The Breakdown - The Halving and the First Fee War of the New Bitcoin Epoch
Episode Date: April 23, 2024For some, the fee war represented how much bitcoin is changing. For others, it was an indication of why we shouldn't be overly concerned about the long term security budget. Today's Show Brought T...o You By Ledger - 5% to Bitcoin Developers When You Buy https://shop.ledger.com/pages/bitcoin-hardware-wallet Consensus 2024 is happening May 29-31 in Austin, Texas. This year marks the tenth annual Consensus, making it the largest and longest-running event dedicated to all sides of crypto, blockchain and Web3. Use code BREAKDOWN to get 15% off your pass at https://go.coindesk.com/3PWW96A. Superintelligent - Learn AI fast. Get 50% off your first month with code "breakdown" https://besuper.ai/ Enjoying this content? SUBSCRIBE to the Podcast: https://pod.link/1438693620 Watch on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/nathanielwhittemorecrypto Subscribe to the newsletter: https://breakdown.beehiiv.com/ Join the discussion: https://discord.gg/VrKRrfKCz8 Follow on Twitter: NLW: https://twitter.com/nlw Breakdown: https://twitter.com/BreakdownNLW
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome back to The Breakdown with me, NLW.
It's a daily podcast on macro, Bitcoin, and the Big Picture Power Shifts remaking our world.
What's going on, guys? It is Monday, April 22nd, and of course, we are catching up on the halving.
Before we get into that, however, if you are enjoying the breakdown, please go subscribe to it,
give it a rating, give it a review, or if you want to dive deeper into the conversation,
come join us on the Breakers Discord. You can find a link of the show notes or go to bit.ly slash
breakdown pod.
Hello, friends. Well, it happened over the weekend just as anticipated Bitcoin's fourth
halving has completed, ushering the protocol into the next epic. The network's programmatic monetary
policy adjusted right on schedule at Block 840,000, bringing the issuance schedule for the hardest
money on Earth to 3.125 Bitcoin per block. The having occurred late on Friday night on the
East Coast, but still happened on April 20th in UTC time. This having featured a fee war unlike
anything we've seen before, as users bid to place a transaction in the historic block.
In the lead-up to the halving, fees had already been running hot. On each of the previous
three days, Bitcoin fees outpaced Ethereum fees. The halving block brought in $2.4 million in fees,
making it the most valuable block ever mined. During previous cycles, mining the halving block has been
nothing but a vanity achievement for mining pools. So what's different now? The rise of
ordnals over the past year has meant there was a significant monetary value attached to the achievement
as well. Most of you already know all about this, but the Ordinals Protocol is based around the
order that individual sats are produced, giving each sat a unique identifier.
Ordinals enthusiasts have designated the first sat produced in each halving block as the epic
sat. None of these ultra-rare sats have ever been sold, so it's difficult to put a price tag on
them. A more common rare sat, however, was sold for $100,000 in January, and some ordinal's
collectors believe the epic sat could sell for over a million dollars.
Heading into the halving, many thought that this epic sat would lead to ruthless competition
from miners. The most extreme example of this would have been a block reorganization, where
recently mined blocks are invalidated. This process is extremely costly, but analysts thought this
might be worth it due to the value of the Epic Sat. There were attempts to reorg, but it seems that the
highest value play for miners was just producing blocks normally to receive the sky-high fees,
which lingered well into the weekend. Saturday ended up being the most lucrative day ever for
miners. Roughly $78 million in fees were paid, smashing the previous single-day record of $24 million.
Nine out of the 10 highest fee blocks were mined following the having, with the only outlier being a
a stake in overpayment of fees last November. Fees were larger than the block reward for each of the first
104 blocks, the longest streak in history. This ravenous demand for blockspace was largely
attributed to the launch of a new Bitcoin-native meme coin protocol called Rooms. The protocol is viewed
as a big improvement to the previously accepted standard for memecoins on Bitcoin known as BRC20.
Using Bitcoin blockspace for meme coins has been wildly controversial, but there's a few
interesting pieces of commentary to pick up on. For those participating in the launch of Rooms,
the day was chaotic. Hundreds of meme coins were launched and there was very little consensus on
where the value would accrue. Leonidas, a popular Ordinals developer, captured the chaotic mood.
During a Twitter space, as he said, as everybody is scrambling to figure out what the hell's going
on, I just want to take a moment to say, it's awesome being here with all of you. The more high-level
take was that this fee bonanza demonstrated fees could be a viable path forward for Bitcoin
security. For years, there have been concerns that Bitcoin has a long-term security problem.
Each halving reduces the payment to minors, which some think will eventually make securing
the blockchain unprofitable. Bitcoin investment firm 1031 wrote in their Saturday newsletter,
we expect the particular frenzy pushing fees to these levels to die down in the relatively
near term. But this episode is the latest indication that concerns about Bitcoin's long-term
security budget are misplaced. Kasa chief security officer Jameson Lop tweeted,
Bitcoin is on a record 100-block streak of transaction fees exceeding the block subsidy.
