The Breakdown - Why the IMF Is Pressuring Argentina to Discourage Crypto
Episode Date: March 22, 2022This episode is sponsored by Nexo.io, Arculus and FTX US. As many in geopolitics and economics try to understand how the world global order is shifting in the wake of Russia’s invasion of U...kraine and the resulting sanctions (see The Bretton Woods III Thesis), one battleground is the International Monetary Fund versus new forms of debt financing. On today’s episodes, NLW looks at: Why El Salvador’s “Bitcoin Bond” is being delayed, and why it is being issued by a state-owned energy firm The IMF’s latest agreement with Argentina, and why it focuses on disincentivizing the use of crypto The Malaysian Communication Ministry’s suggestion the country makes BTC legal tender - Take your crypto to the next level with Nexo. Invest and swap instantly, earn up to 20% APR on your idle assets or borrow cash against them at industry-leading rates. Get started today at nexo.io to receive up to a $100 welcome bonus. Valid through March 31. - Arculus™ is the next-gen cold storage wallet for your crypto. The sleek, metal Arculus Key™ Card authenticates with the Arculus Wallet™ App, providing a simpler, safer and more secure solution to store, send, receive, buy and swap your crypto. Buy now at amazon.com. - FTX US is the safe, regulated way to buy Bitcoin, ETH, SOL and other digital assets. Trade crypto with up to 85% lower fees than top competitors and trade ETH and SOL NFTs with no gas fees and subsidized gas on withdrawals. Sign up at FTX.US today. - Consensus 2022, the industry’s most influential event, is happening June 9–12 in Austin, TX. If you’re looking to immerse yourself in the fast-moving world of crypto, Web 3 and NFTs, this is the festival experience for you. Use code BREAKDOWN to get 15% off your pass at www.coindesk.com/consensus2022. - Enjoying this content? SUBSCRIBE to the Podcast Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/podcast/id1438693620?at=1000lSDb Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/538vuul1PuorUDwgkC8JWF?si=ddSvD-HST2e_E7wgxcjtfQ Google: https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9ubHdjcnlwdG8ubGlic3luLmNvbS9yc3M= Join the discussion: https://discord.gg/VrKRrfKCz8 Follow on Twitter: NLW: https://twitter.com/nlw Breakdown: https://twitter.com/BreakdownNLW - “The Breakdown” is written, produced by and features Nathaniel Whittemore aka NLW, with editing by Rob Mitchell, research by Scott Hill and additional production support by Eleanor Pahl. Adam B. Levine is our executive producer and our theme music is “Countdown” by Neon Beach. The music you heard today behind our sponsor is “I Don't Know How To Explain It” by Aaron Sprinkle. Image credit: btgbtg/Getty Images, modified by CoinDesk. Join the discussion at discord.gg/VrKRrfKCz8.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
It's also worth noting here that there are two very different interpretations of what's going on.
The first is that the IMF is concerned about money laundering and currency controls and fears that
crypto can help people get around things like this.
The second interpretation is that the IMF seeing crypto in places like Argentina as a do-it-yourself
recovery vehicle that competes directly with their loans.
Welcome back to The Breakdown with me, NLW.
It's a daily podcast on macro, Bitcoin, and the Big Picture Powering.
shifts remaking our world. The breakdown is sponsored by nexo.io, Arculus, and FtX, and produced and
distributed by CoinDesk. What's going on, guys? It is Monday, March 21st, and today we are talking
about the growing contest between new crypto-powered sovereign fundraising schemes and the traditional
IMF-led order. First, however, if you are enjoying the breakdown, please go subscribe.
to it wherever you listen to podcasts, give it a rating, give it a review, or if you want to dig
deeper into the conversation, come join us on the Breakers Discord. You can find a link in the show
notes or go to bit.le. That's L.Y slash breakdown pod. Also, a disclosure as always,
in addition to them being a sponsor of the breakdown, I also work with FTX. We are in a weird
liminal in-between moment. What do I mean by that? Well, on the Russia-Ukraine front,
we're now in the thick of the fighting. It's settled in that this isn't going away. Markets are
getting used to it on the face of it. However, the economic dislocations are just starting.
