asking for this sort of engagement is that they
have major differences with the Republicans. The flip side is that it's not impossible that
this is a political calculus, that this group of Democrats is A, well and truly fully on board
with crypto legislation, and B, thinks that it's a significant enough deal in the eyes of
history that they want to have a bigger seat at the table, not just for the sake of what gets in there,
but for the sake of storytelling and narrative after the fact. The optimistic take, in other words,
is that they want their names in a more prominent place when the history books are written.
Whatever the case, we won't have to speculate for long. We will get much more information soon
about exactly what this particular flavor of bipartisanship looks like. Hopefully there's just
enough time to get something done once that's clear. On stable coins, meanwhile, the U.S. Treasury
is seeking a second round of comments before they commence rulemaking for the Genius Act.
In a Thursday notice, the Treasury said that although advanced notice of rulemaking was not required
to implement the Genius Act, they are nevertheless seeking public input. The Genius Act is set to go
into force 18 months after its passage in July, or 120 days after the Treasury and the Fed finalized
their regulations. In their statement, the Treasury noted that they are, quote, tasked with issuing
regulations that encourage innovation and payment stablecoins, while also providing an appropriately
tailored regime to protect consumers, mitigate potential illicit finance risks, and address financial
stability risks. In particular, the Treasury is seeking data and other information that could
help them tailor regulations related to these and other issues. They noted as an example that
the Genius Act doesn't mention taxation, potentially leaving room for the IRS to develop their own
interpretation. The bill is also silent on issues like the marketing of stable coins and has room
to interpret how the Bank Secrecy Act should apply to stable coin issuers. The comment period is
pretty tight ending on October 20th, meaning that potentially Treasury is trying to move quickly
and get the regulations moving before the end of the year. Now we close out today with a little bit
market talk. One of the big stories to end last week was the approval of Grayscale's
crypto index fund. The fund tracks the top five crypto assets, namely Bitcoin, Ethereum,
Salana, Ripple, and Cardano. Bitcoin is around 73% of the fund's weight, with Ethereum representing
another 17%, leaving the rest to fit in the last 10%. For Grayscale, this approval is a huge
milestone and in some ways the fruition of their long-term thesis. CEO Peter Minnsberg said on
Thursday, the launch is more than just another ETP. It's a reflection of our decade-long commitment
into being first, moving fast, and giving investors transparent exposure to the crypto ecosystem.
Nate Garassi, the president of Noah Diaz Wealth commented,
in my opinion, index-based and actively managed to bot crypto ETFs will be met with significant
demand, especially from financial advisors, will be a huge category.
Inflows were a fairly impressive $22 million on day one of trading on Friday, compared to $222 million
for the Bitcoin ETFs and $47 million for the Ethereum ETFs.
Ultimately, while the Crypto Index Fund isn't outperforming products that give single asset
exposure, it is still a healthy start for an entirely new category. Lastly today, Crypto Custodian BitGo
is the next crypto company up to the plate after they filed their IPO paperwork. The company released
their financials and filed all the necessary documents on Friday paving the way for the stock to list
in the coming weeks. So far this year, crypto IPOs have been largely about ignoring the current
financial situation and betting on the future. Circle was emblematic of this theme with fairly lackluster
earnings leaving crypto Twitter unimpressed ahead of the IPO. Once the stock began trading, however, it was
clear that many investors simply wanted exposure to the stablecoin theme and the stock took off.
BitGo seems a little better, with the company disclosing some very promising financials.
BitGo had $4.2 billion in revenue over the first half of this year, up almost 4x from the first
half of 2024. The profit story is a little bit more challenging. They recorded $12.6 million in
profit this year compared to $30.9 million in the first half of last year. The company now has $90.3
billion in assets on its platform, and a client base of more than 4,600 entities and 1.1 million
individuals. The filings also disclosed that CEO and co-founder Mike Belchie intends to retain majority
voting power due to the company's dual-class shares. BitGo is intending to list on the New York Stock
Exchange, but the filings did not disclose a share count or pricing for the IPO. That likely
signals that the listing is still a few weeks off. The debates now get into just how strong the
business is. Zero XRWA wrote, The art of reading financial statements is going to be a much
bigger source of alpha going forward. Crypto Twitter is buzzing with BitGo revenue shooting up
4x year-on-year-on-year but profit going down. The core business is loss-making, though margins are
improving. The source of profits is from price appreciation of their treasury assets which are
marked to market. As the market went up, those holdings became profitable, but those should
be discarded for the right value of equity. But the most important factor is that a major
part of the revenue is coming from crypto trading. 4.18 billion of sales against 3.88 billion
of costs from buying crypto assets. That means the core custody business is not generating
more than a few million dollars of revenue. Chain Yoda, meanwhile, was just impressed they had
an actual business behind them commenting, unlike several recent crypto IPOs, BitGo is a legitimate
business with recurring operating revenues, but that low earnings figure is a bit surprising.
BitWise CEO Hunter Horsley thinks that the important point is much bigger, saying,
in the last several months, circle, bullish, figure, Gemini, and now BitGo, and more to come.
People are discovering how big the businesses of this space are.
That's going to do it for today's breakdown.
Appreciate you listening, as always.
And until next time, be safe and take care of each other.
Peace.