Great to see the experiment playing out and proving the theory that fees can sustain the thermodynamic
security budget. Nick Batia and Joe Consorti wrote in the Bitcoin layer that this could be a,
quote, preview of what's to come in Bitcoin mining economics decades from now, as Bitcoin
monetizes into a 10 trillion-plus asset, demand for the network is orders of magnitude larger than
today, and we've had a few more halvings.
Hello, breakers. Today's episode is sponsored by Ledger. As another cycle ramps up, it's another
chance to think about your Bitcoin custody best practices, and of course, to help all the
new folks do the same. Ledger is the global platform for securing Bitcoin and other crypto.
ledger combines both hardware wallets and the Ledger Live app to offer the best way to buy,
sell, swap, and stake without sacrificing on security or self-custody.
Ledger features cutting-edge technology in the form of a certified secure chip and a proprietary
operating system, but also brings ease of use.
This makes Ledger a safe and secure way to manage your digital assets without all the stress.
Check out the link to the Bitcoin Ledger Nano in the show notes.
5% of all sales of the Bitcoin Ledger Nano go to support Bitcoin development.
once again to Ledger for supporting the breakdown.
All right, breakers.
Consensus 2024 marks the 10th gathering of the biggest event that's devoted to all sides of the
crypto, blockchain, and Web3 ecosystems.
Join pioneering fingers and builders as they delve into the future of Defy and
explore game-changing tech, from AI to ZK Proofs and everything in between.
The event is three days of jam-packed content, networking, and so much more.
Some of the speakers at the event include Chris Dixon, the founder and managing partner at A16Z
crypto, Sergei Nazarov, the co-founder of Chainlink, Kathy Wood, the CEO of Arc, Hester Perce,
commissioner of course, from the U.S. SEC, and Tom Emmer, Republican Majority Whip for the U.S. House
of Representatives.
Visit Consensus24.coindex.com to learn more and save 15% on registration with the code
breakdown. That is 15% on registration with the code breakdown.
So obviously one day of record fees doesn't prove that the long-term problem is solved.
However, it does demonstrate that fees could be a viable source of security.
funding if there's a reason to use the blockchain more often. And although the average fee on halving day
reached $128, the frenzy does appear to be mostly over. Average fees are now back down below $10
per transaction, which of course means that with the temporary boost fading, miners will need to make
do once again with the reduced block rewards. There was tons and tons of commentary on this stuff.
Investor Dan Held wrote, high fees on Bitcoin give us a preview of what's to come. If how you use
Bitcoin doesn't work in a high fee environment, you're going to eventually have a problem.
Bitcoin Policy Institute fellow Troy Cross summed up some of the apparent contradictions in the
Bitcoin space, writing, Only in Bitcoin does an industry cheer a halving of its own revenue,
and at the same time, again, paradoxically, boo its own windfall of Bitcoin fees,
and simultaneously get magically rewarded by price increases for something everyone saw coming.
What can you do but laugh?
Beyond the mining economics, commentators are looking forward to seeing what this new era
of Bitcoin will bring.
Finance CEO Richard Tang noted that there has already been a series of significant events
that could drive Bitcoin adoption.
He said, in addition to the ETF breakthrough, which has spurred institutional interest and participation,
another major current in crypto today is the boom of the layer two in defy activity on the Bitcoin
network, fueled by the popularity of the Ordinals Protocol and Bitcoin inscriptions.
Although Tang was optimistic about Bitcoin's price, he urged caution, stating, immediate price
shifts in the wake of the having are not warranted, and its fundamental importance will
manifest itself in longer trends in value, liquidity, adoption, and crypto's standing and acceptance
as an asset class. For billionaire investor Mark Cuban, this era is all about mine.
but not for the usual reason. Cuban shrugged off the importance of the halving, stating that it's just,
quote, going to make it harder for miners to get paid. Instead, he's much more interested in how
Bitcoin mining fits into a rapidly changing economy, saying, the truly interesting question related
to the having is the GPU market. Miners need more power. There is unprecedented demand from
AI for those GPUs. Will that distort the economics of mining? Not just from the perspective of
cost, but could it be a better business to use those GPUs to train models? Now, obviously,
we are long past the era when miners use GPUs, given that the entire
industry now uses single-purpose ASICs, but these devices do still compete for manufacturing
resources, at least. And despite the confusion, Cuban still makes an interesting point. The global
competition for energy and chip manufacturing capacity is definitely only increasing with the
development of AI, which means that this era could see Bitcoin miners squeeze for multiple angles,
requiring a much higher Bitcoin price for them to remain in business. It seems that the
having has also marked the end of bearish price action, at least for the short term. Last week
saw Bitcoin dip below $60,000 multiple times, and some analysts fear to
further drawdown. In the lead-up to the having, multiple research shops began to suggest that not only
was the having priced in, but that it could be a sell-the-news event. Nothing close to that outcome
was visible in the charts with generally positive price action. On Friday, Bitcoin jumped back to
65,000 and didn't trade below 63,000 for the entire weekend. That still leaves quite a bit of distance
back up to all-time highs, but many are relieved to see constructive price action sustained for a few
days. At the time of recording, we are at 66,600, which the metalhead Bitcoiners will, I'm sure,
appreciate. Bitfinex head of derivatives, Yag Cooner, warned we might not be out of the woods yet, stating,
it remains to be seen if the macro conditions will affect fundamentals, but sentiment is decidedly
more cautious now than it had been just a week ago. Coinbase analyst David Hahn is also
wary of a post-having correction, writing, given the elevated levels of realized year-to-date volatility,
a further move downwards is well within the realm of possibility. That said, options pricing and
on-chain metrics still indicate constructive cyclical positioning, even as traders appear to be
preparing for possible chops lower in the near term.