The early stuff is pretty apparent, right? The costs of gas, of course, in the U.S., which is well
publicized and much discussed. But it still feels closer to the beginning than the end. We're still just
starting to grok and grapple with things like fertilizer prices that are up 111% year-over-year-over
year, and which will have much more significant second order effects. On the macro and monetary policy
front, obviously the Fed meeting was last week. We got the anticipated rate increase, and we also got
some color on how balance sheet reduction was likely to happen, not in the form of the Fed actively
selling assets into market, but instead allowing bonds to mature without replacing them. Even with
that color, though, however, that's still something that's in the future and wouldn't be starting until at least
next month? What about the in-between feeling in the crypto world? When it comes to most of the industry,
the focus continues to be wrapped up in the macro and geopolitical. Russia and Ukraine have simply
added a new context to the crypto debate with sanctions entering the mix in a major way.
Remember last week on that front, we had first a hearing where experts said that it wasn't
really possible for Russia to use crypto to evade sanctions in a major way. Second, a Treasury
Department official, Nellie Lang, the Undersecretary for Domestic Finance, telling Reuters,
quote, the transaction size we've seen is fairly small. Of course, we recognize we may not see
everything, but there is a fair amount of oversight. At this point, we just don't see that
crypto could be used in a large-scale way to evade sanctions. However, in spite of all of that,
we still had Elizabeth Warren releasing legislation that would give Treasury sweeping powers over
exchanges to compel them to block addresses even which weren't associated with sanctions evaders.
To the extent that there is anything else going on in the crypto industry that is pushing in a
different direction, I think you have to look to the excitement around Yuga Labs, the parent of
the Bored Apes Yacht Club, buying the IP for Cryptopunks and then launching Apecoin at the end of
last week. That has certainly put some life into the NFT and Metaverse side of things and opened up
big new questions about what comes next and what sort of precedent they've now set. But I still don't
think it's a big enough catalyst to get the industry as a whole out of its larger macro focus.
So the point is all of this just feels in between, like we're between different eras, macroeconomically,
geopolitically, and certainly within the crypto industry. One of the places that I think you see that
playing out is with regard to how crypto-powered systems are increasingly competing with traditional
economic systems. We've talked extensively on this show about the idea that we're moving from
one global monetary order to another. You'll remember the Bretton Woods three show from now a week
and a half ago or so, where we explored the idea that Russia's invasion of Ukraine, or more
specifically the sanctions that came next, were the last gasp for an old order and the beginning
of a new one. However, it's not just Russia and Ukraine that have made some people wonder if a new
monetary order is emerging. And if so, what role Bitcoin and crypto more broadly have to play in
that new order? These questions were certainly front and center last year when El Salvador
announced that it was making Bitcoin legal tender and then proceeded in just a few months to do
exactly that. Nexo is the go-to platform for all things crypto. Invest in the hottest coins out
there and start earning risk-free interest of up to 20% APR, paid out daily. Need cash,
SAP but don't want to sell? Use your crypto as collateral and receive a credit line at premium rates.
Open your NXO account by March 31st and receive up to a $100 welcome bonus. Get started today at nexo.io.
That's N-E-X-O.I-O. Meet Arculus, the next generation cold storage wallet.
Arculus secures your crypto using three-factor authentication, providing a simpler, safer, and
smarter way to store, buy, swap, send, and receive crypto.
Arculus is offline cold storage. Your private keys are encrypted on the Arculus keycard
and are never online. Stay safe from hackers with no cords, no charging, no Bluetooth.
Just crypto security made simple. Buy Arculus on Amazon today. The breakdown is sponsored by
FTXUS. FtXUS is the safe, regulated way to buy and sell Bitcoin and other digital assets,
with up to 85% lower fees than competitors.
There are no fixed minimum fees, no ACH transaction fees, and no withdrawal fees.
One of the largest exchanges in the U.S.
FDXUS is also the only leading exchange that supports both Ethereum and Solana NFTs.
When you trade NFTs on FTCX, you pay no gas fees.
Download the FTCX app today and use Referral Code Breakdown to support the show.
El Salvador has been in the news recently with regard to its Bitcoin bond scheme.
The Bitcoin bond or the volcano bond, as some people have called it, is a $1 billion financing
vehicle to be raised in which $500 million or half will go towards infrastructure spending
in a new Bitcoin city that is intended to be powered by geothermal volcano energy with an
item making crypto mining more sustainable. As fortune puts it, the other half will be invested
into Bitcoin with any eventual capital gains, five years later being evenly split between the
country and bondholders as a form of special dividend.
So in short, this is an infrastructure bond. It's going to build out infrastructure in the country.
This is a new way for the crypto community, the Bitcoin community specifically, to support the genuinely
radical transformation happening within El Salvador. And the country's finance minister had previously
suggested that the sale could happen as early as this past week.
Alejandro Zelaya, El Salvador's finance minister, had previously said the bond sale could come
anywhere between March 15 and March 20th, although that was probably aspirational.
Still, last week, he noted that the war between Ukraine and Russia had had an impact to slow the process.
He told a local TV station, quote, we have the tools almost finished, but the international
context will tell us.
According to local newspapers, as of March 15th, the laws necessary for the bonds hadn't been sent to Congress.
There has also been a little more intrigue over the last week, as it's revealed that the bond
will be technically issued by a state thermal energy company LaGio.
Fortune again says the bond will be issued by El Salvador's state-owned energy.
Energy Company LaGio on the Liquid Network created by Canada-based firm Blockstream and tradable
on the BitFinex platform. Frank Musi, the author of the Common Sense newsletter, dug in and wrote
a little bit more about this company LaGio. In a piece he titled El Salvador's Volcano Bond
will be issued by a tiny state-owned energy company, not the government. Here's what Frank dug up
about LaGio. This is a company who had revenues of $136 million last year and a profit of $36 million.
It has about $773 million in assets, but around half of them are in long-term loans to
electricity distributors in El Salvador. In other words, they're highly illiquid.
About 257 million of those $773 million in assets are tangible assets.
The company also has $200 million in long-term debt that comes from a 2014 deal where they
securitized and sold a part of their future cash flow.
The company had previously had to defer principal and interest payments for 24 and six months
respectively, due to COVID-19, according to local rating agency Zuma.
Moosey writes, given these numbers, can LaGio repay a billion-dollar bond?
Um, no.
Basically, the volcano bonds will generate $65 million in annual interest payments,
which is about half of LaGio's total revenue.
The company's annual interest expenses would jump from $15 million per year to $80 million
per year, turning its healthy profit of around $35 million into a loss of $30 million, end
quote. So why then is the bond being issued through this company? Well, Moussi posits two reasons.
The first is to separate it from other sovereign debt. Quote, if Buckele stops paying traditional bondholders,
he can continue paying the crypto bondholders through Leggio, and crucially, he can continue
tapping the crypto community for further financing. Second, more cynically, he argues that if
things go badly, there is less recourse for bondholders. In other words, this keeps the government
distanced from the repercussions of a failure.
A Salvadoran Twitter account, however, gave a different interpretation of this.
He writes,
Oh, the bonds will be sovereign.
You see it as a complicated scheme.
Someone forced our government to use LaGio as collateral
because it is easier to sue a company than a government.
Or if LaGio is unable to pay the bonds after they mature,
they will take LaGio as payment.
There is a lot of speculation out there
and a lot of attribution of intent
that I think it's worth taking every interpretation with a huge.
huge grain of salt. Ultimately, however, a lot of this is going to come down to how big the appetite
from Bitcoiners is for these bonds, and right now it seems like it's there. The Financial Times is reporting
that there is $1.5 billion in interest for the theoretically $1 billion bond. That demand may be why
the institutions of international finance like the IMF are getting more and more opposed to this
sort of thing. Not only in El Salvador, where they've been encouraging the country to unwind the legal
tender law, but in other countries as well. On that front, some fascinating news.