Coin coverhead of strategy, Duncan Ash, is convinced that once volatility declines,
Bitcoin's price will settle at higher levels. He suggested that a post-having price increase
will, quote, restore a closer balance between the number of buyers and sellers and settle the market.
In addition, the industry will emerge with more users, a higher market cap, and greater
liquidity. The large and obvious price driver behind the halving is the reduction in new supply.
Many argue that Bitcoin has reached a point where supply reduction is an insignificant factor
compared to the regular daily volume of trading. And while that might be a realistic take,
The narratives behind a supply reduction are still a very easy story to tell. The most obvious comparison
is with the ETF flows, which flipped positive on Friday to record almost 60 million in net inflows.
Post-having, around 450 Bitcoin will be created each day. Friday's ETF flows were then just enough
to counteract the block reward. Post-having, that relatively unimpressive day of ETF demand
will be double new Bitcoin issuance. This is, of course, what we talked about a couple times over the
weekend and on Long Read Sunday, the narrative power of the having being some of the most profound power
that it has. I think the point here that ETF flows give it a new denominator, basically, a new
specific comparison. In other words, how many of the days Bitcoin produced were eaten up by the
ETF inflows makes it all the more powerful. Moving on, though, although the last few weeks
has seen a major correction, we're beginning to see signs that the bottom is in. On-chain indicators
suggest that Bitcoin holders were more than willing to buy the dip. Last Tuesday, when Bitcoin
hit a two-month low, buying activity spiked. More than $1.7 billion worth of Bitcoin was sent to
addresses identified for their accumulation activity. That's the largest single-day accumulation in
CryptoQuant's data series using the metric. Looking at the cycle timing indicators, there could be
plenty more in the tank for this bull market. Ki-Yung-Ju, the CEO of Crypto Quant, reported
that newer whales are only up 1.6% on their holding so far. He classified new whales as wallets
holding at least 1,000 Bitcoin for less than 155 days. This cohort likely includes numerous
ETF cold storage wallets and institutional investors. Other notable cohorts were old whales,
up 223%, small miners up 131%, and large mining companies up 81%. Young Ju summed it up by saying,
Not enough profit to end this cycle, in my opinion. Funding rates for perpetual futures tell a similar
story. They dip slightly negative for a few days last week, their first trip into the red since November.
Despite a small uptick in price over the weekend, funding rates remain very low, around a third of
typical levels in March. Ted Talks macro tweeted,
The market has gifted us with a beautiful reset in trader positioning for Bitcoin. Open interest-weighted
funding turned negative for the first time since October 2023. That was before Bitcoin ran from 27K
to 46K without any meaningful dip. Bitcoin analyst Dave the Wave wrote,
A lot is being made of the current Bitcoin halving being at the highest price as compared to
previously. But this is not so significant when you see that previous halvings were all
pushing previous all-time highs, with having prices within the last month spike of the previous
cycle highs. The takeaway is that havings have all been more or less recoveries of price,
and marking something of a midway point toward the peaks. Also, that the initial peak last time
should be considered the macro top momentum-wise, even though a nominal higher price was seen on the
second peak. Elio Trades wrote, feels like one of the most asymmetric moments in crypto, below prior
all-time high, ETF-Mani-s settling, just after the halving. Hard not to feel like this is the
moment to absolutely stack. And indeed, this is definitely the sentiment shift that I'm seeing.
We had a period there for a little bit where it was mostly gloomy, where people had started to
settle into the idea that maybe, just maybe, this bull market had run out of steam really, really
fast. Now, by and large, the conversation is much more about this being a good buying opportunity.
Whether that plays out remains to be seen. But that's the vibes from here. Not a bad place to start
the week. Anyways, guys, that is going to do it for today's breakdown. One more big thank you to
my sponsor for today's show. Check out the Ledger Bitcoin Orange Nano. Five percent of your purchase
will go to support Bitcoin development. Until next time, be safe and take care of each other. Peace.