out of Argentina. The IMF and Argentina have reached a $45 billion deal restructuring debt payments
from previous deals. From the official press release, the IMF staff and the Argentine authorities
have released a staff-level agreement on the economic and financial policies to be supported
by a 30-month extended fund facility arrangement. The EFF, with requested access of SDR-31.914
billion, equivalent to U.S. 45 billion, aims to provide Argentina with balance of payments and budget
support to address the country's most pressing economic challenges, and to enhance the prospects
of all Argentines by implementing measures designed to promote growth and protect essential social
programs. Now, it is that latter part that is the most interesting in terms of what else is
being agreed to as part of this deal. Several Argentine news sites caught a paragraph in the
memorandum outlining financial policies to be implemented under the agreement that references
crypto. Quote, strengthening financial resilience. While commercial banks remain illiquid
and well-capitalized, strong bank oversight will continue, especially following the unwinding
of pandemic-related regulatory forbearance. To further safeguard financial stability, we are taking
important steps to, one, discourage the use of cryptocurrencies with a view to preventing money laundering,
informality, and disin remediation. Two, further support the current process of digitization of payments
to improve the efficiency and costs of payment systems and cash management, and three, safeguard financial
consumer protection. Now, what people noticed right away was that the IMA
was here being clear that one of their goals was preventing disintermediation, in other words,
protecting financial intermediaries. David Morris from CoinDesk wrote,
Unpacked yesterday's news that the IMF's new $45 billion line to Argentina will require that they
quote-unquote discourage cryptocurrency. The IMF notes specifically, and this blew my mind,
cites the danger of disintermediating the financial system. They're saying the quiet part loud.
However, Argentine crypto organizations have some questions. The executive director of ONG Bitcoin
In Argentina, Javier Madariaga wrote,
We are convinced that the path is neither disincentives nor prohibition,
but to work in a coordinated manner with the private and public sectors
to take advantage of the potential of decentralized finance,
so that more and more individuals can transact in a secure manner
and security forces can improve their ability to combat cybercriminals.
It worries us that the authorities are agreeing to disincentivize a technology
that the population itself has already massively adopted
instead of unleashing its potential to address historic problems.
Now, of course, there is also a question of practicality.
Argentina deals with extremely high inflation.
The goal of the IMF deal, for example, is to get it below 40% by 2024.
And in that context, it already ranks as number 10 on Chainalysis's 2021 Global Crypto Adoption Index.
This is a place that has a huge and vibrant crypto community.
I brought my father-in-law to visit with Argentinian crypto companies and community members in February of 2018, just as one example.
The point is that compliance is going to be extremely difficult.
However, it's also worth noting here that there are two very different interpretations of what's going on.
The first is that the IMF is concerned about money laundering and currency controls and fears that crypto can help people get around things like this.
In other words, it's a discreet concern for this big traditional institution.
The second interpretation, however, though, is that the IMF seeing crypto in places like Argentina as a do-it-yourself recovery vehicle that competes directly with their loans.
This would obviously be the much more significant geopolitical interpretation.
My guess, despite everything that has gone on, is that it's still more, number one,
a discreet concern about the way that crypto changes the equation,
at least in the minds of people like the IMF, as regards money laundering, currency controls, etc.
However, you have to believe that the example of El Salvador makes number two
this concern about competition in a totally different way to organize the economy
around non-sovereign assets and non-official rails, as more of a concern than it has been in the past.
It also seems likely to me that that concern is going to do nothing but grow.
Take, for example, a headline from Bloomberg today.
Malaysia should adopt crypto as legal tender, ministry says.
Speaking in Parliament, the Deputy Minister of the Communications and Multimedia Ministry made this assessment.
Now, this is a group that oversees the digital and broadcast sectors,
things like rolling out 5G mobile networks and attracting tech investments.
It's not clear exactly what their role with digital assets is or even exactly which
ministry has authority over digital assets.
The central bank has not given a formal position on Bitcoin as legal tender, although in January
it did tell Bloomberg that it was assessing CBDCs.
Now, this could be just one rogue minister saying one rogue thing and it not meaning much more
than that.
However, there's no denying the extent to which Bitcoin is entering the discourse when
comes to the global monetary realignment. The Bitcoin bond, whenever it happens, could be another
step in that, and you have to think that many governments around the world are watching with
interest what happens then. For now, I want to say thanks again to my sponsors, nexus.io,
Arculus and FTX. And thanks to you guys for listening. Until tomorrow, be safe and take care of each other.
Peace.
Hey, breakdown listeners, come join CoinDesk's Consensus 2020, the festival for the December
centralized world this June 9th through the 12th in Austin, Texas. This is the only festival
showcasing and celebrating all sides of blockchain, crypto ecosystems, Web 3, and the Metaverse,
and is designed for crypto-newbies, investors, entrepreneurs, developers, and creators. Don't miss
speakers like Kathy Wood, SBF, CZ, Punk 6529, and Joe Lubin to name just a few. Use code breakdown to
get 15% off your pass at coin desk.com slash consensus 2022.
Thank you.
